Hitler and The Big Lie
Joe Bruno
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
From: Joe <jbr...@indystart.com>
Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:35:42 -0700
Local: Mon, Jun 4 2007 3:35 pm
Subject: Hitler on "The Big Lie"
Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original |
Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this author
Topaz tells us repeatedly:
Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler
was
in favor of big lies.
Well, he invaded Holland after guaranteeing her neutrality:
http://www.ww2sites.com/?action=jump&page=nlnetherlands
He invaded the USSR after signing a non-aggression pact with Stalin:
http://www.faits-et-documents.com/bilan_communisme/nonaggression_pact...
He swindled the German people out of money for Volkswagens that were
never delievered and the money was never refunded:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/227aca7bb5d9e4d0
He betrayed the Catholic Church after signing a treaty with the
Vatican:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/17ff769f77793d6c
He perpetuated the Gleiwitz Fraud
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/a433c8ef6fc338fd
He repeatedly assured the world that he wanted peace, despite the
fact
that he invaded every country in Continental Europe with the
exception
of Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland. He also invaded North Africa.:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/195ba1673076f9e4
B'iny'amin C'r'amer
"Joe Bruno" <jbr...@indystart.com> wrote in message
news:0c725cda-6c42-428c...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
>
>
> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> From: Joe <jbr...@indystart.com>
> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:35:42 -0700
> Local: Mon, Jun 4 2007 3:35 pm
> Subject: Hitler on "The Big Lie"
> Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original |
> Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this author
> Topaz tells us repeatedly:
>
> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
> Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler
> was
> in favor of big lies.
>
>
> Well, he invaded Holland after guaranteeing her neutrality:
So? You cunts keep on with the biggest lie of all, b'luto. "God gave it to
us." That's a bloody pearler.
B'iny'amin C'r'amer
"Caduceus" <kc...@fusemail.com> wrote in message
news:9cnro3tu4uiui6a0c...@4ax.com...
Methinks you've got the wrong bloke, stevie babes.
Threatened to shoot any women and kids this week?
Protagonist
He was forced to sign treaties and treaties are meant to be broken, fag
Bruno!
Don't forget Versaille!
JS
tur...@shaw.ca
wrote:
>He was forced to sign treaties and treaties are meant to be broken, fag
>Bruno!
>Don't forget Versaille!
what the hell are you talking about?
hikler signed nothing in versailles
when that treaty was signed he was just another country bumpkin
if he could enter that building, only through the servant's door
Topaz
The Diaries of Charles A. Lindbergh, p.986
"That young girl riding on her bicycle - she must know that on the
day the Russians come she will probably be raped by a dozen soldiers.
When do they come? In days? In weeks? That, we have not told the
Germans. She has a good face - nicely dressed in old but clean and
brightly colored garments - like the daughter of a middle class
American family. I realize that we Americans are holding her at
Dessau. She cannot flee to safety.
We will not let her pass our sentries on the roads. We are turning her
and thousands of
others like her over to the Soviet soldiers for their sport. I feel
ashamed."
p.961
"German children look in through the window. We have more food than
we need, but regulations prevent giving it to them. It is difficult to
look at them. I feel ashamed of myself, of my people, as I eat and
watch those children. They are not to blame for the war. They are
hungry children. What right have we to stuff ourselves while they look
on - well-fed men eating, leaving unwanted food on plates, while
hungry children look on."
Berlin Correspondent, The Times, September 10th, 1945
"...Another small boy turned out of Danzig had a scrawled postcard
attached to him stating that his soldier father was long since missing
and that his mother and two sisters had died of hunger."
At this time, Denmark, formerly occupied by the Germans as a means
of denying the allies a North Sea bridgehead was bursting at the seams
with surplus food and was pleading with the allies to put it to good
use. It was refused.
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com
Protagonist
> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:20:23 -0800, Protagonist <sza...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>> He was forced to sign treaties and treaties are meant to be broken, fag
>> Bruno!
>> Don't forget Versaille!
>
> what the hell are you talking about?
>
> hikler signed nothing in versailles
I never said Hitler signed the Versailles treaty, idiot!
But Versailles crippled Germany and Hungary, ignorant Bolshevik!
JS
Its all a bit strange
news:VuydnSyIW42yVBPa...@comcast.com:
> turan*@shaw.ca wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:20:23 -0800, Protagonist
>> <sza...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>> He was forced to sign treaties and treaties are meant to
>>> be broken, fag Bruno!
>>> Don't forget Versaille!
>>
>> what the hell are you talking about?
>>
>> hikler signed nothing in versailles
>
> I never said Hitler signed the Versailles treaty, idiot!
> But Versailles crippled Germany and Hungary, ignorant
> Bolshevik! JS
What crippled Germany and Hungary was losing the war, not
signing the peace treaty.
Did you think that the losers should be patted on the back
and given an eclair?
>
>>
>> when that treaty was signed he was just another country
>> bumpkin
>>
>> if he could enter that building, only through the
>> servant's door
>>
>
--
Like Minded Mates
Reading from Mein Kampf
Snuggling by the fire
He shares his deepest thoughts
Holding him close
My Aryan warrior
A warm bath
Then the lights go out
Ben Cramer
Copyright ©2007 Ben Cramer
tur...@shaw.ca
>I never said Hitler signed the Versailles treaty, idiot!
"He was forced to sign treaties and treaties are meant to be broken,
Gallows Cheater
> Protagonist <sza...@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:VuydnSyIW42yVBPa...@comcast.com:
>
>> turan*@shaw.ca wrote:
>>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:20:23 -0800, Protagonist
>>> <sza...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> He was forced to sign treaties and treaties are meant to
>>>> be broken, fag Bruno!
>>>> Don't forget Versaille!
>>>
>>> what the hell are you talking about?
>>>
>>> hikler signed nothing in versailles
>>
>> I never said Hitler signed the Versailles treaty, idiot!
>> But Versailles crippled Germany and Hungary, ignorant
>> Bolshevik! JS
>
> What crippled Germany and Hungary was losing the war, not
> signing the peace treaty.
>
> Did you think that the losers should be patted on the back
> and given an eclair?
>
It wasn't the Rockenfelder NWO?
--
SSGG - When somebody talks of shutting them down, you get three hundred
thousand "1st amendment" types jumping to the guy's defense, giving you a
class on the Bill of Rights - Jacob Baltuch, Brandeis University
http://www.ice.gov/pi/news/newsreleases/articles/051115chicago.htm
B'iny'amin C'r'amer
"Its all a bit strange" <strangeth...@invalid.invalid> wrote in
message news:Xns9A27D5128D2F3...@85.214.54.150...
> Protagonist <sza...@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:VuydnSyIW42yVBPa...@comcast.com:
>
>> turan*@shaw.ca wrote:
>>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:20:23 -0800, Protagonist
>>> <sza...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> He was forced to sign treaties and treaties are meant to
>>>> be broken, fag Bruno!
>>>> Don't forget Versaille!
>>>
>>> what the hell are you talking about?
>>>
>>> hikler signed nothing in versailles
>>
>> I never said Hitler signed the Versailles treaty, idiot!
>> But Versailles crippled Germany and Hungary, ignorant
>> Bolshevik! JS
>
> What crippled Germany and Hungary was losing the war, not
> signing the peace treaty.
Not true.
Actually, Germany was winning the war. The fools were conned into simply
"giving up" by the hebes.
It was the theft of their colonies, much of their land, and their having to
pay reparations which fucked them over.
Its all a bit strange
news:HvSdnTOA25ZIahPa...@giganews.com:
>
> "Its all a bit strange"
> <strangeth...@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> news:Xns9A27D5128D2F3...@85.214.54.150...
>> Protagonist <sza...@comcast.net> wrote in
>> news:VuydnSyIW42yVBPa...@comcast.com:
>>
>>> turan*@shaw.ca wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:20:23 -0800, Protagonist
>>>> <sza...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> He was forced to sign treaties and treaties are meant
>>>>> to be broken, fag Bruno!
>>>>> Don't forget Versaille!
>>>>
>>>> what the hell are you talking about?
>>>>
>>>> hikler signed nothing in versailles
>>>
>>> I never said Hitler signed the Versailles treaty, idiot!
>>> But Versailles crippled Germany and Hungary, ignorant
>>> Bolshevik! JS
>>
>> What crippled Germany and Hungary was losing the war, not
>> signing the peace treaty.
>
> Not true.
Hey asshat, you supposedly had me killfiled. Just another cramer
lie.
>
I've had to snip the rest of your skewed shite, benjji. It's
just too, too saddening to see you make such a fool of yourself.
RJ11
B'iny'amin C'r'amer <hebe...@atalltymes.com> wrote:
(angry rants snipped)
Still upset that your side lost, doper?
"Had Hitler won the war, the world would be a much better
place." --Posted by "Ben Cramer", Source: Message-ID
<ILudnfQdX6UCtfva...@giganews.com>.
RJ.
Joe Bruno
wrote:
>
Te doorak y Mudak y legoon.
Sara Salzman
> turan*@shaw.ca wrote:
>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:20:23 -0800, Protagonist <sza...@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> He was forced to sign treaties and treaties are meant to be broken,
>>> fag Bruno!
>>> Don't forget Versaille!
>>
>> what the hell are you talking about?
>>
>> hikler signed nothing in versailles
>
> I never said Hitler signed the Versailles treaty, idiot!
Then what treaty were you referring to when you said "He was forced to
sign treaties..."
> But Versailles crippled Germany and Hungary, ignorant Bolshevik!
> JS
>
>>
>> when that treaty was signed he was just another country bumpkin
>>
>> if he could enter that building, only through the servant's door
>>
--
Insults are the refuge of the fearful and devious.
-and-
I don't do "name-calling" childish fat slag.
-Ben Cramer
Protagonist
> Protagonist <sza...@comcast.net> wrote in
> news:VuydnSyIW42yVBPa...@comcast.com:
>
>> turan*@shaw.ca wrote:
>>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:20:23 -0800, Protagonist
>>> <sza...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> He was forced to sign treaties and treaties are meant to
>>>> be broken, fag Bruno!
>>>> Don't forget Versaille!
>>> what the hell are you talking about?
>>>
>>> hikler signed nothing in versailles
>> I never said Hitler signed the Versailles treaty, idiot!
