Andros' Rephoton (2)
hanson
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/414521c791f5b20b
wherein it says:
The popular model of a molecule is two or more nucleons in close proximity
sharing an outer shell of electrons. For some as yet to be discovered reason
the outer shell prefers some integer multiple of two electrons, which may
simply be a matter of mathematical configuration such as a soap bubble
being spherical through surface tension.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Electron_orbitals.svg .... etc.
>
[hanson]
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/c2a968cbcbfd3abb
wherein it says:
Excellent, Andro! Gimme some time to comment on this.
There may be more to your "Rephoton" than what has been
said about that view so far... not the least of it being that it may
lead to an elegant and intuitively acceptable explanation why
photons do not any apparent mass.... etc...
Here are some references that I ran across.
Are these investigations along your line of thinking?
"Backward Light":
http://www.rochester.edu/news/show.php?id=2544
>
http://www.rochester.edu/news/photos/backward_light.mpg
>
http://www.googlesyndicatedsearch.com/u/rochester?hl=en&lr=&ie=ISO-8859-1&domains=rochester.edu%3Bsa.rochester.edu%3Burmc.rochester.edu&q=backward+light&btnG=Search&sitesearch=rochester.edu
>
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=backward+light&btnG=Google+Search
>
or are you re-expressing the "Recoil photon" effect?:
http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0031-8248(197703)44%3A1%3C95%3ACTSRAC%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Y
>
http://hadron2.bk.psu.edu/Phys213/L7P.ppt
>
http://groups.google.fr/group/sci.skeptic/msg/32772367a667ada5?dmode=source&hl=fr
>
Take care dude. I noticed in one of your posts that you have
some grief with your eye sight. Your symptoms may be due
to cataracts. That condition is common at your age and it is
easily fixed on a out patient basis by replacing your cornea
with a Polycarbonate lens. Good luck to you. ---- hanson
Sorcerer
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message news:zPxgh.8843$HX4.6358@trnddc03...
| [Androcles]
| http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/414521c791f5b20b
| wherein it says:
| The popular model of a molecule is two or more nucleons in close proximity
| sharing an outer shell of electrons. For some as yet to be discovered reason
| the outer shell prefers some integer multiple of two electrons, which may
| simply be a matter of mathematical configuration such as a soap bubble
| being spherical through surface tension.
| http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Electron_orbitals.svg .... etc.
| >
| [hanson]
| http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/c2a968cbcbfd3abb
| wherein it says:
| Excellent, Andro! Gimme some time to comment on this.
| There may be more to your "Rephoton" than what has been
| said about that view so far... not the least of it being that it may
| lead to an elegant and intuitively acceptable explanation why
| photons do not any apparent mass.... etc...
|
| Here are some references that I ran across.
| Are these investigations along your line of thinking?
Nah, that guy is a nutter, trying to violate causality.
Quote: --"It's weird stuff," says Boyd. "We sent a pulse through an optical fiber, and before its peak even entered the fiber, it was exiting the other end.--
He's got resonance or phase shift or something trivially simple going on.
Violation of causality would generate more noise than cold fusion, the press would be all over it. An oscilloscope trace? C'mon...
Mine is far simpler and definitely not weird.
There are always two photons emitted (conserving momentum).
We see only one of them, the other goes away from us.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/PoR/PoR.htm
| Take care dude. I noticed in one of your posts that you have
| some grief with your eye sight. Your symptoms may be due
| to cataracts. That condition is common at your age and it is
| easily fixed on a out patient basis by replacing your cornea
| with a Polycarbonate lens. Good luck to you. ---- hanson
|
Yeah, I wondered about that too.
|
|
MathFreak NoMore
Andr.. I mean Hassan,
Why are your posts so messy? What do you do to them to
turn them into such mess. Can't you just use the simple
reply feature of your newsreader?
--
"AftAbeh lagan haft dast, shAmo nAhAr hichchi"
hanson
wrote in message news:1buwvtovlwpze.1...@40tude.net...
>
> hanson in <news:zPxgh.8843$HX4.6358@trnddc03> wrote:
>
[Mehram]
> Andr.. I mean Hassan,
> Why are your posts so messy? What do you do to them to
> turn them into such mess. Can't you just use the simple
> reply feature of your newsreader?
>
awe!... So, you miss me?.... How nice, but who is Andr...?
Hassan, we know, is your idol and role model... ahahaha...
