Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Historical perspective of "diet" in treating diabetes

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 6:40:41 PM12/3/08
to
GysdeJongh wrote:
>
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d73c4?

The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
eaten has made him/her hungrier.

The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.

Truth is simple.

Therefore, in remains much wiser to eat less, down to the right
amount:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3558812d72ab4e17?

May you and other dear neighbors, friends, and brethren have a
blessedly wonderful 2008th year since the birth of our LORD Jesus
Christ as our Messiah, the Son of Man ...

... by being hungrier:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/f891e617d10bd689?

Hunger is wonderful ! ! !

It's how we know the answer to the question "What does Jesus
want?" (WDJW):

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/f43db72a7c5c1da0?

Yes, hunger is our knowledge of good versus evil that Adam and Eve
paid for with their and our immortal lives:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/52a3db8576495806?

"Blessed are you who hunger NOW...

... for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)

Amen.

Here is a Spirit-guided exegesis of Luke 6:21 given in hopes of
promoting much greater understanding:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/cc2aa8f8a4d41360?

Be hungrier, which is truly healthier:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/991d4e30704307e7?

Marana tha

Prayerfully in the awesome name of our Messiah, LORD Jesus Christ,

Andrew <><
--
"... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
12:3)

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/43acbc5ea248ceee?

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 7:22:46 PM12/3/08
to
In article <984cb765-18e3-4d9f...@20g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> writes:
> GysdeJongh wrote:
> >
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d73c4?
>
> The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
> a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
> was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
> eaten has made him/her hungrier.
>
> The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.

Starting when? Age ten? Five? Six months? At birth?


-- cary

marcia

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 7:41:56 PM12/3/08
to
On Dec 3, 6:40 pm, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com>
wrote:
> GysdeJongh wrote:
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d7...

>
> The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
> a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
> was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
> eaten has made him/her hungrier.
>
> The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.

Is that in the Bible? Where?

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 9:35:41 PM12/3/08
to
marcia wrote:

> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > GysdeJongh wrote:
> >
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d7...
> >
> > The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
> > a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
> > was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
> > eaten has made him/her hungrier.
> >
> > The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.
>
> Is that in the Bible?

Yes.

> Where?

Exodus 16:36 as per the Holy Spirit:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/40f387f2e7c73b1b?

May you and other dear neighbors, friends, and brethren have a
blessedly wonderful 2008th year since the birth of our LORD Jesus
Christ as our Messiah, the Son of Man ...

... by being hungrier:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/f891e617d10bd689?

Hunger is wonderful ! ! !

It's how we know the answer to the question "What does Jesus
want?" (WDJW):

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/f43db72a7c5c1da0?

Yes, hunger is our knowledge of good versus evil that Adam and Eve
paid for with their and our immortal lives:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/52a3db8576495806?

"Blessed are you who hunger NOW...

... for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)

Amen.

Here is a Spirit-guided exegesis of Luke 6:21 given in hopes of
promoting much greater understanding:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/cc2aa8f8a4d41360?

Be hungrier, which is truly healthier:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/991d4e30704307e7?

Marana tha

Prayerfully in the awesome name of our Messiah, LORD Jesus Christ,

Andrew <><
--
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3558812d72ab4e17?

MāckŠŽ

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 11:10:11 PM12/3/08
to
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 00:22:46 +0000 (UTC), ca...@afone.as.arizona.edu
(Cary Kittrell) wrote:

>In article <984cb765-18e3-4d9f...@20g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> writes:
>> GysdeJongh wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d73c4?
>>
>> The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
>> a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
>> was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
>> eaten has made him/her hungrier.
>>
>> The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.
>
>Starting when? Age ten? Five? Six months? At birth?
>
>
>-- cary
>

then according the nutter chung, a 10 year old eating 32 ounces of
fries and ice cream is eating healthy.

Cork Soaker

unread,
Dec 3, 2008, 11:30:05 PM12/3/08
to


Where the hell did it come up with that number?

I'm missing the good life here.

maggie

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 1:10:47 AM12/4/08
to
On Dec 3, 11:30 pm, Cork Soaker <Thunderb...@Intrepid.invalid> wrote:
> Màck©® wrote:
> > On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 00:22:46 +0000 (UTC), c...@afone.as.arizona.edu
> > (Cary Kittrell) wrote:

>
> >> In article <984cb765-18e3-4d9f-9f1c-0e250dd62...@20g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> writes:
> >>> GysdeJongh wrote:
>
> >>>>http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d7...

> >>> The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
> >>> a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
> >>> was delicious !  I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
> >>> eaten has made him/her hungrier.
>
> >>> The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.
> >> Starting when?  Age ten?  Five?  Six months?  At birth?
>
> >> -- cary
>
> > then according the nutter chung, a 10 year old eating 32 ounces of
> > fries and ice cream is eating healthy.
>
> Where the hell did it come up with that number?
>
> I'm missing the good life here.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -


How 'about everyone just shuts up? This is not a "fun" matter,
according to "statistics", family and otherwise, I should have
screamingly high cholesterol, and be a diabetic, and could perhaps
drop dead, to boot. As my Dr. told me, cholesterol is "freakish"
excellent, no diabetes.

Everyone here, obviously, has the power to take care of their own
health, if you have the $$ to look stuff up on the internet, and
also exhaustingly paste and yammer on...what's your point?

Kadaitcha Man

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 2:12:53 AM12/4/08
to
maggie, ye mangled very monster in apparel, never hung poison on a
fouler toad, ye hissed:

Oh, fuck's sakes, shut the fuck up yourself and die a horrible death, you
screeching harridan.

