More of my philosophy about Patents and Copyrights and Trademarks and more of my thoughts..

[Amine Moulay Ramdane]

Hello,



More of my philosophy about Patents and Copyrights and Trademarks and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and as you notice that the difference between a Patent, Copyright, and Trademark is: A patent protects new inventions, processes, or scientific creations, a trademark protects brands, logos, and slogans, and a copyright protects original works of authorship, but as you notice that my abstraction below of from where comes dignity also makes you understand that the Mastery in my abstraction below also means that you have to have a good education , and having a good education makes you correctly think and act by protecting with Patents and Copyrights and Trademarks, and it also makes you make laws and enforce them in a country or in a global world, and notice also that mastery in my abstraction below also means the mastery over nature , so it also means that you have to be inventive and creative, so as you notice that i think my abstraction below of from where comes dignity is correct, so reread my thoughts of my philosophy below that i have thought and written quickly so that you notice my kind of dignity and so that you notice my kind of personality:

More of my philosophy of from where comes dignity and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, i will ask a philosophical question of:

From where comes dignity ?


I think that dignity comes not from big money or easy money, but dignity
comes from what we call in french: "La maîtrise" or what we call in english "The mastery", like of the mastery of science and/or technology , so i mean that dignity comes from you having to master the tools of adaptation that makes you successful, so it is why the having a good education is the so important thing that brings dignity, so it is why you are noticing that my way of talking to you is like the talking of a good educated man, and this shows my kind of dignity or this shows my kind of personality, since for me the most important thing is that i have to master the tools of adaptation so that to be successful, and of course you can invent the tools of adaptation and it is not in logical contradiction , since inventing the tools of adaptation is also the understanding of them and is like the mastery of them, like my way of inventing my thoughts of my philosophy and my inventing many proverbs that i am posting here etc.


More of my philosophy about is morality just an intellectual construct or not and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i have talked more about morality,
and i will ask the following philosophical question:


Is morality just an intellectual construct or not ?


I think that individual morality comes from the individual interest,
but being individual interest is not societal morality or general or global morality, so then societal morality comes from the societal interest, but here again notice that we can ask a philosophical question of:

What is the societal or general or global interest ?

I think that as i am explaining it in my thoughts of my philosophy,
that the essence of morality comes from the fact that we want to
adapt efficiently and to become more and more perfect so that to solve our problems and so that to be happy and so that to be greatly perfect or perfect, so it is the engine that creates morality, so then morality
is not just an intellectual construct, but it also comes from the empirical, so then i can ask a philosophical question of:

Is morality universal ?


So i invite you to read my following thoughts in the following
web link so that answers this philosophical question and that
talks more about morality:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/s8IZ5i5Udm0


And you can read the rest of my "interesting" philosophical thoughts in the following web links so that to understand my views on different subjects:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vc32viYv1SY

And read also my other thoughts of my philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/CmaowkjUJVY


More of my philosophy about the pragmatic meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think that you can, like in absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, logically infer that human existence is absurd, but i don't think it is the good way of measuring, since i think that there is also the "pragmatic" way of measuring, since i think that noticing that humans die or a part of humans suffer or the like is not the thing that must make us think that human existence is absurd, since the "pragmatic" way of measuring the meaning of human life is to notice that we have really progressed in the today human life compared to the old human life and we are really progressing in an exponential way, and i think that it is what gives the meaning of human life, so i think what remains is that we have to minimize at best or avoid wars and we have to be the right safety in managing the exponential progress of our humanity, and speaking about the exponential progress of our humanity, here is what i have said about it:

More of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask a philosophical question of:

From where comes the meaning of human life ?


I think i am highly smart, and i say that you can by being relativism in
philosophy says that human life has no meaning, so relativism in philosophy in its essence has a problem, but i think that the smart way of constructing a meaning of human life, is also to be the pragmatic way by giving weights of importance to things, it is like "prioritizing" by giving weights of importance so that to be successful, i mean look at human life, it is much better than the old human life, so this way of looking at it permits to give a weight of importance , and also the other way is also to say that humanity is in fact progressing in an exponential way, so we are progressing so rapidly, and this way also of looking at it gives a great weight of importance and those two ways of looking at human life gives optimism, so i think it is the way to construct a meaning of human life, and this way of constructing a meaning of human life looks like my answer below about the can we be enlightned or not, so as you are noticing that the pragmatic way of my answer below proceeds by giving weights of importance so that also enforce the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world. And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ


And look in the following interesting article about how AI will create millions more Jobs than it Will destroy:

https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/


So i think we have to be optimistic about this exponential progress of our humanity.


More of my philosophy about enlightenment and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will invite you to look at
the following video of the indian philosophy that is making a big mistake:

The Bizarre Life Of An Enlightened Person

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzmGkRF2ggU


So i am discovering in the above video patterns with my fluid intelligence that say to me that the above video of the indian philosophy is making a big mistake, since the above video of the indian philosophy is saying that you can not be enlightned, but it is "relativism" in philosophy that is not acceptable as morality, since also with this relativism we can also say that the smart humans among us are not smart humans, and this relativism brings an advantage of the being humbleness , but it also brings a disadvantage of being arrogance, so it is by logical analogy like the we can not say that you have to know how to use relativism like you have to know how to use a knife, since the normal distribution says that a not negligible percentage of humans are genetically violent, it is why i think that so that to be the right safety, we have to be the pragmatic way that also enforces the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world, so we have to for example say that the "highly smart" humans among us are the most important humans, since also they are like the most important engine that we have, since we can easily notice that without the highly smart humans, humanity becomes inferior like inferior animals, and it is why i have just said the following:


More of my philosophy about how to create in new type of man and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i think that it is possible to create a kind of new sophisticated type of human or man, so i think i have just explained in my below thoughts of my philosophy how to be hope and how to be a positive energy, but i think one of the most important thing is to ask a the following philosophical question:

What is the mechanisms that make a human be efficient at adaptation and perfection ?

So i think that i have also just talked in my below thoughts of my philosophy about the first mechanism that is that when you become more and more perfect, you begin to notice that human life becomes more and more easy for you, since for example when you become more and more educated , you become more and more smart, so then for example the "reusability" of this smartness makes human life more easy for you, but not only that, but the second mechanism is that we have to organize knowledge and information such as on internet in such way that it becomes easy to find the efficient and high quality knowledge and information, so then you have to be "selective" in such way of your knowledge and information so that to be efficient. And of course i have also just said that this becoming more and more smart and more and more selective can hurt and can hurt business, and here is what i have just said about it:

More of my philosophy about the radical form of governance and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and as you have just noticed i have just
talked about the Volksgemeinschaft and about neo-Nazism, read it below, and as you have noticed i have just talked about the radical form of governance where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), so this way of governance has not worked, but today the way of governance has changed and i think that it is proceeding by the way of introducing appropriate, rational reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments and by monitoring with statistics, other than that there is also another radical form of governance that says that we have to be the radical form of class struggle as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), but i think that this way of doing has not worked since this radical way of class struggle renders people too much hateful(filled with hatred), since in this radical form of Class Struggle, the lower classes in the society hate the upper classes and the upper classes hate the lower classes, so this kind
of radical form of Class Struggle doesn't work and it is not good for business, since i say that in business we have even to be disciplined at buying a product or service even if we don't love them, since for example i can say that when you become more and more educated, so then you become more and more smart, so then you become more and more "selective" of products and of services and of humans and this can hurt and this can hurt business, so then i think that the solution of this problem is for example to become disciplined at buying a product or service even if you don't love them, and of course you are noticing that we have to make people aware of it by educating them correctly. And here is what i say more about Class struggle:

And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic
contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and
Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social
Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

More of my philosophy about thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism and about competition and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think that thesis and antithesis and the synthesis of dialectical materialism of marxism and communism, is by logical analogy like the process of competition between ideas or between people that brings quality, so you can have a “synthesis” of private property and socialism understood as thesis and antithesis, and you can have collision of the bourgeoisie and the working class as competing thesis and antithesis that can bring a synthesis as quality, so i think that marxism and communism say that the bourgeoisie of the capitalistic system is not capable of treating correctly the working class, and i think it is from where comes marxism, but i think that this way of thinking is too extremist in our today world , since i have just for example said that workers living standards depend on wage levels, not wage ratios, eventhough when measuring wage dispersion, economists frequently look at the 90/50 ratio, so i think that we have not to be pessimistic about the living standards that has brought capitalism, and you can read all my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to notice it:

More of my philosophy about the Volksgemeinschaft and about neo-Nazism and more of my thoughts..

