A theory of Einstein the irrational plagiarist
ingu...@yahoo.com
The name "Einstein" evokes images of a good-humoured genius, who
revolutionised our concepts of space, time, energy, mass and motion.
Time named Albert Einstein "person of the century". The language itself
has incorporated "Einstein" into our common vocabulary as a synonym for
extraordinary brilliance. Many consider Einstein to have been the
finest mind in recorded human history.
That is the popular image, fostered by textbooks, the media, and hero
worshiping physicists and historians. However, when one reads the
scientific literature written by Einstein's contemporaries, a quite
different picture emerges: one of an irrational plagiarist, who
manipulated credit for their work.
Einstein is perhaps most famous for the special theory of relativity,
published in 1905 in the German physics journal, Annalen der Physik.
The paper was devoid of references, a fact that Einstein's friend and
Nobel prize winner for physics, Max Born, found troubling.
"The striking point is that it contains not a single reference to
previous literature," Born stated in 1955, before the International
Relativity Conference in Bern. "It gives you the impression of quite a
new venture. But that is, of course, as I have tried to explain, not
true."
Though Einstein's 1905 article contained no references, it was so
strikingly similar to a paper written by Hendrik Lorentz the previous
year, that Walter Kaufmann and Max Planck felt a need to publicly point
out that Einstein had merely provided a metaphysical reinterpretation
and generalisation of Lorentz' scientific theory, a metaphysical
reinterpretation and generalisation Henri Poincare had already
published.
As Charles Nordmann, astronomer to the Paris Observatory, pointed out:
"It is really to Henri Poincare, the great Frenchman whose death has
left a void that will never be filled, that we must accord the merit of
having first proved, with the greatest lucidity and the most prudent
audacity, that time and space, as we know them, can only be relative. A
few quotations from his works will not be out of place. They will show
that the credit for most of the things which are currently attributed
to Einstein is, in reality, due to Poincare."
Einstein acknowledged the fact, but justified his plagiarism in a
cavalier fashion in Annalen der Physik in 1907. "It appears to me that
it is the nature of the business that what follows has already been
partly solved by other authors. Despite that fact, since the issues of
concern are here addressed from a new point of view, I believe I am
entitled to leave out a thoroughly pedantic survey of the literature,
all the more so because it is hoped that these gaps will yet be filled
by other authors, as has already happened with my first work on the
principle of relativity through the commendable efforts of Mr. Planck
and Mr. Kaufmann."
The completed field equations of the general theory of relativity were
first deduced by David Hilbert, a fact Einstein was forced to
acknowledge in 1916, after he had plagiarised them from Hilbert in late
1915. Paul Gerber solved the problem of the perihelion of Mercury in
1898. Physicist Ernst Gehrcke gave a lecture on the theory of
relativity in the Berlin Philharmonic on August 24, 1920, and publicly
confronted Einstein, who was in attendance, with Einstein's plagiarism
of Lorentz' mathematical formalisms of the special theory of
relativity, Palagyi's space-time concepts, Varicak's non-Euclidean
geometry and of the plagiarism of the mathematical solution of the
problem of the perihelion of Mercury first arrived at by Gerber.
Gehrcke addressed Einstein to his face and told the crowd that the
emperor had no clothes.
This was Einstein's response published in the Berliner Tageblatt und
Handels-Zeitung on August 27, 1920, translated into English in the book
Albert Einstein's Theory of General Relativity edited by Gerald E.
Tauber: ". . . Gerber, who has given the correct formula for the
perihelion motion of Mercury before I did. The experts are not only in
agreement that Gerber's derivation is wrong through and through, but
the formula cannot be obtained as a consequence of the main assumption
made by Gerber. Mr Gerber's work is therefore completely useless, an
unsuccessful and erroneous theoretical attempt.
"I maintain that the theory of general relativity has provided the
first real explanation of the perihelion motion of mercury. I have not
mentioned the work by Gerber originally, because I did not know it when
I wrote my work on the perihelion motion of Mercury; even if I had been
aware of it, I would not have had any reason to mention it."
The fact that Einstein was a plagiarist is common knowledge in the
physics community. What isn't so well-known is that the sources
Einstein parroted were also largely unoriginal. In 1919, writing in the
Philosophical Magazine Harry Bateman, a British mathematician and
physicist who had emigrated to the United States, unsuccessfully sought
acknowledgment of his work.
