The Motion of Photons Along Fixed Absolute Surfaces
eightwi...@yahoo.com
Recently, my ongoing research has led me to conclude that photons (the
real ones, not the wavicle crap) can move *only* along fixed, absolute
surfaces. I have determined that there exist four types of photons.
One is responsible for the electrostatic field and the other three for
magnetism. Furthermore, we are immersed in an immense 4-D lattice of
such photons. The motion of bodies through this lattice and the
interaction of matter with the lattice photons give rise to EM and
gravitational phenomena.
The fact that lattice photons can move only along fixed absolute
surfaces (there are three) will show (among many other wondrous
things) the relativists' "no-preferred frame" mantra to be nothing but
religious dogma. I have excellent reasons to believe that certain
privileged classes in ancient civilizations were privy to this
knowledge. The builders of the Sphinx (Leo is a directional symbol)
and the great pyramid of Giza are a case in point. That the pyramid is
oriented to true north is particularly telling.
Other than to say that this knowledge will revolutionize
transportation and energy production, this is all I am going to write
on this subject for now. Again, this is only for the record.
Making phun of physicists is so much phucking phun! ahahaha...
Louis Savain
More Nasty Little Truths About Physics:
http://www.rebelscience.org/Crackpots/nasty.htm
hanson
news:1174143356....@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
Yo, Louis!.. It's good to have you back to make waves in uncle
Al's River of Shit. -- It is so boring to hear EinSchein here and
EinSchwein there and Einstein Dinglerries everywhere...
despite Albert's own, well known, confession close to the end
of his life in 1954 where he said to Besso:
"I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based
on the field concept, i. e., on continuous structures. In that
case nothing remains of my entire castle in the air, gravitation
theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics." -- A.E.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/47cc4181eb6470dd
ahahaha... ahahahanson
BioFreak
wrote:
> Making phun of physicists is so much phucking phun! ahahaha...
Physicists like you too. Those rejecting you are
engineers in heart.
--
"Ab Atash rA madad shod hamcho naft"
- Mowlana
eightwi...@yahoo.com
> Louis Savain <eightwings2...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yes. A castle in the air is all that it is since nature is indeed
discrete... (ahaha...) as anybody with the IQ of a watermelon can
figure out. Continuity (infinite divisibility) requires an infinite
regress in zero time! It will turn out to be not much more valid than
the flat earth hypothesis, along with such gems as acausal motion and
the non-existence of absolute motion/position. ahahaha...
socratus
constant: speed of motion с = 1 ?
* * *
On the planet of Earth there is the law - that every newborn cries,
and each nestling in order to be born must break the shell of the
egg.
His new life starts with this moment.
In Kingdom of eternal cold / Vacuum / there is its law :
each quantum of light for its birth should make internal impulse h =
1
and then it gains constant speed of motion с = 1.
His new life starts with this moment.
===================================
According to quantum theory, the particle's mass increases
at approaching to the speed of light quantum.
And at achievement of this speed,
the particle's mass becomes infinite.
But the quantum of light is real particle and
its mass is particular and not infinite.
How to leave this contradiction?
And the scientists invented an artful way: the quantum
does not possess the mass of rest and it is always in motion.
All other material particles have the mass of rest and
only quantum of light has a privileged position.
Why?
May be it so differs from material particles, that it is not
material, is it?
And if it is not material, what is it?
It is written in the Bible:
«And God said: let there be light, and there was light.
And God saw the light and that it was good».
However, the Scientist interfered with the God's business and added:
« But let the quantum of light not possess the mass of rest
and let it move eternally.
And who will doubt, let him be betrayed to anathema and fire! ».
Yes! It is difficult to be quantum of light.
All particles have mass of rest, and it does not.
All particles can have a rest, lie down, have a sleep.
And it, poor, does not have a second of rest, all the time in motion.
For what sins, I ask.
And as though God is pleased with it and praises it.
Only evidently, the quantum of light did not please the scientist
with something, and he is angry about it and without pity runs it in
the world.
God, save and protect me from such mentality.
============ ===========
The quantum of light has not
mass of rest equal to zero.
=============
The Soviet/Russian academic S. Vavilov suggested an
interesting idea. In his book ' Isaac Newton' he wrote.
