Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Cancer & "Rotational Field Nuclear Quantum Magnetic Resonance

1 view
Skip to first unread message

hanson

unread,
Oct 20, 2006, 7:48:31 PM10/20/06
to
The $$$-greed of the US Med-Pharm-FDA Complex which has
precipitated the current shameful & pitiful decline of health care
in the USA is beginning to encourage US insurance companies
to OUT-SOURCE the treatment and care of their subscribers to
"3rd world countries", in particular to India which does have state
of the art health care capabilities and facilities (ABC TV 17-Oct-06).

AFA Medical R&D advances India is pushing the frontiers now:
The Institute of Aerospace Medicine (IAM) of the Indian Air Force
and the Bangalore-based Centre for Advanced Research and
Development (CARD) have taken up clinical trials to treat patients
with osteoarthritis as well as cases in the end-stage cancers.
High-intensity magnetic resonance beams (as is done in an MRI
machine) from 288 specialised guns are focussed on a particular
tissue. In this"Rotational Field Nuclear Quantum Magnetic Resonance
(RFQMR)," the beams are used to alter cell division so that the cells
either multiply or cell growth can be arrested. The new method is
free of the side effects associated with Western chemotherapy
and radiotherapy. Current state of results:
http://www.thehindu.com/2005/07/12/stories/2005071214360200.htm
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/thscrip/print.pl?file=2005071214360200.htm&date=2005/07/12/&prd=th&
>
What are the opinions of the Usenet members on this?

Are there any analogous developments and treatments conducted
in Western countries, in the US?
All we loudly hear in the USA are surgical successes about a few
cases of identical twin separations, but there's a deafening silence
about any care improvement for the millions and millions of our
own elderly. Even louder is the constant whining from green enviro
groups and from regulatory agencies like FDA/EPA/OSHA
about the dangers of Cellphones-, Hi-Volt power lines, etc, while
the rest of world boldly marches on to solve problems that will
bring & provide solutions.... that once were America's pride....
ahahaha... ahahahanson

Sorcerer

unread,
Oct 20, 2006, 10:12:44 PM10/20/06
to

"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
news:jfd_g.2763$A27.417@trnddc08...

| The $$$-greed of the US Med-Pharm-FDA Complex which has
| precipitated the current shameful & pitiful decline of health care
| in the USA is beginning to encourage US insurance companies
| to OUT-SOURCE the treatment and care of their subscribers to
| "3rd world countries", in particular to India which does have state
| of the art health care capabilities and facilities (ABC TV 17-Oct-06).
|
| AFA Medical R&D advances India is pushing the frontiers now:
| The Institute of Aerospace Medicine (IAM) of the Indian Air Force
| and the Bangalore-based Centre for Advanced Research and
| Development (CARD) have taken up clinical trials to treat patients
| with osteoarthritis as well as cases in the end-stage cancers.
| High-intensity magnetic resonance beams (as is done in an MRI
| machine) from 288 specialised guns are focussed on a particular
| tissue. In this"Rotational Field Nuclear Quantum Magnetic Resonance
| (RFQMR)," the beams are used to alter cell division so that the cells
| either multiply or cell growth can be arrested. The new method is
| free of the side effects associated with Western chemotherapy
| and radiotherapy. Current state of results:
| http://www.thehindu.com/2005/07/12/stories/2005071214360200.htm
|
http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/thscrip/print.pl?file=2005071214360200.htm&date=2005/07/12/&prd=th&
| >
| What are the opinions of the Usenet members on this?

33% of Indians still cannot read. When I was there in 1983-4
leprosy was still common. I'll put up with the greed of the few
in the West over the greed of the few in the East anyday. As for
chemotherapy, my daughter died 14 hours after ingesting the
start of the third course. Maybe the first course prolonged her
life, but the second course robbed her of her hair and the third
killed her early. If it ever comes to me, I'm not taking anything
after the first course. What I want (but won't get) is a solution
to death. I can map the path, but I can't do the research.
Have a laser dissect a rat's brain and build a mathematical
model (neural network) that duplicates every neuron, every
synapse. Then see if a computer can behave like a rat.
Next stage...
Have the rat learn a maze, and then afterwards see if the
computer knows the same maze. Do that and you'll have
eternity on backup. You can have my brain when I'm done
with it, just give me my mind back.
Androcles

Twittering One

unread,
Oct 20, 2006, 10:52:05 PM10/20/06
to
Got milk ~ ?

hanson

unread,
Oct 20, 2006, 11:17:00 PM10/20/06
to
"Sorcerer" <Headm...@hogwarts.physics_b> wrote in message
news:wmf_g.7250$lT5....@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

>
> "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
> news:jfd_g.2763$A27.417@trnddc08...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/8ac74c4d9a604029

> | The $$$-greed of the US Med-Pharm-FDA Complex which has
> | precipitated the current shameful & pitiful decline of health care
> | in the USA is beginning to encourage US insurance companies
> | to OUT-SOURCE the treatment and care of their subscribers to
> | "3rd world countries", in particular to India which does have state
> | of the art health care capabilities and facilities (ABC TV 17-Oct-06).
> |
> | AFA Medical R&D advances India is pushing the frontiers now:
> | The Institute of Aerospace Medicine (IAM) of the Indian Air Force
> | and the Bangalore-based Centre for Advanced Research and
> | Development (CARD) have taken up clinical trials to treat patients
> | with osteoarthritis as well as cases in the end-stage cancers.
> | High-intensity magnetic resonance beams (as is done in an MRI
> | machine) from 288 specialised guns are focussed on a particular
> | tissue. In this"Rotational Field Nuclear Quantum Magnetic Resonance
> | (RFQMR)," the beams are used to alter cell division so that the cells
> | either multiply or cell growth can be arrested. The new method is
> | free of the side effects associated with Western chemotherapy
> | and radiotherapy. Current state of results:
> http://www.thehindu.com/2005/07/12/stories/2005071214360200.htm
> http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/thscrip/print.pl?file=2005071214360200.htm&date=2005/07/12/&prd=th&
> | >
> | What are the opinions of the Usenet members on this?
>
[Andro]

> 33% of Indians still cannot read. When I was there in 1983-4
> leprosy was still common. I'll put up with the greed of the few
> in the West over the greed of the few in the East anyday.
>
[Andro]

> As for
> chemotherapy, my daughter died 14 hours after ingesting the
> start of the third course. Maybe the first course prolonged her
> life, but the second course robbed her of her hair and the third
> killed her early. If it ever comes to me, I'm not taking anything
> after the first course.
>
[hanson]
That's odd. Last year one of my employees, 44, lung cancer
spread into brain, did die exactly the under the same conditions,
2 days after his 3rd course's start. Does that event sequence
occur often? If so then why is that regimen used?
>
[Andro]

> What I want (but won't get) is a solution
> to death. I can map the path, but I can't do the research.
> Have a laser dissect a rat's brain and build a mathematical
> model (neural network) that duplicates every neuron, every
> synapse. Then see if a computer can behave like a rat.
> Next stage...
> Have the rat learn a maze, and then afterwards see if the
> computer knows the same maze. Do that and you'll have
> eternity on backup. You can have my brain when I'm done
> with it, just give me my mind back.
> Androcles
>
[hanson]

> | Are there any analogous developments and treatments conducted
> | in Western countries, in the US, comparable to this Indian one?
> | http://www.thehindu.com/2005/07/12/stories/2005071214360200.htm

Twittering One

unread,
Oct 20, 2006, 11:25:21 PM10/20/06
to
One course of chemo may offer "paliative" results,
eg, relief of pain, through tumor-size remission,
but not halt or reverse the cancer progression.

