More precision about more of my philosophy about the truth and about the meaning and purpose of human existence..

[Amine Moulay Ramdane]

Hello,




More precision about more of my philosophy about the truth and about the meaning and purpose of human existence..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am highly smart, and i will be more precise, so i think so that to give meaning and values to human existence so that we respect them and follow them so that to be a much better world, i think we have first to define what is an extremist view, so is the measuring like absolutely the meaning of human existence like i am saying it below, an extremist view ? so i think that the system of the meaning of human existence is dynamic system, so i think that we can for example say that saying that our human existence is absurd like was saying it the philosopher Albert Camus can not be generalized and i think this absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus is is today an extremist view, since it is today too pessimistic, so it is why we have not to be so pessimistic about our human existence and say that our human existence have no meaning or is absurd, since the goal of philosophy is "happiness", so happiness is how we have to measure the meaning of human existence, so then i say that we can not say that we are absolutely not happy over this earth ! and now the logical proof becomes much clear, since i think that it has not to be black or white, but we have to see the nuances like in fuzzy logic and be not pessimistic about the meaning of human existence, and i think that it is the weakness of absurdism of the philosopher Albert Camus, since he was not nuancing correctly and he was not like using like fuzzy logic, since i think that we have not to be pessimistic about human existence as i am explaining it below by for example talking about the exponential progress of our humanity, so then i invite you to read my below thoughts so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy of how to give a meaning and purpose to human existence and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart , and i have just talked about the problematic of how to measure the meaning or the meaning of human existence, read it below, but i think that the meaning and purpose of human existence comes from the being more happy and more stable , so it comes from the being more perfection, and notice that the being more perfection is not the having big money, but it is the "mastery" that makes you more and more perfection and that makes you rich, and here is what i have said about it in my thoughts of my philosophy:


More of my philosophy about the meaning and purpose of human life and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, since i have passed two certified
IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will talk about
an important subject in philosophy, and it is about the meaning and
purpose of human life, but before, i invite you to look at the
following video that is talking not wisely about the meaning and purpose
of human life, and you have to look at it carefully so that to understand my point of view below:

Why the world is going crazy—and how to win back our minds | Jamie Wheal | Big Think

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqJQvJ7i7Ek


So i think i am highly smart and i will explain my smart way of showing
you what is the meaning and purpose of human life, so how do you think
i will explain what is the meaning and purpose of human life ? it is
by discovering patterns with my fluid intelligence, and the patterns
that i am discovering are the following:

I think that the meaning or purpose of human life has to give you like
a kind of stability that permits you to go forward into living
your life with much more confidence, so i think that the pattern
that i am discovering that permits you to resist instabilities is the following:

Here is my other new proverb in english and french:

Voici mon nouveau proverbe en français et en anglais:

"La stabilité s'obtient avec la force de la perfection,
car quand vous devenez plus parfait vous augmentez
vos forces et donc vous résistez mieux aux instabilités,
et je pense que ceci est comme une loi de la moralité"

"Stability is obtained with the force of perfection,
because when you become more perfect you increase
your strenghts , then you better resist instabilities,
and I think this is like a law of Morality"

So as you are noticing that my proverb above is also saying that
by becoming more and more perfect you also easy more and more
the hard work by the process of reusability of your intelligence and
your experience etc. and you better and better resist instabilities,
and of course we have to take into account the exponential progress
of our humanity that is bringing, and really fast, a much more stability that is required by the meaning and purpose of human life, since this exponential progress will make us really soon much much more powerful,
and this much more powerful brings also much more stability and much more quality, so the very important thing to do is to manage well this exponential progress of our humanity, and here is what i am saying about this exponential progress of our humanity:

And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee
of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place
where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster
exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our
humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much
faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ


More of my philosophy about the stability and about the meaning and purpose of human life and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, since i have passed two certified
IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and notice that i have
thought and written rapidly my below thoughts, and now i will talk
a little bit more about what is the meaning and purpose of human life, so i think that the previous old philosophers were pessimistic about the meaning and purpose of human life, but i think i am more optimistic and i am not pessimistic, and i say that since the meaning of human life comes from a kind of stability that permits us to go forward living our human life with self-confidence, and notice that the being stability is not the resisting to change, since i define the being instability as something bad that hurts the system, and notice that i am also saying that stability comes mainly from mastery of science and technology, but i think, as i am saying it below , that the thinking it GDP per capita so that to become rich is also an interesting way of doing, and read about it carefully in my below thoughts, so i think that we have not to be pessimistic about the meaning of human life, since i think that we can attain a kind of stability that permits us to appreciate pleasures of life and be much more happy, so i invite you to read my following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand how and so that to understand my views about it:

