Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Re: Do you remember when. . .

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 5, 2006, 1:24:41 PM10/5/06
to
Feather Forestwalker wrote:
> . . .someone called me a horrid name on here? How did I respond? Believe me,
> I wanted to lash out and scream and cry at being called such a horrid thing.
> I was in such a state of utter shock and disbelief that I made myself "sit
> on my hands" and NOT respond. Oh how I *wanted* to lash back. I sat here in
> tears, asking God to give me strength to leave it in His hands rather than
> attempt a defense of myself.
>
> BUT:
>
> MANY here (and some who are no longer here) came to my defense. It's in
> Google from 2004 if you want to check it out. MANY defended my "honor" as it
> were.
>
> If so many could stand up for me - many who do not know me at all, simply
> came to my defense and rallied around and supported me - offering me comfort
> in such beautiful ways, that they may not ever truly know the depth of how
> it touched me - if so many could stand up for me when I was called such a
> horrid name, how is it that we cannot stand up for two others here who have
> been called such a wicked name?
>
> Being called a rapist, especially in this day and age when some aren't
> rapists at all but who are merely accused and now have to register as sex
> offenders for the rest of their lives - (how many rapists or accused rapists
> have you hired today?) - is just as bad as being called what I was two and a
> half years ago.
>
> Think it over. . .and really think hard.
>
> When you call someone a horrid name, even in a newsgroup, it can ruin a
> life.
>
> A few years ago, Vera said something about lies and libel and slander being
> spread on Usenet and how it affected one's job applications. I remember
> thinking how utterly ludicrous it was; that NO employer in their right minds
> would go to the internet and check someone's usenet history - but you know
> what? It happes. It's happened to me - thank God the past is past, but it
> pays to be careful.
>
> Scripture also teaches us:
>
> Jesus' words to the centurions, can also apply to us:
>
> Luke 3:14
> them. Then some soldiers asked him, "And what should we do?" He replied,
> "Don't extort money and don't accuse people falsely-be content with your
> pay."
>
> And how about 1 Peter?
>
> 1 Peter 2:12
> Live such good lives among the pagans that, though they accuse you of doing
> wrong, they may see your good deeds and glorify God on the day he visits us.
>
> How about slander?
>
> Starting with Leviticus:
>
> Leviticus 19:16
> " 'Do not go about spreading slander among your people. " 'Do not do
> anything that endangers your neighbor's life. I am the LORD.
>
> Psalm 38:20
> Those who repay my good with evil slander me when I pursue what is good.
>
> Psalm 41:6
> Whenever one comes to see me, he speaks falsely, while his heart gathers
> slander; then he goes out and spreads it abroad.
>
> Matthew 15:19
> For out of the heart come evil thoughts, murder, adultery, sexual
> immorality, theft, false testimony, slander.
>
> 1 Corinthians 4:13
> when we are slandered, we answer kindly. Up to this moment we have become
> the scum of the earth, the refuse of the world.
>
> Ephesians 4:31
> Get rid of all bitterness, rage and anger, brawling and slander, along with
> every form of malice.
>
> Titus 3:2
> to slander no one, to be peaceable and considerate, and to show true
> humility toward all men.
>
> James 4:11
> Brothers, do not slander one another. Anyone who speaks against his brother
> or judges him speaks against the law and judges it. When you judge the law,
> you are not keeping it, but sitting in judgment on it.
>
> 1 Peter 2:1
> Therefore, rid yourselves of all malice and all deceit, hypocrisy, envy, and
> slander of every kind.
>
> ===================================================
>
> God bless you all in your walk with Jesus Christ, our Lord.
>
> Feather

In truth, being slandered and libeled over the years has resulted for
me in a much closer walk with Christ Jesus, our LORD.

This would have been different if others in this world had come to my
defense.

Instead, it was just me and my LORD.

It does not get any more personal than this when you turn to HIM and HE
replies:

"Yes, I know."

"Remember they hated ME first and so they will hate you for walking
with ME."

In the Holy Spirit, I was there to witness my LORD's suffering slander,
libel, scourging, and crucifixion with no one in this world coming to
HIS defense. The tears from my eyes flowed like rivers.

Marana tha

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water, dear sister
Feather whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a77da2d26da0ab97?

GentleOwlSpirit

unread,
Oct 5, 2006, 1:36:48 PM10/5/06
to

God bless you Andrew!

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1160069081.8...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 5, 2006, 6:36:00 PM10/5/06
to
HE just did through you :-)

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water, dear sister

Sioux whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><

holy spirit, Batman!

unread,
Oct 6, 2006, 12:57:24 AM10/6/06
to

GentleOwlSpirit wrote:
> God bless you Andrew!

May HE heal your damaged brain, and forgive you for wasting the talent
HE gave you obsessing on Usenet instead of practicing medicine.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 6, 2006, 3:54:42 AM10/6/06
to
Nymshifting neighbor wrote:
> GentleOwlSpirit wrote:
> > God bless you Andrew!
>
> May HE heal your damaged brain

In my continued walk with Christ Jesus, HE keeps me completely well.

>, and forgive you for wasting the talent
> HE gave you obsessing on Usenet instead of practicing medicine.

My LORD's purpose for me here remains to inform so that all may come to
praise our Father in heaven.

Laus Deo ! !

Marana tha ! ! !

May GOD continue to keep your heart beating, dear neighbor whom I love

Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition

unread,
Oct 6, 2006, 3:59:45 AM10/6/06
to
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 10:24:41 -0700, Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD sat in thee
Comfee Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea:

> In truth, being slandered and libeled over the years has resulted for me
> in a much closer walk with Christ Jesus, our LORD.

You're my second choice for the Office of Darth Bawl, this month.

--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris!
Demon Prince of Absurdity
COOSN-029-06-71069
Looney Maroon nominee for August 2006 Johnny D Wentzky foamed:
"You never asked someone who goes into areas of the internet that are
only for adults who has an underage id somehow or another if they are a
cop posing as an underage person online?
I guess lots of people just don't watch dateline or read stories much.
Why don;t you go to pervertedjustice,com and see what they do. They are
awash in their self-proclaimed glory after they lied to membners of the
public.
They are awash in their self-proclaimed glory after they posed as an
underage person and agreed to do all sorts of sex acts wioth adult
males, and they are adults posing as teenager themselves. They make
themsleves into liars by falsely impersonating underage persons and by
not fuilfilling the words they tell the victims online in their chats.
Why don't you read it where they tell these victims of their deceit
about how they have been with grown men and such? Why don't you read it
where they say, "That would be cool." after someone makes an advance
towards an adult who is posing as a teenager? And, where they agree to
meet the person, etc.
Lost control, didn't you?
Is that why you feel as if you need to lie so much now? I see where lots
of these false impersonation games are not sticking. They feel as if
they can lie and then order the victims to get counseling in the
gayblade, governmental, pro-choice tax leech counseling centers. They
are doing nothing more than usury and fraud in many cases." -- Wentzky
almost comes out of the closet as a pedo/ephebophile in MID:
<H%%Eg.28916$Uq1....@bignews6.bellsouth.net>

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 7, 2006, 7:48:03 AM10/7/06
to
Atheist neighbor wrote:

> Andrew wrote:
>
> > In truth, being slandered and libeled over the years has resulted for me
> > in a much closer walk with Christ Jesus, our LORD.
>
> You're my second choice for the Office of Darth Bawl, this month.

Name-calling simply confirms that you remain lost.

May GOD continue to keep your heart beating, dear neighbor whom I love

Jude Alexander

unread,
Oct 7, 2006, 9:47:32 AM10/7/06
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1160221683.0...@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

> Atheist neighbor wrote:
>> Andrew wrote:
>>
>> > In truth, being slandered and libeled over the years has resulted for
>> > me
>> > in a much closer walk with Christ Jesus, our LORD.
>>
>> You're my second choice for the Office of Darth Bawl, this month.
>
> Name-calling simply confirms that you remain lost.

