2X2L Calling CQ

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 1, 2002, 12:50:05 AM11/1/02

to

2X2L, calling CQ...2X2L, calling CQ...2X2L, calling CQ New
York...Isn't there anyone on the air? Isn't there anyone on the air?

Isn't there anyone?

2X2L...
--
Russell B. Goode
bigf...@databasix.com

*****VOTE SOAPY FOR ALT.FLAME NEWBIE OF THE YEAR, 2002*****

\| ...
-:. //||\\ _.
`::::' Q Q ``::::::+.
._"__.' \
____ `==' _._
.' `.
.' .:- Team-.-. `
.' '.') SOAPY ' _ /||.
__.--|_.' ' : ( \/' /\\
/,=-U' ' 02 : `. `. /U
' ' . ( -._.---"
....-----( ' . ` -.
) .:\:::\ '`. ` ` .'
_ ( .:::::::::....--`--..-' \
( ``-.\:::'' \ \
\\ ""\\-' `..:.\
`:-=/) `(::)
` .:::/
a:f_______________________________ |::/ _________
______... .."\\/
.......------"""""" __.. . \\ -. _ .
__..--'' ..'...`- (\ `-'
__..---""" ..:::::::::::::::.`.`-. .
'' `````````:::::::.`._) .
.-' `:''' .
.-' . .
' . .
. .
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!
GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY! GO SOAPY!

leiageek

unread,

Nov 1, 2002, 1:40:10 AM11/1/02

to

"Russell B. Goode" <bigf...@databasix.com> wrote in message
news:apt4mo$b7m$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...

> 2X2L, calling CQ...2X2L, calling CQ...2X2L, calling CQ New
> York...Isn't there anyone on the air? Isn't there anyone on the air?
>
> Isn't there anyone?
>
> 2X2L...
> --
> Russell B. Goode
> bigf...@databasix.com
>

Don't tease me RB! (girlish giggle)
leiageek

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 1, 2002, 2:13:55 AM11/1/02

to

You know why they call me Big Funchy, right?

Soapy

unread,

Nov 1, 2002, 7:19:53 AM11/1/02

to

Russell B. Goode <bigf...@databasix.com> wrote in

<apt9ju$b7m$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>:

You're not fooling anywon.

leiageek

unread,

Nov 1, 2002, 10:30:41 PM11/1/02

to

"Russell B. Goode" <bigf...@databasix.com> wrote in message

news:apt9ju$b7m$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...

Coz you have a Funchy that's really big?? I would be excited about that if I
had a clue what a Funchy was? is it some kind of furry animal?
leiageek

pinch

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 12:19:05 AM11/2/02

to

It's my secret club.

FUNCHA BUNCH ROLL CALL!

Missy Munch!
Big Funchy!
Chesty Funch!
Pincha Funch!
Cutie Crunch!
Funchette!
Frenchy Funch!
Buns o' Funch!
Snaky Snaky Funch!
Coconut Susie Funch!

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 12:18:13 AM11/2/02

to

They all laughed when "leiageek" <leia...@yahoo.com> said:

>"Russell B. Goode" <bigf...@databasix.com> wrote in message
>news:apt9ju$b7m$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>> They all laughed when "leiageek" <leia...@yahoo.com> said:
>>
>> >
>> >"Russell B. Goode" <bigf...@databasix.com> wrote in message
>> >news:apt4mo$b7m$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
>> >> 2X2L, calling CQ...2X2L, calling CQ...2X2L, calling CQ New
>> >> York...Isn't there anyone on the air? Isn't there anyone on the air?
>> >>
>> >> Isn't there anyone?
>> >>
>> >> 2X2L...
>> >> --
>> >> Russell B. Goode
>> >> bigf...@databasix.com
>> >>
>> >
>> >Don't tease me RB! (girlish giggle)
>>
>> You know why they call me Big Funchy, right?
>
>Coz you have a Funchy that's really big?? I would be excited about that if I
>had a clue what a Funchy was? is it some kind of furry animal?
>leiageek

Eh, never mind. Pinch fscking ruined it, just because she's mad that I
forgot her little fake birthday.

--
Russell B. Goode
bigf...@databasix.com

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 12:16:19 AM11/2/02

to

It was the Buncha Funch, you fscking maroon.

--
Russell B. Goode
bigf...@databasix.com

pinch

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 12:31:11 AM11/2/02

to

Nuh uh. I copied it straight from Deja, you jibbering halfwit.

pinch

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 12:32:55 AM11/2/02

to

"Russell B. Goode" wrote:
>
> They all laughed when "leiageek" <leia...@yahoo.com> said:
>
> >"Russell B. Goode" <bigf...@databasix.com> wrote in message
> >news:apt9ju$b7m$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> >> They all laughed when "leiageek" <leia...@yahoo.com> said:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >"Russell B. Goode" <bigf...@databasix.com> wrote in message
> >> >news:apt4mo$b7m$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...
> >> >> 2X2L, calling CQ...2X2L, calling CQ...2X2L, calling CQ New
> >> >> York...Isn't there anyone on the air? Isn't there anyone on the air?
> >> >>
> >> >> Isn't there anyone?
> >> >>
> >> >> 2X2L...
> >> >> --
> >> >> Russell B. Goode
> >> >> bigf...@databasix.com
> >> >>
> >> >
> >> >Don't tease me RB! (girlish giggle)
> >>
> >> You know why they call me Big Funchy, right?
> >
> >Coz you have a Funchy that's really big?? I would be excited about that if I
> >had a clue what a Funchy was? is it some kind of furry animal?
> >leiageek
>
> Eh, never mind. Pinch fscking ruined it, just because she's mad that I
> forgot her little fake birthday.

I ruined it? I *OWN* the Buncha Funch and the names that go with it. You
disgrace us all by using your secret name to score chicks. Shame on you.

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 12:29:55 AM11/2/02

to

And I copied this straight from Google, which, unlike Deja, still exists,
you goddamned blind hippie whore.

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=381B548E.26FECB3E%40yahoo.com

marci

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 12:46:22 AM11/2/02

to

because you sit around whacking off and eating funyons all day?

marci

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 12:46:30 AM11/2/02

to

On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 00:19:05 -0500, pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com>
said:

here here!!!1!

pinch

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 9:07:09 AM11/2/02

to

I don't know about this, but you joined the Funcha Bunch and I found it
on Deja, you barking loon.

http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=na8cOLgB2UqkY8Vyj%3DR%3D7U8GmIKx%404ax.com

http://www.deja.com

pinch

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 9:07:51 AM11/2/02

to

Who the hell was Buns o' Funch?

Attipulgus Trogfolio

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 12:36:52 PM11/2/02

to

pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com> pulled a "Crafonzo" by saying
::
::
::

...(peeved)....

--

Respectfully submitted by,

Attipulgus Trogfolio

pinch

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 1:40:06 PM11/2/02

to

Where YOU Buns o' Funch?

Attipulgus Trogfolio

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 3:11:37 PM11/2/02

to

pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com> pulled a "Crafonzo" by saying
::
::
::

As I recall, *I* thought of the idea, *YOU* stole my idea, and then
denied me admission to your little club, which was *MY* idea.

pinch

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 3:49:44 PM11/2/02

to

...(reeeeally peeved)...

marci

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 11:08:28 PM11/2/02

to

On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 09:07:09 -0500, pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com>

that's so cute.

