Work for me is doing real fine. The regular little golden boy.
Personal life is a bit in a turmoil, and I'm trying to learn a little
of that zen stuff you preach about being happy with "one's self"
ohummmmmmm I could probably use some help in that order.
Values are changing, as you understand when you get older.
I've been called upon for one more tour in the entertainment business
for rock and roll,,,,maybe next year. I"m trying to figure it all
out, and put on a happy face,,,, I don't know when enuff is enuff.
I don't have the answer, but I'm sure, I will know by next year.
BAWAHAHAHhahahahahahhah
Fine, the VA came up with a pill that pretty well keeps it under
control without the bad reaction I had to Verapamil. This new
medication got tested last week when some Jerry K. acting Nazi jumped
Bob Church over some wording----Here's a guy scratching around a small
airport, jumping out of a buddy's Cessna, no big ways....just knee's
in the breeze and probably grinning all the way up then back down. A
guy that demo's for free just to pay back the locals for letting him
do his thing out in the boondocks of Ohio or somewhere up there North
of the Mason Dixon line----You know a jumper like that loves the
sport....He managed a spot between the rain squalls and jumped in a
Santa suit stating if the kids in the local High School band could
stand being miserable and wet, so could he----Sounded a little to much
like a "the show
must go on!" attitude that has killed some demo people in the past to
some neurotic shit head and they freaked out.
This Bob Church guy represents the true spirit of the jump I do
believe....Before bottom feeders saw the money potential and started
killing the sport by pricing new comers out. So I got mad and started
hollering for a blood atonement from
the creep causing trouble---Bob was there, he made the call and pulled
it off.... landed a little far out but within Airport boundary's on
the grass but his canopy is so damn loud you couldn't miss it was a
skydiver coming in, that canopy is
so loud he don't need landing lights----shore is a pretty thing, tried
to blame the choice on his wife but I believe the
kid has a sense for fashion---The J Pegs are in his post, go check it
out. Why hell I'd jump the thing just to freak
Jerry out-----I can hear him now......And you called me a fashion fag
where are your bootee's to go with that flashy canopy old man? heh
heh------>Blame Bob Church's wife, somebody in that family has good
taste...He claims it ain't him.
>
> Work for me is doing real fine. The regular little golden boy.
> Personal life is a bit in a turmoil, and I'm trying to learn a little
> of that zen stuff you preach about being happy with "one's self"
> ohummmmmmm I could probably use some help in that order.
>
> Values are changing, as you understand when you get older.
I get much older and I'll be door nail dead but I'll die a 1950's
Neanderthal no mater how much shit changes.
Can't live without honor so a lot of these self involved, back
stabbing young people are already dead far as I'm concerned.
>
> I've been called upon for one more tour in the entertainment business
> for rock and roll,,,,maybe next year. I"m trying to figure it all
> out, and put on a happy face,,,, I don't know when enuff is enuff.
> I don't have the answer, but I'm sure, I will know by next year.
As a roady?
> BAWAHAHAHhahahahahahhah
At the risk of sounding like Festus Hagen and giving rural people a
bad name everywhere: "Don't you see Marshal,
he ain't mad at me, he's jealous of the way we live in small town
America.....No wonder he comes home from the DZ pissed off all the
time and raising hell about my parochial opinions. If I had to live in
Harris County and deal with Houston traffic I'd be pissed off too heh
heh and all the time I was thinking the kid just didn't like my
comments or the direction I give him on how to man up 1950's style and
do the right thing. He's actually jealous.............snigger. 0~;->
~eat up with it~ ~eat up with it~ ~eat up with it~ heh
heh heh
I could use a new drug. I have resisted takeing any of them kinda
pills in the past, but shucks, I'm going to have to pretty soon.
Its a sorry day for me, when I start that kinda drug. sigh..
> Bob Church over some wording----
I am not for sure, but I think I jumped with him in the midwest. He
seemed okay to me., The midwest appears to STILL be the only place in
ameriica that still holds honest an true to teaching, safety, and
overall fun jumps are the objective of a skydive. I wish,, i was
closer to the midwest.
....He managed a spot between the rain squalls and jumped in a
> Santa suit stating if the kids in the local High School band could
> stand being miserable and wet, so could he----Sounded a little to much
> like a "the show
> must go on!" attitude that has killed some demo people in the past to
> some neurotic shit head and they freaked out.
>
>
> I get much older and I'll be door nail dead but I'll die a 1950's
> Neanderthal no mater how much shit changes.
> Can't live without honor so a lot of these self involved, back
> stabbing young people are already dead far as I'm concerned.
Good point,, they are all dead. Yeah,,, you're right.
> > I've been called upon for one more tour in the entertainment business
> > for rock and roll,,,,maybe next year. �I"m trying to figure it all
> > out, �and put on a happy face,,,, I don't know when enuff is enuff.
> > I don't have the answer, but I'm sure, I will know by next year.
>
> As a roady?
LAUGHING VERY HARD,,, YEPPERSSSS I"m a roadie.
They have promised me "a ride" --as in riding, -- in as a roadie.
They promised me I ride in, and they promised me I get a ride out. I
don't have to hump my old ass anywhere. Just sit in the back, and
shut up old man.
Look at the deals we get when we get old.
Gaw dang,,, I love america.
LAUGHING VERY HARD,,,,, OOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
why in the HELLLL< did we ever volunteer for thisw shittttttt
spewing bourbonnn on schereen..
Fondren doesn't run inside the 610 loop. Not a single bit of it.
Doesn't cross 610 anywhere and doesn't come any closer to loop 610
then 4 miles or so further west from 610's west side.
You were either lost or simply didn't know where you were (or the
person driving you was) driving.
Next, you say you get practically stopped in traffic yet you still
make it to where you were going on time? That's some traffic jam and
patience is a virtue. Then you're complaining about people driving
too fast? Quit whining and learn to drive better, next time - if that
was you driving - which I doubt.
I think George Carlin (RIP) put it this way - anyone driving slower
than you is an idiot and anyone driving faster than you is a maniac.
...bsrp
...jlk
If it makes you feel better, Jinnie - have a party. You're still an
unrepetant racist, liar, poser, and hypocrite. I can cite solid
examples, every one, and with your own words illustrating how what
I've said is true and you indeed are what I say you are. Btw -
Houston traffic is only bad in certain parts of town at certain times
and it's just knowing when and where - experience counts. Houstion
traffic's pretty tame compared to some places - but you wouldn't know
about those places.
...bsrp
...jlk
You get off 59 just past Fannin on West Park, hit Fondren cross
Westhimer....its all inside the loop, coming out I crossed Bellair and
a few major streets, ran down feeder roads till I could get back on
59...Got to be careful you don't get shoved off on 45, 10 or 610
coming out of the downtown area---Wasn't as much traffic when I came
out but what their was was running 70 or 75 mph....No regard for the
damn traffic law down there, their all crazy as hell...No way I could
live in that town
>
> You were either lost or simply didn't know where you were (or the
> person driving you was) driving.
>
Who was there you or me? I was alone, went to a private clinic so the
VA van didn't ride me from the Lufkin OPC---The Guvment had a check
for $74.50 waiting at the Doctors Office for my mileage----Shoulda
joined the Navy when you had the chance boy. The Guvment takes care of
everything for old war horses...So the VA sez...We think we can keep
you alive till your in your mid 80's got any incentive to live that
long? "Oh hell yeah my main booty bitch needs me" sez I HAHAHAHAHA----
>Next they will have me down there for a psych eval for PTSD
again...Not a damn one of them is a Combat veteran or skydiver nor has
ever been, my humor goes over their head but WTF it goes over your
head 99 percent of the time and you sky dive. Course you take yourself
far to serious heh
> Next, you say you get practically stopped in traffic yet you still
> make it to where you were going on time?
I left 3 hours early, figured leave here at 7:30 AM and the rush hour
traffic would be over by the time I got inside the loop......Bzzzt
WRONG---Caught the tail end of the 59 back up right about George R.
Brown and Minute Maid park....Thought of you when I finally got off 59
& West Park to catch Fondren ran it till it crossed crossed
"Westhimer" I know how much being associated with that name upsets you
so I switched from ohm ohm ohm to ha ha ha made my fricking day! Being
a grouchy old man ain't so bad a deal if you laugh a lot. 0~;)
>
> I think George Carlin (RIP) put it this way - anyone driving slower
> than you is an idiot and anyone driving faster than you is a maniac.
>
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Ran with the maniacs today, until everyone became a idiot along about
the George R Brown convention center...I'm usually running with the
little old lady's up here.....45 mph and onto the shoulder to let the
faster log trucks pass..Starting about Splendora and Conroe their
ain't no shoulder, just concrete barricades right up against the
lanes.
You got to get after it or get run over---Never saw one cop either way
the whole trip----I think their afraid to get out there with the
traffic and mix it up
Dunno about that I drove cross country when I was a Teamster, been to
NYC, LA Chi town all the big uns Course that was long ago. BTW
complain to the Guvment about those thing you claim I am, maybe they
will pay me more money...tootle loo and remember pay your taxs kid,
part of your tax dollar comes to me for services rendered to our
Country Guvment is going to try to keep me alive at least till my mid
80's, might even make it to 90...I'll be here for you a long time kid
heh
in time of war hee hee haw haw haw I love it! 0~;-*
Dunno about you, they had a draft back in the 1950's you chose or they
chose for you and their choice might end up messy. But our country
created us in one way or another you might say----I know Jerry K's
gratefull...I'm probably the only steady example of a 1950's manly man
he has ever had....Like a rock---The kid loves me don't fall for all
that bitching, wailing and crying he does..I'm a rock for the kid---
Not talking about the Woody's I get trying to help him out, I'm
talking a real touchstone for the youngster, something he missed by
turning the Navy Recruiter down, he gets it right here! heh heh 0~;)
>
> > As a roady?
>
> LAUGHING VERY HARD,,, YEPPERSSSS I"m a roadie.
>
> They have promised me "a ride" --as in riding, -- in as a roadie.
> They promised me I ride in, and they promised me I get a ride out. I
> don't have to hump my old ass anywhere. Just sit in the back, and
> shut up old man.
>
Take it from me thats hard
> Look at the deals we get when we get old.
Wouldn't be no road shows, not even for the biggest bans if not for
roadies supporting them
>
> Gaw dang,,, I love america.
Me too......I think Jerry's having a hard time loving this country and
the talkative old men it creates---He might kind of wish we were from
somewhere else----Somewhere where ornery old geezers might get a Hell
Fire missile up the tail pipe Thanks to the good Ole USA and one of
them Predator deals----Rather see his tax money go to that then to
some sweet old Veteran trying to show him the light I'm thinking heh
0~;->
Hell yeah, the guy jumps out of planes and likes Donuts what could be
wrong with him?
I'll let you in on a little known fact.....Those Yankee's....most of
the ones living in rural areas, blue collar workers, farmers etc. are
Good Ole Boys just like us.....the accent is just different------>Yep
just a bunch of Rednecks. I say we send
Jerry K up there in a trade for Bob might have to throw in a couple of
Mules-----Jerry don't seem to be able to Man up.
You don't know what you're talking about. The west park exit off of
59 is around seven miles after Fannin, no "just past" about it.
>hit Fondren cross
>Westhimer.
Westpark does indeed cross Fondren and Fondren does indeed cross
Westheimer- outside loop 610.
>...its all inside the loop,
You don't know what you're talking about, dumbass. Fondren runs
north/south and is decidedly outside loop 610 - it's west of it. Show
me on a map where Fondren runs anywhere inside loop 610. You can't
because it doesn't. And you're an idiot to 1) speak without knowing
what you're talking about and 2) upon correction not checking the
facts and continuing to speak without knowing what you're talking
about. You're a weak specimen to maintain some easily debunked
fiction.
>coming out I crossed Bellair and
>a few major streets, ran down feeder roads till I could get back on
>59...Got to be careful you don't get shoved off on 45, 10 or 610
>coming out of the downtown area---Wasn't as much traffic when I came
>out but what their was was running 70 or 75 mph....No regard for the
>damn traffic law down there, their all crazy as hell...No way I could
>live in that town
This town eats weak people like you alive - you can tell this is so
when they start whining about the traffic and losing their bearings -
thinking some place is inside loop 610 when it certainly isn't, for
instance. You did the right thing running for home - or whoever was
diriving did.
>>
>> You were either lost or simply didn't know where you were (or the
>> person driving you was) driving.
>>
>Who was there you or me?
What with your conclusion, despite the clear and undeniable facts
which say otherwise, that any part of Fondren is inside loop 610, I
doubt you were there. Look at a map, dumbass.
>I was alone, went to a private clinic so the
>VA van didn't ride me from the Lufkin OPC---The Guvment had a check
>for $74.50 waiting at the Doctors Office for my mileage----Shoulda
>joined the Navy when you had the chance boy. The Guvment takes care of
>everything for old war horses...So the VA sez...We think we can keep
>you alive till your in your mid 80's got any incentive to live that
>long? "Oh hell yeah my main booty bitch needs me" sez I HAHAHAHAHA----
>>Next they will have me down there for a psych eval for PTSD
>again...Not a damn one of them is a Combat veteran or skydiver nor has
>ever been, my humor goes over their head but WTF it goes over your
>head 99 percent of the time and you sky dive. Course you take yourself
>far to serious heh
Heh - and when someone else expresses his low opinion of the concept
of the show must go on in terms of skydving you spazz out and say
stupid and certainly unable to back up crap such as "there must be
blood," or some such. Hypocrite.
>
>> Next, you say you get practically stopped in traffic yet you still
>> make it to where you were going on time?
>
>I left 3 hours early, figured leave here at 7:30 AM and the rush hour
>traffic would be over by the time I got inside the loop......Bzzzt
>WRONG---Caught the tail end of the 59 back up right about George R.
>Brown and Minute Maid park....Thought of you when I finally got off 59
>& West Park to catch Fondren ran it till it crossed crossed
>"Westhimer"
Nevermind that 59 doesn't cross Westpark until it is outside loop 610.