The force, according to the Newton,s Second Law,
is equal to : F= ma.
This force is possible to consider as absolute independent
quantity - impulse. When in case with light quanta
the impulse is equal to: mc.
He continued.
Let us now imagine that light quanta falls on a black body,
and it absolutely absorbs this light quanta
( it means light quanta stops).
Then, according to the Lebedev,s law, light quanta
renders pressure on the black body: E/c.
Therefore it is possible to write: mc=E/c.
It means that according to Classic physics the stopping
light quanta has rest mass ( potential energy/mass):
M=E/c^2. (E=Mc^2).
=========================
The potential energy/mass of light quanta
can transform in its kinetic energy.
===============
Quantum of light is a privileged particle.
Only the speed of a light quantum in Vacuum has
a maximal, constant, absolute quantity of c=1.
No other particle can travel with the speed c = 1.
If quantum of light flies always rectilinearly c=1, it is a mad one.
Is he really mad?
No.
In Vacuum, in a condition of rest its internal impulse is equal to
zero h=0.
But Quantum of Light has two kinds of internal impulse.
1) Under one internal impulse (Planck,s spin h =1)
a quantum of light flies rectilinearly with speed (c = 1).
A quantum of light behaves as a particle.
2) Under other internal impulse (Goudsmit - Uhlenbeck's spin h = h /
2pi)
a quantum of light rotates around of his diameter and is known as
electron.
A quantum of light behaves as a wave.
Very strange particle is quantum of light.
Quantum of light stays in Vacuum and on it nobody and nothing renders
influence.
It is independent and makes a decision in which of three conditions
it occurs.
1. In a condition of rest its internal impulse is equal to zero h=0.
2 .In a condition of uniform rectilinear movement its impulse h=1.
3. In a condition of rotation around of his diameter its impulse h =h/
2pi.
So it can work only with particle that has his own consciousness.
They are alive, spiritual particles.
His own consciousness is not static but can develop.
The development of conscious scale goes " from vague wishes up to a
clear thought ".
This evolution proceeds during hundred millions (billion) years.
===========
The secret of words 'God', 'soul ', 'religion', ‘ Existence’,
'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
in the “Theory of Light quanta”.
============
hanson
news:1174154089....@n76g2000hsh.googlegroups.com...
> [snip].....Why the quantum of light has such magic,
> It is written in the Bible:
> «And God said: let there be light, and there was light.
> in motion. For what sins, I ask.
>'dualism of consciousness', 'human being' hide
>
[hanson]
My god just told me to tell you that he is the boss of your
god and that your god is a stupid shit... ahahahaha....
because there are only 5 true paths to your own heaven:
Heresy, Blasphemy, Sacrilege, Irreverence and Profanity;
in any convenient sequence, Fuck! yeah!
ahahaha... ahahahanson
>
PS:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy/msg/f530e77d49dbc0a0
wherein it says;... "the all time best story that was ever concocted
was when Gamov and his cronies conjured up the Bang Bang story.
It was a stroke of pure genius. Not for scientific reasons, oh, no.
It was genius because its slogan, *"Let there be light"*, resonated
with the religious folks and proved to them that their holy scriptures
were "right" and that science had finally proven their spiritual beliefs.
And so the coffers opened and, Hallelujah, the shekels were doled
out etc. etc...."
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.energy/msg/ae028f60874054ab
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/f469392c3adad409
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/4123e802383114db
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sci.math.probability/msg/71c6dacc5f80740e
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sci.physics.new-theories/msg/c774bb701e781864
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.sci.physics.new-theories/msg/6993200492cda3d9
eightwi...@yahoo.com
> This is for the record only. Usenet remembers everything. ahahaha...
>
> Recently, my ongoing research has led me to conclude that photons (the
> real ones, not the wavicle crap) can move *only* along fixed, absolute
> surfaces. I have determined that there exist four types of photons.
> One is responsible for the electrostatic field and the other three for
> magnetism. Furthermore, we are immersed in an immense 4-D lattice of
> such photons. The motion of bodies through this lattice and the
> interaction of matter with the lattice photons give rise to EM and
> gravitational phenomena.
