Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: Ever wonder how PHANTOM, Buster, Tracey12, and the rest of the rightwingnutjobs came to be so ignorant? Here's your answer.
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Steve
Apr 28, 2013, 7:49:57 PM4/28/13
to
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:15:34 -0500, Kurt Lochner Harrington, a pissy
old man of little cognitive skills, <baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>'talking points' in order to get attention..
Transcript of Kurt Lochner Harrington admitting to being an alcoholic and a
dead-beat dad which leads to him being desperate to
manufacture unsupported nonsense (ie, <chuckle>)"something,
anything to attack me personally."
His problem here, of course, is that I have proof
whereas he has nothing.
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:30:55 -0600
Canyon: "did the court let you settle for pennies on the
dollar?"
Lochner "Not that I'm aware of.. Did you have any other
petty remarks? "
Canyon: "did they see that your kids were better off if
you weren't in the picture? "
Lochner "Why don't you go and find out for yourself, cartoon
hero..
Oh, that's right, you can't find anything past that, no
child custody filings, no further hearings on the
settled account and discontinuence.. Poor little
cartoon hero..
You really are looking for something, anything to
attack me personally, with malice aforethought..
That'll be just another in a long series of mistakes
you've made today.."
Canyon: "...say, are you attending those AA meetings regularly?"
Lochner "Sure am, anything else you'd like to desperately try to
attack me personally with, or would you prefer to stop
now before you get into much more trouble?
--Or, do you just have nothing left to lose?"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/7171c5a4bd29de81?hl=en
old man of little cognitive skills, <baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>'talking points' in order to get attention..
Transcript of Kurt Lochner Harrington admitting to being an alcoholic and a
dead-beat dad which leads to him being desperate to
manufacture unsupported nonsense (ie, <chuckle>)"something,
anything to attack me personally."
His problem here, of course, is that I have proof
whereas he has nothing.
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:30:55 -0600
Canyon: "did the court let you settle for pennies on the
dollar?"
Lochner "Not that I'm aware of.. Did you have any other
petty remarks? "
Canyon: "did they see that your kids were better off if
you weren't in the picture? "
Lochner "Why don't you go and find out for yourself, cartoon
hero..
Oh, that's right, you can't find anything past that, no
child custody filings, no further hearings on the
settled account and discontinuence.. Poor little
cartoon hero..
You really are looking for something, anything to
attack me personally, with malice aforethought..
That'll be just another in a long series of mistakes
you've made today.."
Canyon: "...say, are you attending those AA meetings regularly?"
Lochner "Sure am, anything else you'd like to desperately try to
attack me personally with, or would you prefer to stop
now before you get into much more trouble?
--Or, do you just have nothing left to lose?"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/7171c5a4bd29de81?hl=en
Man of Mind
Apr 28, 2013, 9:51:53 PM4/28/13
to
On 4/28/2013 6:49 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:15:34 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>
>> On 4/28/2013 11:41 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 11:31:26 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/28/2013 10:56 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 04:38:28 -0700 (PDT), trainguard replied to:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, April 27, 2013 7:03:10 PM UTC+1, Patrick wrote:
.......
>>>>>>> The basic foundations of American conservatism can
>>>>>>> be boiled down to four fundamental concepts. We might
>>>>>>> call them the four pillars of modern conservatism:
>>>>>>> The first pillar of conservatism is liberty, or freedom.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But that is the first pillar of liberalism, in both Europe and America!
>>>>>
>>>>> But, of course, the leftist's interpretation
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, blah-blah-blah, leftist's this, leftist's that,
>>>> blah-blah-blah, and blither-blah..
>>>
>>> <SNICKER> I seem to have pissed of
>>
>> You seem to be a pissy old man of little cognitive
>> skills, and acting out like a retarded fourth-grader
>> with your mean-spirited political 'talking points'
--
"Conservatives have no ideas; just irritable mental
gestures which seek to resemble ideas"
-Lionel Trilling
>
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:15:34 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>
>> On 4/28/2013 11:41 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 11:31:26 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/28/2013 10:56 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 04:38:28 -0700 (PDT), trainguard replied to:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, April 27, 2013 7:03:10 PM UTC+1, Patrick wrote:
.......
>>>>>>> The basic foundations of American conservatism can
>>>>>>> be boiled down to four fundamental concepts. We might
>>>>>>> call them the four pillars of modern conservatism:
>>>>>>> The first pillar of conservatism is liberty, or freedom.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But that is the first pillar of liberalism, in both Europe and America!
>>>>>
>>>>> But, of course, the leftist's interpretation
>>>>
>>>> Yeah, blah-blah-blah, leftist's this, leftist's that,
>>>> blah-blah-blah, and blither-blah..
>>>
>>> <SNICKER> I seem to have pissed of
>>
>> You seem to be a pissy old man of little cognitive
>> skills, and acting out like a retarded fourth-grader
>> with your mean-spirited political 'talking points'
>> in order to get attention..
Thank you again for proving my point..
--
"Conservatives have no ideas; just irritable mental
gestures which seek to resemble ideas"
-Lionel Trilling
Steve
Apr 29, 2013, 7:35:53 AM4/29/13
to
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:51:53 -0500, Kurt Lochner Harrington, a pissy
old man of little cognitive skills, <baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>'talking points' in order to get attention..
old man of little cognitive skills, <baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>'talking points' in order to get attention..
Man of Mind
Apr 29, 2013, 8:03:24 AM4/29/13
to
On 4/29/2013 6:35 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:51:53 -0500,Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:51:53 -0500,Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>
>> On 4/28/2013 6:49 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:15:34 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/28/2013 11:41 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 11:31:26 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 10:56 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
......
>> On 4/28/2013 6:49 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:15:34 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/28/2013 11:41 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 11:31:26 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 10:56 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>> Yeah, blah-blah-blah, leftist's this, leftist's that,
>>>>>> blah-blah-blah, and blither-blah..
>>>>>
>>>>> <SNICKER> I seem to have pissed of
>>>>
>>>> You seem to be a pissy old man of little cognitive
>>>> skills, and acting out like a retarded fourth-grader
>>>> with your mean-spirited political 'talking points'
>>>>>> blah-blah-blah, and blither-blah..
>>>>>
>>>>> <SNICKER> I seem to have pissed of
>>>>
>>>> You seem to be a pissy old man of little cognitive
>>>> skills, and acting out like a retarded fourth-grader
>>>> in order to get attention..
Touched a nerve there?
Steve
Apr 29, 2013, 8:25:21 AM4/29/13
to
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:03:24 -0500, Kurt Lochner Harrington, a pissy
old man of little cognitive skills, <baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>'talking points' in order to get attention..
old man of little cognitive skills, <baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>'talking points' in order to get attention..
Man of Mind
Apr 29, 2013, 8:43:58 AM4/29/13
to
On 4/29/2013 7:25 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:03:24 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:51:53 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
Thank you again for proving my point..
--
Canyon <steven...@nospam.yahoo.com>
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:08:28 GMT
news:<u3sp5vc0nhsdj4fbo...@4ax.com>
"[..] my ego isn't even slightly effected by what others
might think of me."
Steve <steven...@yahooooooo.com>
Wed, 28 May 2008 10:37:55 -0400
news: <p6rq341tt0r6gkte6...@4ax.com>
"<chuckle> I aint here to collect responses,[..]"
Steve <steven...@yahooooooo.com>
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:20:02 -0400
news: <3b5a84t0b9fanulr3...@4ax.com>
"I never had any friends on Usenet.. I never needed any
friends on Usenet.."
