More of my philosophy about selfishness or egoism and more of my thoughts..

[Amine Moulay Ramdane]

Hello,



More of my philosophy about selfishness or egoism and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will ask an important philosophical question:


Are humans individually selfish or egoistic ?


I think i am highly smart, and i think that we have to be optimistic,
since Liberty engenders responsability as i am explaining it below, and responsability also causes individual human selfishness or egoism to also become human selfishness or egoism of society and a zone like European union, so then it also becomes solidarity and collaboration inside such zone or society, and i think that it is the same process that can happen around the world, so i think that humans are not individually selfish or egoistic since they are constrained in a such way. So then i can logically infer from it and from my thoughts below that humans are not animals and are not individually egoistic or selfish , so then we have to be optimistic about humans.

More of my philosophy about are humans like animals and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask a philosophical question of:

Are humans like animals ?

So i think i am highly smart, and i think that humans understand that
Liberty is not being free, since so that to be Liberty of your
today and of your tomorrow or future, you have to be the right responsability, since Liberty is not only Liberty of your today, but it is also that you have to ensure to be Liberty of your tomorrow or your future, and this being responsability of humans is a much more sophisticated responsability than that of animals, and it is the basis of why humans are not animals, since humans are also pushed forward by this engine of responsability so that to be Liberty or so that to be Love, and of course there is not only this kind of engine , but there is also the engines of human laws that are enforced by the police and the army so that to be Liberty, but as you notice that we have not to be pessimistic, since as you notice that humans are not animals since they have to be organized in much more sophisticated manner than animals so that to be this Liberty, so i think that i can logically infer that you have not just to compare the genetics of humans and that of monkeys and for example say that researchers sequenced the chimp genome and have known that humans share about 99% of our DNA with chimpanzees, making them our closest living relatives, but you have to understand that the 1% difference in genetics of humans, compared to chimp genome, has made humans much more perfect than chimpanzees or animals, and you can for example look at how animals and humans are organized, and notice again that this kind of organization of humans is "much" more sophisticated than animals, so then i can finally logically infer that humans are not animals , and you can also easily notice it by reading my following thoughts of my philosophy and noticing how it is much more sophisticated, and of course you have to know that i have invented quickly all my thoughts of my philosophy below:

More of my philosophy about the human desires and about capitalism and about morality and about more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will ask a philosophical question of:

Are we enslaved by our human desires and is capitalism just
exploiting those human desires so that to sell products and services ?


So i think i am highly smart, and i say that there must be engines
that push us forward by advancing efficiently humans, and i think that those engines are also our human desires, since without the human desires there is no capitalism etc., and it is also the fact that capitalism rewards merit, since also the capitalist believes that wealth in the hands of bright, successful, hard-working people (entrepreneurs) will be the incentive to produce newer and better products and services because of the expectation of the monetary rewards from which they will benefit, but not only that, but i think that so that to be efficient, we have also to not only specialize in a job, but we have to be more efficient by specializing in a job in what we do better, and we have to have good coaches(the ones that instructs and trains) that make us play the game of life smartly and efficiently not only as an individual, but also as a society or a world, so then to specialize in what you do better is not sufficient, since you have to also have a level of efficient political consciousness and philosophical consciousness, and it is why i am coming to you with my new philosophy, so i invite you to read it carefully in my following thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche and about morality and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i am discovering some patterns in the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche that shows that it is lacking smartness, and here they are: In the Friedrich Nietzsche's philosophy, Nietzsche’s Superman, also known as the Ubermensch, is the embodiment of the noble way of life, and to be noble is to possess outstanding qualities, so i think for Friedrich Nietzsche we have to live in the way of the being noble, that means we have to perfect more and more our beings so that to become noble, so i think that there are noble humans and there are noble things, so i think that Friedrich Nietzsche also wants the "master" that is the noble to create value, but there is a lack of smartness in the "abstraction" of Friedrich Nietzsche, since the being noble is vague, and the being noble can be the possessing of outstanding qualities , but the not being wise, so i think that it shows that Friedrich Nietzsche is lacking smartness, and it looks like the following saying of Hitler that is lacking smartness, since the stronger can be the not wise or the not smart, so read it again:

More of my philosophy about white supremacism and about Hitler and about neo-nazism and more of my thoughts..

I have just looked at the quotes of Hitler here:

https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/30691.Adolf_Hitler

So then i think i am highly smart and notice the following saying of Hitler:

“The stronger must dominate and not mate with the weaker, which would signify the sacrifice of its own higher nature. Only the born weakling can look upon this principle as cruel, and if he does so it is merely because he is of a feebler nature and narrower mind; for if such a law did not direct the process of evolution then the higher development of organic life would not be conceivable at all.”
― Adolf Hitler

Read the saying of Hitler here so that to notice:

https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/30691.Adolf_Hitler

I think i am highly smart and i say that Hitler is not at all smart in his above saying, since we have first to define what is "stronger" , so for example the stronger can be the not smarter and/or not the wiser, since you can be the stronger by having the most powerful military or the most stronger will to fight without being the smarter and wiser and this can cause that you win the competition or the fight, so when Hitler says in the above saying: "the stronger must dominate", i think from my explanation above that it is stupid to say so, since also the being stronger can also also be the not the being the smarter and wiser . And i also think this strictness of Hitler is not correct, since he was not understanding the disadvantage of when the genetic algorithm can be more elitist in the crossover steps, since this kind of Elitism in a genetic algorithm can has the tendency to not efficiently higher the average best of the average members of the population, and you can read more about my below thoughts of the following web links about the genetic algorithm.

Also Hitler says the following:

“Humanitarianism is the expression of stupidity and cowardice.”
― Adolf Hitler

So i think that this strictness of Hitler is not correct,
since we need a level of humanitarianism that also soften morals
and that makes us less violent.


So i think that Hitler is too much strict and too much violent.

So i invite you to read carefully my following thoughts of my philosophy so that to understand my views:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/FcCeH_UqGoU


More of my philosophy about the Law of Accelerating Returns and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, i think that humans have not to make wars, since i think that most humans are not understanding the exponential progress of our humanity, so i invite you to read carefully the following very interesting article about the Law of Accelerating Returns from Ray Kurzweil ( You can read about him here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Kurzweil ) so that to understand correctly how humanity will become so much powerful really "soon":

https://www.kurzweilai.net/the-law-of-accelerating-returns


And i invite you to look at the following very interesting video about
the Exponential Progress of humanity so that you understand correctly:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ


And look in the following interesting article about how AI will create millions more Jobs than it Will destroy:

https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/


More of my philosophy about the essence of things and about philosophy and more of my thoughts..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask the following interesting
philosophical question:

What is the smart logical analogy between beauty and relativism ?


I think it is a really smart question, since i think that the problematic is that beauty is systemic, and measuring the meaning of life is also a systemic thing, so you can measure the meaning of human life relatively to a greater meaning, and you can also lack in the meaning , so i think it is also the basis of relativism, and it looks by logical analogy "somewhat" like a mathematical theory or such theory that has a stronger or less stronger basis, so then i think that beauty has like the same problem as relativism, since we can ask if beauty is universal, but i think the first question is to ask if beauty exists in our today world ? so the answer to this question depends on the point of view, i mean if you are individualistic , you will look at beauty not from a systemic point of view, but if you are objective you will look at it from a systemic point of view, so as you are noticing that it is a "delicate" subject in philosophy, but as you have just noticed that i have just said, read it below, that we have not to be pessimistic, since humans have the tendency to looking at the higher levels view of beauty that looks like beauty and take pleasure of it without worrying too much about the systemic way of looking at the lower layers of the details of beauty, i don't mean that they are idiots, but i mean that we also have, we humans, a capacity of forgetting and not worrying that permit us to be happy, and the same can be applied to other pleasures of life, so then we have to be optimistic about happiness, other than that i think that beauty is universal, since it is the highly smart that has
to measure it, not the diversity of humans that are not apt to measure it correctly, and i think that this process is part of a sane morality,
so as you are noticing that the way to solve this problematic, of the does beauty exists, looks like relativism, since i also think that relativism is relativism since we are like lacking the meaning, i mean that when you are for example suffering, you are like lacking the meaning, so, so that to survive or so that to be happy , you have to compare yourself with others that are suffering much more than you or/and you compare with your near future that can be much better that your today since humanity is progressing in an exponential way as i am explaining it below, so i say that you have to notice smartly that the process here is not simply relativism, but this process of comparing this way has to create an important value for you so that it works, since relativism can also destroy the meaning, and it is what i am explaining in my below thoughts.

