Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
More political philosophy about Swarm Intelligence..
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Amine Moulay Ramdane
Dec 28, 2020, 2:58:28 PM12/28/20
to
Hello..
More political philosophy about Swarm Intelligence..
Swarm intelligence can make a person much smarter, or it can make us collectively much smarter, so the best way is to know how to use it
efficiently, so that also to enhance much more productivity and to enhance much more quality, this is why i am very positive, since we have to be proactive so that to make people much smarter with Swarm intelligence.
More political philosophy about: Are humans smart ?
So are humans smart ?
I am very positive about humans, and i think that humans are smart,
since we are also advancing by the following process of Swarm Intelligence that is so efficient, read about it here:
How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter
https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/
So i think that "collectively", we humans, we are smart, and i think that you will soon notice it by following the exponential progress of our humanity.
More political philosophy about do we have to be pessimistic..
I think it is a beautiful day in history, and how can you understand it ?
First you will notice that the exponential progress of our humanity is going "very" fast, look at the following video to understand it:
Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ&t=144s
So as you are noticing that you have to take this exponential progress
of our humanity into account and be much more optimistic.
And you have to know that this exponential progress of our humanity also comes from the following process:
How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter
https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/
And here is my new poem called: "This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress"
--
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
Because it is a beautiful maturity but not the adolescence
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
And we have to beautifully tune it with the beautiful consensus
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us not be just guesses but technicality and science
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us be a beautiful expressiveness that is not helpless
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us take together this beautiful breakfast
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
Since you are also like my so beautiful Princess
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us be a beautiful presence for present and future acceptance
--
Also you have to read my following thoughts to understand more:
More political philosophy about solidarity..
I think i am a philosopher, and you have to read below my
thoughts about the problem of absurdity, and you will notice that
that i am "abstracting" so that you understand, and i am for example saying: "this smartness of humans gives "hope" and this pleasures of human life gives an interesting purpose and an interesting value to human life", so as you are noticing that solidarity can also be classified as a pleasure of human life among other pleasures of human life that is important and that gives an interesting purpose and an interesting value to human life, so i think that the abstraction is correct. And you have to read my following political philosophy about Morality:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
And notice that i am saying in the the above web link about Morality the following about solidarity:
More about compassion in political philosophy..
And what about compassion and love in political philosophy ?
"Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More
perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an
effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction, and you have
noticed that i said the following so that to abstract it:
"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and
eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being
this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan
couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes
with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to
prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient
philosophy. And it is also my spirit."
So then compassion and love is also "mechanical" that comes from my Rule
of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", since perfection of my
abstraction of morality above, is also helping others, so then a more
appropriate morality is to not neglect helping others and to know how to
help others.
So you are noticing that i am saying: "since perfection is also helping
others"
But i have to logically explain the big picture, here is how:
Since we can for example say: Perfection is perfection of not helping
the weakest members of our society and it is also perfection of helping
the weakest members of the society, and we can notice that each side has
a weight of importance, since we can not say that helping the weakest
members of the society has no importance, because it is also a
perfection that has a weight of importance, and logically we have not to
neglect it, and as you have noticed that i also said that:
"Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More
perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an
effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction.
Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand:
More political philosophy about Albert Camus and the problem of absurdity..
I am a white arab, and i think i am a philosopher, and
now i will talk about an important subject in political philosophy:
So read the following article about Albert Camus:
Albert Camus and the problem of absurdity
https://blog.oup.com/2019/05/albert-camus-problem-absurdity/
So notice that it says:
"The philosopher Albert Camus asserts that we should embrace the absurdity of human existence and take on the purpose of creating value and meaning. Efforts and resilience – not suicide and despair – are the appropriate responses."
So i think i am smart, and i am noticing that Albert Camus has
made a big mistake by saying that human existence was or is absurd, because human existence is inherently not absurd, i can prove it easily by saying the following:
Human existence inherently has an interesting purpose and
it inherently comes with an interesting value that has a great weight of importance, i mean that human life inherently comes with human smartness
that has a great weight of importance and human life comes with pleasures of life, and human life is both "pleasures" of life and a level of suffering, this smartness of humans gives "hope" and this pleasures of human life gives an interesting purpose and an interesting value to human life, so this is why i say that Albert Camus was not right by saying that human existence is absurd.