Not really. The guy may be lost indeed, but just by virture of name calling
does not a lost person make... according to the gospels, Jesus called some
people vipers, white washed tombs and He exhibited anger to the point of
becoming physical to the merchants in the Temple. I'm not saying Jesus
wasn't right in doing so. I say this to show you that you assessment of
name calling is incorrect.


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 7, 2006, 10:21:08 AM10/7/06
to
Jude Alexander wrote:

> Andrew wrote:
> > Atheist neighbor wrote:
> >> Andrew wrote:
> >>
> >> > In truth, being slandered and libeled over the years has resulted for
> >> > me
> >> > in a much closer walk with Christ Jesus, our LORD.
> >>
> >> You're my second choice for the Office of Darth Bawl, this month.
> >
> > Name-calling simply confirms that you remain lost.
>
> Not really.

Actually, yes.

> The guy may be lost indeed, but just by virture of name calling
> does not a lost person make...

Name-calling as defined by the on-line Merriam Webster Dictionary is
bearing false witness.

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/name-calling

> according to the gospels, Jesus called some
> people vipers, white washed tombs

Jesus spoke truthfully.

> and He exhibited anger to the point of
> becoming physical to the merchants in the Temple.

Jesus acted righteously.

> I'm not saying Jesus
> wasn't right in doing so. I say this to show you that you assessment of
> name calling is incorrect.

It remains my choice to continue to write truthfully.

Is Christ Jesus your LORD and your GOD, dear Jude ?

Jude Alexander

unread,
Oct 7, 2006, 8:01:02 PM10/7/06
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1160230868.5...@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...

> Jude Alexander wrote:
>> Andrew wrote:
>> > Atheist neighbor wrote:
>> >> Andrew wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > In truth, being slandered and libeled over the years has resulted
>> >> > for
>> >> > me
>> >> > in a much closer walk with Christ Jesus, our LORD.
>> >>
>> >> You're my second choice for the Office of Darth Bawl, this month.
>> >
>> > Name-calling simply confirms that you remain lost.
>>
>> Not really.
>
> Actually, yes.
>
>> The guy may be lost indeed, but just by virture of name calling
>> does not a lost person make...
>
> Name-calling as defined by the on-line Merriam Webster Dictionary is
> bearing false witness.
>
> http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/name-calling
>
>> according to the gospels, Jesus called some
>> people vipers, white washed tombs
>
> Jesus spoke truthfully.

He called the priests names. He was right in doing so. Name calling is NOT
necessarily a sign of being lost. There is no card blanche about name
calling as it can get out of hand, I can see that and know that.

>> and He exhibited anger to the point of
>> becoming physical to the merchants in the Temple.
>
> Jesus acted righteously.

I agree. I say HURRAH for standing up against the corruption & hypocrisy of
the religious leaders.

>> I'm not saying Jesus
>> wasn't right in doing so. I say this to show you that you assessment of
>> name calling is incorrect.
>
> It remains my choice to continue to write truthfully.
>
> Is Christ Jesus your LORD and your GOD, dear Jude ?

Yes, but I don't believe in the inerrancy of the bible. That will probably
get on your nerves like it usually does others.


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 8, 2006, 12:48:50 PM10/8/06
to
Jude Alexander wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
> > Jude Alexander wrote:
> >> Andrew wrote:
> >> > Atheist neighbor wrote:
> >> >> Andrew wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > In truth, being slandered and libeled over the years has resulted
> >> >> > for
> >> >> > me
> >> >> > in a much closer walk with Christ Jesus, our LORD.
> >> >>
> >> >> You're my second choice for the Office of Darth Bawl, this month.
> >> >
> >> > Name-calling simply confirms that you remain lost.
> >>
> >> Not really.
> >
> > Actually, yes.
> >
> >> The guy may be lost indeed, but just by virture of name calling
> >> does not a lost person make...
> >
> > Name-calling as defined by the on-line Merriam Webster Dictionary is
> > bearing false witness.
> >
> > http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/name-calling
> >
> >> according to the gospels, Jesus called some
> >> people vipers, white washed tombs
> >
> > Jesus spoke truthfully.
>
> He called the priests names.

That is not the same thing as name-calling. Simply review the
definition given by the online Merriam Webster Dictionary.

> He was right in doing so. Name calling is NOT
> necessarily a sign of being lost. There is no card blanche about name
> calling as it can get out of hand, I can see that and know that.

"Those who are secure in the truth have the strength to refrain from
descending into name-calling" -- Holy Spirit

Amen.

> >> and He exhibited anger to the point of
> >> becoming physical to the merchants in the Temple.
> >
> > Jesus acted righteously.
>
> I agree. I say HURRAH for standing up against the corruption & hypocrisy of
> the religious leaders.

GOD's will be done and not our will.

> >> I'm not saying Jesus
> >> wasn't right in doing so. I say this to show you that you assessment of
> >> name calling is incorrect.
> >
> > It remains my choice to continue to write truthfully.
> >
> > Is Christ Jesus your LORD and your GOD, dear Jude ?
>
> Yes, but I don't believe in the inerrancy of the bible.

Where is the Holy Bible in error in your opinion ?

> That will probably
> get on your nerves like it usually does others.

"It is my heavenly Father's job to judge, the Holy Spirit's job to
convict, and my job to love." -- Reverend Billy Graham

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water, dear brother
Jude whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit

As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/f4dad7fe68478acf?

Jude Alexander

unread,
Oct 8, 2006, 3:19:16 PM10/8/06
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1160326130.5...@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...

> Jude Alexander wrote:
>> Andrew wrote:
>> > Jude Alexander wrote:
>> >> Andrew wrote:
>> >> > Atheist neighbor wrote:
>> >> >> Andrew wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > In truth, being slandered and libeled over the years has resulted
>> >> >> > for
>> >> >> > me
>> >> >> > in a much closer walk with Christ Jesus, our LORD.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You're my second choice for the Office of Darth Bawl, this month.
>> >> >
>> >> > Name-calling simply confirms that you remain lost.
>> >>
>> >> Not really.
>> >
>> > Actually, yes.
>> >
>> >> The guy may be lost indeed, but just by virture of name calling
>> >> does not a lost person make...
>> >
>> > Name-calling as defined by the on-line Merriam Webster Dictionary is
>> > bearing false witness.
>> >
>> > http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/name-calling

I'm sorry. Clarifying what Jesus is reported to have done via a modern
dictionary is a bit funny. Think about it.

>> >
>> >> according to the gospels, Jesus called some
>> >> people vipers, white washed tombs
>> >
>> > Jesus spoke truthfully.
>>
>> He called the priests names.
>
> That is not the same thing as name-calling. Simply review the
> definition given by the online Merriam Webster Dictionary.
>
>> He was right in doing so. Name calling is NOT
>> necessarily a sign of being lost. There is no card blanche about name
>> calling as it can get out of hand, I can see that and know that.
>
> "Those who are secure in the truth have the strength to refrain from
> descending into name-calling" -- Holy Spirit

So you claim God speaks to you personally, i.e. above quote of the "Holy
Spirit." Do you hear voices? How do you receive these messages?


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 8, 2006, 3:32:33 PM10/8/06
to
Jude Alexander wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
> > Jude Alexander wrote:
> >> Andrew wrote:
> >> > Jude Alexander wrote:
> >> >> Andrew wrote:
> >> >> > Atheist neighbor wrote:
> >> >> >> Andrew wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> > In truth, being slandered and libeled over the years has resulted
> >> >> >> > for
> >> >> >> > me
> >> >> >> > in a much closer walk with Christ Jesus, our LORD.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> You're my second choice for the Office of Darth Bawl, this month.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Name-calling simply confirms that you remain lost.
> >> >>
> >> >> Not really.
> >> >
> >> > Actually, yes.
> >> >
> >> >> The guy may be lost indeed, but just by virture of name calling
> >> >> does not a lost person make...
> >> >
> >> > Name-calling as defined by the on-line Merriam Webster Dictionary is
> >> > bearing false witness.
> >> >
> >> > http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/name-calling
>
> I'm sorry. Clarifying what Jesus is reported to have done via a modern
> dictionary is a bit funny. Think about it.