--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007.
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007, August 2008.
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, Official owner
and trainer of Bucky Breeder, August 2008.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Member of:
Usenet Ruiner List
Top Assholes on the Net List
Most hated usenetizens of all time List
Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

Join me for dinner. I'm cooking perished sparrow blister with cabbage
sauce garnished with tainted discarded douchebags and manatee abdomen
preserve accompanied by disturbing hymen on top of putrefied cadaver
foreskins and alligator penis sauce garnished with sizzled discarded
douchebags, dished up in a steaming double boiler stuffed with squirming
scraps of tomato in stale cabbage juice, a side of bread and a bottle of
moonshine.

Cork Soaker

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 3:23:46 AM12/4/08
to
Kadaitcha Man wrote:
> maggie, ye mangled very monster in apparel, never hung poison on a
> fouler toad, ye hissed:
>
>> On Dec 3, 11:30 pm, Cork Soaker <Thunderb...@Intrepid.invalid> wrote:


Yeah, I'd be happy with that. Sounds like bitch has mental health
problems affecting her chemistry. Try heroin.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 5:31:31 AM12/4/08
to
convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > GysdeJongh wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d73c4?
> >
> > The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
> > a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
> > was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
> > eaten has made him/her hungrier.
> >
> > The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.
>
> Starting when? Age ten? Five? Six months? At birth?

Parents, who are eating the right amount of food per day, would know
when.

Truth is simple :-)

Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
you to unwittingly update folks on your continued inability to
publicly proclaim that "Jesus is LORD."

Bottom line concerning the predicament of you and other non-
christians:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/035c93540862751c?

<><

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3558812d72ab4e17?

Andy is Still Evil

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 6:15:04 AM12/4/08
to
False Christian and sociopath "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love27
@thetruth.com> wrote in news:984cb765-18e3-4d9f-9f1c-0e250dd62089@
20g2000yqt.googlegroups.com:

> GysdeJongh wrote:
>>
>>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d73c4?
>
> The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
> a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
> was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
> eaten has made him/her hungrier.
>
> The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.

LIE.
The 32 ounces was by Andy's design. He attempted to shoehorn a scriptural
account of the use of 2 omers in support of his claim. Andy's use of the
omer was incorrect since it was a measure of volume rather than weight.
This has been pointed out to him many times. When Andy deliberately
repeats this wrong statement even when he is aware of the correct usage
his statement becomes a lie.
>
> Truth is simple.
>
Andy is so sensitive to truth that he leaves the room before it has a
chance to enter. If you look in the archives of sci.med.cardiology you'll
see that Andy came up with his 2 pound diet (as he named it then). Only
after many postings was he persuaded to add "with a balanced diet" as a
caveat. To this day other posters continue to show that factors such as
age and exercise need to be taken into account, seemingly to no avail with
stuck Andy.


If you follow the links below, you can see a pattern where Andy has
himself been digging his own professional grave over many years. This
post simply serves to put warning lights around the hole.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/5a8f36628c734909
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/fcc64b7a7b861413
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6847393fd66086ff

Until Andy is able to change his behaviour it will remain that Andy is
Still Evil.

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 10:39:19 AM12/4/08
to
In article writes:
> nds-media.com!newsfe02.iad.POSTED!7564ea0f!not-for-mail
> From: MāckŠŽ <Māc...@www.alt-support-diabetes.org>
> Newsgroups: sci.med.cardiology,misc.health.alternative,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.atheism
> Subject: Re: Historical perspective of "diet" in treating diabetes
> Followup-To: sci.med.cardiology,misc.health.alternative,alt.usenet.kooks,alt.atheism
> Organization: Alt Support Diabetes
> Message-ID: <dslej4ht0n8qbutjl...@4ax.com>
> References: <49348564$0$4944$ba62...@nova.planet.nl> <984cb765-18e3-4d9f...@20g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> <gh77sm$62r$1...@onion.ccit.arizona.edu>
> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Lines: 25
> NNTP-Posting-Host: 72.218.169.39
> X-Complaints-To: newsm...@cox.net
> X-Trace: newsfe02.iad 1228363823 72.218.169.39 (Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:10:23 UTC)
> NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 04:10:23 UTC
> Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:10:11 -0500
> Xref: news.arizona.edu sci.med.cardiology:158729 misc.health.alternative:200248 alt.usenet.kooks:917886 alt.atheism:2069181
>
> On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 00:22:46 +0000 (UTC), ca...@afone.as.arizona.edu
> (Cary Kittrell) wrote:

>
> >In article <984cb765-18e3-4d9f...@20g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> writes:
> >> GysdeJongh wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d73c4?
> >>
> >> The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
> >> a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
> >> was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
> >> eaten has made him/her hungrier.
> >>
> >> The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.
> >
> >Starting when? Age ten? Five? Six months? At birth?
> >
> >
> >-- cary
> >
>
> then according the nutter chung, a 10 year old eating 32 ounces of
> fries and ice cream is eating healthy.
>

Well, I've certainly in my life eaten a quart of ice cream -- pretty
close to 32 ounces -- and then thought "That was delicious! I wants
more!". So maybe the 2PD-1QTFUDGETWIRL is the "approach" for me.


--cary

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 10:41:08 AM12/4/08
to
In article <958f2d94-6413-4cde...@t3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> writes:
> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > GysdeJongh wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d73c4?
> > >
> > > The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
> > > a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
> > > was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
> > > eaten has made him/her hungrier.
> > >
> > > The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.
> >
> > Starting when? Age ten? Five? Six months? At birth?
>
> Parents, who are eating the right amount of food per day, would know
> when.

And on average -- in your "collective clinical experience", of
course -- that age would be?...

