Re: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्}

20 views

Skip to first unread message

Ananda Ghanam

unread,

Feb 19, 2011, 1:05:05 AM2/19/11

to bvpar...@googlegroups.com

Regarding Dampatee and Jampatee:

I want to bring to your notice that Jaayaa Shabda - is substituted with the Syllable Jam and Dam; by the way of Nipaata. This is noted in Gana Paatha.

The word Dama/ Daama/ Dhaama does not have an etymological connection.

With Warm Regards
Vamshi K Ghanapathi
---------------------
सर्वं ब्रह्ममयम्

On 19 February 2011 05:20, <bvparisha...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

Today's Topic Summary

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/bvparishat/topics

GurugItA in SkandapurANa [4 Updates]

Information regarding Bruhatkalikapurana [1 Update]

Question on various smRiti's [1 Update]

Significance In The Use Of Right Hand-----A Reference In The Scriptures [1 Update]

Etymology of the word "Dampati" [1 Update]

censue & sanskrit, भारत की जनगणना एवं संस्कृत [1 Update]

Foundation Day Celebrations [1 Update]

request for meaning [1 Update]

Topic: GurugItA in SkandapurANa

Surendra Mohan Mishra <dr.surendramo...@gmail.com> Feb 18 11:40AM +0530 ^

Esteemed Scholars,

I have a point to clarify.The celebrated GurugItA is considered to be a part
of the Uttara-khaNDa of the Skanda-purANa as shown by the colophon of the
GurugItA.In many printed editions of the SkandapurANa,as I got it, the
GurugItA portion is missing.Can anybody kindly enlighten me on any printed
text / manuscript which has the GurugItA as an itegral part ?

Regards,

SMMishra

--
*****
Surendramohan Mishra
Dept of Sanskrit,Pali & Prakrit
Faculty of Indic Studies,Kurukshetra University
KURUKSHETRA-136 119,Haryana,INDIA
Tel : (Off.)01744 238410(extn.)2504
(Mob.)098960 86579;(Res.)01744-238567
Blogs : http://surendrashastram.blogspot.com
http://surendra-shaastram.blogspot.com

"Director, CIF" <dire...@chinfo.org> Feb 18 02:42PM +0530 ^

Dear Mishraji
Namaskar
Gurugita is from the Skandapurana and it published in many places one of
that I am sending one copy for you.

With regards and love

2011/2/18 Surendra Mohan Mishra <dr.surendramo...@gmail.com>

--
Dr. Dilip Kumar Rana
Director
Chinmaya International Foundation Shodha Sansthan
Veliyanad, Ernakulam, Kerala-682319
M-09567761194, 0484 2747104( telefax)

Surendra Mohan Mishra <dr.surendramo...@gmail.com> Feb 18 05:14PM +0530 ^

Dear Ranababu,
Thanks for the reply.Can you tell me the edition/critical edition of the
SkandapurANa from which this is taken ? And in your knowledge,is there a
version of SkP which doesn't have the GurugItA section ?
Warm regards,
SMMishra

2011/2/18 Director, CIF <dire...@chinfo.org>

--
*****
Surendramohan Mishra
Dept of Sanskrit,Pali & Prakrit
Faculty of Indic Studies,Kurukshetra University
KURUKSHETRA-136 119,Haryana,INDIA
Tel : (Off.)01744 238410(extn.)2504
(Mob.)098960 86579;(Res.)01744-238567
Blogs : http://surendrashastram.blogspot.com
http://surendra-shaastram.blogspot.com

Sivasenani Nori <sivas...@gmail.com> Feb 18 11:17PM +0530 ^

Sir

I somewhere heard that skAndapurANa is the favourite for nikshiptas, that is
insertions. If someone wants some piece to pass off as purANa, it is simply
inserted in the skAnda. One example is the SatyanArAyaNasvAmivrata section
in the RevakhaNDa - apparently outside of South-Central India (with a bit of
spillover in the East and deep South), this particular section of
skAndapurANa is not popular.

I wonder if this accusation about skAndapurANa is true?

Regards
N. Siva Senani

2011/2/18 Surendra Mohan Mishra <dr.surendramo...@gmail.com>

Topic: Information regarding Bruhatkalikapurana

dashrathlal vedia <d.g....@gmail.com> Feb 18 09:34PM +0530 ^

Dear Scholars,

Limbachpurana is said to be the part of the Bruhat Kalikapurana . But I
have the information regarding the Kalikapranas: (1) Kalikaprana Uppurana
and (20 Kalikapurana a jnatiprana of kansara community. I did not find
Bruhat Kalikaprana. If any scholar has information pl. furnish me with the
complete details.

