This group is officially CLOSED
Nomen Nescio
Anyone caught violating the NO POST rule shall be reported to their ISP for proper discipline.
This includes YOU.
yumhuyk
I am the legal owner of alt.fan.bob-larson and this newsgroup will
remain open through 2013.
yours in Christ,
isamu
KabukiBob
Usenet groups cannot be legally owned by anyone Yukke, only the
moderated ones can be moderated.
And unfortunatly the BL moderated one has you in it.
Moe
Kent Wills
>On Aug 8, 11:00 am, Nomen Nescio <nob...@dizum.com> wrote:
>> Move along, nothing to see here.
>>
>> Anyone caught violating the NO POST rule shall be reported to their ISP for proper discipline.
>>
>> This includes YOU.
>
>I am the legal owner of alt.fan.bob-larson
Liar.
>and this newsgroup will
>remain open through 2013.
>
And, most probably, beyond.
--
Sanza speme vivemo in disio.
Greegor
Was there an ORIGINAL FAQ for "alt.fan.bob-larson" ?
Didn't Deja have a policy against hate groups?
Did they really not recognize that the "fan" designation
was a way for sociopaths like Moe to represent a hate
group as if it was a fan group for BL?
KabukiBob
Quit the act gaggie. You know as well as I do how the alt fan BL group
started. The Canadian people who objected to Larson's homophobia.
Moe
bob-a-looey
Oh, good...
bob-a-looey
Life is tough for a young mole, isn't it?
bob-a-looey
Excellent question!
bob-a-looey
Newsgroups: alt.fan.bob-larson
From: gjnel...@cantor.ee.umn.edu (Greg Nelson)
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 1995 22:09:55 GMT
Local: Mon, Mar 27 1995 3:09 pm
Subject: Bob Larson FAQ
he Bob Larson FAQ (by Greg Nelson (gjnel...@cantor.ee.umn.edu))
Q: Who is Bob Larson?
A: Bob Larson is a Denver-based radio televangelist. His show, "Talk
Back", airs
from 2:00 to 4:00 Mountain time on Christian radio stations nationwide.
Q: Why is Bob Larson worthy of a fan club?
A: 1) His radio show is quite entertaining. Bob Larson spends much of his
time railing against such "evils" as Mormons, Masons, and homosexuals. His
frequent pleas for money bring back memories of Jim Bakker and PTL. He
features
such promo giveaways as "The Death of Vince Foster". - "Bill Clinton says
it was suicide. Read this book for the truth!"
2) He runs his show in a call-in format, allowing those with differing
views
to debate him. He often treats his callers in an antagonistic (and
entertaining) manner.
Not a day goes by that he doesn't get into a heated debate with either an
atheist or a death-metal music fan.
Q: What is the purpose of this group?
A: 1) To trade information about Bob, such as the location of his personal
appearances or the stations he broadcasts on.
2) To discuss Bob's latest tirade victims. Currently, he's down on
"godless
atheists", after months of Clinton-bashing.
bob-a-looey
> Quit the act gaggie. You know as well as I do how the alt fan BL group
> started. The Canadian people who objected to Larson's homophobia.
>
> Moe
LIAR!
Kent Wills
>Who DID actually start this "alt.fan.bob-larson" hate group?
Your deceptive presentation that it's a hate group aside, a group
of Canadian gay activists made it. This is very old news.
Why are you asking a question that was answered several months
ago? Do you honestly think your following your Aspergers' pattern
wouldn't be noticed?
>
>Was there an ORIGINAL FAQ for "alt.fan.bob-larson" ?
Not as far as I am aware.
>
>Didn't Deja have a policy against hate groups?
Maybe. What would it matter? That you're LYING and claiming it
was a hate group in 2011 wouldn't matter when it was created in the
early 90's.
>
>Did they really not recognize that the "fan" designation
>was a way for sociopaths like Moe to represent a hate
>group as if it was a fan group for BL?
All members of the BLFC were FANatic about exposing Bob Lar$on
for the fraud he was. I don't recall this ever being in dispute.
Which of these women is Lisa Rene Watkins:
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/8b1234bd.jpg
"I am Bob Larson."
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson offering more proof that he is
as mentally ill as he presents.
Message-ID:
<df610804-da3b-4aa8...@cu4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com>
A select number of items that really are about Gregory Scott "Piggly
Wiggly" Hanson (They are so accurate, Greg compared them the comment
that water is wet):
Title: ST VS GREGORY HANSON
(DOB 05/22/1959)
CRIMINAL COMPLAINT 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 1 OWI 1ST
OTHER CITATION 04/10/1996
Comments: CT 2 SPEED
Disposition Status
GUILTY PLEA/DEFAULT
"That's the chick, but not the pic, zipperhead!"
Greg "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson proving his bigotry towards Asians, by
attacking my first wife (deceased).
http://www.rsdb.org/search?q=zipperhead
Me: "I suspect your stalking is due to the use and abuse of illegal
drugs, Greg. Is the reason for your stalking the members of
alt.friends due to the use and abuse of illegal drugs?
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child abuser:
"Of course."
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson, wife beater and child
abuser
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
Path:
news.datemas.de!newsfeed.datemas.de!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!postnews.google.com!y21g2000yqn.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: Greegor <gree...@gmail.com>
Newsgroups:
misc.kids,alt.support.foster-parents,uk.people.parents,alt.support.child-protective-services
With the Christmas season upon us again, my stepdaughter was launching
into her usual tirade of "I need this" (Nintendo 64 games, Pokemon,
videos, Rhianna CD, etc.) After enduring a trip through Kmart, I
was at my wits end. I took the kid home and filled the bathtub with
water. Then I dunked the brat's head under the water and counted out
a full minute, with her flailing her arms. I brought her up and she
gasped for air. When she'd caught her breath, I asked her, "When you
were under that water, did you 'need' Nintendo? Pokemon? Rhianna?"
She shook her head. "What were you thinking about?" I
prodded. She told me "I was thinking that I needed air."
"Now you know the difference between 'need' and 'want'" I exclaimed
triumphantly.
--a true story
As of Sunday, Feb. 27, 2011:
SMALL CLAIMS ORIGINAL NOTICE
Comments: OPA $2805.04
COPIES TO PA
VERIFICATION OF ACCOUNT
JUDGEMENT DEFAULT
Comments: JUDGMENT AGAINST GREGORY HANSON FOR $2805.04
+ INTEREST AT 7.271% FROM 8/6/98 & $45.00 COSTS.
Comments: NOTE OF GARN/NOTE TO DEFT SERV 9/24/98 BY WCSD
TO SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT (ED POLKERS) FOR GREG HANSON
FEES $35.60
Gregory Scott "Piggly Wiggly" Hanson has a Garnishment order against
him. There is nothing to even suggest any of the money legally owed
has been paid. The SoL on the order has likely expired, but Greg still
can't risk getting a job due to it.
Greegor
in alt.fan.bob-larson ??
Thanks, bob-a-looey!
Newsgroups: alt.fan.bob-larson
From: gjnel...@cantor.ee.umn.edu (Greg Nelson)
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 1995 22:09:55 GMT
Local: Mon, Mar 27 1995 3:09 pm
Subject: Bob Larson FAQ
The Bob Larson FAQ (by Greg Nelson (gjnel...@cantor.ee.umn.edu))
G > Who DID actually start this "alt.fan.bob-larson" hate group?
G > Was there an ORIGINAL FAQ for "alt.fan.bob-larson" ?
G > Didn't Deja have a policy against hate groups?
G >
G > Did they really not recognize that the "fan" designation
G > was a way for sociopaths like Moe to represent a hate
G > group as if it was a fan group for BL?
Moe > Quit the act gaggie. You know as well as
Moe > I do how the alt fan BL group started. The
Moe > Canadian people who objected to
Moe > Larson's homophobia.
Was Greg J Nelson using a U of MN account the
person who started the hate group while
pretending that it was not a hate group
by posting a FAQ that was a fiction?
You DO know that the U of MN is a hotspot
of raging rabid ultraleft kook politics, right?
Where's the CANADA connection, Moe?
Where's the gay connection, Moe?
Do you deny that the TRUE INTENT of the
alt.fan.bob-larson group and it's founders
was hate speech from the beginning, Moe ?
Greg J Nelson, through a University of MN account
Greg J Nelson, through a University of MN account on Tues, Mar 28 1995
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.fan.bob-larson/msg/f734b14bdce81d26?hl=en&dmode=source
Kent Wills
>Does anybody have a LINk to the very first post
>in alt.fan.bob-larson ??
>
It's likely on Google. If you're so keen on reading it, look for
it.
>Thanks, bob-a-looey!
Thanking your own sock puppet for doing your own work is NOT the
behavior of the mentally sound, Greg. Also, replying to Moe's post,
claiming it was from your sock puppet is not the behavior of the
mentally sound.
Greegor
> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Does anybody have a LINk to the very first post
> >in alt.fan.bob-larson ??
>
> It's likely on Google. If you're so keen on reading it, look for
> it.
>
> >Thanks, bob-a-looey!
>
> Thanking your own sock puppet for doing your own work is NOT the
> behavior of the mentally sound, Greg. Also, replying to Moe's post,
> claiming it was from your sock puppet is not the behavior of the
> mentally sound.
If you have some actual proof that I used a sock ID,
then post it, Kent and Moe, but your lame claims
that I "outed my own socks" are just idiocy.
I do not use sock identities.
KabukiBob
You do.
Posting the proof would take too long and waste more bandwidth than
you two do in day, apparently, but you damn well know you uses sock
IDs and you obsession is such that you cannot see how each new sock is
repeating the exact same crap YOU do and each curiously totally
agrees with you and mysteriously has the same level of BS you have on
each of us. You out your socks every time you do this " game" and use
the same proxy server.
Some of the anonys like " George Monroe" are probably not you but the
various socks you've pulled the last few months ARE you.
And yes it is that obvious. Your fourth grade education level makes
you think that such a childish and obvious ploy would fool people. It
does not.
Moe
yumhuyk
Greg doesn't use sox because he is a sock -- your sock.
yours in Christ,
isamu
Kent Wills
The proof was already posted. You ran away from the Lar$on group
for quite a while, under your Greegor nym, starting the next day.
While not PROOF that you feared the evidence presented, the
timing was certainly interesting.