Read my following political philosophy about Morality to know more
about my thoughts:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4
More political philosophy about Democracy and Morality..
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i think i am also a philosopher, and now i will start by asking a philosophical question:
Is Democracy morality ?
I will say that Morality is about exactness and how to be the exact perfection, note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting", read here to notice it:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection
And Democracy is a mechanism that permits to avoid corruption of morality and corruption of morality is also lack of efficiency and it is extremism that hurts Democracy, and Democracy doesn't mean that people have to govern, because it is absurdity, but Democracy is the "tool" of Morality, since morality wants to be the exact perfection , this is why it needs Democracy, and Morality or society have to be "progressive", read my following writing of my political philosophy about morality to know that they have to be progressive:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
And we can say the following:
The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles.
But i ask a smart question of:
Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ?
Here is my answer:
But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't
necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization,
and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can
notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than
Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU
More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..
Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?
When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy
is better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this
way of doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also we can logically prove it by saying the following:
From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?
So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be
Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be
a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more
money.
But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical question, and it is the following:
Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements
it has:
From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement
of parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third
requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement
and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and a country can become a more global world like European union or such.
More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy..
I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written
the following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012:
----
More about China and Russia and other such countries education system..
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, read the following:
“Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education is no exception,” Mr. Li said.
A Chinese Education, for a Price
Read more here:
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html
I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system,
and i don't think it is meritocratic !
It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it:
Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass examinations and obtain a diploma.
RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities
Read more here:
https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20100514205552600#:~:text=According%20to%20necessarily%20rough%20estimates,in%202009%20totalled%20%241%20billion.&text=But%2C%20despite%20the%20country's%20increased,much%20the%20salaries%20actually%20are.
----
And also i have just posted about the today China after the anti-corruption compaign in China, read the following:
---
I invite you to read the following interesting article:
China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign and the Challenges of Political Meritocracy
https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/chinas-anti-corruption-campaign-and-the-challenges-of-political-meritocracy/
---
So as you are noticing from my above writing that corruption can corrupt
the education system and when education system is corrupt then the Meritocratic system is corrupt and this is dangerous. So even after the anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press, read my following thoughts to understand more:
From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?
So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be
Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be
a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more
money.
Now why to be Democracy ?
I think that we have to be more smart and notice that
Democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also
like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to
some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example
if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think
that Democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption
more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is
understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum
towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency
of fighting corruption (and corruption also means lack of efficiency),
we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt
and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that
democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in
democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance
this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best.
More political philosophy about what is the goal of philosophy..
What is the goal of philosophy ?
I think there is a difference between doing philosophy like i am doing and the goal of philosophy, and doing philosophy is getting more efficiently into the "details" by being inventive and by more efficiently understanding, but the goal of philosophy is also, first, to know how to be an efficient higher level "abstraction" that abstract complexity so that people do understand efficiently your philosophy, so that people be efficient in this life, and, second, the goal of philosophy is also the following:
I have just read the following article:
How to Live Better, According to Nietzsche
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/10/nietzsches-guide-to-better-living/568375/
And it says the following:
"More recently, in his Philosophical Investigations (1953), Ludwig Wittgenstein suggested that the aim of philosophy is not to seek the truth but rather to provide relief—“to show the fly the way out of the fly-bottle.” "
I think i am smart and i think i am a philosopher and i am not in accordance with the above saying of Ludwig Wittgenstein, because i think
that it is by logical analogy like knowing the difference between boolean logic and fuzzy logic, i mean the goal of philosophy is to seek the truth, but philosophy is like Democracy that gives you a certain level of liberty under the "laws" of the society that permits you to think and write your philosophy and it can be philosophy that is the truth or that is a certain level of truth, so it is like fuzzy logic, since we want to let people in democracy diversify there thinking on philosophy(but they have to respect the laws), and the goal of philosophy is that from this philosophical diversity we have to choose what is the best philosophy.