More of my philosophy about the meaning of human life and more of my thoughts..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask a philosophical question of:

From where comes the meaning of human life ?


I think i am highly smart, and i say that you can by being relativism in
philosophy says that human life has no meaning, so relativism in philosophy in its essence has a problem, but i think that the smart way of constructing a meaning of human life, is also to be the pragmatic way by giving weights of importance to things, it is like "prioritizing" by giving weights of importance so that to be successful, i mean look at human life, it is much better than the old human life, so this way of looking at it permits to give a weight of importance , and also the other way is also to say that humanity is in fact progressing in an exponential way, so we are progressing so rapidly, and this way also of looking at it gives a great weight of importance and those two ways
of looking at human life gives optimism, so i think it is the way to construct a meaning of human life, and this way of constructing a meaning of human life looks like my answer below about the can we be enlightned or not, so as you are noticing that the pragmatic way of my answer below proceeds by giving weights of importance so that also enforce the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world. And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ


And look in the following interesting article about how AI will create millions more Jobs than it Will destroy:

https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/


So i think we have to be optimistic about this exponential progress of our humanity.


More of my philosophy about enlightenment and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will invite you to look at
the following video of the indian philosophy that is making a big mistake:

The Bizarre Life Of An Enlightened Person

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzmGkRF2ggU


So i am discovering in the above video patterns with my fluid intelligence that say to me that the above video of the indian philosophy is making a big mistake, since the above video of the indian philosophy is saying that you can not be enlightned, but it is "relativism" in philosophy that is not acceptable as morality, since also with this relativism we can also say that the smart humans among us are not smart humans, and this relativism brings an advantage of the being humbleness , but it also brings a disadvantage of being arrogance, so it is by logical analogy like the we can not say that you have know how to use relativism like you have to know how to use a knife, since the normal distribution says that a not negligible percentage of humans are genetically violent, it is why i think that so that to be the right safety, we have to be the pragmatic way that also enforces the necessary "hierarchy" of humans so that to be the necessary order in society or in the world, so we have to for example say that the "highly smart" humans among us are the most important humans, since also they are like the most important engine that we have, since we can easily notice that without the highly smart humans, humanity becomes inferior like inferior animals, and it is why i have just said the following:


More of my philosophy about the wise man and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i will ask a philosophical question of:

Does the wise man exists and why have we to Love the wise man ?


I think it is a really smart question in philosophy, and i think
it follows a distribution of the more and less wise like the distribution of genetical smartness, and i think that so that to be pragmatic we have to say that the most wise among us is the wise, so then we can logically infer that the wise man does exist in a pragmatic way, so then the second question above of why do we have to Love the wise man ? i think that the wise man has to be loved for his "respectability", since he is like a good professional, so the being wise is about good professionalism, so the good professionalism of a wise man or men is a positive energy and a positive spirit, and now read my below explanation of my new proverb so that you understand how it is smart:



More of my philosophy about my philosophy and more of my thoughts..


I think we have not to be pessimistic about the how to be happy,
since i think that humans have also the tendency to know how to take pleasure of beauty (or other pleasures of life) from like the high level layers and not get into the lower level layers into the details and see that beauty is systemic and see that beauty is in fact not like beauty, so then you have to understand the wisdom of my new proverb below that also makes you understand that the wise way to do is also really important so to also be the right safety, other than that i have talked about the genealogy and the essence of morality and i have also come with another new philosophy , but notice that the wisdom of my new philosophy permits to make people positive and optimistic and responsable, also notice in my philosophy how i am showing you how to take care of the how in a governance you have to be this good balance between performance and stability, so read my following thoughts of my philosophy in the following web link so that to understand my views on different subjects:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/FcCeH_UqGoU


More of my philosophy about high inflation and more of my thoughts..


Supply chain disruption is a major factor driving prices higher around the globe, as demand for goods such as cars, oil and computer chips have outpaced supplies, but i think we have to be optimistic since i think that the problematic of higher gas and oil prices will be solved quickly, since fears that tightening Western sanctions on Russia would drastically reduce global oil inventories have proved overblown since Moscow succeeded in replacing European markets with sales to China, India and South America,
so i think we have to be much more optimistic since i think inflation will go down substantially, so what remains is the chips shortage and the Covid-19 problematic, but i think that the Chips shortage will not last long, since some experts and auto companies predict that the global chip shortage could ease by the second half of 2022 or so, so then we have to be optimistic since i think that high inflation will not last long and will soon go down substantially.


More of my philosophy about the wise man and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i will ask a philosophical question of:

Does the wise man exists and why have we to Love the wise man ?


I think it is a really smart question in philosophy, and i think
it follows a distribution of the more and less wise like the distribution of genetical smartness, and i think that so that to be pragmatic we have to say that the most wise among us is the wise, so then we can logically infer that the wise man does exist in a pragmatic way, so then the second question above of why do we have to Love the wise man ? i think that the wise man has to be loved for his "respectability", since he is like a good professional, so the being wise is about good professionalism, so the good professionalism of a wise man or men is a positive energy and a positive spirit, and now read my below explanation of my new proverb so that you understand how it is smart:

More of my explanation of my new proverb and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i will ask a philosophical question
so that you understand my new proverb below:


But do we have to fear the wise man ?


I think it is about the positive spirit, so i say that the wise man has
to minimize at best the dangers and to maximize at best the opportunities, so then i say that notice carefully that it has to be an "effort", so i think it brings a positive energy or positive spirit, and now i think that you are understanding my new proverb below, since notice carefully that it says:

"...Since also beauty for a wise man is not just the present beauty, but it is what you wisely make a future beauty."

And i think that when you are wise , this process of making wisely a future beauty is beautiful, since the becoming wise is like a positive spirit or positive energy that brings beauty and makes you happy as i am explaining above, so then reread my new proverb and you can read all my thoughts of my philosophy below:


More of my philosophy about my new proverb and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and here is my new proverb that i have invented quickly:

"When you look at our reality, there is also like many layers
of how to look at beauty, so you can look at beauty from the high level layer of the looking or the appearance of beauty and say that it is beauty, but you can get into the lower level layers into more details and notice that beauty is not like beauty, so then it shows the importance of the power of abstraction, since i say that you have to look at beauty from the power of abstraction of a wise man point of view so that to be happy, since also beauty for a wise man is not just the present beauty, but it is what you wisely make a future beauty, since i think that when you become wise you become much more happy and you know how to be patience and how to be happy."

And i invite you to read all my other proverbs that i have invented quickly in the below web links.