And read the following article so that you understand more:

Germany seeks ban on neo-Nazis

https://wc.arizona.edu/papers/94/58/01_96_m.html


And I invite you to read the following article from a white supremacist and neo-nazi website called national vanguard:


https://nationalvanguard.org/2022/04/cosmotheism-in-savitri-devi-2/


And notice that it is saying the following about national socialism
of the white supremacism and neo-nazism:

"[National Socialism] aimed at stemming the physical and moral decay of modern, technically “advanced” humanity by forcing it — by forcing its racial élite, at least — to live in accordance with the ultimate purpose of Nature, which is not to make individuals “happy,” nor even to make, nations “happy,” but to evolve supermankind — living godhead — out of the existing master races, first of all, out of the pure Aryan. Happiness is a bourgeois conception, definitely. It is not our concern. We want animals to be happy — and inferior men, also, to the extent their happiness does not disturb the New Order. We believe higher mankind has better things to do. The Aryan world, remoulded by us after our final triumph, will no longer think in terms of happiness like the decadent world of today. It will think in terms of duty — like the early Vedic world, the early Christian world, the early Islamic world; like the world at the time of any great new beginning."


But i think i am smart and i say that there is two weaknesses in
the above thoughts of neo-nazism, first weakness is that neo-nazism wants to be dictatorship so that to use the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), but this way of doing has not worked, and the second weakness is that the "duty" in the above thoughts of neo-nazism is idealized, but since the duty has to be dictated by the dictatorship of neo-nazism, so since it is not the democratic way, then the duty that is dictated by neo-nazism can not work correctly and it can become a big problem since it comes from the dictatorship of neo-nazism.

I think i am smart, and i have just spoken yesterday about neo-Nazism
and i have just said that what also they want to do is to be a dictatorship so that to use the radical form that has not worked, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), and here is more logical proof about the way of Social Engineering of Nazism and how the Nazism or neo-Nazism define who belongs to the National Socialist ‘community’ and who does not, read the following:

https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689590.001.0001/acprof-9780199689590

Other than that , i think you can live to 100 years if you take
Metformin, and here is the logical proof of it:

With reference to observed survival in diabetic patients initiated with metformin monotherapy [survival time ratio (STR) = 1.0], adjusted median survival time was 15% lower (STR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.81-0.90) in matched individuals without diabetes and 38% lower (0.62, 0.58-0.66) in diabetic patients treated with sulphonylurea monotherapy.

Read more here on the following study so that to notice it:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25041462/


More of my philosophy about the stock price and about bitcoin and more of my thoughts..

Microsoft stock price stood in year 2022 at $268.09

According to the latest long-term forecast, Microsoft price will hit $300 by the end of 2022 and then $400 by the middle of 2025. Microsoft will rise to $500 within the year of 2026, $600 in 2027, $700 in 2028, $800 in 2031 and $900 in 2033.


Read more here:

Microsoft Stock Forecast 2022 - 2025 - 2030

https://coinpriceforecast.com/msft#:~:text=Microsoft%20stock%20price%20stood%20at,2031%20and%20%24900%20in%202033.


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i think that my below thoughts
about investments in stocks is valid, since look at the above example
at the Microsoft stock prices above, the first thing to notice is that
it is just a forecast, but as i am saying below that it is
too risky, since you have to diversify your investment by
for example investing in index funds as i am explaining it
below, and second important thing to notice is that the stock
price is the current price that a share of stock is trading for on the market , but it looks by analogy like the bitcoin currency, since
it also follows demand and supply, but i think that investing in
the stocks is better than investing in bitcoin, since there is
a return of investment in stocks that also permits you to sell much easily your shares of stock, and i think that this return of investment doesn't exist in bitcoin, also i think bitcoin has still much lesser value.


Here is my new proverb:


"When you see a giant killer wave coming to swallow you,
you have not to waste your time at being pessimistic,
but i think you have to know how to beautifully swim so that
to survive the giant killer wave. And i think it is my kind of spirit,
and notice that it is by logical analogy like my way of being the
good vibes that i am talking about below, even if our world
is too much pessimistic."

More of my philosophy about the good vibes and about Love and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


How can we Love when we are no more innocence ? and when we are no more adolescence ? so i think that there is still a beautiful "kind" of Love
and it is a kind of Love that comes from the good vibes, and i think that the good vibes also come from a wise spirit, and take for example a look at my following poems that i have invented quickly, and i think that you have to notice the good vibes in them, since i think that i am both showing my good vibes in form of my poems of Love and i am also showing my wise kind of spirit in form of my other poems, and this kind of wise spirit of mine is also like the good vibes of like being good professionalism, and i think that the good vibes also make the good fans (i mean the when you are fan of someone) and attracts customers in business, and it is my way of doing in business, and notice that those good vibes are a first step to a trustworthy relationship, since i can also say that you cannot love without trusting a person. Since i think that trust is the building block of love. Just like how a child trusts her mother and thereby loves her, your partner needs to know that you are trustworthy and won’t ditch them in difficult times. This feeling is important for love to sprout and flourish. Trust is also very important for Business Relations in the Arab World, so i invite you to read the following interesting article from the Arab world about it:

Al-Ississ: Trust is at the Heart of Business Relations in the Arab World

https://www.aucegypt.edu/news/stories/al-ississ-trust-heart-business-relations-arab-world

So i invite you to look at my following poems in english and french
in the following web link so that to notice my good vibes in them:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/NOpq_uc2gOg


More of my philosophy about being a seller of Amazon products and more of my thoughts..


I have just said the following:

"I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, I have quickly taken a look at Amazon profit margin and ROI(Return of investment), and i think by being a sellers of Amazon(or the like) products you can become rich, since you can buy in more quantity so that to lower the price of an Item of Amazon, so it is better for you if you have more money when you start selling Amazon products, and after that i think that you can use Amazon shipment strategy that easy the things for you, and after you make much more money by being a seller of Amazon products, you can invest a part of your money in index funds in stocks that have an average ROI of around 10%, so i think you can become rich by this way of doing, and i think that it is better than Real Estate investment."


But i think there is still a problem in the being a seller of Amazon products, and it is that when you are a seller and you buy more quantity of a product so that to lower the price of an Item, there is a "competition" in this process of buying more quantity of a product, like in the process of creativity below, so there can be others that can buy much more quantity than you, so that to lower more than you the price of an Item , so it is i think the problem, so i think so that to be successful as a seller of Amazon products, you have to have much more money when you start selling Amazon products and so that to "also" lower the Risk, also you have to know that in most cases, customers(that i think can be sellers of Amazon products) can request returns within 30 days of receiving their order, and this shows that it is not easy to become rich as i am explaining it below.


More of my philosophy about Real Estate investment and about
creativity and about stocks and bonds and more of my thoughts..


