Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Anti-Savage Nation

2 views
Skip to first unread message

obamao.sux....@gmail.com

unread,
May 6, 2009, 8:05:41 AM5/6/09
to
British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of
mass-murdering terrorists.

http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=34711

The Liberal Fascist thought police > HEIL HITLER!

Speeders & Drunk Drivers are MURDERERS

unread,
May 6, 2009, 12:52:42 PM5/6/09
to
obamao.sux....@gmail.com wrote in news:352e349a-7663-4a85-a19e-
69b5d4...@g20g2000vba.googlegroups.com:

I hate this Wiener idiot but let him speak. All the govt does nowadays is
call someone a "hater" and then their rights are gone.

Billary/2009

unread,
May 6, 2009, 7:18:08 PM5/6/09
to

The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy
and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how
strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that
makes the gub'ment's black list.

Mike C.

unread,
May 6, 2009, 9:13:25 PM5/6/09
to

Savage spends a lot of time screaming about people he thinks shouldn't be in
this country, but he won't give another country the same benefit. Go figure.


Billary/2009

unread,
May 6, 2009, 9:29:09 PM5/6/09
to

Savage is as real as they come. Unlike that idiot Dobermann or that
Dyke Maddowoman.

Mike C.

unread,
May 6, 2009, 9:51:14 PM5/6/09
to

Whatever that means.

Savage is just a loud-mouthed asshole. If that's "real" to you, enjoy.


z

unread,
May 6, 2009, 10:07:56 PM5/6/09
to
On May 6, 7:18 pm, "Billary/2009" <BillaryClinton2...@gmail.com>
wrote:

one who happens to have called for the deportation of muslims, members
of the ACLU, and anchor babies. gee, i don't recall all the
conservatives standing up for human rights at the time.

z

unread,
May 6, 2009, 10:08:28 PM5/6/09
to
On May 6, 9:29 pm, "Billary/2009" <BillaryClinton2...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Savage is as real as they come. Unlike that idiot Dobermann or that
> Dyke Maddowoman

so are dog turds!

Billary/2009

unread,
May 6, 2009, 10:31:05 PM5/6/09
to

Wrong again hockey puck. I recall GW pushing for "amnesty" for
illegals. And protecting America after the gloves came off. I don't
agree with Savage. But he is a non-violent person using his 1st
amndment right to voice his discontent. McCarthy did the same thing to
the Communist didn't he?

Telamon

unread,
May 6, 2009, 10:46:37 PM5/6/09
to
In article
<1a27254b-1f26-472b...@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com>,
z <gzuc...@snail-mail.net> wrote:

So what do you call this, liberal dog turd logic? I've heard before that
the logic liberals employ was not worth a dog's turd but this is the
first time I've heard one owe up to it.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Seon Ferguson

unread,
May 7, 2009, 1:03:14 AM5/7/09
to
On Wed, 6 May 2009 16:18:08 -0700 (PDT), "Billary/2009"
<BillaryCl...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy
>and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how
>strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that
>makes the gub'ment's black list.

I think both are witch hunts.

C Gattman

unread,
May 7, 2009, 1:29:21 AM5/7/09
to
On May 6, 5:05 am, obamao.sux.donki.dix...@gmail.com wrote:

It's their friggin' country. They don't tell us what to do and we
don't tell them.

Any other rights of theirs that anybody would like to step on? Maybe
we should just open our borders to anybody who wants to come in?

England's leading by example: They get to decide who comes into their
country. Not the US or anybody else. We've got all kinds of Al
Qaieda types on the no-fly list. Just imagine if they all decided to
sue Homeland Security.

-c

Telamon

unread,
May 7, 2009, 1:53:32 AM5/7/09
to
In article
<d0e998b7-96c0-4f28...@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
C Gattman <gat...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On May 6, 5:05�am, obamao.sux.donki.dix...@gmail.com wrote:
> > British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of
> > mass-murdering terrorists.
> >
> > http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=34711
> >
> > The Liberal Fascist thought police > HEIL HITLER!
>
> It's their friggin' country. They don't tell us what to do and we
> don't tell them.
>
> Any other rights of theirs that anybody would like to step on? Maybe
> we should just open our borders to anybody who wants to come in?

< SNIP >

What about Savages rights? Some Brit government hack decided they didn't
like him and lumped him in with murders and criminals advocating
violence so banned him from entering the country just because they don't
like what he stands for. That is defamation of character.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

dave

unread,
May 7, 2009, 7:52:00 AM5/7/09
to

All the so-called lefties on TV have held their noses and defended Mr.
Weiner. Perhaps this is because they realize he is joking and that his
audience is a bunch of gullible morons.

dave

unread,
May 7, 2009, 7:56:02 AM5/7/09
to

Jacqui Smith is not held in very high regard by the Brits. Mr. Weiner
should wear this as a badge of honor.

Mike C.

unread,
May 7, 2009, 7:55:15 AM5/7/09
to
Telamon wrote:
> In article
> <d0e998b7-96c0-4f28...@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,
> C Gattman <gat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On May 6, 5:05 am, obamao.sux.donki.dix...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of
>>> mass-murdering terrorists.
>>>
>>> http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=34711
>>>
>>> The Liberal Fascist thought police > HEIL HITLER!
>>
>> It's their friggin' country. They don't tell us what to do and we
>> don't tell them.
>>
>> Any other rights of theirs that anybody would like to step on? Maybe
>> we should just open our borders to anybody who wants to come in?
>
> < SNIP >
>
> What about Savages rights?

What rights? He's not a British citizen, and his US Constitutional rights to
be a scathing ass don't extend past the US borders.

> Some Brit government hack decided they
> didn't like him and lumped him in with murders and criminals
> advocating violence so banned him from entering the country just
> because they don't like what he stands for. That is defamation of
> character.

So a loudmouth asshole who, yaks on the radio all day attacking people,
doesn't like it when he's attacked back. Boo hoo.

Mike C.

unread,
May 7, 2009, 8:05:06 AM5/7/09
to

I'm sure he's thrilled, this is more publicity than he's received in ages.