>> But Versailles crippled Germany and Hungary, ignorant
>> Bolshevik! JS
>
> What crippled Germany and Hungary was losing the war, not
> signing the peace treaty.
>
> Did you think that the losers should be patted on the back
> and given an eclair?
Not really bozo head!
War was over in 1918, with armistice signed, Versailles was signed in
1920, because the British, French kept up the economical blocked on the
Germans, forcing them to sign.
Hungary lost 70% of it's territories and 1/3 population result of the
Versailles.
French used the Romanian army to attack and rob it, to force Hungary to
sign it.
But Bozo heads like don't any thing.
You think you've seen a few Yankee Hollywood movies, now you know every
thing and must be true.
JS
Protagonist
> Protagonist wrote:
>> turan*@shaw.ca wrote:
>>> On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 07:20:23 -0800, Protagonist <sza...@comcast.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> He was forced to sign treaties and treaties are meant to be broken,
>>>> fag Bruno!
>>>> Don't forget Versaille!
>>>
>>> what the hell are you talking about?
>>>
>>> hikler signed nothing in versailles
>>
>> I never said Hitler signed the Versailles treaty, idiot!
>
> Then what treaty were you referring to when you said "He was forced to
> sign treaties..."
Google it, Sara Da ignorant.
JS
tur...@shaw.ca
wrote:
>Hungary lost 70% of it's territories and 1/3 population result of the
>Versailles.
actually the treaty that concerned hungary was signed in trianon, not
in versailles
>French used the Romanian army to attack and rob it, to force Hungary to
>sign it.
that is true, but interestingly enough (the jewish led) soviet type
army succesfully fought against the landgrab, while the fascist horthy
who was put into power by the same rumanian forces signed the "dictat"
>But Bozo heads like don't any thing.
huh?
Topaz
Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was
Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
context:
"But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity
for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute
responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had
shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the
catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that
hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for
the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took
away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous
enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the
Fatherland to justice. All this was inspired by the principle--which
is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain
force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always
more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature
than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity
of their minds they are more readily fall victims to the big lie than
the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little
matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It
would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and
they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort
truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so
may be brought clearly to their minds, they still doubt and waver and
will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For
the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it
has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in
this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These
people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest
purposes.
"From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than
any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their
very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a
religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a
race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has
branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and
exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew 'The Great Master of
Lies'. Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not
wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth
to prevail."
Protagonist
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:22:01 -0800, Protagonist <sza...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>> Hungary lost 70% of it's territories and 1/3 population result of the
>> Versailles.
>
> actually the treaty that concerned hungary was signed in trianon, not
> in versailles
Both are in France, only different buildings.
>
>> French used the Romanian army to attack and rob it, to force Hungary to
>> sign it.
>
> that is true, but interestingly enough (the jewish led) soviet type
> army succesfully fought against the landgrab, while the fascist horthy
> who was put into power by the same rumanian forces signed the "dictat"
Really? Seems wasn't very successfully, idiot, when only lasted 2
months with the collapse of that communist regime and the chance for
Hungary to be wiped off the map for ever.
Kun Bela Da Jewish communist leader, who lead the socialist revolution
in Hungary, was executed by Stalin, in 1932.
JS
tur...@shaw.ca
wrote:
>turan*@shaw.ca wrote:
>> On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 17:22:01 -0800, Protagonist <sza...@comcast.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hungary lost 70% of it's territories and 1/3 population result of the
>>> Versailles.
>>
>> actually the treaty that concerned hungary was signed in trianon, not
>> in versailles
>
>Both are in France, only different buildings.
that explains it
>>> French used the Romanian army to attack and rob it, to force Hungary to
>>> sign it.
>>
>> that is true, but interestingly enough (the jewish led) soviet type
>> army succesfully fought against the landgrab, while the fascist horthy
>> who was put into power by the same rumanian forces signed the "dictat"
>
>Really? Seems wasn't very successfully,
actually it was, if you hadn't skip school you would know
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/hu/6/62/Nepkoztarsasag.png
> idiot, when only lasted 2
>months with the collapse of that communist regime and the chance for
>Hungary to be wiped off the map for ever.
with the willing co-operation of the hungarian pinochet, that rumanian
puppet, the fascist pig horthy
>Kun Bela Da Jewish communist leader, who lead the socialist revolution
> in Hungary, was executed by Stalin, in 1932.
so, what does that has to do with this, scatterbrain?
tur...@shaw.ca
wrote:
>That was your habit to skip schools, to sniff glue at the Communist
>Youth meetings, Comrade TuRuszki.
so how come that you're so stupid and undereducated?
what are *you* smoking?
>Saved Hungary to become permanent part of the Soviet Union!
there was never such plan because lenin opposed such
further the soviet union had more than enough problems to deal with,
thus couldn't be involved in hungary at all
what a hell are you talking about?
>Hell of a marriage!
you can say that again, but it was fitting for horthy for sure
after all, he was a servile arse licker in all his life
>>> Kun Bela Da Jewish communist leader, who lead the socialist revolution
>>> in Hungary, was executed by Stalin, in 1932.
>>
>> so, what does that has to do with this, scatterbrain?
>
>Just an example
but what does it have to do with, scatterbrain?
> for the Jewish communist brother hood, for idiots like you.
say, the jews run the soviet union, or not?
Michael Ejercito
> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
> Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was
> in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that
> Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
> context:
Michael
tur...@shaw.ca
and a cheat too
Kenneth McVay OBC
sexual deviant
animal abuser
wife killer
--
"Wipe the smegam from your lips you Jew fag."
(Scott Bradbury, the Leading Revisionist Scholar
in Bellville, Texas)
The Nizkor Project: http://www.nizkor.org/
Mirelle
"All this was inspired by the principle--which
is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain
force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always
more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature
than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity
of their minds they are more readily fall victims to the big lie than
the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little
matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It
would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and
they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort
truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so
may be brought clearly to their minds, they still doubt and waver and
will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For
the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it
has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in
this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These
people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest
purposes."
-- Hitler, from "Mein Kampf."
Mirelle
ElParedon
"Michael Ejercito" <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3812079d-19bb-4444...@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
> Michael
Little Big Man
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> - Show quoted text -
You say you want to beat George Bushes meat? Paredon you is one crazy
homo.
Mirelle
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
> >> Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was
> >> in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that
> >> Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
> >> context: Hitler was indeed a big liar.
> NOBODY CAN BEEAT GEORGE BUSH IN THAT AREA OF ENDEVOUR
Oh, Arik Sharon, is in competition with Bush for that "honor!"
http://www.usefulwork.com/shark/independent_sharon.jpg
Mirelle
Kenneth McVay OBC
Except, of course, Alex Seredin, the hatemonger of Delray Beach.
--
"All shit like you have is lies and smears. Shit like you
can't refute what I post so shit like you resort to cheap
personal attacks and you wonder why kike filth is hated so much!
(Scott Bradbury, Bellville's leading revisionist scholar)
ElParedon
"Kenneth McVay OBC" <kmc...@shell.vex.net> wrote in message
news:13p1vhp...@corp.supernews.com...
> In article <jms1p3166tl9odrme...@4ax.com>,
> <turan*@shaw.ca> wrote:
>>On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:26:07 -0800 (PST), Michael Ejercito
>><meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Jan 17, 7:11 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
>>>> Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was
>>>> in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that
>>>> Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
>>>> context:
>>> Hitler was indeed a big liar.
>>
>>and a cheat too
>
> sexual deviant
> animal abuser
> wife killer
dsha...@gmail.com
> "All this was inspired by the principle--which
> is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain
> force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always
> more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature
> than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity
> of their minds they are more readily fall victims to the big lie than
> the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little
> matters
That gets Frau Perks about right.
>but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It
> would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths,
Nope, that's definitely not Frau Perks, who lies about anything and
everything. And composes really bad doggerel verse, to boot.
> -- Hitler, from "Mein Kampf."
> Mirelle
Obviously someone quoted it for Vera, she's too stupid to have read it
on her own.
Deborah
B'in'yamin C'r'amer
"Michael Ejercito" <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:3812079d-19bb-4444...@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Less so than any other politician I can name, greaser.
B'in'yamin C'r'amer
<turan*@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:jms1p3166tl9odrme...@4ax.com...
Really? Upon what to you base this totally fact free, unsubstantiated
allegation, jew cunt?
>
B'in'yamin C'r'amer
"Little Big Man" <Chief_R...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b1ebb618-2ccf-4831...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
ElParedon
"Little Big Man" <Chief_R...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b1ebb618-2ccf-4831...@e10g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3812079d-19bb-4444...@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...>
> On Jan 17, 7:11 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
> >> Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was
> >> in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that
> >> Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
> >> context:
> > Hitler was indeed a big liar.
>
BECAUSE BUSH IS THE BIGGEST TERRORIST ON THE FACE OF THE EARTH
tur...@shaw.ca
"what to you" ?
now you're picking up kurt's accent?
the "allegations" are substantiated and supporting data is widely
available
namely, he broke signed treaties, started a war without declaration,
had his best friend and mentor killed, and abused blondie too,
fotzerasur
B'in'yamin C'r'amer
<turan*@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:vfh2p310vbv94i56h...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:02:07 +1000, "B'in'yamin C'r'amer"
> <hebes...@best.com> wrote:
>
>>
>><turan*@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>>news:jms1p3166tl9odrme...@4ax.com...
>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:26:07 -0800 (PST), Michael Ejercito
>>> <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Jan 17, 7:11 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
>>>>> Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was
>>>>> in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that
>>>>> Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
>>>>> context:
>>>> Hitler was indeed a big liar.
>>>
>>> and a cheat too
>>
>>Really? Upon what to you base this totally fact free, unsubstantiated
>>allegation, jew cunt?
>
> "what to you" ?
Be careful, jew cunt. I've left your grammatical FUBARs alone so far.
>
> now you're picking up kurt's accent?
>
> the "allegations" are substantiated and supporting data is widely
> available
That should be "date "are"" jew cunt.
B'in'yamin C'r'amer
<dsha...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ef80cfc6-afa5-4083...@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
Fuck orf, slime.
tur...@shaw.ca
<hebes...@best.com> wrote:
>> "what to you" ?
