Liberals and NAZIs were Allies
∅baMa∅ Tse Dung
and Judiciary] in a single party [Liberal Fascist Democrats] headed by
an absolute dictater [0baMa0 Tse Dung].
When you vote on Tuesday cut them off from your Tax Dollars and vote
with your wallet.
REMEMBER: Anyone who is not a ComuSexual (Liberal/Progressive/
Socialist/Communist)
is a Fascist according to Useful Liberal Fascist Idiots.
What are THE ROOTS OF LIBERAL FASCISM?
Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GsFoiVZDSRs
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3hdqjDIfyfo
Pt.3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nqdf7Wz-Pe4
Pt.4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SfJSub3CDJk
Pt.5 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vmAMVyNuVa0
Pt.6 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KE-4VDpwYwk
Pt.7 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DCJqnwZPc0Q
If you haven't read the book, watched all of the above and understood
what was said and what is written below don't bother responding with
your ComuSexual propaganda lies.
Left-wing roots of the Nazis
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4758sBZLC5k
Marxism, National Socialism [NAZI] and Juche [N.Korea] are left-wing
brothers
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fa1sj0gwnuQ
When Liberals and NAZIs were Allies
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D-URfx_k9uU
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R9XrscWjPYs
Why Nazism Was Socialism and Why Socialism Is Totalitarian
Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Uk9WQaAIbOg
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FmDXuA1-8FE
Pt.3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eeNB_rWqpk
Pt.4 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4maXhvSm4fQ
The Liberal's Path to Socialism
Pt.1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fPyoEbU_wc4
Pt.2 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dvuxr7v4xzk
"Just as the Left was drawn to the communist killing machines of
Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and Castro, so too it is now attracted to
radical Islam."
"The contempt that German Hitlerytes had for "Bolshevism" or "marxist
Jews" generally should also not mislead us in assessing the similarity
between National Socialism and Communism. Leftist sects are very prone
to rivalry, dissension, schism and hatred of one-another. One has only
to think of the Bolsheviks versus the Mensheviks, Stalin versus
Trotsky, China versus the Soviet Union etc. Similarity does not
preclude rivalry. Hitler and Stalin were literally brothers in arms
BEFORE they became rivals. That socialist brothers sometimes fall out
should not prevent us from noting the brotherhood concerned."
_
"THE FUNDAMENTAL DOGMA of all brands of socialism and communism is
that the market economy or capitalism is a system that hurts the vital
interests of the immense majority of people for the sole benefit of a
small minority of rugged individualists. It condemns the masses to
progressing impoverishment. It brings about misery, slavery,
oppression, degradation and exploitation of the working men, while it
enriches a class of idle and useless parasites."
"This doctrine was not the work of Karl Marx. It had been developed
long before Marx entered the scene. Its most successful propagators
were not the Marxian authors, but such men as Carlyle and Ruskin, the
British Fabians, the German professors and the American
Institutionalists. And it is a very significant fact that the
correctness of this dogma was contested only by a few economists who
were very soon silenced and barred from access to the universities,
the press, the leadership of political parties and, first of all,
public office. Public opinion by and large accepted the condemnation
of capitalism without any reservation."
[...]
"The term 'planning' is mostly used as a synonym for socialism,
communism, and authoritarian and totalitarian economic management.
Sometimes only the German pattern of socialism-Zwangswirtschaft-is
called planning, while the term socialism proper is reserved for the
Russian pattern of outright socialization and bureaucratic operation
of all plants, shops, and farms. At any rate, planning in this sense
means all-around planning by the government and enforcement of these
plans by the police power. Planning in this sense means full
government control of business. It is the antithesis of free
enterprise, private initiative, private ownership of the means of
production, market economy, and the price system. Planning and
capitalism are utterly incompatible. Within a system of planning
production is conducted according to the government's orders, not
according to the plans of capitalists and entrepreneurs eager to
profit by best filling the wants of the consumers.
"But the term planning is also used in a second sense. Lord Keynes,
Sir William Beveridge, Professor Hansen, and many other eminent men
assert that they do not want to substitute totalitarian slavery for
freedom. They declare that they are planing for a free society. They
recommend a third system, which, as they say, is as far from socialism
as it is from capitalism, which, as a third solution of the problem of
society's economic organization, stands midway between the two other
systems, and while retaining the advantages of both, avoids the
disadvantages inherent in each.
"These self-styled progressives are certainly mistaken when they
pretend that their proposals are new and unheard of. The idea of this
third solution is very old indeed, and the French have long since
baptized it with a pertinent name; they call it interventionism.