If it wasn't an overwhelming FEAR of the evidence, what was the
reason you ran away an hid for so long? Did your shrink suggest it as
a means of combating your Usenet addiction?
>I do not use sock identities.
Liar.
KabukiBob
If he was my sock ID he'd have more personality and wit.
You have neither.
Moe
>
> yours in Christ,
> isamu
bob-a-looey
> Which of these women is Lisa Rene Watkins:
Who is ""Lindsay"" ?
What is your ""son's"" name?
Why are you living in your parent's bungalow?
Greegor
The mythology that Kent himself posted
says that his teenage son's name is Richard.
Kent deleted all references to Richard later on.
Kent Wills
>On Aug 15, 3:29 pm, bob-a-looey <sc...@sd.ale> wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Aug 2011 03:20:00 -0500, Kent Wills wrote:
>> > Which of these women is Lisa Rene Watkins:
>>
>> Who is ""Lindsay"" ?
>>
>> What is your ""son's"" name?
>>
>> Why are you living in your parent's bungalow?
>
>The mythology that Kent himself posted
>says that his teenage son's name is Richard.
>
"I mistakenly posted my son's name before. If you NEED to stalk a
juvenile male, you'll find his name."
-- Me
Way to go, stupid!
>Kent deleted all references to Richard later on.
Why are you stalking a juvenile male, Greg?
Don't run and hide, or attempt to distract. Answer the question.
Which of these women is Lisa Rene Watkins:
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/8b1234bd.jpg
bob-a-looey
Kent is melting down as we speak.
Greegor
bob-a-looey > What is your ""son's"" name?
bob-a-looey > Why are you living in your parent's bungalow?
G > The mythology that Kent himself posted
G > says that his teenage son's name
G > is Richard.
G >
G > Kent deleted all references to Richard later on.
KBW > "I mistakenly posted my son's name before.
KBW > If you NEED to stalk a juvenile male,
KBW > you'll find his name." - Kent Wills
KBW >
KBW > Way to go, stupid!
bob-a-looey > Kent is melting down as we speak.
So it would seem!
KBW > Why are you stalking a juvenile male, Greg?
You posted that he was 13 more than 5 years ago, Kent.
Why are you now claiming he is a Juvenile?
KBW > Don't run and hide, or attempt to distract.
KBW > Answer the question.
Ya got your Kent Bradley Wills hat on or off, Kent?
ie How could I stalk the son of a man
who says he is not Kent Bradley Wills?
bob-a-looey
LOL!
Kent Wills
>bob-a-looey > Who is ""Lindsay"" ?
>bob-a-looey > What is your ""son's"" name?
>bob-a-looey > Why are you living in your parent's bungalow?
>
>G > The mythology that Kent himself posted
>G > says that his teenage son's name
>G > is Richard.
>G >
>G > Kent deleted all references to Richard later on.
>
>KBW > "I mistakenly posted my son's name before.
>KBW > If you NEED to stalk a juvenile male,
>KBW > you'll find his name." - Kent Wills
>KBW >
>KBW > Way to go, stupid!
>
>bob-a-looey > Kent is melting down as we speak.
>
>So it would seem!
>
Not to the mentally stable.
>KBW > Why are you stalking a juvenile male, Greg?
>
>You posted that he was 13 more than 5 years ago, Kent.
Liar.
>Why are you now claiming he is a Juvenile?
Because he is.
>
>KBW > Don't run and hide, or attempt to distract.
>KBW > Answer the question.
>
>Ya got your Kent Bradley Wills hat on or off, Kent?
>
Answer the question I asked, coward.
>ie How could I stalk the son of a man
>who says he is not Kent Bradley Wills?
Answer the question I asked, coward.
kensmith^^dumpster-diver
>>bob-a-looey > Kent is melting down as we speak.
>>
>>So it would seem!
>>
>
> Not to the mentally stable.
YOU are not mentally stable, never have been, never will be.
Profit-Of-Gloom
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:6b38c565-5982-46ba...@v9g2000pri.googlegroups.com...
Greegor
POG > WILL YOU PLEASE REMOVE ARJ-W
POG > from your cross-postings. No one here cares.
Are you one of the elders?
Why are you posting ONLY in the Bob Larson group?
Nice try, Kent!
Nice touch using albasani server, BTW.
Greegor
bob-a-looey > What is your ""son's"" name?
bob-a-looey > Why are you living in your parent's bungalow?
G > The mythology that Kent himself posted
G > says that his teenage son's name is Richard.
G >
G > Kent deleted all references to Richard later on.
KBW > "I mistakenly posted my son's name before.
KBW > If you NEED to stalk a juvenile male,
KBW > you'll find his name." - Kent Wills
KBW >
KBW > Way to go, stupid!
bob-a-looey > Kent is melting down as we speak.
G > So it would seem!
KBW > Why are you stalking a juvenile male, Greg?
G > You posted that he was 13 more than 5 years
G > ago, Kent. Why are you now claiming he is a Juvenile?
KBW > Don't run and hide, or attempt to distract.
KBW > Answer the question.
G > Ya got your Kent Bradley Wills hat on or off, Kent?
G > ie How could I stalk the son of a man who
G > says he is not Kent Bradley Wills?
bob-a-looey > LOL!
Why so glum, Kent?
Kent Wills
>On Aug 17, 3:21 pm, "Profit-Of-Gloom" <G...@invalid.net> wrote:
>POG > WILL YOU PLEASE REMOVE ARJ-W
>POG > from your cross-postings. No one here cares.
>
>Are you one of the elders?
>Why are you posting ONLY in the Bob Larson group?
>Nice try, Kent!
>
Not everyone who posts is me, Greg. No matter how much you
believe I am every poster on Usenet, including you, I am not.
>Nice touch using albasani server, BTW.
Which stands to prove it wasn't me. I use a server in Germany.
Kent Wills
>G > ie How could I stalk the son of a man who
>G > says he is not Kent Bradley Wills?
>
>bob-a-looey > LOL!
>
>Why so glum, Kent?
Replying to your own self outted sock puppet is NOT the behavior
of the mentally sound, Greg.
Add that I can't be your sock puppet, despite your insistence to
the contrary, and your mental illnesses (plural) are further exposed.
Let your mental health care professional know about this at your
next session.
Larsonia
He's morphing again!
Greegor
POG > WILL YOU PLEASE REMOVE ARJ-W
POG > from your cross-postings. No one here cares.
G > Are you one of the elders?
G > Why are you posting ONLY in the Bob Larson group?
G > Nice try, Kent!
G >
G > Nice touch using albasani server, BTW.
Larsonia > He's morphing again!
Kent thinks he's the invisible man when he does that.
Larsonia
Lol!
Kent Wills
That you use sock puppet accounts is well known. You out them
more often than anyone else is able.
This doesn't mean everyone else makes use of them Greg.
Oh, replying to your own self outted sock puppet is NOT the
behavior of the mentally sound.
Let your mental health care professional know that you are
COMPELLED to do this at your next session.
Greegor
G > says he is not Kent Bradley Wills?
bob-a-looey > LOL!
G > Why so glum, Kent?
> Replying to your own self outted sock puppet is NOT the behavior
> of the mentally sound, Greg.
> Add that I can't be your sock puppet, despite your insistence to
> the contrary, and your mental illnesses (plural) are further exposed.
> Let your mental health care professional know about this at your
> next session.
Is Richard YOUR son or the son of that
""OTHER"" Kent Wills you say you're not?
Kent Wills
"I mistakenly posted my son's name before. If you NEED to
stalk a juvenile male, you'll find his name."
-- Me
You have admitted you NEED to stalk a juvenile male.
Where is the post you claim I sent five years ago stating my son
was 13 years old?
If the original is gone (an interesting trick since it never
existed) any replies quoting the age claim will be acceptable. Of
course, there are no replies, since one can't reply to a post never
made and sent. A truth you seem not to be able to understand.
I'm waiting...
Greegor
G > ""OTHER"" Kent Wills you say you're not?
KBW > "I mistakenly posted my son's name
KBW > before. If you NEED to stalk a
KBW > juvenile male, you'll find his name."
KBW > -- Kent Wills
KBW > You have admitted you NEED to stalk a juvenile male.
I admitted no such thing, but your psychopathic
reasoning has you asserting that I did.
KBW > Where is the post you claim I sent five
KBW > years ago stating my son was 13 years
KBW > old? If the original is gone (an interesting
KBW > trick since it never existed) any replies
KBW > quoting the age claim will be acceptable.
First you admit that you DID post Richard's name,
then you claim the post never existed.
Aren't you afraid somebody might notice
how you contradict yourself, Kent?
Please explain why it matters to me that
your post of Richard's name was a mistake
on your part? I think a LOT of what
you've posted was a mistake. So what?
Whose responsibility is that, Kent?
G > Is Richard YOUR son or the son of that
G > ""OTHER"" Kent Wills you say you're not?
Larsonia
>>Is Richard YOUR son or the son of that ""OTHER"" Kent Wills you say
>>you're not?
>
> "I mistakenly posted my son's name before. If you NEED to
> stalk a juvenile male, you'll find his name."
> -- Me
>
> You have admitted you NEED to stalk a juvenile male. Where is the
> post you claim I sent five years ago stating my son
> was 13 years old?
A challenge for shiteater moe = Kent Wills EXPOSED
alt.california - 67 posts - 11 authors - Last post: Oct 12, 2008
Lindsay and I have a son, Richard, who will turn nine years old in a
little over
two ... Moe (forevernitefan), obsessive-compulsive psycho , 8-13-08
"What ...
http://groups.google.com/g/6bd7fef5/t/979f4a74b2b9c3b0/d/5f896ea046696a27
Larsonia
Kent Wills says he'll answer any questions 1997
alt.support.child-protective-services - 294 posts - 18 authors -
Last post: Apr 9, 2008
Lindsay and I have a son, Richard, who will turn nine years old in a
little ...
Name Birthday Email 13 Kent Wills (Your Webmaster) Jan 8, 1969 compuelf
at ...
http://groups.google.com/g/9ba7ff08/t/d9a618f565c9ee98/d/2bca7df1805a6d1e
Greegor
Kent, in Feb 1998 on your Prodigy account you
quoted yourself back in a reply to a reply and
in the original you claimed that your son Richard
was 9 on March 23 1998.
Yet you recently claimed he is a minor child.