Steve <steven...@yahooooooo.com>
Sat, 09 Aug 2008 16:44:19 -0500
news: <tour941biih7br0kr...@4ax.com>
"It's actually quite satisfying to be hated and despised"
>
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:03:24 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:51:53 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/28/2013 6:49 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:15:34 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 11:41 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
......
>>>> On 4/28/2013 6:49 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:15:34 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 11:41 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>> You seem to be a pissy old man of little cognitive
>>>>>> skills, and acting out like a retarded fourth-grader
>>>>>> with your mean-spirited political 'talking points'
>>>>>> skills, and acting out like a retarded fourth-grader
>>>>>> in order to get attention..
>>
>>
>> Touched a nerve there?
>>
>> Thank you again for proving my point..
>
> Transcript
>>
>> Thank you again for proving my point..
>
Thank you again for proving my point..
--
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:08:28 GMT
news:<u3sp5vc0nhsdj4fbo...@4ax.com>
"[..] my ego isn't even slightly effected by what others
might think of me."
Steve <steven...@yahooooooo.com>
Wed, 28 May 2008 10:37:55 -0400
news: <p6rq341tt0r6gkte6...@4ax.com>
"<chuckle> I aint here to collect responses,[..]"
Steve <steven...@yahooooooo.com>
Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:20:02 -0400
news: <3b5a84t0b9fanulr3...@4ax.com>
"I never had any friends on Usenet.. I never needed any
friends on Usenet.."
Steve <steven...@yahooooooo.com>
Sat, 09 Aug 2008 16:44:19 -0500
news: <tour941biih7br0kr...@4ax.com>
"It's actually quite satisfying to be hated and despised"
Steve
Apr 29, 2013, 1:33:05 PM4/29/13
to
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:43:58 -0500, Kurt Lochner Harrington, a pissy
old man of little cognitive skills, <baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>'talking points' in order to get attention..
old man of little cognitive skills, <baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>'talking points' in order to get attention..
Man of Mind
Apr 29, 2013, 9:23:12 PM4/29/13
to
On 4/29/2013 12:33 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:43:58 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:43:58 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>
>> On 4/29/2013 7:25 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:03:24 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/29/2013 6:35 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:51:53 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 6:49 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:15:34 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 11:41 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
........
>> On 4/29/2013 7:25 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:03:24 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/29/2013 6:35 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:51:53 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 6:49 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:15:34 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 11:41 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>> You seem to be a pissy old man of little cognitive
>>>>>>>> skills, and acting out like a retarded fourth-grader
>>>>>>>> with your mean-spirited political 'talking points'
>>>>>>>> skills, and acting out like a retarded fourth-grader
>>>>>>>> in order to get attention..
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Touched a nerve there?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you again for proving my point..
>>>
>>> Transcript
>>
>> Thank you again for proving my point..
Need some more rope?
>>>>
>>>> Thank you again for proving my point..
>>>
>>> Transcript
>>
>> Thank you again for proving my point..
Steve
Apr 30, 2013, 6:02:12 AM4/30/13
to
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:23:12 -0500, Man of Mind
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Need some more rope
<LOL> Need to make some more public admissions?
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>Need some more rope
<LOL> Need to make some more public admissions?
Man of Mind
May 1, 2013, 12:05:05 AM5/1/13
to
On 4/30/2013 5:02 AM, Steve wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:23:12 -0500, Man of Mind
> <baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:23:12 -0500, Man of Mind
> <baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/29/2013 12:33 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:43:58 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/29/2013 7:25 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:03:24 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/29/2013 6:35 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:51:53 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 6:49 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:15:34 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 11:41 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
..........
>>>
>>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:43:58 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/29/2013 7:25 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:03:24 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/29/2013 6:35 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:51:53 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 6:49 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:15:34 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 11:41 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>>> You seem to be a pissy old man of little cognitive
>>>>>>>>>> skills, and acting out like a retarded fourth-grader
>>>>>>>>>> with your mean-spirited political 'talking points'
>>>>>>>>>> in order to get attention..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Touched a nerve there?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you again for proving my point..
>>>>>
>>>>> Transcript
>>>>
>>>> Thank you again for proving my point..
>>
>> Need some more rope?
>
>>>>>>>>>> skills, and acting out like a retarded fourth-grader
>>>>>>>>>> with your mean-spirited political 'talking points'
>>>>>>>>>> in order to get attention..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Touched a nerve there?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you again for proving my point..
>>>>>
>>>>> Transcript
>>>>
>>>> Thank you again for proving my point..
>>
>> Need some more rope?
>
> <LOL> Need to make some more
How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
senile raving..
Steve
May 1, 2013, 9:03:16 AM5/1/13
to
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:05:05 -0500,Kurt Lochner Harrington, a pissy
Names that Kurt Lockner Harrington has claimed to be me in the course of one week
"John Patrick"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/a1cf0a750ed0a27b
"Nichole"
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.african.american/msg/7afc288cd5ce842a
"peter"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/f0e68f5eeccd3d2d
"Sam"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/b6e643d40be55c10
"It's Sollog's GF and/or little brother"
and supporters"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/66c5a3dea83b4cda
old man of little cognitive skills, and acting out like a retarded
fourth-grader wrote:
>How about I elaborate on you
<LOL> Who?
>How about I elaborate on you
Names that Kurt Lockner Harrington has claimed to be me in the course of one week
"John Patrick"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/a1cf0a750ed0a27b
"Nichole"
http://groups.google.com/group/soc.culture.african.american/msg/7afc288cd5ce842a
"peter"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/f0e68f5eeccd3d2d
"Sam"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/b6e643d40be55c10
"It's Sollog's GF and/or little brother"
and supporters"
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics/msg/66c5a3dea83b4cda
Man of Mind
May 1, 2013, 9:12:01 AM5/1/13
to
On 5/1/2013 8:03 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:05:05 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>
>> On 4/30/2013 5:02 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:23:12 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>>>>>> You seem to be a pissy old man of little cognitive
You, pretending to be a cartoon hero, when in fact your are but
a gullible right-winger taken in by the 'tea-party' astroturf
organizations' political pabulum..
>
> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:05:05 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>
>> On 4/30/2013 5:02 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:23:12 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>
>>>> On 4/29/2013 12:33 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:43:58 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/29/2013 7:25 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:03:24 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/29/2013 6:35 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:51:53 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 6:49 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:15:34 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 11:41 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
............
>>>> On 4/29/2013 12:33 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:43:58 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/29/2013 7:25 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 29 Apr 2013 07:03:24 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 4/29/2013 6:35 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 20:51:53 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 6:49 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 13:15:34 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 4/28/2013 11:41 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>>>>> You seem to be a pissy old man of little cognitive
>>>>>>>>>>>> skills, and acting out like a retarded fourth-grader
>>>>>>>>>>>> with your mean-spirited political 'talking points'
>>>>>>>>>>>> in order to get attention..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Touched a nerve there?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you again for proving my point..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Transcript
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you again for proving my point..
>>>>
>>>> Need some more rope?
>>>
>>> <LOL> Need to make some more
>>
>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>> senile raving..
>
> <LOL> Who?
>>>>>>>>>>>> in order to get attention..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Touched a nerve there?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thank you again for proving my point..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Transcript
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thank you again for proving my point..
>>>>
>>>> Need some more rope?
>>>
>>> <LOL> Need to make some more
>>
>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>> senile raving..
>
You, pretending to be a cartoon hero, when in fact your are but
a gullible right-winger taken in by the 'tea-party' astroturf
organizations' political pabulum..
