Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
More philosophy about optimality..
0 views
Skip to first unread message
World90
May 19, 2021, 10:55:48 PM5/19/21
to
Hello....
More philosophy about optimality..
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
So notice carefully the following definition of optimality:
Optimality is defined as the point where the difference between benefits
and costs for a behavior is maximized, which can be done by graphing the
benefits and costs on the y-axis and a measure of the behavior on the
x-axis.
You can read about it here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimality_model#:~:text=Optimality%20is%20defined%20as%20the,behavior%20on%20the%20x%2Daxis.
I think i am smart and that we have to be smart to find patterns in the
above definition, so when i look at the above definition i am finding a
pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that i think we can think
our universe as a system that comes with "imperfections" and those
imperfections are "relative" to us seeing them like imperfections for
us, and those imperfections of our universe are like "bugs" and those
imperfections are costly since they prevent us from attaining a great
perfection or absolute perfection, so i think that optimality is
efficiency that minimizes at best those imperfections of our universe so
that we be great perfection or absolute perfection and it is the essence
of morality that is progressive as i am explaining it in my thoughts of
my philosophy below, so we can define optimality as an efficiency that
minimizes at best the imperfections of our universe that are the costs
so that we be or attain great perfection or absolute perfection, and
note that i define that we are part of our universe.
More philosophy about the essence of philosophy..
I have spoken before in my thoughts of my philosophy about the essence
of morality, here is my thoughts about the essence of morality, read
them carefully:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
Now i will talk about the essence of philosophy..
So we can ask a philosophical question of what is an "essence" of this
or that?
I think it is like in computer science or in Petri Nets when we try to
find the "invariants" of the system, since i think the essence of this
or that system is like the invariants that form the "basis" of this or
that system and that don't change with time, so look carefully in my
above thoughts of my philosophy about the essence of morality, and you
will notice that i am abstracting the essence of morality by saying that
it is "perfection at best", and the "at best" is also here in my
definition to "model" correctly the essence of morality,
so now we can ask a philosophical question of:
What is the essence of philosophy ?
I think the essence of philosophy is also that philosophy is high level
layer of abstraction of morality, i mean that the essence of philosophy
is like a high level language like C# and not like the machine language,
i mean that the essence of philosophy is the high level abstraction of
the way of morality that is perfection at best.
More philosophy about inventiveness and creativity..
I just written the following:
"So look carefully at how i am using abstract logical thinking, since i
am for example below making logical analogies between inventiveness and
creativity by talking about USA, since i think that an invention has not
to be constructed from nothing, since i also think that an invention can
be an invention if it contains an added value that has a great
importance, so then we can not say that an invention has to be
constructed from nothing, so then we can say that inventiveness looks
like creativity since i think being creative is bringing an added value
of a great importance"
So i think i am smart and i will explain more the above with like a
logical proof:
I said above that an invention can be an invention if it contains an
added value that has a great importance, and also i just said above that
i think being creative is bringing an added value of a great importance,
since the importance of the creation or invention is also logically
inferred from the fact that we have to be "diversification" that makes
us satisfied, so then an individual invention or creation of an average
importance become of great importance since it is part of an all
creations or inventions that satisfy a great part of the people,
so then we can logically infer that a creation or invention of an
average importance has a great added value.
More philosophy about my kind of philosophy..
If i ask a philosophical question of:
Who am i ?
I will answer that i am also like my philosophy, i mean that i am a
disciplined person and i think i am creative, this is why you are
noticing that i am abstracting in my philosophy by avoiding the less
important details, so i can ask a smart question of: How am i
abstracting my philosophy ? so, i am abstracting my philosophy by not
being it a too reductionist system like the too reductionist system of
Economic Liberalism of Adam Smith and this is a very important thing, so
you are noticing that i am prioritizing so that to be efficient because
i am thinking rapidly and inventing rapidly my thoughts of my
philosophy, so you have to know how to prioritize so that to be
successful, so look carefully at how i am using abstract logical
thinking, since i am for example below making logical analogies between
inventiveness and creativity by talking about USA, since i think that an
invention has not to be constructed from nothing, since i also think
that an invention can be an invention if it contains an added value that
has a great importance, so then we can not say that an invention has to
be constructed from nothing, so then we can say that inventiveness looks
like creativity since i think being creative is bringing an added value
of a great importance, so then you are noticing below that my logical
analogies are much more precise, also notice how i am abstracting in my
philosophy by talking about Japanese Ikigai and more in my thoughts here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
So you are noticing that my philosophy is using abstract thinking
and it also uses my fluid intelligence so that to find some important
patterns and also my abstract thinking of my philosophy must not be a
too reductionist system as i have just said.