>
>http://www.deja.com

marci

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 11:21:20 PM11/2/02

to

On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 09:07:51 -0500, pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com>
said:

i have no idea. go deja it.
>

i can't follow this thread but maybe this answers it:

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Buns+o%27+Funch+group:alt.tv.real-world&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=38E69470.701153FA%40yahoo.com&rnum=1&filter=0

pinch

unread,

Nov 2, 2002, 11:36:07 PM11/2/02

to

Maura? Maura was Buns o' Funch? Goddamn I miss her.

marci

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 1:52:55 AM11/3/02

to

On Sat, 02 Nov 2002 23:36:07 -0500, pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com>

me too. i wonder what she's doing.

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 6:53:01 AM11/3/02

to

Nobody could tell me to shut up quite like she could. *sigh*

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 7:01:48 AM11/3/02

to

Ha! WRONG. I have proof, irrefutable proof, that it was in fact the
Buncha Funch that I joined. I also have a confession, in your words, that
I am right. I shall be happy to produce it upon request, at which point
you will be laffing out of the other side of your funchy.

>http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=na8cOLgB2UqkY8Vyj%3DR%3D7U8GmIKx%404ax.com

This proves NOTHING.

>http://www.deja.com

An automatic redirect to http://groups.google.com, wherein all the actual
content can be found. You are WRONG WRONG WRONG again, you yellow cur.

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 7:10:50 AM11/3/02

to

Where exactly ON DEJA did you copy it from hmmmmmmmm? Hmmmmmmmm?

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 7:13:17 AM11/3/02

to

They all laughed when pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com> said:

IHYGSBB.

--
Russell B. Goode
bigf...@databasix.com

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 7:13:25 AM11/3/02

to

They all laughed when marci <marc...@charter.net> said:

She was Missy Munch, then you fucked up and gave her another name.

>me too. i wonder what she's doing.

I wonder who she's doing. *sigh*

pinch

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 1:14:27 PM11/3/02

to

You hope I get some what?

pinch

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 1:15:40 PM11/3/02

to

I started at www.deja.com and drilled down from there. Boy, have you
gotten stupid since I've been gone. Smoking too much weed?

pinch

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 1:25:57 PM11/3/02

to

Hey. Deja don't lie. All the proof *I* need is in the link above. Any
attempt on your part to prove otherwise, whether successful or not, will
only paint you as someone who spends a lot of time "reading my old
threads". And that? I guess that WILL make me laff out the other side of
me funchy.

> >http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=na8cOLgB2UqkY8Vyj%3DR%3D7U8GmIKx%404ax.com
>
> This proves NOTHING.
>
> >http://www.deja.com
>
> An automatic redirect to http://groups.google.com, wherein all the actual
> content can be found. You are WRONG WRONG WRONG again, you yellow cur.

Oh who CARES what the menu bar says AFTER I type in www.deja.com? Why
would you even LOOK THERE? Deja gets me in and shows me the way. I am
RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT, you peevish boor.

marci

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 1:16:17 PM11/3/02

to

my money's on the bag boy at the grocery store.

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 4:15:42 PM11/3/02

to

So, you didn't copy it anywhere from ON DEJA, hmm? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm?

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 4:15:50 PM11/3/02

to

Eh, she probably went back with that fscking guy she was married to.
That's what they all do. I'll bet her tail is wagging right now. *sigh*

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 4:15:35 PM11/3/02

to

*S*. B*B*.

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 4:16:26 PM11/3/02

to

Deja doesn't say anything, you ludicrous bint. It's just a redirect.
GOOGLE, on the other hand, quite handily confirms my assermotations in this
link:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=3AE9CF38.B6590893%40imagonnagetcha.com

So, you see, you conceded this debate long ago. Which means that not only
are you wrong, you are arguing against yourself (out of both sides of your
funchy, as it were).

>All the proof *I* need is in the link above. Any
>attempt on your part to prove otherwise, whether successful or not, will
>only paint you as someone who spends a lot of time "reading my old
>threads". And that? I guess that WILL make me laff out the other side of
>me funchy.

Arrrrr, matey, lol?

>> >http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=na8cOLgB2UqkY8Vyj%3DR%3D7U8GmIKx%404ax.com
>>
>> This proves NOTHING.
>>
>> >http://www.deja.com
>>
>> An automatic redirect to http://groups.google.com, wherein all the actual
>> content can be found. You are WRONG WRONG WRONG again, you yellow cur.
>
>Oh who CARES what the menu bar says AFTER I type in www.deja.com? Why
>would you even LOOK THERE? Deja gets me in and shows me the way. I am
>RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT, you peevish boor.

Ha ha ha. You are babbling. I win! CREAM pie!

--
Russell B. Goode
bigf...@databasix.com

pinch

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 4:41:03 PM11/3/02

to

STUNG BY BEES?

pinch

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 4:41:35 PM11/3/02

to

I copied it in the spirit of Deja.

pinch

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 4:45:55 PM11/3/02

to

It's clear by that post I wasn't in my right mind; I was all goofed up
on the archives being back. You sir, however, picked your Funcha Bunch
name beneath a Funcha Bunch roll call. The evidence rests. I win.

> >All the proof *I* need is in the link above. Any
> >attempt on your part to prove otherwise, whether successful or not, will
> >only paint you as someone who spends a lot of time "reading my old
> >threads". And that? I guess that WILL make me laff out the other side of
> >me funchy.
>
> Arrrrr, matey, lol?

Are you making a mockery of me funchy?

> >> >http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=na8cOLgB2UqkY8Vyj%3DR%3D7U8GmIKx%404ax.com
> >>
> >> This proves NOTHING.
> >>
> >> >http://www.deja.com
> >>
> >> An automatic redirect to http://groups.google.com, wherein all the actual
> >> content can be found. You are WRONG WRONG WRONG again, you yellow cur.
> >
> >Oh who CARES what the menu bar says AFTER I type in www.deja.com? Why
> >would you even LOOK THERE? Deja gets me in and shows me the way. I am
> >RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT, you peevish boor.
>
> Ha ha ha. You are babbling. I win! CREAM pie!

No, I win, but I have a blue icey for you if you want a consolation
prize.

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 5:29:39 PM11/3/02

to

You are capitulating. Ha ha ha!

--
Russell B. Goode
bigf...@databasix.com

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 5:29:48 PM11/3/02

to

I specifically stated that I wanted to join the BUNCHA FUNCH. I said
nothing about joining any "Funcha Bunch," and I made no contract, verbal or
written, committing myself to joining any such group. Your errors at the
beginning do not justify your errors now; you were simply wrong BOTH times.

I have further PROOF that you, yourself, later quietly corrected yourself
and began using the correct name. However, I shall withhold this evidence
in lieu of a written confession, signed by you, that you are wrong (and I
am right). The ball is in your court.

>> >All the proof *I* need is in the link above. Any
>> >attempt on your part to prove otherwise, whether successful or not, will
>> >only paint you as someone who spends a lot of time "reading my old
>> >threads". And that? I guess that WILL make me laff out the other side of
>> >me funchy.
>>
>> Arrrrr, matey, lol?
>
>Are you making a mockery of me funchy?

You are already a mockery pinch, lol?