Nevermind that Fondren is outside loop 610. Nevermind that Fondren
intersects Westheimer outside loop 610 - about the 8900 block of
Westheimer. You're wrong, Jinnie - be a man for once, accept it, and
move on.
> I know how much being associated with that name upsets you
>so I switched from ohm ohm ohm to ha ha ha made my fricking day! Being
>a grouchy old man ain't so bad a deal if you laugh a lot. 0~;)
Call yourself what you will - I'll just call you an ignorant, racist,
lying and posing, hypocrite. But then, that's only because you've
demonstrated yourself to be those things. And that ain't talk - I can
back up all those labels, apt that they are, with your own words.
>
>>
>> I think George Carlin (RIP) put it this way - anyone driving slower
>> than you is an idiot and anyone driving faster than you is a maniac.
>>
>> ...bsrp
>> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Ran with the maniacs today, until everyone became a idiot along about
>the George R Brown convention center...I'm usually running with the
>little old lady's up here.....45 mph and onto the shoulder to let the
>faster log trucks pass..Starting about Splendora and Conroe their
>ain't no shoulder, just concrete barricades right up against the
>lanes.
>You got to get after it or get run over---Never saw one cop either way
>the whole trip----I think their afraid to get out there with the
>traffic and mix it up
There are far better ways - quicker, less traffic, more sceneic, and
less distance to get to Fondren and Westheimer from northeast of
Houston which doesn't involve going by the GRB and the ballpark on 59.
You - or whoever drove - took the soccer mom route.
...bsrp
...jlk
Oh, yeah - send me "up there," Jinnie. Make it happen. Pardon me
while I don't hold my breath. You gonna man up and admit you were
mistaken, speaking in ignorance, when you said you went to an "outside
specialist inside the 610 loop in Houston?" Hypocrite.
...bsrp
...jlk
I do. Were they inside loop 610, too?
>BTW
>complain to the Guvment about those thing you claim I am, maybe they
>will pay me more money...
No, I'll just remind you of the facts and that's a remarkably
"merchant mentality" you got going on there, hypocrite.
>tootle loo and remember pay your taxs kid,
>part of your tax dollar comes to me for services rendered to our
>Country Guvment is going to try to keep me alive at least till my mid
>80's, might even make it to 90...I'll be here for you a long time kid
>heh
>in time of war hee hee haw haw haw I love it!
You won't be at dropzones and you won't be skydiving. Works for me.
...bsrp
...jlk
Outside the VA system, they wanted a independent opinion, the
Government likes to spend money to preserve antiques. I'm surprised
they didn't send a Limo for me, this is why it is important to pay
your tax's kid I enjoy the finer things in life heh heh heh
>
> >tootle loo and remember pay your tax's kid,
> >part of your tax dollar comes to me for services rendered to our
> >Country Guvment in time of war. Their going to try to keep me alive at least till my mid
> >80's, might even make it to 90, then perhaps the Smithstonian...I'll be here for you a long time kid
> >heh hee hee haw haw haw I love it!
>
> You won't be at dropzones and you won't be skydiving. Works for me.
>
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Lets see, #1. cruising the lake with a barge full of Dolly's or #2.
at the drop zone with a buncha whiny girly men?
I choose number one
Good things located inside loop 610, like you said it was? Moron.
...bsrp
...jlk
Your loss and the dropzone's gain. Be sure to send a postcard from
fantasy island. Loser.
...bsrp
...jlk
See what happens when you try to resist your sea daddy's wealth of
knowlege? You can't tell up from down.
I crossed 610 going in and didn't cross it again till I finished the
exam and came out------->Thats inside the
loop any way you cut it "young dummy" Hope they ain't letting you spot
the loads shit you are lost in your own city. ;-P
~eat up
with it~
Peanut would, he's still sore at the Yankee's for beating the
South-----But I wouldn't skin anybody with a unfair trade
like that, besides the mules wouldn't like the cold weather
Your words, dummy, and undeniable.
"The VA sent me to a outside specialist inside the 610 loop in
Houston."
There's more:
"You get off 59 just past Fannin on West Park, hit Fondren cross
Westhimer....its all inside the loop,"
It's clear what you said and it's clear you didn't know what you were
saying.
That Fondren - any part of it - is not "inside the 610 loop in
Houston" is undeniable.
That the West Park exit where "you get off 59" and "hit Fondren" is
not "inside the 610 loop in Houston" is undeniable.
That where "Fondren cross Westheimer" is not "inside the 610 loop in
Houston" is undeniable.
That it's not "all inside the loop," is undeniable.
That you are now crayfishing your ignorance to ~crossing~ "the 610
loop in Houston," going to and from, is undeniable - nevermind that
undeniably you also sad, "all inside the loop."
That you claimed, stupidly so, that your specialist was ~inside~ "the
610 loop in Houston," is undeniable.
That you described how you got there, from the West Park exit, up to
Fondren and Westheimer as "all inside the loop," making the same
stupid error a ~2nd~ time - even when you had a chance to correct
yourself, having been informed of your mistake, before you made the
same mistake a 2nd time - is deniable.
That you are a major league moron and a boot for not knowing where you
were, where you went, so stupid to open your fat mouth without the
benefit of having the facts, and so ruled over by your overwhelmingly
and not to be denied self-affirming, fat ego which does not allow you
to recognize, let alone realize, your own stupid errors, even when the
facts and the proof clearly illustrating where and how you are
mistaken are so undeniable as to be almost literally shoving you, nose
first, into the watery shit of your own making is undeniable.
You stepped in it again, moron, and now you're crayfishing. It won't
change what you said. And that, too, is undeniable ------> Log it.
...bsrp
...jlk
You just said, "I say we ..." so when you say "we," you mean someone
else. I follow. Standard boot crap to be expected from you, Jinnie.
No surprise there. You're all talk and no walk. Poser.
...bsrp
...jlk
We in the imperial sense but in this case Peanut and I, you are they
and they are the bottom feeders which is you,
not much business for a bottom feeder around small municipal airports
in Ohio and the mules don't want to be seen with you so you
stay....unfortunatly
"Imperial we?" You don't know what you're talking about ----> again.
No such thing. Do you mean the "Royal we," princess? So you can't
send me (or anyone else) "up there" but with Peanut's help? Okay - I
say feel free, you and the nut - make it happen. Pardon me while I
don't hold my breath since 1) you'e an all talk and no walk poser and
2) the nut, as much as you whine for a rope from him, likely realizes
the total lack of reality in the idea that you or even you with some
help can, much less will, "send" some total stranger on the usenet
"up there." Moron. Naturally and not unexpectantly, you've
crayfished from the idea upon your dumb bluff being challenged so now
it's the punt to name calling a'la "bottom feeder" - simply a
comforting label appended to dismiss the messenger because your fat
ego can't handle it's message of truth - and further - some fanciful
notion regarding "mules" and who they prefer to be "seen with." Pretty
fucking lame, princess, and as it stands, I guess your statement, "I
say we send (me) up there in a trade for Bob" was a stupid and not
very well thought out idea to begin with. Fucking lame.
...bsrp
...jlk
Don't low rate nut man------Imperial as in more than one, BTW you
found your map of Houston yet big city girl?
I didn't. But you have. I can cite the evidence - as ever in your
own words, hypocrite. Dare me?
>----Imperial as in more than one,
There is no such defenition of or usage for Imperial in that sense,
moron, as in as you put it, "We in the imperial sense but in this case
Peanut and I,"
True to form, you could not contain your ignorance and it has lead you
to stepping in it again. There is a "Royal" we, princess.
>BTW you
>found your map of Houston yet big city girl?
You obviously haven't, princess.
"You get off 59 just past Fannin on West Park, hit Fondren cross
Westhimer....its all inside the loop,"
I bet I can point to any map of Houston which displays "the 610 loop
in Houston" and displays where West Park crosses Fondren and/or where
Fondren crosses Westheimer and it will, beyond all doubt show those
corners to be decidely NOT "inside the 610 loop in Houston."
You're a boot who didn't know where he was and a boot who couldn't
contain his ignorance.
You stepped in it, princess -----> again.
More fool you to flail and crayfish so much over it.
Buf if you're so sure you're right - you're not but reality clearly
has no bearing for your boot self - put your money where your mouth
is, princess.
Or just puss out like you always do. Loser.
...bsrp
...jlk
>
> >> >> <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
> >> >> >On Sep 30, 8:17 pm, peanut4040 <peanut4...@aol.com> wrote:
>
> >> >> >> > Bob Church over some wording----
>
> >> >> >> I am not for sure, but I think I jumped with him in the midwest. He
> >> >> >> seemed okay to me., The midwest appears to STILL be the only place in
> >> >> >> ameriica that still holds honest an true to teaching, safety, and
> >> >> >> overall fun jumps are the objective of a skydive. I wish,, i was
> >> >> >> closer to the midwest.
>
> >> >> >Hell yeah, the guy jumps out of planes and likes Donuts what could be
> >> >> >wrong with him?
>
> >> >> >I'll let you in on a little known fact.....Those Yankee's....most of
> >> >> >the ones living in rural areas, blue collar workers, farmers etc. are
> >> >> >Good Ole Boys just like us.....the accent is just different------>Yep
> >> >> >just a bunch of Rednecks. I say we send
> >> >> >Jerry K up there in a trade for Bob might have to throw in a couple of
> >> >> >Mules-----Jerry don't seem to be able to Man up.
>
> >> >> Oh, yeah - send me "up there," Jinnie. Make it happen. Pardon me
> >> >> while I don't hold my breath.
>
> >> >> ...bsrp
> >> >> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >> >Peanut would, he's still sore at the Yankee's for beating the
> >> >South-----But I wouldn't skin anybody with a unfair trade
> >> >like that, besides the mules wouldn't like the cold weather
> I guess your statement, "I
> say we send (me) up there in a trade for Bob" was a stupid and not
> very well thought out idea to begin with. Fucking lame.
>
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yeah, the Yankee's are smarter than that, no way would they trade Bob
for a girly man who don't know up from down, in from out......I don't
think that Cessna has a spotting light by the door for lost Weiner's
like you, you might end up in down town Cincinnati and then the pilot
would be in trouble because you don't know where the loop is. ;-P
Glad you agree that your idea was stupid and not very well thought out
- and lame.
>.....I don't
>think that Cessna has a spotting light by the door for lost Weiner's
>like you,
Wasn't your most recent skydive, almost ten years ago, out of a
Cessna? How'd your spotting work out then?
>you might end up in down town Cincinnati and then the pilot
>would be in trouble because you don't know where the loop is.
The irony here is it has been clearly demonstrated that you have no
clue where you went, where you were, and what lies inside "the loop
610" and what doesn't.
How many demo jumps you got, princess? Assuming Bob has Pro Rating -
an easy assumption to make - you ever get one one like me and Bob did?
Oh, wait - that was a dumb question - getting Pro Ratings requires,
among other things outside your limited ability, being able to stand
up a landing with any degree of consistancy.
Oh, btw -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DgWpT5jOzs8
I'm the last one down - no wind and landed in the center circle on the
field. Did that jump out of the old Spaceland 182. Feel the burn,
princess.
...bsrp
...jlk
Ethan spotted, he has since followed his woman to
Australia........Hope he's not lost in the out back <grin>
Another reason the exchange won't go down......Bob does it for free
because he loves the sport, who's going to trade for a scrawny whore
who can't tell up from down, that wants pay? One thing for sure, not
even you could get lost at that country airport he's jumping at----Not
going to be big crowds either, so there goes your ego trip. ;-Pfffft
> How many demo jumps you got, princess? Assuming Bob has Pro Rating -
> an easy assumption to make - you ever get one one like me and Bob did?
You know all about assuming, don't you?
Jerry pulled a Bob and did a free demo? No way and that ain't a
assumption, thats knowing GU whores!!!
What gave you that idea, Mike? Btw - I thought you weren't reading my
crap. Since you are, again - welcome back.
Blues Skies,
Jerry
So you didn't even look out or down just to see where you were at? You
find out before you boarded what the winds were doing or did you leave
that to someone else as well?
Ethan was your green light, eh princess?
Shit, I doubt you ever knew how to spot with dropping the ball like
that. Skydiving can be an unforgiving sport if one doesn't think it
through, eh princess?
...bsrp
...jlk
You can pull reasons out of your ass until your head gets lonely up in
there, princess, it was your idea to begin with and the more reasons
you come up with to explain why you can NOT send me or anyone up
wherever just underlines how inane and stupid your idea was in the
first place.
>.....Bob does it for free
>because he loves the sport, who's going to trade for a scrawny whore
>who can't tell up from down, that wants pay?
It was your idea, princess. Perhaps you should have realized all
these supposed reasons BEFORE you started gassing, "I say we send (me)
up there in a trade for Bob" Stupid boot.
>One thing for sure, not
>even you could get lost at that country airport he's jumping at----Not
>going to be big crowds either, so there goes your ego trip
You're projecting again, princess. Wanna tell us again how the West
Park exit off of 59, where it meets Fondren, and where Fondren crosses
Westheimer is "all inside the loop?"
And again - I bet you a fifth of Jack Daniels and a case of Shiner
Bock that none of those locations, contrary to what you said, are
"inside the 610 loop." You don't like those stakes, come up with
something you can handle. I'm putting my money where my mouth is,
princess, you going to step up?
Not a chance in hel, I'm thinking, but man up and call my bluff if
you're so sure, princess..
No, Jinnie - ain't me who ever got lost trying to find Waller - that
was you - and that is just another example of what a big, fat
hypocrite you are. Puss puss puss - Jinnie's all talk and no
walk -------> take it to the bank.
...bsrp
...jlk
No, that IS assumption on your part, moron, because outside of perhaps
a Balunar Liftoff you may have visited where I was jumping - and
jumpers jumped into that event for the fun of it - you have no idea
what sort of compensation or not I have ever received doing demos.
"Knowing GU whores?" You don't know shit, princess - you have made
two skydives in the last 14 years. Period. You may have thought you
once knew "GU whores" but when you get down to it, what you knew, damn
little that it ever was, was heavily shaded by your small amount of
time in skydiving, as well as your affirmation starved ego. Guess you
haven't been on any bigways, have you, kid? On that note, even if you
actualy are "knowing GU whores," fat lot a good that ever did you when
the runway was coming up just before you exited skydiving for good.
