More explanation about the rule of "work smart and not hard"..

[Amine Moulay Ramdane]

Hello..


More explanation about the rule of "work smart and not hard"..

I will be more logically rigorous and explain more, so read my logical proof:

I have just looked at the following video, i invite you to look at it:

People who say "work smart not hard" pretty much always fail | James Gosling and Lex Fridman

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jaho2mbaVGM&t=99s

Here is James Gosling:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Gosling

And here is Lex Fridman:

https://lexfridman.com/#:~:text=Lex%20Fridman%3A%20I'm%20an,Teaching%3A%20deeplearning.mit.edu


I think i am a white arab that is smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms and i say that Lex Fridman and James Gosling in the above video are not smart by saying that "work smart and not hard" pretty much always fail, and notice that Lex Fridman says that
the "not hard" in the rule means lazy, but this is not logically correct, since if the statistical distribution of the strenght and force of the work is normal in the real world , so i have to discern with my fluid intelligence that it is a system that means "work smart and not hard" and it can mean: "work smart and using an average force or strenght", so then it means that this system or rule doesn't pretty much always fail, also we can generalize and say: since the truth of "work smart and not hard pretty much always fail" depends on the statistical distribution(of the strenght and force of the work) in the real world, so we can not generalize and say that the rule of "work smart and not hard" pretty much always fail.


Here is more logical proof about how i am abstracting smartness to learning..

As you have just noticed that i just said the following:

---

Yet more political philosophy about smartness..

I think i am smart, so i will talk more about smartness,
smartness permits to learn, so we can abstract and say that
smartness is like learning, so we can measure smartness by looking at
"quality" of learning, so then if the learning is constrained
by the envirenment it can can hurt the quality of learning and
we can say that we are not smart, but there is still something
about smartness, it is that smartness can be artificial or biologic,
for example when you look at how the Sun causes lightning on earth,
we can then learn from this system of Sun that is causing lightening on earth, and this learning from this system is artificial intelligence and it is smartness , so we can say that our universe also contains such systems that contains smartness of artificial intelligence and we can also say that we can also construct artificial intelligence.

--


So how i am abstracting smartness to learning ?

Here is my logical proof:

I said the following about fluid intelligence:

--

Here is my definition of "pattern", since i am using it in
my thoughts of my political philosophy:

A pattern is a discernible coherent system based on the intended interrelationship of component parts.

So you are understanding that fluid intelligence from genetics
has to discern this coherent system and also extract the rule,
it is also how we are extracting a theorem in mathematics,
it is how works fluid intelligence from genetics.

---



So you are noticing that this discerning the coherent system
and extracting the rule(s) is the acts of fluid intelligence,
so since we are discerning the coherent system and extracting
the rules, so it gives after that the "learning", so we can then "abstract" and say that smartness is like learning.


More precision about more political philosophy about smartness and more..

I have just said the following:

"So i think we can say that the capacity of being
genetically a good human artist is artificial intelligence and it is then smartness, since i view it as a mechanism or as a system that is artificial intelligence, but we have not to be pessimistic about the social mobility, since it depends on other factors than artifical or biologic human Smartness"

I will give more precision: i mean that we have to isolate the part of the brain of being genetically a good human artist, so this part in the brain that comes from genetics of being a good human artist is not smartness that we know of the human brain, so by isolating the part like that we can define it as a mechanism or as a system that is artificial intelligence and we then can say that it is also smartness.

Read my following previous thoughts to understand:

More political philosophy about smartness and more..

Please read below how i am defining being genetically a good human artist..

What do you think is smartness ?

If i say:

2 + 2 = 4

So are you capable of seeing smartness ?

So if you are smart you will not only look at the equality
of: 2 + 2 = 4, but you will also look at the constraints by
saying that with 2 + 2 = 4 you are not learning much and
by saying that we have to verify if learning is constrained
by the envirenment(like too much limited or so), so now you are understanding what is smartness, and now you are seeing that saying
that smartness is genetical and cultural is not the right abstraction,
because the envirenment can also constrain too much that we can say that
we are not smart.

Yet more political philosophy about smartness..

I think i am smart, so i will talk more about smartness,
smartness permits to learn, so we can abstract and say that
smartness is like learning, so we can measure smartness by looking at
"quality" of learning, so then if the learning is constrained
by the envirenment it can can hurt the quality of learning and
we can say that we are not smart, but there is still something
about smartness, it is that smartness can be artificial or biologic,
for example when you look at how the Sun causes lightning on earth,
we can then learn from this system of Sun that is causing lightening on earth, and this learning from this system is artificial intelligence and it is smartness , so we can say that our universe also contains such systems that contains smartness of artificial intelligence and we can also say that we can also construct artificial intelligence.

So i think we can say that the capacity of being
genetically a good human artist is artificial intelligence and it is then smartness, since i view it as a mechanism or as a system that is artificial intelligence, but we have not to be pessimistic about the social mobility, since it depends on other factors than artificial or biologic human Smartness, and here is what i have just said about it:

More political philosophy about social mobility..

I have just read the following article:

https://www.redpepper.org.uk/social-mobility-is-capitalisms-cover-story/


So as you are noticing it says:

"The prominent sociologist Michael Young claimed that fixed social strata were the regrettable consequence of a meritocratic society, as those who had secured higher positions through merit would use their advantage to ensure their offspring were able to secure similarly superior positions for themselves."


But he is too pessimistic, since i think that we have to take into account the "context", i think with the current sophistication of internet and the abundance of knowledge on internet, i think this also enhance much more creativity and productivity, and also because of digitalization and by doing business on internet and on the social medias like Facebook and youtube etc. you can "quickly" exponentially grow your number customers and this will enhance much more social mobility, since as i said about Digitalization:

Digitalization: Once something goes from physical to digital, it gains
the ability to grow exponentially.

So we have not to be pessimistic. And this is related to my following thoughts, read them carefully:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU


Also capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth

Read more here:

http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth

More political philosophy about communism of China and communism..

You have to understand that communism of China of today is much more
"modern", i think that it lets many become very rich,
but it taxes the rich much more and that benefits its socialism,
and it demands a greater "loyalty" of the Rich to the communist party of China, and i think that communism China is much more capable because China is a much more bigger and powerful country.

Read the following article to notice it:

China's Communist Party demands private sector's loyalty as external risks rise

https://www.journalpioneer.com/business/reuters/chinas-communist-party-demands-private-sectors-loyalty-as-external-risks-rise-497631/

And read the following article to notice it:

More taxes for China's super rich will narrow income gap

https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1136002.shtml


This is why i just said (read below) that communism of China is "useful", i mean it is useful for China and it allows us to see why it is useful and that's useful too !

More political philosophy about more interesting subjects..