My guess is that the Brits will end up apologizing all over the place for
this, and the right will be able to claim a "victory over oppression and
tyranny".

~ RHF

unread,
May 7, 2009, 8:45:20 AM5/7/09
to
On May 6, 5:05 am, obamao.sux.donki.dix...@gmail.com wrote:

- British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage
- the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists.
-
- http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=34711
-
- The Liberal Fascist thought police > HEIL HITLER!

So the UK Says "No" to Michael Savage :
http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2008/s2563493.htm

Which just helps to Prove that "Freedom of Speech"
is Dead in the UK.
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103819122

Oops . . . but then Michael Savage is Banned on NPR Too !
-?- Has Michael Savage ever been a 'guest' on
any NPR Program : The Topic Yes -but- a 'quest'
never : Now that is real Fair-and-Balanced.

While the the UK Releases "Abu Izzadeen"
a know Terrorist Supporter and Instigator of
Public Unrest in the UK.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awr8_ODVJ08
http://www.indopia.in/India-usa-uk-news/latest-news/567192/International/2/20/2

* Izzadeen convicted of raising Funds for
Terrorists and Supporting Terrorism Overseas.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Izzadeen

* Izzadeen was shown in a Video Clip
provoking Muslims"To Kill Americans".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Ghurabaa

* Izzadeenled a radical Islamic Group to storm
into the moderate Mosque in central London.
http://www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_content.php?id=941091&lang=eng_news

So it would seam like Advocating 'Killing
Americans" is 'good sport' in the UK -and-
Breaking into Mosques is also just 'good
sport' in the UK -and- Funding Terrorism
in Other Countries is A-OK in the UK
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7paINhyXmk4
- - - but . . . Freedom of Speech
THAT'S A NO NO IN THE UK ~ RHF
.
.

dave

unread,
May 7, 2009, 8:54:27 AM5/7/09
to
~ RHF wrote:

> -
> - The Liberal Fascist thought police > HEIL HITLER!

There is no such thing as a Liberal Fascist. Liberals and fascists are
each others' enemies. If you hate liberals you like support fascism.

MNMikeW

unread,
May 7, 2009, 10:15:44 AM5/7/09
to

"Billary/2009" <BillaryCl...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ef61fb53-e120-48e3...@p4g2000vba.googlegroups.com...

----------------------------------------------------------------
Free speech is a one-way street to dopey libs.


(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be: www.LayoffRemedy.com

unread,
May 7, 2009, 11:52:05 AM5/7/09
to
On Wed, 6 May 2009 05:05:41 -0700 (PDT),
[<Moronic@Alias>] wrote:


> British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the
> equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists.

Yep. Really SMART cookies, those Brits!

We'd probably be FAR better off these days if we'd
LOST the Revolutionary War!

HERE'S a good summation of the banning of that
hateful LOSER, from across the pond:

INTELLIGENT BRITS won't allow POND-SCUM BIGOT,
Michael Weiner ("Savage"), to INFEST their country!


SOURCE:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/16-banned-from-britain-named-and-shamed-1679127.html

http://
www.
independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/
16-banned-from-britain-named-and-shamed-1679127.html

Named and shamed: the 16 barred from UK
By Beverley Rouse, Press Association
Tuesday, 5 May 2009

Sixteen people banned from entering the UK were "named and shamed"
by the Home Office today.

Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said she decided to make public the names
of 16 people banned since October so others could better understand what
sort of behaviour Britain was not prepared to tolerate.

The list includes hate preachers, anti-gay protesters and a far-right
US talk show host.

"I think it's important that people understand the sorts of values and
sorts of standards that we have here, the fact that it's a privilege to
come and the sort of things that mean you won't be welcome in this
country," Ms Smith told GMTV.

"Coming to this country is a privilege. If you can't live by the rules
that we live by, the standards and the values that we live by, we should
exclude you from this country and, what's more, now we will make public
those people that we have excluded.

"We are publishing the names of 16 of those that we have excluded since
October. We are telling people who they are and why it is we don't want
them in this country."

She said the number of people excluded from Britain had risen from an
average of two a month to five a month since October.

The list of the 16 "least wanted" includes radio talk show host Michael
Savage, real name Michael Weiner.

"This is someone who has fallen into the category of fomenting hatred,
of such extreme views and expressing them in such a way that it is actually
likely to cause inter-community tension or even violence if that person
were allowed into the country," Ms Smith told BBC Breakfast.

Also named are American Baptist pastor Fred Waldron Phelps Snr and his
daughter Shirley Phelps-Roper, who have picketed the funerals of Aids
victims and claimed the deaths of US soldiers are a punishment for US
tolerance of homosexuality.

"If people have so clearly overstepped the mark in terms of the way not
just that they are talking but the sort of attitudes that they are
expressing to the extent that we think that this is likely to cause or have
the potential to cause violence or inter-community tension in this country,
then actually I think the right thing is not to let them into the country
in the first place. Not to open the stable door then try to close it
later," Ms Smith said.

"It's a privilege to come to this country. There are certain behaviours
that mean you forfeit that privilege."

Hamas MP Yunis Al-Astal, Jewish extremist Mike Guzovsky, former Ku Klux
Klan grand wizard Stephen Donald Black and neo-Nazi Erich Gliebe are also
on the list released today.

Artur Ryno and Pavel Skachevsky, the former leaders of a violent Russian
skinhead gang which committed 20 racially motivated murders, are also
banned from coming to Britain. Both are currently in prison.

Making up the rest of the 16 named by the Home Office today are
preachers Wadgy Abd El Hamied Mohamed Ghoneim, Abdullah Qadri Al Ahdal,
Safwat Hijazi and Amir Siddique, Muslim activist Abdul Ali Musa (previously
Clarence Reams), murderer and Hezbollah terrorist Samir Al Quntar and
Kashmiri terror group leader Nasr Javed.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =

GOOD for the BRITS!!

SMART PEOPLE!!

And -- NO RRR Cult for THEM!!