"The appearance of Dr Silberstein's recent article on General
Relativity without the Equivalence Hypothesis encourages me to restate
my own views on the subject," Bateman wrote.
"I am perhaps entitled to do this as my work on the subject of general
relativity was published before that of Einstein and Kottler, and
appears to have been overlooked by recent writers."
My book is a documentation of Einstein's plagiarism of the theory of
relativity. It discloses his method for manipulating credit for the
work of his contemporaries, reprints the prior works he parroted, and
demonstrates that he could not have drawn his conclusions without prior
knowledge of the works he copied but failed to reference.
Numerous republished quotations from Einstein's contemporaries prove
that they were aware of his plagiarism. Side-by-side comparisons of
Einstein's words juxtaposed to those of his predecessors prove the
almost verbatim repetition. There is even substantial evidence
presented in the book that Einstein plagiarised the work of his first
wife, Mileva Maric, who had plagiarised others.
Mr Bjerknes, an American historian of science, has authored six books
on Einstein and the theory of relativity. Albert Einstein: The
Incorrigible Plagiarist (ISBN 0971962987) is available at
www.amazon.com
Dirk Van de moortel
<ingu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1159816511.5...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Christopher Jon Bjerknes -
Bjerknes is a well know neo-nazi anti-Semitic troll
Dirk Vdm
hanson
call you names, as they will move closer to the warmth of
their role model's and idol's sphincter at Albert's asshole.
Einstein Dinglerries treat RELativity like J-fishing Evangelicals,
head-bobbing Zionists and ass-venting Islamo fundies do
treat their respective RELigions. You have committed heresy,
blasphemy and other assorted sins against their phantasms.
BUT... ahahaha....Thanks for the laughs!.... ahahahanson
hanson
ahahahaha....
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.geo.geology/msg/64164b112950f811
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/9ba94e678282297f
as poster VD Moortel, a very malodorous Einstein Dingleberry, just as
was predicted in
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/65c3a6ba5eae6391
Hey Dirk, thanks for the laughs, mooch! .... ahahahaha...
ahaha... ahahahanson
>
>
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message
news:nYdUg.108500$c7.14...@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
Sam Wormley
>
> My book is a documentation of Einstein's plagiarism of the theory of
> relativity. It discloses his method for manipulating credit for the
> work of his contemporaries, reprints the prior works he parroted, and
> demonstrates that he could not have drawn his conclusions without prior
> knowledge of the works he copied but failed to reference.
>
Rubbish
hanson
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/bac88589087aa6b8
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/65c3a6ba5eae6391
... you couldn't control yourself, but just like VD Moortel you
had to waltz into it with a Shakespearian cape waving
but not expressing yourself clearly enough whether it was
Einstein's plagiarism that was "Rubbish", or Christopher
Jon Bjerknes disclosures and dissemination of Albert's ill
character traits were such.
Anyway, Thanks for the laughs, Sam.... ahahaha....
ahahaha... ahahahanson
>
"Sam Wormley" <swor...@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:2yeUg.221294$1i1.163457@attbi_s72...
> Rubbish
Sorcerer
"Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:nYdUg.108500$c7.14...@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
|
psychopath!
HAHAHAHAHA!!!
You are funnier than Wilson Rabbidge!
Sorcerer
I see you are maintaining your usual standard of reasoned
argument.
Martin Hogbin.
Sorcerer
have a point.
"hanson" <han...@quick.net> wrote in message
news:4dfUg.4470$753.450@trnddc05...
hanson
"Sorcerer" <Headm...@hogwarts.physics_b> wrote in message
news:HFgUg.71915$wg.7...@fe1.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
Sorcerer
| But who is "he" and and whose point for whom?
Doesn't matter, Einstein or Wormey, they are both idiots,
but what I meant was Einstein plagiarised crap and Wormey
said it was rubbish, so Wormey is right.
Sorcerer
| But who is "he" and and whose point for whom?
Doesn't matter, Einstein or Wormey, they are both idiots,
but what I meant was Einstein plagiarised crap and Wormey
said it was rubbish, so Wormey is right.
It's kinda like telling a catholic the Pope is full of shit...
Dork and Wormey are instantly inflamed. Hahahaha...