I have just looked at the following video, i invite you to look at it:

Jordan Peterson | Full interview

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1ruwVc0t2c0

I think that this Jordan Peterson is not smart by talking as he is talking about Marxism and Feminism, I am a white arab
and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so i will say that Jordan Peterson is talking about Marxism not correctly, because he is neglecting the "context" of Marxism, since we can say that Marxism is not "generally" a correct ideology, but Marxism can become "useful" in the context of Today world, so i will say that the Today communism of China is "useful", since here is what i have just said about it:

---

But if you are not smart you will say that communism of China is evil,
but this is not correct because you have to understand the essence of
communism..

Here is how to explain it:

There is competition and there is collaboration and solidarity,
but competition has a problem, it is that it can monopolize too much,
it is like the problem of monopoly that hurts competition and that hurts quality, so notice that today those that are smart or/and have more money are quickly making too much money with the help of exponential growth of capitalism and exponential progress, so this is a big problem for communism of China, so this is why communism of China of today is not confident with the private sector that is for them having this big problem, and this is why communism of China is not being confident with the West, so this why communism China of today is not wanting to become Democracy.

So you can read my following thoughts about the problem of Globalization and the unequal distribution of income and opportunities to understand more(and i am giving a solution to it, so read it carefully):

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/wlJu5j1xhPk


I think that there is a bug in the world system, and it is that we want in capitalism to be competition and competitiveness , this is why so that capitalist countries do attract investment and smart people they have accepted the fact that people make too much money quickly(and you have to understand the context of exponential growth of capitalism and exponential progress), so as you are noticing that this is making communism of China not wanting to become Democracy, or it is making socialism of other countries such as Algeria etc. not wanting to become capitalism.

So the West has to solve the problem of Globalization and the unequal distribution of income and opportunities so that to make Marxism much
less relevant.

----


Also notice in the above video that Jordan Peterson is talking about Feminism and saying that he agree with Feminism on equality of opportunities, but he doesn't agree with being equity, but i think he is not thinking correctly since he is too vague, since read for example what i am saying about Meritocracy:

Read the following article about Meritocracy from the Atlantic:

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/12/meritocracy/418074/

So as you notice it says:

“The pursuit of meritocracy is more difficult than it appears,”

So i think in Meritocracy we can not be strict equality,
so we have to get into the details and into the calculations to tune
it correctly and efficiently so that to make Meritocracy efficient and at the same time less problematic, but we have to notice that Meritocracy is still important.

Yet more political philosophy about decentralization..

We can say the following:

The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles.

But i ask a smart question of:

Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ?

Here is my answer:

But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't
necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization,
and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can
notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than
Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU


But notice in my above link that i am saying that we have to seek like a balance between competition and collaboration, and i think that it is
this new more efficient model of seeking like a balance between competition and collaboration that is the "cause" of bringing decentralization that brings efficiency, and i think that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration.

And since i am talking in my following thoughts about the socialist state of Algeria, here is my thoughts about socialism:

More political philosophy about socialism..

I think that socialism today as a system is a result of an inferior act of human nature that has the tendency to being too much dictatorship or too much fascism, socialism is like measuring individual smartness with only smartness that comes from genetics neglecting smartness that comes from culture, it is like neglecting to reason about some important variables in the system in the context of this Globalization, it is also too much idealism that neglects to see the weaknesses of socialism in the reality and in practice, you will notice that even socialism in Democracy is a bad thing, but socialism of a dictatorship is even worse , since like in optimization in mathematics, since socialism has the
tendency to make the government too big and inefficient, because it is simply socialism, so how to be safe from this act of socialism ? and
since socialism has the tendency to make taxes too much high, so
this is not competitive in the context of this Globalization that needs efficiency of competitiveness, and in dictatorship of Socialism
we are not safe from corruption of the government, and corruption in morality can be lack of efficiency , so how can we "escape" this corruption in a dictatorship? so you are noticing with me that dictatorship is a big problem(read about it below on my writing to understand better),also since socialism is solidarity so it also has the tendency to help too much the national companies that are deficient and this not good and this even engender too much debt and this is not good in the context of this Globalization that needs competitiveness, and let us take a look at my writing about socialism in Democracy, it is not even in dictatorship, here is how it looks like:

Now I will talk about some deficiencies of socialism like high taxation..

I think that there is a real impact of high taxation of socialism on economic growth, productivity and innovation.

Take for example Francois Hollande of the french socialist party,
I do not like the rich had cried Francois Hollande of the socialist party during the election campaign that led to the presidency of France. He went to a confiscatory tax and strangled the middle class with taxes. As a result, as the rest of the world emerges from the recession, the French economy stagnates, unemployment increases, young people decamp, the purchasing power of the French falls by 1% per year and foreign investors sulk. Euthanasia of capital and increased taxation have the effect of impoverishing the whole of society. In this sense, it is indeed egalitarianism.

But i have to be more technical about lowering the taxation,
here is what i will also technically say:

It is agreed that a lower taxes mechanically stimulates growth by the effect of the multiplier tax effect: indeed, it results in an increase in households or corporate profits, which favors consumption and/or investment, and therefore, indirectly, the production and employment.

Here is the video of Francois Hollande where he said that he doesn't like the rich:

"Je n'aime pas les riches" F-Hollande

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ui17eyLcJfk


Read my following previous thoughts to understand:


Read the following:

From Centralized to Decentralized Governance

https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/fandd/1999/12/dillinge.htm


And read my following previous thoughts:


More political philosophy about how Algeria Liberalized Its Socialist System..

I have just read the following interesting article about Algeria:

Algeria Liberalizes Its Socialist System

https://www.nytimes.com/1982/05/07/business/algeria-liberalizes-its-socialist-system.html


You will quickly notice in the above article the deficiencies of a centralized way of managing or governing, this is why in the above article Algeria has decentralized for much better efficiency, and notice that today Algeria is still a socialist country, but its socialism is much more "pragmatic"(that understand the way of decentralization for better efficiency etc.),
and notice in the following article about a new law in today Algeria:

Necessary implementation of a strategy and a law governing digital startups

https://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=auto&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fedition.legal-doctrine.com%2Fprojet-de-loi-start-up-algerie%2F

So as you are noticing that you have to understand it using logical abstraction, i mean that with this new law Algeria wants to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, i mean you can easily notice it by the fact that socialist state of Algeria wants to have a certain level of control so that to avoid Risks, and i think
that the tendency of our today world is to seek a balance between competition and collaboration, read more my following thoughts to notice:

And read my following thoughts:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU


More political philosophy about efficiency..