>
>Be careful, jew cunt. I've left your grammatical FUBARs alone so far.
who was talking about grammar?
okay if you want it, i confess to you, i'm not a native speaker of
english
but while doing so, i must also say that i could spell the shit out of
you on a better day, and on a worst day i just don't give a crap
i also speak four languages besides some english, so your grammar
should be better than mine
neither am i who tries to be a grade school teacher here,
so what's your point with this?
>> now you're picking up kurt's accent?
>>
>> the "allegations" are substantiated and supporting data is widely
>> available
>
>That should be "date "are"" jew cunt.
perhaps in oz
where i'm writing from "data" has no plural
it's much the same like "information"
expla...@yahoo.com
Yes, Hitler was a liar just like Mohammed- the false Islamic prophet
who lied as follows:
Islam is full of lies because Mohammed lied and
lied; for the sayings of Mohammed's have been verified
as falsehood and substantiated as falsehood
by the following facts:
1]. Mohammed lied that Allah sent him as
the last messenger, BUT MOHAMMED DID
NOT HAVE THE 4 EYE-WITNESSES REQUIRED
IN SURA 24:13 TO SUBSTANTIATE HIS SAYINGS
AS TRUE; and Allah call Mohammed A LIAR;
2]. Mohammed also lied that Allah has given
the Muslims, the COVENANT OF ABRAHAM AND
ISMAIL. A covenant is an agreement between God
and its believers AND THE AGREEMENT MUST
HAVE TERMS AND CONDITIONS, but the Islamic
Covenant of Abraham and Ismail is EMPTY
(without terms and conditions) that is without
the laws of God namely the laws of Moses.
Hence, Islam without the Law of God of which is
THE LAWS OF MOSES OF THE 6TH COMMANDMENT
OF THE TRUE ALLAH "Thou shall not MURDER" causes
the Islamic world havoc through THE KILLINGS OF
MUSLIMS BY MUSLIMS in Iraq, Pakistan, Palestine,
lebanon, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, and Indonesia;
AND THE KILLINGS OF THE "INFIDELS"
WHEN BURNING AND BOMBING CHURCHES
were/are committed by Islamic terrorists.
AND for such sins, The TRUE ALLAH is punishing the
such Islamic countries that do not condemn the evil acts
of these Islamists by sending Tsunami and earthquake
after earthquake affecting Islamic countries:Pakistan,
Afghanistan, Iran, Turkey, Afghanistan, and Indonesia
of which death toll is accounted Muslims alone as 90
percent of the dead;
3]. Mohammed also lied that he was an Arab
as well as a Hebrew. How could Mohammed have
2 different Fathers to enable him to be an Arab
as well as a Hebrew being the descendant of Ismail?
MOREOVER, THE FATHER OF ALL ARABS IS
QAHTAN
and
THE FATHER OF ALL HEBREWS/ISRAELITES IS
ABRAHAM!!!
4]. Mohammed also lied that a day's fast is only 12 hours
when a day is of 24 hours. No other religion tells its
believers to consider a day's fast is of 12 hours as these
priests were/are educated and thus know that a day is
of 24 hours and not 12 hours, BUT MOHAMMED WAS
UNEDUCATED AND HENCE MOHAMMED
ERRONEOUSLY THINK A DAY AS DAYLIGHT OF 12
HOURS BEING ILLITERATE WOULD HAVE THOUGHT
SO. The True Allah, if He had indeed sent Mohammed
as the last messenger, the True Allah would have told
Mohammed a day's fast is of 24 hours, right?
5]. Mohammed lied that he split the moon into 2. Now, why
the moon is still round and not half; and where is the other
half-moon?
6] Mohammed lied that the earth is flat when we all know
that the earth is round.
7] Mohammed claimed that Allah is one, but if Allah is
singular, how come the Quran quotes Allah using the
plural pronoun " WE " whenever Allah speaks? The answer
explaining why the Arabic language is detracted by
Mohammed is as follows:
Dear little hoopoe,
You wrote saying: "....These words, innaa ("Verily We")
and nahnu ("We"), and other forms of the plural, may be
used by one person speaking on behalf of a group,
or they may be used by one person for purposes of respect
or glorification, as is done by some monarchs when they
issue statements or decrees in which they say "We have
decided..."
My reply:
"We" when used by one person speaking on behalf of a group
is acceptable but if by a Singular God, then it is unfathomable.
When "we" is used by a Monarch, it is taken to mean that
the King is speaking on behalf of the Royal Family, but if
the King is not married and only Himself alone in His kingdom,
He will be most foolish to use "We" when he speaks, right?
And for the truth you may not know: what if Allah uses
"We(Nahnu)" when He is speaking on behalf of the Family of
God - Elohiym; and " I(Ana) " when He uses it to express
Himself like He expressed his name to Moses as
" I AM THAT I AM" as God, the Father Almighty; and
"He(Huwa)" when He uses it to refer to His Son, Jesus???
To say that in Arabic language using plurality to emphasize
glory or respect is literary style is unwise: for why adopt
such literary style when it is practical to use the right words
to emphasize glory or respect like "I, your Allah or
We, your God(Elohiym)...I, your King or We, the Royal Family,
etc" so as not to confuse other races who, wisely, never use
plurality to emphasize glory or respect otherwise the World
would be upside-down like in most Islamic countries !
And "Innaa" translated by you as "verily, We". You know
the meaning of verily which means in the very truth, and
to put "verily" in front of the word "WE" which you say
could be "I" makes the word "verily" to also mean not
the very truth, right?
Hence, how good is the Arabic language when used in
the Quran to express the true meaning of Allah?
I could understand why the Arabic language uses such
"literary style": since Mohammed-a uneducated man,
in the past, ruling by the sword, no one dares to oppose
his grammatical errors, and now he is acclaimed by Muslims
as a prophet of Islam, who among the Muslims dare to point out
his errors WHEN MOHAMMED SAID "We" Is "I", and "I" is "We"?
Even now, no Muslim dare to object to Mohammed-
the uneducated man- using Arabic language uneducatedly
with grammatical mistakes except the Christians, right?
For Christians do what is right in the sight of God Almighty,
BUT NOT THE MUSLIMS for Muslims fear the Islamists
who are ready to kill any Muslim who goes against
the Quran even in good faith that there are grammatical errors
in the Quran such as using the PLURAL PRONOUN 'WE' wrongly!!
Now, speaking of the beauty of the Arabic language, may I ask you
" Was Mohammed an Arab?"
Mohammed was not even an Arab, and hence he negated the beauty
of the Arabic language by detracting it as forementioned.
Amen in Christ Jesus - the prophet who does not lie !
Amen In Christ Jesus
Topaz
It's easy to prove that the media is a pack of liars. If they were not
liars they would tell people that Hitler believed that the Jews
controlled the media. Why don't they? Here are some quotes from Mein
Kampf:
"The man who is not opposed and vilified and slandered in the Jewish
Press is not a staunch German and not a true National Socialist. The
best rule whereby the sincerity of his convictions, his character and
strength of will, can be measured is by the hostility which his name
arouses among the mortal enemies of our people.
"The followers of the movement, and indeed the whole nation, must be
reminded again and again of the fact that, through the medium of his
newspapers, the Jew is always spreading falsehood and that if he tells
the truth on some occasions it is only for the purpose of masking some
greater deceit, which turns the apparent truth into a deliberate
falsehood. The Jew is the Great Master of Lies. Falsehood and
duplicity are the weapons with which he fights.
"Every calumny and falsehood published by the Jews are tokens of honor
which can be worn by our comrades. He whom they decry most is nearest
to our hearts and he whom they mortally hate is our best friend.
"If a comrade of ours opens a Jewish newspaper in the morning and does
not find himself vilified there, then he has spent yesterday to no
account. For if he had achieved something he would be persecuted,
slandered, derided and abused. Those who effectively combat this
mortal enemy of our people, who is at the same time the enemy of all
Aryan peoples and all culture, can only expect to arouse opposition on
the part of this race and become the object of its slanderous attacks.
"When these truths become part of the flesh and blood, as it were, of
our members, then the movement will be impregnable and invincible."
" Then I began to examine my favorite 'World Press', with that fact
before my mind. "The deeper my soundings went the lesser grew my
respect for that Press which I formerly admired. Its style became
still more repellant and I was forced to reject its ideas as entirely
shallow and superficial. To claim that in the presentation of facts
and views its attitude was impartial seemed to me to contain more
falsehood than truth. The writers were- Jews.
"Thousands of details that I had scarcely noticed before seemed to me
now to deserve attention. I began to grasp and understand things which
I had formerly looked at in a different light."
"Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry would have to be
secured. This was the Press. The Jew exercised all his skill and
tenacity in getting hold of it. By means of the Press he began
gradually to control public life in its entirety."
Topaz
I myself was brought up in a small village in the southwest of
Germany. In 1939, when the war broke out, we left for the less exposed
Odenwald area until the possible danger of a French invasion had
passed. Shortly after that my father was transferred to the Ruhr
region. He as requested work as a foreman for the Mauser arms factory.
The government, true to their claims to be national and socialist,
took their promises seriously and provided young people starting a
family, as well as those who already had children, with affordable
housing. The first child brought a reduction of the mortgage by 25
percent, and when the fourth child arrived the mortgage was no more.
My parents already had four children then and thus were eligible for a
free newly built house from the government.
This was but one of the many programs the government established in
order to improve the quality of life for its citizens..
Then there was the "Kinderlandverschickung" program. It was started
before the war and enabled mothers in need of recreation to spend some
time in rural settings together with their children..
Another very popular social program of the government was "Fraft
durch Freude" (strength through joy). Here deserving workers could
take all-inclusive tours on luxury liners that were built especially
for this purpose. On these ships there was only one class and
everybody was treated the same. They visited the Azores and
Spitsbergen among other places. Those ships were not allowed to dock
in and English port however. The reason was that the British
government did not want it's citizens to see what it also could have
done for them..
The most misinterpreted program in Germany was the so-called
"Lebensborn". It was the exact opposite of what people are made to
believe it was, or should I say, of what people like to believe.. The
Lebensborn was the institution to help unwed mothers who did not know
where to turn for help. They were taken care of during their
pregnancies and afterward as well. This was the Lebensborn, and any
other interpretation is plain hogwash..
