Re: Inerrancy?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> "Jude Alexander" wrote:
> > "Feather Forestwalker" wrote:
> >> "Jude Alexander" wrote:
> >>> "Feather Forestwalker" wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> YES, the Scripture is inerrant.
> >>>
> >>> If so, why so many mistakes?
> >>
> >> Mistakes in translation do not make it errant, Jude. Humans make the
> >> mistakes, not God. :)
> >
> > It goes far beyond translational problems, Feather. That's exactly it.
> > HUMANS make mistakes, not God. Therefore, when you find so many
> > (non-translational) errors, you have to conclude that it was written by
> > humans about their perception OF God.
>
> sensi:
> In full agreement with Jude. People had experiences and wrote them down.
> Who can say their experience hasn't been altered by religious dogma of this
> should say this and that should say that.
> Not everyone has the *same* experiences and trying to live your life based
> on someone else's experience doesn't give God much room for offering your
> own experiences.
It is in our weakness (imperfection) that GOD's holiness (perfection)
is fully realized.
The reason the Bible is inerrant (Holy) is because the errors of the
writers were purposefully permitted by GOD.
"Fear GOD and dread nought."
What humans perceived to be a problem with the DreadNought USS Texas
was by GOD's design because HE planned to use C.T. to place the sailors
and the outcome of Normandy (and WWII) within HIS divine mercy and
grace:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/352546a7bf4a81ee?
Similarly, what humans perceive to be problems with the Bible is also
by GOD's design because it is HIS will that we rely on the Holy Spirit
to go beyond just seeing but also perceiving:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/70afc5dee61bf8fe?
And so prophecy will be fulfilled that the way to GOD will be travelled
by very few.
Laus Deo ! !
May GOD continue to heal our hearts with HIS living water, dear sister
Sensi whom I love unconditionally.
Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit
As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
(Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).
http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love
Sensi
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1162590538.0...@h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
> Sensi wrote:
>> "Jude Alexander" wrote:
>> > "Feather Forestwalker" wrote:
>> >> "Jude Alexander" wrote:
>> >>> "Feather Forestwalker" wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> YES, the Scripture is inerrant.
>> >>>
>> >>> If so, why so many mistakes?
>> >>
>> >> Mistakes in translation do not make it errant, Jude. Humans make the
>> >> mistakes, not God. :)
>> >
>> > It goes far beyond translational problems, Feather. That's exactly it.
>> > HUMANS make mistakes, not God. Therefore, when you find so many
>> > (non-translational) errors, you have to conclude that it was written by
>> > humans about their perception OF God.
>>
>> sensi:
>> In full agreement with Jude. People had experiences and wrote them down.
>> Who can say their experience hasn't been altered by religious dogma of
>> this
>> should say this and that should say that.
>> Not everyone has the *same* experiences and trying to live your life
>> based
>> on someone else's experience doesn't give God much room for offering your
>> own experiences.
>
> It is in our weakness (imperfection) that GOD's holiness (perfection)
> is fully realized.
sensi:
I don't know bout that Andrew.
God gave us weaknesses to work on not to be a perfect person but I think
it's to have a perfect understanding of laws and creation. . If God creates
evil and good perhaps it's about understanding the results of which we
produce by all the things he gave us to work with.
> The reason the Bible is inerrant (Holy) is because the errors of the
> writers were purposefully permitted by GOD.
sensi:
Just like a Hallmark card. You buy the sentiments of which you choose to
offer others.
I KILLED YOUR GOD...IT WAS EASY!
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote in message
news:1162590538.0...@h54g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
>> "Jude Alexander" wrote:
>> > "Feather Forestwalker" wrote:
>> >> "Jude Alexander" wrote:
>> >>> "Feather Forestwalker" wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> YES, the Scripture is inerrant.
>> >>>
>> >>> If so, why so many mistakes?
>> >>
>> >> Mistakes in translation do not make it errant, Jude. Humans make the
>> >> mistakes, not God. :)
>> >>
> writers were purposefully permitted by GOD.
>
the buy bull is full of shit-just like you,chunks.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Nothing wrong with not knowing.
> God gave us weaknesses to work on not to be a perfect person but I think
> it's to have a perfect understanding of laws and creation. .
It remains GOD's plan to create a new heaven, new earth, and a new
Jerusalem.
The imperfections justify the plan. For this reason, these
imperfections, which are by GOD's design, are actually not
imperfections.
For example, silicon crystals have to be made imperfect (doped) in
order to have the properties needed for solid state electronics. For
this reason, our interaction here on usenet would not even be possible
if everything were perfect (by human standards) ! ! !
Many are ever seeing imperfection and perceiving no perfection where
HIS brethren are both seeing and perceiving the perfecting of GOD's
will.
> If God creates
> evil and good perhaps it's about understanding the results of which we
> produce by all the things he gave us to work with.
Something that is imperfect is not evil.
Something that chooses to rebel against GOD's will is evil even if it
otherwise seems perfect.
The latter describes the fallen archangel Lucifer.
It remains GOD's infinite will that all souls retain HIS generous gift
of free will.
The separation of good souls from evil souls will be done on HIS Day of
Judgement.
> > The reason the Bible is inerrant (Holy) is because the errors of the
> > writers were purposefully permitted by GOD.
>
> sensi:
> Just like a Hallmark card. You buy the sentiments of which you choose to
> offer others.
Yes, it is the intent that matters. There is no way to conclude error
if you do not know the will of GOD.
Sensi
YES, the Scripture is inerrant.
If so, why so many mistakes?
Mistakes in translation do not make it errant, Jude. Humans make the
mistakes, not God. :)
It goes far beyond translational problems, Feather. That's exactly it.
HUMANS make mistakes, not God. Therefore, when you find so many
(non-translational) errors, you have to conclude that it was written by
humans about their perception OF God.
sensi:
In full agreement with Jude. People had experiences and wrote them down.
Who can say their experience hasn't been altered by religious dogma of this
should say this and that should say that.
Not everyone has the *same* experiences and trying to live your life based
on someone else's experience doesn't give God much room for offering your
own experiences.
It is in our weakness (imperfection) that GOD's holiness (perfection) is
fully realized.
sensi:
I don't know bout that Andrew.
