THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM
∅baMa∅ Tse Dung
celebrate the blessings that Providence has bestowed on their beloved
country.
A deep appreciation of these blessings involves understanding that
they were earned. It is to understand the awesome truth of how "God
helps those who help themselves" applies to the Mayflower Pilgrims and
their First Thanksgiving at America's birth.
This is an appreciation and understanding of which those on the Left
are incapable - for it would mean celebrating the capitalist freedom
that made that original Thanksgiving possible. This no liberal, no
Democrat, no leftie can do. Thus they must distort history instead.
The distortion starts in Kindergarten, with the childish make-believe
of your kid's school play portraying the noble Squanto teaching the
helpless Pilgrims how to feed themselves. So let's drop the curtain on
the distortion and watch the real thing. Here it is.
http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/4314/2/
The Tale of the Pilgrims -- Why It Needs to Be Taught
The study of the history and culture of one's own country is a vital
element of education. It is important for children to understand how
and why they are living the way they are now and that it is a result
of what people who lived before them have done. They need to be able
to connect the dots -- these prevailing thoughts led to fights, these
ideas led to prosperity, this action led to that one, and so on. It is
from making these kinds of connections that the child learns how to
think logically.
The tale of the Pilgrims who came to America to escape tyranny is a
heroic and moving story. Most children have been told the basic story
of Thanksgiving. Here are some more facts for your own information or
that you may want to discuss with your child this holiday:
http://www.americanthinker.com/2010/11/the_tale_of_the_pilgrims_why_i.html
David Barts
cuh...@webtv.net
cuhulin, the Capitalist Pig
RHF
You Mean You Did Not Get Your 'Free' Obama Turkey !
oh that's right 'bho' is still in the white house . . .
now think about it . . . Having Our First African-American
'Black' US Prez-A-Duntz having to Live in a place called
"The White House" . . . that's 'pure' racism . . . ~ RHF
.
.
cuh...@webtv.net
Christmas eve, also at the auto battery factory that used to be in
Florence,Mississippi, we got a free Turkey each Christmas eve.When I
used to have a Sunbeam bread route, we got two free loaves of Sunbeam
bread every day.That is part of Capitalism.
cuhulin, the Capitalism
N∅ ∅baMa∅
wrote:
> Debunked:
>
> http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/rewriting-history-fox-reporter-cla...
Debunking the Communist Debunked OR How little "David Barts" can't
read anything except Mao's Little Red Book (as if he ever could).
Pay close attention to the words. Take it slow. Maybe a sentence per
hour and repeat. Here we GO Komrade:
THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM
Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler
Thursday, 25 November 2010
http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/4314/2/
On Thanksgiving Day, Americans gather with their family and friends to
celebrate the blessings that Providence has bestowed on their beloved
country.
A deep appreciation of these blessings involves understanding that
they were earned. It is to understand the awesome truth of how "God
helps those who help themselves" applies to the Mayflower Pilgrims and
their First Thanksgiving at America's birth.
This is an appreciation and understanding of which those on the Left
are incapable - for it would mean celebrating the capitalist freedom
that made that original Thanksgiving possible. This no liberal, no
Democrat, no leftie can do. Thus they must distort history instead.
The distortion starts in Kindergarten, with the childish make-believe
of your kid's school play portraying the noble Squanto teaching the
helpless Pilgrims how to feed themselves. So let's drop the curtain on
the distortion and watch the real thing. Here it is.
The real history of the Mayflower Pilgrims was recounted by their
leader, William Bradford (1590-1657) in his book Of Plymouth
Plantation, completed in 1647. It is from Bradford that we learn of
Squanto, who did indeed show the Pilgrims how to "set" or plant corn
(a new unfamiliar crop for them). Then we learn that the Pilgrims
taught the Indians how to grow more corn than they ever had before:
"The Indeans used to have nothing so much corne as they have since the
English have stored them with their hoes, and seene their industrie in
breaking up new grounds therwith."
Reading the real history of the Pilgrims is so revelatory that I want
you to see it at length. The Pilgrims landed in December 1620,
suffered a horrible winter, figured out how to fish and hunt that
spring and summer so that there may have been some sort of feast with
friendly Indians in the fall of 1621 - although Bradford doesn't
recount the incident.
But by 1622 they were starving. There was no "Thanksgiving" that
year. There was the next - for 1623 saw the Pilgrims in well-fed
abundance, and thus was the year of the real First Thanksgiving.
What made the difference? Here are Bradford's own words (albeit with
modern spelling like "been" instead of "bene" - the original spelling
is in the link above; the parentheses are his, the explanatory
brackets are mine), describing Anno Dom.1623:
It may be thought strange that these people should fall to these
extremities in so short a time, being left competently provided when
the ship [the Mayflower] left them, and had an addition by that
moyetie [portion] of corn that was got by trade, besides much they got
of the Indians where they lived, by one means and other.
It must needs be their great disorder, for they spent excessively
whilst they had, or could get it. And after they began to come into
wants, many sold away their clothes and bed coverings; others (so base
were they) became servants to the Indians, and would cut them wood and
fetch them water for a cap full of corn; others fell to plain
stealing, both night and day, from the Indians, of which they
grievously complained. In the end, they came to that misery that some
starved and died with cold and hunger...
All this while no supply was heard of, neither knew they when they
might expect any. So they began to think how they might raise as much
corn as they could, and obtain a better crop than they had done, that
they might not still thus languish in misery.
At length, after much debate of things, the Governor [Bradford] (with
the advise of the chiefest amongst them) gave way that they should set
corn every man for his own particular [plant corn on his own private
land], and in that regard trust to them selves; in all other things to
go on in the general way as before.
And so [there was] assigned to every family a parcel of land,
according to the proportion of their number for that end, only for
present use (but made no division for inheritance), and ranged all
boys and youth under some family. This had very good success; for it
made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted then
other wise would have been by any means the Governor or any other
could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better
content.
The women now went willingly into the field, and took their little-
ones with them to set corn, which before they would allege weakness
and inability; whom to have compelled would have been thought great
tyranny and oppression.
The experience that was had in this common course and condition, tried
sundry years, and that amongst godly and sober men, may well evince
the vanity of that conceit of Plato's and other ancients applauded by
some of later times -- that the taking away of property, and bringing
in communities into a common wealth, would make them happy and
flourishing, as if they were wiser than God.
For this community (so far as it was) was found to breed much
confusion and discontent, and retard much employment that would have
been to their benefit and comfort. For the young-men that were most
able and fit for labor and service did repine [complain] that they
should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and
children, with out any recompense.
The strong, or man of parts, had no more in division [in amount] of
victails [food] and clothes, than he that was weak and not able to do
a quarter the other could; this was thought injustice. The aged and
graver men to be ranked and equalized in labors, and victails,
clothes, etc., with the meaner and younger sort, thought it some
indignity and disrespect unto them.
And for men's wives to be commanded to do service for other men, as
dressing their meat, washing their clothes, etc., they deemed it a
kind of slavery, neither could many husbands well brook it.
Upon the point all being to have alike, and all to do alike, they
thought them selves in the like condition, and have as good as
another; and so, if it did not cut off those relations that God hath
set amongst men, yet it did at least much diminish and take of the
mutual respects that should be preserved amongst them.