And now here is a part of my philosophy about how to be self-confidence and about how to be the positive energy and how to be hope so that you notice how my philosophy is smart:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM

And read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy of how we have to be wise and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and now i will talk to you about a so important philosophical problem, and it is by asking the following question:

How have we to measure it , absolutely or relatively ?


So i think that the problematic in philosophy is the from
where comes the meaning, i mean that the problem is if for example you measure the meaning of human intelligence from genetics, you can measure it relatively to the normal IQ distribution and say for example that this person has a high IQ, so he is highly smart, but if you measure like absolutely the meaning of human intelligence, you will for example say that our humanity has so many big problems that can not be solved with high intelligence from genetics , so this high intelligence from genetics becomes not smart, so i think that it is the same for the meaning of human life, you can measure it relatively or like absolutely, so you can say that we have to be pragmatic and say that a high human intelligence from genetics is smart, but i think this way of doing doesn't work, so how can we make it work, and here again you are not understanding that this way of creating the meaning is not so efficient, and giving the meaning to human life is also the way of giving or creating values that we have to respect and follow so that to make the world a much better world.


And you can read the rest of my philosophical thoughts in the following
web link so that to understand my views on different subjects:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vc32viYv1SY


More of my philosophy about the human existence and more of my thoughts..

I think i am really highly smart, and i think that the God hypothesis
is not so true, because if we think that the reality is like a simulation, i think this hypothesis is not true, since God or super powerful beings can not be so evil by making suffering a so great number of human souls or humans, so then i think that i am really highly smart and i am discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that there is things or low level layers in our universe or multiverse that have always existed and they have not been created or created by an even low level layer and here is what i have just said about it:

More of my philosophy about how something is created from nothing and more of my thoughts..

I think i am really highly smart, since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will ask an important philosophical question and i will answer it rapidly with my fluid intelligence, here it is:

How can we explain that the space or such things of our universe or multiverse have been created from nothing ?

So i think i am really highly smart, and i will say that for a
highly intelligent person like me, it is an easy question,
since the pattern that answers the question and that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence is that our logic or common sense is not enough to answer it with certitude(absolute certainty), and it can makes us falsely believe that something can not always exist, so it remains that there is a not negligeable possibility that things in the universe or multiverse, like space and such , can have always existed, so there is also a not negligeable possibility that the thing that we call God can have always existed and not created.


More of my philosophy of can your personality or individuality be resurrected and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and from my explanation below of what is
awareness and self-awareness or what we call consciousness and self-consciousness, i think from the ingredients of my explanation below,
i can say that so that to resurrect a person that have died, you have to record, before the dying, the meanings from the human senses and there parts of the human brain that gives him self-awareness of him and brings them back with science, and of course you have to bring back with science those human senses and there parts of the human brain that gives self-consciensness as i am explaining below, and of course you have to record and bring back the knowledge and its meanings of the brain of the individual and it is how you will bring back a human individuality or personality, and of course you have to bring back the rest.


More of my philosophy about human self-awareness and awareness and more of my thoughts..

So i will start by asking a philosophical question of:

Is human self-awareness and awareness an emergence and what is it ?