Hardly anybody can doubt that history will link the idea of social
security, more closely than with the American New Deal and with Sir
William Beveridge, with the memory of Bismarck whom our fathers did
not precisely describe as a liberal. All the essential ideas of
present-day interventionist progressivism were neatly expounded by the
supreme brain-trusters of imperial Germany, Professors Schmoller and
Wagner, who at the same time urged their Kaiser to invade and to
conquer the Americas. Far be it from me to condemn any idea only on
account of its not being new. But as the progressives slander all
their opponents as old-fashioned, orthodox, and reactionary, it is
expedient to observe that it would be more appropriate to speak of the
clash of two orthodoxies; the Bismarck orthodoxy versus the Jefferson
orthodoxy.
[...]
"The fundamental dogma of all brands of socialism and communism is
that the market economy or capitalism is a system that hurts the vital
interests of the immense majority of people for the sole benefit of a
small minority of rugged individualists. It condemns the masses to
progressing impoverishment. It brings about misery, slavery,
oppression, degradation and exploitation of the working men, while it
enriches a class of idle and useless parasites. This doctrine was not
the work of Karl Marx. It had been developed long before Marx entered
the scene. Its most successful propagators were not the Marxian
authors, but such men as Carlyle and Ruskin, the British Fabians, the
German professors and the American Institutionalists. And it is a very
significant fact that the correctness of this dogma was contested only
by few economists who were very soon silenced and barred from access
to the universities, the press, the leadership of political parties
and, first of all, public office. Public opinion by and large accepted
the condemnation of capitalism without any reservation.
[...]
Dr. Ludwig von Mises - 1952 - http://mises.org/books/planningforfreedom_mises.pdf
___
This following is taken from The World Book Encyclopedia, 1947
edition:
The chief characteristics of Fascism are as follows:
*THE CULTIVATION OF IGNORANCE*
Fascism, like all forms of government, rests firmly on the sincere
consent of a large part of the population... To maintain this consent,
the Fascist leadership must cut off the people from any information
which might cause them to doubt the complete rightness of the fixed
Fascist principles... All forms of communication are carefully
censored, so that the public will receive only those facts that the
dictators want known... Travel to other countries must be controlled,
and freedom of speech and assembly must be rigorously suppressed...
Listen to 0baMa0's rhetoric and his fascistic support from the
Liberals
............................sound
familiar?............................
*SUPPRESSION OF LABOR AND INDUSTRY*
Fascism in Italy and Germany at first won the support of the wealthy
classes, both landed and industrial... These people saw in Fascism a
protection against the demands of farmers and other workers... Both
regimes at first upheld the rights of private property... They
subjected the working classes to a rigorous discipline... As soon as
they were firmly established, the dictators began to limit profit,
impose capital levies, and regulate business in great detail...
............................sound
familiar?............................
*THE POLICE STATE*
Fascism depends upon the police to crush all opposition or dissent.
Secret police spy on the whole population, and any casual remark
against the regime leads to swift and severe punishment... Opposition
parties are dissolved. Intellectual, athletic and recreational
organizations are usually brought under the control of the Fascist
authority... The ruthlessness of the police gradually becomes less
noticeable... This is because within a year or so after a Fascist
government takes power, vigorous opponents of the regime have either
left the country, been killed or jailed...
(Both Fascist and Communist leaders make use of the police state...
Every absolute government has used the police state to some degree...)
............................sound
familiar?............................
*EXTREME NATIONALISM*
Fascism is highly nationalistic... It tries to identify its principles
with the country, so that disagreement will look like treason... Some
other country, or some group within the country, is chosen to serve as
the "enemy" and made to appear as the cause of all evils or
misfortunes... For example, the Nazis in Germany represented their
movement first as a crusade against the Jews, then as a fight against
Communism and later as a struggle against the "attacks" from whatever
neighboring country they wished to subdue or occupy... Extreme
nationalism often becomes a kind of racial fanaticism... Sometimes it
combines racial and religious bigotry...
Listen to 0baMa0's rhetoric and his fascistic support from the
Liberals
............................sound
familiar?............................
*MILITARISM*
Fascism maintains among the people a permanently warlike frame of
mind... Every citizen feels that he is mobilized against enemies of
the regime from within, and against possible foreign foes... The
dictator usually comes to power during a period of economic crisis or
depression... He relieves the depression partly by employing many
people in the making of armaments... To justify this procedure, he
must convince the people that the country is threatened, and must
point toward some of the enemies against whom the armaments may be
needed...
Listen to 0baMa0's rhetoric and his fascistic support from the
Liberals
............................sound familiar?............................
Topaz
<0bama0....@gmail.com> wrote:
>Fascism is a form of government which centers all power [House, Senate
>and Judiciary] in a single party [Liberal Fascist Democrats] headed by
>an absolute dictater
Many people think they arrive at their own ideas all by themselves,
when in fact their ideas are usually made for them by Hollywood. Take
two movies that are anti-leadership propaganda, Gladiator, and
Braveheart.
