More precision about more of my philosophy about competition and fairness and more of my thoughts..

[Amine Moulay Ramdane]

Hello,


More precision about more of my philosophy about competition and fairness and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


I think i am highly smart, and i make you notice how the following interesting article is speaking about competition, so i invite you to read it carefully:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lepoint.fr%2Fpolitique%2Femmanuel-berretta%2Fconcurrence-le-reveil-de-l-europe-face-aux-subventions-etrangeres-18-06-2020-2380631_1897.php


So are you noticing how it is saying the following:

"The Commission does not seek to copy the Chinese model by
favoring subsidized European champions. She does not deny her position
in the Siemens-Alstom file. Margrethe Vestager was very clear on this
point: “What we are asking for is reciprocity and conditions of
equality. […] We are not going to sacrifice the advantages of
competition to do the same thing that others do, namely to subsidize
companies. No, because we would sacrifice the idea that the market is
there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices."

So i think i am highly smart, and i will ask the following political
philosophy question:

Is competition that is spoken about by the commission in the above article a fair competition or not ? since notice how it is saying that we have to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices using the competition, but i am smart and i say that there is something that precedes the serving consumers with fairness and fair prices using competition, and it is the: Does competition is a fair competition or not ? so it is my smart political philosophy question for today, and i have to answer it like the following:

So i am highly smart, and i think that the above smart political question of is competition a fair competition or not?, is like by
logical analogy asking the question of why we have to enforce laws !
since i make you for example notice that past history before the
enforcing correctly laws or international laws was full of disorder
and crimes ! so then the today way of doing is that we have to enforce
laws so that to be "order", and notice carefully how i am smart
since i say that my sentence of: "that past history before the enforcing correctly laws or international laws was full of disorder and crimes", is by logical analogy like the actual world that comes with inequalities like the not being equal and not even having the same equal opportunities and it is why i say that this kind of disorder have to be made order by enforcing the laws, so as you are noticing there is not even fairness of equal opportunities between individuals and groups, but we have to enforce the laws so that to be smart and not to become an unacceptable disorder and violence ! and i will also say smartly , that it looks like bolshevism, since bolshevism was a reactionary violent movement in that they have not accepted those kind of inequalities and they have started to be a violent revolution and they have started to want to make individuals much more equal
even if it was the inefficient way of doing, so you are
understanding more that competition is not fair because we are not
equal and we don't even have equal opportunities between individuals and groups, but there is still something to notice that make us not pessimistic, and it is that capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, and notice that the big profit makes competition smarter, and read my following thoughts of what i have just said about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism so that you understand my views:

And today i will talk about Class struggle of Communism and Marxism,
so i will first ask a philosophical question of:

Is Class struggle "valid" and a good thing to have ?

I will say that there is not one type of Class struggle, because
we can have "levels" of Class Struggle, such as the Class Struggle of
Communism and Marxism under Mao Zedong in China, and i think it is
logically inferred in Marxism from the fact that there is antagonistic
contradictions that are contradiction between the Chinese communists and
Chinese bourgeoisie and between the imperialist camp and the socialist
camp, so we can also consider that this antagonistic contradictions also
comes from the fact that we can be genetically predisposed to being
smart or having a good memory efficiency and such genetical
characteristics, so this gives much more "chance" to those that have
this kind of genetical predispositions to become rich and successful, so
this is why Communism and Marxism says that we have to equalize much
more between people, so this is why i think it is also a kind of
competition that gives this kind of Class Struggle, but i will say that
the fact that we equalize much more between people in a society is not
good for "diversity" inside the society and it is not good for
efficiency, since we have to have a level of diversity that brings
"resilience" to the organization of a society, and even in economy we
have to have a level of diversification of economy that brings
resilience, so this is why i think that the level of Class struggle that
we have to have doesn't look like archaism of Communism or Marxism,
since i think we have to have some kind of Social Assistance and Social
Solidarity and we have to have social programs that help the weakest
members of the society or the poors of the society in a kind of way, so
we have also to have a level of Class Struggle that is like a
competition that ensure that those kind of rights of providing some kind
of social programs that helps the weakest members and the poors of the
society are fought for in a civilized way inside such places as the
congress and in Democracy. Now there is also other antagonist
contradictions between the government and the people under Democracy or
the communist regime, and inside two groups or more inside a political
party or within a communist Party, and i think that we have to have
civilized ways and manners like by vigorous criticism and self-criticism
so that to resolve those kind of antagonist contradictions.


More of my philosophy about economic monopoly power and antitrust laws and more of my thoughts..

I have just looked at the following interesting video about south Korea and Samsung, so i invite you to look at it:

The Story of the Richest South Korea's Family - Samsung

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gudGOngD08A

I think i am highly smart, and i think that south Korea is having a problem, since i think that Samsung has a big monopoly power, and i think that Samsung revenue is equivalent to around 15% of South Korea's GDP, and Samsung is part of a large conglomerates that include Hyundai Motor and LG and i think they are also a monopoly power in south Korea too, so i think it is not good for the so important thing that we call "competition" and i think it is related to antitrust laws, so USA have to know how avoid this problem, and i think that south Korea is having the same problem as had Japan, and here is my thoughts about this problem:


And here is my other important proverb:

"R&D (Research and development) and innovation bring
or introduce a kind of economic volatility, so you
have to know how to manage it and how to manage the
risk brought by it, so then you have to know how to manage
efficiently by not hurting good competition"

Note that "volatility" in the the dictionary means:

"A tendency to change quickly and unpredictably"

Read more here to notice it:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/volatility

This above new proverb of mine also says that since the R&D (Research
and development) and innovation bring or introduce a kind of economic
volatility, so we have also to know how to manage it carefully and
efficiently with Antitrust laws, and here is the why of Antitrust laws:

"Antitrust laws are statutes developed by governments to protect
consumers from predatory business practices and ensure fair competition.
Antitrust laws are applied to a wide range of questionable business
activities, including market allocation, bid rigging, price fixing, and
monopolies."

This new proverb of mine is also related to the below problem that
brings nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good
competition, read about it carefully in my below writing and thoughts:

More political philosophy about what are the big economic problems of
China?..

Here is the big economic problems of China:

First economic problem is that China is addicted to debt, look at the
following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IT7DTn9PKLw

Second economic problem is that China has Not enough PEOPLE for the
FUTURE, look at the following video to notice it:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4qFVuXEe-8

Third economic problem, is that China has the same problem of
nationalism and its economic nationalism that hurts good competition
that brings efficiency, and here it is, read it carefully:


Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? and more about China...

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and today
i will speak about: Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN?
and more..