Steve
May 1, 2013, 10:59:56 AM5/1/13
to
On Wed, 01 May 2013 09:23:09 -0500, Man of Mind
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/1/2013 8:14 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>
>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 08:12:01 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>
>How about you watching the sunrise over the Gulf of Mexico?
<LOL> Like I used to do from my boat? Like I did from Cozumel?
I see the UC Davis site still says "according to Faraday's law, a
changing magnetic field can create an electric field." Lochner
stupidly claimed that he'd make them change that, see below:
Transcript of Canyon schooling Kurt Lochner Harrington about Faraday's Law
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups&hl=en#!topic/sci.physics/...
Lochner: Steve, you made the claim that a changing magnetic field causes an electrical field..
Canyon: <ROTFL> Of course, that is quiet true
Lochner: Nope, and I defy you to prove otherwise..
Canyon: OK...
"According to Faraday's law, a changing magnetic field can create an electric field"
http://maxwell.ucdavis.edu/~electro/faraday/overview.html
..and this Syracuse University physics dept. has a lecture with a chapter title of "Changing magnetic field creates electric field"
www.phy.syr.edu/~xxing/teaching/.../34_LectureOutline_PRS.pp
...Oh, and look, the University of Texas-Pan American has the phrase "Changing magnetic field creates electric field, and vice versa" in a lecture summary.
http://zope.cs.panam.edu/ee/faculty-staff/hfoltz/course-materials/ele...
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups&hl=en#!topic/sci.physics/...
A changing magnetic field makes an electric field. A changing electric field makes a magnetic field.
www.oberlin.edu/physics/dstyer/Electrodynamics/ChangeChange.pdf
...and here's Kurt Lochner Harrington claiming he's going to correct the University's lectures.
"I'll be sure to write the ucdavis.edu site tomorrow, m'kay?
Rest assured that they'll be correcting that shortly, because
it's completely wrong, "
Kurt Licknob challenging ucdavis.edu knowledge of Faraday's law.
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/e3f66eb534b82eae?hl=en
...and then Lochner will have to correct Princeton, too..
"Electromagnetism manifests as both electric fields and magnetic fields. Both fields are simply different aspects of electromagnetism, and hence are intrinsically related. Thus, a changing electric field generates a magnetic field; conversely a changing magnetic field generates an electric field."
http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Electromagnetic_force.html
...and now Kurt Lochner Harrington admits that I was right and he was wrong all along.
Lochner:"Steve, what you found on Google is a common misconception
about Faraday's Law of Induction, that "magnetic fields"
somehow 'create' an electric field..
They don't, except in the presence of a conductor."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/de6447da602e27d2?hl=en
<GUFFAW> Looks like I successfully tricked Lochner into admitting
that even he knows that magnetic fields do create an electric field..
How long can it be before Kurt starts arguing that
he can't get drunk. He can't, you know... EXCEPT when alcohol is
present.
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/1/2013 8:14 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>
>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 08:12:01 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>
>>> On 5/1/2013 8:03 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:05:05 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/30/2013 5:02 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>....
>>> On 5/1/2013 8:03 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:05:05 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/30/2013 5:02 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>>> senile raving..
>>>>
>>>> <LOL> Who?
>>>
>>> You
>>
>> <LOL> Lochner hasn't a clue who I am or even where I am...
>>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>>> senile raving..
>>>>
>>>> <LOL> Who?
>>>
>>> You
>>
>
>How about you watching the sunrise over the Gulf of Mexico?
<LOL> Like I used to do from my boat? Like I did from Cozumel?
I see the UC Davis site still says "according to Faraday's law, a
changing magnetic field can create an electric field." Lochner
stupidly claimed that he'd make them change that, see below:
Transcript of Canyon schooling Kurt Lochner Harrington about Faraday's Law
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups&hl=en#!topic/sci.physics/...
Lochner: Steve, you made the claim that a changing magnetic field causes an electrical field..
Canyon: <ROTFL> Of course, that is quiet true
Lochner: Nope, and I defy you to prove otherwise..
Canyon: OK...
"According to Faraday's law, a changing magnetic field can create an electric field"
http://maxwell.ucdavis.edu/~electro/faraday/overview.html
..and this Syracuse University physics dept. has a lecture with a chapter title of "Changing magnetic field creates electric field"
www.phy.syr.edu/~xxing/teaching/.../34_LectureOutline_PRS.pp
...Oh, and look, the University of Texas-Pan American has the phrase "Changing magnetic field creates electric field, and vice versa" in a lecture summary.
http://zope.cs.panam.edu/ee/faculty-staff/hfoltz/course-materials/ele...
https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups&hl=en#!topic/sci.physics/...
A changing magnetic field makes an electric field. A changing electric field makes a magnetic field.
www.oberlin.edu/physics/dstyer/Electrodynamics/ChangeChange.pdf
...and here's Kurt Lochner Harrington claiming he's going to correct the University's lectures.
"I'll be sure to write the ucdavis.edu site tomorrow, m'kay?
Rest assured that they'll be correcting that shortly, because
it's completely wrong, "
Kurt Licknob challenging ucdavis.edu knowledge of Faraday's law.
https://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/e3f66eb534b82eae?hl=en
...and then Lochner will have to correct Princeton, too..
"Electromagnetism manifests as both electric fields and magnetic fields. Both fields are simply different aspects of electromagnetism, and hence are intrinsically related. Thus, a changing electric field generates a magnetic field; conversely a changing magnetic field generates an electric field."
http://www.princeton.edu/~achaney/tmve/wiki100k/docs/Electromagnetic_force.html
...and now Kurt Lochner Harrington admits that I was right and he was wrong all along.
Lochner:"Steve, what you found on Google is a common misconception
about Faraday's Law of Induction, that "magnetic fields"
somehow 'create' an electric field..
They don't, except in the presence of a conductor."
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.rush-limbaugh/msg/de6447da602e27d2?hl=en
<GUFFAW> Looks like I successfully tricked Lochner into admitting
that even he knows that magnetic fields do create an electric field..
How long can it be before Kurt starts arguing that
he can't get drunk. He can't, you know... EXCEPT when alcohol is
present.
Man of Mind
May 1, 2013, 11:32:34 AM5/1/13
to
On 5/1/2013 9:59 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 09:23:09 -0500, Man of Mind was exploiting:
>
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 09:23:09 -0500, Man of Mind was exploiting:
>>
>> On 5/1/2013 8:14 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 08:12:01 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>
>>>> On 5/1/2013 8:03 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:05:05 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/30/2013 5:02 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
......
>> On 5/1/2013 8:14 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 08:12:01 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>
>>>> On 5/1/2013 8:03 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:05:05 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/30/2013 5:02 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>>>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>>>> senile raving..
>>>>>
>>>>> <LOL> Who?
>>>>
>>>> You
>>>
>>> <LOL> Lochner hasn't a clue who I am or even where I am...
>>
>> How about you watching the sunrise over the Gulf of Mexico?
>
> <LOL> Like I used to do from my boat?
No, like you claimed you did from your 'condo', skippy..
>>>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>>>> senile raving..
>>>>>
>>>>> <LOL> Who?
>>>>
>>>> You
>>>
>>> <LOL> Lochner hasn't a clue who I am or even where I am...
>>
>> How about you watching the sunrise over the Gulf of Mexico?
>
> <LOL> Like I used to do from my boat?
Steve
May 1, 2013, 1:32:30 PM5/1/13
to
On Wed, 01 May 2013 11:42:42 -0500, Man of Mind
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/1/2013 11:16 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>
>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 10:32:34 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>
>Yes, that was pointed out to you after you boasted of
>watching the sunrise over the Gulf..
<LOL> of course that never happened...