Look at the following video from Russia:

Putin: If Russia Has No Technological Breakthrough Soon, We Will Fall Far Behind!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5OEUTGaxZlI


I think we have not to be pessimistic, since as you notice that
we are becoming more and more efficient with the help of
exponential growth of capitalism and with the help of exponential progress, so i think Russia too is understanding it and this is a positive thing, and as you are noticing that efficiency is about quality
and productivity, so i invite you to read my following thoughts about quality and productivity to understand more:

More political philosophy about mathematics and quality..

You have just seen me previously posting about mathematics, I think that mathematics also brings quality..

So i invite you to read my following thoughts to notice it:

About Mathematics and Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D..

I have just read the following article about Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D, i have just easily understood Inverse Kinematics in 2D and 3D, so i invite you to read it carefully:

https://www.alanzucconi.com/2018/05/02/ik-2d-1/

Yet more political philosophy about quality control and quality..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms..

So first you have to define quality(read below about it) and second
you have to construct quality and third you have to control quality.

So, I have just read the following about the Central Limit Theorem
(I understood it), i invite you to read it carefully:

https://www.probabilitycourse.com/chapter7/7_1_2_central_limit_theorem.php


So as you are noticing this Central Limit Theorem is so important
for quality control, read the following to notice it(I also understood Statistical Process Control (SPC)):

An Introduction to Statistical Process Control (SPC)

https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/19494/An-Introduction-to-Statistical-Process-Control-SPC.aspx

Also PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration.

So, i have designed and implemented my PERT++ that that is important for quality, please read about it and download it from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal


So I have provided you in my PERT++ with the following functions:


function NormalDistA (const Mean, StdDev, AVal, BVal: Extended): Single;

function NormalDistP (const Mean, StdDev, AVal: Extended): Single;

function InvNormalDist(const Mean, StdDev, PVal: Extended; const Less: Boolean): Extended;

For NormalDistA() or NormalDistP(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the probability of the value Aval or the probability between the values of Aval and Bval.

For InvNormalDist(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the length of the critical path of the probability PVal, and when Less is TRUE, you will obtain a cumulative distribution.


So as you are noticing from my above thoughts that since PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So then you have to use my above functions
that are Normal distribution and inverse normal distribution functions, please look at my demo inside my zip file to understand better how i am doing it:

You can download and read about my PERT++ from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal


And about productivity, read my following smart thoughts to understand:

https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/73133/about-productivity


So as you are noticing i am saying:

"Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input

But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger than the Serial productivity part, so productivity can scale much more (and it is like Gustafson's Law)."

So as you are noticing that my answer about productivity is smart.

More political philosophy of what is quality..

I have just read the following article about what is quality,
i invite you to read it:

https://www.cmc-global.org/content/why-quality-so-important-organization

And notice that it says:

"What is “Quality”?

We can define the term “quality” in many ways, but the ISO family of standards gives a very concise definition: “quality - the degree to which a set of inherent characteristics fulfils requirements.” (ISO 9000:2005 – 3.1.1)."


So i think that this definition is also in accordance with my previous thoughts of my political philosophy, since notice that the requirements
in the definition are both requirements by the people that use quality and requirements by the individual or group who bring quality, and notice that the requirements of the individual or group who bring quality have to adhere to the following, read my following thoughts to understand:

More political philosophy about civilization..

So first you are noticing that we have to be Meritocracy, but Meritocracy has to define what is the right "value", is the right value only a useful utility ? so now you are understanding that if we define it by simply saying that it is a useful utility to people, so now we are not respecting the principles of Morality, since we have to make our civilization go forward towards more and more perfection, so this going forward towards more and more perfection sets the usefulness of the utility , so then it sets the value, so then you are noticing that Morality is like going forward towards more and more perfection and this process enhance the "quality" and the quality of the utility, so then it sets the value and it sets the usefulness of the utility, and i think this is part of the essence of a civilization.

So read my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality here to notice it:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4


More political philosophy about efficiency..

Today i will speak about the most important subject and
it is: How to be efficient ?

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, so i will answer this question as follows:

You have to be both good productivity and good quality.

Now my answer is a high level abstraction, so i will go into the
lower layers of abstraction:

So, to be efficient productivity, here is what you have to
do: Read my following smart thoughts to understand:

https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/73133/about-productivity


So as you are noticing i am saying:

"Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input

But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger than the Serial productivity part, so productivity can scale much more (and it is like Gustafson's Law)."


So as you are noticing that my answer about productivity is smart.

And now how to be good in quality?

You have to be smart(and use you fluid intelligence efficiently) and
efficiently learn how to learn and efficiently learn.

So as you are noticing that the constant factors in the human population are genetical, so the very important thing to notice is that to be good in quality you have to have a good education and an awareness, and of course you have, like in genetic algorithms, to know how to efficiently optimize locally(by exploitation) and globally(by exploration and diversification) so that to be optimal optimization. And of course there is individual efficiency and the group efficiency, but you have to be
smart and notice that you have to know about the exponential progress and how to exponentially progress, so read my following thoughts to
understand about it:

Here is the 6 D’s of Exponential Growth:

Digitalization: Once something goes from physical to digital, it gains
the ability to grow exponentially.

Deception: Initial exponential growth is such small increases (.01 to
.02) that it goes largely unnoticed.

Disruption: Either a new market is created, or an old one is overturned.
You either disrupt yourself, or you are disrupted.

Demonetization: The major assets in the industry will become free. Free
music, free reading, free communication.

Dematerialization: Removal of the original product entirely, lumping
alarm clocks, cameras, notebooks, and phones into one smartphone.

Democratization: The costs drop so low that the technology becomes
available to everyone.

Read more here:

The 6 Ds of Tech Disruption: A Guide to the Digital Economy

https://singularityhub.com/2016/11/22/the-6-ds-of-tech-disruption-a-guide-to-the-digital-economy/?fbclid=IwAR1Jx4VJYvIce-BJXeVcajBYjwdKvvP_2y4WOd-2DEtGvXnOye0yzkQVdQU&utm_content=bufferb9891&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook-hub&utm_campaign=buffer

Also capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth

Read more here:

http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth

And read the following:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ


But as you have just noticed that it is also related to my following
thoughts:

The future of innovation is in software

I keep reading about how the future will be shaped by new cheaper fuel
or amazing new medications. I believe that we are misreading the trends.
Yes, we will have better medications and cheaper fuel in the future.
However, I believe we are clearly in the mist of an information
revolution. The future will be shaped by software, defined broadly.

Specifically, I believe that:

Tele-work, tele-play, tele-learning will soon represent 80% of our lives.

There is much more room for innovation in software than in hardware.

There are few ways to build a house, but many more ways to build a
virtual house.

Read more here:

https://lemire.me/blog/2008/10/27/the-future-of-innovation-is-in-software/

And this related to my following thoughts:

Dematerialising the future: what role can technology and consumers play?