Now then, to your impression about my messy posts:
LIVE WITH IT, Mehram.... ahahahahaha.... To boot, they
are made that way so that simpletons & sub-intellectuals
do not have access to or see the secret code contained
within. They may have 3 or more dimensions in addition
to the one you see/read on their surface.... hahahahaha...
So, what was it that intriged you in
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/814ea45d314d6e04
Thanks for the laugh........ ahahaha.... ahahahanson
Sorcerer
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message news:ZZZgh.690$od6.242@trnddc04...
decode it. Andr.
MathFreak NoMore
news:ZZZgh.690$od6.242@trnddc04:
> they
> are made that way so that simpletons & sub-intellectuals
> do not have access to or see the secret code contained
> within.
>
Usenet facility is messy enough. I was curious whether in
your naive thinking you've been under the impression that
you're actually making things look better in your messages.
If that's the case, then I'd like to inform you that that's
not the case :)
--
"be goftAre dAnandegAn rAh juy
be giti bepuyo be har kas beguy"
- Ferdowsi
hanson
<MathFre...@FakeAddress.com> wrote in message
news:Xns989BCF16A888Ma...@216.168.3.66...
[hanson]http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/0d45a898ff98d56f
>> Now then, to your impression about my messy posts:
>> LIVE WITH IT, Mehram.... ahahahahaha.... To boot,they
>> do not have access to or see the secret code contained
>> within.
>
> Usenet facility is messy enough. I was curious whether in
> your naive thinking you've been under the impression that
> you're actually making things look better in your messages.
> If that's the case, then I'd like to inform you that that's
> not the case :)
>
.... AHAHAHA... Mehram, Mehram, Mehram. Your proud, incisive,
seminal and theological advice above has been noted. It carries
the distinct over- and under- tone of your now well know habit
of pissing at house walls in public... ahahaha... AHAHAHAHA...
Detail here, for your exclusive benefit, Mehram:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.environment/msg/765af649ed08a326
>
[hanson to Andro]
Andro, re: "xyzzy", roger... I know, but you ruined it with kindness.
My intention was for Mehram to cough it, "Andr.." up himself...'cuz
apparently he is too afraid to spell it out in the fear that you may
come into the game and play with him. Thanks for the thought though.
MathFreak NoMore
news:Iq2hh.156$mT6.40@trnddc07:
> My intention was for Mehram to cough it, "Andr.." up
> himself...'cuz apparently he is too afraid to spell it out
> in the fear that you may come into the game and play with
> him.
"Andr.. I mean Hassan" has nothing to do with Androcles or
sorcerer, etc. "Andr" is the first part of your real name.
You keep using my name without providing yours, so I may want
to reveal your full name one day.
--
"be kunesh migeh- donbAle man nayA buye gand
midi!"
The Thing
Interesting web page.
Consider the following experiment. Construct a 1uF
capacitor from two metallic plates. Next construct a 1uH
inductor from a coil of wire. Place both these on a spaceship.
The ship accelerates to 0.75C relative to the earth. If we
then measure the capacitance and the inductance of these
devices, what do you think will be the result? If the answer
is 1uF and 1uH respectively then I don't see how your view
can be consistent with Maxwell's equations. If your answer
has the capacitance or inductance changing then how slowly
would the spacecraft have to be traveling to have a
measurable change in circuit parameters? I would think with
modern test equipment not much velocity would be needed
to see the change.
Regards
The
hanson
the irate Iranian aka <MathFre...@FakeAddress.com> w/i
news:Xns989BD8853A88BMa...@216.168.3.66...
[hanson]
> "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote to Androcles in
> news:Iq2hh.156$mT6.40@trnddc07:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.environment/msg/765af649ed08a326
>> My intention was for Mehram to cough it, "Andr.." up
>> himself...'cuz apparently he is too afraid to spell it out
>> in the fear that you may come into the game and play with
>> him.
>
> "Andr.. I mean Hassan" has nothing to do with Androcles or
> sorcerer, etc. "Andr" is the first part of your real name.
> You keep using my name without providing yours, so I
> may want to reveal your full name one day.
>
... ahahaha... Yeah, tell that to Wabnig, the cowardly puffed
up sow-bladder, who once did the same deal and attacked
the wrong people. Now, what is it that you intend to do with
or for "Andr"... Do you wanna send money to me, Dr. A.N.
for finally paying off your bills for the psychiatric treatments
I administered to you at Ravencrag?.... ahahahaha...
ahahaha.... ....ahahanson
PS: I do not understand why you seem to have objections
for me to use your name. After all you posted for years
under that handle, which who knows whether that is your
real-world name. To me, "Mehram" sounds more human
and kinder then "MathfreakNoMore" So, what is your beef?