Nothing wrong with not knowing.
sensi:
Good, so your atheist friends and others you perceive as unbelievers fall in
the category of not knowing or understanding what YOU believe to be true for
you and for them.
God gave us weaknesses to work on not to be a perfect person but I think
it's to have a perfect understanding of laws and creation. .
It remains GOD's plan to create a new heaven, new earth, and a new
Jerusalem.
sensi:
What do you think this heaven consist of?
Physical things, mental things, emotional things. types of attitudes? Just
wondering what your ideas might be. .
The imperfections justify the plan. For this reason, these imperfections,
which are by GOD's design, are actually not imperfections.
For example, silicon crystals have to be made imperfect (doped) in
order to have the properties needed for solid state electronics. For
this reason, our interaction here on usenet would not even be possible if
everything were perfect (by human standards) ! ! !
sensi:
Creation in itself is perfectly equipped to further new knowledge. Heh?
Discoveries of that are made everyday.
Many are ever seeing imperfection and perceiving no perfection where HIS
brethren are both seeing and perceiving the perfecting of GOD's will.
sensi:
What is God's will for you Andrew? Are you following that perfectly while
others are not so perfect in the way they follow? What's the difference in
you verses them?
If God creates evil and good perhaps it's about understanding the results
of which we
produce by all the things he gave us to work with.
Something that is imperfect is not evil.
Something that chooses to rebel against GOD's will is evil even if it
otherwise seems perfect.
sensi:
How does a person rebel against God's nature when his nature is Spirit?
The latter describes the fallen archangel Lucifer.
sensi:
How does this fallen archangel rebel against God?
Is it a war against good and evil that God has to fight like a human fights
with attitude, emotion, weapons and hatred of his neighbor? IF it is about
an archangel where do you fit in that picture?
It remains GOD's infinite will that all souls retain HIS generous gift of
free will.
sensi:
What does free will consist of ?
The separation of good souls from evil souls will be done on HIS Day of
Judgement. The reason the Bible is inerrant (Holy) is because the errors of
the writers were purposefully permitted by GOD.
sensi:
What makes a good soul verses an evil soul?
sensi:
Just like a Hallmark card. You buy the sentiments of which you choose to
offer others.
Yes, it is the intent that matters. There is no way to conclude error if
you do not know the will of GOD.
sensi:
But what people offer others in bible verses is often not their best
sentiment. So is it the will of God or is it just a persons ego?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
The boldness that you see in those who are guided by the Holy Spirit
comes from knowing.
In the Holy Spirit, the brethren of Christ know the will of GOD.
> God gave us weaknesses to work on not to be a perfect person but I think
> it's to have a perfect understanding of laws and creation. .
>
> It remains GOD's plan to create a new heaven, new earth, and a new
> Jerusalem.
>
> sensi:
> What do you think this heaven consist of?
> Physical things, mental things, emotional things. types of attitudes? Just
> wondering what your ideas might be. .
It remains my personal choice to cross only the bridges I have reached.
> The imperfections justify the plan. For this reason, these imperfections,
> which are by GOD's design, are actually not imperfections.
>
> For example, silicon crystals have to be made imperfect (doped) in
> order to have the properties needed for solid state electronics. For
> this reason, our interaction here on usenet would not even be possible if
> everything were perfect (by human standards) ! ! !
>
> sensi:
> Creation in itself is perfectly equipped to further new knowledge. Heh?
> Discoveries of that are made everyday.
This increase in knowledge has been prophesied.
> Many are ever seeing imperfection and perceiving no perfection where HIS
> brethren are both seeing and perceiving the perfecting of GOD's will.
>
> sensi:
> What is God's will for you Andrew? Are you following that perfectly while
> others are not so perfect in the way they follow? What's the difference in
> you verses them?
The guidance of the Holy Spirit.
> If God creates evil and good perhaps it's about understanding the results
> of which we
> produce by all the things he gave us to work with.
>
> Something that is imperfect is not evil.
>
> Something that chooses to rebel against GOD's will is evil even if it
> otherwise seems perfect.
>
> sensi:
> How does a person rebel against God's nature when his nature is Spirit?
Via GOD's generous gift of free will.
> The latter describes the fallen archangel Lucifer.
>
> sensi:
> How does this fallen archangel rebel against God?
Via GOD's generous gift of free will.
> Is it a war against good and evil that God has to fight like a human fights
> with attitude, emotion, weapons and hatred of his neighbor?
No.
> IF it is about
> an archangel where do you fit in that picture?
Simply a lowly member of the brethren of Christ Jesus:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/fear.asp
> It remains GOD's infinite will that all souls retain HIS generous gift of
> free will.
>
> sensi:
> What does free will consist of ?
Awareness.
> The separation of good souls from evil souls will be done on HIS Day of
> Judgement. The reason the Bible is inerrant (Holy) is because the errors of
> the writers were purposefully permitted by GOD.
>
> sensi:
> What makes a good soul verses an evil soul?
The choice made through GOD's generous gift of free will to obey GOD.
> sensi:
> Just like a Hallmark card. You buy the sentiments of which you choose to
> offer others.
>
> Yes, it is the intent that matters. There is no way to conclude error if
> you do not know the will of GOD.
>
> sensi:
> But what people offer others in bible verses is often not their best
> sentiment. So is it the will of God or is it just a persons ego?
Without the counsel of the Holy Spirit, interpretation of Scripture is
tainted by a person's ego.
Mark T
> the Bible is inerrant (Holy)
The two words do not mean the same thing.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, wrote:
>
> > the Bible is inerrant (Holy)
>
> The two words do not mean the same thing.
Correct.
That which is Holy is inerrant, however that which is inerrant is not
necessarily Holy.
May GOD continue to keep your heart beating, dear neighbor Mark whom I
r m
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> Mark T wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, wrote:
> >
> > > the Bible is inerrant (Holy)
> >
> > The two words do not mean the same thing.
>
> Correct.
>
> That which is Holy is inerrant, however that which is inerrant is not
> necessarily Holy.
That probably explains why some translations are not packaged as "Holy
Bible".