-- cary

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 12:41:10 PM12/4/08
to
convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > > GysdeJongh wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d73c4?
>> > >
>> > > The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
>> > > a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
>> > > was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
>> > > eaten has made him/her hungrier.
>> > >
>> > > The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.
>> >
>> > Starting when? Age ten? Five? Six months? At birth?
>>
>> Parents, who are eating the right amount of food per day, would know
>> when.
>
>And on average -- in your "collective clinical experience", of
>course -- that age would be?...

When the children start eating more than 32 ounces per day on their
own.

Truth is simple.

And, the truth shows that you, Cary Kittrell, are a fool.

"Cary Kittrell is a fool." -- Holy Spirit

Amen.

Such is the condition of all those who are unable to publicly say
"Jesus is LORD."

Bottom line concerning the predicament of you and other non-christians

like you:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/BottomLine

May we, who are Christians (either Jew or gentile), continue to pray
for your perishing soul, dear Cary:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/PrayForCary

Prayerfully in the awesome name of our Messiah, LORD Jesus Christ,

Andrew <><
--
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3558812d72ab4e17?

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 1:03:23 PM12/4/08
to
In article <n65gj4lk8ksfhql35...@4ax.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <ach...@emory.edu> writes:
> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> >> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> > > GysdeJongh wrote:
> >> > > >
> >> > > >
> >> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d73c4?
> >> > >
> >> > > The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
> >> > > a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
> >> > > was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
> >> > > eaten has made him/her hungrier.
> >> > >
> >> > > The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.
> >> >
> >> > Starting when? Age ten? Five? Six months? At birth?
> >>
> >> Parents, who are eating the right amount of food per day, would know
> >> when.
> >
> >And on average -- in your "collective clinical experience", of
> >course -- that age would be?...
>
> When the children start eating more than 32 ounces per day on their
> own.

And on average -- in your "collective clinical experience", of
course -- that age would be?...

-- cary

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 1:23:36 PM12/4/08
to
convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > >> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > >> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > >> > > GysdeJongh wrote:
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d73c4?
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
> > >> > > a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
> > >> > > was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
> > >> > > eaten has made him/her hungrier.
> > >> > >
> > >> > > The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.
> > >> >
> > >> > Starting when? Age ten? Five? Six months? At birth?
> > >>
> > >> Parents, who are eating the right amount of food per day, would know
> > >> when.
> > >
> > >And on average -- in your "collective clinical experience", of
> > >course -- that age would be?...
> >
> > When the children start eating more than 32 ounces per day on their
> > own.
>
> And on average -- in your "collective clinical experience", of
> course -- that age would be?...

12 years for females and 13 years for males.

Truth is simple :-)

<><

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3558812d72ab4e17?

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 1:45:22 PM12/4/08
to

OK, filed for future reference.

--cary

Lord Vetinari

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 1:57:20 PM12/4/08
to
"maggie" <go...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:17dc43b0-62bc-4951...@h5g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
: On Dec 3, 11:30 pm, Cork Soaker <Thunderb...@Intrepid.invalid> wrote:

: > MāckŠŽ wrote:
: > > On Thu, 4 Dec 2008 00:22:46 +0000 (UTC), c...@afone.as.arizona.edu
: > > (Cary Kittrell) wrote:
: > >> In article
<984cb765-18e3-4d9f-9f1c-0e250dd62...@20g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> "Andrew
B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> writes:
[snip]
: > >>> The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.

: > >> Starting when? Age ten? Five? Six months? At birth?
: > > then according the nutter chung, a 10 year old eating 32 ounces of

: > > fries and ice cream is eating healthy.
: > Where the hell did it come up with that number?
: > I'm missing the good life here.- Hide quoted text -
:
: How 'about everyone just shuts up?

You first, cranky.

: This is not a "fun" matter,

How so? If people are enjoying it, then it is a "fun" matter.

: according to "statistics", family and otherwise, I should have


: screamingly high cholesterol, and be a diabetic, and could perhaps
: drop dead, to boot. As my Dr. told me, cholesterol is "freakish"
: excellent, no diabetes.

I like the way you say that, did you know that? Haven't you heard? There's
lies, damned lies, and statistics.

:Everyone here, obviously, has the power to take care of their own


: health, if you have the $$ to look stuff up on the internet, and
: also exhaustingly paste and yammer on...what's your point?

Where did you get the impression that it costs money to look things up on
the internet? One can go any number of places, and get online wirelessly,
if one has the gear, and if one hasn't the gear, there are these things
called "libraries". As to yammering, you do an admirable job of it.


marcia

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 2:17:47 PM12/4/08
to
On Dec 4, 6:15 am, Andy is Still Evil <nos...@nospam.net> wrote:
> False Christian and sociopath "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love27
> @thetruth.com> wrote in news:984cb765-18e3-4d9f-9f1c-0e250dd62089@
> 20g2000yqt.googlegroups.com:
>
> > GysdeJongh wrote:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d7...

>
> > The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
> > a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
> > was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
> > eaten has made him/her hungrier.
>
> > The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.
>
> LIE.
> The 32 ounces was by Andy's design. He attempted to shoehorn a scriptural
> account of the use of 2 omers in support of his claim. Andy's use of the
> omer was incorrect since it was a measure of volume rather than weight.
> This has been pointed out to him many times. When Andy deliberately
> repeats this wrong statement even when he is aware of the correct usage
> his statement becomes a lie.
>
> > Truth is simple.
>
> Andy is so sensitive to truth that he leaves the room before it has a
> chance to enter. If you look in the archives of sci.med.cardiology you'll
> see that Andy came up with his 2 pound diet (as he named it then). Only
> after many postings was he persuaded to add "with a balanced diet" as a
> caveat. To this day other posters continue to show that factors such as
> age and exercise need to be taken into account, seemingly to no avail with
> stuck Andy.
>
> If you follow the links below, you can see a pattern where Andy has
> himself been digging his own professional grave over many years. This
> post simply serves to put warning lights around the hole.http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/5a8f36628c734909http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/fcc64b7a7b861413http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6847393fd66086ff

>
> Until Andy is able to change his behaviour it will remain that Andy is
> Still Evil.

