More political philosophy about globalization and free trade..

[Amine Moulay Ramdane]

Hello..


More political philosophy about globalization and free trade..

Globalization causes some problems to lower class and some of the middle class in western countries, but i think that we have to compensate those losers by for example doing this and doing it "better":

Countries that have unemployment benefits provide assistance to people who have lost their jobs. Some of those people will have been affected by competition from abroad.

The United States has a programme that is specially targeted for people who lose their jobs as a result of imports, called Trade Adjustment Assistance.

Also globalization causes the rich to become much more rich and it is what we call the problem of unequal distribution of income and
opportunities(read my thoughts below about it)..
..

Look at the following video:

Comment l'occident va s'effondrer ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XD6FpV7r9so

As you have noticed that the most important by far that creates like a
great empire like USA are good education and innovation and technology
and the most important by far that avoids the decline of like a great
empire like USA are good education and innovation and technology, and
innovation and technology permit you to be good at competitiveness and
they permits you to export much more, but it is "not" sufficient, for
example Germany that is good in education and innovation and technology
must not cause economic problems to its consumers of other countries of
Europe, it is by logical "analogy" like Fordism that is: mass production
of inexpensive goods coupled with high wages for workers, what do i mean
is that for example Germany or USA that are good in innovation and
technology must know how to take care of wages of there consumers or how
to take care of the economies of the countries of there consumers so
that to be able to sell there products and services, so we have like to
globally maintain a kind of "balance", i mean that so that to be like a
great empire like USA, you have to know how to "tune" it correctly by
ensuring that consumers globally have sufficient quantity of power or
money to buy your products and services.

But you have to also understand that this taking care of wages is also
Globalization and trade that have increased real wages, please read
below my thoughts to notice it:

More precision about What billionaires said about wealth inequality and
capitalism..

Read below i am giving more precision by saying that i think that
Bill Gates is right by saying that we have to raise taxes of the rich
and i think it is a part of the solution for unequal distribution of
income and opportunities..

I have just written the following:

============

More about Globalization and the unequal distribution of income and
opportunities..

Jedi Master that is a supporter of Donald Trump has just responded to me
the following:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/soc.culture.usa/f0_oA92rIwE

I think that Jedi Master is not right, because Donald Trump and his
governance have not yet dealt with the unequal distribution of income
and opportunities, read the following To notice it:

Globalization and Inequality: Sharing Wealth One of Society’s Greatest
Challenges

https://theglobepost.com/2019/01/30/globalization-inequality/

And read my previous thoughts to understand:

More political philosophy about Globalization and USA and Donald Trump..

I think Donald Trump is not managing correctly, because USA and Donald
Trump have to deal with the unequal distribution of income and
opportunities, read the following to notice it:

Overcoming zero-sum games to sustain growth and globalisation

https://voxeu.org/article/overcoming-zero-sum-games-sustain-growth-and-globalisation

"The protesters claim that globalization is bad for poor people in poor
countries. A large body of evidence, however, suggests the
opposite—though clearly globalization can result in unsettling
experiences for many who live in the developing world. My recent
research with Nancy Birdsall and Stefano Pettinato suggests that
globalization has brought substantial benefits and opportunities for
upward mobility for many low-income individuals in the emerging
economies. Yet these same opportunities entail new vulnerabilities and
new risks for others."

Read carefully here:

https://www.brookings.edu/articles/winners-and-losers-perspectives-on-globalization-from-the-emerging-market-economies/


=============


And i think here is a part of the solution of the problem of unequal
distribution of income and opportunities: i think that
Bill Gates is right by saying that we have to raise taxes of the rich,
read the following:

What billionaires said about wealth inequality and capitalism in 2019

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/31/what-billionaires-said-about-wealth-inequality-and-capitalism-in-2019.html

And more about globalization..

1- Globalization has created new opportunities for firms to develop
business models and offerings that have a higher intensity of R&D,
innovation and capital. Many of the goods and services that have entered
the market over the past decades have exactly those features, and
without globalization, firms would have been forced to continue with
business models that work with a smaller volume of sales. Firms have
been able to specialize more than before and, as a consequence, human
capital and the share of skilled jobs in the economy have grown
remarkably. Today, advanced economies have a greater share of
better-paid and better-skilled jobs than ever before.

2- Globalization has increased real wages for people in Western
economies by making products cheaper or reducing the pace of price
increases. If the typical goods that every household purchases had
followed domestic rather than international price developments,
consumers would have been poorer and saddled with products of lower quality.

3- Globalization has made significant contributions to productivity
growth and, as a consequence, further raised living standards.
Globalization has been particularly important for enabling new
technology to spread fast across markets. In the long term, it is the
speed of technological improvement that sets the pace for how richer
societies get.

However, trade and investment are not growing fast anymore, and there is
much suggesting that the decline in trade and investment growth is one
explanation to the failing dynamism of Western economies. While some
appreciate the decline in the growth of globalization, those who care
about the prosperity of a society should deplore it and make efforts for
the world economy to return to high levels of trade growth.

Read the following study to know more about globalization:

The Economic Benefits of Globalization for Business and Consumers

http://ecipe.org/publications/the-economic-benefits-of-globalization-for-business-and-consumers/


More of my philosophy about complexity and productivity and quality..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and i think i am a philosopher, so i have just talked yesterday in my philosophy about the meaning and purpose of life(read my thoughts about it below), and today i will
speak more about complexity and productivity and quality..

So i will ask a philosophical question:

How to manage efficiently complexity ?

I think you can manage complexity by the “divide and rule” approach
to management, which also leads to hierarchical division of large organisations, or wich also leads to the Division of "labour",
you can read more about the Division of labour here:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Division_of_labour

Also you can manage complexity by using constraints, such as laws, road rules and commercial standards, all of which limit the potential for harmful interactions to occur, also you can manage complexity by
using higher layers of abstraction such as in computer programming,
and we can also follow the efficient rule of: "Do less and do it better" that can also use higher level layers of abstraction to enhance productivity and quality, this rule is good for productivity and quality, and about productivity: I have also just posted about the following thoughts from the following PhD computer scientist:

https://lemire.me/blog/about-me/

Read more here his thoughts about productivity:

https://lemire.me/blog/2012/10/15/you-cannot-scale-creativity/

And i think he is making a mistake:

Since we have that Productivity = Output/Input

But better human training and/or better tools and/or better human smartness and/or better human capacity can make the Parallel productivity part much bigger that the Serial productivity part,
so it can scale much more (it is like Gustafson's Law).

And it looks like the following:

About parallelism and about Gustafson’s Law..

Gustafson’s Law:

• If you increase the amount of work done by each parallel
task then the serial component will not dominate
• Increase the problem size to maintain scaling
• Can do this by adding extra complexity or increasing the overall
problem size

Scaling is important, as the more a code scales the larger a machine it
can take advantage of:

• can consider weak and strong scaling
• in practice, overheads limit the scalability of real parallel programs
• Amdahl’s law models these in terms of serial and parallel fractions
• larger problems generally scale better: Gustafson’s law

Load balance is also a crucial factor.

So read my following thoughts about the Threadpool to notice that my Threadpool that scales very well does Load balance well:

---

About the Threadpool..

