Last blows for my new physics from Google Groups

[Arindam Banerjee]

On Tuesday 28 January 2020 at 05:45:04 UTC+11, Thomas Heger wrote:
> Am 22.01.2020 um 12:48 schrieb Page Harritt:
> > Ross A. Finlayson wrote:
> >
> >> On Tuesday, January 21, 2020 at 10:39:08 AM UTC-8, carleto4...@gmail.com
> >> wrote:
> >>> The purposes of SR is to justify the em ether, Maxwell's theory and the
> >>> ether, composed of matter.
> >>
> >> Sure it does.
> >> That's light's speed, constant in the vacuum,
> >> in deep, still space the theory.
> >> Sure, Special Relativity is quite well held up.
> >> Also electrical....
> >
> > you write like shit. And no, SR makes "ether" _completely_ obsolete,
> > deprecated, or you two lovers terribly misunderstood something.

Right, that was the whole purpose of e=mcc-hv, to make aether obsolete, as it relates to aum, a Hindu concept.
The main idea was to get rid of Hinduism, by colonialism and deception, so it would not do to have the Vedic physics as valid.
So Jewish physics was invented by Jews to keep up the books relating to the One True God.
Tesla rightly wrote that the relativists were very brilliant people, but not as scientists. They were/are theologians.
An infinite, eternal universe pervaded by infinitely fine aether supporting waves, and positive and negative charges, does not suit the Jewish metaphysics.

> >
> The question is: what is it, that makes light move with c?

Maxwell related them to electric permittivity and magnetic permeability, in his famous equations for the em travelling wave.
Which makes three important points:
em radiation is a wave
there are electric and magnetic fields
there has to be a medium for their progagation, for all waves need media.
>
> Apparently the speed of light behaves somehow similar to speed of sound,
> but way faster.

Doppler effect works for both yes.
When we consider that wavelength does not change, just moves faster with a higher velocity of the wave.
Mathematically, f(v)=(c+v)/wavelength, where c is speed of light/sound and v is the velocity of the emitter of the light/sound.
Much simpler, above, than twisting up the wavelength as is done now.
>
> The speed of the emitter is irrelevant, only the features of the space
> between emitter and receiver are relevant. Therefor there should be
> something, which causes light to pass through at always the same speed.

Light does not pass at the same speed.
c(v) = c(epsilon, mu)+V
The MMI clearly shows that light speed varies with the speed of the emitter, when we correct the big bungle there about the interferometer moving with the Earth's movement.
I made this clear back in 2005.
>
> Since there is no matter (in vacuum), the space itself should have an
> influence.
>
> This is certainly astonishing, since because of this behavior any
> 'ballistic' theory could be ruled out.

Wrong. Why continue with the bungle about light speed constancy? It is ridiculous. Scandalous. Idiotic, unless money/fame/ascendancy is involved, in which case it is criminal.
>
> My personal explanation is this:
>
> Empty space is not really empty, but emptiness is 'relative', too.

It is full of aether, through which electrons glide through without opposition, as aether is composed of infinitely fine matter.
>
> This emptiness is a function of the perspective and matter for one
> observer is not necessarily matter for all others.
>
> I call this concept 'structured spacetime' and have actually written
> kind of 'book' *) about it, which could be found here:
>
> https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dd8jz2tx_3gfzvqgd6
>
> TH
>
> *) it is not really a book, but a google.doc presentation

All intelligent people must consider my new physics:
****
The physics aphorisms of Arindam
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/8HgH3sbRe94/m/gYzu9OAkAgAJ

The cause of gravity
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 1
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/6UIGDNHH7n0/m/U0t-kYqgAAAJ

Explaining the nova and supernova phenomena with new physics theories - 2
https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/CffbGTXV72c/m/5ONP6J6gAAAJ

*****
Introduction to "A New Look Towards the Principles of Motion"
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/1wmee5C8mFs/kJMPdnFkAwAJ

Section 1
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/GbpQC3a2d1Q/jSXQeb9kAwAJ

Section 1 (contd.)
Linear Motion, Momentum, Force, Energy, Internal Force Engines, and the design of Interstellar Spacecraft
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/P9ZiinIDhHU/ZtMQVyliBQAJ

Section 2
The Creation and Destruction of Energy
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/wY6_9V8ucSY/3nnJQk9iBQAJ

Section 3
The Structure of Heavenly Bodies
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ

Section 4
The Nature of Explosion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/7TkOVZigFHg/uv43_aZiBQAJ

Section 5
The forces involved in rotational motion
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/jhgcsTq-NrQ/ZBwG8S9jBQAJ

*******

https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/VtFeGAkIABg/m/CLPzLRElAwAJ

Cheers,
Arindam Banerjee