~ RHF

unread,
May 7, 2009, 12:36:27 PM5/7/09
to

dave, Dave. DAVE !
You are becoming a real Obama-Speaker© {Truth Denier}
.
The ObamaSpeakers© Denying That "Liberal-Fascism" Exists
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/20943adbe30480e1
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/22d3aa8461de1401
~ibid~
.
The Validity of the Term "Liberal Fascist" - Can It Exist? - Does It
Exist
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/af4569002bba33ca
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/efbc4aa52f959d40
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/55070611dd003a01
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/dee38e44a0d1c320
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/f95e688bb0612c63
~ibid~
.
Obama-Regime© Using Left-Wing Radial High Tech
Media Shout-Down BARACKING©
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/8e579a6b903e62b1
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/3adda4284110e71f
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/59dcfdaa2b7cbc2d
.
Don't Let The Truth Be Told : Manufacturing the Democrat
Half-Truth and Liberal Media Lie by Distorting the Facts
and Reality.
~ibid~
.
Therefore It Follows . . . -from- Wikipedia
The National Socialist German Workers' Party
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Socialist_German_Workers%E2%80%...
(German: Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei)
Abbreviated NSDAP), commonly known in English
as the NAZI Party
(Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei)
was a political party in Germany between 1919 and 1945.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi
It was known as the German Workers' Party (DAP)
.
Today we have 21st Century "Liberal-Fascism"
and the Liberal-Fascist Agents of Social Change.
-aka- The Democrat Party of the USA attempting
to Socialize the Nation under their One Party Control
with their Charismatic Leader {Totalitarian} Barack
'Hussein' Obama . -aka- Change You Can Believe In !
-aka- "The Third Way" via Fascism Authoritarian {Elitist}
and Totalitarian
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Third_position
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authoritarian
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Totalitarianism
.
The Validity of the Term "Liberal-Fascist"
- Can Liberal-Fascism Exist?
- Do Liberal-Fascists Exist ?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/af4569002bba33ca
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/efbc4aa52f959d40
~ibid~
.
Denying the potential existence of 'Liberal-Fascism'
does not change the fact that 'Liberal-Fascism' may
and can exist in the world today.
.
Liberal-Fascist :
Employing the Justification, Means and Tactics of
Fascism {National Socialism} to Achieve the Ends
of a One Party Liberal {Socialist} Agenda is what
has morphed into "Liberal-Fascism" and those who
are the Agents-of-One-Party-Socialist-Change are
in-fact Liberal-Fascist.
* Classically Fascism had one reasoned definition
in the early 1900s. -but- Time Changes Words and
their Meanings . . .
.
Time often changes Words and the Meaning
of Words; and that is part of the Evolution of
Language with the Passage of Time.
.
Hence the use of the 'Hyphen' between the Two
Words Linking Them and Uniting Them into One
Compound Word with a New Meaning and Usage.
"Liberal-Fascism" & "Liberal-Fascist"
.
Liberal & Fascist have now become One Newly
'Hyphenated' {Combination} Word "Liberal-Fascist"
with it's own new unique meaning.
.
ObamaNistas© {Liberal-Fascists} Worried About
"The Great Leader's" Socialist Economic Competence
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/9876df6e26d1b4c8
~ibid~
.
dave - history could be repeating itself
all over again - idtars ~ RHF {Hey That's Me ~ibid~}
.
.

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
May 7, 2009, 1:43:39 PM5/7/09
to
Michael Savage is A OK.I like to listen to him rantin n raving.
cuhulin

dxAce

unread,
May 7, 2009, 2:01:11 PM5/7/09
to

cuh...@webtv.net wrote:

> Michael Savage is A OK.I like to listen to him rantin n raving.

Me too, and, as far as I know, he has a genuine PhD and didn't have to lie about
having one.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

And, as always, don't let your children attend Louisville Technical Institute.
They've hired at least one dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, and who knows,
there may be more dufi there.

WQGT447

unread,
May 7, 2009, 2:16:35 PM5/7/09
to
On May 6, 10:53 pm, Telamon
<telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:
> In article
> <d0e998b7-96c0-4f28-a5ef-fa1312ef8...@v23g2000pro.googlegroups.com>,

You speak as though he has a character to be defamed. Frankly, MS is
his own worst enemy - his thoughts are controlled by his gall bladder,
and it shows.

z

unread,
May 7, 2009, 2:54:51 PM5/7/09
to
On May 6, 10:46 pm, Telamon
<telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid> wrote:

> So what do you call this, liberal dog turd logic? I've heard before that
> the logic liberals employ was not worth a dog's turd but this is the
> first time I've heard one owe up to it.
>
> --
> Telamon
> Ventura, California

i think the word you're searching for is OWN up to it. thank your
teachers.

z

unread,
May 7, 2009, 2:56:20 PM5/7/09
to
On May 6, 10:31 pm, "Billary/2009" <BillaryClinton2...@gmail.com>
> the Communist didn't he?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

so you're saying a nation doesn't get to have any choice over who they
let in? or is it just that they don't get to choose whether americans
get to visit? or rightwingers? or anybody who's not arab/muslim? i
don't see where you're going with this.

z

unread,
May 7, 2009, 2:58:14 PM5/7/09
to
On May 7, 10:15 am, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...@aol.com> wrote:

> Free speech is a one-way street to dopey libs.

news to conservatives: the UK is a totally separate country from the
US! It's true! In fact, the US broke away from them, because they
wanted MORE LIBERTY! And the British who didn't join in chose the way
they wanted to run their country! It's true! Look it up!

z

unread,
May 7, 2009, 3:00:10 PM5/7/09
to
On May 7, 1:53 am, Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid>
wrote:

> What about Savages rights? Some Brit government hack decided they didn't
> like him and lumped him in with murders and criminals advocating
> violence so banned him from entering the country just because they don't
> like what he stands for. That is defamation of character.
>
> --
> Telamon
> Ventura, California

not sure what part of the British Bill of Rights gives foreign radio
hosts the right to enter Britain free of challenge. Maybe you could
point me to it.

z

unread,
May 7, 2009, 3:22:57 PM5/7/09
to
On May 7, 1:03 am, Seon Ferguson <seo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 May 2009 16:18:08 -0700 (PDT), "Billary/2009"
>
> <BillaryClinton2...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy
> >and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how
> >strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that
> >makes the gub'ment's black list.
>
> I think both are witch hunts.