So i will explain my views on this subject:


Notice that when you touch a cold water you will know about the essence
or nature of the cold water and you will also know that it is related
to senses of humans and there parts in the brain, and i think that the brain is also a sense, so i think that the senses of a human, with there brain parts of the senses, give life to ideas, it is like a "reification" of an idea, i mean that an idea is alive since it is like reified with the senses of humans, and there parts in the brain of humans, that makes you aware of time and space and matter, so this reification gives the correct meaning since you are like reifying with the human senses, and there parts in the human brain, that gives the meaning, and i say that this capacity of this kind of reification with the human senses, and there parts in the human brain, is an emergence that comes from the human biology, so i will say that the brain is a kind of calculator that calculates by using composability with the meanings that also come from this kind of reification with the human senses and there parts in the human brain, and i think that self-awareness comes from the human senses and there parts in the human brain, that makes you aware of our ideas of our thinking and of our acts, so it makes you know that you exist as an individual, and it is what gives consciousness and self-awareness, so now you are understanding that what is missing in artificial intelligence is this kind of reification with the human senses and there parts of the human brain, that render the brain much more optimal than artificial intelligence, since it makes you learn much more easier and with much less data than artificial intelligence, and i will explain more
the why of it in my next posts.

More precision about more of my philosophy about how something is created from nothing and more of my thoughts..


I think i am really highly smart, since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will ask an important philosophical question and i will answer it rapidly with my fluid intelligence, here it is:

How can we explain that the space or such things of our universe or multiverse have been created from nothing ?

So i think i am really highly smart, and i will say that for a
highly intelligent person like me, it is an easy question,
since the pattern that answers the question and that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence is that our logic or common sense is not enough to answer it with certitude(absolute certainty), and it can makes us falsely believe that something can not always exist, so it remains that there is a not negligeable possibility that things in the universe or multiverse, like space and such , can have always existed, so there is also a not negligeable possibility that the thing that we call God can have always existed and not created.

More of my philosophy about the logical proof that telekenisis and remote viewing from the brain is possible and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i will make you notice that in
the following video that proves that telekenisis and remote
viewing from the brain is possible, notice that person in the following video is capable of moving the compass needle with his brain, and
it is the proof that telekenisis is possible, and i think that
it can be scaled and made really powerful, and i think that "secret" black projects have already reverse engineered this process of telekenisis from the brain and scaled it and made it really powerful, here is the video and notice carefully:

Third Eye Spies (FULL MOVIE)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1VX_W32mNM


More of my philosophy about relativity of time and about consciousness and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115, so i say that consciousness is like a "distributed" intelligence, like in an Ant colony, from where has emerged consciousness, i say it is like how works our heart or our stomach, since our heart or our stomach is not controlled by our brain, but our heart or our stomach is like a distributed intelligence from like specializations of small atoms or such small components of matter that created the distributed intelligence that we look at as a heart, and i think it is how has emerged the distributed intelligence of our consciousness, and i think that relativity of time has emerged from a distributed intelligence from the specialization of small components of matter in the lower level layers that has made emerge relativity of time, and i think that this process of distributed intelligence also can create such processes such as telekenisis from the brain or remote viewing from the brain, and i think that even the thing that we call God can be an emergence from a distributed intelligence of the lower level layers of matter.

So i invite you to look at the following video that proves much more that telekenisis and remote viewing from the brain is possible:

Third Eye Spies (FULL MOVIE)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y1VX_W32mNM

So i think that the miracles of Jesus Christ or such can also come from such process of telekenisis and remote viewing from the brain that extraterrestrials have like reverse engineered and after that scaled and made powerful, and from the law of conservation of mass, which in France is taught as Lavoisier's Law, is paraphrased in the phrase "Rien ne se perd, rien ne se crée, tout se transforme."("Nothing is lost, nothing is created, everything is transformed."), and after this reverse engineering , so we can then reverse engineer and understand the brain and the body from the low level layer of molecules and protons and neutrons to upper level layers , so we can understand the brain and the body etc. from the low level layers to the upper level layers, so we can then be able to construct a body from the low level layers of molecules and protons and neutrons and such , and we can make a body like instantly older or younger or making my brain like instantly smarter etc. using like the same process above of telekenisis etc.

More of my philosophy about fractals and about distributed intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have just looked at the model of fractals here:

https://iternal.us/what-is-a-fractal/

And i think by looking at them, i am discovering a pattern with my fluid intelligence, and it is that they look by logical analogy like a distributed intelligence and collective intelligence, since you can
consider the small steps(like the individual intelligence of the collective intelligence) that we repeat, of the model of fractals, like
the individual ants in an Ant colony, and when you look at the final
result of a good fractal you will think that it is so sophisticated,
but i think that from looking at the small steps and there small interactions you can understand that it is an impression and that it is not so sophisticated, and the so important question is how from an intelligence, that looks like a problem, can you makes it a distributed intelligence of small parts of intelligence that makes the interactions and give the result.

