Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Kook fight thread.

0 views
Skip to first unread message

guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 12, 2008, 10:58:10 PM10/12/08
to
Linda, is it possible that you keep your rage in check to one thread
please?

> Why did you lie to me about the change in your belief when Mark T
> convinced you the Messiah was not God incarnate and you were thanking
> him 'for what he would know'?

Mark Tindall has never convinced me of anything, I was thanking him
for not being rude.

> Rhetorical question. You LIED because
> you wanted to make it appear that I and Qadosh supported your new
> false teachings, the same reason you falsified that post from Qadosh
> today in the Signs and Seals in Revelation thread, trying to make it
> look as if he ADMIRED you. LOL. Qadosh was always suspicious of your
> false compliments and manipulations.

I credit the man to at least being honest to what he believes and
respect that… on with your confession please..

> And I only put up with your annoying personality as long as I have
> because I thought you believed in the Messiah and had been made aware
> Paul was a false apostle, but it turns out you jumped on that
> information because you were never a believer or follower of Yahashua`
> the Messiah, God incarnate; you came here with the intention of
> harassing Christians and thought I would help you because I reject
> Paul.

I am still a follower of Yehoshua and all the others in scriptures,
it’s good to see you using at least one true name. I don’t argue
about the vowels because as you might now, Hebrew has no vowels.

> You're unstable, uneducated, and wholly ignorant of the entire
> Scriptures and the teachings of the Messiah.

You’re entitled to your opinion still Linda.

>You remind me a lot of
> Paul, as you're a lying, aggressive false prophet, and had allied
> yourself with believers for a short time, all the while deceiving
> them, and left because you were never of us.

I am a Messianic but you fail to recognize what this means because you
are still in the false religion and don’t know it. To say that Messiah
was part of יהוה Ěl Shaddai is true but his spirit never dies and is
much more than a man.

Psa 82:6 I, I said, “You are elohim, And all of you are sons of the
Most High.
Psa 82:7 “But as men you die, And fall as one of the heads.”
Psa 82:8 Arise, O Elohim, judge the earth, For You shall possess all
the nations.

I do not deny his being and realize that we are to worship one name.
Authority and a throne are given to his Messiah but worship and praise
go to ONE, our heavenly Father alone.

> You've joined yourself to
> Mark T's alleged beliefs for the same reason he claims to accept
> Yahweh, but rejects the belief that the Messiah was not God incarnate,
> solely to use that claim to harass believers and followers of the
> Messiah. You're no 'brother' and you're no prophet. You'll pay come
> Judgment Day.

You really need to learn what the prophets say my friend.

Isa 45:19 “I have not spoken in secret, in a dark place of the earth.
I have not said to the seed of Yaʽaqoḇ, ‘Seek Me in vain.’ I am יהוה,
speaking righteousness, declaring matters that are straight.
Isa 45:20 “Gather yourselves and come; draw near together, you who
have escaped from the gentiles. No knowledge have they who are lifting
up the wood of their carved image, and pray to a mighty one that does
not save.
Isa 45:21 “Declare and bring near, let them even take counsel
together. Who has announced this from of old? Who has declared it from
that time? Is it not I, יהוה? And there is no mighty one besides Me, a
righteous Ěl and a Saviour, there is none besides Me.
Isa 45:22 “Turn to Me and be saved, all you ends of the earth! For I
am Ěl, and there is none else.
Isa 45:23 “I have sworn by Myself, a word has gone out of My mouth in
righteousness, and shall not return, so that to Me every knee shall
bow, every tongue swear.
Isa 45:24 “One shall say, ‘Only in יהוה do I have righteousness and
strength’ – he comes to Him. And all those displeased with Him shall
be put to shame.
Isa 45:25 “In יהוה all the seed of Yisra’ĕl shall be declared right
and boast. ”

Isa 43:9 All the nations shall be assembled, and the peoples be
gathered. Who among them declares this, and show us former events? Let
them give their witnesses, to be declared right; or let them hear and
say, “It is truth.”
Isa 43:10 “You are My witnesses,” declares יהוה, “And My servant whom
I have chosen, so that you know and believe Me, and understand that I
am He. Before Me there was no Ěl formed, nor after Me there is none.
Isa 43:11 “I, I am יהוה, and besides Me there is no saviour.

Elohim is one and recently I was accused of denial of the Good News of
יהושע Messiah, the Son of Elohim. The majority of the world uses a
faulty translation of scriptures that fails to recognize the name of
EL. For whatever reason, the name of our heavenly Father is being
hidden from the majority of people. I don’t necessarily think this is
all just the works of man because of this passage:

Isa 45:15 Truly You are Ěl, who hide Yourself, O Elohim of Yisra’ĕl,
Saviour!

Because we have rejected his Torah and taught men the names of foreign
elohims the curses of Deuteronomy have been effecting civilizations on
a whole. Part of the problem is that we spend so much time reading
nothing but the Good News and we wrongly believe that Duet. 28 have
nothing to do with us. The scriptures are clear that there is one
Torah for all and this is where most people get tripped up is by
ignoring the Torah, the very foundation of understanding. Without a
proper foundation we are easily mislead into believing things and
taken to practices we shouldn’t. So that brings me to my current
issue... one that will definitely cause a stir.

Should we worship the Messiah?

In the KJV of scriptures a lot of evidence can be giving to easily
support this idea that we should worship the Messiah and that Jesus
Christ is God. The problem with this is that almost all modern
translations of scriptures have been meticulously altered to remove
the names of our Heavenly Father and his only begotten son. For
whatever reasons historically these names were removed and replaced
with titles and the name Iesos Christos.

We’re a stubborn people that want to think we are all right in the
knowledge we have held onto and the faith we have kept and I can
respect that a vast majority of people will never even consider the
fact that they have been deceived into false worship. At no point in
the New Testament does the Messiah tell others to worship his name, if
he did, he would be a false Messiah because scriptures are clear in
that we have one saviour and that’s our heavenly Father.

Mat 2:2 Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we
have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him.

Did men worship the Messiah as the KJV records?

Mat 4:10 Then יהושע said to him, “Go, Satan! For it has been written,
‘You shall worship יהוה your Elohim, and Him alone you shall serve.’ ”

No, he clearly didn’t want worship of himself and the KJV is a gross
mistranslation of what is written. Without any doubt he stated that
we are only to worship our heavenly Father. To believe that he
allowed worship of himself makes a liar out of יהוה Ěl Shaddai and a
false prophet out of יהושע Messiah! The job of the Messiah is to
establish the church of our heavenly Father!

Zec 6:12 and shall speak to him, saying, ‘Thus said יהוה of hosts,
saying, “See, the Man whose name is the Branch! And from His place He
shall branch out, and He shall build the Hĕḵal of יהוה. “

Now to be clear, יהושע Messiah was more than just a man or a prophet,
he was the anointed one of יהוה Ěl Shaddai and was the messenger that
appeared to men. The spirit of our heavenly Father was in him so he
was a part of our heavenly Father.

Joh 1:18 No one has ever seen Elohim.1 The only brought-forth Son, who
is in the bosom of the Father, He did declare.2 Footnotes: 1See 5:37,
6:46, 1 John 4:12. 2The pre-existent Son declared, and was the One who
appeared to men.

This verse in John is proof of my point!

Joh 5:31 If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true.

And this verse:
Joh 5:37 “And the Father who sent Me, He bore witness of Me. You have
neither heard His voice at any time, nor seen His form.

So, we have not seen the form or heard his voice... The Father sent
him to preach about the Father. He did not come in his own name and
if he had then his witness is NOT TRUE by his own words. This is
conclusive proof that the KJV translation is wrong when it states that
men worshipped him. Who did he tell you to believe?

Joh 5:46 “For if you believed Mosheh, you would have believed Me,
since he wrote about Me.

You should believe Moses, who spoke of him in the Torah. But because
many do not believe in Moses, they have fallen into a trap and
believed mistranslations of the many wrong versions of scriptures that
should read:

Mat 2:2 saying, “Where is He who has been born Sovereign of the
Yehuḏim? For we saw His star in the East and have come to do
reverence to Him.”

יהוה Ěl Shaddai is our SAVIOUR, just as all the prophets tell you,
over and over again but confusion is because people simply refuse to
give up wrong translations. The Messiah did not come in his own name
by his own words and told us only to worship יהוה Ěl Shaddai and
believe the Good News of יהושע Messiah!

Many who are wise in the Torah have come to reject the Jesus of the
New Testament because the Torah clearly states that we are only to
worship our heavenly Father... A dear girl that tried hard to get me
to understand her doubt (Debra) rejected the Messiah because of a bad
translation error.

Rev 14:12 Here is the endurance of the set-apart ones, here are those
guarding the commands of Elohim and the belief of יהושע.

The belief of our Messiah that we are to keep is that we are to
worship and pray to our Heavenly Father and guard the Ten Words of the
covenant. To be clear, The Messiah did die for the sins of many.

Mat 1:21 “And she shall give birth to a Son, and you shall call His
Name יהושע for He shall save1 His people from their sins.” Footnote:
1This is the precise meaning of the Heḇrew of His Name.

But we are saved by our heavenly Father’s compassion for us:

Act 2:21 ‘And it shall be that everyone who calls on the Name of יהוה
shall be saved.’

Act 4:12 “And there is no deliverance in anyone else, for there is no
other Name under the heaven given among men by which we need to be
saved.”

Deliverance to the Father is by Good News of יהושע Messiah, the Son of
Elohim.

Isa 66:5 Hear the Word of יהוה, you who tremble at His Word, “Your
brothers who hate you, who cast you out for My Name’s sake, said, ‘Let
יהוה be esteemed, so that we see your joy.’ But they are put to
shame.”


Did you make a difference in the world today?

Shalom,
*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

To be a man is... to be responsible. It is to feel shame at the sight
of what seems to be unmerited misery. It is to take pride in a victory
won by one's comrades. It is to feel, when setting one's stone, that
one is contributing to the building of the world.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery

http://groups.google.com/group/messianicYehoshua <-- join
http://www.isr-messianic.org/ <- download the scriptures free


Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 12, 2008, 11:21:04 PM10/12/08
to
On Oct 12, 10:58 pm, guardian Snow <mr_snow_pheo...@yahoo.com.au>
wrote:


You're a liar and a false teacher.

You are wholly in the dark, Snowjob/Dark Man, and there is no light in
you, which is why you feel free to ignore the Messiah's own words
explicitly stating he was the Father (John 14:9 - see below).

Look Snowjob/Dark Man, as long as you continue to deliberately ignore
scriptures that plainly show the Messiah was worshipped during his
incarnation and especially his statement saying explicitly he WAS the
Father incarnate, I have nothing more to say to you except perhaps to
point out what a double-minded, secretive, manipulative fraud and
hypocrite you are.

And since you explained your double-mindedness as 'growth', why don't
you do everyone a favor and finish 'growing' and read the Scriptures
and learn something before you begin preaching?

Are you drinking or what? Having a little nip and pretending to be a
prophet? What FUN.

Your mercurial nature and ignorance and contentiousness is making you
look more and more simply like a TROLL.

Here again, hypocrite, are the scriptures you choose to ignore. I can
post them endless times - if you would like them shoved down your
throat, keep posting your garbage to me.

Matt. 2:11 "And when they were come into the house, they saw the young
child with Mary his mother, and fell down, and WORSHIPPED him".

Matt. 9:18 "While he spake these things unto them, behold, there came
a certain ruler, and WORSHIPPED him, saying, My daughter is even now
dead: but come and lay thy hand upon her, and she shall live."

Matt. 8:2 "And, behold, there came a leper and WORSHIPPED him, saying,
Lord, if thou wilt, thou canst make me clean".

Matt. 28:9 "And as they went to tell his disciples, behold, Jesus met
them, saying, All hail. And they came and held him by the feet, and
WORSHIPPED him."

Matt. 14:33 "Then they that were in the ship came and WORSHIPPED him,
saying, Of a truth thou art the Son of God."
Claiming equality with God was the reason he was killed: In John 5:18
John says, "Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill him, because he
not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his
Father, making himself EQUAL with God."

John 14:9 "JESUS SAITH unto him, Have I been so long time with you,
and yet HAST THOU NOT KNOWN ME, Philip? HE THAT HATH SEEN ME HATH SEEN
THE FATHER; and how sayest thou then, Shew us the Father?"

The nic you sometimes use, "Dark Man", is a really appropriate nic for
you as you're filled with darkness, i.e. ignorance and evil. I don't
know whether you're a troll, or just double-minded, i.e. unstable, and
keep changing your beliefs, but I really don't care anymore.

Snowjob the hypocrite wrote: "Isn't it amazing how you put scriptures
right in front of there eyes and they still run around in denial? " -
from http://groups.google.com/group/alt.messianic/msg/ea943ac0940523ed
Description of Snowjob/"Dark Man":

James 1:6 "he that wavereth is like a wave of the sea driven with the
wind and tossed.
James 1:7 For let not that man think that he shall receive any thing
of the Lord.
James 1:8 A double minded man is unstable in all his ways".

.

guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 12, 2008, 11:35:57 PM10/12/08
to
On Oct 13, 2:21 pm, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
> On Oct 12, 10:58 pm, guardian Snow <mr_snow_pheo...@yahoo.com.au>
> wrote:
>
> You're a liar and a false teacher.
>
> You are wholly in the dark, Snowjob/Dark Man, and there is no light in
> you, which is why you feel free to ignore the Messiah's own words
> explicitly stating he was the Father (John 14:9 - see below).

Joh 14:9 יהושע said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and you
have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father, and
how do you say, ‘Show us the Father’?
Joh 14:10 “Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father
is in Me? The words that I speak to you I do not speak from Myself.
But the Father who stays in Me does His works.
Joh 14:11 “Believe Me that I am in the Father and the Father in Me,
otherwise believe Me because of the works themselves.

Maybe you didn't read my post.. I speak to the fact that the Father is
indeed in his anointed Messiah. Just as John says, the FATHER IS IN
HIM. He also says that he doesn't speak from "Myself" because his
words are given to him by the Father. To say that the Messiah is יהוה
Ěl Shaddai, fails to recognize how much MORE the the Father is. It's
like looking at your eyeball detached from your body and saying,
"That's Linda Lee".

Shalom,
*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

Grow we must, if we outgrow all that loves us.
Oliver Wendell Holmes

Mark T

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 1:21:42 AM10/13/08
to
"guardian Snow" <mr_snow...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

> Linda, is it possible that you keep your rage in check to one thread
> please?

That's why she is in my Bozo Bin.


>> You've joined yourself to
>> Mark T's alleged beliefs for the same reason he claims to accept
>> Yahweh, but rejects the belief that the Messiah was not God incarnate,
>> solely to use that claim to harass believers and followers of the
>> Messiah.

...


> You really need to learn what the prophets say my friend.

I'm willing to CHANGE IMMEDIATELY.

All anyone has to do is convince me that Jesus of Nazareth led the people of
Israel out of Egypt according to the following scripture ....

######################################
God spoke all these words, saying:

I the LORD am your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt, the house
of bondage: You shall have no other gods besides Me. You shall not make
yourself a sculptured image, or any likeness of what is in the heavens
above, or on earth below, or in the waters under the earth. You shall not
bow down to them or serve them. For I the LORD your God am an impassioned
God, visiting the guilt of the parents upon the children, upon the third and
upon the fourth generations of those who reject Me, but showing kindness to
the thousandth generation of those who love Me and keep MY commandments.

Exodus 20: 1 - 6 (JPS Tanakh)
#####################################

That shouldn't be to difficult to do IF Jesus of Nazareth really is God.

Waiting ................

--
MY SOUNDCLICK PAGE- download my original songs in mp3 format
http://www.soundclick.com/marktindall

FUNDY FUNHOUSE -
http://fundamentalistfunhouse.blogspot.com/
- a resource on the current Fundamentalist Dark Age and Christian
fundamentalism.

Mark T

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 1:26:33 AM10/13/08
to
"guardian Snow" <mr_snow...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

>> the Messiah's own words
>> explicitly stating he was the Father (John 14:9 - see below).

> Joh 14:9 ????? said to him, "Have I been with you so long, and you


> have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father,
> and how do you say, 'Show us the Father'?

...


> I speak to the fact that the Father is indeed in his anointed Messiah.


So do I. That is the MEANING of Messiah - a human anointed by God.

Of course, the other MAJOR problem with the quote is that it was NEVER
stated by Jesus of Nazareth. It is ONLY found in John's gospel which was
written 90 - 120 CE when the apostle John was dead.

Barry Ogrady

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 2:32:48 AM10/13/08
to
Mark T is the biggest bozo of all.

"Mark T" <snailmail@12oclockrock> wrote in message
news:48f2dae6$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...

> I'm willing to CHANGE IMMEDIATELY.

That's very good. Start my getting a liffe and not being agressive with your
false ideas.


Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 1:35:31 AM10/13/08
to
On Oct 12, 11:35 pm, guardian Snow <mr_snow_pheo...@yahoo.com.au>

wrote:
> On Oct 13, 2:21 pm, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > On Oct 12, 10:58 pm, guardian Snow <mr_snow_pheo...@yahoo.com.au>
> > wrote:
>
> > You're a liar and a false teacher.
>
> > You are wholly in the dark, Snowjob/Dark Man, and there is no light in
> > you, which is why you feel free to ignore the Messiah's own words
> > explicitly stating he was the Father (John 14:9 - see below).
>
> Joh 14:9 יהושע said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and you
> have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father, and
> how do you say, ‘Show us the Father’?
> Joh 14:10 “Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father
> is in Me? The words that I speak to you I do not speak from Myself.
> But the Father who stays in Me does His works.
> Joh 14:11 “Believe Me that I am in the Father and the Father in Me,
> otherwise believe Me because of the works themselves.
>
> Maybe you didn't read my post.. I speak to the fact that the Father is
> indeed in his anointed Messiah.  Just as John says, the FATHER IS IN
> HIM.

So now you're equating John to the Messiah. Disgusting.

> He also says that he doesn't speak from "Myself" because his
> words are given to him by the Father.  To say that the Messiah is יהוה
> Ěl Shaddai, fails to recognize how much MORE the the Father is.  It's
> like looking at your eyeball detached from your body and saying,
> "That's Linda Lee".


Your insistence on trying to convince me you are right on this
particular subject is infuriating.

I refuse to argue over or 'debate' whether or not God incarnated to
act as our only Saviour.

DON'T TELL PEOPLE YOUR MESSAGE IS "OUR MESSAGE" as you did a few days
ago when you KNEW I don't agree with you on this. YOUR MESSAGE IS
***NOT*** MY MESSAGE.

You are not comprehending the Messiah's words. Your endless confusion
is a big waste of time.

roy...@gmail.com

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 1:37:52 AM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 4:21 pm, "Mark T" <snailmail@12oclockrock> wrote:

> "guardian Snow" <mr_snow_pheo...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > Linda, is it possible that you keep your rage in check to one thread
> > please?
>
> That's why she is in my Bozo Bin.
>
>
>
> >> You've joined yourself to
> >> Mark T's alleged beliefs for the same reason he claims to accept
> >> Yahweh, but rejects the belief that the Messiah was not God incarnate,
> >> solely to use that claim to harass believers and followers of the
> >> Messiah.
> ...
> > You really need to learn what the prophets say my friend.
>
> I'm willing to CHANGE IMMEDIATELY.
>
> All anyone has to do is convince me that Jesus of Nazareth led the people of
> Israel out of Egypt according to the following scripture ....

Well;
Charlton Heston went from being Moses in The Ten Commandments,
to encountering Jesus while as Judah Ben Hur in Ben Hur,
to meeting Jesus again while as the Baptist in The Greatest Story Ever
Told,
to painting Jesus in The Agony And The Ecstasy as Michaelangelo,
and turned up as a cardinal in The Three Musketeers.

He didn't quite make it as Jesus. :-)

>
> ######################################
> God spoke all these words, saying:
>
> I the LORD am your God who brought you out of the land of Egypt, the house
> of bondage: You shall have no other gods besides Me. You shall not make
> yourself a sculptured image, or any likeness of what is in the heavens
> above, or on earth below, or in the waters under the earth. You shall not
> bow down to them or serve them. For I the LORD your God am an impassioned
> God, visiting the guilt of the parents upon the children, upon the third and
> upon the fourth generations of those who reject Me, but showing kindness to
> the thousandth generation of those who love Me and keep MY commandments.
>
> Exodus 20: 1 - 6 (JPS Tanakh)
> #####################################
>
> That shouldn't be to difficult to do IF Jesus of Nazareth really is God.
>
> Waiting ................
>
> --
> MY SOUNDCLICK PAGE- download my original songs in mp3 formathttp://www.soundclick.com/marktindall
>

> FUNDY FUNHOUSE -http://fundamentalistfunhouse.blogspot.com/

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 1:41:12 AM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 1:21 am, "Mark T" <snailmail@12oclockrock> wrote:

> "guardian Snow" <mr_snow_pheo...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:
> > Linda, is it possible that you keep your rage in check to one thread
> > please?
>
> That's why she is in my Bozo Bin.

What a liar you are; you announced the fact that you had 'plonked' me
when I proved you were lying about the links you provided allegedly
containing some reference to the original Ten Commandments omitting
the Commandment to observe the Sabbath Day. First you tried to insist
it was buried in there somewhere (but refused to quote it - because it
was NOT there); then when I told you I'd copied ALL the info in the
links into a document file so I could easily search for your claimed
lie, you plonked me. You're always the liar.

> MY SOUNDCLICK PAGE- download my original songs in mp3 formathttp://www.soundclick.com/marktindall
>

> FUNDY FUNHOUSE -http://fundamentalistfunhouse.blogspot.com/

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 1:42:49 AM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 1:21 am, "Mark T" <snailmail@12oclockrock> wrote:


First, prove that God actually led the Israelites out of Egypt - that
shouldn't be any harder than your requirement.

Not holding my breath...

guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 1:44:45 AM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 4:26 pm, "Mark T" <snailmail@12oclockrock> wrote:

> Of course, the other MAJOR problem with the quote is that it was NEVER
> stated by Jesus of Nazareth.  It is ONLY found in John's gospel which was
> written 90 - 120 CE when the apostle John was dead.

And of course I still respectfully disagree with you Mark on that
issue because I can only take it on faith, I wasn't alive to witness
the event and neither were you
.
I cross posted so that all the people mentioned would in fact have
input. I knew the title would draw you in... hehehe.

Good to see you are doing well and still pushing buttons. Gave me a
good chuckle, thanks:) Take care and be blessed.

Did you make a difference in the world today?

Shalom,


*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

A designer knows he has achieved perfection not when there is nothing
left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 1:49:31 AM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 1:44 am, guardian Snow <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
> On Oct 13, 4:26 pm, "Mark T" <snailmail@12oclockrock> wrote:
>
> > Of course, the other MAJOR problem with the quote is that it was NEVER
> > stated by Jesus of Nazareth.  It is ONLY found in John's gospel which was
> > written 90 - 120 CE when the apostle John was dead.
>
> And of course I still respectfully disagree with you Mark on that
> issue because I can only take it on faith, I wasn't alive to witness
> the event and neither were you
> .
> I cross posted so that all the people mentioned would in fact have
> input.  I knew the title would draw you in... hehehe.
>
> Good to see you are doing well and still pushing buttons.  Gave me a
> good chuckle, thanks:) Take care and be blessed.
>


You and Mark T are well suited to each other - you're both
hypocritical, ignorant, conceited liars as many already know.

guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 1:54:14 AM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 4:35 pm, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
> On Oct 12, 11:35 pm, guardian Snow <mr_snow_pheo...@yahoo.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Oct 13, 2:21 pm, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Oct 12, 10:58 pm, guardian Snow <mr_snow_pheo...@yahoo.com.au>
> > > wrote:
>
> > > You're a liar and a false teacher.
>
> > > You are wholly in the dark, Snowjob/Dark Man, and there is no light in
> > > you, which is why you feel free to ignore the Messiah's own words
> > > explicitly stating he was the Father (John 14:9 - see below).
>
> > Joh 14:9 יהושע said to him, “Have I been with you so long, and you
> > have not known Me, Philip? He who has seen Me has seen the Father, and
> > how do you say, ‘Show us the Father’?
> > Joh 14:10 “Do you not believe that I am in the Father, and the Father
> > is in Me? The words that I speak to you I do not speak from Myself.
> > But the Father who stays in Me does His works.
> > Joh 14:11 “Believe Me that I am in the Father and the Father in Me,
> > otherwise believe Me because of the works themselves.
>
> > Maybe you didn't read my post.. I speak to the fact that the Father is
> > indeed in his anointed Messiah.  Just as John says, the FATHER IS IN
> > HIM.
>
> So now you're equating John to the Messiah.  Disgusting.

No. What book are we discussing JOHN.. "Just as John says" Whats so
hard to understand?

> I refuse to argue over or 'debate' whether or not God incarnated to
> act as our only Saviour.
>
> DON'T TELL PEOPLE YOUR MESSAGE IS "OUR MESSAGE" as you did a few days
> ago when you KNEW I don't agree with you on this. YOUR MESSAGE IS
> ***NOT*** MY MESSAGE.

I couldn't agree with you more that your message is not mine. I don't
go around blindly attacking everybody and going into sporadic rage
attacks calling everybody dozens of names like you are infamous for.

Control your own emotions. Anytime you want to step away and stop
attacking me and actually listen the words of Yehoshua, would be fine
by me.

Mat 5:44 “But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those cursing
you, do good to those hating you, and pray for those insulting you and
persecuting you,
Mat 5:45 so that you become sons of your Father in the heavens.
Because He makes His sun rise on the wicked and on the good, and sends
rain on the righteous and on the unrighteous.1 Footnote: 1Lk. 6:35,
Acts 14:16-17.

Take care and be blessed.

Did you make a difference in the world today?

Shalom,


*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

A single event can awaken within us a stranger totally unknown to us.
To live is to be slowly born.
Antoine de Saint-Exupery

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 2:25:48 AM10/13/08
to


Then QUIT LYING that it is -- as you did here -
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.messianic/msg/44cbb70a8de52083


Which lies I replied to with: ""our message"??? 'We' don't have an
"our message". You recently
revealed you deny the Messiah was God incarnate. I think you're
ignorant, double-minded, and double-tongued since you had always
previously supported my statements affirming The Messiah was indeed
God incarnate as our Saviour" - from http://groups.google.com/group/alt.messianic/msg/e5353bd1c6d401ac


And I was referring to the following post from you when I said that
above (i.e. "you had always
previously supported my statements affirming The Messiah was indeed
God incarnate as our Saviour") :
Snow-fraud wrote to me: "Can I just tell you... your on a roll. That
was by far one of the
most brilliant post I have ever seen you right to date. I just have
one issue with you. Angels again...". - from
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.bible/msg/c13fd70b5852ba04 - And
you were referring to the following post at
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.messianic/msg/573c56b115fa837a in
which I had said "Wisdom is salvation personified in God incarnate as
the only Saviour.".

And Wisdom IS salvation personified in God incarnate as the only
Saviour. It is "brilliant" and true.

guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 4:21:40 AM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 5:25 pm, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

> And Wisdom IS salvation personified in God incarnate as the only
> Saviour.  It is "brilliant" and true.

Let's explain this again.. Linda Lee is elohim and worthy of worship
in this example.

Linda's eye pops out and all the little people that don't know Linda
see they eye and praise Linda for they have seen Linda.

But they haven't seen Linda.. only Linda's eye and they don't
understand this concept.

When the eye is re attached to Linda.. it is again called Linda but
when the eye is separated from Linda.. it's called an eye.. do you
worship Linda or the eye?

Does that mean that the eye is not apart of Linda when it's popped
out? Of course it's part of Linda but they eye by itself is not
LINDA..

Did you make a difference in the world today?

Shalom,
*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

To be a man is... to be responsible. It is to feel shame at the sight


of what seems to be unmerited misery. It is to take pride in a victory
won by one's comrades. It is to feel, when setting one's stone, that
one is contributing to the building of the world.

guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 4:35:55 AM10/13/08
to
> http://groups.google.com/group/messianicYehoshua<-- joinhttp://www.isr-messianic.org/ <- download the scriptures free

You know.. the biggest problem with what you keep ranting on about is
that you keep using the word God... Figure out the name of that being
and use it and that has nothing to do with what scriptures you use.

Firefly

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 8:57:05 AM10/13/08
to

"guardian Snow" <mr_snow...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message
news:ccf22bb7-87a5-4773...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...

Linda, is it possible that you keep your rage in check to one thread
please?

------------------------------------------------------------------------


You know, sometimes when people get this way they end up showing
others what still maintains control over their heart and mind. Your subject
line sets the tone and state of mind...a conversation that goes nowhere...

Firefly


Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 11:07:32 AM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 8:57 am, "Firefly" <firefly2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "guardian Snow" <mr_snow_pheo...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message

Snowjob pretends civility and constantly provokes; this has been his
way for the entire year he's posted here.

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 11:18:20 AM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 8:57 am, "Firefly" <firefly2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> "guardian Snow" <mr_snow_pheo...@yahoo.com.au> wrote in message

Snowjob pretends civility and constantly provokes; this has been his

way for the entire year he's posted here; he just directs it towards
different believers at different times.

Snowjob knows exactly what his continued provocation and denial of the
Messiah as God incarnate is likely to do; that is why he signed of
like this in his post to me yesterday because he wants to bring me
down to his level ("Controversy equalizes fools and wise men - and the
fools know it. Oliver Wendell Holmes" - from
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.messianic/msg/d66e60180a770bb5 ).

Snowjob's a fool, a liar, and a troll whose only goal is to destroy
the message of the Messiah. He began that way a year ago, preaching
against the cross and claiming the teachings of the Messiah are part
of a false pagan religion, and he's come full circle in the ensuing
year.

Firefly

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 12:03:24 PM10/13/08
to

Some of these very things are what drove me away from faith
for a time. I couldn't find the LORD in any of the voices I heard
or the faces I had seen, always seeing a lack of love and compassion for
those around me, the constant fighting and quarreling, the never ceasing
propagation of hate for others. Perhaps some need to travel down this
path, that one day they will have developed more than just a love of
scripture, but a real love and appreciation for the fine things of the
LORD, and that willingness to hold on that much TIGHTER to HIM.

I went down this road. Maybe, Snow needs to take a walk for
a while to. You never know who the LORD will send out to round up
strays....

guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 12:19:10 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 11:57 pm, "Firefly" <firefly2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> You know, sometimes when people get this way they end up showing
> others what still maintains control over their heart and mind. Your subject
> line sets the tone and state of mind...a conversation that goes nowhere...
>
> Firefly

Well, can't argue against that but it's more of a recognition of
something me and Linda have both been called. I'm not afraid to were
labels that I know don't fit... it would only bother me if I thought
I or Linda was a kook. I don't expect Linda to except what I'm
attempting to speak about, honestly.. speaking with her is a waste of
time... The topic is important to be certain.. Should we worship the
Messiah.. No.

What isn't important is what other people think of me personally
because the message isn't about me. Linda gets hung up on people and
forgets that fact.. that we aren't here to talk about me and her or at
least.. I'm not.

Don't get me wrong.. I really do love Linda.. even when she's sitting
around saying all kinds of wicked things about me. She just doesn't
get it..

I see myself trying to help her... she has no desire for what I know.
I respect that but she can't seem to just walk away and shake the dust
off her feet.

She'll accuse me of stalking her and then chase me around 5 threads
calling me names. Maybe she's going through a hard stage in her life
or maybe she feels I betray her.

What she doesn't realize is that the only thing she's doing is
destroying her own credibility, if she has any. I'd forgive her in a
flash and in fact.. I already have for all the nasty things she going
to continue to say until she gets tired of this self destructive mode
she's in.

I wish her all the best and I continue to pray for her... but I do
have some understandings that she even at this very moment, she will
not grasp. Notice my sign off...

Be blessed and take care and thank you for sharing your perspective
Firefly.

Mat 5:7 “Blessed are the compassionate, because they shall obtain
compassion.
Mat 5:8 “Blessed are the clean in heart,1 because they shall see
Elohim. Footnote: 1Ps. 24:3-4.
Mat 5:9 “Blessed are the peacemakers, because they shall be called
sons of Elohim.
Mat 5:10 “Blessed are those persecuted for righteousness’1 sake,
because theirs is the reign of the heavens. Footnote: 11Pet. 3:14.
Mat 5:11 “Blessed are you when they reproach and persecute you, and
falsely say every wicked word against you, for My sake.
Mat 5:12 “Rejoice and be glad, because your reward in the heavens is
great. For in this way they persecuted the prophets who were before
you.
Mat 5:13 “You are the salt of the earth, but if the salt becomes
tasteless, how shall it be seasoned? For it is no longer of any use
but to be thrown out and to be trodden down by men.
Mat 5:14 “You are the light of the world. It is impossible for a city
to be hidden on a mountain.
Mat 5:15 “Nor do they light a lamp and put it under a basket, but on a
lampstand, and it shines to all those in the house.
Mat 5:16 “Let your light so shine before men, so that they see your
good works and praise your Father who is in the heavens.

Did you make a difference in the world today?

Shalom,
*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

'Men have forgotten this truth,' said the fox. 'But you must not
forget it. You become responsible, forever, for what you have tamed.'
You are responsible for your rose.

Firefly

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 12:30:22 PM10/13/08
to
guardian Snow wrote:
> On Oct 13, 11:57 pm, "Firefly" <firefly2...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> You know, sometimes when people get this way they end up showing
>> others what still maintains control over their heart and mind. Your subject
>> line sets the tone and state of mind...a conversation that goes nowhere...
>>
>> Firefly
>
> Well, can't argue against that but it's more of a recognition of
> something me and Linda have both been called. I'm not afraid to were
> labels that I know don't fit... it would only bother me if I thought
> I or Linda was a kook.

Neither of you are kooks. If the LORD wanted a kook, I'm sure He is
able to design it as he wants it.


guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 12:41:10 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 14, 2:18 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

> Snowjob's a fool, a liar, and a troll whose only goal is to destroy
> the message of the Messiah. He began that way a year ago, preaching
> against the cross and claiming the teachings of the Messiah are part
> of a false pagan religion, and he's come full circle in the ensuing
> year.

Hos 4:6 “My people have perished for lack of knowledge. Because you
have rejected knowledge, I reject you from being priest for Me. Since
you have forgotten the Torah of your Elohim, I also forget your
children.