Helmut Wabnig
>Christopher Jon Bjerknes - The Canberra Times September 19, 2006
>
>The name "Einstein" evokes images of a good-humoured genius, who
.....snipped
>the book that Einstein plagiarised the work of his first
>wife, Mileva Maric, who had plagiarised others.
>
>Mr Bjerknes, an American historian of science, has authored six books
>on Einstein and the theory of relativity. Albert Einstein: The
>Incorrigible Plagiarist (ISBN 0971962987) is available at
>www.amazon.com
>
>http://canberra.yourguide.com.au/detail.asp?story_id=179892&y=2002&m=9&class=Features&subclass=Science&category=Feature&class_id=17
So he wrote 6 books about the same topic,
which is impossible without plagiarizing.
Bjerknes plagiarizes himself, obviously,
and plagiarizes others, because he's not the first one
to point at E.'s plagiarizing.
Why did Bjerknes require 6 books to tell one thing?
Bill Gates is a plagiarizer and self-plagiarizer, too,
but he calls them "Versions"
w.
Koobee Wublee
> So he [Mr. Bjerknes] wrote 6 books about the same topic,
Did he? I can only reckon 2. I don't know about the other 4 as he
claimed he has written 6 books.
> which is impossible without plagiarizing.
In his first book, he had over 3 hundred references.
> Bjerknes plagiarizes himself, obviously,
You are whining. There is no room in science for your childish
behavior. Excuse me. I meant infantile behavior.
> and plagiarizes others, because he's not the first one
> to point at E.'s plagiarizing.
Were you the first?
> Why did Bjerknes require 6 books to tell one thing?
He required 2 books to do so. I only require the following summary.
** Lorentz transform
When first derived by Larmor, the Lorentz transform has 2 properties.
In his 1905 paper, Einstein reverse-engineered the Lorentz transform.
In doing so, he started with the 2 properties in which he referred to
them as postulates. Then, his derivation of the Lorentz transform was
total nonsense. It was so bad that he had to re-derive it later on in
his book. Again, it was totally nonsense in which we witness the very
transform was conjured out of 2 equations equating zero with zero.
Knowing the answer with faulty derivation is a tell-tale sign of
plagiarism.
** E = m c^2
Also in his 1905 paper, he made a series of blatant mistakes to got to
(E = m c^2). Again, knowing the answer before hand with faulty
derivation can only mean plagiarism.
** Field equations
The Einstein field equations can only be derived through the Lagrangian
Hilbert pulled out of his *ss. It is grossly improbable to have 2
persons coming up with the same BS within a week of each other. In
fact, you will have a better chance of winning the lottery 10 times
straight.
> Bill Gates is a plagiarizer and self-plagiarizer, too,
> but he calls them "Versions"
Self-plagiarism only exists in the minds of whiners.
schoenf...@gmail.com
ingu...@yahoo.com wrote:
[...]
> This was Einstein's response published in the Berliner Tageblatt und
> Handels-Zeitung on August 27, 1920, translated into English in the book
> Albert Einstein's Theory of General Relativity edited by Gerald E.
> Tauber: ". . . Gerber, who has given the correct formula for the
> perihelion motion of Mercury before I did. The experts are not only in
> agreement that Gerber's derivation is wrong through and through, but
> the formula cannot be obtained as a consequence of the main assumption
> made by Gerber. Mr Gerber's work is therefore completely useless, an
> unsuccessful and erroneous theoretical attempt.
Are you able to provide a link to Gerbers original work?
Helmut Wabnig
It is contained within here:
http://www.jewishracism.com/SaintEinstein.htm
But beware, Bjerknes is an idiot.
w.
schoenf...@gmail.com
Ad hominem attacks on individuals are insufficient conditions for the
(reasonable) falsification of propositions authored by those
individuals. Thanks for the link.
> w.
hanson
news:1159876709.9...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>
ingu...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> >> This was Einstein's response published in the Berliner Tageblatt und
>> >> Handels-Zeitung on August 27, 1920, translated into English in the
>> >> book
>> >> Albert Einstein's Theory of General Relativity edited by Gerald E.
>> >> Tauber: ". . . Gerber, who has given the correct formula for the
>> >> perihelion motion of Mercury before I did. The experts are not only in
>> >> agreement that Gerber's derivation is wrong through and through, but
>> >> the formula cannot be obtained as a consequence of the main assumption
>> >> made by Gerber. Mr Gerber's work is therefore completely useless, an
>> >> unsuccessful and erroneous theoretical attempt.