So i will give a good example so that you efficiently understand me, here is the example:
Please read my following thoughts about Turing completeness and parallel programming:
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/ju0xEyq36Rc
So notice in the above link of my thoughts how i am explaining by
using the efficient way of learning by "abstraction", so as you will
notice that i am efficiently highering the level abstraction by efficiently wanting you to understand the important things that permits you to be efficient, and this way of doing is also like the goal of philosophy that i explained above.
More political philosophy about civilization..
So now i will talk about an important subject and it is related to the following article, i invite you to read it:
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190218-are-we-on-the-road-to-civilisation-collapse
So i think i am smart and i say that the "main" problem of our today world comes from "complexity", what i mean by this is that we have to know how to manage "complexity", and as you are noticing that we are also managing complexity by using "abstraction", but this abstraction causes problems if it is not managed correctly, i mean that too much abstraction is not good for the system, because we have to be the right level of abstraction to be a good reliability and safety. So we can
ask if specialization that is limiting study to a particular area is also abstraction? i think it is abstraction and it can cause problems if it is not managed correctly, this is why we have also to be an "efficient" philosophy that knows how to abstract complexity.
More about learning by the way of abstraction and about specialization..
Here is the definition of the word "specialization" in the dictionary:
Specialization is: limiting study or work to one particular area.
So as you are noticing i am saying in my thoughts below that learning
by the way of abstraction is a specialization, and i think i am correct
since we can say that learning by the way of abstraction or learning greatly by the way of abstraction make us "specialized" in the area of studying and learning by the way of abstraction.
So read my following thoughts to understand:
More philosophy about smartness and abstraction and complexity..
So i will start by asking a question:
Is the way of learning by abstraction an efficient way ?
So when you are smart you will quickly notice that we have
to take into account the "context" of the way of learning by abstraction, and when you are smart you will notice that the way of learning by abstraction is also to reduce complexity, but when you take into account the context you will notice that learning by abstraction is a also a "specialization" and it is also an efficient way of learning when we measure it inside the "context" of abstraction that is the reality, so then we have not to be pessimistic about learning by the efficient way of abstraction since, first, it reduces the complexity and, second, even if we are not understanding the complexity behind the abstraction, learning by abstraction is also an efficient specialization that is efficient for adaptability, so we have to know how to balance between those that are required to understand the complexity behind the abstraction and those that are required to learn by the way of abstraction that is a specialization.
More philosophy about the way of learning by abstraction..
I will give you an example so that you understand,
so if you ask what is the way of learning by abstraction,
look at my following tutorial where i am presenting
my methodology that, first, permits to model the synchronization primitives of parallel programs with logic primitives with If-then-OR-AND so that to make it easy to translate to petri nets so that to detect deadlocks in parallel programs, please take a look at it because this tutorial of mine is the way of learning by abstraction:
How to analyse parallel applications with Petri Nets
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/how-to-analyse-parallel-applications-with-petri-nets
I think i am smart and i will explain more what is smartness..
So that you understand me more, let us say that you are measuring a human IQ, so if it is high human IQ , this value is a measure that is relative to the other human IQs, so you will say that this high IQ is much better at adaptability than the other humans, but it is not correct measure, because even science and technology have constraints that constrain(or limit greatly) the expressiveness of human IQs, so then we can not say that a high human IQ is better at adaptability than the other humans..
More philosophy about how to measure human IQ or human smartness..
I think i am smart, and i will talk about how to measure human IQs or human smartness, first you have to know that you can measure relatively or absolutely, so if you measure the IQ of a human, you will give a value of IQ that is "relative" to the distribution of IQs of humans, so can we ask if it is the right way to measure human IQs? i think it is not, because there is a "very" important thing that is missing, and it is that you have to also measure IQ or smartness relatively to the "constraints" in our reality that constrain(or limit) human IQ or human smartness, and i think this will give a much more realistic measure of human IQs or human smartness, so if you are really smart you will start by searching what are those constraints in the reality that constrain human IQs or human smartness, because this way you will become really smart.