You go to far as always...

Mat 10:38 “And he who does not take up his stake and follow after Me
is not worthy of Me.

In Messianic scriptures it's common knowledge that the Messiah was
impaled on a stake at Golgotha.

Mar 15:22 And they brought Him to the place Golgotha, which is
translated, Place of a Skull.
Mar 15:23 And they were giving Him wine mixed with myrrh to drink, but
He did not take it.
Mar 15:24 And when they impaled Him, they divided His garments,
casting lots for them, what each one should take.
Mar 15:25 And it was the third hour, and they impaled Him.

stauros means stake, not cross. So clearly I do not say, "he wasn't
murdered". I don't say, "he isn't Elohim" but for that matter so was
Moses and it's this clarity you lack by using bad translations.

Psa 82:6 I, I said, “You are elohim, And all of you are sons of the
Most High.
Psa 82:7 “But as men you die, And fall as one of the heads.”

In your rush for judgment and use of bad translations, you fail to
understand anything because of your steadfast refusal to acknowledge
words you know are false. These false words not found in the Hebrew
give you the wrong understanding in my opinion. יהוה Ěl Shaddai,
true and righteous is not יהושע Messiah, the Son of Elohim.

Your failure is in not recognizing the two identities of which one is
only a part of the other. I will continue to pray that we both
receive our Fathers wisdom, be blessed and take care.

Jas 1:5 If any of you lacks wisdom, let him ask of Elohim, who gives
to all generously and without reproach, and it shall be given to him.

Did you make a difference in the world today?

Shalom,
*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

'Men have forgotten this truth,' said the fox. 'But you must not


forget it. You become responsible, forever, for what you have tamed.'
You are responsible for your rose.

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 12:48:41 PM10/13/08
to

You are blind to your own hypocrisy. You don't see the hypocrisy in
saying that when you STARTED THIS THREAD directed personally to me?

> Maybe she's going through a hard stage in her life
> or maybe she feels I betray her.

Or MAYBE she believes you are a fraud who deliberately misled her
about what you believe to try to use her support to bolster your false
message and are a false prophet teaching a false message.

>
> What she doesn't realize is that the only thing she's doing is
> destroying her own credibility, if she has any.  I'd forgive her in a
> flash and in fact.. I already have for all the nasty things she going
> to continue to say until she gets tired of this self destructive mode
> she's in.
>
> I wish her all the best and I continue to pray for her... but I do
> have some understandings that she even at this very moment, she will
> not grasp.  Notice my sign off...

I noticed your comment to Mark T in this thread ("I cross posted so


that all the people mentioned would in fact have

input. I knew the title ["Kook fight thread"] would draw you in...


hehehe. Good to see you are doing well and still pushing buttons.
Gave me a good chuckle, thanks:)"

Mark T's comment that he put me in his "bozo bin" (when I exposed him
lying that links he provided contained certain false info he claimed)
is what gave you Snowjob "a chuckle" and desire for Mark T's unholy
support in "pushing buttons" (inciting anger) is why you wanted to
draw him into this. You're transparent to me, and you're right it is
useless for you to talk to me now that I see you clearly for what you
are. Continue to run, false prophet, no one can stop a false prophet
from running, but God will take care of it come Judgment Day.

And I noticed this sign-off in your provoking post to me a day or two
ago -- "Controversy equalizes fools and wise men - and the fools know

Explain that quote in your post to me, Mr. 'Sincerity'.

> http://groups.google.com/group/messianicYehoshua<-- joinhttp://www.isr-messianic.org/ <- download the scriptures free

guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 12:49:14 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 14, 3:30 am, Firefly <Firefly2...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>     Neither of you are kooks. If the LORD wanted a kook, I'm sure He is
>     able to design it as he wants it.

I know this all to well.. I certainly don't think Linda is a kook..
she's a wonderful girl I'm sure..

Me.. I have my moments.. 8P Have to have a sense of humor in life..

Did you make a difference in the world today?

Shalom,
*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

Advice is like castor oil, easy enough to give but dreadful uneasy to
take.
Josh Billings

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 12:53:47 PM10/13/08
to


Moses was NOT Elohiym (God). Could you get any more confused?

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 12:57:35 PM10/13/08
to

Moses was NOT Elohiym (God) as you've just said.  Could you get any
more confused? And you think you have "clarity" on what the
Scriptures reveal? Very sad.

guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 1:00:22 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 14, 3:48 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

> I noticed your comment to Mark T in this thread ("I cross posted so
> that all the people mentioned would in fact have
> input.  I knew the title ["Kook fight thread"] would draw you in...
> hehehe.  Good to see you are doing well and still pushing buttons.
> Gave me a good chuckle, thanks:)"
>
> Mark T's comment that he put me in his "bozo bin" (when I exposed him
> lying that links he provided contained certain false info he claimed)
> is what gave you Snowjob "a chuckle" and desire for Mark T's unholy
> support in "pushing buttons" (inciting anger) is why you wanted to
> draw him into this. You're transparent to me, and you're right it is
> useless for you to talk to me now that I see you clearly for what you
> are. Continue to run, false prophet, no one can stop a false prophet
> from running, but God will take care of it come Judgment Day.

Where I have prophesied my lady? Clearly you never read the post "My
prophesy" or you would have known that it was speaking 'bout the
prophets in scriptures and not myself.

You really think you understand me. You have no idea what it was that
made me giggle about Mark Tindall. I wanted him to read this because
of my mention of Debra. I still respect what she was trying to teach
me even if, like you, she went about it in the wrong fashion. Debra
really was a sweet person on some level and her and Mark were good
friends. I think if people are talked about.. they deserve to have
input in the conversation.

I was giggling about the fact that "kook fight" draw him.. yes.. I
still know what draws Mr. Tindall's attention and while we disagree on
issues, it's with respect for each other... something you really need
to work on.


> And I noticed this sign-off in your provoking post to me a day or two
> ago --  "Controversy equalizes fools and wise men - and the fools know
> it. Oliver Wendell Holmes" - from
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.messianic/msg/d66e60180a770bb5
> Explain that quote in your post to me, Mr. 'Sincerity'.

If you felt I was provoking you then why do you continue to take the
bate? Why not actually follow the teachings of the Messiah? Hmmmm?

Did you make a difference in the world today?

Shalom,
*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

Don't ever prophesy; for if you prophesy wrong, nobody will forget it;
and if you prophesy right, nobody will remember it.
Josh Billings

http://groups.google.com/group/messianicYehoshua <-- join

guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 1:04:26 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 14, 3:57 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

> Moses was NOT Elohiym (God) as you've just said.  Could you get any
> more confused?  And you think you have "clarity" on what the
> Scriptures reveal?  Very sad.

To bad you don't know scriptures.

Exo 7:1 So יהוה said to Mosheh, “See, I have made you an elohim to
Pharaoh, and Aharon your brother is your prophet.

Exo 4:16 “And he shall speak for you to the people. And it shall be
that he shall be a mouth for you, and you shall be an elohim1 for him.
Footnote: 1Or mighty one, which is proof that elohim is but a title,
indicating order or authority – it is not a proper name.

Psa 82:6 I, I said, “You are elohim, And all of you are sons of the
Most High.
Psa 82:7 “But as men you die, And fall as one of the heads.”

Psa 82:8 Arise, O Elohim, judge the earth, For You shall possess all
the nations.

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 1:14:11 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 1:04 pm, guardian Snow <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
> On Oct 14, 3:57 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

You wrote:
stauros means stake, not cross. So clearly I do not say, "he wasn't
murdered". I don't say, "he isn't Elohim" but for that matter so was
Moses and it's this clarity you lack by using bad translations.


I replied:


> > Moses was NOT Elohiym (God) as you've just said.  Could you get any
> > more confused?  And you think you have "clarity" on what the
> > Scriptures reveal?  Very sad.
>
> To bad you don't know scriptures.
>
> Exo 7:1  So יהוה said to Mosheh, “See, I have made you an elohim to
> Pharaoh, and Aharon your brother is your prophet.


Exo 7:1 "And the LORD said unto Moses, See, I have made thee A god to
Pharaoh: and Aaron thy brother shall be thy prophet."

Elohiym - Heb. 430 -
BDB Definition:
1) (plural)
1a) rulers, judges
1b) divine ones
1c) angels
1d) gods
2) (plural intensive - singular meaning)
2a) god, goddess
2b) godlike one
2c) works or special possessions of God
2d) the (true) God
2e) God


God made Moses an elohiym (a god), not THE Supreme God, "the (true)
God". Moses is not equal to the Saviour; Moses was the Saviour's
prophet.


>
> Exo 4:16 “And he shall speak for you to the people. And it shall be
> that he shall be a mouth for you, and you shall be an elohim1 for him.
> Footnote: 1Or mighty one, which is proof that elohim is but a title,
> indicating order or authority – it is not a proper name.
>
> Psa 82:6 I, I said, “You are elohim, And all of you are sons of the
> Most High.
> Psa 82:7 “But as men you die, And fall as one of the heads.”
> Psa 82:8 Arise, O Elohim, judge the earth, For You shall possess all
> the nations.

So now by supplying this quote in relation to the subject at hand,
you're implying all the Israelites were gods, and the Messiah was no
different than any other Israelite.

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 1:21:45 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 1:04 pm, guardian Snow <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
> On Oct 14, 3:57 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > Moses was NOT Elohiym (God) as you've just said.  Could you get any
> > more confused?  And you think you have "clarity" on what the
> > Scriptures reveal?  Very sad.
>
> To bad you don't know scriptures.
>
> Exo 7:1  So יהוה said to Mosheh, “See, I have made you an elohim to
> Pharaoh, and Aharon your brother is your prophet.
>
> Exo 4:16 “And he shall speak for you to the people. And it shall be
> that he shall be a mouth for you, and you shall be an elohim1 for him.
> Footnote: 1Or mighty one, which is proof that elohim is but a title,
> indicating order or authority – it is not a proper name.

By the way, can you possibly read and COMPREHEND Footnote 1 you've
supplied above (i.e. this "proof that elohim is but a title,
indicating order or authority – it is not a proper name"), rather than
just copying and pasting it.

The ISR Scriptures you've come to worship are TELLING YOU ELOHIYM is
NOT a NAME, something you've been harassing me and falsely accusing me
about for weeks, claiming Elohiym/God were names and not titles, and
that I was a hypocrite and blasphemous because I used the ENGLISH
TITLE GOD INSTEAD OF ELOHIYM - ALSO A TITLE.

The footnote is also trying to tell you it may mean "mighty one" there
and not a 'god'.


READ YOUR OWN POSTS YOU'VE COPIED AND PASTED, WHY DON'T YOU?

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 1:33:07 PM10/13/08
to

You sure don't follow the teachings of the Messiah.

It's BAIT, NOT "bate", why don't you learn to spell or something? You
constantly use the wrong words for things, and you think people should
listen to you? You can't even comprehend the difference between "your"
and "you're" - EVER.

You don't deny you're trying to provoke to bring others down to your
harassing, BAITING level, the others being me, you sorry little sicko
false prophet. You reveal what your motives are, to attempt to
destroy believers and the Messiah, there is no truth in you.

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 1:49:12 PM10/13/08
to

LOL. IS that my "biggest problem". Too bad the Scriptures (ISR
version) that you worship and copied and pasted later in this thread
agree with me that God i.e. Elohiym is a TITLE and not a name.

On Oct 13, 1:04 pm, guardian Snow <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:


> On Oct 14, 3:57 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > Moses was NOT Elohiym (God) as you've just said. Could you get any
> > more confused? And you think you have "clarity" on what the
> > Scriptures reveal? Very sad.
>
> To bad you don't know scriptures.
>
> Exo 7:1 So יהוה said to Mosheh, “See, I have made you an elohim to
> Pharaoh, and Aharon your brother is your prophet.
>

***********


> Exo 4:16 “And he shall speak for you to the people. And it shall be
> that he shall be a mouth for you, and you shall be an elohim1 for him.
> Footnote: 1Or mighty one, which is proof that elohim is but a title,
> indicating order or authority – it is not a proper name.

***********

Elohiym is "NOT A PROPER NAME" according to your own quote. It is
really too bad that you can't speak hardly a single sentence without
some error or fraud in it.


guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 4:21:59 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 14, 4:21 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

> The footnote is also trying to tell you it may mean "mighty one" there
> and not a 'god'.
>
> READ YOUR OWN POSTS YOU'VE COPIED AND PASTED, WHY DON'T YOU?

Exo 7:1 And Hashem said unto Moshe, See, I have made thee as Elohim to
Pharaoh: and Aharon thy brother shall be thy navi.

Orthodox Jewish Bible

Don't think it's one translation. Just because you don't recognize
the word because you are hard hearted and refuse to come out of using
gentile terms.. Why is that?

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 8:34:36 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 4:21 pm, guardian Snow <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
> On Oct 14, 4:21 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > The footnote is also trying to tell you it may mean "mighty one" there
> > and not a 'god'.
>
> > READ YOUR OWN POSTS YOU'VE COPIED AND PASTED, WHY DON'T YOU?
>
> Exo 7:1 And Hashem said unto Moshe, See, I have made thee as Elohim to
> Pharaoh: and Aharon thy brother shall be thy navi.
>
> Orthodox Jewish Bible
>
> Don't think it's one translation.  Just because you don't recognize
> the word because you are hard hearted and refuse to come out of using
> gentile terms..  Why is that?

Always the fraud. Drop the pretense; you know what I was talking
about i.e. your false claim that Elohiym is a name and that I was a
hypocrite for using the word God.

***********
You posted (and deleted in your response here, of course, trying to
appear justified):


> Exo 4:16 “And he shall speak for you to the people. And it shall be
> that he shall be a mouth for you, and you shall be an elohim1 for him.

> **** Footnote: 1Or mighty one, which is proof that ELOHIM is but a TITLE,
> indicating order or authority – it is NOT a proper NAME. ****

***********

Elohiym is "NOT A PROPER NAME", hypocrite, according to your own
quote from the ISR Scriptures footnote for Exo. 4:16 (above). It is


really too bad that you can't speak hardly a single sentence without

some error or fraud in it, and deliberately use false claims to attack
believers as you've done repeatedly when you claimed Elohiym was a
proper name and not a title. The Scriptures (ISR) that you worship
DISAGREE with your false allegation.

LOL. You yourself provide info that exposes you; it must be God's
work exposing you.

READ YOUR OWN POSTS OF SCRIPTURES YOU'VE COPIED AND PASTED, WHY DON'T
YOU?

You're simply a WOLF who sometimes wears SHEEP'S CLOTHING in order to
pull the wool over people's eyes.

guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 9:57:52 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 14, 11:34 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

> Elohiym is "NOT  A PROPER NAME", hypocrite, according to your own
> quote from the ISR Scriptures footnote for Exo. 4:16 (above).   It is
> really too bad that you can't speak hardly a single sentence without
> some error or fraud in it, and deliberately use false claims to attack
> believers as you've done repeatedly when you claimed Elohiym was a
> proper name and not a title. The Scriptures (ISR) that you worship
> DISAGREE with your false allegation.

Linda, you really have an issue in reading comprehension, I'm not the
first to tell you that either. I never said it was a name and that is
my point. You keep using the title God, when you know it's just that,
a title. Is Yehoshua Elohim, Yes. Is Moses Elohim, Yes.

Elohim and by extension God mean only mighty or strong one. Your
issue is that you keep using God as a proper (name) noun. Until you
unplug and reboot... you can't see that the father is the one you are
to worship in the spirit.

Joh 4:23 “But the hour is coming, and now is, when the true
worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and truth, for the
Father also does seek such to worship Him.
Joh 4:24 “Elohim is Spirit, and those who worship Him need to worship
in spirit and truth.”
Joh 4:25 The woman said to Him, “I know that Messiah is coming, the
One who is called Anointed. When that One comes, He shall announce to
us all.”
Joh 4:26 יהושע said to her, “I who am speaking to you am He.”

It couldn't be any clearer... true worshippers shall worship THE
FATHER in spirit and truth. PICK YOUR VERSION:

Joh 4:23

(VW) But the hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will
do homage to the Father in spirit and truth; for the Father seeks such
to do homage to Him.

(HNV) But the hour comes, and now is, when the true worshippers will
worship the Father in spirit and truth, for the Father seeks such to
be his worshippers.

(JPS)

(KJV+) ButG235 the hourG5610 cometh,G2064 andG2532 nowG3568 is,G2076
whenG3753 theG3588 trueG228 worshippersG4353 shall worshipG4352
theG3588 FatherG3962 inG1722 spiritG4151 andG2532 in truth:G225
forG1063 theG3588 FatherG3962(G2532) seekethG2212 suchG5108 to
worshipG4352 him.G846

(KJV-1611) But the houre commeth, and now is, when the true
worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit, and in trueth: for the
Father seeketh such to worship him.

(KJVR) But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers
shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father
seeketh such to worship him.

(MSG) But the time is coming--it has, in fact, come--when what you're
called will not matter and where you go to worship will not matter.
"It's who you are and the way you live that count before God. Your
worship must engage your spirit in the pursuit of truth. That's the
kind of people the Father is out looking for: those who are simply and
honestly themselves before him in their worship.