>
> The fact that lattice photons can move only along fixed absolute
> surfaces (there are three) will show (among many other wondrous
> things) the relativists' "no-preferred frame" mantra to be nothing but
> religious dogma. I have excellent reasons to believe that certain
> privileged classes in ancient civilizations were privy to this
> knowledge. The builders of the Sphinx (Leo is a directional symbol)
> and the great pyramid of Giza are a case in point. That the pyramid is
> oriented to true north is particularly telling.
>
> Other than to say that this knowledge will revolutionize
> transportation and energy production, this is all I am going to write
> on this subject for now. Again, this is only for the record.
After posting this, I realized that my use of the term "absolute
surface" may be misleading. "Absolute 2-D plane" is a better choice. I
consider the above to be one of my most important discoveries but not
more so than my contention that distance (space) is an illusion and
that position is but one of the intrinsic absolute properties of
particles.
Louis Savain
hanson
news:1174247198....@e1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
I don't know about the lattice insight that your ancients had, but the
Giza stuff and especially what you'll see in the Cairo Museum is
certainly very impressive if you visit in person. Now, your lattice
"from which nothing escapes" that contains 3 (sets) of "Absolute
2-D planes" in which the lattice intersections (your positions) are
populated by your photons ("wall to wall", you used say) may find
some support in traditions physics.
When you consider the enormous, N_A, Avogadro sized number
**in each** of the 3 spatial directions, which give you the loci
at the pi*sqrt(3)/3 or the (3*pi^2)*positions, around each of
the lattice intersections, which when localized around a radii
of Planck length size, sqrt(hG/(2pi*c^3), and contain energy that is
gravitationally compressed to the Schwartzschild- or Kerr horizons
of 1 or 1/2 * c^2/G, you then do get radiation emission of the Lyman
series limit frequency, f_L, and depending on a position transfer, F,
the Faraday constant, either by unit 1 or 13.558 (H) for such entities
it turns out that the "apparent" mass manifestations at the lattice
intersections position are the masses of either the electron or the
proton, the most abundant and simplest manifest mass units in
the universe.
Written in another form, from another perspective the very same
issue that I have just described above can be stated as follows:
The electron's / positron's mass or the proton / antiproton's mass
appears when the electro-magnetic conditions in the lattice obey:
>
[Kerr event horizon] * [Planck length] * [EM shroud] = m_e
[c^2/G] * [sqrt(hG/(2pi*c^3)] * [1/(f_L*F)] * a*pi*sqrt(3)/3 = m_e
or
[Schwartzschild event horizon] * [Planck length] * [EM shroud] = m_p
[c^2/2G]*[sqrt(hG/(2pi*c^3)]*[I_H/(f_L*F)]*(3*pi^2)*sqrt(2a)= m_p
>
Run the numbers and see detailed legend/explanation for that here:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/53371ffd43fe32b9
>
Louis, have fun and I sorely miss your grand rioting against the
establishment and its geriatric physics... ahahaha
ahahaha... ahahanson
Androcles
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message news:6oHLh.28966$yj7.25742@trnddc02...
http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/navigation/ideas/reckoner.shtml
Trying to out-reckon Archimedes, hahahanson?
HAHAHA!
eightwi...@yahoo.com
> Louis Savain, <eightwings2...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1174247198....@e1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
>
[...]
> I don't know about the lattice insight that your ancients had, but the
> Giza stuff and especially what you'll see in the Cairo Museum is
> certainly very impressive if you visit in person.
One of the common themes among megalithic builders (Giza pyramid,
Tiahuanaco, Balbek, Coral Castle, etc...), is that their monuments are
oriented to true north. This is a powerful clue, IMO, one that gives
me reason to believe that they knew what I am now beginning to
understand.
> ahahaha... ahahanson- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Hanson, thanks for that post. I am not sure how you derived the above
but it is certainly interesting if not a little complicated. It's hard
to interpret the real meaning behind the equations. Traditional
physics is sorely missing something. Newton gave a cause (F = ma) for
acceleration but declined to do the same for inertial motion. As a
result, most people, especially the shit-for-brain relativists, assume
that motion is acausal.