Clarifying what name-calling means to understand that Jesus did not
engage in name-calling is not funny. Think about it.

> >> >
> >> >> according to the gospels, Jesus called some
> >> >> people vipers, white washed tombs
> >> >
> >> > Jesus spoke truthfully.
> >>
> >> He called the priests names.
> >
> > That is not the same thing as name-calling. Simply review the
> > definition given by the online Merriam Webster Dictionary.
> >
> >> He was right in doing so. Name calling is NOT
> >> necessarily a sign of being lost. There is no card blanche about name
> >> calling as it can get out of hand, I can see that and know that.
> >
> > "Those who are secure in the truth have the strength to refrain from
> > descending into name-calling" -- Holy Spirit
>
> So you claim God speaks to you personally, i.e. above quote of the "Holy
> Spirit." Do you hear voices?

No.

> How do you receive these messages?

Though prayer and then surrendering my will by dying to self, which I
do daily.

HIS will be done and not my will.

It remains my choice to receive HIS guidance in everything I say, do,
and write.

Now back to the question that HE led me to ask you:

"Where is the Holy Bible in error in your opinion ?" after you wrote,


"Yes, but I don't believe in the inerrancy of the bible."

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water, dear brother

Jude Alexander

unread,
Oct 8, 2006, 3:38:55 PM10/8/06
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1160335953.2...@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

You're twisting my words. Do you know that you're doing it or are you
unaware?

I SAID that to CLARIFY what is reported by the gospel writers by a
dictionary is quite funny. I'll add absurd. Why didn't you at least quote a
biblical dictionary? Get it?

>> >> >> according to the gospels, Jesus called some
>> >> >> people vipers, white washed tombs
>> >> >
>> >> > Jesus spoke truthfully.
>> >>
>> >> He called the priests names.
>> >
>> > That is not the same thing as name-calling. Simply review the
>> > definition given by the online Merriam Webster Dictionary.
>> >
>> >> He was right in doing so. Name calling is NOT
>> >> necessarily a sign of being lost. There is no card blanche about name
>> >> calling as it can get out of hand, I can see that and know that.
>> >
>> > "Those who are secure in the truth have the strength to refrain from
>> > descending into name-calling" -- Holy Spirit
>>
>> So you claim God speaks to you personally, i.e. above quote of the "Holy
>> Spirit." Do you hear voices?
>
> No.
>
>> How do you receive these messages?
>
> Though prayer and then surrendering my will by dying to self, which I
> do daily.

Then how is it received? Through writing? Thoughts that come to you?

> HIS will be done and not my will.
>
> It remains my choice to receive HIS guidance in everything I say, do,
> and write.
>
> Now back to the question that HE led me to ask you:
>
> "Where is the Holy Bible in error in your opinion ?" after you wrote,
> "Yes, but I don't believe in the inerrancy of the bible."

Should I post some of the errors and absurdities? There are literally
thousands.

I started looking to write down the errors. I found a few of my own
accidentially when studying the bible as in reading it many times and not
just reading.... studying like I said. Then I looked to see what others had
found. I researched if what they said had any validity. Loosely, about
half did.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 8, 2006, 4:36:41 PM10/8/06
to

It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.

> Do you know that you're doing it or are you unaware?

"Those unable to believe that the Bible is Holy suffer from a strong
delusion." -- Holy Soirit

> I SAID that to CLARIFY what is reported by the gospel writers by a
> dictionary is quite funny. I'll add absurd. Why didn't you at least quote a
> biblical dictionary? Get it?

You entered into this thread to dispute my understanding of the word
"name-calling." You attempted to use Jesus' example of judging the
Pharisees to achieve this by saying this was name-calling by our LORD.
The on-line Merriam Webster Dictionary shows that you are in error in
your understanding of the word "name-calling." Get it?

> >> >> >> according to the gospels, Jesus called some
> >> >> >> people vipers, white washed tombs
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Jesus spoke truthfully.
> >> >>
> >> >> He called the priests names.
> >> >
> >> > That is not the same thing as name-calling. Simply review the
> >> > definition given by the online Merriam Webster Dictionary.
> >> >
> >> >> He was right in doing so. Name calling is NOT
> >> >> necessarily a sign of being lost. There is no card blanche about name
> >> >> calling as it can get out of hand, I can see that and know that.
> >> >
> >> > "Those who are secure in the truth have the strength to refrain from
> >> > descending into name-calling" -- Holy Spirit
> >>
> >> So you claim God speaks to you personally, i.e. above quote of the "Holy
> >> Spirit." Do you hear voices?
> >
> > No.
> >
> >> How do you receive these messages?
> >
> > Though prayer and then surrendering my will by dying to self, which I
> > do daily.
>
> Then how is it received?

Through the heart of my soul.

> Through writing?

No.

> Thoughts that come to you?

No.

> > HIS will be done and not my will.
> >
> > It remains my choice to receive HIS guidance in everything I say, do,
> > and write.
> >
> > Now back to the question that HE led me to ask you:
> >
> > "Where is the Holy Bible in error in your opinion ?" after you wrote,
> > "Yes, but I don't believe in the inerrancy of the bible."
>
> Should I post some of the errors and absurdities? There are literally
> thousands.

In the Holy Spirit, I have been able to show in this thread that grew
to 1631 messages that every passage of the Holy Bible is truthful:

http://tinyurl.com/qsd6m

Laus Deo ! !

> I started looking to write down the errors. I found a few of my own
> accidentially when studying the bible as in reading it many times and not
> just reading.... studying like I said. Then I looked to see what others had
> found. I researched if what they said had any validity. Loosely, about
> half did.

The latter would be those receiving the guidance of the Holy Spirit.

Don Kirkman

unread,
Oct 8, 2006, 5:49:09 PM10/8/06
to
It seems to me I heard somewhere that Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote in
article <1160339801.2...@c28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>:


>In the Holy Spirit, I have been able to show in this thread that grew
>to 1631 messages that every passage of the Holy Bible is truthful:

You have in no way proven that assertion; further you yourself have
abandoned using the Bible, claiming that instead you are now receiving
messages direct from the Holy Spirit that do not require Biblical
support.
--
Don Kirkman

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 8, 2006, 7:46:55 PM10/8/06
to
Don Kirkman wrote:

> Andrew wrote:
>
> >In the Holy Spirit, I have been able to show in this thread that grew
> >to 1631 messages that every passage of the Holy Bible is truthful:
> >
> >http://tinyurl.com/qsd6m
> >
> >Laus Deo ! ! !

>
> You have in no way proven that assertion;

Correct. The Holy Spirit has used me to prove HIS assertion.

> further you yourself have abandoned using the Bible

Hardly. Simply see my sig.

Bottomline: You remain untruthful.

>, claiming that instead you are now receiving
> messages direct from the Holy Spirit that do not require Biblical
> support.

It remains my choice to continue to receive the guidance of the Holy
Spirit in everything I say, do, and write:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/15abbb67b6ccdd62?

May GOD continue to keep your heart beating, dear neighbor Don whom I

Demon Lord of Confusion

unread,
Oct 12, 2006, 5:51:30 PM10/12/06
to
On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 20:07:24 -0500, Jude Alexander attempted to confuse
the issue further by squeaking:
> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote...