You don't know shit, princess - and you demonstrate this truth
regularly.
...bsrp
...jlk
>> You know all about assuming, don't you?
> What gave you that idea, Mike?
You did, specifically "you ever get one one like me and Bob did?".
Spoken like a true uncomprehending idiot.
> Btw - I thought you weren't reading my
> crap. Since you are, again - welcome back.
There were a few days there when things were a bit more like old times,
but you had to go fucking it all up. Mindless vendettas are like that...
>Jerry K. wrote:
>> On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:00:01 -0700, Mike Spurgeon <mi...@spurgeon.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Jerry K. wrote:
>>>
>>>> How many demo jumps you got, princess? Assuming Bob has Pro Rating -
>>>> an easy assumption to make - you ever get one one like me and Bob did?
>
>>> You know all about assuming, don't you?
>
>> What gave you that idea, Mike?
>
>You did, specifically "you ever get one one like me and Bob did?".
That Bob has a Pro Rating is an easy assumption to make given his
experience, Mike, but I fail to see how the question if the princess
ever earned a Pro Rating just as myself and possibly Bob have
suggests that I have some sort of deep knowledge of assuming. Or was
your question rhetorical in nature, simply suggestion that I either
have the failing of assuming too much or it was simply a sarcastic
suggestion that I know nothing about assuming? Either way, Mike,
rhetorical gymnastics on your part does little in my opinion to, as
you have stated you would have others do on this forum, "expand the
sum knowledge of skydiving."
>
>Spoken like a true uncomprehending idiot.
I took it at face value, Mike. You seem to assume that an inability
to read minds - in this case yours - indicates idiocy. That I assume
Bob has a Pro Rating is clear - I said as much - and its based on my
understanding that he is very experience, has significant longevity in
the sport, and his past demonstration skydive accounts. If the
assumption that Bob has a Pro Rating is in error, I'll be quite happy
to stand corrected.
>
>> Btw - I thought you weren't reading my
>> crap. Since you are, again - welcome back.
>
>There were a few days there when things were a bit more like old times,
>but you had to go fucking it all up.
If you wish to blame me for what you read, Mike, have a party. I
don't buy it but if that works for you, so be it. That said. it's
your problem, Mike. Not mine. So, tough shit. You want to blame some
fly in your ointment of elysium on someone who posts to a public forum
whenever and whatever he wants - as you've said in the past is the way
it should be - that's your problem. Like I've recommended in the
past, Mike, when you come across my posts - it's not like they're
covert or anything - simply close your eyes if you can't keep from
opening those posts. Or killfile if the temptation is too much for
your brain to engage your eyelids shut. Or simply take a deep breath
and stick your head into a bucket of sand. It's no skin off my ass,
Mike, either way but it sure seems to be chapping yours when the
princess gets shit wrong - and he did - and then gets corrected - and
he does - and then the predictable back and forth commences. It's not
like you're without solutions, Mike. Surely that threaded newsreader
of yours can render things back to a bit more like old times without
some other skydiver fucking it all up. Ya think?
>Mindless vendettas are like that...
That's a load of crap, Mike. This is containment, nothing more. You
may as well tell the princess to stop getting shit wrong (as if lol!)
- she was left alone during that period when things were a bit more
like old times, before I just had to go fucking it up, and ya know,
Mike, when I did go fucking it up was the moment the princess started
to get shit wrong. So, consider directing your energies elsehwere and
until then, try to avoid reading my crap - I mean, you did say youhad
stopped or never would again or some such. Makes no difference to me.
Blue Skies,
Jerry
> That Bob has a Pro Rating is an easy assumption to make given his
> experience, Mike,
And you show your ignorance by making that statement.
>> Spoken like a true uncomprehending idiot.
>
> I took it at face value, Mike. You seem to assume that an inability
> to read minds - in this case yours - indicates idiocy.
Making the statement you did about someone you know next to nothing
about indicates idiocy or ego. Take your pick.
> That I assume
> Bob has a Pro Rating is clear - I said as much - and its based on my
> understanding that he is very experience, has significant longevity in
> the sport, and his past demonstration skydive accounts. If the
> assumption that Bob has a Pro Rating is in error, I'll be quite happy
> to stand corrected.
I've assumed nothing, I've never asked him if he did or didn't, but I'm
sufficiently amused by your assumption that I'll put my money where your
mouth/assumptions are, and bet you $100 that he doesn't.
>>> Btw - I thought you weren't reading my
>>> crap. Since you are, again - welcome back.
>> There were a few days there when things were a bit more like old times,
>> but you had to go fucking it all up.
>
> If you wish to blame me for what you read, Mike, have a party.
Sorry dipshit, but I'm blaming you for what you write, ie. your stupid
vendetta
> I
> don't buy it but if that works for you, so be it. That said. it's
> your problem, Mike. Not mine. So, tough shit. You want to blame some
> fly in your ointment of elysium on someone who posts to a public forum
> whenever and whatever he wants - as you've said in the past is the way
> it should be - that's your problem.
It is, and always should be so it's not exactly a problem.
> Like I've recommended in the
> past, Mike, when you come across my posts - it's not like they're
> covert or anything - simply close your eyes if you can't keep from
> opening those posts. Or killfile if the temptation is too much for
> your brain to engage your eyelids shut. Or simply take a deep breath
> and stick your head into a bucket of sand.
I'll do none of the above, but expect the occasional missive calling
stupid stupid, ignorance ignorance, and vendettas vendettas.
> It's no skin off my ass,
> Mike, either way but it sure seems to be chapping yours when the
> princess gets shit wrong - and he did - and then gets corrected - and
> he does - and then the predictable back and forth commences.
So tell us dipshit, who all of the recent posters told him he got
something wrong?
And then did it over and over...
Do you see the point?
> It's not
> like you're without solutions, Mike. Surely that threaded newsreader
> of yours can render things back to a bit more like old times without
> some other skydiver fucking it all up. Ya think?
Let's see - Tony overstated/misstated his case, several old timers
commented, it seemed pretty well resolved, and everyone seemed to accept
it all, and you can do nothing beyond trying to be clever in response to
someone that's jerking your chain.
Over and over...
>> Mindless vendettas are like that...
>
> That's a load of crap, Mike. This is containment, nothing more.
Yeah, in your mind dipshit, and it sure has worked!!!
Yeah and it was a good spot, except I was flying a heavy 7 cell with
one hand....made it back to the runway regardless.
Ethan was a good kid, I've seen him hang canopy's from the hanger
rafters and stand in their cells for hours checking
the stitching, he was a JM also.....to bad he was pussy whipped----The
US looses the best and keeps lazy low achievers
like you that expect to be payed for standing around------->Never
could get a grip so you have to fly camera slot....Desperate for
medals so you take credit for other peoples intermediate gold medals
tsk tsk tsk.....Bobs slot is not for you, he's doing solo's out of a
friends Cessna. Coming on winter now and although the skydivers up
ther jump in the snow, his buddy a pilot will probably want to put the
door back on the Airplane-----Lucky for Bob he has
another love beyond the jump.......HOT COFFEE & DONUTS-----All and
all, my kind of guy---You on the other hand are not.
Why you useless little piece of shit, you avoided National Service----
Mike did it the hard way, I guess the USMC was the only part of the
Navy he could get into heh heh. You took the easiest job in the sport,
can't teach, can't rig-----can't do shit but nickle and dime
Novices----You artta cut the DZ grass or clean toilets. SOMETHING
useful around the DZ to atone for your short comings and if that ain't
bad enough, you're bad mouthing a Icon--A instructor, someone who has
spent decades trying to improve the sport and the skill of its members
and putting up with lip from smart ass's.
~punk~ sissy
ass punk punkpunkpunk
I'll answer that, liked to show my ass on every jump---So I guess
every one after getting off student status was a demo.
My finest was a 800 ft. opening at Lake Anuach Texas....When that
canopy cracked even the S&TA was in awe. The
next best was the one that made Christy cry....Guess I was more a
stunt jumper than a demo jumper but it worked
for me.....That little corner of the brain that produces fear was
damaged in S.E. Asia for me so I had to push harder
to get a adrenalin pump in a sport even Grandma's can do----I dunno
why you city geeks get so big headed about
such a mundane sport----The equipment failure was solved by prior
generations....No PT involved, nobody shooting at
you....All this and you want to get payed for taking pictures? What a
crock of shit.....Homely T.J. whores set around the clubs in Mexico
and offer to take your picture with the better looking girls at the
table, they offer blow jobs on slow nights.
That what you do around the DZ punk? heh heh and you don't know up
from down either...I hope your folks leave you some money kid cause
you can't drive a cab due to confusion on where the loop 610 is and
you're short on viable DZ talent. Better get out there and show the
DZO you can mow grass or something
> Shit, I doubt you ever knew how to spot with dropping the ball like
> that. Skydiving can be an unforgiving sport if one doesn't think it
> through, eh princess?
>
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Yeah it would have been better if we hadn't changed out canopy's, my
Falcon cut into the wind pretty good and the toggle pressure was
light.....Whats more important is both toggles would have been where I
could reach them, that last one is iffy
when you have a massive stroke and end up able to use only one side of
your body the side that doesn't work anymore
will fight the good side as it struggles so hanging harness in the
loft to adjust the risers to the right length might not have done any
good---All I know is the door opened, Ethan went out and I
followed....No problems in free fall...I shook Ethans hand off about
3500 ft....No problems throwing out----All that shits automatic from
the old FJC and its training methods.
Could only fly the Canopy with one toggle so I circled....It occurred
to me that unable to flare their was going to be one hell of a wreck
on the ground so I was angling toward the hanger so my body would be
easier to pick up, then I saw the peas
right along side the runway----Being primarily a civil airport the
damn pilots had parked their Cessna's all around it. I've landed
harder before but my left leg hand been paralyzed nie on two years by
then and it snapped like a twig as soon as I touched down----All in
all it was worth it, had drop foot before that jump but after the
surgeon plated the Tib and Fib back together with stainless steel
plates , the slack was gone and I could walk without a AFO. Another up
side was I didn't have to see you fleecing the novices around the
South Texas DZ's because it effectively ended my jumping. 2 years in a
wheel chair for every jump? Not even I love the sport that much. I
spent 18 months in the Oakland Army Hospital over 3/4 of them in a
body cast....Had my share of down time but I wasn't going to be laid
up just to jump----The USPA won't let you kill the bad guys so their
was no incentive to jump....Keeping your ego problems in check is
about all I have to do with the sport now days and thats enough
excitement for this old man! 0~;)P
> boot
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Wait just a fucking minute, I may be a lot of things but boot ain't
one of them...Carried too many 4 year hash marks on my sleeve. Mater
of fact, if I had shipped over one more time and made a career out of
being a racist, liar, poser and hypocrite I would have been eligible
to wear a gold crow with gold hash marks, if the Provost Marshal
didn't catch up with me & I didn't pull brig time before then that is.
You are a wussy Ass slacker who chose to stay home with the women and
children when your country called----Ya got no right to use USN or
USMC slang kid. I got a sea story about that boot shit. About 8 years
into my service me and a old Chief were watching a working party of
seamen fill sand bags.....I goes "Dammit no one calls me boot anymore,
I'm feeling old." He says "You know why don't you?" I pointed at my
First Class crow and he goes "No!" and started making slashing motions
at his lower arm. "Its the hash marks sonny." I stuck my lip out and
said "this sucks, I liked being called boot better than lifer." So the
Chief who had been in since WWII says "thats OK, you are still a boot
to me and I'm really going to bend you over at the Chiefs
initiation.....If you live that long that is." True to his word, every
time we passed he said "Stupid ass BOOT!" I'd come back with " Sorry
Ass Lifer." A line Officer overhead us and got pissed. "What kind of
example are you senior Petty Officers setting for the men?" "Old Navy,
Sir." said the Chief....Well the Officer walked off grumbling but we
never hear any more about it....Because he knew guys like us ran the
Navy.----Scary huh? heh heh
Slow down and take a breathe Mike, you are starting to sound like
THEM!
The kid wants attention from older men to the point of being plumb
stupid-----He doesn't realize he gives me a reason to keep the threads
going. That he keeps it alive with his sissy ass crying. Mike has told
him more than once...what he's telling Mike about dealing with
himself....Don't respond and their will be no Snuffy taunts....Heh I
love stupid young ego driven sky gods---Their a lot of fun to torture.
~Jerry's eat up with it~ ~eat up with it~ ~eat up with it~ and I love
every minute of it. This started out as a Peanut/Snuffy thread and
booty boy couldn't stand being left out.
Jerry should take his own advice which was Mikes advice in the first
place and kill my responses. Unfortunatly I own the boys emotions tsk
tsk tsk and a heh heh 0~;->
> Slow down and take a breathe Mike, you are starting to sound like
> THEM!
Nope. I'm starting to sound like me. Not often, and usually short and
to the point.
Some will understand it, some will not.
IMMV
I for one over the years have noticed you are King of the one line
zingers & punk put downs....I on the other hand am a old sea story
teller and like to color the insults in and underline them for young
dummy's. ;)
You are assuming again young dummy, perhaps he's seeing quotes in
other peoples post
See what out of control ego can cause? Starting with assuming to
much....The world does not revolve around you
girly boy ;-Pfffft
Well if that is the case, I'm happy that you got back in touch with
yourself, in an empirical sense, of course:)
Some will not understand, and those that take the time to, don't have
much of a life...LOL
>> Some will understand it, some will not.
>>
>> IMMV
> Well if that is the case, I'm happy that you got back in touch with
> yourself, in an empirical sense, of course:)
Even at my age, I don't lose touch.
> Some will not understand, and those that take the time to, don't have
> much of a life...LOL
Most everyone does, and the time spent here is insignificant to the rest
of said life.
Go back to the archives, and you'll find I don't often get cranky, and
when I do, it's for good and sufficient reasons.
On a few occasions, even with good and sufficient results...