More about nationalism and about capitalism..
I think i am smart, and i am not like neo-nazis and white supremacists,
since i think that they are stupid people, since there is a pattern
that they have to see and it is the following:
Nationalism comes also with racism and hate between white europeans and
not white europeans and between blacks and not blacks etc., so it has
the tendency to being too much competition and it lacks too much on
cooperation and collaboration that are so important, so then nationalism
is not good for capitalism and nationalism lacks too much on efficiency,
this is the first problem, second problem is with nationalism like
neo-nazism that needs dictatorship , this dictatorship is also lack of
efficiency because we have to understand the advantages of Democracy so
that to understand, so read my following thoughts of my philosophy on
Democracy so that to understand:
Here is what my political philosophy says about Democracy..
More political philosophy about Democracy and Morality..
And now i will start by asking a philosophical question:
Is Democracy morality ?
I will say that Morality is about exactness and how to be the exact
perfection, note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as:
"the act or process of perfecting", read here to notice it:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection
And Democracy is a mechanism that permits to avoid corruption of
morality and corruption of morality is also lack of efficiency and it is
extremism that hurts Democracy, and Democracy doesn't mean that people
have to govern, because it is absurdity, but Democracy is the "tool" of
Morality, since morality wants to be the exact perfection , this is why
it needs Democracy, and Morality or society have to be "progressive",
read my following writing of my political philosophy about morality to
know that they have to be progressive:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
And we can say the following:
The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply
democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based
on democratic principles.
But i ask a smart question of:
Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be
centralized ?
Here is my answer:
But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily
imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this
kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that
Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free
press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at
fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my
following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU
More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..
Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?
When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is
better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of
doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that
govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary
democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also
we can logically prove it by saying the following:
From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?
So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be
Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.
But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical
question, and it is the following:
Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements it has:
From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement of
parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide
people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the
Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have
to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of
parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third
requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement
and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that
parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the
USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and
a country can become a more global world like European union or such.
More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy..
I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written the
following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012:
----
More about China and Russia and other such countries education system..
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, read the following:
“Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education
is no exception,” Mr. Li said.
A Chinese Education, for a Price
Read more here:
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html
I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system, and i
don't think it is meritocratic !
It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it:
Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who
has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not
only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of
semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass
examinations and obtain a diploma.
RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities
Read more here:
https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20100514205552600#:~:text=According%20to%20necessarily%20rough%20estimates,in%202009%20totalled%20%241%20billion.&text=But%2C%20despite%20the%20country's%20increased,much%20the%20salaries%20actually%20are.
----
And also i have just posted about the today China after the
anti-corruption compaign in China, read the following:
---
I invite you to read the following interesting article:
China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign and the Challenges of Political Meritocracy
https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/chinas-anti-corruption-campaign-and-the-challenges-of-political-meritocracy/
---
So as you are noticing from my above writing that corruption can corrupt
the education system and when education system is corrupt then the
Meritocratic system is corrupt and this is dangerous. So even after the
anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China
is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much
better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press,
read my following thoughts to understand more:
From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?
So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be
Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.
Now why to be Democracy ?
I think that we have to be more smart and notice that Democracy is also
smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality
that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important
things and processes to be able to succeed, for example
if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that
Democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently
than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to
"escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial
intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption (and corruption also
means lack of efficiency), we have to be able to vote for another
political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting
corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting
corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a
"competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best.
More philosophy about abstract logical thinking and about fluid
intelligence..
I think i am smart, and i think i am good at abstract logical thinking
and i am good at finding patterns with my fluid intelligence,
and you will notice that i am not reading books about politics
or philosophy, i am just inventing and inventing my thoughts of my
philosophy, and i am also rapidly finding the problems or bugs of
the many philosophies like the Economic Liberalism of Adam Smith
or other philosophies, also i am a inventor of many many
scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented powerful software
tools etc. this why i think that i am special, since i think i am smart
and creative.
I invite you to read the following interesting article
so that to know what is a Creative Genius:
How to make connections like a Creative Genius
https://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/features/the-value-of-connecting-the-dots-to-create-real-learning/
And i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
And i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here:
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/OjDTCDiawJw
And i invite you to read all my below thoughts of my philosophy:
More philosophy about the problem of optimality in the Adam Smith
economic Liberalism..
