Maureen McAllister lives for DRAMA
Greegor
then attempt to insult straight opponents
by using gay as a SLUR??
Greegor
wrote:
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c19f4811-3406-472d...@g9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Why would Moe pose as gay friendly but
> > then attempt to insult straight opponents
> > by using gay as a SLUR??
>
On usenet??
> but your posts are off-topic in the Jehovah's
> Witness group.
With a 15 year FEUD going on there,
has the topic cop act dampened the
feud at all?
Did you try that when Kent dragged
Moe into the JW FEUD?
> Can you please remove
> the religious group? Thank you.
How many people posting in the JW
group are JW believers?
Is it considered ON TOPIC when a bunch
of detractors rail against JW's there?
In fact, now that I think of it, isn't a usenet
group for JW's naturally going to be about
as ON TOPIC as one about the Amish?
The TOPIC COP thing seems like an Aspergers tactic.
Maureen McAllister lives for DRAMA.
Greegor
> On Aug 31, 8:19 am, "Exposa DeJabriol" <Inva...@invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:c19f4811-3406-472d...@g9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > Why would Moe pose as gay friendly but
> > > then attempt to insult straight opponents
> > > by using gay as a SLUR??
> > I don't mean to be rude,
>
> On usenet??
>
> > but your posts are off-topic in the Jehovah's
> > Witness group.
>
> With a 15 year FEUD going on there,
> has the topic cop act dampened the
> feud at all?
> ::: These people you're feuding with,
> Moe and Kent, aren't regular posters
> there.
So?
> Someone on alt.legal requested the
> cross-posting there be stopped
> also.
Good luck with that, topic cop!
> The last time Antonio had a meltdown,
> several people on the kook group also
> requested they be removed from the
> cross-posting.
Wow. A kook got upset? Imagine that!
> Did you try that when Kent dragged
> Moe into the JW FEUD?
>
> ::: How do you drag someone into a feud they have no interest in? She's
> not involved in any feud there. I don't her, or what your problem with her
> is.
Kent and Moe are so VERY joined at the hip
that apparently they would like to shake that
perception and hence the dramatic performance
where Moe pretended to be ever so independent.
> > Can you please remove
> > the religious group? Thank you.
>
> How many people posting in the JW
> group are JW believers?
>
> ::: I wouldn't know since they'd be afraid to say. People there have been
> outed and threatened.
Which was supposed to convince me how?
> Is it considered ON TOPIC when a bunch
> of detractors rail against JW's there?
>
> ::: Yes, as it's still on topic. We discuss
> all aspects of the WTS, the
> good and the bad.
How NICE for you!
> In fact, now that I think of it, isn't a usenet
> group for JW's naturally going to be about
> as ON TOPIC as one about the Amish?
>
> ::: It's on topic when other topics and flame wars and fueds are not
> cross-posted in.
I see. YOUR flame wars are special, right?
> The TOPIC COP thing seems like an Aspergers tactic.
Golly, why didn't you acknowledge that one?
> Maureen McAllister lives for DRAMA.
>
> ::: Well she's not finding it on ARJ-W. She only posted there a few times
> and moved on.
Why are you trying to sell such BS?
Moe started out saying she was going to stay
OUT of it. It wasn't long before she began
passing judgement in her usual willy nilly style.
ie Pull the other leg you wanker.
Those ""bumps"" on Moe you're suckling
at are way past their "Best By" dates.
And WHY did you post this load of BS only to alt.fan.bob-larson?
Golly, Now WHO do I know that tries this kind of stuff?? LOL
Greegor
> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:dmku57dip86m6hd1p...@4ax.com...> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> The last time Antonio had a meltdown,
> >>> several people on the kook group also
> >>> requested they be removed from the
> >>> cross-posting.
>
> >>Wow. A kook got upset? Imagine that!
>
> It's looking to me like this Greegor just wants to get involved with the
> people on the ARJ-W group.
Why are you so concerned, Carol? LOL
> If he wants to believe Moe is posting there,
> he'll believe it no matter what anyone says.
Do I care either way?
> If she's posting there, her
> posts are either invisible, or my NSPs are not picking them up. Maybe only
> he can see them.
> And it looks like he wants to start in with me.
When you posted what you said was PROOF of
Antonio's racism, I looked at what you presented
and realized that you were trying to pull a fast one.