A problem with chemo, if underdosed,
is that the cancer cells too easily develop,
eg, mutate, resistance to the toxic treatment.

So the chemo is not used to optimum results.

Chemo may slow, halt, or reverse tumor size.
In the best scenario, chemo should reverse
the tumor size.

Clearly, an issue of appropriate callibration
regarding toxic side effects, based on the
patient's status.

Sorcerer

unread,
Oct 20, 2006, 11:58:46 PM10/20/06
to

"Twittering One" <mourne...@aol.com> wrote in message
news:1161399125.3...@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
| Got milk ~ ?

No, I drink my coffee black.
I've got a killfile for fuckin' moronic imbeciles like you, though.
*plonk*

Sorcerer

unread,
Oct 21, 2006, 12:34:24 AM10/21/06
to

"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message news:Mig_g.89$LA.45@trnddc06...

I think it's a euthanasia drug that nobody will admit to.
With hindsight it was merciful, but my daughter certainly
didn't agree to it. She was told by one oncologist that it was a
matter of weeks, I was with her when she saw the second that
prescribed it. All he did was offer hope for a little longer, and
spouted warnings about it causing constipation. And I'd said
"Be brutally honest". He wasn't, but he showed reluctance in
giving it to her. We were groping at any straw, of course.
She was in the process of making her will, it would have been
signed before witnesses in another day or so. I doubt she'd
have lasted anothe month without it, but I'm convinced it
finished her prematurely.

Tom Potter

unread,
Oct 21, 2006, 1:14:10 AM10/21/06
to

"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
news:jfd_g.2763$A27.417@trnddc08...

I saw in the news yesterday
that researchers in South Korea
had genetically modified a virus to kill cancers.

It worked on most mice,
and is going into human trial.

It is interesting to see that
although General Relativity is hyped to be
the ultimate model,

that after Newton's model,
there were immediate and rapid advances
in mechanics, astronomy, etc.

After Maxwell's model
there were immediate and rapid advances
in chemistry, electricity, etc.

After Watson's and Crick's DNA model
there were immediate and rapid advances
in medicine, genetics, animal husbandry,
the history of the Earth and Mankind, etc.

Yet we are, 100 years after General Relativity
and it continues to generate more hype and heat
than light and advances.

General Relativity is a Tower of Babel
that wastes time, money and minds on such
pursuits as time travel, worm holes, gravity waves, etc.

Can you imagine how much better the world would be
if a few of the billions spent trying to rationalize GTR,
was spent on genetic research?

A mind is a terrible thing to waste.

--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

hanson

unread,
Oct 21, 2006, 1:25:07 PM10/21/06
to
"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4539cd5b$0$19746$8826...@free.teranews.com...
[Tom]

> I saw in the news yesterday that researchers in South Korea
> had genetically modified a virus to kill cancers.
> It worked on most mice, and is going into human trial.
>
[hanson]
yeah, but like anything else, "the proof will be in the pudding"
However in this case I think that this SK ACvirus story may
have difficulties of getting traction for a while given the stem-cell
fraud the South Korean researcher Hwang Woo-suk perpetrated recently.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10589085/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hwang_Woo-Suk
>
[Tom]

> It is interesting to see that although General Relativity is hyped to be
> the ultimate model, that after Newton's model,
> there were immediate and rapid advances
> in mechanics, astronomy, etc.
>
> After Maxwell's model there were immediate and rapid advances
> in chemistry, electricity, etc.
> After Watson's and Crick's DNA model there were immediate and rapid
> advances in medicine, genetics, animal husbandry,
> the history of the Earth and Mankind, etc.
>
> Yet we are, 100 years after General Relativity and it continues to
> generate more hype and heat than light and advances.
>
> General Relativity is a Tower of Babel that wastes time, money and minds
> on such pursuits as time travel, worm holes, gravity waves, etc.
>
> Can you imagine how much better the world would be if a few of the
> billions spent trying to rationalize GTR, was spent on
> genetic research?
>
> A mind is a terrible thing to waste.
>
[hanson]
ahahahaha... one could play wonderful games with your last
sentence here... which too boot I think you've plagiarized from
a TV commercial that was begging for money donations for
an exclusive black college in the American deep South.

AFA REL, I do agree with you on the pathology of GTR and
especially its overselling and hyping when there is noting
beneficial that came out of it, except for you and other rational
people to have fun in kicking and ridiculing it, ... justifiably so.
But then, Tom, different strokes for different folks and those
Einstein Dingleberries just love to be near their idol's sphincter.
ahahahaha... ahahahanson

D

unread,
Oct 21, 2006, 11:06:13 PM10/21/06
to


> |
> |
> |Sorcerer

Yes. A lot of things used to be America's pride. Morals, ethics to
be listed among them.
Take away morals and ethics in the gov't arm of the USA and its no
wonder we no longer hear anything
louder in the USA than their boasting abouts surgical twin separations.
Oh, and on't forget the
widespread covering of pedophiles by Dateline and others. I am not
condoning pedophiles in any manner.
But, its like they want the public to only consider that pedophiles is
like one of the most pressing issues
USA must deal with. And also to prove to the world we are taking care
of our pedophiles why aren't yo.
Not I am not saying pedophiles shouldn't be taken care of. I just
saying Dateline and all the others
seem to be wasting a lot of air time on just that particular subject.
What dateline has no other ideas
other their then just one storyline of pedophiles????

dboots

Kent Paul Dolan

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 5:07:07 AM10/22/06
to
hanson wrote:

> That's odd. Last year one of my employees, 44,
> lung cancer spread into brain, did die exactly the
> under the same conditions, 2 days after his 3rd
> course's start. Does that event sequence occur
> often? If so then why is that regimen used?

It helps to understand what _any_ treatment of
cancer is, including surgery: an attempt to kill the
diseased cells without at the same time killing the
patient containing them, when potentially lethal
force is applied to both due to no known way to
apply that force to just the cancer cells.

In the course of chemotherapy, the goal is to take
advantage of the fast replication rate of cancer
cells, damage them in ways that will kill them if
they divide before they can repair the damage (which
most body cells can eventually do).

However, other parts of the human body are _also_
undergoing rapid cell division, in particular the
lining of the gut, the producers of white and red
blood cells, and probably the lining of the lung.