My father was able to buy not one but three guns plus two pistols,
together with plenty of ammunition. All it took him was proof that he
was indeed a German citizen without a criminal record. Then in 1945,
when the French "liberated" us, they disarmed him. I know that he was
not the only one to have guns at home, because I saw the many, many
arms that were handed over to the French, and this was in a very small
village..
Then, after the war was over, we had our first experience with a real
democracy. The French introduced it and gave us some shining examples;
one was that the lived off the country and stole everything which
wasn't nailed down..
It was not until many years later that I learned that Hitler held at
least five plebiscites during the first half of his rule. In
democratic Germany, from 1945 until today there has never been a
plebiscite.
There were foreign workers employed in Germany during WWII. I knew
one of them. He worked on a farm and was treated exactly like the son
who was in the army. After the war he stayed on and married the
daughter of the house. He was a prisoner of war from Poland and I
never saw him guarded by any policeman. This is how foreigners were
treated in Germany. They earned the same wages as the Germans, they
took part in the social insurance program, had paid-for holidays
including free train fares, and many came back with friends who also
wanted to work for these "horrible" Germans. Today they are called
slave laborer.
Not everyone was entitled to go on to a university. Only good marks
and above-average performance in schools qualified. But good
performers were promoted with all means available. Today we are much
more democratic; everyone is entitled to a university education and if
the parents are wealthy enough, the son or daughter can study until
they are 35..
Germany was also the country to introduce, in 1933, the first-ever
comprehensive animal protection law. Farm animals had to be kept in
strictly natural environments and no animal factories were allowed. Of
course, no testing of products on animals was permitted, and no kosher
slaughter.
If new industrial facilities were built they had to conform to the
highest standards with adequate lighting and air inside, canteens
where the workers were served nutritious meals at affordable prices,
and beautiful lawns outside: all for the benefit of the workers.. In
national socialist Germany, no child labor was allowed as it still was
in other European countries.
And finally, although I could still go on for a while, I would like to
mention that on express orders from Hitler himself, it was strictly
forbidden to use corporal punishment in the army. He was of the
opinion that in was incompatible with the honor of a German to be
punished by such degrading means.
That was the Germany I grew up in, and I am glad that I did.
Topaz
"The text of this web page was originally published by the United
States Holocaust Memorial Museum as a pamphlet titled "Homosexuals:
Victims of the Nazi Era".
United States Holocaust Memorial Museum,
100 Raoul Walenberg Place SW,
Washington D.C. 20024-2150.
As part of the Nazis' attempt to purify German society and propagate
an "Aryan master race," they condemned homosexuals as "socially
aberrant." Soon after taking office on January 30, 1933, Hitler banned
all homosexual and lesbian organizations. Brownshirted storm troopers
raided the institutions and gathering places of homosexuals. Greatly
weakened and driven underground, this subculture had flourished in the
relative freedom of the 1920s, in the pubs and cafes of Berlin,
Hamburg, Munich, Bremen, and other cities."
http://www.holocaust-trc.org/homosx.htm
Topaz
Soviet Russia When He Did
Review by Daniel Michaels
For decades the prevailing and more or less official view in the
United States and Europe has been that a race-crazed Adolf Hitler,
without warning or provocation, betrayed a trusting Josef Stalin by
launching a treacherous surprise attack against the totally unprepared
Soviet Union on June 22, 1941. Von Thadden's book-which is based in
large part on recently uncovered evidence from Russian archives,
Stalin's own statements, and new revelations of Russian military
specialists-persuasively debunks this view.
http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v18/v18n3p40_Michaels. html
Topaz
Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was
in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that
Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
context:
"But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity
for falsehood, and their fighting comrades, the Marxists, to impute
responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had
shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the
catastrophe which he had foreseen and to save the nation from that
hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for
the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took
away the weapon of moral right from the only adversary dangerous
enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the
Fatherland to justice. All this was inspired by the principle--which
is quite true in itself--that in the big lie there is always a certain
force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always
more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature
than consciously or voluntarily, and thus in the primitive simplicity
of their minds they are more readily fall victims to the big lie than
the small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little
matters but would be ashamed to resort to large-scale falsehoods. It
would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and
they would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort
truth so infamously. Even though the facts which prove this to be so
may be brought clearly to their minds, they still doubt and waver and
will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For
the grossly impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it
has been nailed down, a fact which is known to all expert liars in
this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These
people know only too well how to use falsehood for the basest
purposes.
"From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than
any others how falsehood and calumny can be exploited. Is not their
very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a
religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a
race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has
branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and
exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew 'The Great Master of
Lies'. Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not
wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping Truth
to prevail."
Sara Salzman
I love it when you fuck up when you're trying to prove how other people
fuck up.
--
Insults are the refuge of the fearful and devious.
-and-
I don't do "name-calling" childish fat slag.
-Ben Cramer
Topaz
Here are some quotes from the German pamphlet "How they Lie" from
1940. The pamphlet has many pictures but the words alone are
interesting enough:
"For example, what would you say if a colleague of yours, whom you
regarded as a rival and who disliked you, were to spread the rumor
that your household is in disorder, that you murder small children and
rape defenseless women? Rest assured that in our country such a person
would soon be behind bars.
But the international politicians and journalists who slander entire
peoples in a shameless manner not only run around freely, they
impudently put on airs as the saviors of human culture. No lie is too
crude for them, no slander too vulgar-they understand their craft.
Even in World War I they knew how to incite hate with the help of
atrocity propaganda. We all recall those daily lies of the "German
barbarian" who, "like a wild beast rages over the earth and destroys
everything in hate and the fury of annihilation, who tortures children
and delights in the tears of mothers," as a foreign paper once wrote.
In war, man stands against man. Each serves the Fatherland in his own
way, and no soldier will deny the knightly convictions of a noble
opponent. Today, however, a cowardly gang of professional agitators
daily invents new lies and pictures from the safety of their desks.
How was the German soldier once depicted by enemy atrocity propaganda?
We all know them, for we had fathers, brothers, sons, and men out
there. For instance, on 20 March 1915, the newspaper "Le Rire Rouge"
published the following picture of the good German soldier:
A bloodthirsty murderer of women and children, a robber and plunderer,
who nourishes himself with sausages made from human flesh-that was how
it saw the brave and loyal German soldier.
Each of us knows what a crude and baseless lie this is. Every decent
person in the world should have known this. And yet: "Some of it will
always be believed, the stupid and gullible will never see through it
all" - so hope the political liars and slanderers.
We know what to think about this flood of slander flowing over the
German people. We heard the same things between 1914 and 1918. Then as
now, they are attempting to drive a wedge between leaders and people.
The goal of this propaganda is always the annihilation of Germany.
We are also familiar with the old lie about the desecration of
churches and shrines, which are once again in fashion with our
enemies.
This is the undamaged cathedral of Tschenstochau.
The picture of the Polish shrine of the Black Madonna, with the German
soldiers in the foreground, was taken after its alleged destruction by
German bombers.
While the lying and yellow press of the entire world and the enemy
transmitters were inventing hypocritical stories about the presumed
destruction of the holy shrine, the Prior of Tschenstochau wrote the
above letter to the German military authorities that clearly testifies
that the monastery and holy shrine were untouched.
Thus the lie regarding supposed German attack could be immediately
exposed. The English Ministry of Advertising has had nothing to say
since.
In reality, these lies are ancient. Our enemies always babble about
violated sanctuaries, persecuted priests, murdered children and
tortured women in order to prejudice the world against Germany and to
arouse the impression that the world must be defended against "the
barbarians who are threatening human culture."
The picture above is taken from a leafet dated 19 August 1914. The
same lie was used back then. Supposedly the Germans had attacked the
monastery at Jasno-Gora.
They always lied, they lie today, they lie, they lie.
There were countless numbers of these malicious pictures in World War
I. Today we see the new versions of this crude charge. Enemy radio
reports reports of drugged candy and poison gas-filled children's
balloons, with which German troops allegedly killed Polish children.
And our enemies decided to spread this vile slander in the exact
moment that the world heard from neutral journalists about the
unimaginable crimes perpetrated by the Polish on fellow German
countrymen. All of these neutral independent reporters saw and
corroborated the terrible atrocities against Germans with their own
eyes. In light of these proven facts, the shameless enemy presumes to
turn the tables and pin these murders on the Germans, declaring that
the murdered, whose names and addresses are known, are Poles.
They hate the Fuehrer, because he exposes their lies and crimes.
They hate him, because he rescued the hard-working German people from
eploitation. How happy they would be to see the Führer and the entire
German people delivered into the dark machinations of the world
Jewry! It shows the impotence of the Jews, since all they can do is
drag a straw man through the streets and burn it.
What do these subhumans know about the joy of a genuine national
community? These warmongers are hard at work rousing the world against
Germany. How little they know about the indisoluble bond between
Führer and people that is so overwhelmingly clear in this picture:
The Fuehrer speaks with German workers.
He knows that he can trust them, and they know that our cause is in
his good hands.
The enemy countries, who are so worried about the fate of the German
people, also worry about the S. A.
We have often seen them; we know how these men look. They are our
comrades, our colleagues in the workplace, our fathers, brothers, sons
and men.
Do they look like this? Since when are these imagined daggers the true
symbol of the S. A.? Once again some professional liar has taken his
pen in his hand.
They lie, they lie....
German men from all regions and occupations use their free time and
energy in regular practice, so they can be ready to serve the
community. When in the summer of 1939 the agricultural labor force was
too small to bring in the rich harvest, these men freely joined in to
help with the harvest, serving the homeland on peaceful fields. Why
does the enemy press, which loves to speak of its objective reporting,
never carry such pictures of Germany?
The more one examines their endless scribbling and radio news, the
clearer one sees that these expert liars have never spoken the truth,
not even once.
This time a newspaper really outdid itself. Here we see how a German
holiday is libeled.
Christmas and Nazi Winter Relief
We all know this picture. It is the Christmas celebration of a German
family that did not have the means by itself to celebrate this holiday
of love in the way the Führer wishes, in the way that every German
family should experience.
The NSV got involved.