ScottyFLL
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> >
> writers
InERRant means without ERRors, numbskull.
Greywolf
"Mark T" <moi@097797687576487554674476765589687574> wrote in message
news:454beae6$1...@dnews.tpgi.com.au...
> "Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lo...@thetruth.com> wrote:
>
>> the Bible is inerrant (Holy)
>
> The two words do not mean the same thing.
>
>
>
The bible *is* inerrant because Saul of Tarsus -- you know, that guy who
made himself an apostle instead of being elected one by the 'real'
apostles -- said so. What more evidence do you need?
And don't throw up that crap that he was most definitely wrong when he
implied that he would be still alive when that dead guy (name escapes me at
the moment) who came back from the dead, then disappeared for a life in the
clouds for a while, would return in 'Saul's', not 'Paul's' own lifetime for
an encore appearance. So he was clearly wrong. Whoever said he was
infallible? Huh? Answer *that* Mr. That Little Bible Sure Looks Like It's
Contains a Lot of Mistakes to *Me*. You're lucky 'God' doesn't turn you into
a withered fig tree! You bastard.
Greywolf
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> > Mark T wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, wrote:
> > >
> > > > the Bible is inerrant (Holy)
> > >
> > > The two words do not mean the same thing.
> >
> > Correct.
> >
> > That which is Holy is inerrant, however that which is inerrant is not
> > necessarily Holy.
>
> That probably explains why some translations are not packaged as "Holy
> Bible".
The Thomas Jefferson translation where all the descriptions of the
miracles were removed would be an example.
Kurt Gavin
for reality.
You and Teddy could make a nice couple. I'll bet you look good in
pantyhose......
r m
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> r m wrote:
> > Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> > > Mark T wrote:
> > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > the Bible is inerrant (Holy)
> > > >
> > > > The two words do not mean the same thing.
> > >
> > > Correct.
> > >
> > > That which is Holy is inerrant, however that which is inerrant is not
> > > necessarily Holy.
> >
> > That probably explains why some translations are not packaged as "Holy
> > Bible".
>
> The Thomas Jefferson translation where all the descriptions of the
> miracles were removed would be an example.
Now, that's naughty.
Cheers.
Robin: Holy oleo!
Catwoman: I didn't know you could yodel! :-)
Pastor Kutchie
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> It is in our weakness (imperfection) that GOD's holiness (perfection)
> is fully realized.
>
> The reason the Bible is inerrant (Holy) is because the errors of the
> writers were purposefully permitted by GOD.
>
> "Fear GOD and dread nought."
>
> What humans perceived to be a problem with the DreadNought USS Texas
> was by GOD's design because HE planned to use C.T. to place the sailors
> and the outcome of Normandy (and WWII) within HIS divine mercy and
> grace:
>
Tell that to the Marines.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Link boldly restored:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/352546a7bf4a81ee?
> Tell that to the Marines.
There would be no Marines to tell if D-Day had failed.
This victory belongs to GOD, Whom I love with all my heart, soul, mind,
and strength:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/fear.asp
Your consolation prize is eternal life if you choose to surrender to
HIM:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/fcb058da12bb3f3d?
May GOD in HIS infinite mercy and grace keep your heart beating to give
you time to understand and act on this, dear neighbor Kutchie whom I
Pastor Kutchie
Earthquack the sneering sophist wrote:
> Atheist Kutchie, after fleeing AUK in fear
When? Where? Show us, you lying sack of shit. I fear nobody and I run
from nobody, especially not a deluded crackpot such as yourself. A
coward is somebody who, for example, censors their website's guestbook.
, wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >
> > > It is in our weakness (imperfection) that GOD's holiness (perfection)
> > > is fully realized.
> > >
> > > The reason the Bible is inerrant (Holy) is because the errors of the
> > > writers were purposefully permitted by GOD.
> > >
> > > "Fear GOD and dread nought."
> > >
> > > What humans perceived to be a problem with the DreadNought USS Texas
> > > was by GOD's design because HE planned to use C.T. to place the sailors
> > > and the outcome of Normandy (and WWII) within HIS divine mercy and
> > > grace:
> >
> > <narcissistic link to god-bothering drivel snipped by atheist Pastor Kutchie, an ordained minister, in a desperate act of mercy and compassion>
>
> Link petulantly restored:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/352546a7bf4a81ee?
>
> > Tell that to the Marines.
>
> There would be no Marines to tell if D-Day had failed.
>
> This victory belongs to GOD, Whom I love with all my heart, soul, mind,
> and strength:
>
Then how come God's most ardent followers, the SS, were on the losing
side?
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/fear.asp
>
Link deliberately left in to humilliate Earthquack the deluded
> Your consolation prize is eternal life if you choose to surrender to
> HIM:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/fcb058da12bb3f3d?
>
Yada yada yada..... <yawn>
> May GOD in HIS infinite mercy and grace keep your heart beating to give
> you time to understand and act on this, dear neighbor Kutchie whom I
> love unconditionally.
>
Good food, oxygen, haemoglobin, adenosine triphosphate etc. keep my
heart beating very robustly.
> Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,
>
> Andrew <><
> --
> Andrew B. Chung
> Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit
>
> As for knowing who are the very elect,
" Well, I didn't vote for you"
> these you will know by the
> unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
Well, that rules you out completely, doesn't it Earthquack the Sneering
Sophist.
> (Matthew 5:44-45, 1 Corinthians 13:3, James 2:14-17).
> http://HeartMDPhD.com/Love
"Love is hate....Peace is war" - George Orwell.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > Atheist Kutchie, after fleeing AUK in fear
>
> When? Where? Show us, you lying sack of shit.
Name-calling simply shows that you remain vanquished:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6f8eb4d5e5c1f06c?
> I fear nobody and I run
> from nobody, especially not a deluded crackpot such as yourself.
If that were true, you would be using the name that GOD gave you
through your parents.
> A coward is somebody who, for example, censors their website's guestbook.
Didn't know you had a web site much less a guestbook for it.
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > >
> > > > It is in our weakness (imperfection) that GOD's holiness (perfection)
> > > > is fully realized.
> > > >
> > > > The reason the Bible is inerrant (Holy) is because the errors of the
> > > > writers were purposefully permitted by GOD.