We have to be more smart, i think China is also reproducing the
mistakes of Japan, because Japan has protected its large industrial
conglomerates called in Japanese "Keiretsu" and Japan has
compensated there disadvantages even if they were not efficient, and
Japan didn't hesitate to give the Keiretsu all kinds of advantages and
privileges even if they were not efficient, and this was not good for
"competition" and Japan has "failed" by doing it.

Look in this video carefully to notice it:

Why is GERMANY Growing More Than JAPAN? - VisualPolitik

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vou96yLuWXw


I think this is the same that is happening with China, since i think
China needs an efficient mechanism that protects correct "competition"
that brings good efficiency, read the following to notice it:

Competition: Europe's awakening in the face of foreign subsidies

Our state aid rules are very strict: an EU company can only receive
grants of up to € 200,000 over three years. In China, the three 5G
operators received 19 million euros each through the megalopolis of
Shenzhen (12 million inhabitants)… According to the Wall Street Journal
(article of December 25, 2019), Huawei would have benefited from 75
billion state aid via different channels, figures denied by the company.
State capitalism of China obviously raises the question of the inequity
of world competition ...

The direction the Commission is taking through the "white paper" is not
this at all. The Commission does not seek to copy the Chinese model by
favoring subsidized European champions. She does not deny her position
in the Siemens-Alstom file. Margrethe Vestager was very clear on this
point: “What we are asking for is reciprocity and conditions of
equality. […] We are not going to sacrifice the advantages of
competition to do the same thing that others do, namely to subsidize
companies. No, because we would sacrifice the idea that the market is
there to serve consumers with fairness and fair prices. "

Read more here:

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.lepoint.fr%2Fpolitique%2Femmanuel-berretta%2Fconcurrence-le-reveil-de-l-europe-face-aux-subventions-etrangeres-18-06-2020-2380631_1897.php


More of my philosophy about sanctions on Russia and its currency and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i think that the sanctions of western countries on Russia will not be so effective, since Russia is solving it by selling its oil and gas to other markets like India and China and such that don't want to follow the same way of the sanctions of western countries, also even if the currency of Russia has just fallen low at the start of the western sanctions, but Russia has higher its interest rates so that to solve the problem and so that to solve the high inflation that is caused by the sanctions of western countries, so now the higher interest rates of Russia looks somewhat like the one of USA, but the "disadvantage" of higher interest rates is that it slows the economic investments and it slows the economy. So i think that Russia can survive the sanctions of western countries for many years ahead.


More of my philosophy about western values and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and here is more of my philosophy of what is the Western values and more..

I will invite you to look at the following video about what
is the Western values:

"Western Values" Explained

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7DUT4aCkeRA

I think i am smart, and i will answer the question of
what is the Western values:

I think that the important Western values are:

1- Western human rights
2- Democracy
3- Freedom of expression
4- Freedom of worship
5- Secular government

But i think i am smart and i will say that human rights and freedom of expression or speech are not "definitive" rights, since they can change, since as i have just said, that Western countries have wanted to avoid the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of expression or speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive rights, since i think that Western countries are proceeding by rational reforms into society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments, so then they are also monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working correctly , so they can change them. And here is what i have just said about Freedom of Speech:

More of my philosophy about Freedom of Speech and about Turkey and more..

I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look at it:

Erdogan: 'We shouldn't confuse criticism with i...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4-0TlT4hnCg


I will ask a philosophical question of:

Do we have to have a full freedom of speech ?

So as you are noticing in the above video that the american jounalist
is saying to president Erdogan of Turkey that he has to respect freedom of speech in his country since it is the requirement for Turkey to be accepted as a member of European Union, so i think that this journalist is not thinking correctly, since Freedom of speech has also to be contextualized, since Freedom of speech in Turkey is much more difficult since you have to know that Turkey is living in an unstable region where there is many wars and too much violence, so then being Freedom of speech in Turkey can for example engender violence inside Turkey,
this is why we have to contextualize and be objective, and look for example at USA, you have just noticed that in USA Freedom of speech of Donald Trump have caused too much violence against the USA congress, so this is why i think that we have to analyse it like i am analysing it and say that we can not always have Freedom of speech, this is why i think that there can be constraints in reality that make us be not Freedom of speech, so it depends on the context, so then i think that the requirements of European Union that asks Turkey to be Freedom of speech so that to be accepted as a member of European Union is not a realistic and objective way of doing.


More of my philosophy about competition and about adaptation and more of my thoughts...

I think i am highly smart, so now i will talk more about an important subject, so as you have just noticed, i have just spoken about competition and decentralization, but let us talk again more about competition, so as you notice that in an economic system you can compete on quality or/and quantity and/or cost, but i think that a good competition needs a well diversified economy that brings resilience to the economic system, and so that this resilience also amortizes much more efficiently the bad effects of competition, so we have not to have only antitrust laws, but we have to have a well diversified economy that is so important, and a well diversified economy is what is lacking in third world countries and even in Russia, and you can easily notice it even in Algeria, since i think that the value or price of the currency that is called the Dinar in Algeria is also dependent on the health of the economy of Algeria and then i think that the price or the value of the currency is determined by the law of supply and demand in economics, so since the economy of Algeria is not well diversified, so thus the currency of Algeria can fall too much low and this can cause problems to Algeria, since Algeria is too much dependent on imports from outside that can become too costly since when the value or the price of the currency fall too much low, so then it can cause a high inflation that makes the lower class in Algeria suffers a lot, so i think that it is not good and i think that it is also caused by the fact that Algeria, as third world countries, have not an economy that is well diversified, so i think that the way of managing economy in Algeria is not a good way of managing , since Algeria has to have a well diversified economy, since Algeria, as Russia , are too much dependent on oil and gas exports and it is a defect, and i think that both Russia and Algeria have not properly unleashed private sector forces so that to have a well diversified economy, so i invite you to read the following article so that to notice that it is what happens in Algeria:

Algeria dinar's fall hits finances, but may bring reserves benefits

https://www.reuters.com/article/algeria-currency-idUSL8N18S1PR

And i think that the mechanisms such as the borrowing from World Bank and IMF and the mechanism such as the price or value of the currency that is determined by open market through supply and demand on global currency markets, are also ways that permit to force third world countries to well manage there economies and public finances.