It is an exquisite balancing act, and a gamble, to
kill the cancer without killing enough of these
other vulnerable, fast dividing parts of the body
to kill the whole patient. Sometimes, that gamble
is lost, on balance, or the regimen would be
changed, it is won more often than it is lost. If
the doctors are following ethical guidelines, the
risk is explained to the patient in advance and the
patient knowingly agrees to that "third course of
chemo".

Life comes with no guarantee of eternity, so it is
no surprise that each of us eventually loses the
attempt to live forever. Having cancer makes your
near term odds a whole lot worse, that's all.

HTH

xanthian, once married to a long time cancer patient
(incurable but sometimes survivable "mycosis
fungoides") for all 14 years of our marriage, is why
I know this stuff.

Sorcerer

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 7:12:07 AM10/22/06
to

"Kent Paul Dolan" <xant...@well.com> wrote in message
news:1161508027....@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...


Simple logic dictates that since we can't keep body and soul together
for more than a few years no matter what we do, we should be striving
for a more robust vehicle for the soul instead of patching up the body.
Androcles
I think, therefore I am - Rene Descartes.

Dirk Van de moortel

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 7:42:27 AM10/22/06
to

Sorcerer

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 7:48:33 AM10/22/06
to

"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:DOI_g.142647$w56.2...@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
How old are you?


D

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 8:45:38 AM10/22/06
to

Kent Paul Dolan wrote:
> hanson wrote:
>
> > That's odd. Last year one of my employees, 44,
> > lung cancer spread into brain, did die exactly the
> > under the same conditions, 2 days after his 3rd
> > course's start. Does that event sequence occur
> > often? If so then why is that regimen used?
>
> It helps to understand what _any_ treatment of
> cancer is, including surgery: an attempt to kill the
> diseased cells without at the same time killing the
> patient containing them, when potentially lethal
> force is applied to both due to no known way to
> apply that force to just the cancer cells.
>
> In the course of chemotherapy, the goal is to take
> advantage of the fast replication rate of cancer
> cells, damage them in ways that will kill them if

Kent

The thing is, somehow for whatever reason, cancers are on the
uprise.
Cancer clusters in communitys have risen especially over the last ten
years.
This is ultimately not a good sign for the rest of the population.

Because Doctors are not programmed to look at the bigger picture.
They take a patient, If a test points them in one direction, they are
just as happy
to steer that patient in that first direction rather than following
thru to see if perhaps
anything else could be causing these cancer clusters.
Too many doctors are not willing to bother with going the extra mile.
Cancer are on the rise. Many doctors are aware of this, but just
getting a degree to practice medicine does not mean we as patients
are going to get doctors that necessary have the guts to look past
the noses on their faces.

dboots

ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 11:35:02 AM10/22/06
to
In sci.physics D <dboot...@clearwire.net> wrote:

<snip>

> The thing is, somehow for whatever reason, cancers are on the
> uprise.

Cancer is a disease of age. The longer you live, the better the odds
of getting cancer. Everyone is living longer than they used to.
Detection is also much better than it used to be.

> Cancer clusters in communitys have risen especially over the last ten
> years.

There has never been a proven cancer cluster in a community.

Lots of supposed cancer clusters, but never one that stood up to
testing.

<snip>

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

D

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 12:06:49 PM10/22/06
to

Jim

Newest cancer cluster near a newly built elec power station. In
Stockotn, Ca. Pretty
affluent neighborhood. Cancer within a mile radius near this newly
build power station
for that part of the town, have risen 20%. West March Lane off of I-5
highway.

Oh my god, like one of those scientists who work for the gov't is
honestly going to say
yes to cancer clusters data. Scientists cover their asses. Hey, truth
is anyone who bucks the system (i.e. whistle blowers) too often lose
their jobs and the gov't has a way to
blacklist people who do blow the whistle. Lots of people who work for
the gov't know
about the unwritten rules to abide by. A scientist has to feed his
family too.

So just because it hasn't been proven by the gov't as true, doesn't
mean it is necessaryily
not true.

if they did prove a cancer cluster, well then that would open the
doors for Bush's friends
to be sued. Bush's friends get sued, Bush loses their big money
support. Bush doesn't
push business their way, gives contract to the next highest support
contributer on his
list, and so on, an so on.

dboots

hanson

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 12:40:39 PM10/22/06
to
Dirk,
You trying to be humorous is one thing....BUT...
...what you did here in the context of this discussion
is despicable. There are some folks here who are
airing very serious issues that are anything but funny.
So, try not to be so fucking gauche, dude, even if it is the
Usenet. Try to curtail your "Fumble bible" to regular themes.
Don't be an embarrassment to your Belgian Landsmen.
hanson

>
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message
news:DOI_g.142647$w56.2...@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
>
> "Sorcerer" <Headm...@hogwarts.physics_b> wrote in message
> news:bmI_g.5088$3x1....@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>>
>> "Kent Paul Dolan" <xant...@well.com> wrote in message
>> news:1161508027....@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com...
>> | hanson wrote:
>> |
>> | > That's odd. Last year one of my employees, 44,
>> | > lung cancer spread into brain, did die exactly the
>> | > under the same conditions, 2 days after his 3rd
>> | > course's start. Does that event sequence occur
>> | > often? If so then why is that regimen used?
>> |
[Kent]
[Andro]

>> Simple logic dictates that since we can't keep body and soul together
>> for more than a few years no matter what we do, we should be striving
>> for a more robust vehicle for the soul instead of patching up the body.
>> Androcles
>> I think, therefore I am - Rene Descartes.
>
[Dirk Vdm]

Sorcerer

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 1:17:26 PM10/22/06
to
I've said it before, Dork's not just a troll, not just an idiot, he's a
psychopath.

Etymology: International Scientific Vocabulary
: a mentally ill or unstable person; especially : a person affected with
antisocial personality disorder

"In current clinical use, psychopathy is most commonly diagnosed using
Robert D. Hare's Psychopathy Checklist-Revised

1.. Glibness/superficial charm
2.. Grandiose sense of self-worth
3.. Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom
4.. Pathological lying
5.. Conning/manipulative
6.. Lack of remorse or guilt
7.. Shallow affect
8.. Callous/lack of empathy
9.. Parasitic lifestyle
10.. Poor behavioral controls
11.. Promiscuous sexual behavior
12.. Early behavioral problems
13.. Lack of realistic, long-term goals
14.. Impulsivity
15.. Irresponsibility
16.. Failure to accept responsibility for own actions
17.. Many short-term marital relationships
18.. Juvenile delinquency
19.. Revocation of conditional release
20.. Criminal versatility

Hare describes psychopaths as "intraspecies predators who use charm,
manipulation, intimidation, and violence to control others and to satisfy
their own selfish needs. Lacking in conscience and in feelings for others,
they cold-bloodedly take what they want and do as they please, violating
social norms and expectations without the slightest sense of guilt or
regret."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopath

He's frustrated because he can't control me and it can't come to violence,
I'm kind to animals.
In other words calling him a motherfucker would be an insult to his raped
grandmother.