Let me give an example about how to measure IQs or smartness..
So if you are really smart you will give a smart example so that
people can understand, so here it is:
If i say: 2 + 2 = 4
So you will notice that this equality is also constrained by constraints of reality, since for example you are noticing that it is not so mathematically expressive, so this not mathematically expressive is also
constraining human IQ or human smartness, since if you understand and learn this mathematical equality, another person will quickly do the same, so the other person will adapt quickly to this level
of smartness, so now you are noticing the smart idea, it is that even science and technology are constrained the same way, and this constraints on science and technology constrain or limit the expressiveness of high human IQs or high level of smartness so that other lower level human IQs or smartness can attain the level of adaptability of high human IQs, this is what is happening in our today world, and if you are smart you will notice that there is something else that is happening and it is that abstraction of complexity that reduce the complexity is making others not understanding the complexity behind
the abstraction and this is not so efficient.
Here is more about the constraints on science and technology:
Is Science Going To End?
Read more here:
https://philosophynow.org/issues/68/Is_Science_Going_To_End
And read also the following
The Industrial Era Ended, and So Will the Digital Era
Read more here:
https://hbr.org/2018/07/the-industrial-era-ended-and-so-will-the-digital-era
More political philosophy about what is smartness..
I give you an example so that you understand:
If i give the following three words:
I, love, you.
It is not the same as if i give the following five words:
I, love, you, very, much
So you are noticing that the five words permit a more sophisticated
expressiveness, and notice that i am saying more sophisticated, since
the five words bring more efficiency, and this bringing more efficiency
is also what we call smartness, but notice that this smartness is brought by using the "tool" that is composed of the five words, so the tool that is our english language brings smartness, so then we have to be convinced by the fact that the tool like internet brings a much more efficiency and this much more efficiency brings much more smartness, so now you are noticing that smartness is not only genetical or cultural, but it is also the smartness of using the tool, and this is a very important thing, since the tool can be powerful and it can advance very much a human and can make a human really smart. So you have to understand that we are also in an Era of powerful tools such as internet that can advance very much a human and that can make a human really smart.
Read my previous following thoughts to understand better:
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have
also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
Here is my other wisdom:
With more knowledge, the beautiful of the physical reality becomes less beautiful, since we become more aware of the realities of life, but with more knowledge, it is smartness that becomes more beautiful, and then smartness becomes the beautiful that attracts more, since also with
more knowledge we become a more sophisticated intellectual taste, so more knowledge is an engine that pushes us towards more and more smartness, and smartness is also a good thing that can bring more happiness, and then if happiness is brought more by this more smartness, the beautiful of the physical reality becomes again more beautiful. So i predict that in the near future of 2030 we will become much much more smart and this much much more smartness can bring more happiness, since you have also to take into account the exponential progress of our humanity and the abundance of knowledge such as in internet.
And here is my new proverb..
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms, and here is my new proverb:
Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting"
Read here:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection
This is the definition of perfection above that I use below in my explanation of my new proverb.
Here is all my explanation of my new proverb below:
My new proverb comes to me from the essence of morality that I explained to you in my political philosophy that I wrote in English, since in morality we are pushed towards the pretty tomorrow because we are aware of this pretty perfume that is the perfection that pushes us or encourages us to be or allows us to become perfect or greatly perfect.
Read about it here on my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4
So here is my new proverb:
"Life is like the pretty perfume that calls us to be a pretty tomorrow!"
So notice carefully my smart play on words in my new proverb, i think it's smart, and you have to know that the future perfection depends on the present perfection, so when today we are responsibility to be the pretty perfection so that to build the pretty tomorrow, then the pretty perfection of today is part of the pretty tomorrow, and the "pretty perfume" in my new proverb is also the today pretty perfection, but you have to understand the symbolic which allows us to say that being this part of the pretty tomorrow is also like being the pretty tomorrow. It is what makes it a smart proverb.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
More political philosophy about Swarm Intelligence..