(OJB) But a sha'ah is coming, and now is, when those of the true
avodas kodesh will worship HaAv in the Ruach Hakodesh and in Emes, for
indeed [Elohim] HaAv is seeking such to worship Him.

(The Scriptures 1998+) “But the hour is coming, and now is, when the
true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and truth, for the
Father also does seek such to worship Him.

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 10:27:03 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 9:57 pm, guardian Snow <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
> On Oct 14, 11:34 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > Elohiym is "NOT  A PROPER NAME", hypocrite, according to your own
> > quote from the ISR Scriptures footnote for Exo. 4:16 (above).   It is
> > really too bad that you can't speak hardly a single sentence without
> > some error or fraud in it, and deliberately use false claims to attack
> > believers as you've done repeatedly when you claimed Elohiym was a
> > proper name and not a title. The Scriptures (ISR) that you worship
> > DISAGREE with your false allegation.


< snip the perplexed wolf in sheep's clothing Snowjob/Dark Man's
distortions of the teachings of the Messiah >

guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 10:44:56 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 14, 1:27 pm, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:


> < snip the perplexed wolf in sheep's clothing Snowjob/Dark Man's
> distortions of the teachings of the Messiah >

Not a distortion... Worship the FATHER, very simple. (HNV)

Joh 4:23 But the hour comes, and now is, when the true worshippers


will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for the Father seeks such
to be his worshippers.

Joh 4:24 God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in
spirit and truth.”

Joh 4:25 The woman said to him, “I know that Messiah comes,” (he who
is called Anointed One). “When he has come, he will declare to us all
things.”

Joh 4:26 Yeshua said to her, “I am he, the one who speaks to you.”

Yeshua is the Anointed ONE and his message is clear to worship the
FATHER. I'm happy to demonstrate this in any version you know... it's
even in your KJV. So how is this my distortion? Pray:

Mat 6:5 “When you pray, you shall not be as the hypocrites, for they
love to stand and pray in the synagogues and in the corners of the
streets, that they may be seen by men. Most certainly, I tell you,
they have received their reward.
Mat 6:6 But you, when you pray, enter into your inner room, and having
shut your door, pray to your Father who is in secret, and your Father
who sees in secret will reward you openly.


Pray to THE FATHER.. Our Father, who art in HEAVEN...

Mat 6:8 “Therefore do not be like them, for your Father knows what you
need before you ask Him.
Mat 6:9 “This, then, is the way you should pray: ‘Our Father who is in
the heavens, let Your Name be set-apart,
Mat 6:10 let Your reign come, let Your desire be done on earth as it
is in heaven.
Mat 6:11 ‘Give us today our daily bread.
Mat 6:12 ‘And forgive us our debts, as we forgive our debtors.
Mat 6:13 ‘And do not lead us into trial,1 but deliver us from the
wicked one – because Yours is the reign and the power and the esteem,
forever. Amĕn.’ Footnote: 1See 26:41.
Mat 6:14 “For if you forgive men their trespasses, your heavenly
Father shall also forgive you.
Mat 6:15 “But if you do not forgive men their trespasses, neither
shall your Father forgive your trespasses.

Who do you pray to and even more important.. who forgives you.. YOUR
HEAVENLY FATHER.

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 11:10:13 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 10:44 pm, guardian Snow <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
> On Oct 14, 1:27 pm, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > < snip the perplexed wolf in sheep's clothing Snowjob/Dark Man's
> > distortions of the teachings of the Messiah >
>
> Not a distortion... Worship the FATHER, very simple. (HNV)
>
> Joh 4:23 But the hour comes, and now is, when the true worshippers
> will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for the Father seeks such
> to be his worshippers.
> Joh 4:24 God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in
> spirit and truth.”

The Father and The Son are one and the same. Our Teacher and Guide
was teaching people how to pray to HIM.

Yahashua`.

> and even more important.. who forgives you..

Yahashua`.


> YOUR HEAVENLY FATHER.

Yahashua`.

Mar 2:5 When Jesus saw their faith, he said unto the sick of the
palsy, Son, THY SINS BE FORGIVEN THEE.
Mar 2:6 But there were certain of the scribes sitting there, and
reasoning in their hearts,
Mar 2:7 Why doth this man thus speak blasphemies? who can forgive
sins but God only?
Mar 2:8 And immediately when Jesus perceived in his spirit that they
so reasoned within themselves, he said unto them, Why reason ye these
things in your hearts?
Mar 2:9 Whether is it easier to say to the sick of the palsy, Thy
sins be forgiven thee; or to say, Arise, and take up thy bed, and
walk?
Mar 2:10 But that ye may know that the Son of man hath power on earth
to forgive sins, (he saith to the sick of the palsy,)
Mar 2:11 I say unto thee, Arise, and take up thy bed, and go thy way
into thine house.

>
> Did you make a difference in the world today?

Apparently not; you're still confused.


>
> Shalom,
>   *´¨)
>  ¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
> (¸.•´   (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)
>
> 'Men have forgotten this truth,' said the fox. 'But you must not
> forget it. You become responsible, forever, for what you have tamed.'
> You are responsible for your rose.
> Antoine de Saint-Exupery
>

> http://groups.google.com/group/messianicYehoshua<-- joinhttp://www.isr-messianic.org/ <- download the scriptures free

guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 11:27:39 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 14, 2:10 pm, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

> Apparently not; you're still confused.

Good now take a hike... Start your own thread.

Did you make a difference in the world today?

Shalom,

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 11:45:19 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 13, 11:27 pm, guardian Snow <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
> On Oct 14, 2:10 pm, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> > Apparently not; you're still confused.
>
> Good now take a hike... Start your own thread.

Poor little control freak Snowjob. This is not your own thread. You
don't control it or Usenet, and you don't control me. I'll go 'hiking'
when I feel like it; not when you order me to, you wolf in sheep's
clothing.

guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 11:46:22 PM10/13/08
to
On Oct 14, 2:45 pm, Linda Lee <li...@hipstargraphics.com> wrote:

> Poor little control freak Snowjob.  This is not your own thread. You
> don't control it or Usenet, and you don't control me. I'll go 'hiking'
> when I feel like it; not when you order me to, you wolf in sheep's
> clothing.

Can't even follow the Messiah either.. shame on you stalker.

Linda Lee

unread,
Oct 13, 2008, 11:55:16 PM10/13/08
to

Stalker? You started this thread with a post addressed to me; you
really are confused, aren't you?

guardian Snow

unread,
Oct 14, 2008, 12:19:32 AM10/14/08
to

This thread.. yes... the other 5.. no. Can't help but be yourself I
suppose.

Have the last word Linda.. I know you need it... maybe then you can
listen to the Messiah.

Shame...

Mat 15:13 But He answering, said, “Every plant which My heavenly
Father has not planted shall be uprooted.
Mat 15:14 “Leave them alone. They are blind leaders of the blind. And
if the blind leads the blind, both shall fall into a ditch.”

The sad thing is that we don't agree on if the Messiah had the spirit
of our Father in him... you just refuse to stick to one topic and get
things clear in your head.

I'm done. Your turn.. tell me how horrible I am.

guardian SnowPheonix

unread,
Oct 16, 2008, 9:18:59 AM10/16/08
to
On Oct 15, 1:46 pm, Barry OGrady <god_free_jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
> > Exo 4:16 “And he shall speak for you to the people. And it shall be
> > that he shall be a mouth for you, and you shall be an elohim1 for him.
>

> If there is an elohim1 there must be an elohim2.
> Tell us about elohim2
>
> Barry

Brilliant question Barry. See, you ask this because your not polluted
with false ideas and can think logically. Now remember the word
elohim has been translated God.. so a plural word has been made
singular and thats why Christians chase their tales in circles trying
to explain something that if it had been properly translated, would be
no issue.

Elohim means, "Mighty one".. So for example Moses was an elohim to
pharoh in scriptures. Exo 7:1.

The Messiah formerly known as Christ was an Elohim.

Isa 19:20 And it shall be for a sign and for a witness to יהוה of
hosts in the land of Mitsrayim. When they cry to יהוה because of the
oppressors, He sends them a Saviour and an Elohim, and shall deliver
them.

Now look at how this is translated:

Isa 19:20 And it shall be for a sign and for a witness unto the LORD
of hosts in the land of Egypt: for they shall cry unto the LORD
because of the oppressors, and he shall send them a saviour, and a
great one, and he shall deliver them.

But now look at this...

Isa 43:11 I, even I, am the LORD; and beside me there is no saviour.

Isa 43:11 I, even I, am YHVH; and beside me there is no saviour.

See where the name of the Father is hidden in the false translation of
"LORD". After all, Christians think Jesus is Lord. But because the
Father sends the saviour, he should have credit but...
mistranslations...

Mat 7:21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord,
Mat 7:21 “Not everyone who says to Me, ‘Master, Master,’

But in fact the Messiah is sent by the Father just as he says:

1Jn 4:14 And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son
to be the Saviour of the world.

And Christians are to blind to see simple truth.

Thanks for asking.. I hope that was clear to you because all the
Christians never understand that words have been mistranslated and
they are praying to the wrong person.

Qadosh Stephanos

unread,
Nov 1, 2008, 10:41:10 AM11/1/08
to
On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:00:22 -0700 (PDT), guardian Snow
<snowp...@eck.net.au> wrote:

>Where I have prophesied my lady? Clearly you never read the post "My
>prophesy" or you would have known that it was speaking 'bout the
>prophets in scriptures and not myself.

You have done that already in past. You need to park your wheat plow.

guardian Snow

unread,
Nov 1, 2008, 8:14:48 PM11/1/08
to
On Nov 2, 1:41 am, Qadosh Stephanos <qadosh.stepha...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:00:22 -0700 (PDT), guardian Snow
>
> <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
> >Where I have prophesied my lady?  Clearly you never read the post "My
> >prophesy" or you would have known that it was speaking 'bout the
> >prophets in scriptures and not myself.
>
> You have done that already in past. You need to park your wheat plow.

After you and Linda stop dumping manure, deal.

http://groups.google.com/group/messianicYehoshua
Come post a message please, I'd love to hear from you. While this is
a moderated forum, the only moderation will be to remove spam.


Shalom,
*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
o o
/^^^^^7
' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
,'))))))))))))))), /{
' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
> ))))))))))))))))={
`, ))))))\ \)))))))={
',))))))))\/)))))' \{
'*O))))))))O*'

Linda Lee

unread,
Nov 1, 2008, 9:11:52 PM11/1/08
to
On Nov 1, 8:14 pm, guardian Snow <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
> On Nov 2, 1:41 am, Qadosh Stephanos <qadosh.stepha...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 13 Oct 2008 10:00:22 -0700 (PDT), guardian Snow
>
> > <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
> > >Where I have prophesied my lady?  Clearly you never read the post "My
> > >prophesy" or you would have known that it was speaking 'bout the
> > >prophets in scriptures and not myself.
>
> > You have done that already in past. You need to park your wheat plow.
>
> After you and Linda stop dumping manure, deal.

You're such a damned hypocrite; you're the one who started crying
murderer, you slime.

Linda Lee

unread,
Nov 1, 2008, 9:17:27 PM11/1/08
to
On Oct 16, 9:18 am, guardian SnowPheonix <snowpheo...@eck.net.au>
wrote:

> On Oct 15, 1:46 pm, Barry OGrady <god_free_jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > > Exo 4:16 “And he shall speak for you to the people. And it shall be
> > > that he shall be a mouth for you, and you shall be an elohim1 for him.
>
> > If there is an elohim1 there must be an elohim2.
> > Tell us about elohim2
>
> > Barry
>
> Brilliant question Barry.  

And a typically stupid response to his joke about the footnote
reference 1.

>See, you ask this because your not polluted
> with false ideas and can think logically.  Now remember the word
> elohim has been translated God.. so a plural word has been made
> singular and thats why Christians chase their tales in circles trying
> to explain something that if it had been properly translated, would be
> no issue.
>
> Elohim means, "Mighty one"..

You're a pathological liar who now thinks he can lie with impunity to
atheists.

Elohim - Heb. 430 -

H430
אלהים
'ĕlôhîym


BDB Definition:
1) (plural)
1a) rulers, judges
1b) divine ones
1c) angels
1d) gods
2) (plural intensive - singular meaning)
2a) god, goddess
2b) godlike one
2c) works or special possessions of God
2d) the (true) God
2e) God

Part of Speech: noun masculine plural


<Delete the rest of the pathological liar's garbage>

guardian Snow

unread,
Nov 1, 2008, 10:16:10 PM11/1/08
to

pretty broad spectrum of availible choices.. ironically, "mighty one"
fits ever last one of them.

Psa 82:6 I, I said, “You are elohim, And all of you are sons of the
Most High.

So, which one are you? I don't get where you think your GOD, after
all, Hebrew doesn't have lower case letters.

http://groups.google.com/group/messianicYehoshua
Come post a message please, I'd love to hear from you. While this is
a moderated forum, the only moderation will be to remove spam.

Shalom,
*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,


or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”
o o
/^^^^^7
' ' ,oO))))))))Oo,
,'))))))))))))))), /{
' ,'o ))))))))))))))))={
> ))))))))))))))))={
`, ))))))\ \)))))))={
',))))))))\/)))))' \{
'*O))))))))O*'

Linda Lee

unread,
Nov 1, 2008, 10:59:28 PM11/1/08
to

No it doesn't; you're another dunce who thinks he can redefine terms
to fit his pathology.

>
> Psa 82:6 I, I said, “You are elohim, And all of you are sons of the
> Most High.
>
> So, which one are you?  I don't get where you think your GOD, after
> all, Hebrew doesn't have lower case letters.
>

John 10:34 "Jesus answered them, Is it not written in your law, I
said, Ye are gods?"

Well, we're not mighty ones, and we're not judges or rulers, and so
Psa. 82:6 (below) and the Messiah (above) means we are the angels, the
fallen angels, a concept that is beyond someone of your limited
spirituality, being that you are still blind.

Psa 82:6 "I have said, Ye are gods [elohim]; and all of you are
children of the most High."

And since we have become fallen and according to the Scriptures have
been cast down to Earth and to Hades, Psa. 82:7-8 "But ye shall die
like men, and fall like one of the princes. Arise, O God, judge the
earth: for thou shalt inherit all nations".

Talking to you is like talking to a brick wall...

Psa. 82:5 "They know not, neither will they understand; they walk on
in darkness: all the foundations of the earth are out of course."

Qadosh Stephanos

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 12:46:53 AM11/2/08
to
On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:59:28 -0700 (PDT), Linda Lee
<lindag...@juno.com> wrote:

>Talking to you is like talking to a brick wall...

Religious people are like that. Their loss of an innocence.

http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=4494332279887844652

Pathetic examples of lost innocence and of uncooked truth.

guardian Snow

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 8:38:06 AM11/2/08
to
On Nov 2, 3:46 pm, Qadosh Stephanos <qadosh.stepha...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:59:28 -0700 (PDT), Linda Lee
>
> <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
> >Talking to you is like talking to a brick wall...
>
> Religious people are like that. Their loss of an innocence.
>
> http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=4494332279887844652
>
> Pathetic examples of lost innocence and of uncooked truth.

I think it's tragic that both of you somehow think you have any
inspiration and spend all your time in this doctrine of hate you both
preach. It's very troubling to me that you think that hating
everybody is a good thing.

The worst part of it is that it's not the evil you hate.. it's people
you hate. People are created in the image of our Father and if you
hate them, your not demonstrating love of the Father.

I hope that sinks in to either of you. Good luck and take care.

Linda Lee

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 9:45:14 AM11/2/08
to
On Nov 2, 8:38 am, guardian Snow <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
> On Nov 2, 3:46 pm, Qadosh Stephanos <qadosh.stepha...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:59:28 -0700 (PDT), Linda Lee
>
> > <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
> > >Talking to you is like talking to a brick wall...
>
> > Religious people are like that. Their loss of an innocence.
>
> >http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=4494332279887844652
>
> > Pathetic examples of lost innocence and of uncooked truth.
>
> I think it's tragic that both of you somehow think you have any
> inspiration and spend all your time in this doctrine of hate you both
> preach.  It's very troubling to me that you think that hating
> everybody is a good thing.
>
> The worst part of it is that it's not the evil you hate.. it's people
> you hate.  People are created in the image of our Father and if you
> hate them, your not demonstrating love of the Father.
>
> I hope that sinks in to either of you.  Good luck and take care.


May GOD bless you Snowjob; I'll pray for you. I hope it works because
I really expect more of you than the hypocrisy you typically display.

guardian Snow

unread,
Nov 2, 2008, 10:31:46 AM11/2/08
to

YAHWEH does bless me Linda because I acknowledge his name.

Mat 11:25 At that time יהושע responding, said, “I thank You, Father,
Master of the heavens and earth, because You have hidden these matters
from clever and learned ones and have revealed them to babes.

Thanks for the prayers. I would rather you pray for knowledge.

Hos 4:4 “However, let no one strive or reprove another, for your
people are like those striving with a priest.
Hos 4:5 “And you shall stumble in the day, and the prophet shall also
stumble with you in the night. And I shall make your mother perish.
Hos 4:6 “My people have perished for lack of knowledge. Because you
have rejected knowledge, I reject you from being priest for Me. Since
you have forgotten the Torah of your Elohim, I also forget your
children.
Hos 4:7 “As they were increased, so they sinned against Me. My esteem
they have changed into shame.

