Scripture for the weekend and beyond.
;;;Matt;;;
3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;
4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge
of the truth.
5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man
Christ Jesus;
2 Peter 3
9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count
slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any
should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
God Bless You All
Matt
Amazing Grace
";;;Matt;;;" <trdell1234@ns%%gmail.com> wrote in message
news:juic45dlh41b9b047...@4ax.com...
Amen. Thank God for His mercy and grace.
dolf
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>
> 1 Timothy 2 KJV
>
> 3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;
>
> 4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge
> of the truth.
>
> 5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man
> Christ Jesus;
Yes, Christ Jesus is the Priest of the WDJW church He has built on
rock representing the reality of Peter's life with the Messiah
(Matthew 16:18):
"And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My
church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it." -- LORD Jesus
Christ (Matthew 16:18)
Amen.
> 2 Peter 3
>
> 9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count
> slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any
> should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Amen.
Matt, can you publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
Love in the truth,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
and Author of "Be Hungry"
http://NetCabal.com
"Don't be left behind as were Cleopas and Simon ...
... -----------------> be hungry ! ! !"
"... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
12:3)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/035c93540862751c?
What are the keys of the Kingdom of Heaven?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/980b41e6999de315?
Only the truth can cure the "hunger is starvation" delusion:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/74281ab7d7ce78de?
;;;Matt;;;
<lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:
>;;;Matt;;; wrote:
>>
>> 1 Timothy 2 KJV
>>
>> 3 For this is good and acceptable in the sight of God our Saviour;
>>
>> 4 Who will have all men to be saved, and to come unto the knowledge
>> of the truth.
>>
>> 5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men, the man
>> Christ Jesus;
>
>Yes, Christ Jesus is the Priest of the WDJW church He has built on
>rock representing the reality of Peter's life with the Messiah
>(Matthew 16:18):
>
>http://WDJW.net
>
>"And I tell you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My
>church, and the gates of Hades will not overcome it." -- LORD Jesus
>Christ (Matthew 16:18)
>
>Amen.
>
>> 2 Peter 3
>>
>> 9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count
>> slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any
>> should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
>
>Amen.
>
>Matt, can you publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
Hi Andrew We have been though this before. Yes I can say it Publicly
"Jesus is Lord". I have many times. Will do so at Church tomorrow if
you like. Going up the mountain in a few minutes to pray and do
some reflection on a few things.
Matt
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Please allow me to hear you say "Jesus is LORD" via voice mail at the
number listed at the WDJW web site listed above.
> Going up the mountain in a few minutes to pray and do
> some reflection on a few things.
Please know that when we are spiritually hungrier, this registers
physically in our brains as physical hunger.
Be hungrier, which is truly healthier for mind, body, and soul:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/BeBlessed
Marana tha
Prayerfully in the awesome name of our Messiah, LORD Jesus Christ,
Andrew <><
--
Author of WDJW:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_does_Jesus_want%3F
dolf
#200 = To be corrupt or foul; to mix lewdly (mutually lascivious behavior)"
Going up the mountain in a few minutes to pray and do some reflection on
a few things.
@memeBrain [Telos: #5600, Super: #78 - Recognizing Fidelity, Trust in
Faith; I-Ching: H59 - Dispersal; Tetra: 47 - Pattern, Ego: #11 - Value
and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching: H8 - Seeking Unity; Tetra: 33 -
Closeness]
Male Idea: #247 has 13 Categories: #1, #6, #40, #200 = n. Loquacious,
Boastful; #2, #40, #200, #5 = To rebel against; #7, #40, #200 = To
vibrate, twang, whir; to touch or strike (musical chords); to harp,
sing; to clip, prune; music, playing (of instruments); singer; gazelle
or antelope; vine branch; family branch or member; #7, #200, #40 = To
flow, flood, wash away; pouring rain, a storm; #10, #200, #6, #1, #30 =
n. God's Foundation; #40, #1, #6, #200 = A luminary; light; sparkling; a
candlestick; #40, #6, #200, #1 = Fear; respect, reverence; object of
fear; an astounding deed, a miracle or prodigy; #40, #7, #200 = To be
corrupt or foul; to mix lewdly (mutually lascivious behavior); #40, #7,
#200 = To bind or combine; #40, #7, #200 = Northern constellations; the
north; north winds; the planets; zodiacal signs; #40, #200, #2, #5 =
Increase; plenty or abundance; #1, #10, #7, #2, #30, #7, #50, #6, #50,
#10, #70, #4 = During the whoredoms of Jezebel;
English Words: albeit; bandoleer; beetle; belated; bolero; borer;
chalet; channels; concealer; deanship; earmark; erelong; formidable;
gladsome; hilt; ironclad; megalomaniac; mishandle; parking; rancher;
raring; reaffirm; rechargeable; reemerge; skinflick; soaking
Female Idea: #106 has 0 Categories:
--- to break through, to make a breach; to repair a breach, to rebuild.
--- to cleave to, adhere to, cling to, press after; chase, pursue;
attached or steadfast; a soldering or welding (of metals).
--- n. "Multitude".
--- n. "He Praises God".
--- n. "Yah Establishes".
--- n. "Slumber".
--- to be high, pointed or towering, crag-like.
--- n. "Cane" or "Reed".
--- to suck or swallow down; wander or go astray.
--- messenger of Yah, a prophet.
--- n. "My Counsellor".
--- n. "Counsellor"
--- n. "Fish" (father of Joshua).
--- to swim; fish.; to increase or thrive; the Letter Nun with value 50.
--- to suckle or give milk; a suckling or infant.
--- to turn or twist, to be wrong or perverse.
--- perverseness.
--- wrong-doer, transgressor.
--- yoke,(for the neck of draught animals, of slavery, of affliction).
--- burnt-offering, holocaust.
--- The Supreme (deity).
@memeBrain [Telos: #3830, Super: #77 - Natural Guide, Heaven's Reason;
I-Ching: H12 - Stagnation; Tetra: 57 - Guardedness, Ego: #23 - Constancy
of Guiding Concepts, Emptiness & Non-Existence; I-Ching: H18 - Arresting
Decay; Tetra: 26 - Endeavor]
Male Idea: #101 has 0 Categories:
Female Idea: #66 has 26 Categories: #1, #7, #50, #8 = Drying up; #1, #9,
#6, #50 = yarn, thread; #1, #10, #30, #20, #5 = I will go; #1, #20, #10,
#30, #5 = An eating, a meal; #1, #50, #10, #5 = A ship; #1, #50, #10, #5
= Sighing, lamentation; #1, #60, #5 = To trouble, injure; to hurt; to
vex; #2, #8, #6, #50 = A trier (of metals), assayer; #2, #8, #6, #50 =
Watch-tower; #2, #9, #50, #5 = Pistacianut; #3, #6, #7, #50 = n. Refuge;
#3, #30, #3, #30 = Wheel (of a chariot); a whirlwind; chaff, stubble;
#4, #50, #5, #2, #5 = n. Stinky; #8, #50, #4, #4 = n. Favor of Hadad;
#8, #50, #8 = To press or fasten together; #10, #6, #20, #30 = To be
able; #10, #6, #50 = To boil or bubble up; to ferment; Greece, the
Greeks (Ionia) --- Wineland(ers); mire, mud; #10, #8, #7, #10, #1, #30 =
n. God beholds; #10, #20, #6, #30 = To be able; to hold, contain; to be
capable of; to prevail, succeed; to control oneself; to overcome; to
master; to comprehend; #20, #6, #40 = To group; to join, to cluster
together; #20, #40, #6 = As, like; when, as soon as; thus; #30, #6, #30
= To turn, wind; #50, #2, #7, #2, #5 = Spoil or booty, riches or wealth;
#50, #2, #10, #2 = Willing or prompt, voluntary; a noble or prince; #60,
#1, #5 = To mark off, to measure; #60, #1, #5 = A measure (a corn
measure containing 1/3 of an Ephah, about 1 1/2 peck)
I have many times.
@memeBrain [Telos: #1568, Super: #51 - Natural Guides and Nursing
Virtuosity; I-Ching: H47 - Exhaustion; Tetra: 69 - Exhaustion, Ego: #29
- Deeming, Non-Assertion; I-Ching: H36 - Sinking Light; Tetra: 67 -
Darkening]
Male Idea: #152 has 0 Categories:
Female Idea: #95 has 0 Categories:
Will do so at Church tomorrow if you like.
@memeBrain [Telos: #3645, Super: #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 -
Marriageable Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner, Ego: #0 - ; I-Ching: H0 - ;
Tetra: 0 - ]
Male Idea: #169 has 0 Categories:
Female Idea: #95 has 0 Categories:
Going up the mountain in a few minutes to pray and do some reflection on
a few things.
@memeBrain [Telos: #5600, Super: #78 - Recognizing Fidelity, Trust in
Faith; I-Ching: H59 - Dispersal; Tetra: 47 - Pattern, Ego: #11 - Value
and Function of Non-Existence; I-Ching: H8 - Seeking Unity; Tetra: 33 -
Closeness]
Male Idea: #247 has 13 Categories: #1, #6, #40, #200 = n. Loquacious,
Boastful; #2, #40, #200, #5 = To rebel against; #7, #40, #200 = To
vibrate, twang, whir; to touch or strike (musical chords); to harp,
sing; to clip, prune; music, playing (of instruments); singer; gazelle
or antelope; vine branch; family branch or member; #7, #200, #40 = To
flow, flood, wash away; pouring rain, a storm; #10, #200, #6, #1, #30 =
n. God's Foundation; #40, #1, #6, #200 = A luminary; light; sparkling; a
candlestick; #40, #6, #200, #1 = Fear; respect, reverence; object of
fear; an astounding deed, a miracle or prodigy; #40, #7, #200 = To be
corrupt or foul; to mix lewdly (mutually lascivious behavior); #40, #7,
#200 = To bind or combine; #40, #7, #200 = Northern constellations; the
north; north winds; the planets; zodiacal signs; #40, #200, #2, #5 =
Increase; plenty or abundance; #1, #10, #7, #2, #30, #7, #50, #6, #50,
#10, #70, #4 = During the whoredoms of Jezebel;
English Words: albeit; bandoleer; beetle; belated; bolero; borer;
chalet; channels; concealer; deanship; earmark; erelong; formidable;
gladsome; hilt; ironclad; megalomaniac; mishandle; parking; rancher;
raring; reaffirm; rechargeable; reemerge; skinflick; soaking
Female Idea: #106 has 0 Categories:
dolf
#200 = To be corrupt or foul; to mix lewdly (mutually lascivious behavior)"
Going up the mountain in a few minutes to pray and do some reflection on
a few things.