Just an observation Mr. Mike. You are getting to be as vain as the
others, supposing that there is enough interest in your thoughts to
take a walk through memory lane, in the bowels of the wreck.....LOL
You paid the dues, if you want to be "cranky" it's alright.
Laughing, I come back to check in, and look what happens? 54 post, on
me and you just talkingj old people stuff. Imagine whats going to
happen when we start talking poop ?? You going to cause me to get one
of them spammer awards again.
The Yankees don't know what to make out of this mess, they must all
think we are crazy. Jerry jumped all over poor M.S.
for having a opinion. Even gave him back his own advice on how to deal
with shit you don't want to read. That blaming your own crimes on
other people and stealing credit for other peoples idea's and even
medals is so childish----It makes me and you look positively Adult. I
can see him dissing me but Mike? I'm beginning to think Jerry don't
like old people or anyone smarter than him....shit 90 percent of the
world has a IQ over 80 so thats a lotta people to hate heh heh.
Jerry accused me of being raciest----This from a Nazi sympathizer who
first appeared on wreck baiting a Jewish
skydiver and bragging about his pappy shaking hands with a big time
Nazi then topping it off my singing the old National Socialist song
made so famous in WWII by the loosing side. Shit the kid makes me look
like Gandhi----The big city must totally fuck up the more feeble young
minds although I suspect its hereditary to some extent, one thing for
sure girly boy has the South Texas sky god act down perfect......Just
as I remember them only more hysterical. 0~;->
"Poor M.S.?" That's a good one. <sarcasm, dummy> Behold, it's
princess misrepresentation!" Naw, telling someone tough shit for
wanting something they can't change ain't "jumping all over" anyone or
anything. As if crying for "blood" over Tony's opinion ain't jumping
"all over?" Hypocrite.
>Even gave him back his own advice on how to deal
>with shit you don't want to read. That blaming your own crimes on
>other people and stealing credit for other peoples idea's and even
>medals is so childish-
So's misrepresentation, princess. When have I said I "don't want to
read" your line of crap? About as much as I've said I wanted to read
it - that is - zero, one way or the other. Stealing credit for ideas
or medals? That's a load of crap. Substantiate it or blow it out
your ass, princess liar. You can't, of course, and never have every
time you've retreated to that stupid canard. You've never learned
that just because you say it doesn't make it true but your lies have
certainly enabled any one reading your crap to realize - because you
say it, it is very likely and almost certainly untrue. How many years
you skydive, princess liar?
>---It makes me and you look positively Adult. I
>can see him dissing me but Mike? I'm beginning to think Jerry don't
>like old people or anyone smarter than him.
Shit, if it were a matter of age or smarts as an excuse, given the
emotional level of your crap, perhaps disdain and contempt for the
intellect and emptional makeup of a 12 year old troll with affirmation
issues. As for you or Mike being "smarter," Miike I have no data to
measure, one way or the other - seems certainly sharp enough to me,
but you? Hoo-boy - given your record and what you spout in here?
You're dumber than a bag of hammers. A bag of really stupid hammers.
The list of your demonstrated and proven stupidities is extensive.
>...shit 90 percent of the
>world has a IQ over 80 so thats a lotta people to hate heh heh.
If low IQ were the qualifier for admiration, princess, you'd be hugely
admired. As it is, it is anything but from this quarter. Such is the
contempt there is for a lying, posing, and a demonstrated racist
troll.
>
>Jerry accused me of being raciest-
And the accusation is accurate. I can cite your words, princess, and
you have said some very racist things - unrepentantly so.
>---This from a Nazi sympathizer who
>first appeared on wreck baiting a Jewish
>skydiver and bragging about his pappy shaking hands with a big time
>Nazi then topping it off my singing the old National Socialist song
>made so famous in WWII by the loosing side.
That's a load of crap. You misrperesent and you lie, princess. Lay
it all out. Cite the posts. I know the score, what was said, when,
and to whom by whom and I can lay it out easily - I've done it before
so I won't immediately quote what was actually said and link to the
actual posts - but I will if you persist in such big, fat lies.
>Shit the kid makes me look
>like Gandhi-
Gandhi did not, princess, make statements suggesting followers of
Judaisim looked a certain way or some music was only for a specific
racial groups who happen to live in low income circumstances. You
did. Deny it and I'll shove your face in that, too ... again.
>---The big city must totally fuck up the more feeble young
>minds although I suspect its hereditary to some extent, one thing for
>sure girly boy has the South Texas sky god act down perfect......Just
>as I remember them only more hysterical.
How many years you skydive, Jinnie? What was the size of the largest
formation you were supposedly ever on? Whose oft trumpeted opinion of
his skydiving experience and abilities fall way short of what they
actually were? No, princess, "skygod" as you would use it is just
another convienent handle for a strawman which, back in the day, were
simply other, more experienced skydivers telling you to cut the crap
before you screwed up big and were jumping on formations out of your
league, as green as you were. They knew better than you and had the
benefit of experience and so they became "skygods." The irony here is
now you think you know better - with two skydives in the past 14 years
and one of those two so poorly planned and terribly executed, it left
you completely out of skydiving -------> forever. No, you are the
"skygod" in this conversation, princess. You fit the description on
pretty much every category save only the actually being able to
skydive one. Hypocrite.
...bsrp
...jlk
As if you ever needed someone to provide a reason? No, princess, if
you weren't keeping them "going" here, you'd be starting new ones. The
pattern is well established.
>That he keeps it alive with his sissy ass crying.
You just said you're keeping the threads going and now you're saying
someone else "keeps it alive." That one contradiction in the space of
two consecutive sentences, boot, and about as stupid as it gets.
>Mike has told
>him more than once...what he's telling Mike about dealing with
>himself.
That's a load of crap. princess. I've told Mike I'm not responsible
for what he chooses to read - specifically when he takes issue with
reading something he would prefer not to read and especially after
announcing he wouldn't be reading it in the first place.
>...Don't respond and their will be no Snuffy taunts.
And that's several loads of crap, princess. 1) I never told Mike to
not respond and 2) it has been established that not responding to your
line of crap does nothing to alter the relative level of your inane
lines of crap. Indeed, when you have been ignored it is not uncommon
for you to start keening for attention. Shall I cite examples of you
invoking my name and others out of the blue on unrelated threads
concerning unrelated subjects, princess? I can. Respond to your
lines of crap and you simply devolve into name calling and subject
changes since your lines of crap cannot stand the light of reason or
reality and ignore your lines of crap simply spurs you to cry out for
attention with lies, mischaracterzation, and posing prtense. This
pattern is as well worn as it is predictable.
>...Heh I
>love stupid young ego driven sky gods---Their a lot of fun to torture.
Which all plays into your demonstrated habit of fooling yourself -
even going so far as to fantasize what must be without the benefit of
knowing what is. You wish it were torture so you could affirm to
yourself that you are capable of causing discomfort and woe upon those
who would have the effrontery to call you on your lies, hypocrisies,
self absorbtion, and posing pretenses, and in doing so make them sorry
for crossing you. This also has been demonstrated multiple times
where you've imagined and expressed numerous comeuppance fantasies for
various detractors ranging from low status at the dropzone (the
funniest imo), legal entanglements, physical illness and
incapacitation, and even death. I'm not making this shit up,
princess, I can cite it all.
>~Jerry's eat up with it~ ~eat up with it~ ~eat up with it~ and I love
>every minute of it.
You just keep on clutching close that which makes you feel better,
princess and try not to reflect upon how "eat up" one who doesn't
skydive must be to lurk and troll an electronic newgroup on the usenet
for skydivers and skydiving, even going so far as to invoke and call
for abuse - as long as it brings that all too important attention,
princess.
>This started out as a Peanut/Snuffy thread and
>booty boy couldn't stand being left out.
You got shit wrong, princess - your statements regarding what you
thought resided inside the loop 610 in Houston - and got corrected.
From there you proceeded to spazz out - as per your standard - and
here we are now - you have been corrected and all you have to offer is
spasms attempting to dismiss the messenger because you can't
countenance the message. You certainly didn't take the bet which put
real stakes against what you said. Another pattern long established.
>Jerry should take his own advice which was Mikes advice in the first
>place and kill my responses.
That would be true if one was interested in absolute suppression but
the goal here, as has been explained in the past, has nothing to do
with supression and everything to do with containment - shrinking the
footprint - and that has been an overwhelming success.
>Unfortunatly I own the boys emotions tsk
>tsk tsk and a heh heh
You just keep on telling yourself that, princess, as the memory of you
amongst skydivers becomes even more misted and obscured over time,
less clear and more unmemorable every day, and those who would
potentially pay attention tp what you have to say in here become
potentially less in number, each and every day. You have been
corralled, princess. You could start a whole slew of new threads and
hope something sticks or remain in these ponderous back and forths
with the vain expectation that anyone would plow through them all on
any sort of regular basis. No, princess - the only answer against
this, the mutually assured killfile is to killfile the detractor
engineering it which, and this is the best part, is almost
inconceivable, given your demonstrated and long record of
egocentricity - the idea that someone could write something about you
which you might not ever see is counter to your very being. I'd call
it brilliant if it wasn't so obivous. Tough shit boot. You're just
ill equipped, is all.
...bsrp
...jlk
>Jerry K. wrote:
>
>> That Bob has a Pro Rating is an easy assumption to make given his
>> experience, Mike,
>
>And you show your ignorance by making that statement.
Shit, Mike - simply STATING that it was an assumption IS an admission
of ignorance in the first place - duh! You going to correct and
inform me, Mike? As it is right now you're just pissing on your shoes
over nothing and whether Bob has a Pro Rating or not does nothing to
change the princess' lack of one. Which is nothing to be ashamed of -
but that's not how his affirmation starved ego works, you see. That I
have one and he doesn't, which most people wouldn't even give a rat's
ass about - nor should they unless its lining up a stadium jump or
something, chaps the holy hell out of him. His is a world of pissing
contests, Mike. Simply a chain yank. Is there a problem?
>
>>> Spoken like a true uncomprehending idiot.
>>
>> I took it at face value, Mike. You seem to assume that an inability
>> to read minds - in this case yours - indicates idiocy.
>
>Making the statement you did about someone you know next to nothing
>about indicates idiocy or ego. Take your pick.
Which is it when the princess does exactly the same thing to the nth
degree, Mike? Clearly, on my part it was an assertion with an
undeniable caveat of admitted assumption which is an open admission of
ignorance from the get go, as well as an open invitation to be
illuminated on the subject - which I heartily accept and stand by,
ready and willing, to be illuminated on, Mike - unless such
information is outside your scope of ignorance - that is, you know the
answer.
>
>> That I assume
>> Bob has a Pro Rating is clear - I said as much - and its based on my
>> understanding that he is very experience, has significant longevity in
>> the sport, and his past demonstration skydive accounts. If the
>> assumption that Bob has a Pro Rating is in error, I'll be quite happy
>> to stand corrected.
>
>I've assumed nothing, I've never asked him if he did or didn't, but I'm
>sufficiently amused by your assumption that I'll put my money where your
>mouth/assumptions are, and bet you $100 that he doesn't.
Those stakes are too rich for my interest. But, I am none the less
curious, and will take the bet if you agree to lowering the stakes to
the neighborhood of a lift ticket or a case of beer if you prefer -
call it $20. If he doesn't I will be surprised given his demo
experience which he has related in here and, of course, his long time
in skydiving. If you agree to the stakes I propose then I will accept
the wager and readily accept clarification from Bob, at his word, at
face value, and as the final word in terms of the wager.
>>>> Btw - I thought you weren't reading my
>>>> crap. Since you are, again - welcome back.
>>> There were a few days there when things were a bit more like old times,
>>> but you had to go fucking it all up.
>>
>> If you wish to blame me for what you read, Mike, have a party.
>
>Sorry dipshit, but I'm blaming you for what you write, ie. your stupid
>vendetta
Might as well shake your fist at the wind while you piss into it,
Mike. What I write is out of your control. Tough shit. What you
choose to read, however, entirely is.
>
>> I
>> don't buy it but if that works for you, so be it. That said. it's
>> your problem, Mike. Not mine. So, tough shit. You want to blame some
>> fly in your ointment of elysium on someone who posts to a public forum
>> whenever and whatever he wants - as you've said in the past is the way
>> it should be - that's your problem.
>
>It is, and always should be so it's not exactly a problem.
Fair enough. So, your appreciation for things being a bit more like
the old times and someone fucking it all up. If it's not exactly a
problem then why bring it up in the first place?
>
>> Like I've recommended in the
>> past, Mike, when you come across my posts - it's not like they're
>> covert or anything - simply close your eyes if you can't keep from
>> opening those posts. Or killfile if the temptation is too much for
>> your brain to engage your eyelids shut. Or simply take a deep breath
>> and stick your head into a bucket of sand.
>
>I'll do none of the above, but expect the occasional missive calling
>stupid stupid, ignorance ignorance, and vendettas vendettas.
It was never unexpected, Mike. It's an open forum, for god's sake.
What is unexpected is the idea, contrary to several past resolutions,
that you now intend to keep reading them. That's the spirit! I, of
course, will mention when you're peeing on your shoes, which I
suppose is not unexpected by you.
>
>> It's no skin off my ass,
>> Mike, either way but it sure seems to be chapping yours when the
>> princess gets shit wrong - and he did - and then gets corrected - and
>> he does - and then the predictable back and forth commences.
>
>So tell us dipshit, who all of the recent posters told him he got
>something wrong?
That's a stupid question, Mike. Myself, of course. Did you perhaps
not know he was wrong the last time he was wrong? Not knowing is not
a bad thing, btw. And neither is correction - especially when truth
and facts are there in support it. And if you did know he was wrong
the last time when he was wrong, were you content to let fiction and
falsehood stand as a matter of indisputed record?
>And then did it over and over...