> I'm not
> interested in communicating with anyone who would defend a well known
> sadistic sociopath like Antonio L Santana/Jabriol, or with someone who
Are you going all Marie Antoinette on me now? LOL
> admitted he cruelly abused a small child, calling her a brat. Something is
> seriously wrong there.
Kent Wills really BAD sporgery of me, but Kent
falsely attributes it to me and quotes it over and over again.
How are your tactics any different, Carol?
Shushaku
> On Sep 2, 8:31 am, "Parrish *~" <Par...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
> > "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:dmku57dip86m6hd1p...@4ax.com...> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >>> The last time Antonio had a meltdown,
> > >>> several people on the kook group also
> > >>> requested they be removed from the
> > >>> cross-posting.
>
> > >>Wow. A kook got upset? Imagine that!
>
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > It's looking to me like this Greegor just wants to get involved with the
> > people on the ARJ-W group.
>
> Why are you so concerned, Carol? LOL
>
It makes her look bad in front of her sock puppets.
>
> When you posted what you said was PROOF of
> Antonio's racism, I looked at what you presented
> and realized that you were trying to pull a fast one.
>
> > I'm not
> > interested in communicating with anyone who would defend a well known
> > sadistic sociopath like Antonio L Santana/Jabriol, or with someone who
>
> Are you going all Marie Antoinette on me now? LOL
>
> > admitted he cruelly abused a small child, calling her a brat. Something is
> > seriously wrong there.
>
> Kent Wills really BAD sporgery of me, but Kent
> falsely attributes it to me and quotes it over and over again.
>
> How are your tactics any different, Carol?
they are not, that why she is a kook.
Greegor
KBW > When I made it clear that his sexual OBSESSION
KBW > with me will never be returned, Greg started
KBW > claiming I was convicted
The claim that Kent was convicted was not
originally mine, and predated my first knowledge
that Kent even existed.
Kent's statement here about timing or
cause and effect is a lie, as is usual for Kent.
Kent only began this false assertion that
my involvement is sexual fairly recently.
It's a variation on Maureen's attempt to
insult opponents by calling them gay.
> of either two, three and at one time four felonies.
Court records are ONLINE and show that Kent
has two thieving felonies and a misdemeanor for
using a teen as an accomplice on his 2nd felony
for garage burglary in Ankeny Iowa.
Kent is reaching for some way to confuse
the proveable facts about his record.
Why try to confuse the details if it's not his?
> Someone was able to dumb down Iowa's Three Strikes Law enough to
> get Greg to realize his LIES about three or four felonies would be
> impossible (I'd still be in prison if I had three or more).
I did once express a suspicion of more, probably
in some state other than Iowa, but
Kent falsely represents that I CLAIMED he
had three or four.
Kent is the someone who brought up the Three Strikes law,
hoping it would help him distract from his convictions.
> Since then he's only claimed two felonies, with no explanation as
> to why the others vanished. At this point, I've accepted he's never
> going to offer one.
> He uses Iowa's court web site to promote his lies. Of course,
> depending on his mood, the information about Kent Wills was placed to
> either catch a racist stalker (whom only Greg is aware exists and is
> unable to name),
Kent and Maureen repeatedly claimed that
Kent Wills is only a nickname adopted to
throw off a racist stalker who Kent said
threatened Kent's hispanic wife and kids.
Kent said his stalkers name was Eric Ross.
But when asked for the number of a Police
report, a date or which Police department,
Kent has never ponied up any proof.
I find it amusing that here Kent has changed
his story and pretended that his claims
were my claims.
> or it was done as a joke (for what end he's not
> stated),
Another of Kent's OWN claims.
For some time Kent claimed that the
court records on him were FAKED
by a buddy of his, as a joke on him.
This story was shot down by pointing out
that the records show up on three different
official state court and corrections web sites
and that faking such records would be
a VERY serious felony level crime.
Later Kent claimed that he is not
even named Kent, which is not compatible
with the faked records claim KENT MADE.
Kent has posted rotating denials that
sometimes collide with each other.
eg How could records be faked about
him if his name is not the same as
on the court records?
> or as part of an undercover government
> operation (he jumped on that when
> Kevin made a joke about it).
Quoteless again.