You don't have Suinomophobia, hateing your own name,
like selfloating Jews do, or do you? Let me know, whether
you need further admisterings from our Ravencrag staff.
MathFreak NoMore
> PS: I do not understand why you seem to have objections
> for me to use your name. After all you posted for years
> under that handle,
Perhaps this poses a challange for your Ravencrag staff
but for me It's just common sense.
If you've seen sense in not using your real name here
then you cannot insist on using another person's real
name when he, for whatever reason, prefers an alias.
But if you do this because I kick some of you
Americans' ruder asses, that's another story. I put my
name under every one of those statements anytime you
want. So can you.
--
"ze bimAri batar bimAr-dAri"
hanson
irate Iranian Mehram Maleki aka "MathFreak NoMore" <
MathFre...@FakeAddress.com> wrote in message
news:zpoedrjhrjdh.9kmwloxnpw5g$.dlg@40tude.net...
>
[hanson]
> hanson <news:by3hh.375$HT5.265@trnddc02> wrote in:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/965a428e00ae852a
>> PS: I do not understand why you seem to have objections
>> for me to use your name. After all you posted for years under
>> your own name, like the self-loathing Jews do? ....
>
[Mehram]
> Perhaps this poses a challange for your Ravencrag staff
> but for me It's just common sense.
> If you've seen sense in not using your real name here
> then you cannot insist on using another person's real
> name when he, for whatever reason, prefers an alias.
> But if you do this because I kick some of you
> Americans' ruder asses, that's another story. I put my
> name under every one of those statements anytime you
> want. So can you.
>
ahahahaha... Mehram, Mehram, Mehram. You have issues.
Mehram, you appear to have dictatorial mullah-apprentice
notions of telling me what to do and call myself.... ahahahaha...
What's in it for me if I acquiesce and comply with your wishes?...
I mean your offered rewards of pissing against house walls
[1] in public or... venting my ass 5 times a days... aren't very
alluring, besides them being rude.. Now read this here again
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/965a428e00ae852a
and [1] being in
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/752119def87a672a
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.environment/msg/765af649ed08a326
BTW, Mehram, how did that Holocaust conference in Tehran
come out? I see you said to Schwartz that "Bullshitting about
Iran for the past 27 years has cost you your holocaust"... ahaha..
Is that a fact. Mehram?.... But, can't you see that the Zionists
wanted that and did that purposely so that all the Yidds do come
back to the promised land ... and as the Zionists say, they "do
all they can to increase Anti-Semitism" to achieve their goal
read here the edicts of Ariel Sharon himself:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/d29c4e7587b1f592
So, Mehram it may turn out that you, Iranians, fucked yourself
in your premature celebration... but then there is still that MAD
situation that you are working on which makes the Jews' assholes
twitch... ahahaha... Dark Joy to the world, thanks to you religious
fucks of all 3 monotheistic faiths! ahahahahaha.... ahahahanson
MathFreak NoMore
news:w0ghh.574$mT6.229@trnddc07:
> read here the edicts of Ariel Sharon himself:
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/d29c4e7587b1f
> 592
>
That's a dishonest distortion of what he said. The actual
words are at:
http://sandiego.indymedia.org/en/2002/04/1003.shtml
Anyway. Sharon is a simpleton. Who needs to find out what he
says. Him and a dozen others in Israel are just there for
being part of the manipulations required for much bigger
undertakings. They will not do anything purely on their own.
There are limits set for this, one step beyond and all that
bunch are taken out. Just like that. Waste of time even
talking about them.
About that Holocaust matter, I thought first it was a joke but
turns out they've made a decision. In Islam everything is
accounted for! Your lies included. Somebody must've felt it
was time to see how Islam handles this.
--
"Westerners' remarks on Islam are equivalent to
math comments of a bimbo who hates math."
- Maleki
hanson
w/i news:Xns989C8706D4822Ma...@216.168.3.66...http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/b455c64db6bc67c4
>> read here the edicts of Ariel Sharon himself:
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/d29c4e7587b1f592
>>
> That's a dishonest distortion of what he said. The actual
> words are at:
>
Yes, it is a mild, santized, shorter version as it contains only
the kinder, nicer and pertinent sentences distilled OUT of the
lengthy diatribe you refer to below which actually puts the
Zionist cause even into a far worse light then does the abridged
edition above.
