Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Questions for the self-proclaimed "more knowledgeable one", Hank Sienzant: Question # 25
40 views
Skip to first unread message
Gil Jesus
Oct 27, 2023, 4:31:42 AM10/27/23
to
There are many questions that I have about this case and I feel compelled to go to a reliable source, the self proclaimed "more knowledgeable" one, Hank Sienzant. I'm sure Hank in his infinite wisdom and knowledge will have no problem answering my questions.
There were last minute changes to the motorcade at Love Field. One of those changes was that the general who normally sat in the front seat between the SS agents was told he would not be riding in the limousine and placed in a car further back in the motorcade.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/motorcade-montage.jpg
QUESTION # 25: Why was this done ?
There were last minute changes to the motorcade at Love Field. One of those changes was that the general who normally sat in the front seat between the SS agents was told he would not be riding in the limousine and placed in a car further back in the motorcade.
https://gil-jesus.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/motorcade-montage.jpg
QUESTION # 25: Why was this done ?
Bud
Oct 27, 2023, 6:11:17 AM10/27/23
to
Ben Holmes
Oct 27, 2023, 9:21:19 AM10/27/23
to
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 03:11:16 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
wrote:
Chickenshit can't answer...
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
wrote:
Chickenshit can't answer...
So, according to Bugliosi, it was this "oval" shape that was
"virtually conclusive evidence" of an SBT?
Chickenshit is TERRIFIED of this simple honest question. He knows
that Bugliosi was a moron if he truly thought this... yet you can't
get Chickenshit to publicly acknowledge that Bugliosi said this.
It's a simple "Yes" or "No" question, and Chickenshit cannot cite
where he has EVER answered it. (Without immediately denying it.)
So it's going to keep getting asked until Chickenshit answers it.
Brian Doyle
Oct 27, 2023, 9:34:19 AM10/27/23
to
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 9:21:19 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 03:11:16 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> wrote:
>
There's a major event happening in the evidence however Ben and Gil are jealous so they are thread spamming for attention like little kids...
> On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 03:11:16 -0700 (PDT), Bud <sirs...@fast.net>
> wrote:
>
John Corbett
Oct 27, 2023, 11:39:31 AM10/27/23
to
Ben Holmes
Oct 27, 2023, 11:42:38 AM10/27/23
to
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 08:39:29 -0700 (PDT), John Corbett
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>For once, you are absolutely correct.
When a moron tells a troll that they are "correct" ... it doesn't mean
<geowri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>For once, you are absolutely correct.
anything...
Gil Jesus
Oct 28, 2023, 5:48:33 AM10/28/23
to
On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 11:42:38 AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
> When a moron tells a troll that they are "correct" ... it doesn't mean anything...
Is the enemy of your enemy your friend ?
> When a moron tells a troll that they are "correct" ... it doesn't mean anything...
It seems like when it comes to attacking you or myself, the result makes for strange bedfellows.
But if we weren't here, would Corbett be so agreeable with Doyle ?
I doubt it.
In fact, some of Corbett's responses to Doyle's posts prove me correct.
For example:
"This is all about which faction of wackos has the nuttiest theory."
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/1NrHXtJVdwI/m/dvsx9NCtAQAJ
"ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ"
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/fjoEXdMEdzk/m/OnclSbpNAgAJ
"I think we have just entered the Twilight Zone."
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/fjoEXdMEdzk/m/jE_hlfslAAAJ
"Any army of conspiracy hobbyists have been picking through the evidence for almost six
decades and now we are supposed to believe that Scrum Dumb has "cracked the case".
Call Sixty Minutes. I'm sure they would enjoy a good laugh as much as I have."
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/TnOHBWeKBCA/m/AElr8pAxBgAJ
Those are just a few.
But as his agreement with Doyle shows, Corbett will bend over and spread his asscheeks for anyone who insults us,
regardless of their belief in the case. That's what the LN trolls are here for--- to insult.
As for Doyle, he's the first one who screams at you , "GET OUT OF MY THREAD" when YOU post something,
but it's OK for him to come into someone else's thread just to cast aspersions.
He's not only an agent of disinformation, he's a hypocrite as well.
He's for peer review, as long as he's doing the reviewing. Others are not allowed to peer review him, however.
Doyle + Corbett. A typical example of how 1+1 can equal zero.
And yes, you are correct, their opinions don't mean anything.
They just haven't realized it yet.
Bud
Oct 28, 2023, 6:27:55 AM10/28/23
to
You just haven`t realized that yet.