More of my philosophy about the civilization and about the people and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i am still rapidly inventing my thoughts,
and now i will invent more of my thoughts about another important subject, so i think that the problem why arab countries or black african
countries or south american countries or such third world countries are not so sophisticated as western countries, is that i think it is about competition and about decentralization, since i think that my model of self-interest and egoism as i have just explained it, is a high level manner of explaining from where comes prosperity and happiness of nations, so read in my below thoughts how i am explaining it, but another higher level view is to also look at competition and decentralization, since i think that good decentralization and good competition is what is lacking in third world countries, since i think that the good competition has to be a well diversified economy that makes the economic system "resilient", but a well diversified economy is also lacking in the third world countries, and also i say that the mechanism of competition of third world countries is not as good as competition in western countries since it is also lacking much on the democratic mechanisms that bring quality and a good governance, also i think that third world countries lacks the good decentralization, and the good decentralization is the fact that you have to be the good specialization in a job and in what you do, or be better than that by being good specialization in a job and in what you do better, since it is good for quality and for productivity, and here is what i have just said about it:

More precision about more of my philosophy about specialization and about quality and about Adam Smith and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will now talk about another important idea of Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and it is about "specialization" in an economic system, since i say that in an economic system we have to be specialized in doing a job so that to be efficient and productive, but not only that, but we have to specialize in doing a job in what we do better so that to be even more efficient and productive, and we have to minimize at best the idle time or the wasting of time doing a job, since i can also say that this average idle time or wasting time of the workers working in parallel can be converted to a contention like in parallel programming, so you have to minimize it at best, and you have to minimize at best the coherency like in parallel programming so that to scale much better, and of course all this can create an economy of scale, and also i invite you to read my following smart and interesting thoughts about scalability of productivity:

I will talk about following thoughts from the following PhD computer scientist:

https://lemire.me/blog/about-me/

Read more here his thoughts about productivity:

https://lemire.me/blog/2012/10/15/you-cannot-scale-creativity/

And i think he is making a mistake:

Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input

But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger that the Serial productivity part, so it can scale much more (it is like Gustafson's Law).

And it looks like the following:

About parallelism and about Gustafson’s Law..

Gustafson’s Law:

• If you increase the amount of work done by each parallel
task then the serial component will not dominate
• Increase the problem size to maintain scaling
• Can do this by adding extra complexity or increasing the overall
problem size

Scaling is important, as the more a code scales the larger a machine it
can take advantage of:

• can consider weak and strong scaling
• in practice, overheads limit the scalability of real parallel programs
• Amdahl’s law models these in terms of serial and parallel fractions
• larger problems generally scale better: Gustafson’s law


Load balance is also a crucial factor.


More of my philosophy about the religions and about quality and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and i will ask a philosophical question:

What is the big problem with monotheistic religions ?

I think i am highly smart, and i think that the really big problem with
monotheistic religions is that it is like my philosophy about the being "unity" in my thoughts below, since monotheistic religions are like the being unity in religion that corrupts the so important mechanism of "competition" that brings quality and that also brings the best governance, since a christian has the tendency of being too much merciful or too much tolerant or too much lenient towards another same christian because christians or muslims or jews give too much importance to the faith in God than to the competition process that has not to be corrupted and this is not good for the mechanism of competition and it is a corruption of morality

More of my philosophy about the being selfishness and egoism and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i invite you to read again the
following interesting article that proves that humans are naturally and individually selfish and egoistic:

https://thebaynet.com/humans-are-naturally-selfish-study-finds-html/

So as you notice on the above interesting article about a study, that humans are naturally selfish and egoistic since it is like a game of "competition" where you have to get a big profit, but i think that i am highly smart and i say that the seeking the big profit by being competition is also regulated by antitrust laws, and individual self-interest and egoism creates competition and by the mechanism of competition we become self-interest and egoism of a group and of a society or of a zone such as the European union and then we become collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity in a society or in a zone such as the European union or in global world and that creates prosperity and happiness of nations, and also we have to say that when we get a big profit we can also help the others by being solidarity,
so then we have not to be pessimistic about humans that are naturally and individually selfish and egoistic, but we have to be patience since it takes some time so that this individual self-interest and egoism becomes collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity as i am explaining it, and of course we have to be much more optimistic since capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital and we have to be much more optimistic since self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, as has said it Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and notice that we have to look at competition from a broader point of view since competition is also
competition inside a Democracy that fights efficiently corruption by using different political parties and different political groups inside the congress etc. and competition that fights efficiently corruption is also the separation of powers in USA, since the U.S. constitution establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law), so i think that for example USA is much less corrupt than African countries or such countries since they lack this kind of "competition" that balances this way the powers.

More of my philosophy about the why to soften morals and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and i have just spoken about the model
of self-interest and egoism that also build great things, read my thoughts below about it, but as you have just noticed, i have just said that it needs patience so that self-interest and egoism becomes collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity, and my model looks like the Adam Smith model that also said the following:

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

But Adam Smith model is not like my model since i am saying
that my model needs "patience" so that self-interest and egoism becomes collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity, and i also say that my model needs also the mechanisms that soften morals like of listening to the beautiful music and like reading beautiful poetry of Love and such mechanisms that soften morals so that to reduce or to minimize efficiently violence, and it is why i have also invented many poems of Love and i have posted them here, so i invite you to reread my previous thoughts so that to understand my views:

More of my philosophy about macroeconomics and inflation and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i think that the Federal Reserve policymakers of USA are trying to slow down the economy and subdue inflation by highering interest rates, and highering interest rates make money costlier and borrowing less appealing and that, in turn, slows demand to catch up with supply, which has lagged badly throughout the pandemic, but that's the macroeconomics of it, and its potential effects include lower wages, a halt or even a drop in home prices and a decline in stock market valuations etc., but notice that the highering of interest rates reduces the demand, so i think it has a macroeconomic effects of balancing by creating lower prices in one side and part of the economy and this compensate much more for the higher prices in the other side and part of the economy, but notice that it doesn't mean that the highering of interest rates solves all the problems.

More of my philosophy about the high volatility of cryptocurrencies and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i invite you to read the following
article from Forbes that shows how highly volatile is bitcoin
and other cryptocurrencies:

Explaining Crypto’s Volatility

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicolelapin/2021/12/23/explaining-cryptos-volatility/?sh=1068853e7b54

So notice carefully in the above article how it says the following:

"Cryptocurrency is an incredibly volatile investment. In one day, Bitcoin’s value dropped 30%."


So as you notice from my below thoughts that this high volatility is
really useful , since you can make with such high volatility an interesting income by not investing too much to avoid the high Risk as i am explaining it in my below thoughts, and this high volatility gives the value to cryptocurrency, so read my previous thoughts so that to know how:

More of my philosophy about bitcoin and cryptocurrencies and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and i have just looked at the following
video that says the president of the world bank Christine Lagarde said that the cryptocurrencies such as Bitcoin are worth nothing
since they are based on nothing and they are unsafe, here is the video:


Le Bitcoin ne vaut RIEN...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3iWfLWFuec0


But i think i am highly smart and i am not in accordance with Christine Lagarde the president of the World Bank, since i say that Cryptocurrencies are highly volatile and they are based on the supply and demand law of economics, so with this high volatility you can make money, since you can buy when the price of the cryptocurrency is low and you can sell when the price is high enough for you the supply and low enough for the demand, but the really important thing to know is that cryptocurrency is not for investing lots of money, since you have not to invest too much to lower the Risk and be able to generate an income that is interesting, so you can invest 1000$ or 2000$ or 5000$ or so, but not too much to lower the Risk and be able to generate an income from the high volatility, so cryptocurrencies have this value that comes from the high volatility of it , but you have to be careful to not invest too much so that to avoid the high risk of it.