You also claimed to be a History Teacher which
I doubt you got the degree for, but at least in
1998 you didn't have the 2000 thieving felony yet.
You've posted information on your short stay
at Grinnel, and a Mortuary trade school (?)
but when were you at a four year university
that confers teaching credentials?
Your first thieving FELONY offense was on
Jan 24, 2000, a Monday, when a teacher
would have been busy at work.
Are you a credentialed school teacher
who got caught for STEALING from
the school or somebody at the school?
What years did you supposedly
get your Bachelors degree, Kent?
Kent Wills
>On Aug 19, 11:37 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> G > ie How could I stalk the son of a man who
>> G > says he is not Kent Bradley Wills?
>>
>> bob-a-looey > LOL!
>>
>> G > Why so glum, Kent?
>>
>> > Replying to your own self outted sock puppet is NOT the behavior
>> > of the mentally sound, Greg.
>> > Add that I can't be your sock puppet, despite your insistence to
>> > the contrary, and your mental illnesses (plural) are further exposed.
>> > Let your mental health care professional know about this at your
>> > next session.
>>
>> Is Richard YOUR son or the son of that
>> ""OTHER"" Kent Wills you say you're not?
>
>Kent, in Feb 1998 on your Prodigy account you
>quoted yourself back in a reply to a reply and
>in the original you claimed that your son Richard
>was 9 on March 23 1998.
Liar.
Your editing of the post when you re-posted it here, as I've
already PROVED you did, only servers to PROVE you the pathological
liar you are.
Please see Message-ID:
<a6d0579dc3ehhg54u...@4ax.com> where I undeniably PROVE
you LIED.
>Yet you recently claimed he is a minor child.
Those who are 15 years of age are minors, stupid.
No amount of your editing of posts when you re-post them will
change this.
>
>You also claimed to be a History Teacher which
>I doubt you got the degree for, but at least in
>1998 you didn't have the 2000 thieving felony yet.
>
Since you've admitted I have no felonies, DUH!
>You've posted information on your short stay
>at Grinnel, and a Mortuary trade school (?)
>but when were you at a four year university
>that confers teaching credentials?
>
I transferred from Grinnel. Very old news.
And the year hasn't changed since the last time I told you.
Why do you ask questions so many times AFTER they've been
answered?
>Your first thieving FELONY offense was on
>Jan 24, 2000, a Monday, when a teacher
>would have been busy at work.
Since you admitted I have no felonies, DUH!
>Are you a credentialed school teacher
>who got caught for STEALING from
>the school or somebody at the school?
Since I've never stolen from the school or anybody at the school,
no.
>
>What years did you supposedly
>get your Bachelors degree, Kent?
The same as the last four times you asked.
Why do you ask the same questions so many times AFTER they've
been answered?
Don't run and HIDE, or attempt to distract. Answer the question
I asked.
Greegor
> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Aug 19, 11:37 pm, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> G > ie How could I stalk the son of a man who
> >> G > says he is not Kent Bradley Wills?
>
> >> bob-a-looey > LOL!
>
> >> G > Why so glum, Kent?
>
> >> > Replying to your own self outted sock puppet is NOT the behavior
> >> > of the mentally sound, Greg.
> >> > Add that I can't be your sock puppet, despite your insistence to
> >> > the contrary, and your mental illnesses (plural) are further exposed.
> >> > Let your mental health care professional know about this at your
> >> > next session.
>
> >> Is Richard YOUR son or the son of that
> >> ""OTHER"" Kent Wills you say you're not?
>
> >Kent, in Feb 1998 on your Prodigy account you
> >quoted yourself back in a reply to a reply and
> >in the original you claimed that your son Richard
> >was 9 on March 23 1998.
>
> Liar.
> Your editing of the post when you re-posted it here, as I've
> already PROVED you did, only servers to PROVE you the pathological
> liar you are.
> Please see Message-ID:
> you LIED.
>
> >Yet you recently claimed he is a minor child.
>
> Those who are 15 years of age are minors, stupid.
OOps! I thought you said he was 13, Kent?
Why are you now suddenly claiming he's 2 years older
than you claimed only days ago?
> No amount of your editing of posts when you re-post them will
> change this.
You said that a reply quoting you was sufficient.
Are you going back on that stipulation, Kent?
> >You also claimed to be a History Teacher which
> >I doubt you got the degree for, but at least in
> >1998 you didn't have the 2000 thieving felony yet.
>
> Since you've admitted I have no felonies, DUH!
I keep asserting that you DO have felonies, Kent.
> >You've posted information on your short stay
> >at Grinnel, and a Mortuary trade school (?)
> >but when were you at a four year university
> >that confers teaching credentials?
>
> I transferred from Grinnel. Very old news.
> And the year hasn't changed since the last time I told you.
> Why do you ask questions so many times AFTER they've been
> answered?
You weren't there very long.
> > Your first thieving FELONY offense was on
> > Jan 24, 2000, a Monday, when a teacher
> > would have been busy at work.
> Since you admitted I have no felonies, DUH!
I never "admitted" that you have no felonies, Kent.
> >Are you a credentialed school teacher
> >who got caught for STEALING from
> >the school or somebody at the school?
>
> Since I've never stolen from the
> school or anybody at the school, no.
G > What years did you supposedly
G > get your Bachelors degree, Kent?
> The same as the last four times you asked.
> Why do you ask the same questions so
> many times AFTER they've been answered?
> Don't run and HIDE, or attempt to distract.
> Answer the question I asked.
I'm not going anywhere, and you know it.
You refuse to answer questions a lot.
It's not something new.
Kent Wills
Two years ago, I probably did. I don't recall the matter coming
up on Usenet, but it is possible.
>Why are you now suddenly claiming he's 2 years older
>than you claimed only days ago?
I made no such claim days ago.
You are referring to my question, "So in 2008 (almost a decade
AFTER Prodigy.com ceased to exist) I mentioned he will turn nine years
of age?"
Once again you allow me to PROVE you are psychologically UNABLE
to be honest.
Quick, claim the post is gone. That I nuked it.
That anyone may check MID:
1atv47lavolug635d...@4ax.com and see the TRUTH should
not interfere with your lie!
>
>> No amount of your editing of posts when you re-post them will
>> change this.
>
>You said that a reply quoting you was sufficient.
>Are you going back on that stipulation, Kent?
>
You didn't quote a reply.
How can anyone reply to a post sent in 2005 back in 1998?
>> >You also claimed to be a History Teacher which
>> >I doubt you got the degree for, but at least in
>> >1998 you didn't have the 2000 thieving felony yet.
>>
>> Since you've admitted I have no felonies, DUH!
>
>I keep asserting that you DO have felonies, Kent.
>
You've already admitted I don't.
Were you lying then, or are you lying now?
>> >You've posted information on your short stay
>> >at Grinnel, and a Mortuary trade school (?)
>> >but when were you at a four year university
>> >that confers teaching credentials?
>>
>> I transferred from Grinnel. Very old news.
>> And the year hasn't changed since the last time I told you.
>> Why do you ask questions so many times AFTER they've been
>> answered?
>
>You weren't there very long.
>
I didn't say I was.
Now answer the question I asked, coward.
>> > Your first thieving FELONY offense was on
>> > Jan 24, 2000, a Monday, when a teacher
>> > would have been busy at work.
>
>> Since you admitted I have no felonies, DUH!
>
>I never "admitted" that you have no felonies, Kent.
>
You did. I posted the MID for one when you claimed you were able
to make use of MIDs with Google. It's still interesting how as soon
as I did so, you lost your ability to make use of them.
Not to worry. I must be the only person to notice. LOL
>> >Are you a credentialed school teacher
>> >who got caught for STEALING from
>> >the school or somebody at the school?
>>
>> Since I've never stolen from the
>> school or anybody at the school, no.
>
>
>G > What years did you supposedly
>G > get your Bachelors degree, Kent?
>
>> The same as the last four times you asked.
>> Why do you ask the same questions so
>> many times AFTER they've been answered?
>
>
>> Don't run and HIDE, or attempt to distract.
>> Answer the question I asked.
>
>I'm not going anywhere, and you know it.
But you are attempting to distract.
>You refuse to answer questions a lot.
Lair.
>It's not something new.
I refuse to answer the same questions several times. You keep
asking them in the hope that no one will notice that they've been
answered. This method of deception has never worked for you, yet you
are COMPELLED to use it.
KabukiBob
Hello Greg Hanson.
Do me a favor, butt wipe. Cuss under your main nym instead of doing
this stupid act. If you are trying to cliam Larosnia is Bob Larson,
you are failing at that because as bad as Lar$on is, he would not
lower his pretentious mask to post the type of cussing you do.
Moe
Greegor
> On Aug 20, 12:22 pm, Larsonia <spi...@ual.war> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 04:05:14 -0500, Kent Wills wrote:
> > >>Is Richard YOUR son or the son of that ""OTHER"" Kent Wills you say
> > >>you're not?
>
> > > "I mistakenly posted my son's name before. If you NEED to
> > > stalk a juvenile male, you'll find his name."
> > > -- Me
>
> > > You have admitted you NEED to stalk a juvenile male. Where is the
> > > post you claim I sent five years ago stating my son
> > > was 13 years old?
>
> > A challenge for shiteater moe = Kent Wills EXPOSED
> > alt.california - 67 posts - 11 authors - Last post: Oct 12, 2008
> > Lindsay and I have a son, Richard, who will turn nine years old in a
> > little over
> > two ... Moe (forevernitefan), obsessive-compulsive psycho , 8-13-08
> > "What ...http://groups.google.com/g/6bd7fef5/t/979f4a74b2b9c3b0/d/5f896ea04669...
Moe > Hello Greg Hanson.
Moe >
Moe > Do me a favor, butt wipe. Cuss under
Moe > your main nym instead of doing this
Moe > stupid act. If you are trying to cliam
Moe > Larosnia is Bob Larson, you are failing
Moe > at that because as bad as Lar$on is,
Moe > he would not lower his pretentious
Moe > mask to post the type of cussing you do.
Do I need permission to answer when you call
somebody else by my name, psycho?
You're noticing a slight difference between
two different people whom you claim
are the very same person.
Getting a clue yet, Maureen?
Are you having fun with the JW
group that Kent dragged you into?
Everybody there can see how
you stayed out of it!
After you make more enemies are you
going to pretend that just like all of
your other anony detractors, they are
all me as well?