>> >> >http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=na8cOLgB2UqkY8Vyj%3DR%3D7U8GmIKx%404ax.com
>> >>
>> >> This proves NOTHING.
>> >>
>> >> >http://www.deja.com
>> >>
>> >> An automatic redirect to http://groups.google.com, wherein all the actual
>> >> content can be found. You are WRONG WRONG WRONG again, you yellow cur.
>> >
>> >Oh who CARES what the menu bar says AFTER I type in www.deja.com? Why
>> >would you even LOOK THERE? Deja gets me in and shows me the way. I am
>> >RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT, you peevish boor.
>>
>> Ha ha ha. You are babbling. I win! CREAM pie!
>
>No, I win, but I have a blue icey for you if you want a consolation
>prize.

(in denial)

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 5:29:32 PM11/3/02

to

Y. SBB. IHYGSBB.

--
Russell B. Goode
bigf...@databasix.com

Wavy G

unread,

Nov 3, 2002, 5:36:24 PM11/3/02

to

Everywon with something useful and intelligent to contribute to this thread,
please step forward. --AHHT! Not so fast, Russell B. Goode
<bigf...@databasix.com>...

She must have realized that working for a living was worse than being in an
abusive realationship, LOL?

>

pinch

unread,

Nov 4, 2002, 10:55:51 PM11/4/02

to

YM.

pinch

unread,

Nov 4, 2002, 10:57:01 PM11/4/02

to

No. It's not even close to that time of the month.

pinch

unread,

Nov 4, 2002, 10:59:33 PM11/4/02

to

No. You gave your new name after a FUNCHA BUNCH roll call.

> I said
> nothing about joining any "Funcha Bunch," and I made no contract, verbal or
> written, committing myself to joining any such group.

Your request for a moniker containing "funch" in any form was an implied
contract. You know this. I know this. The internet at large knows this.

> Your errors at the
> beginning do not justify your errors now; you were simply wrong BOTH times.
>
> I have further PROOF that you, yourself, later quietly corrected yourself
> and began using the correct name. However, I shall withhold this evidence
> in lieu of a written confession, signed by you, that you are wrong (and I
> am right). The ball is in your court.

Ah baloney.

> >> >All the proof *I* need is in the link above. Any
> >> >attempt on your part to prove otherwise, whether successful or not, will
> >> >only paint you as someone who spends a lot of time "reading my old
> >> >threads". And that? I guess that WILL make me laff out the other side of
> >> >me funchy.
> >>
> >> Arrrrr, matey, lol?
> >
> >Are you making a mockery of me funchy?
>
> You are already a mockery pinch, lol?

Little LOL.

> >> >> >http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=na8cOLgB2UqkY8Vyj%3DR%3D7U8GmIKx%404ax.com
> >> >>
> >> >> This proves NOTHING.
> >> >>
> >> >> >http://www.deja.com
> >> >>
> >> >> An automatic redirect to http://groups.google.com, wherein all the actual
> >> >> content can be found. You are WRONG WRONG WRONG again, you yellow cur.
> >> >
> >> >Oh who CARES what the menu bar says AFTER I type in www.deja.com? Why
> >> >would you even LOOK THERE? Deja gets me in and shows me the way. I am
> >> >RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT, you peevish boor.
> >>
> >> Ha ha ha. You are babbling. I win! CREAM pie!
> >
> >No, I win, but I have a blue icey for you if you want a consolation
> >prize.
>
> (in denial)

(enchanted)

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 4, 2002, 11:19:01 PM11/4/02

to

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc. The saddest little fallacy of them all. A
surer sign of losing, even, than comparing one's opponent to Hitler. IW!
IW!

>> I said
>> nothing about joining any "Funcha Bunch," and I made no contract, verbal or
>> written, committing myself to joining any such group.
>
>Your request for a moniker containing "funch" in any form was an implied
>contract.

Well, yes. Of course it was. It was an implied contract committing myself
to join the group that I had EXPLICITLY MENTIONED, by NAME, as the BUNCHA
FUNCH.

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=UNAbOKNWeMZ5awXtWxsIcIkmwpqu%404ax.com

> You know this. I know this. The internet at large knows this.
>
>> Your errors at the
>> beginning do not justify your errors now; you were simply wrong BOTH times.
>>
>> I have further PROOF that you, yourself, later quietly corrected yourself
>> and began using the correct name. However, I shall withhold this evidence
>> in lieu of a written confession, signed by you, that you are wrong (and I
>> am right). The ball is in your court.
>
>Ah baloney.

Not at all. I have this proof at the ready, and could post it at a
moment's notice, from you or from any interested third party.

>> >> >All the proof *I* need is in the link above. Any
>> >> >attempt on your part to prove otherwise, whether successful or not, will
>> >> >only paint you as someone who spends a lot of time "reading my old
>> >> >threads". And that? I guess that WILL make me laff out the other side of
>> >> >me funchy.
>> >>
>> >> Arrrrr, matey, lol?
>> >
>> >Are you making a mockery of me funchy?
>>
>> You are already a mockery pinch, lol?
>
>Little LOL.

So you admit, by your laughter, that you are a mockery. A little side
victory that I had not, frankly, counted upon. Well-played (he said
snidely).

>> >> >> >http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=na8cOLgB2UqkY8Vyj%3DR%3D7U8GmIKx%404ax.com
>> >> >>
>> >> >> This proves NOTHING.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> >http://www.deja.com
>> >> >>
>> >> >> An automatic redirect to http://groups.google.com, wherein all the actual
>> >> >> content can be found. You are WRONG WRONG WRONG again, you yellow cur.
>> >> >
>> >> >Oh who CARES what the menu bar says AFTER I type in www.deja.com? Why
>> >> >would you even LOOK THERE? Deja gets me in and shows me the way. I am
>> >> >RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT, you peevish boor.
>> >>
>> >> Ha ha ha. You are babbling. I win! CREAM pie!
>> >
>> >No, I win, but I have a blue icey for you if you want a consolation
>> >prize.
>>
>> (in denial)
>
>(enchanted)

(insane)

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 4, 2002, 11:19:08 PM11/4/02

to

UY.

pinch

unread,

Nov 4, 2002, 11:32:05 PM11/4/02

to

W?

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 4, 2002, 11:26:45 PM11/4/02

to

YHM.

pinch

unread,

Nov 4, 2002, 11:42:46 PM11/4/02

to

WRONG. You would not have posted your brand new Funcha Bunch name had
there *not* been a roll call. YL! YL!

> >> I said
> >> nothing about joining any "Funcha Bunch," and I made no contract, verbal or
> >> written, committing myself to joining any such group.
> >
> >Your request for a moniker containing "funch" in any form was an implied
> >contract.
>
> Well, yes. Of course it was. It was an implied contract committing myself
> to join the group that I had EXPLICITLY MENTIONED, by NAME, as the BUNCHA
> FUNCH.
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=UNAbOKNWeMZ5awXtWxsIcIkmwpqu%404ax.com

I'm pretty sure Google mixed up some of those letters when the posts
were transferred from Deja. Regardless, it was *my* club. *I* named it
and your misrepresentation of that does not change that.