First i will give you the definition of optimality:
Optimality is defined as the point where the difference between benefits
and costs for a behavior is maximized, which can be done by graphing the
benefits and costs on the y-axis and a measure of the behavior on the
x-axis.
So i think i am smart because i am rapidly inventing my thoughts of my
philosophy, read them below, and now i will talk about the problem of
economic Liberalism of Adam Smith:
So i think that the problem of Economic Liberalism of Adam Smith is a
problem of "optimality", so first you have to note that we are
constrained by the fact that we have to avoid violence of economic
Liberalism that is based on competition and that lacks cooperation or
collaboration, and this of course shows that it is lacking
"diversification" of products and services since we can notice that we
even need economic actors that share ideas across nations and industries
(and this needs globalization) that make us much more creative and
that's good for economy, other than that since economic Liberalism is
based on self-interest and competition, so i think it is a too
reductionist system, since the too reductionist system of self-interest
and competition lacks one more variable that is the intellectual taste
of the customers in economy, i mean that the customers needs a more
enhanced intellectual taste so that to push the quality of products and
services upward, so people of a society need to be well educated like in
Democracy so that to have a good intellectual taste, and here what i
said about it in my thoughts of my philosophy:
More of my philosophy about Niklaus Wirth and about the good taste..
Having good taste involves knowing what is truly excellent or of genuine
value.
Read here to notice it:
What Is Good Taste?
https://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2014/03/what-is-good-taste.html
And as you have just noticed i have just posted the following thoughts
of Niklaus Wirth (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niklaus_Wirth):
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/h_xKwu2gM44
And i think that Niklaus Wirth is too pessimistic on the above thoughts
Since you have to know that an efficient education can permit to give
you a good intellectual taste so that to be able to be efficiently
selective, and this is valid for both the consumers and the producers
of products or services.
And more of my philosophy about the good taste..
So let us look in the dictionary at what is the taste, it says the
following:
"The taste is the sense by which the qualities and flavour of a
substance are distinguished by the taste buds."
Read here in the dictionary to notice it:
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/taste
But when you are smart you will also notice that there is also the
intellectual taste from culture or genetics, i mean that when you are
genetically more rational and more smart you will notice that this more
rational and more smart is also intellectual taste since with it you
are able to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it
permits you to enhance quality, and this is also the same for culture,
i mean when you enhance more your culture it enhances your intellectual
taste and it permits you to be more efficiently selective of your
knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality.
So as you are noticing that the intellectual taste is so important..
More about "specialization" and "division of Labor" in economy..
As you have noticed i have just spoken about my kind of economic
Coopetition and i just said that it is better than economic Liberalism,
read about it below, now you have to understand that i am using abstract
logical thinking by speaking by using efficient abstractions, so from my
kind of economic Coopetition that is seeking like a balance between
competition and cooperation or collaboration, we can logically infer
that it is like inherent to this abstraction that so that to be
efficient globally we need also specialization and division of Labor,
read more about my kind of economic Coopetition below so that to
understand more my philosophy, and i also said the following about
complexity:
And how to manage efficiently complexity ?
I think you can manage complexity by the “divide and rule” approach
to management, which also leads to hierarchical division of large
organisations, or wich also leads to the Division of "labour", you can
read more about the Division of labour here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_of_labour
Also you can manage complexity by using constraints, such as laws, road
rules and commercial standards, all of which limit the potential for
harmful interactions to occur, also you can manage complexity by using
higher layers of abstraction such as in computer programming, and we can
also follow the efficient rule of: "Do less and do it better" that can
also use higher level layers of abstraction to enhance productivity and
quality, this rule is good for productivity and quality,
More about Bernard Arnault and about more about capitalism..
I invite you to look at the following interesting video that
shows more how capitalism is working efficiently by bringing good
quality using competition and how also in capitalism creativity needs
also collaboration and cooperation, and notice carefully how Bernard
Arnault in the following video is playing it smartly like playing it
smartly in a game of Chess and look carefully how he is even speaking
a good english since also speaking many languages is good for
efficiency:
Bernard Arnault, Chairman and CEO of LVMH | The Brave Ones
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRZvHxUJUoE
More of my philosophy about Adam Smith economic Liberalism..
Economic Liberalism of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith says
that self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition to not
lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and
self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
happiness of nations. But i can efficiently abstract more the
abstraction of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith by saying that
self-interest comes from competition since i can say that individual
self-interest comes from competition between individualism and
collectivism and from competition between the survival and the not
survival, so i think we can efficiently abstract it more and say that in
economic Liberalism of Adam Smith self-interest comes from competition
and competition regulates to not lead to corruption, fraud,
price-gouging, and cheating.