According to the National Council of Real Estate Investment Fiduciaries (NCREIF), as of Q1 2021 the average 25-year return for private commercial real estate properties held for investment purposes slightly outperformed the S&P 500 Index, with average annualized returns of 10.3% and 9.6%, respectively. Residential and diversified real estate investments also averaged returns of 10.3%, and i think that a good ROI for a rental property is usually above 10%, but 5% to 10% is also an acceptable range. Real estate investing can be lucrative, but it's important to understand the "risks". Key risks include bad locations, negative cash flows, high vacancies, and problem tenants. Other risks to consider are the lack of liquidity, hidden structural problems, and the unpredictable nature of the real estate market, so i think because of the Risks in Real Estate, i think it is in accordance with what i am saying below, so reread it carefully:

More of my philosophy about what about creativity and how to get rich and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and as you have just noticed i have
just said , read it below, that you can not get easily rich,
but as you have just noticed i have not taken into account the factor of creativity, so let us look at what the following web page is saying about creativity:

Everyone can be creative

https://edu.gcfglobal.org/en/creativity/everyone-can-be-creative/1/


But i think i am highly smart, and i say that what is not saying the
above web page, is that creativity is not just creativity , since
so that make much more money with your creativity, you have to be also
"competition" with the other humans that can be much better than you
in the kind of your creativity, so this can lesser the value of your creativity, so then we can not generalize and say that everybody can become rich or easily rich by being creative, and this is in accordance with what i am saying below, so reread it again:


More of my philosophy about Benjamin Franklin and about investments..


I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I have just looked at the following video about the US. president Benjamin Franklin that talks about the EASIEST way to become rich:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hWbRmkVqhQ


I think i am highly smart since I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i am not in accordance with the US. president Benjamin Franklin in the above video, since let us take a look at the following interesting web page of the Investment growth calculator from Fidelity investments in Canada, since i am understanding it easily, and here it is and take a look at it carefully:

https://www.fidelity.ca/en/growthcalculator/


But notice that it is asking to put two important informations that are:

1- Rate of return
2- Inflation rate


But i think that for the long-term investment, the Inflation rate is not so important, so i think that we have to focus on the "Rate of return",
so i am highly smart, and i say that you can not be rich easily, since
you can not for example invest in stocks of this or that company
since it is so much more risky, so you have to "diversify" correctly by investing in index funds in stocks, since they are much less risky and i think that they have an average of around 10% of rate of return or return of investment, so i think that you can not get rich easily with it, since the Time to grow in the above calculator has to be set to around 40 years or so and this will permit you to have a "good" retirement, but it will not permit you to easily become rich, and i think that the Bond that is a fixed-income instrument that represents a loan made by an investor to a borrower (typically corporate or governmental) is not better in rate of return or return of investment than index funds, so then this shows that it is not easy to get generally rich for the people, and i mean "generally".


More of my philosophy about IQ tests and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and I have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, but i have just passed more and more IQ tests, and i have just noticed that the manner in wich we test with IQ tests is not correct, since in an IQ test you can be more specialized and above average in one subtest of intelligence than in another subtest of intelligence inside an IQ test, since IQ tests test for many kind of intelligences such as the spatial and speed and calculations and logical intelligence etc., so i think that you can be really above average in logical intelligence, as i am really above average in logical intelligence, but at the same time you can be below average in calculations and/or spatial.., so since an IQ test doesn't test for this kind of specializations of intelligence, so i think it is not good, since testing for this kind specializations in intelligence is really important so that to be efficient by knowing the strong advantages of this or that person in every types of intelligences. And about the importance of specialization, read carefully my following thought about it:


More of my philosophy about specialization and about efficiency and productivity..

The previous CEO Larry Culp of General Electric and the architect of a strategy that represented a new turning point in the world corporate strategies, Larry Culp's strategy was to divide the company according to its activities. Something like we are better of alone, seperately and
focused on each one's own activity, than together in a large
conglomerate. And it is a move from integration to specialization.
You see it is thought that a company always gains economies of scale
as it grows, but this is not necessarily the case, since as the company
gains in size - especially if it engages in many activities - it
also generates its own bureaucracy, with all that entails in term
of cost and efficiency. And not only that, it is also often the case
that by bringing together very different activities, strategic focus is lost and decision-making is diluted, so that in the end no one ends up
taking responsability, it doesn't always happen, but this reasons are
basically what is driving this increasing specialization. So i invite to look at the following video so that to understand more about it:

The decline of industrial icon of the US - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hqwYxFCY-k


And here is my previous thoughts about specialization and productivity so that to understand much more:

More about the Japanese Ikigai and about productivity and more of my thoughts..

Read the following interesting article about Japanese Ikigai:

The More People With Purpose, the Better the World Will Be

https://singularityhub.com/2018/06/15/the-more-people-with-purpose-the-better-the-world-will-be/

I think i am highly smart, so i say that the Japanese Ikigai is like a Japanese philosophy that is like the right combination or "balance" of passion, vocation, and mission, and Ikigai and MTP, as concepts, urge us to align our passions with a mission to better the world, but i think that Japanese Ikiai is a also smart since it gets the "passion" from the "mission", since the mission is also the engine, so you have to align the passion with the mission of the country or the global world so that to be efficient, and Japanese Ikigai is also smart since so that to higher productivity and be efficient, you have to "specialize" in doing a job, but so that to higher more productivity and be more efficient you can also specialize in what you do "better", and it is what is doing Japanese Ikigai, since i think that in Japanese Ikigai, being the passion permits to make you specialized in a job in what you do better, and here is what i have just smartly said about productivity:

I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will now talk about another important idea of Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and it is about "specialization" in an economic system, since i say that in an economic system we have to be specialized in doing a job so that to be efficient and productive, but not only that, but we have to specialize in doing a job in what we do better so that to be even more efficient and productive, and we have to minimize at best the idle time or the wasting of time doing a job, since i can also say that this average idle time or wasting time of the workers working in parallel can be converted to a contention like in parallel programming, so you have to minimize it at best, and you have to minimize at best the coherency like in parallel programming so that to scale much better, and of course all this can create an economy of scale, and also i invite you to read my following smart and interesting thoughts about scalability of productivity:

I will talk about following thoughts from the following PhD computer scientist:

https://lemire.me/blog/about-me/

Read more carefully here his thoughts about productivity:

https://lemire.me/blog/2012/10/15/you-cannot-scale-creativity/

And i think he is making a mistake in his above webpage about productivity:

Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input

But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger that the Serial productivity part, so it can scale much more (it is like Gustafson's Law).

And it looks like the following:

About parallelism and about Gustafson’s Law..

Gustafson’s Law:

• If you increase the amount of work done by each parallel
task then the serial component will not dominate
• Increase the problem size to maintain scaling
• Can do this by adding extra complexity or increasing the overall
problem size

Scaling is important, as the more a code scales the larger a machine it
can take advantage of:

• can consider weak and strong scaling
• in practice, overheads limit the scalability of real parallel programs
• Amdahl’s law models these in terms of serial and parallel fractions
• larger problems generally scale better: Gustafson’s law


Load balance is also a crucial factor.

More of my philosophy about cleverness and about the wise man and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i have just read the following
proverb or saying of Albert Einstein in the following web page of Wise Sayings, Quotes & Phrases:


https://everydaypower.com/wise-sayings-about-life/


Here it is:


174. “A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it.” – Albert Einstein


So i will analyse or analyze it quickly with my fluid intelligence
by discovering patterns in it, so the first pattern is:

Notice you can analyse the system of the above proverb or saying of
Albert Einstein by looking if it is logically consistent, so notice that it is not logically consistent, since the good avoidance of problems
needs good cleverness and we can not logically say that avoidance of problems is not solving problems, since the good avoidance of problems can be solving problems, also the second pattern that i am discovering
with my fluid intelligence is that we can also look at the definition
of wisdom or a wise man and it is the following:

"Wisdom is the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgment, and being wise is having or showing experience, knowledge, and good judgment, so then having and showing the good judgment is also being genetically apt at being or showing the good judgment , so i think that being wise needs from you to be smart and clever , so it comes from both the genetical and cultural"


So then the above definition of Wisdom or the being wise shows that
the above proverb of Albert Einstein is not correct and is not smart.

