Martin Luther King..Communist..Womanizer..Plagiarist
>
>
>
> Critics have charged that King plagiarized that too by borrowing from a
> speech given to the Republican convention in 1952 by an
> African-American preacher named Archibald Carey, Jr.
> Some of them say he gave Cary's speech word-for-word.
> It can probably be said that King borrowed from the idea of the speech
> by Carey (who was a friend of King's), but only the last couple of
> paragraph's resembled Carey's speech and little of it is word-for-word.
> Both men spun their remarks off the words of the song "My Country 'Tis
> of Thee."
>
>
>
>
> Martin Luther King plagiarized in college-Truth!
> The staff at the Martin Luther King, Jr. Papers Project discovered a
> lot of plagiarism in Martin Luther King's writings and in a 1991
> article in THE JOURNAL OF AMERICAN HISTORY said that "plagiarism was a
> general pattern evident in nearly all of his academic writings"
> including his doctoral dissertation.
>
>
>
> King was under surveillance because of his ties to communist
> organizations-Truth!
> David Garrow, the author of "Bearing the Cross," a book about Martin
> Luther King, says that King's criticism of the Kennedy administration
> drew administration scrutiny.
> There was suspicion that two of his associates, including Stanley
> Levinson, had disassociated from the Communist party as a cover to work
> with and influence King.
> Despite extensive surveillance, the FBI was never able to find any
> direct funding or other links between King and the Communist party.
>
>
http://www.martinlutherking.org/thebeast.html
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/m/mlk.htm
bobandcarole~ wrote:
> Martin Luther King..Communist..Womanizer..Plagiarist
Off topic in any sci.* newsgroup.
David A. Smith
To be honest Einstein wasn't the nicest person to women on all ocassions. He
left his first wife for his second cousin. He wanted a wife that wouldn't
want to talk physics but would do his cooking, cleaning, sewing etc.
But he was still an awesome man to me with a superior soul.
Pete
Superior to whom?
Hi haha-hanson,
Einstein never proposed relativity as religion. I don't think he was
ever accused of being a communist either. As to plagiarism, it seems
that it is the norm that you borrow from "the giants" and at the time,
everyone knew who they were...
David A. Smith
>> .... NOT if they would have added: ..." just like Einstein was!"
>> ahahaha.... ahahanson
>
[Smitty]
> Einstein never proposed relativity as religion. I don't think he was
> ever accused of being a communist either. As to plagiarism, it seems
> that it is the norm that you borrow from "the giants" and at the time,
> everyone knew who they were...
> David A. Smith
>
[hanson]
You might wanna check out "FBI and Einstein". They suspected
differently. But hey, once you get taken in by "the giants"
their word becomes "The Word" for you... religiously.... ahahahaha...
There are some more goodies on your defendant, here in this post
which you have apparently missed:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/fcc7fb13a66d2439
BTW, belatedly, but from my heart, Smitty, old chum
I wish you ---- A Happy 2007 --- ,
hanson
What's difference between a belief in supernatural time dilation
and miracles (if there is one)?
hanson wrote:
> Smitty, "dlzc" <dl...@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:1168956298....@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com...
> news:1168894147.6...@11g2000cwr.googlegroups.com...
> >> >
> >> > bobandcarole~ wrote:
> >> >> Martin Luther King..Communist..Womanizer..Plagiarist
> >> >
> >> David A. Smith wrote:
> >> > Off topic in any sci.* newsgroup.
> >> >
> >> [hanson]
>
> >> .... NOT if they would have added: ..." just like Einstein was!"
> >> ahahaha.... ahahanson
> >
> [Smitty]
> > Einstein never proposed relativity as religion. I don't think
> > he was ever accused of being a communist either. As to
> > plagiarism, it seems that it is the norm that you borrow
> > from "the giants" and at the time, everyone knew who they
> > were...
> >
> [hanson]
> You might wanna check out "FBI and Einstein". They suspected
> differently.
They suspect everyone, and always did. After all he was from what was
then a "soviet block" country, seemed to have some sort of "social
conscience" (you don't have to repeat Einstein urging to build the bomb
again), and was high profile enough to sway opinions.
> But hey, once you get taken in by "the giants" their word
> becomes "The Word" for you... religiously.... ahahahaha...
Not really. Just like in church, the sermons are constantly changing.
Different than church (well, since King James anyway) the "good books"
keep changing with new information. And we get to test the "limits of
sin" in science! ;>)
> There are some more goodies on your defendant, here
> in this post which you have apparently missed:
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/fcc7fb13a66d2439
>
> BTW, belatedly, but from my heart, Smitty, old chum
> I wish you ---- A Happy 2007 --- ,
And to you as well. May you be healthy and profitable, surrounded by
people that keep you pleasantly challenged.
David A. Smith
Eh? I can't rule out that the great American intellectual
J. Edgar Hoover may have seen it that way, but if I remember
my history right, Berlin in 1933 was not exactly on friendly
terms with the Soviets.
Maybe the problem was that he fled an *anti*Soviet country,
and who but a communist would ever want to do that?
"Not exactly on friendly terms".... the German Army conducted routine
training in Russia in the '20's, in violation of the Treaty of
Versailles. Russia signed a non-agression pact with Germany in August
1939, that was closer to an allaince. Russia supplied huge amounts of
badly needed raw materials to Germany right up to the minute Germany
turned on her 22 June 1941. Russia divided up the East with Germany,
taking part of Poland, and all of Estonia, Latvia, and most of
Lithuania, Bessrabia and Northern Bukovina, while Germany got Memel,
Western Poland, the Corridor. Russia then looked away as Germany
destroyed its ally Yugoslavia.