And would have been worse if they had been men of another condition.
Let none object this is men's corruption, and nothing to the course
itself. I answer, seeing all men have this corruption in them, God in
his wisdom saw another course fitter for them...
By the time harvest was come [fall 1623], instead of famine, now God
gave them plenty, and the face of things was changed, to the rejoicing
of the hearts of many, for which they blessed God. And the effect of
their particular planting was well seen, for all had, one way and
other, pretty well to bring the year about, and some of the abler sort
and more industrious had to spare, and sell to others, so as any
general want or famine hath not been amongst them since to this day
[1647].
That is as effective a refutation of socialism and affirmation of
capitalism as there has ever been. The Pilgrims were starving,
stealing and begging from the Indians under a no private property/
everybody work for the common good economy. They switch to a private
property/everybody work for themselves economy, and within one season
there is abundance for all.
But how can Lefties and Zero-Reid-Pelosi Democrats be thankful for
this? They cannot and are not. Their goal is not abundance. Their
goal is deprivation - for where there is deprivation there must be
victims, victims who can be manipulated to acquire power.
Bradford's history - the real history of Thanksgiving - is there in
plain black and white, undeniable and irrefutable for anyone to see.
It is the history that should be taught to our schoolchildren but is
not. It is ignored and denied. It likely is the very first time you
yourself have ever seen Bradford's words.
Liberals, Democrats, and members of America's Fascist Left may very
well be enjoying this day - enjoying good food, good wine, good
friends and family. Let's hope they are. We should not begrudge them
this moment of good cheer.
But what is impossible, or at least difficult for them is to enjoy
being American, being thankful for America, to celebrate the abundance
of America, the abundance of its material and spiritual well-being
thanks to the private property capitalism that made the first
Thanksgiving and all those that followed possible.
Any celebration of theirs is always a yes...but thankfulness. "Yes,
we have much to be thankful for on this day, but we must never forget
what we did to the Indians and the slaves, that there is still too
much poverty and racism in America, blah, blah, blah..."
The purpose of Thanksgiving is to be thankful for being American. This
is the day to celebrate the goodness of our country - the moral
goodness, the moral decency of American institutions, American
history, and the character of the American people. Without any buts.
It's easy for conservatives to do this - it comes natural to us. It's
the opposite for liberals, who relish and revel in incessant guilt-
mongering - and can't celebrate a Thanksgiving with no buts.
So this day, we can relish and revel in the capitalist freedom and
abundance that Providence enabled the Pilgrims to choose, and create
America thereby.
That freedom and abundance is today being threatened as never before
by a Fascist Left determined to destroy it. Now more than ever is the
time to focus anew on all that we love about our country, to know that
Providence has always smiled upon it - for we, like the Pilgrims have
the capacity to choose capitalist freedom over socialist slavery.
With that choice, the original Americans created a civilization out of
the wilderness. With that choice, we Americans of today can rescue
our civilization from the wilderness of the Fascist Left led by
President Zero.
That choice liberates us from their power-lust and make us impervious
to the poison of anti-America hate that eats at all liberal souls.
That is why we are what they are not: grateful for our country, for
the very existence of America, for the priceless privilege of being an
American.
Happy Thanksgiving to you all.
bpnjensen
wrote:
>
> read more »
You are a VERY confused and warped individual.
N∅ ∅baMa∅
>
> You are a VERY confused and warped individual.
You are a very bankrupt and penniless Serf.
RHF
Sort of Trickle-Down _ _ _
* * * Turkey Gravy * * *
.
Nickname unavailable
wrote:
it is impossible for liberals to be fascists. fascists hate liberals,
trade unionist, socialists, communists, jews(because most of them are
liberal), the weak, the disabled, minorities, homosexuals. they are
intolerant of other views and religions. they practice bigotry,
racism, and homophobia, etc. say, i just described the modern
conservative movement:)
RHF
- - - Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:09:08 -0800 (PST)
- - - Local: Fri, Nov 26 2010 1:09 pm
- - - Subject: THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM
- - - http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/2a0bc142952d999d
- - On Nov 27, 1:13 pm, bpnjensen <bpnjen...@yahoo.com> wrote:
- - You are a VERY confused and warped individual.
- On Nov 27, 11:29 am, N∅ ∅baMa∅
- <obamao.sux.donki.dix...@gmail.com> wrote:
- You are a very bankrupt and penniless Serf.
Ah . . . "Serfdom" in 21st Century America !
Yeah the Average Working American 'Serf' :
* * * Serfs-R-Us * * *
Owns Their Own 3-Bedroom Home
-with- Gas & Electricity*
-with- Clear Water & Sewerage
+plus+ Garbage Pick-Up & Recycling
* Winter Heating and Summer Air Conditioning
Owns Two Cars
-with- Good Safe Public Roads to Drive-on
+plus+ Low Cost Fuel
Owns Four Color TVs
-with- Multi-Channel+ Cable TV a/o Satellite TV
Owns Two PCs and Internet Devices
-with- High Speed Internet in the Home
Has Ready Access to Low Cost Food
-at- The Local/Neighborhood SuperMarket
Has Ready Access to Low Cost Consumer Goods
-at- The Local/Town/City Shopping Mall
Has Access To The Highest Full Time Employment
Rates -aka- 'Open Job Market' in the Industrialized
World for the Larger Populated Countries/Nations
-wrt- G8/G20
plus,,, Plus... PLUS ! ! ! -drum-roll-please-
We Now Have Obama-Care© :o)
yeah it's real tough being a 'serf'
in 21st century america ~ RHF
.
.
Chas. Chan
Yet another Useful Liberal Fascist JackAss Idiot parroting twisted
Communist Party propaganda lies.
You can't hide in your closet any longer.
Everyone knows how Marxists like you must confuse the ignorant masses
with twisted lies in order to win them over.
Give it up! - Even your former handlers have seen the light:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cj0Id3BLFco&feature=related
We now turn the spot light on the dark mind of you:
The Europeans have exposed your NAZI "teeth in gum" relationship with
the Communist Party:
Hitler learned from your kind very well and the result predictable.
Your murders continue to be counted and documented:
http://www.GlobalMuseumOnCommunism.org
Fascism is a form of government which centers all power [House, Senate
and Judiciary] in a single party [Liberal Fascist JackAss Democrats]
headed by an absolute dictater [0baMa0 Tse Dung].
.........................sound..familiar?.........................
Anyone who is not a ComuSexual (Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/
Communist) is a Fascist according to Useful Liberal JackAss Idiots.
Anyone who refutes a ComuSexual (Liberal/Progressive/Socialist/
Communist) is a moron according to Useful Liberal JackAss Idiots.
Liberal Fascism
Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsFoiVZDSRs
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hdqjDIfyfo
Pt.3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nqdf7Wz-Pe4
Pt.4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfJSub3CDJk
Pt.5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmAMVyNuVa0
Pt.6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE-4VDpwYwk
Pt.7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCJqnwZPc0Q
If you haven't read the book, watched all of the above and understood
what was said don't bother responding with your ComuSexual propaganda
lies.
