Re: Digest for veteransindia@googlegroups.com - 7 Messages in 3 Topics

[Omprakash Saxena]

Dear Sir,

Could someone take up a case regarding restoration of exemption of charges for Demand Draft by the banks especially SBI? 

Earlier the BANKS never used to charge for DD from the ESM and the serving defence personnels.

Regards,

OP Saxena
+919953240888
--
We all have been sent by the Almighty for a fixed purpose of serving the humanity without blinking at all even for a moment. 

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:05 AM, <vetera...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

  Today's Topic Summary

Group: http://groups.google.com/group/veteransindia/topics

• Not to vote any body in Pb: ESM decide [2 Updates]
• Digest for vetera...@googlegroups.com - 2 Messages in 1 Topic [4 Updates]
• Exempting armed forces from toll tax [1 Update]

 Not to vote any body in Pb: ESM decide

gyan misra <misr...@gmail.com> Jan 10 06:44PM -0800  

By not voting you are helping indirectly the parties against whom you
have grievances. It is very common for the political parties to make
tall promises before elections and forget them thereafter. It is
strange that you are ready to vote for a party, which promises to work
for welfare of ESM , being aware of their past record..I think it will
be better to support a promising independent candidate, with a clear
understanding of what you expect from him in return for your support.
In the coalition era prevalent today, independents and small parties
can have a say in policy matters and cannot be ignored. Here in
Uttarakhand Lt Gen T P S Rawat, after hobnobbing with both, the
Congress and the BJP, has formed Uttarakhand Raksha Morcha, which is
fielding candidates for 60 out of 70 seats. They include many retirees
from defence forces and civil services.Even if they get a few seats,
they will be in a position to put up the views of service class of
people effectively to whichever party forms the govt.
 
G Misra
 


 

anand ranjit <anand...@yahoo.com> Jan 11 11:01PM +0530  

Dear Sir,
              Good Day!
It is not advisable to boycott elections for ESM in Punjab Assembly
Elections. The ESM Veterans can speak up their grievances to captain Amrinder
Singh and decide on voting the Congress party.
otherwise , it shall be just wastage of their right to Vote. It is not
going to help in any way by not exercising your right to vote.Please take you
decision back  and contact captain Amrinder Singh on the said grievances.
And advise the ESM to vote for Congress and remove SAD/BJP Govt. from
the scene. Please do not waste your vote.
 
 
Thanks
With Best regards
(R.S.Anand)
 
 
________________________________
From: ss sohi <sadh...@gmail.com>
To: vinod jaiswal <vjais...@yahoo.co.in>
Sent: Sunday, 8 January 2012 6:29 PM
Subject: Re: Not to vote any body in Pb: ESM decide

 
Sir, thanx, we are obliged. Rgds. Col Sohi.9815107744.
 
 
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 5:56 PM, vinod jaiswal <vjais...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
 
Dear Sir,
 
>>PRESS RELEASE
>> 
>>Ex-Servicemen decided
Not to vote any body
>>Dear Sir/
Veterans,
>>1. An ESM meeting was held at Jallandhar (Rama Mandi) on 7 Jan 12, which was
attended by (16 NGOs/  ESM Organisations from
all over Pb to decide to whom to vote to. It was Org by Sqn Ldr YS Nijjar to foster overall unity &
solidarity amongst various ESM outfits with a common purpose. Because, the decision
makers understand the language of
Vote bank only. We (about 8 lakh ESM voters) are the biggest sufferer
& neglected community due to corruption & misgovernance. The main
issues & aspects which were discussed at length were as under:-
>> 
>>2. SAD/BJP
Govt in Pb.
>>a. Gun Licenses to ESM are stopped, which use to help ESM job for security
Guards. Shortage of working staff & Sainik Sadan took last priority in Pb,
when Centre is paying 50% of its cost.
>>b. 67000 tubewell connections released recently, have gone to SAD suppoters
basically. ESM quota is ignored. ESM/ Widows property is not safe from
encroachers/ grabbers.
>>c. War Widows (138 approx) are still waiting for their 10 Acres promissed Land/
cash in lieu for each Widow. ESM/ Widow’s welfare activities/ Funds &
scheme are on the decrease.   
>>d. ESM Reserve Job quota 13% is fulfilled with less than 1.5% ESM, only.
>>e. CSD Canteen taxes in Pb are the highest, ie Rum Rs 10-12/- & Whiskey Rs
45-50/- is costing more than other states around. Our appeals have made no
effect on Govt.
>>f. Ration depots are released secretly w/o publicity to Govt’s own men and ESM
are ignored. Similarly, jungle Raj cases with ESM/ Families by ruling elements are
on the increase a n d so on.     
 