More of my philosophy about abstraction and intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will ask an important philosophical question of:

Does the level of abstraction that we use by using a language like english or french or arabic is sufficient and efficient ?

So i think the languages like english and french and arabic are languages that "abstract" the reality of the existence, so they are not
precise languages that describe reality, but i am smart and i say
that those languages, like english and french and arabic, have there deficiencies, since they can not describe the technical or scientific thoughts in a more precise and more technical manner , so then the languages like english and french and arabic are not sufficient and are not efficient at expressing those kind of technical or scientific thoughts, this is why we are for example using software programming languages that can be described as technical languages since i say that they describe the thoughts of humans that are more precise and more technical than non-technical or non-scientific thoughts, so i think i am smart and i will say that when you do software programming it is that you describe technical thoughts in a much more precise and technical manner, this is why i say that software programming learns us to be more disciplined and more precise and more technical, since for example a cosine or a sine or other trigonometric functions are part of a technical language that we find in technical languages like software programming languages, but i think that they were added late after to the english dictionary, but notice that they are not part of the english language, and look for example a computer programming register that we use in software programming, notice that is part of technical language and it is not the english language, so look carefully at my following thoughts that i have thought quickly about more of my philosophy about stack memory allocations and about preemptive and non-preemptive timesharing, and notice how i am using both the english language and the technical language so that to be much more precise and technical:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/JuC4jar661w

Also i say that the meaning of a language is so important, so
the modality of thoughts is so important, and here is my
thoughts about it:

More of my philosophy about smartness and about discovering patterns and more of my thoughts..


I think i am really smart, i think that inventing sophisticated theorems in mathematics is also discovering smart patterns with your fluid intelligence, it is why i am inventing my thoughts by also discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence , but notice that discovering patterns in mathematics is like a low level way of doing like in microeconomics, but discovering patterns can be in a high level way like in macroeconomics, and here is an example of how i am doing it quickly, read my following thoughts about Nikola Tesla and about Garry Tan that i have invented quickly so that to notice how i am discovering smart patterns with my fluid intelligence in a high level way:

More of my philosophy of how i am smart and about what is smartness..

I think i am smart, and i think that smartness is not doing
mathematics, i think being highly smart is discovering smart patterns and composing smartly other patterns with those patterns etc. so i will
give you my examples of how i am genetically highly smart, so read
carefully my following thoughts and notice how i have quickly
read a saying of Nikola Tesla and how i have rapidly discovered
smart patterns with my fluid intelligence in a form of my
showing that Nikola Tesla is not correct thinking and by discovering
other patterns with my fluid intelligence in a form of my invention of my new proverb below etc. so read carefully my following thoughts and you will notice that being highly smart is also quickly discovering smart patterns in the way i am doing it below(and notice below the other smart patterns that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence when i am rapidly showing that Garry Tan is not correct thinking):

More of my philosophy about Nikola Tesla and my proverbs and more..

I have just looked at the following video of the sayings of Nikola Tesla, and you can read about him here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikola_Tesla, and you can look at the video here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YnQ-o6R2wac

And i think Nikola Tesla doesn't look like me, Since of course i am also an inventor of many software scalable algorithms and algorithms, but i don't think Nikola Tesla was a wise type of person, since for example he is saying the following saying in the above video:

"Be alone, that is the secret of invention;
be alone, that is when ideas are born"

So i think that the above saying from Nikola Tesla is not smart at all, since creativity needs convergent and divergent thinking, and divergent thinking needs to "collect" information and data from other people so that to be efficient, and i also think that creativity is the mother of invention, so this is why Nikola Tesla is not smart by saying the above saying, and here is more of my smart thoughts about it so that you understand my kind of personality:

More of my philosophy about divergent and convergent thinking and more..

I invite you to look at the following video:

5 Life-changing books YOU MUST READ in 2022

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGZd2dn8IJ4

I think i am smart, and notice that he is talking about the book called "The one thing", and he is saying that we have to be focused on doing one thing at a time because it is good for productivity, and he is saying that doing many things at the same time is not good for productivity, but i think i am smart and i say he is not smart and he is not correct to say so, because we can do many things at the same time and be like divergent thinking before doing one thing at a time and be like convergent thinking, and this kind of efficient "balance" like between convergent and divergent thinking makes the efficient thinking, and here is my new proverb about my methodology:

"Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance
divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of
efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent
thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
optimum of efficiency.

And here is my thoughts about artificial intelligence and evolutionary
algorithms in artificial intelligence so that you understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0

More of my philosophy about an IQ test for the highly smart and more..

I think i am really smart and here is a smart IQ test for the highly smart:

So notice what is saying in the following video the known Garry Tan that is an asian from USA about the how to become rich and notice that he attended Stanford University from 1999 to 2003, and graduated with a bachelor's degree in Computer Systems Engineering:

So I invite you to look at his following video that speaks
about how to become rich:

STOP Chasing Money -- Chase WEALTH. | How To get RICH | Garry Tan's Office

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t

The person that is speaking on the above video is called Garry Tan,
and here he is:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garry_Tan

And I think i am smart and i invite you to look at the following
"defect" or "bug" of the above video, look here at what he is saying:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Hdu4DlnLIk&t=425s

So notice that he is saying that so that to become rich you have to be the following:

"So what is most useful, is actually acquiring skills that nobody else
has, especially in combination that are rare. If you can rebound the
ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame
basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and
in life."

But it is like an IQ test for the highly smart, since i am quickly discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that he is trying to abstract the way of becoming rich by also saying:

"If you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, you can be a Hall of Fame basketball player. And that applies to all the things in your career and in life."

But the pattern that i am quickly discovering with my fluid intelligence is that even if you can rebound the ball and nobody does it quite the way you can, the becoming rich is also not only dependent on the supply but also on the "demand", so if the demand doesn't want to give you enough money so that to become rich , you will still not become rich,
so if you are smart you will also notice that it is also about usefulness, since the demand can find the giving enough money to make
you rich not useful for his pocket, so Garry Tan in the above saying of the video is not so smart, since he is not taking into account the factor that we call usefulness to consumers. So the person on the above video has forgot the very basis of what is it of something has to be useful for the consumers or customers, so read my following smart "redefinition" of Utilitarianism so that to understand:

More of my philosophy about why the definition of Utilitarianism is like
an IQ test..

Notice that i think i am smart, since when i just looked rapidly at the
definition below of Utilitarianism, i have rapidly discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence and it is that even if the definition
of Utilitarianism is: That Utilitarianism prescribes actions that
maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
i can easily see a pattern with my fluid intelligence since i am
smart, since the pattern is that Utilitarianism maximises happiness and
well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future, i mean that responability
is inherent to the definition since the well balancing forces us
to be responsability in the present or today so that to maximize
correctly happiness and well being tomorrow or in the future.

I think i am really smart, and what i am trying to explain is that
you have first to know that a language is also an abstraction of the reality, since even a concept is an abstraction of the reality and also
a language is full of concepts, and not only that but a very important
thing in the process of thinking is that you have to know how to
make a difference between what we call in french: "La pensée duale" et
"La pensée multimodale", and it means in english: that there is a thinking that is like a boolean logical of thinking and there is a more efficient thinking that comes with precision in form of nuances etc.
and it is the weakness of the above abstraction of the known Garry Tan,
since his abstraction of how to become rich doesn't come with the right precision and the right nuances, since notice that the becoming rich depends not only on the supply but also on the demand and the demand can be influenced by other factors such as Covid-19 or the like that prevent
from making rich an individual or individuals in the supply, so
it is why i say that the known Garry Tan above is not so smart.

