NC Governor Should Resign Over Science
NoEinstein
TRUTHS in education, is just the tip of the iceberg, nationally.
[*Also see my similarly titled, earlier post:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ca7733d51c0d6ec0/d68a772ab0b32c8f?hl=en#d68a772ab0b32c8f
]
In my nearly seven year odyssey to get my disproofs of Einstein
recognized, the following universities, and one college, have come up
lacking:
1. MIT -- Places more emphasis on 'the form', and the *precedence,
then it does on the simplicity and the elegance of the arguments.
[*i.e.: It requires one to show that what is presented is an evolution
from the status quo, and thus supports the status quo as "the
foundation" of what is allowed to follow.]
2. University of Colorado -- Ditto the above response.
3. Furman University (SC) -- Ditto the above response.
4. University of Chicago -- Beginning in 2007, no response of any kind
to exhaustive appeals to the science head, Robert Fefferman (a
mathematician) and to top administration.
5. Davidson College (NC): No response to several appeals to the
college president, including my offer to demonstrate my X-Y-Z
interferometer.
6. University of NC -- No response of any kind to exhaustive appeals
to the physics department at the main Chapel Hill campus; and to a
computer simulation specialist in modeling scientific events. Later,
there was a token reply from UNC President Erskin Boles, an
acquaintance, who promised to give my materials to an appropriate
person(s). But Boles didn't reply to my follow-ups, nor accept my
offers to demonstrate my X-Y-Z interferometer.
7. Georgia Tech -- No response of any kind to my exhaustive appeals to
the head of the science department (a mathematician), and my
especially strong offers to present my X-Y-Z interferometer at their
convenience.
8. University of Georgia -- No response of any kind to my exhaustive
appeals to the head of the physics department, an Englishman, and my
especially strong offers to present my X-Y-Z interferometer at their
convenience.
9. NC State University -- No response of any kind to my exhaustive
appeals to the head of the physics department, and to a computer
simulation professor; and my especially strong offers to present my X-
Y-Z interferometer at their convenience.
10. University of Virginia -- No response of any kind to my exhaustive
appeals to the head of the physics department, an astronomer; to the
provost, a physicist; and to the university president. And no reply
to my offers to present my X-Y-Z interferometer, at their university,
at their convenience.
11. University of Florida -- No response of any kind to my exhaustive
appeals to the university president, a dentist, and my offers to
present my X-Y-Z interferometer at their convenience.
12. University of Maryland -- A blatant turn down by the university
president of my all or nothing appeal, including my offer to present
my X-Y-Z interferometer at their convenience.
13. Virginia Tech -- No response of any kind to my exhaustive appeals
to the university president. And no reply to my offers to present my
X-Y-Z interferometer, at their university, at their convenience.
14. Cornell University -- No response of any kind to my exhaustive
appeals to a German professor who specializes in audio and other non
destructive testing of materials.
15. Penn State University -- A teacher in the "Gravity Department",
Martin Bojowald, wrote a research paper on: "The Big Bounce". Such
paper relies on Einstein's... "Space doesn't exist near super massive
objects." idea. I informed Bojowald of my Einstein disproofs, and
sent him all of my materials. I requested that he put a caveat
paragraph at the beginning of his, then, not yet published paper
stating that Einstein has been disproved, thereby invalidating the
purpose of his paper... which was financed, in part, by the NSF...
Getting no reply from Bojowald, I wrote to the Dean of the
Graduate School, Eva J. Pell, informing her that obtaining funding for
research projects that are based on false premises is a felony.
Additionally, I informed the university president the same thing. I
then got a reply from the PSU counsel, a Mr. Courtney, Esquire,
informing me that my "rights' had not been violated by anything that
Penn State had done.
Realizing that I had discovered a willingness of PSU to obtain
research funding money, and state money, to knowing teach things that
are untrue, I informed Penn. Governor Edward G. Rendell. I told him
that he is legally obligated to protect the best interests of the
Penn. taxpayers. And I told him that if he did not do so, then he
would be guilty of aiding and abetting felonies. I never heard from
him...
The above scenario with Penn State, and the State of Penn. not
caring that the taxpayers are being cheated, is the same bury-its-head-
in-the-sand negative response that I have gotten from NC Governor Mike
Easley. Easley is apparently willing to CHEAT the NC taxpayers,
because the non-existent news media in NC won't hold him accountable.
They're more interested in the advertising money in their pockets from
new industries being lured to NC--because of the (non existent)
'quality' education, available, there--than they are in the money being
WASTED by the naive citizens of NC on... supposed 'quality' education...
16. Case Western Reserve University (Cleveland, OH) -- I informed
physicist Lawrence Krauss that the M-M experiment, that is in one of
their basements, lacks a CONTROL, and is thus invalid. This
university, periodically, gives a "Michelson-Morley Prize" for
'outstanding' work in science. Stephen Hawking received such award in
2003. I informed Krauss that CWRU would benefit by announcing to the
world my discoveries. I also informed their new lady president, an
attorney, that CWRU would be committing felonies to let students pay
tuitions to "learn" things that are knowing false. And I told the
lady, she would be similarly guilty for not correcting this bad
situation. She did nothing...
17. Wake Forest University (NC) -- After checking that such university
doesn't seem to be "corrupted" by science research grant money from
the NSF, I urged the physics department to confirm my findings. They
did nothing.
18. Appalachian State University (NC) -- Realizing that universities
are willing to be criminal and "teach" falsehoods, I wrote a pointed
letter to the ASU president, and the head of the sciences school. I
informed those men that they had a fiduciary responsibility to teach
only truths, and if they did not, it would be criminal. I sent a copy
of this long, emailed letter to NC Governor Mike Easley, and attached
pivotal articles and files to the governor. Neither ASU nor Gov.
Easley has responded appropriately. Nor have any of the 90% of NC
newspapers that I have twice apprised of those crimes. Like I have
said, Governor Mike Easley should resign, and the heads of all of the
Universities I have mentioned should be fired.
-- NoEinstein --
none
up often. Your mistake is just more obvious than some of the others.
>
> 17. Wake Forest University (NC) -- After checking that such university
> doesn't seem to be "corrupted" by science research grant money from
> the NSF, I urged the physics department to confirm my findings. They
> did nothing.
>
> 18. Appalachian State University (NC) -- Realizing that universities
> are willing to be criminal and "teach" falsehoods, I wrote a pointed
> letter to the ASU president, and the head of the sciences school. I
> informed those men that they had a fiduciary responsibility to teach
> only truths, and if they did not, it would be criminal. I sent a copy
> of this long, emailed letter to NC Governor Mike Easley, and attached
> pivotal articles and files to the governor. Neither ASU nor Gov.
> Easley has responded appropriately. Nor have any of the 90% of NC
> newspapers that I have twice apprised of those crimes. Like I have
> said, Governor Mike Easley should resign, and the heads of all of the
> Universities I have mentioned should be fired.
>
> -- NoEinstein --
Since your supposed disproof is wrong because you do not calculate the
average velocity correctly, all the universities above, and the governor
are exercising good judgment. At least in this case.
By the way, you have not even presented your interferometer design to
us. Why not? I am curious as to what you have done wrong on that. I
am hoping for something more subtle than your math error.
Eric Gisse
[snip exhaustive list of people who have ignored you]
No wonder you continue to post here - nobody else listens to you.
Isn't that sad?
Igor
> The *heads-in-the-sand bad attitudes of NC universities toward seeking
> TRUTHS in education, is just the tip of the iceberg, nationally.
That's hilarious. Their crackpot files are probably now filled to
overflowing. Not to mention the fact that you seem to have some
really serious delusions.
tadchem
paranoiac.
You are in illustrious company. The name "Al Gore" leaps to mind.
Every election year generates more from the ranks of the losers.
When megalomaniacs fail they often cannot accept that they are
responsible for their own failure. They externalize, blaming those
around them. Al Gore calls us "deniers".
What will you call us?
A friend of mine once dubbed us "narapoids" - the consonant inversion
suggesting the inverted role we take of choosing to be the ones whom
the paranoids feel are persecuting them.
We outnumber you.
We are everywhere and we are watching.
We know who you are and we saw what you did.
Sooner or later, we're going to get you.
You can run but you cannot hide.
I'm the one your momma warned you about.
There is nothing wrong with your television set.
Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling
transmission.
We will control the horizontal.
We will control the vertical.
We can roll the image; make it flutter.
We can change the focus to a soft blur or sharpen it to crystal
clarity.
For the next hour we will control all that you see and hear.
We repeat: there is nothing wrong with your television set.
You are about to participate in a great adventure.
You are about to experience the awe and mystery which reaches from the
inner mind to the outer limits.
Good Fun!
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
NoEinstein
> NoEinstein wrote:
> > The *heads-in-the-sand bad attitudes of NC universities toward seeking
> > TRUTHS in education, is just the tip of the iceberg, nationally.
> > [*Also see my similarly titled, earlier post:
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
*****Dear None:
Your aptitude for calculating arrival times; distances; and velocities
in systems (or experiments) that "move as a set" is nonexistent. You--
like generations of supposed scientists before--don't have the "space
visualization" skills to analyze experiments that are in MOTION. You
exhibit infantile arrogance to assert that your "knowledge" of math
somehow trumps mine. You are incapable of realizing that systems in
motion aren't analyzed the same as cars traveling between points on a
map.
You seem more than willing to brag about your 'correctness' in
problem solving. Then, you wrongly infer--apparently maliciously--that
YOUR misunderstanding somehow negates my years of dedicated research
and testing. By so doing, you are committing LIBEL against me, for
whatever motive. [[[[[ Therefore, I will take every legal action
against you if you EVER reply on any of my posts, again, or if I learn
that you are Libeling me on the posts of others, or in any public
forum!! Therefore, it is in your best interest NEVER to comment about
"NoEinstein" to anyone, again!! None, just one more malicious comment
from you, and you had better hire yourself a good law firm!! ]]]]]
-- NoEinstein --*****
NoEinstein
Dear Eric: Isn't it SAD that your problem-visualization skills didn't
allow you to correctly calculate the angle of the sides of any of the
Giza pyramids? Read what I wrote to "None" on this post, and take
notice: You are on the cusp of being sued for LIBEL. In the future, I
recommend that you take your "expert" remarks elsewhere. -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
>
> - Show quoted text -
*****Dear Igor: Put THIS in your file:! You are at risk for being
sued for violating my First Amendment right to free speech. You did
such this past spring when you refused to allow me to post my
disproofs of Einstein on: "sci.physics.research". I had desired to do
so--on your moderated group--so that I would not have to reply to all of
the arm chair physics hobbyists out there, who maliciously savage my
findings. Apparently, your own BIAS dictated this explanation that
you emailed to me: "Your ideas are overly speculative" (or some
similar phrasing).
I highly recommend that you never comment about "NoEinstein" again,
nor reply on any posts, or in any public forum regarding my disproofs
of Einstein. Or--as I told "None"-- you will probably be sued and/or
criminally prosecuted for your wrongful actions against me. --
NoEinstein --*****
NoEinstein
*****Dear Tom (Davidson): A couple of months ago you replied on one of
my posts that you wished to see details about my X-Y-Z interferometer
experiment. I was more than happy to send you a diagram, plus a long
email explaining how my experiment was conducted. Your first reply
contained a long list of expectations for "an" interferometer. I
emailed back, and told you that the simple objective of my experiment
was: As inexpensively as possible, design, build and test an optical
experiment that proves that the velocity of the Earth in the cosmos
can be detected via interference fringe changes. Albert Einstein had
said that no such Earth-based experiment was possible, because the
1887 Michelson-Morley experiment had failed. Well, my interferometer
can detect fringe changes galore!!
From your manner of writing--that tried to "impress me" with how
much you know about interferometers--I could infer that you are a
PEDANT, or one who makes needless display of knowledge. I even told
you, that your listing "so many things" about interferometers wasn't
appropriate. But what your pedantry shows is: You probably have "a
complex" of some kind. Your characterizing ME as a failed
megalomaniac, (who) transforms into a paranoiac is clearly LIBEL!!
First: My experiment was and is a SUCCESS! Second, I have been as
defensive as needed of my overwhelming disproofs of Einstein's
theories. If you choose to interpret my successes in those regards
as... megalomania, that's your problem!
Tom Davidson, I highly recommend that you "go back into the
woodwork" from which you came! If you EVER reply in any public forum
about "NoEinstein", or my experiments, you should expect to have the
shirt sued-off-of-your-back!! -- NoEinstein --*****
NoEinstein
> TRUTHS in education, is just the tip of the iceberg, nationally.
*****In the 'first reply' to the present post, "None" supposes that
the lady president of Case Western Reserve University is "laughing at
me". I invite all visitors to this post to read the letter, copied
below, that I sent to her last August. Then, judge for yourselves
whether she is... "laughing" at her prospects for remaining president at
such university.
__________
8/26/07
Dear Dr. Snyder (Barbara R.):
Last month I emailed you regarding my having invalidated the 1887
Michelson-Morley interferometer experiment. Such experiment was
performed at Case, and is thus part of your university's long history.
My easy-to-understand, common-sense disproofs of the M-M experiment
run counter to the notion that Einstein-type, imagined laws of physics
represent the highest level of intellectual achievement. Those
calling themselves physicists have been seen as being a cut above,
partially because: The unfathomable and the difficult are, too often,
wrongly assumed to always trump the simple and the clear.
If I have needed years to get my ideas accepted, that would seem to
show a shallowness in my reasoning. Actually, what it shows is how
much institutions, such as CWRU, defer to the status quo rather than
acknowledging that the supposed intelligentsia in those places just
couldn't "see" the simple and the clear.