More philosophy about the psychology of the way of my Coopetition
philosophy..
I think i am smart by talking as i am talking about economic Liberalism
of Adam Smith, here in my thoughts of my philosophy and notice it:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YSaGSfcYmtc
So notice carefully that i am saying in my web link above that my new
philosophy that i call Coopetition is better than classical economic
Liberalism, because read carefully in the above since i am saying that
since we have not to "escape" my kind of Coopetition since it permits to
efficiently avoid violence of economic Liberalism that comes from
competition that lacks cooperation or collaboration, so then you will
understand that my kind of Coopetition "diversify" much better the
products and services that are regulated by self-interest and
competition and that's much better for "creativity", since we can notice
that we even need economic actors that share ideas across nations and
industries (and this needs globalization) that make us much more
creative and that's good for economy.
I invite you to look at the following interesting video
that shows that capitalism also uses healthy competition
to bring good quality:
5 Reasons Guys Buy Luxury Items || Men's Fashion 2019 || Gent's Lounge
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qMBFBAkLvI
So i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy
about economic Liberalism and capitalism so that to understand my views,
and you will notice that my philosophy also makes it clear that the way
of my economic Coopetition is better than classical economic Liberalism:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YSaGSfcYmtc
Also here is my other thoughts of my philosophy, so i invite you to read
them carefully:
And i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
And i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here:
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/OjDTCDiawJw
And here is my new saying about capitalism:
If capitalism fails, it will be too much dangerous for humanity, so
nationalism has the tendency to make capitalism fail, but capitalism has
not to fail, this is why i don't like nationalism and this is why i am
speaking about nationalism in the way i am speaking.
More of my philosophy about how USA has become powerful and rich..
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I have just looked at the following two videos about
MIT and Bill Gates, here they are:
REPORTAGE sur le MIT de Boston, La fabrique de génies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ag45W_FTTiM
Bill Gates
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8AsQ9TVKuA
And i think i am smart and i have just found with my smartness a pattern
in the above videos that made USA so rich and powerful, and it is the
following:
I think the pattern is that you have to invent by being creative and
innovative and inventive and after that those inventions will bring big
money and after that big money will bring the smartest people from
around the world to your country that also has made big money and they
will follow the same pattern, this is the pattern that has followed USA
so that to become powerful and rich.
And by logical analogy i have just said the following in my thoughts
of my philosophy that follows the same above pattern:
I have just talked before about the importance of the following
statement in business:
"The focus should be on the product, since if the product is good
the profits will follow"
But notice that it is saying that if the product is good then the
profits will follow, so as you are noticing we have to define what
is a good product ? and does a good product only comes from science or
from engineering? not at all !, since the product can become good by the
process of creativity, and then we have to define creativity, and
creativity needs globalization, since creativity and innovation come
from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries, and
i invite you to read about what is creativity in the following
interesting web page from Yale university:
What Is Creativity?
https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-is-creativity
Also by logical analogy i have also just said the following:
Why Israel is a Tech Capital of the World
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuPx61911Oo
I think that this jewish from Israel that is talking in the above video
is not thinking correctly, because there is two important things that
you must have so that a country be successful: Capital and talents, the
above video is making a mistake by saying that you need the two so that
to be successful, i mean it is saying that you need Capital and talents,
but i think he is making a mistake, because i think that Capital can
attract talents, so Capital can make you successful as a country, so
then i can logically infer that so that to have capital that make you
successful, you have to know how to construct a product or services that
you can sell from those competitive advantages of competitive part or
parts of product or service that can come from you or/and can come from
different countries of the global world, and it is i think an efficient
way that makes you adapt quickly and efficiently in this globalization,
and notice with me that having competitive part or parts of a product or
service doesn't mean it has to come from R&D(Research and development),
also the above video of the jewish from Israel is not saying that
Capital can come from "democratization" of finance, since
you have to know that our global world has changed very much by being
democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and
democratization of information, read my following thoughts so that you
also understand that Capital also comes from democratization of finance:
So i have invite you to read all my thoughts of my philosophy from here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YSaGSfcYmtc
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
More philosophy about optimality..
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
So notice carefully the following definition of optimality:
Optimality is defined as the point where the difference between benefits
and costs for a behavior is maximized, which can be done by graphing the
benefits and costs on the y-axis and a measure of the behavior on the
x-axis.
You can read about it here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optimality_model#:~:text=Optimality%20is%20defined%20as%20the,behavior%20on%20the%20x%2Daxis.