> > > >
> > > > "Fear GOD and dread nought."
> > > >
> > > > What humans perceived to be a problem with the DreadNought USS Texas
> > > > was by GOD's design because HE planned to use C.T. to place the sailors
> > > > and the outcome of Normandy (and WWII) within HIS divine mercy and
> > > > grace:
> > >
> > > <link snipped by atheist Kutchie in a desperate act of cowardice>
> >
> > Link restored:
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/352546a7bf4a81ee?
> >
> > > Tell that to the Marines.
> >
> > There would be no Marines to tell if D-Day had failed.
> >
> > This victory belongs to GOD, Whom I love with all my heart, soul, mind,
> > and strength:
> >
>
> > http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/fear.asp
>
> Then how come God's most ardent followers, the SS, were on the losing
> side?
Those who murder GOD's chosen people, the Jews, are **not** GOD's most
ardent followers.
The born-again Christian citizens of the United States, as "one nation
under GOD", are GOD's most ardent followers:
Fear GOD and dread nought:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/352546a7bf4a81ee?
The is no explanation except GOD for the documented history of this
amazing DreadNought of one nation under GOD.
Laus Deo !
> Link deliberately left in to humilliate Earthquack the deluded
Without the LORD, your fantasies are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
> > Your consolation prize is eternal life if you choose to surrender to
> > HIM:
> >
> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/fcb058da12bb3f3d?
>
> Yada yada yada..... <yawn>
>
> > May GOD in HIS infinite mercy and grace keep your heart beating to give
> > you time to understand and act on this, dear neighbor Kutchie whom I
> > love unconditionally.
>
> Good food, oxygen, haemoglobin, adenosine triphosphate etc. keep my
> heart beating very robustly.
Steve Irwin likely had similar thoughts right before his heart stopped:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a594498b8fefec9b?
May GOD continue to keep your heart beating unless you choose to curse
HIM, dear neighbor Kutchie whom I love unconditionally.
Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung
Cardiologist, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit
As for knowing who are the very elect, these you will know by the
unconditional love they have for everyone including their enemies
Pastor Kutchie
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > Atheist Kutchie, after fleeing AUK in fear
> >
> > When? Where? Show us, you lying sack of shit.
>
> Name-calling simply shows that you remain vanquished:
>
You can' can you. Liar.
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6f8eb4d5e5c1f06c?
>
> > I fear nobody and I run
> > from nobody, especially not a deluded crackpot such as yourself.
>
> If that were true, you would be using the name that GOD gave you
> through your parents.
>
What's in a name? A rose, by any other name would smell as sweet.
> > A coward is somebody who, for example, censors their website's guestbook.
>
> Didn't know you had a web site much less a guestbook for it.
>
No, but YOU do, don't you!
> > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > It is in our weakness (imperfection) that GOD's holiness (perfection)
> > > > > is fully realized.
> > > > >
> > > > > The reason the Bible is inerrant (Holy) is because the errors of the
> > > > > writers were purposefully permitted by GOD.
> > > > >
> > > > > "Fear GOD and dread nought."
> > > > >
> > > > > What humans perceived to be a problem with the DreadNought USS Texas
> > > > > was by GOD's design because HE planned to use C.T. to place the sailors
> > > > > and the outcome of Normandy (and WWII) within HIS divine mercy and
> > > > > grace:
> > > >
> > > > <link snipped by atheist Pastor Kutchie, ordained minister, in a desperate act of compassion and mercy
> > >
> > > Link restored:
> > >
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/352546a7bf4a81ee?
> > >
> > > > Tell that to the Marines.
> > >
> > > There would be no Marines to tell if D-Day had failed.
> > >
> > > This victory belongs to GOD, Whom I love with all my heart, soul, mind,
> > > and strength:
> > >
> >
> > > http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/fear.asp
> >
> > Then how come God's most ardent followers, the SS, were on the losing
> > side?
>
> Those who murder GOD's chosen people, the Jews, are **not** GOD's most
> ardent followers.
>
Who are you to judge? They invoked HIS allegedly 'holy' name every time
they donned their belts.
> The born-again Christian citizens of the United States, as "one nation
> under GOD", are GOD's most ardent followers:
>
> http://TruthRUS.org
>
More lunacy.
> Fear GOD and dread nought:
>
Typical Apologetic duplicity.
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/352546a7bf4a81ee?
>
> The is no explanation except GOD for the documented history of this
> amazing DreadNought of one nation under GOD.
>
Any military historian will disagree, who are you to disdain their
considered judgement?
> Laus Deo !
>
> > Link deliberately left in to humilliate Earthquack the deluded
>
> Without the LORD, your fantasies are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
>
According to your warped and twisted 'logic' and your Wholly Babble.
> > > Your consolation prize is eternal life if you choose to surrender to
> > > HIM:
> > >
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/fcb058da12bb3f3d?
> >
> > Yada yada yada..... <yawn>
> >
> > > May GOD in HIS infinite mercy and grace keep your heart beating to give
> > > you time to understand and act on this, dear neighbor Kutchie whom I
> > > love unconditionally.
> >
> > Good food, oxygen, haemoglobin, adenosine triphosphate etc. keep my
> > heart beating very robustly.
>
> Steve Irwin likely had similar thoughts right before his heart stopped:
>
What an exceptionally nasty piece of work you truly are, Earthquack the
Sneering Sophist
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a594498b8fefec9b?
>
> May GOD continue to keep your heart beating unless you choose to curse
> HIM, dear neighbor Kutchie whom I love unconditionally.
>
Fuck your non-existent GOD.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > Atheist Kutchie wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > >
> > > When? Where? Show us, you lying sack of shit.
> >
> > Name-calling simply shows that you remain vanquished:
> >
>
> You can' can you.
Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for compelling you
to write that I can and have.
Fear GOD and dread naught:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/352546a7bf4a81ee?
May GOD continue to keep your heart beating unless you curse HIM, dear
neighbor Kutchie whom I love unconditionally.
Prayerfully in Christ's amazing love,
Art Deco
>Pastor Kutchie wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > Atheist Kutchie wrote:
>> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > > > Atheist Kutchie, after fleeing AUK in fear, squeaked:
>> > >
>> > > When? Where? Show us, you lying sack of shit.