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/1/2013 11:16 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>
>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 10:32:34 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>
>>> On 5/1/2013 9:59 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 09:23:09 -0500, Man of Mind was exploiting:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/1/2013 8:14 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 08:12:01 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 8:03 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:05:05 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/30/2013 5:02 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>........
>>> On 5/1/2013 9:59 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 09:23:09 -0500, Man of Mind was exploiting:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/1/2013 8:14 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 08:12:01 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 8:03 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, 30 Apr 2013 23:05:05 -0500, Man of Mind stated the obvious:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 4/30/2013 5:02 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>>>>>>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>>>>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>>>>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>>>>>>> senile raving..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <LOL> Who?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <LOL> Lochner hasn't a clue who I am or even where I am...
>>>>>
>>>>> How about you watching the sunrise over the Gulf of Mexico?
>>>>
>>>> <LOL> Like I used to do from my boat?
>>>
>>> No, like you claimed you did from your 'condo', skippy..
>>
>> <LOL> My condo is on the Florida side of the Gulf
>>>>>>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>>>>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>>>>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>>>>>>> senile raving..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <LOL> Who?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <LOL> Lochner hasn't a clue who I am or even where I am...
>>>>>
>>>>> How about you watching the sunrise over the Gulf of Mexico?
>>>>
>>>> <LOL> Like I used to do from my boat?
>>>
>>> No, like you claimed you did from your 'condo', skippy..
>>
>
>Yes, that was pointed out to you after you boasted of
>watching the sunrise over the Gulf..
<LOL> of course that never happened...
Man of Mind
May 1, 2013, 2:44:12 PM5/1/13
to
posting under your superspews account? Terrific!
--
Canyon <steven...@nospam.yahoo.com>
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:11:30 GMT
news:<i4tp5v4c5ulhakvei...@4ax.com>
"I never made any claims I couldn't back up...."
Canyon <parkie...@nospam.yahoo.com>
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:59:42 GMT
news:<rg6q5vgq29cerpocl...@4ax.com>
"I don't need to back anything up, you moron, cause unlike
yourself, my self image is not dependent on what others
think about me."
Steve <steven...@yahooooooo.com>
Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:36:15 -0500
news: <cejm945eqt2hspb4k...@4ax.com>
"I don't need to prove anything.."
Steve
May 1, 2013, 3:23:27 PM5/1/13
to
On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:44:12 -0500, Man of Mind
<BIG GUFFAW> Of course that never happened either...
Face it, Drunky, you have nothing...
Face it, Drunky, you have nothing...
Man of Mind
May 1, 2013, 4:34:34 PM5/1/13
to
On 5/1/2013 2:23 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:44:12 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>
>> On 5/1/2013 12:32 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 11:42:42 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
> Of course that never happened either...
Uh-huhn.. Sure it didn't..
> Face it,
How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
senile raving..
Or, have you found any of your alleged "magnetic capacitors" yet?
--
Steven Canyon <Ga...@dog.soldiers>
Mon, 12 Aug 2002 03:30:14 GMT
news:<og8elu4eaudlftq93...@4ax.com>
"any and all capacitors work on the principal of magnetism...."
Steven Canyon <Ga...@dog.soldiers>
Fri, 09 Aug 2002 12:57:55 GMT
news:<0t87lu46blkiotfga...@4ax.com>
"The only time capacitors are doing anything they have
significant magnetic fields,"
Steve <steven...@yahooooo.com>
Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:37:58 -0500
news: <qjkqb6h5aeanvjlfq...@4ax.com>
"Anyone that thinks electromagnetic force is not the force that
exists in a charged capacitor is simply ignorant on the subject.."
Steven Canyon <Ga...@dog.soldiers>
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:57:10 GMT
news:<jc1iluog2emtkjqso...@4ax.com>
"the references to capacitors in that cite had nothing
to do with my claims about capacitors,[..]"
Steven Canyon <Ga...@dog.soldiers>
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:57:10 GMT
news:<jc1iluog2emtkjqso...@4ax.com>
"Electromagnetic Force = a force by which objects
with electric charge attract OR repel one another"
>
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:44:12 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>
>> On 5/1/2013 12:32 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 11:42:42 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>
>>>> On 5/1/2013 11:16 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 10:32:34 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 9:59 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 09:23:09 -0500, Man of Mind was exploiting:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 8:14 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
........
>>>> On 5/1/2013 11:16 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 10:32:34 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 9:59 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 09:23:09 -0500, Man of Mind was exploiting:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 8:14 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>> How about you watching the sunrise over the Gulf of Mexico?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <LOL> Like I used to do from my boat?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, like you claimed you did from your 'condo', skippy..
>>>>>
>>>>> <LOL> My condo is on the Florida side of the Gulf
>>>>
>>>> Yes, that was pointed out to you after you boasted of
>>>> watching the sunrise over the Gulf..
>>>
>>> <LOL> of course that never happened...
>>
>> Oh, so now you're admitting having more than one person
>> posting under your superspews account? Terrific!
>
> <BIG GUFFAW>
Still trying to copy my writing style, eh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <LOL> Like I used to do from my boat?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No, like you claimed you did from your 'condo', skippy..
>>>>>
>>>>> <LOL> My condo is on the Florida side of the Gulf
>>>>
>>>> Yes, that was pointed out to you after you boasted of
>>>> watching the sunrise over the Gulf..
>>>
>>> <LOL> of course that never happened...
>>
>> Oh, so now you're admitting having more than one person
>> posting under your superspews account? Terrific!
>
> <BIG GUFFAW>
> Of course that never happened either...
> Face it,
How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
senile raving..
--
Steven Canyon <Ga...@dog.soldiers>
Mon, 12 Aug 2002 03:30:14 GMT
news:<og8elu4eaudlftq93...@4ax.com>
"any and all capacitors work on the principal of magnetism...."
Steven Canyon <Ga...@dog.soldiers>
Fri, 09 Aug 2002 12:57:55 GMT
news:<0t87lu46blkiotfga...@4ax.com>
"The only time capacitors are doing anything they have
significant magnetic fields,"
Steve <steven...@yahooooo.com>
Tue, 19 Oct 2010 04:37:58 -0500
news: <qjkqb6h5aeanvjlfq...@4ax.com>
"Anyone that thinks electromagnetic force is not the force that
exists in a charged capacitor is simply ignorant on the subject.."
Steven Canyon <Ga...@dog.soldiers>
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:57:10 GMT
news:<jc1iluog2emtkjqso...@4ax.com>
"the references to capacitors in that cite had nothing
to do with my claims about capacitors,[..]"
Steven Canyon <Ga...@dog.soldiers>
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:57:10 GMT
news:<jc1iluog2emtkjqso...@4ax.com>
"Electromagnetic Force = a force by which objects
with electric charge attract OR repel one another"
Steve
May 1, 2013, 4:51:43 PM5/1/13
to
On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:34:34 -0500, Man of Mind
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/1/2013 2:23 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>
>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:44:12 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>>
>>> On 5/1/2013 12:32 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 11:42:42 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/1/2013 11:16 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 10:32:34 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 9:59 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 09:23:09 -0500, Man of Mind was exploiting:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 8:14 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>........
>>>>>>>>> How about you watching the sunrise over the Gulf of Mexico?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <LOL> Like I used to do from my boat?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, like you claimed you did from your 'condo', skippy..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <LOL> My condo is on the Florida side of the Gulf
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, that was pointed out to you after you boasted of
>>>>> watching the sunrise over the Gulf..
>>>>
>>>> <LOL> of course that never happened...
>>>
>>> Oh, so now you're admitting having more than one person
>>> posting under your superspews account? Terrific!
