Campaigning is a 'Science', too.
NoEinstein
be done. That's a good thing. But if you haven't realized by now,
the primary/convention system is hugely undemocratic. FL and MI
realized that fact long ago, and tried to get their 'fair' say by
moving their primaries ahead of Iowa.
In FL, the move-up of the primary was a Republican, not a Democratic
decision. The controversy over that change was a known issue--so,
neither Clinton nor Obama campaigned there, though both were on the FL
ballot. Yes, Clinton was the better known candidate. But Obama was
well known, too. After all, hadn't he made some rousing speeches
during the campaigns of 2000 and 2004, and didn't he speak at the 2004
Democratic Convention? It was easy to realize that Barack Obama, with
his fine oratory, was an up-and-comer in politics.
I've been observing politics since before Obama was born. I too was
curious if he would become the next Jesse Jackson. Both Jesse and I
were born in Greenville, SC. I had sided with "states rights" during
the segregation era, but this was largely because I felt that "the
right not to..." should be equal to "the right to...". The strong
arguments in support of my philosophy, work only if there is no
discrimination against blacks. But since such wasn't the case,
integration was the way to go.
Other than the fact that Obama was born poor, much of what he knows
about "black issues" he learned from others. The man was motivated
to... pull-himself-up-by-his-bootstraps. And he did that exceedingly
well. So, like his outspoken 'preacher' proclaims, there are huge
gaps between blacks and whites. But were is Obama in the socio-
economic mix?
If blacks, or those struggling to make ends meet, had to choose a
sympathetic candidate to, hopefully, improve their lot during the next
four years, would they select someone who is successful? Probably.
Through the ages leaders have been those who have risen above, or who
are the most motivated to do such. The disadvantaged are in a
quandary to select someone who is sympathetic on the one hand, and who
knows "the ways" to success on the other.
Clinton doesn't rush to reveal her tax records. She knows that her
assets will be used as a wedge to distance her from those to whom she
must appeal. Though Obama doesn't have Clinton's accumulated wealth,
he is "on the wealth track". Both his education and his social status
as a senator make him much less... "black" than his light skin hints.
But by speaking with his trademark 'anger' at the status quo, those
who are disadvantaged, and thus angry, have rallied behind that man.
So, should Obama be the Democrats' next nominee for president? No!
If you asked most of his supporters why they like him better than
Clinton, they would say: They like his excellent speeches; they like
that he is for change; they like that others are rallying behind him;
and they want to give their support to someone who can win. That last
'motivator' is hugely tied up in trying to resolve who is the best
candidate in these final months.
Somehow, 'Screaming Howard Dean' became Chairman of the Democratic
National Committee. When that "god" says that Iowa gets to continue
to have the first say-so in selecting the candidate of the party,
"his" rules hold sway. But what about the unwritten rules of
democracy? Isn't democracy important any more? And isn't democracy
more over-riding than the rules of the Democratic Party?
The primary results of the State of Florida should stand as is. Yes,
Obama didn't campaign there. But the "for change" issues probably
gave him his due--even if he was less well known than Clinton. Redoing
that election is not only wasting money, it is putting Florida--the
goof-up state as far as elections go--back in the spotlight. But the
margin of Clinton's victory, there, exceeds the "hanging chad" margin
of error. Obviously, Michigan must redo its primary, because Obama
wasn't on the ballot.
Both FL and MI wanted more influence. Obama's camp hopes they won't
get it. Such attitude is anti-democracy, isn't it? It's as anti-
democracy as our having allowed the poll takers and the biased news
commentators to stampede people to Obama--just because he is 'trending'
as the 'likely' front-runner. But what about the recent 'trending'
away from Obama in Ohio and Texas? Isn't that worthy of a stampede
away from the man? And aren't the voters in the latter primaries MORE
knowledgeable of the candidates than those in the earlier ones? Yes
they are!
Getting elected to public office is a 'science'. My qualification to
comment is due to my being a lifelong keen observer of human nature,
and one of, if not the best, graphologists in the world. My 'call' on
Obama is: He's under qualified; overly motivated; and overly hyped.
The man doesn't have a pleasant disposition. He's a detail-oriented
individualist, NOT a group player, nor a person easily agreeable to
compromises. Though he can talk like: Men in the barber shops of
America, about how things should be, he has next to zero idea about
the president's role in improving the world. Sadly, it is Congress,
NOT the President that makes the laws. If we just wanted a "sensible"
ticket for good "dictators" to be our leaders, it would be: Ron Paul
and Dennis Kosinich, not Barack Obama and whomever... If Obama is
nominated, I will write in Paul and Kosinich!
BE IT KNOWN: Hillary Rodham Clinton is a here and now candidate! Her
simple mantra should be: She's the best qualified person, alive, to be
president! If anyone can work well within 'the system', Hillary can--
and from day one! She doesn't need to get advisers to tell her how to
organize the Executive Branch; she already knows! And she doesn't
need to weed out all of the false promises like Obama keeps making
daily, because she has made none!
With every ounce of my being, I urge all of you, of whatever race,
sex, color or creed, to support Hillary Rodham Clinton for President
of the United States of America! Respectfully submitted by --
NoEinstein -- that independent thinker who has disproved Einstein's
theories of relativity!
Handwriting Analysis of Clinton, Obama, McCain and Einstein (is
Copyrighted.)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/eed2bb0cf762e015/6173e270dee543b3?hl=en#6173e270dee543b3
__________
NoEinstein
>
Apparently, the race for the White House isn't about selecting the
best person for the job. Long ago, it became a choose-sides, sporting
event, with the sole objective of winning. And that's "winning"--as in
jumping-up-and-down and feeling superior to the losers. Broad cross
sections of America love having "their team or teams" win. That's
because the latter are our surrogates in the primal fights for
survival that modern day life has denied most of us the need for
fighting. Having someone who wins 'represent' us, gives us
confidence. That's why we will defend... "our team" against all reason.
Barack Obama represents a team that has two main things "going for
it": (1.) He's a Democrat, and therefore is different from the failed
Republican president who has occupied the White House for seven plus
years. (2.) And he is black. If Obama gets elected, people 'know'
things will be different...
But is "different" what is best for America? America flourished under
President Ronald Reagan. Though he was a "technical" Republican, the
largest majority of voters in quite a while chose him. With his
trademark: "Well...", coupled with the relaxed tilt of his head and his
sincere smile, people felt GOOD about America--even though "trickle
down" didn't always get where it was needed most.
Reagan had a 'conventional' personality with much in common with many
people. His handwriting shows those things to me, because I've been a
lifelong graphologist--or rather, I've been one since my early teens.
Reagan was an emotional person. And he had a nervous temperament. He
responded to things at an emotional and heart-felt level. Because he
was a generalist, Reagan left most of the details to his trusted
subordinates.
Of the three remaining candidates for President, Hillary Rodham
Clinton's handwriting is most similar to Ronald Reagan's. Like
Reagan, Clinton is a conventional thinker. She does things in
predictable, reasonable ways. She's also a generalist. Those tend to
get "the big picture". And most generalists realize that one person
can't do, or be, all things. So, they become group players; they
delegate authority; and they lead efforts for constructive
compromises. The latter is an ability that women have more than men.
My objective assessment of Barack Obama's handwriting shows him to be:
A modern, detail-oriented, specialist, with little in common with most
people. "Modern" people don't tend to be influenced greatly by the
attitudes of others. They tend to do their own thing, and they can be
cold in social situations. Until the last few days, I've observed
that Obama doesn't smile very often. He isn't a happy person...
Some of you may have noticed that Obama is a "lefty". Those, quite
simply, don't think like the majority of people think. They are the
artists and the dreamers who tend to be isolated individuals with
little in common with others. Is 'that' a type person who could
represent our best interests as President? No way!
Recently, I've commented regarding the hugely negative indicator that
90 plus percent of blacks are for Obama--no matter what he does, nor
how unqualified for President he is. Barack Obama is a team symbol,
NOT a paragon of virtue, nor one with the personality to accomplish
what his supports so trust will transpire if the man gets elected.
Where are the critical thinkers in America?
The revelations that Obama is a willing member of a radical, USA
hating church is damaging his persona. The man read his recent
prepared speech with the coolness of a penguin. In interviews, his
emotions are nowhere to be seen. The man is so cool (or should that
be 'cold') that he could pass any polygraph test. Should the
president of the United States be someone without a normal emotional
range?
As more negatives surface about Obama's qualifications, and about his
character, his supporters mimic his coolness. Jack Cafferty of CNN,
talks about "the certainty" of Obama's nomination, while he belittles
Clinton at every turn for demanding that her supporters in FL and MI
be seated at the Democratic Convention. Tell me, if Cafferty is so
certain that Obama will 'get' the nomination, why does Cafferty become
all hot-and-bothered because she's more than holding up 'her end' of
the horse race?
Jack Cafferty is a microcosm of what is WRONG about the media. In
that man's shallow way of thinking, if he can just "cover" the news in
an arrogant enough manner in support of his biases, the candidate of
HIS choice will be nominated. But is democracy about having people be
influenced by ANY wish of ANY commentator in ANY medium--Jack Cafferty
included? HELL NO, IT ISN"T!
In the last two days, smiles have come to Obama's face realizing that
the state legislators in MI place more emphasis on taking their
recesses, than they do on seeing to it that democracy is served. That
man is clearly 'amused and comforted' that his supporters are so
unprincipled. After all, don't the unprincipled ones usually win over
the... good guys? Bush did that--in his first term--because the US
Supreme Court had been BOUGHT. I recall there were sick smiles and
'laughter' over that injustice, too.
When Bill Clinton made a sincere wish for having a 'clean and fair'
campaign, Obama's supporters--like that retired general did in
Charlotte, NC 3/21/08--interpret Bill's remarks as excluding Obama from
the ranks of the virtuous. Yet no names were even mentioned. So, how
can a statement that mentions no names be considered offensive to
anyone? It seems that the small consciences of Obama and his
supporters are starting to pang them. But all the while, they smile
and laugh to themselves knowing that Obama has so many supporters who
are... unprincipled. Surely, everyone knows: The ones who fight without
principle have an advantage. Isn't that part of the reason Obama is
already claiming victory?
New Mexico's Governor Bill Richardson endorsed Obama, yesterday. But
he did so almost surreptitiously. He had a hastily grown, Chinese
looking, black beard. When Richardson looked himself in the mirror,
afterward, the person he saw was... 'someone else'. If "the voters"
can't elect Obama by themselves, maybe Bill Richardson can 'tilt' a
few opinions and influence the outcome. Is "democracy" apparent
anywhere in that process? No way!
More and more, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is sitting in the
moral jury chairs. They've got a scheduled primary that passes the
sanction of the DNC. If a large enough majority of the voters in
Pennsylvania believe as I do, that Hillary Clinton has been, and is
being, treated unfairly in the media, then Pennsylvania can take a
stand--not only for sensible business decisions relative to Saving
American Jobs, but a stand for protecting democratic principles and
possibly SAVING the entire USA!
I urge the voters in PA, NC and all the rest of the states still in
play to show their support for democracy by REJECTING the bid of
Barack Obama to occupy the White House--now and forever! Let reason
rule; let fairness prevail; and let the USA rise above the pettiness
of any mere 'sporting event'. In the end, the victors should be every
one of us!
Respectfully submitted, -- NoEinstein --
> Copyrighted.)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/eed2b...
> __________
Eric Gisse
[snip boring spew, unread]
This newsgroup is not your personal blog. Get out.
Jeff▲Relf
casting a vote for Coke ( McCain ) or Pepsi ( Hillary ) is meaningless,
either way you get caffeinated sugar-water.
G=EMC^2 Glazier
that count the votes. Crooks can count to make figures lie. Republican
party will control the executive branch even if killing is needed That
is reALITY BERT
NoEinstein
>
3/25/08
These days, people concerned with the Democratic race for President
are having to decide whether to stick-to-their-guns, or to switch
sides.
I remember a 'most telling' cartoon that I saw decades ago. It was
drawn in PLAYBOY magazine. The pen and ink drawing had two side-by-
side pictures. The left one depicted the outside of a football
stadium. Parts of the throng entering the stadium were waving an
about equal number of yellow or purple triangular flags--like those
traditionally waved at the football games of old. The second picture
depicted the outside of that same stadium as the crowd was leaving
after the game. About an equal quantity of flags were being waved,
but all of them are purple. Obviously, the "yellow" team had
performed so poorly that their fans switched loyalty and purchased
purple flags while inside.
Too often our political races are decided by which candidate seems
most likely to win. Until Clinton won Texas and Ohio, the stampede
was to Obama. In the USA the vast majority are hungry to win! At a
most fundamental level, people assume that if they can just side with...
the winner, they will be better off.
Part of that attitude comes from the joy they feel after the election,
and the voting "scores" are placed on the board. Another part of it
comes from... "bragging rights" at work or in social situations. But
how much of the 'joy' results from being assured that the USA, as a
whole, will be better off? Usually, about 50% will vote for the
loser... Can the USA ever be "better off" if 50% of its population
isn't going to be better off, too? And are the decisions that our
elected representatives will make only going to benefit those who
voted for them? If the answer to that question is... yes, then this
country's future looks dim, indeed.
There are those who complain about 'the problems', and those who do
something about them. I have always been the latter type! Run for
office? Hell no! A person would have to be a near fool to subject
themselves to even a tiny fraction of what Clinton and Obama are going
through. To wit: Appealing to people who see themselves as either a
"yellow" or a "purple" means having to 'promise' different things to
different groups. But don't the laws that get made apply to all
groups, equally? Doesn't the Fourteenth Amendment give ALL of us the
equal protection of the law?
After viewing and hearing the full context of that "Damn the USA..."
sermon by Obama's pastor, I am even more appalled. It seems such type
highly politicized sermons aren't that unusual in black churches. In
a nutshell, those types of addresses: accentuate the negative; create
hate and dissention; and divide the nation along group lines. Try to
imagine Barack Obama willingly listening to sermons that have a
similar tone. When he decided to enter public office, did he do so
because of his love for his fellow man, or because of his hatred for
some?
A good while before the 2004 Democratic Convention, I had heard family
members and friends commenting that a man named "Obama" was making
great speeches, and might be the heir apparent to Jesse Jackson. So,
I listened and watched with great interest when he spoke at that
convention. Though his speech was expertly delivered, I couldn't feel
an affinity for the man. I wasn't moved.
As I've often explained, I don't... 'hate' blacks. I've agreed with the
majority of the things that Jesse Jackson has done and said. I even
considered he would make a fine President. I admire that Jesse is
someone who is both emotional and articulate. Though Obama is
definitely articulate, he is nearly totally lacking in emotion. When
he speaks, his face is a long... dead pan. Call me funny, but I can't
like anyone with a dead pan face, or one who doesn't gesture freely.
Last Spring when TIME ran their amateurish handwriting analysis of
the, then, six leading candidates for President, I emailed TIME my
professional level analyses. Obama's signature shows flare,
individuality, and exactness in the letter formations. When he "takes
notes" during his debates with Hillary, his left hand moves with the
slow precision of a machine. Most people taking notes under those
circumstances would scribble so quickly, that what they write would
look like "shorthand" to anyone but them. Clearly, Obama's mind
doesn't work like most people's--and that concerns me greatly. More
and more I realize that my expertise with graphology stems from my
expertise in observing people. I know that if a person shows 'such
and such' traits, they likely will have other associated traits as
well.
One thing that will turn me against someone very fast, is seeing them
smile at the injustices being done to others. Recently, Senator James
Carville and Senator Tom Daschel were interviewed on CNN about how to
resolve the FL and MI primary issues. Carville, a most sincere man,
made reasonable suggestions for giving democracy its due. But Daschel
just smiled... that it doesn't seem to be happening. Daschel has
endorsed, and is campaigning on behalf of, Barack Obama. But when I
saw him smile, with apparent delight that barriers are being placed to
DEMOCRACY in America, I realized that Tom Daschel is unworthy to be a
United States senator! And he unworthy to call himself an American!
I had seen smiles like Daschel's after George Bush--with his...
connections--'bought' the US Supreme Court in the 2000 election. The
majority of that court apparently valued "event schedules" and "time
constraints" above democracy. And those who so voted should be CURSED
for all of history!
Why are there so many things wrong with America? Mainly, it's because
we have let individual choice be replaced by... group will. We divide
ourselves into political parties, and into so many other groups,
hoping to gain advantages. But are we getting better under that
system or worse?
BE IT KNOWN: "Every time 'group will' charades for individual choice,
America looses!" When 90 plus percent of blacks are backing Barack
Obama--whom I know to be unqualified, because of his personality, to be
President--group divisiveness is raising its ugly head in America.
Group interests nearly always run counter to democracy. The latter
is: One person, one vote. But group interests are... arm-twisting and
lobbying to try to get an undemocratic advantage. It is time that we
reinstate DEMOCRACY as a foundation in this country!
Those like Howard Dean, Bill Richardson, and Tom Daschel favor "the
rules" of the DNC over the larger RULE of democracy. And they do so
because they know that Obama will need... their help if he is elected.
Those men are selfishly motivated--as is every single person or group
which has... endorsed Obama!
Though few are yet aware, the solutions to America's problems are in
the offing. And such will bypass most of the failed processes in
Washington. But those solutions won't come to light unless the
supporters of Barack Obama... wise up and change their choice for
President! The discrimination in this country can be abated, and
without the group divisiveness sure to come in the event that Obama is
elected President.
If Hillary Rodham Clinton reads this, she will wonder if 'she' is... the
solution. No. At least not directly. She is just has the right
PERSONALITY to allow those solutions to be heard. Without Clinton as
President, America will likely fail. Not during the next term, but
sooner than anyone who loves America--as I do--would like. And a mighty
empire will be gone... due to its growing inner flaws.
If Barack Obama reads this, he should ponder how his unique
background, and his unique personality, are dividing America and
destroying democracy. Then, he should make the biggest and most heart-
felt speech of his life: He should withdraw as a candidate for
President of the United States of America.
America, America, long may she live!
> ...
>
> read more >>- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
NoEinstein
Dear Jeff: I won't be voting for moron McCain. I realize that
Hillary can't change things on her own, but she can be an instrument
to the needed change. Trust me, change is coming! -- NoEinstein -- :-)
NoEinstein
Dear Bert: Try to hang in there! Most people are both good and bad.
All that is needed is for them to realize that there are more benefits
to them, and to others, if they show their good sides. "Pay It
Forward", and live by the Golden Rule. The good people still hold the
majority. Think positive! -- NoEinstein -- :-)
G=EMC^2 Glazier
power,AND WILL STAY IN POWER. We let things go to long. The republican
Mafia under Severn Trent are the power and the glory We must now pray to
them for our daily bread. Bert
NoEinstein
Dear Bert: I don't pray to any politician, nor to any group! As I
said, positive changes are coming! Obama will be out, and Clinton
in. McCain is too dumb and too mentally unstable, not to mention too
old and likely to kick the bucket before the election. Keep the
'faith', whatever yours is; help is on the way! -- NoEinstein --
Jeff▲Relf
controls the entire U.S. ? where's your evidence ?
“ Severn Trent ” appears to be your own personal term
for some all-powerful mafia that no one but you can see.
Jeff▲Relf
and it's prompting him to do battle with his “ landlord ”.
The end result will be a very costly eviction, I imagine.
By “ landlord ”, I mean:
“ Sheriff Bob Hansel ” ( Osceola County, Kissimmee ),
“ Progress Energy Florida ”, and
“ Avatar Homes ” ( www.AvatarHomes.COM ).
Jeff▲Relf
All that's needed is that we be the best landlords / tenants we can be,
for all are both landlords and tenants.
The only so-called “ Choice ” I see is:
Live faster ( consuming more ) or live longer.
Just as consuming too much food and drink ruins one's health,
consuming too much crude oil harms the health of the global economy.
G=EMC^2 Glazier
May,and I can thank the republican Mafia for that. Just using money to
buy the white house Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier
just thrown out of Portland Oregon. Severn Trent Avatar is Florida's
biggest home builder and its bank "First National" is the big
foreclosure mortgage lender. Check this out. Your a computer whiz
Bert
G=EMC^2 Glazier
spacetime in the near future when the republican Mafia will not allow
this type information to be shown on TV Bert
Jeff▲Relf
Avatar Holdings Inc. ( NasdaqGS: AVTR; Coral Gables, Florida ),
the owner of Avatar Homes... can you ?
Severn Trent wasn't metioned in this lawsuit against Avatar Holdings:
http://securities.stanford.edu/1028/AVTR03-01/20041012_f01k_03738.pdf
Jeff▲Relf
I see CNN at a grocery store lounge sometimes.
It's been decades since I last owned a TV;
even then, I never watched it much.
NoEinstein
Bert: I'm betting the Republicans in the WH will take the blame for
the recession. Their chance of winning is nil. -- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
During that period polls were taken which show that Hillary Clinton
would defeat McCain by a larger margin than Obama would. And just
this week, for the first time, Obama's... "personality" is being
mentioned as an issue. But his camp has chosen to lump all of Obama's
personality issues under this one heading: the "Damn the USA..." sermon
of Obama's preacher, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Since Obama has
already replied to the latter, those in his camp are hoping those
"personality" issues will stay behind him. But Obama's news spinners
are sitting much more tensely in their seats as they try to deflect
the questions about his lack of qualifications--personality or
otherwise. And their 'smiles' in such regard seem much less genuine.
These days, when Obama speaks, those supporters of his with a
propensity to nod their heads in agreement to everything he says, are
planted in the audience in the view of the TV cameras. From the tone
of his recent speeches, one would never realize that he is being
assailed. "Bullets are flying..." over his head. That's figurative
speech, of course. Obviously, there's a battle going on. But is it a
flag-waving "sports event"? Or is it a political race that would ever
find Barack Obama qualified to lead the declining... "greatest nation of
all time"?
CNN has labeled their 24/7 coverage of the race for President, the all
too apt name: "Ballot Bowl". For them, having someone be elected
President is 'sport'. And they are the high paid play-by-play sports
announcers. There isn't a sporting event in this country in which the
announcers don't telescope their personal loyalties by their
excitement over a... "GOAL!"; or a home run; or a touchdown. Many teams
have their own announcers, and their own radio and TV networks.
Choose the 'wrong' one of those, and the announcer won't be showing
the emotion you desire.
Anderson Cooper--or as he chooses to pronounce it: "Coo-per"--has had
what looks like... excellent surgery under his left eye. Anderson could
have told everyone--figuratively, of course--that he got "grazed by a
bullet" when he got off of his plane in Iraq. If he had said 'that'
with a smile, he would have been showing good humor. But he showed no
good humor when he derided Hillary Clinton for saying that she had to
"duck down" getting off of her plane in Bosnia.
Soldiers getting out of still-running helicopters duck down,
reflexively, as the "chopper" blades keep whizzing above. So, when
Clinton repeated that story--too tired to smile, or to wink--should
anyone use that to accuse her of lying? Only someone like Anderson
Cooper, who more and more is showing himself to be pro Obama, would
attack FIGURATIVE speech. To his credit CNN's Wolf Blitzer seems to
be showing a level of professional detachment as he covers the news.
Obama is an expert at rattling off desirable political goals in his
speeches. Yet, other than by addressing Congress, the President gets
few chances to call for legislation. Most of Obama's campaign
speeches would be more apt if this country was a dictatorship, and he
was the dictator. But from the point of view of his 'supporters', he
could be reading numbers from the phone book; they will say "Amen!" to
anything.
A good President has more need of good executive abilities, than good
ideas. The latter are a dime a dozen. Has anyone shown that Barack
Obama has any executive experience? Obama likes to challenge
Clinton's "experience on foreign policy". Rightly, she doesn't jump
up and claim that she has made any foreign policy decisions, herself.
Yet, she is hugely qualified in those areas. How can that be?
Because she was "in the kitchen", so to speak, for the two terms of
her husband's successful years as President of the United States; she
was there! And that makes Hillary Clinton, ipso facto, THE most
qualified person in this country to lead America!
Obama wishes to become President. But he has no qualification other
than being a stony-faced speaker--who happens to be a black Democrat.
I wish that Rev. Al Sharpton had Obama's votes, now. Sharpton has
executive, take-charge, qualities. And he is very knowledgeable of
anything to do with government. I liked the way he silenced hecklers
during a 2004 presidential debate. He said: "'My people' will handle
this, if you people (running the debate) can't."
Because Obama shows just his same, emotionless, stony face while "the
bullets are flying over..." his head, some are now claiming that he's...
the TEFLON candidate. Ronald Reagan had a similar nickname. But
because Reagan was a generalist, he didn't take issue with
disagreements on details. He just stuck to the larger goals, and let
the talk on details fade into the background.
Because Obama is a detail oriented specialist, if he becomes
President, he will insist on involving himself with details way over
his head, and in far too many areas. Obama has neither the
"personality" nor the expertise to know how to delegate authority--the
PRIMARY executive ability! His only "claim" to executive ability is
his running... a "better campaign" than Clinton. But every contribution
Obama gets boosts his ego that he is... 'mandated'. Those contributors
to his campaign are, effectively, special interest group lobbyists who
will paralyze his office, if he is elected.
Pres. Jimmy Carter liked to brag that he was an expert on nuclear
power. Like Obama, the man was smart. But when there was a crisis,
Carter addressed the people. He didn't know the ways of getting
things done by working with Congress, first. He could make heart-felt
speeches. But the American people wouldn't demand that Congress do
what Carter wanted. Barack Obama won't be good at swaying Congress,
either. "The bigger they are the harder they fall." is the
expression. Obama's ego will go head-to-head with the egos of those
in Congress--that Obama will surely pique. His prospect of a failed
presidency... is very high.
But Obama shouldn't even be considered as a candidate for president,
EVER. Why? Because he doesn't support DEMOCRACY! I know such,
because his campaigner and endorser, Senator Tom Daschel, "smiles"
when roadblocks are thrown up to having the votes in FL and MI
counted, or their new primaries scheduled. And Obama himself didn't
tell those legislators in Michigan he wants another primary... to be
fair. Obviously, Obama is against democracy, because that's the ONLY
way he can get the nomination! And Howard Dean favors... 'the rules of
the DNC' over democracy, because that is the ONLY way, he might get a
position in the Executive Branch. In a similar way, George Bush, and
the 2000 US Supreme Court, betrayed democracy just to continue the
lame political party system--that's largely controlled by selfish
business interests.
Corruption, and having any person or group obtain an unfair selfish
advantage, will bring down America. But only if the American people
let it! Till now, it has been far too convenient for them to just let
their 'groups' "represent" their interests. When 90 plus percent of
blacks continue to support Obama--even after Obama has disavowed
DEMOCRACY--then, blacks are disavowing democracy, too. Those "smiling
faces" in the audiences behind Obama, as he speaks, should just be
empty seats. Now, anyone smiling at Obama is giving their assent to
the downfall America. Have any of you blacks who continue to support
him considered that?
Obama has a rude penchant for staring into the eyes of those who are
talking. He's like a raptor waiting to pounce. When Hillary has
replied to questions during debates, imagine how hard it would be to
concentrate on her answers with Obama staring so ungentlemanly. But
'that way', he avoids facing the audience. And he hides his inability
to exhibit a normal range of facial expressions and body language to
the audiences. He just concentrates. And he's in his own, strange,
private world.
Blacks are loyal people. And they are great verbal communicators.
Now isn't the time for them to be... unified behind Obama. It's a time
for them to become color blind, and to vote for the person who is BEST
for America. Deep down, everyone--including Barack Obama--knows that
such person is Hillary Rodham Clinton! Clinton will be a great
President for everyone in the USA!
Respectfully submitted,
-- NoEinstein --
>
> Copyrighted.)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/eed2b...
> __________
NoEinstein
>
The US Constitution allows the States to decide many issues. The
resulting cross jurisdictions guarantee the right to vote, on the one
hand, while allowing each state to determine the boundaries of its own
districts. Problems arise when any district's boundary decisions have
been based on the resulting demographic makeup of districts--
especially, when the latter starts distorting the macro will of the
people, counter to democratic principles.
Conveniently, the political parties in many states use their already
drawn up district boundaries to allocate delegates to the national
party conventions. That's the reason it is possible for a candidate
to... "win" the delegate count, but loose the total popular vote across
the USA. Those times when the latter happens, democracy gets raped.
In the pioneer days when the Constitution was being written, it was
necessary that we be "a representative republic". That's because
democracy--though it is the shinning ideal--would have been impossible
to administer and to guarantee, if the votes of the people had had to
be collected via horse and buggy. And the distribution of the
information necessary for voters to be adequately informed on the
issues made "pure" democracy unpractical.
The US Constitution addressed the vote collection problem in national
elections by having what is known as... the Electoral College.
Originally, such was comprised of trusted citizens from the various
states who actually traveled to Washington (These days, travel to
Washington is no longer required.), and those citizens were on their
honor to vote the way the majority of those in their apt geographic
areas had voted.
A recognized problem was: During the TIME between a presidential
election, and when the votes of the total Electoral College could be
compiled, the dynamics of the contest could have changed. Suppose it
gets revealed that one of the candidates for President has committed a
felony, or other slipup, which surely disqualifies such person to be
president. Are the members of the Electoral College still bound by
the, then, naïve votes of the people in the far away states?
Electors are given some leeway to vote "what is right" for the people
whom they represent. By their having that leeway, it is being
acknowledged: Information which is available at the latest moment,
that was unavailable when the people voted, is MORE important to the
final decision than the votes of the people who didn't have such
information.
The above is most apt to the continuing democratic race between
Clinton and Obama. He is clinging to hopes of victory, because he
built up an early lead in the delegate count. But the stampede of the
voters to Obama STOPPED in Texas and Ohio! With the new revelations
about Obama's "personality" and "qualification" shortcomings, more and
more it seems that the Special Delegates--who will be privy to ALL of
the most up-to-date information--will get to make the final decision.
And the correct final decision is: They should vote to nominate
Hillary Rodham Clinton!
Barack Obama shouldn't even be running to become President at all.
Why? Because he has disavowed democracy... as is evinced by his
"attitude" regarding democracy in FL and MI. Obama--with his corrupt
news spinners with their sick smiles--are placing more importance on...
"the rules" of the DNC than on democracy itself. Folks, if getting
Obama elected is more important than democracy, then the USA is going
down-the-tubes. Not only is Obama unqualified to be President, his
election will lock in the corruption of the Howard Deans, the Bill
Richardsons and the Tom Daschels. NOTE: Corruption isn't a party
issue, it is THE issue!
The US Constitution makes no mention of political parties. Subsequent
laws were passed which gave political parties leeway to decide how
they will select their nominees. But no party, nor officials of any
government, nor any court has the right to negate DEMOCRACY in the
USA!
Quite literally, the HORRIBLE primary system that this country is
saddled with started out with a simple objective: Because people in
'small' states need to meet the candidates; and because it takes a lot
of time for candidates to visit all of the states, it was decided to
allow small states, like Iowa, to hold their primaries on separate
dates. That may be... the tradition... but it violates democracy at every
turn!
Obama will claim that his early stampede of delegates should carry the
same 'weight' as Clinton's later stampede. As with the Electoral
College, later information should carry more weight that earlier,
outmoded information. I wonder how many of Obama's "supporters" would
vote for him now that they know: He clings to the likes of Rev.
Jeremiah Wright who hates America; that his wife "loves America for
the first time" AFTER her husband won a primary; that he has positions
on NAFTA that are different in private than in public; that his
schedule for getting our troops out of Iraq is more open-ended than he
says; that his only 'executive experience' is running a campaign, and
his only standard is the dollars raised; that his "personality" is too
self-centered to be the Chief Executive; that he is attracting the
endorsements of persons and groups with selfish motives; that he has
little in common with anybody; and that he is so selfish that he
thinks his being elected President is more important than DEMOCRACY
itself!
Recent polls show that about 16% of the supporters of both Clinton and
Obama say that they will vote for McCain, unless their own choice gets
the nomination. I say, if Obama gets the nomination, write in: Ron
Paul. Both McCain and Obama would be the puppets of their party.
McCain lucked his way through, because he is intransigent. His
positions on anything never change. He's that way to protect his
likely 90 IQ. Start changing things, and he would reveal his slow
mind. Try to get him to change, and he looses his temper. That
latent temper is his protective mechanism, and it could well kill-him-
off with a heart attack. Every time McCain opens his mouth, his blood
pressure seems to go so high, that he looks like he will explode!
Unfortunately, Obama never changes, either... He becomes so personally
involved with the details, that he takes changes to his proposals as
an affront to his ego. Obama would never be able to compromise; never
be able to get his subordinates to like him; never be able to convince
the American people that he feels their pain (because Obama is devoid
of emotions, himself); and he would never be able to carry through on
most of those "good ideas" he keeps reeling off. Obama uses the
latter as "dangles" for the naïve souls in his audiences, so that he
can to get himself nominated.
If an unbiased observer had to assess the validity of the health care
plans of Clinton vs. Obama, Clinton would win, hands down--if for no
other reason than she has been thinking on that subject for close to
two decades. Obviously, Obama's health care plan is the one he has
most thought about. In the earlier debates, the most "presidential"
reply that Obama, or anyone else, could have made in such regard would
have been:
"I'm committed to a workable and practical health care plan. If
Americans will honor me, by electing me your President, I give you my
word that I will consider the best aspects of the plans of Clinton, or
any of you out there. Admittedly, I'm no expert on health issues, but
I can assure you that I will enlist whatever expert advice may be
needed to best serve you, and as soon as possible, after I take
office."
If Obama becomes President... we will have this angry-toned, manikin-
like figure looking left and right into his teleprompters, as he
explains to us the details of his personally contrived plans... and the
daily build-up to his failed presidency. But such a presidency
needn't become his, nor our, embarrassment! Obama should do himself,
and all of us a favor: He should immediately WITHDRAW as a candidate
for President. And he should expeditiously RESIGN as senator, and get
out of the political arena, forever. But if he doesn't do those
things, Obama should call a press conference; look directly into the
cameras, without teleprompters; and explain to the American people WHY
his getting nominated by the Democrats, is more important than
DEMOCRACY itself!
Respectfully submitted,
-- NoEinstein --
NoEinstein
> On Mar 28, 12:34 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
the media. That's because truths tend to hurt those who are doing the
wrong things, more than the converse. The failed media in this
country is at the very core of America's problems. To correct those
problems will necessitate placing major constraints on allowing ANY
biases in the media to influence ANY decisions of the citizens in how
they will vote in elections or in referenda. So, we in America should
prepare ourselves for living in a world in which "news commentators",
ALL of them, will be an extinct breed.
Recently, I have said that CNN's Wolf Blitzer seems to be showing a
professional detachment in how he administers news stories. This past
Sunday he had James Carville as his guest. As most of you know,
Carville had called Gov. Bill Richardson a... "Judas" for endorsing
Barack Obama. That's because Richardson had served as a cabinet
member during Bill Clinton's administration.
In all fairness, Richardson has every right to switch his loyalty.
But he does NOT have a right to use his own endorsement for anyone
running for office, to persuade others to vote for such person!
Endorsements, more often than not, run counter to democratic
principles. The "buddy-buddy" endorsements by seated officials,
creates these "you owe me one" relationships. Those who manage to get
elected should owe no one anything, other than to do the best job for
all Americans!
James Carville, personality wise, is an ideal person for contrasting
with Barack Obama. Carville shows all of his emotions on his face, or
in his (at times) stammering voice. Those qualities are like windows
to his soul; and he comes across as sincere because of it. Obama, on
the other hand shows NO emotions on his face, nor in his voice. So,
he comes across as someone who can't be analyzed; could be hiding
things; and thus could be untrustworthy.
After Obama made his robot-like address about his relationship with
his pastor, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, he was interviewed about how his
speech may have allayed the Wright issues. I was taken--not by what
Obama said during the interview--but that he said it without a hint of...
quaver in his voice. There was this hugely emotional issue in which
teary eyes, a nervous hand, or Carville-like stammering voice would
have shown Obama to be... human, and perhaps sincere. But Obama has
never shown, to my satisfaction, that he is sincere about anything.
I've seen recent campaign ads of Obama's that are being run in NC. In
those he talks, assertively, about what he will do for the people if
he is elected President. Obama is wearing a white dress shirt with
his sleeves rolled up--the way Screaming Howard Dean had worn his
sleeves.
Obama's speech would have been great for one running to be a US
Senator, but it wasn't appropriate for a person running for
President. Why? Because the issues facing a president are way too
broad to be embodied in one person. Though Obama is a smart man, he
'might be' a smart man worthy of being President ONLY if he is wise
enough to delegate the working out of the details to his
subordinates. Because Obama is a detail-oriented specialist, he is
incapable--by his personality-- of delegating authority; he is difficult
to approach and befriend; and his ego is so huge that everyone in
Congress will have their guards up so high, that all of those
"promising" political ads of his will have been just so much hot air.
Sadly, many people will think that because Obama is so strong willed,
that he'll accomplish things "for them" that have never been
accomplished before. But nothing could be further from the truth!
Because Obama has ZERO executive, and ZERO foreign policy experience,
he will be... at the mercy of the Democratic Party to tell him how to
"run" things. 'That' is the reason people like Richardson, Daschel,
and Dean are so "supportive"--they want jobs in the Executive Branch
that will look good in their 'biographies'. And when they betray
democratic ideals for selfish ends, they themselves are being un
American.
With the Pennsylvania primary looming large on the horizon, PA Senator
Bob Casey has endorsed Obama. Those two recently held a pseudo press
conference. In it Obama took just two or three questions, then tried
to SNOW everyone with... how much he knows. He talking way too long,
and went into way too many boring details. Those same tendencies will
surely doom an Obama presidency.
Sen. Casey was standing beside Obama with this very nervous, almost
stunned look, over how Obama's "press conference" had turned into
monologues. If JFK had held that same press conference, he would have
fielded fifteen our twenty questions, and used no more than three or
four sentences to reply to each. And everyone would have been highly
entertained in the process!
A likely reason that Obama chose to have a pseudo, monologue press
conference is because he didn't wish to 'risk' having a maverick
reporter ask: "Senator Obama, recently, blogs on the Internet are
suggesting that your tacit resistance to having the Fl and MI primary
votes counted, or having those primaries be re held, is tantamount to
your placing more importance on your getting nominated, than you place
on democracy itself. Would you please comment?"
If and when Obama has to answer such a question, his candidacy for
President is over. You voters "still up for grabs" in PA or in NC
should know that Obama can't get to the Democratic National Convention
in August, without answering that very same question. So, to vote for
a real winner (!) Hillary Rodham Clinton is the wisest choice!
Most tellingly, "the question about Obama's favoring getting nominated
over his favoring democracy itself" was never discussed by Wolf
Blitzer. Was he showing bias toward Obama by not discussing that
question? Or was he just following the failed rule-of-thumb in the
media that "news" comes only from A-list politicians or celebrities,
never from any of the John Q. Public out there. I am proud to be John
Q. Public personified!
Immediately, after I began posting regarding Obama's personality being
unsuited for a President of the USA, the readership of my posts shot
way up. Obama knows that I have accused him of having little in
common with anybody. Now, I see him trying to look... American by
bowling gutter balls, or by eating pizza. Yes, he can smile and even
laugh in crowds. But he still can't show any emotion whatsoever while
being interviewed or while making prepared speeches. I could never
trust such a man as my President.
It has been over a week since I accused Obama of "betraying democracy"
for his own selfish ends. Such time period is long enough for him to
have responded this way, if he was so minded: "My fellow Americans: I
have learned--through the recent Internet blogs of a man with the
curious computer name, NoEinstein--that I have slipped up in how I'm
running my campaign for President. The Democratic primaries that were
held in Florida and Michigan... though too early to comply with the
rules of the DNC, were still democratic processes. I agree with
NoEinstein that the rules of a democracy--like I hope that America
still is--will always trump the rules of any political party. In
short, the 'date restriction' set by the DNC for 'which' primaries can
be held 'when', is probably unconstitutional.
"Therefore, I am recommending to the DNC that the vote in Florida be
taken, as is, with no revote. And I am recommending that the votes in
Michigan be apportioned the same as demographically similar
Pennsylvania, in its upcoming primary. If it should turn out that "as
goes Pennsylvania, so goes the Nation" I will live with such results.
My intent is to abide by sound principles of democracy. Any
candidate, so nominated, will best serve the interests of all
Americans. In that light, I remain a candidate to be your President.
Thank you all."
But the above heart felt speech was never forthcoming from Barack
Obama. His motives are to "serve" the throngs that he imagines still
want him to be President. But the momentum in the "Ballet Bowl" has
shifted. And the desperate calls that Clinton... "give up" are rightly
going unheeded. No speeches given in front of rows of American flags
will legitimize the candidacy of one too selfish, and too detached to
serve anyone but those string-alongs who might get asked to do Obama's
bidding.
It is time that Obama withdraw as a candidate, and time that he
apologize to the American people for not honoring the high ideals of
democracy. America can survive without him.
Respectfully submitted,
-- NoEinstein --
>
NoEinstein
>
When our country was founded, America was a place of hope for those
bold enough to brave the sometimes harsh Atlantic to get here. The
early pioneers wanted fair treatment, and freedom from any oppression
that might limit a person's potential. Democracy seemed to be the
most fair form of government. And a Representative Republic was the
most practical approximation of such ideal.
Over the decades, the self-sufficient agrarian lifestyles of the
majority evolved into our present niche specialty lifestyles. Our
economic system--based on specialization--is varyingly successful. But
too often, our governments try to tweak those places where it feels
there are inequities, and those who 'get' have for too long been at
odds with those who 'give'.
For the first time in our history, 81% of American's are unhappy with
the direction that our country is headed. In recent presidential
elections the percent of those who cheered at the outcome was close to
half of those who voted. 'At least' half of the voters were happy...
But does living in a democracy mean that only half can be happy at one
time in America? No, it doesn't!
Don't blame democracy for our problems! It may come as a shock to
many, but America isn't anywhere close to being a democracy. And she
gets further and further away from such an ideal every day. CNN's Lou
Dobbs is often shown asking this question: "Doesn't America deserve a
government that works?" By all means, yes! But we don't have such a
government(s)... because of the naïve complacency of those niche
specialty citizens and voters. All of you nice Americans haven't been
holding our governments accountable.
Those in governments have become our Elected Dictators--a proverbial
ruling class--that was so disdained by our founding fathers. And we
let it happen right under our own eyes, without a care in the world.
With 81% of Americans unhappy with our country, maybe those same
citizens will listen to some of my insights concerning how to save
America:
"When something is broken, fix it!" Government has been paying lip
service to our pioneer era Constitution. But behind the scenes they
have figured how to circumvent most, if not all, of the democratic
principles so desired by our founding fathers. Largely, this has been
due to treason-worthy Supreme Court interpretations. Again, most of
our too trusting Americans have just gone-with-the-flow, while more
and more of our cherished civil liberties have been taken from us.
And those thefts of our liberties keep happening without any calls of:
"Treason!".
"The media has destroyed democracy!" When the Constitution was
written, the citizens learned of developing issues from low volume
newspapers; bulletins; and via word of mouth. Talking to one's
neighbors across the split-rail fences was wonderful for America. But
today the media--and our specialty lifestyles--lets us 'communicate'
about issues mostly in those forums that the media itself allows to be
aired, and in which Americans are just 'spectators' to the daily
lowering of their own destinies.
"The media has encouraged the very worst among us to... 'represent'
us." Those with huge egos, like Barack Obama... are drawn to political
careers, because the media will print what they say, and allow their
mugs to be put in the public view. Wonderful, patriotic Americans who
would represent us well, but who are more shy in public situations,
never venture into public office, because they don't like being in the
media spotlight.
"The media favors those it knows, and especially those who agree with
their political positions on issues." The buddy-buddy relationships
of the politicians and the media favors... 'career politicians'--who, due
to their governmental isolation, too often, are out-of-tune with those
citizens who elected them. The media has made our career politicians
an elite ruling class. And because the media itself is haughty, it
mistakenly believes that IT, the media, represents America. That's
why the media keeps espousing its own ideals, rather than seeking out
and airing the ideals of the citizens.
"The media follows the advertising dollars in deciding positions."
Hillary Rodham Clinton, to her credit, is a known entity who should be
able to win any 'fair election' based on her best-person-for-the-job
persona. And she should be able to do such without having to purchase
a single advertisement! But the corrupt media is favoring Barack
Obama and his "the presidency-can-be-bought" advertising dollars. And
they are doing so because they feel more important by getting someone
who is undeserving of the job elected. One of my own quotes: "The
lust for power favors evil-doing, because the glory of dictating a
good thing is always shared with its unspoken moral imperative."
In the present race for President, persuasiveness--wrongly--is more
important than having the best positions on the issues. Sadly,
persuasiveness is allowed to negate even our supposed Representative
Republic. Here's how that works: We elect a promising new
representative. But he or she starts out without seniority, and soon
learns who the power bosses in Washington are, and to whom they must
defer. The most persuasive orators are able to sway other
representatives to vote this way or that. But where is it written in
the Constitution that America gets ruled by the best orators... like
Barack Obama has managed to convince people that he is?
This week ex Governor of Minnesota, Jesse Ventura, was a guest on
"Larry King Live". Jesse is someone, with a detachment from... "the
system", to evaluate it without bias. That is... unless being "a
centrist" can be called bias. The following is a letter I wrote to
Jesse in 1999. It hints how profoundly involved I am in rooting out
America's problems and trying to put America back on a sound
foundation based on democracy.
_____
June 4, 1999
Honorable Governor of Minnesota
Jesse Ventura
The State House
St. Paul, Minnesota 55155
Dear Governor Ventura:
To an extent, Minnesota is a microcosm of the USA. What is good
for the USA should be good for Minnesota and vise versa. I am writing
this to you because I've discovered major failings in our systems of
government. All of such can be blamed--in whole or in part--on partisan
politics.
I watched you during your wrestling career only in 'switching
channels'--please don't take offense. But I'd seen you enough so that
your face (and voice) were familiar by the time you started running
for governor. You ran for mayor--not because it was a career political
step--but because you saw a need that you could fill, and those in your
small town sensed a personal benefit from having you for their leader.
For want of a 'better' label, I am a registered democrat who is
ultra-conservative in monetary matters, and moderately moderate on
social issues. I am also a die-hard Civil Libertarian. (I've heard
you talk enough to sense that you greatly value civil liberties as
well.) Lumping all of these things together, one might consider me to
be a moderate, or like you call it, a centrist. I'm BIG on the
American People (with a capital P) and... small on politicians and
self-serving government.
The first thing that really impressed me about you was the fact
that you were a Navy Seal. I've had an innate feeling that Seals are
selected as much for their minds as for their bodies. After all, what
worth is a 'machine' without a good control system! The success or
failure of a mission could well depend on the split-second decision of
the man at the front. In America, somehow, we've gotten away from
that high standard and 'accept' that those who are remote (in
Washington or etc.) can do a better job of running things than... the
man on... the front line.
I was impressed that you are a strong family man. I suspect a
good part of your interest in entering... politics... has to do with
the very real wish that your children have a secure future, and that
your grandchildren, and on and on, will have one as well. I am
impressed that you value a seaside-life-of-leisure more than you value
the 'acclaim' that comes with seeking higher and higher public
offices. But you are not a man to stand by idly when you see a need
you can fill, and there are throngs of... the People... who sense a
personal benefit in having (or considering having) you for their
leader.
By normal 'letter' standards this is already long, but it could
be one of the most important letters you'll ever get. There's a
computer disk enclosed that gives details of why this is important. A
'nutshell' of the disk is the attached letter to The London Times. We
(wrongly) have taken for granted that 'the media' will keep the People
informed so that they can't be duped by big government. The media is
largely a bunch of puppet (on strings) news journalists who must
appease their advertisers, and answer to their don't-make-waves
bosses... The true NEWS isn't being reported. So, this is an
indictment of the media at least equal to the indictment of partisan
politics and big (pseudo-functioning) government.
Following The London Times letter is another letter to you
discussing what I propose doing about these 'problems', and how you
and your family, and their families and on and on should be interested
as well.
Governor, you are one of the men I most admire--based on what I've
learned thus far. I hope we can travel the same paths... for the
benefit of the People!
Very truly yours,
-- NoEinstein --
[Actual name and address was used.]
_____
A large part of this essay concerns our failed media. Just today, I
saw CNN's Wolf Blitzer give his trademark, hiding-behind-a-beard-
without-a-hint-of-emotion, tacit attack on democracy. He made such
attack by having as his guests mainly those who are pro Obama. DNC
Chairman Howard Dean is trying for 'Brownie Points' by claiming to be
working to... 'seat' the FL delegates in Colorado. But 'seating' and
'counting' are two separate things. And without a representation from
Michigan, democracy can't even be claimed as a... plank of the
Democratic Party.
Hilary Clinton, and her would be 'First Gentleman', are knowledgeable
enough about running the Executive Branch that they can do so without
having to go hat-in-hand to anyone in the Democratic Party. In the
other wise, Barack Obama will be totally beholden to those selfish
endorsers of his who keep coming out of the woodwork. Those who
endorse Obama are trying to "buy a job"... that is, unless Obama will
publicly decline to even consider any of his endorsers for a Cabinet
position, or any other, in the Executive Branch.
But Obama has been bought--since he first showed oratory promise as a
teen. The man got pegged as a leader... of blacks. And blacks fed his
ego to believe that his becoming president was his destiny. But the
man whom blacks selected as 'white enough', also is carrying the
wounded psyche of a child who had no loving father figure. As a
result, Obama's loyalties are divided, black and white. He is like a
man without a country, or a ship without a port.
Money, and blind eyes, keep Obama on his failed course to gain the
nomination to become a candidate for President. His "lefty" emotions
just aren't there. He's like a machine that those who are
discontented with the direction this country is headed hope can
perform for them. But an Obama presidency would only sink this
country further and further into corruption.
Suppression of democracy is tantamount to the overthrow of America.
If a spy were caught wanting to destroy the very foundation on which
America was built, such person would be tried for treason. When
Barack Obama, Howard Dean, Tom Daschel, Bob Casey, Bill Richardson,
Wolf Blitzer, Anderson Coo-per, Jack Cafferty, etc., etc, etc., think
that the negating of democracy is "fair play", they should be CURSED
by all Americans--if not tired for treason, or subversion from within.
WITH democracy, America survives; without it, we fail--and from our own
complacency. Babies in wet diapers, and people of similar ilk, may
desire... "Obama, Obama...!" to be their president. But thinking ADULTS
will recognize when corrupt and selfish influences are stampeding a
"Manchurian Candidate" like Barack Obama to be a puppet of those bad
influences. Jesse Venture rightly says that Obama and McCain will get
their "strings pulled" by their parties. This country can't allow
political parties, and a corrupt media, to bring down the Greatest
Nation of All Time.
So arise, thinking ADULTS, in PA, NC, IN and the remaining primary
states as well as in Puerto Rico! Give Barack Obama an appropriate
sendoff for one who is selfish enough to betray democracy, and
mentally ill enough not to show the least hint of emotion that he has
so done.
Respectfully submitted,
-- NoEinstein --
>
> and went into waytoomany boring details. Those same tendencies will
> held in Florida and Michigan... thoughtooearly to comply with the
> rules of the DNC, were still democratic processes. I agree with
> NoEinstein that the rules of a democracy--like I hope that America
> still is--will always trump the rules of any political party. In
> short, the 'date restriction' set by the DNC for 'which' primaries can
> be held 'when', is probably unconstitutional.
>
> "Therefore, I am recommending to the DNC that the vote in Florida be
> taken, as is, with no revote. And I am recommending that the votes in
> Michigan be apportioned the same as demographically similar
> Pennsylvania, in its upcoming primary. If it should turn out that "as
> goes Pennsylvania, so goes the Nation" I will live with such results.
> My intent is to abide by sound principles of democracy. Any
> candidate, so nominated, will best serve the interests of all
> Americans. In that light, I remain a candidate to be your President.
> Thank you all."
>
> But the above heart felt speech was never forthcoming from Barack
> Obama. His motives are to "serve" the throngs that he imagines still
> want him to be President. But the momentum in the "Ballet Bowl" has
> shifted. And the desperate calls that Clinton... "give up" are rightly
> going unheeded. No speeches given in front of rows of American flags
> will legitimize the candidacy of onetooselfish, andtoodetached to
NoEinstein
along... "Damn the torpedoes; full steam ahead!" is his mantra. Nearly
a century ago, the brand new luxury liner 'Titanic' set sail on its
fateful voyage. On a clear, cold night, she hit an iceberg. Many
felt a vibration... For a while, at least, most just assumed everything
was normal.
Symbolically, Obama's campaign hit an iceberg when those in it seemed
elated that roadblocks to democracy were being thrown up by the DNC.
Many, like Senator Tom Daschle, smiled that the primary votes in
Florida weren't being counted, and the primary in Michigan wasn't
being redone.
In the 2000 race for President, many will remember that Republicans
grinned like Cheshire cats when the US Supreme Court suspended
democracy--because of... "scheduling difficulties".
Now, it looks like unprincipled Democrats are going to take a stab at
suspending democracy, too. They're doing so by not insisting that the
votes in FL get accepted, or that the votes in Michigan get fairly
apportioned as befits that state's demographic mix.
It's absolutely amazing that the USA considers it her duty to "impose"
democracy in places like Iraq. Yet, democracy is hardly evident
anywhere in the USA! General Petraeous should be circling his troops
around Obama, and his gang of grinning tagalongs. And how about
those who willingly contribute their hard-earned money to defy
democracy in America and get that... Manchurian Candidate, Obama,
nominated? Aren't those contributors as much of a threat to America
as illegal aliens? Because democracy is the dusty cornerstone of our
Constitution, those who violate such are certainly doing illegal acts.
Yesterday, CNN commentator, Campbell Brown, asked three lady guests
for their assessment of the recent slide in the polls of Clinton. The
first two were quick to say that such portends an Obama victory.
Campbell Brown was refreshingly taken aback. She asked the third lady
if it was going to "be three..." against Clinton. By being put on the
spot, the third woman's reply was less knee-jerk anti Clinton.
CNN is owned by TIME Warner. And that media giant is mostly owned and
controlled by... Jews. Jews are probably the most disdained 'minority'
in this country. Mainly, that's because Jews manage to exercise power
disproportionate to their numbers. And ANY disproportionate exercise
of power is anti democracy! So, is it any wonder a Jewish media giant
supports that anti democracy, minority 'puppet', Obama, for President?
The most basic tenet of a democracy is that the adult citizens are
entitled to have one vote each . And such votes must have the same
power regardless of the... "status" of the voter. Folks, the above
defines democracy. But, unfortunately, our governments don't work
that way...
In Washington the Democrats and the Republicans have their own "side
of the aisle". The party with just one more House or Senate member is
considered... the "majority" party. And such party gets to 'chair' the
many committees. And the... "rules" give those chairmen, and those with
seniority, more POWER than the other representatives or senators--in
absolute DEFIANCE of the principles of democracy!!!!!
A Representative Republic should mimic democracy. And it should yield
results as close as possible to a pure democracy. But the results
being yielded by our governments are presently acceptable to only 19%
of those polled.
In light of the above facts, any patriotic American should see how
allowing Barack Obama to even CAMPAIGN to be President, is an assault
on democracy. Obama's continued candidacy portends that the USA will
sink deeper and deeper into her... corruption-is-the-norm state. And
the USA will surely fall--as did the Roman Empire.
The majority of Americans aren't... bad people. They have just gotten
too used to living among those who are bad, and who seem to be getting
ahead because of it. A human flaw is: Making decisions based on what
other people are deciding under the same circumstances. Those 'look
first' qualities amount to mass-mindedness. Blacks see other blacks
supporting Obama, so they support Obama, too--and for that reason
alone. No "trend" in as ominous to the future of America as having 90
plus percent of blacks be mass minded... back to the stone ages. Blacks
support Obama even when "their man" is less than qualified; less than
patriotic, due to his church affiliation; and less than suitable
because of his controlling, rather than delegating, personality. I
have seen "the handwriting on the wall", and Obama's comes up lacking.
Now, the issue is about: Winning the sad, play-by-play sporting event
called "Ballet Bowl". It's not about selecting the best person for
President. Only Hillary Rodham Clinton fills the latter bill of
requirements. But as long as the present election has been cheapened
to a choose-up-sides sport, the loyalties will divide us.
There's this not-too-flattering idea that if enough people support
something, its got to be OK. On such subject, American patriot Thomas
Payne said: "Right is right, even if everyone is against it; and wrong
is wrong, even if everyone is in favor of it!"
In the movie the Poseidon Adventure, actor Gene Hackman's character
tried to get the trapped passengers to follow him "up the Christmas
tree" toward the hull of the overturned ocean liner. But most
preferred to remain with their captain. Within minutes, those who had
not followed Hackman drowned.