I think i am smart and that we have to be smart to find patterns in the
above definition, so when i look at the above definition i am finding a
pattern with my fluid intelligence and it is that i think we can think
our universe as a system that comes with "imperfections" and those
imperfections are "relative" to us seeing them like imperfections for
us, and those imperfections of our universe are like "bugs" and those
imperfections are costly since they prevent us from attaining a great
perfection or absolute perfection, so i think that optimality is
efficiency that minimizes at best those imperfections of our universe so
that we be great perfection or absolute perfection and it is the essence
of morality that is progressive as i am explaining it in my thoughts of
my philosophy below, so we can define optimality as an efficiency that
minimizes at best the imperfections of our universe that are the costs
so that we be or attain great perfection or absolute perfection, and
note that i define that we are part of our universe.
More philosophy about the essence of philosophy..
I have spoken before in my thoughts of my philosophy about the essence
of morality, here is my thoughts about the essence of morality, read
them carefully:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
Now i will talk about the essence of philosophy..
So we can ask a philosophical question of what is an "essence" of this
or that?
I think it is like in computer science or in Petri Nets when we try to
find the "invariants" of the system, since i think the essence of this
or that system is like the invariants that form the "basis" of this or
that system and that don't change with time, so look carefully in my
above thoughts of my philosophy about the essence of morality, and you
will notice that i am abstracting the essence of morality by saying that
it is "perfection at best", and the "at best" is also here in my
definition to "model" correctly the essence of morality,
so now we can ask a philosophical question of:
What is the essence of philosophy ?
I think the essence of philosophy is also that philosophy is high level
layer of abstraction of morality, i mean that the essence of philosophy
is like a high level language like C# and not like the machine language,
i mean that the essence of philosophy is the high level abstraction of
the way of morality that is perfection at best.
More philosophy about inventiveness and creativity..
I just written the following:
"So look carefully at how i am using abstract logical thinking, since i
am for example below making logical analogies between inventiveness and
creativity by talking about USA, since i think that an invention has not
to be constructed from nothing, since i also think that an invention can
be an invention if it contains an added value that has a great
importance, so then we can not say that an invention has to be
constructed from nothing, so then we can say that inventiveness looks
like creativity since i think being creative is bringing an added value
of a great importance"
So i think i am smart and i will explain more the above with like a
logical proof:
I said above that an invention can be an invention if it contains an
added value that has a great importance, and also i just said above that
i think being creative is bringing an added value of a great importance,
since the importance of the creation or invention is also logically
inferred from the fact that we have to be "diversification" that makes
us satisfied, so then an individual invention or creation of an average
importance become of great importance since it is part of an all
creations or inventions that satisfy a great part of the people,
so then we can logically infer that a creation or invention of an
average importance has a great added value.
More philosophy about my kind of philosophy..
If i ask a philosophical question of:
Who am i ?
I will answer that i am also like my philosophy, i mean that i am a
disciplined person and i think i am creative, this is why you are
noticing that i am abstracting in my philosophy by avoiding the less
important details, so i can ask a smart question of: How am i
abstracting my philosophy ? so, i am abstracting my philosophy by not
being it a too reductionist system like the too reductionist system of
Economic Liberalism of Adam Smith and this is a very important thing, so
you are noticing that i am prioritizing so that to be efficient because
i am thinking rapidly and inventing rapidly my thoughts of my
philosophy, so you have to know how to prioritize so that to be
successful, so look carefully at how i am using abstract logical
thinking, since i am for example below making logical analogies between
inventiveness and creativity by talking about USA, since i think that an
invention has not to be constructed from nothing, since i also think
that an invention can be an invention if it contains an added value that
has a great importance, so then we can not say that an invention has to
be constructed from nothing, so then we can say that inventiveness looks
like creativity since i think being creative is bringing an added value
of a great importance, so then you are noticing below that my logical
analogies are much more precise, also notice how i am abstracting in my
philosophy by talking about Japanese Ikigai and more in my thoughts here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
So you are noticing that my philosophy is using abstract thinking
and it also uses my fluid intelligence so that to find some important
patterns and also my abstract thinking of my philosophy must not be a
too reductionist system as i have just said.
More about nationalism and about capitalism..