Agree. It's impossible to convert omers to dry ounces. However, if you
drink all your meals, 2 Israeli omer = 2.09456493506494 gallon
(volume). So an omer is approximately 1 gallon, which is 128 fluid
ounces.

Now, if you try to convert fluid ounces to pounds, you get the
following:

fluid ounce (volume) TO pound (mass) = 6.5198472281401E-05 meter^3 /
kilogram (specific volume)

I can't do the math, can you?

anon...@nowhere.you.know

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 2:32:55 PM12/4/08
to
"The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
eaten has made him/her hungrier."

A good clinition would never give such unfounded advice. What a
diabetic eats is most important based on its content as to its effect on
blood glucose levels and nutritional value, nothing more.

This borders if not goes over the line of professional irresponsibility.

"The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design."

32 oz.s of candy bars would be tasty as above and leave one soon hungry.

This borders if not goes over the line of professional irresponsibility.

Truth is simple."

Lord Vetinari

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 4:47:35 PM12/4/08
to
"Kadaitcha Man" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:brsxlg$ze7$j...@alt.atheism.bondage.female-admins-nntp.org.switzerland...

> maggie, ye mangled very monster in apparel, never hung poison on a
> fouler toad, ye hissed:
>
>> On Dec 3, 11:30 pm, Cork Soaker <Thunderb...@Intrepid.invalid> wrote:
>>> MŕckŠŽ wrote:
[snip]

>> How 'about everyone just shuts up? This is not a "fun" matter,
>> according to "statistics", family and otherwise, I should have
>> screamingly high cholesterol, and be a diabetic, and could perhaps
>> drop dead, to boot. As my Dr. told me, cholesterol is "freakish"
>> excellent, no diabetes.
>>
>> Everyone here, obviously, has the power to take care of their own
>> health, if you have the $$ to look stuff up on the internet, and
>> also exhaustingly paste and yammer on...what's your point?
>
> Oh, fuck's sakes, shut the fuck up yourself and die a horrible death, you
> screeching harridan.

This, coming from one of usenet's finest brain-dead fuckwits, is just
fucking hilarious!! HooooooooBOY, he's a moron.


Kadaitcha Man

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 5:00:43 PM12/4/08
to
Lord Vetinari, ye hasty-witted ratsbane, think'st thou, though her
father be very rich, any man is so very a fool to be married to hell?,
ye hassled:

> This, coming from one of usenet's finest brain-dead fuckwits, is just
> fucking hilarious!! HooooooooBOY, he's a moron.

That, coming from one of usenet's finest brain-dead fuckwits, is just

fucking hilarious!! HooooooooBOY, he's a moron.

<aside>
Fucking stupid cunt.

--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007.
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007, August 2008.
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, Official owner
and trainer of Bucky Breeder, August 2008.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Member of:
Usenet Ruiner List
Top Assholes on the Net List
Most hated usenetizens of all time List
Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

Join me for dinner. I'm cooking grisly monkey pimple with garlic compote
accentuated with loathsome horse flies, served in a bubbling pot with a
slew of vapid squares of acorn and cooked intestine in foul-stinking
fresh blood, a side of rat snake stomach carcinoma and a keg of squid
vaginal secretions.

Syd M.

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 5:04:29 PM12/4/08
to
On Dec 3, 7:22 pm, c...@afone.as.arizona.edu (Cary Kittrell) wrote:

> In article <984cb765-18e3-4d9f-9f1c-0e250dd62...@20g2000yqt.googlegroups.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> writes:
>
> > GysdeJongh wrote:
>
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d7...

>
> > The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
> > a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
> > was delicious !  I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
> > eaten has made him/her hungrier.
>
> > The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.
>
> Starting when?  Age ten?  Five?  Six months?  At birth?
>

C'mon, Cary... You know better then to ask a serious question of
Chung.

PDW

Lord Vetinari

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 5:54:52 PM12/4/08
to
"Kadaitcha Man" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:02vx15$thw$u...@24hoursupport.female.panty-lines.org.nicaragua...

> Lord Vetinari, ye hasty-witted ratsbane, think'st thou, though her
> father be very rich, any man is so very a fool to be married to hell?,
> ye hassled:
>
>> This, coming from one of usenet's finest brain-dead fuckwits, is just
>> fucking hilarious!! HooooooooBOY, he's a moron.
>
> That, coming from one of usenet's finest brain-dead fuckwits, is just
> fucking hilarious!! HooooooooBOY, he's a moron.

That's really original, little boy.

> <aside>
> Fucking stupid cunt.

No, I'm not fucking any stupid cunts, especially not you.


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 5:59:53 PM12/4/08
to

Sadly, the entire archived Google newsgroups file will not help you


publicly say "Jesus is LORD."

Bottom line concerning your difficulties:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/43acbc5ea248ceee?

<><

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3558812d72ab4e17?