In Gladiator they show a corrupt leader of Rome, but would it be
corrupt if Maximus was the leader? That would be much better than
having the lame senators running Rome. And of course in Braveheart the
Scots should have made William their leader. If he was the leader he
could have put the corrupt nobles in their place.
The purpose of the propaganda is to stop good people from wanting
power. The people who have the real power now, the bankers and the
media, are not threatened in the least by libertarians. But if there
was a leader that was really for the people they know they would be
put in their place.
In democracies money talks and those who can buy TV stations are
the rulers. These rulers don't even claim to be for anything but their
own profits and interests. People are much better off with a good
leader who has power above the money power.
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
http://www.natvan.com http://www.nsm88.org
http://heretical.com/ http://immigration-globalization.blogspot.com/
White Crime Wave
"?baMa? Tse Dung" <0bama0....@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:62d312b0-32d9-4a51...@j2g2000vbo.googlegroups.com...
> Fascism is a form of government which centers all power [House, Senate
> and Judiciary] in a single party [Liberal Fascist Democrats] headed by
> an absolute dictater [0baMa0 Tse Dung].
How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
Dänk 666
> Fascism is a form of government which centers all power [House, Senate
> and Judiciary] in a single party [Liberal Fascist Democrats] headed by
> an absolute dictater [0baMa0 Tse Dung].
Only partially true. While single-party rule is inherently fascist, a
dictator is not absolutely necessary. Consider Orwell's Oceania,
where the Party exerts absolute control over everything, and Big
Brother is an invention of the Party, which is collective by nature.
Individual dictators eventually die, but the Party is collective, so
it is immortal.
Russia and China both managed to survive the deaths of their founding
dictators, Lenin and Mao. In Russia's case, one dictator (Lenin) was
replaced by another dictator (Stalin), but after Stalin's death the
Party asserted control, and every Soviet premiere after Stalin was
subordinate to the Party. Same with China: upon Mao's death in 1976
there was a brief power struggle which was quickly suppressed, after
which the Party followed the Soviet example to ensure that the
"supreme leader" was always subordinate to the Party.
> "The contempt that German Hitlerytes had for "Bolshevism" or "marxist
> Jews" generally should also not mislead us in assessing the similarity
> between National Socialism and Communism. Leftist sects are very prone
> to rivalry, dissension, schism and hatred of one-another. One has only
> to think of the Bolsheviks versus the Mensheviks, Stalin versus
> Trotsky, China versus the Soviet Union etc. Similarity does not
> preclude rivalry. Hitler and Stalin were literally brothers in arms
> BEFORE they became rivals. That socialist brothers sometimes fall out
> should not prevent us from noting the brotherhood concerned."
National Socialists and Soviet Socialists were almost identical. I'm
not sure what Hitler and Stalin were even fighting about, except for
control of territory. Two absolute dictators propped up by single-
party parliaments that acted as rubber-stamps for their decrees,
suppression of rights including freedom of speech, assembly, press,
and religion, surveillance of all citizens and restricting their
movements, forced-labor camps, genocide, and so on.
Leftards often quack that since Soviet Communists were socialists,
that German Nazis must have been capitalists, but this is untrue.
National Socialism was just that -- SOCIALISM. Here is a description
of the Nazi economic system from Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism
"The Nazis argued that capitalism damages nations due to international
finance, the economic dominance of big business, and Jewish influences
within it. ... [Hitler] opposed free-market capitalism's profit-
seeking impulses and desired an economy where community interests
would be upheld. He distrusted capitalism for being unreliable, due to
it having an egotistic nature, and he preferred a state-directed
economy."
"In Mein Kampf, Hitler effectively supported mercantilism, in the
belief that economic resources from their respective territories
should be seized by force; he believed that the policy of lebensraum
would provide Germany with such economically valuable territories. He
believed that the only means to maintain economic security was to have
direct control over resources rather than being forced to rely on
world trade. ... He believed that private ownership was useful in that
it encouraged creative competition and technical innovation, but
insisted that it had to conform to national interests and be
'productive' rather than 'parasitical'."
"[Ernst] Röhm claimed that the Nazis' rise to power constituted a
national revolution, but insisted that a socialist 'second revolution"
was required for Nazi ideology to be fulfilled. Röhm's SA began
attacks against individuals deemed to be associated with conservative
reaction."
[Note: the "conservative reaction" refers to reaction AGAINST Nazi
policies. The "conservatives" in this case are the ANTI-Nazis, since
they wish to "conserve" traditional German values against the
revolutionary "progressive" values of the National Socialists.]