I think i am smart, and i am not like neo-nazis and white supremacists,
since i think that they are stupid people, since there is a pattern
that they have to see and it is the following:
Nationalism comes also with racism and hate between white europeans and
not white europeans and between blacks and not blacks etc., so it has
the tendency to being too much competition and it lacks too much on
cooperation and collaboration that are so important, so then nationalism
is not good for capitalism and nationalism lacks too much on efficiency,
this is the first problem, second problem is with nationalism like
neo-nazism that needs dictatorship , this dictatorship is also lack of
efficiency because we have to understand the advantages of Democracy so
that to understand, so read my following thoughts of my philosophy on
Democracy so that to understand:
Here is what my political philosophy says about Democracy..
More political philosophy about Democracy and Morality..
And now i will start by asking a philosophical question:
Is Democracy morality ?
I will say that Morality is about exactness and how to be the exact
perfection, note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as:
"the act or process of perfecting", read here to notice it:
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection
And Democracy is a mechanism that permits to avoid corruption of
morality and corruption of morality is also lack of efficiency and it is
extremism that hurts Democracy, and Democracy doesn't mean that people
have to govern, because it is absurdity, but Democracy is the "tool" of
Morality, since morality wants to be the exact perfection , this is why
it needs Democracy, and Morality or society have to be "progressive",
read my following writing of my political philosophy about morality to
know that they have to be progressive:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4
And we can say the following:
The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply
democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based
on democratic principles.
But i ask a smart question of:
Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be
centralized ?
Here is my answer:
But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't necessarily
imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization, and this
kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can notice that
Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free
press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than Dictatorship at
fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my
following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU
More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..
Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?
When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy is
better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this way of
doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that
govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary
democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also
we can logically prove it by saying the following:
From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?
So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be
Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.
But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical
question, and it is the following:
Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements it has:
From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement of
parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide
people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the
Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have
to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of
parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third
requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement
and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that
parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the
USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and
a country can become a more global world like European union or such.
More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy..
I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written the
following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012:
----
More about China and Russia and other such countries education system..
I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, read the following:
“Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education
is no exception,” Mr. Li said.
A Chinese Education, for a Price
Read more here:
https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html
I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system, and i
don't think it is meritocratic !
It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it:
Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who
has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not
only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of
semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass
examinations and obtain a diploma.
RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities
Read more here:
https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20100514205552600#:~:text=According%20to%20necessarily%20rough%20estimates,in%202009%20totalled%20%241%20billion.&text=But%2C%20despite%20the%20country's%20increased,much%20the%20salaries%20actually%20are.
----
And also i have just posted about the today China after the
anti-corruption compaign in China, read the following:
---
I invite you to read the following interesting article:
China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign and the Challenges of Political Meritocracy
https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/chinas-anti-corruption-campaign-and-the-challenges-of-political-meritocracy/
---
So as you are noticing from my above writing that corruption can corrupt
the education system and when education system is corrupt then the
Meritocratic system is corrupt and this is dangerous. So even after the
anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China
is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much
better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press,
read my following thoughts to understand more:
From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?
So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be
Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be a
reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more money.
Now why to be Democracy ?
I think that we have to be more smart and notice that Democracy is also
smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also like a morality
that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to some important
things and processes to be able to succeed, for example
if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think that
Democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption more efficiently
than dictatorship, i think this is understandable because to be able to
"escape" a local maximum towards a global maximum(like in artificial
intelligence) on efficiency of fighting corruption (and corruption also
means lack of efficiency), we have to be able to vote for another
political party that is more apt and more efficient at fighting
corruption, this is why i think that democracy is better at fighting
corruption, also i think that in democracy the governance must be a
"competent" governance this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best.
More philosophy about abstract logical thinking and about fluid
intelligence..
I think i am smart, and i think i am good at abstract logical thinking
and i am good at finding patterns with my fluid intelligence,
and you will notice that i am not reading books about politics
or philosophy, i am just inventing and inventing my thoughts of my
philosophy, and i am also rapidly finding the problems or bugs of
the many philosophies like the Economic Liberalism of Adam Smith
or other philosophies, also i am a inventor of many many
scalable algorithms and algorithms and i have invented powerful software
tools etc. this why i think that i am special, since i think i am smart
and creative.
I invite you to read the following interesting article
so that to know what is a Creative Genius:
How to make connections like a Creative Genius
https://www.opencolleges.edu.au/informed/features/the-value-of-connecting-the-dots-to-create-real-learning/
And i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
And i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here:
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/OjDTCDiawJw
And i invite you to read all my below thoughts of my philosophy:
More philosophy about the problem of optimality in the Adam Smith
economic Liberalism..