The truth is it is one for one, post for post stemming from the error,
and repeated when the error was repeated. If your problem in this
circumstance is with the method, Mike, tough shit on that, too. Btw -
imagine if you or someone else had leveled the same criticism at the
princess - it would be blown off and dismissed as hemmoroids -
whining. I'm not calling you a whiner, btw, but what I am suggesting
is there is a degree in inconsistancy in that you are taking the time
to express your dissatisfaction with my method, describing it as over
and over, and have yet to express a similar criticism for the
princess whose bread and butter is over and over - to put it mildly.
Your method is your own, of course, Mike, but editorial control over
someone else's method is beyond the scope of an unmoderated public
newsgroup and certainly beyond your control. Comment is something
else entirely, it being a FORUM afterall.
>Do you see the point?
I see the point you are trying to make, certainly. To be clear, if
one doesn't correct the princess when he's wrong he doesn't spazz out
all over the place getting more stuff wrong, over and over, and thus
there is no over and over correction spurring the princess' reciprocal
spazzing and subsequent corrections, and so on. The problem with your
point as I understnad it is your point is intellectually dishonest and
suggests this all happens in a vacuum - which it doesn't. That it is,
as you say, over and over on my part denies the reality that it is one
for one, post for post from the point of error and your point
disregards to the point of tacit acceptance the over and over on the
part of the princess - not to mention the princess getting things
wrong in the first place. I don't start these stupid threads (but I
usually finish them). When the princess gets shit wrong and gets told
he's wrong, it's his problem that he can't keep from (very poorly)
lying or crabwalking or what have you usually into some remarkably
stupid and feeble explanation or bogus rationale (or subject change),
all the while delving into tired, retread lies, dissembling, and
posing pretenses. That these responses and counter responses on his
part get shot down in kind as well is par for the course as his
arsenal is hugely limited. That's his method, too - and it stands
(actually, it falls) on it's own (lack of) merit. If it seems over and
over it is only because the dumbass is getting the same shit wrong
over and over and to not confront such affronts to reality and truth
is tacit acceptance via silence which has the double whammy of 1)
encouraging the princess that he is right (when he assuredly is not),
and 2) encourages the princess to start new threads while mangling
more facts and more truth in his drive for attention, as well as
bullying anyone who might have the audacity to present simpy a
disagreeing opinion. Note Tony's opinion on Bob's idea that the show
must go on and the princess' cry for a bloodletting. That's just one
example in a long line of examples which make up the well established
pattern I describe. Your point as I understand it is that without
correction the problem goes away to which I say, that has been shown
to be a faulty conclusion and does not fit the years of emprical data
stating otherwise.
>
>> It's not
>> like you're without solutions, Mike. Surely that threaded newsreader
>> of yours can render things back to a bit more like old times without
>> some other skydiver fucking it all up. Ya think?
>
>Let's see - Tony overstated/misstated his case, several old timers
>commented, it seemed pretty well resolved, and everyone seemed to accept
>it all, and you can do nothing beyond trying to be clever in response to
>someone that's jerking your chain.
You must have missed the princess (who was never an old timer in any
skydiving sense) spazzing out and actually calling for blood on the
matter. And you have apparently missed that this present thread -
which includes the present back and forth stemming from the princess
making claims which are decidedly disproven by local cartography - is
a seperate thread than the thread where Tony overstated/misstated his
case. Actually, what I had to say in that thread on that matter,
believe it or not, the princess said, "Amen," to. Perhaps he was just
confused - it's happened before. Now, as to trying to be clever or
not - that's in your own head, Mike. I don't craft these ponderous
things in terms of trying to wow or impress or to be clever or any
bullshit like that - it's the fucking usenet, for God's sake. But
there are certainly devices I do use and, shit, it's not like they're
not obvious, or anything. I strive to be truthful, facts on my side,
with due caveat when I'm not sure, pedanatic, long-winded, cutting,
unvitriolic, and as complete as possible in deconstruction, if such
deconstruction is possible. Attention is paid to closing semantic
loopholes and limit the princess' demonstrated tendency to take a
single iota of ambiguity and run with it. Attention is paid to what
is actual. That, and of course, some stock standard dropzone abuse
for sport because abusing self-involved trolling bullies full of
pretense and poses with their own words is sport for me. It doesn't
beat skydiving, of course, but very few things do.
>Over and over...
And back we are to the explanatory metaphor. We have a very boring
and repetitive clown delivering a very unremarkable act. He smears
himself with shit to get a response, content that he is being noticed
enough that someone, anyone tells him his shit stinks of him. You
don't care for the show being interrupted with heckling and all I can
say to that is either tough shit or put on your stinking head phones
because heckling shit stained clowns is as natural to me as is the
smearing of his own shit upon himself is natural to the clown
princess.
>
>>> Mindless vendettas are like that...
>>
>> That's a load of crap, Mike. This is containment, nothing more.
>
>
>Yeah, in your mind dipshit, and it sure has worked!!!
You seem to be confusing containment with absolute suppresion. If I
wanted to do that I'd simply have his computer hacked - which is
illegal of course - hacking his computer, not absolute suppression.
Suppresion is too easy. I prefer to join philosophical combat in the
open - let my deconstructing arguments stand or fall on their own
merits - or lack thereof. True, it's shooting fish in a barrel but the
containment is existant, absolutely. That he is flooding the
newsgroup with new threads, spewing his crap and trolling for
attention from anyone, as it was before I fucked it all up, so to
speak, is not the reality. That he becomes herded into a smaller
number of easily identifiable threads is the reality. That any post
he spends pretending to be the queen of may while he drags out another
tired lie or posing pretense in the course of "answering" (very so to
speak) my deconstructions of his lines of crap is any post not spent
abusing someone else or otherwise flooding the newsgroup. All this
should be very clear on your threaded newsreader, Mike - it is on
mine.
Blue Skies,
Jerry
What a coincidence - Ethan was the JM who suggested I do my lvl 7 in
their one student suit equipped with booties. I was kind of dubious
about the prospect, figuring it might be smarter to get a lot more
airtime before I start considering adding extra control surfaces to my
very green freefall abilities, but he said I'd handle 'em just fine -
asked me if I thought I'd be focusing on RW or sitflying (RW) and
recommended them. He was wearing them and he was my JM. He knew what
he was talking about. Later he explained to me why a fullface helmet
isn't a bad idea and why he wore one. Come to think of it, Ethan was
the one who first suggested to me that I go BOC over ROL. Excellent
guy.
>...to bad he was pussy whipped----The
>US looses the best and keeps lazy low achievers
>like you that expect to be payed for standing around
Naw, when I get paid while skydiving it's because I'm delivering what
skydivers have asked for - usually team training or competing or a
student making their FJ - skydiving - but you wouldn't know about
that.
>------>Never
>could get a grip so you have to fly camera slot..
That's a load of crap, of course. Been on more formations, larger
than any you ever flailed past or never got near, than you have jumps,
period.
>.Desperate for
>medals so you take credit for other peoples intermediate gold medals
And that's a load of crap, too. I know reality doesn't square with
how you imagine things to be - imagination of a world full of
intellectually dishonest and imagined circumstances which encourages
you to dismiss the messenger because your ego can't take the message -
but no matter how often you gargle that lame canard, it won't change
the facts.
>tsk tsk tsk.....Bobs slot is not for you, he's doing solo's out of a
>friends Cessna.
What a coincidence - I also do solos out of a friend's Cessna - the
old Spaceland Cessna as a matter of fact, and almost all of those
solos are demo jumps. But you wouldn't know about those, either.
>oming on winter now and although the skydivers up
>ther jump in the snow, his buddy a pilot will probably want to put the
>door back on the Airplane-----Lucky for Bob he has
>another love beyond the jump.......HOT COFFEE & DONUTS-----All and
>all, my kind of guy---You on the other hand are not.
Oh, woe <sarcasm, dummy>, I'm not Jinnie's "kind of guy!" Whatever
will I do? What the hell, I still get to skydive with my friends -
sometimes even in student airspace. I know this is but a <sarcasm
dummy> shallow substitute for being what Jinnie considers his "kind of
guy" but it is the cross which one who holds slight regard, disdain,
and utter contempt for you and your lame, self-centered act tends to
carry.
...bsrp
...jlk
>On Oct 2, 10:25�pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> On Fri, 02 Oct 2009 18:00:01 -0700, Mike Spurgeon <m...@spurgeon.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >Jerry K. wrote:
>>
>> >> How many demo jumps you got, princess? �Assuming Bob has Pro Rating -
>> >> an easy assumption to make - you ever get one one like me and Bob did?
>>
>> >You know all about assuming, don't you?
>>
>> What gave you that idea, Mike? �Btw - I thought you weren't reading my
>> crap. �Since you are, again - welcome back.
>>
>> Blues Skies,
>>
>> Jerry
>
>You are assuming again young dummy, perhaps he's seeing quotes in
>other peoples post
No assumption at all, princess - clear in black and white. Mike has
replied directly to posts I have made and your "perhaps" is simply a
bad guess. Why don't you ask Mike, princess? In the meantime I can
easily link you to screenshots (or google for that matter) which
absolutely show Mike has directly responded to posts I have made,
words such that Mike is directly responding to my words in a post
which I posted. So, do you want to wager on your "perhaps?" Standard
stakes - case of beer and a bottle of Jack (feel free to suggest other
stakes which I will happily consider) that Mike has indeed been
reading my posts after announcing he would not be doing so - which I
could care less one way or the other except presently in terms of this
potential wager which I have no doubt you will back away from - you
won't admit it but you know I'm right - I expect you to refuse to take
the bet I am offering and that will be proof enough of that. Or, call
my bluff - if it is a bluff - and take me up on the bet, princess, and
we'll see what is "perhaps" and what is "perhaps" not. Dumbass.
>See what out of control ego can cause?
Absolutely - you floundering around in your own pools of watery shit,
for starters but that's nothing new, as well as another very telling
example of how you tend to embrace wild fantasy and imagination
stretched beyond recognition in terms of believability, in the face of
rock solid reality. And soon, "perhaps" we'll have a demonstration of
how you are all talk and no walk while refusing to put your money
where your mouth is.
>Starting with assuming to
>much.
And if you take the bet, princess, the outcome will demonstrate that
it is you assuming too much. Pure and simple. You clearly don't know
- because what you contend does not square a bit with the truth - and
thus is simply erroneous assunmption on your part - the question of
whether Mike replied directly to a post I had made when I commented
that I thought he wasn't reading my posts based on his words in the
past which stated he would not be reading them, or not. But I know
because the reality is clear as day (and for anyone who isn't an idiot
----> NOT YOU) and I am so sure that you are wrong and that you,
yourself, are merely guessing in this regard, that I am willing to bet
over it - or bluff you back onto your high heels. So, what's it gonna
be, princess? You gonna take the bet and call my bluff and gamble on
winning the bet and validating your guess as well as demonstrating
that this is nothing but a baseless bluff on my part or if I'm not
bluffing, gambling against how it might be revealed (again) just how
lost, unable to keep track, and grasping at any straw - or in this
case, chaff, you can imagine towards your vain hopes of knocking down
one who with great efficacy detracts your lines of crap every time you
get shit wrong ------> which is often <------- a peg or two?
>...The world does not revolve around you
>girly boy
Nor you, contrary to your pathetic lies about yourself and pretenses
and posings, princess, but in this case, the question you have whether
Mike did or did not respond directly to a post I have recently made
and therefore did or did not read the post I had made, revolves
specifically around a post I made and which Mike did indeed read. Do
you think that when I commented to Mike that I thiought he wasn't
reading my posts anymore based on earlier statements of his and if he
actually had not been reading my posts he would have neglected to
inform me that he was not reading my posts? Give Mike some credit,
princess, and if you can't do that, take up the bet - or just go on
being a ball-less wonder - makes no difference to me.
boot boot boot boot boot - all talk and no walk -------> log it.
...bsrp
...jlk
>On Oct 2, 8:00�pm, Mike Spurgeon <m...@spurgeon.net> wrote:
>> Jerry K. wrote:
>> > How many demo jumps you got, princess? �
>>
>> You know all about assuming, don't you?
>
>I'll answer that, liked to show my ass on every jump
Such is life going low all the time - comes with the territory, eh
princess?
>---So I guess
>every one after getting off student status was a demo.
Just what you were demonstrating is the question here.
>My finest was a 800 ft. opening at Lake Anuach Texas....When that
>canopy cracked even the S&TA was in awe.
Did he cheer and ask you to do it again?
>The
>next best was the one that made Christy cry
Did she applaud and encourage you to keep at it? Oh, wait - that
"demo" resulted in such audience acclimation<sarcasm dummy> as members
of the audience searching the dz for the "demo" jumper as said "demo"
jumper hid in a tree and later got the hell off the property.
>....Guess I was more a
>stunt jumper than a demo jumper
Shit, princess - you can call it what you will for all it matters -
dangerous idiot is the name that stuck with the stunts you tried to
pull.
>but it worked
>for me..
And, umm - how long did it work for you?
>...That little corner of the brain that produces fear was
>damaged in S.E. Asia for me so I had to push harder
>to get a adrenalin pump in a sport even Grandma's can do-
Which begs the question why you were even in - at least for a short
time - such a pedestrian sport in the first place?
>---I dunno
>why you city geeks get so big headed about
>such a mundane sport-
If you have to ask (what jazz is) you'll never know.
-Louis Armstrong
>---The equipment failure was solved by prior
>generations..
That's a load of crap. Equipment failure, while rare, still occurs
and Rust never sleeps.
-Neil Young
>..No PT involved,
You've never been to the USPA Nationals or indeed, even seen the
beginning of a simple day of training, have you?
>nobody shooting at you..
And this isn't a good thing?
>..All this and you want to get payed for taking pictures?
Damn straight - and not just want to get paid - do get paid.
>What a
>crock of shit..
Whatcha gonna do about it, princess? Stamp your little feet some
more?
>...Homely T.J. whores set around the clubs in Mexico
>and offer to take your picture with the better looking girls at the
>table, they offer blow jobs on slow nights.
It's clear you didn't choose the clubs you went to in Mexico by any
sort of aesthetic beyond desperation.
>That what you do around the DZ punk?