In many ways I feel like Gene Hackman's character felt. I, too, am
pointing out the way to survival. But there is this pervading protect-
the-status-quo idea that will surely doom this country. That's
because the status quo has long since become corrupt--in every niche of
the media; in governments, and in higher education. Only the basic
goodness in every human soul-- without bias toward any person or group--
can set us on the right course again. And that can happen ONLY if we
embrace our fellow man of whatever race, color or creed--rather than
letting ourselves become polarized by ever increasing, selfish group
interests.
If 'the phone rings' in your mind at 3:00 a.m.--or any other time--I
hope such rings will signify that your conscience is urging you to do
the right thing for America, and the right things for democracy.
Barack Obama is presently advertising that if he answers a 3:00 a.m.
call at the White House, that he will already have read all of the
particulars needed to make a decision. But when Hillary Rodham
Clinton answers the phone... SHE can respond from her innate knowledge
and well-honed instincts! She--unlike Obama--doesn't need a "cram"
course to be President of the United States of America from day one!!
Be it known: The right to vote is a high privilege. But those being
urged by Obama to register to vote for him, are being corrupted.
That's because free will is the essence of democracy. And free will
considers the options before making a decision.
Every American should hope that the person for whom they vote will
improve their lot, and improve America. And those objectives don't
have to work against anyone in this country! A properly run Federal
Government, like we presently don't have, will benefit all of us.
With 81% discontent in this country, the time for change has come.
United we stand; and united we shall prosper!
Respectfully submitted,
-- NoEinstein --
>
> On Mar 17, 10:19 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Over Easter, Barack Obama and his family took a short vacation.
> During that period polls were taken which show that Hillary Clinton
> would defeat McCain by a larger margin than Obama would. And just
> this week, for the first time, Obama's... "personality" is being
> mentioned as an issue. But his camp has chosen to lump all of Obama's
> personality issues under this one heading: the "Damn the USA..." sermon
> of Obama's preacher, the Rev. Jeremiah Wright. Since Obama has
> already replied to the latter, those in his camp are hoping those
> "personality" issues will stay behind him. But Obama's news spinners
> are sitting much more tensely in their seats as they try to deflect
> the questions about his lack of qualifications--personality or
> otherwise. And their 'smiles' in such regard seem much less genuine.
>
> These days, when Obama speaks, those supporters of his with a
> propensity to nod their heads in agreement to everything he says, are
> planted in the audience in the view of the TV cameras. From the tone
> of his recent speeches, one would never realize that he is being
> assailed. "Bullets are flying..." over his head. That's figurative
> speech, of course. Obviously, there's a battle going on. But is it a
> flag-waving "sports event"? Or is it a political race that would ever
> find Barack Obama qualified to lead the declining... "greatest nation of
> all time"?
>
> CNN has labeled their 24/7 coverage of the race for President, the alltooapt name: "Ballot Bowl". For them, having someone be elected
> President is 'sport'. And they are the high paid play-by-play sports
> announcers. There isn't a sporting event in this country in which the
> announcers don't telescope their personal loyalties by their
> excitement over a... "GOAL!"; or a home run; or a touchdown. Many teams
> have their own announcers, and their own radio and TV networks.
> Choose the 'wrong' one of those, and the announcer won't be showing
> the emotion you desire.
>
> Anderson Cooper--or as he chooses to pronounce it: "Coo-per"--has had
> what looks like... excellent surgery under his left eye. Anderson could
> have told everyone--figuratively, of course--that he got "grazed by a
> bullet" when he got off of his plane in Iraq. If he had said 'that'
> with a smile, he would have been showing good humor. But he showed no
> good humor when he derided Hillary Clinton for saying that she had to
> "duck down" getting off of her plane in Bosnia.
>
> Soldiers getting out of still-running helicopters duck down,
> reflexively, as the "chopper" blades keep whizzing above. So, when
> Clinton repeated that story--tootired to smile, or to wink--should
> his head, and in fartoomany areas. Obama has neither the
> "personality" nor the expertise to know how to delegate authority--the
> PRIMARY executive ability! His only "claim" to executive ability is
> his running... a "better campaign" than Clinton. But every contribution
> Obama gets boosts his ego that he is... 'mandated'. Those contributors
> to his campaign are, effectively, special interest group lobbyists who
> will paralyze hisoffice, if he is elected.
> let it! Till now, it has been fartooconvenient for them to just let
> their 'groups' "represent" their interests. When 90 plus percent of
> blacks continue to support Obama--even after Obama has disavowed
> DEMOCRACY--then, blacks are disavowing democracy,too. Those "smiling
> > well known,too. After all, hadn't he made some rousing speeches
> > during the campaigns of 2000 and 2004, and didn't he speak at the 2004
> > Democratic Convention? It was easy to realize that Barack Obama, with
> > his fine oratory, was an up-and-comer in politics.
>
> > I've been observing politics since before Obama was born. Itoowas
> > curious if he would become the next Jesse Jackson. Both Jesse and I
> > were born in Greenville, SC. I had sided with "states rights" during
> > the segregation era, but this was largely because I felt that "the
> > right not to..." should be equal to "the right to...". The strong
> > arguments in support of my philosophy, work only if there is no
> > discrimination against blacks. But since such wasn't the case,
> > integration was the way to go.
>
> > Other than the fact that Obama was born poor, much of what he knows
> > about "black issues" he
>
NoEinstein
>
This is that 'bad day' every year when Americans are reminded how
costly "what government does" can be. Those being pressed by home
mortgages without fixed interest rates; or depressed home values--
because of the exodus of the unemployed--especially, have reasons to
feel unhappy.
It has been said: "Misery likes company." A recent poll shows that
81% of American adults are unhappy with the present direction our
country is headed. Should that datum be a cause for us to feel
depression, or to feel hope? Actually, it is one of the most positive
things to ever happen to this country! You ask: How could that be?
"Well..."--as President Reagan liked to begin salient comments by saying--
when Americans are united for a good cause, there is no force on Earth
that can lessen their resolve!
Horrific WW II happens to have been: "The greatest concerted effort in
the history of mankind!" Americans were rightly incensed when our
international friends and allies were invaded. And such was being
perpetrated by a proud, but economically depressed, German people.
Adolph Hitler happens to have been the wrong "artist", at the right
time, with the wrong solution. Even so, he managed to foment the
German masses, because of his exceptional oratory ability.
Barack Obama is acknowledged to have exceptional oratory ability.
Most shy Americans trembled-through their deliveries of oral book
reports in school. So, they consider a speaker... masterful, if he or
she can get through a speech without showing stage fright. Obama has
never shown the emotion of freight--nor any other normal emotion--in his
tone of delivery, or in the expressiveness of his voice. That seems
strange; very strange.
Graphology has been my serious hobby since before I was a teen. I've
been a keen observer of the diverse personalities of those I see
writing. And because I, also, have a knowledge of people in general,
I have a basis for making generalities.
Barack Obama had an unhappy childhood. And he's using such fact to
try to counter his just-now-being-recognized elitism. He claims that
he can identity with the discontented voters to whom he appeals. And
he says he can do so because he was once poor, himself. The Clintons'
tax documents show the obvious fruits of their successes--not their
failures. I ask you: Who is better qualified to lead this country
toward success: A person who likes to brag that he hasn't always been
successful; or the person who has for most of their life been
successful?
The most recent icon of the Democratic Party was certainly JFK. His
family was very rich, yet he was a Democrat--concerned with the lives
of those who are disadvantaged. Many of the richest people in the
world used their wealth to build universities, hospitals, research
centers, or to make grants beneficial to those less fortunate.
America must never stymie an individual's opportunity for economic
attainment, that is... if such attainment has been fairly and honorably
achieved.
Both Clinton and Obama are pressing the objective of improving the lot
of those in the middle class. Every four years, "the rich" in this
country are targeted as being too favored in the tax laws. Since
there are more people of average income, than there are in the high
ranges, it makes good political sense to appeal to: Where the most
voters are. But is such a class-against-class battle what is best for
the future of America? No way!
If and when our systems of government can become like well-oiled
machines, there are optimum objectives that should improve everyone's
opportunities, fairly. Socialism certainly isn't "fair"--because it
depresses free markets (discourages attainment) and rewards those who
won't lift a finger to better themselves. But "socialized medicine"
may be the right thing, if it is agreed that having good medical care
for all Americans is a desirable thing.
A sad characterization of "the American way" in business is: "Find
something that people want or need; then, over-charge them for it."
People certainly need health care when they're sick. But are those in
the health care system deserving of more rewards for their 40 hours,
than those in, say, manufacturing?
Too often, NAFTA gets a bum rap for exporting American jobs to
Mexico. When items are being purchased in the stores, all Americans
benefit from having low prices. But when American wages get high
enough to depress sales due to high prices, businesses begin
outsourcing jobs to remain competitive. The failures, there, are that
those same companies didn't educate their workers, and didn't
modernize their facilities to be more productive. By aiming for a
cheaper work force, too many industries have simply side-stepped their
poor business management. Sadly, and too often, industries feel no
compassion for their loyal workers who did the jobs that they were
asked to do.
In the 'rust belt' states, those without jobs make appealing audiences
to politicians pushing for change. Certainly, the loss of this
country's manufacturing base has reached dire levels. Too often,
smiling politician--like NC Governor Mike Easley--tout education as a
"guarantee" of economic success in life. But there aren't enough of
those college graduates willing to "work" for a living--as in
manufacturing something useful.
My having disproved Einstein's theories has been my 'window' into this
country's failures in higher education; in government; and certainly
in our "trusted" news media. But no failure is greater than was the
suppression of democracy so evident in the 2000 presidential
election. If Bush hadn't been so elected, he wouldn't have gotten a
second shot at being President in 2004.
It's a terrible thing to think that Barack Obama places more
importance on "the delegate count" than on the popular vote. And he
places more importance on the UNCONSTITUTIONAL rules of the Democratic
National Committee--regarding the primaries in Florida and in Michigan--
than he places on democracy itself. If Obama manages to get elected...
President... that will mean that twelve to sixteen years of our
country's "rule" will have been based on a level of corruption
tantamount to treason.
Everyday, a new cockroach comes out of the woodwork to endorse Obama.
Pennsylvania's Senator Bob Casey has revealed himself to be worthy of
ouster from America. As has: Tom Daschle, Bill Richardson, and
Screaming Howard Dean. But the futures of those men is more in doubt
following Sunday's CNN "debate" between Clinton and Obama on "faith".
Obama's first question invited him to explain his recent remarks that
have been viewed as so unfavorable to those disadvantaged ones in "the
small towns" of PA. The actual audio recording of those statements
reveals that Obama paused as if searching for the words he would say.
Clearly, he was talking off-the-cuff. And such a candid statement is
more revealing of what is going on in his head than any oft-repeated
campaign speech.
The media supporting Obama keyed on the word "bitter"--as if that word
was, perhaps, an unfair characterization of those living in small
towns. But the word "cling" is the far more hurtful word. That's
because such denigrates the nobleness of those who are facing some of
life's trials. Regardless of the characterization, the unity of those
in small towns will surely see them through.
Obama's remarks are really just a venting of his own frustrations at
not being able to 'win' very many of the voters in... small towns. As
CNN's John King likes to point out on the maps, Obama has been
dominating the high population centers near big cities. But he isn't
getting winning margins in very many rural, small town areas. Since
the momentum has clearly shifted to Clinton, is it any wonder that
Obama is showing his frustration?
Obama said, with his characteristic coolness, "The Bible urges people
to cling to good things..." I suppose 'religion' and 'guns' and disdain
for unfair trade agreements are the types of things the Bible could
have, but really doesn't, recommend that people cling to. Yes, Obama
chose his words poorly. But as CNN's Lou Dobbs points out, Obama
hasn't apologized for characterizing those people in small town PA as
"clinging". The 'Peanuts' character Linus clung to his blue security
blanket. Accusing people who have fallen on bad times of "clinging",
isn't worthy of any candidate hoping to represent all of the people.
Politics can't extricate us from this period of difficulty just by
electing Clinton, Obama or McCain. But 81% of Americans--if united to
do what is optimum for the most Americans--CAN produce any change in
the USA that they so desire! The founding fathers were wise enough to
know that conditions would be changing. The Constitution has been a
wonderful model. But it's not a powerful enough document to let
democracy wrest control from the special interests, lobbyists, and
corrupt players who are all too evident on the national scene.
"Ballot Bowl" continues with it's daily play-by-play coverage of the
"game" of choosing nominees and the President. But unfair influences
like "polls", and continuing biased comments by high paid commentators
supporting the media's choices, taint our supposed democratic
processes. But there is a hint of fresh air! As with that 'cartoon'--
which I described, earlier--showing the supporters of a loosing
football team switching flags, Obama's supporters are having second
thoughts.
When Obama graduated from college, he took a low paying job to work
for the people. Even so, his people skills are slim. He's a smart
individualist. But Obama has little in common with anybody. The
uniqueness of his handwriting shows such fact, clearly. He's an
introspective, work alone, and fight for his points person. That's
probably the reason that he selected "health care" to try to best
Hillary Clinton. He figured he would be the more persuasive talker.
But the main thing he has shown is his intransigence to compromise, or
to finding a better way. Either of those qualities would doom a
president.
With the PA primary looming large, Hillary Clinton is acknowledging--as
I have repeatedly said--that the democratic race isn't a "game". The
outcome of the Pennsylvania primary is far too important to the future
of democracy to be so characterized. And Obama's continued candidacy
for the Democratic nomination is far too threatening to the future of
the USA.
Wake up and unite, America!
Respectfully submitted,
-- NoEinstein --
>
> On Mar 28, 12:34 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> Barack Obama's campaign for the Democratic nomination is rolling right
> along... "Damn the torpedoes; full steam ahead!" is his mantra. Nearly
> a century ago, the brand new luxury liner 'Titanic' set sail on its
> fateful voyage. On a clear, cold night, she hit an iceberg. Many
> felt a vibration... For a while, at least, most just assumed everything
> was normal.
>
> Symbolically, Obama's campaign hit an iceberg when those in it seemed
> elated that roadblocks to democracy were being thrown up by the DNC.
> Many, like Senator Tom Daschle, smiled that the primary votes in
> Florida weren't being counted, and the primary in Michigan wasn't
> being redone.
>
> In the 2000 race for President, many will remember that Republicans
> grinned like Cheshire cats when the US Supreme Court suspended
> democracy--because of... "scheduling difficulties".
>
> Now, it looks like unprincipled Democrats are going to take a stab at
> suspending democracy,too. They're doing so by not insisting that the
> The majority of Americans aren't... bad people. They have just gottentooused to living among those who are bad, and who seem to be getting
> ahead because of it. A human flaw is: Making decisions based on what
> other people are deciding under the same circumstances. Those 'look
> first' qualities amount to mass-mindedness. Blacks see other blacks
> supporting Obama, so they support Obama,too--and for that reason
> alone. No "trend" in as ominous to the future of America as having 90
> plus percent of blacks be mass minded... back to the stone ages. Blacks
> support Obama even when "their man" is less than qualified; less than
> patriotic, due to his church affiliation; and less than suitable
> because of his controlling, rather than delegating, personality. I
> have seen "the handwriting on the wall", and Obama's comes up lacking.
>
> Now, the issue is about: Winning the sad, play-by-play sporting event
> called "Ballet Bowl". It's not about selecting the best person for
> President. Only Hillary Rodham Clinton fills the latter bill of
> requirements. But as long as the present election has been cheapened
> to a choose-up-sides sport, the loyalties will divide us.
>
> There's this not-too-flattering idea that if enough people support
> something, its got to be OK. On such subject, American patriot Thomas
> Payne said: "Right is right, even if everyone is against it; and wrong
> is wrong, even if everyone is in favor of it!"
>
> In the movie the Poseidon Adventure, actor Gene Hackman's character
> tried to get the trapped passengers to follow him "up the Christmas
> tree" toward the hull of the overturned ocean liner. But most
> preferred to remain with their captain. Within minutes, those who had
> not followed Hackman drowned.
>
> In many ways I feel like Gene Hackman's character felt. I,too, am
NoEinstein
>
Heretofore, we humans have tried to find security by siding with a
strong group with a strong leader or leaders. Often this had been for
the protection of our own physical well-being, not just to gain some
vague economic or sociological advantage. In the last two centuries
Blacks have rallied together for their common cause of reducing
discrimination against their numbers. Though they have been hugely
successful, there are areas in which discrimination still exists. So,
any ‘ideal’ America must address the concerns of Blacks—fairly and
equitably.
There has never been a Black President of the USA. Jesse Jackson,
Colin Powell, Al Sharpton, and now Barack Obama are smart Black men
who have each been considered for this country’s highest office. A
recent poll showed that 76% of voters would be willing to consider a
Black candidate for President. Since Obama is the Black candidate of
the moment, his spinners quickly implied that 76% of the voters want
‘him’. But his viability as a candidate is being brought into
question because of the recent negative press over Reverend Jeremiah
Wright’s “damn the USA” sermon, and due to Obama’s candid remarks
showing his frustration in trying to appeal to those who have fallen
on hard times in the “small towns” of Pennsylvania, and across
America.
In recent weeks I’ve explained how the apparent unity of the Black
community behind Obama is, actually, an ominous sign for America. How
could that be? Obviously, there would be racial pride among Blacks in
finally having a Black elected President. But is that “pride” a
sufficient justification for electing Obama?
A prudent observer would expect that a candidate’s support would vary
up and down as new revelations about his or her qualifications are
aired. When negative aspects concerning Obama surfaced before the
Texas and Ohio primaries, Obama’s support among Blacks ‘should’ have
varied, too. But his 90 plus percent of the Black vote stayed
steady… And THAT fact is what is most ominous—because it shows that a
huge voting block is biased, beyond reason, to support a candidate who
isn’t qualified either by experience, or because of his character or
lack of same, to be President.
“The orator”, Obama, comes across as an angry fighter for his causes.
He appeals to those who are angry enough to fight… or who will rally
around someone who will do so for them. Electing people to “fight for
us” in Washington is what has been going on in this country since it
was established. After a typical election, about 50% of the voters
are losers, and they don’t like it. Nor does the losing party “like
it”. So, whatever good sounding rhetoric that got a politician
elected, usually gets squelched in the constant “fights” in our
perennial, ineffectual congresses. So, an Obama Presidency would be a
loose/loose situation for America.
In our time of discontent, the USA has an untapped UNITY that holds
perhaps the only promise of salvation for this country! To wit: 81%
of adults are “unhappy with the direction this country is headed”.
And such number of citizens—if united for the common objective of
correcting the problems—can FORCE the needed changes! Only by being
“united in our discontent” can the American people MEET the
constitutional requirements to change things! And there isn’t
anything that Congress or the Courts can do to stop it!
Presently, Barack Obama’s continued candidacy for President is the
main obstacle to correcting those solvable problems! For too long our
political parties—unsanctioned by the Constitution—have royally
screwed up America! They have done so, primarily, by inserting…
political party sanctions into our could have been democracy-
approximating form of government. Without fair representation of each
individual citizen, regardless of race, sex, color or creed, this
country is on a path to failure. We “discontented citizens of the
USA” must NOT let that happen!
CNN’s John King points out that Obama’s best chance to win in
Pennsylvania is by his getting a high percentage of… the Black vote in
Philadelphia and Pittsburgh. But if those Blacks are united behind
Obama because of his “color” alone, then racial issues have DIVIDED
America much more than they ever were before Obama came on the scene!
If Blacks are rallying behind Obama, because he seems… mad and wants
to fight, they are KILLING any chance they might have had to correct
the remaining discrimination against their numbers. Blacks must NOT
be one-dimensional, color-is-all-that-matters, people! As strong a
voting block as their numbers are, there aren’t enough Blacks to
counter the likely WHITE discontent that will surface if there is any
color based, reverse discrimination in this country. So, there is no
way that Obama can help to end the discrimination against Blacks.
Daily, thousands of Blacks who have felt so disenfranchised that they
have never registered to vote, are being hustled to support Obama.
But voting is a PRIVATE privilege, NOT a predestined duty for one
candidate! Obama is violating principles of democracy by inserting
his organization into the voter registration process in any way
whatsoever.
The best and perhaps only way for Blacks to get fair treatment is for
them to UNITE to change our governmental processes to be more closely
a democracy. But this read-between-the-lines process to change won’t
happen if Blacks cause this country to become more polarized along
racial lines by continuing to support Barack Obama! The most positive
outcome in Pennsylvania, North Carolina and Indiana is to have a
DECREASING percentage of BLACKS voting for that man! Then, and only
then, will Blacks show that they haven’t been BOUGHT by anyone!
If Blacks want their just and equitable share of power, they can have
it by voting for Hillary Rodham Clinton for President of the United
States of America. If they will do so, ALL Americans will be the
beneficiaries!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
> country are targeted as beingtoofavored in the tax laws. Since
> there are more people of average income, than there are in the high
> ranges, it makes good political sense to appeal to: Where the most
> voters are. But is such a class-against-class battle what is best for
> the future of America? No way!
>
> If and when our systems of government can become like well-oiled
> machines, there are optimum objectives that should improve everyone's
> opportunities, fairly. Socialism certainly isn't "fair"--because it
> depresses free markets (discourages attainment) and rewards those who
> won't lift a finger to better themselves. But "socialized medicine"
> may be the right thing, if it is agreed that having good medical care
> for all Americans is a desirable thing.
>
> A sad characterization of "the American way" in business is: "Find
> something that people want or need; then, over-charge them for it."
> People certainly need health care when they're sick. But are those in
> the health care system deserving of more rewards for their 40 hours,
> than those in, say, manufacturing?
>
> Toooften, NAFTA gets a bum rap for exporting American jobs to
> Mexico. When items are being purchased in the stores, all Americans
> benefit from having low prices. But when American wages get high
> enough to depress sales due to high prices, businesses begin
> outsourcing jobs to remain competitive. The failures, there, are that
> those same companies didn't educate their workers, and didn't
> modernize their facilities to be more productive. By aiming for a
> cheaper work force,toomany industries have simply side-stepped their
> poor business management. Sadly, andtoooften, industries feel no
> corrupt players who are alltooevident on the national scene.
>
> "Ballot Bowl" continues with it's daily play-by-play coverage of the
> "game" of choosing nominees and the President. But unfair influences
> like "polls", and continuing biased comments by high paid commentators
> supporting the media's choices, taint our supposed democratic
> processes. But there is a hint of fresh air! As with that 'cartoon'--
> which I described, earlier--showing the supporters of a loosing
> football team switching flags, Obama's supporters are having second
> thoughts.
>
> When Obama graduated from college, he took a low paying job to work
> for the people. Even so, his people skills are slim. He's a smart
> individualist. But Obama has little in common with anybody. The
> uniqueness of his handwriting shows such fact, clearly. He's an
> introspective, work alone, and fight for his points person. That's
> probably the reason that he selected "health care" to try to best
> Hillary Clinton. He figured he would be the more persuasive
> ...
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
>
For those Americans still deciding which Democratic candidate to
support, last night’s beyond-the-prediction win by Hillary Clinton in
Pennsylvania provides important insights for making up your minds.
CNN filled their studios with commentators and spinners alike.
Campbell Brown moderated those well. And John King’s analyses of the
demographics of the counties won by the candidate seems most telling
of “the trend”—both in the continuing Democratic race, and in the
likely presidential election in November.
Clinton has had to fight like ‘Rocky’ to win, and in doing so she
shows herself to be an amazingly resilient person and a “formidable
candidate”—as Barack Obama said in his concession speech last night
from Indiana. Obama spoke before a crowd showing almost as many
smiling faces as if he had won each of the last three big states:
Texas, Ohio, and now Pennsylvania. Though his speech highlights his
resolve, it also reveals, more and more, that Obama has delusions of
invincibility.
If being the President actually entailed fighting, Obama might be an
acceptable choice. He speaks with the strong voice and level-toned
inflection of a man with a high testosterone level. But selecting our
President shouldn’t be about who has the most testosterone. Those
goals that Obama keeps promising to “fight for” are largely outside of
the range of authority of the Executive Branch.
Suppose that the Democratic Party’s nominee were to be selected by
having a huge tug-of-war. If one wishes to be on the… “winning team”,
it would make sense to rush to the side having the strongest looking
tuggers. But a true democracy isn’t about favoring the strong over
the weak. It isn’t about who has the most stamina. It isn’t about
“winning” just for the pride of being on the winning team. What it
should be about is having clear thinking Americans vote for the
candidates who will do the optimum things for ALL Americans, not just
things for “the half” that happens to be on the winning side in a tug-
of-war.
North Carolina and Indiana are now in the spotlight. NC—where I lived
for years—has been polled to be “leaning” toward Obama. Such seems to
be the case because of the large Black population, there, and because
of the affluent people living in the Research Triangle area.
It seems that Blacks are supporting Obama primarily because he is
Black. The unwavering voting percentages for Obama—in light of his
verbal slipups, and his questionable social and religious associations—
supports such contention. Or, perhaps it is because he seems like a
fighter. In the past, the too easy road to power for Blacks has been
sticking together, as a voting block, for common objectives. That is
the tribal mentality not only of Blacks, but of those who believe that
physical prowess should be a factor in determining outcomes. Sadly,
many Americans “side” where they perceive “the power” to be. This
country is largely being run by two political parties. There haven’t
been enough “Reagan years” where Americans have felt good just being
Americans—rather than fighting… as Democrats or Republicans.
The cause of America’s decline is excessive reliance on group power to
gain supposed advantages. Groups inevitably polarize and
discriminate. “Fighting fair” isn’t a rule, if winning is the only
objective. More and more, fighting dirty and dishonest are
acceptable. If a ball game gets decided by a bad call by an official,
too often the fans of the “winning” team rejoice just as much
afterward. Should there be any joy felt in winning unfairly? No,
there shouldn’t!
As I explained, recently, Blacks have discrimination issues that need
to be addressed. But can that be done by siding with THE most
polarizing man in America, Obama? The assertiveness that his hormones
cause will surely pique the resolve of those in Congress to resist
him. Males don’t like yielding to anyone simply because they are out-
talked or out-lasted. No government nor business would hire Obama to
be a diplomat or PR man—because he enters the room as if ready for
combat with everyone there. Good diplomats must be more low-key.
They must not offend people by seeming… pushy. I ask you: Isn’t
Barack Obama… ‘pushiness’ personified? If you’ve got a pushy boss, do
you like that person? If for no other reason, Obama should not be
President because he is too pushy! His “fight for you” attitude will
assure his failure. Such fights would be more appropriate in Congress—
not within the daily realm of the Presidency.
A huge part of the unfairness in the Democratic campaign is the
“delay” in resolving the FL and MI primaries. If Clinton’s share of
the delegates in those states had already been appropriately allotted
to her, there likely wouldn’t be that clinging invincibleness that
Obama still has. For him, his contributors dollars are “votes” to
continue running a win-at-all-costs fight for… them. Obama has said,
in effect: “To hell with democracy! I want to be President…” If he
manages to gets elected, the last bit of air will have been let out of
the balloon that was… democracy. Never again will there be hope of:
fairness for all Americans; and she will surely fall.
Obama has “smiling faces” like Jamal Simmons and Roland Martin to
reassure those passengers on Obama’s sinking ‘Titanic’ that the
inevitable tragedy won’t happen. PA Senator Bob Casey spins favorably
for his man, Obama, to increase his own chances of getting a position
in an Obama White House. Casey is one of the most recent endorsers of
Obama, and surely knows that Obama has rejoiced because democracy
wasn’t being served in FL and MI. Casey is thumbing-his-nose at
democracy. He should be considered a TRAITOR to America and to the US
Constitution which he has so lightly sworn to uphold.
Understandably, if selfish interests like: ‘affluent voters desiring
to keep more of what they earn’, are to be satiated, that can best
happen if those affluent people will side with the 81% of adults who
are dissatisfied with the direction this country is headed. That way,
the groundwork is set for CORRECTING the waste and inequities in
government. But if the affluent, instead, side with Obama, they are
assuring the continuing group-against-group divisiveness in America,
that has brought this country to the brink of ruin. Folks, we can
either solve this country’s problems, or we can SINK on Obama’s
‘Titanic’.
Hillary Clinton has an affable personality most close to Ronald
Reagan. She doesn’t get the rancor up of those she approaches.
Clinton would be a much better diplomat for America than Obama. In
the area of foreign policy, as in most others, she is prepared “From
Day One” to serve the best interests of this country!
A “new and improved” America shouldn’t require years of long
campaigning to select our President. The toll being taken on the
candidates demands that the process be streamlined, while still
informing Americans about the candidates’ qualifications.
As those “undecideds” try to make up their minds in NC and IN, please
realize that your hopes and dreams for your futures are valid ones.
Any “new and improved” America should benefit you! However, it is
URGENT that you all know this: If this country is to survive… it must
part ways with all undemocratic group influences! Group against group
has been proven time and again not to work. And that’s why we are in
our present messes. But a new hope is on the horizon! Remember,
“United we stand; divided we fall.”
Vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton for President of the United States of
America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> varied,too. But his 90 plus percent of the Black vote stayed
> steady… And THAT fact is what is most ominous—because it shows that a
> huge voting block is biased, beyond reason, to support a candidate who
> isn’t qualified either by experience, or because of his character or
> lack of same, to be President.
>
> “The orator”, Obama, comes across as an angry fighter for his causes.
> He appeals to those who are angry enough to fight… or who will rally
> around someone who will do so for them. Electing people to “fight for
> us” in Washington is what has been going on in this country since it
> was established. After a typical election, about 50% of the voters
> are losers, and they don’t like it. Nor does the losing party “like
> it”. So, whatever good sounding rhetoric that got a politician
> elected, usually gets squelched in the constant “fights” in our
> perennial, ineffectual congresses. So, an Obama Presidency would be a
> loose/loose situation for America.
>
> In our time of discontent, the USA has an untapped UNITY that holds
> perhaps the only promise of salvation for this country! To wit: 81%
> of adults are “unhappy with the direction this country is headed”.
> And such number of citizens—if united for the common objective of
> correcting the problems—can FORCE the needed changes! Only by being
> “united in our discontent” can the American people MEET the
> constitutional requirements to change things! And there isn’t
> anything that Congress or the Courts can do to stop it!
>
> Presently, Barack Obama’s continued candidacy for President is the
> main obstacle to correcting those solvable problems! Fortoolong our
> > read more »- Hide quoted text -
Marcus Aurelius
and discriminatory mantra that is dictated in the USA is; "Caucasian
males are not discriminated against in employment or education.
Therefore, they do not need laws promulgated or passed protecting them
from discrimination. Women and minorities are discriminated against in
the USA. Therefore, they need laws and the promulgation of laws giving
them preferential treatment in employment and education.
If you are a caucasian male and do not publically proclaim the
aforementioned Orwellian discriminatory mantra, you will likely be
subject to significant additional discrimination.
As far as the elections go, I will vote for the Democratic nominee, no
matter who it is, if there is any liklihood of the Republican nominee,
McCain being elected.
Without regard to racial, ethnic, or gender politics, it is clear to
me that the Democratic platform will further the interests of the
American people, as a whole, regardless of gender or race, over the
Republicans.
NoEinstein
>
Yesterday, for the first time, I heard “democracy” mentioned as an
issue in the democratic party’s rules. This was on CNN and concerned
whether or not super delegates should be allowed to have more votes
than delegates. There are precedents, like in the US Senate, for
breaking ties. By most accounts, the race between Clinton and Obama
is a dead heat. If a decision is to be made, someone must break… the
tie. But why is that necessary?
The above comment about super delegates was brought up by a likely
Obama supporter. As the present primary mess plays out—and the August
convention looms—those super delegates are in the position to make the
correct decision: Nominate Hillary Rodham Clinton. Understandably,
Obama supporters don’t want that to happen. Oh, it’s OK with them
that “democracy” has been raped by not counting the FL and MI votes
(yet?). But it isn’t OK with them to allow super delegates to break
the effective tie. In both cases the anti-democracy DNC rules apply.
Because Obama will likely loose after the super delegates have their
say, his supporters don’t like “that” rule… But the former rule is
quite OK, to “punish” the innocent voters in FL and MI. Is anyone
besides me offended by such “Obama must win at all costs” hypocrisy?
The principle of democracy is simple: One person has one vote—and
regardless of their status or importance to any group. So, super
delegates, indeed, violate democracy. But their votes would not even
be needed, if democracy had not already been RAPED by the DNC’s entire
primary system! I’ll explain:
The simple principle of democracy, above, requires that all votes that
are cast have the same importance! Obama clings to that tainted and
bastardized principle, in the apt case, when he claims to have more
delegates than Clinton. Of course, numerically, he is correct… But
from the moment the Iowa votes were counted AND made public, democracy
was ground up, burned, and the ashes cast into the sea…
Democracy DEMANDS that votes be taken and counted on the same day!
Proxy votes that either are not counted, or are not revealed until
election day probably pass the standard of democracy, too. I’ll make
an analogy for how the present anti-democracy primary system works:
An election is scheduled. Voters line up at the polls and begin going
into the closed voting booths. But as soon as a voter is about to
push the ‘cast vote’ button, the curtain opens and a persuasive
supporter for the unselected candidate comes into your private booth
and argues that you should change your vote. Some of the more weak
minded voters in the lines yield to that intrusion and switch their
votes. Now, the voters go outside and the media descends to poll them
regarding how they voted. Almost immediately, the TVs across America
are telling the later voters how the race is going. And issues that
might sway the outcome are quickly aired in commercials—side against
side. Finally, at the end of the day, the voters watch their TVs to
find out if they… won or lost. Under such a system, anywhere from 50%
to 100% of the voters are losers, and the smug, overly-paid
commentators rejoice that there is so much “news” to be covered… Of
course, the above events are truncated into a single day. But to
allow the media into the voting process at ANY point is a supreme
violation of sound principles of democracy! I repeat: To allow the
media into the voting process at ANY point is a supreme violation of
sound principles of democracy!
If the votes in Iowa had not been counted until after all of the
primary results are in, such a “rule” would… approximate… a
democracy. But it wouldn’t BE a democracy! Why? Because those who
voted for Obama BEFORE his personality and character flaws were
revealed, will have had their votes “locked in”… Surely, many of
those would not now desire to vote for Obama. That’s the sole reason
why Obama remains a “viable candidate”. The earlier voters, simply,
had not yet learned how undesirable a candidate Barack Obama truly is…
Some states have held “caucuses” rather than conventional voting-booth
type primaries. However, ALL caucuses are anti-democracy, and are
thus unconstitutional! It goes without saying that Obama loves
caucuses, because those allow his highly verbal supporters to
“persuade” more of those attending to vote for him… But a true
democracy does not allow the PERSUASIVENESS of any supporter of a
candidate to influence any other voters! Each voter must have 100%
free will—without any last minute counter arguments being allowed—in
the voting booths or otherwise. Democracy shall never allow the
strength, persuasiveness, “power” or “status” of others to change the
private voting decision of any other voter!
The candidates and the media are well aware of the democracy issues
that I am waving. Clinton is correct to now report that more
Americans have voted for her, than for Obama. Apparently, she is
sticking to her game plan that has turned-the-tide for her.
Certainly, her becoming President will be more beneficial for America
than Obama would even have had a chance to be! But if she is “happy”
with the present broken system of government in Washington, and
defends it… by tradition, America will be just as doomed under her
presidency as under an Obama presidency.
My support for Clinton is due to her greater executive self-
sufficiency compared to Obama. Clinton is a “Gets the Big Picture”
person, who won’t over-defend or over-attack petty details in proposed
solutions. Such a generalist will be more open to changes in, say,
science and technology. If the latter is so mired as to continue to
uphold Einstein’s theories of relativity—after I have summarily
disproved them—then there isn’t much hope for science and technology…
And unless Clinton is “open” to consider that America deserves a
government that works—as CNN’s Lou Dobbs often suggests—then, the
unity of our present “81% discontent” won’t have much chance to affect
the necessary changes in our systems of government.
I‘ve talked very little about John McCain. As I’ve said: His IQ is
only 90 or so; he is too old and frail; and he will be, like Bush, a
puppet of the (also) corrupt Republican Party. McCain should be very
easy to defeat in the race! He would do the whole country a great
favor if he would just drop out, now, and let Clinton run unopposed!
Then, there would be a unity of purpose which this country needs as it
adapts a new and improved form of government. If the latter is going
to happen, it will occur under Clinton’s watch. And it will become
part of her proud legacy!
So, as the campaigns and media coverage continue—business as usual—
consider how much better off each of you would be if DEMOCRACY was the
main issue of importance for Americans! With democracy reinstated as
a foundation for this great nation, the economy, jobs, international
relations, and a new national pride for a united USA will be assured—
far better than any political party in power could ever assure!
May the ‘shared discontent’ that we now feel, unite us!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
Dear Marcus: Thanks for your thoughtful comments! — NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
>
“Having an informed electorate is crucial to having the most effective
government.” As I try to absorb more and more of… “what is going on”
in the Clinton - Obama race, I’m realizing that the majority of
voters, and a large number of those “commentators”, haven’t been
getting the “big picture”. I don’t think such manifest, narrowed
viewpoints are the result of apathy. More likely they are the result
of bias toward either Clinton or Obama. In short: People will hear
what they want to hear, and close their minds to anything counter to
their personal biases…
Obama supporters, in particular, like to brag about how energized the
Democratic organizations are throughout this country; and about how
many new voter registrations have been added. To me, adding first
time younger registrants isn’t automatically a great thing… Yes, I
believe in democracy! I am the quintessential proponent of
democracy! But voters need to be well informed in order to vote
wisely. And younger voters, as a group, aren’t as well informed as
older voters.
The ready forums for appealing to younger voters are the college
campuses of America. That’s why Chelsea Clinton has been making the
rounds in those places. An indicator of the workings of the minds of
Bill and Hillary is how clearly Chelsea can express herself, and how
calmly. That family GETS the big picture! And such a resource will
certainly make Hillary a more effective President.
As a group, younger voters tend to be more trendy and more mass
minded. They are drawn as much to the ‘atmosphere’ of a gathering of
people, as they are to the stated purpose of the gathering itself.
Some of the debates have been held on college campuses. At those,
Obama seems to get more applause. Some of you who are reading this
may be too young to remember when “applause meters” were used to
decide who wins things like talent contests. Clearly, Obama
supporters seem to believe that ‘strength’ wins. But is physical
strength a standard suited to a democracy? Is the USA a place where
the strong dominate the weak, and the winners revel in beating-up-on
their opponent? Hillary has played the “Rocky” theme song of a
determined underdog. But should the Clinton - Obama race ever be
considered… a sport or game?
Young people love their basketball. They love that the rules of the
game favor having most games go-down-to-the-wire. The excitement of
that type game ending, keeps the crowds large. I’m afraid that a high
percentage of the younger registrants who support Obama are doing so
as much for their anticipation of… the ‘atmosphere’ of being on the
winning side, as they are for calmly supporting the candidate who is
best suited to be President. There may be a rebelliousness in younger
voters to assert themselves by voting counter to their elders. If
they do win, they can say: “See, we did it!”
Apart from the excitement… of the ‘Ballot Bowl’, each American—rich or
poor; Democrat or Republican—has needs for fair treatment and
stability in their lives. Maintaining the latter motivates older
voters not to “bet the farm” on an untested Barack Obama. Younger
voters, who probably have an innate sense that this country isn’t
doing too well, favor the candidate who seems to be the ‘maddest’
about things. If our salvation lies in winning a medieval type battle
fought with swords and shields, Obama has the testosterone level of a
fighter. But again, too many people are using “fight” standards to
make decisions. Having DIPLOMACY and the ability to handle peaceful
negotiations would be characteristics of the person having the best
chance to get this county out of the could-be-fatal mess that it is
in! Because Hillary Clinton has the non-combative nature of a great
diplomat; the wisdom to negotiate in peace; and the predictable
stability to convince the most people that their futures will be
secure, she would be the best choice for President.
Obama continues to brag that he hasn’t, and won’t, take money from
special interests. But every political ad that he runs is financed by
just such special interests! He touts “improving education” as
something he will promote. But the Federal Government shouldn’t even
be involved in education at all. The STATES are the proper overseers
of education in this country. Though Obama “looks good” in that
elementary classroom in front of a brand new, stanchioned American
flag, Obama devalues the flag by trying to use it to legitimize, and
“make Presidential”, his candidacy—after he has shown himself to be
against democracy. If he had been otherwise, the apt delegates in FL
and MI would already have been allocated to Hillary Clinton, and
Obama’s campaign would be in a tail-spin that any thinking voter
should recognize as such.
Realistic commentators are asking: “Why can’t Obama win blue collar
voters?” And his spinners counter that Clinton isn’t winning in the
big cites where high numbers of Blacks live. Those of you who have
read my earlier comments know that I agree with Bill Clinton that
Obama has played… the race card. Clearly, Blacks are giving him their
unwavering support, even after it is pointed out—by me and many others—
that Obama has personality and character flaws. Such “blind” loyalty
must not be allowed to lock this country into any more group against
group fights. Already, 365,000 Americans have died to give Blacks
their freedom. We don’t need any more polarization.
The Reverend Jeremiah Wright defended his “Damn the USA…” remarks by
saying that he was only filling in the history lesson, that too
conveniently has left out some of bad things that the USA has done.
As the pastor of Obama’s church, Wright has bastardized religion away
from the principles taught by Jesus Christ. Christ never said…
“Accentuate the negative; foment hatred; never forgive those who ever
did bad things; and etc.” I believe most Blacks, in their hearts, are
good people! In fact, I believe most people are good people! But it
is inappropriate for any pastor of any church in the world to “preach”
hatred! Most know that Obama’s guilt by association will make him
vulnerable. I say, it should make him a NON candidate!
George Will pointed out today that more time has elapsed since Obama
won his last major primary, than he took winning those he has won to
start with. Folks, ‘that’ is what amounts to a change in momentum for
Hillary Clinton! Younger voters out there wishing to be on… “the
winning team” should realize that Clinton’s team is looking more and
more like a winner! As Obama keeps side-stepping having another
debate with Clinton, please know that he is doing such because he
consistently LOOSES debates to Clinton. Do we want a President of the
USA who is a consistent looser to anyone?
My “Save democracy, to save America message” seems to have riled
Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. He wants people to “Get over…”
what happened in Florida in the 2000 Presidential race. CNN’s Wolf
Blitzer wrongly sees the Supreme Court’s dishonoring of the democratic
process in FL as an issue Floridians are concerned with. Actually, it
is an issue so huge, that ALL patriotic Americans, of whatever party
should be concerned with it! If Obama manages to get the nomination
after he didn’t insist that the foundation of this country, democracy,
be honored, then corruption will have controlled this country for so
long that the people may never again have the opportunity to cleanse
it. Is having Obama be President, just to prove his “team” is
stronger than Hillary’s, worth destroying the USA?
Reinstating democracy should be the primary “concern” of the voters
this year. 81% of American adults don’t like the direction this
country is headed. Instead of rushing every four years to side with…
the perennially failed Democratic or Republican parties, consider how
much better government will work if there are NO biased group
influences between the voters and their government! And suppose that
NO influences outside of the desires of a representative’s
constituents are ever again allowed to influence his or her
decisions! News media headquartered in Washington just to be close
to… “where the action” is, could just as well move to Arizona—because
the media, by its presence, will never again be allowed to influence
governmental processes. The media can still observe, but never again
“analyze” and “predict” to the detriment of democracy!
Scalia shouldn’t be calling too much attention to his part in the rape
of democracy in 2000. Provisions will be in place so that the
American people, if they are dissatisfied with the performance of any
Judge or Justice, can easily unseat and/or sentence them as they see
apt. Never again will the Supreme Court be at the top of the-pecking-
order in this country! Folks, trust me, “these developments” will be
far more important, and “interesting”, than an Obama presidency! And
your children, and theirs, will thank you for electing Hillary Rodham
Clinton President of the United States of America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> election day probably pass the standard of democracy,too. I’ll make
> solutions. Such a generalist will be more open to changes in, say,scienceand technology. If the latter is so mired as to continue to
> uphold Einstein’s theories of relativity—after I have summarily
> disproved them—then there isn’t much hope forscienceand technology…
> And unless Clinton is “open” to consider that America deserves a
> government that works—as CNN’s Lou Dobbs often suggests—then, the
> unity of our present “81% discontent” won’t have much chance to affect
> the necessary changes in our systems of government.
>
> I‘ve talked very little about John McCain. As I’ve said: His IQ is
> only 90 or so; he istooold and frail; and he will be, like Bush, a
NoEinstein
>
Who can deny that all of us know more about Clinton and Obama, how,
than we did following the Iowa caucuses? Having as much CORRECT
information as possible is crucial to the workings of a successful
democracy. Unfortunately, we get most of our information from our
consistently biased “news” media. But, the news coverage being
provided is mostly laughable… Former CBS commentator Roger Mudd
summed it up last Sunday to Bob Schieffer: “Good news coverage is
getting harder to find.” What we get—as in the case of… “Ballot Bowl”—
are the superfluous opinions of those who must fill time. In the case
of the print media, we get the superfluous opinions of those who must
fill column space.
As I have been hinting, our much needed “new and improved” system of
government won’t allow ANY intermediate influences to taint the-will-
of-the-people! Those bad influences include: Political parties; PACS;
pole-takers; lobbyists; endorsers; spinners; commentators; government
insiders; advertisers expecting favors; owners, editors, or managers
of the media who promote their personal agendas; and business special
interests. Each of such will either be eliminated or enjoined from
influencing the out-come of any election or referendum—as surely as if
they had been driving in a dead-end ally that gets walled-up behind
them like a prison. Folks, screwing with democracy will become a
crime!
To their credit, former President Jimmy Carter and the Rev. Al
Sharpton are refraining from endorsing either Clinton or Obama. NC’s
Governor Mike Easley has come out in favor of Clinton. But someday—
hopefully soon—endorsing any candidate will get the endorser in a
whole-heap-of-trouble. But for now, Easley is correct to admire
Clinton because she “gets it”. But he’s incorrect to keep pushing his
maniacal “higher education opportunity for everyone.” Education just
needs to be streamlined and made accountable, NOT allowed to keep
expanding like a cancer without a cure. And, as I have said,
education is OUTSIDE of the proper realm of the Federal Government.
There are too many in government who got there by promising to improve
education. I ask you: Is education being improved if my complete and
total disproofs of Einstein’s theories of relativity have been
squelched by twenty plus universities in this country? Five of those:
Duke, UNC; NC State, Wake Forest, and Davidson (college) are all in my
former state of residence. Governor Mike Easley doesn’t think he
should ever have to hold any school accountable for QUALITY in
education. That FOOL is only interested in the quantity of education—
and to the DETRIMENT of the taxpayers and to the very survival of the
USA!
I urge those interested to read: NC Governor Should Resign Over
Science
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/2e892e00156d4d92?hl=en#
With much of the media determined to shoehorn Barack Obama into a job
for which he is unsuited, Hillary Clinton deserves to get a matching
amount of free time to promote “her” candidacy! The national poles
show Obama’s lead is dropping. Now, the media is sidestepping its
role in the continuing RAPE of democracy by playing up the various
remarks of Rev. Jeremiah Wright. So, “if” Obama looses, it will be
because of Wright… not because of how they handled… “Ballot Bowl” (or
etc.), and thus repressed democracy. Though Wright’s remarks are most
revealing, they aren’t as off-base as is being reported.
The “most hurtful” comment by Wright—from Obama’s perspective—was that
he, Obama, really didn’t ‘mean’ the things Obama had said regarding
Wright’s… “Damn the USA…” sermon. Tuesday, Obama did like David
Gurgin, and others, had urged: he repudiated Wright more strongly.
But I agree with Gurgin, in his subsequent assessment, that Obama
retaliated while wearing boxing gloves. There wasn’t the bare-knuckle
retaliation that most Americans would have liked to see. In most
likelihood, little harm was done to Wright.
My gut reaction when I heard Obama speak for the first time—at the
2004 Democratic convention—was that he lacked emotion. His tone and
expressiveness were robot-like. Last May when TIME magazine ran
another person’s amateurish analysis of the handwritings of the, then,
six major candidates, I used my top level graphology expertise to tag
Obama: An individualistic, egotistical, detail-oriented, specialist
who isn’t easily approached, nor is he one who can work well with
those in groups. I also said that Obama was more intelligent than
Clinton. Now, I’m not so sure… Intelligent people tend to be more
moral than average. But because Obama hasn’t taken the moral high
road by insisting that Clinton, immediately, get credited with her
fair share of the FL and MI delegates, Obama has shown himself to be a
moral light-weight. His IQ is probably 110—lower than Hillary’s 115.
I can confirm his IQ, because, yesterday, I saw how slow Obama signs
his name. Though he does so exactly and legible, his slow writing
speed is an IQ-lowering aspect.
Speed of writing is an indication of the speed of the mental
processes. Speed of TALKING is a similar indicator. Tuesday, when
OBAMA put on his ‘boxing gloves’ for repudiating Wright, Obama’s
talking speed gave important insights to his true feelings on the
Wright issues. Here’s what I conclude: Obama was clearly delivering
his remarks, extemporaneously. He was talking about 75% or less of
the speed he normally speaks. That isn’t a good indicator, however.
Most people who are angry talk FASTER and more to the point than
normal. They cut-to-the-chase! Obama could have said:
“Effective immediately, I resign from Jeremiah Wright’s church! I
invite all others in Wright’s congregation to consider whether they
should do likewise—or whether they should ask Wright to retire from
the ministry. Church-going BLACK Americans shouldn’t allow themselves
to be disparaged, by association, in the eyes of others by sitting
idly by while the USA—that most of us love—gets denigrated.
“Additionally, I would like to apologize for not taking a firmer stand
on Wright’s remarks, earlier. Personally, I had wanted to avoid
controversy. But remarks of his level of hated shouldn’t be ignored
by any patriotic American. Nor should they be dismissed as just
history lessons, or “liberation theology”. The primary theology
taught in our churches needs to be LOVE of our fellow man, NOT hatred
for anyone!
“I accept full responsibility for the consequences of my responses in
these matters. I urge all good people to pray for peace and harmony
between the races, and a oneness of purpose to solving this nation’s
problems.
“United we stand! And united we shall succeed!”
Obama’s slow, searching-for-words reply—unlike the above—indicates
that he has huge mixed emotions about telling Rev. Wright he was
wrong… So, when Wright said that Obama “doesn’t believe” what Obama
had spoken, that assessment could be close to true. Normally, people
saying what they believe will find the words coming quickly and
easily. But, too often, Obama has replied slowly and haltingly. A
person doing things on principle doesn’t need to pause to weigh the
consequences of every word. Clearly, Obama doesn’t have the strong
character that our next President will need. So, Barack Obama should
be rejected as the nominee of the Democratic Party. And he should
retire from any government office!
American Blacks are in an enviable position. Most of the fairness and
lingering discrimination issues that Blacks want to see addressed have
already been “penned into a document”—with them, and others, in mind!
The “new and improved” form of government that is in the offing, only
needs the UNITED will of those 81% of American adults who are
dissatisfied with the direction this country is headed! And it will
need an open-minded President who “gets” the big picture—to allow the
needed changes to be voted into being. That is why I keep urging all
of you: Elect Hillary Rodham Clinton President of the United States of
America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
Handwriting Analysis of Clinton, Obama, McCain and Einstein (is
Copyrighted.)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/eed2bb0cf762e015/6173e270dee543b3?hl=en#6173e270dee543b3
> may betooyoung to remember when “applause meters” were used to
> decide who wins things like talent contests. Clearly, Obama
> supporters seem to believe that ‘strength’ wins. But is physical
> strength a standard suited to a democracy? Is the USA a place where
> the strong dominate the weak, and the winners revel in beating-up-on
> their opponent? Hillary has played the “Rocky” theme song of a
> determined underdog. But should the Clinton - Obama race ever be
> considered… a sport or game?
>
> Young people love their basketball. They love that the rules of the
> game favor having most games go-down-to-the-wire. The excitement of
> that type game ending, keeps the crowds large. I’m afraid that a high
> percentage of the younger registrants who support Obama are doing so
> as much for their anticipation of… the ‘atmosphere’ of being on the
> winning side, as they are for calmly supporting the candidate who is
> best suited to be President. There may be a rebelliousness in younger
> voters to assert themselves by voting counter to their elders. If
> they do win, they can say: “See, we did it!”
>
> Apart from the excitement… of the ‘Ballot Bowl’, each American—rich or
> poor; Democrat or Republican—has needs for fair treatment and
> stability in their lives. Maintaining the latter motivates older
> voters not to “bet the farm” on an untested Barack Obama. Younger
> voters, who probably have an innate sense that this country isn’t
> doingtoowell, favor the candidate who seems to be the ‘maddest’
> about things. If our salvation lies in winning a medieval type battle
> fought with swords and shields, Obama has the testosterone level of a
> fighter. But again,toomany people are using “fight” standards to
> Scalia shouldn’t be callingtoomuch attention to his part in the rape
> of democracy in 2000. Provisions will be in place so that the
> American people, if they are dissatisfied with the performance of any
> Judge or Justice, can easily unseat and/or sentence them as they see
> apt. Never again will the Supreme Court be at the top of the-pecking-
> order in this country! Folks, trust me, “these developments” will be
> far more important, and “interesting”, than an Obama presidency! And
> your children, and theirs, will thank you for electing Hillary Rodham
> Clinton President of the United States of America!
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> — NoEinstein —
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 23, 10:21 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > Yesterday, for the first time, I heard “democracy” mentioned as an
> > issue in the democratic party’s rules. This was on CNN and concerned
> > whether or not super delegates should be allowed to have more votes
> > than delegates. There are precedents, like in the US Senate, for
> > breaking ties. By most accounts, the race between Clinton and Obama
> > is a dead heat. If a decision is to be made, someone must break… the
> > tie. But why is that necessary?
>
> > The above comment about super delegates was brought up by a likely
> > Obama
>
NoEinstein
>
It’s crunch time for Clinton and Obama. Barack says, “Indiana will be
the tie-breaker.” The Guam caucuses, Saturday, turned out to be a
tie. But Obama had been predicted to win. That was because “his
people” are good talkers, and there are a lot of affluent voters,
there. So, things are close to even—if you consider that the
undecideds have been going largely for Hillary. If you rightly
consider those FL and MI voters wanting Clinton, she would be leading
in the delegate count right now.
Obama was interviewed by Tim Russert for an hour this morning. Barack
replied in his normal unflappable way to the well-thought-out
questions that Tim asked. I learned that Jeremiah Wright has already
retired. I suppose Barack has a point when he says he joined that
church, rather than joined Wright. However, if the 8,000 member
church has had Wright as its ongoing preacher for over two decades
since Obama joined, then ‘the church’ and ‘the preacher’ would seem to
be a common draw for the members.
The thing that Russert did which most hurt Obama’s chances of getting
the nomination was showing clips of Obama’s PA speech—where Barack had
tried to dilute the effects of Wright’s “Damn the USA…” sermon. As
I’ve recently pointed out, Obama spoke in a slow, stiff, robot-like
and halting manner. And such hints that Obama was speaking with mixed
emotions, and without conviction. Wright—a likely excellent judge of
people—told a Press Club Banquet, last Monday, that Obama doesn’t
believe what Obama had said in PA.
Russert also showed a slightly more passionate denouncement of Wright
by Barack, from last Tuesday. In that clip Barack stopped short of
actually resigning from his church. But I’m wondering: Why would a
candidate for this country’s highest office want to continue to
associate with a congregation that seems amenable to “Hate the USA…”
sermons? Though Obama has continued to polish his replies concerning
Wright, clearly, he seems duplicitous concerning the appropriateness
of sermons based on… hatred.
An icon of the motion picture industry was a guest, this week, on
Larry King Live. Eighty one year old Sidney Poitier was captivating
while explaining how he had become motivated to be an actor, rather
than a… dish washer. Later, King matter-of-factly set Poitier up to
give a plug for Obama. King just assumed that Poitier would be
swelling with pride that Obama is a candidate for President. The
immediate tension—bordering on anger—showed of Poitier’s face. In a
few sentences, Poitier changed the subject, and without even
mentioning Obama’s name. Apparently, Sidney Poitier has principles!
He won’t cheapen himself by acting in movies that will fall below his
earlier greatness. And he won’t cheapen himself by seeming to be a…
tag along of Obama’s—like 90 plus percent of Blacks apparently are…
Barack Obama is making passionate appeals to the blue collar workers
in Indiana. He continues to stress that he was “the son of a single
white mother who was ‘poor’.” Apparently his connection to the middle
class, blue collar workers is to keep saying that he was poor… “like
them”. Though some blue collar workers may have been poor in this
country, most were from the hard-working middle class families.
