Something to chew for the anti-relativists.
w.
And for those who don't have (or trust) MS-Powerpoint, I have
converted it to PDF and made it available (for a while) on
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/PickUp/18Nelson.pdf
I will remove it in a few days.
Dirk Vdm
> And for those who don't have (or trust) MS-Powerpoint, I have
> converted it to PDF and made it available (for a while) on
> http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/PickUp/18Nelson.pdf
> I will remove it in a few days.
>
> Dirk Vdm
>
>
:-)
**Something chewed on by fanatical relativists**,
... the Einstein disciples, the left-behind ones, who like to make things
needlessly complicated since all this elaborate wabniggering can be
done by rational folks in one simple equation:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/e469ebe11d1d0a73
... wherein it says: In this case here, any decent engineer, let alone
physicist, can quickly see, in ONE FELL SWOOP, that all
what matters in such an approximation is the mass of the earth,
M_e, and the signal height traveled, h, to show in a single line that
[1] (M_e /h ) * (2 G/c^2) * 86400 = 38 microsec
the daily time drift, wherein M_e = the earth's mass, h = the orbit height
over the surface, G = Newton, c = Lightspeed & the 86400 sec/day.
This "38" issue is one of the many examples in which the relativists
are their own worst enemies... by overselling relativity. A sober view
of the _usefulness_ of SR/GR (REL) may be summarized as:
Anybody who works in
[8] mil/indust. Eng, R&D....................."does not need REL shit"
[9] *.edu & for R-grants......................"does need REL, - No shit"
[10] Promo, Sales & Movies............. "loves REL by the shitload"
[11] Jews protect it as their cultural heritage whether "REL is shit or not".
Furthermore, it is of no wonder that the Bavarians [12] have made
GR/SR courses NOT mandatory any longer in their Univs physics
curriculum since/in 1996 and just a few months ago I glanced at a
post from a [13] US student who wondered what book to study about
GR since it was no longer offered at his University in the US.... [14]
Androcles posted yesterday that even the conservative Royal Society
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/opinion/mg18825282.800.html
has now voted Einstein OUT also... and yet in these NG's there are
these loud fanatical disciples infected with Einsteinitis and even
claim that attacks are motivated by "anti-semitism" and jealously.
The facts are clear: Such hung-up and stuck up disciples are jealous
that the world has moved on since 1905/1916 and that the evolution
of physics, and science in general, does continue... with these left
behind relativity fans who came to the Usenet, a 24/7 cyber party, where
they represent glaringly that they are the notorious prodigies that failed
and now have come to these NGs to die.... ('Tis to Savain's delight)
ahahaha... Them times are changing, ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA....
But one aphorism will not fade away as do Einstein's cons now:
[15] "Experiments are the only means of knowledge at our
disposal. The rest is poetry, imagination." -- Max Planck [7]
Therefore: "Let'em sing!.....all of them!....it's a beautiful choir!
Thanks for the laughs though.......ahahahahah....really!.....
ahahaha... ahahaha... Happy 2006 you all!......
ahahaha... ahahahanson
The official GPS specifications by USA governemental
institutions responsible for navigation issues:
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/sigspec/default.htm
Signal standards and relativity corrections:
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/sigspec/gpssps1.pdf
-Example citation from page 18 in above document, satellite clocks:
2.3.1.1 Frequency Plan
The L-band SPS ranging signal is contained within a 2.046 MHz band
centered about L1. The carrier frequency for the L1 signal is
coherently derived from a frequency source within the
satellite. The nominal frequency of this source -- as it appears to an
observer on the ground -- is 1.023 MHz. To compensate for relativistic
effects, the output frequency of the satellite's frequency
standard -- as it would appear to an observer located at the satellite
-- is 10.23 MHz offset by a Df/f = -4.4647 x 10-18 or a Df = -4.567 x
10-3 Hz. This frequency offset results in an output of
10.22999999543 MHz, which is frequency divided to obtain the
appropriate carrier modulation signal (1.022999999543 MHz). The same
output frequency source is also used to generate the
nominal L1 carrier frequency (fo) of 1575.42 MHz.
-end cit.