First i will give you the definition of optimality:
Optimality is defined as the point where the difference between benefits
and costs for a behavior is maximized, which can be done by graphing the
benefits and costs on the y-axis and a measure of the behavior on the
x-axis.
So i think i am smart because i am rapidly inventing my thoughts of my
philosophy, read them below, and now i will talk about the problem of
economic Liberalism of Adam Smith:
So i think that the problem of Economic Liberalism of Adam Smith is a
problem of "optimality", so first you have to note that we are
constrained by the fact that we have to avoid violence of economic
Liberalism that is based on competition and that lacks cooperation or
collaboration, and this of course shows that it is lacking
"diversification" of products and services since we can notice that we
even need economic actors that share ideas across nations and industries
(and this needs globalization) that make us much more creative and
that's good for economy, other than that since economic Liberalism is
based on self-interest and competition, so i think it is a too
reductionist system, since the too reductionist system of self-interest
and competition lacks one more variable that is the intellectual taste
of the customers in economy, i mean that the customers needs a more
enhanced intellectual taste so that to push the quality of products and
services upward, so people of a society need to be well educated like in
Democracy so that to have a good intellectual taste, and here what i
said about it in my thoughts of my philosophy:
More of my philosophy about Niklaus Wirth and about the good taste..
Having good taste involves knowing what is truly excellent or of genuine
value.
Read here to notice it:
What Is Good Taste?
https://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2014/03/what-is-good-taste.html
And as you have just noticed i have just posted the following thoughts
of Niklaus Wirth (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niklaus_Wirth):
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/h_xKwu2gM44
And i think that Niklaus Wirth is too pessimistic on the above thoughts
Since you have to know that an efficient education can permit to give
you a good intellectual taste so that to be able to be efficiently
selective, and this is valid for both the consumers and the producers
of products or services.
And more of my philosophy about the good taste..
So let us look in the dictionary at what is the taste, it says the
following:
"The taste is the sense by which the qualities and flavour of a
substance are distinguished by the taste buds."
Read here in the dictionary to notice it:
https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/taste
But when you are smart you will also notice that there is also the
intellectual taste from culture or genetics, i mean that when you are
genetically more rational and more smart you will notice that this more
rational and more smart is also intellectual taste since with it you
are able to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it
permits you to enhance quality, and this is also the same for culture,
i mean when you enhance more your culture it enhances your intellectual
taste and it permits you to be more efficiently selective of your
knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality.
So as you are noticing that the intellectual taste is so important..
More about "specialization" and "division of Labor" in economy..
As you have noticed i have just spoken about my kind of economic
Coopetition and i just said that it is better than economic Liberalism,
read about it below, now you have to understand that i am using abstract
logical thinking by speaking by using efficient abstractions, so from my
kind of economic Coopetition that is seeking like a balance between
competition and cooperation or collaboration, we can logically infer
that it is like inherent to this abstraction that so that to be
efficient globally we need also specialization and division of Labor,
read more about my kind of economic Coopetition below so that to
understand more my philosophy, and i also said the following about
complexity:
And how to manage efficiently complexity ?
I think you can manage complexity by the “divide and rule” approach
to management, which also leads to hierarchical division of large
organisations, or wich also leads to the Division of "labour", you can
read more about the Division of labour here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_of_labour
Also you can manage complexity by using constraints, such as laws, road
rules and commercial standards, all of which limit the potential for
harmful interactions to occur, also you can manage complexity by using
higher layers of abstraction such as in computer programming, and we can
also follow the efficient rule of: "Do less and do it better" that can
also use higher level layers of abstraction to enhance productivity and
quality, this rule is good for productivity and quality,
More about Bernard Arnault and about more about capitalism..
I invite you to look at the following interesting video that
shows more how capitalism is working efficiently by bringing good
quality using competition and how also in capitalism creativity needs
also collaboration and cooperation, and notice carefully how Bernard
Arnault in the following video is playing it smartly like playing it
smartly in a game of Chess and look carefully how he is even speaking
a good english since also speaking many languages is good for
efficiency:
Bernard Arnault, Chairman and CEO of LVMH | The Brave Ones
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wRZvHxUJUoE
More of my philosophy about Adam Smith economic Liberalism..
Economic Liberalism of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith says
that self-interest is most of the time regulated by competition to not
lead to corruption, fraud, price-gouging, and cheating, and
self-interest and competition is the engine of the properity and
happiness of nations. But i can efficiently abstract more the
abstraction of the philosopher and economist Adam Smith by saying that
self-interest comes from competition since i can say that individual
self-interest comes from competition between individualism and
collectivism and from competition between the survival and the not
survival, so i think we can efficiently abstract it more and say that in
economic Liberalism of Adam Smith self-interest comes from competition
and competition regulates to not lead to corruption, fraud,
price-gouging, and cheating.