When my findings finally make headlines the world over, will I be
explaining my science reasoning? Or will I be explaining what I have
learned about the inflexibility of most of our universities to
respond, appropriately, to new developments regarding... anything? My
subject area is science, but the nonexistent university responses are
probably typical for any new idea, in any discipline, that runs
counter to the status quo. Woe be to anyone who can show that what
universities have been teaching as state-of-the-art, or as the truth,
aren't always such...
About once a year most universities--other than the 100% private ones--
send their president or chancellor to make budget appeals before the
apt state legislatures. For many, education is paramount to having a
flourishing economy. Seldom are any budget items ever debated at the
state level that don't relate to things like the construction of new
buildings, or other physical amenities. Because of a state's
fiduciary trust in the quality of the teaching that goes on at one of
their universities, things like: the curricula; department
organizations; and technical research get approved matter-of-factly.
The latter subject areas are just over-the-heads of most state
legislatures.
I have learned from hard personal experience that most, if not all,
universities will actively discourage any new idea, or technical
development, not arising from within the university itself. In a
nutshell: Universities will stonewall to continue business-as-usual,
regardless of the importance of the new developments.
Also, universities will stonewall to continue to obtain funding to pay
the salaries of professors teaching outmoded courses; or to maintain
departments or administrative staffs to support outmoded teaching or
research; or to fund the oftentimes very expensive research projects
usually associated with the graduate schools. To wit: Universities
don't care about the integrity of the teaching and research that goes
on as long as the money keeps coming in from a naïve and trusting
government.
Dr. Snyder, does the above description of most universities' responses
to new developments also fit CWRU? And are you appalled? Because I
haven't heard from either you or from Dr. Laurence Krauss, it is
becoming more likely that both of you are more than willing to just
bury-your-heads-in-the-sand so that 'the money' will keep flowing to
finance the outmoded.
You are an attorney. Consider this: Because of the long-standing
fiduciary trust of governments in their universities, on faith, those
governments help to fund the universities. Governments just assume
the universities are honest and have integrity, and that they teach
truths that will benefit students. If any university violates that
fiduciary trust and knowingly teaches falsehoods in order to continue
to obtain funding, then those responsible are committing FRAUD by
obtaining funding for spurious intents that helps to pay the salaries
of those like the president of CWRU.
Are you aware that by not acknowledging my new science truths, and
conveniently continuing to tout now-proven falsehoods as "the truth",
that you are committing a criminal act? Would you, the President of
CWRU enjoy having to fight to stay out of prison? You may think that
"the buck" doesn't stop on your desk, but it does.
With just a few phone calls you could marshal up enough 'smart people'
to either confirm or to shoot down my invalidation of the M-M
experiment-- once and for all. But no university has done either of
those things because: In the first case: my findings upset the
precious status quo; and in the second case: there are no 'smart
people', anywhere, who can objectively disprove my common-sense
findings!
Because the M-M experiment is (still) an important part of the history
of CWRU, then it would benefit your university to be the one to
declare my valid disproofs to the World. Such would involve your
holding a press conference with the appropriate teachers and staff
available for comments.
The alternative? You could be holding a press conference to explain
your having to resign, because you are facing the criminal charge of
fraud. Directly or indirectly, CWRU will be denigrated far more by
opposing my reasonable requests, than any funding for any flawed
teaching or research might seem to benefit you, there.
As things now stand, at the very least, CWRU will be named among those
other do-nothing universities that are piss-poor excuses for what high-
minded universities should be. In the long run, my finding out about
the flawed "characters" of most of our universities, and their
cultures, is every bit as important as my disproving Einstein!!
Unless a "new" president, like you, insists otherwise, may CWRU get
the bad press, and loss of the public trust that it seems to so well
deserve.
Very truly yours,
-- NoEinstein --
(My computer name is substituted, above.)*****
G=EMC^2 Glazier
2007. His fighting crime It doubled in 2007 Families forced out of
their homes by Severn Trent Mafia,and it is Severn Trent Mafia that used
its money to make sure Crist would be Florida's governor. Severn Trent
Mafia and all of Florida's elected officials are two sides to the same
coin. My life has been threatened by my Osceola sheriff "Bob Hansel" for
giving out this information to the honest citizens of Osceola county.
He forcefully took away my first amendment rights on October 12/07.
Using three deputies Bert
hanson
>
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbert...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:22523-478...@storefull-3335.bay.webtv.net...
Wow! Oh my G-d (as you would say). It took 4 men in their
prime to subdue you, Herbie, a geriatric 82 year old geezer.
How'd you do that? -- You must be a tough old fucker... ahaha..
>
This is horrible Herbie, especially since Sheriff "Bob Hansel"
sounds mightily Jewish... and him tormenting you, Herbie, you
who is such a good Hebie... you ... always looking out for and
protecting the rights of the little guy.... Terrible, but Kudos to
you, Herbie.... ---- Some free country, huh, Herbie?
>
But it is stupid the way you went at/after this thorn in your eye..
Go complain to your rabbi, call or write to the ACLU or, even
better, wait till after the Florida Primary and then tell your story
to the 1st **loser**, so that he has a reason and ammo to cry
foul for not having won... but Herbie do not "inform" the 'honest
citizens of Osceola' "... ahaha.. It's them who got the cops on
your ass... ahahahaha
Honesty my ass, they are in on the game you complain about.
Naturally if I were in your shoes I'd snuggle up to them and see
how to get in on the game too to get my piece of the action!!
>
Shalom, Herbie... and thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson
Jeff☠Relf
If you want to influence the powers that be,
you should engage them in dialogue ( or pay them off ).
Personally, I just ignore them and they ignore me.
NoEinstein
Dear Bert: Sadly, most things in America have become politicized--even
science. Perhaps the last bastion of hope for us mortal men is the
precious First Amendment to the Constitution. But too conveniently,
the media--that could marshal the citizens to come to your (or my)
defense--judge "the status of the parties" before deciding what is
news. As long as the media keeps elevating those is government to be
above reproach, those omnipresent "sheriffs" will see you as a threat
to America, rather than a hope for America. Our country--that is
without a functioning media--seems not long to endure... -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
> ... ahahahaha... HAHAHAHAHA... ahahahaha... AHAHAHA...
>
Dear Hanson: A worthy quote: "Don't criticize another, until you have
walked a mile in their boots." -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
Dear Jeff: Good philosophies! Instead of categorizing people in the
most harmful ways, the citizens of the World will all benefit by
seeing those things that we have IN COMMON, then, working together for
common goals. If, say, an asteroid is found, certainly to hit Earth
in a month, I'd bet we would begin working together. If we love our
neighbors, and care about the disadvantaged, solutions to the World's
problems can be found. After my Einstein disproofs are accepted, I
can devote myself to improving things, not making conditions worse. —
NoEinstein —
hanson
this is bad, not good/bad, but bad/bad what you, "NoEinstein"
<noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:78b248d5-ed10-4bb3...@e25g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
>
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote:
>>
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbert...@webtv.net> wrote in message
.... enter "No Einstein", cape-waving a la Shakespeare, & said:
"Dear Hanson: A worthy quote: Don't criticize another, until
you have walked a mile in their boots." -- NoEinstein --
>
[hanson]
.. So, what is that YOU are doing?... ahahaha... Besides,
I have no intention to walk in your boots and mine are too
large for you... So, don't even try.. But thanks for the laughs.
.... ahahaha.... ahahahanson
Igor
I think that, through your massive psychosis, you don't realize that
you've gotten me mixed up with one of the mods of s.p.r. Not that you
could ever sue them for such a ridiculous thing anyway, but I have
absolutely nothing to do with it.
none
He has an interesting view of the world that pointing out his obvious
mistakes is somehow criminal. He should take up his complaint with
reality as that is what is limiting his progress. If math would just
change to say what he wants it to, then he could make his conclusions.
It has not changed but he makes his wrong conclusions anyway and then,
of course, refuses to discuss them. You notice that he never has put
up his average velocity calculation and will not since it does not give
the result he wants it to. It was fun reading his bluster for awhile
but that is wearing thin and we need a new crank.
G=EMC^2 Glazier
rabbi Meat ball and mutzi ball relate to each other. I think Jewish
noodles and flat spegetti relate to each other and a pizza crust is a
lot like mutzos Italian deli,and Jewish deli have hanging salami
Both talk with their hands. The head of the Ca. Mafia was Jewish and
lived in Palm Springs Ca. I saw his estate. Go figure Bert
hanson
Hanson Do you think a Rabbi could be Mafia.
>
ahahahaha.... that's like asking whether a Cath Priest
could be a pedo. Go figure, Herbie
>
[Herbie]
There must be Italian rabbi Meat ball and mutzi ball
relate to each other. I think Jewish noodles and flat spegetti
relate to each other and a pizza crust is a lot like mutzos
Italian deli,and Jewish deli have hanging salami
Both talk with their hands.
>
Herbie, we ALL gesticulate and relate to each other,
in war and peace and love. Only some of the kikes
amongst your ilk do think that they are better than
anyone else and Chosen by god, like this one here:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e1842edc4f
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2O9W3UsdRyM
>
[Herbie]
The head of the Ca. Mafia was Jewish and lived in Palm
Springs Ca. I saw his estate. Go figure Bert
>
... ahahaha... So you saw that kike's estate?... WOW!
You sound like he is an admired role model of yours.
Why are you guys, unlike the rest of mankind, so very
proud of having bred criminals out of your midst?
"Go Figure", Herbie, I could never figure out why....
ahahaha... But thanks for the laughs...ahahaha..
ahahaha... ahahanson
..
tadchem
You have sent me the following at my personal e-mail account. You do
NOT have my permission to send such communications to my personal
account. Any further use of my personal account by you will be
ignored.
> *****Dear Tom (Davidson): A couple of months ago you replied on one of
> my posts that you wished to see details about my X-Y-Z interferometer
> experiment. I was more than happy to send you a diagram, plus a long
> email explaining how my experiment was conducted. Your first reply
> contained a long list of expectations for "an" interferometer. I
> emailed back, and told you that the simple objective of my experiment
> was: As inexpensively as possible, design, build and test an optical
> experiment that proves that the velocity of the Earth in the cosmos
> can be detected via interference fringe changes. Albert Einstein had
> said that no such Earth-based experiment was possible, because the
> 1887 Michelson-Morley experiment had failed. Well, my interferometer
> can detect fringe changes galore!!
You sought an honest critique of your experiment, which is exactly
what I provided to you to the best of my ability, indicating serious
systematic errors and oversights which at the very least would
prejudice the results, and at most would completely invalidate the
results.
> From your manner of writing--that tried to "impress me" with how
> much you know about interferometers--I could infer that you are a
> PEDANT, or one who makes needless display of knowledge. I even told
> you, that your listing "so many things" about interferometers wasn't
> appropriate.
Your unwillingness to accept my comments at face value and accusing me
of "trying to impress you" is laughable. I *always* write this way.
It is my style. The use of precise vocabulary and complex grammar to
express what I wish to express as exactly as possible is standard for
us Aspies.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome#Speech_and_language
I could care less about impressing you or anyone else.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome#Social_interaction
> But what your pedantry shows is: You probably have "a
> complex" of some kind. Your characterizing ME as a failed
> megalomaniac, (who) transforms into aparanoiacis (sic) clearly LIBEL!!
As evidence of your megalomania I quote you:
"In my nearly seven year odyssey to get my disproofs of Einstein
recognized,"
...followed immediately with evidence of your paranoia:
"the following universities, and one college, have come up
lacking: "
<snip list of 18 major universities which have either ignored or
dismissed your claims>
> First: My experiment was and is a SUCCESS!
For your experiment can be considered "was and is a success" it must
be independently replicable. This requires that independent
investigators must be able to reconstruct your apparatus and duplicate
your technique with matching results.
First kindly publish the detailed blueprints for your XYZ
interferometer, the experimental protocols for the measurements, and
the observed shifts of fringes and under exactly what conditions these
fringe shifts are observed. Then allow us time to replicate your
results in detail.
Even Einstein's General Relativity was not accepted on the basis of
the first measurements of gravitational refraction of starlight.
Multiple investigators running comparable experiments over a period of
several years were required to validate the results.
> Second, I have been as
> defensive as needed of my overwhelming disproofs of Einstein's
> theories. If you choose to interpret my successes in those regards
> as... megalomania, that's your problem!
I do not interpret your success as megalomania. So far I have seen no
evidence of your success.
I interpret your claim to have disproven Einstein on the basis of a
single non-quantitative and unpublished set of your own unreplicated
results as megalomania. I am speaking now of your behaviour, not your
condition. I am not a mental health professional, and am not
qualified to diagnose mental illness. I AM qualified to recognize
behaviour that is similar to that which I have seen in people with
bona fide mental illnesses.
> Tom Davidson, I highly recommend that you "go back into the
> woodwork" from which you came!
I consider the Internet my "woodwork". My nom-de-'net, "TADCHEM", is
a relic of the days when user ID's were restricted to no more than 8
characters. I have been using it ever since I first accessed the
Internet on a DOS-based machine in 1981, before Microsoft released
their first version of Windows.
> If you EVER reply in any public forum
> about "NoEinstein", or my experiments, you should expect to have the
> shirt sued-off-of-your-back!! -- NoEinstein --*****
If you really want the shirt off my back please publish your name,
address, and postal code and I will gladly send you the one I wore to
work today. I am a generous man, and if you are really that needy I
will gladly make a donation. It is a lovely pastel plaid pattern
men's sport shirt, cotton/poly blend, size XL, by Christian Dior (the
'Monsieur' line) which I picked up in the Dillard's store in Westgate
Mall, Amarillo, Texas, in early 1986. There are no rips or tears,
although the fabric is getting a bit thin and the colors have faded to
near-invisibility. All the buttons are intact still.
