Proof by LORD Almighty GOD: a pathological liar unwittingly confesses
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/d01e03b28ddbcc0b?
Such is the demise of all those who unwisely choose to blaspheme
against the Holy Spirit:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/9c5c55fcace06864?
Truth is simple.
"The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the
LORD." (Proverbs 16:33)
Amen.
A Spirit-guided exegesis of Proverbs 16:33 ...
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/085dcffcafb7e4e2?
Nothing happens by chance because everything happens only as GOD
allows it (Ecclesiastes 9:11):
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/21527d1832960109?
Sign that GOD can easily unleash an H5N1 Pandemic (Pan-Flu) at any
time:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a4581567229974c0?
What we are teaching to prepare folks for the eventuality of a
catastrophic Pan-Flu:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfmkax1wbRU
How to not be fearful:
Trust the truth, Who is Jesus !!!
May dear neighbors, friends, and brethren have a blessedly wonderful
2009th year since the birth of our LORD Jesus Christ as our Messiah,
the Son of Man ...
... by being hungrier:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/f891e617d10bd689?
Hunger is wonderful ! ! !
It's how we know the answer to the question "What does Jesus
want?" (WDJW):
Yes, hunger is our knowledge of good versus evil that Adam and Eve
paid for with their and our immortal lives:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/52a3db8576495806?
Hunger is the physical "hearts burning within us" feeling that unlocks
the 4 mysteries of the "Road to Emmaus" adventure described in Luke
24:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/386f56c2f6d0b154?
Moreover, being hungrier is the key to being Jesus' disciples:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/bd20d7c4fe878897?
Being physically hungrier is how we will physically recognize Jesus
when He physically returns for us to meet Him physically in the air:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/ffa6609710ea9587?
"Blessed are you who hunger NOW...
... for you will be satisfied." -- LORD Jesus Christ (Luke 6:21)
Amen.
Here is a Spirit-guided exegesis of Luke 6:21 given in hopes of
promoting much greater understanding:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/cc2aa8f8a4d41360?
Jesus is LORD, forever !!!
Be hungrier, which is truly healthier for mind, body, and soul:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/991d4e30704307e7?
Marana tha
Prayerfully in the awesome name of our Messiah, LORD Jesus Christ,
Andrew <><
--
"... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
12:3)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/035c93540862751c?
What does Jesus want (WDJW) ?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/11194899724b810d?
Anon
<55590484-4258-44a6...@42g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>,
"Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD" <lov...@thetruth.com> wrote:
Or, as the late C. R. Wylie Jr. put it:
PARADOX
Not truth, nor certainty. These I forswore
In my novitiate, as young men called
To holy orders must abjure the world.
'If . . . , then . . . ,' this only I assert;
And my successes are but pretty chains
Linking twin doubts, for it is vain to ask
If what I postulate be justified,
Or what I prove possess the stamp of fact.
Yet bridges stand, and men no longer crawl
In two dimensions. And such triumphs stem
In no small measure from the power this game,
Played with the thrice-attenuated shades
Of things, has over their originals.
How frail the wand, but how profound the spell!
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Anon
a node in the tree with the start of the tree looking like
1
/ \
2 3
/ \ / \
4 5 6 7
/ \ / \ / \ / \
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
/ \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \
Then number of the left child node of node n is 2*n + 0 and
the number of the right child node of node n is 2*n + 1.
Thus every infinite path (starting at the root node and never ending)
can be represented by an infinite sequence of ever larger naturals
starting with 1 and with the successor to each node n of form
2*n+ 0 or
2* n + 1.
But then, every path can equally be specified by the directions of its
successive branchings,
0 for each n to 2*n+0 branch and
1 for each n to 2*n+1 branch.
Thus we man "identify" each path (special set of naturals) with a unique
infinite binary sequence of 0's and 1's and vice versa.
And we see that every possible such binary sequence corresponds to a
path with different sequences corresponding to different paths.
We now have the problem of whether there is any way to map the naturals
to the binary sequences so that
(1) no natural is used more than once, and
(2) every binary sequence is used at least once.
The Cantor "diagonal" proof for binary sequences shows that the two
conditions cannot both be satisfied simultaneously.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Anon
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Sanity's Little Helper
posteth:
IFYPFY
--
David Silverman
aa #2208
Defender of Civilisation
if a tree falls in the woods... Do all the other trees laugh at it ?