>>
>> <BIG GUFFAW>
>
>Still trying to copy my writing style, eh?
<EVEN BIGGER GUFFAW> Of course that never happened either...
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/1/2013 2:23 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>
>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:44:12 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>>
>>> On 5/1/2013 12:32 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 11:42:42 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/1/2013 11:16 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 10:32:34 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 9:59 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 09:23:09 -0500, Man of Mind was exploiting:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 8:14 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>........
>>>>>>>>> How about you watching the sunrise over the Gulf of Mexico?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <LOL> Like I used to do from my boat?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> No, like you claimed you did from your 'condo', skippy..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <LOL> My condo is on the Florida side of the Gulf
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, that was pointed out to you after you boasted of
>>>>> watching the sunrise over the Gulf..
>>>>
>>>> <LOL> of course that never happened...
>>>
>>> Oh, so now you're admitting having more than one person
>>> posting under your superspews account? Terrific!
>>
>> <BIG GUFFAW>
>
>Still trying to copy my writing style, eh?
>
>> Of course that never happened either...
>
>Uh-huhn.. Sure it didn't..
Sure didn't..
>> Of course that never happened either...
>
>Uh-huhn.. Sure it didn't..
>> Face it, Drunky, you have nothing...
>
...get a job and move out on your own? Your mom would like that.
Too bad you couldn't figure out who I am or where I live...
I remember when Kurt Lochner Harrington did a trace on my post and the icon showed up
where it always did when you traced someone in the Tampa area.. Kurt
thought I lived there..
"Oh, that place over on W. Rio Vista Ave he keeps posting from?"
--Little Kurtie Lichner trying to identify where I post from
and not realizing that any IP in the Tampa area showed up on that
spot.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.society.liberalism/msg/2ceac009efcc3592?
I told Kurt that he got me and that he should come and visit me. I
wasn't home much and he should just come on in, grab a beer and take a
swim in the pool.
Poor Kurt finally figured it out and got very angry...
I wonder if Kurt is still angry about that...
Let it go Kurt. You'll feel better...
Man of Mind
May 1, 2013, 5:27:56 PM5/1/13
to
On 5/1/2013 3:51 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:34:34 -0500, Man of Mind was laughing at:
Already did that, built it myself, silly old man..
> Too bad you couldn't figure out who I am or where I live...
You sure got excited about that. Somehow, your histrionics
seem rather contrived, in that regard, even now, "steve"..
BTW, have you found any of your alleged "magnetic capacitors" yet?
>
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:34:34 -0500, Man of Mind was laughing at:
> >
>> On 5/1/2013 2:23 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:44:12 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>>>
>>>> On 5/1/2013 12:32 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 11:42:42 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 11:16 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 10:32:34 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 9:59 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 09:23:09 -0500, Man of Mind was exploiting:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 8:14 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
..........
>> On 5/1/2013 2:23 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 13:44:12 -0500, Man of Mind laughed at:
>>>>
>>>> On 5/1/2013 12:32 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 11:42:42 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 11:16 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 10:32:34 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 9:59 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 09:23:09 -0500, Man of Mind was exploiting:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 8:14 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>>> How about you watching the sunrise over the Gulf of Mexico?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <LOL> Like I used to do from my boat?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, like you claimed you did from your 'condo', skippy..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <LOL> My condo is on the Florida side of the Gulf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, that was pointed out to you after you boasted of
>>>>>> watching the sunrise over the Gulf..
>>>>>
>>>>> <LOL> of course that never happened...
>>>>
>>>> Oh, so now you're admitting having more than one person
>>>> posting under your superspews account? Terrific!
>>>
>>> <BIG GUFFAW>
>>
>> Still trying to copy my writing style, eh?
>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <LOL> Like I used to do from my boat?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> No, like you claimed you did from your 'condo', skippy..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <LOL> My condo is on the Florida side of the Gulf
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, that was pointed out to you after you boasted of
>>>>>> watching the sunrise over the Gulf..
>>>>>
>>>>> <LOL> of course that never happened...
>>>>
>>>> Oh, so now you're admitting having more than one person
>>>> posting under your superspews account? Terrific!
>>>
>>> <BIG GUFFAW>
>>
>> Still trying to copy my writing style, eh?
>>
>>> Of course that never happened either...
>>
>> Uh-huhn.. Sure it didn't..
>>
>>
>> Uh-huhn.. Sure it didn't..
>>
>>> Face it,
>>
>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>> senile raving..
>
> ...get a job
>>
>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>> senile raving..
>
Already did that, built it myself, silly old man..
> Too bad you couldn't figure out who I am or where I live...
seem rather contrived, in that regard, even now, "steve"..
BTW, have you found any of your alleged "magnetic capacitors" yet?
Steve
May 1, 2013, 5:31:29 PM5/1/13
to
>> Too bad you couldn't figure out who I am or where I live...
>
>You sure got excited about that. Somehow, your histrionics
>seem rather contrived, in that regard, even now, "steve"..
Man of Mind
May 1, 2013, 5:38:45 PM5/1/13
to
On 5/1/2013 4:31 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:27:56 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
thing, seeing as how it's often suspected that you're
posing as someone else, while hiding your identity as
a registered sexual predator..
>>> Too bad you couldn't figure out who I am or where I live...
>>
>> You sure got excited about that. Somehow, your histrionics
>> seem rather contrived, in that regard, even now, "steve"..
>
> I still laugh about it
You weren't laughing about it at the time, you actually acted
out like a frightened right-wing tosser, to put it bluntly..
So, it wasn't an act?
--
Canyon <steven...@nospam.yahoo.com>
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:11:30 GMT
news:<i4tp5v4c5ulhakvei...@4ax.com>
"I never made any claims I couldn't back up...."
>
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:27:56 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>
>> On 5/1/2013 3:51 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:34:34 -0500, Man of Mind was laughing at:
>>>>
>>>> On 5/1/2013 2:23 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
.....
>> On 5/1/2013 3:51 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:34:34 -0500, Man of Mind was laughing at:
>>>>
>>>> On 5/1/2013 2:23 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>> Face it,
>>>>
>>>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>> senile raving..
>>>
>>> ...get a job
>>
>> Already did that, built it myself, silly old man..
>
> So how come you still live with your mom?
I do? That's interesting that you would suggest such a
>>>>
>>>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>> senile raving..
>>>
>>> ...get a job
>>
>> Already did that, built it myself, silly old man..
>
> So how come you still live with your mom?
thing, seeing as how it's often suspected that you're
posing as someone else, while hiding your identity as
a registered sexual predator..
>>> Too bad you couldn't figure out who I am or where I live...
>>
>> You sure got excited about that. Somehow, your histrionics
>> seem rather contrived, in that regard, even now, "steve"..
>
> I still laugh about it
out like a frightened right-wing tosser, to put it bluntly..
So, it wasn't an act?
--
Canyon <steven...@nospam.yahoo.com>
Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:11:30 GMT
news:<i4tp5v4c5ulhakvei...@4ax.com>
"I never made any claims I couldn't back up...."
Steve <steven...@yahooooooo.com> Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:36:15 -0500
news: <cejm945eqt2hspb4k...@4ax.com>
"I don't need to prove anything.."
news: <cejm945eqt2hspb4k...@4ax.com>
"I don't need to prove anything.."
Steven Canyon <Ga...@dog.soldiers>
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:57:10 GMT
news:<jc1iluog2emtkjqso...@4ax.com>
"I have no need to demonstrate what I know,[..]"