I can give you another IQ test that i have rapidly invented and
here it is:

So i will give my example of pattern recognition with my fluid
intelligence that permits to understand, here it is:

So if you want to go fast from my country Morocco to another country
called USA , how will you do it ? or what will you do ?

It is like my IQ test..

So if you answer that you need for example to use a fast airplane to go
fast from Morocco to USA, your answer is a stupid answer, so you need
the smart answer, so i will answer that the fast airplane too has to be
"reliable" and your "health" has too to permit it and the "weather" has
too to permit it, so now you are clearly noticing that you need to take
into account many "factors" so that to go fast from Morocco to USA, so
you are clearly noticing that being smart needs also a good plan.

More precision of my philosophy about Utilitarianism..

I invite you to read the following definition of what is Utilitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Utilitarianism

So as you are noticing, it says that Utilitarianism prescribes actions
that maximise happiness and well-being for all affected individuals,
but i think that Utilitarianism is not idiotic since it maximises
happiness and well-being by well balancing taking into account not
only the present but also the future.

More of my philosophy about the Gödel's First incompleteness theorem and
more of my thoughts..

I have searched more on internet the most precise and correct Gödel's First incompleteness theorem, and here it is:

"Any consistent formal system F within which a certain amount of elementary arithmetic can be carried out is incomplete; i.e., there are statements of the language of F which can neither be proved nor disproved in F"

And in mathematics, a statement is a declarative sentence that is either true or false but not both. A statement is sometimes called a proposition. The key is that there must be no ambiguity. To be a statement, a sentence "must" be true or false, and it cannot be both.

So that means that we know that the statement is true or false but
it can not be proven true or false, so we then logically infer that
we can not prove the consistency of the system , so the statement can be that it is like an axiom in mathematics that is true but that we can not prove by such logical inference or deduction, so then the system
remains really useful even if it's incomplete by Gödel's incompleteness theorems, so i think that Gödel's incompleteness theorems are not so problematic.

More of my philosophy about the CIA and Mossad and such secret services and about fluid intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will talk more about my personality, so i invite you to look at the following web page of the Mossad:

https://www.mossad.gov.il/eng/Pages/default.aspx


So notice how the Mossad is saying in there above web page the following:

"Join us to see the invisible, and do the impossible"


And i think that it is part of my personality, since i am like the Mossad, since my way of doing is discovering patterns or smart patterns with my fluid intelligence, and we can abstract those patterns like being a "system" or smart system that you discover, and the system can be like a rule or a theorem etc. and when you discover those patterns with your fluid intelligence, it is as you are seeing the "invisible" like is saying it the Mossad in there above web page, so i am discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence that permit me to understand philosophy or politics or to make new philosophies, and it is like being an inventor, and i am also discovering patterns that make algorithms, so for example look at my following invention of a scalable Lock algorithm called MLock, and how i have invented it by discovering smart patterns with my fluid intelligence , and read about it in my following thoughts:


About smartness and about my MLock and about MCS Lock and more..

I have just read the following article from ACM:

Scalability Techniques for Practical Synchronization Primitives

https://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=2698990

Notice how they are speaking about one of the best scalable Lock that we
call MCS lock, but i think that CLH and MCS locks are not smart since
those scalable Locks are like intrusive, since they have to hide the
required parameter to be passed, this is why i think i am smart since i
have invented a scalable Lock that is better than MCS Lock since my
scalable Lock doesn't require any parameter to be passed, just call the
Enter() and Leave() methods and that's all, here it is, read carefully
about it in my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock


And notice again how i have invented the following algorithm by
discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence, here it is:


And i have just updated my software invention of a Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references, and it is
now working perfectly with both Windows and Linux, and you can read about it and download it from website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

More of my philosophy about cleverness and about the wise man and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i have just read the following
proverb or saying of Albert Einstein in the following web page of Wise Sayings, Quotes & Phrases:


https://everydaypower.com/wise-sayings-about-life/


Here it is:


174. “A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it.” – Albert Einstein


So i will analyse or analyze it quickly with my fluid intelligence
by discovering patterns in it, so the first pattern is:

Notice you can analyse the system of the above proverb or saying of
Albert Einstein by looking if it is logically consistent, so notice that it is not logically consistent, since the good avoidance of problems
needs good cleverness and we can not logically say that avoidance of problems is not solving problems, since the good avoidance of problems can be solving problems, also the second pattern that i am discovering
with my fluid intelligence is that we can also look at the definition
of wisdom or a wise man and it is the following:

"Wisdom is the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgment, and being wise is having or showing experience, knowledge, and good judgment, so then having and showing the good judgment is also being genetically apt at being or showing the good judgment , so i think that being wise needs from you to be smart and clever , so it comes from both the genetical and cultural"


So then the above definition of Wisdom or the being wise shows that
the above proverb of Albert Einstein is not correct and is not smart.

And i have just found another interesting proverb or saying from Nelson Mandela in the above web page, and it is the following:


195. “If you talk to a man in a language he understands, that goes to his head. If you talk to him in his language, that goes to his heart.” — Nelson Mandela


And here is my proverb that is related to it:


And here is my other smart proverb:

"One very important sign of a wise man is that he knows how to use the
appropriate language to talk to people, but does he needs to use only
one language with "people"? no, he has to know how to use different
languages to talk to people, for example when he talks to the birds he
uses the language of the birds, so he has to know how to be efficient at
that."

So notice that it is a smart proverb, since i am also saying in my new
proverb the following:

"..for example when he talks to the birds he uses the language of the
birds.."

So as you notice that it is also making it clear that a language
is not only like the spoken english language, since it can also mean the
language of the heart(or of Love) or the language of technicality etc."


More of my philosophy about the laws and about free speech and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask a philosophical question
of:


Why i have just said below the following:

"So as you notice that those tough laws against conspiracy can
be "extended" to even control much more efficiently the free speech,
so i think that saying that free speech truly exists is naive."


So i think that the being "free" of free speech is not the being
free since the police or the FBI can investigate your free speech or actions if they evaluate that your free speech is a conspiracy, so if you are investigated in such a way by the police or FBI that also means that you are "not" free even if the conspiracy is not represented by your kind of actions that are evaluated as conspiracy, but by the speech that is evaluated as conspiracy, so then i can logically infer that free speech doesn't truly exists.


More of my philosophy about free speech and more of my thoughts..


I have just looked at the following Wise Sayings, Quotes & Phrases:


https://everydaypower.com/wise-sayings-about-life/


And the web page above contains the following saying related to free speech:

153. “I like criticism. It makes you strong.” — LeBron James


So we can ask a philosophical question of:


Is free speech allowed by the laws ?


So i have just taken a look at the laws, and we have to see if the laws
protect correctly the citizens or the state, and as an example, here is what i have just found as laws in Canada that are related to the above subject, since there is even in Canada tough laws against
conspiracy or what we call "complot" in french, and look at them here(and you have to translate it in english because the laws are in french) :

https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/fra/lois/C-46/section-465.html


So as you notice that those tough laws against conspiracy can
be "extended" to even control much more efficiently the free speech,
so i think that saying that free speech truly exists is naive.


More of my philosophy of how to control your sexual desire and impulses and more of my thoughts..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will ask a philosophical question of:

How to control the sexual desire and impulses ?