Left-wing roots of the Nazis:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4758sBZLC5k
Marxism, National Socialism [NAZI] and Juche [N.Korea] are left-wing
brothers:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fa1sj0gwnuQ
When Liberals and NAZIs were Allies:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-URfx_k9uU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9XrscWjPYs
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian:
Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk9WQaAIbOg
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmDXuA1-8FE
Pt.3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eeNB_rWqpk
Pt.4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4maXhvSm4fQ
The Liberal's Path to Socialism:
Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPyoEbU_wc4
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dvuxr7v4xzk
"Just as the Left was drawn to the communist killing machines of
Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and Castro, so too it is now attracted to
radical Islam."
"The contempt that German Hitlerytes had for "Bolshevism" or "marxist
Jews" generally should also not mislead us in assessing the similarity
between National Socialism and Communism. Leftist sects are very prone
to rivalry, dissension, schism and hatred of one-another. One has only
to think of the Bolsheviks versus the Mensheviks, Stalin versus
Trotsky, China versus the Soviet Union etc. Similarity does not
preclude rivalry. Hitler and Stalin were literally brothers in arms
BEFORE they became rivals. That socialist brothers sometimes fall out
should not prevent us from noting the brotherhood concerned."
[...]
"The fundamental dogma of all brands of socialism and communism is
that the market economy or capitalism is a system that hurts the vital
interests of the immense majority of people for the sole benefit of a
small minority of rugged individualists. It condemns the masses to
progressing impoverishment. It brings about misery, slavery,
oppression, degradation and exploitation of the working men, while it
enriches a class of idle and useless parasites."
"This doctrine was not the work of Karl Marx. It had been developed
long before Marx entered the scene. Its most successful propagators
were not the Marxian authors, but such men as Carlyle and Ruskin, the
British Fabians, the German professors and the American
Institutionalists. And it is a very significant fact that the
correctness of this dogma was contested only by a few economists who
were very soon silenced and barred from access to the universities,
the press, the leadership of political parties and, first of all,
public office. Public opinion by and large accepted the condemnation
of capitalism without any reservation."
[...]
Dr. Ludwig von Mises - http://mises.org/midroad.asp
[...]
"The term 'planning' is mostly used as a synonym for socialism,
communism, and authoritarian and totalitarian economic management.
Sometimes only the German pattern of socialism-Zwangswirtschaft-is
called planning, while the term socialism
proper is reserved for the Russian pattern of outright socialization
and bureaucratic operation of all plants, shops, and farms. At any
rate, planning in this sense means all-around planning by the
government and enforcement of these plans by the police power.
Planning in this sense means full government control of business. It
is the antithesis of free enterprise, private initiative, private
ownership of the means of production, market economy, and the price
system. Planning and capitalism are utterly incompatible. Within a
system of planning production is conducted according to the
government's orders, not according to the plans of capitalists and
entrepreneurs eager to profit by best filling the wants of the
consumers.
"But the term planning is also used in a second sense. Lord Keynes,
Sir William Beveridge, Professor Hansen, and many other eminent men
assert that they do not want to substitute totalitarian slavery for
freedom. They declare that they are planing
for a free society. They recommend a third system, which, as they say,
is as far from socialism as it is from capitalism, which, as a third
solution of the problem of society's economic organization, stands
midway between the two other systems, and while retaining the
advantages of both, avoids the disadvantages inherent in each.
"These self-styled progressives are certainly mistaken when they
pretend that their proposals are new and unheard of. The idea of this
third solution is very old indeed, and the French have long since
baptized it with a pertinent name; they call it interventionism.
Hardly anybody can doubt that history will link the idea of social
security, more closely than with the American New Deal and with Sir
William Beveridge, with the memory of Bismarck whom our fathers did
not precisely describe as a liberal. All the essential ideas of
present-day interventionist progressivism were neatly expounded by the
supreme brain-trusters of imperial Germany, Professors Schmoller and
Wagner, who at the same time urged their Kaiser to invade and to
conquer the Americas. Far be it from me to condemn any idea only on
account of its not being new. But as the progressives slander all
their opponents as old-fashioned, orthodox, and reactionary, it is
expedient to observe that it would be more appropriate to speak of the
clash of two orthodoxies; the Bismarck orthodoxy versus the Jefferson
orthodoxy.
[...]
Dr. Ludwig von Mises - 1952 - http://mises.org/books/planningforfreedom_mises.pdf
The origins of the modern left can be traced back to the famous
passage in Rousseau’s Discourse on the Origin and Foundations of
Inequality, in which he condemned the institution of private
property:
“The first man, who after enclosing a piece of ground, took it into
his head to say, ‘this is mine,’ and found people simple enough to
believe him, was the real founder of civil society.”
Added Rousseau: “How many crimes, how many wars, how many murders, how
many misfortunes and horrors, would that man have saved the human
species, who pulling up the stakes or filling up the ditches should
have cried to his fellows: Beware of listening to this impostor; you
are lost, if you forget that the fruits of the earth belong equally to
us all, and the earth itself to nobody!”
Around the 1830s, a faction of French liberals gravitated toward
Romanticism and the philosophy of the late Rousseau, proclaiming that
capitalism, private property, and the increasing complexity of modern
society were agents of moral decay -- both for the individual and for
society at large. This is essentially the worldview that has made its
way, through history, into the collective mind of the modern left; it
is a worldview calling for a revolution that not only will topple the
existing capitalist order and punish its corrupt leaders, but that
also will replace that order with a socialist regime where the utopian
ideals of perfect justice and equality will reign. Such an ambition
can be put into effect only by a totalitarian state with the authority
to micromanage every facet of human life, precisely the end-point
toward which the policies and crusades of the modern left are
directed.
When the term “liberalism” (from the Latin word liberalis, meaning
“pertaining to a free man”) first emerged in the early 1800s, its
hallmarks were a belief in individual rights, the rule of law, limited
government, private property, and laissez faire economics. These would
remain the defining characteristics of liberalism throughout the
liberal epoch (generally identified as the period of 1815-1914). Yet
the modern left, which portrays itself as the agent of enlightened
commitment to “liberal” causes, in fact stands for the antithesis of
each of the foregoing liberal ideals. Contrary to its self-definition,
the left is neither “liberal” nor “progressive,” but rather a
reactionary force that seeks to resurrect the traditions that
characterized the epoch which preceded the rise of classical
liberalism.
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1217
==================================================
The following is from The World Book Encyclopedia, 1947 edition:
The chief characteristics of Fascism are as follows:
*THE CULTIVATION OF IGNORANCE*
Fascism, like all forms of government, rests firmly on the sincere
consent of a large part of the population... To maintain this consent,
the Fascist leadership must cut off the people from any information
which might cause them to doubt the complete correctness of the fixed
Fascist principles... All forms of communication are carefully
censored, so that the public will receive only those facts that the
dictators want known... Travel to other countries must be controlled,
and freedom of speech and assembly must be rigorously suppressed...
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2010/10/arrest_warrant_filed_for_rahms.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sce0TLA5UYE
http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2010/10/13/exclusive-cbs2-reporter-threatens-journalist-over-rahm-questioning/
*SUPPRESSION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY*
Fascism in Italy and Germany at first won the support of the wealthy
classes, both landed and industrial... These people saw in Fascism a
protection against the demands of farmers and other workers... Both
regimes at first upheld the rights of private property... They
subjected the working classes to a rigorous discipline... As soon as
they were firmly established, the dictators began to limit profit,
impose capital levies, and regulate business in great detail...