>> >
schoenf...@gmail.com wrote:
>> >Are you able to provide a link to Gerbers original work?
>>
ZioNazi and Einstein's Dingleberry Helmut Wabnig is wabinggering:
>> It is contained within here:
>> http://www.jewishracism.com/SaintEinstein.htm
>> But beware, Bjerknes is an idiot.
>
It is not Bjerknes, but beware of Wabnigger, him being the idiot.
Einstein Dingleberry Wabnig has a compulsive ZioNazi fetish,
and happens to be one of the three stooges:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.geo.geology/msg/64164b112950f811
hanson
news:1159862246.4...@k70g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Helmut Wabnig is wabniggering like all Einstein Dingleberries do:
>
...and in the wabniggering mentation of Einstein Dingleberries
like Helmut Wabnig, the ZionNazi, who cannot help his fetish,
because he is one of the three stooges, a bigot who is spreading
Anti-Semitism with a wanton:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.geo.geology/msg/64164b112950f811
>
hanson
excitement "Helmut Wabnig" is the next one of the Einstein
Dingleberries that is lining up to move closer to his idol's sphincter:
in news:8u14i21ulsfb6a7tp...@4ax.com... &
is strutting and showing pride in being one of the three stooges:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.geo.geology/msg/64164b112950f811
>
>>wife, Mileva Maric, who had plagiarised others.
>>
>>Mr Bjerknes, an American historian of science, has authored six books
>>on Einstein and the theory of relativity. Albert Einstein: The
>>Incorrigible Plagiarist (ISBN 0971962987) is available at
>>www.amazon.com
>>
>>http://canberra.yourguide.com.au/detail.asp?story_id=179892&y=2002&m=9&class=Features&subclass=Science&category=Feature&class_id=17
>
> So he wrote 6 books about the same topic,
> which is impossible without plagiarizing.
> Bjerknes plagiarizes himself, obviously,
> and plagiarizes others, because he's not the first one
> Why did Bjerknes require 6 books to tell one thing?
>
...because wabbingering Zionazis like you would not
understand nor accept it if Bjerknes wrote just 5 books
much less if he published only one... ahahahaha....
>
[Wabnigger]
> Bill Gates is a plagiarizer and self-plagiarizer, too,
> but he calls them "Versions"
>
... ahahaha.. yeah, right, just like you are a version
of one of those Einstein Dingleberries... ahahaha...
Thanks for the laughs, Wabbie.... ahahahanson
ingu...@yahoo.com
Oops did he criticise a member of your race Dirk? The most hardened
'Neo-Nazis' wouldn't react like you just did to someone criticising a
member of their race.
Dirk Van de moortel
<ingu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1159883623.8...@m7g2000cwm.googlegroups.com...
>
> Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
>
>> <ingu...@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:1159816511.5...@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
>> > Christopher Jon Bjerknes -
>>
>> Bjerknes is a well know neo-nazi anti-Semitic troll
>>
>> Dirk Vdm
>
> Oops did he criticise a member of your race Dirk?
No, I don't belong to a race.
> The most hardened
> 'Neo-Nazis' wouldn't react like you just did to someone criticising a
> member of their race.
Well, your premise is wrong to begin with, so this
doesn't need a comment.
Dirk Vdm
Dirk Van de moortel
But neither you nor the Bjerkook are considered to be human,
so adhominem attacks to you or him are oxymorons.
Dirk Vdm
Koobee Wublee
> Now all of those Einstein's Dingleberries will moan, groan and
> call you names, as they will move closer to the warmth of
> their role model's and idol's sphincter at Albert's asshole.
> Einstein Dinglerries treat RELativity like J-fishing Evangelicals,
> head-bobbing Zionists and ass-venting Islamo fundies do
> treat their respective RELigions.
You are correct. Einstein started out as a zealous Zionist. However,
when he heard about the massacres of the two Arab villages where all
women and children were executed in cold blood as well as most of the
men (Some men were deliberately left alive to be paraded through the
streets of Jerusalem. Of course, after the parade, they were executed
as well.), he became very vehemently anti-Zionist. Although Einstein
was a plagiarist in science, he was certainly no evil in moral conducts.
surrealis...@hotmail.com
> Christopher Jon Bjerknes - The Canberra Times September 19, 2006
>
> The name "Einstein" evokes images of a good-humoured genius, who
> revolutionised our concepts of space, time, energy, mass and motion.
