DAVID VP
tomnln
Oswald said he had no Lawyer.
Was he Lying?
Name Oswald's Lawyer.
"David Von Pein" <davev...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1158358944....@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>>>> "How do you know Oswald told any lies at all?" <<<
>
> Ohhhh, I don't know....just a hunch:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/ea04b9e6141f0098
>
>
>>>> "The interrogations were not recorded and we know the police lied
> often about what Oswald said." <<<
>
> Oh, we "know" the police "lied" about what Oswald said eh? And just
> exactly HOW do we "know" this (esp. considering the fact that, as you
> noted, none of the interviews were recorded)?
>
> IOW -- How do you "know" the DPD lied about Oswald's behind-closed-doors
> words when you can't possibly "know" what Oswald said in the first place?
>
> Obviously, most CTers want to take the word of the accused killer as
> Gospel, rather than believe anything the DPD said.
>
> E.G.:
>
> "I'm just a patsy."
>
> "I didn't shoot anyone, no sir."
>
> "I emphatically deny these charges." -- (Which means, of course, "I'm
> perfectly innocent of both of these murder charges.")
>
> All of the above words spoken to the press by Lee Oswald are provable
> lies. And there is certainly every reason under the moon to believe that
> Oswald's web of lies didn't simply stop with just his occasional hallway
> bullshit-filled declarations uttered to the Live television cameras.
>
> LHO started telling falsehoods from the minute he was shoved into that
> police car on Jefferson Boulevard. That is a verifiable FACT.*
>
> * = Unless you want to accuse a multitude of people in the DPD, the USSS,
> and the FBI of deliberately skewing Oswald's comments. Do you want to do
> that? If so, where's the proof?
>
>
>>>> "So, you claim there are never any conspiracies?" <<<
>
> I was obviously talking about JUST the JFK case. Of course, you probably
> knew that.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/8b5fe5e258b39f17
>
>
David Von Pein
I have no idea what you're trying to get at here, unless you're
implying that I have said that EVERY SINGLE THING said by Oswald MUST
be a "lie" (which, of course, I never claimed).
Is that the inference here?
Anyway -- No, I don't think Oswald was lying when he said he had no
lawyer. But, then again....so what?
Most of Oswald's lies within his large pack of lies only surfaced when
the questions got close to the topic of his MC rifle and how he
obtained it (or anything about Oswald's precise whereabouts at 12:30 PM
and approx. 1:14 PM on November 22nd).
Other peripheral topics, like lawyers, didn't require any bald-faced
falsehoods from Oswald's mouth. Why would they?
But when it came down to the Brass Tacks of the events of 11/22/63,
Oswald was a literal Lying Machine......
The rifle.
The two murders.
Alek Hidell.
Having lunch with "Junior".
The backyard photos.
"I didn't shoot anybody, no sir."
"I was just going to the picture show." (Paraphrased.)
"Bill Shelley said to go home." (Paraphrased.)
And gobs more.....
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/ea04b9e6141f0098
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/4dd73f8e676a5db8
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/9ff403dedacb5d4f