Androcles

"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message

news:baN_g.3246$fA.2192@trnddc05...

Jason Johnson

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 1:45:45 PM10/22/06
to
In article <1161486373.7...@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>, "D"
<dboot...@clearwire.net> wrote:

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

dboots,
You mentioned morals and ethics are two of the things that are no longer
part of America's pride. I agree. One of the other things that is missing
from the lives of millions of Americans is a belief in God. In the 1700's
to the 1900's, the vast majority of people were Christians. In many
states, that is no longer true. The same thing happened in the Roman
empire during last 100 years. Once the vast majority of people in America
are not Christians, America will be taken over by some other country.
America will fall in much the same way that Rome failed.
Jason
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Dirk Van de moortel

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 2:11:21 PM10/22/06
to

"Sorcerer" <Headm...@hogwarts.physics_b> wrote in message news:GIN_g.25515$3D1....@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

> I've said it before, Dork's not just a troll, not just an idiot, he's a
> psychopath.

[snip remainder of imbecile top-post]

> "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
> news:baN_g.3246$fA.2192@trnddc05...
> | Dirk,
> | You trying to be humorous is one thing....BUT...
> | ...what you did here in the context of this discussion
> | is despicable. There are some folks here who are
> | airing very serious issues that are anything but funny.

Exceptionally, to Hyena Hanson:
I find Androcles using the words "simple logic" and quoting
Descartes *extremely* funny, so I hadn't even looked at the
lines he was responding to, nor at the list of newsgroups.
It does not make sense to look at the lines Androcles responds
to. Androcles does not understand lines he responds to.
Androcles is arrogant and dumb, very arrogant and very dumb...

> | So, try not to be so fucking gauche, dude, even if it is the
> | Usenet. Try to curtail your "Fumble bible" to regular themes.
> | Don't be an embarrassment to your Belgian Landsmen.
> | hanson

... but obviously you are even dumber.
I "curtail" my fumble list to funny arrogant ignorants like
Androcles. Psychotic Hyenas like yourself don't even qualify :-)

Dirk Vdm

[followup set to more appropriate newsgroups]


Sorcerer

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 2:43:32 PM10/22/06
to

"Jason Johnson" <ja...@nospam.com> wrote in message
news:jason-22100...@66-52-22-67.lsan.pw-dia.impulse.net...

Who gives as shit about "America"? It is PEOPLE that matter, not
fuckin' patriots, you moron.
Stick your god up your arse, you ignorant trained chimpanzee.
Trust in fiction is the reason you WILL die. Forever and ever, Amen.


Sorcerer

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 2:51:54 PM10/22/06
to

"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:dvO_g.143149$tN.20...@phobos.telenet-ops.be...

|
| "Sorcerer" <Headm...@hogwarts.physics_b> wrote in message
news:GIN_g.25515$3D1....@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
| > I've said it before, Dork's not just a troll, not just an idiot, he's a
| > psychopath.
|
| [snip remainder of imbecile top-post]


http://magazyn-nova.webpark.pl/head_up_arse2.jpg

[restore post]

hanson

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 4:05:10 PM10/22/06
to
Well, low class as you, the confessed NO-Sperm VD Dirk, are
perhaps your gauche humor attempt may bring some smiles to
a few grief stricken people, making them realize that they are
by far not in such a bad mental condition as you are, because:

VD aka "Dirk Van de moortel", the self-labeled "Third Kacksacker"
and the self-anointed *** moron, local.village.idiot and troll ***
<dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> cranked
himself news:dvO_g.143149$tN.20...@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
and cajoled:
::: [follow-up set to more appropriate newsgroups] [= Dirk's home at:]
::: alt.morons,alt.local.village.idiot,alt.troll
where VD Dirk can been seen at work kacksackering away:
http://home.tiscali.be/stebune/Animal_files/elephant-shit-patrol.jpg
http://www.thesidewaysguide.com/Images/Skate/SkateFeatures/SkateLists...


>
> "Sorcerer" <Headm...@hogwarts.physics_b> wrote in message
news:GIN_g.25515$3D1....@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
>> I've said it before, Dork's not just a troll, not just an idiot, he's a
>> psychopath.
>

[VD]


> [snip remainder of imbecile top-post]
>

[Andro]
[Andro de-snipped and re-stated in short that]


Dork's not just a troll, not just an idiot, he's a psychopath.

The Int. Sci. Voc. describes VD Dork as being
<dirkvandemoortel @ ThankS-***NO-SperM***.hotmail.com>
http://magazyn-nova.webpark.pl/head_up_arse2.jpg


a mentally ill or unstable person; especially a person affected

with antisocial personality disorders, diagnosed and most
succinctly showing that VD suffers amongst other maladies from:


2.. Grandiose sense of self-worth
3.. Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom

8.. Callous/lack of empathy
10.. Poor behavioral controls
11..and of course his incessant habit of compulsive kackskackering.
>
[hanson]
Hey, Dirk, you poor guy, that is some baggage you are carrying.
>
[hanson]


>> "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
>> news:baN_g.3246$fA.2192@trnddc05...
>> | Dirk,
>> | You trying to be humorous is one thing....BUT...
>> | ...what you did here in the context of this discussion
>> | is despicable. There are some folks here who are
>> | airing very serious issues that are anything but funny.
>

[VD]


> Exceptionally, to Hyena Hanson:
> I find Androcles using the words "simple logic" and quoting
> Descartes *extremely* funny, so I hadn't even looked at the
> lines he was responding to, nor at the list of newsgroups.
> It does not make sense to look at the lines Androcles responds
> to. Androcles does not understand lines he responds to.
> Androcles is arrogant and dumb, very arrogant and very dumb...
>

[hanson]
But VD see, that confession of yours here shows exactly your
problem as diagnosed above under 2, 3, 8, 10 & 11... ahahaha...
>
[hanson]


>> | So, try not to be so fucking gauche, dude, even if it is the
>> | Usenet. Try to curtail your "Fumble bible" to regular themes.
>> | Don't be an embarrassment to your Belgian Landsmen.
>> | hanson
>

[VD]


> ... but obviously you are even dumber.
> I "curtail" my fumble list to funny arrogant ignorants like
> Androcles. Psychotic Hyenas like yourself don't even qualify :-)
> Dirk Vdm
>

[hanson]
.... ahahaha... on top of your manifest symptoms 2, 3, 8, 10 & 11,
VD, it is obvious that you cranked yourself enormously for having
been caught with your pants down. Don't be so transparent
when you expose your self so indecently, VD.
But thanks for the laughs, VD... ahahahaha.... ahahahanson

Sorcerer

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 6:20:33 PM10/22/06
to

"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
news:W9Q_g.80034$073.64231@trnddc01...