Senator John Edwards made a similar appeal to that large group by
running ads showing the modest home where he first lived in Seneca,
SC. But the SC voters were too proud to embrace such a… “I’m one of
you.” ploys. Obama still comes across as elitist. I predict he won’t
win many votes by continuing to talk about his poor roots.
Today, Obama said in Indiana: (I paraphrase) “I’ve been asked to
explain why I’m running for President at my young age. Why don’t I
‘wait’ a while? Well, I know that people are hurting because of the
slow economy. I want to work for you to improve your situation…” So,
Obama believes (actually, he deludes himself) that he can magically
improve the economic condition of this country just by having himself
get elected President. If he was a dictator, perhaps. But the
President is the managing chief executive, not one who orders this or
that law to be made. CONGRESS is where laws get made!
Hillary Clinton, also, touts how hard she will work to improve
things. Already, she has been super human just to withstand the
continuous campaigning for such an embarrassingly long time. She
won’t be a dictator, either. She will need to play the diplomat to
get Congress to agree with, say, her health care plan. I’m betting
she can do that pretty soon!
In contrast, Obama isn’t the agreeable sort of person who could
persuade Congress, or anyone, to do anything. Oh, he’ll make his
boring speeches, but the more “forceful” he becomes, the more ho-hum
Congress will be. Such inertia in Congress is a failure of our
present system of government. And its roots are simple: The media has
made celebrities out of our elected officials. And having that
limelight as a lure, draws in the most egotistical among us. Our
‘parties’ favor supporting those who have worked through local and
state governments, before seeking Federal offices. The result: We are
governed by CAREER politicians who are elitist and out of touch with
their constituents. Effectively, they are our elected dictators, NOT
our elected representatives!
My “new and improved” form of government addresses the processes of
selecting those who represent us in Washington—specifically
disallowing career politicians, and political parties! The lone
exception will be the President, who may have held any local or state
office, previously. Because our representatives will all be “new”
politicians, they will be more in touch with the common man. More
salt-of-the-Earth types will be willing to serve, because there will
be no bias that favors incumbents. All representatives will be off-
limits to the national media. Only the media of their local district
or state will be allowed to interview them about pending legislation.
Never again will the media be allowed to create elitism among our
elected officials!
Having Obama be defeated is the initial step to putting democracy
first in this country. As I keep saying, Barack hasn’t shown the high
morals to demand that Clinton get her fair share of the FL and MI
delegates. His endorsers haven’t espoused democracy, either. So, if
Obama gets elected, the Executive Branch will be a corrupt place for
four more years… or eight. The ‘fights’ that he keeps promising to
win will get negated by the always sparring Democratic and Republican
parties. And those never have met the constitution’s requirement for
fair governmental processes.
As the largest minority in this country, Blacks hold the key to
correcting the problems we face. That is, if they will vote for
democracy rather than for more group-against-group fights. The “Get
her done!” good-old-boys have their issues, as do the less is more
government types. A streamlined government, with more representative
people to serve us, can find the middle ground of solutions that will
be optimum for the most people. A proper new government can benefit
most of the people most of the time, IF all of the corrupting
influences are removed between the People and their government. When
something is broken, fix it!
Please vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton for President of the United
States of America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> There aretoomany in government who got there by promising to improve
> education. I ask you: Is education being improved if my complete and
> total disproofs of Einstein’s theories of relativity have been
> squelched by twenty plus universities in this country? Five of those:
> Duke, UNC; NC State, Wake Forest, and Davidson (college) are all in my
> former state of residence. Governor Mike Easley doesn’t think he
> should ever have to hold any school accountable for QUALITY in
> education. That FOOL is only interested in the quantity of education—
> and to the DETRIMENT of the taxpayers and to the very survival of the
> USA!
>
> I urge those interested to read: NC Governor Should Resign OverSciencehttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/2e892...
> easily. But,toooften, Obama has replied slowly and haltingly. A
> person doing things on principle doesn’t need to pause to weigh the
> consequences of every word. Clearly, Obama doesn’t have the strong
> character that our next President will need. So, Barack Obama should
> be rejected as the nominee of the Democratic Party. And he should
> retire from any government office!
>
> American Blacks are in an enviable position. Most of the fairness and
> lingering discrimination issues that Blacks want to see addressed have
> already been “penned into a document”—with them, and others, in mind!
> The “new and improved” form of government that is in the offing, only
> needs the UNITED will of those 81% of American adults who are
> dissatisfied with the direction this country is headed! And it will
> need an open-minded President who “gets” the big picture—to allow the
> needed changes to be voted into being. That is why I keep urging all
> of you: Elect Hillary Rodham Clinton President of the United States of
> America!
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> — NoEinstein —
>
> Handwriting Analysis of Clinton, Obama, McCain and Einstein (is
> Copyrighted.)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/eed2b...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Apr 24, 12:16 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > “Having an informed electorate is crucial to having the most effective
> > government.” As I try to absorb more and more of… “what is going on”
> > in the Clinton - Obama race, I’m realizing that the majority of
> > voters, and a large number of those “commentators”, haven’t been
> > getting the “big picture”. I don’t think such manifest, narrowed
> > viewpoints are the result of apathy. More likely they are the result
> > of bias toward either Clinton or Obama. In short: People will hear
> > what they want to hear, and close their minds to anything counter to
> > their personal biases…
>
> > Obama supporters, in particular, like to brag about how energized the
> > Democratic organizations are throughout this country; and about how
> > many new voter registrations have been added. To me, adding first
> > time younger registrants isn’t automatically a great thing… Yes, I
> > believe in democracy! I am the quintessential proponent of
> > democracy! But voters need to be well informed in order to vote
> > wisely. And younger voters, as a group, aren’t as well informed as
> > older voters.
>
> > The ready forums for appealing to younger voters are the college
> > campuses of America. That’s why Chelsea Clinton has been making the
> > rounds in those places. An indicator of the workings of the minds of
> > Bill and
>
NoEinstein
>
WARNING: The USA is in peril!
The knock-down-drag-out fight to select the Democratic Party’s nominee
highlights how perilously close the USA has come to its own doom. The
underlying cause of that peril? At every level of our social and
economic existence it is becoming much too ‘acceptable’ to do IMMORAL
things to try to achieve perceived advantages over others. In short,
fairness in our daily dealings isn’t part of our decision-making
processes. While we all feel the trickle-down effects of our own
immorality, few realize the primary cause of those ills, which is:
Fighting, and ‘dirty fighting’ if necessary, to “win” in small group
contexts—and at the expense of having all of us WIN by working for the
common, easy-to-achieve, good! For too long people have strived to
“win” within their disparate groups, and have said to HELL with the
consequences to anyone else…
When things aren’t going well in our socio-economic lives, there is an
understandable anger. How ‘good’ it would feel to punch-the-lights-
out of one or more of those who have done bad things to us. But isn’t
the USA supposed to be a civilized nation? We are ‘a nation of
laws’. Supposedly, laws will protect us from unfair treatment. But
for too many, getting fair treatment is a continuing mockery of
justice.
Barack Obama got pegged as the ‘hope’ for Blacks in America. About
90% of that large minority are supporting him through thick and thin.
It matters not that Obama has zero executive experience, and is
lacking in the character and personality to accomplish a single one of
those take-an-issue-out-of-a-hat campaign promises that he makes. But
Obama isn’t ’the main problem’. The huge larger problem is this: By
their blind support of the man, Blacks are resurrecting racism in
America! Those 90% of Blacks are going to be expecting things.
Whether such expectations are right or wrong, anything that Obama does
“as President” will be pegged as something he is doing… just for
Blacks. And THAT will cause a most grievous divisiveness in the USA—
and at a time when our having unity of purpose is most crucial.
Hillary Clinton isn’t using her fair sex to the best advantage. Her
promises to “fight” for the common man are mimicking ‘man talk’.
British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher was a powerful leader. But
she achieved things through sound reasoning, feminine charm, and a
willingness to make wise compromises. She was a quintessential
diplomat who could get the disparate sides to see the central, common
ground.
Yesterday, several commentators who were remarking concerning Barack
Obama’s difficult last few months, noted that he is “stubborn”. Since
last May when I first analyzed his handwriting, I noted that he is: An
individualist, strong willed, and self-centered specialist. He is
most detail oriented. By themselves those qualities aren’t a misfit
for a President of the USA. But together, they show someone who will
insist on being personally involved in making all decisions; he isn’t
someone who can easily delegate authority; he won’t he agreeable to
making compromises; and etc. In short, his “fighting everything”
personality will bog down the Executive Branch. Sensing his
shortcomings, Congress will continue… business as usual. They will
ignore the man, or just give him lip service.
In international relations, other countries will see how powerless
Obama is “at home”. So, they will walk all over him in any sort of
negotiations. Foreign relations is closer to our President’s niche
than ’proposing laws’. For the former, Obama is unqualified—by his
personality—to be diplomatic. But Hillary Clinton is most qualified!
The present horse race to win the Democratic Party’s nomination is
being treated by most Obama supporters as a choose-sides ‘game’. CNN—
that screwed up; put America in peril; lame excuse for a news network—
continues to call the presidential race: “Ballot Bowl”. Perhaps
because of yours truly, “democracy” is getting mentioned a few times
every day. Clinton points out how anti-democracy it would be to
choose a Democratic Party nominee using just 48 of the 50 states.
Rightly, Obama is being blamed for not insisting, months ago, that the
‘primary controversies’ in FL and MI be fairly corrected . If he had
done so by now, that “stampede” to join the strongest side in the
nomination tug-of-war would likely have found more of those, who are
so motivated, “pulling for” Clinton.
As I have pointed out: The entire primary system is anti-democracy.
That’s because the votes of all the people of the different states
have different levels of importance due to the primaries not being
held on the same day. Iowa has had a disproportionate importance,
because once the front-runners were evident, people choosing sides
rushed to the strongest ‘fighter’. Those “party insiders” with ‘two
votes’ are certainly anti-democracy, because ‘their’ votes carry with
them strong “you-owe-me-one” obligations. The majority of the
political and governmental processes in this country are royally
screwed up. But not-to-worry! A ‘new and improved’ document to
correct every single unfair and inequitable aspect of our governments
has already been penned. Such has been polished over a fifteen year
period to make the USA a better and more prosperous place for ALL
Americans!
So, as Obama supporters try to ‘badger’ Clinton out of the race, you
hard working men and women in West Virginia should consider this
example: Suppose a group of coal miners is trapped underground by a
cave-in. The manpower needed to dig them out before their oxygen is
depleted is right there. But the boss is a Republican, and the crews
have been segregated so that Clinton and Obama supporters work only
with their own kind. But in order to get those trapped miners out in
time… both Democrats and Republicans must forget their differences and
immediately start working as a cohesive unit—without concern for which
party or facet will get the glory when the miners are rescued. Do the
trapped miners have a chance of rescue in time? Not unless each of
you will forget your tug-of-war loyalties and start working for the
common good.
As I have explained time and again, Barack Obama is unsuited to be
President. Those voting for him are wishing to “show their power” by
doing the WRONG thing. A parallel to that would be an unprepared
mountain climber wishing to “conquer” Mt. Everest. As the lack of
oxygen at high altitude, and the extreme cold, affect the climber’s
brain, that person trudges on toward the summit. He disregards the
many warnings, only to die once reaching the top. I ask you: Is
achieving a goal—just because “it is there”—justification for not
considering the consequences? Is having Barack Obama become President
worth SQUANDERING perhaps the last chance that the American people
will ever get to wisely correct their ENTIRE system of government—
rather than letting things muddle on to the detriment of us all…
I hope that the hard working men and women in West Virginia, Oregon
and the rest of the states and territories will “see the light” and
vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton for President of the United States of
America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> SC. But the SC voters weretooproud to embrace such a… “I’m one of
> you.” ploys. Obama still comes across as elitist. I predict he won’t
> win many votes by continuing to talk about his poor roots.
>
> Today, Obama said in Indiana: (I paraphrase) “I’ve been asked to
> explain why I’m running for President at my young age. Why don’t I
> ‘wait’ a while? Well, I know that people are hurting because of the
> slow economy. I want to work for you to improve your situation…” So,
> Obama believes (actually, he deludes himself) that he can magically
> improve the economic condition of this country just by having himself
> get elected President. If he was a dictator, perhaps. But the
> President is the managing chief executive, not one who orders this or
> that law to be made. CONGRESS is where laws get made!
>
> Hillary Clinton, also, touts how hard she will work to improve
> things. Already, she has been super human just to withstand the
> continuouscampaigningfor such an embarrassingly long time. She
NoEinstein
>
PHOTO FINISHES NEGATE HOME-STRETCH GUESSTIMATES
Millions, perhaps billions of dollars have been bet on the outcome of
the race for the Democratic nomination for President. Barack Obama is
leading coming around the final turn. Those holding bets on him have
a hopeful, but tenuous, feeling. Such is because, most of the way,
Hillary Clinton has stayed within half-a-length. With the finish line
now within sight, the hands of those in the stands grip the purchased
betting slips. Those people wonder if the slips of paper will need to
be torn and tossed, or kissed and hugged.
A fair race for any nomination requires attention to details. In the
horse race analogy above, drug tests must be run on the horses, and
weigh-ins done of the jockeys and their saddles. In the race between
Clinton and Obama, Hillary hasn’t been afforded the fair courtesy of
having equal racing weights. From the get-go she has been made to run
with extra weight. And that unfair burden is: the shameful media bias
against her.
Barack Obama is no gentleman. Nor does he play by the ’rules’ in the
larger context of a fair democracy. If the present contest is a
football game in the last minutes of the forth quarter, Obama scores
points. Immediately, he ’celebrates’ in the end zone. While there,
he gives interviews about the Super Bowl he expects to be in, soon.
But there are still minutes on the clock… And the game hasn’t been
won nor lost by anyone. Where are “the officials” to throw the flags
of… UNSPORTSMANLIKE CONDUCT and penalize Obama—or throw him out of the
game—for delay-of-game and for insubordination?
Obviously, Obama has heard of, or read, ’The Power of Positive
Thinking’. After every primary win, he and his Jamal Simmons type
band of spinners smile at the “inevitability” of an ultimate victory
by Obama. But Clinton, with her older, feminine convention for
behavior, must not ‘offend’ the sensibilities of the millions of
Blacks supporting Obama. She hasn’t had the luxury of claiming
victory at every turn. And THAT is why Barack Obama is no gentleman!
A true gentleman, Black or white, would not keep claiming victory
before the finish line is reached.
It will come as a surprise to most Democrats that the contest between
Clinton and Obama—from the get-go—has been conducted counter to
principles of democracy. A true democracy requires three things: 1.
An informed electorate; 2. Letting every qualified adult have a
single vote; and 3. Having an equally weighted and fair count of all
of those votes.
The first huge failing of the primary voting process is that the votes
are not taken at the same time in all states. By counting votes as
the process goes on, and by revealing the outcome, the votes
immediately have varying weights—pro or con to a particular
candidate. For those voting ‘early’, their votes are… locked in
without their having the most current information about the
candidates’ true characters. So, earlier votes are less “valid” than
later, better-informed votes. Yet, Obama—the increasingly clear, un
gentlemanlike person that he is—keeps referring to his lead in the
delegate count. But weren’t most of his delegates selected BEFORE it
was learned that Obama is biased against those experiencing hardships
in small towns across America; and before it was learned that Obama
condones groups who—tacitly or otherwise—hate the USA?
In principle, I, and the majority of Americans, support the idea that
a Black could be President. But that is far from saying that Obama
‘should be’ President. The foremost arguments against his suitability
are: Obama has ZERO executive experience, and ZERO foreign policy
experience. His insatiable ego (note the oversized capital letters in
his signature), and his domineering personality (note the very high
pen pressure as he writes) make him unsuited to be a diplomat. His
personality is that of a dictator. It will be: His way, or no way.
And that will get Congress’s guard up. Obama will be a complete and
total failure as President!
So, why are 90 plus percent of Blacks continuing to support that
egotistical jerk? Very simply: Obama is BLACK! Those supporters
don’t care in the least that Obama doesn’t have the right motivations,
character, and personality to be President.
It is most telling that Hillary Clinton is being tagged a racist.
That’s because she continues to get much needed white votes—and she
comments on such fact. Apparently, the most hurtful part of her remark
was that she said “hard-working whites”. Of course, that statement
doesn’t preclude there being ‘hard-working’ Blacks, too. There are
millions and millions of the latter! But a HUGE stigma on Blacks,
from decades past, continues to be that large segments of the Black
population used to prefer to… make babies and get welfare checks, than
to hold jobs and do meaningful work. Many of those new registrants
that Obama brags about are those same ‘babies’ who were born for
profit. Jesse Jackson rightly decried the welfare dilemma that
alienated so many whites.
The race problems that divided America in the past have all but
resolved themselves, that is… until the continuing BLOCK vote of the
blind and unthinking 90 plus percent of Blacks. Their continuing
support of Obama—after his character and personality flaws have been
revealed—shows those Blacks to be… puppets of their leaders, rather
than independent-minded and responsible Americans.
When our President makes a State of the Union Address, the opposition
party gets time, afterward, to present the opposing viewpoints. But
when NBC and CNN make unfair and hurtful assessments of Clinton’s
“chances of winning” she isn’t being given equal time. Since Obama
supporters, clearly, would prefer that Clinton not get her fair share
of delegates, those smiling spinners, like Jamal Simmons and Roland
Martin shouldn’t even be allowed on the shows! Why? Because by
supporting Obama they are, effectively, giving their assent to
disregarding democracy. And THAT should be, and WILL be a criminal
offense in America in the future! Anti-democracy and democracy
supporters shall NEVER be given “equal time” in any medium—Wolf
Blitzer, Jack Cafferty, Tim Russart and their ilk not withstanding!
Barack Obama is telling voters in Oregon that “the race will be over”
a week from Tuesday. In other words, he continues to count his ‘bird
flu infected’ CHICKENS before they hatch. Those ‘super delegates’ out
there who have endorsed Obama, or are leaning in that direction,
consider this: Your votes are a safety valve to “right” the WRONG of
the Democratic party for its having existed. With God’s Providence,
the party conventions this year will be the last such conventions ever
held in the USA!
The desire to… “be on the winning side” is so strong that the buddy-
buddy possibilities of such are over-riding the clear thinking so
needed to select the best candidate. Consistently, Obama’s supporters
haven’t taken the moral high-road by insisting that Hillary get her
FAIR share of the FL and MI delegates. Having a… 50/50 delegate split
in FL and MI—as was being proposed this morning on ‘Meet the Press’ by
Tim Russart to Clinton’s campaign manager, Terry McAuliffe—ISN’T what
a democracy is about! If not for the “locked in” biases, the most
prudent course would be to let all of the delegates vote their
consciences based on ALL of the information that is available at the
convention.
The delegate count is a valid stand-in for the will of the people ONLY
if such is consistent with the popular votes in the states! If by the
time Puerto Rico’s votes are counted, Hillary Clinton has the most
popular votes, she should become the nominee. But she should become
the nominee, regardless—because she is the most highly qualified, and
because she has been “weighted down” by the relentless media bias of
those like Larry King and Jack Cafferty.
What unfair biases has Obama had to contend with? None that I can
see. The Jeremiah Wright sermons and comments were over-reported, of
course. But the implications of the Wright issues were rightly a
cause for concern about Obama’s character. Obama shouldn’t have a
complaint, however, because he didn’t loose a single Black vote.
Apparently, Blacks don’t care much about character and about
qualifications. Their unity is all about having clout.
Unfortunately, the present, tattered Constitution doesn’t allow a
President’s clout to have much effect on how things are done. That
kick-the-rascals-out Congress of ours is an effective millstone that
should be removed from all of our necks.
Blacks need to realize that yours truly, AKA NoEinstein, has penned
and polished a ‘new and improved’ replacement for that loophole-filled
Constitution of ours. To get such ‘new and improved’ document
ratified, the great majority of Americans—say those 81 percent who are
discontented with the direction this country is headed—must be
empowered to be BETTER OFF than they presently are. Decade after
decade, our failed group against group, and class against class fights
haven’t made our lives better. Instead, our civil liberties get
smaller in number, and our resentment of… “Big Brother” government
keeps growing.
If Obama manages to get nominated, or if McCain manages to win, the
status quo of corrupt influences will be locked in… for another four
or eight years. Quite apparently, it has become “acceptable” to win
within our disparate group contexts, without considering the
consequences for the USA as a whole. So, the stage has already been
set for the collapse of this country…
Much of the hatred felt against America is due to the perception—right
or wrong—that we don’t play fair… or that we support nations, like
Israel, that doesn’t play fair. But if we’ll let our too-long-
suppressed, patriotic sides correct just one thing in America:
FAIRNESS in our dealings with our fellow citizens and with other
nations—we can begin to remove the threat of a final nuclear war, and
remove the threat of annihilation of the human race.
As the slipping-away, greatest nation on Earth… we can regain our
status—not has a hated capitalist nation—but as a carrying nation that
“gets it”! We need to show that we can think globally and for the
benefit of all mankind! We can do that in as little as two and one
half years from now, and on a single election day, by voting for the
New Constitution that is ready and waiting. I will not approach
Obama, nor any of his ilk, with my labor of love. Nor will I approach
John McCain with what I have done for America. But if you will elect
Hillary Rodham Clinton President of the United States of America, I
can assure you that “somebody up there” likes you, and wants America
to prosper at the same time that the rest of the world also prospers—
in the most optimum ways for us all!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> On May 5, 12:03 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> WARNING: The USA is in peril!
>
> The knock-down-drag-out fight to select the Democratic Party’s nominee
> highlights how perilously close the USA has come to its own doom. The
> underlying cause of that peril? At every level of our social and
> economic existence it is becoming muchtoo‘acceptable’ to do IMMORAL
> things to try to achieve perceived advantages over others. In short,
> fairness in our daily dealings isn’t part of our decision-making
> processes. While we all feel the trickle-down effects of our own
> immorality, few realize the primary cause of those ills, which is:
> Fighting, and ‘dirty fighting’ if necessary, to “win” in small group
> contexts—and at the expense of having all of us WIN by working for the
> common, easy-to-achieve, good! Fortoolong people have strived to
> “win” within their disparate groups, and have said to HELL with the
> consequences to anyone else…
>
> When things aren’t going well in our socio-economic lives, there is an
> understandable anger. How ‘good’ it would feel to punch-the-lights-
> out of one or more of those who have done bad things to us. But isn’t
> the USA supposed to be a civilized nation? We are ‘a nation of
> laws’. Supposedly, laws will protect us from unfair treatment. But
> fortoomany, getting fair treatment is a continuing mockery of
PD
[Nothing of relevance to sci.physics]
It must steam you to no end that you haven't produced anything that
holds up at all well in physics AND you're losing at politics as well.
PD
NoEinstein
Dear Folks: It certainly must... "Get PD's goat" that he has
absolutely no bearing on the validity of what I have accomplished, nor
on my continuing objectives for improving the world. He is just part
of... the trash, we must all deal with in the real world. —
NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
>
SUPER DELEGATES CAN BRING AMERICA DOWN OR SAVE IT.
At every level of our social, economic, and political existence FAIR
PLAY has become the virtue least in evidence. Too often the rule-of-
thumb is: “Do bad things unto others, before they can do bad things
unto you.” Such philosophy reigns supreme in the USA because: People
see others “getting ahead” by doing bad, often immoral, and sometimes
criminal things. By those examples, people figure they, too, have a
“right” to get ahead in those ways. Would-have-been ‘good people’,
are good whenever such virtue advances their purposes, and they are
bad whenever such vices will “benefit” them. By degrees, the majority
of Americans are… two faced.
The above moral decline in America can be reversed only by having
people come to realize that most people will BENEFIT simply by having
the great majority play fair! If there is a ‘trickle down’ effect
that benefits everyone, it is having people care about the effects of
their actions on their neighbors—far and wide. If businesses ‘seem’
to have prices that are too high, some feel such prices justify their
shoplifting. But across America, shoplifting is a… ‘cost of doing
business’ that adds 15% to the cost of the products being sold. So,
part of the cause of the high prices—that some feel justifies their
shoplifting—is shoplifting itself!
When an American company can’t be price-competitive without out-
sourcing work to other countries, part of the reason for that is: the
cost of labor, here, is simply too high. And the other costs of doing
business, are becoming too great. Ask any company executive, and you
will hear that the cost of providing health care benefits to employees
has gone-through-the-roof. And you will hear that the cost of
litigation due to product liability suits has gone-through-the-roof.
As a ‘defense’, businesses employ expensive lawyers to side-step those
lawsuits. And lawyers will do so by lobbying for laws favorable to
businesses—at the expense of those who have been harmed.
Folks, America is in DIRE STRAITS, because our businesses and our
disparate groups aren’t fighting fair. Too few of us get the Big
Picture! But if most could get the Big Picture—and act wisely based
on that knowledge—the majority of the socio-economic problems that
adversely affect every one of us would begin to SHRINK, and to the
benefit of everyone!
At this moment, the single greatest threat to the survival of the USA,
and perhaps to the survival of the entire human race is… BARACK
OBAMA… His is a campaign that is rooted in UNFAIR PLAY. The USA is
despised in many parts of the world because our capitalist philosophy
seems to be: ‘win at all costs, and to-hell with how anyone else in
the world feels about it.’ And we are despised by many Muslims, in
particular, because we support Israel. Though the Jews have suffered
humongous and inhuman tortures and death, those acts should NEVER be
allowed to become a carte blanche for Jews to act for their own
selfish benefit without considering the consequences of their acts on
others. The Jewish controlled media in this country is backing Obama,
a minority candidate. Is that “an endorsement” that should sit well
with the American people?
Individually, Jews are some very fine people. I’ve had Jews for
friends and associates. But as a race, Jews use nepotism, back room
power plays, and immorality whenever those things will benefit their
race. And they think that they have a right to act unfairly, because
they are… “the chosen people”. That ‘Manchurian Candidate’, Barack
Obama, and Jews—as a race—are the two greatest threats to the survival
of the human race. So, can everyone see why I am so passionately
against having Obama become President?
Hillary Clinton continues to show her MOMENTUM in the Democratic race
for President by winning most of the primaries in the last few
months. Yet Obama keeps using his blatant, anti-democracy tactics to…
hang on. In a neck-and-neck horse race the winner is sometimes
decided in a photo finish. But even a ’winner’, so decided, isn’t
valid until the race has been reviewed to see if there are any late
infractions by the winning jockey that might disqualify such.
The closest semblance of a “democracy” via the present, sequential-
primary, debacle would be to have the super delegates vote—at the
convention—to break the Clinton-Obama tie. But Screaming Howard Dean
started pushing to get super delegates to decide ‘early’… for the
“benefit” of the party. But what that’s actually doing is encouraging
those super delegates to endorse a candidate. As I have explained
time and again in this post, the majority of the supporters of Obama
do so because he shows the testosterone of a fighter. In their naïve
minds they believe that by having a fighting President, they will
finally get their personal grievances addressed.
Every two years since this country was founded, the voters have been
sending… ‘fighters’ to Congress, and to the Executive Branch. But the
USA keeps getting worse and worse off. Now, 82% of Americans are
unsatisfied with the direction this country is headed. Ask
yourselves: Is it probable that a mean-spirited, egotistical jerk like
Barack Obama can convince Congress to suddenly correct deficiencies
that those very same congressman brought into existence by their own
votes?
After four years as President, Obama would be lucky to have gotten a
health care plan enacted. And such plan would probably be a far-cry
from the one that Obama now thinks he’s figured out better than anyone
else. As a rule: The success of a politician is in INVERSE proportion
to the size of his… ego. So, those voting for him can only “rejoice”
at having ram-rodded-in the “winner”. But is doing so, worth
DESTROYING the last chance America could ever have to correct its
ills?
Most of the super delegates are ‘party insiders’. Maybe those have
better judgment than the common delegates. However, the latter seems
highly unlikely. As Obama argues to get super delegates to his side,
those who yield show themselves to be shallow-minded, team-against-
team thinkers rather than: Choose the candidate who’s BEST for America
thinkers.
If and when my New Constitution gets ratified by the people, in a one-
day national referendum, most of those super delegates will be put out
of their “career” governmental jobs. But our selfish, elected
officials, and most of the super delegates, would rather have the
FAILED party system continue controlling this country, than to correct
the flawed Constitution that has allowed the yearly decline in trust
of the People for our governments.
Clinton has a huge case to cry: “FOUL!”, that is… unless she’s
selected to be the party’s nominee. That’s because the principles of
democracy on which this country was founded have been raped by the
parties; and to her personal detriment. Of course, she ‘could’ sue.
But most courts are corrupt places. Only by ratifying my New
Constitution will the Judiciary be put in its rightful place: I’ve
made the Judiciary a “lesser” branch of government!
Presently, one group of citizens controls one whole branch of
government, and effectively controls the other two branches. [Hint:
That group begins with the letter “a…”, and often adds an egotistical
“E…” after their names.] My New Constitution will put those “a…s” in
their proper place—or it will imprison those who don’t fall into
line. If the supporters of Obama are doing so for want of “change”,
the best way to GET change would be to vote for Hillary Rodham
Clinton!
I will not “air” my labor-of-love New Constitution to any person not
valuing democracy in America. If you out there will just value
DEMOCRACY as the most important issue for you, the economy will
improve; the wars will end (or at least I pray, so); and the bad image
of America in the world can start to improve. Unless the latter
happens, the USA could find itself on the receiving end of terrorism
that might well foment nuclear annihilation. So… is “the economy” an
issue more important than the lives and security of your own children
and… theirs?
There are a lot of “Cooter” Jones out there who can’t think beyond the
hoods of their orange hot rods. It’s amazing to me that CNN keeps
digging up these low mentalities to BARK for that dog Obama. In the
past I’ve been a blue (or yellow) dog democrat. But Obama is one anti-
America TRAITORIST whom I will never support! The corrupt national
media, in all of its branches, supposes that it will be Clinton’s duty
to ‘unite’ the democratic party. But by a two to one margin, her
supporters would rather abandon the party than to support Obama!
Never before in the history of this nation has she faced such a dire
crisis. While the starch-for-a-smile, and headlights-for-teeth Jamal
Simmons types keep SELLING Obama to the detriment of the human race,
there is this lone voice of hope bent on saving mankind and bringing
peace and prosperity to the world. My disproofs of Einstein’s
theories would, if our corrupt institutions of higher learning would
allow it, usher in a technological REVOLUTION that would create new
jobs and improve the lives of the citizens of the entire world! But
the cancer of national corruption is in every area of our existence:
social, business, educational, and governmental.
The time has come to ’Pay It Forward’—like in that made for TV movie.
If enough people will realize how showing our better sides can have a
snow-balling effect toward improving our national and world condition,
then hope will again rise in America. The present Democratic race
isn’t some game... It is a life or death struggle for the SURVIVAL of
the human race!
Please vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton for President of the United
States of America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> varied,too. But his 90 plus percent of the Black vote stayed
> steady… And THAT fact is what is most ominous—because it shows that a
> huge voting block is biased, beyond reason, to support a candidate who
> isn’t qualified either by experience, or because of his character or
> lack of same, to be President.
>
> “The orator”, Obama, comes across as an angry fighter for his causes.
> He appeals to those who are angry enough to fight… or who will rally
> around someone who will do so for them. Electing people to “fight for
> us” in Washington is what has been going on in this country since it
> was established. After a typical election, about 50% of the voters
> are losers, and they don’t like it. Nor does the losing party “like
> it”. So, whatever good sounding rhetoric that got a politician
> elected, usually gets squelched in the constant “fights” in our
> perennial, ineffectual congresses. So, an Obama Presidency would be a
> loose/loose situation for America.
>
> In our time of discontent, the USA has an untapped UNITY that holds
> perhaps the only promise of salvation for this country! To wit: 81%
> of adults are “unhappy with the direction this country is headed”.
> And such number of citizens—if united for the common objective of
> correcting the problems—can FORCE the needed changes! Only by being
> “united in our discontent” can the American people MEET the
> constitutional requirements to change things! And there isn’t
> anything that Congress or the Courts can do to stop it!
>
> Presently, Barack Obama’s continued candidacy for President is the
> main obstacle to correcting those solvable problems! Fortoolong our
NoEinstein
>
>
JOHN EDWARDS GOES TO JAIL.
The New Constitution will be a bastion for democracy and fair play in
America! A democracy isn’t about who you know, or how influential
they think that they are. It isn’t about 'networking' to get some
leverage in an obviously corrupt system of government. And it isn’t
about pulling-the-wool-over-the-eyes of the electorate to try to use
them as pawns for one’s own selfish motives.
Barack Obama will look STUNNING in an orange prison uniform as he
gives interviews while looking between closely spaced steel bars.
Folks, screwing with our democracy is a treasonable offense!
Yesterday, John Edwards made an endorsement of “his ideal” for
President. By that act, Edwards is ‘influence peddling’. He, like
Bill Richardson, Tom Daschle, Bob Casey and so many others, has jumped
on the teeter totter to try to counter each and every increase in
momentum that Hillary Clinton gets. Those men are selfishly bent on
padding their own nests. With each endorsement that Obama gets, he
dilutes his might-have-been devotion to work for the best interests of
the electorate. Instead, he must now work for the whims of those to
whom he is beholden.
A good friend of mine told me that, while in office, Senator John
Edwards of NC wasn’t very good at his job. Apparently, Edwards
dropped out of Congress just in time to avoid going down in defeat in
NC. JFK was a well-liked pretty boy. With the proper goals and
actions, Edwards could have been another such youthful presence that
might have inspired this nation.
I now live in South Carolina. Very early I started getting pollsters’
phone calls. During such I was asked, regarding the SC primary, for
whom I would be voting. Because Edwards had “shown promise”, and
because he was born within 50 miles of where I was born, I vowed to
vote for the man. Then, Edwards started flooding the TV with his
campaign ads that touted how ‘poor’ his family was when he was born in
Seneca. Textile mills had closed, there; and Edwards kept saying that
workers are worth every bit as much as managers. He vowed he would
‘fight for’ workers.
Edwards is this multi-millionaire vowing to work for those he
apparently… “feels sorry for”. Edward’s ads were condescending and
effectively elitist. Most hard-working people are wise enough to know
that managers are deserving of more pay then they themselves receive.
And most hard-working people like the idea that the potential is there
for them to move up, too. What Edwards was implying amounts to
socialism. Fortunately, SC Democrats were smart enough to reject
Edward’s condescending attitude toward “their condition”.
As promised, I voted for Edwards. But I wasn’t too sad to have him be
defeated. However, the racist, mindless, and anti-democracy ‘block
vote’ of those 90 plus percent of Black voters for Obama, didn’t boost
my hopes for America. Clearly, Hillary Clinton was, and still is, the
only qualified candidate. Yet, the shallow, racist issue that is now
wagging-the-mongrel is: Get a Black into the Oval Office, and to HELL
with the consequences for America…
Standing together on that podium, Obama and Edwards were these two
selfish elitists who are vowing to help… the poor. Not since FDR has
such a ‘platform’ gotten anyone elected to be President. So, as
broadly as those two were smiling, the chances that the USA will be
better off with them being on the same side is slim to none. And
smiles—ah la Jamal Simmons—should inspire NON trust, rather than
trust. As with used car salesman, if they smile at ‘the deal’—watch
out!
Where there are inappropriate smiles, it’s likely that there are
corrupt dealings. Tom Daschle “smiled” when James Carville proposed
that Clinton’s supporters would pay to redo the Michigan primary. If
“democracy’ had been part of Daschle’s and Obama’s value system, they
would have expedited letting Clinton get her fair share of the
delegates in FL and MI—earlier, rather than later! But as with the US
Supreme Court, Obama supporters pick-and-choose to ‘value’ the
unconstitutional ‘rules’ of the DNC above the fundamental RULE of
having democracy… IN a democracy!
So, as more and more people side with Obama’s RAPE of democracy,
newspaper columnists like Flavia Colgan smile at ‘the fantasy’. For
her, it’s not about doing what is right; it’s about having one’s own
selfish enjoyment. Barbara Walters “yielded” to those same fantasies
with a Black senator. Now, she wishes to elevate her own declining
celebrity by bragging about: “The blacker the berry, the sweeter the
juice.” Rejoice, whites everywhere, and SUPPORT the candidate of
those who are not satisfied with their own kind…
While the anti-democracy primary debacle plays out—like the
unsportsmanlike CAD that he is—Obama is prematurely campaigning
against John McCain. For Obama, it’s a foregone conclusion the “the
numbers” will give him the nomination. Actually, if anything gives
him the nomination it will be the corrupt DNC’s urging that the super
delegates “commit” before the August convention. Those dreg,
political insiders who do so by publicly endorsing that CAD, Obama,
hope that their ‘straw of support’ will tilt the camel for Obama and
thus make Obama more beholden to that particular super delegate, or to
his ilk.
It’s a sad state of events when our could-be democratic processes keep
getting defeated at every turn. As such travesties keep happening,
the leaders who have been encouraging those very same treasonous
actions, are evincing the same ‘sick pleasure’ of a Flavia Colgan,
Barbara Walters, or Jamal Simmons.
“But where there be discontent, surely, there can be hope!”
That moron McCain continues to read from teleprompters in front of a
backdrop of American flags. And he is in direct violation of the New
Constitution! Politicians, candidates, and government office holders
aren’t America! America is the PEOPLE, and their positive SPIRIT,
collectively! Never again will those in government be considered to
be “the” USA. Rather, those in government shall be THE SERVANTS of
the USA, and of the PEOPLE! Never again will the American flag be
allowed to be denigrated by having those be used as a backdrops by
Government officials—other than the President and the Secretary of
State. Nor shall our cherished Stars and Stripes ever be used as a
backdrop to “legitimize” a TRAITOR to democracy like Barack Obama
surely is.
Those of you longing for “A Change You Can Believe In” should realize
that you have been, and are now being, flimflammed! Barack Obama is
this low life, MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE who will gladly destroy America—if
that advances his own selfish ends, and those of his corrupt endorsers
like John Edwards. Remember, Adolph Hitler was a GREAT public
speaker, too.
In the most positive vein, please vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton to
be President of the United States of America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> On Apr 21, 9:37 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
> SUPER DELEGATES CAN BRING AMERICA DOWN OR SAVE IT.
>
> At every level of our social, economic, and political existence FAIR
> PLAY has become the virtue least in evidence. Toooften the rule-of-
> thumb is: “Do bad things unto others, before they can do bad things
> unto you.” Such philosophy reigns supreme in the USA because: People
> see others “getting ahead” by doing bad, often immoral, and sometimes
> criminal things. By those examples, people figure they,too, have a
> “right” to get ahead in those ways. Would-have-been ‘good people’,
> are good whenever such virtue advances their purposes, and they are
> bad whenever such vices will “benefit” them. By degrees, the majority
> of Americans are… two faced.
>
> The above moral decline in America can be reversed only by having
> people come to realize that most people will BENEFIT simply by having
> the great majority play fair! If there is a ‘trickle down’ effect
> that benefits everyone, it is having people care about the effects of
> their actions on their neighbors—far and wide. If businesses ‘seem’
> to have prices that aretoohigh, some feel such prices justify their
> shoplifting. But across America, shoplifting is a… ‘cost of doing
> business’ that adds 15% to the cost of the products being sold. So,
> part of the cause of the high prices—that some feel justifies their
> shoplifting—is shoplifting itself!
>
> When an American company can’t be price-competitive without out-
> sourcing work to other countries, part of the reason for that is: the
> cost of labor, here, is simplytoohigh. And the other costs of doing
> business, are becomingtoogreat. Ask any company executive, and you
> will hear that the cost of providing health care benefits to employees
> has gone-through-the-roof. And you will hear that the cost of
> litigation due to product liability suits has gone-through-the-roof.
> As a ‘defense’, businesses employ expensive lawyers to side-step those
> lawsuits. And lawyers will do so by lobbying for laws favorable to
> businesses—at the expense of those who have been harmed.
>
> Folks, America is in DIRE STRAITS, because our businesses and our
> disparate groups aren’t fighting fair. Toofew of us get the Big
> ...
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
>
OBAMA TAKES THE AMERICAN PEOPLE FOR GRANTED
While the beleaguered Democratic race for the presidential nomination
goes on, Barack Obama has rolled-down his trademark, Screaming Howard
Dean, ‘rolled-up sleeves’. The latter sleeve positions were one of
the ways that Obama mimicked, and MOCKED, the hard-working men and
women of America. Obama has had substantially more success at
attracting people who are naïve, near-sighted, or blind; i.e., those
who favor continuing our failed party-against-party, group-against-
group, and class-against-class contests. But the latter, perennially
ineffectual, contests have been negating the democratic,
representative form of government we deserve, and which we so
desperately need, again.
Instead of rolled-up sleeves, recently, Obama has been wearing the
more conventional, coat and tie attire of a President of the USA. He
hopes that by “looking” presidential, he can steam-roll the remaining
undecideds in Kentucky, Oregon, and Puerto Rico. But mainly he
expects that enough weak-minded super delegates will get on his Pied
Piper Bandwagon to give him… the fateful “numbers” that he needs.
Those RATS will follow him out of town. But it would be best for
America if they would follow him out of this country!
CNN’s Wolf Blitzer interviewed Hillary Clinton, recently. When
Blitzer asked Hillary about her daughter, Chelsea, Hillary started to
cry. Those were most telling tears. They were tears that should TUG
at the heart of America! And they were tears that should separate the
GENUINE candidate from the phony. Blitzer’s implied question wasn’t
so much about: “Don’t you have a wonderful daughter.” It was about
having a wonderful daughter who is putting her HEART and SOUL into
having her mother be elected President of the United States of
America. And it is about having Chelsea’s noble efforts be wasted… in
a fundamentally flawed political race.
In part, I’m working to have Clinton be elected President, because I
won’t allow some phony, egotistical jerk like Barack Obama to be
disrespectful to a genuine-hearted woman like Hillary Clinton. He has
been disrespectful to her in the debates, and ever since he made his
first “acceptance speech” after the IOWA caucuses. And he has been
doing that same thing, more intensely, with every corrupt endorsement,
and with every new look at… ‘the numbers’ that come along. Obama’s
being Black does NOT justify his being discourteous to any woman in
America!!! And I don’t think most Blacks believe that it does!
When Obama told a crowd in Oregon that he will make his ’victory’
speech from there this next Tuesday, the last-straw-of-a-chance that
there is decency anywhere inside of Barack Obama got burned. Though
Obama has won only one state in months, he thinks that it’s a forgone
conclusion that voters in Oregon are naïve, near-sighted or blind. By
his words of premature celebration-in-the-end-zone, Obama shows that
he is UNSPORTSMANLIKE, inconsiderate of WOMEN, and he is taking the
citizens of Oregon and of America for granted!!!
Obama’s words have a more tyrannical sound now that President Bush and
John McCain are ignoring Clinton. They attack Obama as though he is
the presumptive nominee. And that is most inconsiderate of her,
because the race is still continuing. Jay Leno and the others who
make for-pay humor keep on berating Clinton, while she clings to the
hope that our failed political system and societal systems will show
her the fairness that she so rightly deserves. There’s something
fundamentally wrong in America, when THE most qualified person for the
Oval Office gets belittled by high-paid news commentators and by
shallow-mined comedians like Jay Leno. Is there no chivalry in
America?
With his normal bias, Wolf Blitzer asked Clinton if she’s staying in
the race. By that question, asked hundreds of times daily, the askers
are being inconsiderate of Clinton. Of course she wants to win. But
she doesn’t have the “luxury” that Obama has to presume to win.
“Right is on her side; but WRONG has a few more delegates.”
The founding fathers wanted us to have the closest thing to a
democracy. But in the 18th century it wasn’t practical to keep all of
the citizens informed; count the widely spread votes; and communicate
the results to the capital. In national elections and referenda,
electors would represent and relay the results of the various
contests. Our founding fathers would be appalled that we still have
the Electoral College system! That’s because present technology
allows the popular vote to be tallied, quickly. At no point did the
Constitution ever intend that ‘approximations’ of the votes of the
people—as by using state apportioned electors—should take precedence
over the accurately counted popular vote!
The fatally flawed, sequential primary system allocates a certain
number of delegates to each state in proportion to the states’
populations. That sounds good if those delegates were the ones
actually voting at the convention. And if they did so at the same
time. But the delegates are supposed to be representing those
citizens who did vote. That not-so-subtle difference makes everyone’s
votes have different degrees of importance. In a democracy—like this
country doesn’t come close to being—every citizen’s vote must carry
the same weight and importance as any other citizen’s vote.
Suppose two states of equal population have 25 delegates each. If one
state turns-out twice as many voters as the other, when the delegates
are allocated, the weight or value of the votes in the high-turn-up
state is exactly 50% as important as in the lesser turn-out state.
Folks, THAT is anti-democracy, and is thus unconstitutional by the
SPIRIT of the Constitution! The Electoral College is also
unconstitutional by the SPIRIT of the Constitution. The founding
fathers would never allow any ‘best approximation’ system of vote-
taking to hold sway over the actual, accurately-tallied, popular vote
taken without regard for where those votes were cast. If a thousand
people in Alaska want something, those votes should carry the same
weight as a thousand people in California who do.
The reason no one before me has corrected the glaring deficiencies in
our Constitution is because: “A politician’s power can be most evident
in a flawed system.” Those desiring nearly dictatorial powers, like
Barack Obama desires, don’t want a democracy. A democracy rightly
allocates the power to the PEOPLE. So, what glory can a politician
have, if the people get the credit? Folks, THAT is a justification
for ratifying my New Constitution! I have taken the ego component out
of the decision-making processes!
It’s likely that Barack Obama’s ego is swelling even as I write.
Imagine how bloated it will be if… “Because he’s Black, and that
changes things…” gets him elected to be President. But… “The bigger
they are, the harder they fall.” Obama’s ego—and his delusional
“entitlement” to be President—will cause the biggest failed presidency
in this country’s history. George W. Bush will look like a SAINT by
comparison!
The American people are largely oblivious to the threats against
democracy in this country. But unless democracy can be restored as
the foundation of this nation, corrupt influences will dominate every
area of our existence, and more and more. Even ‘fighting dirty’ won’t
protect us from the looming dangers of terrorism and wars. But if we
will start PLAYING FAIR, and being more equitable with ourselves and
with other nations, our hope of surviving, as a nation, past the next
millennium will improve. A thing as simple as fair play can protect
us by improving America’s image in the world.
With each new communication and transportation advance, planet Earth
shrinks in size. We Earthlings are all riding in the same boat. If
we row together we can be saved. But not if we willingly let the
tainted rules and processes lock us to a failed status quo. The
“changes” best for America, are the changes needed to unite us. A New
Constitution is poised for that purpose!
Please elect Hillary Rodham Clinton President of the United States Of
America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> for them to move up,too. What Edwards was implying amounts to
> socialism. Fortunately, SC Democrats were smart enough to reject
> Edward’s condescending attitude toward “their condition”.
>
> As promised, I voted for Edwards. But I wasn’ttoosad to have him be
zzbu...@netscape.net
>
> Heretofore, we humans have tried to find security by siding with a
> strong group with a strong leader or leaders. Often this had been for
> the protection of our own physical well-being, not just to gain some
> vague economic or sociological advantage. In the last two centuries
> Blacks have rallied together for their common cause of reducing
> discrimination against their numbers. Though they have been hugely
> successful, there are areas in which discrimination still exists. So,
> any ‘ideal’ America must address the concerns of Blacks—fairly and
> equitably.
Well, not many ever claimed that they're wasn't at least a smidgeon
of
science, in everything people do. But as soon as the wanks in
Washington
started building spy satellites everywhere, the people in realistic
science
mostly decided, this ain't gonna except for the one-way street
Washingtooners.
And started optical computers, anti-bots, robots that fly, mega PV
Cells,
microcomputers and mircocontrollers, that don't play card games,
encrypted word processors, and lasers disks and fiber optics
systems
that aren't owned and operated by idiots from the New York Times
and the RIAA.
NoEinstein
>
THE FOUNDING FATHERS DID THEIR BEST
When the US Constitution was being written, it got the devoted, best
efforts of the aptly-named ‘founding fathers’. None of those men had
ever helped to write a constitution, before. But because most of them
had either experienced, or been told about, oppressive governments,
they knew they wanted something different for America. They certainly
didn’t want some sort of kingdom with a ruling monarch.
The desire for freedom and new opportunities was the motive for most
of those who emigrated to America. Freedom can best be guaranteed if
the ordinary men and women—who care about those things—can have a say-
so in what their government does. Without citizen input, America
could evolve to be oppressive…
In small groups, simple democratic votes can yield fair results. But
when the population is widely spread—as was the case during the
pioneer era—the only practical APPROXIMATION of a fair democracy was
to have ‘representative’ men go to the capital to vote for their
constituents. Ideally, those representatives would be sufficiently
well attuned regarding how their constituents think, that the
representatives could vote like the people would vote if the people
could be apprised of the issues; hear the pro and con arguments; and
then cast their votes.
Before America was born, the original thirteen state governments, or
councils, were the governing bodies of those living within their
boundaries. In some ways, the constitutional convention was like a
meeting of men from thirteen separate countries. Though there were
major common issues of concern among those citizens, some of the
states felt that the rights and privileges that those therein held
dear, might not get respected if we had a true democracy. States
having small populations feared that larger states would control its
ports; impose tariffs or taxes unfairly; or disparage the “right” to
have slaves.
The only way to appease those apprehensive state delegates was to
bring into parity the population and land area issues by… adding a non
democratic governing body… the US Senate. It was felt that if the two
houses of Congress could be made to hash-things-out between them, that
the likelihood that a small state would get unfair treatment would be
lessened.
Having a US Senate was the “plum” that allowed America to be formed.
But that same branch of government is the primary cause for the
growing, and perhaps fatal, decline in our civil rights; decline in
our trust of our fellow man; and decline in our control of our
government. From the get-go America has not had a functioning
democracy. Yet, the spirit of the Constitution requires that the
people have control over their government so that fair treatment can
be assured. Any new process of government that is fairer for all of
the citizens would surely have been embraced by the founding fathers.
Those men were smart enough to know that changes to the Constitution
should be allowed. Yet, they didn’t want their much-labored-over
document to be too easily modified—at least not without careful
thought. The too great difficulty in modifying the Constitution is
another flaw that the founding fathers left in the document…
A third flaw that I’ll mention is the “presumption” that those we
choose as our representatives and senators will be patriots who place
America’s interests, and those of America’s diverse citizenry, above
their own selfish interests. Nowhere in the Constitution is it
mentioned, or even implied to be acceptable, that we have… political
parties as intermediaries between the citizens and our government.
Another incredible flaw was that the founding fathers let the two
houses of Congress… make their own rules, and determine their own
procedures. An entire BOOK could be written about how… “the
congressional rules” have squeezed DEMOCRACY out of the picture,
entirely, so that we now have a government run by career politicians
who are our elected dictators, NOT our elected representatives!
The founding fathers could not have foreseen how elitist a person is
if he or she gets elected to public office. The media dotes over
political office holders so much, is it any wonder that we’re being
“served” by those mainly interested in “fighting for” their own places
in history?
Senator John McCain was interviewed, yesterday, regarding the sad news
about Senator Ted Kennedy’s health. McCain said, “Senator Kennedy is
one of our most effective senators.” Why is there such a thing as an
“effective” senator? That’s because democracy is nowhere to be seen
in “the big picture” in Washington. A senator may be considered
“effective” if he can make persuasive speeches. He is also seen as
“effective” if he can form alliances with others in the “smoke-filled-
rooms”. Those allow some “effective” senators to sway votes beyond
the 1% influence that the Constitution grants to Kennedy and the
others. If ANYONE is more “effective”—or has more influence—the
representative form of government envisioned by the founding fathers
is… out-the-window.
Hillary Clinton has committed supporters (like me) who will never vote
for Obama. We couldn’t care less about unifying the Democratic Party
to beat John McCain. We just want FAIRNESS in government to be
evident in this country. I’ve been wanting fairness—or government
more closely attuned to a pure democracy—passionately enough to spend
much of the last twelve years writing a New Constitution.
Our follow-the-rules inclinations, has gotten us into dire straights.
When pre-primary polls showed Clinton to be the front-runner, she was
being polite when she agreed that the rushed-ahead primaries in
Florida and Michigan won’t count. Little did she know that racism
would soon enter the picture. Such was manifested in the block votes
of the 90 plus percent of blacks for Obama. Those block votes didn’t
change, regardless of his many character flaws that have been brought
to light.
Obama’s primary character flaw: He won’t fight fair. Principles of
DEMOCRACY take precedence over the unconstitutional rules of the DNC;
and even over the unconstitutional Democratic Party, itself, with all
of its cancerous strings throughout government. A polite person like
Hillary Clinton, can’t be denied her constitutional rights just
because she was wishing to avoid seeming greedy. But now that Obama
has shown himself to be an inveterate scoundrel, of course she’s
correct to insist that the voters in FL and MI get fairly counted.
The main error of the DNC, and of Obama’s tribe of crooks, is their
having put off resolving those FL and MI primaries. That has allowed
Obama to make backroom agreements with as many corrupt super delegates
as he can. Large numbers of voters make their decisions, not by
voting for the best candidate, but by voting for the one who seems
most likely to “win”. That’s why denying Clinton those FL and MI
votes, early, has allowed Obama to hang on by his nails. And the
media has used her for their doormat. If the media had a thread of
decency, it would place DEMOCRACY above the shameful “Ballot Bowl”,
and its ilk. The former play-by-play debacle, and all the others,
lets the media, and their rag-tag bags of “experts”, tinker with the
lives and futures of every American.
Two weeks ago, Obama promised Oregon that he would make his “victory
speech” there, yesterday. Instead, the super-delegate count hasn’t
given him the nomination. So… Obama addressed a somewhat somber crowd
in Iowa. That speech was condescending to Clinton. It referred to
her in ways that keep implying that the nomination race is over. But
Obama is just being his same old delusional self. There aren’t enough
“Blacks and eggheads” in this country for Obama to defeat McCain! The
only chance Obama has of winning is if he can dupe Clinton’s
supporters into believing that he will unite America.
Surely, Obama knows that two thirds of Clinton’s supporters won’t vote
for him if he’s the nominee. Therefore, Obama can’t win! Hillary
Clinton should consider the following “Plan B”: Run as an independent
in the general election. No huge advertising is needed. She already
has the voters to place second in a three-way race with Obama and
McCain.
What that will do is to throw the election into the House of
Representatives. If the democratic house doesn’t pick Clinton, she
has “Plan C”. The founding fathers never knew that technology would
allow holding a run-off election in a single day. Because the
political parties are anti-democracy, and thus against the spirit of
the Constitution, then taking votes in the party-tainted House of
Representatives would be counter to the ideals of fairness and
democracy on which this country was founded. No court can rule
against DEMOCRACY twice in eight years, and do so with impunity.
Those justices who favored “schedules” over Democracy in 2000 are
teetering of being punished, retroactively, after the New Constitution
is ratified by 75% of those voting. So, Congress, or that cursed
Court, should allow a one day run-of election—as is used in every
close state election—to decide McCain vs. Clinton. If those bastards
don‘t do so, the PEOPLE must insist—as in a revolution. Don’t screw
with democracy in America!
Obama, like McCain, has a penchant for speaking in front of one or
more flags. But no starched and ironed American flag—behind him as he
speaks—can legitimize the campaign of a man whose only motives are
selfish ones. Obama talks about using diplomacy with Hamas. But his
voice is that of a dictator, NOT the voice of a diplomat. 60% of
verbal communication is tonal and visual. On those two Obama flunks
as a diplomat. Obama is too ‘cock-sure’ to consider anyone else’s
viewpoint, or to make them believe that he has done so.
After he looses, Barack Obama can write a best seller explaining the
reasons. TIME magazine will probably give him their Man of the Year
award, claiming that he invigorated the nation. In actuality, Obama
would have come closer than any other person in history to destroying
America. And he did so simply by kicking dust in the face of
democracy. Our sometimes tenuous futures in this nation hang on such
happenings.
In the most positive light, please vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton for
President of the United States of America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
Eric Gisse
[snip]
If you are going to post a few thousand word essay on the subject
every few days, why not join the campaign directly and contribute?
NoEinstein
Dear Eric: I AM contributing! — NoEinstein —
Eric Gisse
Yes, you are contributing off-topic noise about political crap to a
physics newsgroup.
What I mean is contribute your clearly large amount of free time to
the campaign of whoever you support.
NoEinstein
Dear Eric: When was the last time you actually discussed science?