Take care and be blessed Linda.

http://groups.google.com/group/messianicYehoshua
Come post a message please, I'd love to hear from you. While this is
a moderated forum, the only moderation will be to remove spam.
Shalom,
*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

There is not love where there is no will.
Indira Gandhi

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion,
or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of
speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to
assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

http://www.isr-messianic.org/ <- download the scriptures free

Barry OGrady

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 12:59:21 PM11/5/08
to
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 06:45:14 -0800 (PST), Linda Lee <lindag...@juno.com> wrote:

>On Nov 2, 8:38 am, guardian Snow <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
>> On Nov 2, 3:46 pm, Qadosh Stephanos <qadosh.stepha...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>>
>> > On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:59:28 -0700 (PDT), Linda Lee
>>
>> > <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>> > >Talking to you is like talking to a brick wall...
>>
>> > Religious people are like that. Their loss of an innocence.
>>

>> > Pathetic examples of lost innocence and of uncooked truth.
>>
>> I think it's tragic that both of you somehow think you have any
>> inspiration and spend all your time in this doctrine of hate you both
>> preach.  It's very troubling to me that you think that hating
>> everybody is a good thing.
>>
>> The worst part of it is that it's not the evil you hate.. it's people
>> you hate.  People are created in the image of our Father and if you
>> hate them, your not demonstrating love of the Father.
>>
>> I hope that sinks in to either of you.  Good luck and take care.
>
>
>May GOD bless you Snowjob; I'll pray for you.

You really don't trust God.

>I hope it works because
>I really expect more of you than the hypocrisy you typically display.

I'm sorry to hear you are so disappointed with God.

Barry
=====
Home page
http://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og

Barry OGrady

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 12:59:07 PM11/5/08
to
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 05:38:06 -0800 (PST), guardian Snow <snowp...@eck.net.au> wrote:

>On Nov 2, 3:46 pm, Qadosh Stephanos <qadosh.stepha...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>> On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:59:28 -0700 (PDT), Linda Lee
>>
>> <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>> >Talking to you is like talking to a brick wall...
>>
>> Religious people are like that. Their loss of an innocence.
>>

>> Pathetic examples of lost innocence and of uncooked truth.
>
>I think it's tragic that both of you somehow think you have any
>inspiration and spend all your time in this doctrine of hate you both
>preach. It's very troubling to me that you think that hating
>everybody is a good thing.

Hate is very basis of Christianity. You are called upon to hate anybody
who does not bow down to the Christian church.

>The worst part of it is that it's not the evil you hate.. it's people
>you hate. People are created in the image of our Father and if you
>hate them, your not demonstrating love of the Father.

But they are, because Christians don't use words like normal people.
When Christians speak of the love of God they mean the hate that
God expresses.

>Snow

Barry OGrady

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 12:59:33 PM11/5/08
to
On Sun, 2 Nov 2008 07:31:46 -0800 (PST), guardian Snow <snowp...@eck.net.au> wrote:

>On Nov 3, 1:45 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>> On Nov 2, 8:38 am, guardian Snow <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Nov 2, 3:46 pm, Qadosh Stephanos <qadosh.stepha...@yahoo.ca> wrote:
>>
>> > > On Sat, 1 Nov 2008 19:59:28 -0700 (PDT), Linda Lee
>>
>> > > <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>> > > >Talking to you is like talking to a brick wall...
>>
>> > > Religious people are like that. Their loss of an innocence.
>>

>> > > Pathetic examples of lost innocence and of uncooked truth.
>>
>> > I think it's tragic that both of you somehow think you have any
>> > inspiration and spend all your time in this doctrine of hate you both
>> > preach.  It's very troubling to me that you think that hating
>> > everybody is a good thing.
>>
>> > The worst part of it is that it's not the evil you hate.. it's people
>> > you hate.  People are created in the image of our Father and if you
>> > hate them, your not demonstrating love of the Father.
>>
>> > I hope that sinks in to either of you.  Good luck and take care.
>>
>> May GOD bless you Snowjob; I'll pray for you. I hope it works because
>> I really expect more of you than the hypocrisy you typically display.
>
>YAHWEH does bless me Linda because I acknowledge his name.

Such a strange God.

>Mat 11:25 At that time ????? responding, said, “I thank You, Father,


>Master of the heavens and earth, because You have hidden these matters
>from clever and learned ones and have revealed them to babes.

Why does God play such stupid games?

>Thanks for the prayers. I would rather you pray for knowledge.

Knowledge leads to atheism.

>Hos 4:4 “However, let no one strive or reprove another, for your
>people are like those striving with a priest.
>Hos 4:5 “And you shall stumble in the day, and the prophet shall also
>stumble with you in the night. And I shall make your mother perish.
>Hos 4:6 “My people have perished for lack of knowledge. Because you
>have rejected knowledge, I reject you from being priest for Me. Since
>you have forgotten the Torah of your Elohim, I also forget your
>children.
>Hos 4:7 “As they were increased, so they sinned against Me. My esteem
>they have changed into shame.

God screws up and blames us.

>Take care and be blessed Linda.

Is that an order?

Ike

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 3:40:09 PM11/5/08
to
"Barry OGrady" <god_fre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:mmn3h4pp0amv6jhqi...@4ax.com...

[snip]

> Hate is very basis of Christianity.

Here comes Satan, riding on a "white horse" shooting "arrows" of false
accusations at the believers, ala Rev 6:1-2.

[snip]

Ike


Silverfish

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 3:43:39 PM11/5/08
to
"Ike" <xeickleb...@msn.com> wrote in message
news:get0bc$a5e$1...@registered.motzarella.org...

[snip]

[snip]

Ike


Whinny!

SF.


Tom

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 4:31:06 PM11/5/08
to

"Silverfish" <Silverf...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
news:12259178...@kangaroo.ozonline.com.au...

> "Ike" <xeickleb...@msn.com> wrote in message
> news:get0bc$a5e$1...@registered.motzarella.org...
> "Barry OGrady" <god_fre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:mmn3h4pp0amv6jhqi...@4ax.com...
>
> [snip]
>
>> Hate is very basis of Christianity.


RIGHT; GOD HATES SIN. EOD.

I

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 6:32:39 PM11/5/08
to
"Tom" <To...@home.con> wrote:


> RIGHT; GOD HATES SIN. EOD.


Then WHY does Tom practise the sin of HATE??????????

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fundamentalists seem aimed at making themselves feel better by placing all
negative and destructive emotions in people with different beliefs, and
enjoying the golden glow of self-justification that results. ... You know
that simile: 'As rare as a Fundamentalist who loves his enemy.' ... the
Inquisition did largely miss the point of 'Love Thy Neighbour', didn't they?
Wasn't burning heretics 'worse' than being tolerant towards them? ...

from "LIFE ...and how to survive it" - Robin Skinner & John Cleese (Methuen;
London:1993) p. 287


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

From Peter Cameron's "Fundamentalism and Freedom" (Doubleday; Sydney: 1995.)
p. 7 ff

To reduce that to convenient headings, the Fundamentalist is uncomfortable
with freedom, truth, and dissent and very much at home with authority,
obedience, and conformity. But the most striking feature of the
Fundamentalist is that, whether he is conscious of it or not, his approach
results in the total contra­diction of what he professes to believe.

They will be fearful in the face of any challenge to their security and
brutal in their reaction; they will seek to bolster their security by
persuading others of its validity.; and those others will be persuaded
because of their own increasing sense of insecurity in the modern world.

...the key concepts being security and power ...the Fundamentalist is
usually both a bully and a coward. ...the potential bully in them responds
eagerly to authority and looks forward to the time when they will exercise
that authority; while the most bullying of the bosses tend to shelter behind
the more cowardly and get them to do their dirty work for them.

...security for the convert ... The Fundamentalist deals in absolutes. ...
"We have the answer. The answer is to ask no questions. Everything is set
out in the Holy Book. Simply obey and you will find happiness - in other
words, security."

... Argument, debate, the possibility that they might be wrong - these are
not on the agenda. In any other walk of life they would be regarded as
unhinged. Very few of them have ever been exposed to the simplest form of
biblical criticism, yet they feel qualified to tell people who have spent
half a lifetime on the subject that they are barking up he wrong tree. It's
rather like witchdoctor medicine confronted with real medicine. The
primitive reaction is one of fear, suspicion and hostility - out with the
spears and shields. And the witchdoctors themselves, of course, have vested
interests to protect: their positions of control and authority. naturally
they resist.

... Fundamentalists need an enemy; an enemy both gives them their own
identity and unites them. ...they stand for nothing positive at all - simply
obedience to rules and the condemnation of those who break them.

... Fundamentalists are impervious to rational argument. They are convinced
that they are God's chosen instrument and that their victims are agents of
the devil. They need to be convinced of this, because it is what gives them
purpose to their lives. Fundamentalism's real purpose is not to save but to
condemn: for the dissenter or for the outsider it is dangerous almost be
definition.

... the danger is manifested in the methods used. No holds are barred. All
is fair in holy war. The end always justifies the means. ...appropriate is
the Old Testament norm, according to which the apostate who deviates from
true doctrine contaminates the people of God and must be weeded out and
burned.

The pattern therefore is one of private hearings, and stacked committees,
and kangaroo courts, or - more simply and more devastatingly - a
behind-the-scenes verdict and a sentence of ostracism with no possibility of
appeal.

... a closed system of rules and obedience, and authoritarian control, and
rigid conformity. Instead of a religion of love which proceeds by
invitation, it is a religion of fear which proceeds by intimidation.

... Fundamentalism is wrong, it is a distortion of Christianity, in fact it
is a complete contradiction. ... it masquerades as the truth. Christianity
is not a matter of obeying commandments, or of obtaining salvation through
the acceptance of an authoritative holy book, or of believing in certain
propositions like a physical resurrection. the irony is that what
Fundamentalist Christianity teaches is exactly the sort of thing which the
founder of Christianity came to warn people about.

...Fundamentalism ... thrives on protective stupidity.

... fear in the face of any challenge to the status quo; indoctrination in
order to prevent dissent, and brutality in suppressing dissent; the
exaltation of authority and rules and control and manipulation; and
certainty on the part of those in charge that they possess the truth, hand
in hand with an actual perversion of the truth into mere expediency.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
MY SOUNDCLICK PAGE- download my original songs in mp3 format
http://www.soundclick.com/marktindall

FUNDY FUNHOUSE -
http://fundamentalistfunhouse.blogspot.com/
- a resource on the current Fundamentalist Dark Age and Christian
fundamentalism.

Barry OGrady

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 8:49:36 PM11/5/08
to

For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are
in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or
dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him,
and for him:
Colossians 1:16

>[snip]
>
>Ike

Barry OGrady

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 8:52:54 PM11/5/08
to
On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 13:31:06 -0800, "Tom" <To...@home.con> wrote:

>"Silverfish" <Silverf...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>news:12259178...@kangaroo.ozonline.com.au...
>> "Ike" <xeickleb...@msn.com> wrote in message
>> news:get0bc$a5e$1...@registered.motzarella.org...
>> "Barry OGrady" <god_fre...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>> news:mmn3h4pp0amv6jhqi...@4ax.com...
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>>> Hate is very basis of Christianity.
>
>
> RIGHT; GOD HATES SIN. EOD.

God created sin to give him one more thing to hate.
Colossians 1:16 says


For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are
in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or
dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him,
and for him:

Barry

Linda Lee

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 8:56:33 PM11/5/08
to
On Nov 5, 8:52 pm, Barry OGrady <god_free_jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 13:31:06 -0800, "Tom" <To...@home.con> wrote:
> >"Silverfish" <Silverfish1...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
> >news:12259178...@kangaroo.ozonline.com.au...
> >> "Ike" <xeickleberrybo...@msn.com> wrote in message
> >>news:get0bc$a5e$1...@registered.motzarella.org...
> >> "Barry OGrady" <god_free_jo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

> >>news:mmn3h4pp0amv6jhqi...@4ax.com...
>
> >> [snip]
>
> >>> Hate is very basis of Christianity.
>
> >    RIGHT; GOD HATES SIN. EOD.
>
> God created sin to give him one more thing to hate.
> Colossians 1:16 says
> For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are
> in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or
> dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him,
> and for him:
>
> Barry
> =====
> Home pagehttp://members.iinet.net.au/~barry.og

Sin occurred before The Creation.

lynx

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 9:01:49 PM11/5/08
to
Linda Lee wrote:

> On Nov 5, 8:52 pm, Barry OGrady <god_free_jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 5 Nov 2008 13:31:06 -0800, "Tom" <To...@home.con> wrote:
>>
>>> "Silverfish" <Silverfish1...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote in message
>>> news:12259178...@kangaroo.ozonline.com.au...
>>>
>>>> "Ike" <xeickleberrybo...@msn.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:get0bc$a5e$1...@registered.motzarella.org...
>>>> "Barry OGrady" <god_free_jo...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:mmn3h4pp0amv6jhqi...@4ax.com...
>>>>
>>>> [snip]
>>>>
>>>>> Hate is very basis of Christianity.
>>>>>
>>> RIGHT; GOD HATES SIN. EOD.
>>>
>> God created sin to give him one more thing to hate.
>> Colossians 1:16 says
>> For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are
>> in earth, visible and invisible, whether [they be] thrones, or
>> dominions, or principalities, or powers: all things were created by him,
>> and for him:
>>
>>
> Sin occurred before The Creation.
>

Not according to the bible.

Barry OGrady

unread,
Nov 5, 2008, 9:06:33 PM11/5/08
to

That's an interesting take. If God created everything except himself then God must
have been the original sinner infecting all of creation with his sin.

Tom

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 11:51:34 AM11/6/08
to

"lynx" <no...@nothere.com> wrote in message
news:hesQk.11444$sc2....@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
The rebellion of satan is generally considered by many people to have
occurred prior to Genesis 1:1......
Nobody said this stuff was easy...


Linda Lee

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 2:46:46 PM11/6/08
to
On Nov 5, 9:06 pm, Barry OGrady <god_free_jo...@yahoo.com> wrote:

God created the 'host of heaven' i.e. angels before he ever created
the physical realm. The Scriptures say the original fallen angel was
not created evil, but when iniquity was found in him, he was cast from
heaven along with those angels who had decided to join him in sin.
You want to blame everything bad on God (a very unwise decision), but
the Scriptures say God hates evil, and only creates evil in someone's
life to lead them to make the choice to repent so they may re-enter
Heaven, so God's motives are always good. Are your motives good in
accusing God? I doubt it.

Linda Lee

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 2:48:54 PM11/6/08
to

Genesis Three is an allegory of the fall of the angels; the 'serpent'
tempting Adam/his wife to disobey God being symbolic of Satan/Lucifer
bringing about the fall of the angels by tempting them to follow him
into sin, rather than remaining loyal to God.

I

unread,
Nov 6, 2008, 5:39:43 PM11/6/08
to
"Tom" <To...@home.con> wroteth:

>>> Sin occurred before The Creation.
>> Not according to the bible.
> The rebellion of satan is generally considered by many people to have
> occurred prior to Genesis 1:1......


Not "many people" ONLY Fundamentalists.


The FRUIT OF FUNDAMENTALISM (& TOM) is:
- hate / hatred
- sorrow
- war / state of war
- impatience
- unkindness
- bad / badness
- harshness
- infidelity / unfaithfulness
- undisciplined / lack of self constraint

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fundamentalists seem aimed at making themselves feel better by placing all
negative and destructive emotions in people with different beliefs, and
enjoying the golden glow of self-justification that results. ... You know
that simile: 'As rare as a Fundamentalist who loves his enemy.' ... the
Inquisition did largely miss the point of 'Love Thy Neighbour', didn't they?
Wasn't burning heretics 'worse' than being tolerant towards them? ...

from "LIFE ...and how to survive it" - Robin Skinner & John Cleese (Methuen;
London:1993) p. 287

--

Barry OGrady

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 5:58:03 AM11/7/08
to

Barry

guardian Snow

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 7:47:22 AM11/7/08
to
On Nov 6, 12:56 pm, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

> Sin occurred before The Creation.

Wrong as usual.

Gen 1:31 And Elohim saw all that He had made, and see, it was very
good. And there came to be evening and there came to be morning, the
sixth day.

He would not have said wickedness is good. What part of the creation
story don't you believe?


*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

It takes but one positive thought when given a chance to survive and
thrive to overpower an entire army of negative thoughts.
Robert H. Schuller

http://groups.google.com/group/messianicYehoshua <-- join


http://www.isr-messianic.org/ <- download the scriptures free

or
http://messianicyehoshua.googlegroups.com/web/RNKJV_W.zip <--free
download of the Restored Names King James Version

guardian Snow

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 7:52:27 AM11/7/08
to
On Nov 7, 6:46 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

> God created the 'host of heaven' i.e. angels before he ever created
> the physical realm. The Scriptures say the original fallen angel was
> not created evil, but when iniquity was found in him, he was cast from
> heaven along with those angels who had decided to join him in sin.
> You want to blame everything bad on God (a very unwise decision), but
> the Scriptures say God hates evil, and only creates evil in someone's
> life to lead them to make the choice to repent so they may re-enter
> Heaven, so God's motives are always good. Are your motives good in
> accusing God? I doubt it.