actually, i think it is pretty silly in savage's case. his visit isn't
going to "stir up trouble" any more than his work from the US does, if
any.

where this kind of thing makes sense is with some of the neoNazis,
etc. who, under the guise of "journalism" or "reporting on events" are
in fact involved in planning and executing them. AFAIK, Savage isn't
involved in anything like that; and if his diatribes are "incentives"
to violence or some such, then they're just as incentivizing coming in
via the intertubes from the US, so there's nothing to gain by slamming
the door on him personally.

bottom line is, though, that the brits do have the right to run their
country as they want to, without regard to how the US would do it.

two things i particularly enjoy about the uproar, thought:
1) Savage's reference to this violating the Magna Carta. He must have
studied a different copy than I did. Here, Mike: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_carta
1a) this being from the same guy who said "Don't tell me they're
entitled to a rational defense, I'm so sick of this" in response to
the decision in Boumediene v. Bush upholding the right of habeas
corpus, no less. Here, Mike: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_carta#Rights_still_in_force_today
2) His threat of having his listeners boycott Britain from their
future travel plans. Yeah, the total number of passports among
Savage's fan base wouldn't fill a supersized beverage container.

MNMikeW

unread,
May 7, 2009, 3:23:57 PM5/7/09
to

"z" <gzuc...@snail-mail.net> wrote in message
news:3c1501d9-3fe2-411d...@j12g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...


Are you saying there are no dopy libs in the UK?


Dragonblaze

unread,
May 7, 2009, 3:58:38 PM5/7/09
to
On May 7, 8:22 pm, z <gzuck...@snail-mail.net> wrote:

[snip]

> 2) His threat of having  his listeners boycott Britain from their
> future travel plans. Yeah, the total number of passports among
> Savage's fan base wouldn't fill a supersized beverage container.

Besides that, what makes him think we'd want his fans in here either?
We already banned a couple of the Phelpses from entering.

Billary/2009

unread,
May 7, 2009, 4:02:18 PM5/7/09
to
On May 7, 8:52 am, "(¯`·.¸Craig Chilton¸.·´¯) Unemployed? No need to
be:

>       GOOD for the BRITS!!
>
>       SMART PEOPLE!!
>
>       And -- NO RRR Cult for THEM!!

No one hates like faggots hate. This faggot takes the prize.

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
May 7, 2009, 4:16:02 PM5/7/09
to
And Michael Savage rides his bicycle to Fisherman's Wharf.You can hear
the chain clanking against the chain guard.
Clank,,, Clank,,, Clank,,,,,,,
cuhulin

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
May 7, 2009, 4:18:17 PM5/7/09
to
U K is not a Country.U K is a Kingdom.
United Kingdom.
America is a Republic.
cuhulin

dave

unread,
May 7, 2009, 4:53:13 PM5/7/09
to

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

(�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to be: www.LayoffRemedy.com

unread,
May 7, 2009, 6:06:35 PM5/7/09
to
On Thu, 7 May 2009 13:02:18 -0700 (PDT),
"Billary/2009" <BillaryCl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (�`�.�Craig Chilton�.���) Unemployed? No need to
> be <www.LayoffRemedy.com> wrote:


>> � � � GOOD for the BRITS!!


>>
>> � � � SMART PEOPLE!!
>>
>> � � � And -- NO RRR Cult for THEM!!

> No one hates like [gay] hate.

Outright LIE. To see the REALLY hateful schmucks,
just look at the ignorant and **bigoted** RRR and LDS
cultists.

> This [gay] takes the prize.

FIRST, the answer to your abject STUPIDITY.

THEN, the post you DUCKED the points of, will follow.

(1) To the doltish homophobic bigots who are too
DUMB to realize that 90% of all who support
EQUAL rights for Gays are ALLIED egalitarians
who are STRAIGHT ---

FEEL FREE
to think I'm gay,
if that's what rings yer bell.

That would bother me precisely as much as it would if you
thought were left-handed.

And I'm not either one.

Handedness, sexual orientation, race, and eye color are
all merely TRIVIAL variations of NORMALCY.

Ignorance knows no bounds, and homophobes are the
PROOF.

(2) Previous post follows:


SOURCE:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/16-banned-from-britain-named-and-shamed-1679127.html

GOOD for the BRITS!!

homepc

unread,
May 7, 2009, 7:22:30 PM5/7/09
to
England has a large and concentrated Muslim population to deal with that
easily dwarfs anything that exists in the USA or CDA. I would speculate
that labeling Mr. Savage in this fashion only serves to contain and placate
a
smoldering and growing problem on their own soil and in neighboring Europe.

I'm in Canada and listen to the Savage show on KFAB 1110 AM for no more than
20" at a time. A lot he has
to say is off the wall and the man clearly has little or no respect for his
audience. However there is a thread of truth to be found in some of his
rants. The news media is more concerned about a H1M1 flu epidemic that
hasn't
really killed anymore people than an ordinary flu -- yet chooses to downplay
or ignore the effect of criminals, weapons and drugs being smuggled north
into the US from Mexico and the countless lives jeopardized by these
activities. Governments around the world make nice with the Saudis and
their Muslim friends to ensure an uninterrupted flow of oil, while numerous
wealthy Saudi families continue to fund various terrorist interests without
consequence.

Mr. Savage is largely the architect of his own grief. Sadly, the really
important stuff he occasionally brings to light gets quickly covered back up
again by the
garbage he spews on air.

<obamao.sux....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:352e349a-7663-4a85...@g20g2000vba.googlegroups.com...