More of my philosophy of the model of intelligence of a Cyborg and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have just talked about the model of distributed intelligence or collective intelligence, read it below, and now i will talk about the model of intelligence of a Cyborg, so i think i am smart and i think that the model of intelligence of a Cyborg looks also by logical analogy like the model of distributed intelligence or collective intelligence, since i think that with internet and such tools we are becoming like Cyborgs, since i think that even the data in for example internet is also a distributed intelligence that we collect so that to be creativity or innovation that can become a high intelligence, so in the distributed intelligence model of for example an Ant colony, the Ants and there knowledge that causes there actions is the specialization of intelligence of the distributed intelligence, and notice how even Elon Musk is saying it that "We’re already a cyborg,", read here so that to notice it:

Elon Musk: We’re already cyborgs

https://www.theverge.com/2016/6/2/11837854/neural-lace-cyborgs-elon-musk

More of my philosophy about the model of intelligence of an Ant colony and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as i have just said that even relativity of time in science comes from a distributed intelligence, but i think i am smart and i will explain one more important pattern so that you understand correctly, and it is that a distributed intelligence or collective intelligence of an Ant colony looks really special or amazing to us, since when you look at the individual Ants, you will not understand correctly how those primitive individual Ants can give a result of the output that is a highly intelligent collective intelligence relatively to the single parts that are the individual Ant of the Ant colony, and it looks like when we look at relativity of time and say that it is really special and really amazing, but i say that this looking really sophisticated and/or really special and/or really amazing as a collective intelligence is only an impression, since you have to understand the distributed intelligence, that is also the the systemic interactions between the individual parts that can give more than the sum of the individual parts, of all the specialized individual parts so that to understand the whole system that is relativity of time or consciousness or the collective intelligence of an Ant colony.

More of my philosophy about the the importance of randomness in
the genetic algorithm and in the evolutionary algorithms and more
of my thoughts..

More of my philosophy about the genetic algorithm and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just talked yesterday about the distributed intelligence and collective intelligence, and i invite you to read it in my below thoughts, and today i will invent more of my thoughts about the genetic algorithm, so i will ask the following philosophical question about the genetic algorithm:

Is the genetic algorithm a brute-force search and if it is
not, how is it different than the brute-force search ?

So i have just quickly took a look at some example of a minimization problem with a genetic algorithm, and i think that the genetic algorithm is not a brute-force search, since i think that when in a minimization
problem with a genetic algorithm you do a crossover, also called recombination, that is a genetic operator used to combine the genetic information of two parents to generate new offspring, the genetic algorithm has this tendency to also explore locally and we call it exploitation, and when the genetic algorithm does genetical mutations
with a level of probability, the genetic algorithm has this tendency to explore globally and we call it exploration, so i think a good genetic algorithm is the one that balance efficiently exploration and exploitation so that to avoid premature convergence, and
notice that when you explore locally and globally you can do it with
a bigger population that makes it search faster, so it is is why i think
the genetic algorithm has this kind of patterns that makes it a much better search than brute-force search. And so that to know more about this kind of artificial intelligence , i invite you to read my following thoughts in the following web link about evolutionary algorithms and artificial intelligence so that to understand more:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0

More of my philosophy about the other conditions of the genetic algorithm and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
.
I think i am highly smart, and i think that the genetic algorithm
is interesting too, but i have to speak about one other most important thing about the genetic algorithm, so i will ask a philosophical question about it:

Since as i just said previously, read it below, that a good genetic algorithm has to efficiently balance between global(exploration) and local(exploitation) search , but how can you be sure that you have found a global optimum ?