>
> > You know this. I know this. The internet at large knows this.
> >
> >> Your errors at the
> >> beginning do not justify your errors now; you were simply wrong BOTH times.
> >>
> >> I have further PROOF that you, yourself, later quietly corrected yourself
> >> and began using the correct name. However, I shall withhold this evidence
> >> in lieu of a written confession, signed by you, that you are wrong (and I
> >> am right). The ball is in your court.
> >
> >Ah baloney.
>
> Not at all. I have this proof at the ready, and could post it at a
> moment's notice, from you or from any interested third party.
>
> >> >> >All the proof *I* need is in the link above. Any
> >> >> >attempt on your part to prove otherwise, whether successful or not, will
> >> >> >only paint you as someone who spends a lot of time "reading my old
> >> >> >threads". And that? I guess that WILL make me laff out the other side of
> >> >> >me funchy.
> >> >>
> >> >> Arrrrr, matey, lol?
> >> >
> >> >Are you making a mockery of me funchy?
> >>
> >> You are already a mockery pinch, lol?
> >
> >Little LOL.
>
> So you admit, by your laughter, that you are a mockery. A little side
> victory that I had not, frankly, counted upon. Well-played (he said
> snidely).

I said LITTLE.

> >> >> >> >http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=na8cOLgB2UqkY8Vyj%3DR%3D7U8GmIKx%404ax.com
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> This proves NOTHING.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >http://www.deja.com
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> An automatic redirect to http://groups.google.com, wherein all the actual
> >> >> >> content can be found. You are WRONG WRONG WRONG again, you yellow cur.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Oh who CARES what the menu bar says AFTER I type in www.deja.com? Why
> >> >> >would you even LOOK THERE? Deja gets me in and shows me the way. I am
> >> >> >RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT, you peevish boor.
> >> >>
> >> >> Ha ha ha. You are babbling. I win! CREAM pie!
> >> >
> >> >No, I win, but I have a blue icey for you if you want a consolation
> >> >prize.
> >>
> >> (in denial)
> >
> >(enchanted)
>
> (insane)

(pixilated)

pinch

unread,

Nov 4, 2002, 11:44:48 PM11/4/02

to

S.

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 4, 2002, 11:52:05 PM11/4/02

to

I did not post my brand new "Funcha Bunch" name. I posted my brand new
BUNCHA FUNCH name, after having joined of my own accord (and, as I said
earlier, with the specific stipulation that the group I was joining was
called, and I quote, the "Buncha Funch").

You are implying a causal relationship between two events one of which
happened to follow the other. Which is totally like something that a
certain German dictator would have done, were he backed into a corner
during an argument about the BUNCHA FUNCH.

>> >> I said
>> >> nothing about joining any "Funcha Bunch," and I made no contract, verbal or
>> >> written, committing myself to joining any such group.
>> >
>> >Your request for a moniker containing "funch" in any form was an implied
>> >contract.
>>
>> Well, yes. Of course it was. It was an implied contract committing myself
>> to join the group that I had EXPLICITLY MENTIONED, by NAME, as the BUNCHA
>> FUNCH.
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=UNAbOKNWeMZ5awXtWxsIcIkmwpqu%404ax.com
>
>I'm pretty sure Google mixed up some of those letters when the posts
>were transferred from Deja. Regardless, it was *my* club. *I* named it
>and your misrepresentation of that does not change that.

You certainly did name it. You named it in this post--the earliest known
mention on Usenet of the terms "Funcha Bunch" [sic] *or* "Buncha Funch":

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=381B529D.BC2996DF%40yahoo.com

Your subsequent screwups do not change this fact in any material way.

>> > You know this. I know this. The internet at large knows this.
>> >
>> >> Your errors at the
>> >> beginning do not justify your errors now; you were simply wrong BOTH times.
>> >>
>> >> I have further PROOF that you, yourself, later quietly corrected yourself
>> >> and began using the correct name. However, I shall withhold this evidence
>> >> in lieu of a written confession, signed by you, that you are wrong (and I
>> >> am right). The ball is in your court.
>> >
>> >Ah baloney.
>>
>> Not at all. I have this proof at the ready, and could post it at a
>> moment's notice, from you or from any interested third party.

Hmm? Hmm?

>> >> >> >All the proof *I* need is in the link above. Any
>> >> >> >attempt on your part to prove otherwise, whether successful or not, will
>> >> >> >only paint you as someone who spends a lot of time "reading my old
>> >> >> >threads". And that? I guess that WILL make me laff out the other side of
>> >> >> >me funchy.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Arrrrr, matey, lol?
>> >> >
>> >> >Are you making a mockery of me funchy?
>> >>
>> >> You are already a mockery pinch, lol?
>> >
>> >Little LOL.
>>
>> So you admit, by your laughter, that you are a mockery. A little side
>> victory that I had not, frankly, counted upon. Well-played (he said
>> snidely).
>
>I said LITTLE.

Yeah, well, you don't want to admit to the full extent of your LOLing.
Understandable, I suppose.

>> >> >> >> >http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=na8cOLgB2UqkY8Vyj%3DR%3D7U8GmIKx%404ax.com
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> This proves NOTHING.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >http://www.deja.com
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> An automatic redirect to http://groups.google.com, wherein all the actual
>> >> >> >> content can be found. You are WRONG WRONG WRONG again, you yellow cur.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Oh who CARES what the menu bar says AFTER I type in www.deja.com? Why
>> >> >> >would you even LOOK THERE? Deja gets me in and shows me the way. I am
>> >> >> >RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT, you peevish boor.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Ha ha ha. You are babbling. I win! CREAM pie!
>> >> >
>> >> >No, I win, but I have a blue icey for you if you want a consolation
>> >> >prize.
>> >>
>> >> (in denial)
>> >
>> >(enchanted)
>>
>> (insane)
>
>(pixilated)

(capitulated)

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 4, 2002, 11:52:37 PM11/4/02

to

IWA! HH!

pinch

unread,

Nov 5, 2002, 10:26:06 PM11/5/02

to

NYD. IHNIWYJS. YL. IW. Y!

pinch

unread,

Nov 5, 2002, 10:37:25 PM11/5/02

to

You intimidate me not with your Nazi references and your jibber jabber
about "causal relationships". That you mistyped the name of MY club. The
club that *I* named, is of no consequence to me. Post your doctored Deja
references until the cows come home. I'm right. I win. And just to show
you how magnanimous a winner can be, I will not kick you out of the
FUNCHA BUNCH.

> >> >> I said
> >> >> nothing about joining any "Funcha Bunch," and I made no contract, verbal or
> >> >> written, committing myself to joining any such group.
> >> >
> >> >Your request for a moniker containing "funch" in any form was an implied
> >> >contract.
> >>
> >> Well, yes. Of course it was. It was an implied contract committing myself
> >> to join the group that I had EXPLICITLY MENTIONED, by NAME, as the BUNCHA
> >> FUNCH.
> >>
> >> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=UNAbOKNWeMZ5awXtWxsIcIkmwpqu%404ax.com
> >
> >I'm pretty sure Google mixed up some of those letters when the posts
> >were transferred from Deja. Regardless, it was *my* club. *I* named it
> >and your misrepresentation of that does not change that.
>
> You certainly did name it. You named it in this post--the earliest known
> mention on Usenet of the terms "Funcha Bunch" [sic] *or* "Buncha Funch":
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=381B529D.BC2996DF%40yahoo.com
>
> Your subsequent screwups do not change this fact in any material way.

Oh, that sounded way too much like a snack so I immediately changed it.
You must have missed that post.