>> >
>> > Name-calling simply shows that you remain vanquished:
>> >
>> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6f8eb4d5e5c1f06c?
>>
>> You can' can you.
>
>Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for compelling you
>to write that I can and have.
Another fine snip-n-run, Fraudi. If you don't win Coward of the Month
for October, I'll be sure to put you back up there for November.
--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth
Hi, fanbois!
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > Atheist Kutchie wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> > Atheist Kutchie wrote:
> >> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> > > > Atheist Kutchie, after fleeing AUK in fear, squeaked:
> >> > >
> >> > > When? Where? Show us, you lying sack of shit.
> >> >
> >> > Name-calling simply shows that you remain vanquished:
> >> >
> >> > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6f8eb4d5e5c1f06c?
> >>
> >> You can' can you.
> >
> >Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for compelling you
> >to write that I can and have.
>
> Another fine snip-n-run
Still here standing by the truth. No running.
> , Fraudi.
Name-calling simply shows that you remain lost:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/dream.asp
> If you don't win Coward of the Month
> for October, I'll be sure to put you back up there for November.
Fear GOD and dread naught:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/352546a7bf4a81ee?
May GOD continue to keep your heart beating unless you curse HIM, dear
neighbor whom I love unconditionally.
Al Klein
<use...@heathens.org.uk> wrote:
>"Love is hate....Peace is war" - George Orwell.
You left out "Andrew is sane".
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
The most curious social convention of the great age in which we live is the
one to the effect that religious opinions should be respected.
-- H. L. Mencken
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Al Klein, after fleeing AUK in fear, squawked:
> Atheist Kutchie, after fleeing AUK in fear, squeaked:
Al Klein
Neither do Andrew and sane.
--
rukbat at optonline dot net
"I like your Christ, I do not like your Christians. Your Christians are so unlike your
Christ."
- Mohandas Gandhi
(random sig, produced by SigChanger)
This signature was made by SigChanger.
You can find SigChanger at: http://www.phranc.nl/
Pastor Kutchie
> Pastor Kutchie, an ordained minister, wrote:
> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > Atheist Kutchie wrote:
> > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > Atheist Kutchie, after fleeing AUK in fear, squeaked:
> > > >
> > > > When? Where? Show us, you lying sack of shit.
> > >
> > > Name-calling simply shows that you remain vanquished:
> > >
> > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6f8eb4d5e5c1f06c?
> >
>
> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for compelling you
> to write that I can and have.
>
> F
Your desperate clutching at straws shows that you know that you are
wrong. Oh! and I'm still waiting for you to substantiate your flimsy
claim that I ran away from AUK. You could also prove your MANHOOD by
restoring all the negative feedback in your guestbook and responding to
it. You wouldn't dare because even someone as blatantly and obsessively
perverse and practised in the black art of sophistry as you are has to
take time out to eat, piss and have a crap from time to time, and the
workload is just too much for you despite your utter abandonment of
your medical career. You only have the time and energy for acts of
abject cowardice.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Earthquack, Gollum's twin brother wrote:
> > Pastor Kutchie, an ordained minister, wrote:
> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > Atheist Kutchie wrote:
> > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > > > > > Atheist Kutchie, after fleeing AUK in fear, squeaked:
> > > > >
> > > > > When? Where? Show us, you lying sack of shit.
> > > >
> > > > Name-calling simply shows that you remain vanquished:
> > > >
> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6f8eb4d5e5c1f06c?
> > >
> >
> > Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for compelling you
> > to write that I can and have.
> >
> > F
>
> Your desperate clutching at straws shows that you know that you are
> wrong. Oh! and I'm still waiting for you to substantiate your flimsy
> claim that I ran away from AUK. You could also prove your MANHOOD by
> restoring all the negative feedback in your guestbook and responding to
> it. You wouldn't dare because even someone as blatantly and obsessively
> perverse and practised in the black art of sophistry as you are has to
> take time out to eat, piss and have a crap from time to time, and the
> workload is just too much for you despite your utter abandonment of
> your medical career. You only have the time and energy for acts of
> abject cowardice.
<yawn>
You simply remain vanquished:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6f8eb4d5e5c1f06c?
Fear GOD and dread nought:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/352546a7bf4a81ee?
May GOD continue to keep your heart beating, dear neighbor Kutchie whom
Art Deco
Another long, hard day of posting to usenet while seeing patients at
the same time, Fraudi?
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
No. Simply a <yawn>.
> , Fraudi?
Name-calling simply shows that you remain lost:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/dream.asp
May GOD continue to keep your heart beating unless you choose to curse
HIM, dear neighbor whom I love unconditionally.
Art Deco
Wrong, Fraudi, I know exactly where I am.
[kooklink redacted]
--
COOSN-266-06-39716
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official "Usenet psychopath and born-again LLPOF minion",
as designated by Brad Guth
"Who is "David Tholen", Daedalus? Still suffering from
attribution problems?"
-- Dr. David Tholen
Pope Snarky Goodfella of the undulating cable, JM, CK, POEE, KOTHASK, DSOCPL, EOTHIDIAUTP, GGGHD, HCNB, MU, BCB, CPFWJ, CPFG, MWFA, CEM
> Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD wrote:
>> Atheist Kutchie wrote:
>> > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>> > > Atheist Kutchie, after fleeing AUK in fear
>> >
>> > When? Where? Show us, you lying sack of shit.
>>
>> Name-calling simply shows that you remain vanquished:
>
Fixed. No, he can't. He's completely impotent.
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6f8eb4d5e5c1f06c?
>>
>> > I fear nobody and I run
>> > from nobody, especially not a deluded crackpot such as yourself.
>>
>> If that were true, you would be using the name that GOD gave you through
>> your parents.
>
> What's in a name? A rose, by any other name would smell as sweet.
>
>> > A coward is somebody who, for example, censors their website's
>> > guestbook.
>>
>> Didn't know you had a web site much less a guestbook for it.
>
> No, but YOU do, don't you!
<flaps arms> Shhhhh! You're not supposed to call him out on shit like
that, he'll cry!