I have just read the following:

Concurrency - Throttling Concurrency in the CLR 4.0 ThreadPool

https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/archive/msdn-magazine/2010/september/concurrency-throttling-concurrency-in-the-clr-4-0-threadpool


But i think that both the methodologies from Microsoft of the Hill Climbing and of the Control Theory using band pass filter or match filter and discrete Fourier transform have a weakness, there weakness is that they are "localized" optimization that maximize the throughput
, so they are not fair, so i don't think i will implement them, so then you can use my following invention of an efficient Threadpool engine with priorities that scales very well (and you can use a second Threadpool for IO etc.):

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well

And here is my other Threadpool engine with priorities:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/threadpool-engine-with-priorities


And read my following previous thoughts to understand more:

About the strategy of "work depth-first; steal breadth-first"..

I have just read the following webpage:

Why Too Many Threads Hurts Performance, and What to do About It

https://www.codeguru.com/cpp/sample_chapter/article.php/c13533/Why-Too-Many-Threads-Hurts-Performance-and-What-to-do-About-It.htm

Also I have just looked at the following interesting video about Go scheduler and Go concurrency:

Dmitry Vyukov — Go scheduler: Implementing language with lightweight concurrency

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-K11rY57K7k

And i have just read the following webpage about the Threadpool of microsoft .NET 4.0:

https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/jennifer/2009/06/26/work-stealing-in-net-4-0/


And as you are noticing the first web link above is speaking about the strategy of "work depth-first; steal breadth-first" , but we have to be more smart because i think that this strategy, that is advantageous for cache locality, works best for recursive algorithms, because a thread is taking the first task and after that the algorithm is recursive, so it will put the childs tasks inside the local work-stealing queue, and the other threads will start to take from the work-stealing queue, so the work will be distributed correctly, but as you will notice that this strategy works best for recursive algorithms, but when you you iteratively start many tasks, i think we will have much more contention on the work-stealing queue and this is a weakness of this strategy, other than that when it is not a recursive algorithm and the threads are receiving from the global queue so there will be high contention on the global queue and this is not good. MIT's Cilk and Go scheduler and the Threadpool of Microsoft and Intel® C++ TBB are using this strategy of "work depth-first; steal breadth-first". And as you are noticing that they are giving more preference to cache locality than scalability.

But in my following invention of a Threadpool that scales very well i am
giving more preference to scalability than to cache locality:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/an-efficient-threadpool-engine-with-priorities-that-scales-very-well

Other than that when you are doing IO with my Threadpool, you can
use asychronous IO by starting a dedicated thread to IO to be more efficient, or you can start another of my Threadpool and use it for tasks that uses IO, you can use the same method when threads of the my Threadpool are waiting or sleeping..

Other than that for recursion and the stack overflow problem
you can convert your function from a recursive to iterative
to solve the problem of stack overflow.

Other than that to be able to serve a great number of internet connections or TCP/IP socket connections you can use my Threadpool
with my powerful Object oriented Stackful coroutines library for Delphi and FreePascal here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/object-oriented-stackful-coroutines-library-for-delphi-and-freepascal

---

And enhancing productivity is also related to my following powerful product that i have designed and implemented(that can also be applied to organizations):

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/universal-scalability-law-for-delphi-and-freepascal

Please read the following about Applying the Universal Scalability Law to organisations:

https://blog.acolyer.org/2015/04/29/applying-the-universal-scalability-law-to-organisations/

Yet more philosophy about quality control and quality..

So first you have to define quality(read below about it) and second
you have to construct quality and third you have to control quality.

So, I have just read the following about the Central Limit Theorem
(I understood it), i invite you to read it carefully:

https://www.probabilitycourse.com/chapter7/7_1_2_central_limit_theorem.php


So as you are noticing this Central Limit Theorem is so important
for quality control, read the following to notice it(I also understood Statistical Process Control (SPC)):

An Introduction to Statistical Process Control (SPC)

https://www.engineering.com/AdvancedManufacturing/ArticleID/19494/An-Introduction-to-Statistical-Process-Control-SPC.aspx

Also PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration.

So, i have designed and implemented my PERT++ that that is important for quality, please read about it and download it from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal

---


So I have provided you in my PERT++ with the following functions:


function NormalDistA (const Mean, StdDev, AVal, BVal: Extended): Single;

function NormalDistP (const Mean, StdDev, AVal: Extended): Single;

function InvNormalDist(const Mean, StdDev, PVal: Extended; const Less: Boolean): Extended;

For NormalDistA() or NormalDistP(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the probability of the value Aval or the probability between the values of Aval and Bval.

For InvNormalDist(), you pass the best estimate of completion time to Mean, and you pass the critical path standard deviation to StdDev, and you will get the length of the critical path of the probability PVal, and when Less is TRUE, you will obtain a cumulative distribution.


So as you are noticing from my above thoughts that since PERT networks are referred to by some researchers as "probabilistic activity networks" (PAN) because the duration of some or all of the arcs are independent random variables with known probability distribution functions, and have finite ranges. So PERT uses the central limit theorem (CLT) to find the expected project duration. So then you have to use my above functions
that are Normal distribution and inverse normal distribution functions, please look at my demo inside my zip file to understand better how i am doing it:

You can download and read about my PERT++ from my website here:

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/pert-an-enhanced-edition-of-the-program-or-project-evaluation-and-review-technique-that-includes-statistical-pert-in-delphi-and-freepascal


More of my philosophy about Niklaus Wirth and about the good taste..

Having good taste involves knowing what is truly excellent or of genuine value.

Read here to notice it:

What Is Good Taste?

https://www.3quarksdaily.com/3quarksdaily/2014/03/what-is-good-taste.html

And as you have just noticed i have just posted the following thoughts
of Niklaus Wirth (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niklaus_Wirth):

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/h_xKwu2gM44

And i think that Niklaus Wirth is too pessimistic on the above thoughts
Since you have to know that an efficient education can permit to give you a good taste so that to be able to be efficiently selective, and this is valid for both the consumers and the producers of products or services.

And more of my philosophy about the good taste..

So let us look in the dictionary at what is the taste, it says the following:

"The taste is the sense by which the qualities and flavour of a substance are distinguished by the taste buds."

Read here in the dictionary to notice it:

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/taste

But when you are smart you will also notice that there is also
the intellectual taste from culture or genetics, i mean that
when you are genetically more rational and more smart you will notice that this more rational and more smart is also intellectual taste since with it you are able to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality, and this is also the same for culture, i mean when you enhance more your culture it enhances your intellectual taste and it permits you to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality.

So as you are noticing that the intellectual taste is so important..


More of my philosophy of what is happiness and pleasures of life..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms, and i think i am a philosopher, so i will ask a philosophical question:

From where comes happiness and pleasures of life?

It is like beauty of the alternance of the day and night, from
this alternance of the day and night comes beauty and a kind of pleasure, so i think that happiness comes from this kind of alternance, i mean that for example you will get a great pleasure from eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui(read about it below) when you are hungry, so from this alternance of being hungry and eating a Moroccan Couscous comes this great pleasure of life that gives happiness and that gives
the meaning of life, so you have to know how to be this alternance
, i mean when for example you work hard and after that you give
yourself peace by taking a rest and you also give yourself a pleasure like eating a Moroccan Couscous Bidaoui, you will get a great pleasure, so you have to know how to be this alternance of being hard work and giving yourself peace by taking a rest, this is from where comes happiness and this is from where comes the meaning of human existence,
read all my following philosophy to understand more:

More of my philosophy about pleasures of life..

