https://www.reddit.com/r/LockdownSkepticism/comments/14558pu/lockdown_dissenters_were_muzzled_in_the_uk_as/
Lockdown Dissenters Were Muzzled in the U.K. as Well as the U.S.
Thin-skinned authoritarians of the world, unite!
J.D. TUCCILLE | 6.9.2023 7:00 AM
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on RedditShare by emailPrint
friendly versionCopy page URL
A businessman with tape over his mouth holding a flag of the United Kingdom.
(Elnur | Dreamstime.com)
When it comes to the political class, bad ideas can be contagious. That
appears to be the case with censorship during the pandemic, which became
a popular pastime among functionaries convinced they are the embodiment
of science—or, at least, the arbiters of truth. As it turns out, that
led to the collaboration between the state and social media companies to
muzzle voices not just in the U.S., but also across the Atlantic in the U.K.
The Rattler is a weekly newsletter from J.D. Tuccille. If you care about
government overreach and tangible threats to everyday liberty, this is
for you.
Email(Required)
Email Address
Submit
Muzzling Dissenting Voices
"A secretive government unit worked with social media companies in an
attempt to curtail discussion of controversial lockdown policies during
the pandemic," The Telegraph reported June 2. "The
Counter-Disinformation Unit (CDU) was set up by ministers to tackle
supposed domestic 'threats', and was used to target those critical of
lockdown and questioning the mass vaccination of children."
The report added that "critics of lockdown had posts removed from social
media. There is growing suspicion that social media firms used
technology to stop the posts being promoted, circulated or widely shared
after being flagged by the CDU or its counterpart in the Cabinet Office."
Among those monitored and penalized were prominent epidemiologists and
medical researchers who challenged official data and restrictive
policies. Activists who opposed lockdowns were also targeted. The
Telegraph, a prominent newspaper which has run articles skeptical of
pandemic authoritarianism, was itself singled out.
Implicated in monitoring content and penalizing dissent at the behest of
government officials were companies including Facebook, Google, Twitter
(under the old management), and the BBC, the U.K.'s high-profile state
broadcaster.
The story follows an earlier report (credited by The Telegraph)
published in January 2023 by civil liberties group Big Brother Watch.
That report, Ministry of Truth: the secretive government units spying on
your speech, called out the Cabinet Office's Rapid Response Unit, the
Counter Disinformation Unit, the Foreign Office's Government Information
Cell, the Home Office's Research, Intelligence and Communications Unit,
and the British Army's 77th Brigade. Together, they targeted what
officials considered "disinformation" during the pandemic and then
following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
"The government has created opaque agencies which increasingly use
social media companies as an extension of the state, using these online
intermediaries to police online speech on their behalf," the report
says. "Though the speech in question may violate these online
intermediaries' terms of use, this itself is not a legitimate cause for
state interference with free expression."
Where Have I Heard That Before?
If that sounds familiar to you, it should. It's essentially identical to
what we've seen revealed in the United States. The Telegraph makes that
point in its story, noting that "In America, Twitter has released
similar information showing how the US government also introduced a
secretive programme to curtail discussion of Covid lockdowns."
As in Britain, U.S. officials leaned on multiple private firms to
suppress messages the government didn't like.
"The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) played a direct
role in policing permissible speech on social media throughout the
COVID-19 pandemic," Reason's Robby Soave reported in January.
"Confidential emails obtained by Reason show that Facebook moderators
were in constant contact with the CDC, and routinely asked government
health officials to vet claims relating to the virus, mitigation efforts
such as masks, and vaccines."
Censors Defending the Indefensible
Not only did government officials seek to muzzle people—often
intelligent, well-informed people—who dared to disagree with them, they
often did so to advance serious policy errors that might have been
avoided if open and healthy debate had been allowed. Just this week, the
UK's Institute of Economic Affairs published a peer-reviewed analysis
showing that during the COVID-19 pandemic, "harsher restrictions, like
stay-at-home rules and school closures, generated very high costs but
produced only negligible health benefits."
"The science of lockdowns is clear; the data are in: the lives saved
were a drop in the bucket compared to the staggering collateral costs
imposed," comments Johns Hopkins University's Steve Hanke, who
co-authored the analysis with Jonas Herby of Denmark's Center for
Political Studies and Lars Jonung of Sweden's Lund University.
Among other costs, researchers find that restrictive pandemic policies
took an enormous toll on people's mental health.
"My colleagues and I conducted a review of all of the studies on mental
health conducted during the first year of the pandemic," social
psychology professor Gery Karantzas of Australia's Deakin University
wrote last year. "We found that overall, social restrictions doubled
people's odds of experiencing mental health symptoms…. Those who
experienced lockdowns were twice as likely to experience mental ill
health than those who didn't."
Children took a particular hit from lockdowns implemented with no viable
plan for keeping them educated and engaged.
"Children lost an average of one-third of a year of school during the
coronavirus pandemic," Reason's Emma Camp pointed out in February.
"Researchers say the loss is largely due to the disruption and damage
school closures—and the subsequent shift to distance learning—brought on
children's physical and mental health."
Violating Rights and Pushing Bad Policy
Suppressing opposing opinions from physicians, journalists, activists,
and anybody else who might have seen downsides to the policies preferred
by those in power turns out to have been not just a violation of free
speech rights (a big deal itself), but an excellent way of greasing the
path to disaster. What officialdom called "disinformation" was actually
the sort of healthy debate that raises valid concerns, differing values,
and important considerations overlooked by thin-skinned authoritarians
who prefer censorship over challenges to their egos.
The Telegraph quoted criticism from civil liberties advocates as well as
lawmakers from the ruling Conservative Party that implemented Britain's
lockdowns and speech controls.
"It is becoming increasingly clear that many of the foundations of our
democracy – such as free speech and parliamentary scrutiny – were
completely disregarded during the pandemic," commented Miriam Cates, a
Conservative member of Parliament.
We could say much of the same here in the U.S. and elsewhere in the
world. Unfortunately, despite their annoyance at being exposed, there's
little evidence that authoritarian officials have learned any lessons.
Sponsored Videos
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG antivirus software.
www.avg.com