@memeBrain [Telos: #5600, Super: #78 - Recognizing Fidelity, Trust in
Will do so at Church tomorrow if you like.
@memeBrain [Telos: #3645, Super: #17 - Politics; I-Ching: H54 -
Marriageable Maiden; Tetra: 65 - Inner, Ego: #0 - ; I-Ching: H0 - ;
Tetra: 0 - ]
Male Idea: #169 has 0 Categories:
Female Idea: #95 has 0 Categories:
Going up the mountain in a few minutes to pray and do some reflection on
a few things.
@memeBrain [Telos: #5600, Super: #78 - Recognizing Fidelity, Trust in
Randy ®
wrote:
(Thereby revealing your name and phone number on his caller I.D.)
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Matt has nothing to fear from this disciple of LORD Jesus Christ.
Randy, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
Love in the truth,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
and Author of "Be Hungry"
http://NetCabal.com
"Don't be left behind as were Cleopas and Simon ...
... -----------------> be hungry ! ! !"
"... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
Sanity's Little Helper
posteth:
Andy, can you publicly say "Mary had a little lamb"?
--
David Silverman
aa #2208
Defender of Civilisation
Muslims, at least, are 66.67% right: There is no God.
Not authentic without this signature.
Randy ®
wrote:
Your question amounts to a denial of what you know to be true, which
is that I already have been saying and defending the fact Jesus is
Lord, and have furnished direct quotes of you both asking and me
answering that question.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
<><
What we are teaching to prepare folks for the probable eventuality of
a deadlier Pan-Flu:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfmkax1wbRU
How to not be fearful:
May dear neighbors, friends, and brethren have a blessedly wonderful
2009th year since the birth of our LORD Jesus Christ as our Messiah,
the Son of Man ...
... by being hungrier:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/f891e617d10bd689?
Hunger is wonderful ! ! !
It's how we know the answer to the question "What does Jesus want?"
(WDJW):
Yes, hunger is our knowledge of good versus evil that Adam and Eve
paid for with their and our immortal lives:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/52a3db8576495806?
Hunger is the physical "hearts burning within us" feeling that unlocks
the 4 mysteries of the "Road to Emmaus" adventure described in Luke
24:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/386f56c2f6d0b154?
Moreover, being hungrier is the key to being Jesus' disciples:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/bd20d7c4fe878897?
Being physically hungrier is how we will physically recognize Jesus
when He physically returns for us to meet Him physically in the air:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/ffa6609710ea9587?
"Blessed are you who hunger NOW...
... for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)
Amen.
Here is a Spirit-guided exegesis of Luke 6:21 given in hopes of
promoting much greater understanding:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/cc2aa8f8a4d41360?
Trust the truth, Who is Jesus (T3WIJ):
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/11194899724b810d?
Be hungrier, which is truly healthier:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/991d4e30704307e7?
Marana tha
Prayerfully in the awesome name of our Messiah, LORD Jesus Christ,
Andrew <><
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>is that I already have been saying and defending the fact Jesus is
>Lord, and have furnished direct quotes of you both asking and me
>answering that question.
Sad to note that you are still not able to answer the above simple
yes/no question with a written affirmative.
May GOD soften your heart, Randy, so that you would come to trust the
truth, Who is Jesus:
Amen.
dolf
And like the deception in which Bruno (Sasha Baron Cohen) engages, there
is probably a deception sandwiched between being "furnished direct
quotes of you answering" and the asking of "that question"
...which is that I already have been saying and defending the fact Jesus
is Lord,
@memeBrain [Telos: #4655, Super: #72 - Self-Love, Holding Oneself Dear;
I-Ching: H39 - Obstacles; Tetra: 79 - Difficulties, Ego: #38 -
Consequences for Virtuous Discourse; I-Ching: H62 - Small Excess; Tetra:
11 - Divergence]
Male Idea: #77 has 21 Categories: #1, #6, #30, #40 = Something bound or
jointed together; vault, arch, hall; #1, #6, #30, #40 = If not, but
perhaps; but, nay but; #2, #40, #5, #30 = n. Son of Circumcision; a
Hebrew; #2, #70, #5 = To bubble, well up, boil; to long for, to seek; to
pray; (#73); #3, #4, #70 = To cut off; to hew down or fell; to destroy;
break asunder, destroy power; #3, #10, #8, #6, #50 = n. A Stream, the
name of a river in paradise: Gihon; #3, #30, #40, #4 = To wrap together;
to be tight, hard, sterile; #7, #10, #4, #6, #50 = Seething, boiling up,
raging; #10, #2, #50, #10, #5 = n. Yah Builds; #10, #5, #6, #50, #4, #2
= n. Yah is Bountiful; #40, #3, #4, #30 = A strong or high place; tower;
platform, pulpit; bed or bank (of flowers), raised parterre; castle;
#40, #7, #30 = Planet, wanderer (of the sky); #40, #30, #6, #1 =
Fullness, a multitude; #40, #30, #6, #1 = A filling up; a rampart;
fortress, citadel; #70, #2, #5 = To wrap up or cover; to be thick or
fat; #70, #2, #5 = Cloud; #70, #6, #1 = To bend or twist; #70, #6, #1 =
n. Overthrow or Ruin, a Babylonian province; #70, #7 = Strong, might,
fierce; strength; a stronghold; #70, #7 = She goat; #70, #7 = Strength
or might (of God); warriors; firmness or stability; defense; glory or
splendour; the ark; praise or musical celebration
Female Idea: #112 has 0 Categories:
--- building.
--- to be angry.
--- n. "Emptying by Yah", or "Skin Bottle of Yah".
--- to thrust, push, press upon; oppressor.
--- to be sharp, to pierce, scratch; a prickly thorn.
--- to pour or gush forth.
--- established, fixed; certain, sure.
--- to dig, excavate; excavation, wine-vat; wine-press.
--- around.
--- n. "Hill", mount Ebal.
and have furnished direct quotes of you both asking and me answering
that question.
@memeBrain [Telos: #5805, Super: #74 - Controlling Feelings, Overcome
Delusion; I-Ching: H39 - Obstacles; Tetra: 80 - Labouring, Ego: #54 -
Culturing Perspectives and Intuition; I-Ching: H55 - Abundance; Tetra:
45 - Greatness]
Male Idea: #151 has 0 Categories:
Female Idea: #166 has 0 Categories:
::: Jesus is LORD :::
news:eb55321e-7563-4064...@z14g2000yqa.googlegroups.com,
Randy � <pulpi...@gmail.com> typed:
(Yes! Why not? Matt likes to pass it on.)
::: Jesus is LORD :::
::: Jesus is LORD ::: <vera...@lycos.com> typed:
(Addition: That was meant ironically, of course.)
<<kêllÿ>>
wrote:
> Innews:7ap7dkF...@mid.individual.net,
> ::: Jesus is LORD ::: <veral...@lycos.com> typed:
> > In
> >news:eb55321e-7563-4064...@z14g2000yqa.googlegroups.com,
> > Randy ® <pulpitf...@gmail.com> typed:
> >> (Thereby revealing your name and phone number on his caller I.D.)
>
> > (Yes! Why not? Matt likes to pass it on.)
>
> (Addition: That was meant ironically, of course.)
Baloney. You meant it exactly as it appeared: mean-spirited. It was
your first instinct to be that way because that is what drives you
when it comes to those in here you hate (which is practically
everyone). Your follow-up post to your previous post you made was
more of a "oh no - I probably shouldn't have said that" - rather than
be honest, however, you decided to try and save face with a lie.
Did you really think you were kidding anyone?
;;;Matt;;;
If I were to decide to do this. Guess I'd need to use my business
phone. The ID on that says "restricted" and gives out no further
information.
Thanks for the warning Randy
Andrew this has nothing to do with your character, I am just very
careful about giving out personal information. If you have noticed
how it can be used in these NG hope you understand.
Jesus is Lord and like it say in Colossians 3 ""Christ is all and in
all""
Matt
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Alternatives include using a payphone, a friend's cellphone,
subscribing to call blocking or posting video as this disciple of
Jesus has done:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8B_70Jp-kc
>Thanks for the warning Randy
Be forewarned that Randy is not able to publicly say "Jesus is LORD."
>Andrew this has nothing to do with your character, I am just very
>careful about giving out personal information.
Your publicly saying "Jesus is LORD" would not be your giving out
public information. Alternatives to calling from your unblocked home
phone have been given as above.
> If you have noticed
>how it can be used in these NG hope you understand.
Hope you understand that until it is known that you actually can
publicly say "Jesus is LORD" there will always be skepticism that you
are truly saved reborn of water and the Holy Spirit.
>Jesus is Lord and like it say in Colossians 3 ""Christ is all and in
>all""
What is actually written is:
"Here there is no Greek or Jew, circumcised or uncircumcised,
barbarian, Scythian, slave or free, but Christ is all, and is in all."
(Colossians 3:11)
The context of "here" is among members of Christ's church, who are
those who are mindful of WDJW and able to publicly say "Jesus is
LORD."
dolf
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>Vera wrote:
>> Vera wrote:
>> > Randy wrote:
>
>> >> (Thereby revealing your name and phone number on his caller I.D.)
>>
>> > (Yes! Why not? Matt likes to pass it on.)
>>
>> (Addition: That was meant ironically, of course.)
>
>Baloney. You meant it exactly as it appeared: mean-spirited. It was
>your first instinct to be that way because that is what drives you
>when it comes to those in here you hate (which is practically
>everyone). Your follow-up post to your previous post you made was
>more of a "oh no - I probably shouldn't have said that" - rather than
>be honest, however, you decided to try and save face with a lie.
>
>Did you really think you were kidding anyone?
Kelly, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
Love in the truth,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
and Author of "Be Hungry"
http://NetCabal.com
"Don't be left behind as were Cleopas and Simon ...
... -----------------> be hungry ! ! !"
"... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Vera wrote:
Vera, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
Love in the truth,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
and Author of "Be Hungry"
http://NetCabal.com
"Don't be left behind as were Cleopas and Simon ...