As you have noticed i have talked before about the meaning and purpose of life (read below my thoughts)..

And here is more explanation of what i was saying about pleasures of life:

101 Simple Pleasures to Boost Happiness

According to Gretchen Rubin, author of The Happiness Project and Happier at Home. "It's not life changes like a new house or a fancy car that make the most impact, but sometimes little things like the smell of an orange, that give the biggest happiness boost," says Rubin.

Read more here:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/simple-pleasures_b_3038326


More philosophy about do we have to measure it relatively or absolutely..

When you measure an IQ , you can measure it relatively to the distribution of other IQs, but is it the right measure? so this question is really important, since the philosopher Albert Camus was measuring the meaning and purpose of life by measuring it like absolutely by saying that human existence is absurd by saying:

"Absurdism arises out of the tension between our desire for order, meaning and happiness and, on the other hand, the indifferent natural universe’s refusal to provide that."

But i think this is a mistake, since in my philosophy i am measuring
the meaning of human existence "relatively" to pleasures of life that
are like "powerful" drugs that bring us more happiness and so they give meaning to human existence(since they are like powerful drugs) and they permit us to go forward towards more and more perfection and this going forward towards more and more perfection is also the goal of morality(read below my political philosophy about morality so that to understand it), so i think i am right by saying so, so then human existence is not absurd.

More political philosophy about morality..

I think i am a philosopher, so i think that so that to love
morality, you have like to love playing smartly at a game of chess,
morality is like playing smartly at a game of chess, morality is smartness in action, and being this smartness in action gives pleasure
, it is a pleasure of human life that gives meaning to human existence, so you have to love morality since smartness is an important thing and it gives also hope and it gives pleasure that gives meaning to human existence.

More political philosophy about pleasures and meaning of human existence ..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms and algorithms, and as i said before that the philosopher Albert Camus said that human existence is absurd, but i think i am a philosopher and i say that life is not absurd since pleasures of life are like powerful drugs that bring us more happiness and so they give meaning to human existence and they permit us to go forward towards more and more perfection and this going forward towards more and more perfection is also the goal of morality(read below my political philosophy about morality so that to understand it), but i think that those pleasures of human life must be balanced, i mean you have to know how to balance other pleasures of life with responsability and solidarity and charity so that to avoid violence and desorder inside the system and so that to bring order and peace to the system that are also pleasures of human life.

And about capitalism and the positive correlation between economic growth and environmental performance..

As an economy expands, resource usage becomes increasingly efficient and economies tend to move away from ecologically harmful behavior, while raising the standard of living of its participants. In fact, the 2018 Yale Environmental Performance Index shows a clear positive correlation between economic growth and environmental performance, read about it here:

https://epi.envirocenter.yale.edu/2018/report/category/hlt

So i think that we are on the right path.

More political philosophy about the pleasure of transcending..

I was just looking at the following video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbZ1vt9LX4E&list=RDLbZ1vt9LX4E&start_radio=1

And notice in the video above that people are getting pleasure by transcending using ideas of a song, those ideas of a song bring them together and they are showing there "satisfaction" of those pleasures of life, so again you are noticing that pleasures of life give meaning to human existence, since those pleasures of life that give us more happiness are like a beautiful drugs that permit you to go forward towards more and more perfection.

Yet more political philosophy about the meaning of human existence..

I said(read below) that the meaning of human existence comes from pleasures of life, pleasures of life like eating a Moroccan Couscous with Seven Vegetables that we call Couscous Bidaoui, so you have to understand that i am a white arab from Morocco living in Canada since year 1989, and here is more of my political philosophy about the Moroccan couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui:

Here is the Moroccan Couscous with Seven Vegetables that is called Couscous Bidaoui:

https://tasteofmaroc.com/moroccan-couscous-with-seven-vegetables/

So as you are noticing you have to be smart, so when you look at this
beautiful Moroccan couscous, there is different levels of abstraction,
since you can simply look at it and remember and say that it is a beautiful Moroccan couscous, or you can be more smart and look at
it from a different perspective and from a different level of abstraction and say that this beautiful Moroccan couscous requires Spices that give it the good taste, and when you are smart you will immediately make a logical analogy with political philosophy by saying that those Spices of this beautiful Moroccan couscous make, from the imperfection of a not so good taste, a perfection of a good taste, so you will say that it is the same for humans, since arabs and indians and south americans and such other ethnical groups can also use Spices in a form of good education and awareness so that to reduce by much there
imperfections that give them a not so good taste , so that to be accepted by others, and now you are understanding that it is a good philosophy that calls for proactivity that wants people to have a good education and an awareness, and this is related to my following thoughts on hate, so read them carefully:

You have to understand political philosophy, i think political philosophy must be "constructive", but what do i mean by constructive ? you will quickly notice that humans have human imperfections, but when you look at those human imperfection you can start to hate humans and hate our humanity, but this is not the good political philosophy, because you have to distinguish between two things: First, you can look at those human imperfections and hate humans and hate our humanity and then degenerate towards a much more violent system, second, you can look at those human imperfections and say that we have to transcend those human imperfections by being efficiently educated and by being efficiently organized globally and locally and by being efficiently trained and by being efficiently aware and conscious, so what will you choose ? so i think you are quickly understanding that Democracy has to be "proactive" by efficiently educating and by efficiently organizing globally and locally and by efficiently training and by efficiently making aware and conscious so that Democracy works correctly and so that we can transcend our human imperfections, so then i think that you are quickly noticing that it is the way that i am choosing so that to transcend our human imperfections, this is why you
have noticed that i said previously the following:

---
I am noticing that people here are quick at hating, notice
that the white supremacist of soc.culture.china newsgroup
called Byker is hating Chinese people and is hating other people
around the world etc. and notice that people are quick at hating people because of there human imperfections, but i think that this is not wise because you can easily hate people and hate our world and hate our humanity, but when you are smart you will notice that you have not to fall into this trap of hating and hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity, because the best way is to be "constructive" and make people educated and aware and efficient so that we reduce much more there imperfections and so that we accept them and so that we don't fall into the trap of hating people and hating our world and hating our humanity. This is why i am talking as i am talking political philosophy.
---


More political philosophy about: Is there free will?

I have just looked at the following new interesting video of Lex Fridman:

Lex Fridman is an AI researcher working on autonomous vehicles, human-robot interaction, and machine learning at MIT and beyond.

Read more here about him here:

https://lexfridman.com/#:~:text=Lex%20Fridman%3A%20I'm%20an,Podcast%3A%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20Podcast


Here is his new video, please look at it carefully:

Is there free will? | David Eagleman and Lex Fridman

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8f92iPYmiGY


I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms, and i will now answer the question of: Is there free will?