"Joseph Goebbels adamantly stressed the socialist character of Nazism,
and claimed in his diary that if he were to pick between Bolshevism
and capitalism, he said 'in final analysis,' 'it would be better for
us to go down with Bolshevism than live in eternal slavery under
capitalism.'"
"In 1920, the Nazi Party published the National Socialist Program, an
ideology that in 25 points demanded: that the State shall make it its
primary duty to provide a livelihood for its citizens . . . the
abolition of all incomes unearned by work . . . the ruthless
confiscation of all war profits ... the nationalization of all
businesses that have been formed into corporations ... profit-sharing
in large enterprises ... extensive development of insurance for old-
age ... land reform suitable to our national requirements."
"Joseph Goebbels adamantly stressed the socialist character of Nazism,
and claimed in his diary that if he were to pick between Bolshevism
and capitalism, he said "in final analysis", "it would be better for
us to go down with Bolshevism than live in eternal slavery under
capitalism."[103]
"The Nazi Party’s early self-description as 'socialist' caused
conservative opponents, such as the Industrial Employers Association,
to describe it as 'totalitarian, terrorist, conspiratorial, and
socialist.'"
"In 1930, Hitler said: 'Our adopted term "Socialist" has nothing to do
with Marxian Socialism. Marxism is anti-property; true Socialism is
not."
RHF
> "?baMa? Tse Dung" <0bama0.spea...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:62d312b0-32d9-4a51...@j2g2000vbo.googlegroups.com...
>
> > Fascism is a form of government which centers all power [House, Senate
> > and Judiciary] in a single party [Liberal Fascist Democrats] headed by
> > an absolute dictater [0baMa0 Tse Dung].
- How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power
- http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
WCW - So Republicans are 'responsible' for
the Sins {Crimes} of Their Grandfathers . . .
-but- Liberals and Democrat Are NOT ! ! !
WCW - You are simply Telling and Repeating
the same old Liberal Democrat Half-Truth [Lie].
.
Liberals & Democrats And The Real History of
Their Fascist Roots : The [Secret] NAZI Connection
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.liberalism/msg/fe09bd888b177a4c
.
-hint- "Prescott" Bush : GWB's Grandfather
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prescott_Bush
.
Prescott Bush became vice-president of A. Harriman & Co.
.
You now that great Democrat Family of Harrimans [D]
* Brown Brothers Harriman & Co.[D]
* Harriman Brothers & Co. [D]
* William Averell Harriman [D], who became a major
Democratic Party power-broker
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Averell_Harriman#War_seizures_controversy
* * Harriman Bank -wrt-NAZI War Seizures
* * Union Banking Corporation (UBC) (Harriman & Thyssen)
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/GERthyssen.htm
* * Holland-American Trading Corporation (Harriman & Thyssen)
* * Seamless Steel Equipment Corporation (Harriman & Thyssen)
http://www.suite101.com/content/fritz-thyssen-helped-finance-the-nazi-party-a210397
* * Silesian-American Corporation (Harriman & Thyssen)
* Union Banking Corporation
http://clamormagazine.org/issues/14/feature3.php
* * E. Roland Harriman (Harriman & Company)
.
-note- That the Bush's were always the junior partners
to the Harrimans [D] Big Money Wall Street Banking
and Political Influence within the FDR Administration.
.
-while- the Harrimans where up to their necks in
Funding and Working with the NAZI {Thyssen}
War Machine
http://clamormagazine.org/issues/14/feature3.php
.
Learn more about the Harriman-Bush-Hitler 'Union'
Banking Corp business connection prior to WWII.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/a6b3aea8ef50468f
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/8e7de9ed2f4736d8
.
Hitler's Angel (The Other Half of the Story) that
the Liberals & Democrats Don't Want You To Know
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/23861e9e51d0cd80
.
Remember : When You Don't Tell the Whole Truth.
You End Up Telling Only Half Truths and Lies [.]
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/8e7de9ed2f4736d8
.
-but- Your one-sided Liberal Democrat Talking Points
training page left these other equally real facts out about
one of their own NAZI War Time Collaborators ! ? !
.
Now WCW,
The good little Political Cadre of the Democrat Party
of the USA post their "Daily Taking Points" and at
least will stay around for a Post or two and Rely to
Defend the "Daily Taking Points" of the Democrat Party
of the USA : because that is what good little Political
Cadre of the Democrat Party of the USA are supposed
to do as a daily part of taking-control of the Web.
.
A First Class Political Cadre of the Democrat Party
of the USA will at least will stand-up and defend their
Posts while you simply whimp-out and 'post-and-run'
like some... what's the word... oh yeah 'whimp' ;-} ~ RHF
.