I am not a wealthy man, however, and I can guarantee you that your
lawyer will charge you more for suing me than you can possibly collect
from me. My IQ is higher than my credit score. YOUR IQ is probably
higher than my credit score. Besides, the anonymity behind which you
hide not only protects you from public embarrassment, it protect me
from your efforts to sue for any kind of defamation, since such suits
require proof that our statements make "a false claim, expressly
stated or implied to be factual, that may harm the reputation of an
individual".
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libel
If you are not identifiable, your reputation is not at risk, and
cannot be damaged.
I recommend you leave the lawyer out of it, though. If I guess
correctly, by the time the lawyer is done passing it through his
hands, there will be naught left but the pocket.
Identifiably yours,
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
G=EMC^2 Glazier
its 25,000,000 toilets. Jewish Mafia,and Italian Mafia have been
working as one for years. Jewish brains and Italian balls are a killer
combination Bert They now own all water,and electric utilities
in the USA In Florida they go under the name "Severn Trent" Toho
Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier
should be :God save America. The press is no more a watch dog.
There are no Ben Franklins out there. Its money all the way down. Bert
NoEinstein
>
> - Show quoted text -
Igor 2: That is a worthy point. Miss identification can certainly be
a problem in large communities. But the sentiment I expressed wasn't
too misplaced on you judging from to "the tone" of your replies to
me. If you would stop making broad character and "qualifications"
attacks, I would be willing to reply, civilly to you regarding my
science truths. Otherwise, consider yourself a persona non grata. --
NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
>
> - Show quoted text -
None: Persona non grata. Sorry. -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
NO! YOU ASKED TO SEE MY LAYOUT. I NEVER ASKED FOR YOUR
UNDERQUALIFIED EVALUATION OF ANYTHING! -- NoEinstein --
which is exactly
> what I provided to you to the best of my ability, indicating serious
> systematic errors and oversights which at the very least would
> prejudice the results, and at most would completely invalidate the
> results.
>
> > From your manner of writing--that tried to "impress me" with how
> > much you know about interferometers--I could infer that you are a
> > PEDANT, or one who makes needless display of knowledge. I even told
> > you, that your listing "so many things" about interferometers wasn't
> > appropriate.
>
> Your unwillingness to accept my comments at face value and accusing me
> of "trying to impress you" is laughable. I *always* write this way.
> It is my style. The use of precise vocabulary and complex grammar to
> express what I wish to express as exactly as possible is standard for
> us Aspies.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome#Speech_and_language
> I could care less about impressing you or anyone else.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome#Social_interaction
> individual".http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libel
> If you are not identifiable, your reputation is not at risk, and
> cannot be damaged.
>
> I recommend you leave the lawyer out of it, though. If I guess
> correctly, by the time the lawyer is done passing it through his
> hands, there will be naught left but the pocket.
>
> Identifiably yours,
> Tom Davidson
> Richmond, VA- Hide quoted text -
hanson
Hanson Walter Annenburg and Nixon gave us the Rube Goldberg
shuttle with its 25,000,000 toilets.
Jewish Mafia,and Italian Mafia have been working as one for years.
They now own all water,and electric utilities in the USA
In Florida they go under the name "Severn Trent" Toho
Bert
>
ahahaha... yeah, yeah... that's an old combination, Herbie.
Of course, they do own it. --- It has been known for the last
2000+ years that Jewish brains believe that Jews can walk
on water, ... and that all that money from it goes unfortunately
to the brawn of the Italian mafia, in Rome, to the Vatican
specifically... ... But now, since you said that your own Swiss
step-daddy was a member of the Pope's bodyguard, what the
fuck are you "oye-weh"-ing about? Go with the flow of water
and money and most of all, "Go figure", Herbie... ahahaha....
Thanks for the laughs... ahahahaha... ahahahanson
NoEinstein
DearG=... : Glad to see that a modest and honest man like you agrees
with me that the media is no longer acting as the protector of the
little men. It is my hope that by eventually getting my Einstein
disproofs recognized, that I can cause our cloistered and incestuous
universities to clean up their acts. Similarly, I hope that our BLIND
governments will stop considering universities to be above reproach.
Universities are the most self-centered and selfish institutions
imaginable. The media, only 'evolved' to be bad--like that computer
"Hal" in 2001, A Space Odyssey. The main problem in the media is that
there are too many wimps, and not enough whip-crackers. The "news"
has become the media consensus, rather than the dynamic, every-medium-
is-different institutions of by-gone years. Unless all three of those
problem areas can be corrected, and soon, America's future looks
dim... -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
> "G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglaz...@webtv.net> wrote in message
Dear Hanson: I managed to prove Einstein wrong without resorting to
race bashing. Racial bias probably helped him to stay 'elite', but
people like Androcles, you and me are perfectly well prepared to argue
based on science, and not have to resort to the 'bias' that may have
been shown to the scientists. -- NoEinstein --
hanson
news:efa693fa-d925-4bd8...@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" <herbertglaz...@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:28144-478...@storefull-3333.bay.webtv.net...
shuttle with its 25,000,000 toilets.
Jewish Mafia,and Italian Mafia have been working as one for years.
Jewish brains and Italian balls are a killer combination -- Bert
They now own all water,and electric utilities in the USA
In Florida they go under the name "Severn Trent" Toho
Bert
>>
[hanson]
ahahaha... yeah, yeah... that's an old combination, Herbie.
Of course, they do own it. --- It has been known for the last
2000+ years that Jewish brains believe that Jews can walk
on water, ... and that all that money from it goes unfortunately
to the brawn of the Italian mafia, in Rome, to the Vatican
specifically... ... But now, since you said that your own Swiss
step-daddy was a member of the Pope's bodyguard, what the
fuck are you "oye-weh"-ing about? Go with the flow of water
and money and most of all, "Go figure", Herbie... ahahaha....
Thanks for the laughs... ahahahaha... ahahahanson
>
Dear Hanson: I managed to prove Einstein wrong without resorting
to race bashing. Racial bias probably helped him to stay 'elite', but
people like Androcles, you and me are perfectly well prepared to
argue based on science, and not have to resort to the 'bias' that may
have been shown to the scientists. -- NoEinstein --
>
... ahahahaha... What is this "Dear" shit?... I don't care what
you managed or not as long a you don't try to manage me!...
>
I have told you before: "hanson travels alone" and hanson
chooses his own "elite" if he so desires.
>
AFA "race bashing", "NoEinstein" listen up: Go whine to
Herbie about it. He brought it up. He likes it. We joke about it.
You don't understand Ashkenazi humor. I grew up amongst'em.
>
To boot, Jews are not a race. It's a faith and a fate. Racially,
Jews, as a collective, are the most mongrelized bunch of
folks of any religion. ... and as far as "Racial Bias", the Jews
themselves have a patent on that... and they are proud of it...
Why shouldn't they!!!?
>
So, go your merry way and keep on "proving" Einstein wrong.
The Jews will be grateful to you for your service to them to
keep Einstein in the lime light... Thanks for the laughs, Dreidel!...
ahahahaha... ahahahahanson
>
PS:
I don't care whether Einstein is wrong or not. **Four dollars**
with or without Einstein's fucking theories will buy me a cup of
coffee at Starbucks... both of which, the price and the theories,
are causes for laughs.... ... ... due to their ridiculousness!
Androcles
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
news:CEdkj.703$pC5.94@trnddc05...
Its funny how they can move a massive object through nothing
but as soon as it comes to light they need a crutch and start
babbling "wave". When are they going to understand "beam"?
G=EMC^2 Glazier
change.That is why I get fucked with my pants on Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier
"First emenments rights" My Osceaola sheriff "Bob" Hansel works not for
the people but "Severn Trent Mafia" Its lights out in Florida,and
flickering lights in all USA Its more than dim Bert
NoEinstein
> ahahaha.... "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
Hanson: Don't explode! Happiness has much to do with attitude. Get
'that' right and the cup of coffee at Starbucks is half full, rather
than half empty. Remember this: "Words once spoken can never be fully
retracted." "Care, and the world cares with you. Hate, and there is
no one to care about you." -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
> "hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
>
> news:CEdkj.703$pC5.94@trnddc05...
Androcles: 'They' (or is that NoEinstein?) don't need a 'crutch'.
And light isn't a wave. Areas of the Universe are practically devoid
of ether, but the light photons travel perfectly well there, too.
Having you accept that there is an ether isn't something necessary for
my Einstein disproofs to be valid. Ether is just the correct
explanation for all of those observations in nature purported to be
'explained' or 'predicted' by Einstein's space-time ideas. Applaud
the invalidity of Einstein, and forget about that ether that divides
us. -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
Dear Bert (G=...): Continue to point out wrongs. The first step in
solving any problem is to recognize it and state it, clearly. Time
and again, it is the imperfect influence of groups that divides us.
But it will be our commonality as individuals that will finally unite
us. -- NoEinstein --
hanson
news:b028687d-9430-45ba...@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
fffffFFFFt!...
>
[hanson]
Dude, you are soo-goody-two shoe-is... ahahaha... Pity!
Are you the illegitimate produce of Ann Landers or Emily Post?...
... or did you beat off while reading their advice as an ad- vice
and feel compelled now to save my rotten soul?.... ahahaha...
Say something funny or put a new twist on an old idea,
but don't play Sunday school teacher for/on/with me.
ahahaha... ahahahanson
hanson
Hanson, I'm an honest American citizen. It is to late for me to
change.That is why I get fucked with my pants on Bert
>
... ahahahaha... Awe!, awe!.. well, these are the breaks, Herbie.
But don't tell me that you kept your "pants on" when you did that
" x-cowboy cheer leader for $500 from 1 to 5 am.".. "Go figure"
Herbie... and be an "honest American citizen". "It is NOT too
late for you to change".....Thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson
PD
But scientists do that. They publish the details of their apparatus
and their methods, as well as the details of the analysis used to
derive the results.
They do this so that others who have NOT yet done the experiment can
attempt to replicate it. If an experiment is replicable, then its
importance is recognized. If it is not replicable, then the stated
results are cast into doubt. (See "cold fusion".)
It is up to you whether you want to submit your work to be published
to establish primacy and so that others may attempt to replicate the
result. If you do not *want* others to attempt to replicate the
result, then there is little chance your work will get any further
examination.
Sorry, pal, them's the rules.
PD
> On Jan 10, 1:56 pm, Igor <thoov...@excite.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 9, 5:24 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > The *heads-in-the-sand bad attitudes of NC universities toward seeking
> > > TRUTHS in education, is just the tip of the iceberg, nationally.
> > > [*Also see my similarly titled, earlier post:http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/ca773...
> > > ]
>
> > > lacking:
>
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> sued for violating my First Amendment right to free speech. You did
> such this past spring when you refused to allow me to post my
> disproofs of Einstein on: "sci.physics.research". I had desired to do
> so--on your moderated group--so that I would not have to reply to all of
> the arm chair physics hobbyists out there, who maliciously savage my
> findings. Apparently, your own BIAS dictated this explanation that
> you emailed to me: "Your ideas are overly speculative" (or some
> similar phrasing).
Ah, so moderation of a newsgroup AT ALL is a violation of First
Amendment rights?
PD
Just to be sure I understand. You think the Governor of NC should
resign because you've convinced no one of the truth of your
assertions. Likewise, you think the heads of any university that
chooses to ignore you should be fired.
PD
Dirk Van de moortel
"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:efa693fa-d925-4bd8...@z17g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
People like Androcles arguing based on science:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Androrgasm.html
People like NoEinstein arguing based on science:
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/ImmortalFumbles.html
Dirk Vdm
NoEinstein
> Hanson I'm an honest American citizen It is to late for me to
> change.That is why I get fucked with my pants on Bert
Dear G=...: Till now it often seems that good guys finish last.
That's because they play by the rules, but bad guys do that only when
it suits them. Isn't it written somewhere: "He who is first shall be
last; and he who is last shall be first."? -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
Hang in there! -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
> ... AHAHAHA.... "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in messagenews:b028687d-9430-45ba...@f47g2000hsd.googlegroups.com...
> fffffFFFFt!...
>
> [hanson]
> Dude, you are soo-goody-two shoe-is... ahahaha... Pity!
> Are you the illegitimate produce of Ann Landers or Emily Post?...
> ... or did you beat off while reading their advice as an ad- vice
> and feel compelled now to save my rotten soul?.... ahahaha...
> Say something funny or put a new twist on an old idea,
> but don't play Sunday school teacher for/on/with me.