Thanks & Regards,

Dr.D.G.Vedia

Topic: Question on various smRiti's

dashrathlal vedia <d.g....@gmail.com> Feb 18 08:57PM +0530 ^

Dear Scholar,

It is ashtonishing that Kokila smriti which is reffered in
SHIMALAPURANA is not mentioned in the list. Pl. note.

With regards

D.G.Vedia

2010/12/31 subrahmanyam korada <kora...@gmail.com>

--
Thanks & Regards,

Dr.D.G.Vedia

Topic: Significance In The Use Of Right Hand-----A Reference In The Scriptures

dashrathlal vedia <d.g....@gmail.com> Feb 18 08:34PM +0530 ^

Dear Scholar,
You have nicely and properly discussed the point.

with regards,
Dr.D.G.Vedia

2010/12/31 iragavarapu narasimhacharya <insac...@gmail.com>

--
Thanks & Regards,

Dr.D.G.Vedia

Topic: Etymology of the word "Dampati"

dashrathlal vedia <d.g....@gmail.com> Feb 18 08:26PM +0530 ^

Dear Scholar,

My problem is that when there is word 'Dama for house why one should derive
the word " Dampati' through 'Jampati.....Please clarify this
problem puzzling me.

with best regards,

Dr.D.G.Vedia

2011/2/17 subrahmanyam korada <kora...@gmail.com>

--
Thanks & Regards,

Dr.D.G.Vedia

Topic: censue & sanskrit, भारत की जनगणना एवं संस्कृत

Surendra Mohan Mishra <dr.surendramo...@gmail.com> Feb 18 11:23AM +0530 ^

Thanks Dr Kartikeyan, to ascribe to Samskrita this epithet "God's Own
Language" ! In fact this is so.For the MImAmsaka-s this could be "god's own
language" as there is no "God"in the system,but "gods" as Indra,Agni etc. do
exist..For the materialist this also could be a fast language for health and
wealth and wisdom.The wise are also "gods" as per the S'atapatha
BrAhmaNa.Thus the secularly wise are no less godly ! They may adopt
Samskrita as a sure way to know the best details of material existence.

I look forward to the day when lacs and crores of our people, very
truthfully, would be in a position to mention Samskrita as their Mother
tongue.So far we have to adopt this pAk.sika satya as a need.

There was a long debate on how to write 'Sanskrit' in Roman.I have finally
decided to write "Samskrita" and have asked my students to do so.In the
South or South-east,if someone writes "Samskruta" I have no objection.The
best is '.r' but this is not keyboard-friendly in fast writing.But that 'n'
in the word must be replaced with 'm'.Let this be a good start for the kind
of Samskrita we want to spread sincerely.Shakespeare may argue as to what is
there in a name,but in BhArata a name signifies a lot.Our nAmakarana
samskAra testifies to this fact.

Regards,
SMM

2011/2/17 karthik tv <karthi...@yahoo.co.in>

--
*****
Surendramohan Mishra
Dept of Sanskrit,Pali & Prakrit
Faculty of Indic Studies,Kurukshetra University
KURUKSHETRA-136 119,Haryana,INDIA
Tel : (Off.)01744 238410(extn.)2504
(Mob.)098960 86579;(Res.)01744-238567
Blogs : http://surendrashastram.blogspot.com
http://surendra-shaastram.blogspot.com

Topic: Foundation Day Celebrations

Surendra Mohan Mishra <dr.surendramo...@gmail.com> Feb 18 10:57AM +0530 ^

*//श्री://
Dear Dr Rana,
It's a proud occasion that the CIF Shodha Samsthanam is going to celebrate
the completion of it' third year of dedicated service to the growth of
Samskrita and Indological studies and research having a national and global
reach.
I congratulate you and your colleagues and Swami Advayananda on the eve and
wish the celebration and academic program great success :
शतं जीवतु कल्याणी सहस्रं च तथा समाः /
संस्था शंकरनिलये वेदावेदांतशोधिनी //
Warmest regards,
S M Mishra*

2011/2/17 Director, CIF <dire...@chinfo.org>

--
*****
Surendramohan Mishra
Dept of Sanskrit,Pali & Prakrit
Faculty of Indic Studies,Kurukshetra University
KURUKSHETRA-136 119,Haryana,INDIA
Tel : (Off.)01744 238410(extn.)2504
(Mob.)098960 86579;(Res.)01744-238567
Blogs : http://surendrashastram.blogspot.com
http://surendra-shaastram.blogspot.com

Topic: request for meaning

"Saroja Bhate" <sar...@bhates.net> Feb 18 10:34AM +0530 ^

Thanks I will check Kiraata

Bhate.