I think that by analysing humans, we can predict with a probability
that this human or that human has a certain "tendency", so it is
like probability, so when we analyse a human, without measuring with IQ tests, we can say that a human has a tendency to be smart, then we can say that there is a high probability that he is smart, so then we can give some probabilistic predictions like that, so we can
proceed by the same methodology for other human tendencies, so then is there any free will ? so i think that since we can not predict some human tendencies with 100% certainty, so we can logically say that the truth is not that humans have no free will. So i think that humans are a composition of free will and not free will.

More political philosophy about solidarity and the meaning of human existence...

Can we, in philosophy, say that the meaning of human existence comes from solidarity ?

When you are smart, you will notice that saying so is not correct, because when you say that it is solidarity, it can become problematic
since solidarity can become perfection that is problematic, so we have
to abstract more correctly than that and say that since human life is not so easy, so the meaning of human existence comes from pleasures of life that make us more happy. This is why i think that i am correct to define it like this, because it "depends" on the conditions of human life, this is why i said the following:

More philosophy about what is the purpose and meaning of human existence..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

So i will ask a philosophical question of:

What is the purpose and meaning of human existence?

I think i am smart, and i will say that the meaning of human existence
comes from pleasures of life, but you have to understand that so that
to have those pleasures in life you have to know how to "balance" pleasures of life with a level of difficulties of life so that to be perfection, i mean that you have for example to work so that to be perfection that gets you "money" from your work, and you have also to know how to be perfection that creates pleasures in this life that makes
us more happy, this is why i am not in accordance with the philosopher
Albert Camus that said that human life is absurd.

Also you have to know about the purpose of life by reading my following
political philosophy about Morality where i am also explaining that
society and morality have to be progressive:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4


Read the rest of my thoughts to understand:

More political about what is the best spirit..

I think i am a philosopher, and i think that the best spirit is
the spirit that creates pleasures in life that makes us more happy and this makes us more happy gives meaning to human life,
and you can notice that you have to know how to be solidarity and charity because even solidarity and charity can become pleasures in life, since solidarity and charity can make us more "happy" and this this make us more happy gives meaning to human life, and creating products and services that make us more happy is creating pleasures in life that gives meaning to life, so you are understanding my philosophy (read about it below) this is why i am also creating pleasures in life
by writing my poetry and by for example saying the following in my poetry:

--

More explanation of my poem of Love below:

Notice that i am saying in my poem of Love below the following:

"But my beautiful desire for you is "also" always rolling"

The "rolling" in my poem of Love below means:

Happening like in a steady and continuous way.

Read in the following dictionary to notice it:

https://www.lexico.com/definition/rolling

So here is my new poem of Love that i have just written,
read it listening at the same time at this beautiful song:

Cesaria Evora - Mae Velha

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhpAbA78IKM

Here is my new poem of Love:

Time is flowing and walking and running

But my beautiful heart is always resisting

Time is flowing and walking and running

But my beautiful love for you is forever staying

Time is flowing and walking and running

But my beautiful desire for you is "also" always rolling

Time is flowing and walking and running

But my love for you is a so beautiful King

Time is flowing and walking and running

Like our love is also forever flowing like a beautiful spring

Time is flowing and walking and running

But my love is a beautiful ring around your beautiful angel wings

Time is flowing and walking and running

But my love is a so beautiful offspring

Time is flowing and walking and running

But our love is like our beautiful God that we are worshiping !

---


More philosophy about how morality is going forward towards more and more perfection..

I have just said the following:

---------------------------------------------------------------

More philosophy about what is the purpose and meaning of human existence..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

So i will ask a philosophical question of:

What is the purpose and meaning of human existence?

I think i am smart, and i will say that the meaning of human existence
comes from pleasures of life, but you have to understand that so that
to have those pleasures in life you have to know how to "balance" pleasures of life with a level of difficulties of life so that to be perfection, i mean that you have for example to work so that to be perfection that gets you "money" from your work, and you have also to know how to be perfection that creates pleasures in this life that makes
us more happy, this is why i am not in accordance with the philosopher
Albert Camus that said that human life is absurd.

Also you have to know about the purpose of life by reading my following
political philosophy about Morality where i am also explaining that
society and morality have to be progressive:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4

-------------------------------------------------------------------

So as you are noticing we are moving forward towards more and more perfection that also creates pleasures in this life. I give you
an example: look at my following poetry in english and french at how i am creating "pleasures" by perfecting with my smartness so that to bring more happiness:

Here is some of my poetry in english:

https://www.facebook.com/Poetry-about-Love-and-more-113452413628897

And here is some of my poetry in french:

https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.quebec/c/0AslKfJS9Nw



Read the rest of my previous thoughts:


More philosophy about what is the purpose and meaning of human existence..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

So i will ask a philosophical question of:

What is the purpose and meaning of human existence?

I think i am smart, and i will say that the meaning of human existence
comes from pleasures of life, but you have to understand that so that
to have those pleasures in life you have to know how to "balance" pleasures of life with a level of difficulties of life so that to be perfection, i mean that you have for example to work so that to be perfection that gets you "money" from your work, and you have also to know how to be perfection that creates pleasures in this life that makes
us more happy, this is why i am not in accordance with the philosopher
Albert Camus that said that human life is absurd.

Also you have to know about the purpose of life by reading my following
political philosophy about Morality where i am also explaining that
society and morality have to be progressive:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4

More precision about capitalism and about National Vanguard..

I will be more rigorous, so read again:

I have just read the following article from a white supremacist website
called National Vanguard:

Why Capitalism Fails

https://nationalvanguard.org/2015/07/why-capitalism-fails/

And it is saying the following about why capitalism fails:

"Capitalism permits inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner. And therein is the flaw: inherited wealth isn’t earned by its owner, yet it leads to a class segregation of men that has nothing to do with how much wealth they have earned; i.e., nothing to do with how much or how well or how significantly they have worked."

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, and i will answer with my fluid intelligence:
I think the above article is not taking into account the risk factor and
and the smartness factor, so there have to be mechanisms, that are
like engines, that "encourage" to or/and "make" a part of the people work by taking risks or great risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and that "encourage" to or/and "make" the smartest to give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich), so i think capitalism has those mechanisms in form of rewards by allowing to become "rich" and in form of rewards by allowing inheritance, the command transfer of private property to a designated new owner upon the death of the previous owner: Since it "encourages" to or/and "makes" a part of the people work by taking risks and by doing there best (so that to become rich) or/and it encourages to or/and makes the smartest give there best with there smartness (so that to become rich).

And notice that i am also defining taking a "risk" as working "hard".

And the above article is saying the following:

"Capitalism constantly looks for ways to reduce labor costs. Automation made human labor less necessary than it had been when capitalism first appeared. When automation did appear, people who had the talent, the skills, and the motivation to make contributions began to find no jobs, or to become uncompetitive with mass-production if they tried to employ themselves."

I think it is not true, because read the following:

https://singularityhub.com/2019/01/01/ai-will-create-millions-more-jobs-than-it-will-destroy-heres-how/

And read the following:

Here is the advantages and disadvantages of automation:

Following are some of the advantages of automation:

1. Automation is the key to the shorter workweek. Automation will allow
the average number of working hours per week to continue to decline,
thereby allowing greater leisure hours and a higher quality life.

2. Automation brings safer working conditions for the worker. Since
there is less direct physical participation by the worker in the
production process, there is less chance of personal injury to the worker.