More of my philosophy about the model of a civilization and
the model of a democracy and the model of an economic system and
more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and notice carefully in my below thoughts how i am speaking about the model of an economic system or the model
of a democracy or the model of a civilization, so as you notice that
i am speaking about the ingredients that makes or creates the model, for example when i ask if the following ingredients as a model can serve as an interesting model:

self-interest and egoism ?

So as you notice when you look at the model of self-interest and egoism
you will think that it is not a good model, but when you are smart
you will notice that self-interest needs the profit and the big profit
that creates a smart competition and this competition regulates
the self-interest and egoism in an efficient way, as also has said it Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism , and the self-interest and competition and egoism becomes collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity , so you are noticing that the primitive model of self-interest and egoism can build great things such as
prosperity and happiness, so then you notice the self-interest and egoism can appear like not the good way at first, but when you
analyze it like i am doing it, you can notice that the primitive
model of self-interest and egoism is so interesting and so useful,
but taking a look further at the so important ingredient in Democracy and in an economic system that is "competition", notice that
when you say a "good competition", it also means a good diversification
like the good diversification of economy, that makes the system "resilient", so then look carefully in my below thoughts how i have just said that the engines of a civilization are
self-improvement and money, but you will think that i am idiotic by
saying so, but i am not, since it is inherent to the primitive model of self-improvement and money, that there is of course a self-interest and egoism, but the engine of money is like the profit or big profit that
create the smart competition that regulates the self-interest and egoism
in an efficient way as i am saying it above, so then we have to guide the self-improvement that is the other engine so that it become a good self-improvement that makes democracy and the economic system and the civilization the efficient systems.

More of my philosophy about unity and about democracy and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, but as you have noticed i am talking
here about more and more subjects about philosophy and politics,
but i think that there remain a very important thing that i have
to talk about, and it is that the main advantage of "Democracy", it is the one of "competition" that brings the best governance, not about the being unity, since i think that the wanting to be unity like in China
communist way of governance of today, is not a good way of doing, and i think that the way of Democracy that is to be the right competition that brings the best governance and that fights much more efficiently corruption is the good way, and notice that corruption can be corruption of morality that can be viewed as corruption of efficiency, so i think that the mechanisms of Democracy are so important, so as you notice that the mechanisms of Democracy is not that we have to be unity , so read my following thoughts about arab countries so that to understand more my views:

I think i am really smart and i have just looked at the following
video of the Arab Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=toZA3gMBsrQ


And i think i am really smart and i am discovering a smart pattern
with my fluid intelligence in the above video, and this smart pattern
is that Egyptian president Gamal Abdel Nasser Hussein was talking
about unity of arabs, and he was saying that arabs must be united, but
being this kind of unity in a country or in the arab world is a defect, and it is the basis of dictatorship and it is the inefficient way of doing, since you have to understand that Democracy is not about being united, but it is about plurality of views or diversity of thoughts or political views that uses the mechanism of competition so that to bring the best governance, but of course we have to know how to avoid extremism, and here is an Arab proverb in the following video that shows from where comes the defect of the arab countries or such countries that are lacking Democracy:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNOpK4KoIIQ&t=372s

So notice that the arab proverb in the above video says:

"A house divided can not stand"

But i think that this arab proverb can also be read symbolically and i
think that it also means that a country must be united, but i think that
it is the big defect of the arab countries and such countries that lack
Democracy or democratic mechanisms that bring the necessary quality or
perfection as i am explaining above.

And here is more of my thoughts about Democracy:

We can say the following:

The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply
democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based
on democratic principles.

But i ask a smart question of:

Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be
centralized ?

Here is my answer:

But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily
imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this
kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that
Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free
press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at
fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my
following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU


More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..


Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?


When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is
better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of
doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that
govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary
democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also
we can logically prove it by saying the following:

From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be
Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.

But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical
question, and it is the following:

Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements it has:

From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement of
parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide
people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the
Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have
to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of
parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third
requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement
and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that
parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the
USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and
a country can become a more global world like European union or such.


More precision about the way of international relations and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed i have
just talked about international relations between countries
and zones, read it in my below thoughts, but you have to
understand what i am trying to make you understand, since i think
that self-interest and egoism build great things too, and build
great things in international relations too, but i am saying below
that you have to be the right "patience" that permits
self-interest and egoism to take form into collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity that build great things and that creates prosperity
and happiness of nations, i mean that you have not be pessimistic about self-interest and egoism , since it can appears to you like a not correct way, and you can become pessimistic and more violent by thinking it, but as you are noticing, i am explaining below how you have to be patience so that self-interest and egoism becomes collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity that creates prosperity and happiness of nations, and i am explaining the way by wich self-interest and egoism becomes collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity that creates
properity and happiness of nations, so reread my
previous thoughts since i have also corrected them more:

More of my philosophy about international relations between countries
and zones and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i invite you to look at the following
video about politics:

Algérie - Maroc : la rupture ? • FRANCE 24

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yMBQZcXkVwg


And notice carefully that the video above is saying that
international relations between countries are cynical today, since they
are based mostly on self-interest and egoism , but i think we have not to be pessimistic about it, since from the individual self-interest and egoism and from the profit or big profit you create a smart competition and from this you can create a country or society that is based on collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity and from self-interest and competition and egoism of countries you can build the self-interest and egoism of two countries or more that is based on collaboration and cooperation and even solidarity and from this self-interest and egoism of the two countries or more you can build interesting values such as confidence and solidarity between countries and you can create a positive energy and create prosperity and happiness, so i think that the way of self-interest and egoism is also a way that can build great things, but we have to be the right "patience" that allows it, and as i just said that capitalism allows it since capitalism is not a zero sum game, and since with a "reasonable" level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, but of course you have to notice how i have just talked yesterday about
what is a civilization , read it in my thoughts below, and notice
how the self-interest has to be guided by the necessary self-improvement , and of course notice how i am saying below that
that the engines of a civilization are self-improvement and money,
and of course like in the Adam Smith model of economic Liberalism, competition regulates self-interest, but you have to read
my following thoughts so that you notice that we have to understand competition in a much broader view:

More of my philosophy about Adam Smith and corruption and more of my thoughts..