You think you don't make any enemies
with your behavior, right Moe?
Don't you feel so VERY special that
Kent invoked you in a new newsgroup
and then you could pose as too
aloof and superior to condescend
to jumping in?
Then later, after you claimed up and down
that you were not going to jump in,
you are feel special enough to
pass judgement and make enemies
there amazingly aligned with Kent.
Your ruse to show that you are your own
person sure has worked out well! LOL
south-centralscrutinizer
Maureen "McAlexander" : useful idiot.
Atsumi
> On Sun, 21 Aug 2011 10:22:52 -0700 (PDT), Greegor
>
> >are the very same person.
>
> >Getting a clue yet, Maureen?
>
> >Are you having fun with the JW
> >group that Kent dragged you into?
>
And now they are here to stay.
> >Everybody there can see how
> >you stayed out of it!
>
LOL
> >After you make more enemies are you
> >going to pretend that just like all of
> >your other anony detractors, they are
> >all me as well?
>
> >You think you don't make any enemies
> >with your behavior, right Moe?
>
> >Don't you feel so VERY special that
> >Kent invoked you in a new newsgroup
> >and then you could pose as too
> >aloof and superior to condescend
> >to jumping in?
>
> >Then later, after you claimed up and down
> >that you were not going to jump in,
> >you are feel special enough to
> >pass judgement and make enemies
> >there amazingly aligned with Kent.
>
> >Your ruse to show that you are your own
> >person sure has worked out well! LOL
>
> Maureen "McAlexander" : useful idiot.
That Not Fi_Fa-Fair. I like Mo-Mo-Moe.
KabukiBob
(( rolls eyes)) I choose to be in this, gaggie. You don't like it,
tough turdies. Situations change. That's life. I may one day not be
interested in something then something catches my eye and I become
interested. You choose your limited mental rut and repetitive
obsessions and claims, which doesn't speak well for you.
Hurl your crap all you wish, unemployed female using, child abusing
bum. Lie and distort as usual for you. Projection and hypocrisy is
natural for you and you do it often.
You can go back to obsessing about Kent, now.
Moe
KabukiBob
Antonio, you just pushed me closer to Carol's side.
Moe
south-centralscrutinizer
Oh she's a dense one alright...I've seen modeling clay with more
smarts.
south-centralscrutinizer
Maureen, you are doing what you always do, tossing shit at other
people you don't know.
south-centralscrutinizer
So you both can go back to obsessing about Bob?
Gotta job yet Maureen?
MadMonkey
>
> (( rolls eyes)) I choose to be in this, gaggie. You don't like it,
> tough turdies. Situations change. That's life. I may one day not be
> interested in something then something catches my eye and I become
> interested.
> Moe
Why are you interested? Male bashing fascinate you?
--
=You don't want a Mad Monkey on your back=
MadMonkey
> On Aug 22, 3:00 pm, Atsumi <jabriol2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Maureen "McAlexander" : useful idiot.
>>
>> That Not Fi_Fa-Fair. I like Mo-Mo-Moe.
>
> Antonio, you just pushed me closer to Carol's side.
>
> Moe
Forgive the Loon. But I think that was his intent.
Bob L. Head
> Antonio, you just pushed me closer to Carol's side.
>
> Moe
Moe-ron, you were never going to stay out of it!
Bob L. Head
> You can go back to obsessing about Kent, now.
>
> Moe
And you can stammer at Bob!
Bob L. Head
A mole can be an adequate pet, if you have lots of dirt for it.
Greegor
Moe > gaggie. You don't like it, tough turdies.
Moe > Situations change. That's life. I may
Moe > one day not be interested in something
Moe > then something catches my eye
Moe > and I become interested.
MM > Why are you interested? Male bashing fascinate you?
ROFL
Maureen is addicted to DRAMA.
Greegor
then attempt to insult straight opponents
by using gay as a SLUR??
Exposa DeJabriol
"Greegor" <gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c19f4811-3406-472d...@g9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
> Why would Moe pose as gay friendly but
> then attempt to insult straight opponents
> by using gay as a SLUR??
>
I don't mean to be rude, but your posts are off-topic in the Jehovah's
Witness group. Can you please remove the religious group? Thank you.
Greegor
wrote:
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c19f4811-3406-472d...@g9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Why would Moe pose as gay friendly but
> > then attempt to insult straight opponents
> > by using gay as a SLUR??
>
> I don't mean to be rude,
On usenet??
> but your posts are off-topic in the Jehovah's
> Witness group.
With a 15 year FEUD going on there,
has the topic cop act dampened the
feud at all?
Did you try that when Kent dragged
Moe into the JW FEUD?
> Can you please remove
> the religious group? Thank you.
How many people posting in the JW
group are JW believers?
Is it considered ON TOPIC when a bunch
of detractors rail against JW's there?
In fact, now that I think of it, isn't a usenet
group for JW's naturally going to be about
as ON TOPIC as one about the Amish?
The TOPIC COP thing seems like an Aspergers tactic.
Maureen McAllister lives for DRAMA.
Exposa DeJabriol
On Aug 31, 8:19 am, "Exposa DeJabriol" <Inva...@invalid.invalid>
wrote:
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:c19f4811-3406-472d...@g9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Why would Moe pose as gay friendly but
> > then attempt to insult straight opponents
> > by using gay as a SLUR??
>
> I don't mean to be rude,
On usenet??
> but your posts are off-topic in the Jehovah's
> Witness group.
With a 15 year FEUD going on there,
has the topic cop act dampened the
feud at all?
::: These people you're feuding with, Moe and Kent, aren't regular posters
there. Someone on alt.legal requested the cross-posting there be stopped
also. The last time Antonio had a meltdown, several people on the kook
group also requested they be removed from the cross-posting.
Did you try that when Kent dragged
Moe into the JW FEUD?
::: How do you drag someone into a feud they have no interest in? She's
not involved in any feud there. I don't her, or what your problem with her
is.
> Can you please remove
> the religious group? Thank you.
How many people posting in the JW
group are JW believers?
::: I wouldn't know since they'd be afraid to say. People there have been
outed and threatened.
Is it considered ON TOPIC when a bunch
of detractors rail against JW's there?
::: Yes, as it's still on topic. We discuss all aspects of the WTS, the
good and the bad.
In fact, now that I think of it, isn't a usenet
group for JW's naturally going to be about
as ON TOPIC as one about the Amish?
::: It's on topic when other topics and flame wars and fueds are not
cross-posted in.
The TOPIC COP thing seems like an Aspergers tactic.
Maureen McAllister lives for DRAMA.
::: Well she's not finding it on ARJ-W. She only posted there a few times
and moved on.
Greegor
wrote:
> "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:3e7c2ace-7d4f-4307...@t7g2000vbv.googlegroups.com...
> On Aug 31, 8:19 am, "Exposa DeJabriol" <Inva...@invalid.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > "Greegor" <greego...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:c19f4811-3406-472d...@g9g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > Why would Moe pose as gay friendly but
> > > then attempt to insult straight opponents
> > > by using gay as a SLUR??
> > I don't mean to be rude,
>
> On usenet??
>
> > but your posts are off-topic in the Jehovah's
> > Witness group.
>
> With a 15 year FEUD going on there,
> has the topic cop act dampened the
> feud at all?
> ::: These people you're feuding with,
> Moe and Kent, aren't regular posters
> there.
So?
> Someone on alt.legal requested the
> cross-posting there be stopped
> also.
Good luck with that, topic cop!
> The last time Antonio had a meltdown,
> several people on the kook group also
> requested they be removed from the
> cross-posting.
Wow. A kook got upset? Imagine that!
> Did you try that when Kent dragged
> Moe into the JW FEUD?
>
> ::: How do you drag someone into a feud they have no interest in? She's
> not involved in any feud there. I don't her, or what your problem with her
> is.
Kent and Moe are so VERY joined at the hip
that apparently they would like to shake that
perception and hence the dramatic performance
where Moe pretended to be ever so independent.
> > Can you please remove
> > the religious group? Thank you.
>
> How many people posting in the JW
> group are JW believers?
>
> ::: I wouldn't know since they'd be afraid to say. People there have been
> outed and threatened.
Which was supposed to convince me how?
> Is it considered ON TOPIC when a bunch
> of detractors rail against JW's there?
>
> ::: Yes, as it's still on topic. We discuss
> all aspects of the WTS, the
> good and the bad.
How NICE for you!
> In fact, now that I think of it, isn't a usenet
> group for JW's naturally going to be about
> as ON TOPIC as one about the Amish?
>
> ::: It's on topic when other topics and flame wars and fueds are not
> cross-posted in.
I see. YOUR flame wars are special, right?
> The TOPIC COP thing seems like an Aspergers tactic.
Golly, why didn't you acknowledge that one?
> Maureen McAllister lives for DRAMA.
>
> ::: Well she's not finding it on ARJ-W. She only posted there a few times
> and moved on.
Why are you trying to sell such BS?
Moe started out saying she was going to stay
OUT of it. It wasn't long before she began
passing judgement in her usual willy nilly style.
ie Pull the other leg you wanker.
Those ""bumps"" on Moe you're suckling
at are way past their "Best By" dates.
And WHY did you post this load of BS only to alt.fan.bob-larson?
Golly, Now WHO do I know that tries this kind of stuff?? LOL
Exposa DeJabriol
So?
How NICE for you!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Have a nice evening.
Kent Wills
>> The last time Antonio had a meltdown,
>> several people on the kook group also
>> requested they be removed from the
>> cross-posting.
>
>Wow. A kook got upset? Imagine that!
>
Antonio does seem to be very upset.
>> Did you try that when Kent dragged
>> Moe into the JW FEUD?
>>
>> ::: How do you drag someone into a feud they have no interest in? She's
>> not involved in any feud there. I don't her, or what your problem with her
>> is.
>
>Kent and Moe are so VERY joined at the hip
>that apparently they would like to shake that
>perception and hence the dramatic performance
>where Moe pretended to be ever so independent.
>
Moe has always been ever so independent.
Is there a SPECIFIC reason you're LYING and presenting that she
is not?
>
>> The TOPIC COP thing seems like an Aspergers tactic.
>
>Golly, why didn't you acknowledge that one?
>
>> Maureen McAllister lives for DRAMA.
>>
>> ::: Well she's not finding it on ARJ-W. She only posted there a few times
>> and moved on.