> British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of
> mass-murdering terrorists.
>

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
May 7, 2009, 7:25:10 PM5/7/09
to
Derry is still Derry to me.
cuhulin

Seon Ferguson

unread,
May 7, 2009, 7:32:53 PM5/7/09
to
On Thu, 7 May 2009 12:22:57 -0700 (PDT), z <gzuc...@snail-mail.net>
wrote:

>actually, i think it is pretty silly in savage's case. his visit isn't
>going to "stir up trouble" any more than his work from the US does, if
>any.
>
>where this kind of thing makes sense is with some of the neoNazis,
>etc. who, under the guise of "journalism" or "reporting on events" are
>in fact involved in planning and executing them. AFAIK, Savage isn't
>involved in anything like that; and if his diatribes are "incentives"
>to violence or some such, then they're just as incentivizing coming in
>via the intertubes from the US, so there's nothing to gain by slamming
>the door on him personally.
>

Exactly he is not preaching hatred or trying to cause violence towards
the Jews or any other minority group. If I am wrong please provide
quotes.

>bottom line is, though, that the brits do have the right to run their
>country as they want to, without regard to how the US would do it.
>
>two things i particularly enjoy about the uproar, thought:
>1) Savage's reference to this violating the Magna Carta. He must have
>studied a different copy than I did. Here, Mike: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_carta
>1a) this being from the same guy who said "Don't tell me they're
>entitled to a rational defense, I'm so sick of this" in response to
>the decision in Boumediene v. Bush upholding the right of habeas
>corpus, no less. Here, Mike: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magna_carta#Rights_still_in_force_today
>2) His threat of having his listeners boycott Britain from their
>future travel plans. Yeah, the total number of passports among
>Savage's fan base wouldn't fill a supersized beverage container.

He is the 3rd largest talk show host in America. But it still won't be
much of an affect.

Seon Ferguson

unread,
May 7, 2009, 7:34:40 PM5/7/09
to
On Thu, 7 May 2009 09:15:44 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMi...@aol.com>
wrote:

>
>The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy
>and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how
>strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that
>makes the gub'ment's black list.
>
>----------------------------------------------------------------
>Free speech is a one-way street to dopey libs.

I don't support Bush so I guess you would put me into this category.
Trouble is I support the free speech of Michael Savage, Ann Colter,
Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and all the other right wing hacks.

Seon Ferguson

unread,
May 7, 2009, 7:35:37 PM5/7/09
to
On Thu, 7 May 2009 13:02:18 -0700 (PDT), "Billary/2009"
<BillaryCl...@gmail.com> wrote:

What a hypocrite. You go on about how the liberals hate and use
hateful language like that. You make me sick.

Telamon

unread,
May 7, 2009, 9:26:54 PM5/7/09
to
In article <4A0321E6...@milestones.com>,
dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:

> cuh...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> > Michael Savage is A OK.I like to listen to him rantin n raving.
>
> Me too, and, as far as I know, he has a genuine PhD and didn't have
> to lie about having one.
>
>

> And, as always, don't let your children attend Louisville Technical
> Institute. They've hired at least one dufus who once claimed to have
> a PhD, and who knows, there may be more dufi there.

Nobody can rant like Savage.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Telamon

unread,
May 7, 2009, 9:32:54 PM5/7/09
to
In article
<194f9e78-90be-4250...@e20g2000vbc.googlegroups.com>,
z <gzuc...@snail-mail.net> wrote:

> On May 7, 1:53�am, Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > What about Savages rights? Some Brit government hack decided they didn't
> > like him and lumped him in with murders and criminals advocating
> > violence so banned him from entering the country just because they don't
> > like what he stands for. That is defamation of character.
> >
>

> not sure what part of the British Bill of Rights gives foreign radio
> hosts the right to enter Britain free of challenge. Maybe you could
> point me to it.

The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite
violence and murder. That is defamation.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

z

unread,
May 7, 2009, 11:09:51 PM5/7/09
to
On May 7, 3:23 pm, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...@aol.com> wrote:


> Are you saying there are no dopy libs in the UK?

they still have a queen, for godsake. we couldn't even deal with a
hereditary bush monarchy.

z

unread,
May 7, 2009, 11:11:16 PM5/7/09
to
On May 7, 9:32 pm, Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid>
wrote:

> The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite
> violence and murder. That is defamation.
>
> --
> Telamon
> Ventura, California

you'd think he'd be complimented. at last somebody takes him
seriously, ooooh, he's dangerous. stay away from him, girls.

Brenda Ann

unread,
May 7, 2009, 11:12:54 PM5/7/09
to

"Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:iur60512hhsgvm37l...@4ax.com...

Absolutely. Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of
expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon
LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to
disagree and to state that they do disagree.

Seon Ferguson

unread,
May 7, 2009, 11:58:19 PM5/7/09
to
On Fri, 8 May 2009 12:12:54 +0900, "Brenda Ann" <bre...@shinbiro.com>
wrote:

>
>Absolutely. Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of
>expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon
>LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to
>disagree and to state that they do disagree.

Or the rights of me to not listen tot hem. Its a pity the UK or
Australia (where I live btw) can't guarantee those rights. Your
countries founding fathers sure knew what they were talking about.

Message has been deleted

Telamon

unread,
May 8, 2009, 1:07:10 AM5/8/09
to
In article
<90e0b014-b928-4330...@z19g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>,
z <gzuc...@snail-mail.net> wrote:

> On May 7, 9:32�pm, Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid>
> wrote:
>
> > The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite
> > violence and murder. That is defamation.
> >
>

> you'd think he'd be complimented. at last somebody takes him
> seriously, ooooh, he's dangerous. stay away from him, girls.

I can only hope you have the same luck then.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

z

unread,
May 8, 2009, 1:19:55 AM5/8/09
to
On May 8, 1:07 am, Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid>
wrote:
> In article
> <90e0b014-b928-4330-912c-e59945e88...@z19g2000vbz.googlegroups.com>,

>
>  z <gzuck...@snail-mail.net> wrote:
> > On May 7, 9:32 pm, Telamon <telamon_spamshi...@pacbell.net.is.invalid>
> > wrote:
>
> > > The Brit hack/spokes-hole lumped Savage in with people that incite
> > > violence and murder. That is defamation.
>
> > you'd think he'd  be complimented. at last somebody takes him
> > seriously, ooooh, he's dangerous. stay away from him, girls.
>
> I can only hope you have the same luck then.
>
> --
> Telamon
> Ventura, California

pretty sure that won't happen. that's why i'm here instead of doing
something.

dave

unread,
May 8, 2009, 8:56:47 AM5/8/09
to

It's an act. He's a lefty.

