BOAT
Greegor
Was it something to do with the video of ""your boat""?
Dan Sullivan
Kent Wills
"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:22603d49-7f20-4e6f...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> Kent, Why did you remove your YouTube page?
> Was it something to do with the video of ""your boat""?
How would you know the page is gone? Hoping that I posted the video of
The Princess dancing to it? You've already PROVED you have a SICK
fascination with underage girls, so your hope of seeing her dancing is a
logical guess.
Not to worry. The video is on YouTube. Spend several obsessive hours
looking for it, if your mentally ill mind requires it of you.
Once you do find it, you'll be very disappointed as it's not
provocative in any way. Of course, as I understand it, people like you,
those sexually interested in little girls, can get excited over something as
innocent as an infant dancing.
BTW, why are you stalking and harassing past and current members of
alt.friends? You've only played the avoidance game when I've asked, which
is getting very old.
--
"Jek rat, jek jakha, jek dji, jek porh, jek baht."
Romani: [We are of the] Same blood, the same eyes,
the same soul, the same belly, and of one happiness.
Peter Hucker
> On Apr 13, 8:11 am, Greegor <Greego...@gmail.com> wrote:
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Tedious aren't you? [plonk]
--
This message has been brought to you by nuclear power. Please don't tell the neighbours.
http://www.petersparrots.com http://www.insanevideoclips.com http://www.petersphotos.com
How is it one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
krp
"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:22603d49-7f20-4e6f...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> Kent, Why did you remove your YouTube page?
> Was it something to do with the video of ""your boat""?
His SS Titanic SANK in the mid Atlantic and he's staying in his SMALL
Villa in London. Buckingham Palace.
krp
"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ftt9nr$uuo$1...@stable.tornevall.net...
>> Kent, Why did you remove your YouTube page?
>> Was it something to do with the video of ""your boat""?
> How would you know the page is gone?
Did you forget your BRAGGING about it? Now you BITCH and call Gregg a
"STALKER" because he looked at the site YOU were BRAGGING ABOUT? How does
THAT work Kunt? You really ARE a big CRY BABY!
Dan Sullivan
Kent Wills
" krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote in message
news:zksMj.5014$iI3.3311@trnddc06...
What is the SPECIFIC reason you are psychologically FORCED to lie about
things you know can be proved to be lies?
Kent Wills
>
> "Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:ftt9nr$uuo$1...@stable.tornevall.net...
>
>
>>> Kent, Why did you remove your YouTube page?
>>> Was it something to do with the video of ""your boat""?
>
>> How would you know the page is gone?
>
> Did you forget your BRAGGING about it?
Bragging? How is offering links to a site than ANYONE can have,
bragging? Be specific as I suspect you are the ONLY person who thinks
getting a YouTube page and linking to it is bragging.
>Now you BITCH and call Gregg a "STALKER" because he looked at the site YOU
>were BRAGGING ABOUT?
I never bragged about it, dullard.
Why are you psychologicaly COMPELLED to LIE about most everything?
>How does THAT work Kunt? You really ARE a big CRY BABY!
>
Once again the point went right past you. No surprise, really.
BTW, why did you add so many groups, Mr. I NEVER start cross-posts?
Kent Wills
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ftt9nr$uuo$1...@stable.tornevall.net...
>
> "Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:22603d49-7f20-4e6f...@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>> Kent, Why did you remove your YouTube page?
>> Was it something to do with the video of ""your boat""?
>
>
> How would you know the page is gone? Hoping that I posted the video
> of The Princess dancing to it? You've already PROVED you have a SICK
> fascination with underage girls, so your hope of seeing her dancing is a
> logical guess.
> Not to worry. The video is on YouTube. Spend several obsessive hours
> looking for it, if your mentally ill mind requires it of you.
> Once you do find it, you'll be very disappointed as it's not
> provocative in any way. Of course, as I understand it, people like you,
> those sexually interested in little girls, can get excited over something
> as innocent as an infant dancing.
>
> BTW, why are you stalking and harassing past and current members of
> alt.friends? You've only played the avoidance game when I've asked, which
> is getting very old.
>
Greg? You gonna answer?
Greegor
G > Was it something to do with the video of ""your boat""?