>
[Mehram]
> http://sandiego.indymedia.org/en/2002/04/1003.shtml
> Anyway. Sharon is a simpleton. Who needs to find out what
> he says. Him and a dozen others in Israel are just there for
> being part of the manipulations required for much bigger
> undertakings. They will not do anything purely on their own.
> There are limits set for this, one step beyond and all that
> bunch are taken out. Just like that. Waste of time even
> talking about them.
>
What bigger manipulations? What dozen? What cryptic
gibberish is that? Your blather sounds like your short boss
guy in his beige wind jacket uttered when was alleged to
having said : "Israel should be wiped off the map"... which
according to some is a distortion too... ahahaha..So what
gives?.... At times you lie FOR the Zionists and then you
lie for the Isalmo fascists... but you always lie against the
Westerners... Why is that so, Mehram?
>
[Mehram]
> About that Holocaust matter, I thought first it was a joke but
> turns out they've made a decision. In Islam everything is
> accounted for! Your lies included. Somebody must've felt it
> was time to see how Islam handles this.
>
... if my lies are included then Islam is a lie. ... AHAHAHAHA...
I thought so, Mehram. But don't fret. The other 2 of the 3, the
Torah & the Bible are lies too, or at least founded and built
upon lies... Maybe you are not as blind as I thought... ahahaha...
>
[Mehram]
"Westerners' remarks on Islam are equivalent to
> math comments of a bimbo who hates math."
> - Maleki
>
No, Mehram you are totally blind(ed)... because you are
pissing against house walls in public again (see in here)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/752119def87a672a
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.environment/msg/765af649ed08a326
and your other proverb of wisdom suits you much better, when you
said in:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/65a0eb47a52ace67 :
>
[Mehram]
"Stupidity isn't always bad for you. It is only sometimes bad for you."
> - Maleki
>
[hanson]
ahahahah... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahahaha...
If there is a corollary in the Koran to the Bible's verse of ~
"Blessed are the idiots and the mentally feeble for they
shall enter/inherit the lord's heavenly kingdom"... then
Mehram, then I do understand why you are so deeply
religious.... ahahaha... THANKS FOR THE LAUGHS!
ROTFLMAO....ahahaha... ahahahanson
... ahahaha... AND ....
[Mehram]
> Each time I got fired at a job it made me so happy!
[hanson]
.... ahahahaha... and what were their reasons that you got fired
so many times?... ahahahaha... Cm'om, let's hear it!. It'll make
excellently funny copy, Mehram!..... ahahahaha....
MathFreak NoMore
news:svihh.4134$od6.1223@trnddc04:
> [Mehram]
>> That's a dishonest distortion of what he said. The actual
>> words are at:
>>
> [hanson]
> Yes, it is a mild, santized, shorter version as it contains
> only the kinder, nicer and pertinent sentences distilled
> OUT of the lengthy diatribe you refer to below which
> actually puts the Zionist cause even into a far worse light
> then does the abridged edition above.
>
No none of that. You must read him carefully. He's just saying
he's had it. While the pieces you had selected just misses the
point while quoting him verbatim. That's why I said it was
dishonest. You do that sometimes.
He's a soldier, a simpleton. And nobody wants a soldier
suddenly placed at positions of political decision. Hence what
I said earlier. And he knows how far he can go.
Israel almost got nuked in 1982. He would _kiss_ the hands of
those Hezbollah fighters whom we trained to settle the matters
differently. He knows that one too. But he's just a soldier
and that's how a soldier must manage.
In some similar ways Iranians have had it too. I can
understand his blight.
--
"sad musho ye gorbeh kAfiyeh."
hanson
Mehram Maleki "MathFreak NoMore" is pissing [1] against house
walls as he, <MathFre...@FakeAddress.com> wrote in
news:Xns989CA8E68F445Ma...@216.168.3.66...http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3858fbe0205e9ce8
>
[Mehram]
That's a dishonest distortion of what he said. The actual
words are at:
>>>
[hanson]
Yes, it is a mild, santized, shorter version as it contains
only the kinder, nicer and pertinent sentences distilled
OUT of the lengthy diatribe you refer to below which
actually puts the Zionist cause even into a far worse light
then does the abridged edition above.
>>
No none of that. You must read him carefully. He's just saying
he's had it. While the pieces you had selected just misses the
point while quoting him verbatim. That's why I said it was
dishonest. You do that sometimes.
