"The Peeler" wrote in message news:tsmgG.310380$_3E.2...@usenetxs.com...
>On Mon, 30 Mar 2020 06:00:22 -0700, clinically insane, pedophilic, serbian
>bitch Razovic, the resident psychopath of sci and scj and Usenet's famous
>sexual cripple, making an ass of herself as "preferred jew PAEDOPHILE
>aliash
>Ron Jacobson (RJ11)", farted again:
>>>Be hungrier, which really is wonderfully healthier especially for
>>>diabetics and other heart disease patients:
>>
>> STARVE to death , which really is even MORE wonderfully healthy,
>> especially for those with terminal illnesses!
The mangina can not show that any of Dr. Chung's patients starved to
death.
>ESAD, filthy dreckserb! You know it makes every sense in your case!
Indeed.
Judith Bergman writes about Sweden's culture of silence.
http://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/15741/sweden-culture-of-silence
Sweden: Culture of Silence
by Judith Bergman
March 30, 2020 at 4:00 am
Send
Print
Share98
"The interviewee realized that the conclusions would be politically
unpopular, but had nevertheless written them... Other former employees have
pointed out that it was clear that there were political reasons why they
were pressured to change content in reports..." — Report by Linköping
University about the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Brå),
"Can Brå be trusted?"
"One employee reported, among other things, that a director-general
expressed that 'there is a reality and a political reality' when the
director-general demanded that an employee change a report..." — Report by
Linköping University, "Can Brå be trusted?"
"If results were not liked then censorship was used, correction of results,
toning down results and highlighting other parts of [the] study that were
not so sensitive or that could show positive results". — Report by Linköping
University, "Can Brå be trusted?"
"After I was hired at Brå, it took me a short time to understand that
working at Brå is a big challenge. As an employee of Brå, you should write
and think in a certain way. Brå is extremely controlled from the top. There
are some people at Brå who control with an iron hand. If one were to be a
little harsh then one could liken it to a sect. I don't think they really
understand what kind of culture they have created" — Another employee, from
the report by Linköping University, "Can Brå be trusted?"
The report also found that Brå appears to strive to hire employees that will
"act as obedient bureaucrats at an authority, rather than people who have
accepted a researcher's role".
Meanwhile, Sweden continues its downward spiral.
A recent report published by Linköping University about the Swedish National
Council for Crime Prevention (Brå), has claimed that Brå's reports are
politically biased. Pictured: Linköping University's Valla Campus in
Linköping, Sweden. (Image source: Anna Nilsen [LiU]/Wikimedia Commons)
A recent report published by Linköping University about the Swedish National
Council for Crime Prevention (Brå), "Can Brå be trusted?" has claimed that
Brå's reports are politically biased.
According to Brå's own website, "Brå is an agency under the auspices of the
Ministry of Justice and a knowledge centre for the criminal justice system.
The agency's mandate is to contribute to the development of knowledge within
the criminal justice system and the criminal policy area, as well as to
promote crime prevention work. Brå is responsible for the official criminal
statistics and other statistics, which includes producing, following,
analysing, and reporting on criminality and the criminal justice system's
responses to crime".
It is therefore crucial that Brå fulfill its obligations in a factual and
objective manner, not least in the current environment, when Sweden is
experiencing a veritable crime wave, including shootings, bombings and other
gang-inspired violence that some commentators have likened to "war".
According to the Linköping University report, the results of which were
based primarily on interviews with former and current employees and managers
of Brå, in addition to a number of former police chiefs and ministers of
justice, Brå's work is politically biased due to political pressure from the
Ministry of Justice as well as the management of Brå. The report states:
"For example, a former employee said that he, together with the
Director-General [of Brå] was called to the Ministry of Justice for a
conversation with the requirement of a report to be 'corrected'. The report
consisted of an evaluation of a government proposal, concluding that the
proposals were harmful. The interviewee realized that the conclusions would
be politically unpopular, but had nevertheless written them... Other former
employees have pointed out that it was clear that there were political
reasons why they were pressured to change content in reports even though
these researchers were not called to the Ministry... One employee reported,
among other things, that a director-general expressed that 'there is a
reality and a political reality' when the director-general demanded that an
employee change a report..."
The Linköping University report goes on to say:
"Interviews show that adaptation of content in reports has taken place in
different ways. A former employee made the following summary: 'If results
were not liked then censorship was used, correction of results, toning down
results and highlighting other parts of [the] study that were not so
sensitive or that could show positive results'".