I think i am highly smart, and i will say that you have to control
them by enhancing your taste or intellectual taste, and i have done it
and i think it works, so as i have just explained in my new proverb , read about it in my below thoughts of my philosophy about beauty, so when you are convinced that beauty is systemic in the way i am explaining it in
my new proverb about beauty below, and you get into much details of what is beauty, and when you get more conscious and more educated about life, you will start to notice that your intellectual taste and taste change, and i think it is the way to control the sexual desire and impulses, and i think it works , since i have done it, so i think it looks by logical analogy like my following thoughts about the power of an idea, since you can understand beauty by the power of the ideas too, so read carefully my following thoughts so that to understand my views:


What is the true power of the idea ?

This is a so important philosophical subject, since
i think i am smart and i will make you feel more the true
power of the idea by first talking about the technic in psychology that
we call "Mood freezing", since i think that the most important aspect of
Mood freezing is that it recognizes the true power of the mind, and you
can read about it here:

https://www.alleydog.com/glossary/definition.php?term=Mood+Freezing

So as you are noticing that it says that when the respondents were
convinced that expressing aggression would not make them feel better,
they actually accepted their current situation which eventually improved
their moods, so this proves that the power of the idea is great, this is
why i am of the ones that believes that we can enhance much better
humans and construct a new type of man by using some intellectual
mechanisms, and i am talking about some of them below and here is my
poem about the true power of the idea, read it again:

"Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how they have built south Korea
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how we unite the people such as of Crimea
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not just a pizza from the pizzeria
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not the simple prayer of Ave Maria
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is not the stupid war between the sunnite and shiah
Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
Since it is how we make north Korea look like a beautiful Canada
So give me more of those beautiful and so smart ideas !"


More of my philosophy about the “Customer is King” and about Democracy and about intelligence and more of my thoughts..



So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so the “Customer is King” is an age-old mantra reflecting the importance of customers or consumers in every business. But i think saying that the “Customer is King” is not wise and is not correct, since it is by logical analogy like Democracy, since in Democracy the people are not King, since the people have for example to be educated correctly and they have to be informed correctly by the medias so that Democracy works correctly, so the medias have to be objective too, so then the customers in Business are not the King, since they can be not correctly wise and they can be not correctly educated so they can have a bad intellectual taste or taste, so then the intellectual taste or taste of the customers in business have to be enhanced correctly so that they know how to buy so that to not cause problems, and i think it is progressive and it is part of the evolution of humanity since we have to advance correctly.


And i have just updated my software invention of a Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references, and it is
now working perfectly with both Windows and Linux, and you can read about it and download it from website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references


More of my philosophy about the essence of human or artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will explain more my views,
so since human intelligence is by essence an efficiency, since the highly human intelligence is an efficiency that comes from like the interactions of objects of the lower level layers of the universe and that works well and produces good results, so then intelligence is not only the sophisticated plan that permits you to adapt efficiently, but it is by essence an efficiency that permits to adapt, so i think this abstraction permits us to say that a delicious maghrebian couscous is an efficiency, and i think that we can call it an intelligence, since it is an efficiency that comes from like the interactions of objects of the lower level layers of the universe, so then we can consider tools such a static or dynamic system that gives an appreciable efficiency as artificial intelligence or intelligence, and the tools can be constructed by humans or by mother nature, so then human smartness is not only genetical and cultural , but it is also the smartness or intelligence of the tool that can make humans much more smart, and how to measure the greatness of the artificial intelligence or intelligence ? so for example a tool can become much more efficient if it it is bought by many customers , so then it is also relative and you have to contextualize so that to measure the value of the tool.


Read my previous thoughts:

More philosophy about efficiency and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i will ask a really smart philosophical question so that you understand my views:

So how can we define an artificial intelligence ?

So there is two ways to measure it, there is the relative way and the absolute way, so then notice carefully that can we say that we have
to measure artificial intelligence by comparing with human intelligence ? so i will answer this question by asking: Can we say that a monkey is not smart since a human is much smarter than a monkey ? so now you are understanding my kind of smartness, so where have we to set the limit that defines artificial intelligence ? since i say that artificial intelligence can not just be measured by comparing with human intelligence, so now you are understanding that i am saying below that smartness is an efficiency, so then i can logically infer that we can also set the limit by saying that we can consider an efficiency of a tool of a product or of a static system or of a dynamic system as being a kind of artificial intelligence. So read my previous thoughts now:

More of my philosophy about efficiency and about smartness and more of my thoughts..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask an important philosophical question of:

Is smartness an efficiency ?


So i think that smartness is an efficiency, since
something that is efficient works well and produces good results by using the available time, money, supplies etc. in the most effective way,
so it is why i think i can logically infer that a tool of a product or service that is more efficient is like an "artificial" smartness that can make you much more smart than average smartness, so i think that smartness is not only the genetical smartness or cultural smartness, but it is also smartness of the tool, so then i can logically infer that we can also become sophisticated smart Cyborgs by using powerful tools such as internet or the like, so we are not today just dealing with humans , but we are also dealing with Cyborgs,
so when you are creative or inventive and you invent tools , you can become a sophisticated Cyborg using those tools.

More of my philosophy about success and failure and more of my thoughts..


First you have to know that when i am saying the following:

"So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ."

It is the truth , but i am not narcissistic or arrogant by saying so,
since a highly smart IQ can also mean that it is 115 IQ.


Other than that i will ask a very important philosophical question of:

How to define the being success and failure ?


I think that you have to define it by looking at the weights of importance so that to "prioritize" by weights of importance so that
to be successful, so i think that the success can not be defined by having big money but by your level of good adaptation, since the best way to being success is to be smart and wise that both permit to be a good adaptation that makes you rich and successful, but not only that, but by measuring by weights of importance we can also say that when you are smart and wise and success is just near of you or at hand, so it like means that you can easily become successful since success is so near of you and is at hand and an easy thing, we can also say of it that it is a kind of success, since we are measuring it too with the level of good adaptation, since the being smart and wise is so important. So i can also ask a smart question of: Is the being creative the being smart? so we have to contextualize, since the being creative or being inventive can bring the creative tool of a product of service that can make you smarter than the average smartness, so it can make you smart, so the genetical smartness is not the only smartness, the creative tool can also make you much smarter than average smartness, and read carefully
my following thoughts so that to understand more about what is smartness:

More philosophy about how to measure human IQ or human smartness..

I think i am smart, and i will talk about how to measure human IQs or
human smartness, first you have to know that you can measure relatively
or absolutely, so if you measure the IQ of a human, you will give a
value of IQ that is "relative" to the distribution of IQs of humans, so
can we ask if it is the right way to measure human IQs? i think it is
not, because there is a "very" important thing that is missing, and it
is that you have to also measure IQ or smartness relatively to the
"constraints" in our reality that constrain(or limit) human IQ or human
smartness, and i think this will give a much more realistic measure of
human IQs or human smartness, so if you are really smart you will start
by searching what are those constraints in the reality that constrain
human IQs or human smartness, because this way you will become really smart.

Let me give an example about how to measure IQs or smartness..

So if you are really smart you will give a smart example so that people
can understand, so here it is:

If i say: 2 + 2 = 4

So you will notice that this equality is also constrained by constraints
of reality, since for example you are noticing that it is not so
mathematically expressive, so this not mathematically expressive is also
constraining human IQ or human smartness, since if you understand and
learn this mathematical equality, another person will quickly do the
same, so the other person will adapt quickly to this level of smartness,
so now you are noticing the smart idea, it is that even science and
technology are constrained the same way, and this constraints on
science and technology constrain or limit the expressiveness of high
human IQs or high level of smartness so that other lower level human
IQs or smartness can attain the level of adaptability of high human
IQs, this is what is happening in our today world, and if you are smart
you will notice that there is something else that is happening and it
is that abstraction of complexity that reduce the complexity is making
others not understanding the complexity behind the abstraction and this
is not so efficient.