Helpers, men and women, walked upstairs and downstairs, heard the
wishes of the needy, and provided gifts.
We all know the results. In any case, the 80 million people of the
greater German Reich know that the liar who drew the picture on the
previous page of an alleged German Christmas is not only a liar but
also an idiot. If the gentlemen wanted to lie, they should have at
least started out more intelligently, so that they were not found out
immediately.
What National Socialist Germany has done and continues to do for
working people is unique in the entire world.
The foreign plutocratic countries that are dominated by high finance
viewed this new and happy life with envy and ill-will. They never
ceased in their endeavor to compel this new Germany into war, to keep
it in the same miserable state it was in after the Treaty of
Versailles.
But Germany knows what it has to lose. And because it is stronger than
the rest of the world, it will end this struggle victoriously.
Mr. Churchill, English warmonger, First Lord of the Admiralty,
architect of the encirclement campaign had it easy in the fall of
1939.
When he decided to wage war against Germany, he selected four English
passenger ships that were sailing to America. Then he sent the above
telegram, dated 28 August 1939, to Cunard White Star Lines, compelling
them to turn German passengers away from these ships, as they would be
uncomfortable eyewitnesses. See the accompanying letter from the
shipping company, dated 29 August 1939. Churchill then sent suitable
"rescue ships" to be "coincidentally" on the course of these ships,
which were now loaded with Americans. The Athenia was torpedoed and
sunk. If the affair with the "Athenia" not worked, then one of the
other three ships would have been sunk,so that Mr. Churchill would
have more stories for the English Ministry of Lies.
We know the rest. The yellow press of the world blows Churchill's
lying horn obediently: a German submarine allegedly sank the
"Athenia."
But the evil, criminal escapade failed. Germany got hold of the
documents and exposed the criminals.
Once again, one of the vilest and most base of the English lies is
exposed.
The following story is perhaps the best way of showing the reality of
moneybags journalism, and how decent foreign journalists are forced to
invent lie afer lie.
A couple of months ago, a foreign journalist whose name we must hide
in order to protect his job, came to Germany. He wanted to see the
alleged "Nazi hell" with his own eyes, in order to give an eyewitness
account.
He saw workers who had jobs. He saw workers taking vacations with the
KdF. And he saw workers going to the theater. He saw the NSV's charity
for the poor. He saw and was amazed.
He had not expected to see that! How could he, knowing the truth,
continue to write lies and false atrocity stories about Germany, like
the financiers of his newspaper want it?...
In German camps, criminals and misfits live in clean and orderly
accommodations, receive sufficient nourishment and have enough time
for both work and play.
The foreign press reporter visited one of these camps.
The officials of the German concentration camp were outraged when they
later read his article.
The article talked about piles of corpses over which the poor reporter
had to climb, of moaning people in dark dungeons, of caning orgies and
other such imaginary atrocities.
The man had seemed so honest. How could he lie like that? What had
happened? The journalist wrote a letter to explain. He had written a
truthful account of what he had seen at the concentration camp.
But the owner of the newspaper switched everything around. Naturally
there are decent foreign papers that would never falsify the facts
like that, but we are not talking about them here.
The newspaperman begged the Germans not to take action against his
paper or the publisher who falsified the report, because then he would
lose his job.
That is how freedom of the press looks like in other countries; that
is how the lies and fairy tales come to be.
The Fuehrer spoke about the criminal newspaper Jews and the war
profiteers, in his speech on 6 October. They order the journalists and
radio reporters around like schoolboys. These "servants of public
opinion" are not allowed to have convictions or express their true
opinions, and only a very few exceptions prove this rule. They must
lie and slander and blacken Germany and its Fuehrer to keep the
gentlemen behind the plutocratic, moneybag policies in business.
But why do these newspaper moneybags lie so crudely, so stupidly, so
impudently? Why do they spread their slander all over Germany of all
places?
They lie because they are weak and Germany is strong. They lie because
they want to make money by going to war against Germany, even though
the people do not want to go to war and are scared to go to war
against a strong Germany...
Things are a thousand times better here. Things are more honest and
fair here than anywhere in the entire world.
Here we recognize the honor of the worker.
Here there is a right to work.
Here the moneybags are not in control...
In conclusion:
We will not be confused by the lies of the foreign countries! We know
what we are fighting for!
Topaz
struggle), by Hans Hinkel:
"Faster than lightening a lie about us spread throughout the country,
spread in every attic room where poor people lived by newspapers owned
or obedient to the opponent. It took a week of work by us National
Socialists to deal with a three-line lie in an opposing newspaper. As
soon as one lie was dealt with, a hundred more sprang up. Like a
hydra, the opponent's horror stories about National Socialism and its
supporters spread. There was not a speech by the Führer or his
associates that was not immediately twisted and tastefully served up
to the gullible Michael at breakfast or dinner. Adolf Hitler had "spat
out the communion wafer." Hermann Göring was smuggling opium or
morphine. Robert Ley has "lost a 'v'" in his name Pastor Münchmeyer
was guilty of "moral crimes" in Borkum. We often would have laughed
had we not hourly learned the amazing gullibility of millions of
German citizens who were trapped in the enemy's web of lies. The only
answer was for everyone to set to work with the people, going
everywhere to fight, speak and educate. Sooner or later the opponent
would have to face us and be revealed as a liar to the public."
"The city was like an upset anthill on that cold winter night. Roland
Freisler ran out from the chattering council meeting and went with us
to the nearby Friedrich Square where we spoke with the starving
masses. We forgot the middle class niceties! We had to stop Moscow
from winning over these citizens driven crazy by hunger, making them
wiling subjects of the insane ideas of Bolshevism"
"Only a few weeks later, I needed an escort to leave or return to my
apartment. Several loyal S.A. men had to be with me all the time,
since Communist unemployed men, unscrupulously incited against us
National Socialists, wanted to attack me now that they knew who I was.
Every day I joined the unemployed who demonstrated in the large
courtyard of the labor office on Giesberg Street. More than once I had
to be met by party members at the Kassel train station to protect me
from lurking Communist terror troops. It was the same or worse for all
of our prominent Kassel party members and S.A. men, just as for the
storm troops of our movement who risked their lives every day and
every hour in every city and every village of Germany. The enemy
naturally was particularly after us speakers. According to the law, we
had to be unarmed. We would have been in deep trouble if a body search
had found a weapon! A nail file was thought to be a weapon. Later even
a party badge, since it had a long needle!"
"The attempts of our party comrades to hold a National Socialist
meeting failed a half dozen times or more. Most meetings were made
impossible by the thousand-fold numerical superiority of the opponent,
or else broken up before they could finish. Our protective service
-every party member in each local group belongs - is still too weak in
most areas to stand up against the red avalanche, driven more and more
by the Communists. One National Socialist against five hundred or even
a thousand citizens, that is how it always is there!"
"After I had spoken about twenty minutes, a worker jumped up on a
table and called upon the "comrades" to leave the meeting of the
"Fascist band." Several dozen start singing the "Internationale" and
we have no choice but to overpower the growling of the comrades with
"Deutschland, Deutschland über alles." Another several hundred leave
the hall. The singing quieted down and peace was slowly restored. I
spoke to several hundred people at the end, all that were left of the
more than a thousand who were there to start."
"For years now we speakers have been traveling through every Gau in
Germany. I speak primarily in Saxony, Brandenburg, Hessen-Nassau and
in the West. We see that even red Saxony is streaming more and more to
National Socialism. The meetings are difficult, but always
successful."
"For how long? When would this hard battle end? When would more
Germans wake up? When would hundreds of thousands finally be ready to
march into battle behind the banner of National Socialism?! - None of
us thinks about the "when." Forward! - Only forward! Each heart won
over is a victory! The day will come...!"
B'in'yamin C'r'amer
<turan*@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:i0k2p31mdtgqaqti2...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:08:39 +1000, "B'in'yamin C'r'amer"
> <hebes...@best.com> wrote:
>
>
>>> "what to you" ?
>>
>>Be careful, jew cunt. I've left your grammatical FUBARs alone so far.
>
> who was talking about grammar?
Grammar, spelling, English fuckups - the lot. I've left them alone.
Do you get it yet, you semantic, pedantic little jew cunt?
tur...@shaw.ca
<hebes...@best.com> wrote:
>
><turan*@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>news:i0k2p31mdtgqaqti2...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:08:39 +1000, "B'in'yamin C'r'amer"
>> <hebes...@best.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> "what to you" ?
>>>
>>>Be careful, jew cunt. I've left your grammatical FUBARs alone so far.
>>
>> who was talking about grammar?
>
>Grammar, spelling, English fuckups - the lot. I've left them alone.
>
>Do you get it yet, you semantic, pedantic little jew cunt?
yeah i get it ol' boy
you fell off the volkswagen again
i was not having fun with your "Grammar, spelling, English fuckups -
the lot. I've left them alone" too
Kurt Knoll
what you are posting here. Cheating deceiving and twisting fact is their way
of life.
Kurt Knoll.
"Topaz" <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:v7n2p3hrggvl5eouu...@4ax.com...
Its all a bit strange
news:yb8kj.55041$vt2....@bignews8.bellsouth.net:
>
> "Michael Ejercito" <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3812079d-19bb-4444-9eb6-
6a446d...@k2g2000hse.googleg
> roups.com...
>> On Jan 17, 7:11 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big
>>> lies. The
>>> Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed
>>> that Hitler was in favor of big lies. This was in itself
>>> a big lie and proof that Hitler was right. Here is what
>>> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in context:
>> Hitler was indeed a big liar.
> NOBODY CAN BEEAT GEORGE BUSH IN THAT AREA OF ENDEVOUR
>>
>> Michael
>
>
You're lies come a close second
--
Like Minded Mates
Reading from Mein Kampf
Snuggling by the fire
He shares his deepest thoughts
Holding him close
My Aryan warrior
A warm bath
Then the lights go out
Ben Cramer
Copyright ©2007 Ben Cramer
B'in'yamin C'r'amer
<turan*@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:mqt2p310geug7im1a...@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:09:58 +1000, "B'in'yamin C'r'amer"
> <hebes...@best.com> wrote:
>
>>
>><turan*@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>>news:i0k2p31mdtgqaqti2...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:08:39 +1000, "B'in'yamin C'r'amer"
>>> <hebes...@best.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>> "what to you" ?