> >> > You know this. I know this. The internet at large knows this.
> >> >
> >> >> Your errors at the
> >> >> beginning do not justify your errors now; you were simply wrong BOTH times.
> >> >>
> >> >> I have further PROOF that you, yourself, later quietly corrected yourself
> >> >> and began using the correct name. However, I shall withhold this evidence
> >> >> in lieu of a written confession, signed by you, that you are wrong (and I
> >> >> am right). The ball is in your court.
> >> >
> >> >Ah baloney.
> >>
> >> Not at all. I have this proof at the ready, and could post it at a
> >> moment's notice, from you or from any interested third party.
>
> Hmm? Hmm?

Ah double baloney.

> >> >> >> >All the proof *I* need is in the link above. Any
> >> >> >> >attempt on your part to prove otherwise, whether successful or not, will
> >> >> >> >only paint you as someone who spends a lot of time "reading my old
> >> >> >> >threads". And that? I guess that WILL make me laff out the other side of
> >> >> >> >me funchy.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Arrrrr, matey, lol?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Are you making a mockery of me funchy?
> >> >>
> >> >> You are already a mockery pinch, lol?
> >> >
> >> >Little LOL.
> >>
> >> So you admit, by your laughter, that you are a mockery. A little side
> >> victory that I had not, frankly, counted upon. Well-played (he said
> >> snidely).
> >
> >I said LITTLE.
>
> Yeah, well, you don't want to admit to the full extent of your LOLing.
> Understandable, I suppose.

What's understandable is how much you enjoy making pirate jokes.

> >> >> >> >> >http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=na8cOLgB2UqkY8Vyj%3DR%3D7U8GmIKx%404ax.com
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> This proves NOTHING.
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> >http://www.deja.com
> >> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> >> An automatic redirect to http://groups.google.com, wherein all the actual
> >> >> >> >> content can be found. You are WRONG WRONG WRONG again, you yellow cur.
> >> >> >> >
> >> >> >> >Oh who CARES what the menu bar says AFTER I type in www.deja.com? Why
> >> >> >> >would you even LOOK THERE? Deja gets me in and shows me the way. I am
> >> >> >> >RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT, you peevish boor.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Ha ha ha. You are babbling. I win! CREAM pie!
> >> >> >
> >> >> >No, I win, but I have a blue icey for you if you want a consolation
> >> >> >prize.
> >> >>
> >> >> (in denial)
> >> >
> >> >(enchanted)
> >>
> >> (insane)
> >
> >(pixilated)
>
> (capitulated)

(captivated)

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 6, 2002, 11:18:39 AM11/6/02

to

I hope pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com> gets stung by bees.

IS"UY." TYAMWIS. TIS"YHM." TYS"S." TIS"IWA!" WID. HH!

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 6, 2002, 11:32:23 AM11/6/02

to

I hope pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com> gets stung by bees.

>"Russell B. Goode" wrote:

You can't kick me out of the FUNCHA BUNCH any more than you can kick me out
of the National Ripple Association or the Commonist Party. No such
organization exists, as you well know (besides a mountain of evidence
backing up my claims, I can see it in your eyes). I have you dead to
rights. Honestly, this is as clear a victory as I have achieved on Usenet
since the great "Caine Mutiny" massacre.

>> >> >> I said
>> >> >> nothing about joining any "Funcha Bunch," and I made no contract, verbal or
>> >> >> written, committing myself to joining any such group.
>> >> >
>> >> >Your request for a moniker containing "funch" in any form was an implied
>> >> >contract.
>> >>
>> >> Well, yes. Of course it was. It was an implied contract committing myself
>> >> to join the group that I had EXPLICITLY MENTIONED, by NAME, as the BUNCHA
>> >> FUNCH.
>> >>
>> >> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=UNAbOKNWeMZ5awXtWxsIcIkmwpqu%404ax.com
>> >
>> >I'm pretty sure Google mixed up some of those letters when the posts
>> >were transferred from Deja. Regardless, it was *my* club. *I* named it
>> >and your misrepresentation of that does not change that.
>>
>> You certainly did name it. You named it in this post--the earliest known
>> mention on Usenet of the terms "Funcha Bunch" [sic] *or* "Buncha Funch":
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=381B529D.BC2996DF%40yahoo.com
>>
>> Your subsequent screwups do not change this fact in any material way.
>
>Oh, that sounded way too much like a snack so I immediately changed it.
>You must have missed that post.

Ha ha ha! You are lying just like a little kid! Boy, have I got you wound
up. This is more fun than gluing quarters to the desks at the library.

>> >> > You know this. I know this. The internet at large knows this.
>> >> >
>> >> >> Your errors at the
>> >> >> beginning do not justify your errors now; you were simply wrong BOTH times.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> I have further PROOF that you, yourself, later quietly corrected yourself
>> >> >> and began using the correct name. However, I shall withhold this evidence
>> >> >> in lieu of a written confession, signed by you, that you are wrong (and I
>> >> >> am right). The ball is in your court.
>> >> >
>> >> >Ah baloney.
>> >>
>> >> Not at all. I have this proof at the ready, and could post it at a
>> >> moment's notice, from you or from any interested third party.
>>
>> Hmm? Hmm?
>
>Ah double baloney.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm? Cat got your tongue? You're usually so
talkative.

>> >> >> >> >All the proof *I* need is in the link above. Any
>> >> >> >> >attempt on your part to prove otherwise, whether successful or not, will
>> >> >> >> >only paint you as someone who spends a lot of time "reading my old
>> >> >> >> >threads". And that? I guess that WILL make me laff out the other side of
>> >> >> >> >me funchy.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Arrrrr, matey, lol?
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >Are you making a mockery of me funchy?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> You are already a mockery pinch, lol?
>> >> >
>> >> >Little LOL.
>> >>
>> >> So you admit, by your laughter, that you are a mockery. A little side
>> >> victory that I had not, frankly, counted upon. Well-played (he said
>> >> snidely).
>> >
>> >I said LITTLE.
>>
>> Yeah, well, you don't want to admit to the full extent of your LOLing.
>> Understandable, I suppose.
>
>What's understandable is how much you enjoy making pirate jokes.

I happen to know for a fact that my joke elicited at least a medium LOL
from you. At LEAST. Say, have I ever posted my hilarious poem about Jean
Lafitte?

>> >> >> >> >> >http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=na8cOLgB2UqkY8Vyj%3DR%3D7U8GmIKx%404ax.com
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> This proves NOTHING.
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> >http://www.deja.com
>> >> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> >> An automatic redirect to http://groups.google.com, wherein all the actual
>> >> >> >> >> content can be found. You are WRONG WRONG WRONG again, you yellow cur.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >Oh who CARES what the menu bar says AFTER I type in www.deja.com? Why
>> >> >> >> >would you even LOOK THERE? Deja gets me in and shows me the way. I am
>> >> >> >> >RIGHT RIGHT RIGHT, you peevish boor.
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Ha ha ha. You are babbling. I win! CREAM pie!
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >No, I win, but I have a blue icey for you if you want a consolation
>> >> >> >prize.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> (in denial)
>> >> >
>> >> >(enchanted)
>> >>
>> >> (insane)
>> >
>> >(pixilated)
>>
>> (capitulated)
>
>(captivated)

(goatless)

Brian Pez

unread,

Nov 6, 2002, 10:36:14 PM11/6/02

to

Attip...@Trogfolio.edu in Message-id:
<ikc8sugk20ptstsp2...@4ax.com> wrote:
>
>pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com> pulled a "Crafonzo" by saying
>::
>::
>::
>::Attipulgus Trogfolio wrote:
>::>
>::> pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com> pulled a "Crafonzo" by saying
>::> ::
>::> ::
>::> ::

>::>
>::> ...(peeved)....
>::
>::Where YOU Buns o' Funch?
>
>As I recall, *I* thought of the idea, *YOU* stole my idea, and then
>denied me admission to your little club, which was *MY* idea.
>--
>
Actually David is right. Really. David was the won who coined the term
"funcha-bunch" or "bunch of funch"..and then Pinch stole the idea! DAMB HER!
:-)

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 7, 2002, 12:37:07 AM11/7/02

to

I hope bria...@aol.com (Brian Pez) gets stung by bees.