According to Dork, XOR implies OR. That's what his last list of "fumbles"
were about.
Id est:
there is a switch: therefore the light is on.
Nobody's home.
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/XorOr.gif

Androcles

D

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 6:51:29 PM10/22/06
to

Jason Johnson wrote:
> In article <1161486373.7...@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com>, "D"

Jason

How do I say this. Emmm, not everybody in the USA are Christians. I
did not know that Christians
were losing their faith in God. A lot of us are not.

dboots

ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 8:55:03 PM10/22/06
to
In sci.physics D <dboot...@clearwire.net> wrote:

> ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com wrote:
> > In sci.physics D <dboot...@clearwire.net> wrote:
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > > The thing is, somehow for whatever reason, cancers are on the
> > > uprise.
> >
> > Cancer is a disease of age. The longer you live, the better the odds
> > of getting cancer. Everyone is living longer than they used to.
> > Detection is also much better than it used to be.
> >
> > > Cancer clusters in communitys have risen especially over the last ten
> > > years.
> >
> > There has never been a proven cancer cluster in a community.
> >
> > Lots of supposed cancer clusters, but never one that stood up to
> > testing.
> >
> > <snip>

> Jim

> Newest cancer cluster near a newly built elec power station. In
> Stockotn, Ca. Pretty
> affluent neighborhood. Cancer within a mile radius near this newly
> build power station
> for that part of the town, have risen 20%. West March Lane off of I-5
> highway.

Cancer has risen 20% relative to what?

Every so called cancer cluster to date when analyzed has shown no
difference from the expected average rates and random distribution
in spite of untold millions of dollars spent to do such studies.

<snip childish screed; so called cancer clusters predate all the Bushes>

betsyb

unread,
Oct 22, 2006, 9:37:53 PM10/22/06
to

--

BetsyB

"Sorcerer" <Headm...@hogwarts.physics_b> wrote in message

news:oZO_g.26486$3D1....@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...

My, don't we have the biggest mouth in the neighborhood and your tone turns
us off from anything constructive you might decide to share. Say goodbye!!

Betsy


Art Deco

unread,
Oct 23, 2006, 8:48:01 PM10/23/06
to
hanson <han...@quick.net> wrote:

Now *this* is a proper campaign speech for the Goofy Azzed Babboon,
[hanson].

Support newsgroup snecked.

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

Hi, fanbois!

Archie Leach

unread,
Oct 23, 2006, 9:35:26 PM10/23/06
to
Art Deco <er...@netcabal.com> wrote:

[hanson] appears to be the retarded stepcousin of the legendary and
long-spnaked alt.flame mediocrity known as Xixixlezit (aka "Bleat
Goat", etc.)


D

unread,
Oct 24, 2006, 7:30:38 PM10/24/06
to

Jim

1/4 mile north south east west in a 1 mile radius total suppose 40+
cancers.

Quite a high abnormal number I am told for that small of an area.
Children, teens, 30, 40 50
60 years old. . Cancer knows no age limits it seems in that 1 mile
radius.

DB

ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com

unread,
Oct 24, 2006, 8:15:03 PM10/24/06
to
In sci.physics D <dboot...@clearwire.net> wrote:

> Jim

> DB

Assuming you are talking to me...

Forty cases, oh the horrors.

How many people total?

What is the age distribution?

How many in each age bracket have cancer?

How long have they had it?

How do the statistics compare to the expected averages and random
distribution?

Get back to me after more millions are flushed down the sewer analyzing
this lastest "cluster" only to find that once again there is no cluster.

hanson

unread,
Oct 24, 2006, 10:05:24 PM10/24/06
to
<dboot...@clearwire.net> wrote in message
news:1161732638....@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
[hanson]
These observations are simply results of statistical pattern
recognition. There are innumerable ways that stats can
be interpreted. Enviros do that all the time from GW-doom
to safety exaggerations. Pattern recognitions are a sure way
to make money, because so many people do "recognize" it.
Don't get taken in, Diva, by such cons without seeing other
totally independent corroborating evidence... or you'll end up
to become a class 3 enviro.
hanson


D

unread,
Oct 25, 2006, 3:34:09 AM10/25/06
to

Hanson

You consider 40 cases of cancer in a one mile radius next to a newly
built electrical power stations simply a result of statistical pattern
recognition. The pattern they are recognizing
is these people don't have colds more often, and they have more sore
throats that
other neighborhoods, but cancer is only a statistical pattern tool like
you are calibrating
something. I do not think that anyone who knows someone who has cancer
or who
has had cancer would ever say that the fact that they have cancer, that
the only reason they have cancer was just a sure way for someone to
make money.
And if thats your case, then you have proven your theory. If the only
reason is that
they have cancer is a sure way of someone making more money that you
can bet
that they also thought of a way to ignore the facts and let people get
cancer just
only so they could ensure a way to continue to make money and hope
people
DO NOT recognize it and continue in believe in dumb people who make
such
statements as this. People who try and conned others into believing no
cancer cluster has ever been documented anywhere on this planet. Huh
huh, three mile island, Chernobyl.
Get real, Hanson. Rhetoric just does not cut it these days.

DB

J

unread,
Oct 25, 2006, 6:21:47 AM10/25/06
to
D wrote:

> People who try and conned others into believing no
> cancer cluster has ever been documented anywhere on this planet. Huh
> huh, three mile island, Chernobyl.
> Get real, Hanson. Rhetoric just does not cut it these days.

Clusters have been documented, but they forgot (or because wikipedia's
mostly written by Americans) Chernobyl.

People cluster, people with cancer cluster

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cancer_cluster
Cancer cluster is a term used by epidemiologists, statisticians, and public
health workers to define an occurrence of a greater-than-expected number of
cancer cases within a group of people in a geographic area over a period of
time1.

Historical examples of work-related cancer clusters are well documented in
the medical literature. Notable examples include: scrotal cancer among
chimney sweeps in 18th century London, osteosarcoma among female watch dial
painters in the 20th century, skin cancer in farmers, bladder cancer in dye
workers exposed to aniline compounds, and leukemia and lymphoma in chemical
workers exposed to benzene2.

Cancer cluster suspicions usually arise when members of the general public
report that their family members, friends, neighbors, or coworkers have
been diagnosed with the same or related cancers. State or local health
departments will investigate the possibility of a cancer cluster when a
claim is filed3. In order to justify investigating such claims, health
departments conduct a preliminary review. Data will be collected and
verified regarding: the types of cancer reported, numbers of cases,
geographic area of the cases, and the patients clinical history. At this
point, a committee of medical professionals will examine the data and
determine whether or not an investigation (often lengthy and expensive) is
justified4.

In the U.S., state and local health departments respond to more than 1,000
inquiries about suspected cancer clusters each year. It is possible that a
suspected cancer cluster may be due to chance alone, however, only clusters
that have a disease rate that is statistically significantly greater than
the disease rate of the general population are investigated. Given the
number of inquiries it is likely that even some of these are due to chance
alone.