Oh, wait, yeah, make him cry.
They weren't True Christians, see -- say, do you hear bagpipes?
>> The born-again Christian citizens of the United States, as "one nation
>> under GOD", are GOD's most ardent followers:
>>
>> http://TruthRUS.org
>
> More lunacy.
>
>> Fear GOD and dread nought:
>
> Typical Apologetic duplicity.
>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/352546a7bf4a81ee?
>>
>> The is no explanation except GOD for the documented history of this
>> amazing DreadNought of one nation under GOD.
>
> Any military historian will disagree, who are you to disdain their
> considered judgement?
Why, he's SuperChung! An impotent SuperChung.
>> Laus Deo !
>>
>> > Link deliberately left in to humilliate Earthquack the deluded
>>
>> Without the LORD, your fantasies are meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
>
> According to your warped and twisted 'logic' and your Wholly Babble.
>
>> > > Your consolation prize is eternal life if you choose to surrender to
>> > > HIM:
>> > >
>> > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/fcb058da12bb3f3d?
>> >
>> > Yada yada yada..... <yawn>
>> >
>> > > May GOD in HIS infinite mercy and grace keep your heart beating to
>> > > give you time to understand and act on this, dear neighbor Kutchie
>> > > whom I love unconditionally.
>> >
>> > Good food, oxygen, haemoglobin, adenosine triphosphate etc. keep my
>> > heart beating very robustly.
>>
>> Steve Irwin likely had similar thoughts right before his heart stopped:
>
> What an exceptionally nasty piece of work you truly are, Earthquack the
> Sneering Sophist
>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a594498b8fefec9b?
>>
>> May GOD continue to keep your heart beating unless you choose to curse
>> HIM, dear neighbor Kutchie whom I love unconditionally.
>
> Fuck your non-existent GOD.
Fuck your non-existent GOD.
--
________________________________________________________________________
All Hail Discordia! TM#5; Flonk Leader 2 & 11-1/9
The Ridiculously Long Scarf of Tom Baker
COOSN-029-06-71069
http://www.netcabal.com/auk/faq.html
1. What is this newsgroup, alt.usenet.kooks (AUK)?
A mass of electrons spread out upon bandwidth scattered across the globe
for the express purpose of separating the wheat from the chaff of the
net.
2. This is a joke, right? RIGHT?!!
No more a joke than the fact that ISPs let people on every day who have
nothing better to do than annoy their neighbors enough to win by popular
vote silly little awards created for just such buffoons as them.
3. What's this newsgroup for?
The newsgroup alt.usenet.kooks is for the discovery and discussion of
Kooks on Usenet and the Internet. These people are known technically as
net.kooks.
4. What's this newsgroup NOT for?
This group exists for recreational Kookology, not for Very Personal
Vendetta. It is not to be used for general harassment of someone, or for
net abuse such as spamming and flooding and cancelbombing in an attempt
to gain vengeance on someone or get the denizens of AUK to shut up.
Either way, it won't work, it's very messy, "Bob" will give you triple
your money back, and you don't get a life.
Also, we [tinw] are not in the business of harassing the vulnerable or
the insane. Occasionally an apparent net.kook proves to be genuinely
ill. In such cases the person is disqualified from winning awards and
other posters are asked to avoid exacerbating his or her problems.
Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly
discouraged.
5. Who let this newsgroup in here, and why wasn't I notified?
That's what you get for hogging the Beer Fund.
(Here you can view the control message that started it all, from our
Mighty Founder MAC.)
http://www.netcabal.com/auk/cmsg.html
6. Who is a net.kook?
If you post uniquely strange, preferably incomprehensible articles, or
you manifest a persistent, extreme, and somewhat bizarre obsession, you
just might be a net.kook. And more.
It is important to note the subtle distinction between a net.kook, a
net.cretin, a clueless newbie, troll, or garden-variety @$$hole. The
newbie, one hopes, can acquire a clue on the installment plan even if he
can't afford to buy one for cash; the cretin is merely stupid and/or
irritating; the troll makes a fool out of himself by making a fool out
of you, the @$$hole is, well, simply that. But a TRUE net.kook has a
special fascination derived from his/her/its utter ineffability. Their
behavior is irrational, if not downright weird, but they are seldom
merely boring.
It is not considered appropriate to nominate clueless newbies, trolls,
or longwinded spambrains as net.kooks. It is acceptable to nominate
net.cretins, or simply to present them, without nomination, for whatever
minor amusement value they may have; but the real focus here is on
net.kooks in all their raging, indomitable glory.
Important Disclaimer: the fact that someone has been proclaimed a
net.kook does not imply any psychological diagnosis in and of itself. A
net.kook may or may not be clinically insane; that is not the concern of
the AUK audience.
We hope.
7. Can you show me a few examples?
I'd rather not, but it may help to clarify things... The person who
posted a handful of meaningless, ill-formed newgroup messages on May 21,
1994 was a Clueless Newbie. The person who hung around
alt.religion.kibology during April and May 1994, constantly posting
boilerplate "warning" messages telling people that ARK messages were
intentionally meaningless, was a net.cretin. The people who post
demented "scientific" theories, like Archimedes Plutonium's concept of
the universe being one giant atom of plutonium, and seem incorrigible to
criticism, are moderate net.kooks. The sort of being who constantly
raves about the conspiracy against her/him/it is an extreme net.kook,
especially if he/she/it automatically assumes that anyone who questions
their world-view is an agent of the conspirators or is an ultra
right-wing/left-wing extremist, and hides behind an anonymous remailer
to avoid "persecution" even though they would get one hell of a lot less
of it by not posting at all.
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm
8. How do I present a Kook on this group?
The preferred technique is to get the suspected Kook to start posting to
AUK so that we can all see him/her/it in all their first-hand Glory. You
can do this by posting followups to the suspect's weirder messages, with
your followups nonchalantly crossposted to AUK. If the suspect responds
to your messages without editing the Newsgroups line, you've achieved
your goal.
Another acceptable method is to repost, complete and unedited, one or
two of the suspected Kook's recent rants. If you do this, please provide
a brief intro in the header describing what the hell you're doing, such
as indicating who this person is, what group you found the message on,
or why you think the rest of us should give a rat's @$$ about it.
