On Mon, 30 Dec 2019 01:42:16 -0500, nospam wrote:
> no you very definitely weren't.
*This proves, yet again, you apologists aren't like normal adults.*
o *Your posts prove you own the comprehensive skills of a child, nospam.*
I understand that you survive on Apple newsgroups by spouting complete &
utter bullshit, where the average Apple poster on this Apple newsgroups
seems to be as uncomprehensive of facts as you prove to be, nospam.
But expect me to prove otherwise, when you spout your bullshit:
What's interesting, nospam, is that apologists consistently and clearly
prove to lack basic adult abilities to comprehend known facts.
Not only do I copy anything I want to/from any device I want,
I even wrote the tutorial, so that others could do what I easily do:
o Simultaneously slide Windows Linux iOS Android files back and forth over USB at 7GB per minute speeds using 100% native devices (no proprietary software needed)
<
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/comp.mobile.android/WohhLOTCYKw/n_ytNizaCAAJ>
*You apologists, nospam, always prove to be not like normal adults.*
> i remember when you fumbled for weeks trying to copy stuff between a
> phone and a desktop computer, asking for help ftp'ing, which is one of
> the worst possible methods, and fucked it up big time.
Again, nospam, your posts prove you lack comprehensive skills that anyone
who is an adult, is supposed to own.
o *You apologists, nospam, always prove to be not like normal adults.*
How many tutorials have you written, nospam, where you exercised _every_
known option for transferring files between a desktop & mobile device?
HINT: The answer is _zero_ nospam.
When I test software, particularly for my many tutorials, I test _every_
option that is suggested, where, I haven't used FTP in quite a long time -
but I tested it, along with WebDAV (which allows the entire mobile device
to be mounted as a drive letter on Windows, for example), SAMBA/CIFS, HTTP,
FTP, libMTP, adb, etc.
*Your posts prove you own the comprehensive skills of a child, nospam.*
--
The main problem with the scores of apologists is their brains prove to be
almost totally immune to facts as a result of their child-like
comprehensive skills; hence, they turn out to be extremely highly
susceptible to (admittedly brilliant) marketing of imaginary functionality.