Here is more about the constraints on science and technology:

Is Science Going To End?

Read more here:

https://philosophynow.org/issues/68/Is_Science_Going_To_End

And read also the following

The Industrial Era Ended, and So Will the Digital Era

Read more here:

https://hbr.org/2018/07/the-industrial-era-ended-and-so-will-the-digital-era

More political philosophy about what is smartness..


I give you an example so that you understand:

If i give the following three words:

I, love, you.

It is not the same as if i give the following five words:

I, love, you, very, much

So you are noticing that the five words permit a more sophisticated
expressiveness, and notice that i am saying more sophisticated, since
the five words bring more efficiency, and this bringing more efficiency
is also what we call smartness, but notice that this smartness is
brought by using the "tool" that is composed of the five words, so the
tool that is our english language brings smartness, so then we have to
be convinced by the fact that the tool like internet brings a much more
efficiency and this much more efficiency brings much more smartness, so
now you are noticing that smartness is not only genetical or cultural,
but it is also the smartness of using the tool, and this is a very
important thing, since the tool can be powerful and it can advance very
much a human and can make a human really smart. So you have to
understand that we are also in an Era of powerful tools such as internet
that can advance very much a human and that can make a human really smart.

More of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..



So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i will ask a philosophical question:


So how do you think i am creating a meaning for my human life and
is it the meaning of human life ?


So i think i am highly smart, so i think that a meaning of human life
that doesn't create a positive energy is not a meaning of human life,
so i think for me the meaning of human life is also that i have to be wise,
so why have i to be wise?, since the being wise is like a good professionalism, and the good professionalism is something "respectable"
and is something that "attracts" confidence and that attracts customers,
so it is also good for business, and notice that this good professionalism of the being wise is a positive energy too, so the being wise is so important for me, so the meaning of human life is not only this positive energy of the being wise but it is also the following:

More of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask a philosophical question of:

From where comes the meaning of human life ?


I think i am highly smart, and i say that you can by being relativism in
philosophy says that human life has no meaning, so relativism in philosophy in its essence has a problem, but i think that the smart way of constructing a meaning of human life, is also to be the pragmatic way by giving weights of importance to things, it is like "prioritizing" by giving weights of importance so that to be successful, i mean look at human life, it is much better than the old human life, so this way of looking at it permits to give a weight of importance , and also the other way is also to say that humanity is in fact progressing in an exponential way, so we are progressing so rapidly, and this way also of looking at it gives a great weight of importance and those two ways of looking at human life gives optimism, so i think it is the way to construct a meaning of human life, and this way of constructing a meaning of human life looks like my answer below about the can we be enlightned or not, so as you are noticing that the pragmatic way of my answer below proceeds by giving weights of importance so that also enforce the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world. And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ


And look in the following interesting article about how AI will create millions more Jobs than it Will destroy:

https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/


So i think we have to be optimistic about this exponential progress of our humanity.


More of my philosophy about enlightenment and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will invite you to look at
the following video of the indian philosophy that is making a big mistake:

The Bizarre Life Of An Enlightened Person

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzmGkRF2ggU


So i am discovering in the above video patterns with my fluid intelligence that say to me that the above video of the indian philosophy is making a big mistake, since the above video of the indian philosophy is saying that you can not be enlightned, but it is "relativism" in philosophy that is not acceptable as morality, since also with this relativism we can also say that the smart humans among us are not smart humans, and this relativism brings an advantage of the being humbleness , but it also brings a disadvantage of being arrogance, so it is by logical analogy like the we can not say that you have to know how to use relativism like you have to know how to use a knife, since the normal distribution says that a not negligible percentage of humans are genetically violent, it is why i think that so that to be the right safety, we have to be the pragmatic way that also enforces the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world, so we have to for example say that the "highly smart" humans among us are the most important humans, since also they are like the most important engine that we have, since we can easily notice that without the highly smart humans, humanity becomes inferior like inferior animals, and it is why i have just said the following:


More of my philosophy about the essence of philosophy and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will talk about an important
subject in philosophy, so i will ask a philosophical question of:

What is the goal of philosophy ?


So i think i am highly smart, and i will answer it quickly by saying the following:


So if i say that the goal of philosophy is to be Happy or Happiness, you will think that it is stupid, but it is not stupid since Happiness is by logical analogy like Liberty, since i think that humans understand that Liberty is not being free and happiness is not the just having pleasures of life, since so that to be Liberty or Happiness of your today and of your tomorrow or future, you have to be the right responsability, since Liberty or Happiness are not only Liberty or Happiness of your today, but it is also that you have to ensure to be Liberty or Happiness of your tomorrow or your future, and this being responsability of humans is a much more sophisticated responsability than that of animals, and it is the basis of why humans are not animals, since humans are also pushed forward by this engine of responsability so that to be Liberty or so that to be Love, and of course there is not only this kind of engine , but there is also the engines of human laws that are enforced by the police and the army so that to be Liberty, but as you notice that we have not to be pessimistic, since as you notice that humans are not animals since they have to be organized in much more sophisticated manner than animals so that to be this Liberty, so i think that i can logically infer that you have not just to compare the genetics of humans and that of monkeys and for example say that researchers sequenced the chimp genome and have known that humans share about 99% of our DNA with chimpanzees, making them our closest living relatives, but you have to understand that the 1% difference in genetics of humans, compared to chimp genome, has made humans much more perfect than chimpanzees or animals, and you can for example look at how animals and humans are organized, and notice again that this kind of organization of humans is "much" more sophisticated than animals, so then i can finally logically infer that humans are not animals , and you can also easily notice it by reading my following thoughts of my philosophy and noticing how it is much more sophisticated, but there still remains a problem in philosophy, and it is the fact that saying
that the goal of philosophy is Happiness is too much abstraction since
we have to show clearly one of the most important thing so that to attain the goal of Happiness, and it is what i call in french:
La philosophie a aussi pour important objectif de vous permettre
de vous tenir debout face aux difficultés de la vie, and my translation
of it in english is: Philosophy also has the important objective of enabling you to stand tall in the face of life's difficulties, and
here is what i have just said about this really important goal:

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask the following important
question in philosophy:

What is the most important thing in philosophy ?


I think that the most important thing in philosophy is the basis principle in philosophy that you have to know how to stand up so that to make morality stand up correctly , even if you are rich, and i think that this first so important principle is the basis principle of an organization or institution like the USA army. I mean that for example the hippies mindset had been that the hippies had fallen rapidly, without the being the right resistance, in being too much liberty that has not made there morality stand up correctly, so then you have to know how to "resist" and make stand up morality and not rapidly fall into immorality by looking at the human reality and saying that life is not worth it, and i think it is the basis first principle of philosophy.

More of my philosophy about my contributions and more of my thoughts..