... -----------------> be hungry ! ! !"
"... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
Randy �
In newsgroup "alt.christnet.christianlife",
Article
<6031548f-7a8f-4448...@b9g2000yqm.googlegroups.com>,
Subject: Re: Ping: Matt ...
<<k�ll�>> <rosie...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
Does anyone really believe that someone who insists the Bible
teaches God endorses loving, monogamous homosexuality, is
somehow a credible witness?
--
Have you heard Christ died for our sins, and God raised Him
from the dead? Did you know God saves you from hell and
gives you eternal life through faith in this finished work alone,
not your merits (Jn. 3:16; 1 Cor. 15:1-3; Eph. 2:8-10; 2 Thess.
1:8-9)? This is so man cannot boast, and God alone gets the
glory (Eph. 2:8-9).
______________________________________________
www.faithguard.org
www.twitter.com/faithguard
www.facebook.com/faithguard
______________________________________________
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Kelly wrote:
>> Vera wrote:
>>> Vera wrote:
>>
>>> >> (Thereby revealing your name and phone number on his caller I.D.)
>>>
>>> > (Yes! Why not? Matt likes to pass it on.)
>>>
>>> (Addition: That was meant ironically, of course.)
>>
>>Baloney. You meant it exactly as it appeared: mean-spirited. It was
>>your first instinct to be that way because that is what drives you
>>when it comes to those in here you hate (which is practically
>>everyone). Your follow-up post to your previous post you made was
>>more of a "oh no - I probably shouldn't have said that" - rather than
>>be honest, however, you decided to try and save face with a lie.
>>
>>Did you really think you were kidding anyone?
>
>Does anyone really believe that someone who insists the Bible
>teaches God endorses loving, monogamous homosexuality, is
>somehow a credible witness?
The only truthful witnesses are those who can publicly say "Jesus is
LORD."
Randy, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
Love in the truth,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
and Author of "Be Hungry"
http://NetCabal.com
"Don't be left behind as were Cleopas and Simon ...
... -----------------> be hungry ! ! !"
"... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
JohnH
> ;;;Matt;;; wrote:
>
SNIP
>
>>>
>>> Matt, can you publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
>> Hi Andrew We have been though this before. Yes I can say it Publicly
>> "Jesus is Lord". I have many times. Will do so at Church tomorrow if
>> you like.
>
> Please allow me to hear you say "Jesus is LORD" via voice mail at the
> number listed at the WDJW web site listed above.
>
Michael Jackson's personal cardiologist?
>
SNIP
Randy �
In newsgroup "alt.christnet.christianlife",
Article <h292cj$6qv$1...@news.albasani.net>,
And no one can accuse Michael Jackson of not being hungry
enough. He was a skeleton.
<<kêllÿ>>
> If I were to decide to do this. Guess I'd need to use my business
> phone. The ID on that says "restricted" and gives out no further
> information.
Press *67 when you first hear a dial tone and then dial whatever
number you want - *67 blocks the receiver of the call from seeing your
number on caller ID (except with 800-type numbers).
<<kêllÿ>>
wrote:
> Kelly, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
I've been able to (and have) for over 34 years.
<snipped egocentric, self-serving links from Andy>
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Matt wrote:
>
>> If I were to decide to do this. �Guess I'd need to use my business
>> phone. �The ID on that says "restricted" and gives out no further
>> information.
>
>Press *67 when you first hear a dial tone and then dial whatever
>number you want - *67 blocks the receiver of the call from seeing your
>number on caller ID (except with 800-type numbers).
Wonderful.
There goes that excuse for those who actually are not able to publicly
say "Jesus is LORD" because have not yet been born again of water and
the Holy Spirit.
Kelly, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
Love in the truth,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
and Author of "Be Hungry"
http://NetCabal.com
"Don't be left behind as were Cleopas and Simon ...
... -----------------> be hungry ! ! !"
"... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
Randy ®
wrote:
> Randy wrote:
> > Kelly wrote:
> >> Vera wrote:
> >>> Vera wrote:
> >>> > Randy wrote::
>
> >>> >> (Thereby revealing your name and phone number on his caller I.D.)
>
> >>> > (Yes! Why not? Matt likes to pass it on.)
>
> >>> (Addition: That was meant ironically, of course.)
>
> >>Baloney. You meant it exactly as it appeared: mean-spirited. It was
> >>your first instinct to be that way because that is what drives you
> >>when it comes to those in here you hate (which is practically
> >>everyone). Your follow-up post to your previous post you made was
> >>more of a "oh no - I probably shouldn't have said that" - rather than
> >>be honest, however, you decided to try and save face with a lie.
>
> >>Did you really think you were kidding anyone?
>
> >Does anyone really believe that someone who insists the Bible
> >teaches God endorses loving, monogamous homosexuality, is
> >somehow a credible witness?
>
> The only truthful witnesses are those who can publicly say "Jesus is
> LORD."
>
> Randy, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
Are you denying you already asked, or that I already answered that
question?
<<kêllÿ>>
wrote:
> There goes that excuse for those who actually are not able to publicly
> say "Jesus is LORD" because have not yet been born again of water and
> the Holy Spirit.
Excuse? You misunderstand - they likely used it as a way to get you
to stop pestering them with your inane and ego-centric "Simon (Peter)
says Jesus is Lord on the phone" campaign. Oh, and BTW...it's not
"born again of water and the Holy Spirit", the Word of God in John 3:5
says, "...unless one is born of water and the Spirit..." - (and, FYI,
the "water" part isn't speaking of baptism). Stop trying to change
God's Word to something it was never meant to be (centered around you
and your delusional, egomanical fantasies).
> Kelly, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
Are you learning impaired? I've already answered this question for
you several times over - maybe English isn't your first language?
Short term memory loss? Brain tumor? Then again, someone who does
push-ups on-camera and posts the video online thinking it's
glorification of God over glorification of self could just be...
...plain stupid.
Like you.
<back in the bozo-bin with you, Andy>
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>> Kelly, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
>
> I've been able to (and have) for over 34 years.
Then what is your excuse for not honoring this disciple of Jesus'
polite request to hear you publicly glorify Jesus by saying "Jesus is
JohnH
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 20:37:53 -0400,
> In newsgroup "alt.christnet.christianlife",
> Article <h292cj$6qv$1...@news.albasani.net>,
> Subject: Re: Ping: Matt ...
> JohnH <jo...@nospam.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>>> ;;;Matt;;; wrote:
>>>
>> SNIP
>>>>> Matt, can you publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
>>>> Hi Andrew We have been though this before. Yes I can say it Publicly
>>>> "Jesus is Lord". I have many times. Will do so at Church tomorrow if
>>>> you like.
>>> Please allow me to hear you say "Jesus is LORD" via voice mail at the
>>> number listed at the WDJW web site listed above.
>>>
>> Apparently, Andy's just had a coronary. Does anyone know how to contact
>> Michael Jackson's personal cardiologist?
>
>
> And no one can accuse Michael Jackson of not being hungry
> enough. He was a skeleton.
>
he gets into heaven. They should hope and pray instead that he had
known, in his lifetime, that Jesus was the Christ, and that he had
actually accepted Him as his personal Lord and Savior. The fruit from
his music videos testify otherwise, however.
monkfish
He basically does not belive that
God has plans for everyone.
He might be trying to save himself
by making other people appear to be condemned.
Lack of trust in God will do that to him.
--
monkfish
monkfish
How can he trust you when he cannot even trust God?
Sooner or later he would be asking God
to publicly say "You know me better than I do."
--
monkfish
Randy �
In newsgroup "alt.christnet.christianlife",
Article
Subject: Re: Ping: Kelly ...
<<k�ll�>> <rosie...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>Stop trying to change
>God's Word to something it was never meant to be (centered around you
>and your delusional, egomanical fantasies).
Isn't that how you concluded the Bible does not condemn
"loving", monogamous, homosexual relationships?
monkfish
> Kelly wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>>> Kelly, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
>>
>> I've been able to (and have) for over 34 years.
>
> Then what is your excuse for not honoring this disciple of Jesus'
> polite request to hear you publicly glorify Jesus by saying "Jesus is
> LORD" ?
Are you superstitious or something?
Isn't it enough to say "Lord, help me" in private?
I do that countless times a day.
Can you say "Lord, help me" in private?
--
monkfish
Dr. House
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:57:00 -0700 (PDT),
> In newsgroup "alt.christnet.christianlife",
> Article
> Subject: Re: Ping: Kelly ...
>
> >Stop trying to change
> >God's Word to something it was never meant to be (centered around you
> >and your delusional, egomanical fantasies).
>
> Isn't that how you concluded the Bible does not condemn
> "loving", monogamous, homosexual relationships?
Of course the Bible condemns homosexual relationships. The question
is did God have men write that or did men pretend God wrote it?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/21c110fd0d39f0d3?
May GOD soften your heart, Kelly, so that you would come to trust the
truth, Who is Jesus:
Amen.
monkfish
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:57:00 -0700 (PDT),
> In newsgroup "alt.christnet.christianlife",
> Article
> <62f9e550-7a82-409f...@y34g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> Subject: Re: Ping: Kelly ...
> <<kêllÿ>> <rosie...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>>Stop trying to change
>>God's Word to something it was never meant to be (centered around you
>>and your delusional, egomanical fantasies).
>
>
> Isn't that how you concluded the Bible does not condemn
> "loving", monogamous, homosexual relationships?
It appears that at the time the Bible is written
God didn't like homosexual relationships.
But God can change His mind, can't He?
--
monkfish
::: Jesus is LORD :::
Randy � <pulpi...@gmail.com> typed:
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:57:00 -0700 (PDT),
> In newsgroup "alt.christnet.christianlife",
> Article
> <62f9e550-7a82-409f...@y34g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> Subject: Re: Ping: Kelly ...
> <<k�ll�>> <rosie...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Stop trying to change
>> God's Word to something it was never meant to be (centered around you
>> and your delusional, egomanical fantasies).
>
>
> Isn't that how you concluded the Bible does not condemn
> "loving", monogamous, homosexual relationships?
I adore your patience with that lady, Randy. She is one more on my
ignore list, and I have not responded to her evil trash for months.
JohnH
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>>> Kelly, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
>> I've been able to (and have) for over 34 years.