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 13:57:10 GMT
news:<jc1iluog2emtkjqso...@4ax.com>
Steve
May 1, 2013, 5:57:46 PM5/1/13
to
On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:38:45 -0500, Man of Mind
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/1/2013 4:31 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>
>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:27:56 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>
>>> On 5/1/2013 3:51 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:34:34 -0500, Man of Mind was laughing at:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/1/2013 2:23 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>.....
>>>>>> Face it,
>>>>>
>>>>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>>> senile raving..
>>>>
>>>> ...get a job
>>>
>>> Already did that, built it myself, silly old man..
>>
>> So how come you still live with your mom?
>
>I do? That's interesting that you would suggest such a
>thing,
I thought it was interesting.. seeing as how you are middle aged
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/1/2013 4:31 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>
>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:27:56 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>
>>> On 5/1/2013 3:51 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:34:34 -0500, Man of Mind was laughing at:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/1/2013 2:23 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>.....
>>>>>> Face it,
>>>>>
>>>>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>>> senile raving..
>>>>
>>>> ...get a job
>>>
>>> Already did that, built it myself, silly old man..
>>
>> So how come you still live with your mom?
>
>I do? That's interesting that you would suggest such a
>thing,
>seeing as how it's often suspected that you're
>posing as someone else, while hiding your identity as
>a registered sexual predator..
>
>>>> Too bad you couldn't figure out who I am or where I live...
>>>
>>> You sure got excited about that. Somehow, your histrionics
>>> seem rather contrived, in that regard, even now, "steve"..
>>
>> I still laugh about it
>
>You weren't laughing about it at the time, you actually acted
>out like a frightened right-wing tosser, to put it bluntly..
Man of Mind
May 1, 2013, 6:32:44 PM5/1/13
to
On 5/1/2013 4:57 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:38:45 -0500, Man of Mind was eliciting knee-jerks from:
people who disagree with your narrow-minded conceit, aren't you?
>> seeing as how it's often suspected that you're
>> posing as someone else, while hiding your identity as
>> a registered sexual predator..
>>
> <LOL> Of course, none of that has ever happened either...
I'll check on that, soon..
>>>>> Too bad you couldn't figure out who I am or where I live...
>>>>
>>>> You sure got excited about that. Somehow, your histrionics
>>>> seem rather contrived, in that regard, even now, "steve"..
>>>
>>> I still laugh about it
>>
>> You weren't laughing about it at the time, you actually acted
>> out like a frightened right-wing tosser, to put it bluntly..
>>
Running like a frightened rabbit, deleting postings with your
"real name", changing your account to superspews so the ISP's
wouldn't show that you were running a newspaper delivery route..
How's the car wash doing, by the way..
>
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:38:45 -0500, Man of Mind was eliciting knee-jerks from:
>>
>> On 5/1/2013 4:31 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:27:56 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>
>>>> On 5/1/2013 3:51 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:34:34 -0500, Man of Mind was laughing at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 2:23 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
.......
>> On 5/1/2013 4:31 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:27:56 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>
>>>> On 5/1/2013 3:51 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:34:34 -0500, Man of Mind was laughing at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 2:23 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>> Face it,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>>>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>>>> senile raving..
>>>>>
>>>>> ...get a job
>>>>
>>>> Already did that, built it myself, silly old man..
>>>
>>> So how come you still live with your mom?
>>
>> I do? That's interesting that you would suggest such a
>> thing,
>
> I thought it was interesting
Considering that it's not true, but you're still stalking
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>>>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>>>> senile raving..
>>>>>
>>>>> ...get a job
>>>>
>>>> Already did that, built it myself, silly old man..
>>>
>>> So how come you still live with your mom?
>>
>> I do? That's interesting that you would suggest such a
>> thing,
>
> I thought it was interesting
people who disagree with your narrow-minded conceit, aren't you?
>> seeing as how it's often suspected that you're
>> posing as someone else, while hiding your identity as
>> a registered sexual predator..
>>
> <LOL> Of course, none of that has ever happened either...
>>>>> Too bad you couldn't figure out who I am or where I live...
>>>>
>>>> You sure got excited about that. Somehow, your histrionics
>>>> seem rather contrived, in that regard, even now, "steve"..
>>>
>>> I still laugh about it
>>
>> You weren't laughing about it at the time, you actually acted
>> out like a frightened right-wing tosser, to put it bluntly..
>>
>> So, it wasn't an act?
>
> Oh I was definitely
>
Running like a frightened rabbit, deleting postings with your
"real name", changing your account to superspews so the ISP's
wouldn't show that you were running a newspaper delivery route..
How's the car wash doing, by the way..
Steve
May 1, 2013, 7:16:25 PM5/1/13
to
On Wed, 01 May 2013 17:32:44 -0500, Man of Mind
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/1/2013 4:57 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>
>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:38:45 -0500, Man of Mind was eliciting knee-jerks from:
>>>
>>> On 5/1/2013 4:31 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:27:56 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/1/2013 3:51 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:34:34 -0500, Man of Mind was laughing at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 2:23 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>.......
>>>>>>>> Face it,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>>>>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>>>>> senile raving..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...get a job
>>>>>
>>>>> Already did that, built it myself, silly old man..
>>>>
>>>> So how come you still live with your mom?
>>>
>>> I do? That's interesting that you would suggest such a
>>> thing,
>>
>> I thought it was interesting
>
>Considering that it's not true, but you're still stalking
>people who disagree with your narrow-minded conceit, aren't you?
Thanks for verifying that you ARE living with your mom.
<baron.v...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On 5/1/2013 4:57 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>
>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:38:45 -0500, Man of Mind was eliciting knee-jerks from:
>>>
>>> On 5/1/2013 4:31 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:27:56 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5/1/2013 3:51 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:34:34 -0500, Man of Mind was laughing at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 2:23 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>.......
>>>>>>>> Face it,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>>>>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>>>>> senile raving..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ...get a job
>>>>>
>>>>> Already did that, built it myself, silly old man..
>>>>
>>>> So how come you still live with your mom?
>>>
>>> I do? That's interesting that you would suggest such a
>>> thing,
>>
>> I thought it was interesting
>
>Considering that it's not true, but you're still stalking
>people who disagree with your narrow-minded conceit, aren't you?
>>> seeing as how it's often suspected that you're
>>> posing as someone else, while hiding your identity as
>>> a registered sexual predator..
>>>
>> <LOL> Of course, none of that has ever happened either...
>
>I'll check on that, soon..
>>>>>> Too bad you couldn't figure out who I am or where I live...
>>>>>
>>>>> You sure got excited about that. Somehow, your histrionics
>>>>> seem rather contrived, in that regard, even now, "steve"..
>>>>
>>>> I still laugh about it
>>>
>>> You weren't laughing about it at the time, you actually acted
>>> out like a frightened right-wing tosser, to put it bluntly..
>>>
>>> So, it wasn't an act?
>>
>> Oh I was definitely
>
Man of Mind
May 1, 2013, 8:08:40 PM5/1/13
to
On 5/1/2013 6:16 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 17:32:44 -0500, Man of Mind noted the usual bloviations from:
>>>> seeing as how it's often suspected that you're
>>>> posing as someone else, while hiding your identity as
>>>> a registered sexual predator..
>>>>
>>> <LOL> Of course, none of that has ever happened either...
>>
>> I'll check on that, soon..
>
> <LOL>
Still such a pissy old fart that you have copy my postings, eh?
>>>>>>> Too bad you couldn't figure out who I am or where I live...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You sure got excited about that. Somehow, your histrionics
>>>>>> seem rather contrived, in that regard, even now, "steve"..