You'll never know, will you, boot? You don't go to dropzones so it
will just have to remain a question which you'll have to answer for
yourself. But then, it is telling that, right on schedule, your
stupid meanderings have predictably lead to ruminating on fellating
guys you've never met on the usenet. You're just ill equipped, is all
abd boy, you sure do have issues.
>heh heh and you don't know up
>from down either..
Actually, I do. You gonna say again how the West Park exit off of 59,
West Park and Fondren, and Fondren and Westheimer are, as you said,
"all inside the loop 610?" It's not like maps of that area are hard
to find or link to, princess.
>.I hope your folks leave you some money kid cause
>you can't drive a cab due to confusion on where the loop 610 is
Oh, I know exactly where 610 is, what streets cross it, and other
streets - like Fondren - which don't. You are the one who was
confused in this circumstance, princess, and the more you resist this
fact, the more pathetic it gets - but feel free to keep it up and I'll
be certainly happy to rub your face in it some more and for as long as
you can take the abuse.
>nd
>you're short on viable DZ talent. Better get out there and show the
>DZO you can mow grass or something
Naw, as ever I'll just continue to skydive with my friends, skydive in
student airspace, skydive on formations you never have - and never
will - and all in all just continue to have a great deal of wonderful
fun at it. Life is good.
...bsrp
...jlk
Gee, I bothering princess jinnie, yet?
>Mike did it the hard way, I guess the USMC was the only part of the
>Navy he could get into heh heh. You took the easiest job in the sport,
>can't teach, can't rig-----can't do shit but nickle and dime
>Novices----
Clutch hard to the reaffirming fantasy, Jinnie. You don't know shit
about anything - least of all skydiving or me - but don't let that
stop you from clutching to those imagined items of your own creation
of how things must be - just so you can dismiss the messenger, as the
message is too rough for you to handle.
>You artta cut the DZ grass or clean toilets. SOMETHING
Who says I don't? You? You who has two skydives in 14 years and
doesn't even go to dropzones, much less even skydive? On that note,
you artta pull your head out of your ass.
>useful around the DZ to atone for your short comings
Ah, Jinnie - without these "short comings" you imagine into being you
would have to face the facts that skydiving continues on, as fun as it
ever was, while you are relegated to the whuffo seats due to your own
failings and inabilities. No, you'd just have ot face the fact that
one who sees through your bogus act and your astounding
self-involvement and takes you to task for it - and which you have no
relevant answer for does indeed, unlike you, skydive with his friends
and has been doing so for way the fuck longer than you were ever
capable. Tough shit, junior. Guess you haven't been on any bigways,
have you, kid?
>and if that ain't
>bad enough, you're bad mouthing a Icon--A instructor, someone who has
>spent decades trying to improve the sport and the skill of its members
>and putting up with lip from smart ass's.
> ~punk~ sissy
>ass punk punkpunkpunk
Cut the crap - Tough shit to you, too, princess.
That drooling dog of yours ain't hunting, princess hypocrite.
Yo, princess dumbass, talikng about "bad mouthing a Icon--A
instructor, someone who has spent decades trying to improve the sport
and the skill of its members and putting up with lip from smart ass's"
- remember this?
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skydiving/msg/5cc71d9f8f440812
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:44:31 -0700, Mike Spurgeon <m...@spurgeon.net>
> wrote:
> >We're like the bar business, recession proof.
<<<and what you wrote in response, princess>>>
Nothing is ression proof punk
* * *
Of course you don't. Blow it out your ass, princess hypocrite. You
really are a moron, you know that, princess?
(Of course you don't.)
...bsrp
...jlk
Try three and a half years. Perhaps taking the canopy into account
would have been a smart idea since you apparently spotted enough to
determine whether it was good or not in your opinion. Just the same,
that good spot did put you ultimately into the runway.
>
>> Shit, I doubt you ever knew how to spot with dropping the ball like
>> that. �Skydiving can be an unforgiving sport if one doesn't think it
>> through, eh princess?
>>
>> ...bsrp
>> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Yeah it would have been better if we hadn't changed out canopy's, my
>Falcon cut into the wind pretty good and the toggle pressure was
>light.....Whats more important is both toggles would have been where I
>could reach them, that last one is iffy
>when you have a massive stroke and end up able to use only one side of
>your body the side that doesn't work anymore
>will fight the good side as it struggles so hanging harness in the
>loft to adjust the risers to the right length might not have done any
>good---
That's a load of crap. Hanging harness would have done a lot of good
in simply determining if you would be capable of reaching, unstowing,
and controlling, no matter the riser length in that regard.
>All I know is the door opened, Ethan went out and I
>followed..
Never once taking into consideration where you were at and the canopy
you would be flying.
>..No problems in free fall...I shook Ethans hand off about
>3500 ft....No problems throwing out----All that shits automatic from
>the old FJC and its training methods.
>Could only fly the Canopy with one toggle so I circled....It occurred
>to me that unable to flare their was going to be one hell of a wreck
>on the ground
And this had not occurred to you on the ground?
>so I was angling toward the hanger so my body would be
>easier to pick up, then I saw the peas
>right along side the runway----Being primarily a civil airport the
>damn pilots had parked their Cessna's all around it. I've landed
>harder before but my left leg hand been paralyzed nie on two years by
>then and it snapped like a twig as soon as I touched down----All in
>all it was worth it, had drop foot before that jump but after the
>surgeon plated the Tib and Fib back together with stainless steel
>plates , the slack was gone and I could walk without a AFO.
You forgot to mention the faceplant into the runway.
>Another up
>side was I didn't have to see you fleecing the novices around the
>South Texas DZ's because it effectively ended my jumping.
Actually, you are doomed to see that and nothing but that as you don't
go to dropzones and have no way to see what actually occurs and with
the fact that I regularly deconstruct your self-involved lines of crap
and you are so ill-equipped as to be without relevant response, all
you have left is very lame attempts at dismissing the message by
dismissing the messenger and name calling. Of course, since you did
have a stated goal of getting back to your "120 jumps/year" with that
jump, I'd say your jumping more or less ended before you boarded for
your final jump - for lack of thinking things through.
>2 years in a
>wheel chair for every jump? Not even I love the sport that much. I
>spent 18 months in the Oakland Army Hospital over 3/4 of them in a
>body cast....Had my share of down time but I wasn't going to be laid
>up just to jump-
Especially since to avoid being laid up would mean having the smarts
to think things through and effectively plan and prepare for what you
were doing. Skydiving isn't for everyone.
>---The USPA won't let you kill the bad guys so their
>was no incentive to jump.
Ah, <sarcasm, dummy> such an important motivator for skydiving -
killing people. State and Federal law actually prohibits that sort of
thing - at least not without a legal trial and sentence.
>...Keeping your ego problems in check is
>about all I have to do with the sport now days and thats enough
>excitement for this old man!
Laugh riot! It's come down to your conception of my ego is the
closest thing you have to skydiving. Heh - you are so fucking owned.
Shit too funny!
...bsrp
...jlk
>On Oct 3, 2:50?am, Mike Spurgeon <m...@spurgeon.net> wrote:
>> Jerry K. wrote:
>> > That Bob has a Pro Rating is an easy assumption to make given his
>> > experience, Mike,
>>
>> And you show your ignorance by making that statement.
>>
>> >> Spoken like a true uncomprehending idiot.
>>
>> > I took it at face value, Mike. ?You seem to assume that ?an inability
>> > to read minds - in this case yours - indicates idiocy.
>>
>> Making the statement you did about someone you know next to nothing
>> about indicates idiocy or ego. ?Take your pick.
>>
>> > ?That I assume
>> > Bob has a Pro Rating is clear - I said as much - and its based on my
>> > understanding that he is very experience, has significant longevity in
>> > the sport, and his past demonstration skydive accounts. ?If the
>> > assumption that Bob has a Pro Rating is in error, I'll be quite happy
>> > to stand corrected.
>>
>> I've assumed nothing, I've never asked him if he did or didn't, but I'm
>> sufficiently amused by your assumption that I'll put my money where your
>> mouth/assumptions are, and bet you $100 that he doesn't.
>>
>> >>> ?Btw - I thought you weren't reading my
>> >>> crap. ?Since you are, again - welcome back.
>> >> There were a few days there when things were a bit more like old times,
>> >> but you had to go fucking it all up. ?
>>
>> > If you wish to blame me for what you read, Mike, have a party.
>>
>> Sorry dipshit, but I'm blaming you for what you write, ie. your stupid
>> vendetta
>>
>> > I
>> > don't buy it but if that works for you, so be it. ?That said. it's
>> > your problem, Mike. ?Not mine. So, tough shit. ?You want to blame some
>> > fly in your ointment of elysium on someone who posts to a public forum
>> > whenever and whatever he wants - as you've said in the past is the way
>> > it should be - that's your problem.
>>
>> It is, and always should be so it's not exactly a problem.
>>
>> > ?Like I've recommended in the
>> > past, Mike, when you come across my posts - it's not like they're
>> > covert or anything - simply close your eyes if you can't keep from
>> > opening those posts. ?Or killfile if the temptation is too much for
>> > your brain to engage your eyelids shut. Or simply ?take a deep breath
>> > and stick your head into a bucket of sand.
>>
>> I'll do none of the above, but expect the occasional missive calling
>> stupid stupid, ignorance ignorance, and vendettas vendettas.
>>
>> > It's no skin off my ass,
>> > Mike, either way but it sure seems to be chapping yours when the
>> > princess gets shit wrong - and he did - and then gets corrected - and
>> > he does - and then the predictable back and forth commences.
>>
>> So tell us dipshit, who all of the recent posters told him he got
>> something wrong?
>>
>> And then did it over and over...
>>
>> Do you see the point?
>>
>> > ?It's not
>> > like you're without solutions, Mike. ?Surely that threaded newsreader
>> > of yours can render things back to a bit more like old times without
>> > some other skydiver fucking it all up. ?Ya think?
>>
>> Let's see - Tony overstated/misstated his case, several old timers
>> commented, it seemed pretty well resolved, and everyone seemed to accept
>> it all, and you can do nothing beyond trying to be clever in response to
>> someone that's jerking your chain.
>>
>> Over and over...
>>
>> >> Mindless vendettas are like that...
>>
>> > That's a load of crap, Mike. ?This is containment, nothing more.
>>
>> Yeah, in your mind dipshit, and it sure has worked!!!
>
>
>Slow down and take a breathe Mike, you are starting to sound like
>THEM!
I agree entirely.
Bravo Zulu.
Blue Skies,
Jerry
>rooster wrote:
I thought you always sounded like you. My mistake.
Blue Skies,
Jerry
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skydiving/msg/5cc71d9f8f440812
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:44:31 -0700, Mike Spurgeon <m...@spurgeon.net>
> wrote:
> >We're like the bar business, recession proof.
<<<and what you wrote in response, Jinnie>>>
Nothing is ression proof punk
* * *
Who's the young dummy and who is the punk in the above exchange?
...bsrp
...jlk
Boot boot boot boot boot. I can cite examples, all indicative of the
label, boot.
>Carried too many 4 year hash marks on my sleeve. Mater
>of fact, if I had shipped over one more time and made a career out of
>being a racist, liar, poser and hypocrite I would have been eligible
>to wear a gold crow with gold hash marks, if the Provost Marshal
>didn't catch up with me & I didn't pull brig time before then that is.
Yeah, and if monkeys flew out of your ass you'd have some like minded
company. And you'd still be the boot.
>You are a wussy Ass slacker who chose to stay home with the women and
>children when your country called----Ya got no right to use USN or
>USMC slang kid.
I can use whatever slang I wish, boot. Now, if the situation were
reversed, this is the point where you'd be keening over freedom of
speech or some such, but the reality is, you playing the service card
is just another stupid, unproven, and beside the point canard
indicative of a boot who couldn't argue his way out of a wet paper
bag.
<princess' one time in bandcamp story snipped>
.----Scary huh?
Not at all but very banal, I'll give youi that.
...bsrp
...jlk
> Those stakes are too rich for my interest. But, I am none the less
> curious, and will take the bet if you agree to lowering the stakes to
> the neighborhood of a lift ticket or a case of beer if you prefer -
> call it $20. If he doesn't I will be surprised given his demo
> experience which he has related in here and, of course, his long time
> in skydiving. If you agree to the stakes I propose then I will accept
> the wager and readily accept clarification from Bob, at his word, at
> face value, and as the final word in terms of the wager.
$20 it is. Money is preferred. Then I can get a lift ticket AND a beer
or two.
>>>>>>>>Snipped for brevity! 13 replies in a row Wow a one
girl thread<<<<<<<<
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
~Hit a nerve while drilling kid?~
Odds are the kid is a Welcher, he's already proved to be a two bit
four flusher trying to cop credit for a prior team mates intermediate
gold RW medals
>
> >..No PT involved,
>
> You've never been to the USPA Nationals
Yes but it was USPA style & accuracy Nationals, it was also the first
year CRW events were combined with those first two
> or indeed, even seen the
> beginning of a simple day of training, have you?
>
Oh yeah, saw that.....Deguello and several 4 way teams trained at my
home DZ's----That was when Deguello was a 20-way. Larry used to show
up for 4-way pratice looking half dead heh.
>
>
> >...Homely T.J. whores set around the clubs in Mexico
> >and offer to take your picture with the better looking girls at the
> >table, they offer blow jobs on slow nights.
>
> It's clear you didn't choose the clubs you went to in Mexico by any
> sort of aesthetic beyond desperation.
>
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk
Same TJ Bars and Whore Houses Sailors and Marines had been going to
since before WWII on a 24/48 or 72 hour pass.
You fucked around and got threw in jail down there, you needed more
than a 48 thats for sure cause the Shore Patrol
only swept through picking up the weekend dregs once a week. Unless a
major warship couldn't get underway because
too many key crew members were cooling their heels in the Tijuana
jail. Same with the Marines, no sense for the Amphibious squadron
lighting off their boilers if half the FMF was locked up in Mexico.