Ben Holmes
Oct 30, 2023, 9:19:43 AM10/30/23
to
Ben Holmes
Oct 30, 2023, 9:19:43 AM10/30/23
to
On Sat, 28 Oct 2023 02:48:31 -0700 (PDT), Gil Jesus
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 11:42:38?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> When a moron tells a troll that they are "correct" ... it doesn't mean anything...
>
>Is the enemy of your enemy your friend ?
>It seems like when it comes to attacking you or myself, the result makes for strange bedfellows.
>
>But if we weren't here, would Corbett be so agreeable with Doyle ?
>I doubt it.
>
>In fact, some of Corbett's responses to Doyle's posts prove me correct.
>For example:
>
>"This is all about which faction of wackos has the nuttiest theory."
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/1NrHXtJVdwI/m/dvsx9NCtAQAJ
>
>"ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ"
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/fjoEXdMEdzk/m/OnclSbpNAgAJ
>
>"I think we have just entered the Twilight Zone."
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/fjoEXdMEdzk/m/jE_hlfslAAAJ
>
>"Any army of conspiracy hobbyists have been picking through the evidence for almost six
>decades and now we are supposed to believe that Scrum Dumb has "cracked the case".
>Call Sixty Minutes. I'm sure they would enjoy a good laugh as much as I have."
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/TnOHBWeKBCA/m/AElr8pAxBgAJ
>
>Those are just a few.
>
>But as his agreement with Doyle shows, Corbett will bend over and spread his asscheeks for anyone who insults us,
>regardless of their belief in the case. That's what the LN trolls are here for--- to insult.
>
>As for Doyle, he's the first one who screams at you , "GET OUT OF MY THREAD" when YOU post something,
>but it's OK for him to come into someone else's thread just to cast aspersions.
LOL... news to me. My filter deletes his posts, and I rarely see
anything...
>He's not only an agent of disinformation, he's a hypocrite as well.
>
>He's for peer review, as long as he's doing the reviewing. Others are not allowed to peer review him, however.
>
>Doyle + Corbett. A typical example of how 1+1 can equal zero.
>
>And yes, you are correct, their opinions don't mean anything.
>They just haven't realized it yet.
Well, I must give their mother's the benefit of doubt - they may
actually believe their children. But in the wider scheme of things,
you're right - no-one believes them, and to be honest, you can only
laugh at the stupidity on display...
<gjjma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 11:42:38?AM UTC-4, Ben Holmes wrote:
>> When a moron tells a troll that they are "correct" ... it doesn't mean anything...
>
>Is the enemy of your enemy your friend ?
>It seems like when it comes to attacking you or myself, the result makes for strange bedfellows.
>
>But if we weren't here, would Corbett be so agreeable with Doyle ?
>I doubt it.
>
>In fact, some of Corbett's responses to Doyle's posts prove me correct.
>For example:
>
>"This is all about which faction of wackos has the nuttiest theory."
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/1NrHXtJVdwI/m/dvsx9NCtAQAJ
>
>"ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ"
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/fjoEXdMEdzk/m/OnclSbpNAgAJ
>
>"I think we have just entered the Twilight Zone."
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/fjoEXdMEdzk/m/jE_hlfslAAAJ
>
>"Any army of conspiracy hobbyists have been picking through the evidence for almost six
>decades and now we are supposed to believe that Scrum Dumb has "cracked the case".
>Call Sixty Minutes. I'm sure they would enjoy a good laugh as much as I have."
>https://groups.google.com/g/alt.conspiracy.jfk/c/TnOHBWeKBCA/m/AElr8pAxBgAJ
>
>Those are just a few.
>
>But as his agreement with Doyle shows, Corbett will bend over and spread his asscheeks for anyone who insults us,
>regardless of their belief in the case. That's what the LN trolls are here for--- to insult.
>
>As for Doyle, he's the first one who screams at you , "GET OUT OF MY THREAD" when YOU post something,
>but it's OK for him to come into someone else's thread just to cast aspersions.
anything...
>He's not only an agent of disinformation, he's a hypocrite as well.
>
>He's for peer review, as long as he's doing the reviewing. Others are not allowed to peer review him, however.
>
>Doyle + Corbett. A typical example of how 1+1 can equal zero.
>
>And yes, you are correct, their opinions don't mean anything.
>They just haven't realized it yet.
actually believe their children. But in the wider scheme of things,
you're right - no-one believes them, and to be honest, you can only
laugh at the stupidity on display...
0 new messages