A total lunar eclipse should be blue not red.

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

If lunar color is coming from the blue atmosphere
it would be blue dominant not red.
Science doesn't know a red coming from a blue.

Mitchell Raemsch

[Jim Pennino]

For how many years are you going to repeat this stupidity?

It has been explained to you many, many, many times why an eclipse is
red, babbling moron.

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

an eclipse creates a shadow across covering the Moon.
That inner shadow has no reason to glow red.
Why isn't it blue? how much red is in the blue atmosphere?
Blue would dominate instead. So how does red?

[Jim Pennino]

You have been posting this babbling nonsense about the Moon for years
now and you have been told many, many, many times why the Moon appears
red during an eclipse.

Obviously you have a very low attention span and are a babbling moron
for reposting this nonsense yet again.

[Volney]

On 8/8/2023 2:23 AM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> If lunar color is coming from the blue atmosphere
> it would be blue dominant not red.
> Science doesn't know a red coming from a blue.

Why aren't you listening to all the earlier answers you got, as Jim P
told you?

And obviously, if you think it "should be" blue, but it "is" red, you
should be asking yourself "Where did I go wrong, thinking it should be
blue?" After all, if reality conflicts with a belief/theory/hypothesis,
it is reality which is real (obviously!) and your
belief/theory/hypothesis is just plain wrong.

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

I question why it would be red. Why is it not blue from the blue
atmosphere. I am pointing out science thinks it has answers
to everything where it clearly does not.
Why would an eclipse shadow not darken the Moon whole disc instead?

[Jim Pennino]

Nope. "Science" has kown why the Moon is red during an ecliple for a
very long time and much longer than the many years you have been
reposting this babbling nonsense.

> Why would an eclipse shadow not darken the Moon whole disc instead?

Why do you not understand that you have been given the answer to this
many, many times by many many people over the years you have been
repeatedly asking this quesion, which is also a free, simple lookup
moron?

Do you have brain damage or were you born a moron that you keep asking
this year after year?

[Volney]

On 8/8/2023 2:55 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:32:11 AM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
>> On 8/8/2023 2:23 AM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> If lunar color is coming from the blue atmosphere
>>> it would be blue dominant not red.
>>> Science doesn't know a red coming from a blue.
>> Why aren't you listening to all the earlier answers you got, as Jim P
>> told you?
>>
>> And obviously, if you think it "should be" blue, but it "is" red, you
>> should be asking yourself "Where did I go wrong, thinking it should be
>> blue?" After all, if reality conflicts with a belief/theory/hypothesis,
>> it is reality which is real (obviously!) and your
>> belief/theory/hypothesis is just plain wrong.
>
> I question why it would be red.

And you got your answer. Do you think the answer is different now than
it was last week or a year ago or something?

> Why is it not blue from the blue
> atmosphere.

And again, you already got your answer.

> I am pointing out science thinks it has answers
> to everything where it clearly does not.

And the answers which were given to you are science's answers. So
obviously, science does have the answers.

> Why would an eclipse shadow not darken the Moon whole disc instead?

Google how an eclipse happens, Roy.

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 12:31:58 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
> On 8/8/2023 2:55 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:32:11 AM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
> >> On 8/8/2023 2:23 AM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> >>> If lunar color is coming from the blue atmosphere
> >>> it would be blue dominant not red.
> >>> Science doesn't know a red coming from a blue.
> >> Why aren't you listening to all the earlier answers you got, as Jim P
> >> told you?
> >>
> >> And obviously, if you think it "should be" blue, but it "is" red, you
> >> should be asking yourself "Where did I go wrong, thinking it should be
> >> blue?" After all, if reality conflicts with a belief/theory/hypothesis,
> >> it is reality which is real (obviously!) and your
> >> belief/theory/hypothesis is just plain wrong.

I know it is red. But through Earth's blue atmosphere
it should be blue. There is not enough red particles
in a blue atmosphere. So why is it not blue then?
Science believes it knows everything where it does
not. It cannot replace God doing whatever He wants.
It is not red by science... it is red by God...

> >
> > I question why it would be red.

It should be blue.

[Jim Pennino]

You have been told over and over why an eclipse is red, moron.

Since the answer has not penetrated your thick, moron skull in spite
of it being repeated many times over the years, nothing would be
accomplished by repeating the answer yet again, moron.

>> >
>> > I question why it would be red.
>
> It should be blue.

And you should be able to understand the simple explaination that has
been given to you many times over the years.

Yet you don't because you are just plain blazingly stupid.