Kadaitcha Man

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 6:23:09 PM12/4/08
to
Lord Vetinari, ye sottish malignant thing, out of my door, you witch,
you hag, you baggage, you polecat, you ronyon!, ye nitpicked:

> "Kadaitcha Man" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> news:02vx15$thw$u...@24hoursupport.female.panty-lines.org.nicaragua...
>> Lord Vetinari, ye hasty-witted ratsbane, think'st thou, though her
>> father be very rich, any man is so very a fool to be married to
>> hell?, ye hassled:
>>
>>> This, coming from one of usenet's finest brain-dead fuckwits, is
>>> just fucking hilarious!! HooooooooBOY, he's a moron.
>>
>> That, coming from one of usenet's finest brain-dead fuckwits, is just
>> fucking hilarious!! HooooooooBOY, he's a moron.
>
> That's really original, little boy.

Is your local police constabulary aware that you troll for kids on usenet?

>> <aside>
>> Fucking stupid cunt.
>
> No, I'm not fucking any stupid cunts, especially not you.

Oh, an IKYABWAI. That's really original...

--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007.
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007, August 2008.
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, Official owner
and trainer of Bucky Breeder, August 2008.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Member of:
Usenet Ruiner List
Top Assholes on the Net List
Most hated usenetizens of all time List
Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

Join me for dinner. I'm cooking objectionable used tampons and Norway
rat running sore extract accentuated with toasted spinal cord inside
baked used tampons and banana marinade accompanied by horrific bowels on
top of ominous earthworm genitalia, simmered in a cooling mug brimming
with thin scraps of anchovy and chunks of gut in rancid crud, a side of
flying squirrel spinal cord and a gallon of coagulated white blood
cells.

Don Kirkman

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 7:42:34 PM12/4/08
to
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
article
<e59658c9-db4b-45bb...@d32g2000yqe.googlegroups.com>:

>Sadly, the entire archived Google newsgroups file will not help you
>publicly say "Jesus is LORD."

Since so much of the archived Google newsgroups file for
sci.med.cardiology preserves your own writings, that seems to imply
something about the effectiveness of your much writing.
--
Don Kirkman
don...@charter.net

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 7:43:51 PM12/4/08
to

The nominations for Non-Sequitur of the Week, Open Division, closed
yesterday at midnight. Hope you didn't invest too much time in creating
that one (although I do admit I'm forced to admire its masterful orthonality;
good job!)


-- cary

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Dec 4, 2008, 10:01:42 PM12/4/08
to

Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
you to again update folks on your continued inability to publicly say
"Jesus is LORD."

Bottom line concerning the predicament of you and other non-christians
like you:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/035c93540862751c?

<><

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3558812d72ab4e17?

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Dec 5, 2008, 9:36:48 AM12/5/08
to

Did so. You failed to "discrern" the fact. And that is the "bottom
line" on you.


-- cary

Lord Vetinari

unread,
Dec 5, 2008, 10:22:23 AM12/5/08
to
"Kadaitcha Man" <inv...@invalid.invalid> raved in message
news:9nx9d1$1xs$4...@alt.sex.wanted.one-armed-boar-pig.net.china...
> Lord Vetinari wrote:
>> "Kadaitcha Man" <inv...@invalid.invalid> spewed in message
>> news:02vx15$thw$u...@24hoursupport.female.panty-lines.org.nicaragua...

>>> Lord Vetinari, wrote:
>>>> This, coming from one of usenet's finest brain-dead fuckwits, is
>>>> just fucking hilarious!! HooooooooBOY, he's a moron.
>>> That, coming from one of usenet's finest brain-dead fuckwits, is just
>>> fucking hilarious!! HooooooooBOY, he's a moron.
>> That's really original, little boy.
> Is your local police constabulary aware that you troll for kids on usenet?

When do you go back for your next round of ECT?

>>> <aside>
>>> Fucking stupid cunt.
>>
>> No, I'm not fucking any stupid cunts, especially not you.
>
> Oh, an IKYABWAI. That's really original...

Compared to anything that you've posted? Fer sure.

I like your fake email address - makes me think of Gattica...and BOY, are
YOU invalid.


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Dec 5, 2008, 12:04:45 PM12/5/08
to
convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/1fe8ba2ba0447eb7?

>>
>> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
>> you to again update folks on your continued inability to publicly say
>> "Jesus is LORD."
>
>Did so.

Indeed, you did update folks :-)

Bottom line concerning your having less free will:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/WaywardCary

May we, who are Christians (either Jew or gentile), continue to be
mindful of WDJW by praying for your perishing soul, dear Cary:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/Convicts/PrayForCary

Prayerfully in the infinite power and might of the Holy Spirit,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Lawful steward of http://EmoryCardiology.com
A latter-day disciple of the KING of kings and LORD of lords.
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/DiscipleNow

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Dec 5, 2008, 1:25:18 PM12/5/08
to
In article <venij45jko3ef4c4t...@4ax.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <ach...@emory.edu> writes:
> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/1fe8ba2ba0447eb7?
> >>
> >> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
> >> you to again update folks on your continued inability to publicly say
> >> "Jesus is LORD."
> >
> >Did so.
>
> Indeed,

You snip, then I snip.

Got that?

Good.


-- cary

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Dec 5, 2008, 4:05:33 PM12/5/08
to
convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/92a4f79dbeb7e076?

>
>You snip, then I snip.

Have not snipped but rather have restored :-)

>Got that?

Restored is more than that :-)

>Good.

GOD is good :-)

HE has given those of us who are Christians (either Jew or gentile)
eternal life so that we have all the time we need to fully inform
non-christians folks like you who are simply "unable to say 'Jesus is
LORD'" because the Holy Spirit does not want to help you...