I say that in economic Liberalism of Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, so you have to understand what is competition in the Adam Smith philosophy, since i think that Adam Smith also means competition inside a Democracy that fights efficiently corruption by using different political parties and different political groups inside the congress etc. and competition that fights efficiently corruption is also the separation of powers in USA, since the U.S. constitution establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law), so i think that for example USA is much less corrupt than African countries or such countries since they lack this kind of "competition" that balances this way the powers.


More precision about more of my philosophy of what is a civilization and more of my thoughts..

I have just corrected my typos, since i have written fast my post,
so i invite you to reread it:

I think i am highly smart, and i will ask a so important question of:

What is the essence of a civilization or what is the important
ingredients that make a civilization ?


So as you notice, it is a so important question, so how do you think i will answer it ? so first i will make you understand two things:

There is the first thing that we call individual smartness
and there is the second thing that we call societal smartness,
so if you are really smart you will notice that Adam smith, the father of economic Liberalism, has said that in an economic system we have to specialize the individuals of a society so that to be efficient and productive, but i think that Adam Smith was not so right, since the weakness of his model is that his model make like more stupid people that lack societal smartness, and we can easily notice it on internet that individuals lack societal smartness of understanding the right dose of philosophy or the right dose of politics that makes them a good citizens, and more than that we can also easily notice that in our today world, the individuals are expressing too much there differences in a not correct way, such as being sadist or masochist or the being negro or the being white or the being too sexual or too hot and the like, without giving the right importance to the being the right societal smartness that makes us good citizens that can live in harmony, and this of course requires knowing how to live together in harmony, and this knowing how to live together in harmony requires the right and the good philosophy to follow, and so that to answer more smartly my above philosophical question, i invite you to look at the following video so that you notice what is the problem with Africa:

Sénégal, le sage de l'Afrique - Dakar - Saint-Louis - Documentaire voyage - HD

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LqWluJkJZjI


So i think from looking at Africa in the above video, i am noticing
that it also lacks societal smartness that i am talking about, and to answer the above philosophical question of:

What is the essence of a civilization or what is the important
ingredients that make a civilization ?


I think that the engine of a civilization is not only money,
because big money doesn't add much individual happiness to having individually enough money ( look at the following video from a techlead so that to notice it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1kQmeIsCVs ),
so i think that the engines of a civilization is both self-improvement
and money , and this self-improvement has to know about the "goals"
that are also the being this well balance between the individual smartness and the societal smartness so that to give form to a civilization and so that to make the good citizen, and of course we have to know how to make loving the way of self-improvement in such a way.

And here is my new proverb that explains more my views:

"Passion is not a good engine since it is much less powerful,
so if for example you have passion for sex, then can you make sex
a passion that guides you ? no, so then it is not a general or
much more general way of doing, so i think that individual
happiness comes from the satisfaction of self-improvement,
and does money = happiness? I think that big money doesn't
add much individual happiness to having individually enough money
( look at the following video from a techlead so that to notice it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1kQmeIsCVs ), but big money
can add much to societal happiness, and big money builds empires."

In my above smart new proverb , i am saying that individual happiness comes from satisfaction of self-improvement, and I invite you to read
my following thoughts of my philosophy that talks about it and
about how you become self-confidence and how you become this
positive energy and positive energy of hope:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM

And here is my other new proverb that also talks about how individual happiness comes from satisfaction of self-improvement:

"When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at
flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can
learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
think this conception of life makes you more positive."

And here is the translation in french of my new proverb:

"Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches
dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce
chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être
plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en apprendre plus et avoir plus
d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie
ressemble à cela, tu peux la traverser vers des objectifs, mais en la
traversant tu peux avoir aussi des plaisirs qui te rendent plus heureux
et tu peux apprendre plus et avoir plus d'experience et cela t'est
utile, et je pense que cette conception de la vie te rend plus positif."

So you have to understand that my proverb above is like
trying to well balance between, in one side, our strong human desire for
success and the fear or the disliking of failure to attain the goal,
and, in the other side, i am showing in my new proverb the good sides or
advantages or the pros of walking our lives towards the goal or goals
even if failure or failures happen(s), and i think this conception of
life of my proverb permits to be more positive, also you have to align
the usefulness of the utility with the global mission of the country or
global world"


Also I have searched more on internet the most precise and correct Gödel's First incompleteness theorem, and here it is:

"Any consistent formal system F within which a certain amount of elementary arithmetic can be carried out is incomplete; i.e., there are statements of the language of F which can neither be proved nor disproved in F"

And in mathematics, a statement is a declarative sentence that is either true or false but not both. A statement is sometimes called a proposition. The key is that there must be no ambiguity. To be a statement, a sentence "must" be true or false, and it cannot be both.

So that means that we know that the statement is true or false but
it can not be proven true or false, so we then logically infer that
we can not prove the consistency of the system , so the statement can be that it is like an axiom in mathematics that is true but that we can not prove by such logical inference or deduction, so then the system
remains really useful even if it's incomplete by Gödel's incompleteness theorems, so i think that Gödel's incompleteness theorems are not so problematic.


More of my philosophy about quality control and more of my thoughts..

I have just looked and understood quickly the following paper about SPC(Statistical process control):

https://owic.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/pubs/EM8733.pdf


I think i am highly smart, but i think that the above paper doesn't speak about the fact that you can apply the central limit theorem as following:

The central limit theorem states that the sampling distribution of the mean of any independent, random variable will be normal or nearly normal, if the sample size is large enough.

Also the above paper doesn't speak about the following very important things:

And I have quickly understood quality control with SPC(Statistical process control) and i have just discovered a smart pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that with SPC(Statistical process control) we can debug the process, like in software programming, by looking at its variability, so if the variability doesn't follow a normal distribution, so it means that there are defects in the process, and we say that there is special causes that causes those defects, and if the variability follows a normal distribution, we say that the process is stable and it has only common causes, and it means that we can control it much more easily by looking at the control charts that permit to debug and control the variability by for example changing the machines or robots and looking at the control charts and measuring again with the control charts

And I have just put my thoughts below about the agile methodology, so i invite you to read my thoughts again carefully:

More precision about more of my philosophy about specialization and about quality and about Adam Smith and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and i will now talk about another important idea of Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, and it is about "specialization" in an economic system, since i say that in an economic system we have to be specialized in doing a job so that to be efficient and productive, but not only that, but we have to specialize in doing a job in what we do better so that to be even more efficient and productive, and we have to minimize at best the idle time or the wasting of time doing a job, since i can also say that this average idle time or wasting time of the workers working in parallel can be converted to a contention like in parallel programming, so you have to minimize it at best, and you have to minimize at best the coherency like in parallel programming so that to scale much better, and of course all this can create an economy of scale, and also i invite you to read my following smart and interesting thoughts about scalability of productivity:

I will talk about following thoughts from the following PhD computer scientist:

https://lemire.me/blog/about-me/

Read more here his thoughts about productivity:

https://lemire.me/blog/2012/10/15/you-cannot-scale-creativity/

And i think he is making a mistake:

Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input

But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger that the Serial productivity part, so it can scale much more (it is like Gustafson's Law).

