Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
For the record, I'm watching very interestedly, the thread comments by the type II apologist to prove what they are is what I say they are
2 views
Skip to first unread message
Arlen Holder
Nov 3, 2020, 9:08:00 PM11/3/20
to
Placeholder thread...
Most Apple owners "just give up" the instant they run into a problem,
while, at the same time, all apologists prove to be shockingly immune to
even the simplest of the most basic of the most obvious of facts.
For the record, I'm watching very interestedly, how Steve (sms) makes out
on the New Pipe thread where Poutnik is (valiantly) trying to help Steve.
o PSA: NewPipe v0.20.1 (YouTube ad-free clone on steroids) workaround posted earlier today [newpipe-FIXED.zip]
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.android/kjwJS4AeiVc>
1. I saw (and fully understood) what Steve posted when he posted it.
2. I decided not to intervene - because I want Steve to prove what he is
What Steve is doing in that thread is proving he's a Type II apologist.
o Let's see if helpful people NOT on this Apple ng can "help" Steve.
My prediction:
a. Given Steve is a Type II apologist (i.e., immune to even basic facts);
b. Steve already gave up based _purely_ on his own utter ignorance of fact.
I post this thread ahead of time as I predict Steve will prove me correct.
o This thread is further proof I almost fully _understand_ you apologists.
-
Most Apple owners "just give up" the instant they run into a problem, where
when you add the fact that all apologists prove to be shockingly immune to
even the simplest of the most basic of the most obvious of facts - you end
up with apologists like Steve erroneously concluding EXACTLY what Steve
just did.
Most Apple owners "just give up" the instant they run into a problem,
while, at the same time, all apologists prove to be shockingly immune to
even the simplest of the most basic of the most obvious of facts.
For the record, I'm watching very interestedly, how Steve (sms) makes out
on the New Pipe thread where Poutnik is (valiantly) trying to help Steve.
o PSA: NewPipe v0.20.1 (YouTube ad-free clone on steroids) workaround posted earlier today [newpipe-FIXED.zip]
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.android/kjwJS4AeiVc>
1. I saw (and fully understood) what Steve posted when he posted it.
2. I decided not to intervene - because I want Steve to prove what he is
What Steve is doing in that thread is proving he's a Type II apologist.
o Let's see if helpful people NOT on this Apple ng can "help" Steve.
My prediction:
a. Given Steve is a Type II apologist (i.e., immune to even basic facts);
b. Steve already gave up based _purely_ on his own utter ignorance of fact.
I post this thread ahead of time as I predict Steve will prove me correct.
o This thread is further proof I almost fully _understand_ you apologists.
-
Most Apple owners "just give up" the instant they run into a problem, where
when you add the fact that all apologists prove to be shockingly immune to
even the simplest of the most basic of the most obvious of facts - you end
up with apologists like Steve erroneously concluding EXACTLY what Steve
just did.
Arlen Holder
Nov 4, 2020, 2:20:46 PM11/4/20
to
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 02:07:59 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder wrote:
> 1. I saw (and fully understood) what Steve posted when he posted it.
> 2. I decided not to intervene - because I want Steve to prove what he is
Hehhehheh...
> 1. I saw (and fully understood) what Steve posted when he posted it.
> 2. I decided not to intervene - because I want Steve to prove what he is
Regarding:
o For the record, I'm watching very interestedly, the thread comments by the type II apologist to prove what they are is what I say they are
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.ipad/FWq0jLyXCR8>
I wish I could predict an election outcome as well as I can predict all
three types of you apologists...
o Type I (nospam) parrot MARKETING no matter what the facts are
o Type II (sms) never seem to check their facts so they're just ignorant
o Type III (Lewis) equate Apple MARKETING mantra with their "self worth"
Steve, being a TYPE II apologist, just proved what he was moments ago:
o PSA: NewPipe v0.20.1 (YouTube ad-free clone on steroids) workaround posted earlier today [newpipe-FIXED.zip]
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.android/kjwJS4AeiVc>
In this message:
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.android/kjwJS4AeiVc>
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.android/kjwJS4AeiVc/2A69NkvuCQAJ>
Note two things about Type II apologists (who aren't malicious per se):
1. They don't ever seem to doublecheck their facts (hence they're ignorant)
2. Which means they base all their assessments on pure ignorance
As another example, sms _still_ thinks Qualcomm royalties went down!
o None of the apologists own even the most basic of adult cognitive skills
The worst, of course, are the TYPE III apologists like Alan Baker:
o Why are apologists like Alan Baker so fantastically immune to basics skills an adult should have on the Internet?
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/EiNl6hyMBDo>
But even the Type II apologists (who are not malicious like the Type III
are) are still utterly fantastically immune to even the most basic fact.
Note that in this case, despite the entire point of the thread (which was
to update to the 0.20.2 release version), Steve's claim that NewPipe didn't
work (and hence, his reason for "giving up") was based on him using the
wrong version.
What shocks me is that Steve lives in the Silicon Valley, where we expect
people to be able to process the simplest of the basic obvious facts.
And yet, he failed.
o As do all three of you apologist types
The only things I can infer about the "purpose" of the three types are:
o Type I (nospam) have the sole purpose to defend MARKETING at all cost
o Type II (sms) simply form incorrect conclusions based on pure ignorance
o Type III (Jolly Roger) are cultists whose "self worth" === Apple products
--
I wish I could predict an election outcome as well as I can apologists.
