In any case, everyone who cares to is encouraged to contribute
anything they free might tempt Healy to make a response. I`ll start of
with some visuals, the first I`ve entitled "Healy making breakfast"..
http://cannazine.co.uk/images/stories/drugs/heroin-needle-and-candle.jpg
Healy`s last date. A little advice Healy, when you take a tranny to
dinner, don`t take her to a hot dog stand...
http://i8.photobucket.com/albums/a17/sfboi/tranny.jpg
And a little going away present, a photo of his hero, Ben Holmes
(doughy bastard, isn`t he?). I`m sure Healy can use his knowledge of
film alteration to change the face of the guy riding Ben`s back to his
own.
http://kodokanjudo.info/images/seoi2.jpg
I know you are in a cold sweat now, dying to post some nonsensical
remark, but you have to use your willpower if you are ever going to
get the newsgroup monkey off your back. This is only step one, and we
have a long way to go (I haven`t figured out what the other eleven
are, maybe we`ll just do something like this every month for twelve
months). So, gird them loins, suck it up, perhaps tie your hands to
your chair to keep from responding, and with the help of your friends
on the newsgroup, we`ll get you through this.
Roflmao Bud, that Tranny is too good looking for Healy!
The other picture would be breakfast, lunch, dinner and in between
snacks.
Healy will not be able to control himself. He makes these farewell
speeches once every 6 months and never gets any support from his CT
buddies. They probably are hoping he's finally leaving too.
Of course he only lasts about an hour tops, if even that, before he
comes back with more stupidity so that we can humiliate him further.
It's like hanging a pork chop in front of a dogs face...he'll keep
chasing it but he's never going to catch it. Healy barks like a lapdog
every time his name is mentioned. He barks for his Ct buddies thinking
he is going to scare us off. His buddies on the other hand, ignore him
except Holmes when he needs his ass cleaned again, or Jesus when we've
pointed out how retarded he is being once again.
Can't wait to see step 2....I'll bet money Healy can't survive step 1
LOL
I don`t know, Justy, call me a crazy optimist, but I think with our
encouragement and support, he might be able to overcome this terrible
compulsion. I think he might even have the strength to change his
tranny-chasing ways with our help, but I think we have to start small
and work up his list of problems. Come to think of it, Healy`s
problems might require a freight elevator instead of steps.
Good idea, Bud, but I think Step One should require Healy to step up
like a Man, admit who he is and stop hiding behind that "Aeffects"
thing. Oh, I know why he does it. He doesn't want people he knows
Googling him by name and finding out that he's a bit off (actually,
way off) kilter.. but even so. Be a Man, Healy.
JGL
ROTFLMAO Bud! Ben seems to particularly enjoy being taken from behind, as
it were.
> It's like hanging a pork chop in front of a dogs face...he'll keep
> chasing it but he's never going to catch it. Healy barks like a lapdog
> every time his name is mentioned. He barks for his Ct buddies thinking
> he is going to scare us off. His buddies on the other hand, ignore him
> except Holmes when he needs his ass cleaned again, or Jesus when we've
> pointed out how retarded he is being once again.
SPEAKING OF RETARDED
Justme1952 accused an "imposter" of posting a post of his to other
newsgroups, when in fact HE was the one who cross-posted it:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/a1714b6d2ffd26fd
When he found out that his/her post was on other newsgroups, he
flipped out, blaming the "imposter" for creating "bogus" newsgroups :
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/55eea239ebd9c15d
Proof that it was HE who cross-posted it came to light when he sought
out John McAdams, who checked and said that the posting had come from
JUSTME'S server (Roadrunner) and no one else's.
On comparing Justme's ISP with that of the poster, Mcadams posted:
"It looks like the same ISP as the troll".
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/443d90f32be42d77
------------------------------------------------------------
These unbelievable actions from a self described "Information
Technology" EXPERT with over 12 years experience.
You have more patience with the trolls than I do, Gil - I suspect that even
first-time lurkers already know that there are nuts everywhere - and can quickly
figure out who they are in this forum.
By the way, care to repost your list of 50 questions to start off the new year?
It's always good to remind the kooks that they don't have a leg to stand on.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ben Holmes
Learn to Make Money with a Website - http://www.burningknife.com
Hop to it Gilly, Benny the fat dwarf has a vacancy for a new lapdog.
Maybe Bud's onto something here. But I'm certainly not going to wager
my January "CIA Disinfo, Inc." check on Healy's abstinence. But I'm
rooting for him. (Well, sort of.)
LMAO Sam, and he did too. Jesus has been waiting to take over licking
Bens balls....
he's become the new lapdog.
I love when Jesus takes the time to post the little bio he's made of
me, it gives me the opportunity to tell him what a skanky piece of
fecal matter he is.
I'll take the publicity, because it's letting everyone know what a
lying, homophobic, bigot he is. LOL
<snicker> I`m not sure it was fair to call Ben "doughy", I`m sure
the pajamas add 40 pounds.
<snicker> Gil isn`t house trained. Of course, neither was Healy
(it`s fun to talk about him in the past tense).
Good call though, Gil did just what he was told, and reposted his
questions. Shows promise, he can be obedient, but can nuzzle his wet
snout in Ben`s crotch like Healy? Only time will tell.
Stay strong, stoner! You can do this! Well, who am I kidding,
probably not.