Employment Rates under Liberal Fascism
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ssIhiD8kKM
.........................sound..familiar?.........................
*THE POLICE STATE*
Fascism depends upon the police to crush all opposition or dissent.
Secret police spy on the whole population, and any casual remark
against the regime leads to swift and severe punishment... Opposition
parties are dissolved. Intellectual, athletic and recreational
organizations are usually brought under the control of the Fascist
authority... The ruthlessness of the police gradually becomes less
noticeable... This is because within a year or so after a Fascist
government takes power, vigorous opponents of the regime have either
left the country, been killed or jailed...
(Both Fascist and Communist leaders make use of the police state...
Every absolute government has used the police state to some degree...
It was highly developed among the ancient Assyrians...)
.........................sound..familiar?.........................
*EXTREME NATIONALISM*
Fascism is highly nationalistic... It tries to identify its principles
with the country, so that disagreement will look like treason... Some
other country, or some group within the country, is chosen to serve as
the "enemy" and made to appear as the cause of all evils or
misfortunes... For example, the Nazis in Germany represented their
movement first as a crusade against the Jews, then as a fight against
Communism and later as a struggle against the "attacks" from whatever
neighboring country they wished to subdue or occupy... Extreme
nationalism often becomes a kind of racial fanaticism... Sometimes it
combines racial and religious bigotry...
When you hear the Liberal Fascist JackAss propaganda that THEY are the
true patriots then you know the time is near. Look for it from the
socialist Labor Unions such as the SEIU!
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.asp?grpid=6535
*MILITARISM*
Fascism maintains among the people a permanently warlike frame of
mind... Every citizen feels that he is mobilized against enemies of
the regime from within, and against possible foreign foes... The
dictator usually comes to power during a period of economic crisis or
depression... He relieves the depression partly by employing many
people in the making of armaments... To justify this procedure, he
must convince the people that the country is threatened, and must
point toward some of the enemies against whom the armaments may be
needed...
Listen to 0baMa0's rhetoric and his fascistic support from the
Liberals
.........................sound..familiar?.........................
Here are the Three (3) Phases of Liberal Decay into Fascism:
1. Liberalism (Well Meaning, Nice Sounding, "Do-Gooder" Policies
Always Doomed to Fail)
2. Liberal-Progressivism (The Drive for Social Improvement through
Change and Promising Hope;
More Draconian Liberal Polices are Implemented to Transform The People
into a New Society that
Is Guided by 'The Party') The Party Elite Have Complete Power and Rule
Un-Checked.
3. Liberal-Fascism (The Rise of the Party Leader over 'The Party'
Ensuring the Unity and Uniformaty of 'The Party' and Enforcing The
Will of 'The Party' Over the People.) The Party Leader will Cleanse
'The Party' of All those Who Are NOT of 'The Party'; and 'The Party'
Will Cleanse the People of All Those Who Do NOT Support 'The Party'
and The Party Leader. The Party Leader Now Has Complete and Total
Power and Rules by the Force of His Iron Will.
Brother/Sister Are You "OF" 'The Party' ?
Does The Teaching Of 'The Party' Abide Within You ?
Does The Thoughts Of 'The Party' "Leader" Guide Your Thoughts ?
Let 'The Party' Change Your Life and Transform You !
Let 'The Party' Give You Hope and Renew You !
_____________________________________________________________
When you vote cut them off at the knees from your Tax Dollars.
Vote with your wallet.
Chas. Chan
> - - - From: ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung <0bama0.spea...@gmail.com>
> - - - Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 13:09:08 -0800 (PST)
> - - - Local: Fri, Nov 26 2010 1:09 pm
> - - - Subject: THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM
per...@3web.com
very. Conservatives, sit up and take notice who is speaking for you
and what is being said in your name. That is, of course, unless he's a
troll.
dave
>
> With that choice, the original Americans created a civilization out of
> the wilderness. With that choice, we Americans of today can rescue
> our civilization from the wilderness of the Fascist Left led by
> President Zero.
>
The original Americans were the people who were here when the crazy
cultists arrived from Holland or wherever they came from. My people also
killed Indians, but we've always been pro-business.
To equate what happened in Plymouth to derivatives trading is ludicrous.
Options traders are parasites. They are going for the crumbs.
Nickname unavailable
the fascists are righties, and everyone knows it, but low
functioning, low information conservatives/libertarians/fascists.
The aristocrats and gentlemen of the Right who made up the majority of
Hitler's cabinet hated the concept of democracy even more than the
Nazis did, All over Germany, thugs in brown shirts took possession of
the streets and roughed up Communists, socialists, and Jews; they
chased socialist mayors and officials out of government buildings
http://www.buy.com/prod/hitler-and-his-secret-partners/q/loc/106/30426378.html
Chapter 1: Financing the 1933 Elections
On the cold winter weekend of January 28, 1933, Germany was officially
without a government. Chancellor Kurt von Schleicher and his cabinet
had resigned on Saturday afternoon, and eighty-six-year-old President
von Hindenburg had not yet appointed a new chancellor. A nervous
tension spread over Berlin. Everyone waited for news; most felt
Germany was at an historic turning point.
Who would be the next chancellor? Hitler - the leader of the largest
party, the Nazis, who pledged to destroy democracy? Papen - the
aristocratic horseman who had been chancellor before Schleicher, but
who had no popular following? Perhaps Schleicher again, if he could
persuade the Social Democrats, the second largest political party in
the country, to join him in a coalition? Governing Germany in the
middle of an economic depression with nine million unemployed was not
an enviable task. The country had just had three different chancellors
in rapid succession. By tradition, the leader of the largest party was
usually appointed chancellor. But the Nazis had been the largest party
for over a year, and so far intrigues and political maneuvering had
succeeded in keeping Hitler out of power. Everyone guessed what a
Hitler government would mean. He had not kept his militarism, anti-
Semitism, and dictatorial ambitions a secret.
Political intrigues were so numerous that weekend that no one really
knew what was going on. Sensational rumors were being spread
throughout the city. Some said an army coup was imminent, that
Schleicher and the generals were about to abduct President von
Hindenburg and declare martial law. There were also rumors of an armed
Nazi uprising and a general strike by the socialist workers.
Hitler and Hermann Goering, the second most powerful man in the Nazi
party, stayed up all night on Sunday, January 29, trying to figure out
what Hindenburg might do. It was not until after 10 A.M. on Monday
that Hitler received a summons to the president's office. Even at that
point, the Nazis were not certain whether Hitler would be appointed
chancellor or Hindenburg would ask him to serve as vice-chancellor.
Across the street from the Chancellery, in the Kaiserhof Hotel,
Hitler's lieutenants were waiting, unsure of what was going on.
Goebbels, the Nazi propaganda chief, said:
In the street the crowd stands waiting between the Kaiserhof and the
Chancellery. We are torn between doubt, hope, joy and despair. We have
been deceived too often to be able, wholeheartedly, to believe in the
great miracle. [S.A.] Chief of Staff Roehm stands at the window (with
binoculars) watching the door of the Chancellery from which the
Fuehrer [the leader, Hitler] must emerge. We shall be able to judge by
his face if the interview was a success. Torturing hours of waiting.