> ahahaha... ahahahanson
Hanson: No technological nor scientific solution is worth a damn,
unless us humans start caring about other humans, too. Even you, in
your bewilderment, have so much to offer, if you would start being a
more positive thinker. Pay it forward! For the record, I don't need
to read advice columns; I just: "Do unto others as I would have them
do unto me." -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
Hanson: Airing ones dirty laundry could be considered a source of air
polution. -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
>
Dear PD: How could you possibly replicate my experiment? Such
doesn't need confirming. You just enjoy playing this judge who gets
to pass on things. That's your way of feeling more important. For me
to keep replying to your intermittent pits of ignorance, I must try to
put themselves into your naïve mind. But will teaching PD to "get it"
improve the world in any way? No, it won't! You are like a deserted
Bates Motel on a two-lane road. The super highway moved elsewhere
decades ago, but you still keep talking to your dead mama in the
rocking chair. -- NoEinstein --
> > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
NoEinstein
>
> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear PD: Saying falsehoods, maliciously, can be either slander or
libel. Allowing ones own biases to suppress the free speech of others
is a violation of that person's 1st Amendment rights. Sadly, the
media does this all of the time whenever they act as (biased) clearing
houses for what 'news' is allowed to be covered. Without free speech,
America is doomed. -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear PD: You are getting warm. And you reading is improving! --
NoEinstein --
PD
> On Jan 21, 9:29 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> Dear PD: How could you possibly replicate my experiment? Such
> doesn't need confirming. You just enjoy playing this judge who gets
> to pass on things. That's your way of feeling more important. For me
> to keep replying to your intermittent pits of ignorance, I must try to
> put themselves into your naïve mind. But will teaching PD to "get it"
> improve the world in any way? No, it won't! You are like a deserted
> Bates Motel on a two-lane road. The super highway moved elsewhere
> decades ago, but you still keep talking to your dead mama in the
> rocking chair. -- NoEinstein --
Ah, I see. So you don't think that your experiment needs confirmation,
and that it should just stand on what you've done. Well.
If you are *completely* ignorant of scientific methodology, just say
so.
If you think scientific methodology should be something completely
different than what it is, then I suggest you take it to sci.history
or sci.philosophy.
PD
PD
First, you have to establish in a court of law that they are indeed
falsehoods. Are you prepared to do that? Then by all means, hire a
lawyer, who will hire experts to evaluate whether they are falsehoods.
Secondly, you have to establish damages as a result of being ignored.
If you think that you've been personally damaged, then you'll have to
establish what damage has been caused. If you think a class of people
have been damaged, then you're pursuing a class action suit, and
you'll have to establish the damages caused to the group.
Third, you have to establish willful and malicious intent. The key
thing will be demonstrating that the defendants in your suit knew
better (in documentation, preferably), but that they deliberately
misled.
Well, there you have it. Go for it. Or bluster and foam. Whatever.
> Allowing ones own biases to suppress the free speech of others
> is a violation of that person's 1st Amendment rights.
Sorry, you do not have the right to publish wherever you want. You
seem to be as ignorant of political science as you are about physics.
I certainly hope you were a better architect than you are either of
these. If not, that might explain the amount of free time you have.
> Sadly, the
> media does this all of the time whenever they act as (biased) clearing
> houses for what 'news' is allowed to be covered. Without free speech,
> America is doomed. -- NoEinstein ---
Agreed, and here you've found a venue both to post your free speech
and to be mocked for it, which is also guaranteed by the First
Amendment. Or do you imagine that the First Amendment gives you the
right to say what you want without being mocked? If that's the case,
then I'd say you have a psychological problem, having not progressed
emotionally beyond the petulant child.
PD
Yeah, that's what I thought you meant.
Now, if you'll just let us put these straps on, they'll help keep you
from biting your tongue during electroshock therapy.
PD
NoEinstein
>
The following two letters to NC Gov. Mike Easley highlight the
reasonable tone of my petition for redress of a grievance, which
Easley has summarily refused to address. Citizens of NC are urged to
"grape-vine" this issue, because the NC media refuses to consider that
the citizens are entitled to know the truth about the corruption that
is rampant in their state. The citizens in NC ARE the State of North
Carolina, NOT the supposed representative government in Raleigh that
should be, and shall be, the SERVANT of the citizens of North
Carolina!
__________
To: The Honorable Mike Easley
Governor of North Carolina
From: -- NoEinstein -- (actual name, address, and phone number given)
Re: Priorities in Education
Date: 11/27/07
Dear Governor Easley:
As the leading PR man for the State of North Carolina, you enjoy
knowing that quality in education in your state, at reasonable prices,
is a magnet for industries and jobs, there. You like to brag that NC
has a high percentage of its high school students, who not just
attend, but go on to graduate from a NC university in their chosen
fields. So, it would seem, education is a game-of-numbers. Your
recent TV ads, encouraging more high school students to apply for
admission to a college or university, underscores how important you
feel those numbers are.
But what numbers can you cite that reflect the quality rather than
just the quantity of education available in NC? Would you be
interested to know that four NC universities and one, heretofore,
respected college have failed an impromptu test of their objectivity
and their willingness to learn new truths? If such failures be made
known, the prestige of obtaining degrees from NC schools will likely
go down. There will be fewer new industries choosing to locate there,
and fewer, lower paying jobs available.
If your response is typical, you would rather say: "To hell with
quality! Squelch any failures by NC schools. I'll go on touting 'the
excellence' of our schools, and keep attracting new jobs to NC; that's
what the citizens expect me to do." But is it, really?
The "stuff" that high school students need to know to become
"professionals" is harbored within the cloistered walls of
universities; it is explained in thick textbooks; and elucidated in
fine print reference books. All of this will get orchestrated into
the minds of our students by the faculties of our 'trusted'
universities. Do the citizens of NC think otherwise?
The esteem of education by the public is so high, that those in our
universities are just accepted, on faith, to be 'above reproach'.
Yet, every day, universities sweep-under-the-rug any evidence that
they aren't "perfection"... in everything that they teach. If anyone
can show that even one discipline being taught in a university isn't
perfection, the prestige of the entire university, and even the entire
university system, suffers. The public trusts the quality of
education. But what they don't know... can't hurt them.
In the present technological era, changes happen so fast that texts
can be out of date by the time the first shipments arrive. Professors
must rethink what they 'teach'; curricula must be revised; departments
restructured; research redirected. But all of those things are very
slow to happen, if they are allowed to happen at all.
I have learned that our universities are largely bastions of the
status quo--right or wrong. Increasingly, more and more wrong things
are allowed to be taught, because they have been in the texts for so
long.
A typical NC citizen would consider it most significant if, say,
Einstein's theories of relativity have been disproved. But they would
likely be most appalled to learn that Einstein's ideas are such a
"cornerstone" of academia that universities, throughout the USA, will
do everything in their power to suppress such a new truth. Because
universities are so "trusted", they tend to have the ability to
suppress anything that they so choose. And those in government who
approve funding for public education "trust" that truths are being
taught. Universities have a fiduciary responsibility to teach
truths! The public expects it! When a university willfully seeks
funding to continue to teach that which it knows, or reasonable should
suspect, to be in error, by such acts--obtaining public funding under
false pretenses--felonies are being committed.
Conservatively, 25% of what is being taught in our universities is
wrong, but continues to be taught, because the "professors" already
have the lessons memorized... Apparently, obtaining an education is
about surviving the mental exercises, not about learning the most
simple truths. If there are enough of those out there, then there
won't be need for universities to pay high salaries for teaching
errant "complexities"--such as Einstein's theories of relativity are.
Governor Easley, the test of your office is: Whether you will hold
education to higher standards, or whether you'll just let them... make-
the-grade, and hope that the citizens of North Carolina are none the
wiser.
-- NoEinstein -- on Google's newsgroup sci.physics (actual name was
given here, and above)
Copy: The "trusting" Media
__________
To: Governor Mike Easley
of North Carolina
From: -- NoEinstein -- (actual name, address, and phone number
given)
Re: PR v. Education
Date: 12/14/07
Dear Mike:
For 25 years I called NC my home. I applauded each of your political
victories; and felt: "There is a politician who will do the right
things." Your continuing TV ads bragging about how NC high schools
allow bright students to take college credit courses, underscores how
much you, personally, have taken up the cause of education. But is
your motive, or the motive of those you speak for, to improve the
quality of education, or just to increase the percentage of NC
students who attend or graduate from college? Doing the latter could
never be a bad thing, now, could it?
If a state can show that it has a higher percentage of people who are
college graduates, it can use such statistic as a lever to get new
industries to locate in NC rather than in "less advantageous
states". If quality also accompanies the quantity of education in
NC, then, you, as education's leading PR man in NC, are justified in
using education as a lure for industries.
But this year I have learned that four universities and one used-to-
be- respected college in NC don't care as much about quality in
education... as about the number of students passing through those
gates. How can I make that judgment? Because: I have disproved
Einstein's theories of relativity! Haven't heard?
Learned things are in the domains of universities, are they not? I
have trusted that NC universities would welcome my major news in
science. Because I now live in SC, how convenient it would be for me
to drive to NC to demonstrate my scientific experiment that supports
my findings. Such experiment supersedes the 1887 Michelson-Morley
experiment--the result of which was the errant space-time varying,
relativity theories of Einstein.
Any university interested in having quality, state-of-the-art teaching
should be open-minded enough to witness such an experiment. Right?
But universities are primarily interested in maintaining their
unjustified images of perfection. If a university, in any way, is a
part of acknowledging the fall-from-grace of Einstein, simultaneously,
they are acknowledging that what they purport to "teach" has been
wrong! So, universities are most reluctant to revise their teaching
at all. Because everyone trusts them to be the final word on learned
things, they can keep government; and the trusting public; and the
trusting media from learning the truth. What news medium would take
the word of an independent science researcher, like me, over the tacit
"denial" of a "trusted university". To date, none of them have...
The "buzz" on the WEB suggests that my postings, there--under the name
NoEinstein--are finally causing the appropriate stir. But when my news
comes to light in the thus far... timid media, I won't be talking about
"science". First and foremost, I will be talking about how flawed our
systems of education have become. And I will be talking about how
Mike Easley, apparently, couldn't care less about the quality of
education in NC! You are mainly interested in where NC schools rate
on such lists as U. S. News and World Report's annual rankings of
schools.
You are like a salesman, willingly hawking flawed goods. Isn't that a
crime, Governor? Because you haven't replied to my similar letter to
you last month, then, it is reasonable that I begin to question your
decision making processes. Are you a man who responds to moral
imperatives, or are you just a coward who is continuing to hope that
the media, as well, couldn't care less about the quality of education
in NC? Even more than you, the media in NC protects the images of
its systems of education! After all the media is the clearinghouse of
the modicum of truths that the trusting public is allowed to hear...
Hasn't it always been that way? If the media does nothing, and
willingly allows flawed goods to be sold, isn't that aiding crime?
My disproving Einstein pales in importance to my discovering the
"shortcomings" in so many areas of our nation's being. I am like that
figure of old who carried a lantern into the night searching for an
honest man. If that man is YOU, Governor, the right things can begin
to be done... At least that is my continuing, but not too optimistic
hope.
-- NoEinstein -- (actual name given)
__________
NoEinstein
which I have apprised of my Einstein Disproofs. Via copy to Gov.
Easley, and to most NC newspapers, those have all learned of the
tarnish on NC higher education. Yet, they refuse to allow 'anything'
about NC to be disparaged--truthful or not. Since Gov. Easley knows
that he is committing crimes, he must be heartened that few if any NC
citizens are learning about it. His rationale: If the corrupt media
in NC thinks it's OK, it must be... OK.
The content and the tone of the following letter, to which the
Governor, nor the media has replied, is most telling of their
corruption, criminality, and civil liability.
__________
To: Dr. Robert D. Lyman, Dean
College of Arts & Sciences
Appalachian State University
Boone, North Carolina
From: -- NoEinstein -- (actual name, address, and phone number given)
Date: November 12, 2007
Dear Dr. Lyman:
The subject title of this email, Giant Killer, relates both to my
reason for writing, and to the pride that Appalachian State University
must be feeling for having had the greatest football upset in the
country, this year. Knocking off giants is fun, isn't it!
But achievements in sports are laudable for a university only if a
similar fighting spirit to surpass is reflected in academic
excellence, too. It's widely recognized that there is a battle for
pride going on to rate as high as possible in U. S. News & World
Report's rankings of universities. Amazingly, none of their criteria
include: Excellence in teaching state-of-the-art truths... The likely
reason: The entire width and breadth of the learning experiences at a
university would have to be analyzed, rated, and compared. Even at a
state's university administrative level, and in a state's budgeting
processes, "Excellence in teaching state-of-the-art truths..." is never
considered.
Dr. Lyman, please suppose that a new truth in science is revealed, and
only to Appalachian State University, that negates a cornerstone of
"what it is" to be an educated person, and "what it is" to be on the
forefront of science and technology. Would you, and your university's
other administrators do these things: call press conferences; begin
revising curricula; suspend courses; reassign professors; curtail
research projects indefinitely; notify textbook and reference book
publishers to begin revisions, and do all of those things gladly--
because the general public "trusts" that our universities teach only
state-of-the-art truths?
My experience leads me to believe that the probable response of
Appalachian State University is that it--like the dozen or so other
universities that I have contacted in the past year--will just bury its
collective heads in the sand, and go right on "teaching" and
"researching" as if the new development never happened. In the
unlikely event that a "good" administrator thinks that the new
development in science might be valid, what does that person do? He
or she goes to the resident "expert" in the field--probably someone
with a Ph.D.--and asks such person to 'evaluate' what has been
submitted. In effect, a "good" administrator must go hat-in-hand to a
person who didn't have the insight to see the flaws in what such
person has been "teaching" for perhaps decades...
Can objectivity possibly prevail when such Ph.D. will be knocked from
grace; have his or her research projects stopped; and embarrass the
entire university by not having caught the errors sooner? No,
objectivity could never prevail under those all too common
circumstances! So the new science truth gets shunned, and shunned,
and shunned again. And the taxpaying public is none the wiser.
The "problem" I have described with our universities isn't limited to
just one area of science, it pervades every area of "teaching". Many
at universities are smart enough to know better, but there is this
"unwritten law" in academia: Never make waves... or someone will make
waves about you. And the textbooks keep getting thicker and thicker
with untruths that few have the guts to acknowledge. The longer those
untruths have been published... the less likely anyone is willing to
make the needed revisions. CORRECTING EDUCATION IS JUST TOO DAMBED
DIFFICULT AND TOO DAMNED EMBARRASSING!!!!!