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/43acbc5ea248ceee?
... meanwhile, you are running out of time, just as our dearly
departed Bob (this one) Pastorio ran out of time, with our dear
convicted neighbor Don Kirkman following right at his heels:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/134aca053227804c

And, so you are incredibly foolish...

http://HeartMDPhD.com/FoolishCary

... as is dear Don:

http://HeartMDPhD.com/FoolishDon

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Dec 5, 2008, 6:17:21 PM12/5/08
to
In article <ss4jj4d1g5qqnd440...@4ax.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <ach...@emory.edu> writes:
> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/92a4f79dbeb7e076?
> >
> >You snip, then I snip.
>
> Have not snipped

In the post to which I was responding, you most certainly did.

Your choice to write untruthfully does not bode well for you.


-- cary

Don Kirkman

unread,
Dec 5, 2008, 7:29:42 PM12/5/08
to
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
article <ss4jj4d1g5qqnd440...@4ax.com>:

>... meanwhile, you are running out of time, just as our dearly
>departed Bob (this one) Pastorio ran out of time, with our dear
>convicted neighbor Don Kirkman following right at his heels:

>http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/134aca053227804c

>And, so you are incredibly foolish...

>... as is dear Don:

Meaningless links snipped.

>May we, who are Christians (either Jew or gentile), continue to be
>mindful of WDJW by praying for your perishing soul, dear Cary:

So long as you have nothing but idle words as evidence of your
fantasies I continue my peaceful and productive existence.

Got the stuff together yet to prove that I'm a non-Christian? Didn't
think so.
--
Don Kirkman
don...@charter.net

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Dec 6, 2008, 1:51:57 AM12/6/08
to
convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > >
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/92a4f79dbeb7e076?
> > >
> > >You snip, then I snip.
> >
> > Have not snipped
>
> In the post to which I was responding, you most certainly did.

Not as you have snipped, which has been interrupting sentences.

Truth is simple.

<><

"... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
12:3)

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/43acbc5ea248ceee?

Kadaitcha Man

unread,
Dec 6, 2008, 6:47:10 PM12/6/08
to
Lord Vetinari, ye raw-boned martyr slain in cupid's wars, like a serpent
are thee, who, though ye feed on sweetest flowers, yet poison ye breed,
ye discoursed:

Wow. An email address lame. You are formidababble. I am ruined. I shall run
away!

--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]

Hammer of Thor: February 2007.
Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007, August 2008.
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle, Official owner
and trainer of Bucky Breeder, August 2008.
Official Member: Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Official Overseer of Kooks & Trolls in 24hoursupport.helpdesk

Member of:
Usenet Ruiner List
Top Assholes on the Net List
Most hated usenetizens of all time List
Cog in the AUK Hate Machine List

Find me on Google Maps: 24°39'47.13"S, 134°4'20.18"E

Join me for dinner. I'm cooking microwaved echidna intestine and quagga
belly dressing smothered in contemptible bull duodenum and garden snail
cancer vinegar, served in a turbid double boiler with a slew of burnt
olive, bland medley of salami and specks of giblet, melted cheese, a
side of prairie dog colon and a glass of puerile cherry tomato extract.

Tiger_Lily

unread,
Dec 6, 2008, 9:48:22 PM12/6/08
to
Cary Kittrell wrote:

> In article <958f2d94-6413-4cde...@t3g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> writes:
>> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>> GysdeJongh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d73c4?
>>>> The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
>>>> a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
>>>> was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
>>>> eaten has made him/her hungrier.
>>>>
>>>> The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.
>>> Starting when? Age ten? Five? Six months? At birth?
>> Parents, who are eating the right amount of food per day, would know
>> when.
>
> And on average -- in your "collective clinical experience", of
> course -- that age would be?...
>
>
>
> -- cary
>
>> Truth is simple :-)

>>
>> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
>> you to unwittingly update folks on your continued inability to
>> publicly proclaim that "Jesus is LORD."

>>
>> Bottom line concerning the predicament of you and other non-
>> christians:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/035c93540862751c?
>>
>> <><
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3558812d72ab4e17?
>
>
amazing

a feeding every 1 to 2 hours of 1 to 4oz of breastmilk for a baby

i guess we should limit a babies access to breastmilk to much less than
48 oz a day, then?

my Dr would have been very interested in THIS interpretation

--
kate
type 1 since 1987
www.diabetic-chat.org
www.diabetic-talk.org
http://www.diabetes-support.org.uk/newly%20diagnosed.html

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Dec 7, 2008, 7:45:50 AM12/7/08
to
convicted neighbor Tiger_Lily wrote:
> >>
> >> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3558812d72ab4e17?
> >
> >
> amazing
>
> a feeding every 1 to 2 hours of 1 to 4oz of breastmilk for a baby

That would be possibly a range of 12 (1 oz per 2 hrs) to 96 oz (4 oz
every hr) of breastmilk for a baby.

> i guess we should limit a babies access to breastmilk to much less than
> 48 oz a day, then?

Wiser to simply feed the baby directly from the breast and not express
for purposes of weighing the breast milk.

Truth is simple.

<><

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/e7b39fa84dd3f593?

Cork Soaker

unread,
Dec 7, 2008, 10:53:50 PM12/7/08
to
Lord Vetinari wrote:
> I love sucking on big fat cocks.


Shut the fuck up, freak!

Cork Soaker

unread,
Dec 7, 2008, 10:52:37 PM12/7/08
to


Are you trying to be ironic, you thick cunt?

