On Sun, 8 Sep 2019 09:46:07 -0700, Alan Baker wrote:
> e factually logical adult assessment below that:
>> o *Apple phones are _more risky_ than Android phones*
>
> That is an assertion unsupported by any fact you've ever presented.
Hi Alan Baker,
Adults can do two things:
a. They can comprehend basic facts, and,
b. Adults can form logical assessments of those basic facts.
Apologists habitually brazenly deny facts and logical assessments
o Sans a single fact to back up their imaginary belief systems.
As an adult, I pointed you to a cite utilizing that logical assessment
o Proving, yet again, apologists, like flat earthers, are immune to facts
Google themselves said, and Apple did NOT dispute:
"The root causes I highlight here are not novel and are often
overlooked: we'll see cases of [Apple] code which seems to have never
worked, [Apple] code that likely skipped QA or likely had little testing
or review before being shipped to [iOS] users.'"
<
https://cnnews9.com/2019/09/08/apple-angry-at-google-for-bursting-iphone-security-myth-bubble-mspoweruser/>
Notice Google proved Apple iOS is, essentially, a diarrhea of untested
releases, which is something I've been proving for years on this ng with
well-cited facts - and which you apologists have no facts to refute.
In addition, notice I've always logically concluded that iOS is no safer
than Android, and, in many cases, far less safe than Android, which we
proved using well-cited facts long ago on this thread, Alan Baker:
o What is the factual truth about PRIVACY differences or similarities between the Android & iOS mobile phone ecosystems?
<
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/MiZixhidmOs/ATC1S3s4FQAJ>
Notice that other logical adults assess the facts similarly:
"It has been pretty clear, from government-sponsored attacks, that
iPhones are as vulnerable as any other smartphone, and that they may
actually be more risky, due to giving users the impression that the
handsets are safer than they actually are, and by making it more difficult
to detect infections, as malware-scanning software is impossible to
install."
<
https://cnnews9.com/2019/09/08/apple-angry-at-google-for-bursting-iphone-security-myth-bubble-mspoweruser/>
The cites clearly indicate the following valid logical assessment of fact
o Google proved Apple iOS code is essentially untested for vulnerabilities
o Apple does not dispute ANY of the salient facts in the Google expose
o Apple iOS is no safer than Android - and - in many cases - far worse.
o Apple advertises trust - but doesn't actually deliver it - it's imaginary
Admittedly, Apple is brilliant at selling purely imaginary functionality.
o What is the most brilliant marketing move Apple ever made?
<
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/misc.phone.mobile.iphone/wW-fu0jsvAU/s6gu-hj2BwAJ>
Which is why you apologists, who gravitate to Apple's messaging
o Own imaginary belief systems which are instantly destroyed by facts
--
Note that my facts & assessments are supported by cites while the
apologists brazenly deny all facts and assessments, sans a single cite.