3. Automated production results in lower prices and better products. It
has been estimated that the cost to machine one unit of product by
conventional general-purpose machine tools requiring human operators may
be 100 times the cost of manufacturing the same unit using automated
mass-production techniques. The electronics industry offers many
examples of improvements in manufacturing technology that have
significantly reduced costs while increasing product value (e.g., colour
TV sets, stereo equipment, calculators, and computers).

4. The growth of the automation industry will itself provide employment
opportunities. This has been especially true in the computer industry,
as the companies in this industry have grown (IBM, Digital Equipment
Corp., Honeywell, etc.), new jobs have been created.
These new jobs include not only workers directly employed by these
companies, but also computer programmers, systems engineers, and other
needed to use and operate the computers.

5. Automation is the only means of increasing standard of living. Only
through productivity increases brought about by new automated methods of
production, it is possible to advance standard of living. Granting wage
increases without a commensurate increase in productivity
will results in inflation. To afford a better society, it is a must to
increase productivity.

Following are some of the disadvantages of automation:

1. Automation will result in the subjugation of the human being by a
machine. Automation tends to transfer the skill required to perform work
from human operators to machines. In so doing, it reduces the need for
skilled labour. The manual work left by automation requires lower skill
levels and tends to involve rather menial tasks (e.g., loading and
unloading workpart, changing tools, removing chips, etc.). In this
sense, automation tends to downgrade factory work.

2. There will be a reduction in the labour force, with resulting
unemployment. It is logical to argue that the immediate effect of
automation will be to reduce the need for human labour, thus displacing
workers.

3. Automation will reduce purchasing power. As machines replace workers
and these workers join the unemployment ranks, they will not receive the
wages necessary to buy the products brought by automation. Markets will
become saturated with products that people cannot afford to purchase.
Inventories will grow. Production will stop. Unemployment will reach
epidemic proportions and the result will be a massive economic depression.

And to know more about economy and capitalism, please read my following thoughts:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/wlJu5j1xhPk


And more political philosophy about the good taste..

So let us look in the dictionary at what is the taste, it says the following:

"The taste is the sense by which the qualities and flavour of a substance are distinguished by the taste buds."

Read here in the dictionary to notice it:

https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/taste

But when you are smart you will also notice that there is also
the intellectual taste from culture or genetics, i mean that
when you are genetically more rational and more smart you will notice that this more rational and more smart is also intellectual taste since with it you are able to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality, and this is also the same for culture, i mean when you enhance more your culture it enhances your intellectual taste and it permits you to be more efficiently selective of your knowledge, so it permits you to enhance quality.

So as you are noticing that the intellectual taste is so important..

And you have to also know that i am also doing political philosophy by
efficiently finding the patterns with my smartness, i give you an example, look at the following pattern that i am finding with my smartness:

--

More explanation about the rule of "work smart and not hard"..

I will be more logically rigorous and explain more, so read my logical proof:

I have just looked at the following video, i invite you to look at it:

People who say "work smart not hard" pretty much always fail | James Gosling and Lex Fridman

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jaho2mbaVGM&t=99s

Here is James Gosling:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Gosling

And here is Lex Fridman:

https://lexfridman.com/#:~:text=Lex%20Fridman%3A%20I'm%20an,Teaching%3A%20deeplearning.mit.edu


I think i am a white arab that is smart since i have invented many
scalable algorithms and i say that Lex Fridman and James Gosling in the above video are not smart by saying that "work smart and not hard" pretty much always fail, and notice that Lex Fridman says that
the "not hard" in the rule means lazy, but this is not logically correct, since if the statistical distribution of the strenght and force of the work is normal in the real world , so i have to discern with my fluid intelligence that it is a system that means "work smart and not hard" and it can mean: "work smart and using an average force or strenght", so then it means that this system or rule doesn't pretty much always fail, also we can generalize and say: since the truth of "work smart and not hard pretty much always fail" depends on the statistical distribution(of the strenght and force of the work) in the real world, so we can not generalize and say that the rule of "work smart and not hard" pretty much always fail.

--

I give you another example, look at the following patterns that
i am finding with my smartness:

---

What is it to be smart ?

Read my following thoughts, since i have just corrected a typo:

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart like a genius ,
since i have invented many scalable algorithms and there implementations, and today i will speak about what is
it to be "smart"..

So i will start it by inviting you to read carefully the following webpage from a Senior Consultant (and former Editor-in-Chief and Publishing Director) of New Scientist and Author of After the Ice:

Why are humans smarter than other animals?

https://www.edge.org/response-detail/12021

So as you are noticing he is saying the following:

--
"The idea of human superiority should have died when Darwin came on the scene.
Unfortunately, the full implications of what he said have been difficult to take in: there is no Great Chain of Being, no higher and no lower. All creatures have adapted effectively to their own environments in their own way. Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy among many others, not the top of a long ladder.
It took a surprisingly long time for scientists to grasp this. For decades, comparative psychologists tried to work out the learning abilities of different species so that they could be arranged on a single scale. Animal equivalents of intelligence tests were used and people seriously asked whether fish were smarter than birds. It took the new science of ethology, created by Nobel-prize winners Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch, to show that each species had the abilities it needed for its own lifestyle and they could not be not arranged on a universal scale. Human smartness is no smarter than anyone else's smartness. The question should have died for good."
--

So i am smart like a genius and i say that the above webpage is not so smart, because the logical reasoning defect is that he is first saying the following:

"Human "smartness" is just a particular survival strategy"


This is the first logical defect, since he is like using boolean logic by saying that human smartness is only a particular survival strategy, and this is not correct logical reasoning, because we have like to be fuzzy logic and say that not all humans are using smartness for only survival, since we are not like animals, since we have not to think it only societally, but we can also say there is a great proportion of humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with there smartness to be a much better human condition than only survival. So now we can say with human smartness (and measure it with human smartness) that the humans that have transcended there "survival" condition with there smartness to be a much better human condition have a much superior smartness than animals, since we can measure it with human smartness, and here is the definition of surviving in the dictionary:

https://www.dictionary.com/browse/survive

So as you are noticing that survival is only to remain alive, so i am logical in my thoughts above.

The second logical defect of the above webpage is the following:

Notice that the above webpage that he is saying the following:

"Strangley enough, even evolutionary biologists still get caught up with the notion that humans stand at the apex of existence. There are endless books from evolutionary biologists speculating on the reasons why humans evolved such wonderful big brains, but a complete absence of those which ask if a big brains is a really useful organ to have. The evidence is far from persuasive. If you look at a wide range of organisms, those with bigger brains are generally no more successful than those with smaller brains — hey go extinct just as fast."

So i think that the above webpage is not right.

So notice again that he is saying that the brain must be successful in survival, and this is not correct reasoning, since as i said above
smartness is not only about survival, since we have to measure it with
our smartness and notice that from also my above thoughts that we can
be humans that are much more smart than animals even if we go extinct.