A cluster is more likely to be "genuine" if the case consists of one type
of cancer, a rare type of cancer, or a type of cancer that is not usually
found in a certain age group. Between 5% to 15% of suspected cancer
clusters are statistically significant[citation needed].

ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com

unread,
Oct 25, 2006, 9:55:03 AM10/25/06
to
In sci.physics J <nos...@nospam.net> wrote:
> D wrote:

> > People who try and conned others into believing no
> > cancer cluster has ever been documented anywhere on this planet. Huh
> > huh, three mile island, Chernobyl.
> > Get real, Hanson. Rhetoric just does not cut it these days.

> Clusters have been documented, but they forgot (or because wikipedia's
> mostly written by Americans) Chernobyl.

Lots of documentation by lots of non-Americans; your bias is showing.

A big accident spreading known carcinogenic material around the country
side is not what most people call a cancer cluster.

If you count such things, then yes, there have been documented cancer
clusters.

If you go by the main stream usage of the term, i.e. there seem to be
a lot of cancer cases in this place and there is no apparent reason
but we think it is the xyz factory or the power lines, then there have
been no documented cancer clusters.

> People cluster, people with cancer cluster

> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cancer_cluster
> Cancer cluster is a term used by epidemiologists, statisticians, and public
> health workers to define an occurrence of a greater-than-expected number of
> cancer cases within a group of people in a geographic area over a period of
> time1.

> Historical examples of work-related cancer clusters are well documented in
> the medical literature. Notable examples include: scrotal cancer among
> chimney sweeps in 18th century London, osteosarcoma among female watch dial
> painters in the 20th century, skin cancer in farmers, bladder cancer in dye
> workers exposed to aniline compounds, and leukemia and lymphoma in chemical
> workers exposed to benzene2.

As none of the above are associated with a geographic area, but rather
with an occupation, they are not "cancer clusters" as most people use
the term. Rather, they are occupational injuries.


> Cancer cluster suspicions usually arise when members of the general public
> report that their family members, friends, neighbors, or coworkers have
> been diagnosed with the same or related cancers. State or local health
> departments will investigate the possibility of a cancer cluster when a
> claim is filed3. In order to justify investigating such claims, health
> departments conduct a preliminary review. Data will be collected and
> verified regarding: the types of cancer reported, numbers of cases,
> geographic area of the cases, and the patients clinical history. At this
> point, a committee of medical professionals will examine the data and
> determine whether or not an investigation (often lengthy and expensive) is
> justified4.

> In the U.S., state and local health departments respond to more than 1,000
> inquiries about suspected cancer clusters each year. It is possible that a
> suspected cancer cluster may be due to chance alone, however, only clusters
> that have a disease rate that is statistically significantly greater than
> the disease rate of the general population are investigated. Given the
> number of inquiries it is likely that even some of these are due to chance
> alone.

> A cluster is more likely to be "genuine" if the case consists of one type
> of cancer, a rare type of cancer, or a type of cancer that is not usually
> found in a certain age group. Between 5% to 15% of suspected cancer
> clusters are statistically significant[citation needed].

hanson

unread,
Oct 25, 2006, 11:28:29 AM10/25/06
to
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... AHAHAHA....
Diva aka "D" <dboot...@clearwire.net> wrote in message
news:1161761649.4...@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

>> <dboot...@clearwire.net> wrote in message
>> news:1161732638....@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>> > 1/4 mile north south east west in a 1 mile radius total
>> > suppose 40+ cancers.
>> > Quite a high abnormal number I am told for that small of an area.
>> > Children, teens, 30, 40 50 60 years old. .
>> > Cancer knows no age limits it seems in that 1 mile radius.
>> > DB
>> >
>> [hanson]
>> These observations are simply results of statistical pattern
>> recognition. There are innumerable ways that stats can
>> be interpreted. Enviros do that all the time from GW-doom
>> to safety exaggerations. Pattern recognitions are a sure way
>> to make money, because so many people do "recognize" it.
>> Don't get taken in, Diva, by such cons without seeing other
>> totally independent corroborating evidence... or you'll end up
>> to become a class 3 enviro.
>> hanson
>
[Diva]

> You consider 40 cases of cancer in a one mile radius next to a newly
> built electrical power stations simply a result of statistical pattern
> recognition.
>
[hanson]
Cancers don't occurs overnight because of NEWLY built electrical
power station in the neighborhood, which to boot does not even
have the potential to release radioactive emission as in your
Chernobyl example below... It looks much more like the greenies
have infected you with their enviro-doom disease... ahahaha...
>
[Diva]

>The pattern they are recognizing is these people don't
> have colds more often, and they have more sore throats that
> other neighborhoods, but cancer is only a statistical pattern tool like
> you are calibrating something.
> I do not think that anyone who knows someone who has cancer or who
> has had cancer would ever say that the fact that they have cancer, that
> the only reason they have cancer was just a sure way for someone to
> make money. And if thats your case, then you have proven your theory.
> If the only reason is that they have cancer is a sure way of someone
> making more money that you can bet that they also thought of a way to
> ignore the facts and let people get cancer just
> only so they could ensure a way to continue to make money and hope
> people DO NOT recognize it and continue in believe in dumb people
> who make such statements as this. People who try and conned others
> into believing no cancer cluster has ever been documented anywhere
> on this planet. Huh huh, three mile island, Chernobyl.
> Get real, Hanson. Rhetoric just does not cut it these days.
> DB
>
[hanson]
ahahahaha... sweet pea, **recognize** that you actually got a moist
and swollen clit over this issue....ahahahaha... Work it off... then relax
and work yourself up again by reading what "J" has posted...
Thanks for the laughs, wet Diva, ahahahaha... ahahanson

D

unread,
Oct 26, 2006, 3:36:32 AM10/26/06
to
J

Quite fancy reading there. You would almost believe that the makers of
one of those
cancer drugs, wrote it themselves that part where clusters are only
realy deemed a
cluster if they are rare cancers or all the same. Cancer is cancer.
It shouldn't have
to be a rare cancer. It shouldn't have to be the same cancer. A rise
in cancer, in an
study, should be considered as not normal because ANY CANCER THAT IS ON
THE RISE IS NOT NORMAL. It means there is something in the environment
that
is mutating the cells more often. Air, water ,food supply. Something
is feeding the cells that make cancer and blocking something in us that
stopped the cancers before, so they
are now rising across the state. But 40 cases surrounding a
neighborhood that is less
than 15 years old that is next a power station has to make somebody go
HMMMMMM.

db

ji...@specsol.spam.sux.com

unread,
Oct 26, 2006, 11:05:03 AM10/26/06
to
In sci.physics D <dboot...@clearwire.net> wrote:
> J

> db

Bunch of babbling nonsense.

Tom Potter

unread,
Oct 26, 2006, 8:29:28 PM10/26/06
to

"Art Deco" <er...@netcabal.com> wrote in message
news:231020061848018317%er...@netcabal.com...

Hanson, I suggest that you are dead on,
with your psychological analysis of Dork moortel.