Actually, he came up with the idea of an atr-w "Funch Bunch." At the time,
I'm sure I wasn't alone in thinking that the term was his creation.

However, my research in this matter has turned up an extremely disturbing
piece of news. Apparently the term "Funch Bunch" was NOT created by David
H at all, but rather by an AM talk radio host, by the name of Neal Boortz,
in the city of...no, wait for it...**ATLANTA**.

http://www.boortz.com/bunch.htm

I await the kudos that shall naturally accrue to me for "blowing the lid"
off of this shattering secret.

PLEASE PLACE KUDOS IN THE SPACE PROVIDED:

-------SPACE FOR KUDOS--------

Wavy G

unread,

Nov 7, 2002, 10:54:44 AM11/7/02

to

Everywon with something useful and intelligent to contribute to this thread,
please step forward. --AHHT! Not so fast, Russell B. Goode
<bigf...@databasix.com>...

>I hope bria...@aol.com (Brian Pez) gets stung by bees.

kudos.

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>-------SPACE FOR KUDOS--------
>

Dandelion

unread,

Nov 7, 2002, 11:59:21 AM11/7/02

to

http://www.kudosbar.com/kudos/index.html

>-------SPACE FOR KUDOS--------

Brian Pez

unread,

Nov 7, 2002, 10:46:38 PM11/7/02

to

Russell B. Goode bigf...@databasix.com in Message-id:

<aqcu63$bt5$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com> wrote:
>
>I hope bria...@aol.com (Brian Pez) gets stung by bees.
>
>> Attip...@Trogfolio.edu in Message-id:
>><ikc8sugk20ptstsp2...@4ax.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com> pulled a "Crafonzo" by saying
>>>::
>>>::
>>>::Attipulgus Trogfolio wrote:
>>>::>
>>>::> pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com> pulled a "Crafonzo" by saying

>>>::> ::It's my secret club.
>>>::> ::
>>>::> ::FUNCHA BUNCH ROLL CALL!
>>>::> ::
>>>::> :: Missy Munch!
>>>::> :: Big Funchy!
>>>::> :: Chesty Funch!
>>>::> :: Pincha Funch!
>>>::> :: Cutie Crunch!
>>>::> :: Funchette!
>>>::> :: Frenchy Funch!
>>>::> :: Buns o' Funch!
>>>::> :: Snaky Snaky Funch!
>>>::> :: Coconut Susie Funch!
>>>::>
>>>::> ...(peeved)....
>>>::
>>>::Where YOU Buns o' Funch?
>>>
>>>As I recall, *I* thought of the idea, *YOU* stole my idea, and then
>>>denied me admission to your little club, which was *MY* idea.
>>>--
>>>
>>Actually David is right. Really. David was the won who coined the term
>>"funcha-bunch" or "bunch of funch"..and then Pinch stole the idea! DAMB
>HER!
>

>Actually, he came up with the idea of an atr-w "Funch Bunch."...
>
>
So Pinch shamelessly stole David's idea for her own personl glory? Oh, that
woman is pure evil.

PS: I think I was Cutie Crunch...or at least I *should* have been given that
name. :-)

marci

unread,

Nov 8, 2002, 12:57:49 AM11/8/02

to

On Wed, 06 Nov 2002 21:37:07 -0800, Russell B. Goode

i would first like to see what mr. trofigoligiacrfaongioanaoza has to
say about it.
>
>
>
>
>
>-------SPACE FOR KUDOS--------

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 8, 2002, 12:10:23 PM11/8/02

to

I hope marci <marc...@charter.net> gets stung by bees.

He's not going to say anything. He's going to ignore this and hope it goes
away. So, do I get a fscking kudo from you or don't I?

>>-------SPACE FOR KUDOS--------

Attipulgus Trogfolio

unread,

Nov 8, 2002, 7:33:44 PM11/8/02

to

marci <marc...@charter.net> pulled a "Crafonzo" by saying
::
::
::i would first like to see what mr. trofigoligiacrfaongioanaoza has to
::say about it.

Alright, I "lifted" it from Boortz. Fucking Russell.

--

Respectfully submitted by,

Attipulgus Trogfolio

unread,

Nov 8, 2002, 7:34:35 PM11/8/02

to

Russell B. Goode <bigf...@databasix.com> pulled a "Crafonzo" by
saying
::
::
::He's not going to say anything. He's going to ignore this and hope it goes

::away. So, do I get a fscking kudo from you or don't I?

I hope you get diarhea and lockjaw at the same time. Wait, I meant
seasickness.

marci

unread,

Nov 9, 2002, 2:06:46 AM11/9/02

to

On Fri, 08 Nov 2002 09:10:23 -0800, Russell B. Goode

sure!@

\|/ | | \|/
-+- +- -| - - -+-
/|\ |\ | | | | | | \ /|\
-- - - -

>>>-------SPACE FOR KUDOS--------

marci

unread,

Nov 9, 2002, 2:07:09 AM11/9/02

to

On 9 Nov 2002 00:33:44 GMT, Attipulgus Trogfolio

<Attip...@Trogfolio.edu> said:
>marci <marc...@charter.net> pulled a "Crafonzo" by saying
>::
>::
>::i would first like to see what mr. trofigoligiacrfaongioanaoza has to
>::say about it.
>
>
>Alright, I "lifted" it from Boortz. Fucking Russell.

\|/ | | \|/
-+- +- -| - - -+-
/|\ |\ | | | | | | \ /|\
-- - - -

for your honesty, pla.

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 9, 2002, 8:26:58 PM11/9/02

to

I hope marci <marc...@charter.net> gets stung by bees.

>On 9 Nov 2002 00:33:44 GMT, Attipulgus Trogfolio

Whooooooooooooooooooaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, whoa whoa whoa. I expose DH
as a fraud (well, a bigger fraud) and you give HIM kudos? Oh, fuck no. No
way. That's an illegal kudo.

**KUDO DENIED**

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 9, 2002, 8:25:41 PM11/9/02

to

Thank you. Yes, and I do believe I have a few more kudos coming to me.
Yes, if only those people ***AND THEY KNOW WHO THEY ARE*** who still owe me
kudos would just step up and deliver those kudos, we could put this
embarrassing little incident behind us and begin the healing process. So,
to conclude, let's see the kudos please. Kudos, right here. TY.

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 9, 2002, 8:46:26 PM11/9/02

to

I hope Attipulgus Trogfolio <Attip...@Trogfolio.edu> gets stung by bees.