I have just posted before about Dematerialization Through Services,
read it here:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/soc.culture.usa/rVZUcghUe5E

The above makes it clear that the evidence indicates that
‘dematerialization through services’ is not a valid policy for
reducing carbon emissions.

But Dematerialising is still important, read the following to notice it:

Dematerialising the future: what role can technology and consumers play?

https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/dematerialising-future-technology-consumers

Also read my following thoughts to notice:

About capitalism and the positive correlation between economic growth
and environmental performance..

As an economy expands, resource usage becomes increasingly efficient and
economies tend to move away from ecologically harmful behavior, while
raising the standard of living of its participants. In fact, the 2018
Yale Environmental Performance Index shows a clear positive correlation
between economic growth and environmental performance, read about it here:

https://epi.envirocenter.yale.edu/2018/report/category/hlt

So i think that we are on the right path, so as you are noticing that we
have to dematerialize much more so that to avoid Environmental problems,
but how will look like our near future that will be much more
dematerialized ? look here in the following video to notice that one of
our fellow techlead and software developer is doing it by much more
dematerializing his life and he is happy by doing it:

My minimalist apartment (as a millionaire)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUeqHhbQWFc


More political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui..

I am a white arab from Morocco that is living in Canada since year 1989 and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and now i will do more political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, here it is:

https://tasteofmaroc.com/moroccan-couscous-with-seven-vegetables/

So as you are noticing you have to be smart, so when you look at this
beautiful Moroccan couscous, there is different levels of abstraction,
since you can simply look at it and remember and say that it is a beautiful Moroccan couscous, or you can be more smart and look at
it from a different perspective and from a different level of abstraction and say that this beautiful Moroccan couscous requires Spices that give it the good taste, and when you are smart you will immediately make a logical analogy with political philosophy by saying that those Spices of this beautiful Moroccan couscous make, from the imperfection of a not so good taste, a perfection of a good taste, so you will say that it is the same for humans, since arabs and indians and south americans and such other ethnical groups can also use Spices in a form of good education and awareness so that to reduce by much there
imperfections that give them a not so good taste , so that to be accepted by others, and now you are understanding that it is a good philosophy that calls for proactivity that wants people to have a good education and an awareness, and this is related to my following thoughts on hate, so read them carefully:

You have to understand political philosophy, i think political philosophy must be "constructive", but what do i mean by constructive ? you will quickly notice that humans have human imperfections, but when you look at those human imperfection you can start to hate humans and hate our humanity, but this is not the good political philosophy, because you have to distinguish between two things: First, you can look at those human imperfections and hate humans and hate our humanity and then degenerate towards a much more violent system, second, you can look at those human imperfections and say that we have to transcend those human imperfections by being efficiently educated and by being efficiently organized globally and locally and by being efficiently trained and by being efficiently aware and conscious, so what will you choose ? so i think you are quickly understanding that Democracy has to be "proactive" by efficiently educating and by efficiently organizing globally and locally and by efficiently training and by efficiently making aware and conscious so that Democracy works correctly and so that we can transcend our human imperfections, so then i think that you are quickly noticing that it is the way that i am choosing so that to transcend our human imperfections, this is why you
have noticed that i said previously the following:

---
I am noticing that people here are quick at hating, notice
that the white supremacist of soc.culture.china newsgroup
called Byker is hating Chinese people and is hating other people
around the world etc. and notice that people are quick at hating people because of there human imperfections, but i think that this is not wise because you can easily hate people and hate our world and hate our humanity, but when you are smart you will notice that you have not to fall into this trap of hating and hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity, because the best way is to be "constructive" and make people educated and aware and efficient so that we reduce much more there imperfections and so that we accept them and so that we don't fall into the trap of hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity. This is why i am talking as i am talking political philosophy.
---


More political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, here it is:

https://tasteofmaroc.com/moroccan-couscous-with-seven-vegetables/


First i said the following about fluid intelligence:

---

Here is my definition of "pattern", since i am using it below in
my thoughts of my political philosophy:

A pattern is a discernible coherent system based on the intended interrelationship of component parts.

So you are understanding that fluid intelligence from genetics
has to discern this coherent system and also extract the rule,
it is also how we are extracting a theorem in mathematics,
it is how works fluid intelligence from genetics.

---


So as you are noticing i am using my fluid intelligence so that
to make you understand my way of thinking, so notice from my
definition above of what is a pattern, that fluid intelligence
that is capable of discerning a more difficult pattern or coherent system is what we call smartness, so notice how in my above thoughts i have with my fluid intelligence descerned an important pattern or an
important coherent system in the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, also i have with my fluid intelligence discerned another important pattern or coherent system in Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui, and here it is:

When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and
eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being
this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan
couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes
with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to
prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient
philosophy. And it is also my spirit.

But you have to be "smart" to understand my example above, the double
satisfaction is also the intellectual or cultural satisfaction
and the material satisfaction, because knowing how to cook
a Moroccan couscous is intellectual or cultural and eating a
Moroccan couscous is material, and it is also a philosophy that shows that satisfaction is good, but the cultural and/or the material satisfaction needs the necessary effort by being responsability, and this cultural and material satisfaction is like an engine that push us forward towards more and more perfection, read my following thoughts of my political philosophy on morality to understand more clearly:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4


So now you are noticing that critical thinking needs not only fluid intelligence but it needs to diversify its knowledge by exploration
, like in genetic algorithms , so that to be optimal.


More political philosophy about: Is there free will?

I have just looked at the following new interesting video of Lex Fridman:

Lex Fridman is an AI researcher working on autonomous vehicles, human-robot interaction, and machine learning at MIT and beyond.

Read more here about him here:

https://lexfridman.com/#:~:text=Lex%20Fridman%3A%20I'm%20an,Podcast%3A%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20Podcast


Here is his new video, please look at it carefully:

Is there free will? | David Eagleman and Lex Fridman

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f92iPYmiGY


I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms, and i will now answer the question of: Is there free will?

I think that by analysing humans, we can predict with a probability
that this human or that human has a certain "tendency", so it is
like probability, so when we analyse a human, without measuring with IQ tests, we can say that a human has a tendency to be smart, then we can say that there is a high probability that he is smart, so then we can give some probabilistic predictions like that, so we can
proceed by the same methodology for other human tendencies, so then is there any free will ? so i think that since we can not predict some human tendencies with 100% certainty, so we can logically say that the truth is not that humans have no free will. So i think that humans are a composition of free will and not free will.

And more political philosophy about the good taste..

So let us look in the dictionary at what is the taste, it says the following:

"The taste is the sense by which the qualities and flavour of a substance are distinguished by the taste buds."