You should be aware that if you try this with some perfectly reasonable
posting, you may be flamed to net.hell and back and probably suspected
of being a net.loon yourself. It is also considered extremely lame to
nominate someone as a Kook simply because you have lost, or at least
failed to win, a debate with them; persistently doing so is likely to
get you nominated for Kook Awards. That someone fails to perceive the
self-evident, unassailable wisdom of your viewpoint does not, in and of
itself, constitute Kookery.
9. What are the Kook Awards?
The newsgroup alt.usenet.kooks offers a variety of widely-recognized and
highly dubious honors for your service, applying to net.kooks
everywhere. They recognize several kinds and many levels of net.kookery.
Here is a detailed list of AUK awards and descriptions.
http://www.netcabal.com/auk/awards.html
10. Who the FSCK appointed YOU net.kookologist/god/nazi etc.
Nobody. We have a Gift.
11. Are there any holidays in AUK?
Why yes, there sure are:
March 30th - CALL to ARMMs
Commemorating the earliest most virulent Kook post flood of Usenet, and
the great flamewar that followed in its wake.
June 26th - KOOKS DAY
Named in commemoration of Earl Curley checking into the Motel Deep 6 to
serve a major in the pine penalty box, the same date as Edmond Wollmann
got arrested riding the San Clemente railway...on his motorcycle.
August 15th - DEAD DOC TAVISH DAY
Named in honor of the death of one of Usenet's most famed identities due
to excessive Usenet exposure; his virtual corpse is buried in a rural
cemetery near New Bremen, Texas
September 10th - KAZOO DAY
This holiday commemorates Raymond Ronald "Kazoo" Karczewski's conviction
for seven felonies. May Raymold be a warning to all kooks who are
tempted to think that a "Sovereign Christ" is above the law.
December 20th - AUK BIRTHDAY
The anniversary of the newgrouping of alt.usenet.kooks
12. What should I do if I'm paged on the Red Courtesy Telephone?
Give the caller Gandalf the Gray's speech to the demon. Verbatim.
13. Is alt.usenet.kooks archived anywhere?
Why would you even *want* to know? [But if you truly must know, GIYF.
You masochist, you.]
14. What should we do about the book?
Burn it.
15. Where can I find out more about net.kooks?
Several mini-FAQs on classic kooks of the past and present (along with
several non-kooky legendary netters) are available on the World Wide Web
in various archives. Be sure to set aside coffee and cats before
reading. [Try insurgent.org/kook-faq/]
16. What are the AUK Offices?
As well as the kook awards, kooks may compete to hold office for a month
or longer. Nominations are made in exactly the same way as for awards;
the difference is that the previous holder of the office always appears
on the ballot paper when a new candidate emerges, and the winner remains
in office until challenged again. At present, the offices are as
follows.
Darth Bawl -
This office is held by Usenet's biggest crybaby.
Village Idiot -
The name says it all.
Kooki Information Minister -
Named in honour of Iraq's Mohammed Saeed al-Sahhaf, this office is held
by the kook whose claims are most noticeably at variance with known
facts.
Ministry of Circle Jerks -
Although many kooks are lone wolves, a few like to make friends with
those who are as delusional as themselves. This office rewards the
slurpfests that often ensue.
17. Are there any net.kook awards outside of AUK?
At various points of time there have been several, from the Christian
groups' Steebie Award to alt.fan.art-bell's Angstrom Medal. At least two
newsgroups, talk.politics.guns and comp.systems.mac.advocacy, have given
out their own Kook of the Month awards. Check around from time to time
to see what other net.kook awards might be around. [alt.atheism does
them, too.]
18. What is the Cabal?
From the beginning of Usenet time, there has been but one force capable
of holding it in check to remain in the realm of mortal existence. For
today's Usenet world you need a Giant. A Behemoth. A Cabal of IMMENSE
PROPORTIONS. A REALLY *BIG* *CABAL* to offer all news ORDER.
Within this force is the most ruthless and efficient organization on all
Usenet, known as the Cabal Obsidian Order (COO). If *YOU* wish to know
of this entity, read, learn, and do as you will.
SEE THE LIGHT OF COLLECTIVE WISDOM!!!
A. I *SAID*, what is the CABAL?
There Is No Cabal. Long Live The Cabal.
B. How does the Cabal function??
As well as any apocryphal organization can hope to function.
C. What are the weaknesses of the Cabal?
<chortle> What weaknesses?
D. What is the hierarchy and power structure of the Cabal?
Oh, you don't need to know that. Really. You can trust us, especially
when it comes to information you haven't paid for.
E. What is the Cabal Obsidian Order?
The Cabal Obsidian Order (COO) is a profoundly secret collective of
operatives designed to outrun, outgun and Eliminate the most vile scum
and villainy the net has to offer.
F. How do I know if the COO is responsible for something?
If the COO's operatives are doing their job correctly, they'll be
laughing at whoever is actually responsible.
G. Who are the leaders of the COO?
Leaders? Where we function we don't need Leaders.
H. What is the Beer Fund?
The more you contribute to it, the more we will tell you.
I. How may I apply to become an operative of the COO?
Pitiful begging at the Vote Wrangler's feet might help. Then again it
might not.
19. Who is the FNVW?
Why, our highly esteemed Friendly Neighbourhood Vote Wrangler (FNVW),
whose benevolent supreme dictatorship runs the electoral wheels of our
great realm. Seven fearless folk have served, with distinction:
AUK VOTE WRANGLERS
Craig Dickson (1994-1995)
Matthew Legare (1995-1997)
Killfile Daemons (1997)
Robbie Honerkamp (1997-1998)
Phoenix (1997-2004)
Peter J Ross (2004-2006)
Sean Monaghan (2006-Present)
On retirement, Phoenix accepted the high office of Friendly Neighborhood
"Bob"father.
20. Do I have what it takes to BE a Vote Wrangler?
<chortle> If you have to ask, you don't have what it takes.
21. Who do you %$#@!s think you are to oppose ME, Lord High Poster-Child
of the Macrocosmic Universe?