>marci <marc...@charter.net> pulled a "Crafonzo" by saying
>::
>::
>::i would first like to see what mr. trofigoligiacrfaongioanaoza has to
>::say about it.
>
>
>Alright, I "lifted" it from Boortz. Fucking Russell.

____
__,-~~/~ `---.
_/ , - ( , )
_/_,---( , )
__ / ( < / ) ) \___
- ------===;;;'====------------------===;;;===----- - -
\/ ~"~"~"~"~"~\~"~ )~"/
(_ ( \ ( > \)
\ ( _ < > >'
\_( _ < ) > _>'
~ `-i' ::>|--"
| | |
.-=|| | |=-.
`-=#$%&%$#=-'
| | |
| ; :|
| | |
.-=|| | |=-.
`-=#$%&%$#=-'
| ; :|
_____.,-#%&$@%#&#~,._____
888888b. .d88888b. .d88888b. 888b d888 888
888 "88b d88P" "Y88b d88P" "Y88b 8888b d8888 888
888 .88P 888 888 888 888 88888b.d88888 888
8888888K. 888 888 888 888 888Y88888P888 888
888 "Y88b 888 888 888 888 888 Y888P 888 888
888 888 888 888 888 888 888 Y8P 888 Y8P
888 d88P Y88b. .d88P Y88b. .d88P 888 " 888 "
8888888P" "Y88888P" "Y88888P" 888 888 888

Attipulgus Trogfolio

unread,

Nov 9, 2002, 8:52:52 PM11/9/02

to

Russell B. Goode <bigf...@databasix.com> pulled a "Crafonzo" by
saying
::
::I hope marci <marc...@charter.net> gets stung by bees.

Too late. I've already cashed it in for a BOOM!

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 9, 2002, 9:14:57 PM11/9/02

to

I hope Attipulgus Trogfolio <Attip...@Trogfolio.edu> gets stung by bees.

>Russell B. Goode <bigf...@databasix.com> pulled a "Crafonzo" by

Yeah, well, it's not legal tender so you'll have to turn it in at the store
or other establishment where you purchased it. Anyway, your booming days
are over now that I have exposed you as a worse plagiarist than Alex Haley.
You've boomed your last boom, you pathetic little fuck. Admit it, you're
whipped (like Toby, lol).

Wavy G

unread,

Nov 9, 2002, 10:18:33 PM11/9/02

to

Everywon with something useful and intelligent to contribute to this thread,
please step forward. --AHHT! Not so fast, Russell B. Goode
<bigf...@databasix.com>...

>I hope Attipulgus Trogfolio <Attip...@Trogfolio.edu> gets stung by bees.

You mean, Kunta Kinte wasn't really his grandpa?

Attipulgus Trogfolio

unread,

Nov 9, 2002, 10:20:53 PM11/9/02

to

Russell B. Goode <bigf...@databasix.com> pulled a "Crafonzo" by
saying
::
::

::Yeah, well, it's not legal tender so you'll have to turn it in at the store

::or other establishment where you purchased it. Anyway, your booming days

Can't be done, seeing as how the "boom" has already cleared the (boom)
bank.

Your account is now, overd(r)awn, lol?

::are over now that I have exposed you as a worse plagiarist than Alex Haley.

::You've boomed your last boom, you pathetic little fuck. Admit it, you're
::whipped (like Toby, lol).

Toby who?

John McGuirk

unread,

Nov 9, 2002, 10:03:52 PM11/9/02

to

"Russell B. Goode" <bigf...@databasix.com> wrote in message

news:aqkcl2$cjg$3...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com...

Is anybody else craving a candy bar or is it just me?
>

pinch

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 4:47:13 PM11/10/02

to

INGTPIQ. YL. P.

pinch

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 4:50:14 PM11/10/02

to

Think again about that "victory". Think again.

> >> >> >> I said
> >> >> >> nothing about joining any "Funcha Bunch," and I made no contract, verbal or
> >> >> >> written, committing myself to joining any such group.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Your request for a moniker containing "funch" in any form was an implied
> >> >> >contract.
> >> >>
> >> >> Well, yes. Of course it was. It was an implied contract committing myself
> >> >> to join the group that I had EXPLICITLY MENTIONED, by NAME, as the BUNCHA
> >> >> FUNCH.
> >> >>
> >> >> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=UNAbOKNWeMZ5awXtWxsIcIkmwpqu%404ax.com
> >> >
> >> >I'm pretty sure Google mixed up some of those letters when the posts
> >> >were transferred from Deja. Regardless, it was *my* club. *I* named it
> >> >and your misrepresentation of that does not change that.
> >>
> >> You certainly did name it. You named it in this post--the earliest known
> >> mention on Usenet of the terms "Funcha Bunch" [sic] *or* "Buncha Funch":
> >>
> >> http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=381B529D.BC2996DF%40yahoo.com
> >>
> >> Your subsequent screwups do not change this fact in any material way.
> >
> >Oh, that sounded way too much like a snack so I immediately changed it.
> >You must have missed that post.
>
> Ha ha ha! You are lying just like a little kid! Boy, have I got you wound
> up. This is more fun than gluing quarters to the desks at the library.

You're not "thinking."

(not quite)

pinch

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 5:00:57 PM11/10/02

to

Really, what does it matter, hmm? Both Russell and David get so
predictably worked up when I mention The Funcha Bunch that I can't help
myself. David always yells and Russell, no matter how baseless my
arguments are expends tremendous energy "debunking" me. I must have had
this discussion with them four times in the last three years. They fall
for it EVERY TIME.