>
>Why are you trying to sell such BS?
>
>Moe started out saying she was going to stay
>OUT of it.
That's not what she stated. That is your DECEPTIVE spin on her
claim.
Why are you so UNABLE to be honest?
>It wasn't long before she began
>passing judgement in her usual willy nilly style.
>
>ie Pull the other leg you wanker.
>
>Those ""bumps"" on Moe you're suckling
>at are way past their "Best By" dates.
>
>And WHY did you post this load of BS only to alt.fan.bob-larson?
>
>Golly, Now WHO do I know that tries this kind of stuff?? LOL
One Gregory Scott Hanson, a "man" with Aspergers, self admitted
user and abuser of illegal drugs, convicted wife BEATER, founded child
ABUSER, and self proved pathological LIAR.
http://i212.photobucket.com/albums/cc127/kwills_photo/8b1234bd.jpg
--a true story
As of Wednesday, August 31, 2011:
south-centralscrutinizer
wrote:
> Moe has always been ever so independent.
As sycophants to garage burglars go, eh Kunt?
Bob L. Head
> Antonio does seem to be very upset.
Your smoke screen does seem to be very Wills' generated.
Parrish *~
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:dmku57dip86m6hd1p...@4ax.com...
> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>> The last time Antonio had a meltdown,
>>> several people on the kook group also
>>> requested they be removed from the
>>> cross-posting.
>>
>>Wow. A kook got upset? Imagine that!
>>
It's looking to me like this Greegor just wants to get involved with the
people on the ARJ-W group. If he wants to believe Moe is posting there,
he'll believe it no matter what anyone says. If she's posting there, her
posts are either invisible, or my NSPs are not picking them up. Maybe only
he can see them. And it looks like he wants to start in with me. I'm not
interested in communicating with anyone who would defend a well known
sadistic sociopath like Antonio L Santana/Jabriol, or with someone who
admitted he cruelly abused a small child, calling her a brat. Something is
seriously wrong there.
--
(Mk. 3:210) and that among Jesus' last words was the pained outburst: 'My
God my God, Why hast thou forsaken me? -- a poignant lament of a man who had
deluded himself and had at last come to realize it -- if you ask me.(Credit
Graywolf)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Polymath-Z
> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:dmku57dip86m6hd1p...@4ax.com...> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> The last time Antonio had a meltdown,
> >>> several people on the kook group also
> >>> requested they be removed from the
> >>> cross-posting.
>
> >>Wow. A kook got upset? Imagine that!
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> It's looking to me like this Greegor just wants to get involved with the
> people on the ARJ-W group. If he wants to believe Moe is posting there,
> he'll believe it no matter what anyone says. If she's posting there, her
> posts are either invisible, or my NSPs are not picking them up.
Or like MM, you have her killfiled because she knows you are a
misandrist kook.
> Maybe only
> he can see them. And it looks like he wants to start in with me. I'm not
> interested in communicating with anyone who would defend a well known
> sadistic sociopath like Antonio L Santana/Jabriol, or with someone who
> admitted he cruelly abused a small child, calling her a brat. Something is
> seriously wrong there.
> --
But will accept mentally challenged Felons like Kent and stand by her
side. Last I heard a felon is a Felon. Like she stand beside Tallyman
a fratricide.
Parrish *~
"Polymath-Z" <jabri...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f2d51775-b488-48c4...@n35g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 2, 9:31 am, "Parrish *~" <Par...@invalid.com> wrote:
> It's looking to me like this Greegor just wants to get involved with the
> people on the ARJ-W group. If he wants to believe Moe is posting there,
> he'll believe it no matter what anyone says. If she's posting there, her
> posts are either invisible, or my NSPs are not picking them up.
Or like MM, you have her killfiled because she knows you are a
misandrist kook.
** She's not killfiled because she not posting anything. And this coming
from a well know sadistic sociopath who tormented the women on the rape
groups, telling them they looked for it, it was natural and they deserved
it. Moe doesn't know me at all you lying moron. She read some posts on
ARJ-W for a day or two, and that was it. Your own immature-personality pal
from the kook group, and admitted bored troll, calls you a LoOn and a KoOk.
> Maybe only
> he can see them. And it looks like he wants to start in with me. I'm not
> interested in communicating with anyone who would defend a well known
> sadistic sociopath like Antonio L Santana/Jabriol, or with someone who
> admitted he cruelly abused a small child, calling her a brat. Something is
> seriously wrong there.
> --
But will accept mentally challenged Felons like Kent and stand by her
side.
** That makes no sense at all. Prove he's a felon before libeling and
slandering him like you did to so many others. Next you'll be accusing him
of rape and pedophilia and accusing Moe of being a lesbian .
Last I heard a felon is a Felon. Like she stand beside Tallyman
a fratricide.
** Tell us again how you taunted and tortured him for saving his father's
life again Antonio L Santana, you rotten scumbag. How you told him he
should have let his brother kill their frail elderly father. You're proud
to be the sadistic cold-blooded SOB you are.
You remember John Baker don't you Antonio? You had a few go-arounds with
him.
"John Baker" <nu...@bizniz.net> wrote in message
news:9dvv371vkf4arkgac...@4ax.com...
>
> It isn't your beliefs that are the problem, Jabbers (Antonio L Santana).
> It's your
> antisocial behavior (i.e. your incessant trolling), and an atheist
> might write to your church leaders in the hope they might be able to
> put a stop to it.
>
> Of course, that's probably a vain hope, since a psychopath like you
> isn't going to care what your church elders say in any case.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Sauron Khetanna
> "Polymath-Z" <jabriol2...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:f2d51775-b488-48c4...@n35g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 2, 9:31 am, "Parrish *~" <Par...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
> > It's looking to me like this Greegor just wants to get involved with the
> > people on the ARJ-W group. If he wants to believe Moe is posting there,
> > he'll believe it no matter what anyone says. If she's posting there, her
> > posts are either invisible, or my NSPs are not picking them up.
>
> Or like MM, you have her killfiled because she knows you are a
> misandrist kook.
>
> ** She's not killfiled because she not posting anything.
Drinking again? MM is the Mad Monkey relation of yours?
Moe doesn't know me at all you lying moron.
Of course she does, You are kook, what else is needed?
> She read some posts on
> ARJ-W for a day or two, and that was it. Your own immature-personality pal
> from the kook group, and admitted bored troll, calls you a LoOn and a KoOk.
>
Sure cluck, cluck, cluck ..goes chicken Gulley.
> > Maybe only
>
> > he can see them. And it looks like he wants to start in with me. I'm not
> > interested in communicating with anyone who would defend a well known
> > sadistic sociopath like Antonio L Santana/Jabriol, or with someone who
> > admitted he cruelly abused a small child, calling her a brat. Something is
> > seriously wrong there.
> > --
>
> But will accept mentally challenged Felons like Kent and stand by her
> side.
>
> ** That makes no sense at all. Prove he's a felon before libeling and
> slandering him like you did to so many others. Next you'll be accusing him
> of rape and pedophilia and accusing Moe of being a lesbian .
>
Proved that I raped my daughter and I am under a two state
investigation.
> Last I heard a felon is a Felon. Like she stand beside Tallyman
> a fratricide.
>
> ** Tell us again how you taunted and tortured him for saving his father's
> life again Antonio L Santana, you rotten scumbag. How you told him he
> should have let his brother kill their frail elderly father. You're proud
> to be the sadistic cold-blooded SOB you are.
>
Tally could have shot his brother in the Leg. But nooooooo he went for
the Kill, one shot to his brother noggin, then he empty out his gun
just to make sure his brother stayed down.
Since your demise is a coming due to brain rot a Kook known illness..
relax this video is for you.
Parrish *~
"Sauron Khetanna" <jabri...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:c2836ee5-7140-4942...@19g2000vbv.googlegroups.com...
On Sep 2, 10:54 am, "Parrish *~" <Par...@invalid.com> wrote:
> "Polymath-Z" <jabriol2...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:f2d51775-b488-48c4...@n35g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 2, 9:31 am, "Parrish *~" <Par...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
> > It's looking to me like this Greegor just wants to get involved with the
> > people on the ARJ-W group. If he wants to believe Moe is posting there,
> > he'll believe it no matter what anyone says. If she's posting there, her
> > posts are either invisible, or my NSPs are not picking them up.
>
> Or like MM, you have her killfiled because she knows you are a
> misandrist kook.
>
> ** She's not killfiled because she not posting anything.
Drinking again? MM is the Mad Monkey relation of yours?
::: I don't have all your family problems Antonio. I have no need to drink
anything other than diet Pepsi and coffee.
Moe doesn't know me at all you lying moron.
Of course she does, You are kook, what else is needed?
::: She does? How come I never saw her before? BTW, both she and MM
called you a loon and a kook.
ad some posts on
> ARJ-W for a day or two, and that was it. Your own immature-personality pal
> from the kook group, and admitted bored troll, calls you a LoOn and a
> KoOk.
>
Sure cluck, cluck, cluck ..goes chicken Gulley.
And jerk, jerk, jerk,... goes chicken Santana. :-D Like on guy said, you
have to pay your own hand. LOL!!!!
> > Maybe only
>
> > he can see them. And it looks like he wants to start in with me. I'm not
> > interested in communicating with anyone who would defend a well known
> > sadistic sociopath like Antonio L Santana/Jabriol, or with someone who
> > admitted he cruelly abused a small child, calling her a brat. Something
> > is
> > seriously wrong there.
> > --
>
> But will accept mentally challenged Felons like Kent and stand by her
> side.
>
> ** That makes no sense at all. Prove he's a felon before libeling and
> slandering him like you did to so many others. Next you'll be accusing him
> of rape and pedophilia and accusing Moe of being a lesbian .
>
Proved that I raped my daughter and I am under a two state
investigation.
::: Prove you didn't have that hallucination, which you keep adding to,
after having a seizure from your epilepsy and bonking your head on the
pavement. You were reported for THREATENING me and trying to get someone to
assault my husband, a total stranger to you. You said you would destroy my
marriage... guess what you sick scumbag ... you FAILED, like you failed
everything else in your miserable unhappy life.
> Last I heard a felon is a Felon. Like she stand beside Tallyman
> a fratricide.