> Greg thinks his posting the same lie over and over,
Official and public LINKS that can be
confirmed by anybody on the internet.
> knowing that he's admitted it's not true
False claim repeated ad infinatum.
It's a STOCK deception of Kents to falsely
claim that his opponent already conceded
to whatever lie Kent is asserting.
> and that it's been PROVED not to be true,
> will, in some way, make it true. Further, he thinks once it magically
> becomes the truth, it will server to punish me for not returning his
> sexual desires for me.
Kent seems to count on most readers having
a short attention span and not bothering
to do any fact checking themselves.
Kent's arguments go in a LARGE circle
but a circle nonetheless.
Greegor
You are Kent Bradley Wills, DOB Jan 8, 1969.
KBW > There are only two of us posting with any regularity,
KBW > and those posts aren't all that regular.
KBW > Greg thinks that because Usenet is an extremely
KBW > important part of his life, this is the case with
KBW > everyone. Most of the people on Usenet see it
KBW > as a distraction from real life, not as being real life.
KBW > Sadly, Greg's mind doesn't work like that.
KBW > It's looking like Antonio's mind is much the same.
Ask Kent how many messages he posted each
month in October and November of 2007.
Scroll down to the posting history.
Carol > If you've noticed, many ISP's have dropped
Carol > Usenet. One ISP told me it's because of
Carol > all the complaints they got about people,
Carol > and all the spam. Too many crazies
Carol > on Usenet he said.
Naturally you didn't think that applied to your 15 year
hate campaign against one religion, or Moe's 26 year
hate campaign against one televangelist. LOL
> It wasn't cost effective to maintain
> employees to deal with all the complaints. The other thing taking Usenet
> under is all the trolls. People are moving to moderated forums. They don't
> want to have to put up with the Greg's and the Jabriol's and the MMs.
You run a FIFTEEN YEAR hate campaign against JW's.
Moe runs a TWENTY SIX YEAR hate campaign against
one particular televangelist and ran a TEN YEAR hate
campaign against one eBay seller even though she got
a refund within MONTHS.
You think THOSE campaigns are beloved by ISP's
and that any detractor thorns in your side are
creating the problems for the ISP??
Nice delusion for you.
> One day Usenet will be a vast wasteland with very
> few people posting on any of the NGs. I've seen
> the number of posters drop quite a bit since 1996.
Naturally you didn't consider that cell phones
and facebook had any part in that change.
> I personally give up on trolls because there's no getting anywhere with
> them. They're a waste of time. Flaming is their main interest. Unless
> they pay me I can't see reading their boring redundant material.
Calling every opponent in a discussion group a troll
sure is convenient FOR YOU.
-----
> "I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
> you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
> you will understand why I dismiss yours" - Stephen Roberts -
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Are you an atheist now, Carol?
Refusing to answer such pertinent questions
is one of those CULT behaviors, isn't it?
Greegor
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
EDJ > Have a nice evening.
On Sep 1, 4:39 am, Kent Wills <compu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> The last time Antonio had a meltdown,
> >> several people on the kook group also
> >> requested they be removed from the
> >> cross-posting.
G > Wow. A kook got upset? Imagine that!
KBW > Antonio does seem to be very upset.
Is that YOUR scorecard, Kent?
> >> Did you try that when Kent dragged
> >> Moe into the JW FEUD?
>
> >> ::: How do you drag someone into a feud they have no interest in? She's
> >> not involved in any feud there. I don't her, or what your problem with her
> >> is.
>
> >Kent and Moe are so VERY joined at the hip
> >that apparently they would like to shake that
> >perception and hence the dramatic performance
> >where Moe pretended to be ever so independent.
KBW > Moe has always been ever so independent.
KBW > Is there a SPECIFIC reason you're LYING
KBW > and presenting that she is not?
LOL
> >> The TOPIC COP thing seems like an Aspergers tactic.
>
> >Golly, why didn't you acknowledge that one?
>
> >> Maureen McAllister lives for DRAMA.
>
> >> ::: Well she's not finding it on ARJ-W. She only posted there a few times
> >> and moved on.
>
> >Why are you trying to sell such BS?
G > Moe started out saying she
G > was going to stay OUT of it.
KBW > That's not what she stated.
Without a quote and link this appears
to just be more of your psychopathic ""reasoning"".