>
> Then what is your excuse for not honoring this disciple of Jesus'
> polite request to hear you publicly glorify Jesus by saying "Jesus is
> LORD" ?
>
man, who actually believes that showing your letters here makes you a
somebody when it does absolutely nothing of the kind, (well, other than
showing that you're a self-serving, self-righteous, egotistical, and
vain little man, that is.) Despite Kelly's variance on homosexual
issues, she's still a hundred-fold better Christian than you, so put
that into your balloon catheter and push on it.
>
SNIP
Randy �
In newsgroup "alt.christnet.christianlife",
Article <7aqmr1F...@mid.individual.net>,
>In news:gu8g45plahqhqkel5...@4ax.com,
>Randy � <pulpi...@gmail.com> typed:
>> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:57:00 -0700 (PDT),
>> In newsgroup "alt.christnet.christianlife",
>> Article
>> <62f9e550-7a82-409f...@y34g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
>> Subject: Re: Ping: Kelly ...
>> <<k�ll�>> <rosie...@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Stop trying to change
>>> God's Word to something it was never meant to be (centered around you
>>> and your delusional, egomanical fantasies).
>>
>>
>> Isn't that how you concluded the Bible does not condemn
>> "loving", monogamous, homosexual relationships?
>
>I adore your patience with that lady, Randy. She is one more on my
>ignore list, and I have not responded to her evil trash for months.
Glory to God. It's not that I haven't been trying to keep her
in my kill-file, it's just she keeps changing her id
information. The latest upgrade of my news client, however,
has a new tool that will make that more difficult. Here goes.
Let's see if this puts an end to it...
monkfish
It's not in the ten commandments, is it?
Can God change His mind?
--
monkfish
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Sad to note that you still can't answer the above simple yes/no
question with a written affirmative.
May GOD soften your heart, Randy, so that you would come to trust the
truth, Who is Jesus:
Amen.
Love in the truth,
monkfish
Do you ever say "Lord, help me" in private?
--
monkfish
<<kêllÿ>>
> Glory to God. It's not that I haven't been trying to keep her
> in my kill-file, it's just she keeps changing her id
> information. The latest upgrade of my news client, however,
> has a new tool that will make that more difficult. Here goes.
> Let's see if this puts an end to it...
Liar. I haven't changed my nym in quite a while.
dolf
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/4eafbeb876c89919?
May GOD soften your heart, JohnH, so that you would come to trust the
truth, Who is Jesus:
Amen.
Love in the truth,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
and Author of WDJW:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_does_Jesus_want%3F
dolf
The USENET STALKERAZZI have since their "Griz cult" collaboration,
whipped themselves up into a frenzy looking for their next kooks award
victim.
Clearly they're baying for blood and want to kill someone off...
Bruno (Sasha Baron Cohen) makes and interesting point about relationship
fidelity and autonomic rights in relation to the Apple i-Pod (how do you
know its stolen property which has no contact information and has a
short life for street kids with no place to recharge it): "[He] talked
to the mother and gave her an iPod in exchange for the child. But Ich
had real welfare concerns.
"Ich was really, really worried about the welfare of that iPod, because
the village where Ich met the woman was actually 2000 miles (about 3220
km) from the nearest Apple store. There was no chance for wi-fi update."
[http://www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,25694744-2902,00.html]
And while cafes such as Battuta Cafe Restaurant in 179 Oxford Street
Sydney provide WiFi access, this is no replacement for cheerful and
equitable service.
Microsoft is also increasingly being fascist (family oriented) and
unresponsive in their vilification of those who don't conform to their
nuclear family as autonomic model which denies the individual right.
But just how safe is your Apple I-Pod and the information it contains?
Is it possible that you could plan to do someone over by simply
deploying the semantics in the songs as discrete objects.
I'm not interested in providing anymore foundational cognitive
elements for multi-media Alice-In-Wonderland marketing opportunities.
Whilst it doesn't have any form of its own, what relationship does this
have within media, radio, television and the arts who might derive some
benefit from this stalking and elimination of any reference to a person?
Leonard Talmy's Toward a cognitive semantics says, "The relationship of
any of these categories or their members to the 'cognitive systems'
adduced is a heuristic matter to be worked on in the course of time.
The first heuristic psychological category includes the 'foundational'
cognitive systems that underlie or mediate the other psychological
functions. It includes consciousness and the accessibility of other
cognitive systems to consciousness, attention, perspective, perception,
memory, and motor control.
That may be considered a category of 'executive' functions includes
agency, intention, volition, goal pursuit, planning and decision."
So if you guess the Lyrics prematurely, it disrupts their continuum
--and they have to start again. This one goes back a long way back when
they first mentioned the cover versions of this song (by Leonard Cohen)
and deliberately excluded the Canadian Lesbian kd.Lang from mention:
I've heard there was a secret chord
that David played, and it pleased the Lord
But you don't really care for music, Do you?
It goes like this, the fourth, the fifth
The minor Fall, The major lift,
The baffled king composing, hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Your faith was strong but you needed proof
You saw her bathing on the roof
Her beauty in the moonlight overthrew you
She tied you to a kitchen chair, she broke your throne
she cut your hair and from your lips she drew the halleujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Maybe I've been here before
I know this room, I've walked this floor
I used to live alone before I knew you
I've seen your flag on the marble arch
love is not a victory march
it's a cold and it's a broken Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
There was a time you let me know
What's real and going on below
but now you never show it to me, do you?
And remember when I moved in you
the holy dove was moving too
And every breath we drew was Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Maybe there's a God above
And all I ever learned from love
Was how to shoot at someone who outdrew you
It's not a cry you can hear at night
It's not somebody who's seen the light
it's a cold and it's a broken Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah�
The word is "hallelujah" meaning "God be praised (uttered in worship or
as an expression of rejoicing)" and there was a distinct relation
between this and frenzy by these ATHIEST MONKEYS as USENET STALKERAZZI:
- Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com>
- Sanity's Little Helper <elv...@noshpam.org>
- AndrewJH <ahill...@yahoo.com>
- Budikka666 <budi...@netscape.net>
- Ken [Cyberstalker] Kellogg (flak...@aol.com):
Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> dolf wrote:
>> Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> Do you have any relationship with media,
>> radio, television and the arts that might derive some benefit from
>> your stalking?
>>
>> Because I'm not into organized crime...
>
> I don't believe you. Prove it.
Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> Do you have any relationship with media,
>> radio, television and the arts that might derive some benefit from
>> your stalking?
>
> Yes.
>>
>> Because I'm not into organized crime...
Olrik <olri...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> Sanity's Little Helper <elv...@noshpam.org> wrote:
>>> Andy, can you publicly say "Mary had a little lamb"?
>
> Pure quote fabrication.
>
> "dolf", you're a dishonest person. Shame on you. You should buy a
gun, at least one bullet, and do the honorable thing.
>
> Thank you.
Sorry that your transformation didn't go to plan--sure you might seek to
dump a few last minute adjectives and nouns into irrational sentences so
you close your parallel and cross market pitch--loop cycle...
But we are wise to you who are bruised ...
I <Iam@home0000298> wrote:
> ";;;Matt;;;" wrote:
>
>> Diana don't let them get to you either as they are lairs or at least
>> spinners of the truth.
>
> I second that!
>
>
>> They might be trying to restart the Griz cult under a new name. Vera
>> did tell me I should post to another group or maybe it was Grace she
>> said this to.
>>
>> The new rule everyone who disagrees with them is a Heretic. Sounds
>> like a Cult doctrine to me.
>
> They have forgotten that Christians are allowed to disagree with each
other. Paul disagreed with Peter. PROTEST-ants disagreed with
Catholics. Disagreements do not nullify one's stance as a Christian.
>
#298
--- inaccessible, steep; ore.
--- son(s) of the gods.
--- n. "Ruddy".
--- to fence around, enclose; to sing, to sound forth bright and clear;
to be bright or green, to bloom; court, yard; a village.
--- n. "Autumn Rain".
--- to cut in, to scratch; to cut to a point, to sharpen; to decide; to
gird oneself, to be active; loins; to shine, glitter.
--- n. "Help of Yah".
--- n. "Mouse".
Great Sage Itchy <it...@itchyandscratchy.com> wrote:
> In article <2ES1m.1544$ze1...@news-server.bigpond.net.au>, Michael
> Christ <Jesus...@Father.com> wrote:
>
>> "Great Sage Itchy" <it...@itchyandscratchy.com> wrote in message
news:280620091431495724%it...@itchyandscratchy.com...
>>> Andrew B. Chung,
>>> You are a supreme egoist,
>>> You are a sick asshole,
>>> You are a hated internet creep and troll,
>>> There is NOTHING "spiritual" about what you do here, or anywhere else,
>>> It's all EGO. Your whole life is nothing but EGO,
>>> You are a loser,
>>> You have NO friends,
>>> You never will have friends.
>>> Nobody likes an asshole,
>>> And that's what you are.
>>> And always will be.
>>>
>>> And now let us pray for usenet creep Andrew's perishing asshole soul:
>>>
>>> -----------------------------------------
>>> The Internet Lord's Prayer by GreatSageItchy (c) 2009
>>> -----------------------------------------
>>> Our Lord who lives in the sky,
>>>
>>> We acknowledge that you are all powerful,
>>> and that Andrew B. Chung is a sick asshole.
>>>
>>> We worship you Lord, in the knowledge that you will soon bring a
>>> glorious day when Andrew Chung will no longer be a total asshole, loser
>>> and usenet creep...
>>>
>>> But until then, he's lazy and stupid, so can you spare him some bread,
>>> SkyDude?
>>>
>>> And as you know, SkyGod, Andrew Chung is a weak, perverted, worthless
>>> creep, but please protect him from those who try to take advantage of
>>> his weakness, perversion, and stupidity...
>>>
>>> And stop him from doing creepy things he will later regret..
>>>
>>> Because, SkyGod, he wants to be a winner who does the right thing,
>>> but he's a loser and pervert, so he needs your help...
>>>
>>> For you are the Great Overlord and his Master, SkyGod,
>>> and only you can save his broke loser faggot ass.
>>> Amen.
>>> ----------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> And now, Andrew B. Chung, can you now publicly say "Jesus is a
>>> SKELETON" ?
>>>
>>> Love in the truth,
>>>
>>> -Great Sage Itchy, Greater than Heaven and God combined!