Swarm intelligence can make a person much smarter, or it can make us collectively much smarter, so the best way is to know how to use it
efficiently, so that also to enhance much more productivity and to enhance much more quality, this is why i am very positive, since we have to be proactive so that to make people much smarter with Swarm intelligence.
More political philosophy about: Are humans smart ?
So are humans smart ?
I am very positive about humans, and i think that humans are smart,
since we are also advancing by the following process of Swarm Intelligence that is so efficient, read about it here:
How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter
https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/
So i think that "collectively", we humans, we are smart, and i think that you will soon notice it by following the exponential progress of our humanity.
More political philosophy about do we have to be pessimistic..
I think it is a beautiful day in history, and how can you understand it ?
First you will notice that the exponential progress of our humanity is going "very" fast, look at the following video to understand it:
Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ&t=144s
So as you are noticing that you have to take this exponential progress
of our humanity into account and be much more optimistic.
And you have to know that this exponential progress of our humanity also comes from the following process:
How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter
https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/
And here is my new poem called: "This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress"
--
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
Because it is a beautiful maturity but not the adolescence
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
And we have to beautifully tune it with the beautiful consensus
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us not be just guesses but technicality and science
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us be a beautiful expressiveness that is not helpless
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us take together this beautiful breakfast
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
Since you are also like my so beautiful Princess
This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress
So let us be a beautiful presence for present and future acceptance
--
Also you have to read my following thoughts to understand more:
More political philosophy about solidarity..
I think i am a philosopher, and you have to read below my
thoughts about the problem of absurdity, and you will notice that
that i am "abstracting" so that you understand, and i am for example saying: "this smartness of humans gives "hope" and this pleasures of human life gives an interesting purpose and an interesting value to human life", so as you are noticing that solidarity can also be classified as a pleasure of human life among other pleasures of human life that is important and that gives an interesting purpose and an interesting value to human life, so i think that the abstraction is correct. And you have to read my following political philosophy about Morality:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
And notice that i am saying in the the above web link about Morality the following about solidarity:
More about compassion in political philosophy..
And what about compassion and love in political philosophy ?
"Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More
perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an
effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction, and you have
noticed that i said the following so that to abstract it:
"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and
eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being
this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan
couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes
with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to
prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient
philosophy. And it is also my spirit."
So then compassion and love is also "mechanical" that comes from my Rule
of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", since perfection of my
abstraction of morality above, is also helping others, so then a more
appropriate morality is to not neglect helping others and to know how to
help others.
So you are noticing that i am saying: "since perfection is also helping
others"
But i have to logically explain the big picture, here is how:
Since we can for example say: Perfection is perfection of not helping
the weakest members of our society and it is also perfection of helping
the weakest members of the society, and we can notice that each side has
a weight of importance, since we can not say that helping the weakest
members of the society has no importance, because it is also a
perfection that has a weight of importance, and logically we have not to
neglect it, and as you have noticed that i also said that:
"Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More
perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an
effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction.
Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand:
More political philosophy about Albert Camus and the problem of absurdity..
I am a white arab, and i think i am a philosopher, and
now i will talk about an important subject in political philosophy:
So read the following article about Albert Camus:
Albert Camus and the problem of absurdity
https://blog.oup.com/2019/05/albert-camus-problem-absurdity/
So notice that it says:
"The philosopher Albert Camus asserts that we should embrace the absurdity of human existence and take on the purpose of creating value and meaning. Efforts and resilience – not suicide and despair – are the appropriate responses."
So i think i am smart, and i am noticing that Albert Camus has
made a big mistake by saying that human existence was or is absurd, because human existence is inherently not absurd, i can prove it easily by saying the following:
Human existence inherently has an interesting purpose and
it inherently comes with an interesting value that has a great weight of importance, i mean that human life inherently comes with human smartness
that has a great weight of importance and human life comes with pleasures of life, and human life is both "pleasures" of life and a level of suffering, this smartness of humans gives "hope" and this pleasures of human life gives an interesting purpose and an interesting value to human life, so this is why i say that Albert Camus was not right by saying that human existence is absurd.