I think i am smart, and i will say that it also depends on the kind of problem, so if for example we have a minimization problem, you can
rerun a number of times the genetic algorithm so that to select the best minimum among all the results and you can also give more time to
the exploration so that to find the a better result, also you have to know that the genetic algorithm can be more elitist in the crossover steps, but i think that this kind of Elitism can has the tendency to not efficiently higher the average best of the average members of the population, so then it depends on wich problem you want to use the genetic algorithm, also i think that the genetic algorithm is
a model that explains from where comes humans, since i also think
that the genetic mutations of humans, that happens with a probability, has also not only come from the inside body from the chromosomes and genes, but they also were the result of solar storms that, as has said NASA, that may have been key to life on Earth, read here so that to notice it:

https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2016/nasa-solar-storms-may-have-been-key-to-life-on-earth

I think i am highly smart, and i will invite you to read my following
smart thoughts about evolutionary algorithms and artificial intelligence so that you notice how i am talking about the so important thing that we call "randomness":

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0


So i think i am highly smart, and notice that i am saying in the above web link the following about evolutionary algorithms:

"I think that Modern trends in solving tough optimization problems tend
to use evolutionary algorithms and nature-inspired metaheuristic
algorithms, especially those based on swarm intelligence (SI), two major
characteristics of modern metaheuristic methods are nature-inspired, and
a balance between randomness and regularity."

So i think that in the genetic algorithm, there is a part that is hard coded, like selecting the best genes, and i think that it is what
we call regularity, since it is hard coded like that, but there is
a so important thing in that genetic algorithm that we call randomness,
and i think that it is the genetic mutations that happen with a
probability and that give a kind of diversity, so i think that this
genetic mutations are really important, since i can for example
say that if the best genes are the ones that use "reason", so then reason too can make the people that has the tendency to use reason do
a thing that is against there survival, like going to war when we
feel that there is too much risk, but this going to war can make
the members or people that use reason so that to attack the other enemy
be extinct in a war when they loose a war, and it is the basis of randomness in a genetic algorithm, since even when there is a war
between for example two Ant colonies, there are some members that do not make war and that can survive if other are extinct by making war, and i say it also comes from randomness of the genetics.

More of my philosophy about student performance and about artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..


I have just read the following interesting article from McKinsey, and
i invite you to read it carefully:

Drivers of student performance: Asia insights

https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/education/our-insights/drivers-of-student-performance-asia-insights

And i think i am smart, and i think that the following factors in the above article that influence student performance are not so difficult to implement:

1- Students who receive a blend of inquiry-based and teacher-directed
instruction have the best outcomes

2- School-based technology yields the best results when placed in the
hands of teachers

3- Early childhood education has a positive impact on student scores,
but the quality and type of care is important

But i think that the factor that is tricky to implement (since it needs good smartness) is good motivation calibration that permits to score 8 to 14 percent higher on the science test than poorly calibrated one, and the high self-identified motivation that permits to score 6 to 8 percent higher.

More of my philosophy about what Americans think of Metaverse
and more of my thoughts..

Surprise! 78 percent of Americans think Metaverse is just hype

"In his keynote speech, while announcing the company name change, Zuckerberg said that 3D spaces in the metaverse will let people socialize, learn, play, and collaborate in ways we have never seen before. The company revealed one of its virtual reality worlds later in the year to all those who had access to its proprietary headsets.."

Read more here:

https://interestingengineering.com/americans-think-metaverse-is-just-hype

More of my philosophy about Zettascale and about Metaverse and more of my thoughts..

As you have just noticed, i have just posted about Zettascale or ZettaFLOP that we need so that Metaverse be possible, and as you notice the article below, with of Intel’s Raja Koduri talking, says that the architecture is possible and it will be ready around 2027 or 2030 and it is the following:

An architecture jump of 16x, power and thermals are 2x, data movement is 3x, and process is 5x. That is about 500x, on top of the two ExaFLOP Aurora system, gets to a ZettaFLOP.

Interview with Intel’s Raja Koduri: Zettascale or ZettaFLOP? Metaverse what?

Read more here:

https://www.anandtech.com/show/17298/interview-with-intels-raja-koduri-zettascale-or-zettaflop-metaverse-what


More of my philosophy about memory safety and about artificial intelligence and about productivity and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


And I have just read the following webpage about "Fearless Security: Memory safety":

https://hacks.mozilla.org/2019/01/fearless-security-memory-safety/

Here is the memory safety problems:

1- Misusing Free (use-after-free, double free)

I have solved this in Delphi and Freepascal by inventing a "Scalable" reference counting with efficient support for weak references.

You can download it from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

2- Uninitialized variables

This can be detected by the compilers of Delphi and Freepascal.