"a mentally ill or unstable person; especially a person affected
with antisocial personality disorders, diagnosed and most
succinctly showing that VD suffers amongst other maladies from:

Grandiose sense of self-worth


Need for stimulation/proneness to boredom

Callous/lack of empathy
Poor behavioral controls"

and I suggest that the URL below provides
a good discussion of the particular defense mechanism
used by Art Deco.

I think that Art is (Was?) basically a good person,
who came into the newsgroups,
and like many others, wanted to make a contribution,
but he couldn't handle the rejection, so he did a 180.
(Adopted the "reaction formation" defense mechanism.)

One could feel sorry for the psycho's and neurotics,
if they respected the science newsgroups,
and they confined their silly, immature trash
to the newsgroups set up for adolescents and neurotics.

Hopefully Art Deco with study "reaction formation",
think about it, heal himself, and leave the "Dark Side".

There is no cure for people like Dork moortel,
short of a frontal lobotomy.

http://changingminds.org/explanations/behaviors/coping/reaction_formation.htm

"Reaction Formation
==============
Description
Reaction Formation occurs when a person feels an urge to do or say something
and then actually does or says something that is effectively the opposite of
what they really want. It also appears as a defense against a feared social
punishment. If I fear that I will be criticized for something, I very
visibly act in a way that shows I am personally a long way from the feared
position.

A common pattern in Reaction Formation is where the person uses 'excessive
behavior', for example using exaggerated friendliness when the person is
actually feeling unfriendly.

Example
A person who is angry with a colleague actually ends up being particularly
courteous and friendly towards them.
A man who is gay has a number of conspicuous heterosexual affairs and openly
criticizes gays.
A mother who has a child she does not want becomes very protective of the
child.
An alcoholic extols the virtues of abstinence.

Discussion
A cause of Reaction Formation is when a person seeks to cover up something
unacceptable by adopting an opposite stance. For example the gay person who
has heterosexually promiscuous may be concealing their homosexual reality.
This may be a conscious concealment but also may well occur at the
subconscious level such that they do not realize the real cause of their
behavior. Reaction Formation thus can turn homosexual tendencies (love men)
to homophobic ones (hate men).

Freud called the exaggerated compensation that can appear in Reaction
Formation 'overboarding' as the person is going overboard in one direction
to distract from and cover up something unwanted in the other direction,
such as a person who fears war becoming a pacifist, convincing themselves
that war is wrong (rather than the 'cowardly' position that war is scary).

Reaction Formation goes further than projection such that unwanted impulses
and thoughts are not acknowledged.

Extreme patterns of Reaction Formation are found in paranoia and
obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), where the person becomes trapped in a
cycle of repeating a behavior that they know (at least at a deep level) is
somehow wrong."

--
Tom Potter
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com


--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Art Deco

unread,
Oct 26, 2006, 11:56:42 PM10/26/06
to
Tom Potter <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote:

*ding*


>
>I think that Art is (Was?) basically a good person,
>who came into the newsgroups,
>and like many others, wanted to make a contribution,
>but he couldn't handle the rejection, so he did a 180.
>(Adopted the "reaction formation" defense mechanism.)
>
>One could feel sorry for the psycho's and neurotics,
>if they respected the science newsgroups,
>and they confined their silly, immature trash
>to the newsgroups set up for adolescents and neurotics.
>
>Hopefully Art Deco with study "reaction formation",
>think about it, heal himself, and leave the "Dark Side".

Hi, Crackpotter! Thanks for coming out in favor of [hanson]'s Goofy
Azzed Babboon nomination, I'm sure it'll go a long way toward securing
more votes in his favor.


>
>There is no cure for people like Dork moortel,
>short of a frontal lobotomy.
>
>http://changingminds.org/explanations/behaviors/coping/reaction_formation.htm
>
>"Reaction Formation
>==============
>Description
>Reaction Formation occurs when a person feels an urge to do or say something
>and then actually does or says something that is effectively the opposite of

Nice screed, but alas, it seems to have be flushed. Sorry.

--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth

Hi, fanbois!

Androcles

unread,
Oct 27, 2006, 12:00:53 AM10/27/06
to

"Tom Potter" <tdp...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:4541469e$0$19687$8826...@free.teranews.com...

| Hanson, I suggest that you are dead on,
| with your psychological analysis of Dork moortel.


Not quite.
Dork Van de merde is also prime psychotic as well as psychopathic.

http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/TwinsEvents.html

As you can clearly see, his offer to create web pages because
he worked for a major international IT provider with 500 plus
employees in Belgium (as a janitor) is endorsed by his exemplary
skill in creating images in text.

He also has a gender recognition malfunction.
"In order for the travelling twin to make *his* trip, *she* must be in
frame S' "

Androcles


D

unread,
Oct 29, 2006, 5:55:31 AM10/29/06
to

hanson wrote:
> ahahaha... AHAHAHA... AHAHAHA....

Hanson

It is 15 years later. Didn't happen overnight. It happened over the
course of only 15 years.
But to some that could represent "overnight I guess"

Dboots

hanson

unread,
Oct 29, 2006, 6:21:19 PM10/29/06
to
"Diva" <dboot...@clearwire.net> wrote in message
news:1162119331.1...@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> hanson wrote:
>> ahahaha... AHAHAHA... AHAHAHA.... in
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/af2a33bade9fe203

>> ahahahaha... sweet pea, **recognize** that you actually got a moist
>> and swollen clit over this issue....ahahahaha... Work it off... then
>> relax
>> and work yourself up again by reading what "J" has posted...
>> Thanks for the laughs, wet Diva, ahahahaha... ahahanson
>
[Diva]

> It is 15 years later. Didn't happen overnight.
> It happened over the course of only 15 years.
> But to some that could represent "overnight I guess"
> Dboots
>
[hanson]
WOW... sweet pea, Diva!.. Can't you make up your mind?
Was it inter-course over 15 years... or just a long overnight stand?...
ahahaha... ahahahanson

D

unread,
Oct 29, 2006, 10:47:00 PM10/29/06
to

Hanson

Give me a break. The only intercourse you know is with your hand and a
wet tissue.
And to you that probably represents an over nightter when your bragging
to your friends.

dboots

hanson

unread,
Oct 29, 2006, 11:51:27 PM10/29/06
to
ahahahaha.... AHAHAHAHAHA... ahahahaha... ahahaha...
"Dick as Diva" <dboot...@clearwire.net> got a hard-on in message
news:1162180020.5...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