KBW > That is your DECEPTIVE spin on her
KBW > claim. Why are you so UNABLE to be honest?
Look, psychopath, everybody knows there's
a REASON you can't or won't quote or link.
You are a well known usenet liar.
> >It wasn't long before she began
> >passing judgement in her usual willy nilly style.
>
> >ie Pull the other leg you wanker.
>
> >Those ""bumps"" on Moe you're suckling
> >at are way past their "Best By" dates.
>
> >And WHY did you post this load of BS only to alt.fan.bob-larson?
G > Golly, Now WHO do I know that tries this kind of stuff?? LOL
KBW > One Gregory Scott Hanson,
KBW > a "man"
KBW > with Aspergers,
KBW > self admitted user and abuser of illegal drugs,
KBW > convicted wife BEATER,
KBW > founded child ABUSER, and
KBW > self proved pathological LIAR.
That is typical of your half truths, Kent.
Why did my response to some sock
make your knee jerk, Kent?
Greegor
> At one time, not so long ago, Annointed Remnant
>
> <Annointed_mem...@newsguy.com> wrote:
> >In article <fh8p67pr3qka37un3t52ibpc0t1aiu7...@4ax.com>, Kent Wills says...
>
> >>You have two convictions for BEATING
> >>Donna, your ex-wife. Contrary to your
> >>LIE, one does not get sentenced to
> >>incarceration for simply pushing away
> >>their attacker. You BEAT her. Denying
> >>this truth doesn't help you at all.
AR > I see. So, we have a wife beater,
> Greg actually tried to claim that all he did was push [...] away
> when she attacked him. The problem with that claim is that pushing
> away an attacker is not a crime in Iowa.
Please cite such a legal code, Kent.
Please also explain why I called the
Police, how I was a counterclaim,
that she was convicted also, and
her BIPOLAR condition.
> As such, he wouldn't have
> been arrested, tried and had a jury convict him (though he claims he
> didn't fight it), then sentenced to jail.
> > a 'man' who throws his pregnant daughter out
> > in the cold, and a 'man' who threatens to do something to an elderly woman and
> > make her husband watch.
> > The pattern is quite clear. All scums.
Do you have a spotless record, Fred?
Kent has two thieving FELONIES and
a misdemeanor for using a teen in
the garage burglary, and BOTH felonies
are much more recent than my misd's.
I volunteered my record, Kent lies about his.
Are you going to volunteer YOUR record, Fred Simmons?
Come on Fred, be more forthright and honest.
What IS your current religion?
What actually caused you to "flip" on the JW's?
Did you get dragged into JW by a wife or somebody?
If you were strong willed then why did you
join and stay in it for THIRTY YEARS?
If you were weak willed, then why did
you leave them?
Please explain your definition of cult better.
Do you have a definition that would not
label most religions as cults?
Do you consider Paganism to be a cult?
If Carol refuses to answer the same
questions please explain how that
behavior is not cult like?
Greegor
Subject: Re: spiceworld reviewsDate: 1998/02/27
Message-ID: <6d5qgl$2eag$1...@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 328993178
References: <34f27b83...@ihug.co.nz>
34f37120.76147...@enews.newsguy.com
X-Auth-User: 000000000/ed2339e429fb818d
X-Post-Time: 27 Feb 1998 07:37:57 GMT
Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY
Newsgroups: ia.talk.misc
[...]
My name is Kent Wills. I live near Des Moines,
Iowa in the USA. I teach American History to
middle school children. I have a wife, Lindsay,
who is a psychologist with the Fifth Judicial
District in Des Moines. Lindsay and I have a
son, Richard, who will turn nine years old
in a little over two weeks (March 23rd to be
exact). They grow up so fast! If you want to
know anything else, just ask. Odds are I'll
answer any questions.
Kent Wills
>From: ahwe29b AT prodigy.com (Kent Wills)
In the original, capital letters are used. Please see the link
below that PROVES you the drug addled LIAR you are for the proof that
you edited the letters.
Why re-write the address with lower case letters? Granted, the
letters are still accurate, but what gain did this bit of editing do
you?
>Subject: Re: spiceworld reviewsDate: 1998/02/27
>Message-ID: <6d5qgl$2eag$1...@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com>#1/1
Note that the MID for the post linked above is the one you used
for your LIE here.