More of my philosophy about the english language in Morocco and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will talk about the english
language in Morocco, so as i have just said from the paper below, that Foreign direct investment has a "significant" and positive impact on economic growth in Morocco, but we can notice that so that to be efficient, Morocco has to master much more the languages of english, and french and arabic, as i think i am mastering them much more, since notice how i am inventing quickly, and with ease, my poems in both english and french, and notice how i am inventing quickly my thoughts of my philosophy, and this proves that i master much more english and french, so, so that to understand more what is happening with the english and french languages in Morocco, i invite you to read the following interesting article:

Morocco: Will English replace French as the new primary official language?

Read more here:

https://www.theafricareport.com/142297/morocco-will-english-replace-french-as-the-new-primary-official-language/

And so that to notice the how i have mastered the english language, here is one of my new poem about the english language:

More of my philosophy about the english language and more..

As i have just said in my new poem below, that the english language
is easy, and here is more proof of it, read the following so
that to notice it:

Why is English Easy to Learn?

https://live-english.net/english-easy-learn/


Here is my new poem:


English is not like the yiddish

Since english is so "easy" but not like the boyish

Since it is not a Darwinian language but a kind of embellish

And i say it with sincerity even if i am not the british

English is not like the yiddish

Since it permits to transcend and to accomplish

And not to stay lonely and as just a simple dervish

English is not like the yiddish

So i am the beautiful white arab and not the Turkish

And i am swimming using the beautiful english so that to not perish

And it is why English is not for me like the yiddish

And my beautiful way is not like smoking the hashish

--

And read my following poems that i have invented quickly:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/5_zx3gFY50Q


More of my philosophy about economy and about Morocco and more of my thoughts..

Here is more proof of what i have just said previously about Foreign direct investment in Morocco, read it below, so read the following paper, from International journal of accounting , finance, auditing , management & economics, that says the following about Morocco:


"Indeed, we have shown from the econometric model representing the simultaneous equations that FDI(Foreign direct investment) has a significant and positive impact on economic growth for the case of Morocco during the period 1970-2019."

And it says the following about Morocco:

"The results of our empirical study show that the first hypothesis is confirmed. Thus, we conclude that “Foreign direct investment is a determining factor of economic growth”. Indeed, our empirical results show FDI directly impact economic growth."

Read more here on the following paper:

https://www.ijafame.org/index.php/ijafame/article/view/505/473


More of my philosophy about Morocco and about Foreign direct investments and more of my thoughts..

I have just looked at the following interesting video of the new Morocco’s inspiring Minister of the Economy, Nadia Fettah Alaoui, so i invite you to look at it (and the video is in french language):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaeJZ1stQbw


Also i invite you to read the following english article about Morocco’s inspiring Minister of the Economy, Nadia Fettah Alaoui:

Nadia Fettah Alaoui, Leading the Moroccan Economy

https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2022/03/347594/nadia-fettah-alaoui-leading-the-moroccan-economy


And notice carefully that it says the following about Morocco:

"Under Fettah’s leadership, the Ministry has introduced a number of key initiatives and policies that focus on rapidly growing foreign direct investment (FDI) in Morocco. Since then, the country has attracted the attention of international investors through noteworthy domestic investment brands such as Morocco Now and Morocco Tech."


So i think that that growing foreign direct investment (FDI) in Morocco
is important for Morocco, and read what i have said about
it in my previous thoughts here:


More of my philosophy about economic growth and about economy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and i say that we have not to simplify too much the Macroeconomic model , so we have to take into account the most important factors, so i think that the economic growth is provided by attraction of the investments, and by the labour resources, also by the scientific and technical progress that promotes the efficiency growth of all resources, it is why i think that Morocco my country has to much more efficiently attract Foreign Direct Investments that is so important for economic growth, not only that, but Morocco has to higher productivity by also providing a good education for its people, but i think that Morocco has a young and relatively well-trained population and a relatively low labour cost, so i think that the best way for Morocco is to attract Foreign Direct Investments that enhance quality and productivity and Morocco has to higher much more productivity, but so that to attract much more efficiently Foreign Direct Investments, i think Morocco has also to also enlarge its market by being high economic "integration" with the other Maghrebis or Maghrebians countries such as Algeria and Tunisia etc. and it has also to easy more the administrative burdens that slow down business activities, and i also think that Morocco's debt-to-GDP is not so bad, other than that i think we can be optimistic about capitalism since capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital.

More of my philosophy about the GDP per capita and about properity and more of my thoughts..

The ideal GDP growth rate is between 2% and 3%, and we know that economic growth is measured as the annual percent change of gross domestic product (GDP), so notice in the following graphical chart
that Rwanda has highered much more economic growth by attracting Foreign direct investments, and notice in the following chart how the net inflow in percentage of GDP between years 2010 and 2020 was very good:

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=RW

So i think that the economic miracle of Rwanda comes mainly from Foreign direct investments.

So as you notice that highering much more economic growth by Foreign direct investments is the best way for Morocco too, and i think that
Morocco can be much more successful than Rwanda since Morocco has also a strategic location, between Europe and sub-Saharan Africa and notice that so that to attract much more efficiently Foreign Direct Investments, you have also to ensure good governance, which includes accountability, transparency and efficiency in deploying scarce resources to key sectors of the national economy.


More of my philosophy about economic growth and more of my thoughts..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i have just discovered a pattern
with my fluid intelligence by looking at the following interesting
video:

How can IRELAND be the RICHEST country in EUROPE? - VisualPolitik EN


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jaCitFjYND0



So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i think the important pattern
that i am discovering with my fluid intelligence in the above video,
is that Ireland has also experiences a high economic growth of 26% by mainly using Foreign direct investments, so i think that the pattern is that Ireland has "rapidly" become a rich country mainly by using Foreign direct investments since it has a "small" population as Rwanda or Israel, and this way of doing of becoming rapidly rich by using foreign direct investments has been applied to Rwanda and Israel and it has been successful, but i think it can not be applied with such success to China or to Russia or India that have a "big" population, so i think that for example China has to develop much more its internal consumption in its internal economic market so that to be much more successful and its internal economic market has to be diversified correctly so that to be resilient. And read my following thoughts about Rwanda so that to notice that Rwanda is following the same way of becoming rapidly rich by the way of Foreign direct investments since it has a small population as Israel and as Ireland(And Israel has done the same):

More of my philosophy about the GDP per capita and about properity and more of my thoughts..

The ideal GDP growth rate is between 2% and 3%, and we know that economic growth is measured as the annual percent change of gross domestic product (GDP), so notice in the following graphical chart
that Rwanda has highered much more economic growth by attracting Foreign direct investments, and notice in the following chart how the net inflow in percentage of GDP between years 2010 and 2020 was very good:

https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/BX.KLT.DINV.WD.GD.ZS?locations=RW



So i think that the economic miracle of Rwanda comes mainly from Foreign direct investments.


More of my precision of more of my philosophy about the most important thing in philosophy and more of my thoughts..



I have to use for example the past perfect of the verb "fall" in my below thoughts, so here is my corrections and more of my precision, so read again:



So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask the following important
question in philosophy:

What is the most important thing in philosophy ?


I think that the most important thing in philosophy is the basis principle in philosophy that you have to know how to stand up so that to make morality stand up correctly , even if you are rich, and i think that this first so important principle is the basis principle of an organization or institution like the USA army. I mean that for example the hippies mindset had been that the hippies had fallen rapidly, without the being the right resistance, in being too much liberty that has not made there morality stand up correctly, so then you have to know how to "resist" and make stand up morality and not rapidly fall into immorality by looking at the human reality and saying that life is not worth it, and i think it is the basis first principle of philosophy.


And i invite you to look at the following video that shows how HIGH Value Men follows this first principle that i am talking about above:

How HIGH Value Men COMMAND Respect

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J7aBfDnqF40

More of my philosophy about Love and more of my thoughts..

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will ask a philosophical question of:

What is really Love ?