You are this college flunk-out needing work. You lift your sagging
ego by attacking someone who can talk science, AND work for the
betterment of mankind. Until you can get a mission in life, please
stop attacking me, because I have a mission. — NoEinstein
Eric Gisse
....a mission you say? What mission might that be?
NoEinstein
>
SENATORIAL CANDIDATES, SAVE YOUR MONEY!
Comedians can make fortunes by poking-fun at politicians. And many
politicians get themselves elected by making the opposition look like
the laughing stock. Quite often, the voters will choose those who are
the most interesting characters as their representatives and
senators. How else can you explain the long tenure of Senator Robert
Byrd of West Virginia? Is having ‘fiddling talent’ a justifiable
reason for electing someone to be a senator? Probably not. But
having the “appeal” to get one’s mug in the national media as often as
possible, “reassures” the voting public that ‘their’ representative or
senator has more power than the rest. That very assumption—constantly
reinforced by the irresponsible media—slaps at the face of democracy.
The senatorial race in Minnesota is drawing attention, there, for the
first time since former MN governor, Jesse Ventura, hammed-it-up in
the wrestling ring. Al Franken—that genius at twisting words—can’t
decide whether he would rather have us laugh or cry… regarding the
decline in our government and in our lives. Because very smart people
tend to be more moral than those less blessed, if all of our elected
officials for the past century had been as smart as Franken, we would
probably be in fine shape, now. Instead, as many as 85% of those
polled say they are dissatisfied with the direction this country is
headed. So, Al Franken will have his work cut out for him, if he’s
elected.
CNN’s Larry King values the celebrity of Jesse Ventura, sufficiently,
to regularly invite Ventura to be a guest on his ‘Larry King Live’.
Ventura is one of those unpredictable characters whom the viewing
public will watch, expecting to be entertained. ‘Maury Povich’ draws
a particular segment of the viewing public to watch those marital-un-
bliss, cat fights. It seems that wrestling and Povich’s show have a
common thread: For-pay, put-on fights. We’re a nation that is longing
for a fight… But most are contented to let our various sports and
recreational pursuits substitute for actually coming to blows,
ourselves.
Jesse Ventura surprised Larry King by saying that he, Ventura, will
likely be registering, soon, to vie for that open senate seat in MN.
Ventura says he will be running as an independent. To his credit,
Jesse promised his father that he won’t ‘bet his bank account’ to seek
public office. Folks, imagine how much better off this country would
be if no candidate spent more money than the average working American
makes in a single year. Wow! Is their any logic—other than to feed
candidates’ egos—to spend more money getting elected than the jobs
being sought will pay? Of course not!
Barack Obama has raised hundreds of millions of dollars trying to
“win”—by hook-or-by-crook—the Democratic Party’s nomination for
President. Jobs and the economy are major issues. Tell me, how can
people who are in need, be “served” by routing ANY of that money into
the hands of the media—whose only ‘need’ is greed? Is it any wonder
that the TV network bosses choose to support the candidate(s) who will
be spending the most money on advertising? Ask yourselves: Is it
right that the amount of money available—rather than the worthiness of
the candidates—gets to decide who can win public office?
Democracy would best be served by putting all contributions into a
common pot and allocating equal funding for each candidate’s ads.
“Winning” by fund-raising is like winning by having a tug-of-war.
Democracy must never pit the strong against the weak. My New
Constitution will GUARANTEE that every registered voter gets a fair
and equal say-so in government. And such will be irrespective of how
persuasive they speak, or how much money they can spare to BUY the
candidate of their choice.
Some of you readers have heard me explain that I’m an expert
graphologist. Last May, TIME Magazine showed a sample of the, then,
six top candidates for President. I commented that ‘John Edwards
can’t be bought’. Right after the West Virginia landslide for
Clinton, Edwards combed his hair and endorsed Obama… I wondered if I
had been wrong last May. Soon, I realized that Edwards wasn’t
‘bought’. He just sold-out for selfish reasons alone. Edwards would
love to get the number two spot on the Democratic ticket. What better
way would there be for him to do so than by, possibly, causing the
decisive rush of the super delegates to Obama? If Edwards had caused
such a rush (but he didn‘t), ‘fate’ might, subsequently, have made him
President. Or, perhaps, he would have an inside track for the
nomination in 4 or 8 years.
Another signature that I’ve analyzed, and generally like, is that of
Face the Nation’s Bob Schieffer. He is a friendly and conventional-
thinking good-guy. I’ve admired his aura of fair news coverage for
years. He’s seems believable and trustworthy. But lately Schieffer’s
reasoning ability is slipping. I’ve noticed that he keeps stressing
the ‘inevitability’ of an Obama victory—because of the numbers. He
said, yesterday, that we are a nation of rules. And he said,
“Businesses have rules…” Schieffer was reasoning, wrongly, that the
DNC doesn’t have to give-in to pressure by Clinton supporters, like
me, to let Clinton have her fair share of the delegates in FL and MI.
Why can’t Schieffer see that democracy is being raped? And why
doesn’t he care?
For too many Americans, the ‘news’ is limited to what the corrupt news
media will allow to be aired. Since no one has aired my assertions
that our political parties are anti democracy, Schieffer won’t let
such ‘trivia’ make him feel guilty. For a man who made his fortune
‘covering’ politics, is it too much to expect such an insider to admit
that the majority of our system of government is simply screwed-up,
and needs to be scrapped. In my New Constitution, one part of
government that will be scrapped is the entire, anti-democracy branch
known as: The US Senate. Those elitists have screwed-up America long
enough!
Unlike Al Franken, I don’t see anything about the Federal Government
that’s a laughing matter. Bill Mahr is another political ‘comedian’
who has more good ideas than bad. But unfortunately, Bill makes too
much money just by belly-aching about bad government. Otherwise, he
might be more willing to ramrod some of his good ideas.
We all know that this country has an energy deficiency. Instead of
depending on petroleum, we could start increasing ethanol production.
One way to do that—which has repeatedly and unfairly been squelched—is
to allow our farmers to grow HEMP. That ‘weed’ could save us—
economically and politically. Such salvation seems more important
than the possible hurt to some, because of the TRACE of the marijuana
drug in its fibers. My guess is that the oil lobbyists don’t want an
ethanol source to be available that might compete with oil. Didn’t
those five oil executives, seated at that long table in the
congressional hearing room, look like five criminals at, say, the
Nuremberg trial following WWII? The high price of crude oil is the
genre of excuse that oil companies need to keep getting more and more
favorable incentives from government to increase oil exploration and
processing efficiency. But as has always been the case, the public
pays, while the fat cats (and oil company shareholders) keep getting
fatter.
Barack Obama did an acceptable job filling-in for an ailing Senator
Ted Kennedy as a commencement speaker. I’ve never faulted Barack’s
poise as a speaker. But from day one, I have faulted his personality
(influenced by Barack’s high testosterone) that causes him to be too
strong-willed to make a good executive. Strong-willed people tend to
assign authority, begrudgingly. And they won’t allow those under them
to get job satisfaction by using their talents, effectively.
Because Obama has ZERO executive experience, he’s now stressing how he
will use ‘diplomacy’ in foreign relations. Here again, Obama’s
personality is a mismatch. The best diplomats are laid-back, affable
people. When they enter a room they don’t broadcast their delusional
superiority by the strong, level tone of their voice, nor by starring-
down those who are talking. A natural born diplomat is our good-
neighbor-type-President, Jimmy Carter. He can empathize with the
viewpoints of others, while seeking a common issue around which to
build a mutually beneficial accord. Obama totally lacks the ability
to see things from anyone else’s perspective, but his own.
After Senator Tom Daschle brushed-off James Carville’s suggestion that
Clinton’s supporters pay to have the MI primary re held, I knew that
it was Obama’s moral imperative to side with democracy. Yet, his
monumental ego prevented him from doing the right things. For Barack,
if a corrupt and unconstitutional political party system benefits HIM,
he’s all in favor of it. That man has shed no tears at the daily
slights to Clinton. But without those slights, Clinton would be ahead
in the pledged delegates, too.
The time has come for one or more reporters with a modicum of decency
to ask Obama this: “Is it true that you value getting elected more
than you value the principles of DEMOCRACY on which this country was
based? If you disagree, then, why haven’t you insisted that Hillary
Clinton get her fair share of the delegates in Florida and Michigan?”
Unless, and until Barack Obama answers those two question, he will
remain the scourge of the USA.
Mike Huckabee made a genuine Freudian slip when he speculated on the
cause of backstage noise—by saying it was just Obama being defensive.
Mike has already let it be known that he would accept the VP spot
under McCain. Naïve Huckabee would see clearer sailing to his
becoming president, if the “supposed” frontrunner, Obama, is out of
the picture. That ‘humorous’ statement shows just how selfish
Huckabee is.
If there was a ‘threat component’ in Huckabee’s statement, such paled
in comparison to… the ‘threat component’ caused by having the corrupt
media REPEATEDLY show Huckabee making those statements. Quite
obviously, the media is as lacking in good responsibility, as it is in
having any concept whatsoever what its mission should be. ‘Maximizing
the profits of the shareholders’ just won’t cut it as a motive for the
media in a democracy.
Neither Al Franken nor Jesse Ventura can save this country from ruin
by having one of them become a senator from MN. But my New
Constitution—when ratified on a first Tuesday in November by 75% of
those voting—will permanently correct our dysfunctional government.
Additionally, it will place reasonable limits on what are considered
to be ‘accepted’ business practices. But not-to-worry! Having a fair
free enterprise system will cause the MAXIMUM benefits for the maximum
number of people. So, prosperity is looming!
In the most positive light, please vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton to
be President of the United States of America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
Handwriting Analysis of Clinton, Obama, McCain and Einstein (is
Copyrighted.)
> document to betooeasily modified—at least not without careful
> thought. Thetoogreat difficulty in modifying the Constitution is
> ...
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
>
THOSE WHO BURY HEADS IN SAND WILL GET THEIR ASSES KICKED!
The corrupt news media looks at what its cohorts in crime are doing,
and says: I’m OK; you’re OK. But the media is sick—really sick! It
has no “corporate” moral judgment nor conscience. Its motives: Fill
time or column space; get viewers or readers; make lots of advertising
money; and if anyone will listen, screw up democracy and any hope for
the long-term survival of the USA.
All of this will come to a head, soon, when the corrupt DNC ‘resolves’
the FL and MI primary issues by, it is hinted, giving the voters in
those states only half of the delegates that they deserve. It seems—
from the Democratic Rules Committee’s perspective—that what it says
trumps democracy itself. Where is it written in any document that
innocent voters can be ‘punished’ for decisions made by legislatures
controlled by the opposition party?
Another sick bit of rationale by some Democrats (mostly Obama
supporters) is that the “the UNITY of the Democratic Party” justifies
prodding super delegates to commit before the August convention. Ever
since that Super Tuesday when Obama jumped into the lead, he and his
tribe of con artists have been bragging victory. And they have been
promising everything—including the kitchen sink—to get “influential”
backers to perhaps swing delegates his way.
Nancy Peloci has endorsed Obama. Her ‘high position’ demands that she
not… peddle influence. But she is pretending objectivity by saying
that “the will of the people” counts, while she calls super delegates
to get the last (and the likely best) of those to commit for Obama.
Experience has shown that the corrupt people in Washington like being
on the winning side. Those super delegates who haven’t committed
surely feel those same motives. But Hillary Clinton is winning the
popular vote, And she’s on the moral (good girl) side. Clinton
hasn’t had the luxury to stampede delegates her way. And she hasn’t
been the candidate spending the most money on advertising. What’s her
‘reward’ for being the most qualified candidate by far? She’s fair
game for all of those irresponsible types, like Jay Leno, who get to
poke fun for pay. Stiff shirts like Wolf Blitzer do that more slyly
by “paraphrasing” every negative assessment about the numbers for
Hillary. The “machine” at CNN, and the rest of those networks, is
corrupt from top to bottom. A few good guys like Lu Dobbs… are
probably afraid to make any real protests, lest they be fired. He is
just the “fair and balanced” that isn’t.
The “poll” that is most telling about Obama is the weight that he has
lost in the last week or so. Apparently his heart is healthy, but his
motives for becoming President aren’t. Barack is looking more like
the featherweight that he is. How well would he fare on prison food,
I wonder? Obama is at the top of the list of those who are more than
willing to kick dust in the face of democracy, if that dastardliness
can get him nominated.
Imagine, if you will, that my New Constitution now has the following
stipulation—subject of course, to being ratified by the people on,
say, the first Tuesday in November of 2010: “The will of the people is
the foundation of government. So, Citizens’ votes shall have parity
without compromise. Because principles of democracy shall reign
supreme in the USA, any civil or private person(s) who uses the
“authority” or influence of their job to actively or tacitly argue
against democracy shall be guilty of a crime. Any person so acting,
beginning with the 2008 Democratic Party primaries, shall be held
culpable, retroactively. Those found guilty can be punished up to and
including the death penalty.”
The citizens of Puerto Rico ‘get’ delegates, but not electors. Why is
that? For decades those people have desired to be made a state. But
the corrupt powers-that-be in Washington don’t want a new “practical
thinking” state to, perhaps, interfere with the failed power
structures already in place. My New Constitution leaves
‘controversial’ issues up to the direct vote of the People. That way,
there are no clandestine influences to deny Puerto Rico their own
star. The American Flag can be designed with the extra star. I’m in
favor of it!
So, as Obama supporters (in the media or otherwise) keep taking pot
shots at Clinton, people like Nancy Peloci and Howard Dean should try
to imagine how well they will fare on prison food. Unless they, and a
thousand more of their ilk, start distancing themselves from the
sinful ways of the status quo, they could well find themselves as
defendants in trials that can only be good for America. Stay tuned!
In the most positive light, please vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton for
President of the United States of America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> Fortoomany Americans, the ‘news’ is limited to what the corrupt news
> media will allow to be aired. Since no one has aired my assertions
> that our political parties are anti democracy, Schieffer won’t let
> such ‘trivia’ make him feel guilty. For a man who made his fortune
> ‘covering’ politics, is ittoomuch to expect such an insider to admit
> under ...
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
>
WARNING: THE USA IS POISED TO FAIL, UNLESS WE DEPART FROM OUR ERRANT
WAYS.
In this country, far too many people place more importance on
“winning” than on doing what is best. The sporting events that
command our attention appeal to our primal instincts to fight for
survival. But such mock fights—whether the players are collegiate or
professional—always have 50% losers. Yet, the ‘rush’ of winning
continues to maintain our addictions to sports of all kinds… even to
‘Ballot Bowl’.
The Republicans and Democrats are, consistently, 50% losers. Yet the
“love of the fight” has allowed those ‘quasi governments’ to squelch
the principles of democracy that our founding fathers hoped would
guide us on our journey as a nation.
When important national decisions need to be made, too often we trust
and defer to our group leaders. Those leaders tend to be highly
verbal people who enjoy participating in meetings of all kinds. They
flourish in group settings—often getting their ‘rush’ in faction
against faction victories without ever accomplishing the objectives of
the members as a whole. And they tend to be staid, older people, who
are less caring about the members’ fundamental objectives than they
are about maintaining their images of invincibility in group settings.
The Democratic Rules and Bylaws Committee members exemplify the above
personality model. For their whole lives, most of those people have
been go-to-meeting types. They revel in formalities, while being
morally BANKRUPT to do what is best for the members of the larger
group. Yesterday’s decision by such committee—to punish the voters of
FL and MI for ‘violation’ of its unconstitutional rules—amounts to the
continuing RAPE of democracy. Covering our eyes to such happenings
will surely bring down this nation of ours… However, IF we will
start holding our leaders accountable for any of their actions which
aren’t in the best interest of the group—and not in the best interest
of the membership of us all in the human race—then, there might still
be HOPE for the survival of the USA!
Hillary Rodham Clinton is THE most qualified candidate for President.
She’s got a gregarious personality not too different from that of
Ronald Reagan. Barack Obama, on the other hand, is a domineering,
egotistical man. He’s a detail oriented loner who doesn’t work well
in, or with, groups. Yet, that less-than-qualified man is being swept
along on the-team-must-win wave. And BE DAMNED with the consequences
to the USA, as a whole, and to the human race.
In the 2000 election, the Supreme Court picked George Bush to be
President. They did so because they placed more importance on the
traditions of ‘scheduling’ than they placed on democracy itself.
Eight years later, the DNC is placing more importance on its own
unconstitutional rules regarding the ‘scheduling’ of primaries than it
places on basic principles of democracy. Can anyone not see how such
repeated corruption is placing the USA in peril?
A sad fact of political life in America is that office seekers must
try to appeal to a majority, while trying not to alienate the rest.
Clinton continues to give lip service to having a unified democratic
party. For months, even though the race with Obama has been neck and
neck, the unprincipled supporters of Obama have kept insisting that it
is Clinton’s responsibility to “unify” the party. Why hasn’t that
Manchurian Candidate, Barack Obama, dropped out—to unify the party
behind the most qualified candidate, Hillary Clinton?
Those who value “winning” above playing fair, cling to the delegate
count numbers as the “standard” for victory. In the Electoral
College, those electors were conceived by the founding fathers as a
best-at-the-time APPROXIMATION of fair democracy. But when modern
technology can allow holding political contests in a single day, and
counting the votes nearly that quickly, the rationale for continuing
to have the Electoral College just isn’t there any more. Similarly,
the rationale for having… delegates for going to conventions to
‘represent’ the will of Democrats, just isn’t there anymore, if the
POPULAR VOTE of all of the Democrats in the USA can select the
candidate, directly—without even necessitating a convention! Is this
country so steeped in tradition, that it favors… PROCESS above fair
democracy?
Any Democrat who doesn’t value the supremacy of the POPULAR vote above
the clearly outmoded delegate count is valuing “winning” above playing
fair—and above doing what is best for the USA, and for the human
race. Many Democrats are reveling in the stampede-to-unity ‘numbers
victory’ that has been pending for so long for that featherweight,
Obama. One of my own quotes: “Those who lust for POWER favor
wrongdoing, because the glory of doing the right things must be shared
with the moral imperative.”
It’s time that America starts doing the right things. In the most
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
>
A NEW CONSTITUTION IS THE “CHANGE” THAT AMERICA NEEDS!
Yesterday, Barack Obama made one of his most impassioned speeches. He
was in Mitchell, SD, and he spoke in front of the world famous Corn
Palace. I’ve visited the Corn Palace, myself. I’ve also visited
Mount Rushmore. Because of highway construction, my arrival at Mount
Rushmore was delayed until dusk. But I got to take a time-exposure
photograph of the four Presidents—lit by LIGHTNING strikes! The photo
is blue, and it is gorgeous!
I admire the independence of the people in South Dakota. I certainly
admire those same qualities in the citizens of Montana—and throughout
America. From remote perspectives, it would be far better if the
decisions made in Washington would just maintain the stability we all
want. But, too often, bad laws and bad policies reach across the
miles to adversely affect us… wherever we live. Why can’t government
stop screwing things up?
Obama’s speech in Mitchell, SD, began with his oft-repeated
explanation of “why” he entered the presidential race at such a young
age. He continues to deny that he is selfishly motivated. Instead,
he talks like a man “chosen”—who’s the only one who cares about the
people. Seemly, if you will just elect Obama, he will go to
Washington and kick butt. But that ‘fighting attitude’ will doom his
chances. That’s because Congress, like Obama, is composed of mostly
egotistical and headstrong individuals who themselves went to
Washington to change things, but couldn’t. And they won’t let Obama
change things, either.
Obama regularly talks about how he hasn’t accepted any… PAC money. He
wrongly implies that there will be no one ‘pulling his strings’. But
with each new endorsement he received, Obama reveled. Perhaps he was
unaware that he was being bought. Obama often bragged that his
contributors have been mostly the low dollar givers. 90 plus percent
of Blacks are voting for Obama—“Come Hell or High Water!”… So, isn’t
it obvious that Obama has already been bought by that same voting
block, and others, to make decisions favorable to… them?
Obama got pushed into office as the Manchurian Candidate of the
Democratic Party leadership. Screaming Howard Dean knows that he,
himself, will never be President. But if a ‘weak’ (on experience)
candidate like Obama gets in, the party powers-that-be will get to use
him as their puppet to continue business as usual. On the other hand,
the Clintons are so knowledgeable concerning how the Executive Branch
should be run—From Day One!—that they won’t be needing the advice of
others.
An Obama presidency would surely be compromised because he has ZERO
executive experience. He would have to ask others how things should
be done. The Democratic Party leadership loves Obama’s inexperience!
They desperately want a weak President, whom they can control. But
folks, you can count on this: Hillary Clinton won’t be needing those
scoundrels at all!
Over a year ago, I learned that Barack Obama’s personality type is
wrong for a Chief Executive. An ideal President should be principled,
easy going, polite, diplomatic, and likable. Those qualities will
allow making the wise concessions needed at this important time in
America’s history. President Ronald Reagan exemplified those
qualities “Well…”! As I’ve mentioned before, I’m one of the top
graphologists in the world. Because of my talent for analyzing
handwriting, I can say—with confidence—that Hillary Clinton has those
same desirable personality qualities. But Barack Obama completely
lacks them!
It is most telling that the Obamas have just now decided to resign
from that “hate the USA” church of theirs. So, both of the Obamas are
lacking in moral judgment. For them, it has taken years to do what
most people would do in a heartbeat. Additionally, Obama has lacked
the moral judgment to insist that Hillary Clinton be treated fairly in
FL and MI. Far more hurtful to her than the robbing, this past
weekend, of half of her delegates in FL and MI, was the months of
delay by the DNC. That long delay allowed Obama to attract more of
his trademark “win at any cost” crowd… They have willingly kicked
dust in the face of democracy.
Obama’s crowd smiled in the same sick way that George Bush’s crooks
had smiled during the Florida vote-counting fiasco in the 2000
presidential election. If Obama had, immediately, been considerate to
those FL and MI voters—and to Clinton—he might have converted even me
to his side. But when I realized that the block-vote of the Blacks
for Obama didn’t care that he was morally weak, and would keep right
on voting for him, regardless, I knew that the USA would be in grave
danger… if Obama were to become President. Corruption in Washington
must STOP! Having a corrupt Barack Obama become President could well
be the final ‘straw that breaks the Camel’s back…’
In Mitchell, SD, Obama talked about his experiences during the SC
primary. In SC—which is my home state—he had promised a lady that he
would visit the city of Greenwood in order to gain her support. After
a one and a half hour drive in the rain, Obama met a “fired-up” local
politician. Apparently, that person’s mantra had the effect of
motivating Obama to try harder to win. Obama told the SD crowd that
the moral of his story was: “One person can make a difference in a
town, a state, a nation, and in the world.”
Coincidently, the latter is the EXACT reason that I have spent much of
the last twelve years of my life writing a New Constitution! Such
document will correct the glaring problems that our failed political
system can’t correct by itself. The corruption in government runs
much too deep. But IF the mostly good-at-heart American people will
disregard their group-against-group, party-against-party, and class-
against-class divisiveness, there are OPTIMUM solutions that can
benefit the vast majority—not just the tiny “winners” in the petty
issues of the moment.
I am 1/16 American Indian. Because of that connection, I am a closest
living relative of pioneer Daniel Boone. Boone fathered a child with
a Shawnee squaw while he was held captive by the Shawnee. That
exceptional child, Kaziah, was my great, great grandmother! So, if
anyone can sense my PASSION for doing what is right for America,
perhaps my bloodline is part of it!
Another of my relatives was the Major who was in charge of Fort
McHenry during the War of 1812. The British wanted to take back
America. Washington had already been burned. If Baltimore was taken,
the British were on their way to victory. But the wise Major urged
that an earthen fortress be built on the eastern side of the city.
And he ordered that a huge new American flag be commissioned. When
Baltimore Harbor filled with British ships, the Major—brevetted to the
rank of Lieutenant Colonel—got the soldiers out of the fort during the
bombardment that followed. The next morning, with there having been
few casualties, the Lt. Colonel ordered the men back into the fort.
They ran up that pristine flag and began blasting those ships out of
the harbor. Because of that Lt. Colonel—my relative—this country was
saved from the British, and our ‘Star Spangled Banner’ was written!
In the most positive light, please vote for Hillary Rodham Clinton for
President of the United States of America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> On May 29, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> WARNING: THE USA IS POISED TO FAIL, UNLESS WE DEPART FROM OUR ERRANT
> WAYS.
>
> In this country, fartoomany people place more importance on
> “winning” than on doing what is best. The sporting events that
> command our attention appeal to our primal instincts to fight for
> survival. But such mock fights—whether the players are collegiate or
> professional—always have 50% losers. Yet, the ‘rush’ of winning
> continues to maintain our addictions to sports of all kinds… even to
> ‘Ballot Bowl’.
>
> The Republicans and Democrats are, consistently, 50% losers. Yet the
> “love of the fight” has allowed those ‘quasi governments’ to squelch
> the principles of democracy that our founding fathers hoped would
> guide us on our journey as a nation.
>
> When important national decisions need to be made,toooften we trust
> and defer to our group leaders. Those leaders tend to be highly
> verbal people who enjoy participating in meetings of all kinds. They
> flourish in group settings—often getting their ‘rush’ in faction
> against faction victories without ever accomplishing the objectives of
> the members as a whole. And they tend to be staid, older people, who
> are less caring about the members’ fundamental objectives than they
> are about maintaining their images of invincibility in group settings.
>
> The Democratic Rules and Bylaws Committee members exemplify the above
> personality model. For their whole lives, most of those people have
> been go-to-meeting types. They revel in formalities, while being
> morally BANKRUPT to do what is best for the members of the larger
> group. Yesterday’s decision by such committee—to punish the voters of
> FL and MI for ‘violation’ of its unconstitutional rules—amounts to the
> continuing RAPE of democracy. Covering our eyes to such happenings
> will surely bring down this nation of ours… However, IF we will
> start holding our leaders accountable for any of their actions which
> aren’t in the best interest of the group—and not in the best interest
> of the membership of us all in the human race—then, there might still
> be HOPE for the survival of the USA!
>
> Hillary Rodham Clinton is THE most qualified candidate for President.
> She’s got a gregarious personality nottoodifferent from that of
NoEinstein
>
The best interests of America can be served by having Hillary Rodham
Clinton become our next President! The best interests of America
CANNOT be served by “uniting” behind an undeserving candidate—however
“fired up” he may be!
Over the past twelve years, I have written a New Constitution for this
country. The ‘really good stuff’ is retained, including the right to
keep and bear arms. My purpose in writing a New Constitution? I wish
to make government be our SERVANT rather than our dictator. To
accomplish that one thing will require holding principles of DEMOCRACY
supreme.
In national contests the present system of State apportioned electors,
as well as state apportioned convention delegates, just won’t cut it—
when our present technology will allow holding elections on one day
and counting those POPULAR VOTES the same day! State populations
shall NEVER be allowed to determine the “weight” of any American’s
vote! The POWER of the votes is in their totals, NOT from which state
they happened to come from. When Puerto Rico becomes our 51st state,
the weight of their votes will be the equal, too!
My New Constitution will assure that our governments, businesses, and
disparate groups value the common interests of us all, above selfish
group interests. To assure that democracy is supreme, there will
never again be political parties wedged between the people and the
governments that the people will now control! Never again will the US
Supreme Court decide controversial issues contrary to the macro will
of the people. And never again will there a US Senate which, from its
inception, has so compromised democracy, and brought the USA to the
brink of disaster…
The negative assessment of many nations and peoples toward the USA can
only be appeased… if we will CLEAN UP OUR OWN ACT HERE AT HOME! We
need not fear terrorism, IF we will start acting FAIRLY in our
dealings with our own citizens, as well as in our dealings with other
nations and groups. Burgeoning technology should be directed toward
neutralizing the resource and economic inequities that cause other
nations and peoples to hate capitalism, and to hate the USA.
There need not be a revolution to cause these positive changes to come
about. My New Constitution is polished and poised to be ratified in
one day in November of 2010. But a “gets the big picture” President,
like Hillary Clinton, needs to be in office. Every word that I have
written in the New Constitution should optimize the business, social
and economic condition of the vast majority of Americans—and to do so
FAIRLY via DEMOCRACY. So, when Hillary Clinton said, “this is an
important day for democracy,” she was right! The POPULAR VOTE and
DEMOCRACY fit like glove to hand.
Join me in urging Hillary Clinton to DISTANCE herself from Barack
Obama. If she can change delegates’ minds between now and August,
that would be wonderful. But if not, Clinton already HAS the votes to
win against that retard McCain, and that Johnny-Come-Lately, Obama.
With these important goals before us, Hillary Clinton supporters: stay
the course!
Reapectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> On Jun 1, 8:54 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> A NEW CONSTITUTION IS THE “CHANGE” THAT AMERICA NEEDS!
>
> Yesterday, Barack Obama made one of his most impassioned speeches. He
> was in Mitchell, SD, and he spoke in front of the world famous Corn
> Palace. I’ve visited the Corn Palace, myself. I’ve also visited
> Mount Rushmore. Because of highway construction, my arrival at Mount
> Rushmore was delayed until dusk. But I got to take a time-exposure
> photograph of the four Presidents—lit by LIGHTNING strikes! The photo
> is blue, and it is gorgeous!
>
> I admire the independence of the people in South Dakota. I certainly
> admire those same qualities in the citizens of Montana—and throughout
> America. From remote perspectives, it would be far better if the
> decisions made in Washington would just maintain the stability we all
> want. But,toooften, bad laws and bad policies reach across the
> muchtoodeep. But IF the mostly good-at-heart American people will
> > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
NoEinstein
>
OPTIMISM CAN BE A VERY DANGEROUS THING.
Every two years, voters hope that the latest batch of politicians who
get sent to Washington will finally change things for the better. Two
years ago, enough Democrats were voted into office to finally control
both houses of Congress. The primary motive of many for electing
those Democrats was to end the insane Iraq War. But that war’s end is
nowhere in sight…
I’m old enough, and have a good enough memory, to realize that those
who promise to “change things”, if elected, consistently don’t do so.
Yet, the misguided optimism of Americans causes them to believe
political promises: “If you voters will just elect so-and-so to public
office, everything will magically be OK.” But It just doesn’t happen.
John McCain talks about how he’s against lobbyists, and against
earmarks. But aren’t most lobbyists representing selfish business
interests of one kind or another? And aren’t most businesses being
run by Republicans? The ‘profit motive’ is what built this country;
you can’t fault that. But now, that same motive for profit has made
it OK for big businesses to wrangle and lever the necessary control of
our governments to assure that the decisions which get made will favor
businesses—rather than favoring the disparate Citizens of this once
great country of ours.
I’m a pragmatist. When our governments keep screwing up this country,
year after year, I realized that those politicians aren’t self-
correcting the huge problems. John McCain says that lobbyists are a
problem. Then, why hasn’t Congress—in a single day—simply voted to
outlaw lobbying? My New Constitution will make lobbying—any lobbying—
a crime! The mired processes of government, primarily laid at the
feet of the US Senate, won’t allow positive things to be done.
Congress is this long-on-ceremony, but short-on-results bunch of
egotistical jerks. The few “good” guys who get elected will
eventually become jerks, too, if they stay in office long enough. And
our party-dominated political system virtually assures that incumbents
will be re elected. That assurance is especially true for senators.
Senators have a higher level of “seeming” importance. And because of
their growing seniority, the voters back home see little advantage in
kicking those rascals out. That’s why senators like Robert Byrd can
keep 'fiddling' himself back into office. My New Constitution will
kick out ALL of the rascal senators. So, there is no unfairness
there!
A large percentage of voters in this country are too busy to ponder
“the causes” of the mess that we find ourselves in. All they know is
that every two years, a new batch of political hopefuls comes along.
Barack Obama is one of those. His level-pitched, testosterone-driven,
tone of voice has ‘hooked’ enough voters that he will fight, and win,
for them—that he has apparently “locked up” the Democratic nomination
for President. That 85% discontent of Americans with the direction
their country is heading, could be the unifying force that allows the
problems, so rampant in America, to actually be corrected. Our
governments won’t and can’t correct those problems. But the American
People can do so, and in a single day, simply by ratifying my New
Constitution!
Barack Obama has used his masculine tone of voice to snow many would-
have-been-discontented voters. Obama has duped them into believing
that he alone can make this country… well again. If the staid
Democratic Party leaders want Obama to be the candidate, why shouldn’t
the naïve voters go along?
Hillary Clinton has gotten most of the older voters to back her. Of
course there are ‘issues’ that older people have. But with age,
doesn’t wisdom increase? If that’s so, then the wisest voters have
backed Clinton. Ipso facto, the less wise voters must be backing
Obama…
I’ve decried the fact that huge numbers of voters—mostly Obama
supporters—rally behind him… simply because so many in the media have
kept saying that he will win. Essentially, Obama got off to a
surprising early lead. And before Clinton’s forces could rally, Obama
had enough “he’ll win” pundits to keep selling his ultimate victory.
How much ‘character’ do sports fans have who always choose the most
likely winner? The ‘thrill of winning’ is so great that many horse
race fans always bet on “the favorite”. That way, they get to jump-up-
and-down more often than if they bet on the long shots. Even though
the money being won is small, the ego boost is high.
Tuesday night, when Obama got beyond the ‘magic number’ of delegates,
a TV station in my former city of residence, Charlotte, NC, went to
Jillian’s Restaurant and Sports Bar. There, those watching the walls
full of TVs started jumping up and down as if their horse had just
won… the Kentucky Derby. Little did those people realize that their
‘optimism’ for Obama could, effectively, be killing any chance that
the problems with our government will ever be corrected. Obama, and
the Democratic Party (or “Puahtee”, as Donna Brazile pronounces it)
don’t care very much about having a FAIR and pro democracy
government. They—and the corrupt national media—have trounced on
Clinton at every opportunity, simply because she had the audacity to
be the most qualified candidate!
Where I come from, when the country is in dire straits, send in the
most qualified people to address the problem. If your basement is
flooding from a busted pipe, do you call someone who has ZERO
experience to fix it? That’s exactly what about 30% of the American
people are wanting to do: send in Obama to fix our country, drowning
from leaks caused by old piping that’s long beyond simply being
patched. When plumbing, i.e., the processes of government, is really
bad, the only plausible solution is to rip out the old piping, and put
in a better-designed and more durable system. In the most simple
terms, that is what my New Constitution would be.
I will never be peddling my nation-saving document to Barack Obama,
nor to John McCain. Those men have too many corrupt influences
pulling their strings. I would be willing to have Hillary Clinton be
one of my intermediaries with the American people. But it’s being
hinted that she is about to bed-down with the enemy… If that happens,
it will underscore how unimportant principles and justice are in the
cultures of Washington. For elected officials, the most important
thing is being on the… winning side. Then, they can be jubilant
looking down on the 50% or so who are losers. But the 50% losers due
to government screw-ups happen to be deserving Americans—like you or
me. A government that has political parties as intermediaries with
the people can never do what is right for all, or most Americans, at
the same time. But my New Constitution will BAN political parties!
So, decisions can begin to be made that are optimum for most
Americans.
As she has for so long been urged to do, Clinton may try to “unify”
the Democratic Party by throwing her support behind Obama. But she
doesn’t speak for her supporters! Polls show that over 2/3rds of
those will NEVER vote for Obama. Clinton has the ‘small town’ votes
of working class men and women. And Obama has no hope of winning in
November without those key votes!
In this final day before her “concession and etc.” to Obama, Clinton
should consider whether she wants to, effectively, close-the-door on
correcting the problems in Washington with a long overdue New
Constitution. She must consider whether she wishes to lock in the
same-old, same-old… good-things-will-happen-AFTER-the-next-election
optimism—that would likely sealing the not-so-rosy fate of the USA.
Whether we succumb to terrorists attacks, or to the Armageddon of
nuclear war, failing to act appropriately—when a workable solution is
at hand—is the most grievous failure of all.
As I’ve said more than once, Barack Obama is the single greatest
threat to the survival of the USA, and perhaps to the survival of the
entire world. But if we will just reject him, and STOP our group-
again-group, party-against-party, and class-against-class fights,
those attitudes of fairness—that ONLY a functioning DEMOCRACY can
assure—will give this country hope. Unless we improve our image in
third-world countries, and others, the clock-to-our-doom will continue
to tick.
I too have optimism. Why else would I have spent twelve years writing
a New Constitution. Last Tuesday night Hillary Clinton smiled when
she exclaimed: “This is an important day for democracy!” Americans
everywhere, hope and pray that DEMOCRACY can get established, once and
for all, in this country. Right now, that responsibility is resting
on the shoulders of Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
>
A MIDCOURSE CORRECTION FOR AMERICA
Eighteen million men and women, all across America, have recently
voted for a qualified woman to be President. By doing so, those same
men and women, all across America, voted AGAINST Barack Obama to be
President. NOTHING that has happened this day—6/07/08—regardless of
any whoop-de-do—automatically changes the ideals of those eighteen
million men and women! Their gut feelings—when they went into those
voting booths—surely, helped to guide them in making their decisions.
Now, gut feelings should aid them in deciding WHERE their loyalties
should lie.
New candidates who vie for public office often play-up the fact that
they are political outsiders. There’s a very real, implied corrupting-
influence if an office holder is seen to be one of the political
insiders. Yet, the ‘power’ of being an incumbent favors having the
insiders get re elected. That’s in spite of the fact that those
insiders have been part and parcel to the implied corruption. These
days, corrupt dealings are largely accepted as… the way that things
are done in politics.
I was raised by a Southern Gentleman, to BE a Southern Gentleman.
Having good manners was stressed to me. All of my life I’ve willingly
embraced the virtues—not only of being a gentleman—but of abiding with
the associated formalities. PLAYING FAIR is a big part of being a
gentleman, as is respecting and protecting… the weaker sex.
All during the Democratic Party’s primaries, Hillary Clinton had to
take—without complaint—the many slights to her candidacy. Those were
made on a continual basis by: A biased media; their ideologically
screened pundits; the choose-the-candidate-that-WE-want democratic
party leadership; by Barack Obama, himself; and by his many selfish
endorsers. Clinton couldn’t defend herself… “like a man”, because she
isn’t a man. She knows that a successful nominee for President will
need to have ‘fair and balanced’ media coverage, if such person hopes
to have any chance of being elected. And she knows that only a
Democrat or Republican seems to have much chance of winning the
presidency.
Probably, Ron Paul is the most ideologically well-qualified man in
America to be President. When discussing the Washington scene, Paul
is quite open in placing-blame-where-blame-is-due. Effectively, Paul
is a lamb among wolves. Yet, because of his good character, he won’t
allow his simple, common sense principles to be compromised. Clinton,
on the other hand, is a diplomat. She knows that in order to gain…
power, she must be able to work with both friends and enemies alike.
Often, that means… (symbolically at least), sleeping with the enemy.
Today, Clinton said: “I will be on the FRONTLINES of democracy!” Last
Tuesday she said: “This is an important day for democracy!” Yet,
Hillary Clinton is urging those eighteen million men and women, all
across America, to disregard the win-at-any-cost, anti FAIR play, and
anti democracy tactics of the Obama campaign. All along, Clinton’s
plan “B” must have been: “If I don’t win, outright, (She DID, but
won’t fight for it…) I will just switch over to… ‘the enemy’—and all
of my supporters will follow along.”
I’m one of those (former) supporters of Hillary Clinton who won’t be
voting for ‘her choice’ for President. EACH of those eighteen million
men and women who voted for Clinton probably did so—ether because she
has executive experience; she’s the more mature and stable candidate;
or because they liked the wisdom of her various visions for America.
Folks, every one of those, and other, valid motives for your having
voted are still waiting to be served! NONE of you fine people should
automatically switch to the candidate of Clinton’s whim—unless your
own hopes and aspirations for America can be made closer to being a
reality! Believe me: “Voting for Barack Obama will doom the hopes of
the majority to have their situations get better… or, at least, not
get any worse.”
Essentially, the problems with our government are personnel issues.
We just keep “hiring” too many, egotistical and out-of-touch
politicians. Those need to be weeded out and/or fired. And… we’ve
allowed powerful business influences that use: Lobbying; “golf course”
and back-room deal making; and media advertising dollars to bias the
media, and to negatively sway the decisions that our government makes—
supposedly on our behalves. Our government should be an
approximation of a true democracy. But instead, it’s a closer
approximation of a dictatorship… run by selfish, big-business
interests.
The ‘threat’ to the USA by having Obama be elected President probably
won’t result from anything that Obama, himself, does. Instead, his
election just gives the all-clear to continue business-as-usual in
Washington. That means group-against-group, party-against-party, and
class-against-class fights. The REAL threat to the USA that could
bring on more terrorism and even… nuclear war, results from our
government having given businesses, here, a Gold Pass Key to conduct
their dealings in other countries any way that they see fit.
If there’s a ‘pollution problem’ in this country that’s causing
Americans to die due to cancer… our government thinks it’s quite OK to
“solve” those issues by letting that industry move to another
country. By so doing, it will be those people in the other countries
who die, not people, here… When, cigarettes became recognized as… a
killer of millions, the tobacco companies maintained their sales by
sending their products to places like China—where there are no
“warning labels” required. Whenever mining, here, starts killing the
land and sea wildlife due to runoff, those companies find alternative
sites in developing countries that have no restrictions.
The reason that the World Trade Center got brought down, was because
NYC and those tall buildings are (or were) symbols of American
capitalism. The have-not nations of the World—that our government
lets our businesses freely exploit—sees how little we care about their
being treated FAIRLY. When our leaders keep swearing to ‘protect and
defend’ Israel, we are siding with, and selling weapons to, a nation
that kicked Muslims off of their land without fair compensation. And
we are siding with a nation that over-reacts to any, understandable,
minor violence—by killing and maiming more Muslims than was the number
of Jews who were hurt or killed.
So, is it any wonder that many Muslim’s hate the USA? The great
number of Muslims in the world—and their concentration in countries
that American businesses gladly exploit—is setting the stage for
increasing terrorism in the USA and among our allies. But there’s a
most simple solution! CLEAN UP our own act in this country to have
FAIRNESS. Then, put RESTRICTIONS on allowing our businesses to RAPE
(figuratively of course) any other country’s natural resources; labor
pool; environment; or general health and safety. Because the US has
already been doing those bad things, we must begin making generous
concessions. If we’ll do the latter, suddenly, the “motive” for
having our much needed businesses, here, move to other countries, just
isn’t there any more. The “economy”—that is issue number one with the
voters—will start to improve, soon!
Much of the 85% discontent of Americans with the direction that this
country is heading results, directly or indirectly, from a
dissatisfaction with the LAWS that are in place, or which just got
enacted. Simply put, the main cause of our discontent is: We have too
many ill-conceived and downright unfair LAWS! My New Constitution,
when ratified, will MANDATE a review and revote of every single law on
that is on the books! And the vote for passage for all laws, old or
new, becomes: 55 percent! Never again will laws get passed that
aren’t liked by more than half of the people. And 55 percent is only
a ‘probationary’ passage. Unless a law passes by 60% or more, it must
be reviewed and revoted every four years. And, if at any time, one
third of the House, or the President alone, thinks that a
controversial law doesn’t meet with the approval of the Citizens, such
law will be put in a referendum—bypassing House authority, completely.
Most Americans will like this: The House will have a ceiling on the
amount of taxes it can raise. Such will be a percentage of the GNP.
And those taxes will be billed, just once a year, to the STATES based
on a state’s population. (Folks, please don’t worry about ‘poor’
states. There will be compensations to even out most inequities.)
Never again will the Federal government keep financial records on any
citizen! And within several years, all of the taxation in the USA
will be sales taxes only. Food and medicines will be tax exempt. The
combined total of all taxes can’t exceed the ceiling without an
amendment to the New Constitution!
The above tidbits from my New Constitution should hint that I want
such document to be user friendly to the People. But it will be:
“Violate at your own peril.” to those in government. There are more
than a dozen circumstances, spelled out, in which a government
official may be either fired, or charged with a felony. Screwing with
democracy in America will have very serious consequences!
My hints of ‘doom’ are mostly cautionary. I’m not walking around with
‘a sign’ saying: “The World will end…” in so many days. On the
contrary, for the past twelve years, I’ve worked to be sure that the
relationships among nations and peoples can become favorable ones.
Simply by ratifying my New Constitution, things will begin to improve,
here. If US companies want to stay in business, the New Constitution
mandates, that such had better start CARING about how those hard
working people in other nations are being treated, and about how World
resources and the environment are being treated. I hope, in the not
too distant future, when FAIRNESS becomes the watchword throughout the
World, that the threat of terrorism and wars will be out-the-window.
At least THAT is my fervent dream!
For now, that plan “B” of Hillary Clinton won’t harm this country,
unless… Barack Obama becomes President. I’m recommending that Obama
and McCain be ignored. Because voters can surely write, when election
day comes, punch or check where it says “Write-In” and print these
clear letters: “RON PAUL” for President of the United States of
America! Those of you who agree with that wisdom, go to Paul’s WEB
page and make a contribution! Ron said, “… a revolution will take
longer.” Hopefully, my New Constitution will speed things up!
Respectfully Submitted,
— NoEinstein —
> eventually become jerks,too, if they stay in office long enough. And
> our party-dominated political system virtually assures that incumbents
> will be re elected. That assurance is especially true for senators.
> Senators have a higher level of “seeming” importance. And because of
> their growing seniority, the voters back home see little advantage in
> kicking those rascals out. That’s why senators like Robert Byrd can
> keep 'fiddling' himself back into office. My New Constitution will
> kick out ALL of the rascal senators. So, there is no unfairness
> there!
>
> A large percentage of voters in this country aretoobusy to ponder
> nor to John McCain. Those men havetoomany corrupt influences
> Itoohave optimism. Why else would I have spent twelve years writing
> a New Constitution. Last Tuesday night Hillary Clinton smiled when
> she exclaimed: “This is an important day for democracy!” Americans
> everywhere, hope and pray that DEMOCRACY can get established, once and
> for all, in this country. Right now, that responsibility is resting
> on the shoulders of Hillary Rodham Clinton.
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> — NoEinstein —
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jun 2, 12:57 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > The best interests of America can be served by having Hillary Rodham
> > Clinton become our next President! The best interests of America
> > CANNOT be served by “uniting” behind an undeserving candidate—however
> > “fired up” he may be!
>
> > Over the past twelve years, I have written a New Constitution for this
> > country. The ‘really good stuff’ is retained, including the right to
> > keep and bear arms. My purpose in writing a New Constitution? I wish
> > to make government be our SERVANT rather than our dictator. To
> > accomplish that one thing will require holding principles of DEMOCRACY
> > supreme.
>
> > In national contests the present system of State apportioned electors,
> > as well as state apportioned convention delegates, just won’t cut it—
> > when our present technology will allow holding elections on one day
> > and counting those POPULAR VOTES the same day! State
>
NoEinstein
>
HAVING ‘CHANGE’ MEANS NOT DOING ‘BUSINESS AS USUAL’.
The campaign slogan of Barack Obama touts: “Change you can believe
in!” But any ‘change’ which doesn’t correct our government’s near
total departure from principles of democracy, is missing the most
important thing that needs to be changed!
From the beginning, Obama has had the backing of the Democratic
Party’s leadership. And that’s contrary to sound principles of
democracy. If the latter had been adhered to, the party leadership
wouldn’t have taken sides nor would they have played favorites. In
state-after-state Obama got the ‘block vote’ of 90 plus percent of
Blacks. Block votes—regardless of the sex, race, color or creed of
those in the block—are anti democracy, plain and simple. That’s
because voting decisions should be INDIVIDUAL ones—not based on ‘the
consensus’ of any biased group. The latter should never be allowed to
be substituted for the might-have-been wisdom of those individual
voters! Nor should voting decisions be based on the subtle, or not so
subtle, endorsements of anyone in the media; in government; nor in the
private sector. IN A DEMOCRACY, VOTING DECISIONS MUST BE MADE BY EACH
INDIVIDUAL VOTER—WITHOUT ANY BIASED, OUTSIDE INFLUENCES WHATSOEVER!
I agree, in principle, that there’s nothing wrong with having a Black
become President. Many Blacks are intelligent, fluent people. A good
President of the USA needs to be an intelligent, fluent person. But
the main ‘justification’ for electing a Black to be President must
have a more important basis than just the color of his (or her) skin.
Skin color, ipso facto, isn’t a qualification for holding any public
office. And if skin color was the standard for judging one’s
qualification to hold public office, such a standard would be
unconstitutional—even in our present and most outdated document.
To have REAL change, we must depart from the ways of the past! Barack
Obama is bragging about how he can appeal to… “both sides of the
aisle”. But by saying those simple words, Obama is touting that he is
ANTI DEMOCRACY. Political parties, and the UNCONSTITUTIONAL rules of
Congress, are for the express purpose of allowing “certain people” to
have more power than the Constitution grants. All of the “seniority
and majority party” allocations of power are now, and always have
been, anti democracy!
Barack Obama is deluded if he believes that he can bring about real
change—simply by continuing to embrace the failed processes of the
past. His chances of success vary from slim to none. The REAL
impediment to having worthwhile changes enacted by Congress is this:
Big Business is “in bed with” our supposed representatives. That
shameful interaction goes much further than the more or less public
influences of lobbyists. The ‘ax’ that businesses hold over
Congress’s heads—and in many cases, over the heads of those in the
Executive Branch—is that it costs hundreds, if not thousand of times
more money to get elected to public office than should be required!
So, it isn’t too difficult to see why the corrupt media will do
everything in its power to be sure that the candidate or candidates
who spend the most money on advertising will get elected to their
respective public offices.
The founding fathers had to include in our government an anti
democracy US Senate in order to get the disparate, thirteen states to
ratify the original Constitution. Now, in the best interests of
democracy, I have ELIMINATED the entire US Senate! There’s no unfair
discrimination against any state. Oh, some the ’small’ states might
not like losing their having the same number of senators as large
states. When the small states did have such equality, they had more
influence than a well-principled democracy would allow. State
governments which have modeled their constitutions on the US
Constitution will have to eliminate their senates, too. Of course,
when my New Constitution is ratified, the ‘prestige’ of saying that
one is a senator, anywhere, will be no more. But rejoice, People!
The efficiency of our governments will nearly DOUBLE—and while cutting
the costs by Billions, if not trillions of dollars!
Firing the collective anti democracy senators will be a simple and
prudent thing to do. But correcting that pseudo branch of government
known as—the media—will be much more involved. Due to dire necessity,
the First Amendment’s guarantee of… ‘freedom of the press’ has been
changed in my New Constitution. The new wording is: “…freedom of a
PRO DEMOCRACY press.” That simple change will send to the
unemployment lines every single person in the media who comments on;
give assessments of; polls regarding; or who openly or tacitly
endorses any candidate for public office; or who touts even the
slightest nuance of any pending public policy as being good or bad.
In short, no professionals in the media shall be entitled to influence
the outcome of any governmental process above the one-person-one-vote
influence guaranteed by the New Constitution!
On a typical day, there is more “news” in the colored scrolls of type
coming across the bottom of your TV than you’ve ever see or hear on
the purported news programs that are appearing LIVE, just above. Even
with those scrolls, biased editors weed out 95% or more of what the
general public is entitled to know. They favor information about
celebrities or media figures over “mundane” news that involves John Q.
Public. The media’s mantra—that shall be changed—is: “We in the
media, and only we in the media, determine what Americans are entitled
to know.”
>>>>> Be it known: The media, as well anyone who holds, or has held, a government office or job shall be culpable, retroactively, if any of its members interfere with—in any manner whatsoever—the ratification processes for the New Constitution. The least punishment for such a felony is three years in prison. It shall be treason, to flagrantly organize a resistance to having a one-day, democratic vote on the New Constitution. The punishment for such treason includes banishment from the USA; life in prison; or death. <<<<<
So, as the media continues on its merry course to RAPE democracy in
America, each person so employed, including the likes of: Tim Russert,
Jack Kafferty, Rush Limbaugh, Larry King, Wolf Blitzer, David Gurgen,
Jeffrey Toobin, Gloria Borger, Jamal Simmons, Roland Martin, Bill
O'Reilly, Donna Brazile ad infinitum should be most careful about
putting themselves in jeopardy by “handicapping” the continuing race
for President.
And those don’t-make-too-many-waves commentators like Lu Dobbs should
consider whether “pulling his punches” to protect his job shows high
enough motives. Bright lights like Campbell Brown should consider
whether her stock ownership in ‘recreational battery companies’ should
justify her ‘smiling’ while CNN continues to rape democracy. Time-
Warner itself could be in danger of being shut down, when it is shown
that its business activities aren’t in the best interest of the
country, and of the world.
Folks, the primary reason for having… ‘punishments’ for wrongs is to
get people to STOP doing wrong things! In past eras, going to war was
the process by which new governments replaced old ones. My New
Constitution has used as its standard: Doing what is best for the vast
majority of Americans. “What is best” will necessitate stopping group-
against-group, party-against-party, and class-against-class fights.
By replacing such divisiveness with FAIR PLAY, the mechanisms of our
American way of life will get the fresh oiling that they sorely need!
Ron Paul has impressed me as someone who sticks to his principles. A
man like that quickly cuts any ‘strings’ that try to pull him one way
or another. One of my many complaints about Barack Obama, is that he
has enough soundly-attached strings on him to circle the globe a
zillion times. Obama could never be objective regarding the
ratification processes for my New Constitution. Corrupt business
influences desire to continue business as usual.
The advantage of having a one-day, POPULAR VOTE, only, ratification
process is that our corrupt Congress will get to have just one vote
per member—like every other duly registered voter in America! The
seated members of the HOUSE will get a two year grace period to remain
in office. After that, my ten year, total term limit will cut in. No
one needs to fear that this country will be “leaderless” during the
transition to a New Form of government. The improved efficiency
brought about because the House will no longer have to came to
agreement with the corrupt Senate, should make those last two years
productive ones for our most tenured representatives.
Other than to modify how our President is elected, nothing about the
duties and functions of the Executive Branch has been changed. And
very importantly, nothing about the organization nor function of our
armed services has changed. Additionally, the Second Amendment Right
to keep and bear arms has been expanded for law abiding citizens! At
every turn, individual rights are increased. Heretofore, those have
been known as our civil liberties. Never again will your or my civil
liberties be placed at the whim of those making or enforcing our
laws. So, as I explain more things about the New Constitution, please
know that you and yours are going to be EMPOWERED to get fair
treatment from your government!
Because RON PAUL is the best choice to be our President, I’m
recommending that Americans everywhere write in RON PAUL this
November. Ron himself likes Rep. Dennis Kucinich for his running
mate. So, if both of those men are in agreement to work together,
patriotic Americans—like you and me—can speed Paul’s ’revolution’
right along! I’ve not talked to him, but I suspect he will appreciate
your votes of encouragement by making contributions to his WEB page.
Now, let us UNITE to achieve our common goals!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> We just keep “hiring”toomany, egotistical and out-of-touch
> mandates, ...
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
>
SOUND MORAL PRINCIPLES SHOULD TRUMP PETTY ‘RULES’.
The longer someone has been a political insider, the greater is the
likelihood that such person has been corrupted. One ‘escape’ from
implications of corruption, is for the person to simply say that they
had been abiding by this or that rule. While abiding by rules
certainly ‘sounds’ like the noble thing to do, too often, rules run
counter to sound moral principles. In every case, the latter should
override any bad rules which have managed to get made.
Simultaneously, rules can be both the ordering mechanism of
complicated processes, and they can be the destroyers of sound moral
principles. For years the Democratic Party has had these ignoble
‘rules’ saying that it can dictate when states hold their primaries.
But such are a flagrant violation of simple and sound principles of
democracy! Democracy requires that every registered voter shall have
his or her vote carry the same… “weight” as every other voter! The
only way equality of the votes can be achieved is by basing the
outcome of races on the national POPULAR VOTE, and by holding the
votes in the different states on the same day.
Few would doubt that the voters in Iowa—person-for-person—have more
power than the voters in, say, South Dakota. Is America well-served
by having such inequality? No way!
The Democratic Party has allowed states to substitute caucuses for
standard primaries. It’s well known that many people don’t like going
to public meetings. Therefore, caucuses are not representative of a
state’s population as a whole. And that is anti democracy! At
caucuses, the issues facing caucus-goers are open for comment and
discussion. Effectively, caucuses will favor the candidate who has
the better public speakers in attendance. Yet, speaking ability,
alone, doesn’t correlate to, nor does it even approximate, which
person is the better candidate! It just favors the candidate who can
turn out supporters… who are good at speaking in public.