Read here in the dictionary to notice it:

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/taste

But when you are smart you will also notice that there is also
the intellectual taste from culture or genetics, i mean that
when you are genetically more rational and more smart you will notice that this more rational and more smart is also intellectual taste since with it you are able to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality, and this is also the same for culture, i mean when you enhance more your culture it enhances your intellectual taste and it permits you to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality.

So as you are noticing that the intellectual taste is so important..

And i think that i have a good intellectual taste, read my
thoughts here to notice it:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming/eAvSXpZwFgE

Or read also my following thoughts to notice it:

https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/72501/pagerank-algorithm---the-mathematics-of-google-search

Or read my following thoughts to notice it:

https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/71464/about-turing-completeness-and-parallel-programming


This also why i said the following:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart and i am an inventor of
many scalable algorithms, but today i will speak about a very important
thing and it is how to build a civilization, because i think that we
have to be smart and notice that so that to build a civilization there
is a very important requirement and it is that it must be an effort of
building a civilization, so we have not to be like a coward that neglect
to be this effort of building a civilization, so the effort of building
a civilization is so important, so we have to be responsability,
and also we have to know by how we have to be guided to this effort of
building a civilization, so we have to be guided by the good taste
that also permits to be efficiently selective to be able to be a greater
quality or perfection and we have to be not violence that permits to be
less individualistic and that permits to be more order and that permits
to be more organized. And read the following about the good taste:

Why we should stand up for good taste

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20140605-what-makes-good-taste

----------------------------------------------------------------------


So as you are noticing that i am not saying above that civilization
needs smartness, because you have to understand that since it is
inherent to a civilization that it needs smartness, so i am not talking
about it, i am just talking about the above important requirements to be
a civilization, and you will notice that i am talking about the
following requirement of being civilization: "that we have to be not
violence that permits to be less individualistic and that permits to be
more order and that permits to be more organized", so as you are
noticing that, like in democracy and in morality, it is also extremism
of violence that has to be avoided in a civilization and this is in
accordance with the tendency of the essence of morality(read below to notice it).

More political philosophy about Universal Democracy

I have just read the following article on a white supremacist website
called National vanguard, so i invite you to read it:

Universal Democracy

https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/06/universal-democracy/

I don't agree with the article above that we have to limit Democracy that way, because this "universal" Democracy is the basis principle that
allows to give a voice to different parts or groups of the society and
it allows a kind of balance that avoids to the society to become
too violent, so it is an important ingredient in Democracy. Please
read my following thoughts to understand more:

More political philosophy about white supremacism and neo-nazism..

Read the following new article from a white supremacist website from USA called national vanguard:

We Know The True American Type And We Know The Liberal

https://nationalvanguard.org/2020/08/we-know-the-true-american-type-and-we-know-the-liberal/

So i am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms, so i have to be frank, so look at the following writing of the above article:

"Today it teaches the doctrine of liberalism with its pacifism, its love for the inferior and misbegotten, its internationalism which makes a virtue out of treason, its hatred of all who possess strong national feelings, its toothless desire for racial equality, and its tolerance of everything and everyone, particularly the alien and the unfit."

So as you are noticing that the above article is making a logical inconsistency, since take for example "beauty", we can say by
the same logic as the above article that since beauty is much
less important than technical efficiency, so we have to pay
beauty much less money than technical efficiency, but if
you say so you are questioning the very basic fondations of what
we call a civilization, since our kind of civilization comes with a kind
of tolerance that permits it , this is part of the backbone of our civilization, it is also this kind of tolerance that permits us
to be the right tolerance and compassion towards the unfit
and towards the alien, and if you change this, i think this will make
our societies much more and too violent societies, so you have to understand it so that to understand the backbone of our civilization. Second logical inconsistency of the above article, it is that those
white supremacists are giving too much importance to genetics, neglecting at same time the power of culture and learning and awareness that permit or can permit other ethnic groups such as arabs and south americans and indians to become much better humans.

More precision about capitalism and about National Vanguard..

I will be more rigorous, so read again:

I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website
called National Vanguard:

Why Capitalism Fails

https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/

And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:

"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner. And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn’t earned by its owner, yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or how well or how significantly they have worked."

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence:
I think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and
and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are
like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become "rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich).

And notice that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".

And the above article is saying the following:

"Capitalism constantly looks for ways to reduce labor costs. Automation made human labor less necessary than it had been when capitalism first appeared. When automation did appear, people who had the talent, the skills, and the motivation to make contributions began to find no jobs, or to become uncompetitive with mass-production if they tried to employ themselves."

I think it is not true, because read the following:

https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/

And read the following:

Here is the advantages and disadvantages of automation:

Following are some of the advantages of automation:

1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow
the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline,
thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life.

2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since
there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the
production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker.

3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It
has been estimated that the cost to machine one unit of product by
conventional general-purpose machine tools requiring human operators may
be 100 times the cost of manufacturing the same unit using automated
mass-production techniques. The electronics industry offers many
examples of improvements in manufacturing technology that have
significantly reduced costs while increasing product value (e.g., colour
TV sets, stereo equipment, calculators, and computers).

4. The growth of the automation industry will itself provide employment
opportunities. This has been especially true in the computer industry,
as the companies in this industry have grown (IBM, Digital Equipment
Corp., Honeywell, etc.), new jobs have been created.
These new jobs include not only workers directly employed by these
companies, but also computer programmers, systems engineers, and other
needed to use and operate the computers.

5. Automation is the only means of increasing standard of living. Only
through productivity increases brought about by new automated methods of
production, it is possible to advance standard of living. Granting wage
increases without a commensurate increase in productivity
will results in inflation. To afford a better society, it is a must to
increase productivity.

Following are some of the disadvantages of automation:

1. Automation will result in the subjugation of the human being by a
machine. Automation tends to transfer the skill required to perform work
from human operators to machines. In so doing, it reduces the need for
skilled labour. The manual work left by automation requires lower skill
levels and tends to involve rather menial tasks (e.g., loading and
unloading workpart, changing tools, removing chips, etc.). In this
sense, automation tends to downgrade factory work.

2. There will be a reduction in the labour force, with resulting
unemployment. It is logical to argue that the immediate effect of
automation will be to reduce the need for human labour, thus displacing
workers.

3. Automation will reduce purchasing power. As machines replace workers
and these workers join the unemployment ranks, they will not receive the
wages necessary to buy the products brought by automation. Markets will
become saturated with products that people cannot afford to purchase.
Inventories will grow. Production will stop. Unemployment will reach
epidemic proportions and the result will be a massive economic depression.

And to know more about economy and capitalism, please read my following thoughts:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/wlJu5j1xhPk


And read more of my thoughts of my political philosophy here:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/8j-rboLzi38


More political philosophy about Meritocracy..