So i have to discover the patterns with my fluid intelligence that
answers the question, so here they are:


So i think that so that to answer the question correctly, i have to discover the first pattern with my fluid intelligence and that is that
there is like the exception of the rule of like saying that Love has
to be just Love without preconditions, but this way of answering is
a naive and not pragmatic and immature way of answering, so i have to
say that Love is like you have to know how to "drive" so that to be Love, so for example Love can not be instability or lack of adaptation that make Love fails, so then Love requires from you to "adapt" correctly, so then you have to know how to make Love last long, and here again you are noticing that i am also saying that Love can be also a positive spirit and enough wisdom that permits Love to last long, but here again i can say that we have to not be extremist, since Love can be not an extremist Love and can be like a basis of enough trust between humans and enough Love that makes Love last long, and this enough trust is also that you have also to, as i am saying it in my below new poems, know how to abstain and how to entertain and how to be a beautiful political campaign, so it is why you have to notice carefully how i have invented quickly my thoughts of my philosophy and political philosophy, and read them below, and it is why i have quickly invented my poems so that to show how i am a gentleman type of person and how i look
like the sophistication of my poems, and of course notice how i am
repeating that i am highly smart, but it is not arrogance that i repeat
it this way, since also the highly genetically smart can be just of 115 IQ, so read my following poems that i have invented quickly so that to know my kind of personality:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/5_zx3gFY50Q


More of my philosophy about americanism and more of my thoughts..



I think i am highly smart and will ask a philosophical question of :


What is the best way of being americanism ?

So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i have to discover the patterns with
my fluid intelligence that answers the question, and here they are:


So i think that the best way of being americanism is to ask the how to be unified as people of USA ? so then i can logically infer the question of: Is the how to be unified as people of USA is the to be unified at 100% ? so i think that what unifies people is the good values, but what kind of good values are the most important ? so i think that the being a kind of decency that avoids too much extremism is an important value, since even in politics we have such political parties such as the republicans or democrats that can not be considered as too much extremists, since the ones that have to be considered too much extremists are the far-right political parties and such extremist groups, and you are noticing that i am using the abstraction by saying to be: "A kind of decency", since i think this level of abstraction permits to much better understand the way of the not to be too much political extremism or extremism, and i think that you have to be this kind of decency in your day to day life so that to construct also a kind of collective imaginary that is worth it and that brings a kind of level of trust that unifies much better the people of USA, so i think that a kind of decency that we also feel like an enough decency is the most important thing that unifies the people. Also notice in my below thoughts how i am solving the problem of Loneliness by talking about the engines of the positive spirit and of the enough wisdom that brings the enough trust that unifies people and make them much less lonely, so i invite you to reread again my following thoughts of my philosophy:


More of my philosophy about the solitude and loneliness and more of my thoughts..


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will talk about a very important subject, and it is about loneliness , so i invite you to look
at the following video:

Fuis la solitude ! | Streetphilosophy | ARTE

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nM4a0J1HSjM



So i think i have to discover the patterns with my fluid intelligence
so that to solve the problem of Loneliness, so i think that you
can feel that you are alone even if you are married or even if you are
talking to people in a society or even if you are meeting and talking to your best friends, since i think that you have to look at the essence of loneliness, since i think that it is systemic, since i think that so that to feel not lonely, there must be a kind of positive spirit and there must be enough wisdom, and the positive spirit can be like the "Yes we can !" of president Obama, that means also that we have to know how to not show our weaknesses in front of others and stay positive by behaving like of the "Yes we can !" of president Obama, also i think that the being wise or being enough wise permit to attain a level of sophistication that permit us adapt much more efficiently , since a good adaptation also makes us much less lonely since it brings a positive energy. So the key also to being much less lonely is to be a good adaptation. And it is why i am being my kind of a level of adaptation by talking to you as i am talking about my philosophy and it is why i am being a positive spirit by inventing quickly my
following poems, so look for example to my following new poem that
abstract much more correctly the way of my positive spirit with my kind
of sophistication too:


Here is my new poem in english, and read all my below poems in english and french:

Voici mon nouveau poème en anglais, et lisez aussi mes
autres poèmes ci-bas en anglais et en français:

---

So it is as i have no problem and no pain

Since it is my being a positive spirit that is my way of being sane

Since it is as the i am the beautiful of Spain

And it is as we want to look at the beautiful again and again

So i have to efficiently know how to abstain

So i have even to know how to beautifully entertain

And i have even to be like a beautiful political campaign

So then i have not to be a birdbrain

And i have like to know how to avoid the risk of a hurricane

Since how do you think you can break the evil chains ?

So as you notice that it is not just about the capital gain !

But my way is to be a smart and a beautiful brain !

---

And read my following poems that i have invented quickly:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/5_zx3gFY50Q


More of my philosophy about egoism and about the philosopher and economist Adam Smith and more of my thoughts...

So i think i am highly smart, and now i will talk about a so important
subject, so i invite you to look at the following video:

What It's Like To Be A Billionaire In Monaco

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSVFxe-Sbb0


So I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i think when i look at the above
video , i have to discover the important patterns with my fluid intelligence, so i think the important patterns that i am discovering are the following:

So in the above video, they are talking about the being rich, so
i have just talked about the being rich in capitalism, and i have also said that the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, the father of economic Liberalism, has said the following important saying: "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations", but i think i am smart and i think i am understanding this smart saying of Adam Smith, since humans are naturally selfish and read the study here that proves it: https://thebaynet.com/humans-are-naturally-selfish-study-finds-html/ , but this naturally selfish of humans is regulated by egoism too, i mean that self-interest of a group regulates the individual self-interest, so it is egoism of a group such as European Union or such that regulates the egoism of an individual so that to become collaboration and solidarity between humans, and it is also individual self-interest that is egoism that also says that we have for example to take care of the world or environment, and also i can say that so that to be wise, we have to smartly notice that so that to be correctly those self-interests we have to be the enough wise as i am
saying it in my below thoughts, and of course i have also said the following about the being rich in capitalism:

I think i am highly smart and i say that in capitalism, overtaxing and imposing excess regulations is not good, since capitalism rewards merit, so overtaxing can hurt capitalism and can kill the spirit of innovation, and of course the government can and should play a role in our capitalist system by using and enforcing antitrust laws and by clamping down on fraud and the exploitation of labor, so i can then say that the capitalist believes that wealth in the hands of bright, successful, hard-working people (entrepreneurs) will be the incentive to produce newer and better products and services because of the expectation of the monetary rewards from which they will benefit, and i have just said the following about it:

Now i will talk about a so important thing about the: Does capitalism really drive innovation? so i invite you to look at the following video about it:

Does Capitalism Really Drive Innovation?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNhdKpTGfAU


I think i am highly smart and I have just looked at the above video and i am noticing that it is making a big mistake, since i think that the public investment has the tendency to be efficient, where capitalism is
not efficient, for the long-term research and development, but the private sector of capitalism has the tendency to invest on projects promising commercial advantages in the short-to-medium term, and this investing on the short-to-medium term of capitalism is also good, so then i can say that capitalism is good for an "optimal" efficiency.

More of my philosophy about personal responsability and about responsability and more of my thoughts..