>
> ** Tell us again how you taunted and tortured him for saving his father's
> life again Antonio L Santana, you rotten scumbag. How you told him he
> should have let his brother kill their frail elderly father. You're proud
> to be the sadistic cold-blooded SOB you are.
>
Tally could have shot his brother in the Leg. But nooooooo he went for
the Kill, one shot to his brother noggin, then he empty out his gun
just to make sure his brother stayed down.
::: You were there in Tally's house and saw what happened? That gave you
the right to torture and torment him over it? Since you weren't there
scumbag, you can't say what he should have done. Like you saw all the rapes
in my house, 900 miles away, when you put Norma's spaghetti strainer with a
coat hanger on your head? :-D
Since your demise is a coming due to brain rot a Kook known illness..
relax this video is for you.
::: Your demise is coming even sooner so you watch it with your wife, if
she hasn't escaped from you by now.........
http://www.ted.com/talks/joan_halifax.html
--
Remember this one you posted in a rare moment of lucidity Antonio L
Santana-Candia?
Ghent aka "Zhragon" (aka JABRIOL/Antonio L. Santana) said this about himself
in:
news:1174085588.2...@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com rec.ponds
"But what do you care, I am just a low ghetto welfare living black
puerto rican scum of the earth whose value is less that your fancy
carp in your ponds... I hope you all sleep well at night."
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Sauron Khetanna
>
> > Last I heard a felon is a Felon. Like she stand beside Tallyman
> > a fratricide.
>
> > ** Tell us again how you taunted and tortured him for saving his father's
> > life again Antonio L Santana, you rotten scumbag. How you told him he
> > should have let his brother kill their frail elderly father. You're proud
> > to be the sadistic cold-blooded SOB you are.
>
> Tally could have shot his brother in the Leg. But nooooooo he went for
> the Kill, one shot to his brother noggin, then he empty out his gun
> just to make sure his brother stayed down.
>
> ::: You were there in Tally's house and saw what happened? That gave you
> the right to torture and torment him over it? Since you weren't there
> scumbag, you can't say what he should have done. Like you saw all the rapes
> in my house, 900 miles away, when you put Norma's spaghetti strainer with a
> coat hanger on your head? :-D
>
it all in the news... full gory details.
Hey Monkey,
Com pot veure, el sonat em segueix a allà on vagi. La deixo a les
seves mans capaços
Parrish *~
--------------------------------------------
I didn't read that, and I saw the News. You're exaggerating. No matter,
you feel you had the right to torment and torture him about it? He did what
he had to do to stop the murder if his father. ONLY YOU tormented him over
it. None of the other JWs did... just you scumbag.
You remember Phil don't you Antonio? He's still around too. You had a
go-around with him also:
"Phil MacDouglass" <Jerem...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:19540-460...@storefull-3337.bay.webtv.net...
> isn't making someone commit suicide murder in a way? jabbers {Antonio L
> Santana} is a
> murderous psychopathic cultist!!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Khetanna Sauron
> "Sauron Khetanna" <jabriol2...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:d76d38a9-ce6e-4581...@y4g2000vbx.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 2, 12:59 pm, "Parrish *~" <Par...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > ::: You were there in Tally's house and saw what happened? That gave you
> > the right to torture and torment him over it? Since you weren't there
> > scumbag, you can't say what he should have done. Like you saw all the
> > rapes
> > in my house, 900 miles away, when you put Norma's spaghetti strainer with
> > a
> > coat hanger on your head? :-D
>
> it all in the news... full gory details.
> --------------------------------------------
> I didn't read that, and I saw the News.
GWN Gulleyworld news.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Parrish *~
"Khetanna Sauron" <jabri...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:4db0516f-3b97-456b...@j1g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
GWN Gulleyworld news.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You don't want people to know how you tormented and harassed and tortured
Tom Tallyman until you drove him from the NG also? Why not brag how you
tormented him over this tragedy? So far Antonio, you've driven everyone off
ARJ-W but me and you lost your little war with me. Despite your threats to
find someone to kill me and assault my husband, I'm still here and it eats
your miserable guts out.
You remember this person don't you Antonio? Anyone can Google any of these
posts and find out who these people who despise you are, and find the
originals:
"Demon Lord of Confusion"
<popesnarky...@verwirren.confused.k00ks.caballista.org> wrote in
message
news:pan.2007.03.12....@verwirren.confused.k00ks.caballista.org...
> On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 06:43:15 -0700, ~Sable~[Antonio L Santana/JABRIOL]
> attempted to confuse the issue
> further by squeaking: SNIP!
>> On Mar 11, 12:04 am, "Text Medium No. 5" wrote:
>>
>>> Your assertions about the Gulley family are not backed up. You are full
>>> of shit.
> No, you've made repeated veiled threats, Santana, and the only reason
> you give a shit about XXXX XXXXX is because his wife has been
> subverting your fellow JW wackos. More power to her, I say, at least as
> far as helping Witnesses who want to leave the WTS get out.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Khetanna Sauron
> "Khetanna Sauron" <jabriol2...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:4db0516f-3b97-456b...@j1g2000yqn.googlegroups.com...
> On Sep 2, 3:58 pm, "Parrish *~" <Par...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > "Sauron Khetanna" <jabriol2...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:d76d38a9-ce6e-4581...@y4g2000vbx.googlegroups.com...
> > On Sep 2, 12:59 pm, "Parrish *~" <Par...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
> > > ::: You were there in Tally's house and saw what happened? That gave you
> > > the right to torture and torment him over it? Since you weren't there
> > > scumbag, you can't say what he should have done. Like you saw all the
> > > rapes
> > > in my house, 900 miles away, when you put Norma's spaghetti strainer
> > > with
> > > a
> > > coat hanger on your head? :-D
>
> > it all in the news... full gory details.
> > --------------------------------------------
> > I didn't read that, and I saw the News.
>
> GWN Gulleyworld news.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> You don't want people to know how you tormented and harassed and tortured
> Tom Tallyman until you drove him from the NG also?
Can'y harrased a Man Jail, they weren't allowed internet.
> Why not brag how you
> tormented him over this tragedy?
I will let you do it. Your good at fabrications
> So far Antonio, you've driven everyone off
> ARJ-W but me and you lost your little war with me.
What war? ohh the voice in your head. I forgot sorry.
> Despite your threats to
> find someone to kill me and assault my husband, I'm still here and it eats
> your miserable guts out.
>
Why would I want you dead? People will die of Boredom if Usenet
greatest Kook ...you..passed.
Parrish *~
::: No fabrications, No need for them. Many of your posts are all still
there for anyone to dig up that you thought you removed. You forgot there
are other archives besides Google. When are you going to claim you never
posted on Usenet?
> So far Antonio, you've driven everyone off
> ARJ-W but me and you lost your little war with me.
What war? ohh the voice in your head. I forgot sorry.
::: Oh you saw it as a war, you even called me your "target." this past
week.
> Despite your threats to
> find someone to kill me and assault my husband, I'm still here and it eats
> your miserable guts out.
>
Why would I want you dead? People will die of Boredom if Usenet
greatest Kook ...you..passed.
::: You tell me.... you're the homicidal sociopath who gloated over
Columbine and Chris Dubose's death.
Anyone can google any of these posts and find out who these people who know
what a scumbag you are, why they dispise you, and find the originals:
"K. A. Cannon" <kca...@insurgent.orgy> wrote in message
news:es88s2$pir$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> On 1 Mar 2007 14:26:41 -0800, "PondMeister"
> JABRIOL<zod...@gmail.com>Antonio L Santana wrote:
>>
>>NGP moderators won't allow me to post. Do I need to say more?
>
> There's a bald faced lie.
>
Greegor
> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:dmku57dip86m6hd1p...@4ax.com...> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> The last time Antonio had a meltdown,
> >>> several people on the kook group also
> >>> requested they be removed from the
> >>> cross-posting.
>
> >>Wow. A kook got upset? Imagine that!
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> It's looking to me like this Greegor just wants to get involved with the
> people on the ARJ-W group.
Why are you so concerned, Carol? LOL
> If he wants to believe Moe is posting there,
> he'll believe it no matter what anyone says.
Do I care either way?
> If she's posting there, her
> posts are either invisible, or my NSPs are not picking them up. Maybe only
> he can see them.
> And it looks like he wants to start in with me.
When you posted what you said was PROOF of
Antonio's racism, I looked at what you presented
and realized that you were trying to pull a fast one.
> I'm not
> interested in communicating with anyone who would defend a well known
> sadistic sociopath like Antonio L Santana/Jabriol, or with someone who
Are you going all Marie Antoinette on me now? LOL
> admitted he cruelly abused a small child, calling her a brat. Something is
> seriously wrong there.
Kent Wills really BAD sporgery of me, but Kent
falsely attributes it to me and quotes it over and over again.
How are your tactics any different, Carol?
Kent Wills
>
>"Polymath-Z" <jabri...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:f2d51775-b488-48c4...@n35g2000yqf.googlegroups.com...
>On Sep 2, 9:31 am, "Parrish *~" <Par...@invalid.com> wrote:
>> It's looking to me like this Greegor just wants to get involved with the
>> people on the ARJ-W group. If he wants to believe Moe is posting there,
>> he'll believe it no matter what anyone says. If she's posting there, her
>> posts are either invisible, or my NSPs are not picking them up.
>
>
>Or like MM, you have her killfiled because she knows you are a
>misandrist kook.
>
>** She's not killfiled because she not posting anything. And this coming
>from a well know sadistic sociopath who tormented the women on the rape
>groups, telling them they looked for it, it was natural and they deserved
>it. Moe doesn't know me at all you lying moron. She read some posts on
>ARJ-W for a day or two, and that was it. Your own immature-personality pal
>from the kook group, and admitted bored troll, calls you a LoOn and a KoOk.
>
He is a loon and a k00k. There is no way to honestly deny this.
> > Maybe only
>> he can see them. And it looks like he wants to start in with me. I'm not
>> interested in communicating with anyone who would defend a well known
>> sadistic sociopath like Antonio L Santana/Jabriol, or with someone who
>> admitted he cruelly abused a small child, calling her a brat. Something is
>> seriously wrong there.
>> --
>
>But will accept mentally challenged Felons like Kent and stand by her
>side.
>
>** That makes no sense at all. Prove he's a felon before libeling and
>slandering him like you did to so many others. Next you'll be accusing him
>of rape and pedophilia and accusing Moe of being a lesbian .