>>> >> >> >> >> > In truth, being slandered and libeled over the years has
>>> >> >> >> >> > resulted for me in a much closer walk with Christ Jesus,
> our LORD.
>>> >> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> >> You're my second choice for the Office of Darth Bawl, this
>>> >> >> >> >> month.
>>> >> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> > Name-calling simply confirms that you remain lost.
>>> >> >> >>
>>> >> >> >> Not really.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Actually, yes.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> >> The guy may be lost indeed, but just by virture of name
>>> >> >> >> calling does not a lost person make...
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Name-calling as defined by the on-line Merriam Webster
>>> >> >> > Dictionary is
>>> >> >> > bearing false witness.
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/name-calling
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm sorry. Clarifying what Jesus is reported to have done via a
>>> >> modern
>>> >> dictionary is a bit funny. Think about it.
>>> >
>>> > Clarifying what name-calling means to understand that Jesus did not
>>> > engage in name-calling is not funny. Think about it.
>>>
>>> You're twisting my words.
>>
>> It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.
>
> That's your opnion that you're writing truthfully. At least I'll believe
> that you believe so, okay? However, that doesn't amount to much does it
> if your deluded.

>
>>> Do you know that you're doing it or are you unaware?
>>
>> "Those unable to believe that the Bible is Holy suffer from a strong
>> delusion." -- Holy Soirit
>
> Quite the opposite. The bible is riddled with errors from beginning to
> end. The whole canonization process had human corruption all over it.
> They, in fact, put in several books that didn't even fit THEIR 3 major
> criteria and left out books that did fit all 3 criteria.

>
>>> I SAID that to CLARIFY what is reported by the gospel writers by a
>>> dictionary is quite funny. I'll add absurd. Why didn't you at least
>>> quote a
>>> biblical dictionary? Get it?
>>
>> You entered into this thread to dispute my understanding of the word
>> "name-calling." You attempted to use Jesus' example of judging the
>> Pharisees to achieve this by saying this was name-calling by our LORD.
>> The on-line Merriam Webster Dictionary shows that you are in error in
>> your understanding of the word "name-calling." Get it?
>
> Oh, I get it and much more. I'm guessing? Pentecostal?

>
>>> >> >> >> according to the gospels, Jesus called some people vipers,
>>> >> >> >> white washed tombs
>>> >> >> >
>>> >> >> > Jesus spoke truthfully.
>>> >> >>
>>> >> >> He called the priests names.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > That is not the same thing as name-calling. Simply review the
>>> >> > definition given by the online Merriam Webster Dictionary.
>
> Only dishonest people OR people under a religious fog/spell or deluded can
> say that calling somebody a name isn't name calling. Smile, Andrew.

>
>>> >> >> He was right in doing so. Name calling is NOT necessarily a sign
>>> >> >> of being lost. There is no card blanche about name
>>> >> >> calling as it can get out of hand, I can see that and know that.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > "Those who are secure in the truth have the strength to refrain
>>> >> > from descending into name-calling" -- Holy Spirit
>>> >>
>>> >> So you claim God speaks to you personally, i.e. above quote of the
>>> >> "Holy
>>> >> Spirit." Do you hear voices?
>>> >
>>> > No.
>>> >
>>> >> How do you receive these messages?
>>> >
>>> > Though prayer and then surrendering my will by dying to self, which I
>>> > do daily.
>>>
>>> Then how is it received?
>>
>> Through the heart of my soul.
>
> The energy that comprises our souls has a heart? I really do get a tired
> of sappy talk that doesn't make sense, really, Andrew.
>
> Come on, can you be more clearer? You say that God communicates to you
> absolute sentences. I know that God communicates to people. Is it like a
> prompting or do you have your thought taken over. Can you try to explain
> other than sappy visualization, i.e. heart of the soul. I'm serious, I'd
> like to hear an explanation how you can post that you recieve words from
> God.

>
>>> Through writing?
>>
>> No.
>>
>>> Thoughts that come to you?
>>
>> No.
>>
>>> > HIS will be done and not my will.
>>> >
>>> > It remains my choice to receive HIS guidance in everything I say, do,
>>> > and write.
>
> Nobody can achieve that kind of perfection.

>
>>> > Now back to the question that HE led me to ask you:
>>> >
>>> > "Where is the Holy Bible in error in your opinion ?" after you wrote,
>>> > "Yes, but I don't believe in the inerrancy of the bible."
>>>
>>> Should I post some of the errors and absurdities? There are literally
>>> thousands.
>>
>> In the Holy Spirit, I have been able to show in this thread that grew to
>> 1631 messages that every passage of the Holy Bible is truthful:
>
> You can't do any such thing, Andrew. Come on, man.
>
> Explain this (truly only the tip of the iceberg).
>
> THE BIBLE
<snip>

Now, _that_ was a SPANK!

--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! mhm 29x21; TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
The God of Odd Statements, the Ugliest Pigfucker In The Universe
Stupidity Takes Its Toll. Please Have Exact Change.
Thread where outing begins: http://tinyurl.com/hojf8
George Pickett Memorial Trophy, Special Ops Cody Memorial Purple Heart,
and the Order of the Holey Sockpuppet winner <wfh...@hotmail.com> on
outing personal contact info in x-poasted subject lines:
"Plenty of people post under their real names and do not attempt to hide
their contact info. You are scared of being 'outed' because you are a
pathological abuser of usenet, and people rightly despise you for it.
You're afraid of being reported to the authorities or, better, visited
by a couple of guys with baseball bats. Other people don't have this
obsessive fear. Ward Hardman himself has posted plenty of personal
information - nothing that anyone else added was hidden in any way.
You're so fucking scared you've built up this whole sick mythology about
different categories of bad dudes who 'out' scum like you.

"Meanwhile you are the ugliest pigfucker in the universe. You are the
coward without ethics. You call me a 'newbie' - ha! what an asshole you
are. Those who want to remain anonymous do so. There is absolutely no
way you could identify me, not unless you had the sort of subpoena power
that only gets turned on for big-time terrorists. That's because I chose
to be anonymous. Some people don't. Only really stupid dicks like you
choose the sort of semi-anonymity which leaves you in constant fear.

"What a dickless wonder you are 'Snarky' you fat asshole."
-- in MID: <1156587081....@m79g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>

"I am the only one who has outer filthed Ward" -- James C. "Crackhead"
Cracked voluntarily self-immolates, in MID:
1159678991.8...@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com

"When I told Abbie Hoffman that he was the first one who made me laugh
since Lenny Bruce died, Hoffman said, "Really? He was my god." The
combination of satirical irreverence and sense of justice that Bruce and
Hoffman shared was the real spirit behind the Yippies--a term I coined to
describe a phenomenon that already existed: an organic coalition of stoned
hippies and political activists who engaged in such actions as throwing
money on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange, then explaining to
reporters the meaning of that symbolism. Folksinger Phil Ochs summed it
up: "A demonstration should turn you on, not turn you off." So when
journalists link the Yippies with misleading bedfellows, at best it's
careless shorthand; at worst it's deliberate demonization. Osama bin Laden
wanted an aircraft to crash into the Pentagon. Abbie Hoffman merely wanted
to levitate it." -- Paul Krassner, http://tinyurl.com/ehu3v

Jude Alexander

unread,
Oct 12, 2006, 6:05:40 PM10/12/06
to

"Demon Lord of Confusion" <verwa...@verwirren.confused> wrote in message
news:pan.2006.10.12....@verwirren.confused...

... directly on the behiney! I'd send him to his room if I could.


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 12, 2006, 7:35:16 PM10/12/06
to

Not to the discerning.

> >> At least I'll believe
> >> that you believe so, okay? However, that doesn't amount to much does it
> >> if your deluded.

In my continued walk with Christ Jesus, HE continues to keep me
completely well.

> >>>> Do you know that you're doing it or are you unaware?
> >>>
> >>> "Those unable to believe that the Bible is Holy suffer from a strong
> >>> delusion." -- Holy Soirit
> >>
> >> Quite the opposite.

Not for the discerning.

> >> The bible is riddled with errors from beginning to
> >> end. The whole canonization process had human corruption all over it.