Not authentic without this signature.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Sanity's Little Helper
posteth:
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/518c33efe51560d7?
>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/65a8ed65854ee284
--
David Silverman
aa #2208
Defender of Civilisation
if a tree falls in the woods, what are the odds it will land in some bear
shit ?
Mike Painter
"... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
12:3)
Jesus is Lord, Jesus is Lord, Jesus is Lord.
Anon
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>
> "... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
> 12:3)
Amen.
> Jesus is Lord, Jesus is Lord, Jesus is Lord.
Now, can you publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
Love in the truth,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Cardiologist
http://T3WiJ.com
Sanity's Little Helper
posteth:
> Mike Painter wrote:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>
>> "... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
>> 12:3)
>
> Amen.
>
>> Jesus is Lord, Jesus is Lord, Jesus is Lord.
>
> Now, can you publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/1d2fce223a9b6cc0
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> > Mike Painter wrote:
> >> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
> >>
> >> "... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
> >> 12:3)
> >
> > Amen.
> >
> >> Jesus is Lord, Jesus is Lord, Jesus is Lord.
> >
> > Now, can you publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/1d2fce223a9b6cc0
Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
you to unwittingly update folks on your still being eternally unable
to publicly say "Jesus is LORD."
May we, who are Jesus' disciples (either Jew or gentile), continue to
be mindful of WDJW by rebuking you at each GOD-given opportunity as
GOD desires:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/518c33efe51560d7?
<><
Amen.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/085dcffcafb7e4e2?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/21527d1832960109?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a4581567229974c0?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfmkax1wbRU
... by being hungrier:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/f891e617d10bd689?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/52a3db8576495806?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/386f56c2f6d0b154?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/bd20d7c4fe878897?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/ffa6609710ea9587?
Amen.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/cc2aa8f8a4d41360?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/991d4e30704307e7?
Marana tha
Andrew <><
--
"... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
12:3)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/035c93540862751c?
Sanity's Little Helper
posteth:
> satan via a sockpuppet (corporeal demon) despairingly posted:
>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>> Mike Painter wrote:
>>>> Andrew, in the Holy Spirit, boldly wrote:
>>>>
>>>> "... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
>>>> 12:3)
>>>
>>> Amen.
>>>
>>>> Jesus is Lord, Jesus is Lord, Jesus is Lord.
>>>
>>> Now, can you publicly say "Jesus is LORD" ?
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.atheism/msg/1d2fce223a9b6cc0
>
> Many thanks, much praise, and all the glory to GOD for His compelling
> you to unwittingly update folks on your still being eternally unable
> to publicly say
http://www.quackwatch.org/02ConsumerProtection/fraudreport.html
Sanity's Little Helper
posteth:
> The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the
http://www.quackwatch.org/02ConsumerProtection/fraudreport.html
Anon
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Brahma rules.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
<><
Amen.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/085dcffcafb7e4e2?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/21527d1832960109?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/a4581567229974c0?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jfmkax1wbRU
... by being hungrier:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/f891e617d10bd689?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/52a3db8576495806?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/386f56c2f6d0b154?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/bd20d7c4fe878897?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/ffa6609710ea9587?
Amen.
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/cc2aa8f8a4d41360?
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/991d4e30704307e7?
Marana tha
Andrew <><
--
"... no one can say 'Jesus is LORD' except by the Holy Spirit." (1 Cor
12:3)
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/035c93540862751c?
Sanity's Little Helper
Anon
<quote>
Any mathematician worth talking to should be able to "accept" alternate
sets of axioms and alternate rules of inference; statements in ZF(C)
may not be applicable (may be neither true nor false) to your premises
and statements from your premises may be inapplicable to ZF(C).
However, it's up to you to demonstrate that an alternate premise has
some intellectual merit - either by proving interesting things in it or
by solving some previously-unsolved problem with it, usually.
Proving that a property from other systems that mathematicians find
useful is invalid within your system is a great way to convince people
*not* to study your system further.
<\quote>
dolf
Anon <hat...@the.lie.com> wrote:
> Brahma Rules!
“There was in the days of Herod {son of a hero}, the king of Judaea {the
praise of the Lord; confession}, a certain priest named Zacharias
{memory of the Lord}, OF THE COURSE-EPHEMERIA OF ABIA (ABIJAH) {the Lord
is my father}: and his wife was of the daughters of Aaron {a teacher;
lofty; mountain of strength}, and her name was Elisabeth {the oath, or
fullness, of God}.