>>>>
>>>>Be careful, jew cunt. I've left your grammatical FUBARs alone so far.
>>>
>>> who was talking about grammar?
>>
>>Grammar, spelling, English fuckups - the lot. I've left them alone.
>>
>>Do you get it yet, you semantic, pedantic little jew cunt?
>
> yeah i get it ol' boy
Splendid.
Mirelle
> Insults are the refuge of the fearful and devious.
Hey, that's my line.
Are you delusional in thinking that I am a 'sock puppet' of Ben
Cramer?
> -and-
> I don't do "name-calling" childish fat slag.
Hey, if the description is accurate, then it is not an insult, fat,
jew slag.
> -Ben Cramer
Mirelle
> B'in'yamin C'r'amer wrote:
>
> > <tur...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> >news:vfh2p310vbv94i56h...@4ax.com...
> >> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:02:07 +1000, "B'in'yamin C'r'amer"
> >> <hebesRtu...@best.com> wrote:
>
> >>> <tur...@shaw.ca> wrote in message
Protagonist
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 04:02:34 -0800, Protagonist <sza...@comcast.net>
> wrote:
>
>> That was your habit to skip schools, to sniff glue at the Communist
>> Youth meetings, Comrade TuRuszki.
>
> so how come that you're so stupid and undereducated?
>
compare to you, I'm a professor of all things.
> what are *you* smoking?
>
>> Saved Hungary to become permanent part of the Soviet Union!
>
> there was never such plan because lenin opposed such
Best, when there is no plan! Ruszkies just suck you in!
>
> further the soviet union had more than enough problems to deal with,
> thus couldn't be involved in hungary at all
That's why the Communist revolt was useless, right from the start!
>
> what a hell are you talking about?
>
>> Hell of a marriage!
>
> you can say that again, but it was fitting for horthy for sure
>
> after all, he was a servile arse licker in all his life
Not much choice, eh!
Now you liking the balls of Canyada!
>
>>>> Kun Bela Da Jewish communist leader, who lead the socialist revolution
>>>> in Hungary, was executed by Stalin, in 1932.
>>> so, what does that has to do with this, scatterbrain?
>> Just an example
>
> but what does it have to do with, scatterbrain?
>
>> for the Jewish communist brother hood, for idiots like you.
>
> say, the jews run the soviet union, or not?
60% of the government was Jewish!
Not by accident, after WW2, Soviets put a Jew, Rakosi and his cronies
for the government of Hungary, idiot.
JS
B'in'yamin C'r'amer
"Mirelle" <mirelle...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:880510f2-fe6e-4c06...@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 18, 6:24 pm, Sara Salzman <catam...@concentric.net> wrote:
> Insults are the refuge of the fearful and devious.
>Hey, that's my line.
>Are you delusional in thinking that I am a 'sock puppet' of Ben
>Cramer?
C'mon Mirelle. If the fat slag said it, it is so. She doesn't lie, yanno.
She's said so.
> -and-
> I don't do "name-calling" childish fat slag.
>Hey, if the description is accurate, then it is not an insult, fat,
>jew slag.
Couldn't have said it better myself, you old sock-puppet you ;-)
That should get ole fatso into a body-wobble.
Wolfgang Kieckbusch
the Village Idiot of Kitimat, Canada
Werner Knoll,
the Village Idiot of Vancouver, Canada
Wolfgang Kieckbusch, Germany
tur...@shaw.ca
wrote:
>Not by accident, after WW2, Soviets put a Jew, Rakosi and his cronies
>for the government of Hungary, idiot.
because the mushiks were too stupid, most of them couldn't even write
just look at yourself
Kurt Knoll
Kurt Knoll.
"Wolfgang Kieckbusch" <kieck...@web.de> wrote in message
news:fa9681cb-222f-4fd2...@s13g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
ElParedon
ElParedon
Topaz you are absolutely correct. I have few friends who worked in Germany,
my uncle spent 4 years in Sachsenhausen (he was an officer) putting together
hermes typewriters. When Germans starved he starved also. I hope Germany
wakes up and does not give another bent cent to the Jewish bloodsuckers.
ElParedon
Michael Ejercito
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3812079d-19bb-4444...@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...> On Jan 17, 7:11 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
> >> Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was
> >> in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that
> >> Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
> >> context:
> > Hitler was indeed a big liar.
>
Michael
Kenneth McVay OBC
The Intellectual Leader of Holocaust Revisionism,
Kurt Knoll, the reigning Village Idiot of Kitimat,
<kkn...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>You sound like a record is this the only sentence you can write in English.
That puts him one ahead of you, Leading Revisionist Moron Kurt Knoll.
33 Statements Qualifying Kurt Knoll as the Intellectual Giant
of Holocaust Denial:
http://www.nizkor.org/hweb/people/k/knoll-kurt/
--
"Fritz is making of himself the Brittany Spears of the
revisionist world..." (Bradley Smith of Friedrich Paul
Berg, Leading Revisionist Scholars both, on Bradley
Smith's Mailing List, Jan. 18, 2008)
Topaz
When I said the Herr Hitler's action was right and inevitable, the
storm of abuse that was about to bust on me was suddenly checked by
Mr. Lloyd George saying exactly the same thing. It is inconceivable
that a single vote should be cast against him."
David Lloyd George, Daily Express 17.9.1936:
I have never met a happier people than the Germans and Hitler is one
of the greatest men. The old trust him; the young idolize him. It is
the worship of a national hero who has saved his country.
Hans Grimm:
I witness with awe and admiration, that he, as nearly the first in
the world, caused multitudes without force or any personal benefits to
follow him of their own free will and volition.
The Observer, John L. Garvin:
I have talked to the humblest type of laborers, with merchants,
professional men. I have yet to discover a single dissenting voice to
the question of loyalty to the Fuehrer.
John F Kennedy, U.S President, Prelude to Leadership, The European
Diary of JF Kennedy, Summer, 1945:
After visiting these two places (the town of Berchtesgaden and
Odersalzberg) you can easily understand how that within a few years
Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of
the most significant figures who ever lived. He had in him the stuff
of which legends are made.
Topaz
The National Socialists made a movie called "The Eternal Jew". Anyone
can see their movie and see that one of the main reasons they were
against the Jews was because the Jews were promoting homosexual
perversion in the media. Here is an article they made about the movie:
"The self-portrait Jewry offered the world was disgusting from the
beginning. All that is overshadowed by the powerful examples in this
new and most valuable film, The Eternal Jew. This film with its
persuasive power must be shown everywhere where anti-Semitism is still
questioned. No one will will fail to shudder at the sneaking servility
and dirty bartering of the Jews when they start out, at the perfidy,
insidiousness and vulgarity of their methods, at the brutality and
all-devouring hatred they exhibit when they reach their goal and
control finance.
The most revolting scenes show Jewish slaughtering methods. These
customs, which cast a particularly vivid spotlight on the so-called
Jewish religion, are so terrible that it is hard to watch the film as
the grinning Jewish butchers carry out their work. It is illuminating
to see how stubbornly Jewry holds to its method of slaughter and with
which casuistry it defends it against the horror of the civilized
world. Rarely will people feel more horror than which watching the
desperate and horrible death struggle of the slaughtered animals. Long
before the seizure of power, the NSDAP fought against Jewish
slaughter. National Socialist representatives in parliament repeatedly
introduced legislation to abolish this form of animal torture through
a ban on Jewish slaughter. Such proposals were always rejected, since
the entire Jewish and Jewish-influenced press ran long articles
against them and the so-called German parties refused to support
National Socialism in its battle against this evil.
Not only in this regard, but in other areas too we are reminded with a
shudder of what once was reality in Germany: the power of the Jews in
the economy, finance, culture, theater, film, publishing, press,
radio, education and politics. All these Jewish leaders of the Weimar
era had their home or their origin in the filthy ghettos of the East.
One has a deep sense of salvation after seeing this film. We have
broken their power over us. We are the initiators of the fight against
world Jewry, which now directs its hate, its brutal greed and
destructive will toward us. We must win this battle for ourselves, for
Europe, for the world. This film will be a valuable tool in that
struggle."
B'in'yamin C'r'amer
<turan*@shaw.ca> wrote in message
news:68i3p31kj181jog29...@4ax.com...
Dear, oh dear, oh dear. You just make it up as you go along, don't you.
>
ElParedon
BUSH AND HIS JEWS HAVE LED USA INTO AN UNWINNABLE WAR WHICH HAS COST
MILLIONS IF IRAQI LIVES AND MANY THOUSANDS OF AMERICAN LIVES, AND HAS
BUNKRUPTED THIS COUNTRY COMPLETELY!
Joe Bruno
wrote:
> "Caduceus" <k...@fusemail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:9cnro3tu4uiui6a0c...@4ax.com...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:44:30 +1000, "B'iny'amin C'r'amer"
> > <hebess...@atalltymes.com> wrote:
>
> >>"Joe Bruno" <jbr...@indystart.com> wrote in message
> >>news:0c725cda-6c42-428c...@u10g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
>
> >>> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> >>> From: Joe <jbr...@indystart.com>
> >>> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:35:42 -0700
> >>> Local: Mon, Jun 4 2007 3:35 pm
> >>> Subject: Hitler on "The Big Lie"
> >>> Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original |
> >>> Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this author
> >>> Topaz tells us repeatedly:
>
> >>> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
> >>> Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler
> >>> was
> >>> in favor of big lies.
>
>
> >>So? You cunts keep on with the biggest lie of all, b'luto. "God gave it
> >>to
> >>us." That's a bloody pearler.
>
> > Fuck Off you child abusing father.
>
> Methinks you've got the wrong bloke, stevie babes.
>
You're not a bloke. You're a joke.
Joe Bruno
> Joe Bruno wrote:
>
> > Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
> > From: Joe <jbr...@indystart.com>
> > Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:35:42 -0700
> > Local: Mon, Jun 4 2007 3:35 pm
> > Subject: Hitler on "The Big Lie"
> > Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show original |
> > Remove | Report this message | Find messages by this author
> > Topaz tells us repeatedly:
>
> > Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
> > Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler
> > was
> > in favor of big lies.