Here is some of my contributions, so here is first a part of my thoughts of my philosophy that i have invented quickly in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/TwTnJw-EsHA

And read about my other new philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/FcCeH_UqGoU

And you can read the rest of my "interesting" philosophical thoughts in the following web links so that to understand my views on different subjects:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vc32viYv1SY

And read also here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/CmaowkjUJVY

And i invite you to read my following other thoughts of my philosophy in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/s8IZ5i5Udm0


And here is my new proverbs that i have invented quickly:

And here is one of my proverb that talks about the being wise:

"There is some french that say: "On doit manier bien le verbe", "That we
have to speak or write a sophisticated language" , but they do not say
that speaking or writing a sophisticated language can become a deadly or
dangerous weapon, so i answer them in french: "Il faut aussi enseigner
le savoir vivre ensemble en enseignant aussi une philosophie efficace de
vie", that means in english: "That we have to efficiently educate people
by also learning them a good and efficient philosophy so that they know
how to live in harmony"

Here is my other proverbs:

"Being strong can become being weak by containing a small weak part that
makes you weak, and being weak can become being strong by containing a
small strong part of great weight of importance that makes you strong"

Here is my other new proverb:

"When you want to construct a much better version of yourself so
that to become successful, there is the first way of the hard working
way, but the hard working way is not the efficient and smart way, this
is why you can construct a much better version of yourself
by being some creative thinking and by being exponential thinking and by
using the exponential progress and growth brought by digitalization to
sell on internet your product or service from this some creative
thinking so that to be successful, so as you notice that this shows that
we have to be positive about our world, and this shows that my following
proverb is truth that actually says the following: The being weak can
become being strong by containing a small strong part of great weight of
importance that makes you strong, since the some creative thinking is a
small part of great weight of importance that makes you strong, since it
is not only capital and talents that make you successful, but it is also
some creative ideas that makes the great Capital that makes you
successful and the great capital that attracts talents that makes you
much more successful than successful."

And read all my other new proverbs in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ZyUvFt_nix8

Here is also one important proverb of mine about Resourcefulness that
permits you to understand it:

"Resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill,
and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and
resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset
and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources
that help us, and resourcefulness is also to know who/what to look for
and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an
engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be
positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits
to easy the jobs for you."


And here is my poems in french and english that i have invented quickly:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mEGKavIJbUU


More of my philosophy about the good adaptation and more of my thoughts..


Here is what i just said yesterday about black americans and about black africans and maghrebians:


--

"More of my philosophy about the black africans and about the maghrebis of France and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am highly smart and i have just looked to the following video
of black africans and maghrebians or maghrebis of France:

Quartiers difficiles : le vrai visage des nouveaux ghettos

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I9kT1PCPLY8

I think i am understanding quickly the human life condition of black africans and maghrebis or maghrebians of France, since i think that the main problem is that they are not equipped correctly with the right tools that permits them to adapt efficiently, so for example the simply looking at a good or beautiful movie doesn't make you adapt much more efficiently, or the simply cooking a Maghrebian couscous doesn't make you adapt much more efficiently, so the most important thing is to teach black africans and maghrebis or maghrebians of France how they adapt much more efficiently or efficiently, since i think that it is a matter of good adaptation, so i think we have not to hate black africans or maghrebis or maghrebians, but we have to learn them how to adapt efficiently. And i think it is my way of doing, since i am also knowing how to adapt efficiently by mastering the languages of english and french and arabic, and i am showing it here by inventing quickly
my poems and by quickly inventing my thoughts of my philosophy and posting them here, and also the higher and much better level of adaptation is also to master a technical language or technical languages as i am doing it, and a high level of adaptation is to be smartly creative and inventive as i am doing it, so as you notice it is what is lacking to black americans and to
black africans and maghrebians or maghrebis of France, so it is a matter of good adaptation."

---



So i think i am in accordance with my above thoughts, since i will
give you an example of how i am doing it so that to be a much
better or good adaptation, so i invite you to read the following interesting article:

WHAT IN-MEMORY COMPUTING ACTUALLY MEANS

https://www.nextplatform.com/2015/09/01/what-in-memory-computing-actually-means/


So about in-memory computing , i invite you to look at my
following open source software project that implement a kind of in-memory computing:

Parallel archiver

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/parallel-archiver


Notice that i am saying the following about my Parallel archiver:

If you want to use an in-memory archive, pass an empty string to the file name in the constructor, like this:

pzr :=TPLZ4Archiver.Create('',1000,4);

And if you want to read your in-memory archive , read from the Stream property that is exposed(a TStream) like this:

pzr.stream.position:=0;

A_Memory_Stream.copyfrom(pzr.stream,pzr.stream.size)

You can also load your archive from a file or memory stream just by assigning your file or memory stream to the Stream property (a TStream).


More about my education and my Diploma and more..

My name is Amine Moulay Ramdane, i am a white arab from Morocco, i am a gentleman type of person, and i live in Quebec Canada since 1989, i am a Canadian from Morocco, and you have seen me writing my thoughts of my political philosophy here, and now i will talk about my education and my Diploma: my Diploma is a university level Diploma, my school in Morocco where i have studied and gotten my university level Diploma in Microelectronics and informatics was under the control of Paris Academie in France (we call it Académie de Paris), and here it is:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Ffr.wikipedia.org%2Fwiki%2FAcad%25C3%25A9mie_de_Paris

And i have continued to study one more year of applied mathematics in university of Montreal in Quebec Canada, and i have succeeded this one
year in applied mathematics in university of Montreal, so with my Diploma and this one year of applied mathematics i have studied and succeeded 3 years at the university level, after that i have studied Network administration and i have also worked as a network administrator and as software developer consultant, the name of my company was and is Cyber-NT Communications in Quebec Canada, and around years 2001 and 2002 i have started to implement some of my softwares like PerlZip that looked like PkZip of PKware software company, but i have implemented it for Perl , and i have implemented the Dynamic Link Libraries of my PerlZip that permits to compress and decompress etc.
with the "Delphi" compiler, so my PerlZip software product was very fast
and very efficient, in year 2002 i have posted the Beta version on
internet, and as a proof , please read about it here:

http://computer-programming-forum.com/52-perl-modules/ea157f4a229fc720.htm

And after that i have sold the release version of my PerlZip
product to many many companies and to many individuals around the world,
and i have even sold it to many Banks in Europe, and with that i have
made more money.

And after that i have continued to work like a software developer
consultant and network administrator, the name of my company was and is CyberNT Communications, and here is my company in Quebec(Canada) called CyberNT Communications, i have worked as a software developer and as a network administrator, read the proof here:

https://opencorporates.com/companies/ca_qc/2246777231

And here is a book from O'Reilly called "Perl for System Administration"
that you can buy from Amazon, and this book is talking about my name that is Amine Moulay Ramdane and is talking about some important Perl modules that i have implemented with Delphi as a Windows DLL(Dynamic Link Library) with a Perl interface to the DLL that are called Win32::MAPI and Win32::AdvNotify:

Look here is the web link to the book from Amazon so that to read about it and notice it:

https://books.google.ca/books?id=umJJXsFGO14C&pg=PA255&lpg=PA255&dq=MAPI+and+amine+moulay+ramdane&source=bl&ots=YmdwQ4fBOg&sig=ACfU3U0pRD9bMKI0GNs8KXPz4wObCyDRbg&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjFroai_vP2AhWgk4kEHStNAUwQ6AF6BAgdEAM#v=onepage&q=MAPI%20and%20amine%20moulay%20ramdane&f=false

And here is the other web link to the book from Amazon so that you read about it and notice it:

https://books.google.ca/books?id=umJJXsFGO14C&pg=PA121&lpg=PA121&dq=advnotify&source=bl&ots=YmdwQ4eEJe&sig=ACfU3U1pq-qVE4NjZ0_ycXgqyzqOy1dW2Q&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi6hsy7-_P2AhWFhIkEHeUPDHoQ6AF6BAgNEAM#v=onepage&q=advnotify&f=false


And here is my other "new" software project for Delphi and Freepascal that is called PLDelphi for Delphi and Freepascal and that permits to connect to Perl in a sophisticated manner :

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pldelphi-for-delphi-and-freepascal

and here is my other software project for Delphi and Freepascal
that is called Regexp-ERE for Delphi and Freepascal and that also connects to Perl in a sophisticated manner:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/regexp-ere-for-delphi-and-freepascal


So as you notice that creating a "trusthworthy" relationship between me
as a software developer and the customers is so important for me, and it is my way of doing that is creating this trusthworthy relationship with my customers and with you here in those newsgroups forums and such.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.