>
.... ahahahaha... my friend, you are expressing & demonstrating
above the typical Islamic and wabniggerish double talk having
no more content then the smell of the air in a puffed up sow bladder.
ahahahaha... You have painted yourself into a corner -- for some
unnecessary reason -- and now in panic, equally irrational, you
begin to chant yourself deeper into your cyber hole... ahahaha...
>
[Mehram]
> He's a soldier, a simpleton. And nobody wants a soldier
> suddenly placed at positions of political decision. Hence what
> I said earlier. And he knows how far he can go.
>
... ahahahaha... the only simpleton that is around is you, Mehram.
Are you that full of hate or is this one of your profound occasions
where your stupidity is good for you? Read your own reasoning in [2]
Sharon, all political shit aside, was from HIS and the Zionists pov
a great soldier, a true patriot and even a good PM & statesman,
which is, of course, why you denigrate the old bastard at all costs
and by any means, in a very transparent way. But you do it in a very
dilettante Iranian Mullah apprentice fashion by feebly mimicking the
Zionist tactics they use to promote the exaggerations of their Holocaust.
Same song by you Mehram. Only your skin & the times are different.
Your Iranian Mullah apprentice tactics are not new nor original.
You lie notoriously, at times to/for the Zionists and then you lie for
the Islamo fascists... but you always lie against the Westerners...
just like you did above.... Stupid & bad scene by you, Mehram.
How can you and your Koran/Allah shit be taken for serious
and much less being trusted when you talk every 5 minutes out
of a different corner of your mouth?... ahahaha... BUT, don't fret
Mehram, your religious brother fanatics from the Bible- and the
Torah clans are smoky mirror images of yourself.... ahahahaha.....
>
[Mehram]
> Israel almost got nuked in 1982. He would _kiss_ the hands of
> those Hezbollah fighters whom we trained to settle the matters
> differently. He knows that one too. But he's just a soldier
> and that's how a soldier must manage.
>
[hanson]
AHAHAHAHA.... Never mind your conditional grand "almost" of
your 1982 apocalypto vision. What kind of fantasy of your is that?
.... Let's hear it... ahahaha... Don't disappoint me now. Tell us!....
Don't be shy. Let me relax you and tell you that everybody has
such "contingency planning scenarios" Tell me this Iranian one.
>
[Mehram]
> In some similar ways Iranians have had it too. I can
> understand his blight.
>
[hanson]
IOW, you ran out of light in your own blight and plight
of Iranian Mullah apprentice bullsherations... Don't feel
bad, Nehram, it was fucking funny. Thanks for the laughs!
>
>
[hanson]
Mehram, this here is again for your benefit, because you are
pissing against house walls in public again (see in here [1])
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/752119def87a672a
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.environment/msg/765af649ed08a326
and your other proverb of wisdom suits you much better, when you
said in:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/65a0eb47a52ace67 :
[Mehram] [2]
MathFreak NoMore
@trnddc06:
> Don't disappoint me now.
I'm afraid I have to :) I don't think you have the capability to
handle anything political in nature. Stick to your anecdotes and
things logistical. That is, your best posts are the ones that
provide raw data. Don't analyze them :)
--
"inhameh khar hasto mA piyAdeh rAh mirim."
hanson
w/i news:Xns989FE943D88EAMa...@216.168.3.66...
>
[hanson]
> "hanson" <han...@quick.net> w/i news:81mhh.876$4Q6.221@trnddc06:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/f769dd6d47260b33
>> Don't disappoint me now, Mehram.
>
[Mehram]
> I'm afraid I have to :) I don't think you have the capability to
> handle anything political in nature. Stick to your anecdotes and
> things logistical. That is, your best posts are the ones that
> provide raw data. Don't analyze them :)
>
Aye thank you, Mehram, like these ones here,
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/f769dd6d47260b33
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/65a0eb47a52ace67
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3858fbe0205e9ce8
.... drum roll....... here come Mehram, with raw data:
>
[Mehram]
"Stupidity isn't always bad for you. It is only sometimes bad for you."
> - Maleki
>
[hanson]
ahahahah... ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA... ahahahaha...
If there is a corollary in the Koran to the Bible's verse of ~
"Blessed are the idiots and the mentally feeble for they
shall enter/inherit the lord's heavenly kingdom"... then
Mehram, then I do understand why you are so deeply
ROTFLMAO....ahahaha... ahahahanson
>
[Mehram]
> "inhameh khar hasto mA piyAdeh rAh mirim."