>>> --
>>> His Holiness Great Sage Itchy, GS, GTH/AGC
>>> God-certified Great Sage,
>>> and Author of "The Internet Lords Prayer", now translated into 167
>>> languages.
>> Like all your vitriol, it is all just a projection of yourself upon
others.
>>
>> It is you that is the arsehole and the egotist, and the evidence is
right before you.
>
>> Michael Christ
>
>
> Another usenet phony religious asshole.
monkfish
Forgive him.
He must have thought he has done something.
--
monkfish
dolf
The USENET STALKERAZZI have since their "Griz cult" collaboration,
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
>>> And now, Andrew B. Chung, can you now publicly say "Jesus is a
>>> SKELETON" ?
>>>
>>> Love in the truth,
>>>
dolf
monkfish <monkfish@nowhere> wrote:
> Do you ever say "Lord, help me" in private?
>
The USENET STALKERAZZI have since their "Griz cult" collaboration,
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah…
JohnH
>
Blah-blah-blah
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> Kelly wrote:
>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kelly, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
>>>
>>> I've been able to (and have) for over 34 years.
>>
>> Then what is your excuse for not honoring this disciple of Jesus'
>> polite request to hear you publicly glorify Jesus by saying "Jesus is
>> LORD" ?
>
> Are you superstitious or something?
Or something.
Superstitious people typically don't ask questions having guessed
their answers.
Thus, this disciple of Jesus' asking questions is an indication that
he is not superstitious.
Monkfish, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
dolf
Ask Kelly whether the reason why she has been able to for over 34 years,
because that's when she last had an orgasm.
JohnH wrote:
> Andy, a nobody, wrote:
>>
> Blah-blah-blah
Jimmy Alpha
> Kelly wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
> >> Kelly, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
> >
> > I've been able to (and have) for over 34 years.
>
> Then what is your excuse for not honoring this disciple of Jesus'
> polite request to hear you publicly glorify Jesus by saying "Jesus is
> LORD" ?
Jimmy Alpha here,
Perhaps she is being mindful of her pearls?
Jimmy Alpha
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/19c1cc01655eb4a8?
May GOD soften your heart, Jimmy, so that you would come to trust the
truth, Who is Jesus:
Amen.
Love in the truth,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
and Author of WDJW:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_does_Jesus_want%3F
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Jimmy Alpha
> You, Jimmy, remain a faux-christian (wolf in sheep clothing):
Not your call sightwalker.
Jimmy "Jesus is Lord" Alpha
Jimmy Alpha
> You, JohnH, remain a faux-christian (wolf in sheep clothing):
Not your call sightwalker.
Jimmy Alpha
dolf
Ask Kelly whether the reason why she has been able to for over 34 years,
is because that's when she last had an orgasm.
What religion are you JohnH?
JohnH wrote:
> Andy, a nobody, wrote:
>>
> Blah-blah-blah
JohnH <jo...@nospam.com> wrote:
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>> Kelly wrote:
>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>
>>>> Kelly, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
>>> I've been able to (and have) for over 34 years.
>>
>> Then what is your excuse for not honoring this disciple of Jesus'
>> polite request to hear you publicly glorify Jesus by saying "Jesus is
>> LORD" ?
>>
monkfish
> monkfish wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>> Kelly wrote:
>>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Kelly, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
>>>>
>>>> I've been able to (and have) for over 34 years.
>>>
>>> Then what is your excuse for not honoring this disciple of Jesus'
>>> polite request to hear you publicly glorify Jesus by saying "Jesus is
>>> LORD" ?
>>
>> Are you superstitious or something?
>
> Or something.
> Superstitious people typically don't ask questions having guessed
> their answers.
> Thus, this disciple of Jesus' asking questions is an indication that
> he is not superstitious.
But you are asking the wrong person.
You should ask yourself and God.
Why don't you ask God "Dear Lord, am I doing what You want?"
--
monkfish
dolf
worship or as an expression of rejoicing)"
monkfish <monkfish@nowhere> wrote:
>>>> Superstitious mantras are not true.
>>> Even the words of God can be abused.
>> That does not change the fact that you have lied about the sentence
>> "Jesus is LORD."
>
> You misunderstood.
> Why don't you think about it
> after saying "Lord, help me" in private.
>
Barry OGrady god_fre...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:55:23 +1000, "I" <Iam@home0000282> wrote:
>
>> "Chucky Stamford" <shells...@cox.net> wroteth:
>>
>>> "Barry OGrady" <god_fre...@yahoo.com> wrote
>>
>> Barry and Chuck - they deserve each other!
>
> Coming from Mark T that's absolutely meaningless.
>
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
Hallelujah, Hallelujah
>>> And now, Andrew B. Chung, can you now publicly say "Jesus is a
>>> SKELETON" ?
>>>
>>> Love in the truth,
>>>
>>> -Great Sage Itchy, Greater than Heaven and God combined!
>>> --
>>> His Holiness Great Sage Itchy, GS, GTH/AGC
>>> God-certified Great Sage,
>>> and Author of "The Internet Lords Prayer", now translated into 167
>>> languages.
>> Like all your vitriol, it is all just a projection of yourself upon
others.
>>
>> It is you that is the arsehole and the egotist, and the evidence is
right before you.
>
>> Michael Christ
>
>
> Another usenet phony religious asshole.
Dr. Sir John Howard, AC, WSCMoF wrote:
> Lee wrote:
>> This is the shocking picture of a young, white schoolboy being
converted to Islam by a cleric linked to a radical Muslim hate
preacher.The bewildered 11-year-old, who gives his name as Sean was
filmed repeating Arabic chants and swearing allegiance to Allah. The boy
is prompted throughout by controversial cleric Anjem Choudary, a
follower of exiled hate-preacher Omar Bakri Mohammed.
>>
>> More:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1196070/The-shocking-picture-white-boy-aged-11-converted-Islam-Choudary.html
>>
>> We don't need no education, we don't need no thought control!
>
> Do what the arselifters would do. Hang the kid for apostasy and kill
the cleric for forced conversion of a minor.
>
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> monkfish wrote:
>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>> Kelly wrote:
>>>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Kelly, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been able to (and have) for over 34 years.
>>>>
>>>> Then what is your excuse for not honoring this disciple of Jesus'
>>>> polite request to hear you publicly glorify Jesus by saying "Jesus is
>>>> LORD" ?
>>>
>>> Are you superstitious or something?
>>
>> Or something.
>> Superstitious people typically don't ask questions having guessed
>> their answers.
>> Thus, this disciple of Jesus' asking questions is an indication that
>> he is not superstitious.
>
>But you are asking the wrong person.
Incorrect.
Kelly is the right person to ask the following question:
"Then what is your excuse for not honoring this disciple of Jesus'
polite request to hear you publicly glorify Jesus by saying 'Jesus is
LORD' ?"
Clearly you continue to be guided by the spirit of error (self)
instead of the Holy Spirit.
May GOD soften your heart, Monkfish, so that you would come to trust
the truth, Who is Jesus:
Amen.
Love in the truth,
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/19c1cc01655eb4a8?
May GOD soften your heart, Jimmy, so that you would come to trust the
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/19c1cc01655eb4a8?
monkfish
Is that why you cannot answer yes or no
whether you ever pray "Lord, help me" in private?
--
monkfish
Sensi
> On Jun 28, 7:17 pm, Randy � <pulpitf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:57:00 -0700 (PDT),
>> In newsgroup "alt.christnet.christianlife",
>> Article
>> <62f9e550-7a82-409f-92a5-84efdca96...@y34g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
>> Subject: Re: Ping: Kelly ...
>>
>>> Stop trying to change
>>> God's Word to something it was never meant to be (centered around you
>>> and your delusional, egomanical fantasies).
>> "loving", monogamous, homosexual relationships?
>
> Of course the Bible condemns homosexual relationships. The question
> is did God have men write that or did men pretend God wrote it?
Sensi"
That ones easy.. The latter! ;-)
The Bible has been tampered with more than once.
This newest translated version is such a sorry mess.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/274bff41bb98ad7e?
May GOD soften your heart, Monkfish, so that you would come to trust
the truth, Who is Jesus:
Amen.
Love in the truth,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
and Author of WDJW:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_does_Jesus_want%3F
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
>Dr. House wrote:
>>
>> Of course the Bible condemns homosexual relationships. The question
>> is did God have men write that or did men pretend God wrote it?
>
>
>Sensi"
>That ones easy.. The latter! ;-)
>
>The Bible has been tampered with more than once.
>This newest translated version is such a sorry mess.
Sensi, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
Love in the truth,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
and Author of "Be Hungry"
http://NetCabal.com
"Don't be left behind as were Cleopas and Simon ...
... -----------------> be hungry ! ! !"
"... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
Randy �
In newsgroup "alt.christnet.christianlife",
Article <dPydnUk5yN_0odXX...@accessus.net>,
So you're contending that the parts of the Bible which condemn
homosexuality are really not God's word (e.g. Leviticus,
Romans 1, Corinthians, etc.)?
--
Have you heard Christ died for our sins, and God raised Him
from the dead? Did you know God saves you from hell and
gives you eternal life through faith in this finished work alone,
not your merits (Jn. 3:16; 1 Cor. 15:1-3; Eph. 2:8-10; 2 Thess.
1:8-9)? This is so man cannot boast, and God alone gets the
glory (Eph. 2:8-9).
______________________________________________
www.faithguard.org
www.twitter.com/faithguard
www.facebook.com/faithguard
______________________________________________
I
>>> Of course the Bible condemns homosexual relationships. The question
>>> is did God have men write that or did men pretend God wrote it?
>>That ones easy.. The latter! ;-)
>>
>>The Bible has been tampered with more than once.
>>This newest translated version is such a sorry mess.
>
> So you're contending that the parts of the Bible which condemn
> homosexuality are really not God's word
Correct!
They are no more "God's Word" that the texts that advocate genocide by
Joshua or the texts that advocate slavery!
1. Jesus of Nazareth NEVER spoke about homosexuality.
2. The Ten Commandments NEVER mention homosexuality.
3. The Bible NEVER refers to itself as the "Word of God".
You appear totally ignorant of those three points.
You should read John Shelby Spong's "The Sins of Scripture: Exposing the
Bible's Texts of Hate to Reveal the God of Love" (HarperCollins:2005).