>
> > Well, he invaded Holland after guaranteeing her neutrality:
>
>
> > He invaded the USSR after signing a non-aggression pact with Stalin:
>
> >http://www.faits-et-documents.com/bilan_communisme/nonaggression_pact...
>
> > He swindled the German people out of money for Volkswagens that were
> > never delievered and the money was never refunded:
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/227aca7bb5d9e4d0
>
> > He betrayed the Catholic Church after signing a treaty with the
> > Vatican:
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/17ff769f77793d6c
>
> > He perpetuated the Gleiwitz Fraud
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/a433c8ef6fc338fd
>
> > He repeatedly assured the world that he wanted peace, despite the
> > fact
> > that he invaded every country in Continental Europe with the
> > exception
> > of Spain, Sweden, and Switzerland. He also invaded North Africa.:
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/195ba1673076f9e4
>
> He was forced to sign treaties and treaties are meant to be broken, fag
> Bruno!
> Don't forget Versaille!
When the Versailles Treaty was signed, Adolph Hitler had not even
entered politics yet.
Versailles was the treaty that ended WWI.
Crawl away, little worm.
snow
Yet there are weapon manufacturers. contractors, suppliers and many
others that made lots of money from this war.
B'in'yamin C'r'amer
But I am, lying b'luto.
Another lie from Joe Bruno.
Joe Bruno
wrote:
> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3812079d-19bb-4444...@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Jan 17, 7:11 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler was
> >> Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
> >> context:
> > Hitler was indeed a big liar.
>
Much less so than you.
Joe Bruno
wrote:
> <dshar...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:ef80cfc6-afa5-4083...@p69g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
>
> Fuck orf, slime.
WOW! You really put her in her place! ROTFL!
B'in'yamin C'r'amer
"ElParedon" <ser...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:ddzkj.69515$rc2....@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
Agreed, apart from the first few words.
It was the jews and their Bush who led the US into the kaka.
>
>
Joe Bruno
> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:08:39 +1000, "B'in'yamin C'r'amer"
>
> <hebesRtu...@best.com> wrote:
> >> "what to you" ?
>
> >Be careful, jew cunt. I've left your grammatical FUBARs alone so far.
>
>
> english
>
> but while doing so, i must also say that i could spell the shit out of
> you on a better day, and on a worst day i just don't give a crap
>
> i also speak four languages besides some english, so your grammar
> should be better than mine
It isn't. Ben Crapper is the untitled king of the incomplete sentence.
B'in'yamin C'r'amer
Thank you, b'luto.
Sara Salzman
--
Insults are the refuge of the fearful and devious.
-and-
I don't do "name-calling" childish fat slag.
-Ben Cramer
B'in'yamin C'r'amer
Not that you've ever been able to prove, whining, lying, b'luto.
Its all a bit strange
news:3pOdnZ5sh4P_6w_a...@giganews.com:
Nope, that's a denier thing. History isn't very kind to
deniers.
--
Like Minded Mates
Reading from Mein Kampf
Snuggling by the fire
He shares his deepest thoughts
Holding him close
My Aryan warrior
A warm bath
Then the lights go out
Ben Cramer
Copyright ©2007 Ben Cramer
Its all a bit strange
>
> <turan*@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:jms1p3166tl9odrme...@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:26:07 -0800 (PST), Michael Ejercito
>> <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>On Jan 17, 7:11 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big
>>>> lies. The
>>>> Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed
>>>> that Hitler was in favor of big lies. This was in itself
>>>> a big lie and proof that Hitler was right. Here is what
>>>> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in context:
>>> Hitler was indeed a big liar.
>>
>> and a cheat too
>
> Really? Upon what to you base this totally fact free,
> unsubstantiated allegation, jew cunt?
>
>
>
>>
>
"Upon what to you...?"
Its all a bit strange
>
> <turan*@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:vfh2p310vbv94i56h...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 10:02:07 +1000, "B'in'yamin C'r'amer"
>> <hebes...@best.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>><turan*@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>>>news:jms1p3166tl9odrme...@4ax.com...
>>>> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 10:26:07 -0800 (PST), Michael
>>>> Ejercito <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Jan 17, 7:11 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell
>>>>>> big lies. The
>>>>>> Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed
>>>>>> that Hitler was in favor of big lies. This was in
>>>>>> itself a big lie and proof that Hitler was right. Here
>>>>>> is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in context:
>>>>> Hitler was indeed a big liar.
>>>>
>>>> and a cheat too
>>>
>>>Really? Upon what to you base this totally fact free,
>>>unsubstantiated allegation, jew cunt?
>>
>> "what to you" ?
>
> Be careful, jew cunt. I've left your grammatical FUBARs
> alone so far.
>>
>> now you're picking up kurt's accent?
>>
>> the "allegations" are substantiated and supporting data is
>> widely available
>
> That should be "date "are"" jew cunt.
>
>
>
>
Cramer cant help it, its his perfection as a grammmarian and
spellor thats too blame. When asked about it, he often
replies' that its because of his faim as a professional
sailer that hes a little wobbly in between his ears.
Its all a bit strange
>
> <turan*@shaw.ca> wrote in message
> news:i0k2p31mdtgqaqti2...@4ax.com...
>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:08:39 +1000, "B'in'yamin C'r'amer"
>> <hebes...@best.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> "what to you" ?
>>>
>>>Be careful, jew cunt. I've left your grammatical FUBARs
>>>alone so far.
>>
>> who was talking about grammar?
>
> Grammar, spelling, English fuckups - the lot. I've left
> them alone.
>
> Do you get it yet, you semantic, pedantic little jew cunt?
Yes, in a flame-war about spelling and grammar, you'd come in
a distant third after kurt
Cramer cant help it, its his perfection as a grammmarian and
spellor thats too blame. When asked about it, he often
replies' that its because of his faim as a professional
sailer that hes a little wobbly in between his ears.
>
>>
>> okay if you want it, i confess to you, i'm not a native
>> speaker of english
>>
>> but while doing so, i must also say that i could spell the
>> shit out of you on a better day, and on a worst day i just
>> don't give a crap
>>
>> i also speak four languages besides some english, so your
>> grammar should be better than mine
>>
>> neither am i who tries to be a grade school teacher here,
>> so what's your point with this?
>>
>>>> now you're picking up kurt's accent?
>>>>
>>>> the "allegations" are substantiated and supporting data
>>>> is widely available
>>>
>>>That should be "date "are"" jew cunt.
>>
>> perhaps in oz
>>
>> where i'm writing from "data" has no plural
>>
>> it's much the same like "information"
Its all a bit strange
>
> <dsha...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ef80cfc6-afa5-4083-a636-
656202...@p69g2000hsa.google
> groups.com...
>
> Fuck orf, slime.
>
>
yiiiiiiiiiiiikkkkkkkkkkkkkkeeeeeeeeeeeeeessssssssssss!!!!
Its all a bit strange
news:3hi4p3dfnfd2buspd...@4ax.com:
>
> The National Socialists made a movie called "The Eternal
> Jew".
B'in'yamin C'r'amer
"Sara Salzman" <cata...@concentric.net> wrote in message
news:eN2dnVPGKN2CWg_a...@giganews.com...
When do you cease with your childish nonsense and lies, fat slag?
The salzman slut is in complete meltdown.
Im koos eich haya kol kach gadol k'mo pe eich, at yechola likabel sus.
Its all a bit strange
news:Sozkj.4227$jJ5...@newssvr11.news.prodigy.net:
> ElParedon wrote:
>> "Michael Ejercito" <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:27bc2a9c-03c1-4030-bc67-531592c5bac1
@z17g2000hsg.googl
>> egroups.com...
>>> On Jan 18, 12:43 pm, "ElParedon" <ser...@bellsouth.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>>> message
>>>>
>>>> news:3812079d-19bb-4444-9eb6-
6a446d...@k2g2000hse.goog
>>>> legroups.com...> On Jan 17, 7:11 pm, Topaz
>>>> <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell
>>>>>> big lies. The
>>>>>> Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed
>>>>>> that Hitler was in favor of big lies. This was in
>>>>>> itself a big lie and proof that Hitler was right. Here
>>>>>> is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in context:
>>>>> Hitler was indeed a big liar.
>>>> NOBODY CAN BEEAT GEORGE BUSH IN THAT AREA OF ENDEVOUR
>>
>> BUSH AND HIS JEWS HAVE LED USA INTO AN UNWINNABLE WAR
>> WHICH HAS COST MILLIONS IF IRAQI LIVES AND MANY THOUSANDS
>> OF AMERICAN LIVES, AND HAS BUNKRUPTED THIS COUNTRY
>> COMPLETELY!
>>
>>
>
> Yet there are weapon manufacturers. contractors, suppliers
> and many others that made lots of money from this war.
>
You sick asshat, making money off of the suffering of others.
B'in'yamin C'r'amer
This, from the poor old fart who can't comprehend anything with more than
two syllables.
Go and polish your armour, joey. Do something useful.
Its all a bit strange
news:9JOdnd37q6B-oAza...@giganews.com:
>
> "Michael Ejercito" <meje...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3812079d-19bb-4444-9eb6-
6a446d...@k2g2000hse.googleg
> roups.com...
>> On Jan 17, 7:11 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big
>>> lies. The
>>> Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed
>>> that Hitler was in favor of big lies. This was in itself
>>> a big lie and proof that Hitler was right. Here is what
>>> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in context:
>> Hitler was indeed a big liar.
>
> Less so than any other politician I can name, greaser.
>
>
What an interesting way to admit your ignorance.
Its all a bit strange
news:V9ydnXZ3cLPDXg_a...@giganews.com:
>
> "Joe Bruno" <jbr...@indystart.com> wrote in message
> news:f1d55a1d-3ba6-4ac8-acdd-541b08799712
@s19g2000prg.google
> groups.com... On Jan 16, 5:26 am, "B'iny'amin C'r'amer"
> <hebess...@atalltymes.com> wrote:
>> "Caduceus" <k...@fusemail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:9cnro3tu4uiui6a0c...@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 21:44:30 +1000, "B'iny'amin
>> > C'r'amer" <hebess...@atalltymes.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>"Joe Bruno" <jbr...@indystart.com> wrote in message
>> >>news:0c725cda-6c42-428c-afd0-733b53dacb35
@u10g2000prn.goo
>> >>glegroups.com...