>
oh yeah?!...: "Y kazuntz dil Angadina hih ün dih ha moss mys kuhr"
Sorcerer
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message news:vTCih.1994$Eo.1933@trnddc08...
| Mehram Maleki "MathFreak NoMore" <MathFre...@FakeAddress.com>
| w/i news:Xns989FE943D88EAMa...@216.168.3.66...
| >
| [hanson]
| > "hanson" <han...@quick.net> w/i news:81mhh.876$4Q6.221@trnddc06:
| http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/f769dd6d47260b33
| >> Don't disappoint me now, Mehram.
| >
| [Mehram]
| > I'm afraid I have to :) I don't think
That says it all. No need to go further, many contributors confess
to not thinking.
hanson
news:5EDih.124432$bz5....@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> w/i news:vTCih.1994$Eo.1933@trnddc08...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/cad69d193a947f15
| Mehram Maleki "MathFreak NoMore" <MathFre...@FakeAddress.com>
| w/i news:Xns989FE943D88EAMa...@216.168.3.66...
| >
| [hanson]
| > "hanson" <han...@quick.net> w/i news:81mhh.876$4Q6.221@trnddc06:
| http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/f769dd6d47260b33
| >> Don't disappoint me now, Mehram.
| >
| [Mehram]
| > I'm afraid I have to :) I don't think
>
That says it all.
No need to go further, many contributors confess to not thinking.
>
... ahahaha... true, but they have a more than compulsive
and self-convincing power tool at their disposal, than thinking:
Their unconditional faith & belief in their religion & education,
them swearing that their know and have the truth, scientifically.
Good or bad?... in the final analysis.. it probably doesn't matter.
But we can readily observe that humankind is run to 99% by
emotion alone... So much for the purity of empirical science.
ahahahaha... ahahanson
Sorcerer
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message news:y4Gih.4135$Jb6.3820@trnddc03...
... repudiating the sensible world, which he neither sees himself nor believes from those who have, the Peripatetic joins combat by childish quibbling in a world on paper, and denies the Sun shines because he himself is blind.
Johannes Kepler to Galileo Galilei, 28 March 1611
http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Quotations/Kepler.html
"I wish, my dear Kepler, that we could have a good laugh together at the extraordinary stupidity of the mob. What do you think of the foremost philosophers of this University? In spite of my oft-repeated efforts and invitations, they have refused, with the obstinacy of a glutted adder, to look at the planets or Moon or my telescope."
http://www-history.mcs.st-andrews.ac.uk/Mathematicians/Galileo.html
Ecclesiastes 1:9 What has been will be again, what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun.
I am glad, my dear Hanson, that we have a good laugh together at the extraordinary stupidity of the mob. What do you think of the foremost philosophers of this newsgroup? In spite of my oft-repeated efforts and invitations, they have refused, with the obstinacy of a glutted adder, to look at the variable stars or novae with my telescope.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Algol/Algol.htm
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Copernicus/LCV.htm
In the final analysis, you ask?
If there should chance to be any mathematicians who, ignorant in mathematics yet pretending to skill in that science, should dare, upon the authority of some passage of Scripture wrested to their purpose, to condemn and censure my hypothesis, I value them not, and scorn their inconsiderate judgement.
De Revolutionibus Coelestibus
Finally we shall place the Sun himself at the centre of the Universe. All this is suggested by the systematic procession of events and the harmony of the whole Universe, if only we face the facts, as they say, 'with both eyes open'. -- Copernicus
And yet it [the Earth] moves. -- Galileo Galilei, who KNEW.
In questions of science, the authority of a thousand is not worth the humble reasoning of a single individual.
Quoted in Arago, Eulogy of Galileo (1874)
I feign no hypotheses. -- Principia Mathematica. If I have been able to see further, it was only because I stood on the shoulders of giants. -- Newton, who KNEW.
Temporis filia veritas; cui me obstetricari non pudet.
Truth is the daughter of time; I do not repudiate being her obstetrician.-- Kepler, who KNEW.
Mensus eram coelos, nunc Terrae metior umbras.
Mens coelestis erat, corporis umbra jacet.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/Wendy/Wendy.htm
In the final analysis I shall join the giants. I have seen further than any of them,
I stood upon my lion's head.
Androcles - who KNOWS - and that is all that will ever matter to me.