Is there a coverable news story here? No, hardly a chance. The
reason: Those in the media are science and technology DROPOUTS who
majored in liberal arts and journalism. If they "cover" anything
about science it must come from the "accepted" ivory towers. It's
amazing that science and technology DROPOUTS wind up being the editors
of newspapers and magazines. Even the editors of esteemed
publications like Science and Nature depend on panels of university
"experts" to decide what gets published. The National Science
Foundation depends on... the National Science Board, supposed university
"experts", to decide what projects get recommended for funding. The
latter board also buries-their-heads-in-the-sand to any new science
development that overturns their sacred apple carts.
So, U. S. News and World Report goes right on judging our universities
on things like "value". Folks, the good news is: It's cheap. The
bad news is: It's full of holes.
Now, after I've said all of this, is there a chance that the academic
culture at Appalachian State University can respond morally and
correctly to a new science development? >>> I have completely and
irrefutably disproved Einstein's theories of relativity! <<< The
supporting proofs of my knocking that cornerstone from the ivory tower
are in the attached files. Note: The large number of files isn't a
collective on the complexity of my disproofs. Rather, such is a
collective on the complexity of getting the status quo in academia,
government, and in the media to realize that Einstein has been
disproved.
Universities have a fiduciary responsibility to teach state-of-the-art
truths. The naïve general public that pays the taxes trusts that its
sons and daughters are being taught TRUTHS. From this moment forth,
if any university in North Carolina obtains State funding to teach
anything about Albert Einstein as... science, they will be obtaining
funding under false pretenses--a felony. The Governor is being so
apprised. Hopefully with the threat of your being imprisoned now in
place, Appalachian State University will find 'a collective' to do the
right things.
Very truly yours,
-- NoEinstein -- (actual name was given)
Copy: Governor Easley; Mort Zuckerman; Erskin Bowles
Dirk Van de moortel
> On Jan 9, 5:24 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Appalachian State University (NC) is the next to the last university
> which I have apprised of my Einstein Disproofs. Via copy to Gov.
> Easley, and to most NC newspapers, those have all learned of the
> tarnish on NC higher education. Yet, they refuse to allow 'anything'
> about NC to be disparaged--truthful or not. Since Gov. Easley knows
> that he is committing crimes, he must be heartened that few if any NC
> citizens are learning about it. His rationale: If the corrupt media
> in NC thinks it's OK, it must be... OK.
>
> The content and the tone of the following letter, to which the
> Governor, nor the media has replied, is most telling of their
> corruption, criminality, and civil liability.
[snip madness]
Have you considered sending this letter to a psychology or
psychiatry professor?
I'm sure there is enough material here to support at least three
master's theses.
Dirk Vdm
NoEinstein
cultures evident in most universities. They're corrupt, because: They
protect the status quo, even when the status quo is wrong, and needs
changing. And they are corrupt because they see making changes, any
changes, in the status quo as an admission of their past imperfection--
that might reduce future enrollment. Textbooks keep getting thicker,
not because of new material, so much as from an unwillingness to
delete outdated status quo material--like Einstein's theories of
relativity now are.
__________
From: -- NoEinstein -- (actual name, address, and phone number given)
11/01/07
To: Ms. Jill Tiefenthaler, Provost
Wake Forest University
Dear Ms. Tiefenthaler:
As Provost, you are a likely generalist, and thus knowledgeable of the
wide range of academic accomplishments of the faculty, departments,
students and graduates of Wake Forest University. I don't know that
you are a scientist, per se. But the public has the perception that
quality universities are cognizant of, and responsive to, any new
developments in the diverse subject areas that they teach.
Earlier this year I visited WFU's Web site. I was specifically
looking for the head of the Physics Department. Finding no such
person, I turned my attention to contacting other, largely ACC
universities about my important scientific discovery. In the process,
I have discerned a shameful lack of objectivity, or openness, in the
majority of our universities to even the possibility that science
textbooks, as well as specific science research activities, will need
to be changed. The reason that the latter will be necessitated: I
have totally and completely disproved Einstein's theories of
relativity!
At this point the "minute manager" in you may be thinking: "Einstein
is one of the elite intellectuals of all time. I've never heard of --
NoEinstein --. Whatever he says is probably wrong. So, I won't waste
my time reading his ideas." Jill, if the latter rather common knee-
jerk reaction applies to you--a figurehead of the academic excellence
at WFU--then, you aren't being objective. Categorizing my scientific
research, sight-unseen, as 'probably wrong'--and doing so without
substantiation, other than your questionable deference to hierarchy--
isn't flattering to your university. Nor is it flattering to any of
those other esteemed universities that have responded with a similar
lack of open-minded objectivity.
Since my subject area is physics, I have directed most of my attention
to contacting physicists. But it wasn't until this Spring that I
learned that a federal agency, the National Science Foundation, is
shot-gunning about two billion dollars, annually, to research anything
and everything to do with Einstein's ideas about the Universe. Other
universities, probably more than WFU, have a huge conflict of interest
because of those grants. And other foundations, trusts, industry and
alumni gifts follow the NSF's lead.
Neutrino research; gravity wave research; and high energy particle
research, such as the Super Collider, are trillion dollar
investments. Those are undertaken primarily to confirm the conditions
associated with the Big Bang. Amazingly, without Einstein's concept
that "space and time don't exist near super massive objects", the Big
Bang never could have happened. Such a conclusion is based on the
present wealth of astronomical and mathematical data--not just on my
own ideas.
By my having disproved Einstein, as the many file attachments will
explain in detail, I negate the need for trillion dollar research
projects. So it's understandable why most universities hope that
Einstein won't ever be disproved! And those universities will do
everything in their power to discredit my findings... just to keep the
money flowing into their pockets...
If what I am saying even might be true, and it is true, then what I
have discovered about the lack of objectivity at universities is
"front page news", perhaps, more significant than my important
scientific discovery. Those in the media aren't scientists.
Unfortunately, they tend to defer to those persons of letters at our
universities, rather than recognizing the accomplishments of an
independent researcher, like me. Effectively, the media protects the
status quo, too.
Since the American taxpayers are footing-the-bill for much of the
Einstein related research, for three or four months, now, I have been
trying to get Congress and the President to nix Einstein's portion of
the NSF's requested budget. I've even asked the director of the NSF,
and the entire National Science Board, to resign. Believe me, I
understand what is going on in the minds of those in our universities,
the media, and in government. The psychology works like this:
We've become a nation of niche specialists. Those tend to defend
their turf. Sadly, niche specialists refrain from criticizing the
areas of specialization of others--even when they suspect errors--lest
those others retaliate and criticize them. If a specialist has
researched or teaches present technology, such person loathes to have
the status quo overturned by a subsequent development. When a new
idea, in any area of specialization, challenges the status quo, to
whom do university administrations send the new information for
confirmation? You guessed it--to those same persons of letters who
teach or who researched the science or technology that could be
disproved. The "system" in place at our universities, effectively,
allows those who are biased toward the status quo to act as clearing
houses for what can get "revised into a curriculum". Books will be
written explaining how the cultures, hierarchies and protocols in our
institutions can and do perpetuate errant status quo teaching in our
"state-of-the-art" universities.
So, what do I wish that Wake Forest University do about any of this?
My new discovery in science will continue to be suppressed--and to the
detriment of the Human Race--unless one university has enough integrity
to uphold my findings. Wake Forest is within a day's drive of my
home. I have a working interferometer experiment that conclusively
disproves Einstein's theories. This year I've urged G. Tech, UGA,
UNC, and NCSU to witness such. Simply by doing that, any one of those
universities would be compelled to acknowledge my new truths in
science. From that moment on, never again would there be any
rationale whatsoever for teaching or researching anything to do with
Einstein--beyond making obscure references in one or more of the dust-
catching tomes of history.
Universities are usually championed as places where "difficult" things
get taught. Because my New Age of Science should be intelligible by
bright middle school students, no persons of letters will be needed as
intermediaries. Now, the question is: Will WFU be objective enough to
look at what I have done with an open mind? Unless you, as Provost,
can initiate a fair and thoughtful evaluation of the files that I
attach, Wake Forest University will find its name added at the bottom
of my list of do-nothing universities. But if you will order a fair
and thoughtful evaluation, WFU puts itself in a most desirable position
--when the funding grants begin to be redirected toward new areas of
research that can benefit Mankind!
For the above reasons, both implicit and explicit, I urge, and will
most appreciate, your careful consideration and thoughtful response.
Very truly yours,
-- NoEinstein -- (actual name was given)
P. S.: The attached files aren't a collective on the complexity of my
disproofs. Rather, they are a collective on the difficulty of getting
the status quo to accept that: "Simple truths can trump complicated
falsehoods."--like Einstein's theories are.
NoEinstein
Dear PD: My various disproofs of Einstein and Coriolis need accepting,
not confirming. That subtle difference in the definitions is probably
beyond your ability to comprehend--as would be your objectivity, if you
were qualified to confirm anything--other than that you are a total
pest. Any dissenters to the latter fact? -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
>
Dear PD: Once again you hold yourself out to be a "qualified" expert
on everything. But your only specialty seems to be your
'understanding' of GPS systems. Such understanding doesn't qualify
you to tell me about Constitutional Rights, nor to claim that lawyers
are a requirement for obtaining justice, or anything else. You must
be very limber, PD, because you keep putting your foot in your mouth.
-- NoEinstein --
PD
> On Jan 22, 9:07 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 21, 6:10 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 21, 9:29 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Dear PD: How could you possibly replicate my experiment? Such
> > > doesn't need confirming. You just enjoy playing this judge who gets
> > > to pass on things. That's your way of feeling more important. For me
> > > to keep replying to your intermittent pits of ignorance, I must try to
> > > put themselves into your naïve mind. But will teaching PD to "get it"
> > > improve the world in any way? No, it won't! You are like a deserted
> > > Bates Motel on a two-lane road. The super highway moved elsewhere
> > > decades ago, but you still keep talking to your dead mama in the
> > > rocking chair. -- NoEinstein --
>
> > Ah, I see. So you don't think that your experiment needs confirmation,
> > and that it should just stand on what you've done. Well.
>
> > If you are *completely* ignorant of scientific methodology, just say
> > so.
>
> > If you think scientific methodology should be something completely
> > different than what it is, then I suggest you take it to sci.history
> > or sci.philosophy.
>
> > PD
>
> Dear PD: My various disproofs of Einstein and Coriolis need accepting,
> not confirming.
Sorry, pal. Things aren't accepted in science before they are
confirmed. This helps protect against errors that goofballs like you
promulgate in your claims.
PD
PD
> On Jan 22, 9:16 am, PD <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear PD: Once again you hold yourself out to be a "qualified" expert
> on everything.
Not at all. I'm reciting what I learned in high school. The fact that
you don't recall what surely was taught to you in high school doesn't
mean that I'm pretending to be a legal expert. It doesn't take a
expert to see the goofball mistakes you make in every other sentence.
> But your only specialty seems to be your
> 'understanding' of GPS systems. Such understanding doesn't qualify
> you to tell me about Constitutional Rights, nor to claim that lawyers
> are a requirement for obtaining justice, or anything else.
Ah, so you aren't interested in actually prosecuting for libel or
slander, you just want to say the words. That's fine. Go right ahead.
Eric Gisse
Everything in science needs confirming... so why are you so special?
NoEinstein
College. It chronicles some of my many efforts to get my Einstein
disproofs accepted. The tone and the content of the letter, combined
with attachments of all apt files relative to my Einstein disproofs,
should have given Davidson College more than enough information to do
a proper evaluation. But Davidson is biased toward the status quo,
too. And they probably realized that if they accepted my disproofs as
valid, and proclaimed such fact, others would be asking: Davidson
College? Who are they?
__________
3/22/07
Dear Professor Vagt:
Over the past two weeks I have been hearing in my mind's ear,
"Davidson". This has been just a single word that usually caused me
to question: Davidson? Thoughts do crop into one's mind like that,
but it wasn't until this morning that I realized that the "Davidson" I
was hearing was actually Davidson College. My subconscious mind wants
me to contact that Davidson!
I know that you are a man caught up in the "pace" of life in your
final year as President. I value your time, and your tight schedule.
But what I wish to tell... "Davidson" needs a human being to tell it
to. I have seen your photograph, so, I am hoping you are The Man.
When I think of Davidson I think: small class sizes; personalized
learning experiences; high standards for admission; and excellence in
giving liberal education, not just niche "liberal arts" education.
Having just 1,700 students creates a family atmosphere that big
colleges lack. By being small, Davidson allows students to rub
shoulders with those in majors different from their own. I sense that
Davidson wants to encourage such openness toward others.
In the past century or so the "body of learning" became much greater
than any one scholar could be expected to know. But education
shouldn't be so much about fact cramming as it is about thought
process development. It is my belief that Davidson teaches its
students to think so well that they are prepared--for the rest of their
lives--to know how to understand any part of the full "body of
learning" that they may be called upon to understand. My belief in
the latter, Professor Vagt, is the reason that I am writing to you,
now.
Large businesses are sometimes named a "corporation". They are
bodies. You probably know all too well that corporations don't
"think" like a single person thinks. One needs to understand
psychology and sociology to figure how best to deal with
corporations. They all have their hierarchy of command. How can an
outsider know who best to contact? Often, the President becomes the
contact person of choice. Does a busy president have the time to
consider so many things? Usually, his assistant or secretaries direct
mail to a person who might be able to help the writer. But too often,
that person doesn't have a big enough grasp of issues, or he feels too
constrained by his or her job description to give the writer the
satisfaction being sought.