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Dec 8, 2008, 1:09:42 PM12/8/08
to
In article <3377857d-28d7-4047...@f3g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> writes:
> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > >
> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/92a4f79dbeb7e076?
> > > >
> > > >You snip, then I snip.
> > >
> > > Have not snipped
> >
> > In the post to which I was responding, you most certainly did.
>
> Not as you have snipped,

You might think about getting on of these:

http://www.southern-tool.com/store/dirtdawg_standard_auger.html

It could save a lot of wear and tear on your back, a consequence
of constantly moving the goalposts.


-- cary

Lord Vetinari

unread,
Dec 8, 2008, 1:52:38 PM12/8/08
to
"Kadaitcha Man" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
news:sg23yx$7gu$d...@alt.flame.weather-beaten-milkman.net.japan...

> Lord Vetinari, ye raw-boned martyr slain in cupid's wars, like a serpent
> are thee, who, though ye feed on sweetest flowers, yet poison ye breed,
> ye discoursed:
>
>> "Kadaitcha Man" <inv...@invalid.invalid> raved in message
>> news:9nx9d1$1xs$4...@alt.sex.wanted.one-armed-boar-pig.net.china...
>>> Lord Vetinari wrote:
>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" <inv...@invalid.invalid> spewed in message
>>>> news:02vx15$thw$u...@24hoursupport.female.panty-lines.org.nicaragua...
>>>>> Lord Vetinari, wrote:
>>>>>> This, coming from one of usenet's finest brain-dead fuckwits, is
>>>>>> just fucking hilarious!! HooooooooBOY, he's a moron.
>>>>> That, coming from one of usenet's finest brain-dead fuckwits, is
>>>>> just fucking hilarious!! HooooooooBOY, he's a moron.
>>>> That's really original, little boy.
>>> Is your local police constabulary aware that you troll for kids on
>>> usenet?
>>
>> When do you go back for your next round of ECT?

Been and back again, eh? How many volts/amps, this time?

>>>>> <aside>
>>>>> Fucking stupid cunt.
>>>>
>>>> No, I'm not fucking any stupid cunts, especially not you.
>>>
>>> Oh, an IKYABWAI. That's really original...
>>
>> Compared to anything that you've posted? Fer sure.
>>
>> I like your fake email address - makes me think of Gattica...and BOY,
>> are YOU invalid.
>
> Wow. An email address lame.

Musta hurt, huh?

> You are formidababble. I am ruined. I shall run away!

Quitcher yappin', and just fucking do it, alright?


Lord Vetinari

unread,
Dec 8, 2008, 1:55:14 PM12/8/08
to
"Cork Soaker" <Thund...@Intrepid.invalid> wrote in message
news:u8iu06-...@quarkbomb.dyndns.org...

> Lord Vetinari wrote:
>> "Kadaitcha Man" <inv...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
>> news:brsxlg$ze7$j...@alt.atheism.bondage.female-admins-nntp.org.switzerland...
>>> maggie, ye mangled very monster in apparel, never hung poison on a
>>> fouler toad, ye hissed:
>>>
>>>> On Dec 3, 11:30 pm, Cork Soaker <Thunderb...@Intrepid.invalid> wrote:
>>>>> MāckŠŽ wrote:
>> [snip]
>>>> How 'about everyone just shuts up? This is not a "fun" matter,
>>>> according to "statistics", family and otherwise, I should have
>>>> screamingly high cholesterol, and be a diabetic, and could perhaps
>>>> drop dead, to boot. As my Dr. told me, cholesterol is "freakish"
>>>> excellent, no diabetes.
>>>>
>>>> Everyone here, obviously, has the power to take care of their own
>>>> health, if you have the $$ to look stuff up on the internet, and
>>>> also exhaustingly paste and yammer on...what's your point?
>>> Oh, fuck's sakes, shut the fuck up yourself and die a horrible death,
>>> you
>>> screeching harridan.
>>
>> This, coming from one of usenet's finest brain-dead fuckwits, is just
>> fucking hilarious!! HooooooooBOY, he's a moron.
> Are you trying to be ironic, you thick cunt?

*snigger* Not at all, you lame sockpuppet you. Not that you'd know the
difference.


Lord Vetinari

unread,
Dec 8, 2008, 1:57:07 PM12/8/08
to
"Cork Soaker" <Thund...@Intrepid.invalid> wrote in message
news:6biu06-...@quarkbomb.dyndns.org...
> Lord Vetinari wrote:
[snipped by sockpuppetry]

>
> Shut the fuck up, freak!

Yeah, I'm a freak...and I'll be freakin' long after you're gone, son. You
wouldn't be just a tad upset, would you?


Cork Soaker

unread,
Dec 8, 2008, 6:07:25 PM12/8/08
to


Waffling on like a faggot who's lost the cock from his arse, you have
proven you're a fucking spastic.

Cork Soaker

unread,
Dec 8, 2008, 6:11:16 PM12/8/08
to
Lord Vetinari wrote:
> "Cork Soaker" <Thund...@Intrepid.invalid> wrote in message
> news:6biu06-...@quarkbomb.dyndns.org...
>> Lord Vetinari wrote:
> [faggotry]

>> Shut the fuck up, freak!
>
> Yeah, I'm a freak...and I'll be freakin' long after you're gone, son. You
> wouldn't be just a tad upset, would you?
>
>

Upset at what? A worthless dick-nibbler like you? Oh yeah, I'll never
live it down.

Such a faggot, are you trying to pretend you've EVER had sex with
another person? You must be about twelve years old, a virgin, a true
dipshit or an autistic spastic.

Which is it, spastic?

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Dec 8, 2008, 7:32:34 PM12/8/08
to
convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/92a4f79dbeb7e076?
> > > > >
> > > > >You snip, then I snip.
> > > >
> > > > Have not snipped
> > >
> > > In the post to which I was responding, you most certainly did.
> >
> > Not as you have snipped,
>
> You might think about getting on of these:
>
> http://www.southern-tool.com/store/dirtdawg_standard_auger.html
>
> It could save a lot of wear and tear on your back, a consequence
> of constantly moving the goalposts.