KW > How would you know the page is gone?
Kent, Did you forget posting a LINK?
> Hoping that I posted the video of
> The Princess dancing to it? You've already PROVED you have a SICK
> fascination with underage girls, so your hope of seeing her dancing is a
> logical guess.
> Not to worry. The video is on YouTube. Spend several obsessive hours
> looking for it, if your mentally ill mind requires it of you.
> Once you do find it, you'll be very disappointed as it's not
> provocative in any way. Of course, as I understand it, people like you,
> those sexually interested in little girls, can get excited over something as
> innocent as an infant dancing.
The "Last Boat Ride" video has the boat registration VERY
visible IA 6312 WW and was posted Oct 6 2007 with
statement it had been purchased just weeks before.
(So he says he bought the boat in Sep 2007)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpteA_Onshg
"This video has been removed by the user."
http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=compuelf&p=r
"This account is closed."
Now Kent, WHY did you remove your videos
and close your Youtube account?
Did it have any connection to the boat registration?
Brilliant timing by the way!
Dan Sullivan
Kent Wills
<Gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>G > Kent, Why did you remove your YouTube page?
>G > Was it something to do with the video of ""your boat""?
>
>KW > How would you know the page is gone?
>
>Kent, Did you forget posting a LINK?
The last time was well over a month ago.
Please explain how you could possibly know if the page is or is
not up now. The last time I mentioned anything on the page was when I
put up the Disney video during the first week of March. More than a
month later, you comment that the page isn't up.
Seems rather "stalkish" to me.
Seek professional mental health care for your sick obsession.
And soon. Before you become a danger to yourself. It's too late for
others as proved by your beating your ex-wife and your abuse of Lisa's
daughter.
>
>> Hoping that I posted the video of
>> The Princess dancing to it? You've already PROVED you have a SICK
>> fascination with underage girls, so your hope of seeing her dancing is a
>> logical guess.
>> Not to worry. The video is on YouTube. Spend several obsessive hours
>> looking for it, if your mentally ill mind requires it of you.
>> Once you do find it, you'll be very disappointed as it's not
>> provocative in any way. Of course, as I understand it, people like you,
>> those sexually interested in little girls, can get excited over something as
>> innocent as an infant dancing.
>
>The "Last Boat Ride" video has the boat registration VERY
>visible IA 6312 WW and was posted Oct 6 2007 with
>statement it had been purchased just weeks before.
>(So he says he bought the boat in Sep 2007)
Is there a SPECIFIC reason you obsessively post this same
paragraph? This is what, the eighth time?
Seek help.
>
>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpteA_Onshg
>"This video has been removed by the user."
>
>http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=compuelf&p=r
>"This account is closed."
>
>Now Kent, WHY did you remove your videos
I didn't. Care to explain exactly why you're LYING and claiming
I have?
>and close your Youtube account?
My Youtube account is still working.
I shut down the back up since I wasn't using it any more.
>
>Did it have any connection to the boat registration?
Since MY page is still up, it must not have.
Next LIE via innuendo, please.
>
>Brilliant timing by the way!
The page to which you refer, which was always a back-up and NOT
my primary, was removed over a month ago. If I recall correctly, and
I do, it was a few days after Betty's comment about Lightning Mc Queen
and how she's not rich.
While I'm writing, why are you stalking and harassing past and
current members of alt.friends? To date you've refused to answer.
You've opted to play the avoidance game instead. Please answer the
question now.
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>
Kent Wills
Dan,
I respectfully request that you remove alt.friends from the list
of groups when pointing out how boring Greg's OCD is. AF has nothing
to do with Greg's OCD or his pathological NEED to lie and stalk
people.
You may forget to remove it on occasion (I do as well), so it
won't be the end of the world if you let some slip by.
Thanks.
" ... But there ought to be conferences and studies on how to curb
minority overpopulation, repatriate minorities abroad, imprison more
minorities, increase use of the death penalty and divest minorities of
the power they have usurped over us in recent years. That would
address the most pressing problems of our day. ... "
April 2000, Gregory Hanson
http://www.nationalist.org/ATW/2000/040101.html#Hanson
krp
>>> Kent, Why did you remove your YouTube page?