> Time named Albert Einstein "person of the century". The language itself
> has incorporated "Einstein" into our common vocabulary as a synonym for
> extraordinary brilliance. Many consider Einstein to have been the
> finest mind in recorded human history.
>
> That is the popular image, fostered by textbooks, the media, and hero
> worshiping physicists and historians. However, when one reads the
> scientific literature written by Einstein's contemporaries, a quite
> different picture emerges: one of an irrational plagiarist, who
> manipulated credit for their work.
>
> Einstein is perhaps most famous for the special theory of relativity,
> published in 1905 in the German physics journal, Annalen der Physik.
> The paper was devoid of references, a fact that Einstein's friend and
> Nobel prize winner for physics, Max Born, found troubling.
>
> "The striking point is that it contains not a single reference to
> previous literature,"
False. Just read the paper and you WILL find embedded references to
previous literature on electrodynamics and mechanics. However, the
paper was written to Einstein's fellow physicists (not to today's
ignorant amateur physics readers who have zero knowledge of the history
of physics up to 1905), who were already experts in the field of
electrodynamics, which, by today's standard, was a very small set of
important papers that didn't need to be explicitly referenced! Any
physicist in 1905 who didn't already know those papers intimately
shouldn't have been reading Einstein's 1905 paper in the first place.
> Born stated in 1955, before the International
> Relativity Conference in Bern. "It gives you the impression of quite a
> new venture. But that is, of course, as I have tried to explain, not
> true."
Impressions are not scholarly facts! Einstein set the record straight
in his many essays on physics, such as can be found in his book of
essays, Ideas and Opinions. It was the writiers following Einstein,
writing about his work from a non-historical viewpoint, who destroyed
the truth about what Einstein was trying to accomplish in his
relativity. Unlike Einstein himself, these authors were ignorant about
the history and philosophy of physics, which would have clarified and
dismissed all these pseudo-issues if they had been knowledgeable about
them.
>
> Though Einstein's 1905 article contained no references, it was so
> strikingly similar to a paper written by Hendrik Lorentz the previous
> year, that Walter Kaufmann and Max Planck felt a need to publicly point
> out that Einstein had merely provided a metaphysical reinterpretation
> and generalisation of Lorentz' scientific theory, a metaphysical
> reinterpretation and generalisation Henri Poincare had already
> published.
Einstein knew that neither he NOR Poincare invented the PoR. Galileo is
the best choice for that. Einstein was VERY clear about his credit for
the PoR in SR: By making it a postulate of electrodynamics, it could be
used heuristically to find the Lorentz covariant equations of the
physics of inertial frames and electrodynamics as a generalization of
the mechanics of particles given by Newton. Einstein also believed that
the PoR, as an empirical principle of nature, was more fundamental than
ANY model of light propagation. He set out to deconstruct the ether,
and he succeeded.
I snipped the rest of the bullshit lies.
Sorcerer
<surrealis...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1159971231.6...@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
| ingu...@yahoo.com wrote:
| > Christopher Jon Bjerknes - The Canberra Times September 19, 2006
| >
| > The name "Einstein" evokes images of a good-humoured genius, who
| > revolutionised our concepts of space, time, energy, mass and motion.
| > Time named Albert Einstein "person of the century". The language itself
| > has incorporated "Einstein" into our common vocabulary as a synonym for
| > extraordinary brilliance. Many consider Einstein to have been the
| > finest mind in recorded human history.
| >
| > That is the popular image, fostered by textbooks, the media, and hero
| > worshiping physicists and historians. However, when one reads the
| > scientific literature written by Einstein's contemporaries, a quite
| > different picture emerges: one of an irrational plagiarist, who
| > manipulated credit for their work.
| >
| > Einstein is perhaps most famous for the special theory of relativity,
| > published in 1905 in the German physics journal, Annalen der Physik.
| > The paper was devoid of references, a fact that Einstein's friend and
| > Nobel prize winner for physics, Max Born, found troubling.
| >
| > "The striking point is that it contains not a single reference to
| > previous literature,"
|
| False. Just read the paper
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
" the unsuccessful attempts to discover any motion of the earth relatively
to the ``light medium,'' is a vague reference to MMX, but the bastard give
no credit to Michelson or Morley.