At last, a car draws up in front of the entrance. The crowd cheers.
They seem to feel that a great change is taking place....
A few moments later, he is with us. He says nothing. His eyes are full
of tears. It has come! The Fuehrer is appointed Chancellor. He has
already been sworn in by the President of the Reich. All of us are
dumb with emotion. Everyone clasps the Fuehrer's hand....Outside the
Kaiserhof, the masses are in a wild uproar....The thousands soon
become tens of thousands. Endless streams of people flood the
Wilhelmstrasse. We set to work...at once.
Hitler's victory was not a complete one by any means. He had been
appointed chancellor in a coalition government. Papen was to be his
vice-chancellor, and all the powerful cabinet posts were held by
Papen's conservative allies, rather than the Nazis. But at the moment,
Hitler's followers weren't worried about the details; for them the
only thing that mattered was that Hitler was chancellor. They had come
to power! All day, crowds gathered in the square outside the Kaiserhof
Hotel and the Chancellery.
At dusk Nazi storm troopers in their brown uniforms gathered in the
Tiergarten park, along with men of the Stahlhelm, an
ultranationalistic veterans' organization, for a torchlight victory
parade through the center of Berlin. As soon as it was dark, they came
marching by the thousands through the Brandenburg Gate, carrying
swastika flags and the black, white, and red flags of the German
empire. Bands marched between the units, beating their big drums as
the men sang old German military songs. But as each band came to the
Pariser Platz, where the French embassy was located, they stopped
whatever they were playing and, with an introductory roll of drums,
broke into the tune of the challenging war song "Victorious We Will
Crush the French."
The torches carried by the marchers glowed hypnotically in the
darkness. To foreign witnesses, it was a frightening sight. "The river
of fire flowed past the French Embassy," Ambassador François-Poncet
wrote, "whence, with heavy heart and filled with foreboding, I watched
this luminous wake." Liberal Germans found it an "ominous sight." It
was, wrote one German reporter, "a night of deadly menace, a nightmare
in...blazing torches."
As the marchers came by the Chancellery, there were tumultuous cheers
for Hitler, who stood in an open window saluting them. He was so
excited that night, he could hardly stand still. He was raising his
arm up and down heiling, smiling, and laughing so much, his eyes
filled with tears. "It was an extraordinary experience," recalled
Papen, who was standing behind Hitler. "The endless repetition of the
triumphal cry: 'Heil, Heil, Sieg Heil!' rang in my ears like a
tocsin." When Hitler turned to speak with Papen, his voice choked with
emotion. "What an immense task we have set for ourselves, Herr von
Papen - we must never part until our work is accomplished." Hitler and
Papen were much closer allies than anyone at the time imagined.
It was after midnight when the parade ended. Being too excited to
sleep, Hitler, Goering, Goebbels, and a few other Nazis sat up talking
for hours. They could hardly believe it had actually happened: they
were in the Chancellery at last. That evening, Hitler said to
Goebbels, "No one gets me out of here alive." It was one of the few
promises he kept.
On the morning of January 31, Hitler's storm troopers gave the German
people a glimpse of what Nazi rule would be like. All over Germany,
thugs in brown shirts took possession of the streets and roughed up
Communists, socialists, and Jews; they chased socialist mayors and
officials out of government buildings and even broke into the private
homes of their political enemies. When people complained to Papen, he
laughed. "Let the storm troopers have their fling." Among his friends
at the Herrenklub, an exclusive gentlemens club, he boasted: "We've
hired Hitler." To a skeptic he replied: "What do you want? I have
Hindenburg's confidence. Within two months we will have pushed Hitler
so far in the corner that he'll squeak."
The facts seemed to support Papen's optimism. Not only did Papen have
Hindenburg"s confidence, but in fact the old president had promised
never to receive Hitler unless he was accompanied by his vice-
chancellor. Papen also held the important post of minister-president
of Prussia, Germany's largest and most powerful state. From the
composition of the cabinet, it seemed all the real power was in the
hands of the conservatives: the aristocratic General von Blomberg was
minister of defense, Baron von Neurath, a career diplomat, was foreign
minister, and the old archreactionary Hugenberg was both minister of
economics and minister of agriculture. The Nazis were outnumbered six
to two.
The two Nazis in the cabinet, Wilhelm Frick and Goering, held posts
that were thought to be insignificant. Frick was minister of the
interior, but he did not control the police, which in Germany was
under the jurisdiction of the individual state governments. Goering
was made minister without portfolio, but with the promise that he
would be minister of aviation as soon as Germany had an air force. He
was also named minister of the interior of Prussia, an office that did
not receive much notice by the public but did control the Prussian
police.
The aristocrats and gentlemen of the Right who made up the majority of
Hitler's cabinet hated the concept of democracy even more than the
Nazis did. These men belonged to the old ruling class of the kaiser's
Germany. They wanted to regain their old position of supremacy, lost
in 1918. They wanted to restore the monarchy, suppress the socialist
unions, avenge the loss of World War I, and make Germany the dominant
power in Europe. It was obvious why such reactionary nationalists
helped put Hitler in power: their goals and his were very similar.
Few people knew the full extent of Papen's collaboration with Hitler.
Historians have said he "did more than anyone else outside the Nazi
party to help Hitler to power." Papen helped Hitler because he was
trying to control him and use the Nazis for his own aims.
Papen was a handsome aristocratic-looking man with distinguished gray
hair and an officer's mustache. From an impoverished family of the
Westphalian nobility, he became a General Staff officer, a skillful
horseman, and a man of great charm. After a successful marriage to the
daughter of a wealthy Saar industrialist, he bought a large block of
shares in the Center party's newspaper, Germania. For a short time in
1932, Papen was chancellor, but his government had no popular support.
Papen believed it would be rather easy for an aristocratic officer
like himself to manipulate a former corporal, like Hitler, and thus be
able to use the Nazi's mass following to accomplish the aims of the
upper-class conservative nationalists.
Hitler immediately began to outmaneuver his conservative colleagues.
He reported to the cabinet that the Center party was making impossible
demands and could not be counted on to form a coalition with the Nazis
and the Nationalists that would have a majority in the Reichstag.
Because of this situation, Hitler argued he would have to call for new
elections. The only "demand" the Center party made was that Hitler
promise to govern constitutionally, but none of the other members of
the cabinet bothered to check Hitler's statement. They agreed to new
elections on the condition that Hitler promise that the composition of
the cabinet would not change regardless of the outcome of the voting.
New elections would provide Hitler with a chance to improve on the
poor results the Nazis had received at the polls the past November. If
the Nazis won a clear majority in the elections, they might be able to
get rid of their coalition partners. Hitler had every reason to
believe the election campaign would be a big success. The entire
machinery of government, including the radio, was now under Nazi
control and could be used for campaigning. The party had been flooded
with new applicants for membership since he had become chancellor. In
the cabinet meeting on February 2, Hitler discussed his preparations
for the elections. Wilhelm Frick, the Nazi minister of the interior,
proposed that the government set aside a million marks for the
election campaign. Count von Schwerin von Krosigk, the minister of
finance, rejected this suggestion. Hitler did not force the issue. He
would have to get the money elsewhere.