>>
>> >>> Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>> >>> From: Joe <jbr...@indystart.com>
>> >>> Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 16:35:42 -0700
>> >>> Local: Mon, Jun 4 2007 3:35 pm
>> >>> Subject: Hitler on "The Big Lie"
>> >>> Reply to author | Forward | Print | View thread | Show
>> >>> original | Remove | Report this message | Find
>> >>> messages by this author Topaz tells us repeatedly:
>>
>> >>> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big
>> >>> lies. The Jewish media took his words out of context
>> >>> and claimed that Hitler was
>> >>> in favor of big lies.
>>
>> >>> Well, he invaded Holland after guaranteeing her
>> >>> neutrality:
>>
>> >>So? You cunts keep on with the biggest lie of all,
>> >>b'luto. "God gave it to
>> >>us." That's a bloody pearler.
>>
>> > Fuck Off you child abusing father.
>>
>> Methinks you've got the wrong bloke, stevie babes.
>>
>
>
>>You're not a bloke.
>
> But I am, lying b'luto.
you put in an extra comma.
>
> Another lie from Joe Bruno.
>
>
--
Concerned Aussies
B'in'yamin C'r'amer <hebes...@best.com> wrote:
>
Hello again, "mr. Cramer".
So what about your son's death?
The death for which you share a large portion of
the responsibility?
Does it haunt you in the dead of the night, "mr. Cramer"?
In your sick, twisted mind, do you still accuse "Jews"
for that, "mr. Cramer"? Does it help to make your life bearable,
"mr. Cramer"?
Michael Ejercito
wrote:
> "ElParedon" <ser...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>
> news:ddzkj.69515$rc2....@bignews1.bellsouth.net...
>
>
>
>
>
> >news:27bc2a9c-03c1-4030...@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
> >> On Jan 18, 12:43 pm, "ElParedon" <ser...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>> "Michael Ejercito" <mejer...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >>>news:3812079d-19bb-4444...@k2g2000hse.googlegroups.com...>
> >>> On Jan 17, 7:11 pm, Topaz <mars1...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf that the Jews tell big lies. The
> >>> >> Jewish media took his words out of context and claimed that Hitler
> >>> >> was
> >>> >> in favor of big lies. This was in itself a big lie and proof that
> >>> >> Hitler was right. Here is what Hitler wrote in Mein Kampf and in
> >>> >> context:
> >>> > Hitler was indeed a big liar.
>
> >>> NOBODY CAN BEEAT GEORGE BUSH IN THAT AREA OF ENDEVOUR
>
> > BUSH AND HIS JEWS HAVE LED USA INTO AN UNWINNABLE WAR WHICH HAS COST
> > MILLIONS IF IRAQI LIVES AND MANY THOUSANDS OF AMERICAN LIVES, AND HAS
> > BUNKRUPTED THIS COUNTRY COMPLETELY!
>
> Agreed, apart from the first few words.
>
> It was the jews and their Bush who led the US into the kaka.
>
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> Here are some quotes from the book "Kampfzeit", (period of
> struggle), by Hans Hinkel:
>
> "Faster than lightening a lie about us spread throughout the country,
> spread in every attic room where poor people lived by newspapers owned
> or obedient to the opponent. It took a week of work by us National
> Socialists to deal with a three-line lie in an opposing newspaper. As
> soon as one lie was dealt with, a hundred more sprang up. Like a
> hydra, the opponent's horror stories about National Socialism and its
> supporters spread. There was not a speech by the Führer or his
> associates that was not immediately twisted and tastefully served up
> to the gullible Michael at breakfast or dinner. Adolf Hitler had "spat
> out the communion wafer." Hermann Göring was smuggling opium or
> morphine. Robert Ley has "lost a 'v'" in his name Pastor Münchmeyer
> was guilty of "moral crimes" in Borkum. We often would have laughed
> had we not hourly learned the amazing gullibility of millions of
> German citizens who were trapped in the enemy's web of lies. The only
> answer was for everyone to set to work with the people, going
> everywhere to fight, speak and educate. Sooner or later the opponent
> would have to face us and be revealed as a liar to the public."
> "The city was like an upset anthill on that cold winter night. Roland
> Freisler ran out from the chattering council meeting and went with us
> to the nearby Friedrich Square where we spoke with the starving
> masses. We forgot the middle class niceties! We had to stop Moscow
> from winning over these citizens driven crazy by hunger, making them
> wiling subjects of the insane ideas of Bolshevism"
> "Only a few weeks later, I needed an escort to leave or return to my
> apartment. Several loyal S.A. men had to be with me all the time,
> since Communist unemployed men, unscrupulously incited against us
> National Socialists, wanted to attack me now that they knew who I was.
> Every day I joined the unemployed who demonstrated in the large
> courtyard of the labor office on Giesberg Street. More than once I had
> to be met by party members at the Kassel train station to protect me
> from lurking Communist terror troops. It was the same or worse for all
> of our prominent Kassel party members and S.A. men, just as for the
> storm troops of our movement who risked their lives every day and
> every hour in every city and every village of Germany. The enemy
> naturally was particularly after us speakers. According to the law, we
> had to be unarmed. We would have been in deep trouble if a body search
> had found a weapon! A nail file was thought to be a weapon. Later even
> a party badge, since it had a long needle!"
> "The attempts of our party comrades to hold a National Socialist
> meeting failed a half dozen times or more. Most meetings were made
> impossible by the thousand-fold numerical superiority of the opponent,
> or else broken up before they could finish. Our protective service
> -every party member in each local group belongs - is still too weak in
> most areas to stand up against the red avalanche, driven more and more
> by the Communists. One National Socialist against five hundred or even
> a thousand citizens, that is how it always is there!"
> "After I had spoken about twenty minutes, a worker jumped up on a
> table and called upon the "comrades" to leave the meeting of the
> "Fascist band." Several dozen start singing the "Internationale" and
> we have no choice but to overpower the growling of the comrades with
> "Deutschland, Deutschland über alles." Another several hundred leave
> the hall. The singing quieted down and peace was slowly restored. I
> spoke to several hundred people at the end, all that were left of the
> more than a thousand who were there to start."
> "For years now we speakers have been traveling through every Gau in
> Germany. I speak primarily in Saxony, Brandenburg, Hessen-Nassau and
> in the West. We see that even red Saxony is streaming more and more to
> National Socialism. The meetings are difficult, but always
> successful."
> "For how long? When would this hard battle end? When would more
> Germans wake up? When would hundreds of thousands finally be ready to
> march into battle behind the banner of National Socialism?! - None of
> us thinks about the "when." Forward! - Only forward! Each heart won
> over is a victory! The day will come...!"
>
Gee, I wonder whatever became of the National Socialists...
Michael
Michael Ejercito
> The National Socialists made a movie called "The Eternal Jew". Anyone
> can see their movie and see that one of the main reasons they were
> against the Jews was because the Jews were promoting homosexual
> perversion in the media. Here is an article they made about the movie:
>
Leviticus 20:13
What faith is that snippet of Scripture from?
Michael
Protagonist
> "B'in'yamin C'r'amer" <hebes...@best.com> wrote in
> news:3pOdnZ5sh4P_6w_a...@giganews.com:
>
>> <turan*@shaw.ca> wrote in message
>> news:68i3p31kj181jog29...@4ax.com...
>>> On Sat, 19 Jan 2008 01:28:45 -0800, Protagonist
>>> <sza...@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Not by accident, after WW2, Soviets put a Jew, Rakosi and
>>>> his cronies for the government of Hungary, idiot.
>>> because the mushiks were too stupid, most of them couldn't
>>> even write
>>>
>>> just look at yourself
>> Dear, oh dear, oh dear. You just make it up as you go
>> along, don't you.
>>
>>
>>
>
> Nope, that's a denier thing. History isn't very kind to
> deniers.
>
Like the 4 million death at Auschwitz lie for 45 years?
Blaming the Germans for the Katyin forest massacre till the 90's?
Rakosi was a bloody Jew and his hole government, put in power by the
Soviets.
So deniers just make up things, blind man?
Facts are facts!
JS
Topaz
The National Socialists made a movie called "The Eternal Jew". Anyone
can see their movie and see that one of the main reasons they were
against the Jews was because the Jews were promoting homosexual
perversion in the media. Here is an article they made about the movie:
"The self-portrait Jewry offered the world was disgusting from the
beginning. All that is overshadowed by the powerful examples in this
new and most valuable film, The Eternal Jew. This film with its
persuasive power must be shown everywhere where anti-Semitism is still
questioned. No one will will fail to shudder at the sneaking servility
and dirty bartering of the Jews when they start out, at the perfidy,
insidiousness and vulgarity of their methods, at the brutality and
all-devouring hatred they exhibit when they reach their goal and
control finance.
The most revolting scenes show Jewish slaughtering methods. These
customs, which cast a particularly vivid spotlight on the so-called
Jewish religion, are so terrible that it is hard to watch the film as
the grinning Jewish butchers carry out their work. It is illuminating
to see how stubbornly Jewry holds to its method of slaughter and with
which casuistry it defends it against the horror of the civilized
world. Rarely will people feel more horror than which watching the
desperate and horrible death struggle of the slaughtered animals. Long
before the seizure of power, the NSDAP fought against Jewish
slaughter. National Socialist representatives in parliament repeatedly
introduced legislation to abolish this form of animal torture through
a ban on Jewish slaughter. Such proposals were always rejected, since
the entire Jewish and Jewish-influenced press ran long articles
against them and the so-called German parties refused to support
National Socialism in its battle against this evil.
Not only in this regard, but in other areas too we are reminded with a
shudder of what once was reality in Germany: the power of the Jews in
the economy, finance, culture, theater, film, publishing, press,
radio, education and politics. All these Jewish leaders of the Weimar
era had their home or their origin in the filthy ghettos of the East.
One has a deep sense of salvation after seeing this film. We have
broken their power over us. We are the initiators of the fight against
world Jewry, which now directs its hate, its brutal greed and
destructive will toward us. We must win this battle for ourselves, for
Europe, for the world. This film will be a valuable tool in that
struggle."
http://www.ihr.org/ http://www.natvan.com