Read my following political philosophy about Morality to know more
about my thoughts:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4
More political philosophy about Democracy and Morality..
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i think i am also a philosopher, and now i will start by asking a philosophical question:
Is Democracy morality ?
I will say that Morality is about exactness and how to be the exact perfection, note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting", read here to notice it:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection
And Democracy is a mechanism that permits to avoid corruption of morality and corruption of morality is also lack of efficiency and it is extremism that hurts Democracy, and Democracy doesn't mean that people have to govern, because it is absurdity, but Democracy is the "tool" of Morality, since morality wants to be the exact perfection , this is why it needs Democracy, and Morality or society have to be "progressive", read my following writing of my political philosophy about morality to know that they have to be progressive:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
And we can say the following:
The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles.
But i ask a smart question of:
Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ?
Here is my answer:
But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't
necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization,
and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can
notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than
Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU
More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..
Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?
When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy
is better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this
way of doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also we can logically prove it by saying the following:
From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?
So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be
Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be
a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more
money.
But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical question, and it is the following:
Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements
it has:
From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement
of parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third
requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement
and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and a country can become a more global world like European union or such.
More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy..
I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written
the following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012:
----
More about China and Russia and other such countries education system..
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, read the following:
“Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education is no exception,” Mr. Li said.
A Chinese Education, for a Price
Read more here:
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html
I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system,
and i don't think it is meritocratic !
It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it:
Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass examinations and obtain a diploma.
RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities
Read more here:
https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20100514205552600#:~:text=According%20to%20necessarily%20rough%20estimates,in%202009%20totalled%20%241%20billion.&text=But%2C%20despite%20the%20country's%20increased,much%20the%20salaries%20actually%20are.
----
And also i have just posted about the today China after the anti-corruption compaign in China, read the following:
---
I invite you to read the following interesting article:
China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign and the Challenges of Political Meritocracy
https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/chinas-anti-corruption-campaign-and-the-challenges-of-political-meritocracy/
---
So as you are noticing from my above writing that corruption can corrupt
the education system and when education system is corrupt then the Meritocratic system is corrupt and this is dangerous. So even after the anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press, read my following thoughts to understand more:
From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?
So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be
Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be
a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more
money.
Now why to be Democracy ?
I think that we have to be more smart and notice that
Democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also
like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to
some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example
if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think
that Democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption
more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is
understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum
towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency
of fighting corruption (and corruption also means lack of efficiency),
we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt
and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that
democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in
democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance
this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best.
More political philosophy about what is the goal of philosophy..
What is the goal of philosophy ?
I think there is a difference between doing philosophy like i am doing and the goal of philosophy, and doing philosophy is getting more efficiently into the "details" by being inventive and by more efficiently understanding, but the goal of philosophy is also, first, to know how to be an efficient higher level "abstraction" that abstract complexity so that people do understand efficiently your philosophy, so that people be efficient in this life, and, second, the goal of philosophy is also the following:
I have just read the following article:
How to Live Better, According to Nietzsche
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/10/nietzsches-guide-to-better-living/568375/
And it says the following:
"More recently, in his Philosophical Investigations (1953), Ludwig Wittgenstein suggested that the aim of philosophy is not to seek the truth but rather to provide relief—“to show the fly the way out of the fly-bottle.” "
I think i am smart and i think i am a philosopher and i am not in accordance with the above saying of Ludwig Wittgenstein, because i think
that it is by logical analogy like knowing the difference between boolean logic and fuzzy logic, i mean the goal of philosophy is to seek the truth, but philosophy is like Democracy that gives you a certain level of liberty under the "laws" of the society that permits you to think and write your philosophy and it can be philosophy that is the truth or that is a certain level of truth, so it is like fuzzy logic, since we want to let people in democracy diversify there thinking on philosophy(but they have to respect the laws), and the goal of philosophy is that from this philosophical diversity we have to choose what is the best philosophy.