The paper was devoid of references, you fuckin' lying piece of shit.
Androcles
hanson
news:1159945092.5...@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> hanson wrote:
>> Now all of those Einstein's Dingleberries will moan, groan and
>> call you names, as they will move closer to the warmth of
>> their role model's and idol's sphincter at Albert's asshole.
>> head-bobbing Zionists and ass-venting Islamo fundies do
>> treat their respective RELigions.
>
> You are correct. Einstein started out as a zealous Zionist. However,
> when he heard about the massacres of the two Arab villages where all
> women and children were executed in cold blood as well as most of the
> men (Some men were deliberately left alive to be paraded through the
> streets of Jerusalem. Of course, after the parade, they were executed
> as well.), he became very vehemently anti-Zionist. Although Einstein
> was a plagiarist in science, he was certainly no evil in moral conducts.
>
yeah, right... ahahaha... if you chose to buy that Zionist line... ahaha
AE used that same MO & pattern, you mentioned, throughout his life.
Like when Albert, the advocate of violence, signed and agitated for
the construction of the A-bomb with the infamous letter to prez FDR,
but the moment the bombs were dropped he quickly switched sides
and became a pacifist. How convenient. How moral.... ahahaha..
Not much different then does his ilk these days. They, the Neocons
(a code word for Jews) Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith,
Rob Loewenberg, David Wurmser and Meyrav Wurmser (known as
the architects of Gulf war 2) agitated in the admins, from Clinton on, &
finally succeeded in goading Brite-Brain-Bush to go into Iraq and to
get Saddam Hussein. ... and then as soon as that was accomplished,
they began to switch sides and became anti-war activists... ahahaha
How convenient. How moral.... ahahaha...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/69f1aedfd606fc46
Take care, KW
hanson
PS: re for AE's personal, convenient, moral conduct...ahahaha...
check into his fidelity level in his marriage(s)... ahahaha.... Not
that I really care about any of this, but what astounds me is that
his conduct is promoted as to be exemplary by many of his
stinking Dingleberries... ahahahaha.....
Koobee Wublee
> False. Just read the paper and you WILL find embedded references to
> previous literature on electrodynamics and mechanics. However, the
> paper was written to Einstein's fellow physicists (not to today's
> ignorant amateur physics readers who have zero knowledge of the history
> of physics up to 1905), who were already experts in the field of
> electrodynamics, which, by today's standard, was a very small set of
> important papers that didn't need to be explicitly referenced! Any
> physicist in 1905 who didn't already know those papers intimately
> shouldn't have been reading Einstein's 1905 paper in the first place.
You have been shown exactly where Einstein made his error on (E = m
c^2) in his 1905 paper. Einstein's paper was total BS, and you are a
pathetic liar and a malicious troll.
> [...]
>
> I snipped the rest of the bullshit lies.
Likewise.
hanson
>
[Dingleberry Dreamer]
> surrealistic-EINSTEIN DINGLEBERRY dream at hotmail.com wrote:
>> False. Just read the paper and you WILL find embedded references to
>> previous literature on electrodynamics and mechanics. However, the
>> paper was written to Einstein's fellow physicists (not to today's
>> ignorant amateur physics readers who have zero knowledge of the history
>> of physics up to 1905), who were already experts in the field of
>> electrodynamics, which, by today's standard, was a very small set of
>> important papers that didn't need to be explicitly referenced! Any
>> physicist in 1905 who didn't already know those papers intimately
>> shouldn't have been reading Einstein's 1905 paper in the first place.
>
> You have been shown exactly where Einstein made his error on (E = m
> c^2) in his 1905 paper. Einstein's paper was total BS, and you are a
> pathetic liar and a malicious troll.
>
>> [...]
>>
>> I snipped the rest of the bullshit lies.
>
> Likewise.
>
[hanson]
Your well meant bon mots will not reach his consciousness
because that poster, a classic Einstein Dingleberry, just moved a
bit closer towards his idol's sphincter in his surrealistic dream...
hahahaha... Surry, is not a "pathetic liar and a malicious troll".