So the important thing to notice in my above logical reasoning , is
that you have to measure smartness with smartness, it is the same
as my following logical proof about: Is beauty universal ? ,
here it is , read it carefully:

I will make you understand with smartness what about the following webpage:

Look at the following webpage from BBC:

The myth of universal beauty

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20150622-the-myth-of-universal-beauty

So notice in the above webpage that it is saying the following about
beauty:

"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"

So you have to understand that the above webpage from BBC is not smart,
i will make you understand with smartness that beauty is universal,
so if we take the following sentence of the above webpage:

"Where starvation is a risk, heavier weight is more attractive"

So you have to put it in the context of the above webpage, and
understand that the way of thinking of the webpage from BBC is not smart, because it is saying that since in the above sentence starvation is a risk , so heavier weight can be more attractive, but this can be heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes, so it makes a conclusion that universal beauty is not universal, but this is not smart because we have not to measure beautifulness with only our eyes and say that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is not beautiful, because we have to measure it with smartness and say that smartness says that in the above sentence that heavier weight that is not beautiful for the eyes is beautiful for smartness because starvation is a risk, so then with smartness we can say that beauty is universal. So we have to know that that the system of reference of measure is very important, by logical analogy we can say that measuring beautifulness with the eyes is like measuring individual smartness with only genetics, but measuring beautifulness with both the eyes and smartness is like measuring individual smartness with both the genetical and the cultural.


About more philosophy about smartness..

You will think that smartness is much more genetical, but this is
a big mistake, since i think i am smart and i will explain:

If you want to climb a big mountain, there is two ways:

You can climb the big mountain or you can make the big mountain small in height so that to climb it, so when you are smart you will take a look at the constraints that make smartness much less expressive, and those constraints that make smartness much less expressive is like making the mountain small in height so that to climb it.

More philosophy about composability..

When you are smart you will realize that you have to know how to
"compose" so that to become smart, but before you know how to compose so that to be smart, you have to efficiently being "selective" of and you have to see clearly what you compose so that to be smart, and here again you will notice that being smartly inventive is also a so important thing. This is why i am thinking it smartly, so read about my following spirit so that to understand more:

I am a white arab and i think i am smart, but i am also becoming much more smart and much more powerful by using "efficiently" Swarm intelligence, read about it here(and my thoughts below about it):

How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter

https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/


More political philosophy about Swarm Intelligence..

Swarm intelligence can make a person much smarter, or it can make us collectively much smarter, so the best way is to know how to use it
efficiently, so that also to enhance much more productivity and to enhance much more quality, this is why i am very positive, since we have to be proactive so that to make people much smarter with Swarm intelligence.

More political philosophy about: Are humans smart ?

So are humans smart ?

I am very positive about humans, and i think that humans are smart,
since we are also advancing by the following process of Swarm Intelligence that is so efficient, read about it here:

How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter

https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/


So i think that "collectively", we humans, we are smart, and i think that you will soon notice it by following the exponential progress of our humanity.

More political philosophy about do we have to be pessimistic..

I think it is a beautiful day in history, and how can you understand it ?

First you will notice that the exponential progress of our humanity is going "very" fast, look at the following video to understand it:

Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ&t=144s

So as you are noticing that you have to take this exponential progress
of our humanity into account and be much more optimistic.

And you have to know that this exponential progress of our humanity also comes from the following process:

How Swarm Intelligence Is Making Simple Tech Much Smarter

https://singularityhub.com/2018/02/08/how-swarm-intelligence-is-making-simple-tech-much-smarter/

And here is my new poem called: "This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress"

--

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

Because it is a beautiful maturity but not the adolescence

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

And we have to beautifully tune it with the beautiful consensus

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

So let us not be just guesses but technicality and science

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

So let us be a beautiful expressiveness that is not helpless

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

So let us take together this beautiful breakfast

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

Since you are also like my so beautiful Princess

This beautiful exponential progress is not a distress

So let us be a beautiful presence for present and future acceptance

--

Also you have to read my following thoughts to understand more:

More political philosophy about solidarity..

I think i am a philosopher, and you have to read below my
thoughts about the problem of absurdity, and you will notice that
that i am "abstracting" so that you understand, and i am for example saying: "this smartness of humans gives "hope" and this pleasures of human life gives an interesting purpose and an interesting value to human life", so as you are noticing that solidarity can also be classified as a pleasure of human life among other pleasures of human life that is important and that gives an interesting purpose and an interesting value to human life, so i think that the abstraction is correct. And you have to read my following political philosophy about Morality:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4

And notice that i am saying in the the above web link about Morality the following about solidarity:

More about compassion in political philosophy..

And what about compassion and love in political philosophy ?

"Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More
perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an
effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction, and you have
noticed that i said the following so that to abstract it:

"When you are preparing and cooking a beautiful Moroccan couscous and
eating it, you will feel doubly satisfied by being satisfaction of being
this more perfection of preparing and cooking the beautiful Moroccan
couscous and you will also be satisfaction of eating it even if it comes
with the "difficulty" of preparing and cooking and of learning how to
prepare and to cook a beautiful Moroccan couscous. That's an efficient
philosophy. And it is also my spirit."

So then compassion and love is also "mechanical" that comes from my Rule
of: "More perfection brings satisfaction", since perfection of my
abstraction of morality above, is also helping others, so then a more
appropriate morality is to not neglect helping others and to know how to
help others.

So you are noticing that i am saying: "since perfection is also helping
others"

But i have to logically explain the big picture, here is how:

Since we can for example say: Perfection is perfection of not helping
the weakest members of our society and it is also perfection of helping
the weakest members of the society, and we can notice that each side has
a weight of importance, since we can not say that helping the weakest
members of the society has no importance, because it is also a
perfection that has a weight of importance, and logically we have not to
neglect it, and as you have noticed that i also said that:
"Independently" of Democracy, we can say that my Rule of: "More
perfection brings satisfaction" comes with a difficulty or with an
effort of being more perfection that brings satisfaction.


Read the rest of my previous thoughts to understand:

More political philosophy about Albert Camus and the problem of absurdity..

I am a white arab, and i think i am a philosopher, and
now i will talk about an important subject in political philosophy:

So read the following article about Albert Camus:

Albert Camus and the problem of absurdity

https://blog.oup.com/2019/05/albert-camus-problem-absurdity/

So notice that it says:

"The philosopher Albert Camus asserts that we should embrace the absurdity of human existence and take on the purpose of creating value and meaning. Efforts and resilience – not suicide and despair – are the appropriate responses."

So i think i am smart, and i am noticing that Albert Camus has
made a big mistake by saying that human existence was or is absurd, because human existence is inherently not absurd, i can prove it easily by saying the following:

Human existence inherently has an interesting purpose and
it inherently comes with an interesting value that has a great weight of importance, i mean that human life inherently comes with human smartness
that has a great weight of importance and human life comes with pleasures of life, and human life is both "pleasures" of life and a level of suffering, this smartness of humans gives "hope" and this pleasures of human life gives an interesting purpose and an interesting value to human life, so this is why i say that Albert Camus was not right by saying that human existence is absurd.

Read my following political philosophy about Morality to know more
about my thoughts:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4

More political philosophy about Democracy and Morality..

I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have invented
many scalable algorithms and algorithms and i think i am also a philosopher, and now i will start by asking a philosophical question:

Is Democracy morality ?