And it looks like the following:

About parallelism and about Gustafson’s Law..

Gustafson’s Law:

• If you increase the amount of work done by each parallel
task then the serial component will not dominate
• Increase the problem size to maintain scaling
• Can do this by adding extra complexity or increasing the overall
problem size

Scaling is important, as the more a code scales the larger a machine it
can take advantage of:

• can consider weak and strong scaling
• in practice, overheads limit the scalability of real parallel programs
• Amdahl’s law models these in terms of serial and parallel fractions
• larger problems generally scale better: Gustafson’s law


Load balance is also a crucial factor.


And more of my philosophy about the Post Graduate Program on lean Six Sigma and more..

I think i am really smart and i invite you to read carefully the following webpage of Alan Robinson Professor of Operations Management at University of Massachusetts and that is a full-time professor at the Isenberg School of Management of UMass and a consultant and book author specializing in managing ideas (idea-generation and idea-driven organization) and building high-performance organizations, creativity, innovation, quality, and lean management:

https://www.simplilearn.com/pgp-lean-six-sigma-certification-training-course?utm_source=google&utm_medium=cpc&utm_term=&utm_content=11174393172-108220153863-506962883161&utm_device=c&utm_campaign=Display-MQL-DigitalOperationsCluster-PG-QM-CLSS-UMass-YTVideoInstreamCustomIntent-US-Main-AllDevice-adgroup-QM-Desktop-CI&gclid=Cj0KCQiA3rKQBhCNARIsACUEW_ZGLHcUP2htLdQo46zP6Eo2-vX0MQYvc-o6GQP55638Up4tex85RBEaArn9EALw_wcB


And notice in the above webpage of the professor, that he is giving Post Graduate Program in Lean Six Sigma and on agile methodology, and i think that this Post Graduate Program is easy for me since i am really smart and i can easily understand lean Six Sigma or Six Sigma and i can easily understand agile methodology, and notice that i am in my below thoughts also explaining much more smartly what is agile methodology, and i think that the more difficult part of Six Sigma or lean Six Sigma is to understand the central limit theorem and to understand what is SPC(Statistical quality control) and how to use the control charts so that to control the variability of the defects, and notice that i am talking about it in my below thoughts, but i think that the rest of lean Six Sigma and Six Sigma is easy for me.

More of my philosophy about Six Sigma and more..

I think i am really smart, and now i will talk more about Six Sigma
since i have just talked about SPC(Statistical quality control), so
you have to know that Six Sigma needs to fulfill the following steps:

1- Define the project goals and customer (external and internal)
deliverables.

2- Control future performance so improved process doesn't degrade.

3- Measure the process so that to determine current performance and
quantify the problem.

4- Analyze and determine the root cause(s) of the defects.

5- Improve the process by eliminating the defects.


And you have to know that those steps are also important steps toward attaining ISO 9000 certification, and notice that you can use SPC(Statistical process control) and the control charts on step [4] and step [5] above.

Other than that i have just read the following interesting important paper about SPC(Statistical process control) that explains all the process of SPC(Statistical process control), so i invite you to read it
carefully:

https://owic.oregonstate.edu/sites/default/files/pubs/EM8733.pdf

So as you notice in the above paper that the central limit theorem
in mathematics is so important, but notice carefully that the necessary and important condition so that the central limit theorem works is that you have to use independent and random variables, and notice in the above paper that you have to do two things and it's that you have to reduce or eliminate the defects and you have to control the "variability" of the defects, and this is why the paper is talking about how to construct a control chart. Other than that the central limit theorem is not only related to SPC(Statistical process control), but it is also related to PERT and my PERT++ software project below, and notice that in my software project below that is called PERT++, i have provided you with two ways of how to estimate the critical path, first, by the way of CPM(Critical Path Method) that shows all the arcs of the estimate of the critical path, and the second way is by the way of the central limit theorem by using the inverse normal distribution function, and you have to provide my software project that is called PERT++ with three types of estimates that are the following:

Optimistic time - generally the shortest time in which the activity
can be completed. It is common practice to specify optimistic times
to be three standard deviations from the mean so that there is
approximately a 1% chance that the activity will be completed within
the optimistic time.

Most likely time - the completion time having the highest
probability. Note that this time is different from the expected time.

Pessimistic time - the longest time that an activity might require. Three standard deviations from the mean is commonly used for the pessimistic time.


And you can download my PERT++ from reading my following below thoughts:

More of my philosophy about the central limit theorem and about my PERT++ and more..

The central limit theorem states that the sampling distribution of the mean of any independent, random variable will be normal or nearly normal, if the sample size is large enough.

How large is "large enough"?

In practice, some statisticians say that a sample size of 30 is large enough when the population distribution is roughly bell-shaped. Others recommend a sample size of at least 40. But if the original population is distinctly not normal (e.g., is badly skewed, has multiple peaks, and/or has outliers), researchers like the sample size to be even larger. So i invite you to read my following thoughts about my software
project that is called PERT++, and notice that the PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration.

And as you are noticing this Central Limit Theorem is also so important
for quality control, read the following to notice it(I also understood Statistical Process Control (SPC)):

An Introduction to Statistical Process Control (SPC)

https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/19494/An-Introduction-to-Statistical-Process-Control-SPC.aspx

Also PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration.

So, i have designed and implemented my PERT++ that that is important for quality, please read about it and download it from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal

---


So I have provided you in my PERT++ with the following functions:


function NormalDistA (const Mean, StdDev, AVal, BVal: Extended): Single;

function NormalDistP (const Mean, StdDev, AVal: Extended): Single;

function InvNormalDist(const Mean, StdDev, PVal: Extended; const Less: Boolean): Extended;

For NormalDistA() or NormalDistP(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the probability of the value Aval or the probability between the values of Aval and Bval.

For InvNormalDist(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the length of the critical path of the probability PVal, and when Less is TRUE, you will obtain a cumulative distribution.


So as you are noticing from my above thoughts that since PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So then you have to use my above functions
that are Normal distribution and inverse normal distribution functions, please look at my demo inside my zip file to understand better how i am doing it:

You can download and read about my PERT++ from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal


And I invite you to look at step 4 of my below thoughts of software Evolutionary Design methodology with agile, here it is:

4- When in agile a team breaks a project into phases, it’s called
incremental development. An incremental process is one in which
software is built and delivered in pieces. Each piece, or increment,
represents a complete subset of functionality. The increment may be
either small or large, perhaps ranging from just a system’s login
screen on the small end to a highly flexible set of data management
screens. Each increment is fully coded Sprints, Planning, and
Retrospectives.