Or you can use my Null safety library for Delphi and Freepascal here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/null-safety-library-for-delphi-and-freepascal

3- Dereferencing Null pointers

I have solved this in Delphi and Freepascal by inventing a "Scalable" reference counting with efficient support for weak references.

You can download it from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

4- Buffer overflow and underflow

This has been solved in Delphi by using madExcept, read here about it:

http://help.madshi.net/DebugMm.htm

You can buy it from here:

http://www.madshi.net/

There is another way is to use my following technic that you can generalize when you copy from arrays of different types, i will
explain it to you in my next post:

About the buffer overflow problem..

I think there is also a "higher" abstraction in Delphi and Freepascal
that does the job very well of avoiding buffer overflow, and it is
the TMemoryStream class, since it behaves also like a pointer
and it supports reallocmem() and freemem() on the pointer but
with a higher level abstraction, look for example at my
following example in Delphi and Freepascal, you will notice
that contrary to pointers , that the memory stream is adapting with writebuffer() without the need of reserving the memory, and this is why it avoids the buffer overflow problem, read the following example to notice how i am using it with a PAnsichar type:

========================================


Program test;


uses system.classes,system.sysutils;


var P: PAnsiChar;


Begin


P:='Amine';


mem:=TMemorystream.create;

mem.position:=0;

mem.writebuffer(pointer(p)^,6);

mem.position:=0;

writeln(PAnsichar(mem.memory));



end.


===================================


More of my philosophy about understanding K-means Clustering in Machine Learning and more..

I have just read about The K-means clustering algorithm, and i think
it is also for grouping similar data points together and discover underlying patterns, it is why it is used in machine learning, i have just quickly understood it, so i invite you to read about it in the following interesting article:

Understanding K-means Clustering in Machine Learning

https://towardsdatascience.com/understanding-k-means-clustering-in-machine-learning-6a6e67336aa1

And to be more smart, i invite you to look in the following at how K-means Clustering algorithm is used smartly in a delivery store optimization that optimizes the process of good delivery using truck drones by using a combination of k-means to find the optimal number of launch locations and a genetic algorithm to solve the truck route as a traveling salesman problem. And here is a paper from the journal of industrial engineering and management on the subject, you have to read it carefully, since i am reading it and understanding it and i think that i will implement it soon in Delphi and Freepascal using a Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm for the Traveling Salesman Problem:

Optimization of a Truck-drone in Tandem Delivery Network
Using K-means and Genetic Algorithm

https://upcommons.upc.edu/bitstream/handle/2117/88986/1929-8707-1-pb.pdf?sequence=1&isallowed=y


More of my philosophy about how to boost productivity with artificial intelligence and more..

You can boost productivity with artificial intelligence by:

1- More accurate demand forecasting using AI and machine learning
2- Predictive maintenance
3- Hyper-personalized manufacturing
4- Optimizing manufacturing processes
5- Automated material procurement

Read more here about those 5 ways artificial intelligence can boost productivity:

https://www.industryweek.com/technology-and-iiot/article/22025683/5-ways-artificial-intelligence-can-boost-productivity

And i think that it is AI(artificial intelligence) that could increase much more the economic growth rates in western countries by changing the nature of work and creating a new relationship between man and machine. The impact of AI technologies on business can increase much more labor productivity and enable people to make more efficient use of their time, but the most important thing is that Digital and AI literacy is of utmost importance to help countries businesses scale and compete internationally. Investing in widespread digital and AI literacy for the entire population will increase domestic demand for technology and technology jobs. A technologically literate population will create more data, which fuels AI and thus the data-driven economy as a whole. It is also necessary for workers to be able to upskill and re-skill in order to remain productive and competitive in an automated workforce. Countries businesses that adopt AI technology will save from lower production costs, have increased output, and be able to invest more. Increased revenue from this domestic demand, and with a global reputation for responsible AI, will help countries businesses scale globally and compete on the international level.

And read the two following web links so that to understand more what i am saying:

"Compelling data reveal a discouraging truth about growth today. There
has been a marked decline in the ability of traditional levers of
production capital investment and labor to propel economic growth."