Read the following article about Meritocracy from the Atlantic:

https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2015/12/meritocracy/418074/

So as you notice it says:

“The pursuit of meritocracy is more difficult than it appears,”

So i think in Meritocracy we can not be strict equality,
so we have to get into the details and into the calculations to tune
it correctly and efficiently so that to make Meritocracy efficient and at the same time less problematic, but we have to notice that Meritocracy is still important.

Read my following previous thoughts of my political philosophy:

More political philosophy about responsability..

I have just read the following article about Putin:

https://www.newsweek.com/putin-says-communism-comes-bible-compares-lenin-saint-781328

And notice that it says the following:

"But Putin argues that like Christianity, communism preaches "freedom, brotherhood, equality." He called the Moral Code of the Builder of Communism, a pamphlet of guiding principles for all party members, a "primitive excerpt from the Bible.""


I agree that the communism was about "freedom, brotherhood, equality.",
but we have to be pragmatic, so we have to be smart and play it smartly since we have to also know how to address the problem of hate, so there must be "responsability", since if we simply call people to freedom and brotherhood and equality, it is not pragmatic, since we have to call them first to responsability that permits to bring such as those qualities, and we have also to be pragmatic since we can not be strict equality(since it is also not Meritocracy, so it is not efficient), but we can be solidarity and collaboration, so now you are understanding why i am talking as i am talking about nationalism and about hate in my thoughts of my political philosophy(read more about hate in my thoughts below), so here is my thoughts of my political philosophy about nationalism:

More political philosophy about globalization and nationalism..

I am a white arab and i think i am more smart, so today i will
talk about a very important subject about Globalization and nationalism,
so i will invite you to look at the following video of Marine Le Pen of
the far-right political party in France:

Marine Le Pen explains why nationalism is important

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fNpI9wKnE8Q


As you notice that Marine Le Pen is saying in french that the
fight today is between nationalism and globalization, since
Marine Le Pen says that globalization is a treat to national
identity and is a treat to national sovereignty, but i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly globalization, since i think that nationalism is too much competition and communism and socialism is too much collaboration , so i think the best way is to seek like a balance between collaboration and competition and when we look
at globalization you will notice that we are collaborating with others by for example sharing Open Source softwares or Free softwares or PhD papers or knowledge on internet etc, and we are also competition by not collaborating with others, and with this new kind of model we are noticing that we are not just one identity like being french, but we are becoming multiple identities because this kind of new model is making a part of us that collaborate "universal", and this is why i think that Marine Le Pen is not understanding correctly this new kind of model of like seeking a balance between competition and collaboration , and i think that this new model is better because it is more efficient , because i think this partly collaboration of this new model is good and more efficient for creativity, innovation, adaptability and speed of progress, i also think in capitalism the price of internet has gotten cheap and the price of computers has gotten cheap, so we are able today to access internet with a low price and benefit from "collaboration" and also sharing in internet, for example look at me, i have invented many scalable algorithms and i have decided to share some of them with the others, and it is of course collaboration , so look for example at my following inventions of scalable algorithms that i have shared with others, here they are:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-rwlock-that-works-accross-processes-and-threads

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming.threads/VaOo1WVACgs

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well

Also i have decided to not share others of my scalable algorithms and it is competition, so i am seeking like a balance between collaboration and competition.


You have to understand political philosophy, i think political philosophy must be "constructive", but what do i mean by constructive ? you will quickly notice that humans have human imperfections, but when you look at those human imperfection you can start to hate humans and hate our humanity, but this is not the good political philosophy, because you have to distinguish between two things: First, you can look at those human imperfections and hate humans and hate our humanity and then degenerate towards a much more violent system, second, you can look at those human imperfections and say that we have to transcend those human imperfections by being efficiently educated and by being efficiently organized globally and locally and by being efficiently trained and by being efficiently aware and conscious, so what will you choose ? so i think you are quickly understanding that Democracy has to be "proactive" by efficiently educating and by efficiently organizing globally and locally and by efficiently training and by efficiently making aware and conscious so that Democracy works correctly and so that we can transcend our human imperfections, so then i think that you are quickly noticing that it is the way that i am choosing so that to transcend our human imperfections, this is why you
have noticed that i said previously the following:

---
I am noticing that people here are quick at hating, notice
that the white supremacist of soc.culture.china newsgroup
called Byker is hating Chinese people and is hating other people
around the world etc. and notice that people are quick at hating people because of there human imperfections, but i think that this is not wise because you can easily hate people and hate our world and hate our humanity, but when you are smart you will notice that you have not to fall into this trap of hating and hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity, because the best way is to be "constructive" and make people educated and aware and efficient so that we reduce much more there imperfections and so that we accept them and so that we don't fall into the trap of hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity. This is why i am talking as i am talking political philosophy.
---


About optimization and about the saying of Bertrand Arthur William Russell..

Bertrand Arthur William Russell said:

“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”

Here is Bertrand Arthur William Russell:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_Russell


I think that this saying of Bertrand Arthur William Russell is not so smart, i am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so here is my saying (that i think is better than the one of Bertrand Arthur William Russel):

I think that it is like the Population based algorithm such as PSO that guarantees the optimal convergence, i mean that so that to be an efficient optimization, you need both an efficient exploration(global optimization) and an efficient exploitation(local optimization) so that to converge to a global optimum, so now you are understanding that you have to be the right "patience"(not being full of doubt like said Bertrand Arthur William Russell) before you converge to the global optimum(that can be the truth etc.).

More of my thoughts on Optimization and Productivity and Quality..

You have to know how to optimize by elimination of waste, like in Just-in-time manufacturing, and you have to know about total quality management (TQM), because one of the most important thing of total quality management (TQM) is not only to correct an apparent problem or defect but it is also to know what is the "cause" or "root" of the problem or defect, so now you are noticing that it needs local and global optimization, so i give you an example, i just said before the following, read in the following web link:


https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/73133/about-productivity


So notice that the PhD scientist in the web link above has
neglected global optimization, so he has acted with his smartness more like an incorrect local optimization of the Simulated annealing algorithm or Hill Climbing algorithm, so he has not acted by being correct local and global optimization like of a Population based algorithm such as PSO, this is i think his deficiency, so he has not been able to see the solution to the problem, so as you are noticing that i am in the above web link more correctly optimizing with my smartness locally and globally and this has allowed me to find the solution(read in the above web link above to notice it), and this is really important and it is related to global and local optimization of Population based algorithms such as PSO.


More political philosophy about what is a Democratic dictatorship
and what is a Democracy partly dictatorship..