GOD remains in control of all things despite HIS generous gift of free
will to all souls, including those belonging to fig trees (Mark
11:12-14, 20).

> >> They, in fact, put in several books that didn't even fit THEIR 3 major
> >> criteria and left out books that did fit all 3 criteria.

GOD's ways are inscrutable to those who are of this world such as
yourself.

> >>>> I SAID that to CLARIFY what is reported by the gospel writers by a
> >>>> dictionary is quite funny. I'll add absurd. Why didn't you at least
> >>>> quote a
> >>>> biblical dictionary? Get it?
> >>>
> >>> You entered into this thread to dispute my understanding of the word
> >>> "name-calling." You attempted to use Jesus' example of judging the
> >>> Pharisees to achieve this by saying this was name-calling by our LORD.
> >>> The on-line Merriam Webster Dictionary shows that you are in error in
> >>> your understanding of the word "name-calling." Get it?
> >>
> >> Oh, I get it and much more. I'm guessing? Pentecostal?

No. Brethren of Christ Jesus.

> >>>> >> >> >> according to the gospels, Jesus called some people vipers,
> >>>> >> >> >> white washed tombs
> >>>> >> >> >
> >>>> >> >> > Jesus spoke truthfully.
> >>>> >> >>
> >>>> >> >> He called the priests names.
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > That is not the same thing as name-calling. Simply review the
> >>>> >> > definition given by the online Merriam Webster Dictionary.
> >>
> >> Only dishonest people OR people under a religious fog/spell or deluded
> >> can
> >> say that calling somebody a name isn't name calling.

Would suggest you review the definition of name-calling and return when
you understand it.

> Smile, Andrew.

I would if it would help you understand.

> >>>> >> >> He was right in doing so. Name calling is NOT necessarily a sign
> >>>> >> >> of being lost. There is no card blanche about name
> >>>> >> >> calling as it can get out of hand, I can see that and know that.
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > "Those who are secure in the truth have the strength to refrain
> >>>> >> > from descending into name-calling" -- Holy Spirit
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> So you claim God speaks to you personally, i.e. above quote of the
> >>>> >> "Holy
> >>>> >> Spirit." Do you hear voices?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > No.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >> How do you receive these messages?
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Though prayer and then surrendering my will by dying to self, which I
> >>>> > do daily.
> >>>>
> >>>> Then how is it received?
> >>>
> >>> Through the heart of my soul.
> >>
> >> The energy that comprises our souls has a heart?

Soul is essence of being and is not comprised of energy.

It remains GOD's infinite will that all souls have HIS generous gift of
free will.

It is via the heart of the soul that the soul knows the infinite will
of GOD and is able to choose through its free will to obey the infinite
will of GOD.

It is during heartfelt prayer in Christ's name, that our souls are able
to seek out and find GOD's infinite will and choose to obey HIM.

> > > I really do get a tired
> >> of sappy talk that doesn't make sense, really, Andrew.

Sorry this tires you. Please forgive all my iniquities.

> >> Come on, can you be more clearer? You say that God communicates to you
> >> absolute sentences. I know that God communicates to people. Is it like
> >> a
> >> prompting or do you have your thought taken over. Can you try to explain
> >> other than sappy visualization, i.e. heart of the soul. I'm serious, I'd
> >> like to hear an explanation how you can post that you recieve words from
> >> God.

See above.

> >>>> Through writing?
> >>>
> >>> No.
> >>>
> >>>> Thoughts that come to you?
> >>>
> >>> No.
> >>>
> >>>> > HIS will be done and not my will.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > It remains my choice to receive HIS guidance in everything I say, do,
> >>>> > and write.
> >>
> >> Nobody can achieve that kind of perfection.

"With GOD all things are possible." - LORD Jesus Christ (Matthew
19:26)

> >>>> > Now back to the question that HE led me to ask you:
> >>>> >
> >>>> > "Where is the Holy Bible in error in your opinion ?" after you wrote,
> >>>> > "Yes, but I don't believe in the inerrancy of the bible."
> >>>>
> >>>> Should I post some of the errors and absurdities? There are literally
> >>>> thousands.
> >>>
> >>> In the Holy Spirit, I have been able to show in this thread that grew to
> >>> 1631 messages that every passage of the Holy Bible is truthful:
> >>
> >> You can't do any such thing, Andrew.

Already done.

> Come on, man.

Still here.

> >>
> >> Explain this (truly only the tip of the iceberg).
> >>
> >> THE BIBLE

*B* asic

*I* nstructions

*B* efore

*L* eaving

*E* arth

May GOD continue to keep your heart beating, dear neighbor Jude whom I

Jude Alexander

unread,
Oct 12, 2006, 8:39:54 PM10/12/06
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1160696116.3...@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...

> Jude Alexander wrote:
>> > On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 20:07:24 -0500, Jude Alexander attempted to confuse
>> > the issue further by squeaking:

I just realized that you put those stupid little verbal darts at the headers
of your debaters.... Now, Andrew go pray for forgiveness because that is
plain not nice.


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 12, 2006, 8:56:16 PM10/12/06
to
Jude Alexander wrote:

> Andrew wrote:
> > Jude Alexander wrote:
> >> > On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 20:07:24 -0500, Jude Alexander attempted to confuse
> >> > the issue further by squeaking:
>
> I just realized that you put those stupid little verbal darts at the headers
> of your debaters....

Your false witness is forgiven as far as I am concerned:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0784f6228062e4a7?

> Now, Andrew go pray for forgiveness because that is
> plain not nice.

It is your demon friend (demon lord of confusion) who needs but never
will receive forgiveness.

Jude Alexander

unread,
Oct 13, 2006, 2:54:11 PM10/13/06
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1160700976.4...@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

> Jude Alexander wrote:
>> Andrew wrote:
>> > Jude Alexander wrote:
>> >> > On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 20:07:24 -0500, Jude Alexander attempted to
>> >> > confuse
>> >> > the issue further by squeaking:
>>
>> I just realized that you put those stupid little verbal darts at the
>> headers
>> of your debaters....
>
> Your false witness is forgiven as far as I am concerned:

Look above, dumbo! Does it say "Jude Alexander ATTMPTED TO CONFUSE THE
ISSUE FUTHER BY SQUEAKING:"

>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0784f6228062e4a7?
>
>> Now, Andrew go pray for forgiveness because that is
>> plain not nice.
>
> It is your demon friend (demon lord of confusion) who needs but never
> will receive forgiveness.

You're as sick as them come. YOU accuse me of false witness when the proof
is there is the title by my name. BUT, you don't hesitate that to say that I
have demond friend.


>
> May GOD continue to keep your heart beating, dear neighbor Jude whom I
> love unconditionally.

Shut up your lying mouth. You aren't able to love unconditionally AND you
also claim God doesn't either since God loves some and hates others. How
can one love unconditionally and hate also, you stupid stupid man.


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 14, 2006, 4:28:47 AM10/14/06
to
Jude Alexander wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
> > Jude Alexander wrote:
> >> Andrew wrote:
> >> > Jude Alexander wrote:
> >> >> > On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 20:07:24 -0500, Jude Alexander attempted to
> >> >> > confuse
> >> >> > the issue further by squeaking:
> >>
> >> I just realized that you put those stupid little verbal darts at the
> >> headers
> >> of your debaters....
> >
> > Your false witness is forgiven as far as I am concerned:
>
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0784f6228062e4a7?
> >
> Look above

I look heavenward all the time.

>, dumbo!

Name-calling simply shows you are lost.

> Does it say "Jude Alexander ATTMPTED TO CONFUSE THE
> ISSUE FUTHER BY SQUEAKING:"

Your demon friend is the person who added that:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0784f6228062e4a7?

May GOD continue to keep your heart beating to give you time to
understand this, dear neighbor Jude whom I love unconditionally.

Jude Alexander

unread,
Oct 14, 2006, 10:26:06 AM10/14/06
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1160814527.6...@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...