Your being unable to publicly say "Jesus is LORD" is not because of
the movement of any goal posts at that stadium event you cited:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/43acbc5ea248ceee?

<><

"... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
12:3)

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/188fd2ec63b3ba63?

Cary Kittrell

unread,
Dec 8, 2008, 8:09:08 PM12/8/08
to
In article <30944025-067e-40d0...@k36g2000yqe.googlegroups.com> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> writes:
> convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/92a4f79dbeb7e076?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >You snip, then I snip.
> > > > >
> > > > > Have not snipped
> > > >
> > > > In the post to which I was responding, you most certainly did.
> > >
> > > Not as you have snipped,
> >
> > You might think about getting on of these:
> >
> > http://www.southern-tool.com/store/dirtdawg_standard_auger.html
> >
> > It could save a lot of wear and tear on your back, a consequence
> > of constantly moving the goalposts.
>
> Your being unable to publicly say "Jesus is LORD" is not because of
> the movement of any goal posts at that stadium event you cited:

The nominations for Non-Sequitur of the Week, Pro-Am division are
indeed once again open.

Your submission has been recorded.

-- cary

John "C"

unread,
Dec 8, 2008, 9:32:19 PM12/8/08
to

"Cork Soaker" <Thund...@Intrepid.invalid> wrote in message
news:k5m016-...@quarkbomb.dyndns.org...

Peter "eater" Ross wants to meet/eat this autistic spastic for a
week-END of camping...

HJ

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Dec 9, 2008, 3:43:52 AM12/9/08
to
convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > convicted neighbor Cary Kittrell wrote:
> > > > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/92a4f79dbeb7e076?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >You snip, then I snip.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Have not snipped
> > > > >
> > > > > In the post to which I was responding, you most certainly did.
> > > >
> > > > Not as you have snipped,
> > >
> > > You might think about getting on of these:
> > >
> > > http://www.southern-tool.com/store/dirtdawg_standard_auger.html
> > >
> > > It could save a lot of wear and tear on your back, a consequence
> > > of constantly moving the goalposts.
> >
> > Your being unable to publicly say "Jesus is LORD" is not because of
> > the movement of any goal posts at that stadium event you cited:
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/43acbc5ea248ceee?

>
> The nominations for Non-Sequitur of the Week, Pro-Am division are
> indeed once again open.
>
> Your submission has been recorded.

Too bad your publicly saying "Jesus is LORD" has not been recorded.

Such is the nature of things that have yet to happen.

Bottom line concerning the predicament of you and other non-
christians:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/035c93540862751c?

<><

"... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
12:3)

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/188fd2ec63b3ba63?

Robert Miles

unread,
Dec 20, 2008, 8:16:37 AM12/20/08
to

"marcia" <marcia...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:de7cd5a1-6fef-4996...@x14g2000yqk.googlegroups.com...
> On Dec 4, 6:15 am, Andy is Still Evil <nos...@nospam.net> wrote:
>> False Christian and sociopath "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <love27
>> @thetruth.com> wrote in news:984cb765-18e3-4d9f-9f1c-0e250dd62089@
>> 20g2000yqt.googlegroups.com:
>>
>> > GysdeJongh wrote:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diabetes/msg/092d6d76495d7...

>>
>> > The right diet varies from person to person and consists of foods that
>> > a person enjoys, which becomes evident when a person exclaims "that
>> > was delicious ! I wants more ! ! " thereby indicating what s/he has
>> > eaten has made him/her hungrier.
>>
>> > The right amount remains invariant at 32 ounces by GOD's design.
>>
>> LIE.
>> The 32 ounces was by Andy's design. He attempted to shoehorn a
>> scriptural
>> account of the use of 2 omers in support of his claim. Andy's use of the
>> omer was incorrect since it was a measure of volume rather than weight.
>> This has been pointed out to him many times. When Andy deliberately
>> repeats this wrong statement even when he is aware of the correct usage
>> his statement becomes a lie.
>>
>> > Truth is simple.
>>
>> Andy is so sensitive to truth that he leaves the room before it has a
>> chance to enter. If you look in the archives of sci.med.cardiology
>> you'll
>> see that Andy came up with his 2 pound diet (as he named it then). Only
>> after many postings was he persuaded to add "with a balanced diet" as a
>> caveat. To this day other posters continue to show that factors such as
>> age and exercise need to be taken into account, seemingly to no avail
>> with
>> stuck Andy.
>>
>> If you follow the links below, you can see a pattern where Andy has
>> himself been digging his own professional grave over many years. This
>> post simply serves to put warning lights around the
>> hole.http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/5a8f36628c734909http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/fcc64b7a7b861413http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6847393fd66086ff
>>
>> Until Andy is able to change his behaviour it will remain that Andy is
>> Still Evil.
>
> Agree. It's impossible to convert omers to dry ounces. However, if you
> drink all your meals, 2 Israeli omer = 2.09456493506494 gallon
> (volume). So an omer is approximately 1 gallon, which is 128 fluid
> ounces.
>
> Now, if you try to convert fluid ounces to pounds, you get the
> following:
>
> fluid ounce (volume) TO pound (mass) = 6.5198472281401E-05 meter^3 /
> kilogram (specific volume)
>
> I can't do the math, can you?
.
I'm not sure I want to. I'd rather just tell Andy to adopt a WOE (way of
eating) of two pounds of salt a day.


0 new messages