Ahhhh, those were the days. ;)
>On Oct 6, 1:06�am, Mike Spurgeon <m...@spurgeon.net> wrote:
>> Jerry K. wrote:
>> > Those stakes are too rich for my interest. �But, I am none the less
>> > curious, and will take the bet if you agree to lowering the stakes to
>> > the neighborhood of a lift ticket or a case of beer if you prefer -
>> > call it $20. �If he doesn't I will be surprised �given his demo
>> > experience which he has related in here and, of course, his long time
>> > in skydiving. �If you agree to the stakes I propose then I will accept
>> > the wager and readily accept clarification from Bob, at his word, at
>> > face value, and as the final word in terms of the wager.
>>
>> $20 it is. �Money is preferred. �Then I can get a lift ticket AND a beer
>> or two.
>
>Odds are the kid is a Welcher,
Want to bet? You gonna man up and bet the courage of your
convictions? Of course not. You're all talk and no walk
> he's already proved to be a two bit
>four flusher trying to cop credit for a prior team mates intermediate
>gold RW medals
That's a load of crap. The facts don't change just because you have
limited yourself to a pathetic and well worn canard. Lowtimers aren't
pemitted at the table, princess - the kiddie pool is outside.
...bsrp
...jlk
>Jerry K. wrote:
Fair enough - if Bob has a Pro Rating I will communicate how best to
pay off the bet and if he does not have a Pro Rating, I leave it to
you to tell me how best to get your winnings to you and again, just so
there is no ambiguity here, I accept the wager and readily accept
clarification from Bob, at his word, at face value, and as the final
word in terms of this wager.
Blue Skies,
Jerry
>On Oct 5, 11:58�pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 00:31:17 -0700 (PDT), the unknown flailer
>
>>
>> >..No PT involved,
>>
>> You've never been to the USPA Nationals
>
>Yes but it was USPA style & accuracy Nationals, it was also the first
>year CRW events were combined with those first two
Was there PT involved?
>
>> or indeed, even seen the
>> beginning of a simple day of training, have you?
>>
>Oh yeah, saw that.....Deguello and several 4 way teams trained at my
>home DZ's----That was when Deguello was a 20-way. Larry used to show
>up for 4-way pratice looking half dead heh.
Was there PT involved?
>> >...Homely T.J. whores set around the clubs in Mexico
>> >and offer to take your picture with the better looking girls at the
>> >table, they offer blow jobs on slow nights.
>>
>> It's clear you didn't choose the clubs you went to in Mexico by any
>> sort of aesthetic beyond desperation.
>>
>> ...bsrp
>> ...jlk
>
>Same TJ Bars and Whore Houses Sailors and Marines had been going to
>since before WWII on a 24/48 or 72 hour pass.
>You fucked around and got threw in jail down there, you needed more
>than a 48 thats for sure cause the Shore Patrol
>only swept through picking up the weekend dregs once a week. Unless a
>major warship couldn't get underway because
>too many key crew members were cooling their heels in the Tijuana
>jail. Same with the Marines, no sense for the Amphibious squadron
>lighting off their boilers if half the FMF was locked up in Mexico.
>Ahhhh, those were the days. ;)
Ah, the days when princess Jinnie, desperate for companionship, could
find it in Mexican bars on slow nights and if that didn't work out,
he'd could count on finding it in Mexican jails.
...bsrp
...jlk
Just send $20 to me at the Parachute Center, 23597 N. Hwy 99, Acampo CA
95220...
But you read every bit of it BTW is it true you have a picture of me
on your bed room wall? One you downloaded from the Internet or perhaps
got from a 1990's cameraman? I was friends with most of them because
unlike you they went on to become TM/JM, Riggers and such-----If not
giving back to the sport then improving it over the years. You know
you love the Manly Man attention you little sissy------>You beg for
it, even jump up and down like a trained monkey for it! 0~;-*
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
No, it was the first time anyone had flown formation with her while
she was under canopy and the other jumper was still in free fall t r a
c k i n g. She was both afraid and pissed I'm thinking, Shit she cried
so hard snot ran out her nose. Hell even after I threw out in the
middle of them, you think they tried to close up and crew? HELL
NO....Those chicks scattered like a covey of Quail------Party poops
and tattle tales, the whole bunch of them- they ran to Mad Dog who was
S&TA at the time and told her right away. I went into Escape and
Evasion mode and poof disappeared into the twilight.
It was getting late anyway, lucky for me.....the shadows and twilight
allowed me to stand just outside of the old SPX hanger and watch all
the dancing around and arm waving before I absconded like the sly old
fox I am. 0~;)
No, just some queer stretching exercises-----Damnedest thing you ever
saw a crowd of city people in Spandex up against the hanger stretching
like ballerina's, some did it, some didn't----Gay boy and new age shit
if I ever saw it....man I just howled---funny as hell. ;)
No problem - I'll email you an address if it turns out Bob does have a
Pro Rating.
Blue Skies,
Jerry
And this was a demo you planned and discussed with all the
participants?
>She was both afraid and pissed I'm thinking, Shit she cried
>so hard snot ran out her nose. Hell even after I threw out in the
>middle of them, you think they tried to close up and crew? HELL
>NO....Those chicks scattered like a covey of Quail------Party poops
>and tattle tales, the whole bunch of them- they ran to Mad Dog who was
>S&TA at the time and told her right away.
Yep - responsible for overall safety on the dropzone and training the
dangerous idiots to refrain from their dangerous idiocy or get their
ass kicked. Was that part of the demo as well?
> I went into Escape and
>Evasion mode and poof disappeared into the twilight.
You hid in a tree and later retreated to the parking lot where you
could retreat more quickly and completely. All part of the plan prior
to the jump, princess? This was how you'd conclude the demo?
>It was getting late anyway, lucky for me.....the shadows and twilight
>allowed me to stand just outside of the old SPX hanger and watch all
>the dancing around and arm waving before I absconded like the sly old
>fox I am.
"I saw them crying to Mad Dog who was S&TA at the time and snuck off
the drop zone, just threw my rig into my car unpacked and cut out---"
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.skydiving/msg/b876d5bb5dd7b82b
* * *
You didn't even stay to pack? Much less stay to defend your position
- it was a "demo," after all, right?
Coward.
Nor did you stay to take your due lumps.
Such is a telling habit of the dangerous idiot.
You describe an event illustrating dangerous idiocy as a "demo" jump.
No, if it was planned at all it was simply a not well thought out
stunt, but it wasn't planned in the slightest - true to form it was
simply you making it up as you went along as you got in over your
head. You never did the jumps, much less honed the skills to jump
into demos.
Plus, you were never asked (as if - ha!).
Shit, you never even jumped at the Balunar Liftoff at Nasa and almost
anyone can get on that demo.
"every one after getting off student status was a demo"
And how many jumps was that when you got off student status?
So, here you are now - reduced to pretending ALL your jumps off
student status were "demo" jumps. Keep on dreaming, princess.
...bsrp
...jlk
>On Oct 5, 11:57�pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 20:47:55 -0700 (PDT), the unknown flailer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
>> >On Oct 5, 8:19�pm, peanut4040 <peanut4...@aol.com> wrote:
>> >> On Sep 30, 11:40 pm, the unknown flailer <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> >The Yankees don't know what to make out of this mess, they must all
>> >think we are crazy. Jerry jumped all over poor M.S.
>> >for having a opinion.
>>
>> "Poor M.S.?" �That's a good one. <sarcasm, dummy> Behold, it's
>> princess misrepresentation!" �Naw, telling someone tough shit for
>> wanting something they can't change ain't "jumping all over" anyone or
>> anything. �As if crying for "blood" over Tony's opinion ain't jumping
>> "all over?" �Hypocrite.
>>
>> >Even gave him back his own advice on how to deal
>> >with shit you don't want to read. That blaming your own crimes on
>> >other people and stealing credit for other peoples idea's and even
>> >medals is so childish-
>>
>> So's misrepresentation, princess. �When have I said I "don't want to
>> read" your line of crap? �About as much as I've said I wanted to read
>> it - �that is - zero, one way or the other. �
>
>But you read every bit of it
Because I read fiction doesn't mean it's true or even relevant. But
if you are now so reduced to gleaning whatever affirmation you can
glean by the idea that I read what you spew in this backwater of the
usenet, have a party.
>BTW is it true you have a picture of me
>on your bed room wall?
That is not true - as much as you wish it were.
>One you downloaded from the Internet or perhaps
>got from a 1990's cameraman?
Or several I saw on your vanity site.
>I was friends with most of them because
>unlike you they went on to become TM/JM, Riggers and such-
Bordelon? Weazl? Carpenter?
>----If not
>giving back to the sport then improving it over the years. You know
>you love the Manly Man attention you little sissy------>You beg for
>it, even jump up and down like a trained monkey for it!
No, I simply post counters to your lame lines of crap. That these
counters are undeniable and by you, unanswerable in any relevant
sense, you are simply describing it as "jumping up and down" - a
construct in your own head constructed to dismiss the message by
dismissing the messenger. It's a dirty job but corralling your dumb
ass beats the alternative. And make no mistake - your "philosophy"
reaches less and less as time goes by. Hello, oblvion!
...bsrp
...jlk
Like I said, you've never been to the USPA Nationals, much less
competed in RW in the USPA Nationals. If you had (and didn't have
your head stuck up your ass) you would have seen PT. You ever gonna
go to the USPA RW Nationals, princess? See what it's like? Dumb
question - of course not. Experiencing what is real is antithetical
to what you've already predetermined as just what must be.
...bsrp
...jlk
> >> >> Jerry K. wrote:
>
> * * *
>
> You didn't even stay to pack? Much less stay to defend your position
> - it was a "demo," after all, right?
>
Nope, though I often did----Then tore it down and repacked when I
arrived the next weekend----The rigs traveled better packed
> Coward.
>
or smart
> Nor did you stay to take your due lumps.
>
Mad Dog chewed the other three guys on that 4 way out because I had
under 75 jumps at the time and was expected to be wild----They got a
chewing for not talking me out of it---Christi walked around scowling
for a few weeks but soon forgot
why she was so pissed to start with----If I had of stayed and fessed
up I believe those 4 chicks might have scratched me up that night----
See thats how you deal with women when their pissed young fellow, lay
low for a while....Don't stand there and argue with them like a idiot
> Such is a telling habit of the dangerous idiot.
You sure sound politically correct and girlfriend, you wear silk
pantys kid?
>
> You describe an event illustrating dangerous idiocy as a "demo" jump.
> No, if it was planned at all it was simply a not well thought out
> stunt, but it wasn't planned in the slightest - true to form it was
> simply you making it up as you went along as you got in over your
> head. You never did the jumps, much less honed the skills to jump
> into demos.
>
> Plus, you were never asked (as if - ha!).
I dunno why you are so upset about that jump, it was over 20 years
ago---Oh yeah probably because you don't have the timing and
understanding of angles or coordination to pull it off....All you know
how to do is lurk and take pictures
>
> Shit, you never even jumped at the Balunar Liftoff at Nasa and almost
> anyone can get on that demo.
>
They hadn't been around that long so I only went to one and was in a
wheel chair at the time, it was the year Tony did a back flip off one
of them golf carts hitching a ride.
> "every one after getting off student status was a demo"
>
> And how many jumps was that when you got off student status?
>
Don't remember, had to be at least 28 but the A, B, C & D came right
on the number
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk<---------------with the big female side heh heh
>On Oct 6, 5:06�pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 13:54:30 -0700 (PDT), the unknown flailer
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
>> >On Oct 5, 11:58�pm, Jerry K. <sky...@pdq.net> wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 3 Oct 2009 00:31:17 -0700 (PDT), the unknown flailer
>>
>> >> <thuy...@iwon.com> wrote:
>
>> >> >> Jerry K. wrote:
>
>>
>> * * *
>>
>> You didn't even stay to pack? �Much less stay to defend your position
>> - it was a "demo," after all, right?
>>
>Nope, though I often did----Then tore it down and repacked when I
>arrived the next weekend----The rigs traveled better packed
It's clear that an immediate and hasty retreat was all you had in you.
>
>> Coward.
>>
>
>or smart
Smart would have not permitted you to get yourself into that
circumstance in the first place. So, smart's out.
But then, you've described that jump as a "demo." And if what you did
wasn't a problem at all, why didn't you stay and stick up for your
actions? Because you are a coward.
>> Nor did you stay to take your due lumps.
>>
>
>Mad Dog chewed the other three guys on that 4 way out because I had
>under 75 jumps at the time and was expected to be wild--
And again - nor did you stay to take your due lumps.
>--They got a
>chewing for not talking me out of it---Christi walked around scowling
>for a few weeks but soon forgot
>why she was so pissed to start with----If I had of stayed and fessed
>up I believe those 4 chicks might have scratched me up that night----
Fessing up, nothing - it was obvious who the dangerous idiot was, but
when it came to taking the lumps that were due for dangerous idiocy,
"snuck off the drop zone, just threw my rig into my car unpacked and
cut out"
You buggered off into the night.
>See thats how you deal with women when their pissed young fellow, lay
>low for a while....Don't stand there and argue with them like a idiot
It was already confirmed at the time (reconfirmed on an almost daily
basis), that you already are "a idiot." Just the same, how skydiving
deals with idiots allows for buggering off into the night for only a
while. As you have illustrated.
>
>> Such is a telling habit of the dangerous idiot.
>
>
>You sure sound politically correct
You didn't even stay to pack. Much less stay to defend your position
on that "demo."
How it might "sound" makes you no less a coward.
Nor did you stay to take your due lumps.
and your habit is no less telling of the dangerous idiot.
>and girlfriend, you wear silk
>pantys kid?
I leave such fashion statements to navy riflemen and the gunny's whose
bunks they know so well.
>
>>
>> You describe an event illustrating dangerous idiocy as a "demo" jump.
>> No, if it was planned at all it was simply a not well thought out
>> stunt, but it wasn't planned in the slightest - true to form it was
>> simply you making it up as you went along as you got in over your
>> head. �You never did the jumps, much less honed the skills to jump
>> into demos.
>>
>> Plus, you were never asked (as if - ha!). �
>
>I dunno why you are so upset about that jump,
Not upset at all - you brought it up - not me - as an example of one
of your "demo" jumps. I've just been shining the light on it, and
you, and exposing the warts in your little self-proclaimed "demo" and
you with your head up your ass.