For the full description of relativistic corrections,
satellite based and user based see on the following pages:
page 18
page 39
page 44
page 45
page 48
About Accuracy and algorithms:
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/sigspec/gpsspsa.pdf
*****************************************************************
Above documents are the source and origin of all GPS algorithms
used in every gps receiver worldwide. Without applying the correct
formulas your set will not work properly. You may guess that today's
GPS receivers use even more sophisticated higher order corrections
than are specified in the original 1995 documents.
******************************************************************
The group clowns Androcles and hanson fiercely deny
applications of relativity in spite of evidence created by
the USA governemental documents.
Androcles compares himself with Newton, and puts himself
above Einstein, while hanson denies relativity because
Einstein was of Jewish origin and hanson is a Jew-hater.
w.
A pity you didn't include the actual energy distribution of
ground-arriving muons -- but this is a nitpick.
:-)
I should note on a technical front that OpenOffice 2.0 presented this
stuff wonderfully well, for those who don't trust Microsoft MS.
Or one can use the converted PDF from Dirk, if one wishes.
All in all, there's a *lot* of evidence *for* SR and GTR. I don't
see nearly as much evidence for c'=c+v here.
--
#191, ewi...@earthlink.net
It's still legal to go .sigless.
Now, after this short, simple and curt statement Wabniggie, a phony,
left-behind Einstein fanatic, tries to convince me to go to his cited
www.navcen.uscg.gov/cgsic/meetings/summaryrpts/41stmeeting/18%20Nelso...
page, advocates and insists to make things even more complicated
thru this website he found from the government and authored by
bureaucrats in whose professional interests it is to make things
as complicated as possible ... ahahaha... and for me to read there
at **great length** the full description of relativistic corrections
in "page 18 / page 39 / page 44 / page 45 / page 48", ahahahaha..
all stuff which is superfluous , and which Wabniggie (a) does not
understand in the first place and, (b) is against Einstein's advice of
keeping things simple, but Wabniggie can simply not grasp that
there is a steady overselling of SR/GR, which was explained to him in
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/e469ebe11d1d0a73
wherein is says where valid applicabilities of SR & GR are, such as in:
[8] mil/indust. Eng, R&D....................."does not need REL shit"
[9] *.edu & for R-grants......................"does need REL, - No shit"
[10] Promo, Sales & Movies............. "loves REL by the shitload"
[11] Jews protect it as their cultural heritage whether "REL is shit or not".
It is now clear that Wabniggie obviously does not belong to any of
the above groups, except him trying to suck the dicks of set [11]...
But, it gets even worse when wabniggie says in his closing remarks
"You may guess".... **GUESSING**, the sure Hallmark fashion of the
Einstein disciple, "guessing", the typical content & conclusions in all
posts of all fanatical relativists, especially like our hilarious Wabnigger's,
who is so proud of his dog brain, a must-be-true conditions because
Wabniggie posted at least 400 times that "On the Internet nobody
knows that I, [Wabnig] am a dog." .... ahahaha.... AHAHAHA...
Wabniggie is not only a guessing dog but he, Wabnig, lies with
certainty for he said just not even a month ago, in his own words:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/4aa2e8ae5f8a05f8
"I, [Wabnigger], will never ever read one of your [hanson] posts"...
But not even 4 weeks later our Köter Wabnigger had to come back
and bark, after he blamed his wife and kids for his sorry condition as
he did in his post (to his imaginary readership) in... ahaha
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/27cd24eead62fd2f
and so Wabniggie, the Köter, feels left-behind, loses his self-esteem,
his self-worth and gives up his identity to seek refuge in and flees
into the safe anonymity of the collective which he hopes will save him,
by sucking up to them [11] and issue a luke warm declaration that:
>
[Wabnigger]
> Androcles compares himself with Newton, and puts himself
> above Einstein, while hanson denies relativity because
> Einstein was of Jewish origin and hanson is a Jew-hater.
>
[hanson]
ahahaha... AHAHAHA... AHAHAnti-.... AHAHAnti-Semitism... ahaha...