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
May 8, 2009, 9:45:47 AM5/8/09
to
His bicycle chain drive is on the Right side of his bicycle.My little
doggy can't chase that flashlight spot light around and around counter
clockwise, going clockwise, she does just fine.That means she is a real
Republican Dog.Try that with your Dog, if you have one.

Unstamped certificate suggest Obama may not be ''natural born'' US
Citizen.
www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=263672
cuhulin

Who i$ John Galt

unread,
May 8, 2009, 11:40:10 AM5/8/09
to

I even root for Liberals talk radio to survive.

~ RHF

unread,
May 8, 2009, 11:42:58 AM5/8/09
to
On May 7, 9:02 pm, retrogro...@comcast.net wrote:

> On Fri, 8 May 2009 12:12:54 +0900, "Brenda Ann" <bren...@shinbiro.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >"Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:iur60512hhsgvm37l...@4ax.com...
> >> On Thu, 7 May 2009 09:15:44 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...@aol.com>

> >> wrote:
>
> >>>The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy
> >>>and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how
> >>>strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that
> >>>makes the gub'ment's black list.
>
> >>>----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>Free speech is a one-way street to dopey libs.
>
> >> I don't support Bush so I guess you would put me into this category.
> >> Trouble is I support the free speech of Michael Savage, Ann Colter,
> >> Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and all the other right wing hacks.
>
> >Absolutely.  Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of
> >expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon
> >LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to
> >disagree and to state that they do disagree.
>
> And yet we have a long list of people we will not give visas to for
> visits. It's not a freedom of speech issue. It's a border issue.

Usually these 'people' are Convicted of a
Felony Crime in their own Home Country
or on a Known Terrorist Watch List.
* Amy Winehouse [Drug Use UK] Banned from the USA
* Martha Steward [Lying Under Oath USA] Banned from the UK
* Real IRA [Terrorist Bombings UK] Banned from the USA
* Tariq Ramadan [Muslim Brotherhood] Banned from the USA
* Palestinian Islamic Jihad Members Banned from Canada

So One Must Ask What Felony Crime Has
Michael Savage Been Convicted Of . . .

Oh That's Right "Freedom-of-Speech" as an
American Radio Talk Show Host.

Once Again Proving "Freedom-of-Speech"
is Dead in the UK ~ RHF
.
.

Who i$ John Galt

unread,
May 8, 2009, 11:48:03 AM5/8/09
to
Seon Ferguson wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2009 12:12:54 +0900, "Brenda Ann" <bre...@shinbiro.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Absolutely. Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of
>> expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon
>> LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to
>> disagree and to state that they do disagree.
>

Until Political Correctness was Born and we created "hate" speech.
Now you don't have a right to say anything about those "special" people.

~ RHF

unread,
May 8, 2009, 11:50:31 AM5/8/09
to
On May 8, 8:40 am, "Who i$ John Galt" <"Men of the Mind"@Talk-n-

Dog..com> wrote:
> Brenda Ann wrote:
> > "Seon Ferguson" <seo...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:iur60512hhsgvm37l...@4ax.com...
> >> On Thu, 7 May 2009 09:15:44 -0500, "MNMikeW" <MNMiik...@aol.com>

> >> wrote:
>
> >>> The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy
> >>> and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how
> >>> strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that
> >>> makes the gub'ment's black list.
>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> Free speech is a one-way street to dopey libs.
> >> I don't support Bush so I guess you would put me into this category.
> >> Trouble is I support the free speech of Michael Savage, Ann Colter,
> >> Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh and all the other right wing hacks.
>
> > Absolutely.  Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of
> > expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon
> > LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to
> > disagree and to state that they do disagree.

- I even root for Liberals talk radio to survive.

NPR "Liberal" Talk Radio has been Surviving
for Decades with your Taxpayer Based Support.
.

~ RHF

unread,
May 8, 2009, 11:52:59 AM5/8/09
to
On May 8, 5:56 am, dave <d...@dave.dave> wrote:
> Telamon wrote:
> > In article <4A0321E6.6B7BA...@milestones.com>,
> >  dxAce <dx...@milestones.com> wrote:

>
> >> cuhu...@webtv.net wrote:
>
> >>> Michael Savage is A OK.I like to listen to him rantin n raving.
> >> Me too, and, as far as I know, he has a genuine PhD and didn't have
> >> to lie about having one.
>
> >> And, as always, don't let your children attend Louisville Technical
> >> Institute. They've hired at least one dufus who once claimed to have
> >> a PhD, and who knows, there may be more dufi there.

- - Nobody can rant like Savage.

- It's an act.  He's a lefty.

What Ever ! - It makes Him # 3 in the Audience Game.
.

~ RHF

unread,
May 8, 2009, 12:08:53 PM5/8/09
to
On May 7, 4:22 pm, "homepc" <wiebe...@gmail.com> wrote:

- England has a large and concentrated Muslim
- population to deal with that easily dwarfs anything
- that exists in the USA or CDA.

The way things are going The UK/England will be the
UK Islamic Republic by the End of this Century; with
a twist the "UK" will stand for the United Kingdoms
of Saudi Arabia and England.

* A still Christian Scotland will be Free

* A still Christan-Catholic Northern Ireland
will be reunited with Catholic {South] Ireland.

* The formerly Christian British Royal Family
will Marry into the Saudi Royal Family and
Convert to Islam; and the Saudis will become
the Rulers of the new UK.

God {Allah} Save The King - - - of the UK !

it's a new world order 'vision' thingee ~ RHF
.
.