Another employee said:
"After I was hired at Brå, it didn't take me long to realize that working at
Brå is a big challenge. As an employee of Brå, you have to write and think
in a certain way. Brå is extremely controlled from the top. There are some
people at Brå who run [the organization] with an iron hand. If one were to
be a little harsh then one could liken it to a sect. I don't think they
really understand what kind of culture they have created".
The Linköping report states that there appears to be a culture of silence by
which is meant, "norms that create silence among employees, when they do not
dare to bring up certain viewpoints, questions or criticism, whether
internal or external".
Ironically, this culture of silence has been symptomatic of Swedish society,
where most have been afraid to speak publicly about the problems caused by
unfettered migration for fear of being ostracized.
The report also found that Brå appears to strive to hire employees that will
"act as obedient bureaucrats at an authority, rather than people who have
accepted a researcher's role".
The report has caused consternation in Sweden. The Swedish Parliament's
judicial committee has now invited the authors of the report, as well as the
general director, to their next meeting. Johan Forsell, the legal spokesman
of the Moderate party, said:
"Very serious allegations and accusations are made in the report. Brå is,
after all, an expert authority that is supposed to deliver facts that
objectively reflect society. We need, quite simply, to get to the bottom of
this... Regardless of when it happened and under what political color, the
very suspicion of influence is serious enough. But that responsibility now
falls on Justice Minister Morgan Johansson".
Meanwhile, Sweden continues its downward spiral. Last year there were 257
reports of explosions -- including attempted explosions -- an increase of
59% compared to 2018, according to SVT Nyheter. Yet, only seven people were
convicted for any of those 257 crimes. In 2020, at least 10 explosions have
already taken place.
According to Stefan Hector, head of the National Operative Unit (NOA):
"Earlier we saw that hand grenades were used. Now we see how homemade
explosives are used instead as weapons in conflicts. Either to injure or to
terrorize but with a new ruthlessness where they bomb wherever the public is
without caring that the public might get hurt".
According to SVT News, the police and other authorities "do not know" where
all the explosives come from. "The issue of explosives as weapons in
conflicts is relatively new. This means that we have considerable
uncertainty as to where the parts for the explosive charges come from",
Hector said.
"Unless the integration of the newcomers succeeds better, in the long run,
the social glue that makes a democratic welfare society of our kind possible
risks being torn apart", professor in political science at the University of
Uppsala, Tommy Möller, recently wrote in an op-ed.
Gatestone Institute has described the serious economic, welfare, crime and
other challenges that Swedish society now faces as a result of migration
into the country, for example here, here, here, here and here.
One issue that Swedish figures of authority are now admitting to having
neglected over the years is anti-Semitism. Municipal managers in Malmö, for
instance, Sweden's third-largest city, where immigrants constitute one-third
of the population, now say that it took a long time before they "saw the
extent" of the problem. Anders Rubin was school council member of the Malmö
municipality from 2013 to 2018. "Many students who have a background in the
Middle East, and in several Muslim countries, have notions of Jews that are
not at all compatible with democratic values," he told Sydsvenskan recently.
He also confessed that the municipality had not taken the complaints of its
Jewish citizens seriously. According to Sydsvenskan:
"Anders Rubin says he and the other leading Social Democrats initially
underestimated the alarm from the city's Jews about a growing amount of
threats and harassment. He describes it as the municipality management
having had their 'guards down'."
"It was not felt that there was an established anti-Semitic attitude more
than in extremely peripheral right-wing groups. I think we understood that
the problem was marginal" admitted Rubin to Sydsvenskan. The newspaper also
recounts how in 2009, Malmö's then-mayor, Ilmar Reepalu, responded to
attacks on a Jewish demonstration by saying that Swedish Jews ought to
distance themselves from Israel.
"It was only when we began to realize that in some of our immigrant groups
there were ideas that were problematic, that we realized that we were forced
to do something", Rubin said. He said there are probably limits to what
municipal authorities can do about anti-Semitism.
"To think that we could achieve the frictionless city is a utopia. In such a
diversified city as Malmö, one cannot change those types of attitudes by
coming from the top and being forceful and telling people what to think.
Somehow, it is extremely difficult to drive this down to a municipal
political level. I think it is a complicated question, how we as
representatives of the majority society should act to influence the
attitudes of minorities. It easily becomes counterproductive".
Perhaps unwittingly, Rubin made a crucial point here: namely, that for years
authorities swept serious problems related to migration under the rug,
making them taboo and then vilifying those who dared to talk about them in
public. The Linköping University report about the culture at Brå, sadly,
exposed this pattern.
Judith Bergman, a columnist, lawyer and political analyst, is a
Distinguished Senior Fellow at Gatestone Institute.