Section 4: The Bible and Homosexuality
- Chapter 12. The ecclesiastical bttle over Homosexuality: Intense,
Irrational, Threatening and Hysterical
- Chapter 13. The Hiliness code frojm the book of Leviticus
- Chapter 14. The story of Sodom
- Chapter 15. The Homophobia of Paul
Oh ... I forget ... your tiny little fundamentalist "god" is all about
HATE!!!
--
The most pronounced characteristics [of fundamentalists] are the following:
(a) a very stong emphasis on the inerrancy of the Bible, the absence from it
of any sort of error;
(b) a strong hostility to modern theology and to the methods, results and
implications of modern critical study of the Bible;
(c) an assurance that those who do not share their religious viewpoint are
not really 'true Christians' at all.
- James Barr "Fundamentalism" (SCM Press:1977) p.1
Sensi
Sensi:
Yes I'am. People are born in those situations and it's not
their fault that they have those tendencies. It's no
different than people being born black, white, smart,
dumb,rich,poor, male, female and then having to deal with
what they've been handed.
I've said all along that it has an inner meaning where man
screws with your mind and you have all these little weird
ideas born into the world that cause harm to men,women and
children but worse to yourself for letting men *.uck with
your mind and heart.
The Bible didn't say homosexuality until it was recently
changed to mean what *they* wanted it to mean. So it goes
back to what you just said in another post about adding words.
If you're going to use the model that all men are sinners
then you're going to have to see yourself as being in a
situation that you don't want to see yourself in rather than
pointing and blaming homos for what they are.
Be fair...and at least see yourself as the sinner instead of
always someone else.
See? See?
Dr. House
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 23:00:37 -0500,
> In newsgroup "alt.christnet.christianlife",
> Subject: Re: Ping: Kelly ...
>
>
>
> >Dr. House wrote:
> >> On Jun 28, 7:17 pm, Randy ® <pulpitf...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 18:57:00 -0700 (PDT),
> >>> In newsgroup "alt.christnet.christianlife",
> >>> Article
> >>> <62f9e550-7a82-409f-92a5-84efdca96...@y34g2000yqd.googlegroups.com>,
> >>> Subject: Re: Ping: Kelly ...
>
> >>>> Stop trying to change
> >>>> God's Word to something it was never meant to be (centered around you
> >>>> and your delusional, egomanical fantasies).
> >>> Isn't that how you concluded the Bible does not condemn
> >>> "loving", monogamous, homosexual relationships?
>
> >> Of course the Bible condemns homosexual relationships. The question
> >> is did God have men write that or did men pretend God wrote it?
>
> >Sensi"
> >That ones easy.. The latter! ;-)
>
> >The Bible has been tampered with more than once.
> >This newest translated version is such a sorry mess.
>
> So you're contending that the parts of the Bible which condemn
> homosexuality are really not God's word (e.g. Leviticus,
> Romans 1, Corinthians, etc.)?
You can't _show_ that any part of it is God's word.
It's something you believe. But look at how much you are willing to
oppress and hurt others over what is just a belief. You are not that
far removed from the Witch Hunters who thought Satan worshipers caused
their crops to fail. Paul had some weird ideas about sex. Some of
them were downright ignorant and hateful. Lev. has codified hate.
Some passages are instructions on who to detest.
You can either think God is behind it or you can think God is angry
that he got blamed for it. I choose to think God is much bigger than
the Bible.
I
> You can't _show_ that any part of it is God's word.
I'm still waiting for ANY Bible verse that refers to the WHOLE Bible as
"God's Word". No such verse exists!!!!!
> I choose to think God is much bigger than the Bible.
God is infinite.
The Bible is a man-made finite artifact.
Randy �
In newsgroup "alt.christnet.christianlife",
Article <Dt6dnZBFBb7j2tXX...@accessus.net>,
Sensi <sensi...@home.com> wrote:
>Randy � wrote:
>> So you're contending that the parts of the Bible which condemn
>> homosexuality are really not God's word (e.g. Leviticus,
>> Romans 1, Corinthians, etc.)?
>>
>
>
>
>Sensi:
>Yes I'am.
How convenient.
dolf
Scripture relate to cosmological understanding 364 days of the Jerusalem
Temple v's 365.25 of the Julian Calendar.
AND ITS CONSEQUENTIAL EFFECT ON THE AUTONOMIC RIGHT AS AN ENGINE
#72 --
#75 -- 30 Categories: #1, #8, #10, #50, #4, #2 = n. Liberal Brother;
#2, #7, #10, #6, #50 = Contempt; #2, #9, #8, #6, #50 = Strong
confidence; hope; #3, #2, #70 = To be vaulted, curved, bowl-shaped; to
be arched, hilly; n. Hill; #4, #10, #50, #10, #1 = n. Dinaites; #5, #6,
#60, #4 = To be established; foundation; #5, #10, #30, #30 = Brightness;
bright star, morning star (Venus & Lucifer); #5, #30, #40 = To stamp,
tread hard; beat, smite; to break to pieces; to snap off, break up;
shine, sparkle; hither, here; n. A Smiting; #5, #40, #30 = To be full;
plenteous, numerous; #10, #20, #30, #10, #5 = n. Yah is Able; #10, #30,
#30, #5 = Wailing; #20, #5, #50 = To perform, execute; to minister,
serve; to be a priest; a priest; #20, #10, #40, #5 = A group, cluster;
the Pleiades, the Seven Stars; #20, #50, #5 = To surname, give a title
of respect; to bite or sting; a plant or shoot; n. Cane or Reed; #30,
#5, #40 = To eat, to devour greedily; #30, #10, #30, #5 = night; by
night; #30, #40, #5 = Wherefore?, Why?; that not, lest; #40, #10, #20,
#5 = n. Who Like Yah?, Micah the prophet.; #40, #30, #5 = Speech or
discourse; a byword; #40, #30, #5 = A word, command; a matter or thing;
#50, #20, #5 = To strike or smite; #50, #20, #5 = Smitten; #50, #20, #5
= n. Conqueror, pharaoh Necho IInd of Egypt; #60, #6, #9 = To turn aside
or roam; #60, #8, #2, #5 = rags, torn pieces; #70, #3, #2 = To breathe
or blow; to breathe after, to desire, to love (passionately), to dote or
lust after; #70, #3, #2 = Love or charm; #70, #4, #1 = To pass, to go or
come; to pass away or perish; to be abolished; to depose; #70, #4, #1 =
n. Timely or Seasonable (the prophet Iddo, author of some lost
historical works and also the name of the grandfather of the prophet
Zechariah); #70, #3, #2 = A pipe or flute
#142 --
#174 --
#584 --
- http://www.grapple.id.au/vCube.html
The Chinese DAOIST metaphysical philosophical / theological view of the
Tetragrammation view of Number being published in 2 BCE and during the
Han dynasty.
var TETRAGRAM = {
1:[0, 27, 54],
2:[0, 9, 18],
3:[0, 3, 6],
4:[1, 2, 3]
} // Chinese Daoist understanding of number as Yang, Yin, Zhun
I have a replica circular jewelry box which dates from about 206 BCE
(preceding the Han Dynasty of 206 BCE-220 CE) which shows a dragon
(Emperor/Male) and phoenix (Consort/Female) and which conforms to the
planetary prohibitions (as a heritage to other peoples) given at Sinai
[Deuteronomy 4] and referenced in Paul's theology of [Romans 1] which
conveys by the Category of Understanding on the rancidity of the Latin
tongue, that acting against the vitality of life is substantive grounds
for divorce:
#1, #2, #20 = To twirl or eddy; to mount up in a column (of smoke);
#1, #8, #6, #8 = n. Brotherhood; #1, #10, #7, #5 = Where?, where now?;
#2, #20, #1 = To drop or trickle, to flow scantily;
#2, #20, #1 = Trickling, weeping, a tree (like balsam-scrub);
#5, #10, #4, #4 = Shout of joy; vintage-cry; war-cry;
#7, #2, #4, #10 = n. Gift of Yah, Zebadi;
#7, #8, #8 = To remove; to bind, knit;
#7, #10, #6 = Brightness, cheerfulness;
#8, #6, #9 = To bind, to sew; thread, string;
#8, #9, #1, #5 = A sin, a sin offering; sinful; penalty for sin;
#8, #10, #5 = To live, be, exist; to coil up, to enclose, collect;
vitality, life; animal, beast; living things; quadrupeds (opp. to birds,
reptiles etc.); wild beasts; living creature (angel); a band or troop of
men; a people;
#9, #6, #8 = To daub, smear over; to plaster; besmear;
#20, #1, #2 = To hurt, to pierce; to be sore; feel pain, to suffer; to
be sick or sad; pain; grief
The Apostle Paul proffers only two theological choices
a "Jew who follows the Torah" is inclusive of the lunar and solar calendar:
The Everlasting Covenant's 'oth cycle as 6D or #2184 days, which
includes a lunar 3 x 354 + 30 = #1092 day analogy, is here shown as a
measurement associated with a certain harmonic to an event of 11
September 2001 + 6D (#2184) + #500 as (2684 days) = 16 Jan 2009 which
has a correspondence to the crucifixion of Jesus of Nazareth.
Or a "pious hymenealist cultist Gregorian calendar Gentile", which in
his day as the Julian calendar had a faulty intercalation of which he
would be aware:
7 x 24 x 13 = 2184 days (priestly service of the Jewish Temple) x 49 =
6J as 294 x 364 days or 293 x 365.2425 days
That the Catholic claim to Christian identity is made redundant and
ineffectual. And a muslim who follows a lunar calendar is therefore
antagonistic to the negation provided by the Judaeo-Christian Paul's
theology as Apostle to the Gentiles.