And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments
and ordinances of the Lord blameless. And they had no child, because
that Elisabeth was barren, and they both were now well stricken in
years. AND IT CAME TO PASS, THAT WHILE HE EXECUTED THE PRIEST’S OFFICE
BEFORE GOD IN THE ORDER OF HIS COURSE-EPHEMERIA {ie The ‘oth {7 x 24 x
13 [= 6D as 2184 days as 6 x 364 days = 354 x 3 + 30 as 1092 days x 2],
W = 6D x 7, J = 6D x 49 = 107016 days as 294 years x 364 or 293 years x
365.2425 = Wednesday 20 March Vernal Equinox / 1 Nisan} cycle of these
24 Priestly Divisions}, ACCORDING TO THE CUSTOM OF THE PRIEST’S OFFICE,
HIS LOT was to burn incense when he went into the temple of the Lord.”
[Luke 1:5-9]
Rod <firefl...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> And so the dogs begin to fight among themselves...
>
> Luke 11:17 But He, knowing their thoughts, said unto them, Every
> kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and a house
> divided against a house falleth.
>
"No servant can serve two masters: for either he will hate the one, and
love the other; or else he will hold to the one, and despise the other.
Ye cannot serve God and mammon.
And the Pharisees also, who were covetous, heard all these things: and
they derided him."
The paradigm postulates that the Balanced Ternary System is intrinsic to
the numbering of days. Such as the 364 day financial and measures
modeling which is consistent with it being a semiotic statement made in
association to the ternary system 37 = #2187 of Weights and Measures v's
'OTH CYCLE of #2184 days as 6D ... 6J = 293 years x 365.2425.
"And he said unto them, Ye are they which justify yourselves before men;
but God knoweth your hearts: for that which is highly esteemed among men
is abomination in the sight of God.
The law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of
God is preached, and every man presseth into it."
THE BIBLICAL COSMOLOGY (AS 10 COMMANDMENTS) IS ASSOCIATED TO A BALANCED
TERNARY DISTRIBUTED SYSTEM
#1 = [the major premise {YANG/FATHER/HEAVEN/MALE/FORM - Formula of
Universal Law}, which contains the law of that will:
7 x 24 x 13 = 2184 days of the 'oth cycle = 6D or 6 x 364 associated to
the 'constant sequence of sun and moon' as 354 x 3 + 30 day
intercalation = 1092 days x 2 = 2184 days] +
#2 = [the minor premise {YIN/MOTHER/EARTH/FEMALE/MATTER - Formula of
Humanity - HEAD OF STATE}, which contains the command to behave in
accordance with the law, that is, the principle of subsumption under the
law:
x 49 = 6J or 294 x 364 days or 365.2425 x 293 years - Vernal Equinox
Wednesday 20 March 1996 / 21 March = 1 Nisan 5756; and] +
#3 = [the conclusion {ZHUN/SON/SEA/ENUMERATE/OFFSPRING - Formula of
Autonomy}, which contains the verdict (sentence), that is laid down as
right in the case at hand: ... 6,000 topical years as Telos ('achariyth
as 122J3W1D) = Arch (re'shiyth as 3W1D) + c² [9(9²+1)/2]:
has #369 with Septet #41 {ie. #81 - #27 - #9 - #3 - #1} centric on {ie.
20 March 1996 + (5*364) + 182 = 12 Sept 2001 as 1st day of 7th solar
month = #0 - Zero point} 13-17 September 2001 / 18 September = 1 Tishri
5762. ref: "On [Sunday 16 September as] the 1st day of the [21st
priestly] course of Jachin {he that strengthens and makes steadfast} on
the 29th day of lunar month, on the 5th day of the 7th solar month."