I have just looked again at the following video, so i invite you
to look at it carefully:

The Invention of Individual Responsibility

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tp4FGAv2gks


I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, so i say that the above video is saying that humans have to be fully responsable about themselves, but i don't agree , since personal responsability doesn't come just from the inside factors of a human, but it also come from outside factors of a human, but here again what have we to do about it in political philosophy ? so i think that the most important thing is that we have also to give humans the necessary tools so that to be personal responsability, but here again we have to know in political philosophy about wich tools to give to humans so that they be personal responsability , so i think that my way of doing , is also to make humans enough "wise", since the being wise is also knowing how to use the tool, and i think that the tool can also symbolically mean the will to fight, since the being enough wise can make the will to fight stronger, and does the how to use wisely the tool can mean the how to use wisely the tool of smartness ? no, since i think wisdom is part of smartness, since wisdom is the quality of having experience, knowledge, and good judgment, so then having the good judgment is also being genetically apt at being a wise type of person, so i think that being a wise type of person is both genetical and cultural, so i think we have to be precise and say that wisdom that is a smartness has to guide the rest of smartness of a human. And it is why i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy that i have invented quickly, since there goal is also the make humans enough wise, so read my following thoughts of my philosophy carefully in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/FcCeH_UqGoU


And read my following poems that i have invented quickly:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/5_zx3gFY50Q



More of my philosophy about meritocracy and about objectivity and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have just said , read in my below thoughts, that CNN lacks objectivity, but here is more proof about it:

The new CNN is more opinionated and emotional. Can it still be ‘the most trusted name in news’?

Read more here:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/media/cnn-opinionated-emotional-zucker/2021/05/11/5f32eb38-7f92-11eb-81db-b02f0398f49a_story.html



Also i have just looked at the following video about meritocracy
in USA:

Is Meritocracy a Sham? | Amanpour and Company

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLEvJUNfyBY


I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i think that in the above video the main problematic is the one that i am talking about in my following thoughts that answers the neo-nazis of national vanguard about Capitalism that permits inheritance, so read my following thoughts carefully:


I have just read again the following article from a white supremacist website called National Vanguard:


Why Capitalism Fails


https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/


And i am not in accordance with the white supremacist views about capitalism on the above webpage, since they are too much pessimistic about capitalism, since i say that we have to be optimistic about capitalism since capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, also i am talking below about Progressive Capitalism that explains how to reform capitalism so that to be efficient, and i am not in accordance with the above white supremacist view about the welfare since i think it is too much strict, since i think we need a level of welfare and here is how i am explaining it:

And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic
contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and
Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social
Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.

More of my philosophy about white supremacism and about Hitler and about neo-nazism and more of my thoughts..

I have just looked at the quotes of Hitler here:

https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/30691.Adolf_Hitler

So then i think i am highly smart and notice the following saying of Hitler:

“The stronger must dominate and not mate with the weaker, which would signify the sacrifice of its own higher nature. Only the born weakling can look upon this principle as cruel, and if he does so it is merely because he is of a feebler nature and narrower mind; for if such a law did not direct the process of evolution then the higher development of organic life would not be conceivable at all.”
― Adolf Hitler

Read the saying of Hitler here so that to notice:

https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/30691.Adolf_Hitler

I think i am highly smart and i say that Hitler is not at all smart in his above saying, since we have first to define what is "stronger" , so for example the stronger can be the not smarter and/or not the wiser, since you can be the stronger by having the most powerful military or the most stronger will to fight without being the smarter and wiser and this can cause that you win the competition or the fight, so when Hitler says in the above saying: "the stronger must dominate", i think from my explanation above that it is stupid to say so, since also the being stronger can also also be the not the being the smarter and wiser . And i also think this strictness of Hitler is not correct, since he was not understanding the disadvantage of when the genetic algorithm can be more elitist in the crossover steps, since this kind of Elitism in a genetic algorithm can has the tendency to not efficiently higher the average best of the average members of the population, and you can read more about my below thoughts of the following web links about the genetic algorithm.

Also Hitler says the following:

“Humanitarianism is the expression of stupidity and cowardice.”
― Adolf Hitler

So i think that this strictness of Hitler is not correct,
since we need a level of humanitarianism that also soften morals
and that makes us less violent.


So i think that Hitler is too much strict and too much violent.


And now more of my thoughts about capitalism and about National Vanguard..


I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website called National Vanguard:


Why Capitalism Fails


https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/


And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:


"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner. And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn’t earned by its owner, yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or how well or how significantly they have worked."


I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence: I think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become "rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich).


And notice that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".


And the above article is saying the following:


"Capitalism constantly looks for ways to reduce labor costs. Automation made human labor less necessary than it had been when capitalism first appeared. When automation did appear, people who had the talent, the skills, and the motivation to make contributions began to find no jobs, or to become uncompetitive with mass-production if they tried to employ themselves."


I think it is not true, because read the following:


https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/


And read the following:


Here is the advantages and disadvantages of automation:


Following are some of the advantages of automation:


1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow
the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline,
thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life.


2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since
there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the
production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker.


3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It
has been estimated that the cost to machine one unit of product by
conventional general-purpose machine tools requiring human operators may
be 100 times the cost of manufacturing the same unit using automated
mass-production techniques. The electronics industry offers many
examples of improvements in manufacturing technology that have
significantly reduced costs while increasing product value (e.g., colour
TV sets, stereo equipment, calculators, and computers).


4. The growth of the automation industry will itself provide employment
opportunities. This has been especially true in the computer industry,
as the companies in this industry have grown (IBM, Digital Equipment
Corp., Honeywell, etc.), new jobs have been created.
These new jobs include not only workers directly employed by these
companies, but also computer programmers, systems engineers, and other
needed to use and operate the computers.


5. Automation is the only means of increasing standard of living. Only
through productivity increases brought about by new automated methods of
production, it is possible to advance standard of living. Granting wage
increases without a commensurate increase in productivity
will results in inflation. To afford a better society, it is a must to
increase productivity.


More of my philosophy about morality and about Islam and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will talk about a so important subject by asking the following philosophical question:

Why have we to value morality ?


So i think that i have to discover the patterns with my fluid intelligence that answers the question, and here they are:


So i think we can better see the answer by noticing that
our today world is wanting to be a kind of human diversity that is not correctly wise, since i am also noticing it in the diversity of the medias in USA, so take for example CNN, we can easily notice that CNN is part of the diversity of the medias , but even if it is a so important media, i have noticed that CNN lacks on objectivity, so i think that this objectivity has to be part of a sane morality, and the sane morality is also the fact that we can not consider beauty not universal or subjective, so we can not accept this kind of unwise diversity, since the wise smartness has to guide , so we can say that beauty can appear to us like subjective, but when we analyse it with the wise smartness we can say that beauty is not a subjective thing, so then
we can not let the unwise humans dictate to the wise humans by saying that beauty is subjective, since it has to be measured not by the looking or the appearance or such, but it has to be measured by the wise smartness that has to dictate. So as you notice we can say that we can not accept fully human diversity, and hence i can also say that it is why Islam has wanted to lesser the differences between humans, that are also human diversity, by also telling to muslims that they have to be "decency", since i think this morality of being decency of Islam avoids a kind of disorder and violence, so hence even Islam has not accepted this kind of diversity of the not being a kind of decency.

More about the wise man and foolish man and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and now i will talk about an important
subject, so i invite you to look at the following web page
about the Wise Man and the Foolish Man from the Church of
Jesus Christ:

https://www.churchofjesuschrist.org/music/library/childrens-songbook/the-wise-man-and-the-foolish-man?lang=eng


I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, so notice in the above web page of
the Church of Jesus Christ that it is saying the following about
the Wise Man and the Foolish Man:

"1. The wise man built his house upon the rock,
The wise man built his house upon the rock,
The wise man built his house upon the rock,
And the rains came tumbling down.

2. The rains came down, and the floods came up,
The rains came down, and the floods came up,
The rains came down, and the floods came up,
And the house on the rock stood still.

3. The foolish man built his house upon the sand,
The foolish man built his house upon the sand,
The foolish man built his house upon the sand,
And the rains came tumbling down.
etc."