If I could choose the person I would suspect is best qualified to read
my letter, I would choose a generalist--or someone who knows a little
about a lot, rather than a lot about a little. The latter are
specialists. The world needs specialists, but not as much as it needs
generalists to have... the Big Picture! If Davidson gives students a
great general education (as I have heard that it does), then, Davidson
is turning out much needed generalists!
The "department" at Davidson that might be right for my present
objective is your physics department. What I will be explaining in
the rest of this letter, and in the attached *.PDF files, should go to
them, eventually, but only after it has been understood by a
generalist like I am hoping that you personify. Ask yourself: Do you
understand how to teach people to think for themselves? Then, you
are qualified!
My objective is to begin to convince the world that I have disproved
Einstein's theories of relativity. That's right--totally and
completely! My story is front page stuff of importance to the entire
world! But... you haven't read about it, and the world isn't learning
about it. The reason is: there are too few generalists...
My sister is a graduate of Furman, Emory, and Clemson. She
recommended that I contact the Dean of the Physics Department at
Furman, whom she said, also, had won a Nobel Prize in Physics. Such a
person must know "it all", I figured. So, I sent him an article I
wrote that invalidates the 1887 Michelson-Morley interferometer
experiment. Such experiment, erroneously, lead Einstein to believe
that the velocity of light, c, is the maximum velocity of anything.
And that experiment failed to detect the presence of a pervasive
energy form called ether [or spelled aether] that had been expected to
exist. Note: Ether was the supposed medium for the propagation of
light waves. A naïve physicist named James Clerk Maxwell had
suspected that ether--like a flowing fluid--should slow down or speed up
light depending on which direction the light was shinning. Since the
Earth changes its velocity vector every second, as it rotates on its
axis and as it circles the Sun, Maxwell naively figured that
Michelson's interferometer should be able to detect Earth's changing
speed as it moves in the cosmos.
The article that I sent to that dean at Furman not only disproved the
Michelson-Morley experiment, mathematically, but it described my
correctly designed NoEinstein Interferometer Type 1. The latter shows
interference fringe changes (like contracting or expanding concentric
rings of a target) at all of the various azimuths of the laser light
source! And my interferometer proves that the velocity of light
changes to be both above and below velocity c--just like the speed of
sound waves change when one listens to a passing train!
The "most shallow response" from that dean was to send me a sample
technical paper written under some grant of the Royal Society that
skimmed over many of the conflicting relativity issues. The dean's
observation was that I had not use a correct form for writing a
technical paper. The sample that he sent me was profuse with
footnotes and included a long bibliography. But my paper is without
precedent! It is a disproof that should stand on its own merits
without needing to quote the work of others... that were wrong!
I have learned that most doctors of physics are specialists, not the
generalists that they should be. But I am hoping that the physics
professors at Davidson will be generalists enough not to rule out what
I have done just because Einstein is the poster boy of intellect, and
because his theories haven't been disproved for a hundred years... Until
NOW!
Professor Vagt, I have close to ten years of work tied up both in my
analysis, research and testing, and in my writing of hundreds of pages
of copyrighted articles. Some of the latter have been offered to the
so-called technical publications in science. Most of those
publications have either not replied, or have told me that I must get
my findings confirmed by the science community before they will
publish them. But how does one get the science community to accept
findings if they never can get published? Mine is the classic chicken-
or-the-egg first, or catch 22 situation that I find myself in.
At present, I am contacting US newspapers hoping that just one of
those editors has enough common sense, i.e., thinking ability, to
realize that the complicated, contrived, and counterintuitive theories
of Einstein can be disproved by a few simple truths that can be
understood by every student at Davidson College, and by its proud
President!
If you would like to have a worthy final project, as President of
Davidson, helping me to get my disproof of Einstein recognized could
be it. I am an inventor with ideas for: Cheap and safe method for
producing fusion power; stopping global warming; lowering the sea
level; controlling the weather to make it rain where it needs to rain;
stopping tornados and hurricanes by diluting their energy; stopping
tsunamis in mid ocean; unstressing earthquake faults; and stopping all
wars and terrorism by creating a world of plenty--not a world of
dissatisfied factions.
For a lowly "deep thinker" to begin to do the above things--that are
already well out of the idea stages--I will need to become so
recognized and so respected for my thinking that I can get people
rallying behind my ideas and objectives. I love the World and wish to
save it, if I can! By something as simple as getting you to
understand what I say about Einstein, and getting you who understand,
to go to your physics professors and getting them to understand, and
they get their colleagues beyond to understand... then, maybe, just
maybe, the world will learn what I have done, and more important
objectives than "understanding Einstein" can take up the time... of
those in science and in academia...
I apologize for the great length of this, but I do not apologize for
my still fervent goals. May your last months at Davidson be cherished
ones!
Very truly yours,
-- NoEinstein -- (actual name used both here and above)
__________
NoEinstein
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear PD: Flip a coin. It's heads or tails; right? Not according to
you! You require all truths to be confirmed. Whether anyone "sees"
that the coin is 'heads' or 'tails', one of those is a truth that
requires no one's confirmation, just their agreement with the truth.
As much as you would love to goad me into posting my Copyrighted
papers on the NET, you aren't qualified to determine... heads or tails,
because you are blinded by 'Einstein's disease'. And that's so
sad...
-- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear PD: Keep it up; maybe I'll sue YOU. -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear Eric: Thanks for the compliment! You must think I'm special,
because you follow me around like a groupie. There is a game called:
King of the Hill. And you and PD keep storming the hill. But I'm not
giving any ground. -- NoEinstein --
Eric Gisse
You are deeply confused if you think your the king of anything, or
that either myself or paul want your "position", such as it is.
Randy Poe
>...
> Professor Vagt, I have close to ten years of work tied up both in my
> analysis, research and testing, and in my writing of hundreds of pages
> of copyrighted articles.
Uh-oh. This claim may be at odds with the claim of
being 16.
- Randy
Dirk Van de moortel
"Randy Poe" <poespa...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:001b0ca2-07ec-4379...@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
You are dealing with NoEinstein here :-)
This one is an old timer. He started screeming here some
10 years ago.
The 16 years old kid is calling itself Albertito.
Dirk Vdm
Randy Poe
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Randy Poe" <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:001b0ca2-07ec-4379...@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Ah, I got my cranks confused. Now I have to take back
the nice things I said to NoEinstein in the other thread.
- Randy
Dirk Van de moortel
"Randy Poe" <poespa...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4e76cabe-492a-4a8f...@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
Yeah... I already suspected something when I read your reply :-)
Your confusion is understandable.
I thought that NoEinstein was a new incarnation of the series
Brian D. Jones, "CAD designer with expertise in Special Relativity"
and former reviewer of http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/info.htm
aka kk, aka Kurt Kinston, aka Dark Energy, aka Forumodus of Halicarnassus,
aka TymBuk2, aka Cadwgan Gedrych, aka 2ndPostulateDude,
aka SRdude, aka Edward Travis, aka Ron Aikas, aka Roy Royce,
aka John Reid, aka Martin Miller aka Wings of Truth,
but I'm not sure anymore.
Dirk Vdm
Eric Gisse
I like how he thinks that his "analysis" is more relevant because it
is has a copyright. I guess he doesn't know everything has been
automatically granted copyright since the 1970's.
Androcles
PD
OK, I'd look forward to that.
PD
PD
It isn't about you. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I
might as well try to convince my kitchen sponge.
PD
Greg Neill
news:5766b334-184f-4178...@v17g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
> It isn't about you. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I
> might as well try to convince my kitchen sponge.
Your kitchen sponge has the great advantage of at least being
able to absorb *something*.
Perhaps a cinderblock with earmuffs would be a better analogy?
Dirk Van de moortel
"Greg Neill" <gnei...@OVEsympatico.ca> wrote in message news:479b5fb8$0$14111$9a6e...@news.newshosting.com...
> "PD" <TheDrap...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:5766b334-184f-4178...@v17g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
>
>> It isn't about you. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I
>> might as well try to convince my kitchen sponge.
>
> Your kitchen sponge has the great advantage of at least being
> able to absorb *something*.
:-))
Dirk Vdm
NoEinstein
of my technical files, illustrations, graphs, and apt correspondence.
Because GT is primarily an engineering school, I expected to get a
practical, common-sense evaluation of my Einstein disproofs. Dr.
Harrell, a mathematician, heads the science department at GT. But he
shows himself to be a timid, tacit defender of the status quo. He is
wholly unqualified to head any department of trust at any university.
__________
4/05/07
Dear Dr. Harrell:
Math can be the proof or it can be the solution. Math can also be the
problem if it is unsolved, or if it is solved wrong. A US spaceship
to Mars missed its target because someone entered data in miles rather
than in kilometers--the way the computer programs necessitated.
Mathematicians are only human, are they not?
Good advice to any math student: "Check your work before handing in
your papers." Those publishing math or science textbooks surely check
what they publish. But different editions get printed every few
years. You, as a conscientious professor, have probably sent in
suggested corrections to publishers. As a rule the more recent the
subject matter, the more willing a publisher is to correct mistakes.
The reason I am writing concerns mistakes of very long standing that
have been published in thousands of texts, reference books, and
technical papers. They are the stuff of footnotes and bibliographies,
but they are still wrong.
I like to watch TV channels like Discovery, National Geographic, and
Public. Shows like NOVA and MythBusters often catch my eye. The
science side of me became appalled realizing the sad state of
Cosmology. It isn't "logical" that all of the matter in the Universe
was once compressed to the size of a muon. And, as an architect who
thinks quite well in 3D, I don't like explanations that space didn't
exist before the Big Bang. Nor did time exist, apparently, so that
the Big Bang could progress through a super expansive stage without
having to conform to present laws of physics.
Where did we go wrong? Try Einstein... Where did Einstein go wrong?
Mainly he erred by blindly accepting the negative results of the 1887
Michelson-Morley experiment. The three Problems for Math and Science,
below, are capsule descriptions of my findings. Your time is
valuable, but so is the truthfulness of what is being taught in our
colleges and universities. I hope you will read the attached
articles, too.
A. A. Michelson knew precision optics better than anyone of his day.
He gave us diffraction gratings for controlling the wavelengths of
light passing through an instrument. He explained the rainbow of
colors observed in an oily film on water. He measured the meter to a
wavelength of light accuracy. And he measured the velocity of light
in air to an accuracy unrivaled to this day. However, Michelson was
never able to figure out why the M-M experiment couldn't detect a
changing velocity of light...
Einstein was just a kid when M-M was performed, but a mentor of
Einstein, Lorentz, wished to explain the negative (failed) result of M-
M. Experiments with electrons and charged particles seemed to show
that those "hit a wall" as their velocities are pushed closer and
closer to velocity c. It seemed that the force needed to accelerate a
particle becomes infinite at velocity c. But such force is hardly
noticeable at the velocities normally encountered on Earth. Lorentz
said that the force increase is inversely proportional to (1-v^2/
c^2)^1/2. That divisor has values ranging from unity, "normal", to
zero at velocity c. Of course, when the divisor goes to zero, the
force increase goes to infinity... or hits-the-wall.
A big problem happened when Lorentz saw a parallel between the
increasing forces on charged particles and the M-M experiment.
Lorentz reasoned: Forces are required to accelerate anything, and the
inertial forces on the objects being accelerated can compress them.
So, he figured that the M-M apparatus, itself, would be compressed by
varying amounts because of the changing velocity vector as the
apparatus is rotated through 360 degrees. If such compression occurs,
the velocity of light might well be decreased, but because the
apparatus contracts, proportionately, there would be no change in the
time required for it to traverse that leg of the light course. And so
there would be no change in the interference fringe pattern. Wow!
That explains it! (sic)
Problem 1 for Math and Science: The contraction explained above has
value zero when an apparatus arm is normal to the velocity vector of
the Earth. Rotate that same arm 90 degrees so that the axis of the
arm is on axis with Earth's velocity vector, and a contraction would
occur that, according to Lorentz, would have an identical value
regardless of the modulous of elasticity of the material from which
the apparatus was constructed (sic!). Generations of scientists have
wrongly assumed that light being emitted, or being reflected by a
mirror in the apparatus, is always in the subtractive direction, i.e.,
were you subtract the Earth's velocity component from the velocity of
light, c, or where the direction of the light beam is always opposite
to the direction of movement of the Earth. Lorentz's explanation
"works" only during the 180 degrees of apparatus rotation, wherein,
the velocity component is subtractive. But it can never work for the
remaining 180 degrees of rotation, wherein, the Earth's velocity
component adds to velocity c. In the additive cases, the apparatus
would have to LENGTHEN (not just go back to zero) to cause the arrival
times of the faster moving light to traverse that leg of the light
course in the same amount of time. Note: A light can shine in both
the subtractive and the additive directions and still be parallel to
the "contracted" axis that is on the velocity vector! But Lorentz's
equation "explains" contraction only--where objects would be flattened
to zero at velocity c. It doesn't "explain" elongation--where the
length would be stretched to infinity at velocity c. Therefore,
Lorentz-FitzGerald's equation isn't the correct explanation for the
negative results of M-M...! Since Einstein based his SRT, GRT, and all
of the his space-time conundrums on such equation, everything that
Einstein ever taught is disproved, indubitably!