...
.. ... .
... . .. /|~~
.. . .. . , / |~~
... . .. /| / |
.. / |~~ | ,~~~~
/ |~~ | /|~~~~
~ / | | / |
|\ () / | | / |
| \/||\ / | | / |
| \/\ / | |/ |
| =====_______/ | |=====| __
| \ ========|====| / \ |__)
| \'V` _\o_o_o_o_o_o_o_o_o_o_o_o__)
| \ ------- -------ss pinch -/
| \ ----------- - --- ---- |}
~~~~|~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
!
J
_/o
~~\_)\~~~ _/o
\^^\) ~~\_)\~~~ <---- Russell & David
"$ \^^$
(_\ "\(
(_\

pinch

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 5:07:59 PM11/10/02

to

Neal Boortz is syndicated--he's on the radio here in Florida.
Regardless, the point is moot. I have officially posted the boat on you.
But please, feel free to bring up the Boortz connection the next time I
trick you into fighting about the Funcha Bunch.

Attipulgus Trogfolio

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 5:15:54 PM11/10/02

to

pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com> pulled a "Crafonzo" by saying
::
::
::

::Really, what does it matter, hmm? Both Russell and David get so

Hey listen TIT LADY. We can all do without your little "boat
posting", k?

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 5:18:56 PM11/10/02

to

I hope pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com> gets stung by bees.

>Brian Pez wrote:

It's not the Funcha Bunch. It's the Buncha Funch. I have proved this
beyond a reasonable doubt, using evidence that YOU choose to ignore.

Until you are ready to carry on this discussion like an adult, I shall have
no choice but to ignore any further writings from you. This includes
whatever you wrote below here (I didn't read it, for the aforementioned
reason).

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 5:20:04 PM11/10/02

to

I hope pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com> gets stung by bees.

>"Russell B. Goode" wrote:

Yes, but his show originates in Atlanta. No way is this just a
coincidence. No frigging way.

>Regardless, the point is moot. I have officially posted the boat on you.
>But please, feel free to bring up the Boortz connection the next time I
>trick you into fighting about the Funcha Bunch.

Impossible, as there is no "Funcha Bunch." And if you think you can
distract me from following the "Boortz angle" (as I prefer to call it) with
your empty posturing, you are just kidding yourself. And that's all I have
to say about that. (For now)

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 5:23:34 PM11/10/02

to

I hope Attipulgus Trogfolio <Attip...@Trogfolio.edu> gets stung by bees.

>pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com> pulled a "Crafonzo" by saying

Why did she draw a picture of a boat?

pinch

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 5:33:54 PM11/10/02

to

You're just mad Russell spent time searching out the Boortz connection.
I, however, am glad he did. It made the boat posting that much more
sweeter.

xoxo,
The Tit Lady

pinch

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 5:41:42 PM11/10/02

to

You mean, (Until pinch tricks me into posting about it again.)

pinch

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 5:42:19 PM11/10/02

to

Because I tricked you into "debunking" me. (It was great, thanks.)

pinch

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 5:43:16 PM11/10/02

to

(peeved)

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 5:37:33 PM11/10/02

to

I hope pinch <pinchp...@yahoo.com> gets stung by bees.

>
>

OK, OK, you're welcome. But to be honest, I didn't "finish" yet. Can I
have a handjob or something?

pinch

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 5:48:16 PM11/10/02

to

I think David's free. And if not, Razner's around here somewhere.

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 5:40:36 PM11/10/02

to

Yeah yeah. Come on, I'm serious. This isn't fair. You're lying there,
spent and satisfied, sweat still glistening on your forehead and chest, and
I'm still worked up. Can I have that handjob, please? Or something?

(I would ask for a titjob but my balls are blue enough already, lol?)

pinch

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 6:34:36 PM11/10/02

to

My pleasure, providing you first admit to one and all that you were
officially had. Without sarcasm, irony or hidden double entendres.

> (I would ask for a titjob but my balls are blue enough already, lol?)

(I would lol, but I'm pretending to be mad at David for all the song
parodies. The angrier I appear, the more he makes.)

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 6:39:02 PM11/10/02

to

I hope pinch <pi...@execuchick.com> gets stung by bees.

Oh, like all that "Deja magically twisted my words around" stuff near the
beginning didn't massively tip me off. Give me a frigging break. Won of
these days, I'm sure I will be "had" by you, but not this time. Now simmer
down already.

>> (I would ask for a titjob but my balls are blue enough already, lol?)
>
>(I would lol, but I'm pretending to be mad at David for all the song
>parodies. The angrier I appear, the more he makes.)

If I can come up with won that is funnier than his, can I have the handjob?

pinch

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 7:01:43 PM11/10/02

to

The earnestness of your previous responses indicate otherwise.

> >> (I would ask for a titjob but my balls are blue enough already, lol?)
> >
> >(I would lol, but I'm pretending to be mad at David for all the song
> >parodies. The angrier I appear, the more he makes.)
>
> If I can come up with won that is funnier than his, can I have the handjob?

Yes. Yes you can. If you come up with won that is funnier than his.
(Which shouldn't be hard as his were uncharactristically lame. Hmm?)

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 7:05:36 PM11/10/02

to

Oh, I don't think so. Please give me an example of said earnestness.

>> >> (I would ask for a titjob but my balls are blue enough already, lol?)
>> >
>> >(I would lol, but I'm pretending to be mad at David for all the song
>> >parodies. The angrier I appear, the more he makes.)
>>
>> If I can come up with won that is funnier than his, can I have the handjob?
>
>Yes. Yes you can. If you come up with won that is funnier than his.
>(Which shouldn't be hard as his were uncharactristically lame. Hmm?)

Well, then, I'll just get right on it. I will let you know when I am done.

pinch

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 7:25:10 PM11/10/02

to

"So, you didn't copy it anywhere from ON DEJA, hmm? Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm?"

The number of m's are directly proportionate to the amount of
earnestness felt by the poster.

>
> >> >> (I would ask for a titjob but my balls are blue enough already, lol?)
> >> >
> >> >(I would lol, but I'm pretending to be mad at David for all the song
> >> >parodies. The angrier I appear, the more he makes.)
> >>
> >> If I can come up with won that is funnier than his, can I have the handjob?
> >
> >Yes. Yes you can. If you come up with won that is funnier than his.
> >(Which shouldn't be hard as his were uncharactristically lame. Hmm?)
>
> Well, then, I'll just get right on it. I will let you know when I am done.

It would be really clever if you worked Joe Frank in there, somewhere.
THAT might be worth something. Hmm?

Attipulgus Trogfolio

unread,

Nov 10, 2002, 8:53:54 PM11/10/02

to

Russell B. Goode <bigf...@databasix.com> pulled a "Crafonzo" by
saying
::
::
::
::Why did she draw a picture of a boat?

I do not "get" this post.

Russell B. Goode

unread,

Nov 11, 2002, 2:31:27 AM11/11/02

to

Ah, I see your problem. Like many women, you mistake enthusiasm for
earnestness. Tell me, have you fallen in love with every man you've "done
it" with, hmm? Hmmmmmmmmmmmm?

>> >> >> (I would ask for a titjob but my balls are blue enough already, lol?)
>> >> >
>> >> >(I would lol, but I'm pretending to be mad at David for all the song
>> >> >parodies. The angrier I appear, the more he makes.)
>> >>
>> >> If I can come up with won that is funnier than his, can I have the handjob?
>> >
>> >Yes. Yes you can. If you come up with won that is funnier than his.
>> >(Which shouldn't be hard as his were uncharactristically lame. Hmm?)
>>
>> Well, then, I'll just get right on it. I will let you know when I am done.
>
>It would be really clever if you worked Joe Frank in there, somewhere.
>THAT might be worth something. Hmm?

I cannot guarantee this. However, my song parody shall be noticeably
funnier than any of David's. THIS, I can guarantee.

pinch

unread,

Nov 11, 2002, 2:00:18 PM11/11/02

to

Taken alone, a preponderance of m's may indeed indicate enthusiasm,
however, when they appear with the rest of your posts regarding this
matter, they indicate earnestness. To suggest otherwise is to be
disingenuous.

For example, your multiple m's along with this little tidbit below sends
a clear message to gentle readers of this newsgroup. And that message
is, "Russell's been had."

"So, you see, you conceded this debate long ago. Which means that not
only are you wrong, you are arguing against yourself (out of both sides
of your funchy, as it were)."

> >> >> >> (I would ask for a titjob but my balls are blue enough already, lol?)
> >> >> >
> >> >> >(I would lol, but I'm pretending to be mad at David for all the song
> >> >> >parodies. The angrier I appear, the more he makes.)
> >> >>
> >> >> If I can come up with won that is funnier than his, can I have the handjob?
> >> >
> >> >Yes. Yes you can. If you come up with won that is funnier than his.
> >> >(Which shouldn't be hard as his were uncharactristically lame. Hmm?)
> >>
> >> Well, then, I'll just get right on it. I will let you know when I am done.
> >
> >It would be really clever if you worked Joe Frank in there, somewhere.
> >THAT might be worth something. Hmm?
>
> I cannot guarantee this. However, my song parody shall be noticeably
> funnier than any of David's. THIS, I can guarantee.

That is disappointing news.