When the number of caucus voters who support each candidate is closely
divided, the majority—if they happen to be the best public speakers—
often elicits responses like this from the minority voters: “Oh, I
suppose I won’t ‘make waves’. I’ll go along with the majority, this
time, so that I can ‘win’, too.” Folks, having ANY open arguments on
election day—during a caucus or otherwise—that can change the opinions
of any voter is flagrantly anti democracy!
Suppose that you are inside your closed voting booth. Just before you
cast your vote for the candidate of your choice, someone squeezes
through the curtain and stands right next to you. They begin giving
you reasons why you should switch your vote. They also tell you that…
“the majority” who are voting in that same place are supporting the
other candidate. Finally, you are convinced to change your vote when
the person says, “Side with the winner; that’s what everyone else is
doing! I ought to know, because I‘ve talked face-to-face with each
person who has voted!” Using those same type anti democracy tactics,
Barack Obama has gotten… “the numbers” to get his party’s nomination
for President. Sad, but true; sad, but true.
The stodgy Democratic Party Rules and Bylaws Committee believed it was
quite OK to… ‘punish’ the voters of FL and MI by reducing the weight
of their votes to ½. Day after day, Obama’s supporters have used
every unfair, and thus anti democracy tactic in their manure pile to
persuade super delegates to “come out” for Obama.
In her ‘concession speech’, Hillary Clinton rightly states—and I
paraphrase: ‘It isn’t OK to discriminate against a Black, or even to
criticize a Black; but it’s quite OK to discriminate against and to
criticize a woman.’ In spite of all of those handicaps, she WON the
popular vote! But she knows that the corrupt media would have seen to
it that she wouldn’t win in November. So, she just shrugged off all
of her slights. Her concession speech sounded very much like she had
been proclaimed the victor. Nonetheless, it remains to be seen
whether any of those 18,000,000 anti-Obama voters care one wit about
who Hillary Clinton is siding with, now.
In the 2000 presidential race, the ‘rule’ saying that the electors
should meet to record their votes for President on such-and-such date,
was viewed by five justices of the US Supreme Court to be more
important than democracy itself. Surely, the processes of government
aren’t so inflexible that the schedules—even the schedule for the
presidential inauguration—couldn’t be shifted by the amount of time
necessary to accurately count all of the votes.
My sister works at the polls. Today, she told me that there is an
election ‘rule’ which prohibits having write-in votes for our
President and Vice President. In SC, “Ol’ Strom” got elected to his
first term as a US Senator via a write-in vote. My father once told
me that he, himself, got a write-in vote for President. In those
days, votes were collected on paper ballots. So, whether or not that
one vote was officially recorded, “someone” must have liked my father
better than he or she liked the… ‘two’ choices for president.
Jesse Ventura thinks there should be a voting button for: NONE OF THE
ABOVE. If he, or anyone else, registered late, the NONE OF THE ABOVE
votes wouldn’t go to the listed candidates. Supposedly, if NONE OF
THE ABOVE won, there would have to be a runoff election. Yet, our
most outmoded Constitution doesn’t allow runoff elections… The
reason: Based on the information that the founding fathers had, it was
assumed that the time required would be too great; and the problem of
information dissemination would be too great. But our founding
fathers didn’t live in this modern era! If they had, they would
insist that elections be based on the popular vote—including any
needed runoff elections.
Various ’rules’ are beginning to constrict our choices for President.
Since Clinton has shown her… true colors, I’m now recommending RON
PAUL for President, and DENNIS KUCINICH for Vice President. Both of
those men probably want the respective jobs. But are they willing to
abandon the “umbrella” of their political parties—however corrupt
those happen to be? Senator Joe Lieberman—whom I had cheered for to
become President in 2004—subsequently, ran as an independent for the
US Senate, and he won. So, I suppose it’s a matter of attitude, and
self-confidence. If “Independent” doesn’t sound catchy enough, Ron
Paul could call his party: the “Revolution Party”!
Having a good person become President, i.e, a person who is light on
strings-attached, and heavy on patriotism, lets the climate be right
so that the American people can vote on a New Constitution. Almost
yearly, the citizens of some country in the world get to do just
that. Surely, there are no ‘rules’ to prevent the will of the
American voters from being heard. If there were such rules, then it
would be time for the American voters to go to their windows and
shout: “I’m mad as hell, and I’m not going to take this any more!”
With the United Will of the American People—there shall be a way!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> So, it isn’ttoodifficult to see why the corrupt media will do
> everything in its power to be sure that the candidate or candidates
> who spend the most money on advertising will get elected to their
> respective public offices.
>
> The founding fathers had to include in our government an anti
> democracy US Senate in order to get the disparate, thirteen states to
> ratify the original Constitution. Now, in the best interests of
> democracy, I have ELIMINATED the entire US Senate! There’s no unfair
> discrimination against any state. Oh, some the ’small’ states might
> not like losing their having the same number of senators as large
> states. When the small states did have such equality, they had more
> influence than a well-principled democracy would allow. State
> governments which have modeled their constitutions on the US
> Constitution will have to eliminate their senates,too. Of course,
> patriotic Americans—like you and me—can speed ...
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
>
GORE UPSTAGES OBAMA.
Al Gore has finally played-his-hand by endorsing Barack Obama. Gore’s
well composed speech has to rate as one of his more impassioned ones.
But was the late date of its delivery chosen to maximize the impact
for Obama? Or was the late date chosen to highlight the oft-hinted
personal spite of Gore for the Clintons?
Gore’s endorsement speech kept mentioning how “important” elections
are. But what he should have said was: …how important FAIR elections
are. Eight years ago, Al Gore was the man who brought many democracy-
loving people, like me, to near tears. In the 2000 presidential race,
no tears had been shed by Republicans over the handling of the Florida
vote counts. Many Republicans actually rejoiced that the majority of
the US Supreme Court valued the scheduling of already slated events
above democracy itself. That’s like rejoicing when your team wins the
Super Bowl, because of bad officiating. Democracy got raped in 2000,
and democracy continues to be raped, now. Who should be rejoicing?
Numbers of times, Obama was shown on camera as he listened to Gore’s
endorsement speech. Obama looked like a smiling, limp rag which has
been squeezed-out too many times. The scene was Detroit—where auto
makers are closing plants. And the scene was… Michigan, where Obama
had been an active, or at least a tacit participant, in the rape of
democracy which so favored his candidacy. To become President, Obama
must win Michigan. That’s why the Gore endorsement campaign rally was
held in Detroit. From Obama’s perspective, surely, Michigan voters
will support for him—if he honors them by visiting. But to get their
support, Michigan voters must have short memories.
The Clinton years were good years for this country. Those facing hard
times can remember that fact. Many of the eighteen million votes for
Clinton were cast because of her experience; confidence for the job;
and because she symbolized the hope and promise of having better
times, again. Only by his rhetoric for “change” has Obama been able
to rally dissatisfied voters.
In less than a week after the final primaries, Hillary Clinton changed-
her-spots to endorse Obama, too. Though her supporters in Washington
cheered, that was another dark day for democracy. Perhaps out of
deference to me, Clinton promised that she “will be on the frontlines
of democracy!” Yet, for whatever reason, she is siding with Obama—who
values any democracy, or the rape thereof, which benefits him.
In his speech, Al Gore referred, erroneously, to “our great
democracy”. The USA is the biggest ‘pusher’ of democracy in the
world. But since the inception of our nation, this country has only
had a crude approximation of a democracy. Electors are apportioned
based on the erroneous assumption that the voter turn-out will match
the states’ relative populations. And that causes the votes in
different states to have different weight. A working democracy—such
as my New Constitution will instate—requires that votes be equally
weighted, well informed, and accurately counted. Those three things
should be understandable by all Americans. Yet, many cling to a hope—
in Barack Obama, no less—that our failed system of government can
magically make things right, if only we’ll elect Obama.
Hillary Clinton took two painful slaps to the face, yesterday. The
first was Obama’s announcement that the former Clinton campaign manager
—whom she herself had fired—would become the ‘press secretary’ for the
vice presidential nominee. So, Clinton is OUT as Vice President.
Now, some are wondering if Al Gore might be Obama’s choice. Gore is
certainly qualified to be President. But is his being pro environment
a strong enough justification for having anyone support Obama, whom
Gore now endorses?
Al Gore kept saying that elections are important. What he was really
stressing was that Michigan voters are important. Michigan is like a
microcosm of blue collar workers. Unless Obama can manage to dupe
them into believing that he is now… clean and good, then it’s unlikely
that blue collar workers, anywhere, will support him. Without blue
collar workers, Obama can’t win.
Realistically, Clinton isn’t the de facto spokesperson for those
eighteen million people who voted for her. Though Clinton, magically,
changed-her-spots right after the primaries, it’s unlikely that those
voters to whom she appealed will be swayed from their key issues. And
didn’t most of those people also vote AGAINST Barack Obama?
‘Dallas’s’ Bobby Ewing once emerged from the shower acting like the
previous year was just a dream. Hillary Clinton, too, should wake up
and realize that neither Obama nor McCain appeal to blue collar
workers. Clinton’s endorsement of Obama got upstaged by Gore, because
of his timing, as well as his passion. In a very real way, Gore also
upstaged Obama. Gore’s passionate ‘introduction’ of Obama wasn’t
matched by a like passion in Obama’s speech. Since Barack couldn’t
match Gore’s passion, he didn’t try. While Obama’s campaign keeps
stampeding right along, he, Clinton, nor Gore can be certain that
Obama can sway those surely bewildered, eighteen million voters who
are now without a champion whom they can trust.
The surefire way to change Washington for the better is to embrace
democracy and ratify my labor-of-love New Constitution. Obama and
McCain would both represent a continuation of the same old group-
against-group, party-against-party, and class-against-class fights
that have failed us in the past. But mostly they would be leaving in
place “a system” that allows big business to control the processes of
government, and the laws, rules and regulations that get passed or
enacted. Our security as a nation demands that we correct the “hate
the USA” feelings, and the hate capitalism feelings evident in much of
the world. World War III can happen at any “3:00 a.m.” But if this
country will heed my wakeup call to put FAIR PLAY back into our
dealings—both here and abroad—then the threat of terrorism and wars
can be greatly lessened.
If Al Gore wants to improve planet Earth, he should insist that people
like me—who have disproved Einstein’s theories of relativity—be freed
up to solve the Earth’s problems. Manpower isn’t being well used
sending kids to universities which don’t teach truths. And the hopes
and dreams of millions of us aren’t being well served by sending
people to Washington to try to change things in a flawed system which,
by its design, discourages making the correct types of changes.
Changing Washington will be a SNAP compared to changing or reining-in
the media. But if the American people will just realize that it is
they—not those whom they too optimistically send to do their bidding—
who hold the key to the salvation of the USA, then there is cause for
hope! As with that famous poster of Uncle Sam pointing his finger: “I
want Americans to realize that our getting a New Constitution is the
best solution for the Citizens of the USA!”
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> On Jun 9, 9:34 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> SOUND MORAL PRINCIPLES SHOULD TRUMP PETTY ‘RULES’.
>
> The longer someone has been a political insider, the greater is the
> likelihood that such person has been corrupted. One ‘escape’ from
> implications of corruption, is for the person to simply say that they
> had been abiding by this or that rule. While abiding by rules
> certainly ‘sounds’ like the noble thing to do,toooften, rules run
> time, so that I can ‘win’,too.” Folks, having ANY open arguments on
> assumed that the time required would betoogreat; and the problem of
> information dissemination would betoogreat. But our founding
NoEinstein
>
THE POLLS ARE IN… AND THE POLLS DON’T LOOK GOOD.
The media has a ‘lock’ on what news the American people are allowed to
learn. The standard operating procedure regarding the ubiquitous news
commentary shows, is to plan them at least a day in advance. News
columnists get even more lag time. The purpose of the planning is to
assure that the overpaid, over-hyped, and otherwise clueless,
commentators and columnists always get to appear smooth and polished.
After all, those people are the ‘celebrities’ who attract the viewers
and readers. And if they can keep doing so—and nothing more—and the
people ‘upstairs’ will remain happy. These days, the media isn’t
about trivial things like the “news”. The media is about market
share, readership, and corporate profits. Its foundation is the
Almighty dollar, and any other motive be damned.
The media, its advertisers and investors are pro Big Business.
Anything which might shake up the status quo of Big Business is
actively, and/or tacitly, put down by the media. Heretofore, the
Republican Party has been considered the more pro business party.
That’s where most of businesses’ power was vested. But to be totally
powerful, Big Business gained control of the Democratic Party as
well. From the perspective of businesses, as long as a Republican or
a Democrat gets elected, they’re contented. In either case, it is
they who pull the strings, and it will be they who tell our government
officials “how high” to jump.
Regularly, I tell readers of my posts that the process of selecting
our President, and other officials, isn’t a game. Games are for
RECREATION. The future of the USA—and perhaps the survival of the
human race—could well depend on what our nation does. Nothing has a
more profound effect on how we are regarded, than our international
business relationships. Americans are largely oblivious to now
despise the USA is, in many third world countries. We are disliked,
in part, because our businesses regularly exploit the cheap labor in
such places. And those same businesses cause discontent, here, by
closing factories.
How could any nation be expected to think positively about America,
when we keep using our military might to protect our questionable
interests abroad? Unfortunately, doing bad things here at home, or
anywhere in the world, is placing us in danger of retribution through
terrorism or war.
Barack Obama continues to tout his lofty promise of “change”. Change
is the ultimate anti status quo. And that’s anti business. So,
Obama won’t be allowed to change things, much. His failure won’t be
in the “game” of winning. He keeps stacking the deck so that he will
“win”. His failure will come AFTER the “game” win—because of his
inability to correct the glaring problems.
America is in a loose-loose situation with Obama and McCain. If
either of those “win”, the business powers-that-be remain unaffected.
The latter have replaced the consensus of the American people to
direct our own course. Even so, every two or four years, we keep
going through the motions of trying to get our perennially failed
political processes to “change” things—but to no avail.
The media is a bastion of the status quo. The media gets to dwell on
the “game” of politics. Thereby, it holds sway on the outcome.
Public Opinion Polls are an important reason that happens. Polls are
the window on the current ‘score’ in the game of politics. Without
polls, there would be no “game”! My New Constitution will outlaw poll
taking regarding any upcoming election or referenda. Polls are an
anathema!
>>> The one thing Americans can do, today, to help restore some semblance of democracy is to tell pollsters: “I will be expressing my opinions in the ballot booth. I won’t respond to political polls of any kind!” <<<
Ross Perot had the business expertise; the executive experience; and
the strong personal constitution to have been a President who could
change things. But the media and the pollsters wouldn’t let him have
a fair chance. With our nation facing the worst loose-loose situation
in its history, we need a third party candidate who isn’t controlled
by Big Business.
Congressman Ron Paul has the right ideas, and he sticks to his
principles. Congressman Dennis Kucinich has right ideas, and argues
them, vociferously. Having those two become President and Vice
President would be good for America! So, why are they cowering when
they are so needed? Obama wants to BUY the election with a billion
dollars in campaign ads. But that money would be better spent by
portioning it out to the jobless and the homeless! If one’s positions
on the issues, and one’s character, are well known, not one red cent
needs to be spent to get elected!
My New Constitution is poised and polished to solve most of the
problems that the voters can only “hope” the present candidates will
solve. When you want something done right, sometimes you yourself
need to do that thing. When our political processes are broken—and
they clearly are—the processes should be fixed! Political insiders
have had centuries to correct the problems, but they haven’t done so.
However, 75 plus percent of voters in the USA can ratify the New
Constitution, in just one voting day. And that will restore the power
to the People! It will make governments our SERVANTS, not our lords!
There are OPTIMUM solutions that will benefit most Americans. To find
such, we must stop sending officials to Washington to fight futile
group-against-group, party-against-party, and class-against-class
fights. Never again shall we allow elitist, career politicians to
tell us what to do. The USA isn’t our government; it is the PEOPLE!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> On Jun 11, 8:20 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> GORE UPSTAGES OBAMA.
>
> Al Gore has finally played-his-hand by endorsing Barack Obama. Gore’s
> well composed speech has to rate as one of his more impassioned ones.
> But was the late date of its delivery chosen to maximize the impact
> for Obama? Or was the late date chosen to highlight the oft-hinted
> personal spite of Gore for the Clintons?
>
> Gore’s endorsement speech kept mentioning how “important” elections
> are. But what he should have said was: …how important FAIR elections
> are. Eight years ago, Al Gore was the man who brought many democracy-
> loving people, like me, to near tears. In the 2000 presidential race,
> no tears had been shed by Republicans over the handling of the Florida
> vote counts. Many Republicans actually rejoiced that the majority of
> the US Supreme Court valued the scheduling of already slated events
> above democracy itself. That’s like rejoicing when your team wins the
> Super Bowl, because of bad officiating. Democracy got raped in 2000,
> and democracy continues to be raped, now. Who should be rejoicing?
>
> Numbers of times, Obama was shown on camera as he listened to Gore’s
> endorsement speech. Obama looked like a smiling, limp rag which has
> been squeezed-outtoomany times. The scene was Detroit—where auto
> makers are closing plants. And the scene was… Michigan, where Obama
> had been an active, or at least a tacit participant, in the rape of
> democracy which so favored his candidacy. To become President, Obama
> must win Michigan. That’s why the Gore endorsement campaign rally was
> held in Detroit. From Obama’s perspective, surely, Michigan voters
> will support for him—if he honors them by visiting. But to get their
> support, Michigan voters must have short memories.
>
> The Clinton years were good years for this country. Those facing hard
> times can remember that fact. Many of the eighteen million votes for
> Clinton were cast because of her experience; confidence for the job;
> and because she symbolized the hope and promise of having better
> times, again. Only by his rhetoric for “change” has Obama been able
> to rally dissatisfied voters.
>
> In less than a week after the final primaries, Hillary Clinton changed-
> her-spots to endorse Obama,too. Though her supporters in Washington
> previous year was just a dream. Hillary Clinton,too, should wake up
> they—not those whom theytoooptimistically send to do their bidding—
NoEinstein
>
TIM RUSSERT PERSONIFIED WHAT’S WRONG ABOUT THE MEDIA.
Many would suppose that it is… the ‘American way’ to advance from a
lowly Washington reporter to have been one of the ‘most watched’
leaders of the media. But Tim Russert was about as anti-American as
they come. Yes, he used smiles to punctuate his trademark attacks on
the ‘weaknesses’ of his many guests. And he sometimes punctuated
those attacks with looks of cynicism. But, getting good Nelson
Ratings shouldn’t be the standard by which any media figure is judged.
While Russet’s star was just rising, I had the ‘inside scoop’ on
felonious acts committed by one of our most notorious US senators.
Sounds like… ‘news’, doesn’t it? But over several years—while I kept
trying to get my story out—I learned that the media is corrupt-to-the-
core. To wit: The media assumes that so-called ‘public figures’
aren’t required to live by the same standards of lawfulness as other
citizens.
Because Tim Russert seemed to be someone who ‘attacked’ his news
stories, I poured-my-heart-out to him in a letter that also included
pages of documentation copied on the old 3.5” floppy disks. But
Russert, nor any of the thirty or so other media ‘icons’ whom I
contacted would even consider that… ‘news’ might come from someone who
isn’t a celebrity. What gets covered as news in this country must
pass through layers of… editors, before some of it leaks through. It
is that same process—that eventually found Tim Russert at or near the
top of the media pecking order—that allows me to rightly peg Russert
as anti-American. The tacit role of the media is to inform the
Citizens. Tim failed to properly do so, because of his bias and
egotistical elitism.
The media is comforted by its united front. These days, there are no
maverick investigative reporters. I should know; I’ve looked high and
low! CNN contributor, Carl Bernstein, once made a splash by helping
to break Watergate. But he won’t make ‘a ripple’, now, to let it be
told that I have disproved Einstein’s theories of relativity. And
Bernstein isn’t interested in breaking a story—much more important
than Watergate ever was—that none of the twenty plus universities
which I have contacted care to correct the errors in their teaching
which the trusting public just assumes are error free. In effect, the
media is protecting the status quo both in government, and in
education. And that is why the media is the one ‘institution’ most
threatening to the survival of the USA. It is even MORE threatening
than all of our failed governments combined!
In addition to my seeking justice via the media for my injuries due to
that… US senator, I also tried to seek justice by contacting the likes
of Al Gore, while he was President of the Senate. And I contacted the
US Justice Department, and eventually, the Chief Justice of the US
Supreme Court. None of those, and dozens more like them, care to hold
any public figure accountable for felonious acts. Such a realization
is what prompted me to write a New Constitution. The primary purpose
of such is to kick out the rascals in Washington, a little at a time,
by restricting our representatives—other than our President and V.
Pres.—to those who have NEVER held any public office at the local,
state, or federal levels. Career politicians are verboten!
George W. Bush is a lame duck whose public esteem is about as low as
it can go. But to his credit, Bush is one of the best from-the-heart
speakers. The man has great speech writers. Even though the words he
expresses aren‘t always his own, his comments seem genuine—like he
cares. I admit that I don’t listen anytime that Bush talks about… his
war. His caring, there, is less than ideal. But if I could go hiking
or fishing with Bush, that would be something special.
Part of the reason George Bush ‘won’ in 2000 was because he got the
endorsement of that felonious US senator whom I’ve alluded to, above.
Bush praised that senator, even after I had written to Bush—as I did
to every state governor in the USA, apprising him, and all of them, of
the senator’s apt crime(s). Apparently, politicians, and the media,
are more than willing to look the other way to the wrongful acts of
public figures. They seem to know, intuitively, that their own
chances of escaping civil retribution for bad deeds goes way up if
they will only look-the-other-way to the wrongs done by public
figures.
After George W. Bush failed to act morally regarding that felonious
senator, I immediately wrote to Senator John McCain. I informed
McCain that he could easily win the Republican nomination if he would
just explain to the media that Bush had knowingly praised and embraced
a felonious senator. I don’t know what… ‘dirt’ the Republican party
had on McCain, but he passed up the last and the best hope he has ever
had to become President… and that was before the loss of much of his
mental wherewithal—which will prevent him from winning the present
presidential race.
I’ve had, perhaps, ’the scoop’ of the century regarding that senator.
And I’ve had the scientific achievement of the century by disproving
Einstein. Recently, I’ve begun to reveal details concerning my labor-
of-love New Constitution. Such has been inspired to correct our
nation’s problems, and in ways that will be most advantageous to the
American People. Incredibly, none of those things, or all three
combined, rises to the threshold of being even “fifteen minutes” of…
news, Because of our corrupt media, America is in big trouble—very big
trouble!
Tim Russert, and his ilk, got or get, personal enjoyment from making
others be uncomfortable, because of pointed questions or comments. A
real gentleman wouldn’t do that. There was something in Russet’s
‘value system’ that just wasn’t right. That’s why I listed him,
first, of those anti-democracy media figures who should face
retribution for their crimes. It has been said that Russert had
enthusiasm. But his enthusiasm was, quite simply, for doing the wrong
things in his job; doing things not in the best interest of the
country; and getting paid a huge salary to do so. Past ‘monetary
compensation’ won’t stand anyone in good stead at the Pearly Gates.
George Carlin, bless his soul, had more vision for how America should
be than any politician in Washington, or any media icon! The man
perceived truths! Very few people can do that so insightfully, for so
long, and with such fervor. His shoes will be very difficult ones to
fill.
The ruinous media keeps right on doing their 24/7 “nothings” that they
pass off as… news. Thinking Americans everywhere should wake up and
realize how hugely biased the media is toward the status quo. If any
of you are craving listening to talk, turn to the public radio and TV
stations. To begin to save the last hope for America: democracy, by
all means, STOP REPLYING TO ANY POLITICAL POLLSTERS! Don’t give the
ubiquitous media fools any ’scores’ to justify their commenting
regarding politics, or anything else, as in Ballot Bowl or etc.
Politics is NOT a game!
Hopefully, Barack Obama is the last of a long line of political two-
faces. He has never reached a high enough moral plateau to qualify to
be President. He didn’t treat Clinton with the respect that she
deserved; and he didn’t honor simple principles of democracy regarding
the FL and MI primaries. Those two things, and others, show that
Obama is unprincipled. He likes anything—corrupt or not—that improves
his chances of winning. People who think like that are the exact ones
my New Constitution will send packing. The main ‘changes’ that the
USA needs are as simple as straightening out the ‘quality of the
personnel’ that we hire to work for us in Washington, and in our local
and state governments.
Please know: “A New Constitution is the only ’change’ that we need!”
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
>
LUKE RUSSERT IS OUT-OF-TOUCH, LIKE HIS DAD.
I’m recommending that thinking Americans, everywhere, stop watching
ANY news commentary shows! The media has gone completely awry!
Corporate boardrooms control the media. And those, effectively,
control the American people, and ALL of our systems of government! At
no time was “freedom of… the press” intended to give any one group
control over our nation. The media is the instrument that is now
allowing big business to control every aspect of American life. And
that is putting the entire human race in jeopardy.
On 9/11, symbols of our ‘capitalism’ and ‘military might’ were
attacked. The USA should get this clear message: Many people in other
nations and groups don’t like what our capitalism and our military
might are doing! We are so despised throughout the world, that unless
we can correct and make amends for the errant decisions that continue
to be made in this country, there is little chance of stopping
terrorism anywhere in the world.
Most likely, I’m the ONLY person on Earth who can get the USA out of
our present quagmire! That’s because I have the intellect, as well as
the powers of observation, to have seen that our systems of government
have evolved away from the ideals envisioned by our founding fathers.
That’s the reason that I’ve spent much of the last twelve years
writing a New Constitution. And such is poised and polished to be the
mid-course correction that the USA so desperately needs.
About the time that I began contemplating writing a New Constitution,
a Charlotte, NC businessman, Alex McMillan, got elected as my
congressman. That man had high hopes of using his clear vision and
business expertise to make things better in this country. As a symbol
of his commitment, he sent out continual questionnaires and
newsletters. Clearly, McMillan wanted to “represent” the will of his
constituents. But after just one or two terms, McMillan was so
disillusioned by the back-room power hierarchy in Washington, that he
decided not to seek re election.
When was the last time one of your congressmen or senators asked your
opinion about anything? Voting in our supposed “democracy”, actually,
sends to Washington people who will be our dictators, NOT our
representatives! With the corrupt media as the source of… truths in
this country (Ha!), Americans don’t have the crucial information they
need in order to exercise their potentially GREAT POWER for correcting
our failed systems of government.
Last night ‘Larry King, Live’ had Luke Russert as a guest. Like the
poor-little-rich-kid that he is, Luke was in an ‘Italian sports bar’
when he learned about his father’s collapse—which was portending his
father’s death. Surprisingly, Luke smiled throughout the interview.
He seemed to enjoy being in the limelight. After all, his father,
Tim, had cast a big shadow. Now, for the first time in his life, Luke
isn’t in his father’s shadow.
King asked the young Russert whether he though Tom Brokaw was a good
choice for moderating ‘Meet the Press’, past the 2008 election. Luke
replied: “Tom Brokaw is well known…” Folks, it isn’t too surprising
that the standard of “suitability” for being on a TV show is to be
well known… And that means being a celebrity—or someone who can
attract a large viewing audience. The purpose of those news
commentary shows isn’t to disseminate news, it is to allow the
celebrities to have MORE INFLUENCE on the voting decisions of the
viewers THAN A DEMOCRACY CAN ALLOW. And such influence can happen,
simply, because the person who moderates the show is known to be…
“important”.
News commentary shows are about wielding corporate power. They are
about controlling the outcomes of elections. Those shows invite only
elitist guests to be interviewed by their own over-paid and over-hyped
staff elitists. Therefore, everyone seen on the various news
commentary shows is out-of-touch with the American people. And if
there aren’t enough elitist guests, the media just talks,
incestuously, with others in the media. All of the latter are
controlled from the SAME corporate boardroom. Folks, the news media
lives in a gold-plated, elitist bubble. And THAT is screwing up
America! The media must not be allowed to destroy our nation!
Last night on CNN, Anderson Cooper (wrongly pronounced Coo-per)
reported—with his trademark BOTOX face—that the latest… “poll shows
that Obama and McCain are dead even. That is a 12 point drop” in less
than a week. Coo-per didn’t venture to explain the reason for so
great a change in the polls. Some of you may recall that in the past
two weeks, I have been saying: “A New Constitution is the only
‘change’ that we need!” Clearly, Barack Obama is morally unfit to be
President. For explanations, please read my earlier treatises.
The American people, in a single day, have it in their power to
correct our corrupt governments. And they can make the ubiquitous,
selfish business interests that now control America, stop screwing-up
the World. Ratifying my New Constitution will do both of those
things, as well as help to assure that our beloved children will be
around to have children, too.
We can’t wait another four or eight years to do something; we must…
“DO IT NOW!” First, send Barack Obama and his rag-tag band of
selfish, power want-a-bees into retirement. Then, elect an
independent ‘principled President WITHOUT any strings attached to big
business’. To send a message to the media that you (like me) are: “…
mad as HELL and not going to take this any more!”, simply STOP
REPLYING TO ANY POLITICAL POLLSTERS! Don’t give the media anything to
analyze! And REJECT the soon-to-be verboten Democratic and Republican
parties. Consider ONLY an independent!
Thus far, Congressman Ron Paul and Congressman Dennis Kucinich haven’t
heeded their nation’s call. Be it Known: This is their LAST CHANCE to
step up to bat for America! In their stead, who among us can be a
calm and objective President during the period that our nation is
making mid-course corrections?
WWII, Fleet Admiral William F. (Bull) Halsey was interviewed after the
victory in the Pacific. Halsey said: “There are no great men. There
are only great challenges that ordinary men—like you and me—are, by
circumstance, called upon to meet.” May EACH OF YOU rise to the
challenge for America!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
PS: Please know: “A New Constitution is the only ’change’ that we
need!” Pass it on!
NoEinstein
>
HILLARY CLINTON IS BETRAYING AMERICA, TOO.
The sinking boat that is our failed system of government keeps getting
bubblegum-patched and repainted every two or four years. The
candidates promise that if you will only elect “them”, everything will
be just fine for you and yours. Those people sitting in the
candidates’ bussed-in, poster waving, audiences must expect that by
their showing such support they will have the inside track to
happiness, prosperity, and security for the next four years. But
nothing could be further from the truth!
Women voters should rightly be incensed that a ‘minority’ Black got
more deference in the media than a ’rare’ woman candidate for
President. Telling ‘the truth’ about a Black was, and is, seen as
unfair; while castigating a woman has been seen as the thing to do…
In less than two weeks time, Hillary Clinton has turned-the-tables on
those who voted for her and trusted that she would be a better
President. At no time did her supporters appoint Clinton as their
spokesperson, come-what-may—especially when Clinton, for whatever sick
reason, has decided to campaign for that low-life Barack Obama.
The scourge of democracy—media polls—will call you and ask: “If the
presidential election was held today, would you vote for John McCain
or Barack Obama?” It is a virtual certainty that the great majority
of Americans already know for whom they will vote. So, why is there a
need to spend, in the next four months, a billion plus dollars on
advertising to help the American people decide how to vote, when their
minds are already made up? The reason: The selfish business interests
of the media want to take the money that has come from the pockets of
well-meaning, small contributors, and put it into their already
overstuffed bank accounts. Advertising money is what allows the media
to pay multimillion dollar a year salaries to stiff-shirt news
commentators like Wolf Blitzer and Anderson Cooper (wrongly pronounced
Coo-per). And such money allows Blitzer and Coo-per to SCREW America
with their pro status quo (business) slants.
The biggest proof that Barack Obama is morally unfit to be President
is this: His ego is so huge that he will gladly SQUANDER a billion or
more hard-earned dollars of his well-meaning ’small’ contributors just
to get his skinny ass elected. Obama has no functioning system of
values!
The second biggest proof that Obama is morally unfit to be President
is this: He thinks it is quite wonderful that he has enough persuasive
sounding supporters to cajole new people into registering to vote for
HIM. Obama doesn’t register “voters”, he only registers voters for
him… In decades past, some politicians got votes by promising to buy
liquor for the ones who do. THAT is why the bars and liquor stores
are closed on election day. There’s a standing principle that votes
not be bought. But Obama is BUYING VOTES, from the get-go, by
promising naïve mentalities that things will be better for them if
they will only vote for Obama. Obama has no morals, and no
functioning value system. He must NOT be allowed to become President!
After all that I’ve written about our non-existent democracy, this
week on TV the Rev. Al Sharpton praised democracy. What he was
actually praising was a corrupt system that seems to be allowing the
presidency to be BOUGHT. Ralph Nader was perfectly right to point out
that Obama is ½ Black. Racially, there’s nothing wrong with being ANY
percent Black! But Obama himself has exploited race by continually
reminding people that his mother was white, and his grandparents who
raised him were or are white. Realistically, it is Obama who is a
racist, NOT Ralph Nader.
Blacks, much like Jews, will exercise power any way that they can get
it. Morals don’t matter. For a race of people tough enough to have
survived the ravages of Africa; slavery; and the discrimination of
‘traditional thinking’ Americans, Blacks have really thin skins. A
Black ladies’ basketball team was so offended by the off-color remarks
of Don Imus that they got Imus fired. Doesn’t our Constitution
guarantee Imus free speech? After all, he made no physical threats
that could have been called an assault. What minorities like Jews and
Blacks do is to use their hypersensitivity to verbal attacks as
weapons to make all others feel guilty. The media, like Lu Dobbs, had
to “seem” incensed because the corporate boardroom didn’t want to
loose advertising dollars. And that’s because Blacks are well known
for… boycotting. Folks, in my New Constitution, ORGANIZING a boycott—
by any person of any race, color, sex, or creed—is a felony. Using a
means other than one person-one-vote for controlling business and
governmental processes is verboten!
Hillary Clinton gave her trademark, wide-eyed, “I recognize you” look
as she entered that stage in Unity, NH, yesterday. Now, she seems to
hope that things will be OK in this country if Obama gets to be
President. She especially hopes things will be OK if those 18,000,000
people who voted AGAINST Barack Obama will only follow her lead and
vote for that low-life, too.
The main change this country needs is not allowing any high pressure
campaign speeches, nor ads, to make you vote contrary to what is
optimum for you, and the millions of American’s like you. The
candidates of the two major parties are putting the lives of all
Americans—and even those not yet born—at risk by having us riding
along willy-nilly in the bubblegum-patched ship that is our failed
system of government. We must STOP having group-against-group, party-
against-party, and class-against-class fights. The only “Unity” we
need is the resolve to correct our broken government by ratifying my
New Constitution. Don’t be fooled by ‘pretty blue dresses and
matching blue ties’. Our present political system has screwed America
long enough!
Please know: “The only change that we need in a New Constitution!”
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
NoEinstein
>
OBAMA IS NO PATRIOT; HE’S A BENEDICT ARNOLD!
True to form, Barack Obama desecrated the American Flags by standing
in front of those, yesterday. He was expressing his disagreement with
a remark of former general, Wesley Clark. Clark stated that John
McCain isn’t a “hero” solely because McCain’s plane got shot down over
North Vietnam. Though Clark has endorsed Obama, Obama says he doesn’t
question McCain’s patriotism, nor will he allow others (like me) to
question his.
Obama doesn’t have the faintest notion what patriotism is!
“Patriotism is manifested by bravely and unselfishly upholding the
ideals of, or defending, one’s country—especially when the country, or
its fundamental ideals, are being threatened.” That charlatan Barack
Obama couldn’t possibly be a patriot! Obama doesn’t uphold the basic
principles of democracy that caused this country to be founded. And
Obama, himself, is the NUMBER ONE threat to the survival of the USA!
How many “Patriots” willingly put their country in jeopardy? Obama
does so with abandon, and THAT is tantamount to treason.
85 plus percent of Americans say that they don’t like the direction
this country is headed. Who determines our direction? The Federal
Government, of course. Now, there is more than enough discontent, and
there should be more than enough motive to take government by the
GONADS and show those BASTARDS who really controls the USA!
I’ve been waiting for years to finally have the USA be discontented
enough to correct things in this country—once and for all. My New
Constitution is right for America, and such is poised and polished,
now! But along comes that blood-sucking flea, Barack Obama. He’s
using his selfish persuasiveness to get people to rally behind him.
Obama is selling people on the erroneous idea that the USA will be
just fine… if you’ll only elect him President. His crux support is
those 90 plus percent of Blacks who’ve got only one issue of
importance, namely: “Get ‘a Black’ elected, and don’t care how you do
it.” If the USA gets destroyed in the WW III that could result—fine
and dandy. At least the last President would have been a Black…
As with Obama and the Democratic Party, Republican’s will try to sell
Americans on the false idea that things will be… just fine with them
in charge. In actuality, the USA will go down-the-tubes in either
case, unless… we very quickly substitute a true democracy for the sham
form of government that we have! Folks, the Democratic and Republican
parties are screwing America, because those have long since been
controlled by Big Business. And it is Big Business which is putting
the USA, and the World in such danger! Please read my earlier blogs
to understand just why.
Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger lamented on Meet the Press, Sunday,
that things in Washington remain bad whichever party is in control.
Believe me, electing Obama or McCain won’t change those prospects.
All it will do is to let 50% of the people have the bragging rights to
having “won”. After “the honeymoon”, and things aren’t better, people
will, by habit, start looking to the next election, and the next… As
our government is presently constituted (A pun intended!) our nation
can only continue to go down hill.
Part of the motive for electing either a Democrat or a Republican, has
to do with Supreme Court nominations. Our government is so
ineffectual, that it has become accepted that the only way to get
desirable changes is to let those nine, depressing nincompoops,
effectively, make our laws for us. My New Constitution will exclude
from public office any person who even suggests that the President
will nominate justices favoring a particular ideology. And a
candidate’s ideology may not even be considered during the
confirmation process. Justices are TECHNICIANS of the law, only. And
the Judiciary will be made a “lesser branch” of government. The
Supreme Court will have ZERO say in instituting new policies that
couldn’t be voted in by Congress!
Tom Brokaw did an acceptable job on his first day moderating Meet the
Press. I especially liked that he stated that… “many bloggers are
negative regarding Barack Obama”. Suddenly, Obama isn’t being seen as
this paragon of virtue. For the first time in our history, more
people are getting their “news” via the Internet than via the media.
THAT is most promising! What bloggers (like me) are saying, is
beginning to determine the direction this country is headed. If
enough people will read what I say, and tell others about it, maybe
there is a chance to save the USA from disaster!
Now, Obama must contend with having some of his key supporters, like
James Carville, showing the guts to disagree with him. Carville
stated that Clark shouldn’t be castigated for saying John McCain
doesn’t qualify as a “hero”. I was a supporter of General Wesley
Clark for President. If Clark will only read some of what I’ve been
saying, he won’t be a supporter of Obama much longer.
Few in the media are reporting any polls showing Obama’s decline.
Thinking Americans should STOP RESPONDING TO ANY POLITICAL POLLS! The
corrupt media must assure that either a Democrat (their favorite), or
a Republican gets elected. Having an independent get elected would
throw the corrupt business interests into turmoil. Ross Perot nearly
did that, and he scared the hell out of business!
Since Congressmen Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich haven’t stepped forward—
as independents—to use their high principles for the betterment of the
USA, voting for the Libertarian Candidates is looking like the way to
go. As with Perot, the media will try to shoot the Libertarians
down. But a wise, angry-enough America can tell the media to go-to-
hell! From now on, we are getting our IMPORTANT news over the
Internet!
Please know: “A New Constitution is the only change that we need!”
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
NoEinstein
>
THE ECONOMY IS ISSUE NUMBER ONE WITH VOTERS
Amazingly, both McCain and Obama are touting their ideas about how
they will get the economy moving again, if they’re elected President.
I say “amazingly”, because those two represent the opposing aisles of
Congress. Since both men have essentially the same goals, then why is
it that Congress and President Bush don’t go ahead and do things to
improve the economy?
Whether or not most of those naïve mentalities in Congress realize the
reasons, Big Business is in control of everything that gets done in
Washington. It’s laughable to suppose that either McCain or Obama can
sway an already corrupted Congress, just by making well-prepared,
pleading speeches. The primary reason those two men travel from state-
to-state talking about “improving the economy” is to sway voters.
They have ZERO chance of swaying the next Congress, or any to follow.
All they care about is getting elected. Both of those men will make
as many unfulfillable promises as they think is necessary to dupe the
voters. It will be close to two years before the voters realize they
have been had (again). By then, the “thrill of victory” will seem
very empty, indeed.
Most of this countries woes can be laid at the feet of Big Oil;
banking interests; health care interests; insurance interests; mining,
resource and power interests; lawyers; manufacturing interests;
consumer products interests; lobbyists in general; and a corrupt
government in particular. Electing a new figurehead President won’t
scratch-the-surface to correct our country’s woes.
Many continue to lament NAFTA… That agreement is cast-in-stone. Or
is it? My New Constitution mandates an immediate, systematic REVOTE
of every law on the books. This will be done without a Senate to bog
things down. The Senate has been anti-democracy from the get-go. The
new minimum vote for passage of any law will be 55% of the House.
Never again will this country be subjected to ’the rule of laws’ that
have, say, 50.1% in favor to 49.9% against. All of those “grey area”
laws will become non laws, and our civil liberties will start going
up. Any new law will have a one year probationary period. If the
American people don’t like a law, if will be stricken from the books—
it’s that simple! The American people can over-ride the House on any
vote via a national referendum. If 60% of American’s assent, they
determine what becomes law. And since conditions change, no law will
be considered to be “the will of the People” from-now-on. Laws can be
called for a revote of the People with just a 1/3 assent in the House,
or at the request of the Chief Executive. That is how a democracy
should work!
Yesterday on C-Span I got to listen to Ralph Nader. For a man of age
74, he was in high form. He continued to give his “set” rationale for
why his candidacy gave the 2000 presidential race to Bush. He chooses
to blame those five Republican Supreme Court Justices. Al Gore was
more pro-environment and pro-consumer than Bush. As smart as Nader
is, he has a few too many missing screws to have ever done what is
best for America.
One hint of Nader’s… not getting it, is: He continues to talk about
our “democracy“. His thought processes are so narrow that Nader
doesn’t realize that a government controlled by “one-person-one-vote,
fully counted”, doesn’t exist in this country. For a nation as
closely divided as we often are, our electoral college system is
raping democracy. Recently, that type of vote tallying favored Obama
against Clinton. Obama, the rascal that he is, loved talking about…
“the delegate count…” as if the UNCONSTITUTIONAL rules of the
Democratic Party were the “standard” of democracy. No candidate with
such a lack of moral judgment should ever be allowed to become
President! Obviously, many Americans will gladly side with a
candidate who doesn’t PLAY FAIR. People, such as Obama’s main Black
voting-block, who are wanting to win-at-any-cost, don’t care about
being moral. Winning is the only thing that matters for
them…
My New Constitution includes the words: “(the Federal Government shall
be) … considerate of our environment, heritage, peace and
tranquillity; (and) Only laws, rules, regulations and procedures that
are in the best interest of the People and the world environment shall
be passed, enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall
be allowed to prosper.”
Ralph Nader pointed out that every time environmentalists try to get
Congress to do the right things, the environmentalists get scooted
away. When the rape of our environment, here, gets too bad, those
polluters, simply, find a foreign country, like Mexico, that doesn’t
have restrictions. And they begin killing those innocent people,
instead. My New Constitution will STOP businesses from harming the
world environment, or doing anything that isn’t in the best interests
of the People everywhere! It will allow businesses, here, to be taxed
or put out of business, completely, if what they are doing isn’t in
the best interests of the world.
Time-Warner, the media giant, isn’t doing things that are in the best
interest of the American People. When my New Constitution is
ratified, Time-Warner will find itself being put out of business.
That’s because such corporation, willingly, allows its sham TIME and
CNN to dupe the people into continuing the failed status quo in our
governments. They do such by talking only about those “two parties”—
both of which are corrupt to the core, and are thus like just one
party. Jew-controlled Time-Warner is pro business, and BUSINESS is
what is putting America in such grave peril. Symbols of corporate
America is what the terrorists attacked on 9/11. Those, plus the
symbol of our military might were hit.
Unless our voters will wise up and vote AGAINST our perennially-
failed, two party system of government, then this country will become
the focus of more terrorists assaults. And Unless we STOP backing
Israel and looking the other way to Israel’s unfair dealings with the
Palestinians, we’ll continue to be one of, if not the, most hated
nation in the world.
The choice is clear: Straighten out our government, and our run-away
business interests, or face terrorist attacks that can take us to WW
III. The cure is SO easy, if only we will take it! Our mutual
discontent is the best and ONLY motive that we need to do what is
right for America. In November vote for the Libertarian Candidates,
and give us hope!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
>
RESTORING RESPECT FOR AMERICA
With his usual monologue-type (too slow and too long) reply to
questions, Barack Obama “uhh”ed…, and “you-know”ed… his way through
his recent interview with Fareed Zakaria. Fareed—a sharp, new
addition to CNN—elicited this comment from Obama: I’ve heard people
ask: “When are we going to restore the respect the world had for
America?” Apparently, Obama thinks that the world will respect the
USA, again, if the American people will just be dumb enough to elect
him President.
Indeed, it is the loss of respect for America that is placing all of
us in such grave peril! In just a single day, John McCain’s “Islamic
extremists” can, effectively, trigger WW III. And it won’t matter
whether there is a Democrat or a Republican in the White House.
Muslims, as a group, may not condone terrorism, but they haven’t risen
up in mass to renounce terrorism, either. Because Muslims are
interspersed throughout the world population, there isn’t a “rightful
nation” against which this country can retaliate, if we suffer another
9/11. The American people won’t take another attack, of any size, on
the chin. If we’re attacked, there will be great pressure on our
government to wipe out the centers of the Muslim faith all over the
world. And THAT will spell the doom of the human race…
There are four primary reasons that the USA has lost respect in the
world:
(1.) We ‘support’ the never-play-fair nation of Israel. We supply
weapons and technology to those rascals, who, as a matter of
entitlement, attacked and confiscated the land and homes of
Palestinians. Because of the Holocaust, Jews feel that they don’t
have to play by the rules. That‘s why they’re despised all over the
world. And our too naïve nation is despised, too, because of our
allying ourselves with Israel.
(2) American businesses willingly exploit the resources,
environments, and the cheap labor in poorer countries. While we enjoy
lavish lifestyles (by world standards), the world gets the sense that
we don’t care about the “sweatshops” that our businesses believe are
necessary in order for us to be… competitive. Too many in the world
believe that our capitalist successes are the result of our not
playing fair. And we back-up those unfair actions with our
overbearing military might.
(3) We use military force to impose… “democracy” in other countries.
If being “like” the USA is our model, most nations, such as Iraq,
don’t want us to be dictating anything.
(4) We are generally insensitive to the feelings of those in other
lands, or to the feelings of other nationalities and religions, here.
Those people are crying about issues of the American attitude, but we
seem to be deaf and blind. Unless the USA can start empathizing with
the plights of others less fortunate, we aren’t going to be well
liked. And our chance of long enduring as a nation is slim.
85 plus percent of Americans are dissatisfied with the direction this
country is headed. That’s wonderful! For the first time in our
history there’s enough discontent to actually CORRECT THE PROBLEMS
plaguing us! But our selfish and over-zealous candidates for
President keep brainwashing us into believing that they alone are the
solution. ANY solution which leaves our corrupt “two party” system in
place will make us, immediately, vulnerable to terrorists’ attacks—
soon after the new President takes office.
Rather than keep sending token politicians to Washington to get
swallowed-up by the pomp and circumstances and rampant corruption,
there, we should immediately begin placating the hatred for the USA.
The best way to do that is to REJECT both the Democratic and the
Republican candidates! In her ‘consolation speech’ after the
primaries, Hillary Clinton paid lip-service to my calls for democracy,
by stating: “I will be on the front-lines of democracy!” Then, she
went-over-to-the-enemy… Obama. Apparently, Clinton assumes that those
18,000,000 who voted against Obama will go-over-to-the-enemy, too.
Democracy is tantamount to playing fair! Barack Obama doesn’t care
that: (1) Caucuses are anti democracy. Those allow persuasive talkers
to influence the outcome—just before the votes are taken—and
discourages people who aren’t persuasive talkers from attending. (2)
‘Delegate’ apportionments that limit the relative weight of the votes
that are cast, are anti democracy. In a democracy the POPULAR VOTE
total should always take precedence over Obama‘s… 'delegate count’.
He never deferred to Clinton’s lead in the only vote that matters, the
popular vote. (3) The DNC rules are anti democracy because they
didn’t hold all primaries on the same day; and they let the Rules and
Bylaws Committee “decide” outcomes. Principles of democracy should
hold sway—not the decisions of biased committees. (4) Obama’s
persuasive talkers are registering new voters. There is an estimated
30 plus percent increase in the number of Blacks registered to vote.
Since most of those were convinced to register by Obama supporters,
they are biasing the system to favor him, and that is anti democracy.
(5) By making promises which he can’t keep, Obama is raising close to
a billion dollars to BUY his way into the White House. Democracy
shall NEVER be about who has the most money! The fact that Obama is
more than willing to SQUANDER the hard-earned dollars of his
supporters, proves that he is morally unfit to be President. And
etc., etc.
If you were from another country, and you disliked America because we
don’t play fair, how could Barack Obama possibly improve that image?
Obama wants to become President by hook or by crook. His candidacy is
jeopardizing the survival of the USA!
There is a hint of promise regarding Obama NOT getting elected.
Everyone has heard that the Rev. Jesse Jackson revealed his true
feelings about Obama. But be it known: “Words, once spoken, can never
be completely withdrawn.” Too often, cross purposes in politics finds
people straddling the fence of public opinion. Hillary Clinton went-
over-to-the-enemy much too easily. Daily, in Congress, she had to
deal… ‘smilingly’ with friend and foe alike. Issues aren’t as
important as being on the winning side—and that means humoring those
on the opposing side in hopes of swaying them. In Clinton’s mind,
there is a ‘winning’. Perhaps Obama promised to make her Secretary of
State; or he promised to support her health care plan. For whatever
reason, she’s campaigning for that scoundrel. However, Bill Clinton
is nowhere to be seen.
Surprisingly, I heard two separate commentators, today, mention a
possible “role-call vote for Clinton at the Convention”. It appears
that Barack Obama isn’t living up to all of his hype. When he and his
wife did an interview with their two daughters, he decided afterward
that such wasn’t a good idea. Like it or not, the man is ‘a
package’. And more and more the package is smelling like spoiled
fish.
Though Clinton is more principled than Obama, since she sided-with-the-
enemy, her character is now in question, too. Bob Schieffer, on ‘Face
the Nation’ closed Sunday’s broadcast by saying: “What we are hearing
from ‘both sides’, lately, isn’t helping them or us.” The message
should be clear: Vote for neither the Democrat nor the Republican.
Vote Libertarian!
Please know: “A New Constitution is the only ‘change’ that we need!”
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> is, he has a fewtoomany missing screws to have ever done what is
> best for America.
>
> One hint of Nader’s… not getting it, is: He continues to talk about
> our “democracy“. His thought processes are so narrow that Nader
> doesn’t realize that a government controlled by “one-person-one-vote,
> fully counted”, doesn’t exist in this country. For a nation as
> closely divided as we often are, our electoral college system is
> raping democracy. Recently, that type of vote tallying favored Obama
> against Clinton. Obama, the rascal that he is, loved talking about…
> “the delegate count…” as if the UNCONSTITUTIONAL rules of the
> Democratic Party were the “standard” of democracy. No candidate with
> such a lack of moral judgment should ever be allowed to become
> President! Obviously, many Americans will gladly side with a
> candidate who doesn’t PLAY FAIR. People, such as Obama’s main Black
> voting-block, who are wanting to win-at-any-cost, don’t care about
> being moral. Winning is the only thing that matters for
> them…
>
> My New Constitution includes the words: “(the Federal Government shall
> be) … considerate of our environment, heritage, peace and
> tranquillity; (and) Only laws, rules, regulations and procedures that
> are in the best interest of the People and the world environment shall
> be passed, enacted or enforced, and no business contrary to such shall
> be allowed to prosper.”
>
> Ralph Nader pointed out that every time environmentalists try to get
> Congress to do the right things, the environmentalists get scooted
> away. When the rape of our environment, here, getstoobad, those
NoEinstein
>
BARACK OBAMA IS THIS NATION’S BIGGEST THREAT.
This week Al Gore spoke about a world in peril due to global warming.
Correcting such problem would be a worthy objective for Gore or for
anyone. But Gore shows his naiveté if he thinks that his endorsement
of Barack Obama will have a snowball’s-chance-in-hell of improving
global climate.
Government is a great sinkhole full of unfulfilled promises. Two
years ago, a fed-up electorate sent a majority of Democrats to
Washington to bring our troops home. But there has been no such
withdrawal. Every hour, both major party candidates are making
unfulfillable promises ‘how things will be’, if only we’ll elect
them. In the USA, it is the Congress that decides most things, NOT
the President. Since both parties in Congress are controlled by
business interests; and since business interests want to maintain the
status quo; then there will be next to zero changes caused by either
candidate. Obama, in particular, keeps promising changes which he
cannot deliver. But a tyrant like him doesn’t care. His candidacy is
about ego, and about winning, NOT about correcting the problems.
A campaign ad for McCain showed: The smoking 9/11 World Trade Center.
The more-true-than-not implication is that if Obama is elected
President, the USA can expect more terrorism. But such likelihood is
also true if John McCain gets elected. While the victors for either
side are still cheering, in all likelihood, plans will be being made
to punish the USA once again for: (1) Backing Israel; (2) allowing our
businesses to exploit the people, environments and resources of other
nations; (3) forcibly trying to impose democracy on others; and (4)
generally not being sensitive to the reservations of other nations and
religions concerning US policies.
Thinking American’s should ask themselves what an appropriate response
would be if the USA is attacked, again, by… “someone, from
somewhere.” John McCain is expecting that ’someone’ to be Islamic
extremists. Following 9/11 there was no huge out-cry from good
Muslims to renounce the extremists and the philosophies responsible.
Instead, there was mostly tacit approval, as if the USA got what we
deserve. If we as a nation are so poorly thought of that our flags
gets burned, and our President is burned in effigy, then we have a
problem that really needs fixing. It is a problem larger and more
grave than the economy and global warming combined. Unless the
American people resolve to correct our… image problem, a possible WW
III will never be more than months into the future.
In additional to our international image crisis, there is a renewed
racial crisis in America. Instead of selecting the best candidate,
Blacks have decided that they are going to ram-rod a Black into office—
suited or not; principled or not; and advisable or not. Combine the
actions of those 90 plus percent of Blacks for Obama with a sour
economy, and there is an unrecognized risk of huge civil unrest if he
manages to get elected. No matter how suave he acts, Obama is ill
prepared to deal with any crisis which threatens the existence of the
USA. In reality Barack Obama, himself, is the greatest threat to
America!
The recent cover of the New Yorker Magazine made ‘satire’ out of
Obama’s identity issues. Though he doesn’t burn flags, every day he
desecrates the Stars and Stripes by wearing that little lapel pin, and
by using the American Flag as a backdrop for making his ubiquitous,
unfulfillable promises. To Obama, “looking Presidential” means
standing in front of flags and talking suave. Apparently, he is
managing to dupe more and more nearsighted Blacks to his side.
A most encouraging poll shows that only 30% of whites have a favorable
opinion of Barack Obama. The 70% of whites who have an UNFAVORABLE
opinion of that tyrant includes many of those “18,000,000 voters” that
Hillary Clinton, vainly, keeps hoping she is the spokesperson for.
This week, President Bill Clinton, replied, cagily: that if asked, he
is available to campaign for Obama. With the likelihood of a “roll
call vote” for Clinton at the convention increasing, Bill must surely
be weighing the advisability of supporting Obama in any way.
Today, Jack Kafferty seemed elated over the amount of campaign money
being raised by both major parties. He supposed that his network’s
management should be pleased. Of course they’re pleased! CNN is
controlled by Big Business for Big Business. By assuring that ’Ballot
Bowl’ is a knock-down-drag-out contest, CNN is raking in the dough for
Time-Warner. And that is guaranteeing that those who provide “the
best political coverage” (Ha!) can make mega bucks. Campbell Brown
has ‘another’ reason to smile.
The potential saving grace of the present Presidential race is this:
For the first time in our history, more people are getting their news
via the Internet than via the major networks and printed media
combined. That means that ‘news’—like my New Constitution being
poised and polished for ratification—is getting discussed. Such is
happening in spite of the fact that the media has buried its
collective heads to there being any “news” other than their
“consensus” propaganda line. Fixing our failed government will be a
snap compared to fixing our corrupt media. But when the latter is
being run counter to principles of democracy and fair play in America,
it will be: comply or be closed.