Problem 2 for Math and Science: The Michelson-Morley experiment was
incredibility sensitive to the most minute changes in the locations,
or relocations, of any of its component parts. Because of that,
generations of scientists have wrongly assumed that M-M, also, should
be a wonderful measure of changes in the velocity of light. Before M-
M it was assumed that light velocity should be variable, either
because of "ether drag" or because of the effect of having the light
being emitted or reflected in an additive or a subtractive
orientation. But when M-M didn't verify those beliefs, not a single
person before yours truly, NoEinstein, was willing to use 9th grade
algebra to find the design flaw in M-M! The attached file Shedding a
Little Light shows the math. What I learned is that 45 degree mirrors
automatically compensate for light velocity changes! Except for two
cases in which the light is emitted or reflected on the axis of the
velocity vector, light in the moving apparatus will always hit the 45
degree beamsplitter off of the designed centerline. And such is the
only manifestation of the Earth's velocity component in M-M. If light
hits off center, say, closer to the nearer edge of the 45 degree
beamsplitter, then, the next leg (the distance that needs to be
traveled) will be increased a like amount, and vice versa. Having a
45 degree beamsplitter in both light courses means that the experiment
has no control or fiducial zero, as Michelson liked to call it. To
measure things by interference, one of the two light courses must not
vary because of velocity. The only way to assure that one light
course is invariable is to have it be located on the z-z axis (only)
and to rotate the interferometer about the z-z axis. My NoEinstein
interferometer is so designed, and it DETECTS the Earth's changing
velocity vector!
Problem 3 for Math and Science: Einstein said: "There isn't enough
energy in the entire Universe to cause even a speck of matter to
travel to velocity c." The reason? He teaches that mass and energy
are equivalent, and that any form of energy--even KE--will increase mass
(sic). Einstein's idea about kinetic energy comes from the 1830
equation by Coriolis, KE = 1/2mv^2. But that formula was derived from
empirical observations that won't pass the scientific method
standards. Lead shots were dropped into soft clay. Because a shot
dropped with twice the velocity penetrated four times as far into the
clay, it was wrongly assumed that KE accrues parabolically with
respect to velocity. Neither Coriolis, nor anyone before yours truly,
NoEinstein, realized that measures of KE must consider the mechanics
and strengths of the materials being hit, not try to ascribe all of
the strains, deflections, penetrations, or general destruction to the
velocity alone! Penetrations into clay (which I know something about,
since I took soil mechanics in college) are influenced by the internal
friction of the clay particles. Everyone knows that the coefficient
of sliding friction is less than the coefficient of friction at rest.
To use clay as the basis of measurement, it must be shown that the
distance of dynamic penetration is directly proportional to KE. But
no such tests were ever made. They just assumed parity, and no one
before me has called them to task for it. "The problem" is: If a
dropped object's KE increases semi-parabolically (Einstein says it
increases parabolically!), then, there must be an input of KE each
successive second that is greater than the previous second. Where
does a dropped object get its KE? From the uniform (for each mass)
force of gravity! If gravity must impart more force each and every
second, then, gravity must have some mechanism for sensing the speed
of all falling objects--because it must, somehow, always apply the most
energy to the fastest falling objects! Since there is no mechanism
for gravity to sense falling objects' speeds, then, both Coriolis and
Einstein violate the Law of the Conservation of Energy, and Einstein's
theories are disproved for the third reason, too!
Dr. Harrell, if you, and others in the College of Sciences, concur
with my assessment that math and science have some big problems to
correct, then, I haven't wasted my time. For the record, I have been
on a five-plus year odyssey to get my findings published. Because
Einstein is (was) at the top of the intellectual elite, few have
believed that "an architect" could nullify his theories. That is why
I need to get authoritative "confirmation" of my results, such as by
getting a consensus in your College of Sciences. I don't need to
explain to you the paradigm shift in science that is in the offing...
that is, if I can get my findings published.
I hope you will email me that you are discussing my findings with your
associates and colleagues. My interferometer type 1--that does what
Michelson-Morley should have done--is available. It is a historic
experiment to witness!
Very truly yours,
-- NoEinstein -- (actual name was used)
__________
4/20/07
Dear Evans:
I recently read that Georgia Tech is a top four engineering school.
Many "science types" tend to have their heads in the clouds, while
engineers tend to be more down-to-Earth. That is why I am optimistic
that some practical thinkers at Tech will, like me, be able to see
through the shallow and spurious teachings and "predictions" of
Einstein.
If you read TIME, you saw the recent article about that man's ideas
concerning religion. But very telling was the first 1/2 page that
dealt with the fact that Einstein was a dumb child (and adult) who
didn't learn to talk till he was over two years of age. When he did
talk, he would mouth the words of everything he said, before saying it
out loud. I am an expert graphologist. If you read the "Mishmash"
article I sent to you, I hope you will also read my attached
Graphoanalysis of Einstein's Writing. His IQ is 85 or 90, no more...
Please read my "The Musical Note that Disproves Einstein". This
started out, yesterday, as a "short" article for you alone. I wished
to focus on the contraction (and expansion) aspects of materials so
crucial to Einstein's theories. As I wrote, I said, "As long as I
discuss this, I might as well discuss this AND that!" What you get is
like a doctorial thesis! I have no doubt to the perfection of its
teachings, though I will bet that there are still a few typographical
errors. I will make a printout and look for those, tomorrow. The
fact that I could write so much in just two days, should tout that I
have a full knowledge of my subject matter!
In your entire career--past, present and future--you will never have any
subject that crosses your desk that can have a more profound effect on
science, and on the world, than what I have emailed to you, then and
now. I have my interferometer and am willing to drive to GT to let
you and your colleagues witness it. Show me that Tech rates number
four or better in objectivity and openness to new things!
Have a great weekend!
Regards, NoEinstein (actual name was used)
__________
5/11/07
Dear Evans,
The end of the school year is a time of rush for you, I know. Today,
I have written another of those articles "appreciated by engineers",
but not appreciated by most status quo scientists. It is called
Matter From Thin Air. Einstein requires stupidity in his believers.
So, I hope you aren't pro... him. Math should be neutral discipline
in science. You should not be so biased not to do simple algebra to
verify that I have invalidated the M-M experiment. Also, I have my
interferometer that I can put in the car and be demonstrating for you
and others at Georgia Tech within a few hours. Won't you let me prove
what I say?
The article hints of my frustration that people are just scared that
Einstein is too complex to be disproved by anything simple. Aren't
the simple math solutions some of the most elegant? If things slow
down for you, I would appreciate hearing your 'take' on what I have
presented. If you would like for me to email anyone else at Georgia
Tech, I would appreciate getting their name and address. Hope you
have a great Summer!
Sincerely, NoEinstein (actual name was used)
__________
6/11/07
Dear Evans,
Whether you have verified any of my Einstein disproofs or not, you
probably realize that others--perhaps friends of yours at Tech--could be
denigrated because of their known acceptance of, or their teaching of
Einstein's theories. Doing the latter, even if part of a required
curriculum, tends to elevate the teacher closer to... brilliance, too.
Universities are protected, cloistered communities where those who
teach say, "I'm OK, you're OK." I know that because I commuted to
college with a professor who had to play-his-cards-close-to-his-chest
lest one of the higher-ups deny him tenure. An uncle of mine was a
college department official. Yet every day he worked in fear that his
boss would find out about his political ideas, regarding his
university, as well as the state and federal governments.
Universities are very political places; one slip-up and someone else
could have your job. But that doesn't happen as much as it is feared,
because it becomes understood that if one doesn't make waves over
anything someone else does, they won't make waves about what you do.
Is being nice what is best for Tech and education in general?
Perhaps you have spoken to some 'Einstein expert' who shrugged off
what I have done. Who are you to argue with anyone who can so readily
shrug me off? But what if you had said, "Wait. I have verified the
math, and it is conclusive: the Michelson-Morley experiment doesn't
pass muster! And until you can show otherwise, my mathematical proofs
of my findings will take precedence over any bury-your-head-in-the-
ground pseudo science!"
Or, perhaps you yourself think I am wrong... But because you are a
nice guy, you just file my emails and think I will be grateful to you
for not hurting my feelings. Well, you are wrong! I have provided
you with enough materials to shoot-me-down. If you can do that,
please let me know! But you can't. Take that as a challenge, if
that's what it takes to get you to take a stand.
I have written one more article, Matter From Thin Air, that points out--
yet again--the lame thinking of those supporting Einstein. I hope you
will enjoy it. Remember my offer to demonstrate my experiments a
Tech. Your objectivity, as the head of the College of Science, can be
easily proved, IF you will stop being nice, and start being a good
educator.
Very truly yours,
-- NoEinstein -- (actual name used here and above)
[END OF EMAILS]
NoEinstein
>
> - Show quoted text -
OK, Eric. If you don't want my "position", then could you explain why
you are my groupie? -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
Randy: That's your claim, since 16 is the highest that you can count.
-- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
Dirk: Albertito Einstein was a moron. Some of his antics would have
made him the rage of 16 year olds. -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
Dear Randy: If and when you say nice things, please don't retract
them! -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Randy Poe" <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:4e76cabe-492a-4a8f...@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> > On Jan 25, 1:15 pm, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
> > SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> "Randy Poe" <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote in messagenews:001b0ca2-07ec-4379...@i3g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
> >> > On Jan 25, 8:13 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >> >>...
> >> >> Professor Vagt, I have close to ten years of work tied up both in my
> >> >> analysis, research and testing, and in my writing of hundreds of pages
> >> >> of copyrighted articles.
>
> >> > Uh-oh. This claim may be at odds with the claim of
> >> > being 16.
>
> >> You are dealing with NoEinstein here :-)
> >> This one is an old timer. He started screeming here some
> >> 10 years ago.
> >> The 16 years old kid is calling itself Albertito.
>
> > Ah, I got my cranks confused. Now I have to take back
> > the nice things I said to NoEinstein in the other thread.
>
> Yeah... I already suspected something when I read your reply :-)
> Your confusion is understandable.
>
> I thought that NoEinstein was a new incarnation of the series
> Brian D. Jones, "CAD designer with expertise in Special Relativity"
> aka kk, aka Kurt Kinston, aka Dark Energy, aka Forumodus of Halicarnassus,
> aka TymBuk2, aka Cadwgan Gedrych, aka 2ndPostulateDude,
> aka SRdude, aka Edward Travis, aka Ron Aikas, aka Roy Royce,
> aka John Reid, aka Martin Miller aka Wings of Truth,
> but I'm not sure anymore.
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear Dirk: Please don't try to "type cast" me. I don't know any of
those people, so I can't tell whether you are paying me an oblique
compliment or not. -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
Dear Eric: Sometimes naive minds must be reminded of the rights of
others. My ability to PROVE my rights is better because I've paid to
put some of my writings in the Copyright Office. Isn't it amazing how
someone, like you, who has just graduated from Questionable U., is an
authority on everything (except science)? -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
> "Randy Poe" <poespam-t...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
Ease off Androcles. Randy Poe just has an... complex. ('Word'
omitted so as not to hurt Randy's feelings.) -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
> > Dear PD: Keep it up; maybe I'll sue YOU. -- NoEinstein --
>
> OK, I'd look forward to that.
>
PD: That's weird. The only people who benefit from lawsuits are the
lawyers. Please don't tell me you like lawyers! -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear PD: Why don't you do like Tom Hanks did when he was marooned on
that deserted tropical island. He painted a face on a ball he found,
and talked to it. Paint my face on that sponge and talk to it. Maybe
that would get you off of my posts! -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
> "PD" <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Dear Greg: Welcome! Either you've been reading my posts without
commenting, or you are choosing sides. Please comment about my
science, rather than 'the scientist' that you think I am; and I will
respond aptly. -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
> "Greg Neill" <gneill...@OVEsympatico.ca> wrote in messagenews:479b5fb8$0$14111$9a6e...@news.newshosting.com...
> > "PD" <TheDraperFam...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >news:5766b334-184f-4178...@v17g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
>
> >> It isn't about you. I'm not trying to convince you of anything. I
> >> might as well try to convince my kitchen sponge.
>
> > Your kitchen sponge has the great advantage of at least being
> > able to absorb *something*.
>
> :-))
>
> Dirk Vdm
>
>
>
>
> - Show quoted text -
How about: :-[ -- NoEinstein --
Eric Gisse
Too bad nothing you write is worth the effort that you go through.
Honestly, you'd fail a freshman physics course. This has nothing to do
with relativity, you are simply _ignorant_ of even classical physics.
PD
So that was a vacuous threat?
I'm really not concerned. I'd enjoy you having to pay my lawyer fees
as well as yours. It might lower your budget for postage stamps and
your ability to pay your BellSouth bills.
PD
PD
Now, why on earth would you post to a PUBLIC forum, and then want
people off your posts? Are you just basically confused about what
you're doing?
PD
NoEinstein
their response is 'live' on this post. Parents and students at OSU
are urged to contact those named below, to be sure that this is one
email that gets an appropriate reply!
__________
1/28/08
To: Dr. William F. Saam, Chair
Department of Physics
College of Mathematical and Physical Sciences
Ohio State University
Re: Curriculum-changing developments in science
Dear Professor Saam:
I found your name at the excellently ordered OSU WEB site. The area
of my new science developments is physics. But that area could soon
broaden to include 'everything'. Such is because my findings
reinstate aether as the purveyor of all of the forces in the Universe,
and I name and define IOTA as the smallest energy unit of the aether,
from which every physical, chemical and biological entity in the
Universe is composed.
Because what I will be explaining to you is so very important,
simultaneously with your reading of this email, those accessing
Google's newsgroup, sci.physics, are getting to read it, too. To
allow you to better discuss such with your colleagues, OSU Executive
Vice President and Provost Joseph A. Alutto, and physics Professor
Stephen S. Pinsky are getting a copy. Because my revelations are
hugely important news, I am also contacting the Cleveland Plain Dealer
newspaper.