So i will give a good example so that you efficiently understand me, here is the example:
Please read my following thoughts about Turing completeness and parallel programming:
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/ju0xEyq36Rc
So notice in the above link of my thoughts how i am explaining by
using the efficient way of learning by "abstraction", so as you will
notice that i am efficiently highering the level abstraction by efficiently wanting you to understand the important things that permits you to be efficient, and this way of doing is also like the goal of philosophy that i explained above.
More political philosophy about civilization..
So now i will talk about an important subject and it is related to the following article, i invite you to read it:
https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190218-are-we-on-the-road-to-civilisation-collapse
So i think i am smart and i say that the "main" problem of our today world comes from "complexity", what i mean by this is that we have to know how to manage "complexity", and as you are noticing that we are also managing complexity by using "abstraction", but this abstraction causes problems if it is not managed correctly, i mean that too much abstraction is not good for the system, because we have to be the right level of abstraction to be a good reliability and safety. So we can
ask if specialization that is limiting study to a particular area is also abstraction? i think it is abstraction and it can cause problems if it is not managed correctly, this is why we have also to be an "efficient" philosophy that knows how to abstract complexity.
More about learning by the way of abstraction and about specialization..
Here is the definition of the word "specialization" in the dictionary:
Specialization is: limiting study or work to one particular area.
So as you are noticing i am saying in my thoughts below that learning
by the way of abstraction is a specialization, and i think i am correct
since we can say that learning by the way of abstraction or learning greatly by the way of abstraction make us "specialized" in the area of studying and learning by the way of abstraction.
So read my following thoughts to understand:
More philosophy about smartness and abstraction and complexity..
So i will start by asking a question:
Is the way of learning by abstraction an efficient way ?
So when you are smart you will quickly notice that we have
to take into account the "context" of the way of learning by abstraction, and when you are smart you will notice that the way of learning by abstraction is also to reduce complexity, but when you take into account the context you will notice that learning by abstraction is a also a "specialization" and it is also an efficient way of learning when we measure it inside the "context" of abstraction that is the reality, so then we have not to be pessimistic about learning by the efficient way of abstraction since, first, it reduces the complexity and, second, even if we are not understanding the complexity behind the abstraction, learning by abstraction is also an efficient specialization that is efficient for adaptability, so we have to know how to balance between those that are required to understand the complexity behind the abstraction and those that are required to learn by the way of abstraction that is a specialization.
More philosophy about the way of learning by abstraction..
I will give you an example so that you understand,
so if you ask what is the way of learning by abstraction,
look at my following tutorial where i am presenting
my methodology that, first, permits to model the synchronization primitives of parallel programs with logic primitives with If-then-OR-AND so that to make it easy to translate to petri nets so that to detect deadlocks in parallel programs, please take a look at it because this tutorial of mine is the way of learning by abstraction:
How to analyse parallel applications with Petri Nets
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/how-to-analyse-parallel-applications-with-petri-nets
I think i am smart and i will explain more what is smartness..
So that you understand me more, let us say that you are measuring a human IQ, so if it is high human IQ , this value is a measure that is relative to the other human IQs, so you will say that this high IQ is much better at adaptability than the other humans, but it is not correct measure, because even science and technology have constraints that constrain(or limit greatly) the expressiveness of human IQs, so then we can not say that a high human IQ is better at adaptability than the other humans..
More philosophy about how to measure human IQ or human smartness..
I think i am smart, and i will talk about how to measure human IQs or human smartness, first you have to know that you can measure relatively or absolutely, so if you measure the IQ of a human, you will give a value of IQ that is "relative" to the distribution of IQs of humans, so can we ask if it is the right way to measure human IQs? i think it is not, because there is a "very" important thing that is missing, and it is that you have to also measure IQ or smartness relatively to the "constraints" in our reality that constrain(or limit) human IQ or human smartness, and i think this will give a much more realistic measure of human IQs or human smartness, so if you are really smart you will start by searching what are those constraints in the reality that constrain human IQs or human smartness, because this way you will become really smart.