While Blacks argue over words like “nigger” and “balls”, there is a
penned document which solves the majority of the so-called Black
issues (and white issues, too!). Now, Blacks have a choice: They can
blindly block-vote for Obama, and thus bring this country to the brink
of its doom… OR Blacks can wake up. The present two-party “clearing
house” to determine who our elected representatives can be, has
divided this country long enough. Big Business doesn’t care which
party wins. That’s because the USA is effectively being run by very
selfish business interests—not by the will of the People. Obama talks
about taking back control of government. But he is powerless to do
so! The 85% of Americans who are discontented with the direction our
country is headed, are anything but powerless!
This week John McCain told Blacks that this country is “a work in
progress”. On the first Tuesday in November of 2010, our voters can
make THE most progress in our entire history by ratifying my New
Constitution. The anti democracy US Senate will be out. Political
parties will be closed down. And democracy will reign supreme! Never
again will we be “ruled” by an elite group of career politicians, out-
of-touch with ordinary people. Those in government will be our
servants, not our lords! Civil liberties long lost will be restored;
oppressive laws will be purged; and public confidence in government
restored! Never again will corrupt business interests have access to
our representatives, on penalty of prison time!
The two-person Presidential contest that’s keeps being promulgated by
the media is guaranteed to leave big business in control. In times of
crisis, doing business as usual won’t protect us. The terrorists of
9/11 sent us a message of their discontent. Thus far we haven’t
responded to the underlying cause: resentment for the USA as listed
above.
Very simply: Elect the Libertarian candidates! Do that most prudent
thing and the world will be sent this massage: FAIR DEALINGS are going
to reign supreme in the USA, and in our relationships with the rest of
the world!
Please know: “A New Constitution is the only ’change’ that we need!
Pass it on!
Respectfully Submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> On Jul 7, 5:58 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> RESTORING RESPECT FOR AMERICA
>
> With his usual monologue-type (tooslow andtoolong) reply to
> world. And ourtoonaïve nation is despised,too, because of our
> allying ourselves with Israel.
>
> (2) American businesses willingly exploit the resources,
> environments, and the cheap labor in poorer countries. While we enjoy
> lavish lifestyles (by world standards), the world gets the sense that
> we don’t care about the “sweatshops” that our businesses believe are
> necessary in order for us to be… competitive. Toomany in the world
> be completely withdrawn.” Toooften, cross purposes in politics finds
> people straddling the fence of public opinion. Hillary Clinton went-
> over-to-the-enemy muchtooeasily. Daily, in Congress, she had to
> deal… ‘smilingly’ with friend and foe alike. Issues aren’t as
> important as being on the winning side—and that means humoring those
> on the opposing side in hopes of swaying them. In Clinton’s mind,
> there is a ‘winning’. Perhaps Obama promised to make her Secretary of
> State; or he promised to support her health care plan. For whatever
> reason, she’scampaigningfor that scoundrel. However, Bill Clinton
> is nowhere to be seen.
>
> Surprisingly, I heard two separate commentators, today, mention a
> possible “role-call vote for Clinton at the Convention”. It appears
> that Barack Obama isn’t living up to all of his hype. When he and his
> wife did an interview with their two daughters, he decided afterward
> that such wasn’t a good idea. Like it or not, the man is ‘a
> package’. And more and more the package is smelling like spoiled
> fish.
>
> Though Clinton is more principled than Obama, since she sided-with-the-
> enemy, her character is now in question,too. Bob Schieffer, on ‘Face
NoEinstein
>
ENERGY IS WASTED ON A FAILED SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT
More and more, people have come to expect that government is the
cradle-to-grave answer to whatever the problems happen to be. But be
it known: “Government is the problem; government is not the solution!”
As I write, Barack Obama is touring in Afghanistan and Iraq. He’s
trying to look and talk presidential. Obviously, he enjoys the
celebrity that results from “the media” considering that he is one
half of a “race” for President. His plan to buy his way into the
White House is right on course…
While Obama was still a law student at Harvard, he weighed the
desirability of taking a low paying job in Chicago—that would help the
poor—vs. joining a prestigious law firm paying big bucks. In the
campaign ads that Obama is now running, he brags about his “unselfish”
decision to work for the poor. But by his mentioning that trivia, he
is effectively acknowledging that such job was just a ploy to improve
his chances of becoming President. How gullible does Obama think the
American people are? Similarly, Obama ran for the US Senate—not as a
way to serve—but to shorten his path to fulfilling his Manchurian
Candidate ‘destiny’ to become President. Now, because of the
Internet, the groundwork is being laid to prevent Obama from ever
succeeding with such vanity.
On Meet the Press this morning, Tom Brokaw continued to do an
excellent job. I especially like that he said: “… if Barack Obama is
elected… ”. Though the media isn’t acknowledging that Obama is
having problems, Brokaw’s guest, Al Gore, hinted that all is not well
for Obama. He did so in two ways. First: Gore, effectively, closed
the door on accepting the #2 position on the Obama ticket. Second:
Gore made a point of recognizing (my) issues with: “Democracy;
lobbyists; and PACS.” When guests in the media mention… ‘democracy’,
there is a never-before, shadow-of-doubt—either in their tone and
expression, or in the lack of any: “Oh, yeah…” replies from the other
guests or commentators. American’s are now realizing that the lip-
service being paid, both to our Constitution, and to our “democracy”
is tantamount to lies.
CNN’s Lu Dobbs keeps running a video clip of him saying: “Don’t
Americans deserve a government that works?” Of course they do! In
just one day’s time, I can give Americans a guaranteed system of
government that works! In such, the PEOPLE will be at the top of the
pecking-order; and every decision made by government will be
conditional upon the People being happy! I have: Shut down the IRS;
removed the ‘right’ of government to raise taxes without citizen
approval; prevented the FEDS from keeping financial, or other records,
on any law-abiding citizen; added term limits; limited representatives
to those who have never held public office; require anonymity in all
campaign contributions; removed victimless crimes (except reckless
endangerment) from prosecution; outlawed lobbying; enjoined
representatives from having any media contacts beyond the local media
of their home districts; outlawed gerrymandering; expanded 2nd
Amendment rights; and hundreds of other guarantees to assure that
government will respond ONLY to the will of the people—never again to
selfish business, governmental, or other interests. Finally, our
government will no longer be divided group-against-group; party-
against-party; and class-against-class. Fair and OPTIMUM solutions
will be found, so that the vast majority are better off!
Ratifying my New Constitution, in 2010, will correct our government’s
conceptual and other flaws once-and-for-all. But ‘the amendment
process’ will be alive and well. Those will take only a day, and
involve the direct vote of the People. The states won’t have to
ratify amendments, separately.
***It is more urgent that no Democrat nor Republican be elected
President, than is the urgency of “the economy” and “global warming”
combined.*** A global warming that we don’t want is… ‘warming’ from
nuclear war. And fixing ‘the economy’ won’t matter if there is no
more human race to manufacture, sell, and buy.
9/11 ‘cocked America’s guns’ against Islamic extremists. John McCain
has promised a swift retaliation if we are attacked. But where do we
retaliate? Islamic extremists are in every country, including the
USA. Knocking out a few training camps, or starting, essentially-
futile, searches for the planners of terrorism won’t satisfy the
American people. The prospect of having a peaceful resolution of the
terrorism powder-keg will vanish if even a few hundred Americans are
killed, or if there is major property or infrastructure damage in the
USA. While those terrorist camps may be rejoicing, the fate of the
human race could already be in the air…
The solution? ***Learn the lesson that those terrorists were willing
to teach us with their lives.*** We aren’t being held hostage by
terrorists. We are being held hostage by the don’t-play-fair JEWS,
who use America’s military might to back up their probably-shouldn’t-
be, nation of Israel.
On Meet the Press, Al Gore defended his ‘ten year plan’ for a 100%
switch to wind, solar, and geothermal power—rather than carbon-
emitting energy sources. For some reason, Gore left out
hydroelectric, nuclear and hydrogen gas. The vitrification and
encapsulation of nuclear waste should be an easy enough solution to
that issue. But Gore’s attack on just the primary ‘cause’ of global
warming, CO^2 emissions, leaves out readily available solutions to the
SYMPTOMS of global warming.
(1.) If there is too much solar energy ‘trapped’ in our atmosphere,
reduce that energy by ’salting’ the ionosphere with particles of, say,
aluminum foil, to reflect a few percentage points of radiation back
into space.
(2.) The melting snow had been a marvelous solar reflector. By using
simple Mechanical Engineering technology, the Arctic and Antarctica
snowfall can be increased to expand the snow caps, once more.
(3.) Ocean rise is threatening coastal cities. So, reduce the level
of the oceans by pumping fresh river water (from all of the
continents) into the steep mountain valleys of Antarctica—which is
quite cold enough to freeze the water, but gets very little snowfall,
because of the dryness of the air.
(4.) We should follow T. Boone Pickens’ ideas to convert cars to burn
natural gas. Gore is wrong to suppose that “buying” an electric
vehicle is a viable, immediate alternative. A typical car can be
converted to burn natural gas for about $1,200.00. The cost of
electric cars would be huge—partly because of the battery price. And
batteries have toxic metals.
(5.) We should immediately encourage ever man, woman, and child (in
the world) to plant at least one tree! And we should subsidize, if
necessary, poor farmers in countries like Brazil to stop cutting down
the rain forests!
(6.) We should remove the ban on growing hemp! The later can be
converted to ethanol; be used to make paper and plastics; and removes
more CO^2 from the air, per acre, than does an acre of forest. Plus,
it has a greater yield. Hemp could help save the world!
(7.) We should build ‘super’ pipelines all over the globe to correct
the water inequities. Water from storms on the Mississippi watershed
should be pumped to where droughts are. I’m not talking ‘irrigation’;
I’m talking rain making! And Mechanical Engineers can make it rain
anywhere, if we will just free them up to design the systems.
(8.) We can use Mechanical Engineers to design heat transfer systems
in the oceans to pipe the excess equatorial solar energy toward the
poles, WITHOUT causing storms. Squirting out warm moist air near the
poles will cause huge snowfalls that will rebuild of the icecaps with
little effort.
(10.) We should be using Mechanical Engineers to REVERSE the
expanding Sahara in North Africa. The Sahara was once a tropical
forest. With the assent of poor Muslim nations, the entire world
should cooperate to help those nations improve their arid
environments, and thus their livelihoods. Capitalism, like in the
USA, won’t be hated, if its pluses become available to all!
(11.) We should ratify my New Constitution, to among other things,
free me to work for improving the world through invention and design,
rather than just talking about doing so. If we in the USA can build
“the Alaska Pipeline”, we can solve all of the weather-related
problems that we face!
Much of the money being spent on storm and flood insurance can go to
installing the piping which will prevent the storms. And by seeding
those under-ocean heat transfer pipes with gold, the dissolved gold in
the sea water can be mined to pay for the pipes. Other minerals can
be similarly mined.
So, if any of you are saying: “Wow!”, tell people about “NoEinstein”.
And tell your friends to vote Libertarian this November. Muslim
extremists will think twice about killing themselves, if it finally
looks like the USA is going to start doing the right things for ALL of
the nations and peoples of the world!
Please know: “A New Constitution is the only ’change’ that we need.”
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> issues (and white issues,too!). Now, Blacks have a choice: They can
NoEinstein
>
POWER TO THE MINORITY IS ANTI DEMOCRACY
We are a nation of disparate groups. Each of those have their pet
objectives. But in too many instances, the members of groups
willingly defer to their spokespersons and lobbyists. They allow the
latter to speak in their place—because the members believe that such
deference will increase the chances that the group’s objectives will
be reached.
There are two minority groups which, overtly, threaten our once great
nation with destruction. Both of those groups are actively being
courted by the Democrat’s nominee-apparent, Barack Obama. If Obama
manages to get elected, under his misguided ‘leadership’ Jews and
Blacks will bring this nation down… That is, unless he is defeated.
This morning on ‘Meet the Press’, Tom Brokaw quoted recent polls, and
read comments of others, that don’t reflect well on Obama. For the
first two-thirds of the hour-long interview, Obama grinned like a
Cheshire cat while side-stepping everything negative that was being
thrown at him. The questions he was being asked were so important,
and the implications were so… grave for the future of the USA, that
smiles were out-of-place. But like a used car salesman selling
damaged goods, Obama’s sick smiles are a cover-up of his corruptness.
In every conceivable way, his campaign is just a cover-up to his
unsuitability to be President.
I first saw Barack Obama when he addressed the 2004 Democratic
convention. I had heard so much hype about… how great, and
charismatic, a public speaker he was. But when I heard him speak that
night, I wasn’t impressed. First, Obama’s voice was flat and lacking
in inflection. Second, he spoke with the same, almost dead-pan facial
expression. Third, he gestured very little. Obama seemed like a
person with a tone of pent-up anger, rather than with pent-up hope.
But I didn’t close-the-door on Obama as a public figure until I got to
see a sample of his handwriting. That was in May of 2007. TIME
magazine ran an amateurish handwriting analysis of the, then, six
front-runners for President. I immediately realized that the capital
letters of Obama’s signature were too large (high ego), and that his
small letters were too meticulously formed (overly detail oriented and
self-centered) to be a good executive. Good executives should be
great delegaters. All of us have heard Obama defend to the death
every remark that he has ever made. The man is far too involved in
details to be an effective leader. Mainly what he is, is a show-off.
He uses his, flowing, continuous verbiage as a means to impress the
gullible. Some of you who don’t know that the President isn’t a
dictator, may be impressed. But every time that fool expounds on
things which he shouldn’t even be caring about, I see Obama as the
number one threat to the survival of the USA!
In the Bible, and elsewhere, are descriptions of the anti-Christ.
Apparently, that man will be charismatic. And it is supposed that he
will also be able to sway the masses. Barack Obama seems to fit those
dire descriptions. Plane-loads of our media follow him wherever he
goes, hoping to get an interview. For a man with an ego problem, the
media is certainly adding fuel to Obama’s fire. But mainly they are
doing so—not because Obama is… “news”—but because he is a MINORITY
candidate. The Jews in control of the media must get a minority
person elected. That way they increase the already-out-of-control
power that Jews have in this country—power which is a rape of
democracy.
How do you suppose Americans would reply if a poll were to be taken
with these questions? (1) Do you believe it is appropriate for the
USA to be siding with Israel in their ongoing conflict with
Palestinians? (2) Do you think that our supporting Israel is
increasing or decreasing the chances of there being more terrorism in
the USA? (3) Do you think that a candidate for President should be
‘campaigning’ in far away places like Israel and Germany? (4) Do you
think it is appropriate for the media to provide continuous coverage
of Obama, while providing little or no coverage of third party
candidates? (5) If it’s likely that there will be renewed terrorism
in the USA soon after either Obama or McCain is elected, will you
still vote for one of them—when a vote for the Libertarian candidates
should reduce the chance of terrorism? (6) If you are an Obama
supporter, is it more important that ‘a Black’ be elected, than it is
for the USA to be secure? (7) Lastly, if the objectives of most
groups, including minorities, can be met simply by ratifying a New
Constitution that outlaws political parties, is it still important to
continue with just a two party political process? If so, why?
Tom Brokaw tried to pin-down Obama regarding his choice for a vice
presidential running mate. It was most telling when Obama said that
choosing someone with… “integrity” is important. Often a candidate
will select someone with qualities that he himself lacks. Barack
Obama surely lacks integrity! The sad thing is: No person with
integrity would give Obama the time-of-day. He is this win-at-all-
costs; anti democracy; egotistical demagogue who couldn’t care less
that he is placing the USA in immediate danger of terrorists attacks.
If a person—for obviously selfish reasons—places the survival of his
country in jeopardy, shouldn’t he be tried for treason? Rightly,
Obama needs to continue courting those “scrap-collecting
propagandists” in Israel, or those leisure-deprived fans in Germany.
He would save this country to cost of a trial, and a little
electricity afterward, if he would do like Osama Ben Laden, and find a
rock he can hid under — outside the USA.
Please know: “A New Constitution is the only ‘change’ that we need!”
Pass it on!
Very truly yours,
— NoEinstein —
Handwriting Analysis of Clinton, Obama, McCain and Einstein (is
Copyrighted.)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/eed2bb0cf762e015/6173e270dee543b3?hl=en#6173e270dee543b3
>
> (1.) If there istoomuch solar energy ‘trapped’ in our atmosphere,
Tom Potter
"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:106e8d32-7130-4154...@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
>On Jul 20, 4:19 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>
>POWER TO THE MINORITY IS ANTI DEMOCRACY
>
>We are a nation of disparate groups. Each of those have their pet
>objectives. But in too many instances, the members of groups
>willingly defer to their spokespersons and lobbyists. They allow the
>deference will increase the chances that the group's objectives will
>be reached.
>
>There are two minority groups which, overtly, threaten our once great
>nation with destruction. Both of those groups are actively being
>courted by the Democrat's nominee-apparent, Barack Obama. If Obama
>manages to get elected, under his misguided 'leadership' Jews and
>
>This morning on 'Meet the Press', Tom Brokaw quoted recent polls, and
>read comments of others, that don't reflect well on Obama. For the
>first two-thirds of the hour-long interview, Obama grinned like a
>Cheshire cat while side-stepping everything negative that was being
>thrown at him. The questions he was being asked were so important,
>smiles were out-of-place. But like a used car salesman selling
>damaged goods, Obama's sick smiles are a cover-up of his corruptness.
>In every conceivable way, his campaign is just a cover-up to his
>unsuitability to be President.
>
>I first saw Barack Obama when he addressed the 2004 Democratic
>candidate. The Jews in control of the media must get a minority
>person elected. That way they increase the already-out-of-control
>democracy.
>
>How do you suppose Americans would reply if a poll were to be taken
>with these questions? (1) Do you believe it is appropriate for the
>USA to be siding with Israel in their ongoing conflict with
>Palestinians? (2) Do you think that our supporting Israel is
>increasing or decreasing the chances of there being more terrorism in
>the USA? (3) Do you think that a candidate for President should be
>'campaigning' in far away places like Israel and Germany? (4) Do you
>think it is appropriate for the media to provide continuous coverage
>of Obama, while providing little or no coverage of third party
>candidates? (5) If it's likely that there will be renewed terrorism
>in the USA soon after either Obama or McCain is elected, will you
>should reduce the chance of terrorism? (6) If you are an Obama
>supporter, is it more important that 'a Black' be elected, than it is
>for the USA to be secure? (7) Lastly, if the objectives of most
>groups, including minorities, can be met simply by ratifying a New
>Constitution that outlaws political parties, is it still important to
>continue with just a two party political process? If so, why?
>
>Tom Brokaw tried to pin-down Obama regarding his choice for a vice
>presidential running mate. It was most telling when Obama said that
>will select someone with qualities that he himself lacks. Barack
>Obama surely lacks integrity! The sad thing is: No person with
>integrity would give Obama the time-of-day. He is this win-at-all-
>costs; anti democracy; egotistical demagogue who couldn't care less
>that he is placing the USA in immediate danger of terrorists attacks.
>
>country in jeopardy, shouldn't he be tried for treason? Rightly,
>Obama needs to continue courting those "scrap-collecting
>propagandists" in Israel, or those leisure-deprived fans in Germany.
>He would save this country to cost of a trial, and a little
>electricity afterward, if he would do like Osama Ben Laden, and find a
>
>Please know: "A New Constitution is the only 'change' that we need!"
>Pass it on!
>
>Very truly yours,
>
NoEinstein is right when he points out
that what caused most of America's problems,
is the thing that caused Germany's and Russia's problems,
destroyed their economies, trashed their cultures,
and caused the deaths of millions of their people,
and that was:
!. Jews migrated en masse to that nation.
2. Banded together and bought a few key political leaders
3. Hoarded essentials.
4. Instigated conflict and war.
5. When the war-ravaged people were desperate,
traded bare minimums of essentials for gold, silver,
and valuables that transcend time, like art, etc.
But NoEinstein is wrong about who is controlled by Jews,
and who is most immune to being controlled by Jews.
As can be seen by examining recent history,
the Bushes and the Clintons
were completely controlled by Jews,
( And of course, this brought on 911
and the needless war on the Iraqi people,
with the accompanying demise of America's
wealth and prestige. )
and as the Jews could not get the public to
buy into Clinton, Lieberman, Bloomberg or Gulianni,
they will be settling on McCain,
and in your guts,
you know he's nuts.
America is fortunate to have a man like Obama,
a man who was raised by a White mother and White Grandparents,
a man who had a Black father and an Asian stepfather,
a man who has brothers and sisters
with White, Black, and Asian blood flowing in their veins.
An intelligent, family man, who gave up a cushy, high paying
legal job, and a prestigious Judicial assistant job,
to work with ordinary people.
Just when America critically needs a person
who can unite Blacks and Whites and Asians,
Muslims, Christians and yes Jews,
America and the world,
and restore trust and respect for America,
God sends us OBAMA!
God bless America!!!!!!!!!!!!
--
Tom Potter
http://www.geocities.com/tdp1001/index.html
http://notsocrazyideas.blogspot.com
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tdp1001.wiki.zoho.com
http://groups.msn.com/PotterPhotos
http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/dingleberry.htm
NoEinstein
>
Dear Tom: Thanks for replying! All of science and all of our
concerns about... the economy, global warming, energy prices and etc.
won't matter one wit if the World doesn't correct its terrorism
problems. The USA—as the world's top military power—won't be a
'peaceful giant' if we are attacked again (like... right after the
next election). And if the attackers are "John McCain's" Islamic
extremists, it will be most difficult to retaliate without killing
innocent Muslims.
Right now, the good Muslims are mostly neutral regarding the taking of
innocent American lives. They understand the frustrations which are
causing the extremists to plan death and destruction. But most
Muslims won't be neutral if this country blindly attacks Muslims, even
if by accident. I— like the King of Jordan—see the Israeli-
Palestinian conflict as an immediate threat to the survival of the
human race. Barack Obama has just been to Israel. He assured those
Jewish jerks that the USA's military might will back Jews over
Muslims. THAT is the same as declaring war on a religion. And such
is a VERY dangerous thing to do.
My determination to stop Barack Obama from becoming President is
largely due to the main precept of my New Constitution. Such empowers
THE PEOPLE—in a democratic way— while almost completely disempowering
every selfish group influence. For too long, the USA has let groups
act in our behalves, while most people go about their daily lives with
little concern for governmental processes. As a result, at any one
time, 50% of the people are dissatisfied. The Democratic and the
Republican parties have for too long acted as clearing houses for who
our elected officials can be. Now, the processes of government are
more about one-up-manship of party against party than they are about
doing what is best for the American people.
When Obama started winning primaries, that was fine until I realized
that BLACKS were supporting him—because he is Black, and for that fact
alone. When issues regarding his church, NAFTA, and love of country,
etc. surfaced, the subsequent primary results should have reflected
those negative things about Obama. Yet, BLACKS remained unwavering in
their support of the man. Because of his candidacy, Obama has
reinstated racial division in America. For Blacks, this is about
becoming powerful... as a group. But group power is ALWAYS anti
democracy! In order for the USA to survive, we must become color
blind. The issue isn't racial hatred; it’s about racial POWER. Any
power by any process that is unfair and anti democracy will eventually
cause enough dissention in the World to make WW III ‘a likely‘...
rather than a possible.
The Bushes and the Clintons were "smart enough" not to alienate the
media and big business—which are largely controlled by Jews. And they
were "smart enough" not to alienate, too much, the opposite party,
because some of those are necessary 'votes' to get elected. While you
may have proof that the Bushes and Clintons were... 'bought' by Jews,
that fact isn't as important as the "sleep with the enemy" two-
faceness manifested of Hillary. Being in Congress requires that one
be two-faced. Those who too willingly smile at one’s enemies...
"across the aisle" are manifesting two-faceness.
I would prefer to let historians decide what the motives have been for
all that has happened in government. The most important thing is to
STOP group power, and to replace it with: “The common best interests
of ALL of the people!” If either Obama or McCain are elected,
terrorism will tip the scales toward our doom. But if we will elect
the Libertarian candidates, a huge message will be sent to the
disgruntled peoples of the World: “Fair and just changes are going to
be happening in this country!” Never again will we be using our
military might to bolster nations not grounded in FAIR PLAY. As
things now stand, Israel, and Jews—as a race—are the personification
of: “Get ahead by any means, and be damn the effect on anyone but
Jews.” Jews ARE the problem. On that we seem to agree!
The American people need to wake up and realize that the Jewish-
controlled media in this country is motivated just for Jews. Jews
want only a two person "race for President"—because they will remain
in control regardless of the outcome. But a vote for anyone but Obama
and McCain will be a vote to NEUTRALIZE the undeserved power and
influence of JEWS in the USA! Unless they can be neutralized, the
World is doomed...
When I called Obama the Anti-Christ, that should tell the readers just
how serious a problem that man is. He is so egotistical that he
doesn't realize that his continued candidacy to become President is
jeopardizing the survival of the USA and the World. Such a person
SHOULD be tried and convicted of treason. Don't you think?
Tom, again, thank you for your rare comments on my efforts to
straighten out some of the world's problems!
— NoEinstein —
>
> "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in messagenews:106e8d32-7130-4154...@r66g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
Tom Potter
"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:1012e408-
b4e9-4bcc-8f9...@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 28, 5:26 am, "Tom Potter" <t...@hotsheet.com> wrote:
>>
>Dear Tom: Thanks for replying! All of science and all of our
>concerns about... the economy, global warming, energy prices and etc.
>won't matter one wit if the World doesn't correct its terrorism
>'peaceful giant' if we are attacked again (like... right after the
>next election). And if the attackers are "John McCain's" Islamic
>extremists, it will be most difficult to retaliate without killing
>innocent Muslims.
>
>Right now, the good Muslims are mostly neutral regarding the taking of
>innocent American lives. They understand the frustrations which are
>causing the extremists to plan death and destruction. But most
>Muslims won't be neutral if this country blindly attacks Muslims, even
>Palestinian conflict as an immediate threat to the survival of the
>human race. Barack Obama has just been to Israel. He assured those
>Jewish jerks that the USA's military might will back Jews over
>Muslims. THAT is the same as declaring war on a religion. And such
>is a VERY dangerous thing to do.
>
>My determination to stop Barack Obama from becoming President is
>largely due to the main precept of my New Constitution. Such empowers
>every selfish group influence. For too long, the USA has let groups
>act in our behalves, while most people go about their daily lives with
>little concern for governmental processes. As a result, at any one
>time, 50% of the people are dissatisfied. The Democratic and the
>Republican parties have for too long acted as clearing houses for who
>our elected officials can be. Now, the processes of government are
>more about one-up-manship of party against party than they are about
>doing what is best for the American people.
>
>When Obama started winning primaries, that was fine until I realized
>alone. When issues regarding his church, NAFTA, and love of country,
>etc. surfaced, the subsequent primary results should have reflected
>those negative things about Obama. Yet, BLACKS remained unwavering in
>their support of the man. Because of his candidacy, Obama has
>reinstated racial division in America. For Blacks, this is about
>becoming powerful... as a group. But group power is ALWAYS anti
>democracy! In order for the USA to survive, we must become color
>blind. The issue isn't racial hatred; it's about racial POWER. Any
>power by any process that is unfair and anti democracy will eventually
>cause enough dissention in the World to make WW III 'a likely'...
>rather than a possible.
>
>The Bushes and the Clintons were "smart enough" not to alienate the
>were "smart enough" not to alienate, too much, the opposite party,
>because some of those are necessary 'votes' to get elected. While you
>may have proof that the Bushes and Clintons were... 'bought' by Jews,
>that fact isn't as important as the "sleep with the enemy" two-
>faceness manifested of Hillary. Being in Congress requires that one
>be two-faced. Those who too willingly smile at one's enemies...
>"across the aisle" are manifesting two-faceness.
>
>I would prefer to let historians decide what the motives have been for
>all that has happened in government. The most important thing is to
>STOP group power, and to replace it with: "The common best interests
>of ALL of the people!" If either Obama or McCain are elected,
>terrorism will tip the scales toward our doom. But if we will elect
>the Libertarian candidates, a huge message will be sent to the
>disgruntled peoples of the World: "Fair and just changes are going to
>be happening in this country!" Never again will we be using our
>military might to bolster nations not grounded in FAIR PLAY. As
>of: "Get ahead by any means, and be damn the effect on anyone but
>Jews." Jews ARE the problem. On that we seem to agree!
>
>The American people need to wake up and realize that the Jewish-
>controlled media in this country is motivated just for Jews. Jews
>in control regardless of the outcome. But a vote for anyone but Obama
>and McCain will be a vote to NEUTRALIZE the undeserved power and
>influence of JEWS in the USA! Unless they can be neutralized, the
>World is doomed...
>
>When I called Obama the Anti-Christ, that should tell the readers just
>how serious a problem that man is. He is so egotistical that he
>doesn't realize that his continued candidacy to become President is
>jeopardizing the survival of the USA and the World. Such a person
>SHOULD be tried and convicted of treason. Don't you think?
>
>Tom, again, thank you for your rare comments on my efforts to
>straighten out some of the world's problems!
>
The most serious problem that
America, Europe, China and Japan
have to deal with is NOT terrorism,
nor waging a long, destructive war
between masses of people,
but is
that insane, stupid and irrational people
like George Bush and the Jewish Necons and Zionists,
will put Russia, Iran, or Pakistan
into the position where they feel
the only way they can prevent a George Bush
from doing to them, what he did to Saddam and Iraq,
is to take out the Persian Gulf oil shipping infrastructure,
and a few supertankers,
as this would quickly propel most of the world
back into the Stone Age.
Can you imagine America or NATO, or any group
trying to mount a massive land war against Russia, Iran or Pakistan
with a few months of oil supply,
when their people can't get to work, air condition and heat their
homes,
and the price of everything is sky rocketing because
it is EXTREMELY expensive to grow, mine, produce
and ship ALL commodities?
Why doesn't Russia or Iran take out the oil shipping infrastructure
and become the most powerful nations of the planet?
Because their leaders and their people prefer
things like Windows XP, the Internet, the GPS system,
McDonald's hamburgers, and P&G products
to war and destruction. (perestroika and glasnost)
What America and the world desperate need NOW
is a bridge builder,
NOT a wall builder,
and America is fortunate that just when
a bridge builder is desperately needed.
Obama appears on the scene.
The world DOES NOT need a Military expert at this time,
nor a economic guru, nor an innovator,
what the world desperately needs is a bridge builder.
What Obama says to the world is:
Tear down this wall between Black and White.
Tear down this wall between rich and poor.
Tear down this wall between left and right.
Tear down this wall between the East and the West.
Tear down this wall between Christians and Muslims.
Tear down this wall between America and Europe.
Tear down this wall between America and the world.
Regarding your comment:
"I realized that BLACKS were supporting him-because he is Black.."
What is your explanation of why so many people all
over the world like Obama?
It is good for the Republican Party that Obama is half-Black,
because if he were White, he would get over 70% of the vote,
and that would be the end of the Republican Party.
I realized that WHITE RACISTS are supporting McCain-because he is NOT
Black..
NoEinstein
>
8/03/08
BREAKING THE POLITICAL PARTIES’ STRANGLEHOLD ON THE USA
The US Constitution makes no mention of political parties. Nowhere
does it say: “In order to be elected to public office, a person must
first be approved by one of two quasi governmental groups—neither of
which shall be required to abide by and to uphold the Constitution.”
Barack Obama—the scourge of America’s future—continues to campaign as
if positions on issues should be the sole determinate of who our next
President will be. But over the past year, Obama has disqualified
himself to hold any public office. He did so by proving that he is
selfishly motivated, and devoid of good character and principles of
fair play. When he discusses issues, that’s really just the ruse of a
Manchurian Candidate to try to convince an often-gullible public into
believing that he is somehow viable. But Obama isn’t viable.
The two-contestant “game” that the media continues to insist that the
race-to-the-White House now is, will have most dire consequences if
Obama manages to win… As we all know, “Games” won are followed by
periods of in-your-face celebration. In the case of Obama, those
doing much of the celebrating will be Blacks. But, be it known:
“Blacks will be celebrating that they have finally found a buy-your-
way, corrupt route to power, more than they will be celebrating that
Obama is good for America.”
Having Obama become President could never be good for America.
Actually, if such happens, Obama places the USA in immediate danger of
more terrorism, as well as civil war… The latter uniquely-dire
possibility will be due to the backlash of those whites who are fed up
with how Blacks have used their “soft skins” to gain advantages. For
example: Blacks have long been hypersensitive to the ‘n’ (nigger)
word; the playing of ’Dixie’; the display of the Confederate Flag; and
to perhaps apt characterizations that there are ‘whores on their
basketball teams‘; and a higher percentage of criminals in their
midst.
To be happy, Blacks should learn from Zen: “Have the right attitudes,
and you insulate yourselves from most petty differences.” As I
explain almost weekly, the placating of Blacks’ concerns—which are
largely, discrimination concerns—will never happen if Obama gets
elected. An Obama presidency will only POLARIZE the nation against
allowing those issues to be addressed. Or… violence will ensue if
there is movement in that direction—because of Obama.
The best route to entrenching FAIRNESS in American, is this: Outlaw
political parties, and STOP allowing group-against-group fights to
influence our governmental processes in any way. Until Barack Obama
came along, Blacks were, rightly, becoming “uncolored”. In many cases
their successes rival those of whites. They were becoming accepted
and valued people in America. And they were on the right road. But
all of a sudden, Obama came along. His… “If Blacks will all vote as a
BLOCK, regardless, attitude” is threatening the past gains of Blacks.
Jews, like Blacks, have been treated terribly in the past. So, Jews
use their hypersensitivity to anti Semitism; they use nepotism; and
they use their bias ‘toward’ Jews to exercise undeserved influence and
power in the USA and in the world. The ’fear’ of loosing media and
Jewish support causes our elected officials to ask: “How high” they
need to jump to have Jewish approval. Having Black support is crucial
to winning elections, too. So, public officials tend to ask: “How
high” they should jump to get the Black vote. When Blacks were evenly
divided between the “two” parties, their power was neutralized. But
now that Obama has brought out “the race” issue, Blacks have become a
threat to the survival of the USA and the Human race. But enlightened
Blacks could become our salvation!
This week Barack Obama proposed that our “government” pay Americans
$1,000.00 to offset the high fuel costs. I heard that fact on TV
where Obama was shown, live, at a campaign rally. A serious-minded
Black man in the audience responded. He asked Obama whether it was
wise to cause the USA go further into debt to “correct” the energy
problem. That same man lamented that if the USA did such, Americans
would be paying the money back—with interest—to China…
True to form, Obama remained calm. His voice—like that of a corrupt
used-car dealer—never wavered. Obama sidestepped the man’s questions
by talking about how much worse off the USA has become since George
Bush took office. The implication was: “Elect Barack Obama President,
and there will be a reversal of our fortunes.” Writing those
$1,000.00 checks will hurt more than help. Going further into debt
when one is broke, isn’t the right thing to do. Is the ‘wisdom’ of my
last statement over-the-heads of the (supposed) 95% percent of Blacks
still “supporting” Obama?
For months, now, I have talked very little about John McCain. Because
of his white skin, McCain may be less predisposed to be ‘tested’ via
immediate terrorist’s attacks than Obama would. Because Obama is weak
on foreign policy, he will be tested in such areas, regularly—and from
every quarter. With the USA in renewed racial turmoil, we won’t need
any foreign problems. In his final address as President, George
Washington warned: “Beware of foreign entanglements.” Having Obama be
President would assure that we have those entanglements.
To his credit, McCain is a better speaker “on his feet” than he is
standing at a podium. Having him be elected President would be
‘better’ than Obama—by far. But John McCain wouldn’t improve our
chances of surviving as a nation. Our government, and how issues get
“decided”, is close to 100% anti democracy. So, is it any wonder that
not a soul in over a century has realized that democracies can’t work
with… Senates; Electoral Colleges; and with primaries held like…
sporting events, in sequence. Doing the wrong things for a very long
time doesn’t make them right! Is the survival of “the Senate” and the
Democratic and Republican Parties MORE important than the survival of
the USA?
Unless Blacks are willing to WITHDRAW their support for Obama, it is
likely that the USA won’t be around another century. Apparently, it’s
quite common for Black churches in America to keep the racial hatred
alive. That seems to get a lot of “amens” While those pastors keep
“reminding” Blacks of their past, they are implying that Blacks are
entitled to have special treatment in the future.
I heard, loud and clear, the cries of those 9/11 extremists, that:
“The USA hasn’t been behaving admirably with our overbearing world
capitalism, and with our policeman-for-the-world military might.” And
I have heard the decades-long cries of Blacks that they be treated
FAIRLY. Every word of my labor-of-love, New Constitution has been
written to allow the WISE WILL OF THE PEOPLE to replace ‘compromised’
governmental processes. The latter tend to predisposed that we will
have at least 50% losers all of the time. Sporting events have 50%
losers all of the time. But the live-or-die crisis that the USA now
faces must not be a… Black against white GAME…
“For want of a horseshoe nail, the shoe was lost. For want of a shoe,
the horse was lost. For want of a horse, the rider was lost. For
want of a rider, the battle was lost—ALL for want of a horseshoe
nail.” HEED MY WORDS!
Please know: “A New Constitution is the only ‘change’ that we need!”
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> On Jul 20, 4:19 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> POWER TO THE MINORITY IS ANTI DEMOCRACY
>
> We are a nation of disparate groups. Each of those have their pet
> objectives. But intoomany instances, the members of groups
> letters of Obama’s signature weretoolarge (high ego), and that his
> small letters weretoometiculously formed (overly detail oriented and
> self-centered) to be a good executive. Good executives should be
> great delegaters. All of us have heard Obama defend to the death
> every remark that he has ever made. The man is fartooinvolved in
> Copyrighted.)http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/eed2b...
Benj
Please know: “A New Constitution is the only ‘change’ that we need!”
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
Oh sure! All America needs is a new constitution that makes Obama
Generalissimo for life! Yeah that should do it!
Oh, wait! We've already got it written! And we've already got a lot of
states who voted for the Con-Con convention to implement it. I"m
talking about the Rockefeller-backed "NewStates Constitution"
nightmare. I'm sure you'll really love the new police state! Freedom
is SO hard for all you serfs to handle. All you'll do with it is get
drunk, smoke and do drugs until the country collapses! That's why we
need a "benign dictator" now to save all us goobers from ourselves!
And Obama is the one!
Feh!
You are WORSE than a moron. You are a traitor and should be hung by
your neck until you are dead (after a fair trial, of course).
NoEinstein
>
Dear Tom: Barack Obama's primary appeal as a "leader" (tongue-in-
cheek) is that he has lots of testosterone. That shows in the level
(masculine) inflection of his voice; the small size of his pelvis; and
his penchant for staring down those he is around. The present mood in
this country is that of a nation at war. In such times people want
the most masculine leaders. Also, Obama is highly (overly) fluent.
Having a masculine leader, who's (might be) smart hints of a strong
opponent.
Admitted or not, most are drawn to Obama because he doesn't play
fair (as in his disregard for democracy). Sadly, in hard times,
people see not playing fair as an advantage. There is that idea that:
"Good guys finish last." Barack Obama could never be called a good
guy!
Having a "bridge builder" (diplomat) would be nice. Obama has
zero experience in those areas. He says that he wants to find a
person "with integrity" to be his running mate. Obama has zero
integrity, himself. In spite of what you might think, nations are
more likely to respect a leader who is both strong AND has good
character, than otherwise. And they will be more respectful of a
strong leader if he isn’t too quick-on-the-trigger.
Obviously, you have thought a lot about our race for President—
even though you now live in China. I hope that the Olympics works
well for the World, and for China. Obama has purchased ad time for
the entire USA. He’s hoping that the "sports" association will get
people on his “team“. But his supporters must be gullible, indeed, if
they don't realize that the USA has only seen the tip of the terrorism
iceberg. The "real" election will be about whether we let a choose-up-
sides President give us false hope which will lead to our doom. My
assessment of Barack Obama is that he is the anti Christ, who is
leading us to our doom. If you know things about him, otherwise, I
will gladly read what you have to say. — NoEinstein —
>
> "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:1012e408-
>
> b4e9-4bcc-8f99-715ffeafc...@c65g2000hsa.googlegroups.com...> >Dear Tom: Thanks for replying! All ofscienceand all of our
> >concerns about... the economy, global warming, energy prices and etc.
> >won't matter one wit if the World doesn't correct its terrorism
> >problems. The USA-as the world's top military power-won't be a
> >'peaceful giant' if we are attacked again (like... right after the
> >next election). And if the attackers are "John McCain's" Islamic
> >extremists, it will be most difficult to retaliate without killing
> >innocent Muslims.
>
> >Right now, the good Muslims are mostly neutral regarding the taking of
> >innocent American lives. They understand the frustrations which are
> >causing the extremists to plan death and destruction. But most
> >Muslims won't be neutral if this country blindly attacks Muslims, even
> >if by accident. I- like the King of Jordan-see the Israeli-
> >Palestinian conflict as an immediate threat to the survival of the
> >human race. Barack Obama has just been to Israel. He assured those
> >Jewish jerks that the USA's military might will back Jews over
> >Muslims. THAT is the same as declaring war on a religion. And such
> >is a VERY dangerous thing to do.
>
> >My determination to stop Barack Obama from becoming President is
> >largely due to the main precept of my New Constitution. Such empowers
> >THE PEOPLE-in a democratic way- while almost completely disempowering
> >act in our behalves, while most people go about their daily lives with
> >little concern for governmental processes. As a result, at any one
> >time, 50% of the people are dissatisfied. The Democratic and the
> >our elected officials can be. Now, the processes of government are
> >more about one-up-manship of party against party than they are about
> >doing what is best for the American people.
>
> >When Obama started winning primaries, that was fine until I realized
> >that BLACKS were supporting him-because he is Black, and for that fact
> >alone. When issues regarding his church, NAFTA, and love of country,
> >etc. surfaced, the subsequent primary results should have reflected
> >those negative things about Obama. Yet, BLACKS remained unwavering in
> >their support of the man. Because of his candidacy, Obama has
> >reinstated racial division in America. For Blacks, this is about
> >becoming powerful... as a group. But group power is ALWAYS anti
> >democracy! In order for the USA to survive, we must become color
> >blind. The issue isn't racial hatred; it's about racial POWER. Any
> >power by any process that is unfair and anti democracy will eventually
> >cause enough dissention in the World to make WW III 'a likely'...
> >rather than a possible.
>
> >The Bushes and the Clintons were "smart enough" not to alienate the
> >media and big business-which are largely controlled by Jews. And they
> >because some of those are necessary 'votes' to get elected. While you
> >may have proof that the Bushes and Clintons were... 'bought' by Jews,
> >that fact isn't as important as the "sleep with the enemy" two-
> >faceness manifested of Hillary. Being in Congress requires that one
Tom Potter
"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:45349bfb-ae31-47c7...@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
On Jul 30, 2:14 am, Tom Potter <tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>Dear Tom: Barack Obama's primary appeal as a "leader" (tongue-in-
>cheek) is that he has lots of testosterone.
Obama's primary appeal as a "leader"
is the same as that of Ronald Reagan,
and that is
he is a charismatic BRIDGE BUILDER,
rather than a greedy, WAR MONGER and WALL BUILDER.
The issue in this election is very clear.
McCain is owned lock, stock and barrel
by the Israel Lobby that is responsible for 911,
the War on the Iraqi people,
and the gang that is trying to com
American Christians, Blacks Red Necks and Latinos
into sacrificing their lives, limbs, liberties and fortunes
to wage the Religious Wars of the 2000's,
so the Jews can make another trillion dollar haul,
as the loot from their Class Wars of the 1900's is almost gone.
As can be seen from today's news,
McCain may select a Jew to be his running mate,
and it does not take a student of history to comprehend
that if he did, and was elected,
he wouldn't live out his term, and the Jewish President,
would join with his Buddy Lieberman and the Israel Lobby
and use the power of the Federal government
to force Americans to wage their Religious Wars,
whether they wanted to or not.
As I pointed out in a previous post,
if Israel and American Jews force Iran, Russia, Pakistan, etc.
into a fight or flight situation, no doubt they will
take out the Persian Gulf oil shipping infrastructure,
and a few super tankers filled with oil,
and it will be impossible for Western Europe, America, Japan,
and China to deal with the situation, and they will
rapidly regress back into the stone age.
Can you imagine America trying to wage a major war
half way around the world, when the folks at home
can't get to work, have no air conditioning or heat,
and the food supply is being rapidly dissipated?
And of course, as America is coping with a sudden loss of
most of the energy they consume,
Palestinians, Lebanese, Syrians, Egyptians, Iraqis and Iranians
will be storming into Israel by foot, donkey, Jeep, bus, truck, etc
seeking revenge.
And of course, as Russia is energy and food sufficient,
and would shut off Western Europe's energy
if a major war broke out,
Russia would emerge as the most powerful nation on the planet.
Of course, as air and sea shipping and travel lanes would
be shut off, nations would be isolated
from trading and waging wars,
every nation would have to refocus their efforts
on their own problems and
on getting by on the energy available to them
As my Pappy used to say:
"Be careful of what you wish for
because your wish may be granted."
It appears to me that most Jews and racists
have some kind of a death wish.
They prefer death, conflict and destruction
to having a half-Black President,
who was raised by a White mother and White Grandparents.
NoEinstein
>
Dear Tom: No two people could be more different than Ronald Reagan
and Barack Obama! If you haven’t read, I am a lifelong graphologist—
one of, if not the best analyzers of handwriting in the entire World!
Ronald Reagan’s handwriting shows someone with a nervous temperament.
But that’s not a “loosing it” nervous temperament like John McCain
has. Reagan was a conventional thinking man; i.e., his value system
was like that of most good people. His personality showed that he was
responding to pressures from various fronts, but he could bend rather
than break. What that means is: Reagan never compromised his
principles! Those who show a legible, normal-sized and formed
writing, that also have a nervous but controlled temperament, are salt-
of-the-Earth people!
Reagan’s letter forms were legible, but not fussily exact. That
means that he was practical-minded and not overly concerned with
details. Writers like that are like the majority of good executives:
They can delegate authority, and are trusting enough to leave the
‘petty details’ to subordinates. Reagan’s signature and the body of
his texts were similar and conventional. His letter forms were
consistently rounded and easy-flowing. So, I know that he was
friendly and well liked. The latter was the primary social trait of
Reagan, which was evident in his smile, humor, easy body language, and
gestures. Those things caused Reagan to inspire trust and confidence!
On the personal side, Reagan was lonely. That fact is indicated
by the above average space between his words. He’d speak his mind,
then leave people alone to do the work required. His relationship
with his family was more detached than he wanted. He had simple, non-
materialistic ideals. The achieving of worthy goals meant more to him
than riches. And those were off-the-table if there were family
pressures. The goals came first, the family second. He was a
trusting parent—not an overly doting one. To him, hard knocks helped
build strong character. Sometimes that was tough-love, but it was
love!
Barack Obama is as artificial and unconventional as his biracial
parentage tells. From birth, he had identity issues that are ruling
him to this day. He has an almost schizophrenia-like way of bottling-
up his emotions. As a kid, he learned to keep his true feelings to
himself. That’s why he never developed the facial expressions and
body language of a normal person. Such a lack was the first abnormal
thing I noticed about him when he addressed the 2004 Democratic
Convention.
Obama’s inferiority complex demanded that he rise above his
heritage. With each little success, his ego swelled—as did his
capital letters. Those with huge egos make very poor executives.
It’s their way or no way. Obama would be a misfit in any group
dynamic such as in the Executive Office. He would keep getting in the
way of even desirable goals. People will resist him, because he is so
cock sure. The ideas of others seem small by comparison.
Yes, Obama has charisma. Basically, that means that he draws
attention to himself because of his bearing and “poise” in public
situations. But the majority of what passes as “poise” with Obama is
his from-birth, personality flaw of not showing appropriate emotions.
Many must be impressed that he doesn’t show nervousness. His control
over his outward emotions is so developed—but is actually pathological—
that he could pass any lie detector test with ease. The man is
emotionally dead. Obama’s dominant ‘tone’ is that of someone who
isn’t happy. He seems to be successful in rallying those who are too
shy to express their own unhappiness.
Obama PRINTS too many of his letters. Even in the body of his
writing he uses printed letters. He makes those forms with such
exactness that he reveals himself to be a pedant and a perfectionist.
Both of those characteristics mean that he has few if any friends.
He’s an individualistic, loner. His best contribution would be to be
left alone to work out the details, but he insists on controlling
every aspect of every activity around him. Obama has the personality
of a dictator and a demagogue, not a “Reagan-like” delegater and
listener.
Most people with unique personalities, whose writing shows flare
that’s lacking in average people, have superior intelligence. But
Obama has excessive deliberateness in his writing. Deliberateness
means artificiality, lack of spontaneity, phoniness, self-centeredness
and being overbearing. It also shows someone who places form above
substance. Because printing is slower than cursive writing, his IQ
isn’t as high as his verbal fluency hints. When Obama must express
his feelings, extemporaneously, he does so in a most broken and
halting matter, and his talking speed is much too slow! Some view
that as his being “really affected” by what he is saying. But I view
it as the expressions of someone with such mixed emotions about things
that he must PLAN his words. People who do that are UNTRUSTWORTHY.
That’s why I keep referring to Obama as: THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE.
Those who are too impressed by his poise-under-fire need to realize
that he’s got the selfish ego of the anti Christ. With Obama,
disaster will be omnipresent!
So, Tom, how is it that someone smart like you, who now lives in
China, has the idea that Obama has a snowball's-chance-in-hell of
improving the World condition? The US Congress—with the majority,
there, having huge egos, too—won’t be swayed by rhetoric. Every day,
rhetoric slides off of their backs like water on ducks. His “I’m
angry-toned” speeches appeal to some would-be voters. But after his
first term bogs down, words won’t be enough. Obama doesn’t have the
LIKABLE personality of a “bridge builder”. He doesn’t have the
character and the “knows the difference between right and wrong”
aptitude to be a respected leader. For the good of the nation, Barack
Obama should never be allowed to “get his picture” on any of our
currency, or on any paintings hung on the Capital walls. The survival
of the World is depending on it!
Your damning characterization of “McCain” are equally true of
Obama. Obama has already addressed those Jewish jerks, live, while
standing in front of that rusting war junk in Israel. In unambiguous
words, Obama promised to “support” Israel (with our military might).
He is being held captive by those &@$#1 Jews, too. But I’m using
every ounce of my being to see to it that NEITHER Obama nor McCain
become President! Electing LIBERTARIANS will send a massage to the
World that we American’s are as fed-up with our government as those in
foreign countries are. My New Constitution will instate—for the first
time in our history—democracy and FAIR PLAY in America! And there
will be swift consequences to any American business not being fair and
respectful to those less fortunate in other lands. By ’cleaning-up-
our-own-act”, here, the World will soon know that the USA is its best
friend.
Obama promises ’changes’… while he is leading us to our doom.
But be it known: “A fair, just and pro democracy NEW CONSTITUTION is
the only ’change’ that we need!” Pass it on! — NoEinstein —
>
> "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in messagenews:45349bfb-ae31-47c7...@k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Tom Potter
"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:43f8930f-5ccd-4e15...@d77g2000hsb.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 4, 12:00 am, "Tom Potter" <t...@hotsheet.com> wrote:
>>
>Dear Tom: No two people could be more different than Ronald Reagan
>build strong character. Sometimes that was tough-love, but it was
>love!
>
> Barack Obama is as artificial and unconventional as his biracial
>parentage tells. From birth, he had identity issues that are ruling
>him to this day. He has an almost schizophrenia-like way of bottling-
>up his emotions. As a kid, he learned to keep his true feelings to
>himself. That's why he never developed the facial expressions and
>body language of a normal person. Such a lack was the first abnormal
>thing I noticed about him when he addressed the 2004 Democratic
>Convention.
> Obama's inferiority complex demanded that he rise above his
>capital letters. Those with huge egos make very poor executives.
>It's their way or no way. Obama would be a misfit in any group
>dynamic such as in the Executive Office. He would keep getting in the
>way of even desirable goals. People will resist him, because he is so
>cock sure. The ideas of others seem small by comparison.
> Yes, Obama has charisma. Basically, that means that he draws
>attention to himself because of his bearing and "poise" in public
>situations. But the majority of what passes as "poise" with Obama is
>his from-birth, personality flaw of not showing appropriate emotions.
>Many must be impressed that he doesn't show nervousness. His control
>there, having huge egos, too-won't be swayed by rhetoric. Every day,
>rhetoric slides off of their backs like water on ducks. His "I'm
>angry-toned" speeches appeal to some would-be voters. But after his
>first term bogs down, words won't be enough. Obama doesn't have the
>LIKABLE personality of a "bridge builder". He doesn't have the
>character and the "knows the difference between right and wrong"
>aptitude to be a respected leader. For the good of the nation, Barack
>Obama should never be allowed to "get his picture" on any of our
>currency, or on any paintings hung on the Capital walls. The survival
>of the World is depending on it!
> Your damning characterization of "McCain" are equally true of
>Obama. Obama has already addressed those Jewish jerks, live, while
>standing in front of that rusting war junk in Israel. In unambiguous
>words, Obama promised to "support" Israel (with our military might).
>He is being held captive by those &@$#1 Jews, too. But I'm using
>every ounce of my being to see to it that NEITHER Obama nor McCain
>become President! Electing LIBERTARIANS will send a massage to the
>World that we American's are as fed-up with our government as those in
>time in our history-democracy and FAIR PLAY in America! And there
>will be swift consequences to any American business not being fair and
>respectful to those less fortunate in other lands. By 'cleaning-up-
>our-own-act", here, the World will soon know that the USA is its best
>friend.
>But be it known: "A fair, just and pro democracy NEW CONSTITUTION is
I just did some serious tasseography
and confirmed what I found by examining
the entrails of a couple of chickens,
and to be sure, I had sessions with
my Taro cards and Oujia board,
and they all indicated the same things.
What they indicated about McCain was:
"In your guts, you know he's nuts",
and that
it is better to elect
a bridge builder with black skin,
than to elect
a loose cannon with a black heart.
NoEinstein
>
RED, WHITE & “BLACK” INSULTS THE USA
At his campaign stops in Michigan and other places, Barack Obama makes
his speeches while standing in front of stanchioned flags.
Apparently, his staff has been carting those same flags from place to
place. It’s part of Obama’s ploy to legitimize his candidacy for
President. But one thing is very curious: Those flags are red, white
and “black”, not red, white and BLUE. Even so, those anti-America
flags seem appropriate for an anti-America candidate like Barack
Obama. The USA, if Obama becomes President, will be a BLACK place,
indeed.
This week, former NC senator, John Edwards, revealed that he had an
illicit affair. Such happened while his wife was undergoing treatment
for cancer. Months ago, Edwards endorsed Obama. By so doing, Edwards
looked like a shoe-in to be on Obama’s short list for Vice President.
But more and more, it seems that Obama’s “short list” includes anyone
with low enough morals to be on the same ticket with him.
Hillary Clinton has been an on-again, off-again, vice presidential-
possibility for Obama. He knows that unless he can start winning a
high percentage of the 18,000,000 voters who were for Hillary, that he
has no chance of becoming President. In her ‘consolation speech’
after the race was STOLEN from her, Clinton talked about “breaking
barriers”. But one barrier she hasn’t been able to break—not even
after months of campaigning for Obama—is to be able to say with
authority that any of those 18,000,000 voters AGAINST Obama will
suddenly follow Hillary, as if she is the Pied Piper of Hamlin, to get
Obama elected President.
It had been hinted that Obama would announce his V. P. choice right
after returning from his trip to Europe. But the negative publicity
resulting from his “campaigning” in Israel and in Germany must have
delayed that. Also, John McCain has been attacking “WHO” Obama is.
Quite frankly, ‘Paris Hilton’ would be a more attractive President
than Obama or McCain. Her main pluses are that she isn’t a puppet of
the Democratic nor the Republican Parties. If those two parties loose
in November, the American People will win! But I’m favoring the
Libertarians, over ‘Hilton’. In the last 50 years, Congress and… the
courts have let our civil liberties be removed one by one. My New
Constitution will reinstate those civil liberties which were taken
from us!
For a moment… suppose that “Paris Hilton” appealed to voters so much
that 51% of them wrote in her name. More people wanted her than
wanted the Democrat or the Republican, combined. But the Supreme
Court tells us that a ‘law’ says that there can be NO write-in votes
for President. As a result, the House of Representatives voted to
have the Democrats’ candidate be President, even though such person
finished a distant third in the effective “three way” race. Do you
believe that the American people should just go-along-with what the
Supreme Court says? And should they acquiesce to a ‘law’ with which
they don’t agree?