-ps- "No" please report for re-training at the nearest
Obama-Cation© {Re-Education} Camp©
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/70ad8d640f13e6dd
* Start by Praising The Great and Wonderful
President Barack 'Hussein' Obama.
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/3d63a10f80b1bd36
* Concentrate on your Obama-Think©
* Practice your Obama-Speak©
* Joyfully Sing "Living in Obama-Merica"© !
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oHqUipinDyw
.
.
RHF
> On Sep 12, 10:19 am, ∅baMa∅ Tse Dung <0bama0.spea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Fascism is a form of government which centers all power [House, Senate
> > and Judiciary] in a single party [Liberal Fascist Democrats] headed by
> > an absolute dictater [0baMa0 Tse Dung].
- Only partially true.
- While single-party rule is inherently fascist,
To Quote You "Only partially true"
Single-Party Rule [SPR] is Inherently Corrupt
the longer it remains Single-Party Rule; Often
SPR becomes more and more Centralized and
Fewer and Fewer Leaders Do The Deciding For
All. The Mind set of these Leaders often takes
on the Form of 'The Collective' {Group Think}
Frequently the Leadership becomes more and
more Brutal and then Single-Party Rule becomes
a Totalitarian Regime with 'The One Leader' that
Controls All.
1st - The Leader* with the Party Leadership Behind Him.
* Stalin : Hitler : Mao : Ho : Castro : Pol Pot : Franco
2nd - The Party Leadership with the Party Behind Them.
3rd - The Party* with the People {Forced} Behind It.
* Communist : NAZI : Socialist : Fascist
4th - The People Exploited and Enslaved by the
Single-Party Rule and Victimized by Corruption
of 'The Party' and Tyranny of 'The Regime'
.
.
- a dictator is not absolutely necessary.
But eventually . . . with more and more consolidation
within 'The Party'; and centralization by 'The Regime' :
"The One Leader" Arises To Lead All - Absolute !
.
.
Liberals & Democrats and Their Fascist [NAZI] Alliance :
The Rest of the Story . . .
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.radio.shortwave/msg/5719a62f36bcbbe8
.
.
dave
> "In 1930, Hitler said: 'Our adopted term "Socialist" has nothing to do
> with Marxian Socialism.
This quote is way newer than the one from Mein Kampf.
dave
> On Sep 12, 11:36 am, "White Crime Wave"<r...@cw.net> wrote:
>> "?baMa? Tse Dung"<0bama0.spea...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:62d312b0-32d9-4a51...@j2g2000vbo.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> Fascism is a form of government which centers all power [House, Senate
>>> and Judiciary] in a single party [Liberal Fascist Democrats] headed by
>>> an absolute dictater [0baMa0 Tse Dung].
>
> - How Bush's grandfather helped Hitler's rise to power
> - http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2004/sep/25/usa.secondworldwar
>
> WCW - So Republicans are 'responsible' for
> the Sins {Crimes} of Their Grandfathers . . .
> -but- Liberals and Democrat Are NOT ! ! !
> .
All family dynasties are immoral and Unamerican. Bring back an
effective Estate Tax and put America back to work.
Eat the rich.
dave
>
> Single-Party Rule [SPR] is Inherently Corrupt
> the longer it remains Single-Party Rule; Often
> SPR becomes more and more Centralized and
> Fewer and Fewer Leaders Do The Deciding For
> All. The Mind set of these Leaders often takes
> on the Form of 'The Collective' {Group Think}
> Frequently the Leadership becomes more and
> more Brutal and then Single-Party Rule becomes
> a Totalitarian Regime with 'The One Leader' that
> Controls All.
>
What we have is an illusion of democracy. One party really rules
(Goldman Sachs/BP), but they let us believe we have a choice.
Topaz
"BOTH Republicans AND Democrats are hypocrites and cowards, because
both have sold out America and the American gross domestic product
(GDP) to Israel. The United States does not exist anymore as a
sovereign entity and all our energy, all our societal efforts are
dedicated to supporting Israel first, Israel second, and Israel third.
America is a Jew-ocracy that is run for the Jews, by the Jews, and of
the Jews, because America is a Jewish owned corporation, not a
"democracy." Votes don't matter much here in the USA because
Washington runs on money, not on votes, and Democratic presidential
candidate Senator Hillary Clinton is just as sold out to the Israeli
lobby, AIPAC (the America Israel Public Affairs Committee), as
Republican presidential candidate Senator Bill Frist. Former
president Bill Clinton was sold out, Jimmy Carter was sold out and
later admitted it after he left office, Ronald Reagan was sold out,
all American presidents were sold out going back to JFK..