> I would speculate
> that labeling Mr. Savage in this fashion only serves to contain and placate
> a
> smoldering and growing problem on their own soil and in neighboring Europe.
>
> I'm in Canada and listen to the Savage show on KFAB 1110 AM for no more than
> 20" at a time.  A lot he has
> to say is off the wall and the man clearly has little or no respect for his
> audience.  However there is a thread of truth to be found in some of his
> rants.  The news media is more concerned about a H1M1 flu epidemic that
> hasn't
> really killed anymore people than an ordinary flu -- yet chooses to downplay
> or ignore the effect of criminals, weapons and drugs being smuggled north
> into the US from Mexico and the countless lives jeopardized by these
> activities.  Governments around the world make nice with the Saudis and
> their Muslim friends to ensure an uninterrupted flow of oil, while numerous
> wealthy Saudi families continue to fund various terrorist interests without
> consequence.
>
> Mr. Savage is largely the architect of his own grief.  Sadly, the really
> important stuff he occasionally brings to light gets quickly covered back up
> again by the
> garbage he spews on air.
>

> <obamao.sux.donki.dix...@gmail.com> wrote in message

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
May 8, 2009, 12:26:01 PM5/8/09
to
About two something years ago, I read somewhere on the internet,
Scotland will be Independent in ten years.About eight something years to
go now.I am Scots Irish by Ancestry.
cuhulin

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
May 8, 2009, 12:22:06 PM5/8/09
to
I will get the title of that article Right, let me fix it.

Southerners and Republicans, Most PATRIOTIC of all Americans.
www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=263723

I fixed that.Now I am fixin to get to work in my back yard some more.
cuhulin

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

Brenda Ann

unread,
May 8, 2009, 6:38:05 PM5/8/09
to

<retro...@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:2in805d13r399v1ga...@4ax.com...

> On Fri, 08 May 2009 11:48:03 -0400, "Who i$ John Galt" <"Men of the
> Mind"@Talk-n-Dog..com> wrote:
>
>>Seon Ferguson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 8 May 2009 12:12:54 +0900, "Brenda Ann" <bre...@shinbiro.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Absolutely. Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom
>>>> of
>>>> expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon
>>>> LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others
>>>> to
>>>> disagree and to state that they do disagree.
>>>
>>
>>Until Political Correctness was Born and we created "hate" speech.
>>Now you don't have a right to say anything about those "special" people.
>
>
> It's funny how the "conservatives' object so to manners and civil
> decorum and see them as coercive.
>
> I mean they're really screaming "I want to be an ass in public! People
> calling me on it is infringing my freedom".
>
> You can say anything you want. You just don't want to be called on it.

Amen. It's amazing to me that so much of what is now called "political
correctness" was taught to my, and previous, generations as "manners" and
"respect for others". When did these become dirty words?


~ RHF

unread,
May 8, 2009, 7:07:40 PM5/8/09
to
On May 8, 9:32 am, retrogro...@comcast.net wrote:
> On Fri, 08 May 2009 11:48:03 -0400, "Who i$ John Galt" <"Men of the
>
> Mind"@Talk-n-Dog..com> wrote:
> >Seon Ferguson wrote:
> >> On Fri, 8 May 2009 12:12:54 +0900, "Brenda Ann" <bren...@shinbiro.com>

> >> wrote:
>
> >>> Absolutely.  Our Constitution guarantees freedom of speech and freedom of
> >>> expression equally to Rush Limbaugh, Dr. Laura, Reverend Wright, Lyndon
> >>> LaRouche and everyone else. This of course includes the right of others to
> >>> disagree and to state that they do disagree.
>
> >Until Political Correctness was Born and we created "hate" speech.
> >Now you don't have a right to say anything about those "special" people.
>
> It's funny how the "conservatives' object so to manners and civil
> decorum and see them as coercive.
>
- I mean they're really screaming
- "I want to be an ass in public!
- People calling me on it is infringing my freedom".

So Freedom-of-Speech ! Is NOT Freedom-of-Speech ?

- You can say anything you want.
- You just don't want to be called on it.

But "I" and 'others' have the Right to Rebut
You or simply Walk Away and Disassociate
Ourselves from You.

Freedom-of-Speech =/= Freedom-Not-To-Have-To-Listen

Freedom-of-the-Press =/= Freedom-Not-To-Have-To-Read-It

Freedom-of-Association =/= Freedom-Not-To-Associate

Freedom-of-Religion =/= Freedom-From-Religion

Right-to-Bear-Arms =/= Freedom-Not-To-Own-A-Gun

Right-to-Vote =/= Right-Not-To-Vote
.
Rights Are A Two Way Street :
* Respect the Rights of Others
* Stand-Up For Your Rights

~ RHF
.

Message has been deleted
Message has been deleted

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
May 8, 2009, 7:48:36 PM5/8/09
to
Working in my back yard, I just now plopped down on doggy's couch, I
felt something crawling up my left wrist.It was a democrat Tick.Ticks
are hard to kill.I squshed that Tick between my thumb and fore finger.I
don't know if I killed that Tick or not.
Definition of poli tics,,, Blood Sucking Insects.
cuhulin

~ RHF

unread,
May 9, 2009, 4:13:18 AM5/9/09
to
On May 8, 4:16 pm, retrogro...@comcast.net wrote:
> On Fri, 8 May 2009 16:07:40 -0700 (PDT), "~ RHF"

>
> <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
>
> >> >Until Political Correctness was Born and we created "hate" speech.
> >> >Now you don't have a right to say anything about those "special" people.
>
> >> It's funny how the "conservatives' object so to manners and civil
> >> decorum and see them as coercive.
>
> >- I mean they're really screaming
> >- "I want to be an ass in public!
> >- People calling me on it is infringing my freedom".
>
> >So Freedom-of-Speech ! Is NOT Freedom-of-Speech ?
>
> You've got it. You use it repeatedly to show you're an uncouth ass.
>
> People have the right to call you on it too. And you can bitch that's
> "political correctness".

- The answer to distasteful speech is more speech, not less.

NO - The Every Powerful "Right To Remain Silent"
Often Says More Then Loud Words.

dave

unread,
May 9, 2009, 8:56:05 AM5/9/09
to

Ick.

John Barnard

unread,
May 11, 2009, 12:36:48 AM5/11/09
to
Lyme disease?