Under my New Constitution, never again will the Supreme Court dictate
anything to anybody that runs counter to the Will of the People. If
the above-mentioned ‘law’, which prevented the counting of write-in
votes for President, is disagreeable to the majority of the voters, it
becomes a non law.
For too long we Americans have deferred our fundamental powers to our
elected officials. And we have little or no say-so regarding who
those representatives are. Our choices are limited to the few who
have come up through the corrupt party system. To get on the ballot,
“career politicians”—who have already sold their souls to “the party
ideals”—are the ones with the best chance of winning. They couldn’t
care less about ‘representing’ the voters. But because the media… and
“tradition” has conditioned the voters that “the winner” will come
from either of the two parties’ choices… third party, or independent
candidates aren’t give enough attention to “seem” viable. And that’s
the stranglehold that the Democrats and Republicans have on America.
People need to realize that if the USA is to survive, they must take
back the control of our government!
The amazing opening ceremony of the Beiging Olympics highlights the
achievements which are possible if enough people have dedication and
are willing to work in unison with others. In America we pride
ourselves more on individuality, than in working in concert with
others. But as the USA is about to be dethroned as the greatest
industrial nation in the world, the need for achieving common goals is
crucial to our very survival.
Ayn Rand’s ‘Atlas Shrugged’ describes the decline and failure of the
USA. In such novel, government has evolved to be in control of all
aspects of daily life. And the centralized control isn’t working.
Similarly, the communist government in the former USSR tried to
control too many things, and it failed. Every time the voters “take
it on the chin” what our government is doing, government becomes more
of the taskmaster, and less of the servant. Polls show that from 75
to 85 percent of the American people are dissatisfied with the
direction our country is headed. We are on a sinking ship… Our task
is to save the vessel, or we all drown.
Barack Obama’s greatest threat is in “promising” hope to the masses,
while leaving the perennially-failed political processes in place.
His BLACK voting base—by their support—is risking not only their own
futures and lives, but also the futures and lives of the human race,
IF Obama gets to be President.
This week Hillary Clinton tried to appease those who voted AGAINST
Obama by saying that there might be a floor vote for her at this
month’s convention. While the latter statement was being assessed by
separatists, Bill Clinton finally agreed to address the convention
“for” Obama. The likely ambiguity in that speech should be worth
hearing!
Bill Clinton isn’t a racist. But he knows that the all-or-nothing
contest to put Obama in the White House has mobilized a money-
collecting machine to BUY his way into office. CNN’s Jack Kafferty
commented, recently, that the execs in the home office should be happy
with the campaign money being raised.
Obama keeps making his ubiquitous, unfulfillable “Million New Jobs”
promises to the national audiences that are watching the Olympics. In
each commercial, a portion of the American flag is shown behind him as
he speaks. No person in our history has ever desecrated our Stars and
Stripes the way Barack Obama does with each public appearance that he
makes.
Red, white and “Black” won’t work for America. Obama likes to laugh-
it-up with the boozing reporters who accompany him on his campaign
flights. But the undercurrent of public opinion seems to be less
‘for’ Obama than pundits had supposed would be the case—at this late
date before the convention. CNN’s Anderson Coo-per quoted poll
results showing Obama in the lead by six or so points. But Anderson
said—with his trademark, starched, the-world-is-coming-to-an-end
expression—that there are other polls which show John McCain leading.
Why is it that CNN keeps mentioning, first, the polls that show Barack
Obama leading? It’s because: Obama has the ad money that Jack
Kafferty has acknowledged is making CNN’s execs happy.
What makes ME happy is the fact that TIME-Warner’s earnings were down
24% in the last quarter. That quarter was when I started pointing out
that the “Jewish” controlled media is bad for the USA. It’s more than
ironic that Jews controlled the media in pre-Nazi Germany, too. When
those in government, first, get the sanction of Jews on everything
that’s up for a vote, try to imagine how much worse-off the USA will
be if Blacks—as a matter of entitlement—begin getting in their ‘wedge
of control’ in government, too. Civil war, terrorism and omnipresent
disaster will be “the weather” if Obama becomes President.
Sadly, the USA is a sinking ship. But my New Constitution is poised
and polished to be our salvation! All that’s needed is for us to have
a UNITY OF WILL. Those who watched those Chinese men, in white,
waging mock fights in… the BEST-choreographed Olympic presentation,
ever (!), should realize what unity of purpose can do. When the
American people, apart from any group biases, want something, they
shall have it! Paris Hilton… be careful ‘what’ you wish for!
Be it known: “A New Constitution is the only ‘change’ that we need!”
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> to winning elections,too. So, public officials tend to ask: “How
Tom Potter
"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:e2024cf6-3dc2-4198...@m36g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Regarding "NoEinstein's" campaign against Obama,
observe that Jews have a long history of
1. Migrating en masses to a rich, powerful nation.
2. Getting a few key national leaders under control
by buying, intimidating or conning them.
3. Using the leaders under their control to
promote the agenda of Jews rather than the
nation the leaders were franchised to serve.
4. At some point, the citizens of the nation,
reject the leaders and demand that the Jews
"Shape up or ship out."
5. The Jews invariably "Ship out",
taking as much of the wealth of their host nation
that they can get away with.
6. They migrate en masse to a new host nation,
and after they get a few leaders under control,
and infiltrate a few of that nation's government infrastructure,
they use those leaders and the infrastructure the control,
to continue to rape their previous host nation,
and to wage economic and real war against them.
The bottom line is that McCain
is owned lock, stock, and barrel by Jews,
and as can be seen, he is Joe Lieberman's sock puppet
Obama is the ONLY candidate for presidency since Reagan
that MIGHT not be owned by the Jewish/Israeli Lobby.
NoEinstein
>
AN OBAMA NATION WOULD BE AN ABOMINATION!
Later this month Barack Obama is slated to make his acceptance speech
for the Democratic nomination for President. Such will be on the
August 28th anniversary of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s, “I have a
dream…” speech. Like King, Obama is a good speech maker. And like
King, he sometimes can drawn big crowds. But Barack Obama is head and
shoulders below Martin Luther King, Jr. in every principle worthy of
fighting for.
King’s ‘non-violence’ movement should be the watchword for every
minority or group experiencing discrimination. King sought unity of
purpose, and unity of resolve. He was smart enough to know that
nothing is more divisive—within a group, or without—than violent
dissention. Because of his ‘non-violence’ attitude, many whites
recognized the rightfulness of King’s cause and began supporting the
movement. They knew that the time had come to start correcting wrongs
against Blacks that were happening just because of their race.
Primarily, King’s dream was to have unfair discrimination against
Blacks come to an end. To have that happen, the plight of Blacks had
to be continually informed to the world—until the message was
received. If King had been asked: “Do you want Blacks to be in
control of this country?”, he would probably have seen a symbolic
value in having such a thing be possible. But he would have preferred
that the unfair discrimination stop, and that Blacks be accepted as
‘non-blacks’ (colorless) by society as a whole. The latter process
was well under way until Barack Obama entered the picture. Because of
him, group-against-group dissention is increasing. Very effectively,
Obama is polarizing the voters with his unfulfillable promises.
Blacks, and ‘for change’ whites, aren’t going to be happy campers when
things don’t go as Obama is promising with each fateful speech that he
delivers.
Russia’s invasion of Georgia is unpleasant world news. Our pseudo
President, Barack Obama, hold his own press conference on the event,
before George Bush had addressed the press. Obama’s tone and his
demeanor was that of a movie or TV actor portraying “a” President. In
his selfish mind, if he can just “act” being President well enough,
perhaps he can convince people that he could be President in real
life, too. But the voters should see through his act.
When Obama addressed that huge crowd in Germany, he talked as if he
was the Commander in Chief and said: “The USA and Germany will work
together to solve the problems in the Middle East.” Many of you will
recall that both Germany and France refused to be “our allies” in
going after Sadom Husane. Now, we have this pseudo American
President, Barack Obama, flying out of this country to tell those
German jerks that they will be “involved” in determining the future of
the Middle East—the very responsibility which Germany and France had
shirked. Is Barack Obama Presidential? Or is he certifiably INSANE?
Having unfair discrimination end in the USA is certainly what this
country needs. My New Constitution has been written with those
objectives in mind. But Barack Obama’s continued candidacy for
President is pumping hot air into the perennially failed “two” party
system of government that has been bringing, and will bring this
country down. When the DNC decreed that it‘s acceptable to slash in
half the “democratic” vote of those in FL and MI, democracy is being
raped. As the main beneficiary of that rape, Obama talked proudly
about how important it is to obey “the rules”. But aren’t the rules
of democracy important, too? And shouldn’t Barack Obama have cared?
Four years ago, Obama was running for, but had not won, his Senate
seat. After he did so, that still-wet-behind-his-big-ears, ego maniac
has been campaigning to become President as if he’s the panacea for
everything ailing this country. Obama is deluded to think that by his
making of “good” speeches, that those in Washington will just be
bowled-over. In his sick mind, he will be dictating this “program” or
that. In such regard, Barack Obama is like Adolph Hitler. But the
parties aren’t going to “unite” just because Obama keeps saying so in
his speeches. For most of our history, the Democratic and Republican
Parties have split the USA right-down-the-middle. And unless we very
quickly kick political parties to oblivion, as by adapting my New
Constitution, the future of the USA is very dim, indeed.
Muslim extremists, or their clones, who were responsible for 9/11 are
still out there. Unless the USA starts doing the right things, from
the Muslim point of view, terrorism will return to the USA. And that
will be true whether Barack Obama or John McCain get elected
President. *** The first requirement for lessening the threat of
Muslim extremists is simply to stop “backing up” Israel with the
military might of this country. *** As has been the case throughout
history, where there are Jews, there is unfairness and resentfulness
of their unfairness.
Jews effectively control government and the media in the USA. They
have become… the clearing house for what we are allowed to read or
see, and they are the clearing house for what laws are allowed to be
passed. Only by NEGATING the undeserved and ruinous power of Jews in
the world, will there be hope for the long survival of the human race.
Muhammad was a wise and good man. But the rules he laid down for
daily living were most apt for the seventh century. At that time, the
rituals of daily life were intended to unify a largely illiterate
people. Daily prayers allowed Muslims to see and to recognize who
one’s ‘friends’ are. But more and more, the continuation of rituals,
of any kind, is increasing divisiveness. Divisiveness, carried to
extremes, is placing the world in danger of nuclear war. There will
only be one WW III, and it will be short.
When much of the world either has given, or is giving women equal
rights, Muslims largely oppress women. That one “difference” causes
Muslims not to be well liked. Those not well liked tend to be
withdrawn and suspicious. By having anything different—manner of
dress, conspicuous rituals, etc. which call attention to themselves,
Muslims are viewed as outsiders. Those who stand out as being
different aren’t very welcome in any, otherwise homogeneous, society.
Muhammad would be appalled that Muslims are killing Muslims over
issues of control. In the primitive age when that great man lived,
fighting and dieing for the right, was a noble thing. But I’m sure
that Muhammad wouldn’t approve of having Muslims become so isolated in
mixed societies that they consider anyone who is different to be their
enemy. The main ‘enemy’ of Muslims is their own insistence on
‘obedience’ to rituals that have long since out-lived their purposes
and their desirability.
If we allow our political parties to continue business-as-usual,
especially, as relates to how the USA does business throughout the
world, we will be inviting more terrorism. As I have said several
times before, the USA will not be content to, again, take-it-on-the-
chin if thousands of our citizens are killed. Our guns are cocked,
and Muslims will be the tender that starts us on the road to the
destruction of the human race. But that final battle need NOT happen!
The false hope that Barack Obama promulgates: "that ‘minorities’ can
be powerful", is placing the world in grave danger. *** Minorities
must NEVER be allowed to become powerful! *** Democracies are the
strength of the MAJORITY! To realize our attainable goals of having
peace and prosperity in the world, ALL that is required is for people
to RELAX their divisive group loyalties, and embrace the common bonds
that we all share! We should become color blind, and GROUP blind. No
rituals or group objectives are important enough to threaten the
entire human race!
Barack Obama is the anti-Christ! Any votes for him will seal our
doom. Simply by rejecting, and correcting, our form of government,
the entire world can be set on the right course! When everyone begins
caring about our neighbors as much as we care about ourselves,
everything will turn out just fine. “Pay it forward!”
Be it known: “A New Constitution is the only ‘change’ that we need!”
Pass it on! And be sure to vote for the Libertarian candidates—to
send the “right message” to the rest of the World!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> On Aug 3, 2:34 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> RED, WHITE & “BLACK” INSULTS THE USA
>
> At his campaign stops in Michigan and other places, Barack Obama makes
> his speeches while standing in front of stanchioned flags.
> Apparently, his staff has been carting those same flags from place to
> place. It’s part of Obama’s ploy to legitimize his candidacy for
> President. But one thing is very curious: Those flags are red, white
> and “black”, not red, white and BLUE. Even so, those anti-America
> flags seem appropriate for an anti-America candidate like Barack
> Obama. The USA, if Obama becomes President, will be a BLACK place,
> indeed.
>
> This week, former NC senator, John Edwards, revealed that he had an
> illicit affair. Such happened while his wife was undergoing treatment
> for cancer. Months ago, Edwards endorsed Obama. By so doing, Edwards
> looked like a shoe-in to be on Obama’s short list for Vice President.
> But more and more, it seems that Obama’s “short list” includes anyone
> with low enough morals to be on the same ticket with him.
>
> Hillary Clinton has been an on-again, off-again, vice presidential-
> possibility for Obama. He knows that unless he can start winning a
> high percentage of the 18,000,000 voters who were for Hillary, that he
> has no chance of becoming President. In her ‘consolation speech’
> after the race was STOLEN from her, Clinton talked about “breaking
> barriers”. But one barrier she hasn’t been able to break—not even
> after months ofcampaigningfor Obama—is to be able to say with
> Fortoolong we Americans have deferred our fundamental powers to our
> elected officials. And we have little or no say-so regarding who
> those representatives are. Our choices are limited to the few who
> have come up through the corrupt party system. To get on the ballot,
> “career politicians”—who have already sold their souls to “the party
> ideals”—are the ones with the best chance of winning. They couldn’t
> care less about ‘representing’ the voters. But because the media… and
> “tradition” has conditioned the voters that “the winner” will come
> from either of the two parties’ choices… third party, or independent
> candidates aren’t give enough attention to “seem” viable. And that’s
> the stranglehold that the Democrats and Republicans have on America.
> People need to realize that if the USA is to survive, they must take
> back the control of our government!
>
> The amazing opening ceremony of the Beiging Olympics highlights the
> achievements which are possible if enough people have dedication and
> are willing to work in unison with others. In America we pride
> ourselves more on individuality, than in working in concert with
> others. But as the USA is about to be dethroned as the greatest
> industrial nation in the world, the need for achieving common goals is
> crucial to our very survival.
>
> Ayn Rand’s ‘Atlas Shrugged’ describes the decline and failure of the
> USA. In such novel, government has evolved to be in control of all
> aspects of daily life. And the centralized control isn’t working.
> Similarly, the communist government in the former USSR tried to
> controltoomany things, and it failed. Every time the voters “take
> ironic that Jews controlled the media in pre-Nazi Germany,too. When
> those in government, first, get the sanction of Jews on everything
> that’s up for a vote, try to imagine how much worse-off the USA will
> be if Blacks—as a matter of entitlement—begin getting in their ‘wedge
> of control’ in government,too. Civil war, terrorism and omnipresent
NoEinstein
>
WHILE OBAMA GRINS-IT-UP, AMERICANS MUST NOT BE DUPED.
Barack Obama—the would-be fixer of all that ails America—has finally
selected Senator Joe Biden of Delaware to be his “…next President,
(no) Vice President” …running mate. If such introduction by Obama,
yesterday, was a Freudian Slip, the country would be better off if
“the ticket” is reversed from the start.
Those two giddily-happy campers didn’t “butt fists”. But Joe Biden
wore Obama’s uniform: a long-sleeve, going to do ‘sweaty work’, dress
shirt with the sleeves rolled up. Also, Biden wore his Hillary
Clinton, Alice-in-Wonderland, blue tie. When Clinton “conceded” to
Obama, Obama had worn a blue tie much like that. It had matched the
blue outfit that Hillary wore. Yesterday, when she “grinned like a
Cheshire Cat” and told the media how “thrilled” she is that someone
with Biden’s experience has been chosen, she was wearing that same…
basic blue.
Apparently, Obama believes that he can win over the millions of blue
collar workers who voted AGAINST him, and for Clinton, simply by
wearing “their”… blue color. However, I believe those hard working
people—who are the backbone of America—are too smart to fall for
Obama’s “color” ruse.
Lately, John McCain has been climbing in the polls. Analysts are
saying that McCain (and yours truly) have made Obama himself… “the
issue”. CNN’s David Gergen suggests that the only way Obama can win
is if he makes… “We don’t want four more years…” of Bush his mantra.
But we’ve been hearing that same thing from both Obama and Clinton for
months. Even so, Obama is dropping in the Polls.
Democrats hope that the hoopla of their convention—that is set to
start, soon—will make Americans get out of their hard-times gloom, and
their “80 plus percent discontent with the direction this country is
headed”. Obama is the Democrat’s “Red, White, and Black” standard
bearer, for now. Presidents will come an go, but the corrupt, anti
America Democratic Party hopes to continue to pull at least 51% of the
strings in Washington. They like to feel like… “winners”, and because
of it, make all of us in the ‘sinking ship’ that is the USA… feel that
all is well.
Obama will be doling-out $1,000.00 checks from “who knows were” (China
and us) to BRIBE the American voters who are strapped by high energy
prices. Obama says that if he is elected president, he alone will be
able to solve this country’s energy problems. Al Gore has made more
speeches about energy (and global warming) than anyone. Has a viable
alternative to fossil fuels been found? And can government mandate a
solution?
With each false promise that Barack Obama makes, gullible Americans
are getting the wool-pulled-over-their-eyes. If “the Titanic” is set
to sail, and Obama smiles—like Blacks can do so well—and if the false
security of his smiles lures you to get on that ship as if it will
surely get you to your destination, then Obama’s smiles, in these hard
times, are VERY threatening things, indeed!
It has taken Obama far longer to find a running mate, ANY running
mate, than had been expected. If the Democrats really liked Biden for
the ticket, why wasn’t he right up there with Hillary Clinton to the
end? In the debates, Biden was someone who could entertain with an
occasional retort, or humorous reply to questions. He also had slants
on the issues that could have been better, or at least as good, as
those of Clinton and Obama. But Biden couldn’t do the “dirty deed”
that all good career politicians must do: raise huge amounts of
campaign funds.
To his credit, I suppose, Biden is Chairman of the Senate Foreign
Relations Committee. However, Democrats would have us believe that
foreign relations will be better if we YANK the chairman, and let
Biden be the President of the Senate. The latter’s only power is to
pound a gavel and to break a rare tie in the Senate. Vice presidents,
also, are required to attend a lot of state funerals. With the world
quickly being thrown into crisis, if Obama gets into the White House,
there will be a lot of state funerals to go to… Not only will there
be civil war in America between “factions” of whites and Blacks, there
will be outright murder of Muslims in this country if John McCain’s
“Muslim extremists” cause another 9/11.
The USA is sitting on a powder keg, and Barack Obama will be the spark
that could well end the human race, IF he manages to BUY his way into
the White House… No one in our history has been more threatening to
the survival of the country than that Anti-Christ, Barack Obama. If
he continues to dupe any more “change-oriented” Americans his way, we
are doomed.
Imagine, if you will, that there is a non-controversial, perfectly-
well-qualified candidate for President. And imagine that there is
another well qualified running mate. Can those two “ideal” candidates
save the USA? Probably not. As I keep saying, the executive isn’t a
dictatorship. The main thing screwing up this country is the party-
against-party, group-against-group, and class-against-class fights
that have for too long been the accepted norm in Washington. The
Democratic and Republican Parties are the clearing houses for who our
elected officials can be. And anyone who gets party sanction had
damned well toe the party line.
We are a nation divided. And a nation divided cannot stand… Our “two”
political parties are the cause. The present Constitution doesn’t
even mention political parties. But my New Constitution does! It
says: …“Federal government shall be limited to functions that cannot
be better performed by local and state governments. Such shall be the
enabler of freedom, justice, fair commerce, climates of opportunity,
cooperative efforts, and national security both internal and
external. Such shall be businesslike yet human; impartial yet
focused; considerate of our environment, heritage, peace and
tranquillity; effective without boastfulness; and divorced from
politics.” Folks, political parties are an anathema!
Additionally, First Amendment rights are expanded. But the “freedom”
of the media will have much need constraints. The corrupt media, such
as TIME-Warner, is largely controlled by Jews for Jews. Being
“Jewish” isn’t just a religion, it’s a secret society bent on
controlling the world. And the Holocaust is the lever that allows
Jews to gain that control. Nice people tend to go out of their way to
defer to Jews, because of their tragedy. When the world gives them an
‘inch’, Jews will take a mile…
In every sentence, my New Constitution champions democracy and fair
play. When our elected officials in Washington, effectively, pass
everything that gets done by Jews—to see if any of them are… hurt—
democracy is dead. Jews are a minority, and minorities are the
antithesis of any successful democracy! If Barack Obama gets elected,
Blacks will be expecting to exercise their new minority power, too.
But unlike the Jewish influence, having Blacks come to power will be
visually apparent. And when Obama’s false promises go unfulfilled,
the before mentioned consequences will loom.
But dire things need not happen IF those 80 plus percent of
discontented Americans will just realize that political-party-
divisiveness is the main cause. My saying: “…and divorced from
politics” is all that needs be said to correct the problem! Never
again will there be political conventions to pump air into
unfulfillable promises. And never again will there be an anti-
democracy, divisive US Senate that the ‘representative’ House must
pass every bill by before such can become law. The time required to
consider and vote on bills will be cut in half. And so will the cost
of running Congress!
While Obama and Biden try to SMILE their way into office, thinking
Americans should be asking this: “Do I trust myself, and my fellow
Americans, to control government—rather than having government
controlling me and my family?” Or will I to give the perennially-
failed “two” party system one more chance, just because a still-wet-
behind-the-ears Barack Obama SMILES, and promises that he can just
snap his fingers and Congress will do his bidding. If Joe Biden could
have done that, with ‘his’ influence and power, there wouldn’t be need
to have someone with Biden’s foreign policy experience on Obama’s
ticket.
John McCain is the lesser of two evils. With him, a new minority
won’t be brought to power… along with the Jews. But unless the Muslim
concerns which cause 9/11 are addressed, and PDQ, terrorism will
return in this country.
My New Constitution mandates that the USA, and its businesses, treat
others fairly. Not just those in this country, but everywhere. The
Democratic and Republican Parties have STRANGLEHOLDS on government.
Needed changes, like ratifying my New Constitution, won’t happen
unless the voting public has the RESOLVE to fix our long broken system
of government. CNN’s Lu Dobbs likes to ask: “Don’t the American
people deserve a system of government that works?” This November vote
for the LIBERTARIAN candidates. There will be two years time for my
simple, but powerful New Constitution to be explained to everyone.
All of the ‘good stuff’ in the original Constitution has been
retained, while the problem areas have been corrected from every
conceivable perspective!
Give democracy a chance, People! Please know: “A New Constitution is
the only ‘change’ that we need!” Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> life,too. But the voters should see through his act.
>
> When Obama addressed that huge crowd in Germany, he talked as if he
> was the Commander in Chief and said: “The USA and Germany will work
> together to solve the problems in the Middle East.” Many of you will
> recall that both Germany and France refused to be “our allies” in
> going after Sadom Husane. Now, we have this pseudo American
> President, Barack Obama, flying out of this country to tell those
> German jerks that they will be “involved” in determining the future of
> the Middle East—the very responsibility which Germany and France had
> shirked. Is Barack Obama Presidential? Or is he certifiably INSANE?
>
> Having unfair discrimination end in the USA is certainly what this
> country needs. My New Constitution has been written with those
> objectives in mind. But Barack Obama’s continued candidacy for
> President is pumping hot air into the perennially failed “two” party
> system of government that has been bringing, and will bring this
> country down. When the DNC decreed that it‘s acceptable to slash in
> half the “democratic” vote of those in FL and MI, democracy is being
> raped. As the main beneficiary of that rape, Obama talked proudly
> about how important it is to obey “the rules”. But aren’t the rules
> of democracy important,too? And shouldn’t Barack Obama have cared?
>
> Four years ago, Obama was running for, but had not won, his Senate
> seat. After he did so, that still-wet-behind-his-big-ears, ego maniac
> has beencampaigningto become President as if he’s the panacea for
Tom Potter
"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message news:92e9ff1d-2659-4cac...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 17, 10:32 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>
>WHILE OBAMA GRINS-IT-UP, AMERICANS MUST NOT BE DUPED.
>
>selected Senator Joe Biden of Delaware to be his ".next President,
>(no) Vice President" .running mate. If such introduction by Obama,
>yesterday, was a Freudian Slip, the country would be better off if
>"the ticket" is reversed from the start.
>
>Those two giddily-happy campers didn't "butt fists". But Joe Biden
>wore Obama's uniform: a long-sleeve, going to do 'sweaty work', dress
>shirt with the sleeves rolled up. Also, Biden wore his Hillary
>Clinton, Alice-in-Wonderland, blue tie. When Clinton "conceded" to
>Obama, Obama had worn a blue tie much like that. It had matched the
>blue outfit that Hillary wore. Yesterday, when she "grinned like a
>Cheshire Cat" and told the media how "thrilled" she is that someone
>basic blue.
I was disappointed to see that NoEinstein"
didn't address the fundamental issue facing
voters in the presidential election,
and that is,
do the voters want more wars,
more unemployment, more conflict in America and the world,
higher gas prices, more government spending,
more loss of lives and limbs by American servicemen,
more loss of trust and respect for America and Americans,
more bank failures, more lack of government honesty and disclosure,
more depletion of American's military arsenal,
more consumption of scarce energy resources by the military
far away from America, greater government control of the
lives of the citizens, the use of the National Guard
to police Iraq rather than fight floods in New Orleans,
more attacking messengers rather than addressing issues,
and more control of America by the Israeli Lobby.
If the voters like what the Israeli Lobby did to
America over the last eight years
by it's control of George Bush,
they should vote for the McCain/Lieberman ticket.
The choice in the next election
is between building bridges between people,
or building walls between people and fighting wars.
Androcles
"Tom Potter" <t...@hotsheet.com> wrote in message
news:g91vau$i7q$2...@aioe.org...
"NoEinstein" <noein...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
news:92e9ff1d-2659-4cac...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Aug 17, 10:32 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>>
>WHILE OBAMA GRINS-IT-UP, AMERICANS MUST NOT BE DUPED.
>
>Barack Obama-the would-be fixer of all that ails America-has finally
>selected Senator Joe Biden of Delaware to be his ".next President,
>(no) Vice President" .running mate. If such introduction by Obama,
>yesterday, was a Freudian Slip, the country would be better off if
>"the ticket" is reversed from the start.
>
>Those two giddily-happy campers didn't "butt fists". But Joe Biden
>wore Obama's uniform: a long-sleeve, going to do 'sweaty work', dress
>shirt with the sleeves rolled up. Also, Biden wore his Hillary
>Clinton, Alice-in-Wonderland, blue tie. When Clinton "conceded" to
>Obama, Obama had worn a blue tie much like that. It had matched the
>blue outfit that Hillary wore. Yesterday, when she "grinned like a
>Cheshire Cat" and told the media how "thrilled" she is that someone
>with Biden's experience has been chosen, she was wearing that same.
>basic blue.
I was disappointed to see that NoEinstein"
didn't address the fundamental issue facing
voters
===================================
Not physics. Fuck off, Potter.
NoEinstein
>
CONTINUE TO PLAY THE GAME OF POLITICS AND AMERICANS LOOSE.
For many, if a crowd has gathered, there must be something important
going on. If you happen to channel-flip past a scene with a throng of
people in a large auditorium, there could be a big boxing match
slated, or there might be an evangelist, rock group, comedian, or even
a political convention. But the fact that a large group seems
interested in the outcome of whatever the event is, there will be a
degree of curiosity.
Movie theatres have stayed in business after TVs got into most homes,
largely because people are gregarious. They like being close to other
people, and hearing the reactions of others to “Jaws” devouring
someone helpless in the ocean. Being alone when something dramatic
happens diminishes the need to express emotions, because there’s no
one to hear them, or see them.
Many of you who have read some of my weekly posts on “Campaigning is a
science, too.” will recall that I have warned that the selecting of
our President should not be viewed like some game or sporting event.
As most realize, sporting events have a winner and a looser. So, it
is guaranteed that there will be 50% loosers.
Effectively in the USA there are just two teams—Democrats and
Republicans. Those two amounted to a “Black and White” ideological
division that made it easy for people to tell for whom they should
vote on election day. In fact, to make voting really easy, there’s
even been a lever or button to push to simplify the process by voting
a “straight” ticket. Do the latter and the voter never has to
consider the names, or the qualifications, of anyone being voted for.
But isn’t an informed electorate the foundation of our hoped-for…
democracy?
For much too long, Blacks in particular, have used the “convenient”
straight party ticket as their race’s sanctioned, follow-the-leader
votes. Blacks make great athletes. And blacks are some of the most
loyal sports fans. But again, any game, or two party “Ballot Bowl”,
will produce about 50% loosers.
The Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr. definitely had a dream. I think
most would agree that King’s dream was that racial discrimination
end. If most Blacks had a choice between having the latter happen—for
certain—vs. having a figurehead Black, such as Barack Obama, be
elected President, most Blacks would prefer the former. Unless there
is a likely desirable outcome from an election, then what use is it to
keep pushing for just a… figurehead, when the long over-due objectives
of ending most discrimination is so readily at hand?
For me it’s always a thrill to hear Senator Ted Kennedy make a
speech. He is one of the more affable public figures. Intuition told
me that he would mention how his brother, JFK, had challenged this
country to go to the Moon. At this moment, the American Stars and
Strips, held level via a wire frame that’s implanted on the windless
Moon—is a testament to what the USA, and the human race, can
accomplish if we have the combined unity of resolve.
Ted Kennedy also mentioned what I have been insisting: That we “end
group-against-group bickering“. I also keep pushing to end… party-
against-party, and class-against-class fights. In each of those three
cases, the identity of a person with groups, a party, or with a class,
allows others to purport to speak for you. All of the dastardly
lobbying in this country is related to fights by minorities (not
necessarily Blacks) to have more power than a pure democracy would
grant. And having more power than is granted is basically playing
unfair. Will Blacks ever be happy unless the people they deal with
play fair? Therefore, shouldn’t Blacks be insisting that the person
whom they support for President has as his personal constitution:
PLAYING FAIR?
When Barack Obama embraced the “rules” of the DNC over the rules of
democracy, he showed himself to be someone who doesn’t play fair. And
when he kept talking about his being “ahead in the delegate count”, he
showed that he doesn’t understand the FAIR concept of a democracy: one
person, one vote, correctly counted. And he showed himself to be
especially unfair in the final months when Hillary Clinton was
outpacing him in the latter primaries. Most of Obama’s early lead
came from caucus states. In caucuses, persuasive speakers get to sway
the voters—those who will tolerate attending public gatherings—with
last minute campaigning. The latter is like allowing someone of the
opposite party go into your voting booth to try to dissuade you from
your personal choice. Because blacks tend to be very verbal people,
Barack Obama won most of the caucuses. But as long as he came out
ahead, he saw no problem with any of the processes. Nor has he seen
it to be a problem that the entire primary setup allows the media to
treat the selection of our President like… a game—a game in which the
corrupt media tends to determine the outcome.
It was most poignant that Ted Kennedy ended his great speech by
saying: “Hopes and dreams live on!” Political conventions are about
pumping-up the voters to “hope” and “dream”. Those same positive
aspirations have been said at every convention in memory. Yet, 80
plus percent of Americans are dissatisfied with the direction this
country is headed. Should Ted Kennedy, or anyone for that matter,
keep building up people’s hopes and dreams—when history shows clearly
that such have gone unrealized, quadrennially? Simply by ratifying my
New Constitution, in 2010, there will be the fulfillment of hopes and
dreams, not just the deferment of those… until the next election.
Michelle Obama’s speech was predictable; too long; and boring by the
second half. She should have followed Ted Kennedy’s example: “Be
prepared; be brief; and be seated.” At one point she said how much
she “loves America“. Immediately, the audience injected long
applause, and Michelle smiled. Many of you will recall that Michelle
Obama had said, following her husband’s win in an important state:
“This is the first time I have loved America.” Such a statement
didn’t seem too unusual, because the Obamas regularly attended the
“hate the USA” church of the Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Her statement
seemed like a ploy to correct past errors by saying that she loves
America. I suppose she’ll love it a lot, if she gets to be the First
Lady. But Michelle won’t be loving the civil war and the terrorism
that likely will follow…
Apparently, commentators like David Gergen felt that the convention
didn’t have enough “show”. There was a dull first two hours in which
many would-be viewers simply channel-flipped away, and left the
commentators talking just to themselves. Today, I heard CNN’s John
King explaining how important it is for Obama to be able to win the
Jewish South Florida area. Because of his Big Ad Bucks, the Jewish
media hopes that Barack Obama will win. Lu Dobbs, and others, have
pointed out that Obama has been on the cover of magazines six times
more often than has John McCain. Doesn’t that show the bias which
I’ve been talking about? Perhaps those South Florida Jews don’t wish
to have their effective control over Washington diluted by having
ANOTHER minority, Blacks, getting into power, and expecting to have
things done their way.
If we let it happen… minorities will surely bring us down. But
there’s hope! Simply don’t vote for either of the promise-making
Democratic or Republican Parties. Go to the polls in November and
vote LIBERTARIAN! By so doing you will shake the powers-that-be to
their very bones! After my New Constitution is ratified, never again
will government be the lord over the People. Government shall become—
by popular demand—the SERVANT of the USA!
Be it known: “A New Constitution is the only ‘change’ that we need.”
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> On Aug 17, 10:32 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> WHILE OBAMA GRINS-IT-UP, AMERICANS MUST NOT BE DUPED.
>
> Barack Obama—the would-be fixer of all that ails America—has finally
> selected Senator Joe Biden of Delaware to be his “…next President,
> (no) Vice President” …running mate. If such introduction by Obama,
> yesterday, was a Freudian Slip, the country would be better off if
> “the ticket” is reversed from the start.
>
> Those two giddily-happy campers didn’t “butt fists”. But Joe Biden
> wore Obama’s uniform: a long-sleeve, going to do ‘sweaty work’, dress
> shirt with the sleeves rolled up. Also, Biden wore his Hillary
> Clinton, Alice-in-Wonderland, blue tie. When Clinton “conceded” to
> Obama, Obama had worn a blue tie much like that. It had matched the
> blue outfit that Hillary wore. Yesterday, when she “grinned like a
> Cheshire Cat” and told the media how “thrilled” she is that someone
> with Biden’s experience has been chosen, she was wearing that same…
> basic blue.
>
> Apparently, Obama believes that he can win over the millions of blue
> collar workers who voted AGAINST him, and for Clinton, simply by
> wearing “their”… blue color. However, I believe those hard working
> people—who are the backbone of America—aretoosmart to fall for
> that have fortoolong been the accepted norm in Washington. The
NoEinstein
> "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in messagenews:92e9ff1d-2659-4cac...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> - Show quoted text -
Dear Tom: For a man living in China, how did you get the notion that
what I'm proposing (a New Constitution) is going to cause wars?
Unless the USA quits taking advantage of the cheap labor and materials
in other countries, and stops using our military might to "back"
Israel, there will be an increasing likelihood that WW III could be in
our near future. Only by NOT electing Obama nor McCain will the world
come to realize that the USA is about to become "a Kinder, Gentler
Nation." May world peace be the lasting result! — NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
>
CLINTON GETS UPSTAGED BY REMARKS OF ONE OF HER DELEGATES.
Last night, I was watching CNN’s coverage of the Democratic
Convention. The expected highlight, Tuesday, was the long anticipated
speech of a “defeated” Hillary Clinton. If you will recall… following
the botched-up primaries, Clinton—for whatever reason—put aside her
year long differences with Obama and endorsed him. She seemed to be
doing so because she thinks that the “party’s goals” are more
important than her goals had been. Her most eloquent speech, last
night, was better delivered than most speeches which I can remember—
not just her speeches, anyone’s. Mainly, that’s because such seemed
to be coming from “some part” of her curious heart. Her husband and
daughter, watching in the audience, looked to be as touched as I was.
And most who listened, including the commentators, were, too.
Of all those who were shown on camera during the speech, Michelle
Obama had the most poker face. She had probably heard, as had those
following “the news”, what the outline of the Clinton’s speech likely
included. From the Obamas’ and the Democrat’s positions, those
18,000,000 voters AGAINST Barack Obama, who were FOR Hillary Clinton
must somehow be delivered to Barack on a silver platter, or he won’t
be elected President.
The interesting lead-in Speech by the former Governor of Virginia
showed more of Ted Kennedy’s hopes and dreams. Still, there’s a huge
piece of the “suitable to be President” pie that must be found.
Michelle Obama knows that her husband falls short of Clinton as a
speaker. And though Michelle is an attorney, her own speech Monday
night didn’t approach the power of Clinton’s, either. Somehow, the
oft-repeated fact that the Obamas came from “poor backgrounds” just
isn’t cutting-it as the link that Barack Obama needs to “connect” with
the rural blue collar voters. It’s difficult to connect with those
whom Obama so offended with his “guns and religion” remarks during the
primaries.
I recorded Clinton’s speech, but turned off the VCR soon afterward. I
continued to listen to the post speech comments, and I looked at the
teary eyes—mostly of the women who had listened from the audience.
CNN was given word that there was a Black lady delegate, in the
audience, who should be interviewed about Clinton’s speech. Suzanne
Malveaux asked that lady—who looked to be in her forties—what she
thought about it. While Suzanne held the microphone, the shy but
clearly articulate lady began to show more HEART and more SOUL than
had Clinton, herself, in the speech!
The lady was wearing a white tee shirt with big printed letters. I
was so affected by the lady’s deep emotions that I could only
concentrate on her face. Though on camera, she didn’t look at it.
She just kept turning her eyes toward the left as if torn to say what
is really in her heart. But say it she did!
That Black Lady is one of the delegates for Hillary. She was asked
who she will vote for in November. “Not McCain…” Then, she
summarized the long road that Blacks have had to travel just to get to
vote in this country. Yet, her tone seemed to imply that it isn’t
likely that she will be voting for Obama. At one point she said: “…
two more days”, as if she would be giving Barack Obama two more days
to convince her. But she almost bit her lip at the prospect. Then,
she said, “…this year, my relatives will have to call me to go vote.
In past years I’ve called them to go vote.”
No words of mine can summarize the POWER of the genuine emotions which
that fine lady was expressing! Almost in awe, she kept mentioning how
“presidential” Hillary Clinton was as she spoke. Relatively speaking,
that meant the lady believes in her heart that Hillary Clinton is more
presidential than Barack Obama. She concluded her tearful, choking
words by saying , “… resume; his resume. No Harvard graduate, right
out of school, gets hired to be the CEO of a major corporation…” At
that Suzanne thanked the wonderful Black lady. Anderson Cooper was so
moved by what he heard, that he suggested that the same lady be
interviewed after Barack makes his acceptance speech, Thursday night,
to see if such speech changes the lady’s mind.
One sign of just how much trouble Obama’s campaign is in, is the fact
that the millions in the likely TV viewing audience won’t satisfy
Obama’s ego, and his desire to bask in the limelight. That’s the
reason he has chosen to deliver his speech before a packed-in, or
trucked-in, 80,000 person audience in the new Denver football
stadium. When Obama campaigned… in Germany, people went “Wow!” that
20,000 showed up to listen. Having a large crowd confirms the
speaker, does it not? Probably not as much as Obama is needing to
have his Manchurian candidacy be confirmed. Try as he will, Obama
could never speak with the genuine passion of Hillary Clinton. As he
reads from the teleprompter, his face will be the same dead-pan
expression of latent anger with which he has delivered every other
speech he has ever made in his life. So, his speech will fall short
of that of Hillary Clinton.
About 10% of Blacks are true, color-blind, members of the human race
and independent thinkers. Those don’t need to have a figurehead Black
like Obama be elected President to feel confirmed. They are perfectly
well confirmed just by doing what they think is right—even if that
goes against what most of their race are doing. Charles Barkley, the
basketball great, was interviewed at the convention last night.
Because of the poverty issues among Blacks that need to be addressed,
Barkley is considering running for Governor of Alabama. But he says
he’ll probably do so as an independent, because… “the Democrats and
Republicans are too corrupt.”
Folks, Charles Barkley knows exactly what I have been telling you for
many months: Moving away from the two major parties is our only hope!
As long as “the game” is party-against-party, there will always be 50%
loosers. Supporters of Obama should realize the peril that the USA
will be in if we elect a “Harvard graduate just out of school to be
the CEO” of America!
The best course for all thinking Americans is to eschew both major
parties and to vote—with a clear conscious—for the LIBERTARIAN
candidates! It’s been said that “Imitation is the highest form of
flattery.” Last night, Obama and the Democrats copied my slogan
below… But I was the FIRST to say:
Be it known: “A New Constitution is the only ‘change’ that we need!”
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> On Aug 24, 7:54 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> CONTINUE TO PLAY THE GAME OF POLITICS AND AMERICANS LOOSE.
>
> For many, if a crowd has gathered, there must be something important
> going on. If you happen to channel-flip past a scene with a throng of
> people in a large auditorium, there could be a big boxing match
> slated, or there might be an evangelist, rock group, comedian, or even
> a political convention. But the fact that a large group seems
> interested in the outcome of whatever the event is, there will be a
> degree of curiosity.
>
> Movie theatres have stayed in business after TVs got into most homes,
> largely because people are gregarious. They like being close to other
> people, and hearing the reactions of others to “Jaws” devouring
> someone helpless in the ocean. Being alone when something dramatic
> happens diminishes the need to express emotions, because there’s no
> one to hear them, or see them.
>
> Many of you who have read some of my weekly posts on “Campaigningis ascience,too.” will recall that I have warned that the selecting of
> our President should not be viewed like some game or sporting event.
> As most realize, sporting events have a winner and a looser. So, it
> is guaranteed that there will be 50% loosers.
>
> Effectively in the USA there are just two teams—Democrats and
> Republicans. Those two amounted to a “Black and White” ideological
> division that made it easy for people to tell for whom they should
> vote on election day. In fact, to make voting really easy, there’s
> even been a lever or button to push to simplify the process by voting
> a “straight” ticket. Do the latter and the voter never has to
> consider the names, or the qualifications, of anyone being voted for.
> But isn’t an informed electorate the foundation of our hoped-for…
> democracy?
>
> For muchtoolong, Blacks in particular, have used the “convenient”
> last minutecampaigning. The latter is like allowing someone of the
> opposite party go into your voting booth to try to dissuade you from
> your personal choice. Because blacks tend to be very verbal people,
> Barack Obama won most of the caucuses. But as long as he came out
> ahead, he saw no problem with any of the processes. Nor has he seen
> it to be a problem that the entire primary setup allows the media to
> treat the selection of our President like… a game—a game in which the
> corrupt media tends to determine the outcome.
>
> It was most poignant that Ted Kennedy ended his great speech by
> saying: “Hopes and dreams live on!” Political conventions are about
> pumping-up the voters to “hope” and “dream”. Those same positive
> aspirations have been said at every convention in memory. Yet, 80
> plus percent of Americans are dissatisfied with the direction this
> country is headed. Should Ted Kennedy, or anyone for that matter,
> keep building up people’s hopes and dreams—when history shows clearly
> that such have gone unrealized, quadrennially? Simply by ratifying my
> New Constitution, in 2010, there will be the fulfillment of hopes and
> dreams, not just the deferment of those… until the next election.
>
> Michelle Obama’s speech was predictable;toolong; and boring by the
> second half. She should have followed Ted Kennedy’s example: “Be
> prepared; be brief; and be seated.” At one point she said how much
> she “loves America“. Immediately, the audience injected long
> applause, and Michelle smiled. Many of you will recall that Michelle
> Obama had said, following her husband’s win in an important state:
> “This is the first time I have loved America.” Such a statement
> didn’t seemtoounusual, because the Obamas regularly attended the
NoEinstein
>
OBAMA, A MAN TOO SMALL ON A STAGE TOO BIG.
Democrats had their spectacle last night in Denver. Some say such was
a lot of ‘air’—rock singers, wrong-colored flags being waved, printed
posters held up-side-down, and general mass hoopla over the wrong man
for President. Most of the latter was a build-up to have Barack Obama
say: “I accept the Democratic Party’s nomination to be President.”
But after doing so, Obama’s nearly hour-long speech was, essentially,
a repeat of his same-old-same-old, trademarked, read-from-
teleprompters, unfulfillable promises. As I predicted, his robot-like
facial expression and unvarying vocal tone made watching and listening
to that speech painful. The same genre of political promises have
been getting people “hoping” and “dreaming” every four years—only to
be let down after… “the honeymoon” is over for the new President.
The weakest speaker last night was Al Gore. He was squeezing too much
verbiage into too little time. His tone and facial expression was
that of an angry man. Part of his anger was probably because Barack
Obama is getting a shot at being President, rather than Gore. But
Gore got assaulted badly enough in 2000, by our failing political
system, to last him a lifetime. Easily, the most stupid thing that
Gore said, was to refer to “our great democracy”. Mr. Al Gore, I’ve
got news for you: From the date of our country’s founding, we’ve had
only a poor APPROXIMATION of a democracy. Mainly, that’s because
every decision made by Congress gets compromised by the anti-democracy
Senate. Senate seats aren’t allocated based on population. From day
one, my New Constitution will ELIMINATE the untenable US Senate! And
the Federal Government will start functioning efficiently for the
first time in its history.
Wisely, the American People want CHANGE! On that one fact, I agree
with the Democrats. However, the huge problems facing this nation
aren’t because we’ve never elected a Black President before. They are
because we have allowed two quasi governmental groups, the Democratic
Party and the Republican Party, to serve as clearinghouses for
everything that can get done at the Federal and State levels. The
original Constitution made no provision for having any such
intermediaries between the People and their government. So, from day
one following the ratification of my New Constitution, political
parties shall be outlawed!
I have designed a straight-forward, three voting day process to
determine who our President and Vice President are. The first vote
can have any number of candidates who can get the requisite number of
registered voters to sign a petition. The second vote will reduce the
slate to just eight candidates. And the final vote will name the top
two vote getters President and Vice President. Because the primary
system and the conventions will be entirely eliminated, the race for
President will take just four to six months. And such won’t require
that anyone spend mega-bucks on advertising. It’s the incredible, and
ridiculous, costs of getting elected to public office that,
repeatedly, prevents us from being served by the most qualified
candidates. Rather, we only get to choose between those ego maniacs
who can SNOW the votes enough to get them to throw away their hard
earned money. The latter is what Barack Obama’s crazed machine is
doing with a vengeance. He is “BaRacking the Vote…”
On CNN, Donna Brazile has liked to brag—with her sick smile—that
voters for Obama are being registered so diligently, that “the polls”
won’t matter come election day. Obama, Donna Brazile, and her ilk of
Democrats are so lacking in moral personal constitutions that they
don’t realize that getting people to register to vote… for Obama, is a
violation of a basic foundation of Democracy, namely: “Don’t screw
with, or try to bias, the individual voter’s right to make private
voting decisions!” The primary caucuses this year, and in the past,
have been a violation of democracy for the same reason. THE DECISIONS
OF THE VOTERS SHALL BE THEIRS AND THEIRS ALONE. Getting people to
register to vote is wonderful! But having that be done by anyone who
is affiliated with a candidate, or with any party, unfairly biases
those new voters. Additionally, my New Constitution will disqualify
any candidate for public office who is involved in any way with the
transport of voters—new ones or existing—to the polls.
If Obama gets elected, he’ll discover very quickly that being a great
“Reader of Speeches” will be a poor lever to get a DIVIDED Congress to
do a single thing which he is recommending. And if anything that he
does recommend gets enacted, such will have been so compromised by the
ruinous influence of lobbyists, the media, party-against-party
bickering, and by the Senate-against-the-House, one-upmanship—that
what gets signed into law will serve the People, poorly.
Yes, CHANGES are needed! But as long as the main cause of this
country’s problems—the Democratic and Republican Parties—remain
tangled up in our governmental processes, this country is screwed… and
the whole World is screwed, too. Folks, no matter how spectacular the
final night of the Democratic convention was, after the election it
will be business as usual in Washington; that is, unless… those 80
plus percent of our voters, who are dissatisfied with the direction
that this country is headed, simply unite. They can deny either the
Democrats’ or the Republicans’ candidates from office. When that
happens, lobbyists; the corrupt media; and career politicians
everywhere will start shaking-in-their-boots! The positive things
needed to save the USA, will begin happening, simply, by voting for
LIBERTARIANS in November!
That wonderful Black delegate, for Hillary Clinton, whom I last wrote
about, is Ms. Anne Price Mills. Mills considers Clinton to be more
presidential than Obama. And she lamented: “His resume… his resume.
No graduate right out of Harvard gets hired to be the CEO of a major
corporation.” Barack Obama wants to placate his ego, so he’s vying—by
hook or by crook—to become our next President. His resume shows he
has ZERO executive experience. All that he’s got is a sick sense-of-
entitlement to be President.
Basketball great, Charles Barkley, is considering running as an
independent to be the Governor of Alabama. He says he won’t be
running as a Democrat or a Republican, because the latter are too
corrupt. Folks, Charles Barkley said that, live, on national
television, Tuesday night. It’s the same thing I’ve been saying,
every week, for nearly a year! The CHANGES which most people know
that this country needs, can’t be made if the UNDERLYING causes of our
problems—the divisive Democratic and Republican Parties—are allowed to
remain in place.
Ego-maniacal and under-qualified Barack Obama can’t affect ANY of the
changes needed. However, even the prospect of our ratifying my New
Constitution, in 2010, can begin the processes for CHANGE!
Ask yourselves these questions: “Will needed changes be likely to come
from an inexperienced candidate who can make good speeches? Or will
needed changes be more likely to come from me—a man who has observed
the decline in the integrity of our government over my lifetime—and
who has spent the last twelve plus years writing and polishing a New
Constitution to correct all of the underlying problems? Folks, unless
we correct the myriad underlying problems, then no new President has a
chance to fix things. Haven’t we “been there and done that” with
President after President?
Obama has plagiarized from me, to say: “Obama, the change that we
need.” But I said something better, and said it FIRST!
Be it known: “A New Constitution is the only ’change’ that we need!”
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
Tom Potter
fb37ac...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
What did you think of Mark Warner's speech
at the Democratic Convention,
and his comments:
"A business who's only strategy is to try to tear down the
competition
will not stay in business very long."
"This race is not about the past, it's about the future."
I suggest that anyone who likes what Bush
has done to America with his policy of
hostility, bullying and wall building
over the last eight years should vote for McCain
as this would perpetuate America's momentum
in the direct that the Bush/McCain followers
and the Oil Companies prefer.
Also, do you think that McCain picked
the gal from Alaska as his running mate,
because she is the best for the job,
or because he wants to pick up enough Hillary
holdouts to become president,
or because her son joined the Army on 9/11/2007?
Or because her connections,
with the Alaskan oil companies
will put more money in his coffers?
???????????????????????????????
??NO THIRD TERM FOR THE DARK SIDERS? ?
???????????????????????????????
NoEinstein
>
Dear Tom: I was unfamiliar with Mark Warner—other than what I just
learned, that he was a past Va. Governor who is now running for the US
Senate. If he wins the latter seat, he’ll only be in office for two
years—because the Senate will be OUT once my New Constitution gets
ratified!
The principle of “Pay It Forward” is for people to put a little effort
into carrying about others. Businesses that are “seek and destroy”
don’t have the right attitude. Believe me, “What goes around, comes
around.”
This country’s future looks dim unless we quickly correct the accruing
errors from past to present. No matter who gets elected President, we
are doomed, if we leave the corrupt Democratic and Republican Parties
pulling-the-strings. But if—as I’m pushing to have come to pass—the
80 plus percent of discontented Americans will elect LIBERTARIANS,
such will shake-up-the-system! And it will signal to… McCain’s
Islamic Extremists, that this country is going to correct its bad
image in the world! Simply by having the USA back away from defending
Israel, Jews will be forced to be more reasonable in their dealings
with Muslims. And the level of world tensions will go down!
I think most Republicans know that they can’t do business as usual and
expect to get elected. McCain has been enough of a maverick that
being different from Bush probably won’t be a problem. However… Big
Oil; anti-environment companies; and other screw-people-to-make-a buck-
companies, will apply extreme pressure to maintain the Bush Years
status quo. But when the American people ratify my New Constitution,
it will become a CRIME for any business or group to contact the
Executive Branch or the House—under business or group auspices—to try
to influence laws being made, or procedures being implemented. The
foundation of democracy is POWER to the individuals, not to group
interests! If businesses want to have an influence, they can get
their employees to contact their Representatives, and theirs alone.
It becomes a CRIME to solicit the support of any Representatives other
than the ones from people’s home districts. The Capital will be
closed to any uninvited person or group, other than the President and
his or her agents, seeking to influence legislation. And the Capital
will be closed to the media. Information about what is happening in
Washington will come from C-Span type continuous broadcasts, and from
the “back home” news released from the Representatives. Any
Representative making appearances on a “Larry King Live” type show
will be out of a job. The corrupt media has screwed up this country
long enough!
I’ve graphologically analyzed that McCain’s IQ is below average. Part
of that, probably, is the result of poor nutrition while a POW. And
part of it is due to his “just get by” attitude while in school.
However, in some of his extemporaneous campaign stops, his mental
processes show more promise. McCain actually listens to the questions
of others, and makes his replies apt. As most know, G. W. Bush was no
mental heavy-weight when first (not) elected. But because of his
being surrounded by fluent, above average people, Bush’s mind is
better now than when he was first (not) elected.
I think McCain is “brilliant” for making his choice for V. P.! He
picked Sarah Palin because he wants to win; I don’t know about the
specifics. She has more executive experience than either McCain or
Obama. Being a great President requires: Someone who knows right from
wrong (has a value system); is a good communicator; trusts others
enough to give them the space needed to augment the President; knows
how to delegate authority; and someone who has a positive disposition
and works well with people. Being President does NOT require that a
person have an “I know better than you” attitude like Barack Obama.
Frankly, all of the discussions about how McCain voted before are
irrelevant. He won’t be making any laws—just proposing some, signing
some, and perhaps vetoing a few.
Except for the “Republican Party connection”, McCain-Palin makes four
times more sense than Obama-Biden. If, during the campaign, McCain
and Palin would call a press conference to say, in effect: “You know,
the American people are correct. The direction that this country is
headed doesn’t look very good. To me, that “New Constitution” being
blogged about, is making more sense, every day. I’ve been in the
Senate long enough to know that progress, there, is slow, because of
the in-fighting—mostly based on egos, rather than getting results. If
Americans will honor me, across party lines, and trust me to be
President, I will gladly assist in any way to allow the People to
decide for themselves if they want a New Constitution.”
John McCain would be more likely to make that sort of rebuff of the
Republican Party, if (honest) polls start showing that it is unlikely
that any candidate will get the needed majority. Since lost civil
liberties will be put back by my New Constitution, then Libertarian
philosophies are right in line. If the American people want REAL
changes for the better, my New Constitution should be just what the
doctor ordered!
Tom, sorry for “over answering” your reply. But I have just saved
myself from having to write those same things in my usual place! —
NoEinstein —
>
> "NoEinstein" <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote in message
>
> news:cc6fd8d2-9726-475c-8fef-
> fb37acd25...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> >>http://www.geocities.com/tdp1001/index.htmlhttp://notsocrazyideas.blo...Hide quoted text -
Tom Potter
> On Aug 30, 7:06 pm,Tom Potter<tdp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Tom: I was unfamiliar with Mark Warner—other than what I just
> learned, that he was a past Va. Governor who is now running for the US
> Senate. If he wins the latter seat, he’ll only be in office for two
> years—because the Senate will be OUT once my New Constitution gets
> ratified!
>
> The principle of “Pay It Forward” is for people to put a little effort
> into carrying about others. Businesses that are “seek and destroy”
> don’t have the right attitude. Believe me, “What goes around, comes
> around.”