>
He's going by the lies of Gregory Scott Hanson.
When I made it clear that his sexual OBSESSION with me will never
be returned, Greg started claiming I was convicted of either two,
three and at one time four felonies.
Someone was able to dumb down Iowa's Three Strikes Law enough to
get Greg to realize his LIES about three or four felonies would be
impossible (I'd still be in prison if I had three or more).
Since then he's only claimed two felonies, with no explanation as
to why the others vanished. At this point, I've accepted he's never
going to offer one.
He uses Iowa's court web site to promote his lies. Of course,
depending on his mood, the information about Kent Wills was placed to
either catch a racist stalker (whom only Greg is aware exists and is
unable to name), or it was done as a joke (for what end he's not
stated), or as part of an undercover government operation (he jumped
on that when Kevin made a joke about it).
Greg thinks his posting the same lie over and over, knowing that
he's admitted it's not true and that it's been PROVED not to be true,
will, in some way, make it true. Further, he thinks once it magically
becomes the truth, it will server to punish me for not returning his
sexual desires for me.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>>> But will accept mentally challenged Felons like Kent and stand by her
>>> side.
>>
>> ** That makes no sense at all. �Prove he's a felon before libeling and
>> slandering him like you did to so many others. Next you'll be accusing him
>> of rape and pedophilia and accusing Moe of being a lesbian .
>>
>
>Proved that I raped my daughter and I am under a two state
>investigation.
Where does Carol even hint that you've done such or that such an
investigation is currently occurring?
Unless I've just exposed a lie from you, you'll be able to point
it out.
--
Nessun maggior dolore
Che ricordarsi del tempo felice
Nella miseria.
Kent Wills
wrote:
>Com pot veure, el sonat em segueix a all� on vagi. La deixo a les
>seves mans capa�os
What language is that supposed to be? It's not Italian, which is
to be MM's native language.
Conosco molto bene l'italiano.
--
Always follow your dream!
Unless it's the one where you're at work in your underwear during a
fire drill.
Kent Wills
>On Sep 2, 8:31 am, "Parrish *~" <Par...@invalid.com> wrote:
>> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:dmku57dip86m6hd1p...@4ax.com...> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >>> The last time Antonio had a meltdown,
>> >>> several people on the kook group also
>> >>> requested they be removed from the
>> >>> cross-posting.
>>
>> >>Wow. A kook got upset? Imagine that!
>>
>> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> It's looking to me like this Greegor just wants to get involved with the
>> people on the ARJ-W group.
>
>Why are you so concerned, Carol? LOL
>
Oh, that's right, in your drug addled mind, women should never
worry about anything and simple be seen, not heard.
>> If he wants to believe Moe is posting there,
>> he'll believe it no matter what anyone says.
>
>Do I care either way?
>
You've PROVED you do. That you felt it necessary to comment
shows you care.
To what degree is the only question.
>> If she's posting there, her
>> posts are either invisible, or my NSPs are not picking them up. Maybe only
>> he can see them.
>
>> And it looks like he wants to start in with me.
>
>When you posted what you said was PROOF of
>Antonio's racism, I looked at what you presented
>and realized that you were trying to pull a fast one.
>
To the mentally sound, presenting the truth is not trying to pull
a fast one. That you don't see it this way is expected.
>> I'm not
>> interested in communicating with anyone who would defend a well known
>> sadistic sociopath like Antonio L Santana/Jabriol, or with someone who
>
>Are you going all Marie Antoinette on me now? LOL
>
>> admitted he cruelly abused a small child, calling her a brat. Something is
>> seriously wrong there.
>
>Kent Wills really BAD sporgery of me, but Kent
>falsely attributes it to me and quotes it over and over again.
>
Still claiming I posted the racist rant, adding your name, YEARS
before either of us were aware of the others existence?
That LIE has been exposed so many times, I'm amazed you still try
to present it, even if by deceptive innuendo.
>How are your tactics any different, Carol?
Since I've never done as you claim, her tactics can't be the
same. It's just not possible to do the same thing as another when the
"another" has never done as you claim.
Shushaku
Yup I did.
> > Despite your threats to
> > find someone to kill me and assault my husband, I'm still here and it eats
> > your miserable guts out.
>
> Why would I want you dead? People will die of Boredom if Usenet
> greatest Kook ...you..passed.
>
> ::: You tell me.... you're the homicidal sociopath who gloated over
> Columbine and Chris Dubose's death.
>
Did I know? oh yeah I forget, Gulley world right?
Shushaku
> At one time, not so long ago, Sauron Khetanna <jabriol2...@gmail.com>
One the Monkey will understand.
Shushaku
> On Sep 2, 8:31 am, "Parrish *~" <Par...@invalid.com> wrote:
>
> > "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:dmku57dip86m6hd1p...@4ax.com...> At one time, not so long ago, Greegor <greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >>> The last time Antonio had a meltdown,
> > >>> several people on the kook group also
> > >>> requested they be removed from the
> > >>> cross-posting.
>
> > >>Wow. A kook got upset? Imagine that!
>
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > It's looking to me like this Greegor just wants to get involved with the
> > people on the ARJ-W group.
>
> Why are you so concerned, Carol? LOL
>
It makes her look bad in front of her sock puppets.
>
> When you posted what you said was PROOF of
> Antonio's racism, I looked at what you presented
> and realized that you were trying to pull a fast one.
>
> > I'm not
> > interested in communicating with anyone who would defend a well known
> > sadistic sociopath like Antonio L Santana/Jabriol, or with someone who
>
> Are you going all Marie Antoinette on me now? LOL
>
> > admitted he cruelly abused a small child, calling her a brat. Something is
> > seriously wrong there.
>
> Kent Wills really BAD sporgery of me, but Kent
> falsely attributes it to me and quotes it over and over again.
>
> How are your tactics any different, Carol?
they are not, that why she is a kook.
Greegor
KBW > mind, women should never worry
KBW > about anything and simple be seen, not heard.
I never made any such claim.
More words you attempt to put in my mouth.
By the way, that expression comes from the
Victorian era, and was used mostly about children.
Since you posted links to scantily clad photos of some
random woman and claimed they are your fictional
wife, apparently you believe she should be SEEN
without being heard from, Kent!
Bob L. Head
> There is no way to honestly deny this.
http://5magazine.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/img_0271.jpg
http://5magazine.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/25484174_e5f642f7741.jpg
Bob L. Head
> Unless I've just exposed a lie from you, you'll be able to point
> it out.
http://5magazine.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/img_0271.jpg
http://5magazine.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/25484174_e5f642f7741.jpg
Bob L. Head
> Conosco molto bene l'italiano.
http://5magazine.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/img_0271.jpg
http://5magazine.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/25484174_e5f642f7741.jpg
Bob L. Head
> You've PROVED you do. That you felt it necessary to comment
> shows you care.
http://5magazine.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/img_0271.jpg
http://5magazine.files.wordpress.com/2010/01/25484174_e5f642f7741.jpg
Bob L. Head
Parrish *~
> At one time, not so long ago, Sauron Khetanna <jabri...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>>> But will accept mentally challenged Felons like Kent and stand by her
>>>> side.
>>>
>>> ** That makes no sense at all. Prove he's a felon before libeling and
>>> slandering him like you did to so many others. Next you'll be accusing
>>> him
>>> of rape and pedophilia and accusing Moe of being a lesbian .
>>>
>>
>>Proved that I raped my daughter and I am under a two state
>>investigation.
>
> Where does Carol even hint that you've done such or that such an
> investigation is currently occurring?
> Unless I've just exposed a lie from you, you'll be able to point
> it out.
If you haven't yet noticed, Antonio L Santana/JABRIOL keeps adding to his
allegations. Now I've supposedly said he's under investigation in two
states. He just keeps making things up to sling mud at me as a
justification for libeling and slandering my husband and myself. He once
accused me of murdering my ex-husband (he died of cancer) for the Insurance
money and burying his body under a trailer on my property. He didn't
realize how crazy that one sounded? Then he accused me of performing 43
abortions, he didn't say on who. I am not a Dr. He dropped those LIES fast
when someone told him to call the Police or the TBI/FBI......
--
T.T. Gregory Jr. - 15 Aug 2006 23:17 GMT
Is that the woman you're trying to have
murdered Jabbers? You're one sick
Jehovahs Witness.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Parrish *~
I suspected it was BS right from the start. I never took Greg serious and
I'm sure no one else would or did either. You have to look at the "source."
;-)
> Since then he's only claimed two felonies, with no explanation as
> to why the others vanished. At this point, I've accepted he's never
> going to offer one.
> He uses Iowa's court web site to promote his lies. Of course,
> depending on his mood, the information about Kent Wills was placed to
> either catch a racist stalker (whom only Greg is aware exists and is
> unable to name), or it was done as a joke (for what end he's not
> stated), or as part of an undercover government operation (he jumped
> on that when Kevin made a joke about it).
Good grief! :-D
> Greg thinks his posting the same lie over and over, knowing that
> he's admitted it's not true and that it's been PROVED not to be true,
> will, in some way, make it true. Further, he thinks once it magically
> becomes the truth, it will server to punish me for not returning his
> sexual desires for me.
>
Since Antonio/Jabriol does the same thing.... maybe they both suffer from
the same serious mental illness. It's clear Antonio isn't playing with a
full deck. Antonio seems to think if he keeps accusing me, of accusing him,
of raping Revis, I really did do it. Anyone who was on rec.ponds and the
other groups he cross-posted to at that time can attest to all the forged
posts and messages both Antonio and a few kOoKs from the kook group posted
there to flood the group to kill it. It was Antonio's finest and most
concentrated effort to drive me from Usenet. Every time Antonio had one of
these meltdowns, he's crossposted where he knows trolls and kOoKs hang out.
He always manages to snare one or two in his meltdown flame wars. It's
possible one of these KoOks, using my nym, did accuse him of raping his
daughter. If so, I never saw the post anywhere and Antonio/Jabriol and
whatever kOoK pal he had at the time has never produced any such post.
There was one person using a program called Hipcrime at the time who could
make very convincing forgeries. But he didn't seem to care much for Antonio
after realizing what a scumbag he is and left the fray as did the other
kOoKs as they got to know the truth about Antonio. Still, I never saw any
such post. That's why I keep saying that Antonio is willfully lying as an
excuse to destroy my marriage, family and myself because he must win the
battle..... or he hallucinated seeing any such post. The rest of the BS
about the Police investigation is a pure lie he added for a better reaction
from people. Or maybe to prove they found him innocent of the rape... who
the hell knows how such a sick medicated mind works.