The theme of the Nazi election campaign was to be the fight against
communism. Hitler opened the attack in a late-night radio broadcast to
the nation on February 1. He blamed the hard times Germany had gone
through since 1918 on the Social Democrats, which had been the largest
party in the Reichstag during most of those years. The Social
Democrats, he reminded his listeners, were actually a Marxist party.
"Fourteen years of Marxism," he said, "have ruined Germany; one year
of bolshevism [communism] would destroy her. The richest and fairest
territories of the world would be turned into a smoking heap of ruins.
Even the sufferings of the last decade and a half could not be
compared to the misery of a Europe in the heart of which the red flag
of destruction has been hoisted." He went on to promise to put the
unemployed back to work and save the peasants from bankruptcy.
On his fourth day in office, just after opening the election
campaign, Hitler took time off to attend a very important dinner. He
had been invited to the home of General von Hammerstein, chief of
staff of the army, to meet the leading officers of the army and navy.
In a speech that lasted almost two hours, Hitler explained his plans
for rebuilding German military power.
The generals were the real power in Germany during the Weimar period.
After World War II, many Germans tried to cover up the role certain
members of the Officer Corps had played in helping to put Hitler in
power. Many historians naively accepted this view, but the real story
is quite different. Traditionally, the German Army ruled from behind
the scenes and had the final "power to veto" any important issue.
After the loss of World War I, the Versailles Treaty severely
restricted the size of the German Army. The only way the generals
could maintain mass training and develop new weapons was to finance
private paramilitary units, like the Free Corps, with secret army
funds.
Hitler not only began his career as an army agent, but even in the
1930s he was supported by a powerful faction in the army. Over several
years, General von Schleicher, who was in charge of a secret informal
political department of the army, funneled over ten million marks to
Hitler. Why? Many military officers wanted an authoritarian government
that could unify the nation. The people needed to be infused with a
new spirit of patriotism because powerful interests were planning a
war of revenge against the Allies. Naturally there was a division of
opinion among the generals as to how much power to give Hitler.
Hindenburg originally had strong reservations about appointing a man
from a lower-class background, like Hitler, chancellor. However, the
aggressive action the Nazis took against Communists was admired by
Hindenburg, and his relationship with Hitler rapidly improved.
One day, Hindenburg summoned Hitler when Papen was away from Berlin.
Hitler informed the president that Papen was out of town and reminded
him of the rule he (Hindenburg) had made, that the chancellor could
visit him only when accompanied by the vice-chancellor. "The old
gentleman [Hindenburg]," said Hitler, "replied that he wished to see
me alone, and that in the future the presence of Papen could be
regarded as unnecessary. Within three weeks, he had progressed so far
that his attitude towards me became affectionate and paternal. Talking
of the elections fixed for the 3rd of March, he said, 'What are we
going to do if you fail to get a majority? We shall have the same
difficulties all over again.'"
At the beginning of the election campaign, Hitler and Papen persuaded
old President von Hindenburg to sign an emergency decree to protect
law and order. The decree gave Nazi officials the right to prohibit
public meetings. Newspapers could be suppressed if they "incited"
civil disobedience or published "false" reports.
RHF
-
- oh that's right 'bho' is still in the white house . . .
-
- now think about it . . . Having Our First African-American
- 'Black' US Prez-A-Duntz having to Live in a place called
- "The White House" . . . that's 'pure' racism . . . ~ RHF
- .
- .
Something-To-Think-About :
Forcing Our First African-American 'Black' US Prez-A-Duntz
To Live In A Place Called "The White House" . . .
! ! ! NOW AIN'T THAT PURE RACISM ? ? ?
Why Didn't Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats Fix This
When She Was Speaker of the House, and They
Controlled the House of the US Congress
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Pelosi
-name-change- The People's House
-or- Freedom House
Why Didn't Harry Reid and the Democrats Fix This
When He Was Majority Leader of the Senate, and
They Controlled the Senate of the US Congress
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Reid
-name-change- The House of the People
-or- Great House of Freedom
Matter-of-Fact : Why Ain't The Congressional 'Black'
Caucus Demanded a Name Change for "The White
House" with the Election of Our First African-American
US Prez-A-Duntz ? -what's-up-wit-dat-cbc-?-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_Black_Caucus
yeah - i been thinking again - o-u-c-h-! ~ RHF
.
.
Kevin Cunningham
The pilgrims were......SOCIALISTS!!!!!!! Oh, the horror!!!!!!!!!
They held property jointly, the decided to jointly defend themselves
and they held money jointly.
EVIL SOCIALSIST! Every one of them!
Why did we allow these socialists into America?????
Kevin Cunningham
wrote:
> On Nov 27, 1:13 pm, bpnjensen <bpnjen...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > You are a VERY confused and warped individual.
>
> You are a very bankrupt and penniless Serf.
Poor drooling right wing scum. You voted for the Bush administration
that was led by three draft dodger. You, a gutless coward, would
never vote for Kerry, a man who proudly wore his nations uniform.
Nope, you voted for Bush, Cheney and Rove, three pieces of human
detritus who never, ever served their country in war time. They ran
away from war, just like you.
So who died to give us the Bush Administration?
D. Peter Maus
> On Nov 27, 3:44 pm, "Chas. Chan"<tianmei...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> the fascists are righties, and everyone knows it, but low
> functioning, low information conservatives/libertarians/fascists.
>
> The aristocrats and gentlemen of the Right who made up the majority of
> Hitler's cabinet hated the concept of democracy even more than the
> Nazis did, All over Germany, thugs in brown shirts took possession of
> the streets and roughed up Communists, socialists, and Jews; they
> chased socialist mayors and officials out of government buildings
>
The hunger for power, and the taste for abuse, does not define
and is not defined by a left/right paradigm. Similarly, the hunger
for power need not be rooted in anything more than a vision of how
things may/should/could/need to be.
Anyone, from any point on the political contiuum, may be driven
to acquire power. And not all are pathological. Some may genuinely
believe such drive is of the purest altruistic motives. How many
wars, purges, and acts of genocide were initiated in the name of peace?
Such a person will, by default, hate democracy, and any number of
groups, ethnicities, and/or political intents that become
politically inconvenient. Or useful. How many times have we heard in
the last half century, 'never let a crisis go to waste.'
All that is required for the abuse of power, is a belief that the
ends justify the means. And that belief is not limited to either the
left, or the right. Anyone may have it, develop it, or evolve to it.
In other words...
One not need be on the right to hunger for and enjoy the abuse of
power.
Nickname unavailable
that is pretty much correct, except, the right has a much longer
history of offenses against humanity than the extreme left. the
extreme left is a human auto response to out of control capitalism,
which lasted for 200 years. the out of control capitalism was defeated
in 1945, but its on the rise again. both extremes are bad though.
i see little difference between a free market economy(fascism), or a
communist economy(marxism), in either system, almost all wealth and
power end up in the hands of a few.
m II
> The pilgrims were......SOCIALISTS!!!!!!! Oh, the horror!!!!!!!!!
>
> They held property jointly, the decided to jointly defend themselves
> and they held money jointly.