[4Q321]] +
#4 = 'OTH Chronological Elements = #10 as {Totality of Nature = Formula
of Progression of individual phenomena: #1 = {0: 1} + #2 = {0: -1, 1: 1}
+ #3 = {0: 0, 1: 1} + #4 = {0: 1, 1: 1} = #10 {0: 1, 1: 0, 2: 1}}
vCube Balanced Ternary System distribution: #1 = {0: 1}; #41 = {0: -1,
1: -1, 2: -1, 3: -1, 4: 1}; #81 = (0: 0, 1: 0, 2:0, 3:0, 4:1}
ONE: 1, 2, 3
TWO: 0, 3, 6
THREE: 0, 9, 18
FOUR: 0, 27, 54 = Chinese Tetragramation (Yang, Yin, Zhun) of Number
(Imperial Governance of male - dragon, female (consort) - phoenix: 206
BCE to 220 CE published 2 BCE)
FIVE: 0, 81, 369 = 9(9²+1)/2 - Organisation of the Myriad of things
SIX: 0, 243, 729 = Appraisals within vCube (9 x 9 x 9)
SEVEN: 0, 729, 2187 = 17 March (Saint Patrick's Day) + 2 x 'OTH CYCLE
of 1092 (6 x 364 = 6D) days as Genesis and substantiation of Christian
identity.
"And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the
law to fail.
Whosoever putteth away his wife, and marrieth another, committeth
adultery: and whosoever marrieth her that is put away from her husband
committeth adultery.' ["Luke 16:13-18 (KJV)]
The substantiation for which is explained in metaphysical terms {ie. the
#237 - USE OF FORCE, ITS RELATION TO AUTONOMIC RIGHT UNDER THE STATE,
and CHRISTIAN IDENTITY} as a technology for managing MARRIAGE in the
following document:
- dolf
- http://www.grapple.id.au/Chronicles/automata.html
<<kêllÿ>> wrote:
> On Apr 5, 4:57 am, "Fred Thomas" <f...@aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Not every one that believes in proven myths are mentally ill, they
may have issues, but are not mentally ill.
>
>>> Of course she did, and she claims to be a Christian !
>
>> She is no different that you.
>
> Uh...excuse me? First of all, I do not believe that anyone believing
> in God is mentally ill. I believe Rod is mentally disturbed because
> he demostrates it everytime he posts. Secondly, there is absolutely
> no comparison between Rod and me. I am a believer in and follower of
> Jesus Christ - Rod changes his spiritual beliefs on a regular basis
> depending on which role he wants to play in Usenet.
>
> On several occasions over the years, Rod has flip-flopped between
> believing in God, being an atheist, being an agnostic, calling God a
> "sky-pixie", claiming he would never call himself a Christian, to his
> latest spiritual incarnation: being a completely unlearned Bible-
> thumper who has no clue what the Bible says and what the God of the
> Bible is about. Here's another example - during the recent
> presidential election and campaign (as well as afterwards) in the
> Christian newsgroups he claimed to be an Obamaite. In other groups
> (not so long ago) where posters from the Christian groups do not
> venture, he claimed to be a non-Obama supporter.
>
> In short, Rodney does what he does and says what he does for shock
> value in order to get attention and reactions from other posters.
> You'll notice that the regular, well-balanced posters in here no
> longer directly respond to him other than on the rare occasion.
> That's because he's been playing the same game in here for years and
> has more than worn out his welcome.
>
> He's nuts.
<<kêllÿ>> <rosiebelleatr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Apr 5, 3:05 am, Randy ® <pulpitf...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The truth _is_ that you are a lying, lesbian abomination.
>
> Really? Show me one place in the Word of God where *people of any
> kind* are called an "abomination", would you?
>
>>> No surprise there - you deny that Jesus
>>> saves all who come unto Him (as the Bible states), so I guess anything
>>> shouldn't surprise me when it comes to you.
>
>> You're the one who can't handle the truth, and denies what
>> Jesus said.
>
> Really? Which part of what Jesus said do I deny?
>
>> Those Jesus saves do not persist in a lifelong
>> lifestyle of abomination, or try to justify that which He said
>> is an abomination, instead of relying on His atonement and
>> repenting.
>
> Have you missed the "whosoever" of John 3:16? I haven't. How about
> Jesus' words in John 8:36, "He who the Son sets free is free,
> indeed"? And then, there is the followup to this from the Apostle
> Paul with "There is therefore no condemnation for those who are in
> Christ Jesus" in Romans 8:1? Did you miss that, too?
>
> Seems like you miss alot in the Word when it doesn't fit your agenda
> of hatred, control, and fear, Randy (I bet your wife could fill us in
> on the truth of that in your household).
>
>> I puke in your general direction.
>
> And I will smile in your general direction and then come up and give
> you a big hug when I see you in heaven, Randy. Oh, and BTW - there
> will be no room for your hatred there.
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Anon
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
<><
"The lot is cast into the lap, but its every decision is from the