Wrong again. Satan is not cast from heaven until the Great
Tribulation.

Job 1:6 And the day came to be that the sons of Elohim came to present
themselves before יהוה, and Satan also came among them.

What part of Job and Revelations don't you believe?

Rev 12:5 And she bore a male child1 who was to shepherd all nations
with a rod of iron. And her child was caught away to Elohim and to His
throne. Footnote: 1Isa. 66:7.

Revelation 12 describes the birth of the Messiah and then after
that...

Rev 12:9 And the great dragon was thrown out, that serpent of old,
called the Devil and Satan, who leads all the world astray. He was
thrown to the earth, and his messengers were thrown out with him.


*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

Problems are not stop signs, they are guidelines.
Robert H. Schuller

http://groups.google.com/group/messianicYehoshua <-- join


http://www.isr-messianic.org/ <- download the scriptures free

guardian Snow

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 7:56:40 AM11/7/08
to
On Nov 7, 6:48 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

> Genesis Three is an allegory of the fall of the angels; the 'serpent'
> tempting Adam/his wife to disobey God being symbolic of Satan/Lucifer
> bringing about the fall of the angels by tempting them to follow him
> into sin, rather than remaining loyal to God.

Oh.. so here you admit you don't believe Genesis and you deny the
creation.
Allegory is another way of say fiction or a fable. Now your telling
people Moses lied.

*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

Some people are at the top of the ladder, some are in the middle,
still more are at the bottom, and a whole lot more don't even know
there is a ladder.
Robert H. Schuller


http://groups.google.com/group/messianicYehoshua <-- join


http://www.isr-messianic.org/ <- download the scriptures free

Linda Lee

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 9:06:09 AM11/7/08
to

Once again Snowjob twists the meaning of the Scriptures. The Creation
was "very good" because it is the realm in which humankind is provided
salvation and is given the chance to repent of their original sin.
Snowjob has no concept of the Scriptures whatsoever, since the
Scriptures are chock full of symbolism and Snowjob considers symbolism
and allegory a lie. He also remains unaware that the scribe Ezra is
said to have compiled all the books of the Pentateuch (the first 'five
books of Moses'), and many scholars believe he compiled the entire
Hebrew Scriptures.

He also is ignorant of the fact that Satan is said to have 'come among
the sons of God' and is not designated as a son of God: Job 1:6 "Now
there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before
the LORD, and Satan came also among them."

Apparently, Snowjob didn't bother to read past Job 1:6 (not that it
would matter because he couldn't comprehend the first six verses) and
hasn't noticed that Satan doesn't act like the other un-fallen angels
in the Scriptures; Satan argues with God and would have killed Job, a
man whom God said was a good man who worshipped him, if God hadn't
prevented him from doing so.

Genesis Three is an allegory of the fall of Satan and the fallen
angels, who are symbolized as the 'serpent' and Adam and his wife
(because the angels were cast out into the temporary hell the Greeks
call Hades to await birth into Adamic flesh God had created for them):

Satan was cast out when God sent 'Adam and his wife' (i.e. the fallen
angels) out of Heaven/Paradise and forbade them to eat any longer of
the 'tree of life' until Judgment Day:

Gen. 3:14 "And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast
done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of
the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all
the days of thy life".

guardian Snow

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 10:00:58 AM11/7/08
to
On Nov 8, 1:06 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

Linda stated:


> Sin occurred before The Creation.

> Once again Snowjob twists the meaning of the Scriptures.  The Creation


> was "very good" because it is the realm in which humankind is provided
> salvation and is given the chance to repent of their original sin.

Thats just the most ridiculous thing you've ever said Jezebel.

Gen 1:1 In the beginning Elohim created the heaven and the earth.

Nope.. nothing about sin and this is the BEGINNING. Because you don't
believe the scriptures starting at verse one, your now fabricating
your own made up religion and not able to support your garbage with
any textual proof.


> Snowjob has no concept of the Scriptures whatsoever,

then how come I'm able to quote them and your just making things up as
you go?

> since the
> Scriptures are chock full of symbolism and Snowjob considers symbolism
> and allegory a lie.

No, I consider your fiction a lie.

>  He also remains unaware that the scribe Ezra is
> said to have compiled all the books of the Pentateuch (the first 'five
> books of Moses'), and many scholars believe he compiled the entire
> Hebrew Scriptures.

Compiling has nothing to do with the author.

> He also is ignorant of the fact that Satan is said to have 'come among
> the sons of God' and is not designated as a son of God:  Job 1:6  "Now
> there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before
> the LORD, and Satan came also among them."

Never made such an ignorant claim. Your reading comprehension is so
bad, you can't remember.

Job 1:7 And YHWH said unto Satan, Whence comest thou? Then Satan
answered YHWH, and said, From going to and fro in the earth, and from
walking up and down in it.

Zec 3:1 And he shewed me Joshua the high priest standing before the
angel of YHWH, and Satan standing at his right hand to resist him.
Zec 3:2 And YHWH said unto Satan, YHWH rebuke thee, O Satan; even YHWH
that hath chosen Jerusalem rebuke thee: is not this a brand plucked
out of the fire?

So we see that Satan is in fact goes to heaven all the time to accuse
"night and day".

Rev 12:10 And I heard a loud voice saying in the heaven, “Now have
come the deliverance and the power and the reign of our Elohim,1 and
the authority of His Messiah, for the accuser of our brothers, who
accused them before our Elohim day and night, has been thrown down.

> Apparently, Snowjob didn't bother to read past Job 1:6 (not that it
> would matter because he couldn't comprehend the first six verses) and
> hasn't noticed that Satan doesn't act like the other un-fallen angels
> in the Scriptures; Satan argues with God and would have killed Job, a
> man whom God said was a good man who worshipped him, if God hadn't
> prevented him from doing so.

But he's before the throne of YHWH when he does it which is proof your
wrong as usual.

<snip) Linda's drivel that says all of Genesis is fiction.

Gen 1:31 And Elohim saw all that He had made, and see, it was very
good. And there came to be evening and there came to be morning, the
sixth day.

If sin had predated creation then he wouldn't have said that ALL THAT
HE HAD MADE was VERY GOOD.

Sin is by definition Transgression of the Torah.. So who transgressed
the Torah prior to being created? What commandment did they break
before the creation? Come on.. if your going to continue with this
stupidity then you had better be able to support your garbage with
scriptures...

Compare:

Satan was cast out when God sent 'Adam and his wife' (i.e. the fallen
angels) out of Heaven/Paradise

But notice what Linda said here:

"Genesis Three is an allegory of the fall of the angels; the 'serpent'
tempting Adam/his wife to disobey

*God being symbolic of Satan/Lucifer*"

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.messianic/msg/96b98ca5a9e011e1

Satan tempted EVE, not Adam. You can't even keep your story straight
from one post to the next.

Gen 3:20 And Adam called his wifes name Eve; because she was the
mother of all living.

So does that mean your an Angel Linda?


*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

If you ever find happiness by hunting for it, you will find it, as the
old woman did her lost spectacles, safe on her own nose all the time.
Be like a postage stamp. Stick to one thing until you get there.
Josh Billings

Linda Lee

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 11:11:33 AM11/7/08
to
On Nov 7, 10:00 am, guardian Snow <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
> On Nov 8, 1:06 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> Linda stated:
>
> > Sin occurred before The Creation.
> > Once again Snowjob twists the meaning of the Scriptures.  The Creation
> > was "very good" because it is the realm in which humankind is provided
> > salvation and is given the chance to repent of their original sin.
>
> Thats just the most ridiculous thing you've ever said Jezebel.
>


The heretic and evil child of the Devil Snowjob once again reveals his
ignorance of the teachings of Yahushua` the Messiah in the Scriptures
and Snowjob's proclivity for habitual lying once again by denying God
intended salvation for his Creation.

The Scriptures indicate the spirits of all peoples of all flesh are
fallen angels; and the Scriptures say some choose to become children
of God, and some remain children of the Devil and so their spirits
will be destroyed come Judgment Day.

I don't expect the always-blind Snowjob to understand the following,
but it is indication that all people are either children of God or
children of the Devil:

1Jn 3:10 "In this the children of God are manifest, and the children
of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither
he that loveth not his brother."

I have chosen to repent of the original sin of all people and worship
Yahushua` the Saviour as God, but Snowjob for instance (who repeatedly
announces publicly here he is the "enemy" of believers, and then
hypocritically demands they show love for him while he demonstrates
hatred for them) has remained a child of the Devil.

To a church of BELIEVERS whom the Spirit of the resurrected Messiah is
commending for their rejection of evil and of false apostles,
Yahushua` the Saviour issues a warning to repent of their original sin
of falling from Heaven:

Rev 2:1 Unto the angel of the church of Ephesus write; These things
saith he that holdeth the seven stars in his right hand, who walketh
in the midst of the seven golden candlesticks;
Rev 2:2 I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how
thou canst NOT BEAR them which are EVIL: and thou HAST TRIED THEM
WHICH SAY THEY ARE APOSTLES, and ARE NOT, and hast found them LIARS:
Rev 2:3 And hast borne, and hast patience, and for my name's sake
hast laboured, and hast not fainted.
Rev 2:4 NEVERTHELESS, I HAVE SOMEWHAT AGAINST THEE, because thou HAST
LEFT THEY FIRST LOVE [their "first love" was God when they committed
the original sin of falling from Heaven by following 'the serpent'].
Rev 2:5 REMEMBER THEREFORE FROM WHENCE THOU ART FALLEN, and REPENT,
and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and
will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent.

The Messiah also taught of the original sin (i.e. the fall of the
spirits within all humankind from Heaven) in the story of the Prodigal
son in Luke chapter 15:11-32, a story of one son who remained with his
father, and another son who abandoned his father and "sinned against
heaven", who eventually repented of his sin against his Father and
Heaven, and was then welcomed back home.

In Luke 15:11 Yahushua` the Messiah and Saviour began to say, "A
certain man had two sons:
Luk 15:12 And the younger of them said to his father, Father, give me
the portion of goods that falleth to me. And he divided unto them his
living.
Luk 15:13 And not many days after the younger son gathered all
together, and took his journey into a far country, and there wasted
his substance with riotous living.
Luk 15:14 And when he had spent all, there arose a mighty famine in
that land; and he began to be in want.
Luk 15:15 And he went and joined himself to a citizen of that
country; and he sent him into his fields to feed swine.
Luk 15:16 And he would fain have filled his belly with the husks that
the swine did eat: and no man gave unto him.
Luk 15:17 And when he came to himself, he said, How many hired
servants of my father's have bread enough and to spare, and I perish
with hunger!
Luk 15:18 I will arise and go to my father, and will say unto him,
Father, I have sinned against heaven, and before thee,
Luk 15:19 And am no more worthy to be called thy son: make me as one
of thy hired servants.
Luk 15:20 And he arose, and came to his father. But when he was yet a
great way off, his father saw him, and had compassion, and ran, and
fell on his neck, and kissed him.
Luk 15:21 And the son said unto him, ************ Father, I have
sinned against heaven, and in thy sight, and am no more worthy to be
called thy son.
Luk 15:22 But the father said to his servants, Bring forth the best
robe, and put it on him; and put a ring on his hand, and shoes on his
feet:
Luk 15:23 And bring hither the fatted calf, and kill it; and let us
eat, and be merry:
Luk 15:24 For this my son was dead, and is alive again; he was lost,
and is found. ************** And they began to be merry.
Luk 15:25 Now his elder son was in the field: and as he came and drew
nigh to the house, he heard musick and dancing.
Luk 15:26 And he called one of the servants, and asked what these
things meant.
Luk 15:27 And he said unto him, Thy brother is come; and thy father
hath killed the fatted calf, because he hath received him safe and
sound.
Luk 15:28 And he was angry, and would not go in: therefore came his
father out, and intreated him.
Luk 15:29 And he answering said to his father, Lo, these many years
do I serve thee, neither transgressed I at any time thy commandment:
and yet thou never gavest me a kid, that I might make merry with my
friends:
Luk 15:30 But as soon as this thy son was come, which hath devoured
thy living with harlots, thou hast killed for him the fatted calf.
Luk 15:31 And he said unto him, Son, thou art ever with me, and all
that I have is thine.
Luk 15:32 It was meet that we should make merry, and ***** be glad:
for this thy brother was dead, and is alive again; and was lost, and
is found." *****

guardian Snow

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 11:21:06 AM11/7/08
to
On Nov 8, 3:11 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I
have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response
were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational
thought. Everyone here is now dumber for having read it. I award you
no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

*´¨)
¸.•´ ¸.•*´¨) ¸.•*¨)
(¸.•´ (¸.• (Snow(.¸.•*´¨)

A person who won't read has no advantage over one who can't read.
Mark Twain

Great Sage Itchy

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 11:40:45 AM11/7/08
to
In article
<74297a3d-c373-429f...@t18g2000prt.googlegroups.com>,
Linda Lee <lindag...@juno.com> wrote:

> The Scriptures indicate the spirits of all peoples of all flesh are
> fallen angels; and the Scriptures say some choose to become children
> of God, and some remain children of the Devil and so their spirits
> will be destroyed come Judgment Day.

The Scriptures indicate??
You mean the interpretation of the Scriptures indicate....

The people of this world are NOT fallen angeles. They are the Children
of the Kingdom, just as they have always been. Spiritually, the world
has lost it's way, but the Children of the Kingdom will find their way
back to the garden. When a people lose their way spiritually, they also
devolve physically and mentally. This is becoming a more and more
serious problem.

Feather

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 12:03:28 PM11/7/08
to
On Nov 7, 8:11 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

>
> The Scriptures indicate the spirits of all peoples of all flesh are
> fallen angels; and the Scriptures say some choose to become children
> of God, and some remain children of the Devil and so their spirits
> will be destroyed come Judgment Day.
>

How is it that Scriptures actually suggest otherwise?

People don't become angels, nor do angels become people. Seems to me
that angels are of an entirely different order in Creation:

Matthew 22:30
At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in
marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven.

Mark 12:25
When the dead rise, they will neither marry nor be given in marriage;
they will be like the angels in heaven.

Mark 13:27
And he will send his angels and gather his elect from the four winds,
from the ends of the earth to the ends of the heavens.

Luke 12:8
"I tell you, whoever acknowledges me before men, the Son of Man will
also acknowledge him before the angels of God.

Luke 15:10
In the same way, I tell you, there is rejoicing in the presence of the
angels of God over one sinner who repents.

Luke 20:36
and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels. They are
God's children, since they are children of the resurrection.

(KEY WORDS IN ABOVE VERSE? "For they are LIKE the angels". Note, it
does *not* say they *are* angels).

1 Corinthians 6:3
Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of
this life!

Hebrews 1:5
For to which of the angels did God ever say, "You are my Son; today I
have become your Father " ? Or again, "I will be his Father, and he
will be my Son" ?
(Cf. Psalm 2:7; 2 Samuel 7:14; 1 Chron. 17:13 )

Hebrews 1:7
In speaking of the angels he says, "He makes his angels winds, his
servants flames of fire." (Cf. Psalm 104:4)

Hebrews 1:13
To which of the angels did God ever say, "Sit at my right hand until I
make your enemies a footstool for your feet" ?
(Cf. Psalm 110:1)

Hebrews 1:14
Are not all angels ministering spirits sent to serve those who will
inherit salvation?

Hebrews 13:2
Do not forget to entertain strangers, for by so doing some people have
entertained angels without knowing it.

(This is one of many references where angels can appear as humans, but
are not).

2 Peter 2:11
Bold and arrogant, these men are not afraid to slander celestial
beings; yet even angels, although they are stronger and more powerful,
do not bring slanderous accusations against such beings in the
presence of the Lord.

Angels are a different order of being in creation than people.

People do not become angels, nor are angels every truly human.

A fallen angel is one who chose to follow Satan to earth.

Isaiah 14:12
How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You
have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!

A short reference to angels is found on the Christian Apologetics and
Research Ministry page here:

http://www.carm.org/bible/angels.htm

Good reading.

So, while humans can be affected by demons; in some cases *possessed*
by them, and in other cases are *minstered* to by them, or actually
end up *entertaining angels*, people do not *become* angels, nor are
angels ever truly human.

God bless,
Feather

Linda Lee

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 12:35:34 PM11/7/08
to
On Nov 7, 12:03 pm, Feather <feat...@earthling.net> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 8:11 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The Scriptures indicate the spirits of all peoples of all flesh are
> > fallen angels; and the Scriptures say some choose to become children
> > of God, and some remain children of the Devil and so their spirits
> > will be destroyed come Judgment Day.
>
> How is it that Scriptures actually suggest otherwise?
>
> People don't become angels, nor do angels become people. Seems to me
> that angels are of an entirely different order in Creation:
>
> Matthew 22:30
> At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in
> marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven.
>
> Mark 12:25
> When the dead rise, they will neither marry nor be given in marriage;
> they will be like the angels in heaven.

Angels don't marry because they are spirits, and not male and female
flesh.

>
> Mark 13:27
> And he will send his angels and gather his elect from the four winds,
> from the ends of the earth to the ends of the heavens.
>
> Luke 12:8
> "I tell you, whoever acknowledges me before men, the Son of Man will
> also acknowledge him before the angels of God.

Yes, before the unfallen angels as the story of the returning Prodigal
Son in Luke 15:11-32 indicates.