More philosophy about the psychology of the way of my Coopetition
philosophy..
I think i am smart by talking as i am talking about economic Liberalism
of Adam Smith, here in my thoughts of my philosophy and notice it:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YSaGSfcYmtc
So notice carefully that i am saying in my web link above that my new
philosophy that i call Coopetition is better than classical economic
Liberalism, because read carefully in the above since i am saying that
since we have not to "escape" my kind of Coopetition since it permits to
efficiently avoid violence of economic Liberalism that comes from
competition that lacks cooperation or collaboration, so then you will
understand that my kind of Coopetition "diversify" much better the
products and services that are regulated by self-interest and
competition and that's much better for "creativity", since we can notice
that we even need economic actors that share ideas across nations and
industries (and this needs globalization) that make us much more
creative and that's good for economy.
I invite you to look at the following interesting video
that shows that capitalism also uses healthy competition
to bring good quality:
5 Reasons Guys Buy Luxury Items || Men's Fashion 2019 || Gent's Lounge
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1qMBFBAkLvI
So i invite you to read my following thoughts of my philosophy
about economic Liberalism and capitalism so that to understand my views,
and you will notice that my philosophy also makes it clear that the way
of my economic Coopetition is better than classical economic Liberalism:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YSaGSfcYmtc
Also here is my other thoughts of my philosophy, so i invite you to read
them carefully:
And i invite you to read my thoughts of my philosophy here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YZSYxV41-qI
And i invite you to read more of my thoughts of my philosophy here:
https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/OjDTCDiawJw
And here is my new saying about capitalism:
If capitalism fails, it will be too much dangerous for humanity, so
nationalism has the tendency to make capitalism fail, but capitalism has
not to fail, this is why i don't like nationalism and this is why i am
speaking about nationalism in the way i am speaking.
More of my philosophy about how USA has become powerful and rich..
I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I have just looked at the following two videos about
MIT and Bill Gates, here they are:
REPORTAGE sur le MIT de Boston, La fabrique de génies
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ag45W_FTTiM
Bill Gates
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r8AsQ9TVKuA
And i think i am smart and i have just found with my smartness a pattern
in the above videos that made USA so rich and powerful, and it is the
following:
I think the pattern is that you have to invent by being creative and
innovative and inventive and after that those inventions will bring big
money and after that big money will bring the smartest people from
around the world to your country that also has made big money and they
will follow the same pattern, this is the pattern that has followed USA
so that to become powerful and rich.
And by logical analogy i have just said the following in my thoughts
of my philosophy that follows the same above pattern:
I have just talked before about the importance of the following
statement in business:
"The focus should be on the product, since if the product is good
the profits will follow"
But notice that it is saying that if the product is good then the
profits will follow, so as you are noticing we have to define what
is a good product ? and does a good product only comes from science or
from engineering? not at all !, since the product can become good by the
process of creativity, and then we have to define creativity, and
creativity needs globalization, since creativity and innovation come
from ideas circulating and combining across nations and industries, and
i invite you to read about what is creativity in the following
interesting web page from Yale university:
What Is Creativity?
https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what-is-creativity
Also by logical analogy i have also just said the following:
Why Israel is a Tech Capital of the World
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RuPx61911Oo
I think that this jewish from Israel that is talking in the above video
is not thinking correctly, because there is two important things that
you must have so that a country be successful: Capital and talents, the
above video is making a mistake by saying that you need the two so that
to be successful, i mean it is saying that you need Capital and talents,
but i think he is making a mistake, because i think that Capital can
attract talents, so Capital can make you successful as a country, so
then i can logically infer that so that to have capital that make you
successful, you have to know how to construct a product or services that
you can sell from those competitive advantages of competitive part or
parts of product or service that can come from you or/and can come from
different countries of the global world, and it is i think an efficient
way that makes you adapt quickly and efficiently in this globalization,
and notice with me that having competitive part or parts of a product or
service doesn't mean it has to come from R&D(Research and development),
also the above video of the jewish from Israel is not saying that
Capital can come from "democratization" of finance, since
you have to know that our global world has changed very much by being
democratization of technology, democratization of finance, and
democratization of information, read my following thoughts so that you
also understand that Capital also comes from democratization of finance:
So i have invite you to read all my thoughts of my philosophy from here:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/YSaGSfcYmtc
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0 new messages