> Jude Alexander wrote:
>> Andrew wrote:
>> > Jude Alexander wrote:
>> >> Andrew wrote:
>> >> > Jude Alexander wrote:
>> >> >> > On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 20:07:24 -0500, Jude Alexander attempted to
>> >> >> > confuse
>> >> >> > the issue further by squeaking:
>> >>
>> >> I just realized that you put those stupid little verbal darts at the
>> >> headers
>> >> of your debaters....
>> >
>> > Your false witness is forgiven as far as I am concerned:
>>
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0784f6228062e4a7?
>> >
>> Look above
>
> I look heavenward all the time.
>
>>, dumbo!
>
> Name-calling simply shows you are lost.

No, it shows that I'm exasperated. But to acknowledge that would require
that you acknowledge one of your pet beliefs has a hole in it.

>> Does it say "Jude Alexander ATTMPTED TO CONFUSE THE
>> ISSUE FUTHER BY SQUEAKING:"
>
> Your demon friend is the person who added that:

Just because I agreed with a fellow about ONE issue, doesn't make him my
friend. THAT you call him a demon friend shows YOUR nasty attitude toward
unbelievers.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 14, 2006, 11:38:17 AM10/14/06
to
Jude Alexander wrote:
> Andrew wrote:
> > Jude Alexander wrote:
> >> Andrew wrote:
> >> > Jude Alexander wrote:
> >> >> Andrew wrote:
> >> >> > Jude Alexander wrote:
> >> >> >> > On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 20:07:24 -0500, Jude Alexander attempted to
> >> >> >> > confuse
> >> >> >> > the issue further by squeaking:
> >> >>
> >> >> I just realized that you put those stupid little verbal darts at the
> >> >> headers
> >> >> of your debaters....
> >> >
> >> > Your false witness is forgiven as far as I am concerned:
> >>
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0784f6228062e4a7?
> >> >
> >> Look above
> >
> > I look heavenward all the time.
> >
> >>, dumbo!
> >
> > Name-calling simply shows you are lost.
>
> No, it shows that I'm exasperated.

The lost are exasperated because they are without GOD's peace.

> But to acknowledge that would require
> that you acknowledge one of your pet beliefs has a hole in it.

Not for those with discerning hearts:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3fa4ecde07979a5a?

> >> Does it say "Jude Alexander ATTMPTED TO CONFUSE THE
> >> ISSUE FUTHER BY SQUEAKING:"
> >
> > Your demon friend is the person who added that:
>
> Just because I agreed with a fellow about ONE issue, doesn't make him my
> friend.

Sorry the truth bothers you. Please forgive all my iniquities.

> THAT you call him a demon friend shows YOUR nasty attitude toward
> unbelievers.

Actually demons are not unbelievers but evil spirits that can take away
the free will of souls that have become devoid of love:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/293523ed00491108?

May GOD keep your heart beating to give you to time to understand this,

Jude Alexander

unread,
Oct 14, 2006, 12:12:22 PM10/14/06
to

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1160840297.3...@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

> Jude Alexander wrote:
>> Andrew wrote:
>> > Jude Alexander wrote:
>> >> Andrew wrote:
>> >> > Jude Alexander wrote:
>> >> >> Andrew wrote:
>> >> >> > Jude Alexander wrote:
>> >> >> >> > On Sun, 08 Oct 2006 20:07:24 -0500, Jude Alexander attempted
>> >> >> >> > to
>> >> >> >> > confuse
>> >> >> >> > the issue further by squeaking:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I just realized that you put those stupid little verbal darts at
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> headers
>> >> >> of your debaters....
>> >> >
>> >> > Your false witness is forgiven as far as I am concerned:
>> >>
>> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/0784f6228062e4a7?
>> >> >
>> >> Look above
>> >
>> > I look heavenward all the time.
>> >
>> >>, dumbo!
>> >
>> > Name-calling simply shows you are lost.
>>
>> No, it shows that I'm exasperated.
>
> The lost are exasperated because they are without GOD's peace.

Do you think that ANYBODY takes this stuff your blather seriously? NOBODY
has complete peace. But then again, if you acknowledge that I'm right,
you'd have to acknowledge that yet ANOTHER one of your pet beliefs are
incorrect.


>
>> But to acknowledge that would require
>> that you acknowledge one of your pet beliefs has a hole in it.
>
> Not for those with discerning hearts:

Hearts don't discern. BRAINS do.

(snipped the link)

>> >> Does it say "Jude Alexander ATTMPTED TO CONFUSE THE
>> >> ISSUE FUTHER BY SQUEAKING:"
>> >
>> > Your demon friend is the person who added that:
>>
>> Just because I agreed with a fellow about ONE issue, doesn't make him my
>> friend.
>
> Sorry the truth bothers you. Please forgive all my iniquities.

THIS IS SARCASM! I've pointed it out before! You don't believe you've
committed a sin and your apology is SARCASTIC! SORRY YOU CAN'T BE HONEST
ABOUT YOURSELF!

>> THAT you call him a demon friend shows YOUR nasty attitude toward
>> unbelievers.
>
> Actually demons are not unbelievers but evil spirits that can take away
> the free will of souls that have become devoid of love:

Another one of your delusional pet beliefs...

(snipped the link and the lying tail end of all your posts)


Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 14, 2006, 1:42:38 PM10/14/06
to

My LORD's purpose for me here remains to inform and not to either
convince or to argue.

> NOBODY has complete peace.

My LORD's peace passes all worldly understanding:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/78641552d1eeac98?

> But then again, if you acknowledge that I'm right,
> you'd have to acknowledge that yet ANOTHER one of your pet beliefs are
> incorrect.

Without the LORD, you will never be right (Ecclesiastes).

> >> But to acknowledge that would require
> >> that you acknowledge one of your pet beliefs has a hole in it.
> >
> > Not for those with discerning hearts:
>
> Hearts don't discern.

Actually the discerning heart resides in the soul:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/3fa4ecde07979a5a?

> BRAINS do.

Brains did not help Chuck:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/76c0d6d2aa5eed2f?

> (snipped the link)

Sorry the truth continues to bother you so terribly. Please forgive
all my iniquities.

> >> >> Does it say "Jude Alexander ATTMPTED TO CONFUSE THE
> >> >> ISSUE FUTHER BY SQUEAKING:"
> >> >
> >> > Your demon friend is the person who added that:
> >>
> >> Just because I agreed with a fellow about ONE issue, doesn't make him my
> >> friend.
> >
> > Sorry the truth bothers you. Please forgive all my iniquities.
>
> THIS IS SARCASM!

No. It does sadden me that the truth bothers you.

> I've pointed it out before!

It has sadden me before.

>You don't believe you've
> committed a sin and your apology is SARCASTIC!

Sarcasm is a "a sharp and often satirical or ironic utterance designed
to cut or give pain."

Source:

http://www.m-w.com/dictionary/sarcasm

In truth, I apologize to others when I have to pause to clear my throat
while speaking to them.

When I apologize here I neither believe clearing my throat is a sin nor
is there the intent to "cut or give pain."

Bottomline: You remain untruthful.

> SORRY YOU CAN'T BE HONEST ABOUT YOURSELF!

It remains my choice to continue writing truthfully.

> >> THAT you call him a demon friend shows YOUR nasty attitude toward


> >> unbelievers.
> >
> > Actually demons are not unbelievers but evil spirits that can take away
> > the free will of souls that have become devoid of love:
>
> Another one of your delusional pet beliefs...
>
> (snipped the link and the lying tail end of all your posts)

Again, sorry the truth continues to bother you so terribly. Please
forgive all my iniquities.

May GOD continue to keep your heart beating, dear neighbor whom I love

Roofshadow

unread,
Oct 14, 2006, 7:04:47 PM10/14/06
to
In article <iZ7Yg.45399$8s6....@bignews4.bellsouth.net>,

"Jude Alexander" <Cajun@middle of the swamp.com> wrote:

>
> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
> news:1160840297.3...@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...