>>>>>
>>>>> I still laugh about it
>>>>
>>>> You weren't laughing about it at the time, you actually acted
>>>> out like a frightened right-wing tosser, to put it bluntly..
>>>>
>>>> So, it wasn't an act?
>>>
>>> Oh I was definitely
>>
They let you go, eh? I can see why..
>
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 17:32:44 -0500, Man of Mind noted the usual bloviations from:
>>
>> On 5/1/2013 4:57 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:38:45 -0500, Man of Mind was eliciting knee-jerks from:
>>>>
>>>> On 5/1/2013 4:31 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:27:56 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 3:51 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:34:34 -0500, Man of Mind was laughing at:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 2:23 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
.........
>> On 5/1/2013 4:57 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:38:45 -0500, Man of Mind was eliciting knee-jerks from:
>>>>
>>>> On 5/1/2013 4:31 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:27:56 -0500, Man of Mind was still laughing at:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 3:51 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 15:34:34 -0500, Man of Mind was laughing at:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 2:23 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>>>> Face it,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>>>>>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>>>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>>>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>>>>>> senile raving..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...get a job
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Already did that, built it myself, silly old man..
>>>>>
>>>>> So how come you still live with your mom?
>>>>
>>>> I do? That's interesting that you would suggest such a
>>>> thing,
>>
>>> I thought it was interesting
>>
>> Considering that it's not true, but you're still stalking
>> people who disagree with your narrow-minded conceit, aren't you?
>
> Thanks for verifying that
That you're a predator? Yeah, already had that figured out, sparky..
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How about I elaborate on your being a pissy old man of perhaps
>>>>>>>> low-functioning sociopathic tendencies, with little in the way
>>>>>>>> of higher cognitive reasoning skills such that your contempt
>>>>>>>> for those who are better educated than yourself has you seething,
>>>>>>>> senile raving..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ...get a job
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Already did that, built it myself, silly old man..
>>>>>
>>>>> So how come you still live with your mom?
>>>>
>>>> I do? That's interesting that you would suggest such a
>>>> thing,
>>
>>> I thought it was interesting
>>
>> Considering that it's not true, but you're still stalking
>> people who disagree with your narrow-minded conceit, aren't you?
>
> Thanks for verifying that
>>>> seeing as how it's often suspected that you're
>>>> posing as someone else, while hiding your identity as
>>>> a registered sexual predator..
>>>>
>>> <LOL> Of course, none of that has ever happened either...
>>
>> I'll check on that, soon..
>
> <LOL>
>>>>>>> Too bad you couldn't figure out who I am or where I live...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You sure got excited about that. Somehow, your histrionics
>>>>>> seem rather contrived, in that regard, even now, "steve"..
>>>>>
>>>>> I still laugh about it
>>>>
>>>> You weren't laughing about it at the time, you actually acted
>>>> out like a frightened right-wing tosser, to put it bluntly..
>>>>
>>>> So, it wasn't an act?
>>>
>>> Oh I was definitely
>>
>> Running like a frightened rabbit, deleting postings with your
>> "real name", changing your account to superspews so the ISP's
>> wouldn't show that you were running a newspaper delivery route..
>>
>> How's the car wash doing, by the way..
>
> Laughing...
>> "real name", changing your account to superspews so the ISP's
>> wouldn't show that you were running a newspaper delivery route..
>>
>> How's the car wash doing, by the way..
>
They let you go, eh? I can see why..
Steve
May 1, 2013, 9:11:53 PM5/1/13
to
>
> Yeah, already had that figured out.
yes, but thanks for verifying it..
Man of Mind
May 1, 2013, 9:58:04 PM5/1/13
to
On 5/1/2013 8:11 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 19:08:40 -0500, Man of Mind noted the usual bloviations from:
>>>>>> seeing as how it's often suspected that you're
>>>>>> posing as someone else, while hiding your identity as
>>>>>> a registered sexual predator..
>>>>>>
>>>>> <LOL> Of course, none of that has ever happened either...
>>>>
>>>> I'll check on that, soon..
>>>
>>> <LOL>
>>
>> Still such a pissy old fart that you have copy my postings, eh?
*>cricket.wav<*
>>>>>>>>> Too bad you couldn't figure out who I am or where I live...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You sure got excited about that. Somehow, your histrionics
>>>>>>>> seem rather contrived, in that regard, even now, "steve"..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I still laugh about it
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You weren't laughing about it at the time, you actually acted
>>>>>> out like a frightened right-wing tosser, to put it bluntly..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, it wasn't an act?
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh I was definitely
>>>>
>>>> Running like a frightened rabbit, deleting postings with your
>>>> "real name", changing your account to superspews so the ISP's
>>>> wouldn't show that you were running a newspaper delivery route..
>>>>
>>>> How's the car wash doing, by the way..
>>>
>>> Laughing...
>>
>> They let you go, eh? I can see why..
*>cricket.wav<*
>
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 19:08:40 -0500, Man of Mind noted the usual bloviations from:
>>
>> On 5/1/2013 6:16 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 17:32:44 -0500, Man of Mind noted the usual bloviations from:
>>>>
>>>> On 5/1/2013 4:57 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:38:45 -0500, Man of Mind was eliciting knee-jerks from:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 4:31 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
.......
>> On 5/1/2013 6:16 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>
>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 17:32:44 -0500, Man of Mind noted the usual bloviations from:
>>>>
>>>> On 5/1/2013 4:57 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 01 May 2013 16:38:45 -0500, Man of Mind was eliciting knee-jerks from:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 5/1/2013 4:31 PM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> sniveled:
>>>>>>> So how come you still live with your mom?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do? That's interesting that you would suggest such a
>>>>>> thing,
>>>>
>>>>> I thought it was interesting
>>>>
>>>> Considering that it's not true, but you're still stalking
>>>> people who disagree with your narrow-minded conceit, aren't you?
>>>
>>> Thanks for verifying that
>>
>> That you're a predator? Yeah, already had that figured out, sparky..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do? That's interesting that you would suggest such a
>>>>>> thing,
>>>>
>>>>> I thought it was interesting
>>>>
>>>> Considering that it's not true, but you're still stalking
>>>> people who disagree with your narrow-minded conceit, aren't you?
>>>
>>> Thanks for verifying that
>>
>
> yes, but thanks for verifying it..
No problem, I knew you couldn't deny it..
> yes, but thanks for verifying it..
>>>>>> seeing as how it's often suspected that you're
>>>>>> posing as someone else, while hiding your identity as
>>>>>> a registered sexual predator..
>>>>>>
>>>>> <LOL> Of course, none of that has ever happened either...
>>>>
>>>> I'll check on that, soon..
>>>
>>> <LOL>
>>
>> Still such a pissy old fart that you have copy my postings, eh?
>>>>>>>>> Too bad you couldn't figure out who I am or where I live...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You sure got excited about that. Somehow, your histrionics
>>>>>>>> seem rather contrived, in that regard, even now, "steve"..
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I still laugh about it
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You weren't laughing about it at the time, you actually acted
>>>>>> out like a frightened right-wing tosser, to put it bluntly..
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, it wasn't an act?
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh I was definitely
>>>>
>>>> Running like a frightened rabbit, deleting postings with your
>>>> "real name", changing your account to superspews so the ISP's
>>>> wouldn't show that you were running a newspaper delivery route..
>>>>
>>>> How's the car wash doing, by the way..
>>>
>>> Laughing...
>>
>> They let you go, eh? I can see why..
Steve
May 5, 2013, 10:50:23 AM5/5/13
to
Man of Mind
May 5, 2013, 10:58:30 AM5/5/13
to
On 5/5/2013 9:50 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> squirmed:
>
> YAWN!