But i think that the above abstraction of what is the Wise Man
and the Foolish Man is not correct, since even the building the house depends on the environment that is like the context, so then a bad environment can make you build the house upon the sand, so then the Wise Man is then the one who tune correctly morality and follows it, so then as i have just said, that even if the Wise Man Tune correctly morality and follows it, this morality still depends on the environment that can make morality fails, or , by logical analogy, make you build the house upon the sand, so then we have to be wise and take really care of the environment of morality too.


More of my philosophy about the merit and more of my thoughts..

I have just said the following:

"But there is still a philosophical question of: Can we say that the genetically smart humans merit success by there genetical smartness?, since smartness becomes easy for them ?, i think that it is morality that enforces the fact that we have to say that they merit success, since we have to be disciplined since morality needs order in a society, and since also capitalism rewards merit, and this brings quality , and the merit can become the to be genetically smart."



But i have to be more precise:

So the definition of "merit" and "worthy" in the english dictionary is:


Merit is the quality of being particularly good or worthy, especially so as to deserve praise or reward.


Worthy is having or showing the qualities or abilities that merit recognition in a specified way.


So i think that when you are genetically smart , you can, by being genetically smart, have and show qualities and abilities that merit recognition and that merit success even if your genetical smartness makes smartness "easy" for you and even without hard work.

So read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy of can the not smart creative humans be competitive and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, so now i will ask a philosophical
question of:


Can the not smart creative humans be competitive ?

I think that even if creativity can come from the not smart humans,
i think that if the not smart humans that are creative are exposed
to the smart humans that are creative, it is too risky for them,
so the way for the not smart creative humans is to know how to smartly hide from the competition of the not smart creative humans,
but this process, too, needs smartness, so it is why i think that the not smart creative humans are not competitive with the smart creative humans, so then smartness is the key to success, but there is still a philosophical question of: Can we say that the genetically smart humans merit success by there genetical smartness?, since smartness becomes easy for them ?, i think that it is morality that enforces the fact that we have to say that they merit success, since we have to be disciplined since morality needs order in a society, and since also capitalism rewards merit, and this brings quality , and the merit can become the to be genetically smart.


More of my philosophy about the successful business way of doing and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart since i have passed two certified IQ tests
and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will talk about an important
subject, so i invite you to look at the following video that is making a mistake about how to be successful in business:

How to Master the Art of Leadership | Simon Sinek’s Greatest Speech

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iu7nwbFm8Os



I think the above video is making a mistake, since we are living in a world based on competition, and it is competition that brings quality,
but how can we define quality? i think that it is also competition that creates efficient medias that also talks about the criteria that makes a product or a service a good product or service, so it is smartness in action that measures the quality or successfulness of a product or service , and of course you can have a competitive advantage in this or that criterion that makes your product or service successful, so of course that you have to be smart so that to know "how" to be smartly competitive in this world based on competition, so then creativity and inventiveness is not the the only factors that makes the product or service successful, since it is also the being smart that makes your product or service successful. Other than that you can read
all my following thoughts so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy about capitalism and more of my thoughts..



I think i am highly smart and i say that in capitalism, overtaxing and imposing excess regulations is not good, since capitalism rewards merit, so overtaxing can hurt capitalism and can kill the spirit of innovation, and of course the government can and should play a role in our capitalist system by using and enforcing antitrust laws and by clamping down on fraud and the exploitation of labor, so i can then say that the capitalist believes that wealth in the hands of bright, successful, hard-working people (entrepreneurs) will be the incentive to produce newer and better products and services because of the expectation of the monetary rewards from which they will benefit, and i have just said the following about it:

Now i will talk about a so important thing about the: Does capitalism really drive innovation? so i invite you to look at the following video about it:

Does Capitalism Really Drive Innovation?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNhdKpTGfAU


I think i am highly smart and I have just looked at the above video and i am noticing that it is making a big mistake, since i think that the public investment has the tendency to be efficient, where capitalism is
not efficient, for the long-term research and development, but the private sector of capitalism has the tendency to invest on projects promising commercial advantages in the short-to-medium term, and this investing on the short-to-medium term of capitalism is also good, so then i can say that capitalism is good for an "optimal" efficiency.

And you can read the rest of my "interesting" philosophical thoughts in the following web links so that to understand my views on different subjects:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vc32viYv1SY

And read also here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/CmaowkjUJVY


And i invite you to read my following other thoughts of my philosophy in the following web link:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/s8IZ5i5Udm0


More of my philosophy about how to lower inflation and about USA and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and i can go into more details by saying that
the american Democrat's way of today of wanting to higher the federal minimum wage is not so bad, since the highering the federal minimum wage has its limit, so Democrats are not wanting to higher too much the federal minimum wage, since it can for example hurt economic investment and it can hurt employment, so we have not to be pessimistic about this way of doing of president Biden governance or of the japanese Kishidanomics, other than that i am not speaking about how the Biden's plan lowers inflation, since i have just talked about the standard way of lowering inflation of the Federal Reserve, and i think that the kind of president Biden's tax increase on the rich is not a problem, read carefully the following so that to notice it:

"In an interview, Mr. Pomerleau said the drag was small from the
proposals because Mr. Biden was largely taxing savings of high earners,
which are not major drivers of economic growth given those Americans
have a lot of their wealth saved.

“Some tax increases have larger effects on growth than others,” he said.
“Biden has chosen taxes that don’t have a massive effect.”"

Read more carefully here so that to understand:

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/18/business/biden-tax-plan-economy.html


Also here is my thoughts about the standard way of lowering inflation by the Federal Reserve that i am talking about above, read it carefully:

More of my philosophy about the Keynesian economics and more..

I think i am highly smart and i will invite you to look at the following new video about how the governments of Europe and USA have spent more in the economy and were following the Keynesian economics in the period of economic Crisis of Covid-19, since i think that Keynesian economics even if it is not the modern way by using the supply of money and by interest rates, can still has some "advantage" in this kind of economic crisis, and the macroeconomic theories and models of Keynesian economics is about how aggregate demand (total spending in the economy) strongly influences economic output and inflations, so i invite you to look at the following new video so that to understand the how of it:

The EU's New Plan to Transform the Economy - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N2-HqLZJIhU


But i will say that Milton Friedman, an American economist awarded the 1976 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics for his contribution to consumption analysis and to monetary history and theory, including his observations of the complexity of stabilization policy, was the founders of the modern monetarist school of economics, that held that the business cycle is determined mainly by the supply of money and by interest rates, rather than by government fiscal policy - contrary to the long-prevailing view of Keynes and his followers. So then you have to understand that the modern way in economics with wich we manage inflation and unemployment is no more using keynesian economics, but it is by using for example the following way using the supply of money and by interest rates:

I think i am highly smart, and i think that the Federal Reserve policymakers of USA are trying to slow down the economy and subdue inflation by highering interest rates, and highering interest rates make money costlier and borrowing less appealing and that, in turn, slows demand to catch up with supply, which has lagged badly throughout the pandemic, but that's the macroeconomics of it, and its potential effects include lower wages, a halt or even a drop in home prices and a decline in stock market valuations etc., but notice that the highering of interest rates reduces the demand, so i think it has a macroeconomic effects of balancing by creating lower prices in one side and part of the economy and this compensate much more for the higher prices in the other side and part of the economy, but notice that it doesn't mean that the highering of interest rates solves all the problems.