Let me give an example about how to measure IQs or smartness..
So if you are really smart you will give a smart example so that
people can understand, so here it is:
If i say: 2 + 2 = 4
So you will notice that this equality is also constrained by constraints of reality, since for example you are noticing that it is not so mathematically expressive, so this not mathematically expressive is also
constraining human IQ or human smartness, since if you understand and learn this mathematical equality, another person will quickly do the same, so the other person will adapt quickly to this level
of smartness, so now you are noticing the smart idea, it is that even science and technology are constrained the same way, and this constraints on science and technology constrain or limit the expressiveness of high human IQs or high level of smartness so that other lower level human IQs or smartness can attain the level of adaptability of high human IQs, this is what is happening in our today world, and if you are smart you will notice that there is something else that is happening and it is that abstraction of complexity that reduce the complexity is making others not understanding the complexity behind
the abstraction and this is not so efficient.
Here is more about the constraints on science and technology:
Is Science Going To End?
Read more here:
https://philosophynow.org/issues/68/Is_Science_Going_To_End
And read also the following
The Industrial Era Ended, and So Will the Digital Era
Read more here:
https://hbr.org/2018/07/the-industrial-era-ended-and-so-will-the-digital-era
More political philosophy about what is smartness..
I give you an example so that you understand:
If i give the following three words:
I, love, you.
It is not the same as if i give the following five words:
I, love, you, very, much
So you are noticing that the five words permit a more sophisticated
expressiveness, and notice that i am saying more sophisticated, since
the five words bring more efficiency, and this bringing more efficiency
is also what we call smartness, but notice that this smartness is brought by using the "tool" that is composed of the five words, so the tool that is our english language brings smartness, so then we have to be convinced by the fact that the tool like internet brings a much more efficiency and this much more efficiency brings much more smartness, so now you are noticing that smartness is not only genetical or cultural, but it is also the smartness of using the tool, and this is a very important thing, since the tool can be powerful and it can advance very much a human and can make a human really smart. So you have to understand that we are also in an Era of powerful tools such as internet that can advance very much a human and that can make a human really smart.
Read my previous following thoughts to understand better:
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have
also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
Here is my other wisdom:
With more knowledge, the beautiful of the physical reality becomes less beautiful, since we become more aware of the realities of life, but with more knowledge, it is smartness that becomes more beautiful, and then smartness becomes the beautiful that attracts more, since also with
more knowledge we become a more sophisticated intellectual taste, so more knowledge is an engine that pushes us towards more and more smartness, and smartness is also a good thing that can bring more happiness, and then if happiness is brought more by this more smartness, the beautiful of the physical reality becomes again more beautiful. So i predict that in the near future of 2030 we will become much much more smart and this much much more smartness can bring more happiness, since you have also to take into account the exponential progress of our humanity and the abundance of knowledge such as in internet.
And here is my new proverb..
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms, and here is my new proverb:
Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting"
Read here:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection
This is the definition of perfection above that I use below in my explanation of my new proverb.
Here is all my explanation of my new proverb below:
My new proverb comes to me from the essence of morality that I explained to you in my political philosophy that I wrote in English, since in morality we are pushed towards the pretty tomorrow because we are aware of this pretty perfume that is the perfection that pushes us or encourages us to be or allows us to become perfect or greatly perfect.
Read about it here on my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4
So here is my new proverb:
"Life is like the pretty perfume that calls us to be a pretty tomorrow!"
So notice carefully my smart play on words in my new proverb, i think it's smart, and you have to know that the future perfection depends on the present perfection, so when today we are responsibility to be the pretty perfection so that to build the pretty tomorrow, then the pretty perfection of today is part of the pretty tomorrow, and the "pretty perfume" in my new proverb is also the today pretty perfection, but you have to understand the symbolic which allows us to say that being this part of the pretty tomorrow is also like being the pretty tomorrow. It is what makes it a smart proverb.
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0 new messages