>>3. Cong
Govt & their Dept of ESM Welfare (DOEW).
>>a. Promised & accepted, OROP issue hanging on, inspite of Court’s Orders.
Most grievances & demands are not being redressed to. DOEW is occupied by
Civilians & bureaucrats, who are arrogant, unapproachable & anti ESM
community by nature & design.
>>b. Unreasonable gaps & anomalies in the Pensions of Naik to Sub Major, in Honorary
Ranks, Capt/ Majors and Maj Generals, are being neglected, even after regular
appeals.
>>c. MOD/ DOEW opposes all Court cases blindly, which are favouring ESM
community.
>>d. DOEW/
MOD has taken over all ESM Welfare Funds & CSD Canteen services control
from the Army HQ and also stopped Sale of Cars. MOD refuses most legitimate
dues/ Justice to ESM community even in small/ petty cases, like double family
Pension to deserving Widows. 
>>e. Family Pension of Widows & War widows is increased but to the bottom
line of post 1/1/06 retirees. Rank & service length is ignored blindly
& with anomalies.
>>f. Welfare grants/ Fin Asst at State & Centre level for ESM/ Widows are
drying up gradually a n d so on...
 
>>4. It is
painfully experienced that Cong Govt & its ministers have been assuring for
OROP & other ESM Welfare measures by proper redressal system, but very
little have been done practically. Same way other Political parties also assure
& say a lot in their manifestoes, but do very little in Parliament or
States, when time comes. Therefore, after prolonged & divergent views
coming up from various Heads of Districts & NGO, most ESM were of the
opinion to support candidates as under:-
 
>>a. Decision: After weighing
pros & cons of all political parties & Govt, it was unanimously decided by the Veterans Not to vote to any
body, to express their anguish & desperation over State &
Centre Govts attitudes.
>> 
>>5. The main
participants/ Heads of ESM NGOs in meeting were Brig HS Toor, Col Hk Singh
& Maj SS Aulakh (Ludhiana) Col KS Grewal (Patiala), Lt Col SS Sohi
(Mohali), Capt BS Bhatti (Bathinda), Hav DC Kataria (Phillour) Wrt Offr SS
Saini (Adampur) N/Sub ML Mandia (Faridkot) Hav Bhola Singh (Maur mandi) Hav
Bhagat Singh (Fazilka) Sub Balbir Singh (Garhshanker) Hav Prem Singh (Ferozpur)
Hav Gian Singh (Tarn Taran) Sub Major Anup Singh (Hoshiarpur) Sub Darshan Singh,
Sub Maj MS Padda Sgt Gobind Singh (Jallandhar) and many more.
>> 
>>Released by:Lt Col SS
Sohi. 9815107744. Dt 07 Jan 12.
>>President
ESM Grievances Cell (Regd) Mohali.


 

 Digest for vetera...@googlegroups.com - 2 Messages in 1 Topic

Rakesh Prasad Chaturvedi <rpchat...@gmail.com> Jan 11 09:39AM +0530  

The extraordinary judgemental interest in the media against the Chief's DOB
arouses suspicion.
Your query is understandable consequence of the Media Blitz, obviously
motivated.
Having said that, let me clarify that the Chief would have been eligible
for entry to NDA even with 1951, the correct DOB. That time the age limit
was 14.5- 16 or 15-16.5 or something similar. I am a couple of courses
senior to Gen VK Singh, and had joined NDA with 15 yrs 4 months age. There
were some younger, with just 15 and 3 months.
The entry gained to NDA is not based on just your say so on the form. That
just remains 'provisional' till a PROOF of DOB is submitted, ie the School
Leaving Certificate in this case. That having been done, the AGs branch
seems to have corrected the records, while the MS branch has not.
The Book Keeping is done by AGs branch,which everyone else, including MS
branch needs to synchronize with. Apparently in this case, like some
others, this has not been done.
The matter really is simple. Its a reconciliation, with the MS requiring to
correct records. However, for reasons not known in public domain,but
speculated, the establishment- politico bureaucratic combine, is keen to
push the unauthentic date to correct the verified correct one.
This is not a simple case. Gen VK Singh is a victim, not a villain as is
being made out.
 