> hanson wrote:
>> "Diva" <dboot...@clearwire.net> wrote in message
>> news:1162119331.1...@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> > hanson wrote:
>> >> ahahaha... AHAHAHA... AHAHAHA.... in
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/af2a33bade9fe203
>> >> ahahahaha... sweet pea, **recognize** that you actually got a moist
>> >> and swollen clit over this issue....ahahahaha... Work it off... then
>> >> relax
>> >> and work yourself up again by reading what "J" has posted...
>> >> Thanks for the laughs, wet Diva, ahahahaha... ahahanson
>> >
>> [Diva]
>> > It is 15 years later. Didn't happen overnight.
>> > It happened over the course of only 15 years.
>> > But to some that could represent "overnight I guess"
>> > Dboots
>> >
>> [hanson]
>> WOW... sweet pea, Diva!.. Can't you make up your mind?
>> Was it inter-course over 15 years... or just a long overnight stand?...
>> ahahaha... ahahahanson
>
[Dick]

> Give me a break. The only intercourse you know is with your
> hand and a wet tissue. And to you that probably represents
> an over nightter when your bragging to your friends.
> dboots
>
[hanson]
ahahaha... Gottcha!... You are one of the many guys who are
posting as a broad hoping to get their POV across easier...
ahahaha... Thanks for the laughs, guy!.... ahahahanson


D

unread,
Oct 31, 2006, 11:27:11 PM10/31/06
to

Well , laugh like Erkel wantabe, what ever I am has got to be better
than who you are.
A -- holes or jerks are a dime a dozen. Erkel had to probably jerk off
too, so don't feel
so bad.

dboots

hanson

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 12:34:29 AM11/1/06
to
ahahahaha.... AHAHAHAHAHA... ahahahaha... ahahaha...

> hanson wrote:
>>"Dick" as Diva" <dboot...@clearwire.net> got a hard-on in message
>> news:1162180020.5...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>

[hanson]
>> ahahaha... Gottcha!... You are one of the many guys who are
>> posting as a broad hoping to get their POV across easier...
>> ahahaha... Thanks for the laughs, guy!.... ahahahanson
>

"Dick" as "Diva" <dboot...@clearwire.net> angrily CONFESSES
news:1162355231.6...@e64g2000cwd.googlegroups.com...
> Well , laugh like Erkel wantabe, ***what ever I am*** has got to be


> better than who you are. A -- holes or jerks are a dime a dozen.
> Erkel had to probably jerk off too, so don't feel so bad.
>

[hanson]
ahahahaha... ahahahaha...So, you cranked yourself... ahahaha...
But that's what you get for impostering and being a class 3 enviro.

Here is more identification revealed about yourself
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.chem/msg/f232cf15901ce7ba
.... and then there are the explanations about class 3 enviros:

Modern, attributal definitions of enviro classifications:
========= enviro Class (1) --- the Green shit(s):
...are the ones who advocate, promote, support, legalize,
institute and extort the permit charges, the user fees, the
enviro surtaxes and the CO2/Carbon tax, all reflected in
HIGHER PRICES of goods and services!, ...and being
responsible for much of the OUT-SOURCING!
========= enviro Class (2) -- the Green turd(s):
... are the ones who are recipients and beneficiaries from
the lootings of (1), directly or indirectly.
========= enviro Class (3) -- the Little green idiot(s):
.. are the unpaid, well-meaning ones who think they do
something for the "environment", when in fact they are only
the enablers and facilitators for (2) who are harvesting the
green $$$ that (1) has extorted.


Dirk Bruere at NeoPax

unread,
Nov 1, 2006, 6:52:39 PM11/1/06
to
Sorcerer wrote:
> "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message

It's being done.
Google "Blue Brain" and then Transhumanism


--
Dirk

http://www.onetribe.me.uk - The UK's only occult talk show
Presented by Dirk Bruere and Marc Power on ResonanceFM 104.4
http://www.resonancefm.com

drs...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 4:13:57 AM12/8/06
to
RFQMR is a new therapy with a device called Cytotron for Tissue
Engineering to degenerate or regenerate tissues. Besides cancer it has
wonderful results in treating joint pain due to Osteoarthritis by
regenerating and repairing joint cartilage. Presently the most
experienced centre after the trial group is Sibia Medical Centre in
Ludhiana, Punjab (India) that is treating patients since March 2006.
The results are amazing - most patients treated are free of pain killer
drugs with decreased deformity. At Sibia Medical Centre joints other
than knee have also been treated with encouraging result. There is hope
for millions of sufferers. - Dr.Sibia (drs...@sssibia.com). More
information can be had from helpline Mb. +91-9814034818 or website
www.sssibia.com or email in...@sssibia.com. - Dr.Harpreet Kaur
hanson ha escrito:

> The $$$-greed of the US Med-Pharm-FDA Complex which has
> precipitated the current shameful & pitiful decline of health care
> in the USA is beginning to encourage US insurance companies
> to OUT-SOURCE the treatment and care of their subscribers to
> "3rd world countries", in particular to India which does have state
> of the art health care capabilities and facilities (ABC TV 17-Oct-06).
>
> AFA Medical R&D advances India is pushing the frontiers now:
> The Institute of Aerospace Medicine (IAM) of the Indian Air Force
> and the Bangalore-based Centre for Advanced Research and
> Development (CARD) have taken up clinical trials to treat patients
> with osteoarthritis as well as cases in the end-stage cancers.
> High-intensity magnetic resonance beams (as is done in an MRI
> machine) from 288 specialised guns are focussed on a particular
> tissue. In this"Rotational Field Nuclear Quantum Magnetic Resonance
> (RFQMR)," the beams are used to alter cell division so that the cells
> either multiply or cell growth can be arrested. The new method is
> free of the side effects associated with Western chemotherapy
> and radiotherapy. Current state of results:
> http://www.thehindu.com/2005/07/12/stories/2005071214360200.htm
> http://www.hinduonnet.com/thehindu/thscrip/print.pl?file=2005071214360200.htm&date=2005/07/12/&prd=th&
> >
> What are the opinions of the Usenet members on this?
>

drs...@gmail.com

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 8:51:02 AM12/8/06
to

hanson

unread,
Dec 8, 2006, 10:43:14 AM12/8/06
to
Thanks, Sibia,
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/7715b2171ba693bf
... too late for BangBang. They loaded her up with morphine and she
was ready for the trip to that RFQMR machine therapy. But the cancer
beat her to it. BangBang died on 8-Nov-06, 62 days after diagnosis.
>
<drs...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1165569237.8...@j72g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

> RFQMR is a new therapy with a device called Cytotron for Tissue
> Engineering to degenerate or regenerate tissues. Besides cancer it has
> wonderful results in treating joint pain due to Osteoarthritis by
> regenerating and repairing joint cartilage. Presently the most
> experienced centre after the trial group is Sibia Medical Centre in
> Ludhiana, Punjab (India) that is treating patients since March 2006.
> The results are amazing - most patients treated are free of pain killer
> drugs with decreased deformity. At Sibia Medical Centre joints other
> than knee have also been treated with encouraging result. There is hope
> for millions of sufferers. - Dr.Sibia (drs...@sssibia.com). More
> information can be had from helpline Mb. +91-9814034818 or website
> www.sssibia.com or email in...@sssibia.com. - Dr.Harpreet Kaur

> hanson ha escrito:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/8ac74c4d9a604029

0 new messages