I invite you to read the following article:

https://voxeu.org/content/could-us-become-democratic-dictatorship


I think that China is calling itself a Democratic dictatorship,
but notice that for example our actual Democracies in the West are also partly Dictatorship, since i just said the following to make you understand it, so read it carefully:

--
I have just spoken about our near future(read below), and the partly
dictatorship of our near future will require the best scientists and technocrats to help the congress to construct and to enforce the laws to ensure a very high level safety from the big dangers and dangers of the exponential progress and those laws has to be globalized and enforced so that to ensure very high safety all around the world from the big dangers and dangers of the exponential progress, so now you are understanding that our actual Democracy is partly dictatorship
since the laws made by the congress and enforced are this partly dictatorship.
--


But you have to be smart to notice why is our actual Democracies in the West that are partly dictatorship are better..

So you have to notice the difference, that in a Democratic dictatorship like China there is still a defect that i think makes our actual Democracies in the West with partly dictatorship better than a Democratic dictatorship, and here it is, read carefully my following thoughts to notice it:

--
More precision about political philosophy about Democracy..

You have to know about abstract reasoning, so when
i am saying below that Democracy is like morality that is a diversity,
so you have to understand that it is abstract reasoning, because
the essence of morality is perfectioning towards absolute
perfection, and democracy is also an acts of perfectioning, so
a logical analogy can be made, this is why it is what we call abstract
reasoning, so I think i am a white arab that is more smart, and
i will explain more Democracy, you have to know that Democracy
needs to advance with more and more perfection towards absolute
perfection so that to solve all our problems, so then Democracy needs
responsability from the people, and Democracy needs meritocracy , so
then it needs capitalism, and read my following logical reasoning to
notice it, please read it carefully and think about it deeply:

From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be
Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be
a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more
money.

Now why to be Democracy ?

I think that we have to be more smart and notice that
Democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also
like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to
some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example
if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think
that Democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption
more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is
understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum
towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency
of fighting corruption (and corruption also means lack of efficiency),
we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt
and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that
democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in
democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance
this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best.
---


Read more my following thoughts of my political philosophy on the following web links to understand more:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/8j-rboLzi38


And read my thoughts about Politics and Economy here to understand more:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/wlJu5j1xhPk


Read my previous thoughts to understand more:


Yet more political philosophy about our future..

I have just spoken about our near future(read below), and the partly
dictatorship of our near future will require the best scientists and technocrats to help the congress to construct and to enforce the laws to ensure a very high level safety from the big dangers and dangers of the exponential progress and those laws has to be globalized and enforced so that to ensure very high safety all around the world from the big dangers and dangers of the exponential progress, so now you are understanding that our actual Democracy is partly dictatorship
since the laws made by the congress and enforced are this partly dictatorship.

Read my previous thoughts to understand:

More political philosophy about our near future..

I think that we have to take into account that the exponential progress of our humanity will soon require a "very" high level of safety, so then i think that Democracy as we know will soon change and become a partly dictatorship, i mean that this partly dictatorship has to to ensure very high level safety from the big danger of the exponential progress and this requires also collaboration with the rest of the world so that to ensure this very high level safety that requires the exponential progress. So i think that we will soon not be able to continu with the actual form of Democracy. Read the rest of my thoughts so that to understand more:

More about violence and about exponential progress..

You have to understand me, i am a white arab and i think i am
smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, but
now i will talk about one of the most important thing:

I am looking at white supremacists and neo-nazis, and i understand
there ideologies, but i think that they are not understanding
correctly the requirements of our exponential progress, i mean
that with this exponential progress of our humanity we are becoming quickly much much more powerful, thus we have to think carefully about the "safety" criterion, i mean that if you are simple minded you will think that we can simply go forward with our kind of human violence, but this is the simple minded thinking, because the exponential progress
requires a "very" high level safety so that the human violence
doesn't destroy our world or our humanity with the "so" big power of the exponential progress of our humanity. This is why we have to know how to collaborate world wide to ensure this very high level safety. And it is related to my following thoughts:

Notice even the following PhD scientist is making a big mistake,
and it is related to very "high" level safety:

More of my thoughts on Optimization and Productivity and Quality..

You have to know how to optimize by elimination of waste, like in Just-in-time manufacturing, and you have to know about total quality management (TQM), because one of the most important thing of total quality management (TQM) is not only to correct an apparent problem or defect but it is also to know what is the "cause" or "root" of the problem or defect, so now you are noticing that it needs local and global optimization, so i give you an example, i just said before the following, read in the following web link:


https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/73133/about-productivity

So notice that the PhD scientist in the web link above has
neglected global optimization, so he has acted with his smartness more like an incorrect local optimization of the Simulated annealing algorithm or Hill Climbing algorithm, so he has not acted by being correct local and global optimization like of a Population based algorithm such as PSO, this is i think his deficiency, so he has not been able to see the solution to the problem, so as you are noticing that i am in the above web link more correctly optimizing with my smartness locally and globally and this has allowed me to find the solution(read in the above web link above to notice it), and this is really important and it is related to global and local optimization of Population based algorithms such as PSO.

About optimization and about the saying of Bertrand Arthur William Russell..

Bertrand Arthur William Russell said:

“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.”

Here is Bertrand Arthur William Russell:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bertrand_Russell


I think that this saying of Bertrand Arthur William Russell is not so smart, i am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, so here is my saying (that i think is better than the one of Bertrand Arthur William Russel):

I think that it is like the Population based algorithm such as PSO that guarantees the optimal convergence, i mean that so that to be an efficient optimization, you need both an efficient exploration(global optimization) and an efficient exploitation(local optimization) so that to converge to a global optimum, so now you are understanding that you have to be the right "patience"(not being full of doubt like said Bertrand Arthur William Russell) before you converge to the global optimum(that can be the truth etc.).

More precision about more political philosophy about the good taste..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and today i will speak about the good taste..

So let us look in the dictionary at what is the taste, it says the following:

"The taste is the sense by which the qualities and flavour of a substance are distinguished by the taste buds."

Read here in the dictionary to notice it:

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/taste

But when you are smart you will also notice that there is also
the intellectual taste from culture or genetics, i mean that
when you are genetically more rational and more smart you will notice that this more rational and more smart is also intellectual taste since with it you are able to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality, and this is also the same for culture, i mean when you enhance more your culture it enhances your intellectual taste and it permits you to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality.

So as you are noticing that the intellectual taste is so important..