>it was over 20 years
>ago-
That's a load of crap since over 20 years ago was years before you
ever skydived. When you start skydiving again, princess?
>--Oh yeah probably because you don't have the timing and
>understanding of angles or coordination to pull it off..
It wasn't by any grasp of timing or geometry which kept bad from
getting catastrophically worse, but just plain, dumb luck. I suppose
you explained to Madolyn your grasp of "timing and understanding of
angles or coordination" which kept anyone from getting killed or
explained this bullshit take to Christy? No, you buggered off into
the night. As for me, I'm not interested in trying - not that you
were trying, mind you, as out of control and unaware and in over your
head as you were - I know better than to blow off a formation I'm on
and dive for the one out ahead, only to fall into the midst of them
after they've opened.
>..All you know
>how to do is lurk and take pictures
That's a load of crap, princess - just another of your blinkered
prejudices getting the better of you because the reality is too bitter
for you to handle. Guess you haven't been on any bigways, have you,
kid?
>>
>> Shit, you never even jumped at the Balunar Liftoff at Nasa and almost
>> anyone can get on that demo.
>>
>They hadn't been around that long so I only went to one and was in a
>wheel chair at the time,
Skydiving has been a part of the Balunar Liftoff since 1994. "Demo"
skydiver as you describe yourself, why weren't you jumping on those
demos in 1994 and 1995? Was it because lowtimers don't get asked to
do demos? Or just you were never asked?
> it was the year Tony did a back flip off one
>of them golf carts hitching a ride.
I was at Balunar that year. Taking grips. Great fun!
>
>> "every one after getting off student status was a demo"
>>
>> And how many jumps was that when you got off student status?
>>
>Don't remember, had to be at least 28 but the A, B, C & D came right
>on the number
So, you were still on student status when you got your A license and
more than halfway to your B by the time you got off student status?
How many jumps you have to repeat?
>> ...bsrp
>> ...jlk<---------------with the big female side heh heh
Typify it anyway you want to serve your need for dismissing the
message by slurring the messenger, loser, it won't change what a
pathetic piece of work you really are, nor will it change your short
number of skydives into "demo" jumps.
...bsrp
...jlk
No that sissy shit yawl call PT is stretching or prancing around at
the best and no gym work on machines in a air conditioned
building....A light PT would be push ups, old fashioned set ups,
jumping jacks, deep knee bends and some touching of the toes with hand
weights all out in the sun and heat...At least enough weight to
simulate a 13 pound rifle all topped off by a 5 mile cross country
run---No road shit, rough terrain only, that should warm you up and
even build some strength in those twiggy arms & legs...Can't let the
weights touch the ground either....If you do double the PT part. Shit
no wonder yawl slap fight like little women or stand 15 foot apart
and scream at each other tsk tsk tsk possssssy boys ;-*
Well he was thinking like a punk, nothing is guaranteed in life...A
deep recession means less money to spend on trying out new sports or
taking thrill rides----All I can write it off to is being exposed to
too too much girly boy thinking like yours.
A depression? Well forget that...I was born at the end of the last
great depression but raised by folks who went through it,
Believe me you have a different view when it gets down to your skills
mean nothing because theirs no market for them.
White collar workers and skilled tradesmen out there picking fruit or
cotton for pennies and glad to get a days work or a meal. Mike should
be old enough for Social Security or to get something from the VA if
he hasn't been paying into SS, a small pension perhaps. I'm not to
worried about him, its the attitude that set me on edge....He should
know better. Damn
> >> ...bsrp
> >> ...jlk<---------------with the big female side heh heh
>
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk<----------Likes the big wussy title <grin>
>>> On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 17:44:31 -0700, Mike Spurgeon <m...@spurgeon.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>> We're like the bar business, recession proof.
>> Nothing is ression proof punk
Jerry K:
>> Who's the young dummy and who is the punk in the above exchange?
>I'm not to
> worried about him, its the attitude that set me on edge....He should
> know better. Damn
I said 'like the bar business, we're recession proof'.
Ie., we had a record year because of how Bill sets his prices, $15 to
13000, $100 tandems to the same altitude.
The rest of the world can be in recession, but the Parachute Center isn't...
Which makes you the young dummy - LOL! This of course calls for
Descartes, and that is a remarkable crawfish you got going on there,
princess. As you skitter about the floor, do try to wrap your pointy,
little head around "Cogito ergo sum."
Btw, you do realize you're "bad mouthing a Icon--A instructor, someone
who has spent decades trying to improve the sport and the skill of its
members and putting up with lip from smart ass's." Appalling.
"Thinking like a punk," indeed. Laugh fucking riot!
>nothing is guaranteed in life...A
>deep recession means less money to spend on trying out new sports or
>taking thrill rides--
In other words, the sport might become less mainstream then it was
during the short period you skydived. Oh, woe! <sarcasm, dummy>
>--All I can write it off to is being exposed to
>too too much girly boy thinking like yours.
Ah, yes - the recession, you say, is due to too much thinking "like
(mine)." Don't forget New Coke, princess - that was me, too!
>A depression? Well forget that...I was born at the end of the last
>great depression but raised by folks who went through it,
>Believe me you have a different view when it gets down to your skills
>mean nothing because theirs no market for them.
Unless you work in skydving or bar business which, as Mike said, is
recession proof. I've worked in both during recessions - Mike is
right.
>White collar workers and skilled tradesmen out there picking fruit or
>cotton for pennies and glad to get a days work or a meal. Mike should
>be old enough for Social Security or to get something from the VA if
>he hasn't been paying into SS, a small pension perhaps. I'm not to
>worried about him, its the attitude that set me on edge....He should
>know better. Damn
Sounds like you're disappointed in Mike, princess. Tough shit. Maybe
you'd feel better if "blood was spilled" because he expressed (a well
informed) opinion which you didn't like.
Of course, the reality is you were just confused at the time and
thought you were responding to someone else but it has been fuin
watching you choose between "bad mouthing a Icon" and admitting your
obvious confusion.
Behold as princess Jinnie throws Mike under the proverbial bus! Shit
too damn funny!!!
...bsrp
...jlk
You've never been to the USPA RW Nationals, have you?
>..At least enough weight to
>simulate a 13 pound rifle all topped off by a 5 mile cross country
>run---No road shit, rough terrain only, that should warm you up and
>even build some strength in those twiggy arms & legs...
Physical training is physical training and just because one program
desgned for shaping soldiers is applicable towards that purpose does
not mean it is applicable towards other purposes, nor does PT
applicable for other purposes not remain PT because it isn't the PT
you envision it MUST be. In other words, you're letting your
prejudices blinker yourself - again - and you've never been to the
USPA RW Nationals, have you?
>Can't let the
>weights touch the ground either....If you do double the PT part. Shit
>no wonder yawl slap fight like little women or stand 15 foot apart
>and scream at each other tsk tsk tsk possssssy boys
Is this what you saw at dropznes up up until 14 years ago and perhaps
on one occasion when you skydived once in 1999, princess? Even if
you had in that 14 year stretch, I highly doubt that this stupid and
intellectually dishonest characterization you've produced is not the
exception to the rule. In that time I've seen fist fights, side arms
and shot guns being pulled (no firing, fortunately) usually between
drunken dipsticks who were good skydving folk when they sobered up and
caught there snap. But this stupid idea you have that the fighting at
dropzones is a "slap fight like little women or stand 15 foot apart
and scream at each other" is really nothing more than a platform for
you to gurgle, "possssssy boys" which is really all you got. Just
call names.
"They are all <bad name> because they do all these things I never saw
but imagined I saw and since imagination is not really much different
from what is real in my book, they are all <bad name>."
The reality is, there are people who do PT at the USPA RW Nationals
but you wouldn't know that, never having been so, as ever, you're
talking another load of crap.
You going to the USPA RW Nationals, princess?
...bsrp
...jlk
Try 16 years ago, 1993 - you admitted this some time ago.
>...Either jump is one you would have
>had the balls to try....Mr. play it safe and get the money.
What, static line? I've done it. Jumped after physical illness?
Never had to but know that if I planned to, I'd actually plan it -
unlike you.
>You asked
>me in a earlier post "Whats the sense of being shot at under canopy?"
Now you're just imagining things and worse, putting quotes around
something I never asked and saying I asked it. I mean, I did say upon
your suggetion that in skydiving no one is being shot at - as if that
were lamentable - that you sounded as if this wasn't a good thing.
>I tell you kid, you will never feel more alive than when people are
>trying to kill you.
Just being alive enough to skydive is not enough for you, it seems.
>Skydiving is a poor second best....All I'm saying
>is add some excitement to it----combine the two and you really have
>something going-
There you have it. Because skydiving lacks attempted homicide as an
integral part, it is to be dismissed. You can keep your little death
cult, pincess kali, skydivers and skydiving do just fine without the
added excietment of fellow skydivers spicing things up with murder.
Sheesh!
>--Grow a pair of balls kid. Might help the DZ's bottom
>line out to have skeet shooting and skydiving
>go off at the same time--
Well, princess kali, why don't you introduce this remarkable plan to
dropzones, USPA and non alike? What's that? It's a dumb idea to put
it mildly? And you're incapable of actually implementiong your stupid
fantasies? All talk and no walk? About the size of it.
>--The USPA could call it, "make the jumper
>drop the clay target or become one heh heh.
No, the USPA (once the laughter settled down) would call it a really
stupid idea.
>Its them silk panties sonny,
The mind boggles that your panty preference has instilled in you the
realization that skydiving would be better off if homicide were
implemented to make things more interesting.
>you need to try wearing some mens under ware
>for a change.
Leave it to Jinnie to ultimately wind his way from introducing
homicide into skydiving to considering men's underware fashion tips.
Maybe you should write Cosmopolitan.
...bsrp
...jlk
No need to be afraid, I'd set it up so no one could kill my pet
monkey, rat shot or salt rock perhaps, just enough to make it worth
while for the shooter hearing that occasional yowl...."I'll be damn
Mildred, I got me another one. Pass me a cold beer and lets
celebrate!"....Lord no, I've had to much amusement needling you over
the years, take to long to find another monkey to train and you would
have something to do in the sport besides shoot video...You think a
DZO is going to ask a high dollar income asset like a target to cut
grass....Hell no, he will probably be out there potting away at you
himself.
$50 sez I can shoot that boys bootee's off heh heh, and besides that
used gear would start moving because who wants to get shot in their
fancy pants gear?, Moving used gear would make the riggers and people
trying to sell happy.
Brilliant its a win win situation---->You could see that if you
weren't a target, I think 22 rifle with rat shot would make it
sporting and no shooting them in the ass while their gathering their
canopy's in after landing---No, TM/JM, Riggers or SOS members can be
targeted-----Just smart ass fancy pants jumpers. Ohhhhhhh yeah, the
USPA needs to develop
a X-skydiver of the year award so they can give it to me for this
outstanding idea----They could sell the shooters USPA
hunting licenses Damn.....DZO's, BOD, Gear Dealers, shooters all happy
and you want to be a party poop? tsk tsk
before their time.....I'm talking late 80's early 90's course one of
them is dead "Art" Weazl wasn't shooting Video back then, he was just
a goofy ass low jump number kid over around Beaumont when I
retired.....I hear he's also a TM/JM now---That extra stint in the
Army must have motivated him----So you are being left behind in
qualifications by kids coming up behind you huh? Better think about
going with that moving target thing I've come up with. It will look
good in your rather bare USPA portfolio-----Not to mention you can
show the chicks your rat shot wounds. 0~;-*
>
> > it was the year Tony did a back flip off one
> >of them golf carts hitching a ride.
>
> I was at Balunar that year. Taking grips. Great fun!
>
>
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Your ego requires that, this is why I'm working so hard on the "Come
out to the DZ and shoot at targets on final!"
plans to bring more money into the USPA so the BOD could have a better
selection of donuts at their meetings.
A new award "Shot in the ass while flaring" would be yours....A medal
few other people would have or want.
This could cut down on your pathological drive to take credit for
other peoples RW medals. Come on, get
with the program boy.....How bad can rat shot hurt through a jump
suit? They say a fine line exists between
genius and madness, I may be on the razors edge with that because I
forgot the students. SPX used to put
students in funky orange jumpsuits to identify them...That won't work
with this plan though because AFF JM's
will need to be protected also and their ego's won't go for looking
frumpy or like a student. So it should be a special
dumb ass jump suit....Call it the Jerry K special---in your colors. We
can't have wuffo's up at the Nationals shooting
at 4-way teams so that event will have to be declared off limits to
hunters. How about that, your own award and clothing line----Is this
business plan for cutting edge DZ's looking better now? 0~;-*
BTW a question for Jerry.....Why would a guy doing it for free out in
Hooter ville Ohio need a pro rating? If 10 people
and 30 cows want to show up and watch....So what. Get that 20 bucks in
the mail to Mike right away Miss know it all. heh heh 0~;)P
Don't bother kid as usual you lost and drop it because he's indicated
someones already trying to shut him down over the Pilots escape rig
issue----Bob represents the roots of a once great sport before you
little girly boys flocked to it in a ego feeding frenzy and begin
requiring air conditioned packing areas, clean rest rooms and
comfortable aircraft-----Just send Mike his 20 bucks and leave this
issue be. Come back to the shoot skeet at the local DZ plan...Stick
with me kid I'll make you the Paris Hilton of the sport. This is
progress-----You are already a slut be on the cutting edge of new
events. ;-*
>
> ...bsrp
> ...jlk- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
Back further unknowns to girly boys like Russel Webb. You know D's
down in the 7000 range and below, being a criminal lawyer he took a
lot of stills of me as a potential client heh heh
My mistake, the B C & D were right on the number....That A came in the
mail at around 38 or 40 jumps. You miss the point though, its all
about having fun and laughing to a lot of people. My original log book
was destroyed on a white water kayaking trip so you have to depend on
a old mans memory---This works for me because it causes monkeys to run
up the flag pole and salute, its not good for you?
Sweet, not to mention $20 from Jerry for being wrong.....Life is good
eh?