> > Not for those with discerning hearts:


>
> Hearts don't discern. BRAINS do.

You'd think a cardiologist would know that wouldn't you?

--
Roofshadow

AUK FNG

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 14, 2006, 8:11:14 PM10/14/06
to
Roofshadow wrote:
> Jude wrote:

> > Andrew wrote:
>
> > > Not for those with discerning hearts:
> >
> > Hearts don't discern. BRAINS do.
>
> You'd think a cardiologist would know that wouldn't you?

The discerning heart resides in the soul and not the body:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/78641552d1eeac98?

May GOD keep you heart beating to give you time to understand this,
dear neighbor whom I love unconditionally.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 14, 2006, 8:11:19 PM10/14/06
to
Diana wrote:
> "Mark T" <wh@tcrap8935687423376589-80984798-57647> wrote in message
> news:45306ccc$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> > "Bent Mitts" <benm...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> >
> >> To (sic) afraid to post to me directly?
> >
> > Why can't fundamentalists spell????
> >
> >
> What does ( sic ) mean?

It means that the typo was left "just so." Mark is using it to draw
attention to the typo.

> If Ben is talking to me I have him blocked and can
> only see his posts in others posts. I don't have to subject myself to his
> abuse.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/78641552d1eeac98?

Our purpose here is to be the salt and light HE would have us be here
on this earth to show others to the way, Who is LORD Jesus Christ. If
you choose to keep your eyes on Christ Jesus and HIM alone, nothing in
this world can abuse you.

You and I and the rest of HIS brethren have been made to worship HIM.

Laus Deo ! ! !

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water, dear sister
Diana whom I love unconditionally.

((((((( hug )))))))

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 14, 2006, 9:05:47 PM10/14/06
to
Diana wrote:
> "Jani" <ja...@dsl.pipex.com> wrote in message
> news:X4udnbxrOoS...@pipex.net...
> >
> > "Diana" <newlife...@msn.com> wrote in message
> > news:mncYg.14366$Cq3....@tornado.ohiordc.rr.com...

<snip>

> >> Yes you and I get along famously. I am glad I have met you even if only
> >> online. You are a true joy to me.
> >
> > Well, you go and get yourself better, and then you can come over here and
> > meet all of us 'unregenerate' agnostics and pagans and other scary people
> > ;-)
> >
> > Jani
> >
> That would be nice to meet you. :-) I have been called alot of things
> including satan's spawn but never 'unregenerate' I had to look that one up
> in the dictionary

Such is our respective walks with Christ Jesus into the world that HE
is saving. It is the people that the Pharisees frowned upon as those
they have judged to be worst sinners for whom our LORD has the fondest
regard. Randy and Dave are our modern-day Pharisees.

Just as the world hates our LORD, their hatred toward us grows ever
heated the closer our walk with HIM:

http://www.netcabal.com/auk/kookle.php?search=chung

There is no doubt in my mind that if GOD removed HIS hedge of
protection from around me, you would find me crucified by satan's
minions in an instant and so my walk with Christ Jesus will continue to
grow ever closer in anticipation of living out the rest of eternity
with HIM sooner or later. Laus Deo ! ! !

HIS will be done and not my will.

"Peace be with you ! " -- LORD Jesus Christ

Amen ! !

Marana tha ! ! !

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/78641552d1eeac98?

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water, dear sister
Diana whom I love unconditionally.

Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,

Mark T

unread,
Oct 14, 2006, 9:50:42 PM10/14/06
to
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:

>> What does ( sic ) mean?
>
> It means that the typo was left "just so." Mark is using it to draw
> attention to the typo.

Not ust a typo that many make because of their typing skills ...but REPEATED
spelling mistakes ... which (as a professional educator) I see in the posts
of Ben and his fellow fundamentalists.


> You and I and the rest of HIS brethren have been made to worship HIM.

Which "HIM"?????

Who does JESUS say to worship and love??????

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Jesus replied: "'Love the Lord your God (YAHWEH NOT YAHWEH'S MESSIAH) with
all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the
FIRST and GREATEST COMMANDMENT. And the SECOND is like it: 'Love your
neighbor as yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these TWO
COMMANDMENTS." - Matthew 22:37-40

One of the teachers of the law came and heard them debating. Noticing that
Jesus had given them a good answer, he asked him, "Of all the COMMANDMENTS,
which is the MOST IMPORTANT?" "The MOST IMPORTANT ONE," answered Jesus, "is
this: 'Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God (YAHWEH NOT YAHWEH'S MESSIAH) the
Lord is one. Love the Lord your God (YAHWEH NOT YAHWEH'S MESSIAH) with all
your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind and with all your
strength.' (Mark12:28-30)

And behold, a lawyer stood up to put him to the test, saying, "Teacher, WHAT
SHALL I DO TO INHERIT ETERNAL LIFE?" He said to him, "What is written in the
law? How do you read?" And he answered, "You shall love the Lord your God
(YAHWEH NOT YAHWEH'S MESSIAH) with all your heart, and with all your soul,
and with all your strength, and with all your mind; and your neighbor as
yourself." And he said to him, "You have answered right; DO THIS AND YOU
WILL LIVE." (Luke 10:25-28)

These are repeated THREE TIMES. They are in each of the synoptic gospels.
The commandments do not mention anything about the finite human Jesus of
Nazareth, The Messiah OR ABOUT CONFESSING JESUS AS LORD GOD!!!!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Roofshadow

unread,
Oct 14, 2006, 10:08:49 PM10/14/06
to
In article <1160871074.2...@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,

"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:

> Roofshadow wrote:
> > Jude wrote:
> > > Andrew wrote:
> >
> > > > Not for those with discerning hearts:
> > >
> > > Hearts don't discern. BRAINS do.
> >
> > You'd think a cardiologist would know that wouldn't you?
>
> The discerning heart resides in the soul and not the body:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/78641552d1eeac98?

Do you believe that we think with our hearts or our brains?

> May GOD keep you heart beating to give you time to understand this,
> dear neighbor whom I love unconditionally.

Thank you Andrew.

--
Roofshadow

AUK FNG

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 14, 2006, 10:59:41 PM10/14/06
to
Mark T wrote:

> Andrew wrote:
>
> >> What does ( sic ) mean?
> >
> > It means that the typo was left "just so." Mark is using it to draw
> > attention to the typo.
>
> Not ust a typo that many make because of their typing skills ...but REPEATED
> spelling mistakes ... which (as a professional educator) I see in the posts
> of Ben and his fellow fundamentalists.

I see them too (worked as editor-in-chief of a medical school
newspaper) but GOD's love in my heart helps me overlook their flaws.

> > You and I and the rest of HIS brethren have been made to worship HIM.
>
> Which "HIM"?????

There is only One.

> Who does JESUS say to worship and love??????

GOD.

"Peace be with you ! " -- LORD Jesus Christ

Amen !

Laus Deo ! !

Marana tha ! ! !

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/78641552d1eeac98?

May GOD continue to keep your heart beating to give you time to
understand this, dear neighbor Mark whom I love unconditionally.

Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD

unread,
Oct 14, 2006, 11:15:33 PM10/14/06
to
Diana wrote:
> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
> news:1160876472....@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> > Diana wrote:
> >> "Mark T" <wh@tyadoin893577656535870989-8773269087843> wrote in message
> >> news:45318bfa$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

> >> > "Jani" wrote:
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >> Well, you go and get yourself better, and then you can come over here
> >> >> and
> >> >> meet all of us 'unregenerate' agnostics and pagans and other scary
> >> >> people
> >> >> ;-)
> >> >
> >> > Ditto to Diana.
> >> >
> >> > Remember to include me ... the "spawn of Satan"
> >> >
> >> Yes Mark you are included. I have another a few in Aussie I would love to
> >> meet. :-) One won't come here for fear of flying, so I am hoping to win
> >> the
> >> lottery some day to come over there and meet everyone.
> >
> > If this is GOD's will, you will win the lottery (Proverbs 16:33).
> >
> > HIS will be done and not our will.