Arlen Holder
Nov 4, 2020, 3:19:34 PM11/4/20
to
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 19:20:45 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder wrote:
> I wish I could predict an election outcome as well as I can apologists.
Poutnik just valiantly tried to teach the Type II apologist a fact here:
> I wish I could predict an election outcome as well as I can apologists.
o PSA: NewPipe v0.20.1 (YouTube ad-free clone on steroids) workaround posted earlier today [newpipe-FIXED.zip]
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.android/kjwJS4AeiVc>
In this message, which, had Steve not been ignorant, he would have known
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.android/kjwJS4AeiVc>
since the _entire_ thread was about updating to the latest version:
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.android/kjwJS4AeiVc/kxJGqWHzCQAJ>
Notice Steve made an incorrect assessment that NewPipe didn't work
o So he "just gave up"
Which is what Apple owners often do whenever confronted with an obstacle
o Except in this case the obstacle confronting Steve was his own ignorance
Which simply proves (again) what I've said about you apologists all along:
o Type I (nospam) parrot marketing; they don't even believe what they say
o Type II (sms) base their assessments on accidental ignorance of fact
o Type III (Alan Baker) are purposefully ungodly ignorant of basic facts
--
Given that we can easily (and repeatedly) prove none of you apologists
comprehend fact, it's petrifying that you apologists are allowed to vote.
Arlen Holder
Nov 8, 2020, 3:22:13 AM11/8/20
to
On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 08:49:29 -0800, sms wrote:
> Every Youtube URL I try to open with Newpipe gives me a "that shouldn't
> have happened" error and a crash report. Uninstalled.
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 20:19:33 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder wrote:
> Which simply proves (again) what I've said about you apologists all along:
> o Type I (nospam) parrot marketing; they don't even believe what they say
> o Type II (sms) base their assessments on accidental ignorance of fact
> o Type III (Alan Baker) are purposefully ungodly ignorant of basic facts
For the record, Steve (sms) proved to be a perfect Type II apologist!
Not only did Steve go silent after being proved wrong by Poutnik
o But the _entire_ time, Steve was shockingly immune to basic facts!
Type II apologists wouldn't be so bad if they weren't so confident in their
ignorance since they're not malicious like Type I and Type III apologists
are.
Yet, Type II apologists like Steve clearly proved to be what I claim:
1. Steve confidently concluded the NewPipe software was no good
2. Where his proclamation was based purely on his own utter ignorance
3. Simply because Steve (like all Type II apologists) was immune to fact
Proof that Steve showed himself to be a Type II apologist is here:
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.android/kjwJS4AeiVc/kxJGqWHzCQAJ>
In summary, what's horrid is how shockingly ignorant you apologists are.
--
It's petrifying how utterly immune to facts all 3 types of apologists are.
> Every Youtube URL I try to open with Newpipe gives me a "that shouldn't
> have happened" error and a crash report. Uninstalled.
On Wed, 4 Nov 2020 20:19:33 -0000 (UTC), Arlen Holder wrote:
> Which simply proves (again) what I've said about you apologists all along:
> o Type I (nospam) parrot marketing; they don't even believe what they say
> o Type II (sms) base their assessments on accidental ignorance of fact
> o Type III (Alan Baker) are purposefully ungodly ignorant of basic facts
o For the record, I'm watching very interestedly, the thread comments by the type II apologist to prove what they are is what I say they are
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.ipad/c/FWq0jLyXCR8>
Not only did Steve go silent after being proved wrong by Poutnik
o But the _entire_ time, Steve was shockingly immune to basic facts!
Type II apologists wouldn't be so bad if they weren't so confident in their
ignorance since they're not malicious like Type I and Type III apologists
are.
Yet, Type II apologists like Steve clearly proved to be what I claim:
1. Steve confidently concluded the NewPipe software was no good
2. Where his proclamation was based purely on his own utter ignorance
3. Simply because Steve (like all Type II apologists) was immune to fact
Proof that Steve showed himself to be a Type II apologist is here:
o PSA: NewPipe v0.20.1 (YouTube ad-free clone on steroids) workaround posted earlier today [newpipe-FIXED.zip]
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.android/kjwJS4AeiVc>
Where this is the last post, again proving how ignorant the apologists are:
<https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.mobile.android/kjwJS4AeiVc>
<https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.android/kjwJS4AeiVc/kxJGqWHzCQAJ>
In summary, what's horrid is how shockingly ignorant you apologists are.
--
It's petrifying how utterly immune to facts all 3 types of apologists are.
Arlen Holder
Nov 12, 2020, 10:04:30 PM11/12/20
to
For the record, I'm also watching _this_ new thread rather closely.
o Copying photographs from Windows 10 to iPaf (6th generation) iOS 14.1
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.ipad/c/B_tjPtX5IPM>
What will be interesting is how worthless the answers from the Apologists
will likely be, where I'm biding my time to see what they come up with.
--
Apple apologists know only what Apple MARKETING has fed them to believe.
o Copying photographs from Windows 10 to iPaf (6th generation) iOS 14.1
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.mobile.ipad/c/B_tjPtX5IPM>
What will be interesting is how worthless the answers from the Apologists
will likely be, where I'm biding my time to see what they come up with.
--
Apple apologists know only what Apple MARKETING has fed them to believe.
0 new messages