And i think that i have a good intellectual taste, read my
thoughts here to notice it:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.programming/eAvSXpZwFgE

Or read also my following thoughts to notice it:

https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/72501/pagerank-algorithm---the-mathematics-of-google-search

Or read my following thoughts to notice it:

https://community.idera.com/developer-tools/general-development/f/getit-and-third-party/71464/about-turing-completeness-and-parallel-programming


This also why i said the following:

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

I am a white arab, and i think i am more smart and i am an inventor of
many scalable algorithms, but today i will speak about a very important
thing and it is how to build a civilization, because i think that we
have to be smart and notice that so that to build a civilization there
is a very important requirement and it is that it must be an effort of
building a civilization, so we have not to be like a coward that neglect
to be this effort of building a civilization, so the effort of building
a civilization is so important, so we have to be responsability,
and also we have to know by how we have to be guided to this effort of
building a civilization, so we have to be guided by the good taste
that also permits to be efficiently selective to be able to be a greater
quality or perfection and we have to be not violence that permits to be
less individualistic and that permits to be more order and that permits
to be more organized. And read the following about the good taste:

Why we should stand up for good taste

https://www.bbc.com/culture/article/20140605-what-makes-good-taste

----------------------------------------------------------------------


So as you are noticing that i am not saying above that civilization
needs smartness, because you have to understand that since it is
inherent to a civilization that it needs smartness, so i am not talking
about it, i am just talking about the above important requirements to be
a civilization, and you will notice that i am talking about the
following requirement of being civilization: "that we have to be not
violence that permits to be less individualistic and that permits to be
more order and that permits to be more organized", so as you are
noticing that, like in democracy and in morality, it is also extremism
of violence that has to be avoided in a civilization and this is in
accordance with the tendency of the essence of morality(read my previous thoughts to notice it).


More about materialism..

As you have just noticed i have just posted the following:

--

About Madonna and the exponential progress..

I invite you to listen to this song of Madonna called Ray Of Light,
and notice how Madonna in the video is like feeling the speed
of exponential progress that is coming to us so fast..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3ov9USxVxY

--


Also you will notice that Madonna in the above video is pessimistic about USA, because she is saying that USA is too materialistic, but
i don't agree with Madonna, because the exponential progress
of our humanity is so powerful and it is making us adapt really quickly
and very efficiently, so i think that we have to be positive about USA because USA will adapt really quickly and become really efficient, so i think we have to be positive..

More about the exponential progress of our humanity..


I have just written the following:

--

About Madonna and the exponential progress..

I invite you to listen to this song of Madonna called Ray Of Light,
and notice how Madonna in the video is like feeling the speed
of exponential progress that is coming to us so fast..

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x3ov9USxVxY

--


But you have to understand me, i think Madonna in the above video
of his song is not understanding correctly exponential progress,
she is like thinking that we are becoming less human, but i don't
think so because the exponential progress of our humanity will
make us soon much much more powerful and much much more capable
so that we can much much more help humans, so i think that
this exponential progress is really hope, and here is my poem that i wrote about this exponential progress of our humanity:


Here is my new poem called: "This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress"

I am speaking about the following exponential progress, read about it here:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ

This exponential progress is even happening to capitalism,
read about it here:

Capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth

http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth

This exponential progress is even happening to Africa, read for example
here:

How e-commerce supports African business growth

Africa’s booming e-commerce sector can not only jump-start small businesses but also help large companies enter a market full of energized consumers.

https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/middle-east-and-africa/how-ecommerce-supports-african-business-growth

So i have just decided to think fast and to write fast my following
poem about this exponential progress, here it is:

--

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

Because it is a beautiful maturity but not the adolescence

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

And we have to beautifully tune it with the beautiful consensus

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

So let us not be just guesses but technicality and science

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

So let us be a beautiful expressiveness that is not helpless

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

So let us take together this beautiful breakfast

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

Since you are also like my so beautiful Princess

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

So let us be a beautiful presence for present and future acceptance



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

---



And here is more of my thoughts on this exponential progress of our humanity:

Here is the 6 D’s of Exponential Growth:

Digitalization: Once something goes from physical to digital, it gains
the ability to grow exponentially.

Deception: Initial exponential growth is such small increases (.01 to
.02) that it goes largely unnoticed.

Disruption: Either a new market is created, or an old one is overturned.
You either disrupt yourself, or you are disrupted.

Demonetization: The major assets in the industry will become free. Free
music, free reading, free communication.

Dematerialization: Removal of the original product entirely, lumping
alarm clocks, cameras, notebooks, and phones into one smartphone.

Democratization: The costs drop so low that the technology becomes
available to everyone.

Read more here:

The 6 Ds of Tech Disruption: A Guide to the Digital Economy

https://singularityhub.com/2016/11/22/the-6-ds-of-tech-disruption-a-guide-to-the-digital-economy/?fbclid=IwAR1Jx4VJYvIce-BJXeVcajBYjwdKvvP_2y4WOd-2DEtGvXnOye0yzkQVdQU&utm_content=bufferb9891&utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook-hub&utm_campaign=buffer

Also capitalism switches from linear to exponential growth

Read more here:

http://parisinnovationreview.com/articles-en/capitalism-switches-from-linear-to-exponential-growth

And read the following:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ


But as you have just noticed that it is also related to my following
thoughts:

The future of innovation is in software

I keep reading about how the future will be shaped by new cheaper fuel
or amazing new medications. I believe that we are misreading the trends.
Yes, we will have better medications and cheaper fuel in the future.
However, I believe we are clearly in the mist of an information
revolution. The future will be shaped by software, defined broadly.

Specifically, I believe that:

Tele-work, tele-play, tele-learning will soon represent 80% of our lives.

There is much more room for innovation in software than in hardware.

There are few ways to build a house, but many more ways to build a
virtual house.

Read more here:

https://lemire.me/blog/2008/10/27/the-future-of-innovation-is-in-software/

And this related to my following thoughts:

Dematerialising the future: what role can technology and consumers play?

I have just posted before about Dematerialization Through Services,
read it here:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/soc.culture.usa/rVZUcghUe5E

The above makes it clear that the evidence indicates that
‘dematerialization through services’ is not a valid policy for
reducing carbon emissions.

But Dematerialising is still important, read the following to notice it:

Dematerialising the future: what role can technology and consumers play?

https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/dematerialising-future-technology-consumers

Also read my following thoughts to notice:

About capitalism and the positive correlation between economic growth
and environmental performance..

As an economy expands, resource usage becomes increasingly efficient and
economies tend to move away from ecologically harmful behavior, while
raising the standard of living of its participants. In fact, the 2018
Yale Environmental Performance Index shows a clear positive correlation
between economic growth and environmental performance, read about it here:

https://epi.envirocenter.yale.edu/2018/report/category/hlt

So i think that we are on the right path, so as you are noticing that we
have to dematerialize much more so that to avoid Environmental problems,
but how will look like our near future that will be much more
dematerialized ? look here in the following video to notice that one of
our fellow techlead and software developer is doing it by much more
dematerializing his life and he is happy by doing it:

My minimalist apartment (as a millionaire)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EUeqHhbQWFc



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.