We are the ones who can and will humiliate your @$$ if you use our group
as your personal piss bowl. You are a freak of the universe. You do not
give the orders here. And whether you like it or not, the universe is
laughing behind your back.
22. That was MEAN, just plain MEAN!!!
Payback's a bitch, ain't it?
23. Should I expect ONE CONSISTENT response to my rude and obnoxious
online behavior from the denizens of AUK?
Absolutely NOT.
24. To whom should I complain if I think I have been treated unfairly?
<Darth Vader>
You think you have been treated unfairly? </Darth Vader>
25. What kind of response can I expect as a result of my stupid online
behavior at AUK?
Guilty party receives one or a combination thereof of the following
assorted reactions (not at all limited to these, mind you):
1. Complete silence while we blow you off
2. Complete silence while we reload
3. Complete silence while we pull the plug on your account
4. Complete silence while we sleep at the switch
5. Complete silence while we sleep in our beds
6. Complete silence while we laugh behind your back
7. Complete silence while we wipe the splattered food and/or drinks off
our screens
8. Complete silence while we contemplate the known macrocosmic universe
9. Complete silence while the Vote Wrangler pays good money to watch
professional Denver teams find new ways to lose
10. Complete silence while we bask in the pure glow of our obnoxiously
self-righteous selves
11. Complete silence while we play high-stakes poker with Snoopy, Spike,
Andy, Olaf, Marbles and Woodstock
12. Complete silence while we never notice your NoCeM'd post
13. Complete silence while we never notice your spam-canceled post
14. Complete silence while we run your rude and obnoxious posts through
goofyizers for reposting
15. Complete silence while the Trekkies among us watch the USS Defiant
blast bad guys' ships into rubble and fly through the debris with that
nice halo of sparks effect
16. Complete silence while we wait for our Gates-sponsored software
systems to uncrash themselves
17. General laughter at your expense
18. General laughter and pointing at your expense
19. General laughter, pointing and personal insults at your expense
20. Someone exposes your true service provider to the Rabble
21. Someone does any of 1-20 and reports you to your state's Attorney
General
22. Someone does any of 1-21 and reports you to the FBI National
Computer Crime Squad (nc...@fbi.gov)
23. Someone does any of 1-22 and does highly amusing parodies of you
during the entire process
24. Talk amongst ourselves about life, love and why they sell 8-hot-dog
weenie sets with 10-bun packages
25. Sounds of awe as we wonder with dropped mouths how you were able to
make a greater fool of yourself than you already had
26. Sounds of astonishment as we MARVEL at the FREAK
27. Flames in your generally specific direction
28. Flames of you in the third, fourth and fifth person
29. Flames from the Vote Wrangler from the other side of the Galactic
Killfile just to annoy all hell out of you
30. Nominations for many noteworthy Kook awards
26. Can I really be kicked off my ISP for...
Being a total @$$hole?
If you try hard enough.
Top-posting like the pathetic imbecile that I am?
Usually not, but we can always try.
Forging someone else's valid e-mail address?
Absolutely.
Posting multiple copies of the same message to individual news groups
(Excessive Multi Posting [EMP])?
Of course. It's the SPAMMING, stupid.
27. Can I really be thrown in jail for posting threatening messages?
Yes. People have been tried and convicted for sending threatening or
harassing Email or Usenet posts. We do NOT support censorship of the
Internet; however, posting a message stating you are going to cause
virtual or unvirtual harm to someone will probably gain you a visit from
your Friendly Neighborhood FBI Agent.
28. Fine. I'll just remain anonymous. That'll work, right?
BWWAAAAAAAAA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Try it, pinkboy. An anon remailer service can be forced to turn you in
for copyright violation, harassment, stalking; you name the crime -
they've got the time. If you ran an anon remailer service what would be
the point of protecting flagrant abusers of the net and the Law??
29. Okay, then I'll bust your #$%&$*!! @$$ off AUK instead!
Uh... yeah. Many denizens of AUK are abuse admins, know abuse admins,
sleep with abuse admins, or otherwise have years of experience dealing
with and educating others about precisely your kind of dubiosity. A good
account is a terrible thing to waste, so don't sacrifice yours on our
altar.
30. I just realized I am a Maroon. How can I improve my standing in the
eyes of the Internet, my balloon doll, and, most importantly, "Bob"?
REPENT. The End is always near.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >Art Deco squeaked:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> >Atheist Kutchie wrote:
> >> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> >> > Atheist Kutchie wrote:
> >> >> > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> >> > > > Atheist Kutchie wrote:
> >> >> > > > > Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >> >> > > > > > Atheist Kutchie, after fleeing AUK in fear, squeaked:
> >> >> > > > >
> >> >> > > > > When? Where? Show us, you lying sack of shit.
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > Name-calling simply shows that you remain vanquished:
> >> >> > > >
> >> >> > > > http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/6f8eb4d5e5c1f06c?
> >> >> > >
> >> >> > > You can' , can you.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for compelling you
> >> >> > to write that I can and have.
> >> >>
> >> >> wrong. Oh! and I'm still waiting for you to substantiate your flimsy
> >> >> claim that I ran away from AUK. You could also prove your MANHOOD by
> >> >> restoring all the negative feedback in your guestbook and responding to
> >> >> it. You wouldn't dare because even someone as blatantly and obsessively
> >> >> perverse and practised in the black art of sophistry as you are has to
> >> >> take time out to eat, piss and have a crap from time to time, and the
> >> >> workload is just too much for you despite your utter abandonment of
> >> >> your medical career. You only have the time and energy for acts of
> >> >> abject cowardice.
> >> >
> >> ><yawn>
> >>
> >> Another long, hard day of posting to usenet while seeing patients at
> >> the same time
> >
> >No. Simply a <yawn>.
> >
> >> , Fraudi?
> >
> >Name-calling simply shows that you remain lost:
>
Link restored:
http://HeartMDPhD.com/HolySpirit/dream.asp
> Wrong, Fraudi, I know exactly where I am.
Without the LORD, your beliefs remain meaningless (Ecclesiastes).
May GOD continue to keep your heart beating (unless you choose to curse
HIM), dear neighbor whom I love unconditionally.