>
> EVIL SOCIALSIST! Every one of them!
>
> Why did we allow these socialists into America?????
If the Natives had known just how evil the newcomers were, they would
have killed every single one them and burned the ships down to the water
line.
mike
cuh...@webtv.net
http://www.cryptome.org/index.html
Scroll down and check out the article about Marilyn's Tush.
Pure nicotine in her anus?
cuhulin
D. Peter Maus
> the
> extreme left is a human auto response to out of control capitalism
Yes. Jealousy will do that.
N∅ ∅baMa∅
> On Thanksgiving Day, Americans gather with their family and friends to
> celebrate the blessings that Providence has bestowed on their beloved
> country.
>
>
m II
That's like saying you envy the rapist for all the sex they're getting.
Avarice, greed, theft, fraud and dishonesty in the extreme are nothing
to be jealous of.
Money earned honestly and by due diligence is nothing to be ashamed of.
Unfortunately, that kind of wealth seems to getting in shorter and
shorter supply.
mike
N∅ ∅baMa∅
wrote:
> On Nov 26, 5:01 pm, David Barts <ebaysucksdonkeydi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Debunked:
>
> >http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2010/11/rewriting-history-fox-reporter-cla...
>
> Debunking the Communist Debunked OR How little "David Barts" can't
> read anything except Mao's Little Red Book (as if he ever could).
>
> Pay close attention to the words. Take it slow. Maybe a sentence per
> hour and repeat. Here we GO Komrade:
>
> THANKSGIVING'S BLESSING OF CAPITALIST FREEDOM
> Written by Dr. Jack Wheeler
> Thursday, 25 November 2010
>
> http://www.tothepointnews.com/content/view/4314/2/
>
Liberal Fascists can't read. Let them watch TV
cuh...@webtv.net
Ireland.He designed the White House (formerly known as the President's
House) in D.C.
The White House was painted white for one of two reasons.To cover the
scortch marks because the British burnt down the White House, or to
protect the sandstone.
Currently, America does NOT have a President, nor a VP either.A born in
Kenya! SOB! ILLEGAL! INELIGIBLE! USURPER! SQUATTER! is squatting in Our
White House!
cuhulin
RHF
- - RHF wrote:
- - Something-To-Think-About :
- - Forcing Our First African-American 'Black' US Prez-A-Duntz
- - To Live In A Place Called "The White House" . . .
- Didn't they have to remove the "colored" entrance sign
http://www.projectview.org/BBHOFE24.jpg
- around back of the white house just before his inauguration?
http://www.dobsonproducts.com/shop/images/jim_crow/jc_sign01.jpg
Nah... Democrat Leaders Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid
Just 'White-Washed' It ;;-}} ~ RHF
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3183/2583184488_4b8c68f37c.jpg
-remember- It was Democrat Prez-A-Duntz Wilson
who Re-Segregation of US Federal Government
Offices during his regime. -circa- 1910s
http://www.utwatch.org/funfacts/woodrowwilson.html
http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Woodrow_Wilson#Sourced
- And what about all those TV news trucks
- that were waiting back there?
Yeah Live On 'Color' TV no less ;;-}} ~ RHF
.
-ps- Under "The White House"s
"Colored" Entrance Sign
was a smaller sign that read
"S T U P I D !
Use The Front Door"
-for-his-gwb'ness-
.
OBTW - Some are wondering just how . . . ?H?O?W?
GWB can be having a Best Selling Prez-A-Duntzial
Book "Decision Points" that he couldn't even read . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decision_Points
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/04/books/04book.html
The GWB Book will focus on "12 Difficult Personal
and Political Decisions" that former-president Bush
faced during his Prez-A-Duntzcy.
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_W._Bush#Post-presidency
* http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/books/2013516442_bestsell28.html?syndication=rss
* http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20023074-503544.html
*
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/11/09/2010-11-09_decision_points_by_george_bush_is_a_best_seller_but_the_expresidents_legacy_is_t.html
.
.
D. Peter Maus
> On 10-11-28 11:20 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:
>> On 11/28/10 11:16 , Nickname unavailable wrote:
>>
>>
>>> the
>>> extreme left is a human auto response to out of control capitalism
>>
>> Yes. Jealousy will do that.
>
>
>
>
> That's like saying you envy the rapist for all the sex they're getting.
No it's not.
Nickname unavailable
i really doubt that. extremism begets extremism.
Nickname unavailable
so well said. me thinks the one who responded to me might be a
sociopath. devoid of remorse and empathy.
RHF
> On Nov 28, 1:13 pm, m II <C...@in.the.hat> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 10-11-28 11:20 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:
>
> > > On 11/28/10 11:16 , Nickname unavailable wrote:
>
> > >> the
> > >> extreme left is a human auto response to out of control capitalism
>
> > > Yes. Jealousy will do that.
>
> > That's like saying you envy the rapist for all the sex they're getting.
>
> > Avarice, greed, theft, fraud and dishonesty in the extreme are nothing
> > to be jealous of.
>
> > Money earned honestly and by due diligence is nothing to be ashamed of.
> > Unfortunately, that kind of wealth seems to getting in shorter and
> > shorter supply.
>
> > mike
- so well said. me thinks the one who responded to me
- might be a sociopath. devoid of remorse and empathy.
NnUa,
NO - Anyone Who Responds To You Fully Realizes
That You Are Just What You Attributed To Others :
"A Sociopath. Devoid of Remorse and Empathy."
and most likely a political bi-polar 'liberal' & 'fascist' ~ RHF
-hint- Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder
http://www.amazon.com/dp/1595550062
-and- Fascism Is It's Terminal Stage©***
.
=WRT= "LIBERAL-FASCISM" : LET THERE BE A REPLY !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/3bc3b4dac799e1f8
.
Is It 'Liberal Fascist' ? -or- Is It "Liberal-Fascist" ?
.
The Two Words When -Hyphenated- Are Not 'Redundant' :
Because the -Hyphenated- between Joins them Together into
a New Evolved Meaning and Relevance for the Present Day.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/81ab049daef0659c
.
Liberals-R-Us : The Liberal "Oxymoron" Rule :
It Is Impossible For Liberals To Be Fascists !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/a469f5dc4b1df3c2
.
Idiot's-R-Us -proclaims-
A New Evolved Concept "Liberal-Fascist" :
Two Words That Are -Hyphenated- "Joined-Together"
Having New Evolved Meaning !
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/81ab049daef0659c
.
Alas... A Self-Evident Truth "Liberal-Fascist" :
Is A Self-Evident Truth : Denying that "Liberal-Fascism"
Exists and the Validity of the Term "Liberal-Fascist" in
the 21st Century does NOT Change the Fact or 'possibility'
that "Liberal-Fascist" is Real or at least 'possible' . . .
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/22455c3e209e5137
.
.
NnUa - "sociopath"
NnUa - "devoid of remorse and empathy"
.
- - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - -
[>: To Liberal-Fascist {Democrat} Name Calling :<]
ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument :
When An Ever So Super-Smart "Enlightened" Liberal
Democrat Socialist Starts Fascist Name Calling*.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/318979fbe8546cfa
* They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional
+ Plus They Often Snip/Delete What You Wrote :
To Disguise Their Complete Inability To Carry The
Argument Forward. -that-is-how-i-see-it- ~ RHF©
.