More of my philosophy about Kishidanomics and about USA and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart , since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will talk about an important subject and it is about the how we have to grow economy , since as you have just noticed, i have just said, read it below, that the Democrats and Republicans in USA have two different ways of how to grow economy, since as i have just for example said that the U.S. Congress believes that today's debt will be dwarfed by tomorrow's economic growth. Driving economic growth is one way to reduce the national debt, but Congress tends to disagree on how to create that growth. Most Democrats push increased spending, while most Republicans champion lower taxes, and it looks like the different economic ways in Japan of Abenomics and Kishidanomics, and i invite you to read the following article about them:

https://cscr.pk/explore/themes/politics-governance/kishidanomics-the-economic-policies-of-fumio-kishida/


But i think that the problematic is that compelling data reveal a discouraging truth about growth today in for example western countries. There has been a marked decline in the ability of traditional levers of production capital investment and labor to propel economic growth, so those traditional levers in economics above have there limits, and here is what i have just said about how to solve this problematic by also using artificial intelligence etc., and read it carefully in my below thoughts:

More of my philosophy about McKinsey and more of my thoughts..

I invite you to look at the following interesting video about McKinsey:

How McKinsey Became One Of The Most Powerful Companies In The World

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BBmmMj_maII

And i also invite you to read this interesting article about McKinsey:

How McKinsey Destroyed the Middle Class

https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/02/how-mckinsey-destroyed-middle-class/605878/

I think i am smart, and i have just looked at the above video and i have
just read the above article, and i think McKinsey was doing it with like the traditional levers, but i think this classical way of managing is not so difficult for countries, but i think this classical way of managing is much less important than the much important way of doing it with artificial intelligence, since compelling data reveal a discouraging truth about economic growth in western countries today, since there has been a marked decline in the ability of traditional levers of production capital investment and labor to propel economic growth in western countries, since i also say that in economic management we know that firms with a large part-time employment share are more productive than firms with a large share of full-time workers, but a 10% increase in the part-time share is associated with 4.8% higher productivity, so as you notice there is a limit to this way of managing with part-time employment, like was also doing it McKinsey, so i think that it is AI(artificial intelligence) that could increase much more the economic growth rates in western countries by changing the nature of work and creating a new relationship between man and machine. The impact of AI technologies on business can increase much more labor productivity and enable people to make more efficient use of their time, but the most important thing is that Digital and AI literacy is of utmost importance to help countries businesses scale and compete internationally. Investing in widespread digital and AI literacy for the entire population will increase domestic demand for technology and technology jobs. A technologically literate population will create more data, which fuels AI and thus the data-driven economy as a whole. It is also necessary for workers to be able to upskill and re-skill in order to remain productive and competitive in an automated workforce. Countries businesses that adopt AI technology will save from lower production costs, have increased output, and be able to invest more. Increased revenue from this domestic demand, and with a global reputation for responsible AI, will help countries businesses scale globally and compete on the international level.

And read the two following web links so that to understand more what i am saying:

"Compelling data reveal a discouraging truth about growth today. There
has been a marked decline in the ability of traditional levers of
production capital investment and labor to propel economic growth."

And it it says the following:

"Accenture research on the impact of AI in 12 developed economies
reveals that AI could double annual economic growth rates in 2035 by
changing the nature of work and creating a new relationship between man
and machine. The impact of AI technologies on business is projected to
increase labor productivity by up to 40 percent and enable people to
make more efficient use of their time."

Read more here so that to notice it:

https://www.accenture.com/ca-en/insight-artificial-intelligence-future-growth-canada

And McKinsey estimates that AI(Artificial intelligence) may deliver an
additional economic output of around US$13 trillion by 2030, increasing
global GDP by about 1.2 % annually. This will mainly come from
substitution of labour by automation and increased innovation in
products and services.

Read more here:

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2019/637967/EPRS_BRI(2019)637967_EN.pdf

More of my philosophy about the US problems and world problems and more of my thoughts..

I think that i am highly smart, and the main problem of USA as i am showing it above by posting the web links, is that Management consultants, like of the powerful McKinsey, implemented and rationalized a transformation in the American corporation by downsizing in response not to particular business problems but rather to a new managerial ethos and methods; they downsized when profitable as well as when struggling, and during booms as well as busts. So i think it is the main problem, since for example read in the following paper that says that: "In contrast to the conventional wisdom, we find that plants of the U.S. manufacturing sector that increased employment as well as productivity contribute almost as much to overall productivity growth in the 1980s as the plants that increased productivity at the expense of employment."

Read more here so that to understand:

Downsizing and Productivity Growth: Myth or Reality?

https://www.jstor.org/stable/40228705

But about the other problem of part-time employment, i think American corporations have to understand that this way of managing
by part-time employment is limited, since we know that a 10% increase in the part-time share is associated with 4.8% higher productivity.

More of my philosophy about productivity and about economic growth and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you are noticing in my below thoughts that the powerful McKinsey has used the management methodology of downsizing and of part-time employment so that to higher productivity so that to higher economic growth, since the ideal GDP growth rate is between 2% and 3%, and since we know that economic growth is measured as the annual percent change of gross domestic product (GDP), and we know that when you higher GDP per capita you higher richness of the country, but you have to notice that this management of the powerful McKinsey was deficient in that it has destroyed much more the Middle Class, and i am
posting the web link below that shows it, and i say that it is why it was not a Long-term good management, but it was done not wisely for short-term benefits of highering productivity, so now it is why it is also necessary to implement progressive capitalism, of Joseph E. Stiglitz the recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics, so that to solve those problems, and you can look at his videos in youtube.

More of my philosophy about the wage levels and the wage ratios and more of my thoughts..

I will say that workers living standards depend on wage levels, not wage ratios, eventhough when measuring wage dispersion, economists frequently look at the 90/50 ratio — the wage of the worker at the 90th percentile divided by the wage of the worker at the median, but you have to understand that i am talking above about how McKinsey has used the management methodology of downsizing(there is also a destruction of jobs in it) and of part-time employment so that to higher productivity and i am explaining how it has much more destroyed the Middle Class.

More of my philosophy about downsizing and about outsourcing and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you are noticing i have just spoken
about the downsizing methodology that is used by McKinsey, read it above, but i can go more and more into more details by saying that notice how i am saying that the downsizing higher productivity, and i think i am smart by saying so, since i say that in management the downsizing can create a cost reduction and it can create more "value", and both cost reduction and this more value can attract investors that makes the company much more productive, so as you notice we have not in management just to focus on the short term of the cost reduction of downsizing, and of course i can also say that there is also the way of doing some outsourcing in a company so that to higher productivity and reduce the costs as well, but here again, in this case, it can also attract investors and make the company much more productive.

More of my philosophy about specialization and about efficiency and productivity..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


The previous CEO Larry Culp of General Electric and the architect of a strategy that represented a new turning point in the world corporate strategies, Larry Culp's strategy was to divide the company according to its activities. Something like we are better of alone, seperately and
focused on each one's own activity, than together in a large
conglomerate. And it is a move from integration to specialization.
You see it is thought that a company always gains economies of scale
as it grows, but this is not necessarily the case, since as the company
gains in size - especially if it engages in many activities - it
also generates its own bureaucracy, with all that entails in term
of cost and efficiency. And not only that, it is also often the case
that by bringing together very different activities, strategic focus is lost and decision-making is diluted, so that in the end no one ends up
taking responsability, it doesn't always happen, but this reasons are
basically what is driving this increasing specialization. So i invite to look at the following video so that to understand more about it:

The decline of industrial icon of the US - VisualPolitik EN

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-hqwYxFCY-k


And here is my previous thoughts about specialization and productivity so that to understand much more:

More about the Japanese Ikigai and about productivity and more of my thoughts..