> >
> > Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,
> >
> > Andrew <><
>
> Thanks Andrew. I really don't play the lottery.

If it is HIS will for you to win the lottery, you will even if you
don't buy a ticket :-)

> I only have hopeful dreams
> is all. I have made so many friends on line and to meet them all would be a
> dream come true. In fact I have a dear lady friend in Atlanta where you are.
> I have never met her but she has been an online/phone/email friend for about
> 7 years now.

You are most certainly welcome to visit me too. My number is as listed
on the HeartMDPhD.com web site.

The most amazing thing happened to me, in the Holy Spirit, just a
little while ago:

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/4b0ed0f59d4114aa?

GOD is awesome !

Laus Deo ! !

"Peace be with you ! " -- LORD Jesus Christ

Amen ! !

Marana tha ! ! !

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/78641552d1eeac98?

May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water, dear sister
Diana whom I love unconditionally.

Al Klein

unread,
Oct 15, 2006, 12:05:25 AM10/15/06
to
On 14 Oct 2006 08:38:17 -0700, "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD"
<lo...@thetruth.com> wrote:

>Actually demons are not unbelievers but evil spirits that can take away
>the free will of souls that have become devoid of love:

Whew! No wonder Florida too your license to practice medicine away.
They shouldn't let you practice being out without a leash.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"The study of geology is ok-But not when it contradicts what is laid
out in the Bible that the earth is more than 10,000 years old."
- Doug Lee, Creationist
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)

Al Klein

unread,
Oct 15, 2006, 12:06:35 AM10/15/06
to

A cardiologist would - a Christiologist wouldn't.


--
rukbat at optonline dot net

"Nothing in biology makes sense without evolution."
- Theodosuis Dobzhansky


(random sig, produced by SigChanger)

This signature was made by SigChanger.
You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/

Read Friendly Neibourhood Vote Ranger

unread,
Oct 15, 2006, 1:26:38 AM10/15/06
to

"Roofshadow" <Roofsha...@spamtrap.yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Roofshadow2004-01D...@comcast.dca.giganews.com...

> In article <1160871074.2...@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:
>
>> Roofshadow wrote:
>> > Jude wrote:
>> > > Andrew wrote:
>> >
>> > > > Not for those with discerning hearts:
>> > >
>> > > Hearts don't discern. BRAINS do.
>> >
>> > You'd think a cardiologist would know that wouldn't you?
>>
>> The discerning heart resides in the soul and not the body:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/78641552d1eeac98?
>
> Do you believe that we think with our hearts or our brains?

You must think with your nuts.

The Demon Prince of Absurdity

unread,
Oct 15, 2006, 5:23:38 AM10/15/06
to
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:26:38 -0700, Read Friendly Neibourhood Vote Ranger
did the cha-cha, and screamed:
> "Roofshadow" wrote...

>> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote:
>>> Roofshadow wrote:
>>> > Jude wrote:
>>> > > Andrew wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > > Not for those with discerning hearts:
>>> > >
>>> > > Hearts don't discern. BRAINS do.
>>> >
>>> > You'd think a cardiologist would know that wouldn't you?
>>>
>>> The discerning heart resides in the soul and not the body:
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/78641552d1eeac98?
>>
>> Do you believe that we think with our hearts or our brains?
>
> You must think with your nuts.

But she _can_ think!

--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! TM#5; COOSN-029-06-71069
Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition
http://www6.kingdomofloathing.com/login.php
http://www.runescape.com/
No one expects the Fannish Inquisition!
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Cabal_of_the_Holy_Pretzel/join

"Q: How many Bush administration officials does it take to change a
light bulb?
A: None. There is no need to change anything. We made the right decision
to stick with that light bulb. People who say that it is burned out are
giving aid and encouragement to the Forces of Darkness." -- Anon.

"Etymology:
Argumentum ad Septicus : argument to putrefaction. Derived from Septicum
Argumentum : putrefaction of argument.

"Septic \Sep"tic\, Septical \Sep"tic*al\
a. [L. septicus to make putrid: cf. F. septique.]
Having power to promote putrefaction. Of or relating to or
caused by putrefaction." -- Kadaitcha Man, indirectly to
Donald "Skeptic"/"Septic" Alford, in MID: <a3svh.d...@news.alt.net>

"I never fail to be amazing" -- Looney Maroon for September 2006 nominee
William Barwell's ego knows no bounds. MID:
12ggt3q...@corp.supernews.com

"We are most nearly ourselves when we achieve the seriousness of the
child at play." -- Heraclitus

"And thats another mistake on your part. Your 'playing' games on usenet,
and I'm not playing...It has nothing to do with impressing you, it has
more to do with making sure you have the education you'll need to debate.
The debate is no fun for me if you are mentally incapable of it. I'm
giving you an opportunity to educate yourself. That's all." -- A trashy
former virus-writer turned Outer Filth doesn't know if he's playing or
working, in MID: <1159389579....@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>

"I am incapable of original thoughts" -- Ctrl¤/Alt¤/Del¤ has an honest
moment, in MID: <0h59i25ejlthqeeit...@4ax.com>

"But now the end is near. Now Mark Foley comes along and is making
almost all liberal dreams come true and seriously, I'm sorry for it.
See, I believe in karma. I believe what comes around goes around and I
know full well that it's just bad juju to wish such a level of turmoil
and ill upon other humans, warmongering gay-hating maladroits or no, and
that the real path of enlightenment is paved with forgiveness and
progress and white-hot love and turning the other cheek and scotch.

"In fact, Jesus said something about that, I do believe. He said, "Knock
it off already with the warmongering and the hating of each other and
let's all get some wine and party like it's 2012." Then again, he never
saw Karl Rove stab the nation with the dull ice pick of bogus fear. He
never heard George W. Bush describe brutal war and the death of tens of
thousands as "just a comma" in world history.

"Check that. Maybe I'm not so sorry after all." -- Mark Morford,
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/gate/archive/2006/10/11/
notes101106.DTL&nl=fix
http://tinyurl.com/kusmr

Free Speech

unread,
Oct 15, 2006, 5:28:10 AM10/15/06
to

"The Demon Prince of Absurdity" <absurd_numb...@hell.corn> wrote in
message news:pan.2006.10.15....@hell.corn...

> On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:26:38 -0700, Read Friendly Neibourhood Vote Ranger
> did the cha-cha, and screamed:
>> "Roofshadow" wrote...
>>> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" wrote:
>>>> Roofshadow wrote:
>>>> > Jude wrote:
>>>> > > Andrew wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > > Not for those with discerning hearts:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Hearts don't discern. BRAINS do.
>>>> >
>>>> > You'd think a cardiologist would know that wouldn't you?
>>>>
>>>> The discerning heart resides in the soul and not the body:
>>>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/78641552d1eeac98?
>>>
>>> Do you believe that we think with our hearts or our brains?
>>
>> You must think with your nuts.
>
> But she _can_ think!

And she _can_ stink!

Al Klein

unread,
Oct 15, 2006, 9:00:33 PM10/15/06
to
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006 22:08:49 -0400, Roofshadow
<Roofsha...@spamtrap.yahoo.com> wrote:

>In article <1160871074.2...@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>,
> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:

>Do you believe that we think with our hearts or our brains?

False dichotomy and assuming your conclusion. The Andrew-bot thinks?


--
rukbat at optonline dot net

"So much blood has been shed by the Church because of an omission from the Gospel: "Ye
shall be indifferent as to what your neighbor's religion is." Not merely tolerant of it,
but indifferent to it. Divinity is claimed for many religions; but no religion is great
enough or divine enough to add that new law to its code."
- Mark Twain, a Biography

0 new messages