With Warm Regards,
Col RP Chaturvedi,
A-35, Sector 36,
Noida 201303.
Mob: +919891279035
E Mail ID: rpchat...@gmail.com
*
*
 
Nescit Cedere
 
 
 
 


 

gyan misra <misr...@gmail.com> Jan 11 06:54AM -0800  

A candidate for entry to the NDA had to be between 15 and 17.5 years
as on 1 Jan or 1 Jul for the term commencing in that particular month.
 
Maj G N Misra (Retd)
 
On Jan 11, 9:09 am, Rakesh Prasad Chaturvedi <rpchaturv...@gmail.com>
wrote:


 

Brig S S Jaswal <jasw...@yahoo.co.in> Jan 11 08:26PM +0530  

VKS & self joined the NDA together in July`66, The age at entry at that time was 15 to 171/2 & min edn 10th pass. Even if result was awaited for 10th class one could still join provisionally & later produce the 10th pass certificate from the school. So he was very much within age limits if dob is 10 May`51. I recall a cadet of my school had to leave NDA after Ist term because he failed in 10th class. He joined later on passing Senior Cambridge. What is baffling is why he did not fill the NDA exam form himself as most of us did before joining & going through a number of stages before final selection to the NDA. What happened later has been `thrashed` threadbare & beautifully given in Lt Gen Vijay Oberoi`s article in the Tribune on 10 Jan`12. He should `stick to his guns` or else resign imdt & go to Court. Let the Govt `fight` over the next Chief - `Dood Ka Dood aur Pani Ka Pani Patta chal jayega` !!!
 
Brig SS Jaswal, Veteran Madras Sapper.
 
 
 
________________________________
From: "vetera...@googlegroups.com" <vetera...@googlegroups.com>
To: Digest Recipients <vetera...@googlegroups.com>
Sent: Wednesday, 11 January 2012 3:23 AM
Subject: Digest for vetera...@googlegroups.com - 2 Messages in 1 Topic
 
 
  Today's Topic Summary
Group: http://groups.google.com/group/veteransindia/topics
* AN EDITORIAL IN ECONOMIC TIMES: 04 Jan 2012 [2 Updates]
 AN EDITORIAL IN ECONOMIC TIMES: 04 Jan 2012
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group veteransindia.
You can post via email.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an empty message.
For more options, visit this group.


 

DR BRIGADIER V RAMANAN <rhinor...@gmail.com> Jan 11 09:30PM +0530  

DEAR ACHUTAN
the reviews have clearly clarified that the gen officer was a son of an
army officer and was born at a military hospital and certificates given by
m h . the a g 's records should have more weightage as against M S
. eariler more than 8 years back the M S has got a clarification from the
chief who was then a maj gen .
 
the government is trying . to fix him for no fault of his.
 
i feel the government will fall on account of this case.
blessings
dr brigadier v ramanan
 
aw
 
--
REGARDS & BLESSINGS
DR BRIGADIER V RAMANAN (veteran) ;
Ph D , M Sc, MBA,LLB ( Hons) DHRM DCA , LMIMA;
Professor and Advisor
SHAIL Group of Institutions
Shail Campus Pithampur Road Indore MP 07314010513 (O)
91-7324-271983 (R) Mob 098261-47738
adv...@indoreinstitute.com, adv...@shailgroup.com
rhinor...@gmail.com , raman...@gmail.com


 