[Andy Everett]

For the same reason that the setting sun is red and the daytime sky is blue. See Google search

"why does the moon turn reddish during a lunar eclipse"

1st result "During a lunar eclipse, the Moon turns red because the only sunlight reaching the Moon passes through Earth's atmosphere. The more dust or clouds in Earth's atmosphere during the eclipse, the redder the Moon will appear. It's as if all the world's sunrises and sunsets are projected onto the Moon."

https://www.google.com/search?q=why+does+the+moon+turn+reddish+during+a+lunar+eclipse&rlz=1CARJNJ_enUS781US784&oq=why+does+the+moon+turn+reddish+during+a+lunar+ec&aqs=chrome.0.0i512j69i57j0i22i30l8.20363j0j15&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 1:06:32 PM UTC-7, Andy Everett wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 2:23:46 AM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> > If lunar color is coming from the blue atmosphere
> > it would be blue dominant not red.
> > Science doesn't know a red coming from a blue.
> >
> > Mitchell Raemsch
> For the same reason that the setting sun is red and the daytime sky is blue. See Google search

But the sunlight is blocked at a total eclipse. So it can't be from a red Sun light.
Why would the whole lunar disc not be covered by the eclipse shadow instead?
God creates gravity. Science doesn't. God can create different lights. Science does not answer everything.


Mitchell Raemsch

[whodat]

Thinking rationally would cause conflict with his narcissism.

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

Science is real because of God not of itself.

[Volney]

On 8/8/2023 3:44 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 12:31:58 PM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
>> On 8/8/2023 2:55 PM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 11:32:11 AM UTC-7, Volney wrote:
>>>> On 8/8/2023 2:23 AM, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>>> If lunar color is coming from the blue atmosphere
>>>>> it would be blue dominant not red.
>>>>> Science doesn't know a red coming from a blue.
>>>> Why aren't you listening to all the earlier answers you got, as Jim P
>>>> told you?
>>>>
>>>> And obviously, if you think it "should be" blue, but it "is" red, you
>>>> should be asking yourself "Where did I go wrong, thinking it should be
>>>> blue?" After all, if reality conflicts with a belief/theory/hypothesis,
>>>> it is reality which is real (obviously!) and your
>>>> belief/theory/hypothesis is just plain wrong.
>
> I know it is red. But through Earth's blue atmosphere
> it should be blue. There is not enough red particles
> in a blue atmosphere. So why is it not blue then?

Once again, you were already given the answer. Many times. If you were
given the answer but you are still too dumb and stoopid to understand
it, then giving you the answer yet again won't help.

> Science believes it knows everything where it does
> not.

But science knows why the moon is red during an eclipse, even if you
don't. And science has known why it turns red for a very long time.

[Jim Pennino]

mitchr...@gmail.com <mitchr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 1:06:32 PM UTC-7, Andy Everett wrote:
>> On Tuesday, August 8, 2023 at 2:23:46 AM UTC-4, mitchr...@gmail.com wrote:
>> > If lunar color is coming from the blue atmosphere
>> > it would be blue dominant not red.
>> > Science doesn't know a red coming from a blue.
>> >
>> > Mitchell Raemsch
>> For the same reason that the setting sun is red and the daytime sky is blue. See Google search
>
> But the sunlight is blocked at a total eclipse. So it can't be from a red Sun light.
> Why would the whole lunar disc not be covered by the eclipse shadow instead?
> God creates gravity. Science doesn't. God can create different lights. Science does not answer everything.
>

This has all been explained to you over and over and over again, idiot.

That you can not understand it, no matter how many times you have been
told, just means that you are a moron, which is obvious from your
babbling gibberish.

[Jim Pennino]

Non sequitur, moron.

[Paul Alsing]

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/search?q=moon%20red%20mitch

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/0ki_GUcZkLc/m/l4ImxyhXFAAJ

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/LpW0Qa6Qx50/m/KbdfGmWCDAAJ

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/KiTTkkeg9n0/m/sLLj2EnHDgAJ

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/wV8XxUnYK6k/m/FTFDcIo-BgAJ

... and I could go on and on for a very long time.

[Jim Pennino]

I have to say I was wrong about Mitch.

I thought he had only been reposting his gibbering nonsense about the
Moon since about 2015, but your search shows that the moron has actully
been posting the same nonsense since 2004.

19 years of blazing stupidity...

[mitchr...@gmail.com]

The Earth atmosphere is blue. It can't be red all the time.
How is the moon being eclipsed always getting red then?
Why not blue?

Mitchell Raemsch

[Paul Alsing]

Asked answered multiple times over a couple of decades.

You don't understand that there is a place in space that is *always" in the shadow of the Earth, and from there the Earth is *always" surrounded by a red ring.

[Jim Pennino]

You have been told why inumerable times over the last 19 years that you
have been posting this.

How did you get so blazingly dense that you can't understand 19 years
worth of replies?

Were you born a moron?

Did you suffer brain damage somewhere along the line?

Are you on drugs?

Are you actually an AD (Artificial Dumbness)?