*** © This is another Copy-Righted 'Brain Fart' of RHF
-wrt- 'Brain Fart' -yeah- This Idea(s) Stinks -pew(pu)-
.
.
cuh...@webtv.net
Nickname unavailable
> On Nov 28, 4:56 pm, Nickname unavailable <Vide...@tcq.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Nov 28, 1:13 pm, m II <C...@in.the.hat> wrote:
>
> > > On 10-11-28 11:20 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:
>
> > > > On 11/28/10 11:16 , Nickname unavailable wrote:
>
> > > >> the
> > > >> extreme left is a human auto response to out of control capitalism
>
> > > > Yes. Jealousy will do that.
>
> > > That's like saying you envy the rapist for all the sex they're getting.
>
> > > Avarice, greed, theft, fraud and dishonesty in the extreme are nothing
> > > to be jealous of.
>
> > > Money earned honestly and by due diligence is nothing to be ashamed of.
> > > Unfortunately, that kind of wealth seems to getting in shorter and
> > > shorter supply.
>
> > > mike
>
> - so well said. me thinks the one who responded to me
> - might be a sociopath. devoid of remorse and empathy.
>
> NnUa,
>
> NO - Anyone Who Responds To You Fully Realizes
> That You Are Just What You Attributed To Others :
> "A Sociopath. Devoid of Remorse and Empathy."
>
> and most likely a political bi-polar 'liberal' & 'fascist' ~ RHF
> -and- Fascism Is It's Terminal Stage©***
> .
> .
> Is It 'Liberal Fascist' ? -or- Is It "Liberal-Fascist" ?
> .
> The Two Words When -Hyphenated- Are Not 'Redundant' :
> Because the -Hyphenated- between Joins them Together into
> .
> Liberals-R-Us : The Liberal "Oxymoron" Rule :
> .
> Idiot's-R-Us -proclaims-
> A New Evolved Concept "Liberal-Fascist" :
> Two Words That Are -Hyphenated- "Joined-Together"
> .
> Alas... A Self-Evident Truth "Liberal-Fascist" :
> Is A Self-Evident Truth : Denying that "Liberal-Fascism"
> Exists and the Validity of the Term "Liberal-Fascist" in
> the 21st Century does NOT Change the Fact or 'possibility'
> .
> .
> NnUa - "sociopath"
> NnUa - "devoid of remorse and empathy"
> .
> - - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - -
> [>: To Liberal-Fascist {Democrat} Name Calling :<]
> ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument :
> When An Ever So Super-Smart "Enlightened" Liberal
> * They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional
> + Plus They Often Snip/Delete What You Wrote :
> To Disguise Their Complete Inability To Carry The
> Argument Forward. -that-is-how-i-see-it- ~ RHF©
> .
> *** © This is another Copy-Righted 'Brain Fart' of RHF
> -wrt- 'Brain Fart' -yeah- This Idea(s) Stinks -pew(pu)-
> .
> .
it matter not how many personalities and alias's that you have. they
all smell of the same thing, crap. all of your personalities are doing
what conservatives/libertarians/fascists do best, project.
dave
>
>
> All that is required for the abuse of power, is a belief that the ends
> justify the means. And that belief is not limited to either the left, or
> the right. Anyone may have it, develop it, or evolve to it.
>
> In other words...
>
> One not need be on the right to hunger for and enjoy the abuse of power.
>
Power is inherently corrupt. No one is immune. People who need leaders
that much are sheeple. They deserve to be slaves.
dave
accumulating wealth beyond one's needs.
dave
> RHF wrote:
>>
>> Something-To-Think-About :
>> Forcing Our First African-American 'Black' US Prez-A-Duntz
>> To Live In A Place Called "The White House" . . .
>
> of the white house just before his inauguration? And what about
> all those TV news trucks that were waiting back there?
He's half white ya' know. Besides, wasn't Clinton the first Black
president? Maybe they should do a checkered flag motif...
dave
>> Yes. Jealousy will do that.
>
>
>
>
> That's like saying you envy the rapist for all the sex they're getting.
>
> Avarice, greed, theft, fraud and dishonesty in the extreme are nothing
> to be jealous of.
>
> Money earned honestly and by due diligence is nothing to be ashamed of.
> Unfortunately, that kind of wealth seems to getting in shorter and
> shorter supply.
>
Brother Peter listens to Citadel Broadcasting all day long, which means
a right wing local morning show, Limbaugh, Hannity, either Savage or
Levin, then a right wing afternoon drive local show. He listens to
headlines on NPR, but it just reinforces his perception of a giant
socialist media conspiracy. He cant listen to the BBC World Service
anymore, because they're "in on it" too. Truthiness is French and gay.
dave
>>
>>
>> That's like saying you envy the rapist for all the sex they're getting.
>
>
> No it's not.
>
>
It is. Whatever capitalism used to be, today it is not. It originally
provided opportunity to take a risk and maybe make some money. No
guarantee, but an even playing field. The reward was proportional to the
risk taken by the capitalist.
Today there is much less risk but much more reward. Profits are
privatized; liabilities are too often are written off, leaving the rest
of us to take up the slack, essentially socializing the risk and
removing it from the equation.
The playing field is nowhere close to even. You support a flawed obscene
institution.
RHF
- that you have.
I am an original one of a kind -&- I Am -who- I AM [.]
-no-alias;s-required-
.
- they all smell of the same thing, crap.
- all of your personalities are doing what
- conservatives/libertarians/fascists
- do best, project.
.
NnUa - "smell" & 'crap" ?
NnUa - "conservatives/libertarians/fascists" ?
NnUa - "project" ?
All Proving Once Again NnUa . . .
.
- - - = = = RHF's Canned Reply 'Rant' = = = - - -
[>: To Liberal-Fascist {Democrat} Name Calling :<]
ROTFL - You Know When You Are Winning An Argument :
When An Ever So Super-Smart "Enlightened" Liberal
Democrat Socialist Starts Fascist Name Calling*.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/318979fbe8546cfa
* They Lose Their Ability To Think And Get Emotional
+ Plus They Often Snip/Delete What You Wrote :
To Disguise Their Complete Inability To Carry The
Argument Forward. -that-is-how-i-see-it- ~ RHF©
.
NnUa -says-time-and-time-again-
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/e1f71df9d84c9911
it is impossible for liberals to be fascists,,,
It Is Impossible For Liberals To Be Fascists...
IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR LIBERALS TO BE FASCISTS ! ! !
* * * D'Oh ! Repeating a "LIE" Doesn't Make It True * * *
[Conclusion] NnUa you clearly suffer from 1930s Thinking
in an Ever Evolving 21st Century Political Reality [.]
Think-About-It : Liberalism Is A Mental Disorder
-and- Fascism Is It's Terminal Stage©
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/ec80342d95348b77
.
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
-by- D. Peter Maus
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/3ffc262ea555fcf5
.
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
-by- Chas. Chan
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/e6ce20a3c3de775e
.
LIBERAL FASCISTS CAN'T READ
-by- N∅ ∅baMa∅
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/bb9fb002e80e4805
.
.
cuh...@webtv.net
burger flippin PHD.
cuhulin