My thesis is that, at each and every position of the lattice, there
exists enough energy to match the energy of the most massive particle
in existence. I derived this from first principles having to do with
the causality of motion. My understanding is that motion requires that
each quantum jump a particle makes as it move must be caused by an
interaction with another particle. Thus a particle moving at c must
continually interact with other particles (e.g., my lattice photons)
each having energy equal to that of the moving particle. What his
means is that we are immersed in an immense, super dense, crystal-like
field of energy (the lattice), lots and lots of it. In order to
exploit the field for our purposes (transportation and energy
production), all we need is to understand the properties of the
lattice photons and how they interact with normal matter.
This, my friend, is not too far off in the future as I'm making very
rapid progress in my research. I can now predict (I hate sounding like
some cheesy prophet but hey, being only human, I also like to say I
told you so, ahahaha...) the dawning of the wonderful age of free
energy and of people moving to and fro at prodigious speeds without
any visible means of propulsion. ahahaha...
hanson
news:1174403461.5...@l77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/b3d9acda1d607584
>
> Hanson, thanks for that post. I am not sure how you derived the above
> but it is certainly interesting if not a little complicated. It's hard
> to interpret the real meaning behind the equations. Traditional
> physics is sorely missing something.
>
I'll be back on/with this in a while, Louis, with Planck's views.
hanson
hanson
news:gNQLh.114822$nW6....@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in news:6oHLh.28966$yj7.25742@trnddc02...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/b3d9acda1d607584
http://www.math.uwaterloo.ca/navigation/ideas/reckoner.shtml
Trying to out-reckon Archimedes, hahahanson?
HAHAHA!
>
ahahaha... Hey, don't laugh, Zaubermeister!
Somebody has to so do that dirty job, even if it's me,
the Zauberlehrling... ahahaha... ahahahahanson
Androcles
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message news:K6ULh.5977$YD.5818@trnddc06...
Hahaha!
Coming soon to a computer near you:
"The Sagnac Effect" in glowing 3D and glorious Technicolor,
starring: Fearless Freddy Foton and Betty Greyballs!
Nearly released from Dumbledore Studios. Watch this space.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/trailer.JPG
Sorry, I had to respond to the thread title, it seemed as if
someone was looking over my shoulder.
hanson
> the Zauberlehrling... ahahaha... ahahahahanson
>
[Andro]
Hahaha!
Coming soon to a computer near you:
"The Sagnac Effect" in glowing 3D and glorious Technicolor,
starring: Fearless Freddy Foton and Betty Greyballs!
Nearly released from Dumbledore Studios. Watch this space.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/trailer.JPG
Sorry, I had to respond to the thread title, it seemed as if
someone was looking over my shoulder.
>
Andro, that's a cool depiction and without going further into it,
the question arises: Louis are Andro's 4 color phases red/yellow/
green/blue of his Sagnac depiction trailer.jpg, a corollary to your
news:1174247198....@e1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
" four types of photons. One is responsible for the electrostatic
I'll be back with Planck, later. --- hanson .
PD
> This is for the record only. Usenet remembers everything. ahahaha...
Louis, interesting to have you back. No doubt you will contribute much
frivolity to the group, intended or otherwise.
>
> Recently, my ongoing research has led me to conclude that photons (the
> real ones, not the wavicle crap) can move *only* along fixed, absolute
> surfaces. I have determined that there exist four types of photons.
> One is responsible for the electrostatic field and the other three for
> magnetism. Furthermore, we are immersed in an immense 4-D lattice of
> such photons. The motion of bodies through this lattice and the
> interaction of matter with the lattice photons give rise to EM and
> gravitational phenomena.
Ah, good. Wonderful news. Let us know when you can calculate
something, anything, with this model of yours. Even better if you can
calculate something measurable that isn't presently calculable.
Until then, for the record, STFU.
hanson
"PD" <TheDrap...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1174492306.3...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> Louis Savain, eightwings2...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> This is for the record only. Usenet remembers everything. ahahaha...
>
> Louis, interesting to have you back. No doubt you will contribute
> much frivolity to the group, intended or otherwise.
> something, anything, with this model of yours. Even better if you can
> calculate something measurable that isn't presently calculable.