~ RHF

unread,
May 13, 2009, 4:23:52 AM5/13/09
to
On May 7, 5:45 am, "~ RHF" <rhf-newsgro...@pacbell.net> wrote:
> On May 6, 5:05 am, obamao.sux.donki.dix...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> - British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage
> - the equivalent of mass-murdering terrorists.
> -
> -http://www.frontpagemag.com/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=34711
> -
> - The Liberal Fascist thought police > HEIL HITLER!
>
> So the UK Says "No" to Michael Savage :http://www.abc.net.au/worldtoday/content/2008/s2563493.htm
>
> Which just helps to Prove that "Freedom of Speech"
> is Dead in the UK.http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=103819122
>
> Oops . . . but then Michael Savage is Banned on NPR Too !
> -?- Has Michael Savage ever been a 'guest' on
> any NPR Program : The Topic Yes -but- a 'quest'
> never : Now that is real Fair-and-Balanced.
>
> While the the UK Releases "Abu Izzadeen"
> a know Terrorist Supporter and Instigator of
> Public Unrest in the UK.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awr8_ODVJ08http://www.indopia.in/India-usa-uk-news/latest-news/567192/Internatio...
>
> * Izzadeen convicted of raising Funds for
> Terrorists and Supporting Terrorism Overseas.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Izzadeen
>
> * Izzadeen was shown in a Video Clip
> provoking Muslims"To Kill Americans".http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Ghurabaa
>
> * Izzadeenled a radical Islamic Group to storm
> into the moderate Mosque in central London.http://www.etaiwannews.com/etn/news_content.php?id=941091〈=eng_news
>
> So it would seam like Advocating 'Killing
> Americans" is 'good sport' in the UK -and-
> Breaking into Mosques is also just 'good
> sport' in the UK -and- Funding Terrorism
> in Other Countries is A-OK in the UKhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7paINhyXmk4
> - - - but . . . Freedom of Speech
> THAT'S A NO NO IN THE UK ~ RHF
>  .
>  .

Mayor of London says the Home Secretary's
decision to put Michael Savage on a Banned
List makes the UK look infantile and pathetic
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/may/11/boris-johnson-jacqui-smith-michael-savage
.
UK Bars 22 Alleged Terrorists and Extremists,
Including US Talk Radio Show Host Michael Savage
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory?id=7504715
.
Poll : Americans Oppose UK's Anti-Free-Speech Muzzle
http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=97962
.
.

cuh...@webtv.net

unread,
May 13, 2009, 10:58:43 AM5/13/09
to
Why doesn't the UK BAN the Usurper? The Usurper is/was/still is a UK POS
when he was born in Kenya!
cuhulin

BDK

unread,
May 13, 2009, 1:41:59 PM5/13/09
to
In article <15206-4A0...@storefull-3171.bay.webtv.net>,
cuh...@webtv.net says...

> Why doesn't the UK BAN the Usurper? The Usurper is/was/still is a UK POS
> when he was born in Kenya!
> cuhulin
>
>

LOL

They don't "BaN" him, because, like all sane, and even most insane
people, know he was born in Hawaii.

But don't let reality get in your way, it never has seemed to before.
--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
Former #1 kOOk Magnet (Title passed to Larnrod!)
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

dxAce

unread,
May 13, 2009, 2:08:57 PM5/13/09
to

BDK wrote:

> In article <15206-4A0...@storefull-3171.bay.webtv.net>,
> cuh...@webtv.net says...
> > Why doesn't the UK BAN the Usurper? The Usurper is/was/still is a UK POS
> > when he was born in Kenya!
> > cuhulin
> >
> >
>
> LOL
>
> They don't "BaN" him, because, like all sane, and even most insane
> people, know he was born in Hawaii.

He may have been born in Kenya, who knows. But, he certainly was abandoned in
Hawaii, by both his mother and his father.

Fine bunch of Liberal's!

Dufi one and all.


Crash

unread,
May 18, 2009, 3:17:11 PM5/18/09
to

in alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, On Wed, 6 May, Mike C. said about:
Re: Anti-Savage Nation


> Billary/2009 wrote:
> > On May 6, obamao.sux.donki.dix wrote:
> >> British authorities deem radio host Michael Savage the equivalent of
> >> mass-murdering terrorists.

Not quite. You ignore the other scumbags on the list.

Actually one can learn quite a bit about their reasoning
by studying the other people on that list.
...like the couple who went to all the American slain
soldiers' funerals shouting etc that they deserved to die
because of American (gay) sodimy. Chech out the
others. For many of them, that's the exact
language and hate-fear-spewing tactics Weiner uses.

Michael "Savage" Weiner is the biggest coward in
America. He's even afraid to shake people's hands
at his heavily gaurded bullet-proof cubicle book signings.
...a TOTAL coward squealling about how muslims will
turn us into bars of soap and lampshades.

Gimme a break. He's just another chest-thumping
Republican coward afraid of his own shadow trying
to pull off a tuff guy act, and nobody's buying it
but the other fraidy cats and nervous nellies..

> >>
> >> The Liberal Fascist thought police > HEIL HITLER!

So yer saying a nation should have NO SAY regarding
which aliens can enter? You want OPEN BORDERS?????

> > The liberals always cry foul when the conversation turns to McCarthy
> > and his black list of KNOWN Communist infiltrators. But notice how
> > strangly quiet they turn when it's a harmless right wing blowhard that
> > makes the gub'ment's black list.

Yer mixing analogies pal. Weiner is an illegal alien in Britain, Mccarthy
was attacking LEGAL fellow American Citizens.

>
> Savage spends a lot of time screaming about people he thinks shouldn't be in
> this country,

Actually zenophobia is his MAIN theme. ...it's the
TOTAL function of his Paul Revere Society.

>but he won't give another country the same benefit. Go figure.


Hypocrisy and moral relativity is what Republicanna
is all about. They have a shorter memory than the
goons shouting Hate against Eastonia in Orwell's 1984.

=========== From 1984 by George Orwell.

"If one is to rule, and to continue ruling, one must
be able to dislocate the sense of reality."

...And if it is necessary to
rearrange one's memories or to tamper with written
records, then it is necessary to FORGET that one has done so. The trick of
doing this can be learned like any other mental technique.
It is learned by the majority of Party members,...

DOUBLETHINK means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs
in one's mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.

========end quotes


>but he won't give another country the same benefit. Go figure.

Get it now?

0 new messages