And it it says the following:

"Accenture research on the impact of AI in 12 developed economies
reveals that AI could double annual economic growth rates in 2035 by
changing the nature of work and creating a new relationship between man
and machine. The impact of AI technologies on business is projected to
increase labor productivity by up to 40 percent and enable people to
make more efficient use of their time."

Read more here so that to notice it:

https://www.accenture.com/ca-en/insight-artificial-intelligence-future-growth-canada

And McKinsey estimates that AI(Artificial intelligence) may deliver an
additional economic output of around US$13 trillion by 2030, increasing
global GDP by about 1.2 % annually. This will mainly come from
substitution of labour by automation and increased innovation in
products and services.

Read more here:

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/637967/EPRS_BRI(2019)637967_EN.pdf

More of my philosophy about specialization and about efficiency and productivity..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


The previous CEO Larry Culp of General Electric and the architect of a strategy that represented a new turning point in the world corporate strategies, Larry Culp's strategy was to divide the company according to its activities. Something like we are better of alone, seperately and
focused on each one's own activity, than together in a large
conglomerate. And it is a move from integration to specialization.
You see it is thought that a company always gains economies of scale
as it grows, but this is not necessarily the case, since as the company
gains in size - especially if it engages in many activities - it
also generates its own bureaucracy, with all that entails in term
of cost and efficiency. And not only that, it is also often the case
that by bringing together very different activities, strategic focus is lost and decision-making is diluted, so that in the end no one ends up
taking responsability, it doesn't always happen, but this reasons are
basically what is driving this increasing specialization. So i invite to look at the following video so that to understand more about it:

The decline of industrial icon of the US - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hqwYxFCY-k


And here is my previous thoughts about specialization and productivity so that to understand much more:

More about the Japanese Ikigai and about productivity and more of my thoughts..

Read the following interesting article about Japanese Ikigai:

The More People With Purpose, the Better the World Will Be

https://singularityhub.com/2018/06/15/the-more-people-with-purpose-the-better-the-world-will-be/

I think i am highly smart, so i say that the Japanese Ikigai is like a Japanese philosophy that is like the right combination or "balance" of passion, vocation, and mission, and Ikigai and MTP, as concepts, urge us to align our passions with a mission to better the world, but i think that Japanese Ikiai is a also smart since it gets the "passion" from the "mission", since the mission is also the engine, so you have to align the passion with the mission of the country or the global world so that to be efficient, and Japanese Ikigai is also smart since so that to higher productivity and be efficient, you have to "specialize" in doing a job, but so that to higher more productivity and be more efficient you can also specialize in what you do "better", and it is what is doing Japanese Ikigai, since i think that in Japanese Ikigai, being the passion permits to make you specialized in a job in what you do better, and here is what i have just smartly said about productivity:

I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will now talk about another important idea of Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and it is about "specialization" in an economic system, since i say that in an economic system we have to be specialized in doing a job so that to be efficient and productive, but not only that, but we have to specialize in doing a job in what we do better so that to be even more efficient and productive, and we have to minimize at best the idle time or the wasting of time doing a job, since i can also say that this average idle time or wasting time of the workers working in parallel can be converted to a contention like in parallel programming, so you have to minimize it at best, and you have to minimize at best the coherency like in parallel programming so that to scale much better, and of course all this can create an economy of scale, and also i invite you to read my following smart and interesting thoughts about scalability of productivity:

I will talk about following thoughts from the following PhD computer scientist:

https://lemire.me/blog/about-me/

Read more carefully here his thoughts about productivity:

https://lemire.me/blog/2012/10/15/you-cannot-scale-creativity/

And i think he is making a mistake in his above webpage about productivity:

Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input

But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger that the Serial productivity part, so it can scale much more (it is like Gustafson's Law).

And it looks like the following:

About parallelism and about Gustafson’s Law..

Gustafson’s Law:

• If you increase the amount of work done by each parallel
task then the serial component will not dominate
• Increase the problem size to maintain scaling
• Can do this by adding extra complexity or increasing the overall
problem size

Scaling is important, as the more a code scales the larger a machine it
can take advantage of:

• can consider weak and strong scaling
• in practice, overheads limit the scalability of real parallel programs
• Amdahl’s law models these in terms of serial and parallel fractions
• larger problems generally scale better: Gustafson’s law


Load balance is also a crucial factor.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.