BTW, the rec.ponds never recovered from this attack on it as he's bragged a
few times.
--
"I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours" - Stephen Roberts -
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Greegor
KBW > When I made it clear that his sexual OBSESSION
KBW > with me will never be returned, Greg started
KBW > claiming I was convicted
The claim that Kent was convicted was not
originally mine, and predated my first knowledge
that Kent even existed.
Kent's statement here about timing or
cause and effect is a lie, as is usual for Kent.
Kent only began this false assertion that
my involvement is sexual fairly recently.
It's a variation on Maureen's attempt to
insult opponents by calling them gay.
> of either two, three and at one time four felonies.
Court records are ONLINE and show that Kent
has two thieving felonies and a misdemeanor for
using a teen as an accomplice on his 2nd felony
for garage burglary in Ankeny Iowa.
Kent is reaching for some way to confuse
the proveable facts about his record.
Why try to confuse the details if it's not his?
> Someone was able to dumb down Iowa's Three Strikes Law enough to
> get Greg to realize his LIES about three or four felonies would be
> impossible (I'd still be in prison if I had three or more).
I did once express a suspicion of more, probably
in some state other than Iowa, but
Kent falsely represents that I CLAIMED he
had three or four.
Kent is the someone who brought up the Three Strikes law,
hoping it would help him distract from his convictions.
> Since then he's only claimed two felonies, with no explanation as
> to why the others vanished. At this point, I've accepted he's never
> going to offer one.
> He uses Iowa's court web site to promote his lies. Of course,
> depending on his mood, the information about Kent Wills was placed to
> either catch a racist stalker (whom only Greg is aware exists and is
> unable to name),
Kent and Maureen repeatedly claimed that
Kent Wills is only a nickname adopted to
throw off a racist stalker who Kent said
threatened Kent's hispanic wife and kids.
Kent said his stalkers name was Eric Ross.
But when asked for the number of a Police
report, a date or which Police department,
Kent has never ponied up any proof.
I find it amusing that here Kent has changed
his story and pretended that his claims
were my claims.
> or it was done as a joke (for what end he's not
> stated),
Another of Kent's OWN claims.
For some time Kent claimed that the
court records on him were FAKED
by a buddy of his, as a joke on him.
This story was shot down by pointing out
that the records show up on three different
official state court and corrections web sites
and that faking such records would be
a VERY serious felony level crime.
Later Kent claimed that he is not
even named Kent, which is not compatible
with the faked records claim KENT MADE.
Kent has posted rotating denials that
sometimes collide with each other.
eg How could records be faked about
him if his name is not the same as
on the court records?
> or as part of an undercover government
> operation (he jumped on that when
> Kevin made a joke about it).
Quoteless again.
> Greg thinks his posting the same lie over and over,
Official and public LINKS that can be
confirmed by anybody on the internet.
> knowing that he's admitted it's not true
False claim repeated ad infinatum.
It's a STOCK deception of Kents to falsely
claim that his opponent already conceded
to whatever lie Kent is asserting.
> and that it's been PROVED not to be true,
> will, in some way, make it true. Further, he thinks once it magically
> becomes the truth, it will server to punish me for not returning his
> sexual desires for me.
Kent seems to count on most readers having
a short attention span and not bothering
to do any fact checking themselves.
Kent's arguments go in a LARGE circle
but a circle nonetheless.
Kent Wills
>
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:0k2467t9j4qklvalf...@4ax.com...
>> At one time, not so long ago, Sauron Khetanna <jabri...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>>> But will accept mentally challenged Felons like Kent and stand by her
>>>>> side.
>>>>
>>>> ** That makes no sense at all. Prove he's a felon before libeling and
>>>> slandering him like you did to so many others. Next you'll be accusing
>>>> him
>>>> of rape and pedophilia and accusing Moe of being a lesbian .
>>>>
>>>
>>>Proved that I raped my daughter and I am under a two state
>>>investigation.
>>
>> Where does Carol even hint that you've done such or that such an
>> investigation is currently occurring?
>> Unless I've just exposed a lie from you, you'll be able to point
>> it out.
>
>If you haven't yet noticed, Antonio L Santana/JABRIOL keeps adding to his
>allegations. Now I've supposedly said he's under investigation in two
>states.
I note he has offered nothing to support, let alone prove, his
claim.
>He just keeps making things up to sling mud at me as a
>justification for libeling and slandering my husband and myself. He once
>accused me of murdering my ex-husband (he died of cancer) for the Insurance
>money and burying his body under a trailer on my property. He didn't
>realize how crazy that one sounded? Then he accused me of performing 43
>abortions, he didn't say on who. I am not a Dr. He dropped those LIES fast
>when someone told him to call the Police or the TBI/FBI......
It's clear I exposed Antonio's lie. While I've not seen the
posts where he accused you of murder or of performing abortions, it's
easy to accept that he's made such claims.
--
"I could have been ambassador to Moscow by now. Maybe even Private
Secretary. Instead, I'm watching a dinosaur trash my office..."
Kent Wills
[...]
>>>** That makes no sense at all. Prove he's a felon before libeling and
>>>slandering him like you did to so many others. Next you'll be accusing him
>>>of rape and pedophilia and accusing Moe of being a lesbian .
>>>
>>
>> He's going by the lies of Gregory Scott Hanson.
>> When I made it clear that his sexual OBSESSION with me will never
>> be returned, Greg started claiming I was convicted of either two,
>> three and at one time four felonies.
>> Someone was able to dumb down Iowa's Three Strikes Law enough to
>> get Greg to realize his LIES about three or four felonies would be
>> impossible (I'd still be in prison if I had three or more).
>
>I suspected it was BS right from the start. I never took Greg serious and
>I'm sure no one else would or did either. You have to look at the "source."
>;-)
>
The only "people" accepting Greg's claims are his sock puppets.
>> Since then he's only claimed two felonies, with no explanation as
>> to why the others vanished. At this point, I've accepted he's never
>> going to offer one.
>> He uses Iowa's court web site to promote his lies. Of course,
>> depending on his mood, the information about Kent Wills was placed to
>> either catch a racist stalker (whom only Greg is aware exists and is
>> unable to name), or it was done as a joke (for what end he's not
>> stated), or as part of an undercover government operation (he jumped
>> on that when Kevin made a joke about it).
>
>Good grief! :-D
>
I suspect, but don't actually KNOW, that Kevin's Dad was in the
FBI. If I am correct, it would explain why Kevin, who is not in any
form of law enforcement, would know about giving an undercover agent a
record that can be checked.
For the record, I am not now, nor have I ever been, a member of
any law enforcement agency. I have no plans on ever being a member in
the future.
>> Greg thinks his posting the same lie over and over, knowing that
>> he's admitted it's not true and that it's been PROVED not to be true,
>> will, in some way, make it true. Further, he thinks once it magically
>> becomes the truth, it will server to punish me for not returning his
>> sexual desires for me.
>>
>
>Since Antonio/Jabriol does the same thing.... maybe they both suffer from
>the same serious mental illness. It's clear Antonio isn't playing with a
>full deck. Antonio seems to think if he keeps accusing me, of accusing him,
>of raping Revis, I really did do it.
Greg also believes, quite firmly, that if he posts the same lies
enough times, they will magically become the truth.
This tactic has never worked for him in the past, but he
continues to follow it religiously. Of course, he MUST follow the
pattern.
>Anyone who was on rec.ponds and the
>other groups he cross-posted to at that time can attest to all the forged
>posts and messages both Antonio and a few kOoKs from the kook group posted
>there to flood the group to kill it.
Greg hasn't done that...yet.
When I ceased even acknowledging his posts for a while, he did
sock up and post with my nym via his x-privat.org account. No one
bought it, but so DESPERATE was he for my attention, he had to do it.
>It was Antonio's finest and most
>concentrated effort to drive me from Usenet. Every time Antonio had one of
>these meltdowns, he's crossposted where he knows trolls and kOoKs hang out.
>He always manages to snare one or two in his meltdown flame wars. It's
>possible one of these KoOks, using my nym, did accuse him of raping his
>daughter. If so, I never saw the post anywhere and Antonio/Jabriol and
>whatever kOoK pal he had at the time has never produced any such post.
While it is possible, I would expect Antonio could have produced
the post in question.
Of course, it's possible someone showed him just how it wasn't
you, so he's unwilling to post it for fear that the truth would be
exposed.
>There was one person using a program called Hipcrime at the time who could
>make very convincing forgeries. But he didn't seem to care much for Antonio
>after realizing what a scumbag he is and left the fray as did the other
>kOoKs as they got to know the truth about Antonio. Still, I never saw any
>such post. That's why I keep saying that Antonio is willfully lying as an
>excuse to destroy my marriage, family and myself because he must win the
>battle..... or he hallucinated seeing any such post.
I think it's more likely that he didn't understand a post and
concluded an accusation was posted when it wasn't.
MM did much the same. He did a C&P of a post wherein someone
claimed Antonio was suspected of a rape. MM claimed this post stated
Antonio committed a rape.
Antonio's grasp of English isn't as strong as it could or should
be. His inability to admit an error to a woman ensures he'll NEVER
tell you he was mistaken.
>The rest of the BS
>about the Police investigation is a pure lie he added for a better reaction
>from people. Or maybe to prove they found him innocent of the rape... who
>the hell knows how such a sick medicated mind works.
>
>BTW, the rec.ponds never recovered from this attack on it as he's bragged a
>few times.
Greg worked hard to destroy the alt.friends newsgroup. There are
only two of us posting with any regularity, and those posts aren't all
that regular.
Greg thinks that because Usenet is an extremely important part of
his life, this is the case with everyone. Most of the people on
Usenet see it as a distraction from real life, not as being real life.
Sadly, Greg's mind doesn't work like that. It's looking like
Antonio's mind is much the same.
Kent Wills
[...]
>> >Hey Monkey,
>>
>> >Com pot veure, el sonat em segueix a all on vagi. La deixo a les
>> >seves mans capa os
>>
>> What language is that supposed to be? It's not Italian, which is
>> to be MM's native language.
>> Conosco molto bene l'italiano.
>>
>
Got it.