>>> Was it something to do with the video of ""your boat""?
>>
>> His SS Titanic SANK in the mid Atlantic and he's staying in his SMALL
>> Villa in London. Buckingham Palace.
> What is the SPECIFIC reason you are psychologically FORCED to lie
> about things you know can be proved to be lies?
Oh KUNT - your LIES regarding "NEVER" having ANY kind of Blog are
becoming the things that legends are made of. I think Burger King wants to
sue you for taking all the WHOPPERS in the world Kunt. Your grandiosity and
then lies about your claims are so damn entertaining. The cute thing is you
are always SOOOOOOO damn SERIOUS in your bullshit. You don't even know when
you are doing it. Love the BOAT thing. So far you have shown at least FOUR
different boats claiming they are the SS WILLS. Your FLEETS of Bimmers and
other luxury cars turns out to be in one photo that slipped by, turned out
to be a RUST BUCKET old 80's model Chevy small pickemup truck. A real POS!
Your VAST land holdings are amusing. The HUGE indoor swimming pool is also a
knee slapper Kunt. Looks like an apartment complex pool. Please TRY to keep
your lies straight. And IF you REALLY want proof of the cars I own, ask your
BUDDY Moore. He has the little FAT girl across the street supplying him with
photos of them.
krp
>>>> Kent, Why did you remove your YouTube page?
>>>> Was it something to do with the video of ""your boat""?
>>> How would you know the page is gone?
>> Did you forget your BRAGGING about it?
> Bragging? How is offering links to a site than ANYONE can have,
> bragging? Be specific as I suspect you are the ONLY person who thinks
> getting a YouTube page and linking to it is bragging.
Oh postying it on MANY newsgroups are acts of Polish HUMILITY?
>>Now you BITCH and call Gregg a "STALKER" because he looked at the site YOU
>>were BRAGGING ABOUT?
> I never bragged about it, dullard.
Ya know shithead, most people look at the posting of blogs with photos
of things you CLAIM to own, all over Usenet as BRAGGING about it.Most folks
take it as grandiosity. I have some nice stuff, yet I only mention things
like my car in answer you your pal's stupid claims, I certainly do NOT have
a BLOG with photos of THINGS I CLAIM to own nor do I post them to dozens of
Usenet newsgroups to try to PUFF UP my credibility as a owner of VAST
amounts of real property, fleets of vehicles, boats planes etc. Of course if
I DID post photos of a boat I CLAIMED was mine, I'd make SURE the
registration DID say I owned it instead of somebody else. I'm just funny
that way.
> Why are you psychologicaly COMPELLED to LIE about most everything?
I'm not the LIAR here Kunt. YOU ARE!
>>How does THAT work Kunt? You really ARE a big CRY BABY!
> Once again the point went right past you. No surprise, really.
> BTW, why did you add so many groups, Mr. I NEVER start cross-posts?
What point? How does Greg repeating YOUR BULLSHIT make HIM a stalker?
How exactly does that work Kunt? Do you see yourself as some special case?
At your "station in life" do you see yourself as some special case?
When did I say I never do crossposts? I add newsgroups. Usually after
some LYING ASSHOLE removed them, OR when I think that they are more
appropriate in a different newsgroup.Such as making sure that the folks in
misc.legal get to see your LEGAL OPINIONS you post in other newsgroups so
they can see your LEGAL KNOWLEDGE. Or what you TRY to pretend as formidable
LEGAL authority and pass off as expertise with your "legal opinions." I
think more REAL LAWYERS need to read your LEGAL ADVICE Kunt to see what you
claim so stridently as "THE LAW."
Dan Sullivan
TNKev
> Kent, Why did you remove your YouTube page?
> Was it something to do with the video of ""your boat""?
and how did you know it was gone?
stalker!
why are you stalking and harassing alt.friends?
TNKev
you are a sick individual greegor.
quit stalking people.
Kent Wills
>"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:fttu1g$ifs$1...@stable.tornevall.net...
>
>>>>> Kent, Why did you remove your YouTube page?
>>>>> Was it something to do with the video of ""your boat""?
>
>>>> How would you know the page is gone?