Transcript of Man of Mind schooling Steve Canyon, a synopsis:
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-02sc-physics-ii-electricity-and-magnetism-fall-2010/capacitance-capacitors-energy-stored-in-capacitors/MIT8_02SC_notes10to11.pdf
5.6 Creating Electric Fields
"Electric fields are created by electric charge. If there
is no electric charge present, and there never has been
any electric charge present in the past, then there would
be no electric field anywhere [in] space."
But, I keep forgetting, you don't even know what a conductor is..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_conduction#In_metals
"A metal consists of a lattice of atoms, each with an
outer shell of electrons which freely dissociate from
their parent atoms and travel through the lattice.
This is also known as a positive ionic lattice. This
'sea' of dissociable electrons allows the metal to
conduct electric current.
When an electrical potential difference (a voltage) is
applied across the metal, the resulting electric field
causes electrons to move from one end of the conductor
to the other."
http://www.diffen.com/difference/Electric_Field_vs_Magnetic_Field
"Magnetic fields also generate power in particles which come
in contact with it. Electric fields are generated around
particles that bear electric charge. Positive charges are
drawn towards it, while negative charges are repelled.
A moving charge always has both a magnetic and an electric field,
and that’s precisely the reason why they are associated with each
other."
"They are two different fields with nearly the same characteristics.
Therefore, they are inter-related in a field called the
electromagnetic field. In this field, the electric field
and the magnetic field move at right angles to each other.
However, they are not dependant on each other. They may also
exist independently. Without the electric field, the magnetic
field exists in permanent magnets and electric fields exist
in the form of static electricity, in absence of the magnetic
field.
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-02sc-physics-ii-electricity-and-magnetism-fall-2010/faradays-law/MIT8_02SC_notes21.pdf
10.3 Induced Electric Field
"Faraday’s law shows that as magnetic flux changes with time,
an induced current begins to flow. What causes the charges
to move? It is the induced emf which is the work done per
unit charge. However, since magnetic field can do [no] work,
as we have shown in Chapter 8, the work done on the mobile
charges must be electric, and the electric field in this
situation cannot be conservative because the line integral
of a conservative field must vanish."
>> Well, that should put an end to it.
>
> Well yeah, right below he admits that "magnetic fields"
> somehow 'create' an electric field in the presence
I see that both of you are unlearned about classical
electrodynamics and have but a "google scholar's"
comprehension of many subjects..
Go figure..
>
> YAWN!
Transcript of Man of Mind schooling Steve Canyon, a synopsis:
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-02sc-physics-ii-electricity-and-magnetism-fall-2010/capacitance-capacitors-energy-stored-in-capacitors/MIT8_02SC_notes10to11.pdf
5.6 Creating Electric Fields
"Electric fields are created by electric charge. If there
is no electric charge present, and there never has been
any electric charge present in the past, then there would
be no electric field anywhere [in] space."
But, I keep forgetting, you don't even know what a conductor is..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrical_conduction#In_metals
"A metal consists of a lattice of atoms, each with an
outer shell of electrons which freely dissociate from
their parent atoms and travel through the lattice.
This is also known as a positive ionic lattice. This
'sea' of dissociable electrons allows the metal to
conduct electric current.
When an electrical potential difference (a voltage) is
applied across the metal, the resulting electric field
causes electrons to move from one end of the conductor
to the other."
http://www.diffen.com/difference/Electric_Field_vs_Magnetic_Field
"Magnetic fields also generate power in particles which come
in contact with it. Electric fields are generated around
particles that bear electric charge. Positive charges are
drawn towards it, while negative charges are repelled.
A moving charge always has both a magnetic and an electric field,
and that’s precisely the reason why they are associated with each
other."
"They are two different fields with nearly the same characteristics.
Therefore, they are inter-related in a field called the
electromagnetic field. In this field, the electric field
and the magnetic field move at right angles to each other.
However, they are not dependant on each other. They may also
exist independently. Without the electric field, the magnetic
field exists in permanent magnets and electric fields exist
in the form of static electricity, in absence of the magnetic
field.
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-02sc-physics-ii-electricity-and-magnetism-fall-2010/faradays-law/MIT8_02SC_notes21.pdf
10.3 Induced Electric Field
"Faraday’s law shows that as magnetic flux changes with time,
an induced current begins to flow. What causes the charges
to move? It is the induced emf which is the work done per
unit charge. However, since magnetic field can do [no] work,
as we have shown in Chapter 8, the work done on the mobile
charges must be electric, and the electric field in this
situation cannot be conservative because the line integral
of a conservative field must vanish."
>> Well, that should put an end to it.
>
> Well yeah, right below he admits that "magnetic fields"
> somehow 'create' an electric field in the presence
I see that both of you are unlearned about classical
electrodynamics and have but a "google scholar's"
comprehension of many subjects..
Go figure..
Man of Mind
May 5, 2013, 11:15:25 AM5/5/13
to
On 5/5/2013 10:06 AM, "steve" <senile....@yahoo.com> squirmed:
> More yawn!
and that�s precisely the reason why they are associated with each
physics and electrodynamics. You both have but a "google scholar's"
comprehension of many subjects, including your political opinions.
And when you have this pointed out to you, with precise details
and counter-arguments that invalidate your 'goggling a bit', you
whine and thrash about with verbal histrionics that more nearly
resemble a temper tantrum exhibited by a frustrated bully..
> More yawn!
other."
"They are two different fields with nearly the same characteristics.
Therefore, they are inter-related in a field called the
electromagnetic field. In this field, the electric field
and the magnetic field move at right angles to each other.
However, they are not dependant on each other. They may also
exist independently. Without the electric field, the magnetic
field exists in permanent magnets and electric fields exist
in the form of static electricity, in absence of the magnetic
field.
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-02sc-physics-ii-electricity-and-magnetism-fall-2010/faradays-law/MIT8_02SC_notes21.pdf
10.3 Induced Electric Field
"Faraday�s law shows that as magnetic flux changes with time,
"They are two different fields with nearly the same characteristics.
Therefore, they are inter-related in a field called the
electromagnetic field. In this field, the electric field
and the magnetic field move at right angles to each other.
However, they are not dependant on each other. They may also
exist independently. Without the electric field, the magnetic
field exists in permanent magnets and electric fields exist
in the form of static electricity, in absence of the magnetic
field.
http://ocw.mit.edu/courses/physics/8-02sc-physics-ii-electricity-and-magnetism-fall-2010/faradays-law/MIT8_02SC_notes21.pdf
10.3 Induced Electric Field
an induced current begins to flow. What causes the charges
to move? It is the induced emf which is the work done per
unit charge. However, since magnetic field can do [no] work,
as we have shown in Chapter 8, the work done on the mobile
charges must be electric, and the electric field in this
situation cannot be conservative because the line integral
of a conservative field must vanish."
to move? It is the induced emf which is the work done per
unit charge. However, since magnetic field can do [no] work,
as we have shown in Chapter 8, the work done on the mobile
charges must be electric, and the electric field in this
situation cannot be conservative because the line integral
of a conservative field must vanish."
> Well yeah, right below he admits that "magnetic fields"
> somehow 'create' an electric field in the presence
I see that both you and slapped_raw are unlearned about classical
> somehow 'create' an electric field in the presence
physics and electrodynamics. You both have but a "google scholar's"
comprehension of many subjects, including your political opinions.
And when you have this pointed out to you, with precise details
and counter-arguments that invalidate your 'goggling a bit', you
whine and thrash about with verbal histrionics that more nearly
resemble a temper tantrum exhibited by a frustrated bully..
0 new messages