"For since the creation of the world his invisible attributes are
clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even his
eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, because,
although they knew God:
they did not glorify him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in
their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened. Professing to be
wise, they became fools, and changed the glory of the incorruptible God
into an image like corruptible man [of male and female--HETEROS Number
mysticism as incommensurate conundrum and syllogistic definition of
piety-monogenes derived from marriage-monogamous gamogenesis] and birds
and four-footed beasts and creeping things." [Romans 1:20-23;
Deuteronomy 4:1-20]
Evidently because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God
has shown it to them as having a contemporary relevance in the 2 BCE
published metathesis on the Chinese Ternary (Yang, Yin, Zhun) Number
based Tetragrammation system of Han Dynasty (206 BCE to 220 CE) Imperial
Governance associating the male to the dragon and the female (consort)
to the phoenix: "Know the male {ie. SUPER-EGO} but keep to the role of
the female {ie. EGO} and be a ravine to the empire. If you are a ravine
to the empire, then the constant virtue {ie. #72 elements of the TORAH
v's #64 elements of the CHANGES} will not desert you and you will again
return to being a babe. Know the white but keep to the role of the
sullied {ie. HETEROS (marriage) as existential, exceptional and
indissoluable BINARY (CHANGES) apparatus of Number and supernal
hierarchy to the SUPER-EGO} and be a model {ie. #72 autonomic elements}
to the empire {ie. #81 elements of the DAO as Commonwealth}. If you are
a model to the empire, then the constant virtue will not be wanting and
you will return to the infinite, know honour but keep to the role of the
disgraced and be a valley to the empire. If you are a valley to the
empire, then the constant virtue will be sufficient and you will return
to being the uncarved block. When the uncarved block shatters it becomes
vessels. The sage makes use of these and becomes the lord over the
officials. Hence the greatest cutting does not sever." [DAO TE CHING #28
- Opposites and Primitivism/ Returning to Simplicity; I-Ching: H24 -
Turning Point; Tetra: 2 - Full Circle, translation by Professor Darrell
T. Liu]
If truly knowledge-based organizations are to be realized, there must be
a keen appreciation of the very nature of knowledge. This includes a
taxonomy of knowledge types, repertoire of knowledge representation
techniques, a familiarity with knowledge-processing methods, and an
understanding of knowledge utilization in solving problems in the
traditional functional areas of management. This formal study of the
fundamentals of knowledge is concerned more with pragmatics than
abstract epistemological issues.
In many instances, the Torah also uses words and phrases in ways that
cannot be understood in their literal sense. There are a number of very
obvious examples of this in the narrative of the Creation, for the
metaphysical events that took place at that time were far removed from
the natural order of the world we know today. They could not have been
accurately described in ways that we can understand, nor in language
that we can relate to. For example, the Torah tells us how God brought
the world into being through speech, when in fact He created the world
through a form of thought. When the Torah describes God's thought
process as speech, it makes it easier for us to grasp the idea on our
own level. [Copyright � 2001 by Rabbi Daniel Travis and www.Torah.org]
The [virtual] Cube in the figure below is suggestive of the
[metaphysical] possibilities that can confront knowledge workers in
attempting to solve a problem. Some combination of one or more cells
must be selected and utilized. The labeled axes of the cube are
indicative of the need for research into knowledge pragmatics. The
beginnings of such investigation can be seen in decision support systems
research into the [ternary] nature of generalized [binary apparatus]
problem processors and in the Artificial Intelligence research efforts
that have led to a [consideration of embedding a 32 bit Windows/Text
based 4th Generation Language] system like Guru [into a HTML document
environment with Javascript functionality]. The unfolding research in
this will also draw on work in such fields as psychology, philosophy,
linguistics, and decision theory.
As the pragmatics of knowledge are more fully comprehended, they will
become an essential aspect of knowledge worker training. They will also
stimulate the appearance of new kinds of facilities in knowledge
management software tools as truly as love of honey drives tool use in
chimpanzees: "If you're impressed that chimps can use tools to hunt or
crack nuts, wait till you hear what they do when foraging for honey. Not
only do they construct several different tools for the purpose, but they
use them sequentially--an achievement approaching the abilities of early
Stone Age humans." [Bob Holmes, New Scientist 30 May 2009, p 11]
I thought the piece on the Georgia Guidestones by Randy Sullivan
rand...@aol.com American Stonehenge Wired Magazine May 2009, p 118 -
126, as the most enigmatic monument in the US, renders their conduct, in
light of 11 September 2001 as contemptuous--pity Bill Gates for all his
wealth, can't swat mosquitoes with an instant death of soul like the US
President magic carpets flys as flecks!
Curiously these stones were subject to graffiti attacks including
slogans like: 'DEATH TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER' This defacement was the
first serious act of vandalism in the Guidestone's history, but was
hardly the first objection to their existence. In fact, for more than
three decades this uncanny structure in the heart of the Bible Belt has
been generating responses that range from enchantment to horror.
Supporters have praised the messages as a stirring call to rational
thinking, akin to Thomas Paine's The Age of Reason.
Opponents have attacked them as the Ten Commandments of the AntiChrist."
[Wired Magazine p 120]
Knowledge worker training must therefore obviously encompass the subject
of advanced knowledge management software tools. This includes not only
tool characteristics, but also tool selection and effective tool
application within each of the functional areas of [business]
management. [(c) 1986 Clyde Holsapple & Andrew Whinston, Manager's Guide
to Expert Systems Using Micro Database Systems Guru, (c) 2004 Savitar
Corporation, p 287-288]
I've recently implemented a basic object browser within the _GIZMO
virtual cube as document centric laboratory. It now displays the
following information:
Grapple strata [strata cognitivi]
Surface [stratum corneum]
memeBrain language interface [creating idea CHADs through heuristic
dialectic ponderings]
Nous Stem [growing ideas]
Chronos: time and month calendar
Nous Info: header
The key to this gliding portal functionality is the use of the elapsed
millisecond as pivot and id which is assigned to the initial FORM table
id such as '57077489.gizmoBrowser@zen:2,row:8,col:4,nous:56'.
This is then used as an unique key together with the grappleIDEA
template name by which the doCellChange({zen: 2, row: 8, col: 4, name:
'monthview', portal: 'portal.57077489'}) function is then called to
generate the form by:
grappleIDEA({tag: obj.portal, vIdea: window[obj.name].know(obj.zen,
obj.row, obj.col, obj.nous, 0, obj.portal)});
The adoption of this technique is expected to increase autonomic power
resource capacity and performance especially given the observation that
a 9 x 9 table with all its style elements and <select> tag attributes,
can generate some 72+ pages of HTML code.
This psychological stratum encompasses all the possible contents of
cognition. Though cognition as yet has no definitive divisions, some
heuristic categories can be ascribed to it.
We next suggest six such categories, as well as a sizable sampling of
cognitive phenomena included within the categories, to underscore the
variety. Each cognitive phenomenon listed is intended to cover the range
from good to poor functioning. For example, 'accessibility to
consciousness' also includes poor access, thus covering additional
phenomena such as preconsciousness, repression, and so on, while
'memory' also includes forgetting. These categories and their members
pertain to the psychological structure of any so-conceived cognitive entity.
The relationship of any of these categories or their members to the
'cognitive systems' adduced is a heuristic matter to be worked on in the
course of time.
The first heuristic psychological category includes the 'foundational'
cognitive systems that underlie or mediate the other psychological
functions. It includes consciousness and the accessibility of other
cognitive systems to consciousness, attention, perspective, perception,
memory, and motor control.
That may be considered a category of 'executive' functions includes
agency, intention, volition, goal pursuit, planning and decision.
A third category consisting of the 'ideational' or 'intellective'
functions and systems would include thought, concepts, and
conceptualizations; beliefs, knowledge, and explanatory understanding;
presuppositions and unnoticed assumptions; opinion and attitude;
worldview; and assessment of familiarity, normativity, probability, and
veridicality; the reasoning, inferencing, and a sense of logic.
A further 'affective' category would include emotions and mood states,
motivations and drives, desires and wishes, an aesthetic response. An
additional category of 'values' would include ethics, morals, and
priorities--in general, ascriptions along the dimensions of goodness and
importance.
Finally, a category of 'composite' or 'overall' psychological phenomena
would include personality, temperament, and character.
These suggestive categories are not mutually exclusive--but largely
combine--comparable features. For example, regret and worry are fully
emotive but are based on an often-detailed intellective assessment of
circumstances." [Leonard Talmy (c) 2003 Toward a cognitive semantics,
Vol II p 440]
dolf
> "Randy �" <pulpi...@gmail.com> wroteth:
>
>>>> Of course the Bible condemns homosexual relationships. The question
>>>> is did God have men write that or did men pretend God wrote it?
>>> That ones easy.. The latter! ;-)
>>>
>>> The Bible has been tampered with more than once.
>>> This newest translated version is such a sorry mess.
>> So you're contending that the parts of the Bible which condemn
>> homosexuality are really not God's word
>
> Correct!
>
> They are no more "God's Word" that the texts that advocate genocide by
> Joshua or the texts that advocate slavery!
>
> 1. Jesus of Nazareth NEVER spoke about homosexuality.
JESUS MENTIONS MALAKOS (WRONGLY INTERPRETED AS HOMOSEXUAL IN PAUL'S
WRITING) IN RELATION TO PERVERSE FASHIONISTA BY THE JEWISH PRIESTHOOD
>
> 2. The Ten Commandments NEVER mention homosexuality.
SINCE THEY HAVE A TERNARY NUMERICAL EQUIVALENT--THE HETEROSEXUAL BINARY
APPARATUS (#0 ... #15 ... #34 ... #65 ... #111 ... #175 ... #260 ...
#369 ... #2000 as Y2K) IS IMPLIED BY MANY OF THE COMMANDMENTS SUCH AS
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (do not commit adultery).
REMEMBER THE SABBATH
49J1W2D + 40 x 364 day/years sojourn = 49J7W (+ 49.7 days = 365.2425
topical year)
HONOR PARENTS
6J x 12 as #294 x 364 or #293 x 365.2425 = 72J + 3(3�+1)/2 = 457 BCE
DO NOT MURDER
#400 MOD 22 & 70 times 7 of 33 CE v's #0 ... #15 ... #34 ... #65 ...
#111 ... #175 ... #260 ... #369 ... #2000 as Y2K
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY
Telos ('achariyth as #6000 122J3W1D) = Arch (re'shiyth as 3W1D) + c�
[9(9�+1)/2]
DO NOT STEAL (DISCRIMINATING NORM: #SHIN)
DO NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS (OBLIGATING NORM: MARRIAGE OATHS (MOTHER
LETTER: #MEM))
DO NOT COVET (MANIFESTING NORM: (MOTHER LETTER: #ALEPH))
>
> 3. The Bible NEVER refers to itself as the "Word of God".
EYE HATH NOT SEEN, NOR EAR HEARD, NOR ENTERED INTO THE HEARTS OF MAN
#308
--- n. "God is Helper".