He just doesn't know any better... ahahaha... Consequently,
in future, do instruct and help him and his fellow Dingleberries
that dangle ffrom/around Albert's asshole, accordingly.
Make them keenly aware of what they are & where they are at....
Carry on, KW, and thanks for the laughs..... ahahaha....
ahahaha.... ahahahanson
hanson
<dirkvand...@ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com> wrote
in message news:ikwUg.110042$8V7.1...@phobos.telenet-ops.be...
> But neither you [Schoenfeld] nor the Bjerkook are considered to
> be human, so adhominem attacks to you or him are oxymorons.
> Dirk Vdm
>
... ahahaha... That only appears to you to be this way because
you Dirk, ***you are an ox and a moron***, notwithstanding
you being one of the 3 stooges, one of Einstein's Dingleberries
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics.relativity/msg/9ba94e678282297f
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.geo.geology/msg/64164b112950f811
and last but not least, you the self-proclaimed "Third Kacksacker".
Lots of baggage you carry, dude, ... ahahahaha...
But thanks for the laughs.... ahahaha... ahahahanson
Koobee Wublee
> KW "Koobee Wublee" <koobee...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > You are correct. Einstein started out as a zealous Zionist. However,
> > when he heard about the massacres of the two Arab villages where all
> > women and children were executed in cold blood as well as most of the
> > men (Some men were deliberately left alive to be paraded through the
> > streets of Jerusalem. Of course, after the parade, they were executed
> > as well.), he became very vehemently anti-Zionist. Although Einstein
> > was a plagiarist in science, he was certainly no evil in moral conducts.
> >
> [hanson]
> yeah, right... ahahaha... if you chose to buy that Zionist line... ahaha
> AE used that same MO & pattern, you mentioned, throughout his life.
Einstein turned down an offer to be the president of you know whom. He
also refused to reside in you know where. The Zionists have tried
their best to erase Einstein's anti-Zionist movements in his later
life.
> Like when Albert, the advocate of violence, signed and agitated for
> the construction of the A-bomb with the infamous letter to prez FDR,
> but the moment the bombs were dropped he quickly switched sides
> and became a pacifist. How convenient. How moral.... ahahaha..
Einstein is not informed or knowledgeable in the A-bomb business.
Einstein in terms of scientific contribution is actually none
existence. The letter to FDR was written by Szillard et al. Einstein
merely signed his name. He was probably tricked to do so. <shrug>
Don't forget. Einstein was also a pacifist during WWI. His stand on
WWII is obviously problematic in which you might have a good point.
> Not much different then does his ilk these days. They, the Neocons
> (a code word for Jews) Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith,
> Rob Loewenberg, David Wurmser and Meyrav Wurmser (known as
> the architects of Gulf war 2) agitated in the admins, from Clinton on, &
> finally succeeded in goading Brite-Brain-Bush to go into Iraq and to
> get Saddam Hussein. ... and then as soon as that was accomplished,
> they began to switch sides and became anti-war activists... ahahaha
> How convenient. How moral.... ahahaha...
Talking about the Neocons makes my blood boil. I become independent.
> PS: re for AE's personal, convenient, moral conduct...ahahaha...
> check into his fidelity level in his marriage(s)... ahahaha.... Not
> that I really care about any of this, but what astounds me is that
> his conduct is promoted as to be exemplary by many of his
> stinking Dingleberries... ahahahaha.....
You are correct about Einstein's moral conduct on marriage.
How many times have you married and divorced?
hanson
>> KW "Koobee Wublee" <koobee...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > You are correct. Einstein started out as a zealous Zionist. However,
>> > when he heard about the massacres of the two Arab villages where all
>> > women and children were executed in cold blood as well as most of the
>> > men (Some men were deliberately left alive to be paraded through the
>> > streets of Jerusalem. Of course, after the parade, they were executed
>> > as well.), he became very vehemently anti-Zionist. Although Einstein
>> > was a plagiarist in science, he was certainly no evil in moral
>> > conducts.
>> >
>> [hanson]
>> yeah, right... ahahaha... if you chose to buy that Zionist line... ahaha
>> AE used that same MO & pattern, you mentioned, throughout his life.