"Anti-Semitism", the standard lore (which WAS) used by Jews till about
15 years back, but no longer now. Today it is only used occasionally
the some goyim, the clueless type, the left-behind ones, the ones who
seeks to suck the Jews' dicks or fiddle to the tune of their yentas, like
you do here, Wagnigger, because of the occasion when you/they are
about to lose their argument and hope that their whining and crying
of/about "anti-semitism" is going to put them back into the saddle...
ahahaha... You are so transparent, Wabnigger, you phony, two faced
"family blamer"... ahahaha... .... So, let's get over my post again in
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/e469ebe11d1d0a73
wherein I stated --- quote starts ---
[11] Jews protect it as their cultural heritage whether "REL is shit or not".
Furthermore, it is of no wonder that the Bavarians [12] have made
GR/SR courses NOT mandatory any longer in their Univs physics
curriculum since/in 1996 and just a few months ago I glanced at a
post from a [13] US student who wondered what book to study about
GR since it was no longer offered at his University in the US.... [14]
Androcles posted yesterday that even the conservative Royal Society
http://www.newscientist.com/channel/opinion/mg18825282.800.html
has now voted Einstein OUT also... and yet in these NG's there are
these loud fanatical disciples infected with Einsteinitis and even
claim that attacks are motivated by "anti-semitism" and jealously.
== The facts are clear: Such hung-up & stuck up disciples are jealous
that the world has moved on since 1905/1916 and that the evolution
of physics, and science in general, does continue... ...with these left
behind relativity fans who came to the Usenet, a 24/7 cyber party,
where they represent glaringly that they are the notorious prodigies
that failed and now have come to these NGs to die... --- quote ends ---
So, friend Wabnigger, what is so "anti-semitic" about saying
"Jews protect it as their cultural heritage" and citing the statements
following [11] above? .... ahahaha... Let me clue you in, your poor
clueless Wabnigger: IT MADE YOU MAD WHEN YOU REALIZED
THAT YOU are one of "these loud fanatical disciples infected with
Einsteinitis and claim that attacks are motivated by "anti-semitism"
and jealously. The facts are clear: YOU ARE one such hung-up and
stuck up disciple who is jealous that the world has moved on since
1905/1916... and made you "the intellectually left-behind Helmut Wabnig".
Now, we have made full circle and you can go to the top where is says
indeed: "The intellectually left-behind "Helmut Wabnig" <hwabnig @ aon.at>
was wabniggering.... ahahahaha... ahahaha... Thanks for the laughs!
PS: Wabbie, you were much further ahead in the game when you
declared me to be your "Fluch". -- That was very much better then
what you are doing now, you sinking so low now by first blaming your
family and now the Jews for your own plight...
But then you guys over there have a history of blaming the Jews,
don't you!
>
>All in all, there's a *lot* of evidence *for* SR and GTR. I don't
>see nearly as much evidence for c'=c+v here.
The main thing to note is IMHO that it comes from
the MAKERS of the GPS and it proves that they
are fully aware of the relativity issues,
be they Einsteinian or Lorentzian or Weitzenböck,
affine or metric, or any other taste & flavor,
but they *do* use relativity in GPS, that is the point.
w.
The reasons for why has been explained to you 2x in great detail in
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/95928d204a5a7f18
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/e469ebe11d1d0a73
Take care and have a happy 2006, Helmuth
hanson
Ha yes, the great detail that gives 2 milliseconds per day
for MIR and the ISS - Congratulations - Ha-Ha.
Dirk Vdm
Where I live, at 5:05 PM, it's not yet entirely dark in the winter.
>, this 2005 NY's eve,
> you should not post when you are already drunk
Don't be afraid, I'm not Androcles, I'm not Ken Tucker, I am
not like you, so I hadn't planned to drink myself unconscious.
Dirk Vdm
But you, 3rd Kacksacker VD, you had to apply it in your typical, fanatical
obsession to *** other cases *** like the MIR or ISS... ahahaha... AHAHA..
You committed an immortal fumble, 3rd Kacksacker. Put it non your website!
Listen, 3rd Kacksacker VD, you can redeem yourself by explaining why
this [1] works only for *** this case of the GPS SVs here! *** .... ahahaha...
Thanks for the laughs, Dirk, sleep your hangover off and then have a
Happy New Year ..... ahahaha... ahahanson