Cleveland has a tie to my science developments, because the historic
1887 Michelson-Morley interferometer experiment is located in the
basement of one of the buildings at Case Western Reserve University.
All that I have done, and hope to do, in science stems from my
complete and total invalidation of the M-M experiment. Such was
supposedly capable of detecting aether drag on the velocity of light
caused by the Earth traveling into the aether 'fluid'. If such drag
existed, interference fringe changes should have been observed.
Everyone was expecting fringe changes in proportion to aether's drag
on light at the varying azimuths of the apparatus's rotation, but
there were none.
To have been a failed experiment, M-M is considered by many to be the
'greatest scientific experiment' of all time. It supposedly proved
that 'c' is the maximum velocity of light, or anything else. To
explain the bewildering negative results, Lorentz and FitzGerald
supposed that... "All matter contracts in the direction of motion due to
velocity--and just the right amounts to always get the two light rays
to the target in the same amount of time." Their contraction factor
was: Beta = (1 - v^2/c^2)^1/2. Probably due to the difficulty of their
doing math in the late 1800s [which was before there were digital
calculators], their pure-supposition equation was never checked by
substituting actual velocities. If they had done so, they would have
realized that their supposed contraction factor won't get the light to
the target in the same amount of time--not even close!
A German moron named Albert Einstein, couldn't do basic math, either.
But he was a 'wiz' at writing equations. Einstein liked equations
very much, because he got to pick and choose what the variables stood
for. And if anyone questioned anything, he could simply change any of
their meanings. Einstein had managed to find the perfect smoke-and-
mirrors area of specialization--theoretical physics.
If you have detected a 'certain venomousness' in my feelings toward
Albert Einstein, it is because I have had to waste years of my life
getting my disproofs of that "acclaimed" moron recognized. How did I
disprove him? In just a single hour of thought and analysis of a M-M
schematic, I realized that such experiment didn't have a CONTROL!
Interference is a comparison of two light beams for changes in the
arrival times at a target. To detect changes in arrival times, one of
the two light courses must be an unchanging CONTROL, while the other
is the TEST light course. Because all of the optical components of M-
M were mounted on a horizontal plane surface, and rotated as a unit,
both light beams were equally affected by the varying velocity
component of the Earth as the apparatus was rotated. So, there was no
CONTROL!
You probably haven't heard of me before. My name is NoEinstein. My
science successes include: as above, (1.) Invalidating the 1887
Michelson-Morley interferometer experiment; (2.) Disproving the 1830,
semi-parabolic equation of Coriolis for kinetic energy: KE = 1/2 mv^2;
and replacing such with my own correct equation: KE = a/g (m) + v/
32.174 (m); (3.) Invalidating the so-called Lorentz transformation;
(4.) Correcting the nearly 300 year old definition of the acceleration
due to gravity, from: 32.2 feet per second^2 to: 32.174 feet per
second EACH second; (5.) Conclusively disproving that space-time
variance is a "Law of Nature"; and thereby (6.) Conclusively
disproving both of Einstein's theories of relativity.
In my quest to get my findings 'acknowledged'--that's not the same as
'confirmed', because my disproofs are conclusive on their merits--I
have learned some not very flattering things about the cultures at
work in most universities in the USA. Universities are being trusted--
both by the families paying the tuitions to send their kids to
college, and by those in our governments who readily approve the
budget requests for the "public" portion of a university's operating
expenses. But no university--with the possible exception of OSU--has
been willing to acknowledge what I have done. The status quo of
Einstein--moron or not--is huge...
Professor Saam, my having disproved Einstein isn't just an academic
issue any more. Now, it's a political and governmental issue. Why?
Because governments typically rush to fund their share of state
schools' budgets. Few state government officials would be happy to
learn that their state's universities "goofed"... by not realizing that
Einstein was wrong. And no state wants to have it known that their
universities aren't 'the best'. As with contests on the gridiron,
universities wish that the public perceive their status as... flawless.
In North Carolina, where I used to live, Davidson College, NC State,
UNC, Wake Forest, and Appalachian State University, all have balked at
replying concerning my Einstein disproofs. Duke University is now 'on
the cusp' of having its name added to the balkers. I can certainly
understand the 'just human' incredulousness at the first mention that
I have disproved Einstein. However, I have offered to drive to that
college and those universities to demonstrate, at their convenience,
my X-Y-Z interferometer. And such interferometer DOES what Einstein
said would be impossible: It detects Earth's movement in the cosmos
via interference fringe changes!
Ohio State isn't a convenient drive for me. But OSU certainly has
respected alumni, or retired faculty members who are close enough to
witness my experiment. As a science field trip, shouldn't the
witnessing of an experiment which disproves Einstein justify its being
approved?
North Carolina Governor Mike Easley likes to tout the "quality" of
education available in NC universities. But he uses the QUANTITY of
students attending as his only standard, rather than considering the
QUALITY of what they learn when they do attend. Those millions of
trusting parents and taxpayers would be appalled that there apparently
is no one requiring that NC universities teach only TRUTHS. And the
NC media--like mass minded Chambers of Commerce--don't consider it to be
news that their universities and their governor are defrauding them...
Are the State of Ohio and Ohio State University more highly motivated,
and thus more moral? I hope so! But you must prove such.
Before I lump OSU with the other failed and corrupt institutions
across the USA, I should allow you, and the entire academic force at
OSU to: Shoot me down, or uphold me. The information in support of my
many-pronged Einstein disproofs is enclosed as 'attachments' to you,
but can also be learned in my various capsule descriptions in my posts
this past year on sci.physics, under my computer name: NoEinstein.
Since my disproofs attack and invalidate each of Einstein's premises,
the 'hashing out' of such avoids those too moot points that have
bogged down science for the last century. A smart man, like yourself,
should be able to recognize "the gravity" of my findings in just an
hour or so of reading.
Be it known: The integrity of science being taught in Ohio, and across
the whole USA, now hinges on YOUR professionalism, Dr. Saam, in
considering these most important issues.
Very truly yours,
-- NoEinstein -- (actual name, address and phone number was given)
__________
NoEinstein
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear Eric: There you go--mistaking passing college courses for
brains. Let me worry about my efforts. You should worry about why
you are so addicted to my posts. If you can't learn from my posts,
then you didn't learn much from Questionable U., either. -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
Dear PD: No. What you would enjoy is the notoriety that you'd get
from being associated with me in any way. -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
PD: Women's toilets are 'public' places too, but only a 'confused'
cross-dresser like you would go there. -- NoEinstein --
PD
Thanks for the laugh this morning. You started my day off right. Let
me know when you become more famous than your own backyard, so I can
say I knew you when.
PD
PD
Why? Do you post your letters to university presidents in women's
toilets too?
PD
NoEinstein
University in 11/07. There is an erroneous perception that student
newspapers, in general, are separate voices to the 'party line' of the
various universities' administrations. Student bodies tend to be
hopeful and trusting groups. If "Old Gold and Black" had informed the
students that Albert Einstein has been conclusively disproved, and
that WFU, even so, wishes to continue teaching all of Einstein's
rubbish regardless of my disproofs, those students would be incensed...
And their parents, who are paying the tuitions, would be incensed,
too.
It appears that WFU doesn't have 'obvious' research grants funded by
the National Science Foundation. So their refusal to acknowledge my
Einstein disproofs, or at least to request that I demonstrate my X-Y-Z
interferometer, indicates a 'cultural bias' toward the status quo of
WFU's "sister" universities. And it indicates an unwillingness to
revise texts and teaching in an area of "learning" so crucial to
diverse, intelligent thought, that the following damning
generalization can be made about the integrity of all academic
cultures: "To maintain images of perfection, no university in the USA
aggressively pursues the revising of texts and teaching to reflect
only the latest state-of-the-art truths." At least 25% of what is in
texts and in reference books, and which is being taught in
universities across America, in every single discipline, (except those
majors that most of those on university athletic scholarships take),
are falsehoods.
The thickness of textbooks keeps increasing, while the percentage of
those texts that the so-called professors "know and understand"
decreases. Going through most higher education MILLS is primarily an
exercise in surviving the non apt. And in order to do so, those
students--many of them smarter that those who profess to... teach--must
pay homage to the people grading their papers, primarily, based on
CONFORMATY to the status quo ideas of those in academia, who are just
too LAZY, and too stuck up to admit that they have ever been wrong
about anything.
Except as a device for attracting student athletes, no university
should be accepting average students. But the amount of money flowing
into universities is in direct proportion to the number of students
enrolled. Is it any wonder that the productivity in the USA is so
low?
College graduates loath to do physical labor of any kind. But the
biggest killer of our productivity? It's the fact that 16 to 18
years of a person's life are consumed in the pursuit of an education
that is largely pointless. Most don't need to know the "history" of
anything--at least not to the extent such is being thrown at students.
Most student's don't need to know "recreational literature". Most
don't need to know "gym" and "band". Those are largely recreational
pursuits.
Mainly, students need to know how to read and write effectively, and
how to do the types of math that they are likely to encounter in their
daily lives. For the majority, that doesn't includes calculus and
other 'academic math'. Geometry and trigonometry are crucial subjects
to anyone who designs or builds anything, and should be taught to all
students. Science should be given due importance. Civics and
government should be given greater emphasis--to get students into the
correct frame of mind to relate well with their fellow men.
If proper teaching techniques were to be used, all students should be
sufficiently well educated in public schools by age 16. Gifted
students should be off to college by age fourteen or fifteen. And no
BS degree in any college should require more than two years. How? By
eliminating all of the deadwood courses and teaching! Pragmatism
should become the watchword in education! And the COST of education
will start going down, dramatically--while America's productivity
increases!
Readers, the above reflects my years of discontent with the direction
that education is headed in this country. The state of NC is just a
(bad) microcosm, well deserving to become a model for the correction
of flawed education in America. -- NoEinstein --
__________
Occasionally, there is information of such importance to the
students and faculty of WFU that having "Old Gold and Black" publish
such should take precedence over their rule that excludes outside
submissions. On 11/01/07 I selected your Provost, Jill Tiefenthaler,
as the point-of-contact for disseminating information to apt WFU
faculty members regarding: My complete and total disproof of
Einstein's theories of relativity.
My name is NoEinstein. Though I am an architect by profession,
for the last seven years I have devoted much of my time doing
scientific research and testing. I was motivated to do such, in part,
because physics was my second career choice in a subject area in which
I had been tested to have very high aptitude. But the primary reason
is: because I had been incensed--from my college days--by the
inconsistencies in much of the subject area known as Mechanics.
In the 1950s I had watched a live TV interview of Albert
Einstein. He was touted as a great intellect, yet he spoke in short
sentences. Those followed long pauses while he sat expressionless,
thinking of answers to questions that he must have been asked dozens
of times before. Though I was just a kid, I wasn't impressed by the
man. Later, when a physics professor of mine explained the Michelson-
Morley interferometer experiment to the class, he mentioned that such
experiment was "important" because it formed the basis for Einstein's
theories of relativity. He said there was a comparison of two
orthogonal light beams. I was immediately incredulous, because each
of the light courses was tee shaped and had components in both
orthogonal directions. But I said nothing, then.
Seven years ago I became incensed by a counterintuitive notion
that I kept reading and hearing on shows like NOVA: "Prior to the Big
Bang, all of the matter in the Universe was once compressed, by
gravity, to be smaller than an atom..." I realized that the many absurd
ideas in physics started being said following the M-M experiment.
Since I already suspected that such had a design flaw, I did simple
research and found it! The M-M doesn't have a CONTROL! Rather, it
had two TEST courses of light that each take the same amount of TIME
to circuit the apparatus.
The above started me on my six year odyssey to get Einstein
dethroned. During 2007, I have contacted thirteen other universities
[...21 to date]. Without exception, those have ignored even the
possibility that Einstein has been disproved. I have a working
interferometer with a control that's available for demonstration. It
detects Earth's movement in the Cosmos, something Einstein said would
be impossible!
By writing this letter to the students and faculty of WFU, I am
hoping that Provost Tiefenthaler will be encouraged not to exhibit the
following all-to-common attitude: "Whatever has been written in
reference books and texts is sacred and not to be questioned." I can
imagine that if I had been a physics student at WFU and had discovered
the real reason for the nil results of M-M, I would probably have been
shunned, similarly.
In addition to my having disproved Einstein by invalidating M-M,
I have also disproved the 1830 kinetic energy equation of Coriolis
that Einstein used as the basis for his E = mc2, and from which
Einstein got the notion: "There isn't enough energy in the entire
Universe to case even a speck of matter to travel to velocity 'c'."
The latter disproof is most laymen friendly, and has been attached to
this letter submission to "Old Gold and Black". If they so wish, they
my publish such.
WFU has a reputation for having smart students and high academic
standards. It seems to me that the latter necessitates being open-
mined to the possibility that errors will be found, and when they are,
to make the needed corrections. By always striving to teach state-of-
the-art truths, Wake Forest University and all of humanity will be the
beneficiaries. Respectfully submitted, NoEinstein, Independent
Researcher
__________
[Note: I am attaching only two, laymen friendly files: An Einstein
Disproof for Dummies; and a supporting illustration, Graphs. Those
three pages completely disprove Einstein. Additionally, I have
approximately 100 pages of other files that I will send upon request
via email. Such larger submission is what I sent to your provost,
that I hope she either has, or now will, submit to apt members of
WFU's faculty.]
NoEinstein
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear Eric: And you are this immature kid, firing away with your 'cork
gun' to no avail. You've been pegged by everyone as the dunce that
you are. Go stand in somebody else's corner! -- NoEinstein --