And you will notice that it has to be done by "prioritizing" the pieces of the software to be delivered to the customers, and here again in agile you are noticing that we are also delivering prototypes of the software, since we often associate prototypes with nearly completed or just-before launch versions of products. However, designers create prototypes at all phases of the design process at various resolutions. In engineering, students are taught to and practitioners think deeply before setting out to build. However, as the product or system becomes increasingly complex, it becomes increasingly difficult to consider all factors while designing. Facing this reality, designers are no longer just "thinking to build" but also "building to think." By getting hands on and trying to create prototypes, unforeseen issues are highlighted early, saving costs related with late stage design changes. This rapid iterative cycle of thinking and building is what allows designers to learn rapidly from doing. Creating interfaces often benefit from the "build to think" approach. For example, in trying to layout the automotive cockpit, one can simply list all the features, buttons, and knobs that must be incorporated. However, by prototyping the cabin does one really start to think about how the layout should be to the driver in order to avoid confusion while maximizing comfort. This then allows the designer iterate on their initial concept to develop something that is more intuitive and refined. Also prototypes and there demonstrations are designed to get potential customers interested and excited.

More of my philosophy about the Evolutionary Design methodology and more..

Here are some important steps of software Evolutionary Design methodology:

1- Taking a little extra time during the project to write solid code and
fix problems today, they create a codebase that’s easy to maintain
tomorrow.

2- And the most destructive thing you can do to your project is to build
new code, and then build more code that depends on it, and then still
more code that depends on that, leading to that painfully familiar
domino effect of cascading changes...and eventually leaving you with
an unmaintainable mess of spaghetti code. So when teams write code,
they can keep their software designs simple by creating software
designs based on small, self-contained units (like classes, modules,
services, etc.) that do only one thing; this helps avoid the domino
effect.

3- Instead of creating one big design at the beginning of the project
that covers all of the requirements, agile architects use incremental
design, which involves techniques that allow them to design a system
that is not just complete, but also easy for the team to modify as
the project changes.

4- When in agile a team breaks a project into phases, it’s called
incremental development. An incremental process is one in which
software is built and delivered in pieces. Each piece, or increment,
represents a complete subset of functionality. The increment may be
either small or large, perhaps ranging from just a system’s login
screen on the small end to a highly flexible set of data management
screens. Each increment is fully coded Sprints, Planning, and
Retrospectives.

5- And an iterative process in agile is one that makes progress through
successive refinement. A development team takes a first cut
at a system, knowing it is incomplete or weak in some (perhaps many)
areas. They then iteratively refine those areas until the product is
satisfactory. With each iteration the software is improved through
the addition of greater detail.

More of philosophy about Democracy and the Evolutionary Design methodology..

I will make a logical analogy between software projects and Democracy,
first i will say that because of the today big complexity of software
projects, so the "requirements" of those complex software projects are
not clear and a lot could change in them, so this is
why we are using an Evolutionary Design methodology with different tools
such as Unit Testing, Test Driven Development, Design Patterns,
Continuous Integration, Domain Driven Design, but we have to notice
carefully that an important thing in Evolutionary Design methodology is
that when those complex software projects grow, we have first to
normalize there growth by ensuring that the complex software projects
grow "nicely" and "balanced" by using standards, and second we have to
optimize growth of the complex software projects by balancing between
the criteria of the easy to change the complex software projects and the
performance of the complex software projects, and third you have to
maximize the growth of the complex software projects by making the most
out of each optimization, and i think that by logical analogy we can
notice that in Democracy we have also to normalize the growth by not
allowing "extremism" or extremist ideologies that hurt Democracy, and we
have also to optimize Democracy by for example well balancing between
"performance" of the society and in the Democracy and the "reliability"
of helping others like the weakest members of the society among the
people that of course respect the laws, and so that to understand more
my thoughts of my philosophy about Democracy, i invite you to read them
here:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/vlDWhmf-MIM


More of my philosophy about is Adam Smith a philosopher or an economist and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i say that when you understand much more deeply Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism, you will notice that he is much more a philosopher than an economist, since i am noticing rapidly his kind of philosophy, since as i am explaining in my below thoughts, he is showing how individual egoism gives rise or creates societal or group egoism and how both individual egoism and societal egoism or group egoism give rise or creates competition and how competition regulates the economic activity, and how competition
is based on profit, and how competition must be smart by attracting with a big profit so that to favor growth, and favor a good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation, and of course his model
also speaks about how Adam Smith argued that profits flowed from capital investments, and that capital gets directed to where the most profit can be made, and i think that as competition , this idea is central to capitalism, since i think that it also favors growth and favors a good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation, and it looks like the why we have to be financial capitalism too, since i say about it the following:

The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people, in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation.

And of course i say that we have not to be pessimistic, since we have always to take into account the very important fact that capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a "reasonable" level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital.


Read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about more of my views about Adam Smith model and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i say that you have to understand more deeply Adam Smith model, i mean that it is a generality and it comes
with conditionalities such as a "good competition" means also that
a local zone like the European union or local region such as a country
have to have a good diversification of the economy so that to be a resilient economy that works correctly, so as you notice that Adam Smith is not speaking about the being good diversification of the economy,
since his model, as i am explaining it, is an abstract generalization,
also it is also an abstract generalization when competition means the
existence of a good competition as different economic competitors that compete and that offer the good choices of products and services.

More of my philosophy about the model of Adam Smith and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i think that Adam Smith is really
highly smart too, since in my logical proof below of how to understand
the following saying of Adam Smith:

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

We can say that when we say a "good competition" , it also means a good diversification of the economy that makes the economy resilient,
so then this makes the Adam Smith model from the above saying correct, so then here is the rest of my logical proof that explains the above saying:

I think i am highly smart, and i think what he means is that it is from individual human egoism or self-interest that comes solidarity and cooperation and collaboration, as i am explaining in my thoughts below, and it can become an egoism as a group of solidarity or/and cooperation or/and collaboration against the other group, but it can also become a universal solidarity and/or cooperation and/or collaboration, so then this egoism as an individual or as a group creates competition, and competition does regulate economic activity, so then i say that it is the model of Adam Smith, and as you notice that in the model of Adam Smith, egoism is the engine and the cause of properity and happiness of nations.

Read my previous thoughts:


More precision of my philosophy about the Adam Smith idea about competition is the regulator of economic activity and more of my thoughts..