I will say that Morality is about exactness and how to be the exact perfection, note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting", read here to notice it:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection

And Democracy is a mechanism that permits to avoid corruption of morality and corruption of morality is also lack of efficiency and it is extremism that hurts Democracy, and Democracy doesn't mean that people have to govern, because it is absurdity, but Democracy is the "tool" of Morality, since morality wants to be the exact perfection , this is why it needs Democracy, and Morality or society have to be "progressive", read my following writing of my political philosophy about morality to know that they have to be progressive:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/7UmkfURwoU4

And we can say the following:

The classical notion of decentralization does not necessarily imply democracy, and an organization may be decentralized without being based on democratic principles.

But i ask a smart question of:

Can we say that an organization based on democratic principles may be centralized ?

Here is my answer:

But we can notice that even though decentralization doesn't
necessarily imply Democracy, Democracy is a "kind" of decentralization,
and this kind of decentralization brings efficiency because we can
notice that Democracy needs requirements such as competitive elections and free press, and i think that Democracy is more efficient than
Dictatorship at fighting corruption(and corruption can mean lack of efficiency), read my following thoughts about Democracy and more to understand:

https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/Nudyb_4QCRU

More political philosophy about Democracy and parliamentary Democracy..

Wich is better, Democracy or parliamentary Democracy ?

When you are smart you will notice that parliamentary Democracy
is better since Democracy means that the people "govern", but this
way of doing brings desorder, since people doesn't mean that it is Elites that govern, so this is why i think that it is inherent to parliamentary democracy that it is the Elites that govern and guide people, since also we can logically prove it by saying the following:

From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be
Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be
a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more
money.

But since i am smart i will ask another important philosophical question, and it is the following:

Does parliamentary democracy has requirements, and wich requirements
it has:

From my above logical proof we can say that the first requirement
of parliamentary democracy is: it is the Elites that must govern and guide people, and from the first requirement we can logically infer that the Elites must be competent, so we can logically infer the since they have to be competent so then we can say the the second requirement of parliamentary democracy that it must be meritocratic, and the third
requirement of parliamentary democracy is also an important requirement
and it is that we have to have a constitution that says that parliamentary democracy has to have law enforcement agencies like the USA FBI and military as necessary basic requirements for a country, and a country can become a more global world like European union or such.

More political philosophy about the mechanisms of Democracy..

I think that we have to be smart, since i have just written
the following about China and Russia of year 2010 and 2012:

----

More about China and Russia and other such countries education system..

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have invented many scalable algorithms, read the following:

“Corruption is pervasive in every part of Chinese society, and education is no exception,” Mr. Li said.

A Chinese Education, for a Price

Read more here:

https://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/22/world/asia/in-china-schools-a-culture-of-bribery-spreads.html


I think we can not be confident with the Chinese education system,
and i don't think it is meritocratic !


It is the same problem in Russia, read the following to notice it:

Mark Levin, a professor at the Higher School of Economics in Moscow who has studied the issue, said corruption in universities took place not only during the entrance examinations but also those at the end of semesters. Levin said some students preferred to pay money to pass examinations and obtain a diploma.

RUSSIA: Rising corruption threatens universities

Read more here:

https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20100514205552600#:~:text=According%20to%20necessarily%20rough%20estimates,in%202009%20totalled%20%241%20billion.&text=But%2C%20despite%20the%20country's%20increased,much%20the%20salaries%20actually%20are.

----


And also i have just posted about the today China after the anti-corruption compaign in China, read the following:

---

I invite you to read the following interesting article:

China’s Anti-Corruption Campaign and the Challenges of Political Meritocracy

https://americanaffairsjournal.org/2020/05/chinas-anti-corruption-campaign-and-the-challenges-of-political-meritocracy/

---


So as you are noticing from my above writing that corruption can corrupt
the education system and when education system is corrupt then the Meritocratic system is corrupt and this is dangerous. So even after the anti-corruption compaign in China , i think that Dictatorship of China is not so efficient at fighting corruption, because Democracy is much better at fighting corruption by competitive elections and free press, read my following thoughts to understand more:

From where people get a correct judgment in Democracy ?

So you are noticing that to be able to be good judgment in Democracy,
you have to be correct "Elitism" that guides people, and you have to be
Meritocracy to be able to be the necessary quality or perfection, but
then you are noticing that to be able to be Meritocracy there must be
a reward for the merit, by for example rewarding by giving more
money.

Now why to be Democracy ?

I think that we have to be more smart and notice that
Democracy is also smart, the big benefits of democracy that it is also
like a morality that is a diversity that prioritize by giving weights to
some important things and processes to be able to succeed, for example
if i ask a question of how to be less corruption ? i think
that Democracy is an enhanced system that fights corruption
more efficiently than dictatorship, i think this is
understandable because to be able to "escape" a local maximum
towards a global maximum(like in artificial intelligence) on efficiency
of fighting corruption (and corruption also means lack of efficiency),
we have to be able to vote for another political party that is more apt
and more efficient at fighting corruption, this is why i think that
democracy is better at fighting corruption, also i think that in
democracy the governance must be a "competent" governance
this is how we will enhance democracy to be the best.


More political philosophy about what is the goal of philosophy..

What is the goal of philosophy ?

I think there is a difference between doing philosophy like i am doing and the goal of philosophy, and doing philosophy is getting more efficiently into the "details" by being inventive and by more efficiently understanding, but the goal of philosophy is also, first, to know how to be an efficient higher level "abstraction" that abstract complexity so that people do understand efficiently your philosophy, so that people be efficient in this life, and, second, the goal of philosophy is also the following:

I have just read the following article:

How to Live Better, According to Nietzsche

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/10/nietzsches-guide-to-better-living/568375/

And it says the following:

"More recently, in his Philosophical Investigations (1953), Ludwig Wittgenstein suggested that the aim of philosophy is not to seek the truth but rather to provide relief—“to show the fly the way out of the fly-bottle.” "

I think i am smart and i think i am a philosopher and i am not in accordance with the above saying of Ludwig Wittgenstein, because i think
that it is by logical analogy like knowing the difference between boolean logic and fuzzy logic, i mean the goal of philosophy is to seek the truth, but philosophy is like Democracy that gives you a certain level of liberty under the "laws" of the society that permits you to think and write your philosophy and it can be philosophy that is the truth or that is a certain level of truth, so it is like fuzzy logic, since we want to let people in democracy diversify there thinking on philosophy(but they have to respect the laws), and the goal of philosophy is that from this philosophical diversity we have to choose what is the best philosophy.

So i will give a good example so that you efficiently understand me, here is the example:

Please read my following thoughts about Turing completeness and parallel programming:

https://groups.google.com/g/comp.programming.threads/c/ju0xEyq36Rc

So notice in the above link of my thoughts how i am explaining by
using the efficient way of learning by "abstraction", so as you will
notice that i am efficiently highering the level abstraction by efficiently wanting you to understand the important things that permits you to be efficient, and this way of doing is also like the goal of philosophy that i explained above.

More political philosophy about civilization..