All our Middle East problems, our vast national debt, our collapsing
economy, and our collapsing standard of living are all directly the
result of our blind support for Israel's illegal ethnic cleansing of
Palestinians from Palestine. Bush used Israeli torture techniques on
Moslems, our leaders have let Israeli agents here in the USA illegally
spy on American citizens, we ignore UN Resolutions that tell Israel
to go retreat to their 1967 borders as international law mandates. We
routinely block the United Nations from taking action against Israel's
illegal activities. We gave Israel plutonium and helped them build
their atomic and hydrogen bombs, we shoveled Israel over 140 billion
in foreign aid since 1950, and we have wasted 3 to 4 trillion dollars
in total on the cult of Zionism since 1950 through the cost of illegal
wars, oil embargoes, foreign aid, and the cost of the strategic oil
reserve. Frankly, the Jews are bleeding America dry and no one is
courageous enough to stand up to the Jews because Jews in America are
the exact equivalent of George Orwell's BIG BROTHER. Jews tell us all
what to do, what we are allowed to think, and what we are allowed to
speak. Jews control our government, dominate our media, and crush any
opposition by slandering those with legitimate and provable complaints
as "anti-Semites."
It must be great to be above criticism and to control the stupid and
dull Christian masses and laugh at them behind their backs and even to
their faces and get no response other than more feet licking, bowing,
and kow towing. George Bush is a useful idiot, a water carrier for
the Jews just as Hillary Clinton will be if elected president. Both
Iraq wars were started for the Jews and by the Jews. All our
politicians are a disgrace and we will never regain our sovereignty,
solve our foreign policy problems, or balance our budget until we end
our slavish allegiance to the immoral, racist, murdering, torturing,
lying, stealing, manipulating cult nation of Israel.
The Holocaust business feeds the Zionist cult and Hollywood has
deified Jews while vilifying Moslems...
Our nation is a lying, hypocritical mess and the world hates us
because the world knows we are a nation of morons run by Jews. Where
are the brave and honest Americans who speak with one face, not two?
Americans are defeated, weak, foolish, and can't even speak out
because they are scared like little girls, unable to even speak the
word "Jew" unless in praise or on bended knees. Imagine if Catholics
or Moonies or the Mafia had that much control in America! Jews are
not above the law and Jews can be opposed for their real world crimes
just like anyone else. Our brains are frozen by decades of media
programming and propaganda so that now we cannot even speak the "J
word." Political correctness, which was invented by Jews as a form of
mind control, prevents Americans from being fully human. We are a
nation of slaves, licking Jewish feet day after day and we never get
tired of it. It's a sad and pathetic situation and we are a sad and
pathetic people who deserve the contempt of the world because we have
no backbone and no honesty.
The United Kingdom is little better than the USA because Tony Blair is
a rabid Christian Zionist himself and most of his top advisors are
Jews. Much of Europe is sold out and controlled by Jews and the cult
of Zionism has Western leaders by the testicles, frozen and unable to
fight back. Now is the time to speak up, to fight back, and to do it
legally, responsibly, and effectively. Just decide that from now on
Jews have no special privileges in your brain and that you can
criticize Jews just like Republicans, Democrats, Catholics, Moonies,
or any other group. Jews act as a 90% unified group, commit crimes as
a 90% unified group, and control America as a 90% unified group, and
thus deserve to be criticized as a 90% unified group. Being able to
criticize those who do harm is what democracy means and is exactly
what freedom of thought means. Become a fully functioning human being
and not just another mind controlled blob of useless DNA!"
inkyblacks
Topaz
Here are some quote from Mein Kampf:
"Human progress and human cultures are not founded by the
multitude. They are exclusively the work of personal genius and
personal efficiency."
"Does anybody honestly believe that human progress originates in
the composite brain of the majority and not in the brain of the
individual personality?"
"The devastating influence of the parliamentary institution might
not easily be recognized by those who read the Jewish Press, unless
the reader has learned how to think independently and examine the
facts for himself. This institution is primarily responsible for the
crowded inrush of mediocre people into the field of politics.
Confronted with such a phenomenon, a man who is endowed with real
qualities of leadership will be tempted to refrain from taking part in
political life; because under these circumstances the situation does
not call for a man who has a capacity for constructive statesmanship
but rather for a man who is capable of bargaining for the favour of
the majority. Thus the situation will appeal to small minds and will
attract them accordingly."
"One truth which must always be borne in mind is that the majority
can never replace the man. The majority represents not only ignorance
but also cowardice. And just as a hundred blockheads do not equal one
man of wisdom, so a hundred poltroons are incapable of any political
line of action that requires moral strength and fortitude."