>
> This country’s future looks dim unless we quickly correct the accruing
> errors from past to present. No matter who gets elected President, we
> are doomed, if we leave the corrupt Democratic and Republican Parties
> pulling-the-strings. But if—as I’m pushing to have come to pass—the
> 80 plus percent of discontented Americans will elect LIBERTARIANS,
> such will shake-up-the-system! And it will signal to… McCain’s
> Islamic Extremists, that this country is going to correct its bad
> image in the world! Simply by having the USA back away from defending
> Israel, Jews will be forced to be more reasonable in their dealings
> with Muslims. And the level of world tensions will go down!
>
> I think most Republicans know that they can’t do business as usual and
> expect to get elected. McCain has been enough of a maverick that
> being different from Bush probably won’t be a problem.
The problem with McCain is not that he is a "maverick,
but that he is a LOOSE CANNON.
Although I was a long time Republican,
who was invited to the White House by Bush the Elder,
and Reagan, I am at heart a Libertarian who supported
Republicans as they fit my philosophy better than
the Democrats.
I did not leave the Republican Party,
they left me when they began to put
themselves, the Republican Party,
money, business,and ego above the
interests of all Americans, and the world community.
What America needs now,
is not a "Loose Cannon", or a Military person,
nor a wall builder,
nor even a skilled administrator,
nor an economist, nor a technologist,
but what America needs is a person
who can build bridges between
Christians and Muslims,
Blacks and Whites,
Russia and America,
Asians and Westerners, etc.
"There is a time for everything, a season for every activity under
heaven.
A time to be born and a time to die. A time to plant and a time to
harvest.
A time to kill and a time to heal."
It's a new season.
America needs a healer, not a killer.
NoEinstein
>
Dear Tom: It seems to me that most thinking Americans should be
Libertarians. Aren’t civil liberties quite important? Certainly!
However, most Americans consider that voting for “the winner” is
important, too. It’s that GAME aspect of elections which I’m trying,
diligently, to discourage. Ever since Ross Perot scared the media and
our “two” political parties in his third party bids for the
presidency, the biased media won’t give independents and third party
candidates the time-of-day.
You probably recall that Ralph Nader—that quadrennial screwball in our
nation’s politics—was the spoiler for Al Gore in 2000. Nader would
love to do the same this November. Surprisingly, his ideas are mostly
reasonable. But his “being in the race” tends to defeat the
candidate, such as Al Gore, whose platform is most like Nader’s. Does
it make sense to dilute the votes of the “main” candidate most like
him, so that the candidate least like him—say G. W. Bush—wins?
Tradition has gotten most Americans believing that we have only two
“real” parties—Democratic and Republican. Hell, we’ve got only “two
sides of the aisles” in Congress! The rules of Congress are designed
by those corrupt, two-party influences to assure that “outsiders” are
powerless. But OUTSIDERS are just what we need to fix our BROKEN
government!
My task is to convince Americans that the main thing “broken” about
government is our having to clear everything that gets done in
Washington with the corrupt “cultures” of the Democrats and
Republicans. Recently, John McCain praised Ted Kennedy as being: “… a
powerful member of the Senate.” Tell me: How is it a virtue to be
“powerful” in government, when democracy demands that freshman and
senior members of Congress have IDENTICAL power? A seniority system,
which gives the chairmanships of committees to the most senior member
of the majority party, screws democracy at every turn!
Having increasing seniority becomes the lever that incumbents use to
keep getting re elected, even though they—for example: Robert Byrd and
his ilk—are corrupt. And our equally crooked media loves the elitism
of talking with and about people who are… powerful. For too long, the
media has been biased toward the elite, within government and
without. When there aren’t any elite guests to talk to, the media
resorts to incest. They call out their staff “consultants” to discuss
their own notions of what the news is—as if anyone gives a damn about
the assessments or opinions of any of those egotists. It’s little
wonder that hard working voters tend to believe that the only “viable”
candidates are the ones which the media has ordained. Well, screw the
media! And SCREW the unconstitutional Democratic and Republican
Parties!
Often times, people don’t care whether an official is “good”… so long
as that person wins. Correcting that ignoble attitude is the reason I
keep touting the “Pay It Forward” principle: “Think in the broader,
human-being context of everything.” Unsurprisingly, if enough people
do the latter, it starts to catch on. For example: If a vehicle is
needing to get from a driveway into heavy traffic, and a sympathetic
person slows down and lets that vehicle in, then it’s likely that the
lucky driver will do the same thing for others. Believe me, courtesy
is contagious. It can benefit mankind at all levels!
If John McCain would stop reading so many speeches from teleprompters—
with those “smile here” insertions—he wouldn’t be all that unsuitable
for President. His “loose cannon” aspects are primarily a defense
mechanism. If he feels that he’s being cornered by reporters’ pointed
questions, he gets red in the face. People with limited, early
vocabularies are more inclined to use profanities. Interestingly,
most ‘nice’ people are more respected if there is some threshold of
temper that can be crossed if they need to make a point. Once while
campaigning, ‘nice’ Ronald Reagan cut down a Black youth in NYC when
the youth asked: “What have YOU ever done for US (Blacks)?” To which
Reagan replied, with a cutting stare: “I can’t do a damned thing for
you, unless I get elected!” That bit of temper probably won Reagan
votes, including a higher percentage of Black votes.
The latest biased polls—biased because they only ask: will you vote:
Democrat? or Republican?—show Obama and McCain to be even. If
Americans keep thinking that they only have… “two” choices, this
country will surely go-down-the-tubes. However, if Americans will
simply realize that the presidential race isn’t a GAME—which
necessitates choosing sides and… going-at-it, things will be fine.
All of us have enough common needs and ideals, that conditions can be
optimized for MOST Americans—not just PROMISED to be made better for
the 50 plus percent who get to brag, and little more than that, that
they… won. I say this: "Unless ALL Americans win, half will loose.
It’s that simple."
If Libertarian Bob Barr agrees with me that our party-dominated
politics must go, then Barr becomes the preferred choice for
President. As soon as my New Constitution gets slated for
consideration by the People, would-be terrorists will probably realize
that ‘the message in 9/11’ has been received, after all. Most know
that America hasn’t been perfect. Our country should never use
military might to avoid doing the critical self-examination necessary
to correct our past errors. Striving for high principles increases
the prospect of World Peace!
Tom, think positive. I hope everyone else who reads this will, too!
— NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
>
MCCAIN STRIKES GOLD IN ALASKA!
If Hockey Moms have as much going for them as Sarah Palin exhibited
last night at the Republican Convention, by all means, turn this
country over to them! Wearing lipstick doesn’t signify that there is
less POWER in “the weaker sex”, it just differentiates the Hockey Moms
from the Pit Bulls!
At last week’s Democratic Convention, Governor Bill Richardson asked
the throng, “Are you ready to take back this country?” That question
seemed to imply that Obama’s motive for ‘change’ is to wrest the
control of our country from the powers-that-be in Washington, and
return control to the People. On that one goal Obama and I agree—The
PEOPLE SHOULD BE IN CONTROL! That said, having Barack Obama be
elected President would be THE most catastrophic thing to happen to
this country, 9/11 included…
As was highlighted by Republicans last night, Barack Obama has ZERO
executive experience. He’s running to be President because his
lifelong inferiority complex—caused by to his being biracial; ’poor’;
and brought up without a father—demands to be compensated. When more
and more Blacks began identifying with Obama’s angry tone of speech,
even though he was still in his teens, Obama began being hyped by
Blacks as their future leader. With each public speech that he
delivered, his ego swelled. Eventually, he deluded himself into
believing that he’s entitled to be President. The country owes him
such, simply because of his sad childhood.
Obama’s undeserved rise to power was bolstered by the deeply corrupt
Democratic Party. Such was needing a Manchurian Candidate—without the
independence of the Clintons—who would be the puppet of Howard Dean
and his band of thieves. Those like Bill Richardson, Tom Daschle and
Bob Casey endorsed Obama, not because he’s exceptional, but because
he’s unexceptional enough to be needing them to help him “run things”
in Washington. Take away the implied rewards for those endorsing
Obama, and the endorsements would have been few, indeed.
For the record, my New Constitution requires that any civil employee
or office holder be fired for publicly endorsing a candidate for
government office. That stipulation will stop the you-owe-me-one
obligations, once in office, which have so compromised candidates’
ability to do their jobs of representing the People.
Screaming Howard Dean, the DNC Chairman, knows that he himself will
never be President. But that hasn’t stopped Dean from lusting to have
as much behind-the-scenes power in the White House as he can muster.
Up until Dean “lost it” in 2004, he had been incredibly successful at
generating ideological and financial support over the Internet.
Barack Obama has followed Dean’s example—perhaps under Dean’s tutorage—
to gain “grass roots” support via the Internet. Very early, 90 plus
percent of Blacks—who feel that THEY are entitled to be “compensated”,
too—began backing Obama. They did so with their dollars and with
their relentless neighborhood recruitments of voters, and new
registrants to vote… for Obama. The latter is a tacit violation of
principles of democracy.
A Black man who was interviewed in Time Square right after Obama’s
acceptance of his party’s nomination, sounded proud as he said, “This
year I contributed $50.00 to Obama. Obama won’t accept contributions
from special interests.” Well, I’ve got news for you: Blacks ARE a
special interest! And they are a hugely threatening one to the future
of the USA!
If Blacks manage to win “the game” of getting Obama elected, there
will be in-your-face celebrating. Right off the bat, Blacks will be
expecting to see the last vestiges of racial discrimination end. They
will be expecting to have their lot in life be improved, yesterday—
because they are Black—and that is the worst form of racism. There
will be violence from Blacks when they aren’t as empowered by Obama’s
election as they had hoped. And there will be violence from whites if
Blacks are empowered, inequitably. The Democrats and Obama have
gotten this country into a loose/loose situation if Obama gets
elected. The Watts Riots will look like soccer celebrations by
comparison.
Sarah Palin is a Breath of Fresh Air (!) in the midst of the dire
situation that the USA finds itself in. If John McCain, the current
standard bearer of the Republican Party, becomes President, our broken
and corrupt “two party” government will be sitting there, unscathed.
Yes, McCain is a maverick who sticks to his principles. And even
though Palin is a “barracuda”, the US Constitution doesn’t grant the
Executive Office the POWER necessary to implement the changes that
need to be made in our government.
Sarah Palin is a genuine gold nugget charmer! But it pains my heart
to have such a HOPEFUL PRESENCE as she be sacrificed against the
Calcified Wall of Corruption that is our Congress.
However, Sarah Palin need not be sacrificed! To save both McCain and
her from failure in ‘correcting’ our government, all that McCain and
she need to do is to: Publicly acknowledge that it is PRUDENT to let
the American People vote on my democracy-based New Constitution, in
November of 2010! By making just that one simple acknowledgment,
Congress, and the World, will be put on notice that the American
People are determined to take back control of government. For much
too long political parties; lobbyists; PACS; the media; and the “great
traditions” of Congress have locked us into continuing to do the same
old ineffectual things.
Historically, Republicans have been pro business; anti big government;
and anti taxes. But as long as we’re in debt—and we are, big time,
because of Bush’s wars—taxes can’t be lowered much. On a positive
note: My New Constitution removes the authority of governments—local,
state and federal—to raise taxes, ANY taxes, without a direct vote of
the People! And the vote for passage becomes 60%, not 50.0001%.
Every law, regulation or procedure that is on the books will be
reviewed and revoted, WITH full citizen input. Never again will this
country be strapped by laws not supported by a big majority. And
never again will the bad laws that got passed be allowed to hold the
People captive, simply because the People are too law abiding.
This week on CNN’s ‘Larry King Live’, Jesse Ventura tells us that he
wants to be a player in this country’s… Revolution. Ventura says that
he has no intention of voting for a Democrat nor a Republican.
Charles Barkley, a potential candidate for governor in Alabama, thinks
that Democrats and Republicans are corrupt. So, he’ll run as an
Independent. And both Obama and McCain are talking about re taking
control of our (party-dominated) governments.
Because of the above, and individual observations, too, thinking
Americans, everywhere, should realize: The major changes needed in our
government will require tearing down and rebuilding from the ground
up. But the Plans and Specifications to do so are poised and
polished. People, start DEMANDING to learn more about my New
Constitution! The media is giving hints that it can’t keep its
collective heads buried-in-the-sand much longer regarding the prospect
of there being a New Constitution.
One day, Alaska Governor Sarah Palin will make a great first woman
President of the United States of America. To help assure that such a
goal isn’t an impossible one for her, simply realize: “A New
Constitution is the only ‘change’ that we need!” Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> On Aug 27, 7:29 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> OBAMA, A MANTOOSMALL ON A STAGETOOBIG.
>
> Democrats had their spectacle last night in Denver. Some say such was
> a lot of ‘air’—rock singers, wrong-colored flags being waved, printed
> posters held up-side-down, and general mass hoopla over the wrong man
> for President. Most of the latter was a build-up to have Barack Obama
> say: “I accept the Democratic Party’s nomination to be President.”
> But after doing so, Obama’s nearly hour-long speech was, essentially,
> a repeat of his same-old-same-old, trademarked, read-from-
> teleprompters, unfulfillable promises. As I predicted, his robot-like
> facial expression and unvarying vocal tone made watching and listening
> to that speech painful. The same genre of political promises have
> been getting people “hoping” and “dreaming” every four years—only to
> be let down after… “the honeymoon” is over for the new President.
>
> The weakest speaker last night was Al Gore. He was squeezingtoomuch
> verbiage intotoolittle time. His tone and facial expression was
> the whole World is screwed,too. Folks, no matter how spectacular the
PD
NoEinstein - 63
Tom Potter - 8
Jeff Relf - 6
G=EMC^2 Glazier - 5
Eric Gisse - 4
Androcles - 1
Marcus Aurelius - 1
Benji - 1
PD - 1
zzbunker - 1
I think we should note from this that
- NoEinstein likes to hear himself talk
- He has only figured out one channel online where he can talk
unfettered, whether it is on topic or not
- The only people who have been willing to engage him are those who
are also famous for using a newsgroup as a personal blog
PD
NoEinstein
Dear PD: Unlike you, I have a desire to make this world a better
place. But you enjoy making put-downs of those striving toward
positive ends. Like I've said before, you are negativity
personified. Regarding my posting in just one spot: People know where
to find me, on sci.physics, so that's where I'll be posting, whether
you like it or not. — NoEinstein —
PD
Please read the charter of the group, NoEinstein.
The newsgroup is not a free hosting service for whatever content you
want to disseminate, nor is it to be used as a personal blog.
While there are no moderation and filtering controls on this
newsgroup, your willingness to freely dispense with netiquette and be
a public boor is also an open invitation to public castigation. You
have no right to whine if your rudeness draws a sharp response, any
more than you would have a right to whine if you stood on a soap box
and started preaching your politics at a public swimming pool and
patrons shouted at you to get the hell out.
You are now free to continue being an obnoxious, self-absorbed prick.
PD
NoEinstein
>
> - Show quoted text -
:-} - ~ - - - — NoEinstein —
NoEinstein
>
PLANS FOR CHANGE: CHOOSE ONE.
The backlash against the Bush Years virtually assures that Democrats
will be in control of both houses of Congress in 2009. Strangely,
history shows that the American electorate has a tendency to choose a
President who isn’t from the party that controls Congress. By that
standard, John McCain looks strong.
Obama-Biden and the Democrats are pinning their hopes on their ability
to convince the voters that the McCain-Palin ticket is in the mold of
G. W. Bush. However, such a message has already overplayed its
usefulness. Nonetheless, Obama is planning a very costly, 50-state
campaign to get out his message to the voters. If quantity of
advertising can swing an election, he will test that theory.
Following the introduction, this past week, of John McCain’s choice
for V. P.—Governor Sarah Palin of Alaska—it is being reported that
Republican campaign contributions are way up. So, it seems that both
major parties must believe that the American People are dumb enough to
say: “So-and-so had the most ads, so I’ll vote by that standard.” For
a country strapped with bank failures and mortgage foreclosures, does
it make sense to be throwing good money into the coffers of the
media? Don’t the voters already know enough about… the candidates?
Desiring to become President has to be the stuff of kids’ dreams. But
in reality, desiring to become President is tantamount to lunacy.
Both Obama and McCain are huge egotists. John McCain, who is
understandably less energetic than Obama, sells himself as a tested
veteran of the unpopular Vietnam War. If sticking-to-his-principles
counts with the voters, McCain’s chances look pretty good.
McCain is touting how he and Palin will be able to work with Congress
to cause the changes this country is needing. He’s been a US Senator
for decades. Did the needed changes happen during those years? No,
they didn’t. But McCain expects us to believe that, magically, after
he’s elected President, he’ll have the power to make Congress correct
its problems. But weren’t many of those same Congressmen at least
partly responsible for the messes we are in?
I understand enough about human nature to know that you don’t get
people, who did wrong, to make corrections when those people are the
ones in power. Needed changes will come about only by removing out-of-
touch Congressmen from power! Under my New Constitution, the American
People will have the say-so . No longer will there be an anti
democracy US Senate. And “Representatives must represent, or be going
on their way!”
Barack Obama is a more persuasive speaker than McCain. But in the
long-on-ceremony and short-on-results Congress, making and listening
to ‘powerful’ speeches is the ho-hum stuff of their daily existence.
Neither Obama nor McCain have a ‘snowball’s chance in hell’ of causing
the needed changes, simply, by talking about those things.
For nearly two years I’ve been explaining to you readers that Barack
Obama doesn’t have the right personality, nor does he have the good
CHARACTER necessary to be President. He’s just an exceptionally
detail oriented, egotistical loner. With every interview that he
gives, he can argue the nuances of this or that way of doing things.
However, being a Chief Executive requires someone who ISN’T detail
oriented; has a general overview of issues; works well with people;
trusts others to do most of the work; can delegate authority; and is a
likeable person with a positive disposition. How does Obama stack
up? Not very good, I’m afraid.
Barack Obama is one of those always right people. Such don’t tend to
be well liked as bosses. His being overly detail oriented means that
he’ll spread himself too thin. He’ll be second guessing those who
should be smart enough to come up with needed plans. Though he will
delegate “authority”, he’ll be the bottleneck to having the proposals
of anyone under him be implemented. And because of the latter, he
will have a hard time keeping a good staff—simply because he won’t
trust his staff to do their jobs.
Obama has a negative, didactic personality. He doesn’t work well in
groups. Because of his mixed race, he has had a lifelong identity
crisis. That’s why he can’t express a normal range of emotions. His
stony exterior will cause others to view him with suspicion. And many
will consider him to be untrustworthy. Since negotiating isn’t in his
nature, he’ll be a failure at foreign policy. His pushy personality
is more suited to a dictator than to a consensus builder. The
impression he makes is that of an overbearing, unhappy person. Those
around him won’t be feeling much sunshine.
The USA will be in dire straits if Barack Obama is elected.
Supposedly, he is smart. Anyone with his personality and character
flaws, who continues to campaign to become President—as a matter of
entitlement—deserves to be tagged… the Anti Christ. If Obama was a
man of character and honor, he would have dropped out of the race
months ago. The future of the USA doesn’t matter to him. The only
thing important to Obama is to placate his maniacal inferiority
complex, turned superiority complex, because of his being fatherless,
and racially half-and-half.
No seventy-something man like John McCain should be promising to
‘fight’ for anything. Admittedly, being a candidate for President is
an honor. But choosing the unnecessary “fight” route to the needed
changes makes no sense.
When I began writing my New Constitution twelve years ago, I knew that
the outlawing of political parties would be a difficult pill for many
to swallow… unless; unless the MAIN OBJECTIVES of both parties can be
realized, fairly. Amazingly, by making government a more responsive
and efficient institution, the business and economic climate in this
country will improve so much that there won’t be any need to keep
looking to government for favors, or even for handouts. Lobbyists for
business interests won’t be needed, if the American economic situation
starts improving on its own!
A misguided concept which is all too common in this country: “If
others are using shady dealings to get ahead, I, or my company, will
too.” The latter genre of thinking is why the USA is in such dire
straits right now. But suppose that the new philosophy in the USA is
this: “I will be FAIR in all of my business and personal dealings.”
As I’ve said: “What goes around, comes around!” Instead of revenues
declining—because there are no more lobbyists to gain undeserved
advantages—rightful advantages will start coming, because more and
more people are dealing FAIRLY with their fellow Americans!
As I have done for the Republican Party, the major objectives of the
Democratic Party are addressed, too. While writing our New
Constitution, I didn’t “take sides”. Rather, I defined optimum
relationships wherefrom the large majority of our Citizens can be
secure in their “Life, Liberty and Pursuit of Happiness.”
If Barack Obama manages to get elected, I’ll lock up my New
Constitution. Case closed. I could never shake that scoundrel’s
hand, even if he extends it. All of my written-in corrections of the
injustices to Blacks will go unrealized, that is… if the ignoble Black
BLOCK voters place more importance on “winning”—by-hook-or-by-crook—
than they place on having their reasonable objectives BE MET. My New
Constitution will assure that Blacks, and all minorities, get the fair
and equal treatment that they deserve. But there will be no such
guarantees if Barack Obama gets elected… Is there any way that I can
make that simple fact MORE clear?!
McCain-Palin needs to wise up. They should inform the country that
they’re OPEN to the idea of letting the American People consider my
New Constitution for ratification in 2010. Sincere statements to such
effect will send huge shockwaves throughout our government! I’ll
predict that there will be little or no opposition from Congress
regarding any reasonable proposal coming from the White House. And
our country’s new charmer, Sarah Palin, won’t be sacrificed against
that “immovable, calcified wall that is the US Congress.”
Additionally, John McCain won’t have to be “acting tough” in foreign
affairs. That’s because the level of world tensions will start going
down! The scuttlebutt, everywhere, will be that the USA is about to
become a “Kinder, Gentler Nation!” Hopefully, the lame-duck US Senate
will decide to go-out on positive notes and work WITH the House rather
than (as so often) against it. A national health care program should
be a top priority. So many positive things can happen in the next two
years. Everyone should be amazed, if we will all just think positive!
Any third party candidates out there, who want to help improve the
world, should also declare their openness to having my New
Constitution be considered.
Barack Obama—effectively more than figuratively—is the ‘Angel from
Hell’. But be it known: “A New Constitution is the only ‘change’ that
we need!” Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> percent of Blacks—who feel that THEY are entitled to be “compensated”,too—began backing Obama. They did so with their dollars and with
> People are determined to take back control of government. For muchtoolong political parties; lobbyists; PACS; the media; and the “great
> traditions” of Congress have locked us into continuing to do the same
> old ineffectual things.
>
> Historically, Republicans have been pro business; anti big government;
> and anti taxes. But as long as we’re in debt—and we are, big time,
> because of Bush’s wars—taxes can’t be lowered much. On a positive
> note: My New Constitution removes the authority of governments—local,
> state and federal—to raise taxes, ANY taxes, without a direct vote of
> the People! And the vote for passage becomes 60%, not 50.0001%.
> Every law, regulation or procedure that is on the books will be
> reviewed and revoted, WITH full citizen input. Never again will this
> country be strapped by laws not supported by a big majority. And
> never again will the bad laws that got passed be allowed to hold the
> People captive, simply because the People aretoolaw abiding.
>
> This week on CNN’s ‘Larry King Live’, Jesse Ventura tells us that he
> wants to be a player in this country’s… Revolution. Ventura says that
> he has no intention of voting for a Democrat nor a Republican.
> Charles Barkley, a potential candidate for governor in Alabama, thinks
> that Democrats and Republicans are corrupt. So, he’ll run as an
> Independent. And both Obama and McCain are talking about re taking
> control of our (party-dominated) governments.
>
> Because of the above, and individual observations,too, thinking
NoEinstein
>
RED, WHITE AND… BLACK WILL NOT SUFFICE FOR THE USA!
The flag of choice for “legitimizing” Barack Obama as a candidate for
President misses the mark. For him trying to seem presidential is a
simple thing. His formula is to wear a coat and tie and to look
suave. Most of you should have noticed that at every opportunity—as
in Obama’s ubiquitous media ads—one or more freshly-starched, red,
white and Black, PHONY replicas of our flag are situated behind him.
I’m most concerned about any BASTARIZATION of our cherished Red, White
and Blue! My blood relative was the COMMANDER of Fort McHenry during
the War of 1812. Washington had been burned, and the British fleet
was sailing into the harbor at Baltimore. But the foresight of my
relative had caused him to commission a huge Red, White and Blue
American flag.
When the ruinous bombardment of Fort McHenry began, my relative
ordered everyone out. That night, those men hunkered down in relative
safety behind the fort while bombs were bursting in air. Francis
Scott Key was a prisoner on one of the British ships. But he could
see… the rockets’ red glare. Key was rightly concerned—not only for
the fort and for those men—but for the very survival of the USA. If
Baltimore had fallen to the British, there is a likelihood that our
country would now be controlled by Great Britain.
Before dawn’s early light, my relative ordered those men back into the
fort. Immediately, they ran up our proud, new, Red-White-and-Blue
flag! The fort—which the British had assumed to be defeated—wasn’t!
Rapid cannon fire from Fort McHenry began sinking the surprised
British Ships. Because of the difficulty of maneuvering in the small
harbor, the planned land invasion of Baltimore was called off. As
quickly as they could, those ships tacked out of the harbor, and
returned home in defeat.
In large measure the USA owes its continued existence to my relative!
Would such a relationship quality me to have my New Constitution be
considered by the American People? Additionally, I, my sibling, and
my first cousins are the closest living relatives of someone many of
you have heard about: pioneer patriot, Daniel Boone. I’m also proud
to say that I am 1/16th American Indian! Part of my passion to SAVE
this country from itself, is in my BLOOD!
Suddenly, from out-of-the-BLACK comes an ego-maniacal BASTARD named
Barack Obama. Before that psycho had even graduated from Harvard Law
School—where he was accepted, preferentially, because of his being a
’disadvantaged’ Black—Obama was setting-his-sights on the White
House. He knew what it takes to ‘appeal to blacks’. So, he took a
low-paying job as a community organizer of Blacks and Black churches
in Chicago. Obama realized how great such a job would look on his
resume. And such would disguise his selfish motives for entering
politics. All that remained for Obama to do was to vote-his-way
“Present.” through the Illinois House of Representatives, and into the
US Senate. Eventually, enough Blacks realized how wonderful a speaker
he is, and how suave. That’s why they pegged Barack Obama as their
President of choice. And by so doing, many Blacks seem to be
thinking: “Doing what is right for America be damned… I’ll just do
what is right for Black power!”
My New Constitution will DISQUALIFY any candidate for public office
for campaigning while intentionally standing in front of an American
flag, or bunting. The rationale is this: Because of the corrupting
influences of the two major political parties, and of the elitist
media, ego maniacs tend to be the only people who are attracted to be
our “leaders”. And part of the appeal to those rascals is their
mistaken idea that government is sanctioned by the present
Constitution to control what goes on in this country. But nothing
could be further from the truth!
Most politicians who aspire to public office do so to elevate their
“status”. Government has evolved away from the ideals of our founding
fathers. Now, our elected officials are, essentially, our “elected
dictators”. It would be too much of a put-down for our elected
officials to consider themselves to be servants of the People. But be
it known: Under my New Constitution, government officials will BE
servants of the people, “… or be going on their way!”
The one-sentence objective of my New Constitution is this: “By way of
democracy and fair play, return the power to the PEOPLE, and take the
power away from every single corrupting group influence, and away from
government!” Because flags are displayed in and around so many
public buildings, those seeking public office have come to associate
flags with the power of government over the people. Sadly… ***The
American flag has been allowed to become a symbol of our oppressive
government.*** And that idea must be REVERSED!
The flags that Barack Obama favors are the BASTARDIZED red, white and
Black variety. Those were the only flags that were available for
purchase, in “support” of his campaign, at that Denver football
stadium, and were being waved while Obama made his cold-hearted, read-
from-teleprompters acceptance speech. That man’s preference in flags
isn’t very subtle in its implications for the control that Obama is
expecting his Black minority to have over the People.
Many of you probably believe, as I do, that it’s unacceptable for Jews
to control the media, and thereby, to effectively control government.
The latter is bringing this country down, fast. But not nearly as
fast as will occur if Blacks start thinking that they are in control,
as a matter of entitlement, because that BASTARD Barack Obama got
elected. The backlash to having Obama be elected will quickly doom
the USA in its own right. But it will also deny you, the American
People, the right to consider my New Constitution—the only hope to
REALLY change Washington.
Barack Obama isn’t subtle with his continued usage of wrongly-colored
flags. Nor is he subtle in taking offense regarding the capabilities
of a woman like Sarah Palin to be President of the USA. His… “Put
‘lipstick’ on a pig; and it’s still a PIG.” remark was within a week
of Sarah Palin have described herself as a hockey mom. Palin had
asked, “Do you know the difference between a hockey mom and a pit
bull? Lipstick!” Barack Obama is consistently disrespectful to
women! Clearly, he was showing his frustration that a personable
woman has upstaged him. But isn’t it high time? Obama’s main
platform is: “We don’t need four more ‘Bush’ years.” Haven’t we heard
that statement enough already?
Michelle Obama has danced with ‘Ellen’ and “wowed” those on ‘The
View’. But she made the latter appearance only after passing out a
list of topics not to be discussed. Days later, an angry-toned
Michelle—stumping for her husband—has promised thousand dollar rebates
if Obama is elected. An even more angry-toned, baggy-eyed Hillary
Clinton said: “No McCain; No Palin; No way!” What Hillary now knows
is this: There is “No Way” that she will ever become the first woman
President of this country. Now, it seems likely that such honor will
be going to Sarah Palin!
A panicky Barack Obama has met with Bill Clinton for a… strategy
session. Afterward, Clinton announced that “Obama will win, easily.”
Apparently, Obama is having more trouble than he and the corrupt
pollsters are letting on. If not, why would he be going hat-in-hand
to Bill Clinton for advice? To wit: Obama has lost the vote of
women. And he hasn’t gotten the blue collar, rural voters who had
been for Hillary.
While Obama laughs-it-up with David Letterman, he really doesn’t have
much to be laughing about. There aren’t enough corrupt Donna
Braziles; Roland Martins; Gloria Borgers; and other members of “the
best political team” covering “Ballot Bowl”, to get Obama elected.
The INTERNET is where the power of FREE SPEECH now resides!
In two more years, following the ratification of my New Constitution,
there will be no more hired media “experts”, and no more news anchors
or self-appointed media celebrities… assessing—in the present or
future tense—the prognosis of any race for public office or any
referendum. Similarly, polling regarding the latter shall be
outlawed. In effect CNN, Time-Warner, and all of the others, will
have to reinvent themselves or be closed down. And the new Federal
Communications Commission will be empowered to do just that! Never
again will the likes of “smiling” Campbell Brown be allowed to second
guess subjects like “the Bridge to Nowhere.” The media can only COVER
the political news as it happens, not interact with the news so as to
change the outcome. Nor shall they keep replaying clips of
yesterday’s news that are most favorable to the ideology of their
management.
In spite of the above, the American people won’t be lacking for the
news! They’ll get it, unedited, and without any biased assessments by
those in the media. Never again will reporters be “filling time” by
talking to their news anchors or to other reporters about what that
day’s political events mean. The only conversations allowed to be
aired regarding the political scene will be those involving non
celebrity, non paid, and non ideologically-screened public citizens.
If Larry King wants a celebrity on his show, King had better not
discuss politics, or his show will be shut down! Also, the airing of
the opinions of movie stars, like Matt Damon, is anti-democracy, and
shall be forbidden in the future. The only “opinions” that matter in
political contests are the opinions of the voters on election day!
Barack Obama’s campaign has elevated him to the status of the Anti-
Christ—get him elected, and be damn the consequences to the USA and to
the World. Obama should consider becoming a ‘GQ’ model. There will
be pictures of him in the media AFTER the American people have
reinstated the Red, White and BLUE as their Stars and Strips of
choice! The prospects for America are bright, but only if we will
TAKE BACK control of our government from all of the corrupt group
influences and special interests!
Be it known: “A New Constitution is the only ‘CHANGE’ that we need!”
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
> he’ll spread himselftoothin. He’ll be second guessing those who
> A misguided concept which is alltoocommon in this country: “If
> others are using shady dealings to get ahead, I, or my company, willtoo.” The latter genre of thinking is why the USA is in such dire
> straits right now. But suppose that the new philosophy in the USA is
> this: “I will be FAIR in all of my business and personal dealings.”
> As I’ve said: “What goes around, comes around!” Instead of revenues
> declining—because there are no more lobbyists to gain undeserved
> advantages—rightful advantages will start coming, because more and
> more people are dealing FAIRLY with their fellow Americans!
>
> As I have done for the Republican Party, the major objectives of the
> Democratic Party are addressed,too. While writing our New
NoEinstein
>
BAD GOVERNMENT CAN’T SAVE AMERICA.
Both Obama and McCain are stressing the CHANGES that need to be made
in this country. “Change” is Obama’s catch word; and “Change We Need”
is his PLAGIARIZED version of my own: “A New Constitution is the only
‘change’ that we need!” Recently, Obama has had that version of my
slogan plastered onto the front of the podium which he transports from
place to place. He also makes sure that some of those bused-in
supporters, seated behind him, are waving his plagiarized slogan.
Barack Obama is the personification of a man lacking in integrity.
And he easily attracts those of similar ‘color’.
This week Michelle Obama made a campaign appearance in Charlotte, NC.
She was as SAUCED as a goose! Her head had more bobble than a Hula
Girl, and she has lost a lot of weight. Those two conditions, for a
person vying to become the next First Lady of this country, are more
telling than any polls. Barack Obama is in trouble. If he isn‘t in
trouble—as his spinners will likely say—then the USA is in BIG, BIG
trouble!
During the Reagan Administration the USSR fell—because centralized
control of a country, and all of its processes, isn’t efficient. But
it also fell because centralized control isn’t FAIR. The ‘socialism’
portion of the USSR had tried to guarantee equality to everyone.
Because of that supposed guarantee, workers would only do the minimum
necessary to get by. And that locked in low living standards for most
of their citizens. Without the motivating force of free enterprise,
and at least the HOPE of having a better lifestyle, prosperity isn’t
likely for an entire country.
Over the past century, our government has assumed control of a
critical amount of the USA’s institutions; business processes; and
societal checks and balances. High taxation is a measure of how
inefficient our government is. In hard economic times, most of us
want to keep our money safe, and at the same time we want to… “get
things from government”. This week, Congress has voted to buy the 3%
or so of bad mortgages in this country in order to shore up failing
banks. The money for purchasing the mortgages will come from the US
Printing Office. Such won’t be backed up by goods and services
produced. It is ‘Monopoly’ money, so to speak, mixed in with the
‘good’ money. Doing such a thing devalues the dollar. Inflation that
is instituted by government is the cruelest form of socialism!
The biggest threat to the USA isn’t a weak economy; it isn’t poor
border security, nor the Iraq War. *** The biggest threat to the USA
is having our clearly dysfunctional government be allowed to continue,
as is, for four more years.” *** Haven’t we all “Been there, done
that.”?
Obama’s mantra is ‘change’. But he’ll be POWERLESS to institute
changes! Broken government can’t be fixed until the “Calcified Wall
that is Congress” is cracked open. Under our present Constitution,
changes come from Congress, NOT from the Executive Branch! And the
Constitution PROHIBITS the Executive Branch from making structural
changes to Congress; to the Judicial Branch; or vice versa! No amount
of angry speeches by Barack Obama can cause a SINGLE needed change!
His political promises are just convenient LIES with which he hopes to
get elected. Every day, Obama snows gullible people with his overly-
detailed plans for this or that. But his authority to implement even
a single plan isn’t sanctioned by the US Constitution!
Blacks, in particular, have been promised-to. And they have been
duped. That’s why 90 plus percent of Blacks have gotten on Obama’s
bandwagon. Like Obama, they feel ENTITLED to win in this perceived
political “game”. In their dreams: “To the victor belongs the
spoils.” But there won’t be any spoils for BLACKS, because there will
be a Civil War. And there will be zero structural changes being made
in our government—the omission of which will doom the USA.
In the months that I’ve been saying that “A New Constitution is the
only ‘change’ that we need!”, not a single news medium has allowed
such a possibility to be aired. From the media’s point of view, the
American People are just warm bodies who can be made to view
advertising. The media’s supposed news coverage is designed,
expressly, to optimize the number of viewers watching, or the number
of readers reading. The accuracy and the thoroughness of the coverage
aren’t concerns for the media.
The media surely knows that its business-as-usual Goose is COOKED—if
my New Constitution is ratified in 2010. And all of those corrupt
political pollsters know that they will be put out of business—from
day one—if my New Constitution is ratified. The ‘bounce’ for McCain,
following the Republican convention was probably real. But from the
media’s point of view, having McCain start to beat Obama could be
foretelling the just-waiting-to-happen stampede away from Obama. It’s
likely that such a shift would curtail the very high expenditures for
campaign ads in the final days leading up to the election. Sad… so
sad for the media.
The media isn’t interested in covering the news. It’s only interested
in influencing the outcome of events to achieve it’s own elitist and
selfish ends. CNN’s Campbell Brown insisted that a lady convert-for-
McCain give reasons for so doing. That lady had said, “Obama is
elitist. If Obama gets elected, there will be class against class
fights.” With the intensity of a prosecuting attorney, Campbell Brown
picks at the perceived weaknesses of those who are opposed to her
first love, Obama. In Campbell’s fantasies, and in reality, she could
easily fill Michelle Obama’s size 12 shoes, or etc.
Obama is an egotistical, immoral, and unprincipled opportunist who
tries to validate himself by standing in front of Red, White and BLACK
replicas of the American flag. His standard of moral correctness is
those $50.00-a-clip “votes” of his win-by-hook-or-by-crook
contributors. As long as… ‘the money’ favors him, he feels just
fine. However, I think most would agree that anyone taking money from
people during hard times—for selfish ends—is little more than a cad
and a scoundrel. Don’t you think such a person is a bit “elitist”,
as well?
Sarah Palin is beginning to have her own say. And she is a delight!
Hillary Clinton cancelled a public appearance, today, because Sarah
Palin will be attending. By some convoluted reasoning (with emphasis
on the CON) Hillary Clinton got on the wrong bandwagon—Obama’s. How
she’s paying the price. Hillary seems especially devastated that her
“become President in due course” dreams have all but been burst by
Sarah Palin… a natural beauty.
Most will agree that executives, like Alaska Governor Sarah Palin,
should have the right to fire people. In our overly litigious
society, everyone wants to sue everyone else over mostly trivia.
That’s because there are too many spoiled lawyers. And especially
it’s because there are too many spoiled lawyers in Washington, DC!
Under my New Constitution, such document will automatically fire
office holders for not doing their jobs, and especially for not being
deferential to the People. And it will limit, for all time, the
percentage of representatives from any profession who may be in the
House of Representatives. And that includes lawyers!
So, as all of you on-the-fence Americans make your decisions about how
best to vote, please realize this: Having Barack Obama become
President is a loose-loose situation for the USA… In economic hard
times, it is better to have pro business Republicans in office than
Democrats. With Barack Obama you won’t even get a chance to vote on a
New Constitution in 2010. Opportunity denied; case closed. With
McCain, you MIGHT get the opportunity to vote for a New Constitution,
but only if McCain and Palin will state—and the sooner the better—that
they are agreeable to allowing the American People to do so.
There isn’t a single thing that would improve the climate in
Washington; in the USA; and in the World as fast as having one or more
of the candidates admit that the problems in Washington are STRUCTURAL
problems—which are beyond the power of the “two political parties” to
fix. Political parties are a major part of the problem, and such
shall be outlawed!
The future of the USA can be bright indeed, if we just have faith in
our ability to self govern in a FAIR DEMOCRACY! Doing optimum things
that are RIGHT can eliminate having to have government be over
involved, as was the case in the USSR, in controlling too much of
people’s lives. THE most patriotic thing that each of you can do is
to REJECT Barack Obama BIG TIME—to send a message that Americans
everywhere are open-minded enough to consider this: “A New
Constitution is the only ‘CHANGE’ that we need!” Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> forcampaigningwhile intentionally standing in front of an American
> flag, or bunting. The rationale is this: Because of the corrupting
> influences of the two major political parties, and of the elitist
> media, ego maniacs tend to be the only people who are attracted to be
> our “leaders”. And part of the appeal to those rascals is their
> mistaken idea that government is sanctioned by the present
> Constitution to control what goes on in this country. But nothing
> could be further from the truth!
>
> Most politicians who aspire to public office do so to elevate their
> “status”. Government has evolved away from the ideals of our founding
> fathers. Now, our elected officials are, essentially, our “elected
> dictators”. It would betoomuch of a put-down for our elected
> Christ—get him elected, and be damn the consequences ...
>
> read more »
NoEinstein
>
DEBATING AMERICA’S FUTURE.
Jim Lehrer, an excellent moderator of presidential debates, began last
night’s debate by saying to McCain and to Obama: “… one of you will be
the next President of the United States.” If things are that “50-50”,
then America is betting its very survival as a nation on having the
coin toss come up John McCain. If the toss of the coin comes up…
Barack Obama, this country, and perhaps the entire human race, will be
going down-the-tubes…
Ask any man on the street if he would rather be “powerful” or
“powerless”, and the great majority will answer: “powerful”. For too
long in America the citizens have been assigning their Constitution-
guaranteed, but perennially suppressed power, to selfish groups such
as the Democratic and Republican Parties. People have been duped into
believing that the solutions to America’s problems will be right in
hand if we only vote for one of… two candidates. But has following
such “traditions” solved our problems in the past? Or have such
“traditions” only gotten us into our present FIX? 90 plus percent of
Americans say that this country is on the wrong course. So, our
“traditions” in government just aren’t working.
The solutions to America’s problems won’t be coming from the US
Government. For decades, well-meaning new congressmen and senators
have been getting elected by promising that they will correct the
problems. Two years ago, the disgruntled voters elected a majority of
Democrats into both houses of Congress. Ostensibly, that was done so
that the ruinous Iraq War could be brought to an end. Did the war
end? In that two year time period, over a thousand more US servicemen
have died, unnecessarily, and a trillion plus dollars has been spent
on the war. Based on the above, would you say the our government is
functioning properly? HELL NO!
Barack Obama, that smooth talking, idea-spouting PEDANT, is leading
‘close to a majority’ of voters down a primrose path to disaster! How
could that be, you ask? Because Obama is promising CHANGES which the
present Constitution doesn’t empower the Chief Executive to affect!
The only Constitution-sanctioned process by which the needed changes
can be made, is to let the American Citizens VOTE to adapt a New
Constitution. All of the needed changes are explicitly and
redundantly spelled out, therein! The latter document, which has been
my own labor of love for the past twelve years, is so explicit, that
never again will it be necessary for a (usually corrupt) US Supreme
Court to “interpret” things to suit the whim of the ones who have,
somehow, gotten the most clout.
If not for the God Damned US Supreme Court, George W. Bush would never
have become President in 2000! And he wouldn’t, thereby, have been
able to get elected to a second term on the following preposterous
assumption: “It’s best not to change presidents… when our country is
at war.” Folks, if it wasn’t for the misguided US Supreme Court,
there would probable be no Iraq War, nor the financial disasters such
war seems to be unleashing, everywhere.
An essential part of my New Constitution is to DEMOTE the US Supreme
Court to be a Lesser Branch of Government! And all 5 to 4 court
rulings shall be temporary. Never again will a President get elected
by promising to bypass democratic processes, by letting the Supreme
Court make “laws”. Permanent laws in this country must be sanctioned
by at least 60% of Americans, not just by one justice! Any candidate
for public office who even implies that a president will appoint
justices favorable to this or that, will be disqualified! And in
keeping with the court’s lowered status, never again will judges or
justices be allowed to wear robes on the job; sit in throne-like
chairs, on elevated podiums; and never again will the American People
be required to stand when any judge or justice enters or exits a
courtroom.
Barack Obama, the Anti Christ of the Human Race, got nominated to be a
Democratic candidate by embracing unfair and anti democracy tactics.
He’s still using such tactics to “stack the deck” with his newly
registered voters which he has duped, from the get-go, to vote only
for him. And his supporters will transport those people to the polls,
if necessary. Obama’s idea of power is corrupt power. The 90 plus
percent of Blacks who support him, are doing so because they consider
politics just a game, and they want to be on the winning side. The
depth of the “thought processes” of the Black block vote is to ask
whether or not the candidate is a Democrat. If the answer is yes,
they will vote for him even if he is a crook! In fact, they PREFER to
vote for anyone willing to use corrupt tactics, because they see such
a candidate as having more power. For Blacks, this election is about
power, and if they don’t get it there will be civil war. Tell me,
voters, do we need a civil war on top of all of our other problems?
John McCain has rightly been tagged a great debater, but a poor speech
giver. Barack Obama has rightly been tagged a great speaker, but a
poor debater. Last night I listened, intently, to what both men had
to say. As I expected, Obama went into too much detail. McCain, on
the other hand, spoke in well-informed generalities. Such a person is
more executive. Hardly ever are great executives detail oriented.
Great executives are PEOPLE people, who can delegate authority.
Last week on 60 Minutes, Obama said that he is qualified to be
President because he is “practical”. When pressed, he went on to say:
“I’m good at getting a group of people together, in a room, to come to
a consensus.” The thesaurus on my computer has these synonyms for
practical: sensible; realistic; no-nonsense; matter-of-fact. To those
I add the colloquial definitions: Efficient; economical; basic.
Nothing about Barack Obama is practical! He is willing to spend a
billion dollars of the hard earned money of others just to get
elected. That’s not practical, that’s ego maniacal! Getting a group
of people together in a room isn’t executive. Where is the delegation
of authority to others? A well run office has a boss who keeps
informed, but lets the processes move along with the minimum of
involvement on his part. Obama is so detail oriented that he will try
to be involved in, and control, everything. Adolph Hitler failed, in
large measure because he didn’t trust his own “generals”. Barack
Obama would be doomed to failure just the same. His personality
simply isn’t right for the job.
John McCain is ten times more qualified to be President than Obama.
But even McCain can’t make the STRUCTURAL changes needed in our
government. Only a New Constitution can cause such changes. As I’ve
said, repeatedly, if Obama gets elected, the American People won’t get
a chance to adapt my New Constitution. But I will keep those options
open, if McCain-Palin get elected.
This country can only fix its problems by keeping what is good about
our government, and throwing out what isn’t! 2010 is the target date
for allowing the American People to vote for my New Constitution.
John McCain should acknowledge that there are STRUCTRAL, but easily-
fixed, problems in our government. Just a few sentences by McCain to
such effect—and the sooner the better—will set into motion most of the
positive actions needed to turn this country around! And such
statements will cause a much needed shake-up of the news media in this
country. They’ll be put on notice that the news media—with their
built-in biases—won’t be allowed to influence the outcome of any
governmental process in the future.
If POWER is what most Americans want, the best way to get it will be
to adapt my New Constitution! “Without change there can be no
progress.” Be it known: “A New Constitution is the only ‘change’ that
we need!” Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> That’s because there aretoomany spoiled lawyers. And especially
> it’s because there aretoomany spoiled lawyers in Washington, DC!
> Under my New Constitution, such document will automatically fire
> office holders for not doing their jobs, and especially for not being
> deferential to the People. And it will limit, for all time, the
> percentage of representatives from any profession who may be in the
> House of Representatives. And that includes lawyers!
>
> So, as all of you on-the-fence Americans make your decisions about how
> best to vote, please realize this: Having Barack Obama become
> President is a loose-loose situation for the USA… In economic hard
> times, it is better to have pro business Republicans in office than
> Democrats. With Barack Obama you won’t even get a chance to vote on a
> New Constitution in 2010. Opportunity denied; case closed. With
> McCain, you MIGHT get the opportunity to vote for a New Constitution,
> but only if McCain and Palin will state—and the sooner the better—that
> they are agreeable to allowing the American People to do so.
>
> There isn’t a single thing that would improve the climate in
> Washington; in the USA; and in the World as fast as having one or more
> of the candidates admit that the problems in Washington are STRUCTURAL
> problems—which are beyond the power of the “two political parties” to
> fix. Political parties are a major part of the problem, and such
> shall be outlawed!
>
> The future of the USA can be bright indeed, if we just have faith in
> our ability to self govern in a FAIR DEMOCRACY! Doing optimum things
> that are RIGHT can eliminate having to have government be over
> involved, as was the case in the USSR, in controllingtoomuch of
> people’s lives. THE most patriotic thing that each of you can do is
> to REJECT Barack Obama BIG TIME—to send a message that Americans
> everywhere are open-minded enough to consider this: “A New
> Constitution is the only ‘CHANGE’ that we need!” Pass it on!
>
> Respectfully submitted,
>
> — NoEinstein —
>
> Happy Days… !http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/99033...
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 8, 1:26 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > RED, WHITE AND… BLACK WILL NOT SUFFICE FOR THE USA!
>
> > The flag of choice for “legitimizing” Barack Obama as a candidate for
> > President misses the mark. For him trying to seem presidential is a
> > simple thing. His formula is to wear a coat and tie and to look
> > suave. Most of you should have noticed that at every opportunity—as
> > in Obama’s ubiquitous media ads—one or more freshly-starched, red,
> > white and Black, PHONY replicas of our flag are situated behind him.
>
> > I’m most concerned about any BASTARIZATION of our cherished Red, White
> > and Blue! My blood relative was the COMMANDER of Fort
>
NoEinstein
>
POWER TO THE PEOPLE!
By a margin of 20 to 1, the People on “Main Street” have rejected the
idea that government should bailout failed businesses. Even a
partisan Congress should never have tried to “buck” the Will of the
People by even putting that bailout of banks up for a vote! Now,
Congress is showing its utter hopelessness by trying to write another
bailout proposal that ‘might’ can be passed. More than economics is
on-the-line, here. The future of Congress—as presently constituted—is
on the line as well. And THAT is the best thing that has ever
happened to the USA!
Barack Obama, the Anti-Christ of the Human Race, continues to drive
straight ahead in his determination to bring this country down. Using
‘his’ new slogan—which he plagiarized from me: “Change We Need”—Obama
continues to snow naïve mentalities with his VOMIT of details on
everything, including the kitchen sink.
Obama is the darling of liberal, news commentary shows. When asked a
simple question, he goes into these unending, monotone, diatribes.
His idea of appropriate communication is too keep talking long enough,
so that no one will be able to recall what the last question, or
point, was, which had been stated by anyone but him. If Obama ever
becomes President (God forbid…), he will try to be an executive (Ha!)
by “getting a group of people together in a room.” Obama claims that
he is “good” at getting such a group to come to a consensus. But
nothing could be further from the truth!
What Obama does before any group, is to express his own ideas in such
boring detail, that those in the group will “agree” with that idiot,
just to get him to SHUT his mouth up! But Obama likes to claim that a
“consensus”, so reached, is proof that he is qualified to be our
country’s Chief Executive. An inveterate, successful executive
listens 90 percent of the time and talks 10 percent of the time.
Apparently, such basic business management wasn’t taught to Obama in
his… “community organizer” classes. And none of his Band of Crooks
will dare to burst his bubble by telling him that he simply talks too
much.
If Barack Obama is so SURE that he can produce the ‘Change We Need’,
he should be given such opportunity BEFORE the election. Instead of
gallivanting from state to state to make diatribe speeches, with his
sleeves rolled up, and his… red, white and BLACK flags in tow, Obama
should be give one week to BE President! During such time he would be
allowed to make any speeches, before any committees of Congress, and
to address the American People, with all of the persuasiveness that he
believes that he has—but which not a single soul in the USA will be
moved by.
If Obama could be given such an opportunity, as above, he would
realize how totally futile it is to have his Black Ass be elected
president. The racial issue, here, isn’t the ‘color’ of his ass, it’s
that such ‘color’ has aligned a non-thinking, lock-step, criminal-
sympathizing and democracy-threatening, Black BLOCK vote—which, even
now, is jeopardizing not just the USA, but the survival of the entire
Human Race.
For the past year I’ve been urging the American People to realize that
governments—local, state, and federal—are screwed up. Mainly, the
latter is so, because of the unjustified influences of
unconstitutional, political parties. However, in one-fell-swoop, the
American People can correct all of the evolved deficiencies in
government, simply by adapting my New Constitution in 2010. But if
Obama gets elected… I will lock up such document and never let it see
the light-of-day. I’ll keep my options opened, however, if the
American People will simply vote McCain-Palin into office.
Today, I heard Bob Barr, Libertarian Party presidential candidate,
comment that the partisan bickering over the economy is increasing his
prospects of becoming President. Folks, Bob Barr is so easy to
please, that he rejoices when some polls show him with 6% of the
vote. Most will agree that it’ll take a vote larger than that to
change the outcome of the race. Though Libertarians have the right
ideas, they simply haven’t stepped-up-to-the-plate to knock the props
out from under the failed institutions in this country. The news
media is #1, followed by government, #2, followed by education, #3.
Those failed institutions share the total blame for bringing down
America.
But if the American People can “be open” to adapting my New
Constitution, the hopefulness of that attitude will immediately begin
causing most positive things to happen in the USA and in the world!
For one thing: The chances of there being any more 9/11 type threats
to this country will go DOWN. Few of McCain’s “Muslim extremists”
will be rushing to kill themselves, if the “attitude changes” that
Muslims seek will be forthcoming. The majority of the American People
don’t think that the USA should be… the police force of the world.
Being such, is simply too expensive. And it is usually inconsiderate
to one or more other nations.
Because of media bias, Jews have gotten control of our failed system
of government. Things must be “agreeable” to Jews, or Congress is
afraid of getting bad press. *** Congress is a failure, because there
are simply too many special interests which must sanction what gets
done. *** My New Constitution will boot out all special interests—
including the tacit ones—with threats of jail time!
If Obama becomes President, Blacks will become another “Jew level”
negative influence in Washington. But more than that, Blacks will
both instigate rioting, and be on the receiving end of violence—the
likes of which this country has never seen. Having such… social unrest
—or even a sibilance thereof—happen during tough economic times, and
with a failed government screwing up more and more of what is going
on, doesn’t bode well for our future as a nation.
Those 20 people (to 1) on ‘main street’ not favoring any bailouts of
Wall Street, should realize the POWER that such unity manifests! Our
strength as a nation can be in our unity; and no one should fear that
‘main street’ won’t do what is best for the country as a whole.
The hopelessly corrupt news media, and government, will be shaken to
their very foundations if, say, Sara Palin—in her debate, or on the
campaign trail—will comment: “… You know, this country has some
serious problems. And it seems that government is a big part of it.
How can serious problems be solved, if the government that is trying
to do the solving, needs to be fixed? Someone has said: “If it ain’t
broke, don’t fix it.” But government is clearly broken. 90% of the
American People who have been polled say that it is. That’s why I’m
open-to-the-Idea of letting the American People vote on a New
Constitution.”
Over-the-hill news anchor, Katie Couric, has taken pot shots at Palin
regarding her sources of knowledge on international affairs. Couric’s
motive was to pigeon-hole Palin as being narrowly informed. But
rather than going there, Palin, wisely, answered in a general way:
that she gets information from many sources. Somehow, those in the
news have the mistaken notion that they are prosecuting attorneys.
They must try to seek-and-destroy, as though doing so will elevate
their own questionable status.
Before Katie Couric left the ’Today’ show, she and Matt Lauer took on
the project of re designing the dressing room of their co-host. Lauer
did a credible job. But Couric took everything as a big joke. She
had a wall-sized picture of her own MUG put on his wall. How “funny”…
but how ‘indicative’ it is that we, as a nation, have let those with
the biggest egos—like Katie Couric and Barack Obama—try to tell us how
we should perceive the little news that we are allowed to hear.
CNN’s Anderson Coo-per, with his, the-world-is-coming-to-an-end, Botox
face, has implied that Palin wasn’t smart enough to name a newspaper
or other source for her facts. But realize this: Any mother, like
Palin, with a son who will, perhaps, be going-into-harm’s-way, tends
to keep informed about world events. Barack Obama keeps implying,
with his boring harangues, that our President must be a cornucopia of
knowledge to handle the job. In fact, the only REAL qualification
needed in our President is that he or she have a functioning value
system—or… knows the difference between right and wrong. If Sara
Palin becomes President one day—as I sincerely hope—I’ll sleep well
knowing that a “Hockey Mom” cares too much about her own family, and
those of her friends and acquaintances everywhere, to do anything
that’s not in the best interest of the USA. And because Palin is a
fast learner, I’ll bet that she will outpace Barack Obama in getting
the… on-the-job training, that the USA can’t afford to let that son-of-
a-bitch, Barack Obama, have!
Be it known: “A New Constitution is the only ‘change’ that we need!”
Pass it on!
Respectfully submitted,
— NoEinstein —
>
> to say. As I expected, Obama went intotoomuch detail. McCain, on
> Happy Days… !http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_thread/thread/99033...