So now i will talk about an important subject and it is related to the following article, i invite you to read it:

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20190218-are-we-on-the-road-to-civilisation-collapse

So i think i am smart and i say that the "main" problem of our today world comes from "complexity", what i mean by this is that we have to know how to manage "complexity", and as you are noticing that we are also managing complexity by using "abstraction", but this abstraction causes problems if it is not managed correctly, i mean that too much abstraction is not good for the system, because we have to be the right level of abstraction to be a good reliability and safety. So we can
ask if specialization that is limiting study to a particular area is also abstraction? i think it is abstraction and it can cause problems if it is not managed correctly, this is why we have also to be an "efficient" philosophy that knows how to abstract complexity.

More about learning by the way of abstraction and about specialization..

Here is the definition of the word "specialization" in the dictionary:

Specialization is: limiting study or work to one particular area.

So as you are noticing i am saying in my thoughts below that learning
by the way of abstraction is a specialization, and i think i am correct
since we can say that learning by the way of abstraction or learning greatly by the way of abstraction make us "specialized" in the area of studying and learning by the way of abstraction.

So read my following thoughts to understand:

More philosophy about smartness and abstraction and complexity..

So i will start by asking a question:

Is the way of learning by abstraction an efficient way ?

So when you are smart you will quickly notice that we have
to take into account the "context" of the way of learning by abstraction, and when you are smart you will notice that the way of learning by abstraction is also to reduce complexity, but when you take into account the context you will notice that learning by abstraction is a also a "specialization" and it is also an efficient way of learning when we measure it inside the "context" of abstraction that is the reality, so then we have not to be pessimistic about learning by the efficient way of abstraction since, first, it reduces the complexity and, second, even if we are not understanding the complexity behind the abstraction, learning by abstraction is also an efficient specialization that is efficient for adaptability, so we have to know how to balance between those that are required to understand the complexity behind the abstraction and those that are required to learn by the way of abstraction that is a specialization.

More philosophy about the way of learning by abstraction..

I will give you an example so that you understand,
so if you ask what is the way of learning by abstraction,
look at my following tutorial where i am presenting
my methodology that, first, permits to model the synchronization primitives of parallel programs with logic primitives with If-then-OR-AND so that to make it easy to translate to petri nets so that to detect deadlocks in parallel programs, please take a look at it because this tutorial of mine is the way of learning by abstraction:

How to analyse parallel applications with Petri Nets

https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/how-to-analyse-parallel-applications-with-petri-nets

I think i am smart and i will explain more what is smartness..

So that you understand me more, let us say that you are measuring a human IQ, so if it is high human IQ , this value is a measure that is relative to the other human IQs, so you will say that this high IQ is much better at adaptability than the other humans, but it is not correct measure, because even science and technology have constraints that constrain(or limit greatly) the expressiveness of human IQs, so then we can not say that a high human IQ is better at adaptability than the other humans..

More philosophy about how to measure human IQ or human smartness..

I think i am smart, and i will talk about how to measure human IQs or human smartness, first you have to know that you can measure relatively or absolutely, so if you measure the IQ of a human, you will give a value of IQ that is "relative" to the distribution of IQs of humans, so can we ask if it is the right way to measure human IQs? i think it is not, because there is a "very" important thing that is missing, and it is that you have to also measure IQ or smartness relatively to the "constraints" in our reality that constrain(or limit) human IQ or human smartness, and i think this will give a much more realistic measure of human IQs or human smartness, so if you are really smart you will start by searching what are those constraints in the reality that constrain human IQs or human smartness, because this way you will become really smart.


Let me give an example about how to measure IQs or smartness..

So if you are really smart you will give a smart example so that
people can understand, so here it is:

If i say: 2 + 2 = 4


So you will notice that this equality is also constrained by constraints of reality, since for example you are noticing that it is not so mathematically expressive, so this not mathematically expressive is also
constraining human IQ or human smartness, since if you understand and learn this mathematical equality, another person will quickly do the same, so the other person will adapt quickly to this level
of smartness, so now you are noticing the smart idea, it is that even science and technology are constrained the same way, and this constraints on science and technology constrain or limit the expressiveness of high human IQs or high level of smartness so that other lower level human IQs or smartness can attain the level of adaptability of high human IQs, this is what is happening in our today world, and if you are smart you will notice that there is something else that is happening and it is that abstraction of complexity that reduce the complexity is making others not understanding the complexity behind
the abstraction and this is not so efficient.


Here is more about the constraints on science and technology:

Is Science Going To End?

Read more here:

https://philosophynow.org/issues/68/Is_Science_Going_To_End


And read also the following

The Industrial Era Ended, and So Will the Digital Era

Read more here:

https://hbr.org/2018/07/the-industrial-era-ended-and-so-will-the-digital-era


More political philosophy about what is smartness..

I give you an example so that you understand:

If i give the following three words:

I, love, you.

It is not the same as if i give the following five words:

I, love, you, very, much

So you are noticing that the five words permit a more sophisticated
expressiveness, and notice that i am saying more sophisticated, since
the five words bring more efficiency, and this bringing more efficiency
is also what we call smartness, but notice that this smartness is brought by using the "tool" that is composed of the five words, so the tool that is our english language brings smartness, so then we have to be convinced by the fact that the tool like internet brings a much more efficiency and this much more efficiency brings much more smartness, so now you are noticing that smartness is not only genetical or cultural, but it is also the smartness of using the tool, and this is a very important thing, since the tool can be powerful and it can advance very much a human and can make a human really smart. So you have to understand that we are also in an Era of powerful tools such as internet that can advance very much a human and that can make a human really smart.

Read my previous following thoughts to understand better:

I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have
also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..

Here is my other wisdom:

With more knowledge, the beautiful of the physical reality becomes less beautiful, since we become more aware of the realities of life, but with more knowledge, it is smartness that becomes more beautiful, and then smartness becomes the beautiful that attracts more, since also with
more knowledge we become a more sophisticated intellectual taste, so more knowledge is an engine that pushes us towards more and more smartness, and smartness is also a good thing that can bring more happiness, and then if happiness is brought more by this more smartness, the beautiful of the physical reality becomes again more beautiful. So i predict that in the near future of 2030 we will become much much more smart and this much much more smartness can bring more happiness, since you have also to take into account the exponential progress of our humanity and the abundance of knowledge such as in internet.


And here is my new proverb..


I am a white arab and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms, and here is my new proverb:

Note that the English dictionary defines "perfection" as: "the act or process of perfecting"

Read here:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/perfection


This is the definition of perfection above that I use below in my explanation of my new proverb.

Here is all my explanation of my new proverb below:

My new proverb comes to me from the essence of morality that I explained to you in my political philosophy that I wrote in English, since in morality we are pushed towards the pretty tomorrow because we are aware of this pretty perfume that is the perfection that pushes us or encourages us to be or allows us to become perfect or greatly perfect.

Read about it here on my thoughts of my political philosophy about morality:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/alt.culture.morocco/7UmkfURwoU4


So here is my new proverb:


"Life is like the pretty perfume that calls us to be a pretty tomorrow!"


So notice carefully my smart play on words in my new proverb, i think it's smart, and you have to know that the future perfection depends on the present perfection, so when today we are responsibility to be the pretty perfection so that to build the pretty tomorrow, then the pretty perfection of today is part of the pretty tomorrow, and the "pretty perfume" in my new proverb is also the today pretty perfection, but you have to understand the symbolic which allows us to say that being this part of the pretty tomorrow is also like being the pretty tomorrow. It is what makes it a smart proverb.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.