>
> Luke 15:10
> In the same way, I tell you, there is rejoicing in the presence of the
> angels of God over one sinner who repents.

Yes, the unfallen angels rejoice over this, just as the "sons of God",
i.e. the "morning stars", rejoiced when God created the Earth and
humankind as a means by which the fallen angels might repent and
return to the Father.

Job 38:1 Then the LORD answered Job out of the whirlwind, and said,
Job 38:2 Who is this that darkeneth counsel by words without
knowledge?
Job 38:3 Gird up now thy loins like a man; for I will demand of thee,
and answer thou me.
Job 38:4 ***** Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the
earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.
Job 38:5 Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who
hath stretched the line upon it?
Job 38:6 Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid
the corner stone thereof;
Job 38:7 When the morning stars sang together, and all the sons of
God shouted for joy? *****


>


> Luke 20:36
> and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels. They are
> God's children, since they are children of the resurrection.

Yes, sons of God, children of God, morning stars, angels.

>
> (KEY WORDS IN ABOVE VERSE? "For they are LIKE the angels".  Note, it
> does *not* say they *are* angels).

Quibbling. That was a good explanation of what they will become.

I don't believe a thing Paul said, so I have no comment on his
misinterpretations. I will say ONLY Paul made the false claim that
the fallen angel Satan could still appear as an angel of light.

>
> 2 Peter 2:11
> Bold and arrogant, these men are not afraid to slander celestial
> beings; yet even angels, although they are stronger and more powerful,
> do not bring slanderous accusations against such beings in the
> presence of the Lord.


The apostle Jude (or "Judas, brother of James" - Luke 6:16, called
also Lebbaeus, and Thaddeus in Matt. 10:3) also mentions fallen angels
being in "chains" awaiting judgment:

Jude 1:6 "And the angels which kept not their first estate, but left
their own habitation, he hath reserved in everlasting chains under
darkness unto the judgment of the great day."

The word here translated 'chains' - Gk. 1199 - "a band, that is,
ligament (of the body) or shackle (of a prisoner); figuratively an
impediment or disability".

The fallen angels/spirits were cast into Hades/hell to await birth in
Adamic flesh so they might repent and escape hell/Gehenna i.e. the
lake of fire come Judgment Day.

2Pe 2:4 For if God spared not the angels that sinned, but cast them
down to hell, and delivered them into chains of darkness, to be
reserved unto judgment;
2Pe 2:5 And spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth
person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the
world of the ungodly;
2Pe 2:6 And turning the cities of Sodom and Gomorrha into ashes
condemned them with an overthrow, making them an ensample unto those
that after should live ungodly;
2Pe 2:7 And delivered just Lot, vexed with the filthy conversation of
the wicked:
2Pe 2:8 (For that righteous man dwelling among them, in seeing and
hearing, vexed his righteous soul from day to day with their unlawful
deeds;)
2Pe 2:9 The Lord knoweth how to deliver the godly out of temptations,
and to reserve the unjust unto the day of judgment to be punished:
2Pe 2:10 But chiefly them that walk after the flesh in the lust of
uncleanness, and despise government. Presumptuous are they,
selfwilled, they are not afraid to speak evil of dignities.
2Pe 2:11 Whereas angels, which are greater in power and might, bring
not railing accusation against them before the Lord.
2Pe 2:12 But these, as natural brute beasts, made to be taken and
destroyed, speak evil of the things that they understand not; and
shall utterly perish in their own corruption;
2Pe 2:13 And shall receive the reward of unrighteousness, as they
that count it pleasure to riot in the day time. Spots they are and
blemishes, sporting themselves with their own deceivings while they
feast with you;
2Pe 2:14 Having eyes full of adultery, and that cannot cease from
sin; beguiling unstable souls: an heart they have exercised with
covetous practices; cursed children:
2Pe 2:15 Which have forsaken the right way, and are gone astray,
following the way of Balaam the son of Bosor, who loved the wages of
unrighteousness;

Linda Lee

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 12:37:34 PM11/7/08
to
On Nov 7, 11:40 am, Great Sage Itchy <it...@itchyandscratchy.com>
wrote:
> In article
> <74297a3d-c373-429f-a786-7cb978130...@t18g2000prt.googlegroups.com>,

>
> Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
> > The Scriptures indicate the spirits of all peoples of all flesh are
> > fallen angels; and the Scriptures say some choose to become children
> > of God, and some remain children of the Devil and so their spirits
> > will be destroyed come Judgment Day.
>
> The Scriptures indicate??
> You mean the interpretation of the Scriptures indicate....
>
> The people of this world are NOT fallen angeles. They are the Children
> of the Kingdom, just as they have always been.


They were always initially children of the devil; some repent and
become children of God:

1Jn 3:2 Beloved, now are we the sons of God, and it doth not yet
appear what we shall be: but we know that, when he shall appear, we
shall be like him; for we shall see him as he is.
...
1Jn 3:7 Little children, let no man deceive you: he that doeth
righteousness is righteous, even as he is righteous.
1Jn 3:8 He that committeth sin is of the devil; for the devil sinneth
from the beginning. For this purpose the Son of God was manifested,
that he might destroy the works of the devil.
1Jn 3:9 Whosoever is born of God doth not commit sin; for his seed
remaineth in him: and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.


1Jn 3:10 In this the children of God are manifest, and the children
of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither
he that loveth not his brother.

Linda Lee

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 12:38:50 PM11/7/08
to
On Nov 7, 11:21 am, guardian Snow <snowpheo...@eck.net.au> wrote:
> On Nov 8, 3:11 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>
> What you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I
> have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response
> were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational
> thought. Everyone here is now dumber for having read it. I award you
> no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.
>


Where is that Christian love, thou hypocrite, blind guide, and child
of the Devil?

Leo Sgouros

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 12:42:35 PM11/7/08
to
"Linda Lee" <lindag...@juno.com> wrote in message
news:53db5c9f-b558-4e94...@d42g2000prb.googlegroups.com...

On Nov 7, 12:03 pm, Feather <feat...@earthling.net> wrote:
> On Nov 7, 8:11 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > The Scriptures indicate the spirits of all peoples of all flesh are
> > fallen angels; and the Scriptures say some choose to become children
> > of God, and some remain children of the Devil and so their spirits
> > will be destroyed come Judgment Day.
>
> How is it that Scriptures actually suggest otherwise?
>
> People don't become angels, nor do angels become people. Seems to me
> that angels are of an entirely different order in Creation:
>
> Matthew 22:30
> At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in
> marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven.
>
> Mark 12:25
> When the dead rise, they will neither marry nor be given in marriage;
> they will be like the angels in heaven.

"Angels don't marry because they are spirits, and not male and female
flesh"

Gabriel is dewcribed as "the man Gabriel".Other angels have eaten food in
the scripture.As the literal meaning of the word, there have no doubt been
human angels..


Linda Lee

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 12:57:13 PM11/7/08
to
On Nov 7, 12:42 pm, "Leo Sgouros" <hanaram...@archangels.mil> wrote:
> "Linda Lee" <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote in message


Actually, that is not the description, but the meaning of the name
Gabriel - Heb. 1403 - is "man of God; Gabriel, an archangel".

Yes, angels often appeared as men:

Gen 19:1 And there came *** two angels *** to Sodom at even; and Lot
sat in the gate of Sodom: and Lot seeing them rose up to meet them;
and he bowed himself with his face toward the ground;
Gen 19:2 And he said, Behold now, my lords, turn in, I pray you, into
your servant's house, and tarry all night, and wash your feet, and ye
shall rise up early, and go on your ways. And they said, Nay; but we
will abide in the street all night.
Gen 19:3 And he pressed upon them greatly; and they turned in unto
him, and entered into his house; and he made them a feast, and did
bake unleavened bread, and they did eat.
Gen 19:4 But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men
of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the
people from every quarter:
Gen 19:5 And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the
men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we
may know them.
Gen 19:6 And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door
after him,
Gen 19:7 And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly.
Gen 19:8 Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man;
let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is
good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came
they under the shadow of my roof.
Gen 19:9 And they said, Stand back. And they said again, This one
fellow came in to sojourn, and he will needs be a judge: now will we
deal worse with thee, than with them. And they pressed sore upon the
man, even Lot, and came near to break the door.
Gen 19:10 But the men put forth their hand, and pulled Lot into the
house to them, and shut to the door.
Gen 19:11 ***** And they smote the men that were at the door of the
house with blindness, both small and great: so that they wearied
themselves to find the door. *****

Men can't blind other men through a door.

guardian Snow

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 1:13:33 PM11/7/08
to

Tell it to Billy Madison. Just because you have no sense of humor:p
I thought I was suppose to be the AntiChrist.. make up your mind.

So.. if sin was "before the creation" as you originally stated and
then later stated that it was after the creation when somebody tempted
Eve, are you going to explain who it was that sinned..

Adam and Eve were fallen Angels.. right? Thats what your saying... So
your a fallen angel.. right?

And you said, "*God being symbolic of Satan/Lucifer*"

Does that mean that Satan is the God you pray to now?

Ike

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 3:11:52 PM11/7/08
to
"Linda Lee" <lindag...@juno.com> wrote in message
news:74297a3d-c373-429f...@t18g2000prt.googlegroups.com...

[snip]

> The Scriptures indicate the spirits of all peoples of all flesh are
> fallen angels;

That's an absolutely ridiculous notion taught nowhere in the Bible.

In fact, IT'S FLAT-OUT BACKWARDS.

> and the Scriptures say some choose to become children
> of God, and some remain children of the Devil and so their spirits
> will be destroyed come Judgment Day.

Oh, really? AND WHERE DOES SCRIPTURE SAY THIS?

> I don't expect the always-blind Snowjob to understand the following,
> but it is indication that all people are either children of God or
> children of the Devil:

> 1Jn 3:10 "In this the children of God are manifest, and the children
> of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither
> he that loveth not his brother."

Ah, John was talking about HERE AND NOW.

[snip]

> Rev 2:1 Unto the angel of the church of Ephesus write; These things
> saith he that holdeth the seven stars in his right hand, who walketh
> in the midst of the seven golden candlesticks;

Which means this letter concerns the Seven Spirits and the Seven Churches,
which are actually synonymous.

> Rev 2:2 I know thy works, and thy labour, and thy patience, and how
> thou canst NOT BEAR them which are EVIL: and thou HAST TRIED THEM
> WHICH SAY THEY ARE APOSTLES, and ARE NOT, and hast found them LIARS:

John's concern here was GNOSTICS and OTHER HERETICS, as addressed by
Clement, et al.

> Rev 2:3 And hast borne, and hast patience, and for my name's sake
> hast laboured, and hast not fainted.

You missed something of uttermost importance here.

First, John pointed to the seven spirits in the salutation.

Then he DUPLICATED TWO TERMS in the opening address.

1) works.
2) labour.
3) patience.
4) cannot bear them which are evil.
5) bourne
6) PATIENCE AGAIN.
7) WORKS AGAIN, but this time IN THE NAME OF CHRIST.

What gives?

These people THINK they are a "seven," that is "complete," and even an
"eight," that is ABUNDANT.

But they are ACTUALLY A SIX, that is "evil."

Why?

BECAUSE THEY FORGET THAT GOSPEL IS ABOUT GRACE, NOT LAW, AND HAVE TAKEN IT
UPON THEMSELVES TO JUDGE ACCORDING TO THE LAW, AND NOT PREACH THE GRACE OF
GOD THAT OVERCOMES THE LAW.

IN SHORT, THIS LETTER IS AGAINST LEGALISM.

> Rev 2:4 NEVERTHELESS, I HAVE SOMEWHAT AGAINST THEE, because thou HAST
> LEFT THEY FIRST LOVE [their "first love" was God when they committed
> the original sin of falling from Heaven by following 'the serpent'].

SEE ALL THE GARBAGE YOU HAVE TO ADD TO TURN THE WORD OF TRUTH INTO A LIE?

THE "FIRST LOVE" IS GOD'S GRACE (JUST AS JESUS, PAUL, AND JOHN ALL TAUGHT).

BUT THESE FOLKS LOST TRACK OF THAT, AND STARTED PREACHING THE GOSPEL OF LAW
INSTEAD.

> Rev 2:5 REMEMBER THEREFORE FROM WHENCE THOU ART FALLEN, and REPENT,
> and do the first works; or else I will come unto thee quickly, and
> will remove thy candlestick out of his place, except thou repent.

THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH PRE-EXISTENT IMMORTALITY, you dolt--IT'S ABOUT
THE CHURCHES RIGHT HERE, RIGHT NOW.

> The Messiah also taught of the original sin (i.e. the fall of the
> spirits within all humankind from Heaven)

NO SUCH EVENT EVER HAPPENED, moron.

THE SIN WAS HERE.

AND NO MAN "PRE-EXISTED" THEIR BIRTHS.

THEY GO ***BACK*** TO THE BEGINNING.

THEY DON'T COME ***FROM*** THERE.

> in the story of the Prodigal
> son in Luke chapter 15:11-32, a story of one son who remained with his
> father, and another son who abandoned his father and "sinned against
> heaven", who eventually repented of his sin against his Father and
> Heaven, and was then welcomed back home.

JESUS MADE NO SUCH APPLICATION OF THE STORY, fool.

YOU'RE DOCTRINE IS A SATANIC LOAD OF CRAP.

Ike

Ike

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 3:14:29 PM11/7/08
to
"Great Sage Itchy" <it...@itchyandscratchy.com> wrote in message
news:071120080840456636%it...@itchyandscratchy.com...

> In article
> <74297a3d-c373-429f...@t18g2000prt.googlegroups.com>,
> Linda Lee <lindag...@juno.com> wrote:
>
>> The Scriptures indicate the spirits of all peoples of all flesh are
>> fallen angels; and the Scriptures say some choose to become children
>> of God, and some remain children of the Devil and so their spirits
>> will be destroyed come Judgment Day.
>
> The Scriptures indicate??
> You mean the interpretation of the Scriptures indicate....
>
> The people of this world are NOT fallen angeles. They are the Children
> of the Kingdom, just as they have always been.

NOW COMES THE IDIOT OF THE OTHER EXTREME.

PRIOR TO THE CRUCIFIXION, THE "CHILDREN OF THE KINGDOM" WERE ISRAEL, AND NO
ONE ELSE.

AFTER THE CRUCIFIXION, THE "CHILDREN OF THE KINGDOM" ARE THE BELIEVERS IN
CHRIST.

BUT BEFORE ALL THESE, THE CHILDREN OF SATAN, i.e. THE CHILDREN OF THE FLESH,
WERE ALWAYS HERE--THEY'RE CALLED "GENTILES," AND THEY MAKE UP THEIR OWN
RELIGIONS LIKE PUTTING ON NEW CLOTHS EVERY DAY.

BUT ONLY THE ONE ESTABLISHED BY GOD WILL BE LEFT STANDING.

[snip the rest of the dolt's ramblings]

Ike


Ike

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 3:17:15 PM11/7/08
to
"Linda Lee" <lindag...@juno.com> wrote in message
news:61966b9e-ddeb-4a46...@c2g2000pra.googlegroups.com...

On Nov 7, 11:40 am, Great Sage Itchy <it...@itchyandscratchy.com>
wrote:
> In article
> <74297a3d-c373-429f-a786-7cb978130...@t18g2000prt.googlegroups.com>,
>
> Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:
>>> The Scriptures indicate the spirits of all peoples of all flesh are
>>> fallen angels; and the Scriptures say some choose to become children
>>> of God, and some remain children of the Devil and so their spirits
>>> will be destroyed come Judgment Day.
>
>> The Scriptures indicate??
>> You mean the interpretation of the Scriptures indicate....
>
>> The people of this world are NOT fallen angeles. They are the Children
>> of the Kingdom, just as they have always been.


> They were always initially children of the devil; some repent and
> become children of God:

Bullshit.

This story STARTED with TWO "TREES:" THE SONS OF GOD and THE GENTILES, i.e.
"the sons of men."

Israel was in. The Gentiles were out.

With the crucifixion, the game changed.

The believers are in, everyone else is out.

And NONE of this had anything to do with PRE-EXISTENT SOULS or "angels"
falling to the earth (unless, of course, one considers Adam and Eve
"angelic" before they fell).

Ike


Ike

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 3:29:52 PM11/7/08
to
"Feather" <fea...@earthling.net> wrote in message
news:46aa81c2-9b34-4e49...@1g2000prd.googlegroups.com...

On Nov 7, 8:11 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

>
> The Scriptures indicate the spirits of all peoples of all flesh are
> fallen angels; and the Scriptures say some choose to become children
> of God, and some remain children of the Devil and so their spirits
> will be destroyed come Judgment Day.
>

> How is it that Scriptures actually suggest otherwise?

> People don't become angels, nor do angels become people. Seems to me
> that angels are of an entirely different order in Creation:

eeeeehhhhhh.

Wrong answer.

Rev 22:8-9
And I John saw these things, and heard them. And when I had heard and
seen, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel which shewed me
these things.
Then saith he unto me, See thou do it not: for I am thy fellowservant,
and of thy brethren the prophets, and of them which keep the sayings of this
book: worship God.

WHO WAS THIS ANGEL?

A PREACHER, A PROPHET, AND A DOER.

Just like John.

IN OTHER WORDS, A MAN.