Why did you LIE and claim I deleted the post when you KNEW I did
not?
>X-Deja-AN: 328993178
>References: <34f27b83...@ihug.co.nz>
>34f37120.76147...@enews.newsguy.com
>X-Auth-User: 000000000/ed2339e429fb818d
>X-Post-Time: 27 Feb 1998 07:37:57 GMT
>Organization: Prodigy Services Company 1-800-PRODIGY
>Newsgroups: ia.talk.misc
What is the underlying motivation that forced you to post edit
the name of the group to which the post was sent?
>[...]
>My name is Kent Wills. I live near Des Moines,
>Iowa in the USA. I teach American History to
>middle school children. I have a wife, Lindsay,
>who is a psychologist with the Fifth Judicial
>District in Des Moines. Lindsay and I have a
>son, Richard, who will turn nine years old
>in a little over two weeks (March 23rd to be
>exact). They grow up so fast! If you want to
>know anything else, just ask. Odds are I'll
>answer any questions.
Note that the text you C&P to the edited headers can be seen
starting at the third paragraph.
Pay attention to the date of the post. Seven years AFTER you
claim it was sent.
Hey, Greg! How is it possible to quote a post seven years
BEFORE it's sent? You've so far refused to answer this question.
Some more you've been reduced to running away from to HIDE, or,
as with the post to which I am replying, tried to distract:
Why are you COMPELLED to stalk minor children?
What caused you to think that presenting the exact same LIE a
seventh time, KNOWING it has been exposed six times already, would be
a winning move?
How are you able to hold the belief that someone who is 15 years
of age is 22 years of age?
Why did you sexually molest Kristen Watkins (Lisa Rene Watkins'
daughter)?
Why do you believe that once a female enters puberty she becomes
as ugly as a sasquatch?
What is at the root of your extreme HATE for families?
I have other questions, but I'll wait for you to answer these. I
expect an honest answer to each and every one.
OK, I don't really expect you to answer honestly. In fact, I
expect you to run away and HIDE from them, since answering would
require you to admit the truth about yourself.
Which of these women is Lisa Rene Watkins:
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/8b1234bd.jpg
"I am Bob Larson."
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson offering more proof that he is
as mentally ill as he presents.
Message-ID:
<df610804-da3b-4aa8...@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (They are so accurate, Greg compared them the comment
that water is wet):
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
As of Wednesday, August 31, 2011:
SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE
Comments: OPA $2805.04
COPIES TO PA
VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT
JUDGEMENT DEFAULT
Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04
+ INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS.
Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
FEES $35.60
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
him. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed
has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still
can't risk getting a job due to it.
Bob L. Head
> In the original, capital letters are used. Please see the link
Name Kent Bradley Wills
Offender Number 1155768
Sex M
Birth Date 01/08/1969
Age 38
Location Interstate Compact
Offense BURGLARY 2ND DEGREE
County Of Commitment Polk
Commitment Date 01/16/2004
Duration
TDD/SDD *01/16/2009
Greegor
[ Kent argues that his 2003 accomplice Sean is a female,
citing what he SAYS is a quote from facebook, even though
the Department Of Corrections web page says MALE. ]
KBW > "Sean only shares some of her profile
KBW > information with everyone. If you know
KBW > Sean, send her a message or add
KBW > her as a friend."
But even if you hadn't LIED, the Department Of Corrections
would be rather conclusive, wouldn't you say?
http://www.doc.state.ia.us/InmateInfo.asp?OffenderCd=6157973
Name Sean Michael Bilyeu
Offender Number 6157973
Sex M
Birth Date 12/18/1985
Age 25
http://www.myspace.com/smb20087
If you mouse over the photo, MYSPACE
shows he is a 25 year old MALE.
His middle initial in the link is nice, too.
Do you deny that the Iowa Department of
Corrections web page says Sean is MALE, Kent?
Do you deny what Sean's MYSPACE account
says he is MALE, Kent?
I don't get the quote you claim came from
Facebook, logged in to Facebook or not.
I doubt you'll admit you LIED.
You CONTINUED this idiotic argument even
after I posted the IDOC and MYSPACE links
and information, Kent.
Do you think that arguing against such
conclusive evidence says much about YOU, Kent?