I think i am highly smart, and i am quickly understanding Adam Smith architectural idea of: competition regulates the economic activity,
since i think that his model speaks about competition in a global world,
so he is like proving in a general way, but the world is not organized
in such a way, since the world is organized in zones like European union
or like countries, so when Adam Smith says that competition is the regulator of economic activity , he also means that competition has to exist as a first condition, so if competition exists , he then says
that competition can be the regulator of economic activity, but i think
that it is not true, since there is still a missing part, since what i have just said that competition is not sufficient, since we have
to have a good "diversification" of the economy that makes the economy "resilient".

More of my philosophy about the holistic view of competition and more
of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and so that to understand my thoughts below
about competition in capitalism and economic Liberalism, look carefully of how i am explaining below the how competition fights efficiently corruption, so it is thus like inherent to my explanation that competition creates cooperation or collaboration inside the group that compete against another group, so it is not just black or white, since as you notice that the model becomes much more clear, and that the point of view of of Adam Smith, the father of economic Liberalism, is also true, since i think that, in his views, competition indirectly creates cooperation and collaboration, and we can logically infer that the view of Adam Smith about egoism is also true, since this competition that creates selfishness and egoism , and i think that we can also say that competition starts from selfishness and egoism, is also the cause of cooperation and collaboration, and it is from where comes also the following saying of Adam Smith:

"Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations",

And we can also explain this saying above of Adam Smith by using another level of abstraction, and it is the following:

In economic Liberalism of Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations, and Adam Smith described the opposing, but complementary forces of self-interest and competition as the invisible hand, it means that while producers and consumers are not acting with the intent of serving the needs of others or society, they do, since when you work, your goal is to earn money, but in the process you provide a valuable good or service that benefits others and society, so it is the basis of the following saying of Adam Smith: "Human egoism is the engine of the properity and happiness of nations"

More of my philosophy about the America’s national anthem and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart and i have just looked at the following
America’s national anthem here:

https://blogs.transparent.com/english/americas-national-anthem/


And i think i am understanding it by looking at the architectural ideas
of this America’s national anthem, so i think i am highly smart and
i am seeing in it a pattern with my fluid intelligence and i think
that it is the the main architectural idea of America’s national anthem, and it is the following:

"O’er the land of the free and the home of the brave!"

But philosophically, in this America’s national anthem, the land of USA
that is the land of the free, is the land of liberty, and the land of liberty is the land of liberty of today and of the tomorrow or the future, so since we have to be the land of the free of the today and of the tomorrow or of the future, so the land of the free, in this America’s national anthem, means that we have to be "responsability" so that to be free today and tomorrow and in the future, and it also means that USA is land that is always in construction by the process of competition etc. as i am explaining below, so that to be free:

And of course the America’s national anthem says the following:

"And this be our motto: “In God is our trust.”"

More of my philosophy about competition in capitalism or economic Liberalism and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have passed two certified IQ tests and i have scored above 115 IQ, and now i will ask a philosophical question of:

Wich precedes as a cause to the other, competition or profit ?

So i think that it is central to capitalism and to economic Liberalism, since you can naively say that we are competing since
we have to survive, but i think that it is too much simplistic to think so, since i think that without the profit that attracts , competition will be too idiotic, since i can also logically infer that the big profit makes the competition smart since it favors growth, and it favors a good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation, but we can notice that competition has the tendency to make you selfish and egoistic, but here again i say that you have to look at it in an holistic manner and say that it is also balanced or solved much more efficiently by the fact that capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, so i think that we have not to be pessimistic.

More of my philosophy about the ideas of Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i say that Adam Smith the father of economic Liberalism argued that profits flowed from capital investments, and that capital gets directed to where the most profit can be made, and i think that as competition , this idea is central to capitalism, since i think that it also favors a good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation, and it looks like the why we have to be financial capitalism too, since i say about it the following:

The biggest benefit of finance, is to provide opportunities to people, in the sense that in a world where there is no finance, the only way to start a company is to be born rich or to have saved for a long time. In a world where finance works well, the people with talent can actually start firms and reach their dreams without waiting to either have saved the money, or be lucky and receive it from their parents, and once you create this opportunity, you will have the most talented people take advantage of those opportunities, which favors growth, which favors a good allocation of resources and, ultimately, innovation.

More of my philosophy about quality and quantity and cost and more of of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and i have just talked yesterday about how competition fights efficiently corruption, but there is another philosophical question, since in economic Liberalism of Adam Smith, competition is central and really important, but i think that there is still an important thing in the model of Adam Smith that is missing, since i think that "competition" is not sufficient in the model of Adam Smith, since for example in economic Liberalism we
compete on the quality and/or quantity and/or cost, but, and by logical analogy, so that to not get stuck in a local minimum and avoids premature convergence as in optimization problems, i think that a good diversification of economy is also central, so i think that competition without a good diversification of economy is not a good thing, since i say that a good diversification of economy makes the economy "resilient" even if we compete on quality and/or quantity and/or cost, and of course read my below thoughts about corruption:

More of my philosophy about Adam Smith and corruption and more of my thoughts..

I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed that i have
just talked about corruption around the world, read it in my below thoughts, but i have to be much more precise, since i think that the corruption of Israel in the news below, is a low level corruption and it doesn't mean that Israel is too much corrupt , since i say that in economic Liberalism of Adam Smith, self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition to not lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, so you have to understand what is competition
in the Adam Smith philosophy, since i think that Adam Smith also means competition inside a Democracy that fights efficiently corruption by using different political parties and different political groups inside the congress etc. and competition that fights efficiently corruption is also the separation of powers in USA, since the U.S. constitution establishes three separate but equal branches of government: the legislative branch (makes the law), the executive branch (enforces the law), and the judicial branch (interprets the law), so i think that for example USA is much less corrupt than African countries or such countries since they lack this kind of "competition" that balances this way the powers.

Read my previous thoughts:

More precision of my philosophy about corruption and more of my thoughts..

I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

I have just posted more about corruption around the world,
but I also think corruption is structural to capitalism,
and it is not only the corruption of the jews such as the big corruption in Israel that i am showing below, since we can also find corruption in the West in white european countries such as Canada, read about it more
carefully here in the following article so that to notice:

https://www-lapresse-ca.translate.goog/actualites/2020-11-11/la-corruption-s-est-raffinee-selon-le-commissaire-de-l-upac.php?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_tr_hl=en


And read my previous thoughts:

More of my philosophy about corruption around the world..


I invite you to read the following news that i have just read
to know about what looks like corruption around the world:

Israel’s Military Censor Doesn’t Want You to Know About ex-Mossad Chief’s Dubious Congo Missions

https://www.haaretz.com/israel-news/.premium-the-censor-doesn-t-want-you-to-know-about-ex-mossad-chief-s-dubious-congo-missions-1.10806159



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.