> Until then, for the record, STFU.
>
Hey Louis, the family man said to you: STFU, "shut the fuck up".
You cannot let that go by unpunished... Drape him with wrath!
ahahaha... ahahahanson
eightwi...@yahoo.com
> "PD" <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:1174492306.3...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...> Louis Savain, eightwings2...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> This is for the record only. Usenet remembers everything. ahahaha...
>
> [Paul]
> > Louis, interesting to have you back. No doubt you will contribute
> > much frivolity to the group, intended or otherwise.
> > Ah, good. Wonderful news. Let us know when you can calculate
> > something, anything, with this model of yours. Even better if you can
> > calculate something measurable that isn't presently calculable.
> > Until then, for the record, STFU.
I am actually looking for a simple mechanism based on first principles
that will levitate your fat geriatric ass into orbit. ahahaha...
> [hanson]
> Hey Louis, the family man said to you: STFU, "shut the fuck up".
> You cannot let that go by unpunished... Drape him with wrath!
> ahahaha... ahahahanson
I used to think that PD stood for pederast. I think that pedophile is
probably more like it seeing that PD is such a family man. I once
accused PD of being stupid as fuck. I was right, of course. ahahaha...
Louis Savain
hanson
news:1174530800.4...@p15g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 21, 12:26 pm, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
>> "PD" <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:1174492306.3...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> Louis Savain, eightwings2...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> >> This is for the record only. Usenet remembers everything. ahahaha...
>>
>> [Paul]
>> > Louis, interesting to have you back. No doubt you will contribute
>> > much frivolity to the group, intended or otherwise.
>> > Ah, good. Wonderful news. Let us know when you can calculate
>> > something, anything, with this model of yours. Even better if you can
>> > calculate something measurable that isn't presently calculable.
>> > Until then, for the record, STFU.
>
> I am actually looking for a simple mechanism based on first principles
> that will levitate your fat geriatric ass into orbit. ahahaha...
>
[hanson]
"a simple mechanism based on first principles"... ahahaha...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.particle/msg/87d3dbce97bae3fc
wherein he said "... I will personally stick a propeller in
your asshole and let you fly out of this august institution"...
>
>
>> [hanson]
>> Hey Louis, the family man said to you: STFU, "shut the fuck up".
>> You cannot let that go by unpunished... Drape him with wrath!
>> ahahaha... ahahahanson
>
PD
> On Mar 21, 12:26 pm, "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
>
> > "PD" <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:1174492306.3...@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...> Louis Savain, eightwings2...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > >> This is for the record only. Usenet remembers everything. ahahaha...
>
> > [Paul]
> > > Louis, interesting to have you back. No doubt you will contribute
> > > much frivolity to the group, intended or otherwise.
> > > Ah, good. Wonderful news. Let us know when you can calculate
> > > something, anything, with this model of yours. Even better if you can
> > > calculate something measurable that isn't presently calculable.
> > > Until then, for the record, STFU.
>
> I am actually looking for a simple mechanism based on first principles
> that will levitate your fat geriatric ass into orbit. ahahaha...
Well, as I said, let me know when you can calculate something,
anything, with this model of yours. Even better if you can calculate
something measurable that isn't presently calculable.
Until then, your giggling and guffawing sounds just a tad hollow...
>
> > [hanson]
> > Hey Louis, the family man said to you: STFU, "shut the fuck up".
> > You cannot let that go by unpunished... Drape him with wrath!
> > ahahaha... ahahahanson
>
> I used to think that PD stood for pederast. I think that pedophile is
> probably more like it seeing that PD is such a family man. I once
> accused PD of being stupid as fuck. I was right, of course. ahahaha...
And if that's all you need to be right about, then you've accomplished
very little, haven't you?
PD
PD
I'll just add that Louis was happy to send me an email where he voiced
the opinion that he doesn't have to provide *anything* to back up his
claims, and that his purpose here is to just enjoy laughing at
physicists, because that's his hobby.
It's always nice when a heckler, after being shut down in public,
comes backstage to heckle in private where he can be less visible.
I've always thought that hecklers were the worst kind of chickensh*t
losers. It turns out that there's even chickensh*t hecklers.
PD