--- a bad smelling plant, a weed.
--- a herdsman; shepherd.
--- to turn white, to pale; to change color, pale, blush; to be
disappointed, come to shame, be deceived; fail in function or purpose;
disgrace.
--- to be bad.
--- an enclosure, a home; grass; a leek.
--- n. "Blooming".
--- to dig; to search, examine, explore (by mining), to search out, to
make a survey of; to examine, to taste; to test; a searching out; a
secret, the inmost or deepest part; unsearchableness (of God ='s God's
works and plans).
--- a cut, slice.
--- n. "Double Cave".
--- to grate or gnash; to grind the teeth.
--- n. "Splendid".
--- to his opposite (bearing), straight forwards.
--- traffic or trade.
--- n. "God's help".
dolf
> "Randy �" <pulpi...@gmail.com> wroteth:
>
>>>> Of course the Bible condemns homosexual relationships. The question
>>>> is did God have men write that or did men pretend God wrote it?
>>> That ones easy.. The latter! ;-)
>>>
>>> The Bible has been tampered with more than once.
>>> This newest translated version is such a sorry mess.
>> So you're contending that the parts of the Bible which condemn
>> homosexuality are really not God's word
>
> Correct!
>
> They are no more "God's Word" that the texts that advocate genocide by
> Joshua or the texts that advocate slavery!
>
> 1. Jesus of Nazareth NEVER spoke about homosexuality.
JESUS MENTIONS MALAKOS (WRONGLY INTERPRETED AS HOMOSEXUAL IN PAUL'S
WRITING) IN RELATION TO PRIESTHOOD
>
> 2. The Ten Commandments NEVER mention homosexuality.
SINCE THEY HAVE A TERNARY NUMERICAL EQUIVALENT--THE HETEROSEXUAL BINARY
APPARATUS (#0 ... #15 ... #34 ... #65 ... #111 ... #175 ... #260 ...
#369 ... #2000 as Y2K) IS IMPLIED BY MANY OF THE COMMANDMENTS SUCH AS
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (do not commit adultery).
REMEMBER THE SABBATH
49J1W2D + 40 x 364 day/years sojourn = 49J7W (+ 49.7 days = 365.2425
topical year)
HONOR PARENTS
6J x 12 as #294 x 364 or #293 x 365.2425 = 72J + 3(3�+1)/2 = 457 BCE
DO NOT MURDER
#400 MOD 22 & 70 times 7 of 33 CE v's #0 ... #15 ... #34 ... #65 ...
#111 ... #175 ... #260 ... #369 ... #2000 as Y2K
AVOID HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY
Telos ('achariyth as #6000 122J3W1D) = Arch (re'shiyth as 3W1D) + c�
[9(9�+1)/2]
DO NOT STEAL (DISCRIMINATING NORM: #SHIN)
DO NOT BEAR FALSE WITNESS (OBLIGATING NORM: MARRIAGE OATHS (MOTHER
LETTER: #MEM))
DO NOT COVET (MANIFESTING NORM: (MOTHER LETTER: #ALEPH))
>
> 3. The Bible NEVER refers to itself as the "Word of God".
EYE HATH NOT SEEN, NOR EAR HEARD, NOR ENTERED INTO THE HEARTS OF MAN
#308
--- n. "God is Helper".
--- a bad smelling plant, a weed.
--- a herdsman; shepherd.
--- to turn white, to pale; to change color, pale, blush; to be
disappointed, come to shame, be deceived; fail in function or purpose;
disgrace.
--- to be bad.
--- an enclosure, a home; grass; a leek.
--- n. "Blooming".
--- to dig; to search, examine, explore (by mining), to search out, to
make a survey of; to examine, to taste; to test; a searching out; a
secret, the inmost or deepest part; unsearchableness (of God ='s God's
works and plans).
--- a cut, slice.
--- n. "Double Cave".
--- to grate or gnash; to grind the teeth.
--- n. "Splendid".
--- to his opposite (bearing), straight forwards.
--- traffic or trade.
--- n. "God's help".
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Randy wrote:
>> So you're contending that the parts of the Bible which condemn
>> homosexuality are really not God's word (e.g. Leviticus,
>> Romans 1, Corinthians, etc.)?
>
>You can't _show_ that any part of it is God's word.
>
>It's something you believe. But look at how much you are willing to
>oppress and hurt others over what is just a belief. You are not that
>far removed from the Witch Hunters who thought Satan worshipers caused
>their crops to fail. Paul had some weird ideas about sex. Some of
>them were downright ignorant and hateful. Lev. has codified hate.
>Some passages are instructions on who to detest.
>
>You can either think God is behind it or you can think God is angry
>that he got blamed for it. I choose to think God is much bigger than
>the Bible.
That is not really writing very much because there are other books
that are bigger than the Bible.
Most assuredly, without doubt, I know and understand GOD to be kind,
just, and right (Jeremiah 9:24).
Dr. House, can you now publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
Jimmy Alpha
> You, Jimmy, remain a faux-christian (wolf in sheep clothing):
That sightwalker, is not your call.
I might be better if you would worry more about getting your own house
in order?
You should really think of your children, and them seeing you acting out
stupid, no telling what they might do with your bad example as a guide?
Remember, they just might have your DNA, and perhaps your obsessive
disorders?
Jimmy Alpha
JohnH
>
nothing of consequence.
JohnH
> You, Jimmy, remain a faux-christian (wolf in sheep clothing):
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/19c1cc01655eb4a8?
>
> May GOD soften your heart, Jimmy, so that you would come to trust the
> truth, Who is Jesus:
>
country needs alright, lazy cardiologists, like Andy and Michael
Jackson's personal lackey.
JohnH
>
that he's out of bullets and shooting nothing but blanks now.
::: Jesus is LORD :::
JohnH <jo...@nospam.com> typed:
> Andy, a nobody, wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Do you think this is the Christian way, John? I wonder...
> nothing of consequence.
--
___________________________________________________
http://www.acc-growing-deeper.de
http://the-beauty-of-the-psalms.blogspot.com
http://jesus-christ-is-my-lord-and-my-god.blogspot.com
http://bible-prophecy-and-revelation.blogspot.com/
::: Jesus is LORD :::
JohnH <jo...@nospam.com> typed:
Do you believe that such insulting and personal comments are helpful for
anything, or could be called "Christian"?
JohnH
> You, Kelly, remain a faux-christian (wolf in sheep clothing):
>
Ah, another "copy & paste" job. An original thought won't kill you,
Andy-Boy!
::: Jesus is LORD :::
Andy is doing a lot of weird things, though, and probably needs help,
but I wonder if he can be helped by calling him "nobody". That sounds
like hate, John, and Christians should really overcome that.
I for one have his strange comments on my ignore list, and that works
just fine for me. I wonder if you could do the same, please?
--
___________________________________________________
http://www.acc-growing-deeper.de
http://the-beauty-of-the-psalms.blogspot.com
http://jesus-christ-is-my-lord-and-my-god.blogspot.com
http://bible-prophecy-and-revelation.blogspot.com/
In news:h2aidk$7g0$1...@news.albasani.net,
JohnH <jo...@nospam.com> typed:
Jimmy Alpha
> Andy is surely not "nobody" but was made in the image of God.
Andypoo is a nobody when it comes to appraising anothers standing before
God.
> Andy is doing a lot of weird things, though, and probably needs help,
Probably! But on the brighter side, on the brighter side, can someone
help me here? 8-)
> but I wonder if he can be helped by calling him "nobody". That sounds
> like hate,
Doesn't sound like hate, but his role when it comes to judging.
> John, and Christians should really overcome that.
Even Christians who haven't called Andypoo, you know, them
faux-christians...
> I for one have his strange comments on my ignore list, and that works
> just fine for me. I wonder if you could do the same, please?
You could just pass on that which you are not fond of, as I often do
with lime beer.
Jimmy "in my Hanes cotton thong" Alpha
JohnH
> In news:h2agm5$4d2$3...@news.albasani.net,
> JohnH <jo...@nospam.com> typed:
>> Andy, a nobody, wrote:
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Do you think this is the Christian way, John? I wonder...
>
first prove that you can be circumspect with yourself, and then maybe
we'll begin this greater work on me. In the meantime, however, perhaps
you'll have the true-grit to finally answer the following
question...this time around:
How would you like it if someone hyper-linked you to an image of a dog,
or a cow, or a pig...like you hyper-linked Matt to the image of Henry
Waxman? [It's a simple question, Vera, would you like it or not?]
>
Randy �
In newsgroup "alt.christnet.christianlife",
Article <h2alac$c9f$1...@news.albasani.net>,
Subject: Re: Being gracefully kind (WDJW) and praying for
JohnH's perishing soul ...
JohnH <jo...@nospam.com> wrote:
>How would you like it if someone hyper-linked you to an image of a dog,
>or a cow, or a pig...like you hyper-linked Matt to the image of Henry
>Waxman? [It's a simple question, Vera, would you like it or not?]
Why are you speaking in the hypothetical?
http://tinyurl.com/nkcshz
Oh...wait... could it be you're another Green Peace Heresy
Advocate whore who only notices when someone who attacks the
credibility of someone taking a stand for the true gospel,
gets a tiny dose of their own medicine?
Dan Listermann
"Randy �" <pulpi...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ojmh45dqgbgbthl64...@4ax.com...
> Have you heard Christ died for our sins, and God raised Him
> from the dead? Did you know God saves you from hell and
> gives you eternal life through faith in this finished work alone,
> not your merits
All silliness.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Truth is logically obvious.
There is joy in being used by GOD to change hearts:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8824c8a5b7c7518c?
May GOD soften your heart, Dan, so that you would come to trust the
truth, Who is Jesus:
Amen.
Love in the truth,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Heart Doctor
and Author of WDJW:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/What_does_Jesus_want%3F
::: Jesus is LORD :::
JohnH <jo...@nospam.com> typed:
Get serious, do you really think that Jesus would want to be associated
with a post like that? Yes or no.
monkfish
How about challenging Chritians
to publicly say "Jesus is LORD"
as if failing to do so whenever they were asked
would make them false Christians?
Can you say "Lord, help me" in private?
--
monkfish
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/19c1cc01655eb4a8?
May GOD soften your heart, Jimmy, so that you would come to trust the