>
> Einstein turned down an offer to be the president of you know whom. He
> their best to erase Einstein's anti-Zionist movements in his later
>
[hanson]
[1] Of course, true to his character, why should Albert have chosen
to live in Israel being its president & having to make original and
tough decisions, when in the US as well as in Germany and CH
he had the comfort given to him by the goyim, including his 1st
Xian wife Mileva Maric, to perpetrate his penchant for plagiarism:
"The secret to creativity is knowing how to hide your sources."
cited here as proof, by Albert himself, for his sleezy MO...ahahaha...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/c317bb71e593ff8b
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/3519d92d18984b8c
[2] Of course the Zionists did so. They are not a stupid lot.
>
[hanson]
>> Like when Albert, the advocate of violence, signed and agitated for
>> the construction of the A-bomb with the infamous letter to prez FDR,
>> but the moment the bombs were dropped he quickly switched sides
>> and became a pacifist. How convenient. How moral.... ahahaha..
>
> Einstein is not informed or knowledgeable in the A-bomb business.
> Einstein in terms of scientific contribution is actually none
> existence. The letter to FDR was written by Szillard et al. Einstein
> merely signed his name. He was probably tricked to do so. <shrug>
>
... of course he was not informed OFFICIALLY about any Chicago,
Oak Ridge, Hanford, nor Los Alamos activites... and for good
reasons... But, believe wait you wish... ahahaha... But put 2+2 together
and you may see the light.. as you usually do, KW... ahahahaha...
>
[KW]
> Don't forget. Einstein was also a pacifist during WWI. His stand on
> WWII is obviously problematic in which you might have a good point.
>
>> Not much different then does his ilk these days. They, the Neocons
>> (a code word for Jews) Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Douglas Feith,
>> Rob Loewenberg, David Wurmser and Meyrav Wurmser (known as
>> the architects of Gulf war 2) agitated in the admins, from Clinton on, &
>> finally succeeded in goading Brite-Brain-Bush to go into Iraq and to
>> get Saddam Hussein. ... and then as soon as that was accomplished,
>> they began to switch sides and became anti-war activists... ahahaha
>> How convenient. How moral.... ahahaha...
>
> Talking about the Neocons makes my blood boil.
>
... ahahaha... why? That is a very dedicated and fanatical bunch.
They are just like the Evangelicals of the Armageddon lobby.
Each has a different MO's, but politics makes strange bedfellows.
One wants to see their messiah, the other one the return of their
Jesus...; which puts both of them into the religious loony bin....
But together they were successful to con the 3rd loon, "reborn"
George into the Mormonism of bombing people and then telling
the grieving survivors: "We'll paint your school and we'll give
candies to your little orphans, because we wanna win your
hearts and minds"... ahahaha... and now all 3 of these godly
people, the N-Jews, the E-Xians, and decent George wonder
why the whole world hates us for what these 3 have done....
.... ahahaha... Now.... if your line implies that you are Jewish,
then you must be congratulated for apparently being one of those
Jews who saw the hand writing on the wall, about which your
B'nai Brith bitterly whined in 2005 in that there were 300'000
fever Jews in the year 2000, in the US, then there were in 1970.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/24b6f89e49a12cd6
>
[KW]
> I become independent.
>
[hanson]
... ahahaha... why did it take you that long? I can't understand why
any thinking person would not become an independent after the
age of 25 if you do not have personal ambitions to run for public
office. -- I always travel alone & board the trains I decide to take.
... ahahaha... It's low class to travel with the herd in cattle cars.
>
[hanson]
>> PS: re for AE's personal, convenient, moral conduct...ahahaha...
>> check into his fidelity level in his marriage(s)... ahahaha.... Not
>> that I really care about any of this, but what astounds me is that
>> his conduct is promoted as to be exemplary by many of his
>> stinking Dingleberries... ahahahaha.....
>
> You are correct about Einstein's moral conduct on marriage.
> How many times have you married and divorced?
>
that it is not yours nor anybody else's biz, because I am not
a public celeb, but I proudly and happily can state: 1x only + 0.
I'm one lucky fucker... ahahaha... ahaha... Now, tell me about
yourself and your marital status, KW... just to keep things even...
ahahaha... ahahahanson
Sorcerer
"I am not a public celeb" -- hahahanson.
You are now, that's why he's asking.
Let's drink to hahahanson's continued lucky fucking, that's
a celebration. Your round.
Androcles