> Maybe Bud's onto something here. But I'm certainly not going to wager
> my January "CIA Disinfo, Inc." check on Healy's abstinence. But I'm
> rooting for him. (Well, sort of.)
This is great, he has publicly gagged himself so I have him right
where I want him. I can ridicule him, and if he responds, he exposes
himself as being weak with no willpower. Check and mate, CT scum.
What more classic troll is there than the "I'm leaving", followed
by days of watching the idiots twitter "He's still gone"?
Thank God for you Lone Nutters. No matter how small or
old Usenet gets, you'll always gobble the flamebait no
matter how many times it's been used.
-- Bill Cleere
"I prefer the pleasure of writing bits of nonsense to that of wearing
an embroidered coat which costs 800 francs." (Stendhal)
>>> "What more classic troll is there than the "I'm leaving", followed by days of watching the idiots twitter "He's still gone"?" <<<
It'll never get to that point, of course. Healy's not going anyplace,
despite his promises.
>>> "Thank God for you Lone Nutters. No matter how small or old Usenet gets, you'll always gobble the flamebait no matter how many times it's been used." <<<
LOL. As if a crackpipe named Healy is smart enough to think up a gag
like that "flamebait" one.
Get real.
LOL.
REPRISE:
>>> "Thank God for you Lone Nutters. No matter how small or old Usenet gets, you'll always gobble the flamebait no matter how many times it's been used." <<<
And thank God for the CT-Kooks. No matter how deep into their bag of
make-believe and unsupportable theories they have to dig, they're
willing to dig still deeper. God bless 'em.
And Franco is still dead.
> Thank God for you Lone Nutters. No matter how small or
> old Usenet gets, you'll always gobble the flamebait no
> matter how many times it's been used.
Like fine wine, flamebait gets better with age. What would you have
us discuss, Bill? The Case? With who?
Appears Ben (the lady in yellow pants) Holmes has fired Healy and
hired Jesus. Man, 2009 is going to be fun!!!
So you'll continue to gag on that hook indefinitely? Suit yourself.
>>>> "Thank God for you Lone Nutters. No matter how small or old Usenet
>>>> gets, you'll always gobble the flamebait no matter how many times it's
>>>> been used." <<<
>
> LOL. As if a crackpipe
"crackpipe"? Odd epithet..... Think of yourself, and something
more appropriate will spring to mind. "Shitpuke", for example.
> named Healy is smart enough to think up a gag
> like that "flamebait" one.
>
> Get real.
ZING!
> LOL.
ZANG!
[....?] Aren't you supposed to go "Get a Life" here?
> REPRISE:
>
>
>>>> "Thank God for you Lone Nutters. No matter how small or old Usenet
>>>> gets, you'll always gobble the flamebait no matter how many times it's
>>>> been used." <<<
>
> And thank God for the CT-Kooks. No matter how deep into their bag of
> make-believe and unsupportable theories they have to dig, they're
> willing to dig still deeper. God bless 'em.
Yep, the Warren Hearings certainly are a bottomless pit of
make-believe and unsupportable theories. I don't fancy we'll ever
run short of material.
No, it doesn't, actually.
> What would you have
> us discuss, Bill? The Case? With who?
This is a bit of a stretch, I admit, but you could try thinking about it.
>>> "Yep, the Warren Hearings certainly are a bottomless pit of make-believe and unsupportable theories. I don't fancy we'll ever run short of material." <<<
Prob'ly not. Not as long as you kooks are on the planet to mangle the
hell out of all 27 total volumes.
Right, Billy?
Nope. Quite wrong, just as one would have expected.
>>> "Nope. Quite wrong, just as one would have expected." <<<
Oh, you mean you aren't going to mangle the hell out of the WC's
report?
Good.
Then Oswald was a lone gunman, just like the WC concluded.
Well done. In your lame (and extremely rude) post-editing,
you've managed to come up with as about as convincing
an argument for the Lone Nut theory as I've heard yet.
LOL. I edited NOTHING. I included your entire post in my last reply.
You're goofy (as per usual).
I invite anyone who's interesting in the maunderings of
this compulsive liar to inspect the business for him or
herself.
>>> "I invite anyone who's interesting in the maunderings of this compulsive liar to inspect the business for him or herself." <<<
LOL. What a kook.
I think Cleere is giving us all "the business".
BTW, (as if anybody cares), when I said:
"I edited NOTHING. I included your entire post in my last
reply."
....I was referring to including all of YOUR WORDS in my last reply,
which is how I always send my messages on forums and NGs. I.E., I
never include the ENTIRE rambling and needless verbiage of a previous
message after I hit the "reply" button. I only copy the portions of a
person's post that I'll be replying to....which is exactly what I did
right here (and your entire reply to my last reply is included here):
www.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy.jfk/msg/7e9835b704384b30
It`s an acquired taste, Bill. Look, if I saw a retard in the real
world, I probably would ignore him. If I was in a wicked mood, I might
tease or mock him. I`d never try to reason with him. Here, I can tease
and mock retards from the safety of my own home, and I don`t have to
deal with the disapproving stares of onlookers (except for you, Bill).
> > What would you have
> > us discuss, Bill? The Case? With who?
>
> This is a bit of a stretch, I admit, but you could try thinking about it.
Thinking is for toilet seats, not newsgroups. It`s old watching CT
jockeys beating the dead horse of conspiracy as if it`s going to get
up and win the race for them.
1. I propose Healy skips steps 1-11 and go right to step 12. Take a
long walk on a short pier.