_____

From: bvpar...@googlegroups.com [mailto:bvpar...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Sampath Kannan
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2011 05:04 AM
To: bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: {भारतीयविद्वत्परिषत्} request for meaning

karoti no...
is kirAtArjunIya 3.51

--- On Wed, 2/16/11, Saroja Bhate <sar...@bhates.net> wrote:

From: Saroja Bhate <sar...@bhates.net>
Subject: RE: {???????????????????} request for meaning
To: bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2011, 10:21 AM

Dr.s Bhatji and Kannanji

Back to the verse:

Pancatantra Subodhinee 1.65 says:

Medhaavinah…..neetiguNaprayuktaam, neetirucito vyavahaarah sa eva guNastena prayuktaamanuSThitaam apaayasandarshanajaamapaayo durupayogastasya samdarshanaat jaataamarthaadanumitaamvipattim… upaayasandarshanajaam, upaayah soopayogah Saadgunyaroopah tatsandarshanaajjatam ca siddhim laabharoopaam purahsphuranteem agre spaSTam bhaasamaanaamaayaanteem iva darshayanti.

I think now it is clear.Here are two more for your consideration: karoti no’sheshajanaatiriktaam sambhaavanaamarthavateem kriyaabhih/ samsatsu jaate puruSaadhikaare na pooraNee tam samupaiti samkhyaa// narasya cihnam narakaagatasya virodhitaa bandhujaneSu nityam/ sarogataa neecagateSu sevaa hyateeva doSah kaTukaa ca vaaNee//

Dhanyavaadaah

Bhate

_____

From: bvpar...@googlegroups.com [mailto: bvpar...@googlegroups.com ] On Behalf Of hnbhat B.R.
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 09:29 PM
To: bvpar...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: {???????????????????} request for meaning

2011/2/12 Saroja Bhate <sar...@bhates.net>

Kannanji,I don’t see any avagraha in the printed text. Would it make any sense?

Please neglect my previous mail I could trace your mail.

Bhate

Dear madam,

I think you have not read my second mail completely.

It has to be interpreted in both ways by shleSha and hence the print doesn't show the "avagraha" as it would bar one of the interpretations. Only by :shleSha" even without the sign, one can interpret in both ways. If "avagraha" sign appears it bars the other interpretation naturally. Thats why the editors haven't put the "avagraha" sign intentionally.

Please go through my mail if available. If not I will forward the same again.

With regards

--
Dr. Hari Narayana Bhat B.R.
EFEO,
PONDICHERRY

--
?? ??????????? ??????? ???????? ? ?????????
??? ???????? ??????? ? ?????? ???????????????
?????????????? ??????? ??????? ???????????
??????????????? ?????? ???????? ??????????? (?.??.)

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3435 - Release Date: 02/12/11 07:34:00

_______________________________________________________
Unlimited Disk, Data Transfer, PHP/MySQL Domain Hosting
http://www.doteasy.com

--
?? ??????????? ??????? ???????? ? ?????????
??? ???????? ??????? ? ?????? ???????????????
?????????????? ??????? ??????? ???????????
??????????????? ?????? ???????? ??????????? (?.??.)

--
?? ??????????? ??????? ???????? ? ?????????
??? ???????? ??????? ? ?????? ???????????????
?????????????? ??????? ??????? ???????????
??????????????? ?????? ???????? ??????????? (?.??.)

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.449 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/3446 - Release Date: 02/15/11 20:20:00

_______________________________________________________
Unlimited Disk, Data Transfer, PHP/MySQL Domain Hosting
http://www.doteasy.com

--
अथ चेत्त्वमिमं धर्म्यं संग्रामं न करिष्यसि।
ततः स्वधर्मं कीर्तिं च हित्वा पापमवाप्स्यसि।।
तस्मादुत्तिष्ठ कौन्तेय युद्धाय कृतनिश्चयः।
निराशीर्निर्ममो भूत्वा युध्यस्व विगतज्वरः।। (भ.गी.)

Dipak Bhattacharya

unread,

Feb 19, 2011, 1:18:58 AM2/19/11

to bvpar...@googlegroups.com

But this is a statement of facts which even a non-grammarian who knows the meaning of the word can see. The grammatical rule adds nothing but furnishes one with aid for remembering the meaning.
The history of the word is discussed on a different plane without necessarily coming into conflict with the pedagogically framed normative-grammatical rule. The former has its own value.
Best
DB

--- On Sat, 19/2/11, Ananda Ghanam <ananda...@gmail.com> wrote:

Reply all

Reply to author

Forward

0 new messages