 Exempting armed forces from toll tax

"Col Madan Sharma (Veteran)" <mada...@gmail.com> Jan 11 06:58AM +0530  

My Dear Veteran Friends, You must Print this and keep it in your car.MM
 
 
****
** **
 
*I'm also attaching the NHAI letter clarifying the exemption for all
serving service personnel, **retired service personnel (yes!) and
dependents (yes! yes!!). **Keeping a copy in your car's glove compartment
should be handy.*****
****
*SC upholds 105-year law exempting armed forces from toll*****
Upholding provisions of the 105-year old Indian Tolls Act, the Supreme
Court on Friday dismissed a special leave petition (SLP) seeking withdrawal
of concessions provided to Armed Forces personnel under the Act.
A Division Bench comprising Mr Justice Ashok Bhan and Mr Justice Markandey
Kadju declined to interfere in the directions issued by the Punjab and
Haryana High Court, which had dismissed a petition filed by a Chandigarh
resident, Sanjeev, in May. Sanjeev had challenged the provisions of the Act
on the ground that it was discriminatory, unconstitutional and against the
spirit of Article 14 of the Constitution of India which provided for
equality before law. He had also contended that other central government
employees and members of the para military forces are not entitled to such
concessions.
The HC Division Bench, comprising Mr Justice H S Bedi and Mr Justice Ranjit
Singh, however, ruled to the contrary and had dismissed the petitioner’s
contentions. Thereafter, he had filed a SLP in the apex court against the
HC order.
Section 3(a) of the Indian Tolls (Army & Air Force) Act, 1901, provides for
toll tax exemption on all public or private roads and bridges in India to
officers and men of the regular forces whether they are on duty or not.
Further civil vehicles and animals moving under military orders, are also
exempted from payment of toll tax. The Act also has an overriding clause,
which causes it to override all other Acts or directions by any legislature
or central or state government in India.
The controversy regarding applicability of the Act began a few years ago,
when private toll operators under the Build-Operate- Transfer (BOT) system
on various roads and bridges had started refusing toll exemption to defence
personnel and in certain cases even to defence vehicles.
The issue had then been settled after Chandigarh-based lawyer, Capt Navdeep
Singh, took up the matter with the Central Government in 2004 and
instructions were issued by government thereafter that the Act was very
much applicable to toll roads and bridges being operated under the BOT
schemes or otherwise. The instructions also clarified that the Act was
applicable even to private vehicles belonging to personnel of the regular
forces.
While the problem of illegal charging of toll tax has more or less been
settled with the instructions being circulated all over, sporadic incidents
of harassment of defence personnel continue to be reported mainly from the
Delhi-Noida- Delhi Flyway and from some areas of Himachal Pradesh.
 
 
 
Madan Sharma
 
** **
****
NHAI_LETTER.pdf<http://xa.yimg.com/kq/groups/10101883/701426069/name/NHAI_LETTER.pdf>
****
.****
 
 
*Lt Col Madan Sharma *
*Veteran Indian Infanteer
CONSERVE & HARVEST RAIN WATER
PLEASE GO GREEN BY USING BIODEGRADABLE PACKING MATERIAL*
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
--
*Lt Col Madan Sharma *
*Veteran Indian Infanteer
CONSERVE & HARVEST RAIN WATER
PLEASE GO GREEN BY USING BIODEGRADABLE PACKING MATERIAL*


 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Group veteransindia.
You can post via email.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an empty message.
For more options, visit this group.

[avtar singh]

Dear All,

It is high time that ESM stop childish act

Refusing to vote is not the right approach to the problem

Regards

Avtar Singh

Lt Cdr
12-12-2012

---

To: vetera...@googlegroups.com
From: vetera...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Digest for vetera...@googlegroups.com - 7 Messages in 3 Topics
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 20:35:05 +0000

[vjs gill]

Dear Col Sharma,

Veterans I-cards is not honoured by NHAI Toll Barriers?

Is there a ruling after 2006 on this matter

can any one clarify please

Col Vjs gill

 

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:05 AM, <vetera...@googlegroups.com> wrote:

[Ajit Rana]

Dear All Veterans

As per the rule position on Tolls, only serving armed forces personnel are exempted payment of Toll at NHAI Tolls. All ex-servicemen/veterans are not exempted. The NHAI letter circulating on internet signed by one Puri is fake and not authenticated by NHAI.

This is authenticated information right from NHAI office.

with regards

Col A S Rana(Veteran)

--
With best wishes
Col Ajit Singh Rana
+919650804787