Read the following interesting article about Japanese Ikigai:

The More People With Purpose, the Better the World Will Be

https://singularityhub.com/2018/06/15/the-more-people-with-purpose-the-better-the-world-will-be/

I think i am highly smart, so i say that the Japanese Ikigai is like a Japanese philosophy that is like the right combination or "balance" of passion, vocation, and mission, and Ikigai and MTP, as concepts, urge us to align our passions with a mission to better the world, but i think that Japanese Ikiai is a also smart since it gets the "passion" from the "mission", since the mission is also the engine, so you have to align the passion with the mission of the country or the global world so that to be efficient, and Japanese Ikigai is also smart since so that to higher productivity and be efficient, you have to "specialize" in doing a job, but so that to higher more productivity and be more efficient you can also specialize in what you do "better", and it is what is doing Japanese Ikigai, since i think that in Japanese Ikigai, being the passion permits to make you specialized in a job in what you do better, and here is what i have just smartly said about productivity:

I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will now talk about another important idea of Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and it is about "specialization" in an economic system, since i say that in an economic system we have to be specialized in doing a job so that to be efficient and productive, but not only that, but we have to specialize in doing a job in what we do better so that to be even more efficient and productive, and we have to minimize at best the idle time or the wasting of time doing a job, since i can also say that this average idle time or wasting time of the workers working in parallel can be converted to a contention like in parallel programming, so you have to minimize it at best, and you have to minimize at best the coherency like in parallel programming so that to scale much better, and of course all this can create an economy of scale, and also i invite you to read my following smart and interesting thoughts about scalability of productivity:

I will talk about following thoughts from the following PhD computer scientist:

https://lemire.me/blog/about-me/

Read more carefully here his thoughts about productivity:

https://lemire.me/blog/2012/10/15/you-cannot-scale-creativity/

And i think he is making a mistake in his above webpage about productivity:

Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input

But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger that the Serial productivity part, so it can scale much more (it is like Gustafson's Law).

And it looks like the following:

About parallelism and about Gustafson’s Law..

Gustafson’s Law:

• If you increase the amount of work done by each parallel
task then the serial component will not dominate
• Increase the problem size to maintain scaling
• Can do this by adding extra complexity or increasing the overall
problem size

Scaling is important, as the more a code scales the larger a machine it
can take advantage of:

• can consider weak and strong scaling
• in practice, overheads limit the scalability of real parallel programs
• Amdahl’s law models these in terms of serial and parallel fractions
• larger problems generally scale better: Gustafson’s law


Load balance is also a crucial factor.


More of my philosophy about American universities and more
about USA and more of my thoughts..


Why American universities are the best in the world

"Americans can take pride that their universities — through a combination of competition, experimentation, and lots and lots of money — rose from small centers of rote learning to become the greatest research institutions in the history of the world."

Read more here in the following interesting article:

https://bigthink.com/the-present/american-university/


And the following other article says that the education system of USA is not so bad as we can think and you can read about it here:

America's Not-So-Broken Education System

Read more here:

https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2016/06/everything-in-american-education-is-broken/488189/


More of my philosophy about U.S. debt and about capitalism and more of my thoughts..


U.S. Congress believes that today's debt will be dwarfed by tomorrow's economic growth. Driving economic growth is one way to reduce the national debt, but Congress tends to disagree on how to create that growth. Most Democrats push increased spending, while most Republicans champion lower taxes. So i invite you to read the following article
so that to understand more:

Will the U.S. Ever Pay Off Its Debt?

https://www.thebalance.com/will-the-u-s-debt-ever-be-paid-off-3970473


More of my philosophy about capitalism and about innovation and more of my thoughts..

Now i will talk about a so important thing about the: Does capitalism really drive innovation? so i invite you to look at the following video about it:

Does Capitalism Really Drive Innovation?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNhdKpTGfAU


I think i am highly smart and I have just looked at the above video and i am noticing that it is making a big mistake, since i think that the public investment has the tendency to be efficient, where capitalism is
not efficient, for the long-term research and development, but the private sector of capitalism has the tendency to invest on projects promising commercial advantages in the short-to-medium term, and this investing on the short-to-medium term of capitalism is also good, so then i can say that capitalism is good for an "optimal" efficiency, and you can now read my following interesting thoughts and writing about cluster of venture capitalists etc.

More of my philosophy about the cluster of venture capitalists and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, since i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will talk more about how is so important the cluster of venture capitalists, so i invite you to look
at the following video that shows a so important thing:

Economy Of Israel: Exploring The Israeli Economy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6vzIsiqQoRc


And notice carefully in the above video that the cluster of the venture capitalists in Israel was a so important factor of the success of the Israel economy, and so that to understand how, i invite you to read the following so interesting article about the Silicon Valley cluster of venture capitalists so that to understand how it is so important and how it is lacking in other western countries such as France, so here it is,
and read it carefully:

Silicon Valley: a cluster of venture capitalists?

http://www.parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/silicon-valley-a-cluster-of-venture-capitalists


And Let's look for example at USA, so read the following from Jonathan Wai that is a Ph.D., it says:

"Heiner Rindermann and James Thompson uncovered that the “smart fraction” of a country is quite influential in impacting the performance of that country, for example, its GDP."

And it also says the following:

"“According to recent population estimates, there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains.” But consider that the U.S. benefits from the smart fractions of every other country in the world because it continues to serve as a magnet for brainpower, something that is not even factored into these rankings.

What these rankings clearly show is America is likely still in the lead in terms of brainpower. And this is despite the fact federal funding for educating our smart fraction is currently zero. Everyone seems worried Americans are falling behind, but this is because everyone is focusing on average and below average people. Maybe it’s time we started taking a closer look at the smartest people of our own country."

Read more here:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/finding-the-next-einstein/201312/whats-the-smartest-country-in-the-world

So as you are noticing it's immigrants(and there are about eight Chinese and Indians for every American in the top 1 percent in brains) that are making USA a rich country.


And read also the following so that to understand more:

"Why Silicon Valley Wouldn’t Work Without Immigrants

There are many theories for why immigrants find so much success in tech. Many American-born tech workers point out that there is no shortage of American-born employees to fill the roles at many tech companies. Researchers have found that more than enough students graduate from American colleges to fill available tech jobs. Critics of the industry’s friendliness toward immigrants say it comes down to money — that technology companies take advantage of visa programs, like the H-1B system, to get foreign workers at lower prices than they would pay American-born ones.

But if that criticism rings true in some parts of the tech industry, it misses the picture among Silicon Valley’s top companies. One common misperception of Silicon Valley is that it operates like a factory; in that view, tech companies can hire just about anyone from anywhere in the world to fill a particular role.

But today’s most ambitious tech companies are not like factories. They’re more like athletic teams. They’re looking for the LeBrons and Bradys — the best people in the world to come up with some brand-new, never-before-seen widget, to completely reimagine what widgets should do in the first place.

“It’s not about adding tens or hundreds of thousands of people into manufacturing plants,” said Aaron Levie, the co-founder and chief executive of the cloud-storage company Box. “It’s about the couple ideas that are going to be invented that are going to change everything.”

Why do tech honchos believe that immigrants are better at coming up with those inventions? It’s partly a numbers thing. As the tech venture capitalist Paul Graham has pointed out, the United States has only 5 percent of the world’s population; it stands to reason that most of the world’s best new ideas will be thought up by people who weren’t born here.

If you look at some of the most consequential ideas in tech, you find an unusual number that were developed by immigrants. For instance, Google’s entire advertising business — that is, the basis for the vast majority of its revenues and profits, the engine that allows it to hire thousands of people in the United States — was created by three immigrants: Salar Kamangar and Omid Kordestani, who came to the United States from Iran, and Eric Veach, from Canada.

But it’s not just a numbers thing. Another reason immigrants do so well in tech is that people from outside bring new perspectives that lead to new ideas."

Read more here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/08/technology/personaltech/why-silicon-valley-wouldnt-work-without-immigrants.html



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.