While Hitler was allegedly "anti-Communist", he modelled his terror
almost exactly on Stalin's. Even the use of the color red in the Nazi
flag was entirely intentional, to be EXACTLY the Communist red (see
Mein Kampf). Joseph Goebbels, his propaganda minister, was a former
Communist. Later, the Sogennante Deustsche Demokratische Republik
(so-called German Democratic Republic, aka East Germany), imitated Nazi
Germany in many details, right down to the goosestepping soldiers.
>
> Maybe the problem was that he fled an *anti*Soviet country,
> and who but a communist would ever want to do that?
Or Jew, or Catholic, or Protestant, or Social Democrat....
The words of the first commandant of Auschwitz (paraphrased): "Jews
will last 2 weeks, priests 4 weeks, everybody else, 6 weeks."
Russell wrote:
> dlzc wrote:
> > Dear hanson:
> >
> > hanson wrote:
> ...
> > > [hanson]
> > > You might wanna check out "FBI and Einstein". They suspected
> > > differently.
> >
> > They suspect everyone, and always did. After all he was from
> > what was then a "soviet block" country,
>
> Eh? I can't rule out that the great American intellectual
> J. Edgar Hoover may have seen it that way, but if I remember
> my history right, Berlin in 1933 was not exactly on friendly
> terms with the Soviets.
Actually Ulm (west of Munich) then Munich (both still in "West
Germany")... but not "Soviet block". Then over into Switzerland. Then
back to Berlin, but still not "Soviet block". I think his first wife
was Serbian... but not the one he had at the time he immigrated to the
US.
> Maybe the problem was that he fled an *anti*Soviet country,
> and who but a communist would ever want to do that?
I withdraw my errant claim about "Soviet block". It would seem that
his departure from Berlin was triggered by Hitler becoming
chancellor...
Einstein's FBI file appears to be in the public domain... but a slow
load.
David A. Smith
All of the world leaders understood that the Jews,
who had massacred the Russian Royal Family,
and co-opted the Russian government,
were using Russia as a base from where
to instigate Class Wars all over the Earth,
in order to co-opt other governments,
and they were trying to deal with the problem.
Some nations, like Spain, Germany, Italy, Japan, etc.
took the battle to the Class War terrorists and instigators,
but the Class War instigators either bought or intimidated
leaders of some nations, like America and England,
If FDR had opposed the War-for-profit gang,
rather than sell out to them,
WWII would have lasted six months,
and there would have been no Cold War, no nuclear weapons,
no Korean War, no Vietnam War, no 911, no Religious Wars, etc.
Fortunately for America and the world FDR died,
and as the War-for-profit gang
had not had time to "Mel Gibson" the new leaders,
(Truman, Nixon, Hoover, McCarthy, etc.),
and Americans were sick of conflict and war,
the new leaders did a 180 in American policy,
and managed to prevent the takeover of America by the gang.
It is interesting to see that the American Generals and
high level government officials understood the problem,
and they made an effort to deal with the problem,
by isolating Jews who might spy for Russia.
Note for example, that General Leslie R. Groves,
who directed the Manhattan Project,
assigned trusted Americans such as Ernest Lawrence
to the most critical jobs (Designing and constructing billion dollar
systems and plants to extract fissionable material.),
and he isolated people who represented a threat to national security
to remote locations.
It is interesting to see that contrary to the hype
that this group of isolated people "invented" the atomic bomb,
after all the jacking around, the group assigned to
designing the bomb trigger,
ended up using the shaped charge approach
promoted by an explosive technician,
who had a hard time getting them to consider his design.
--
Tom Potter
*** Time Magazine Person of the Year 2006 ***
http://home.earthlink.net/~tdp/
http://tdp1001.googlepages.com/home
http://no-turtles.com
http://www.frappr.com/tompotter
http://photos.yahoo.com/tdp1001
http://spaces.msn.com/tdp1001
http://www.flickr.com/photos/tom-potter/
http://tom-potter.blogspot.com
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
[snip]
>
> --
> Tom Potter
>
> *** Time Magazine Person of the Year 2006 ***
> *** Unabomber Surprise KoOk Award December 2006 ***
So who are the gangsters who are trying to take over America today?
Names?
Double-A
> So who are the gangsters who are trying to take over America today?
Guys like Lieberman, Larry Silverman, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle,
John Bolton, Owen Harries, Henry Kissinger, Jeanne Kirkpatrick,
Bea and Bill Kristol, Samuel Huntington, Norman Podhoretz,
Daniel Pipes, Charles Krauthammer, Marty Feldstein,
Eliot Cohen, Peter Rodman, Elliott Abrams,
Richard L. Armitage, William J. Bennett, Jeffrey Bergner, Paula Dobriansky,
Francis Fukuyama, Robert Kagan, Zalmay Khalilzad,
William Kristol, Peter W. Rodman,
Donald Rumsfeld, William Schneider, Jr., Vin Weber,
R. James Woolsey, Robert B. Zoellick, the Bush Family,
and of course, the people who control media,
like the New York Times, and Time Magazine,
which were active in instigating the Spanish-American War,
the Class Wars, and the Religious Wars,
and the people in the news groups who aggressively
try to con American Blacks, Latinos and rednecks
into sacrificing their lives, limbs, liberties and fortunes,
to kill folks they could get along with just fine,
in the absence of instigation.
In short,
the greedy, immoral people
who put race and religion and money,
above a set of moral values,
like truth, honesty, justice, equality, and equity.
--
Tom Potter
*** Time Magazine Person of the Year 2006 ***