"It is not the aim of our modern democratic parliamentary system
to bring together an assembly of intelligent and well-informed
deputies. Not at all. The aim rather is to bring together a group of
nonentities who are dependant on others for their views and who can
be all the more easily led, the narrower the mental outlook of each
individual is. That is the only way in which a party policy, according
the the evil meaning it has to-day, can be put into effect. And by
this method alone is it possible for the wirepuller, who exercises the
real control, to remain in the dark, so that personally he can never
be brought to account for his actions."
"Such people would raise an outcry, if, for instance, anyone
should attempt to set up a dictatorship, even though the man
responsible for it were Frederick the Great and even though the
politicians for the time being, who constituted the parlimentary
majority, were small and incompetent men or maybe even on a lower
grade of inferiority; because to such sticklers for abstract
principles the law of democracy is more sacred than the welfare of the
nation."
"the best form of government is that which makes it quite natural for
the best brains to reach a position of dominant importance and
influence in the community."
Topaz
Many people think they arrive at their own ideas all by themselves,
when in fact their ideas are usually made for them by Hollywood. Take
two movies that are anti-leadership propaganda, Gladiator, and
Braveheart.
In Gladiator they show a corrupt leader of Rome, but would it be
corrupt if Maximus was the leader? That would be much better than
having the lame senators running Rome. And of course in Braveheart the
Scots should have made William their leader. If he was the leader he
could have put the corrupt nobles in their place.
The purpose of the propaganda is to stop good people from wanting
power. The people who have the real power now, the bankers and the
media, are not threatened in the least by libertarians. But if there
was a leader that was really for the people they know they would be
put in their place.
In democracies money talks and those who can buy TV stations are
the rulers. These rulers don't even claim to be for anything but their
own profits and interests. People are much better off with a good
leader who has power above the money power.
Topaz
Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
"There were millions and millions of workmen who began by being
hostile to the Social Democratic Party; but their defences were
repeatedly stormed and finally had to surrender. Yet this defeat was
due to the stupidity of the bourgeois parties, who had opposed every
demand put forward by the working class. The short-sighted refusal to
making an effort towards improving labour conditions, the refusal to
adopt measures which would insure the workmen in case of accidents in
the factories, the refusal to forbid child labour, the refusal to
consider protective measures for female workers, especially expectant
mothers--all this was of assistance to the Social Democratic leaders,
who were thankful for every opportunity which they could exploit for
forcing the masses into their net. Our bourgeois parties can never
repair the damage that resulted from the mistake that was made. For
they sowed the seeds of hatred when they opposed all efforts at social
reform. And thus they gave, at least, apparent grounds to justify the
claim put forward by the Social Democrats--namely that they alone
stand up for the interest of the working class.
"And this became the principle ground for the moral
justification of the actual existance of the Trades Unions, so that
the labour organizations became from that time onwards the chief
political recruiting ground to swell the ranks of the Social
Democratic Party."
"the Jew seized upon the manifold possiblities which the
situation offered him for the future. While on the one hand he
organized capitalistic methods of exploitation to their ultimate
degree of efficiency, he curried favour with the victims of his policy
and his power and in a short while became the leader of their struggle
against himself. 'Against himself' is here only a figurative way of
speaking; for this 'Great Master of Lies' knows how to appear in the
guise of the innocent and throw the guilt on others. Since he had the
impudence to take a personal lead among the masses, they never for a
moment suspected that they were falling prey to one of the most
infamous deceits ever practiced. And yet that is what it actually
was."
Clave
"Topaz" <mars...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:b7ct865usoocttfv4...@4ax.com...
<...snip bilge...>
There's just no end to you fools, is there?
Jim
Topaz
Topaz
Many people think they arrive at their own ideas all by themselves,
when in fact their ideas are usually made for them by Hollywood. Take
two movies that are anti-leadership propaganda, Gladiator, and
Braveheart.
In Gladiator they show a corrupt leader of Rome, but would it be
corrupt if Maximus was the leader? That would be much better than
having the lame senators running Rome. And of course in Braveheart the
Scots should have made William their leader. If he was the leader he
could have put the corrupt nobles in their place.
The purpose of the propaganda is to stop good people from wanting
power. The people who have the real power now, the bankers and the
media, are not threatened in the least by libertarians. But if there
was a leader that was really for the people they know they would be
put in their place.
In democracies money talks and those who can buy TV stations are
the rulers. These rulers don't even claim to be for anything but their
own profits and interests. People are much better off with a good
leader who has power above the money power.