> Matthew 22:30
> At the resurrection people will neither marry nor be given in
> marriage; they will be like the angels in heaven.

IT'S "AS," NOT "LIKE."

CRAP TRANSLATION.

> Mark 12:25
> When the dead rise, they will neither marry nor be given in marriage;
> they will be like the angels in heaven.

SAME THING.

IT'S "AS," NOT "LIKE."

> Mark 13:27
> And he will send his angels and gather his elect from the four winds,
> from the ends of the earth to the ends of the heavens.

AND HOW DOES THIS PROVE MEN DO NOT BECOME THE ANGELS, WHEN THE "ELECT" HERE
IS JUST THE REMNANT, i.e. THE 144,000?

> Luke 12:8
> "I tell you, whoever acknowledges me before men, the Son of Man will
> also acknowledge him before the angels of God.

JOHN QUOTED THIS, TOO, YET CLEARLY STATED THAT THE BELIEVERS ARE THE ANGELS
OF GOD.

> Luke 15:10
> In the same way, I tell you, there is rejoicing in the presence of the
> angels of God over one sinner who repents.

AND HOW DOES THIS PROVE THAT ANGELS WERE NOT ONCE MEN?

> Luke 20:36
> and they can no longer die; for they are like the angels. They are
> God's children, since they are children of the resurrection.

ANOTHER CRAP TRANSLATION THAT USES "LIKE" WHERE IT SHOULD BE "AS."

(KEY WORDS IN ABOVE VERSE? "For they are LIKE the angels". Note, it
does *not* say they *are* angels).

KEY WORD MISTRANSLATED: IT'S "AS," NOT "LIKE."

WHAT CRAP TRANSLATION IS THIS?

> 1 Corinthians 6:3
> Do you not know that we will judge angels? How much more the things of
> this life!

AND WHO WOULD JUDGE THE ANGELS BUT THE OTHER ANGELS, WITH CHRIST BEING
(among other things) THE FIRST ANGEL?

AND NOW WE COME TO THE BIGGIE....

> Hebrews 1:5

HEBREWS DOESN'T BELONG IN THE BIBLE.

IT WAS AN ESSENE/GNOSTIC ATTEMPT TO UNDO THE THEOLOGY OF REVELATION.

THERE ARE SOME TWENTY POINTS WHERE THE AUTHOR PARAPHRASES REVELATION IN
ORDER TO ALTER THE THEOLOGY OF REVELATION WITHOUT ACTUALLY GIVING CREDIT TO
JOHN.

(This is one of many references where angels can appear as humans, but
are not).

YES, THEY ARE.

> 2 Peter 2:11

SAME PROBLEM: 2 PETER DOESN'T BELONG IN THE NEW TESTAMENT, EITHER--IT WAS
ALSO WRITTEN BY AN ESSENE/GNOSTIC ATTEMPTING TO THRUST ESSENE ESCHATOLOGY ON
CHRISTIANITY.

> Angels are a different order of being in creation than people.

NO, THEY'RE NOT.

THAT'S WHY JESUS DRAWS THE EQUATION "ANGELS > STARS > PREACHERS OF THE WORD"
IN THE OPENING OF REVELATION--THEY ARE SYNONYMOUS.

> People do not become angels, nor are angels every truly human.

WRONG.

> A fallen angel is one who chose to follow Satan to earth.

WRONG.

JOHN DOCUMENTS TWO ORIGINS OF THE ANGELS--HALF FROM ABOVE, AND HALF FROM
BELOW.

WHY?

BECAUSE HALF ARE ISRAELITES CAST DOWN, AND HALF ARE GENTILES WHO DON'T GET
TO COME UP.

> Isaiah 14:12
> How you have fallen from heaven, O morning star, son of the dawn! You
> have been cast down to the earth, you who once laid low the nations!

WRITTEN IN PERFECT PROPHETIC TENSE, WHERE THE PROPHET CALLS UPON A THING
THAT IS NOT AS IF IT IS ALREADY.

BUT THE STORY IS FUTURE, NOT PAST.

> A short reference to angels is found on the Christian Apologetics and
> Research Ministry page here:

> http://www.carm.org/bible/angels.htm

> Good reading.

No, a bunch of damn lies.

> So, while humans can be affected by demons; in some cases *possessed*
> by them, and in other cases are *minstered* to by them, or actually
> end up *entertaining angels*, people do not *become* angels, nor are
> angels ever truly human.

WE ARE THE "ANGELS" AND "DEMONS," oh, clueless one--THE STORY WAS RIGHT HERE
IN OUR MIDST THE WHOLE TIME.

Ike


Ike

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 3:32:13 PM11/7/08
to
"Linda Lee" <lindag...@juno.com> wrote in message
news:4012ccb5-4f9a-46c0...@a3g2000prm.googlegroups.com...

LOL

Says the heretic teaching GNOSTICISM, and DENOUNCING JESUS' PARTNERS, PAUL
AND JOHN.

Ike


Ike

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 4:58:36 PM11/7/08
to
"Linda Lee" <lindag...@juno.com> wrote in message
news:53db5c9f-b558-4e94...@d42g2000prb.googlegroups.com...

> Angels don't marry because they are spirits, and not male and female
> flesh.

No, angels don't marry because THEY'VE MOVED BEYOND THE THINGS OF THE FLESH
that they USED TO KNOW.

(Well, actually, some don't, which is WHY THEY FALL.)

[snip]

> Yes, before the unfallen angels as the story of the returning Prodigal
> Son in Luke 15:11-32 indicates.

Ridiculous Gnostic horseshit.

> Yes, the unfallen angels rejoice over this, just as the "sons of God",
> i.e. the "morning stars", rejoiced when God created the Earth and
> humankind as a means by which the fallen angels might repent and
> return to the Father.

Hey, idiot.

SONS OF GOD = MORNING STARS = ANGELS.

THEY'RE ALL THE SAME THING.

[snip]

> Yes, sons of God, children of God, morning stars, angels.

ALL THE SAME THING...

Rev 22:8-9

And I John saw these things, and heard them. And when I had heard and
seen, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel which shewed me
these things.

Then saith he unto me, See thou do it not: for I am 1) THY
FELLOWSERVANT, and 2) OF THY BRETHREN THE PROPHETS, and 3) OF THEM WHICH
KEEP THE SAYINGS OF THIS BOOK: worship God.

> I don't believe a thing Paul said, so I have no comment on his
> misinterpretations. I will say ONLY Paul made the false claim that
> the fallen angel Satan could still appear as an angel of light.

BULLSHIT.

ISAIAH SAID IT, TOO.

SO DID EZEKIEL.

> The apostle Jude...

JUDE WAS WRITTEN BY AN ESSENE/GNOSTIC, and quotes THE ASSUMPTION OF MOSES
and ENOCH, BOTH OF WHICH ARE SPURIOUS WORKS BY THE ESSENE "Sons of Light"
CULT WHICH CO-EXISTED WITH JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY IN THE FIRST CENTURY
(but quickly disappeared when the TEMPLE WAS DESTROYED, but THE END DIDN'T
COME).

[snip the rest of the idiot's dawdle]

Ike


Ike

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 4:59:44 PM11/7/08
to
"Leo Sgouros" <hanar...@archangels.mil> wrote in message
news:gf1umv$66o$1...@registered.motzarella.org...

PRECISELY.

And Jesus, among other things, is the FIRST AND FOREMOST "Angel of God."

Ike


Great Sage Itchy

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 5:09:44 PM11/7/08
to
In article <gf27j7$spb$1...@registered.motzarella.org>, Ike
<xeickleb...@msn.com> wrote:

> "Great Sage Itchy" <it...@itchyandscratchy.com> wrote in message
> news:071120080840456636%it...@itchyandscratchy.com...
> > In article
> > <74297a3d-c373-429f...@t18g2000prt.googlegroups.com>,
> > Linda Lee <lindag...@juno.com> wrote:
> >
> >> The Scriptures indicate the spirits of all peoples of all flesh are
> >> fallen angels; and the Scriptures say some choose to become children
> >> of God, and some remain children of the Devil and so their spirits
> >> will be destroyed come Judgment Day.
> >
> > The Scriptures indicate??
> > You mean the interpretation of the Scriptures indicate....
> >
> > The people of this world are NOT fallen angeles. They are the Children
> > of the Kingdom, just as they have always been.
>
> NOW COMES THE IDIOT OF THE OTHER EXTREME.

> PRIOR TO THE CRUCIFIXION, THE "CHILDREN OF THE KINGDOM" WERE ISRAEL, AND NO
> ONE ELSE.

THERE IS ONLY ONE ORIGIN FOR EVERYTHING, RACIST CREEP. That's a problem
for an egoist like you, though. For the egoist, there has to be the
"right" people, and the "wrong" people.

> AFTER THE CRUCIFIXION, THE "CHILDREN OF THE KINGDOM" ARE THE BELIEVERS IN
> CHRIST.

"BELIEVERS IN CHRIST" !!!......Believe all you want, creep. It won't
help you one bit. If Jesus Christ was alive, and discovered that his
teachings had produced hater/creeps like you, he would commit
hari-kiri.

> BUT BEFORE ALL THESE, THE CHILDREN OF SATAN, i.e. THE CHILDREN OF THE FLESH,
> WERE ALWAYS HERE--THEY'RE CALLED "GENTILES," AND THEY MAKE UP THEIR OWN
> RELIGIONS LIKE PUTTING ON NEW CLOTHS EVERY DAY.

SATAN is NOT a PERSON. SATAN is EGOTISM. It's YOU. You are SATAN.

> BUT ONLY THE ONE ESTABLISHED BY GOD WILL BE LEFT STANDING.
>

> [snip the rest of the creep's ramblings]
>
HERE IS A MESSAGE TO ALL:
IF YOU THINK "BELIEVING" IN CHRIST WILL DO ANYTHING FOR YOU, YOU ARE A
FOOL, AND POSSIBLY AN EGOIST. YOU CAN "BELIEVE" ALL YOU WANT IN CHRIST
OR MICKEY MOUSE OR BOZO THE CLOWN. BUT IF YOU THINK IT WILL GET YOU
SPIRITUAL POINTS, YOU ARE A FOOL. AND IF YOU THINK IT MAKES YOU BETTER
THAN ANYONE ELSE, YOU ARE AN EGOIST. YOU ARE SATAN.

REAL SPIRITUALITY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BELIEVING.

Linda Lee

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 6:27:16 PM11/7/08
to
On Nov 7, 4:58 pm, "Ike" <xeickleberrybo...@msn.com> wrote:
> "Linda Lee" <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote in message

>
> news:53db5c9f-b558-4e94...@d42g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Angels don't marry because they are spirits, and not male and female
> > flesh.

> Luke 12:8


> "I tell you, whoever acknowledges me before men, the Son of Man will
> also acknowledge him before the angels of God.

> > Yes, before the unfallen angels as the story of the returning Prodigal


> > Son in Luke 15:11-32 indicates.


>
> Ridiculous Gnostic horseshit.

You are such a damned imbecile. So you reject the Messiah's parable
in Luke 15 and call it "horseshit"; big surprise.


> Luke 15:10
> In the same way, I tell you, there is rejoicing in the presence of the
> angels of God over one sinner who repents.

>


> > Yes, the unfallen angels rejoice over this, just as the "sons of God",
> > i.e. the "morning stars", rejoiced when God created the Earth and
> > humankind as a means by which the fallen angels might repent and
> > return to the Father.
>
> Hey, idiot.

You're an abusive moron. (Note I replaced the quote from Feather from
Luke 15:10 you had deceptively clipped so as to justify your
egomaniacal ranting.)

>
> SONS OF GOD = MORNING STARS = ANGELS.
>
> THEY'RE ALL THE SAME THING.

That is exactly what I said, dumbo. There is something very wrong
with your brain that you cannot understand written words. Try reading
this real slooowly with the explanation I've added of "a sinner
repenting" [In case you're too senile to remember or look above, it's
in response to Feather posting "Luke 15:10 In the same way, I tell


you, there is rejoicing in the presence of the angels of God over one

sinner who repents."]: 'Yes, the unfallen angels rejoice over this [a
sinner repenting], just as the "sons of God", i.e. the "morning


stars", rejoiced when God created the Earth and humankind as a means

by which the fallen angels might repent and return to the Father.'

>
> [snip]
>
> > Yes, sons of God, children of God, morning stars, angels.
>
> ALL THE SAME THING...

DUH ...no kidding, Ikenboob.

>
> Rev 22:8-9
>
>     And I John saw these things, and heard them. And when I had heard and
> seen, I fell down to worship before the feet of the angel which shewed me
> these things.
>     Then saith he unto me, See thou do it not: for I am 1) THY
> FELLOWSERVANT, and 2) OF THY BRETHREN THE PROPHETS, and 3) OF THEM WHICH
> KEEP THE SAYINGS OF THIS BOOK: worship God.
>
> > I don't believe a thing Paul said, so I have no comment on his
> > misinterpretations.  I will say ONLY Paul made the false claim that
> > the fallen angel Satan could still appear as an angel of light.
>
> BULLSHIT.


>
> ISAIAH SAID IT, TOO.
>
> SO DID EZEKIEL.


So you claim ...give the verses maniac.

Linda Lee

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 6:33:56 PM11/7/08
to
On Nov 7, 5:09 pm, Great Sage Itchy <it...@itchyandscratchy.com>
wrote:

> >
> <xeickleberrybo...@msn.com> wrote:
>
>
> > AFTER THE CRUCIFIXION, THE "CHILDREN OF THE KINGDOM" ARE THE BELIEVERS IN
> > CHRIST.
>
> "BELIEVERS IN CHRIST" !!!......Believe all you want, creep. It won't
> help you one bit. If Jesus Christ was alive, and discovered that his
> teachings had produced hater/creeps like you, he would commit
> hari-kiri.

Hater/creeps? What do you think you are?


>
> > BUT BEFORE ALL THESE, THE CHILDREN OF SATAN, i.e. THE CHILDREN OF THE FLESH,
> > WERE ALWAYS HERE--THEY'RE CALLED "GENTILES," AND THEY MAKE UP THEIR OWN
> > RELIGIONS LIKE PUTTING ON NEW CLOTHS EVERY DAY.
>
> SATAN is NOT a PERSON. SATAN is EGOTISM. It's YOU. You are SATAN.


LOL. You both claim to be some kind of prophets, and anyone reading
you knows neither of you are anywhere near to being a prophet or
knowledgable of the Scriptures.

>
> > BUT ONLY THE ONE ESTABLISHED BY GOD WILL BE LEFT STANDING.
>
> > [snip the rest of the creep's ramblings]
>


> HERE IS A MESSAGE TO ALL:
> IF YOU THINK "BELIEVING" IN CHRIST WILL DO ANYTHING FOR YOU,


> YOU ARE A
> FOOL, AND POSSIBLY AN EGOIST. YOU CAN "BELIEVE" ALL YOU WANT IN CHRIST
> OR MICKEY MOUSE OR BOZO THE CLOWN. BUT IF YOU THINK IT WILL GET YOU
> SPIRITUAL POINTS, YOU ARE A FOOL. AND IF YOU THINK IT MAKES YOU BETTER
> THAN ANYONE ELSE, YOU ARE AN EGOIST. YOU ARE SATAN.

Everything you said is total projection and completely true of
yourself; you are an egoist, a fool, and Satan.

>
> REAL SPIRITUALITY HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH BELIEVING.

Not to a damned imbecile like yourself.

guardian Snow

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 7:22:37 PM11/7/08
to
On Nov 8, 10:33 am, Linda Lee <lindagirl...@juno.com> wrote:

> LOL. You both claim to be some kind of prophets, and anyone reading
> you knows neither of you are anywhere near to being a prophet or
> knowledgable of the Scriptures.

Isa 29:9 Stay yourselves, and wonder; cry ye out, and cry: they are
drunken, but not with wine; they stagger, but not with strong drink.
Isa 29:10 For YHWH hath poured out upon you the spirit of deep sleep,
and hath closed your eyes: the prophets and your rulers, the seers
hath he covered.
Isa 29:11 And the vision of all is become unto you as the words of a
book that is sealed, which men deliver to one that is learned, saying,
Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I cannot; for it is sealed:
Isa 29:12 And the book is delivered to him that is not learned,
saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned.

Qadosh Stephanos

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 10:05:06 PM11/7/08
to
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 07:00:58 -0800 (PST), guardian Snow
<snowp...@eck.net.au> wrote:

>Nope.. nothing about sin and this is the BEGINNING. Because you don't
>believe the scriptures starting at verse one, your now fabricating
>your own made up religion and not able to support your garbage with
>any textual proof.

It is wise to be constructive instead of overly defensive.

You relay on a book that has been proven to be corruptive.

Separation from God is them who has not the word of truth.


I got a real 1611 AD Babble. Screw all you Latin people.

Qadosh Stephanos

unread,
Nov 7, 2008, 10:24:15 PM11/7/08
to
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008 06:06:09 -0800 (PST), Linda Lee
<lindag...@juno.com> wrote:

>Gen. 3:14 "And the LORD God said unto the serpent, Because thou hast
>done this, thou art cursed above all cattle, and above every beast of
>the field; upon thy belly shalt thou go, and dust shalt thou eat all
>the days of thy life".

You're talking about Snow, right?

It is loading more messages.
0 new messages