Topaz
Here are some quotes from Mein Kampf:
http://www.ihr.org/ www.vanguardnewsnetwork.com/
cuh...@webtv.net
HO's! Voting Rights Record
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/readart.cgi?ArtNum=295600
cuhulin
Nickname unavailable
conservative leader of italy wants his fellow conservative adolf
hitler back into power:Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi rages against
liberals and urges Hitler's followers to return him to power:fascism
is the final decay of conservatism
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/09/13/italian-premier-silvio-be_n_714393.html
Berlusconi Jokes About Hitler At Youth Rally
VICTOR L. SIMPSON | 09/13/10 11:42 AM |
ROME — Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi says young women should
follow the money when looking for a partner, noting that women seem to
like him and "I'm loaded."
Berlusconi, who was embroiled in a sex scandal last year and is known
for his gaffes, also raised eyebrows with a joke about Hitler's
followers urging him to return to power.
The billionaire businessman appeared at a convention Sunday of the
youth wing of his People of Freedom party. When questioned by one of
his Cabinet ministers – a woman – he joked about marriages of
convenience, saying women were lining up for him because "I'm a nice
guy" and "I'm loaded."
He also recalled a much-criticized TV interview he once gave, when "I
said to a girl to look for a wealthy boyfriend. This suggestion is not
unrealistic."
He also claimed women favor older men, thinking that "he's old. He
dies and I inherit."
The 73-year-old Berlusconi was engulfed in a sex scandal last year
centering on his purported dalliances with young women, including an
escort. Berlusconi's wife Veronica Lario said last year she was
seeking a divorce. They are now separated.
The media baron has said he is "no saint" but denied ever paying for
sex.
In Italy, a divorce can only be sought after three years of
separation. Media reports this summer suggested that Berlusconi's wife
has rejected his early proposals for a financial settlement.
Berlusconi often gets criticized for his earthy sense of humor, and
this time an opposition political demanded he apologize to Italy's
Jewish community for his Hitler joke.
Before telling it, he said "I already know I am going to be
criticized."
Berlusconi, who claims prosecutors have led corruption investigations
against him because they are left-wing, also appeared to be poking fun
at himself when commenting on the loss of his AC Milan soccer team on
Saturday. He contended the referee robbed the team of three goals and
that Milan often gets "leftist referees."
RHF
> RHF wrote:
>
> > Single-Party Rule [SPR] is Inherently Corrupt
> > the longer it remains Single-Party Rule; Often
> > SPR becomes more and more Centralized and
> > Fewer and Fewer Leaders Do The Deciding For
> > All. The Mind set of these Leaders often takes
> > on the Form of 'The Collective' {Group Think}
> > Frequently the Leadership becomes more and
> > more Brutal and then Single-Party Rule becomes
> > a Totalitarian Regime with 'The One Leader' that
> > Controls All.
- What we have is an illusion of democracy.
- One party really rules (Goldman Sachs/BP),
- but they let us believe we have a choice.
Barack Payola [BP]
http://thefuturespeaks.files.wordpress.com/2010/05/bp-obama-logo1.jpg
Guess Who . . . Let It Go On For Almost 90 Days !
http://www.prwatch.org/files/images/Newsmax_Obama_BP_ad_poll.png
Prez Obama's True Legacy . . .
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_XnIC3Wpq0Zc/TA9nfLt1g6I/AAAAAAAACdA/vmC8D-aQU3s/s1600/new+obama+logo.JPG
BP Sends a 'Message' via the White House
http://uncensored.co.nz/wp-content/uploads/bp-logo-finger.jpg
Prez Obama's "Green" Job . . .
http://www.thebigmoney.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/gallery-image/QTBM_BP-Conspiracy-SS_Obama.jpg
.
cuh...@webtv.net
dave
Who gives a shit? It's local TV in the UK.
cuh...@webtv.net
the big pond in Bognor Regis,England watches a couple of BBC tv stations
and I don't want her Irish mind being biased by that BBC biased ass
SH!T.
cuhulin
dave
Tell her to quit watching the Home Service and get Saudi financed Sky TV.
cuh...@webtv.net
European tv stations and maybe some Japanese tv stations.I once read
tell there is a satellite over Granada which fetches Irish tv from
Ireland, but if I buy me one of those FTA (Free To Air) satellite rigs,
I still don't know if I could access that satellite over Granada.
Where you at?, satellite tv guy in Evansville,Indiana.
cuhulin
RHF
- I still want to watch Irish tv via satellite, and perhaps some other
- European tv stations and maybe some Japanese tv stations.I once read
- tell there is a satellite over Granada which fetches Irish tv from
- Ireland, but if I buy me one of those FTA (Free To Air) satellite
rigs,
- I still don't know if I could access that satellite over Granada.
- Where you at?, satellite tv guy in Evansville,Indiana.
- cuhulin
Free-To-Air Satellite Feeds "Ricks Satellite"
http://www.gofastmotorsports.com/
SAT TV Channel List :
http://www.gofastmotorsports.com/channellist.html
.