>
>>> Did you forget your BRAGGING about it?
>
>> Bragging? How is offering links to a site than ANYONE can have,
>> bragging? Be specific as I suspect you are the ONLY person who thinks
>> getting a YouTube page and linking to it is bragging.
>
> Oh postying it on MANY newsgroups are acts of Polish HUMILITY?
You started the cross-posting. I simply replied to the same
groups.
>
>>>Now you BITCH and call Gregg a "STALKER" because he looked at the site YOU
>>>were BRAGGING ABOUT?
>
>> I never bragged about it, dullard.
>
> Ya know shithead, most people look at the posting of blogs with photos
>of things you CLAIM to own, all over Usenet as BRAGGING about it
That the closest thing I have to a blog is on MySpace. That I have
NO photos on that "blog" doesn't factor in, huh?
Kenny-Bob has LIES to tell. The truth be damned!
>Most folks
>take it as grandiosity. I have some nice stuff, yet I only mention things
>like my car in answer you your pal's stupid claims,
You have almost nothing.
>I certainly do NOT have
>a BLOG with photos of THINGS I CLAIM to own
Nor do I. Keep LYING and claiming I do, if your seriously ill
mind requires it, but the truth will remain the truth.
>nor do I post them to dozens of
>Usenet newsgroups to try to PUFF UP my credibility as a owner of VAST
>amounts of real property,
Meh... I don't see it as vast. I accept that you do.
>fleets of vehicles,
We don't have a fleet.
Why do you lie?
>boats
Hey, what ever became of you LIE that I mentioned owning a third
boat? When the light of truth was shown on your comment, you ran away
like the cockroach you are.
>planes
ONE Piper Cub. One. Singular.
I understand that you see one as equaling a number greater than
one, but I don't think many others have this affliction.
>etc. Of course if
>I DID post photos of a boat I CLAIMED was mine, I'd make SURE the
>registration DID say I owned it instead of somebody else. I'm just funny
>that way.
The current registration for both boats list the corporation as
owner.
You would do well NOT to pay attention to what Jonezie claims.
He will freely lie with NO indication of regret, sorrow or concern for
the truth.
>
>> Why are you psychologicaly COMPELLED to LIE about most everything?
>
> I'm not the LIAR here Kunt. YOU ARE!
I've proved you to be the liar you are above.
And not for the first time. I doubt it will be the last.
>
> >>How does THAT work Kunt? You really ARE a big CRY BABY!
>
>> Once again the point went right past you. No surprise, really.
>> BTW, why did you add so many groups, Mr. I NEVER start cross-posts?
>
> What point? How does Greg repeating YOUR BULLSHIT make HIM a stalker?
When, exactly, did I post the names and birthdays of past and
current members of alt.friends?
Is there anything about which you will NOT lie?
>How exactly does that work Kunt? Do you see yourself as some special case?
>At your "station in life" do you see yourself as some special case?
Have I ever claimed such?
Hint: No.
>
> When did I say I never do crossposts? I add newsgroups.
So you LIED when you claimed it was Moore who was the only one
doing it. Got it.
>Usually after
>some LYING ASSHOLE removed them, OR when I think that they are more
>appropriate in a different newsgroup.Such as making sure that the folks in
>misc.legal get to see your LEGAL OPINIONS you post in other newsgroups so
>they can see your LEGAL KNOWLEDGE.
Everyone here is aware of me and my opinions.
>Or what you TRY to pretend as formidable
>LEGAL authority and pass off as expertise with your "legal opinions."
What is the EXACT reason you are psychologically forced to LIE and
give me a level of knowledge you KNOW I don't have?
>I
>think more REAL LAWYERS need to read your LEGAL ADVICE Kunt to see what you
>claim so stridently as "THE LAW."
>
There are a few lawyers in misc.legal. And I point out in any
reply that could be viewed as legal advice that I'm not a lawyer.
Further, I tell people that if anyone who is a lawyer contradicts
anything I write, they should go with the lawyer's opinion over mine.
Of course, you already know this, but lack the mental stability
to admit it.
--
"We'd like to arrange for YOUR rape..."
--Kenneth Robert Pangborn of KRP Consulting, from an argument with a
woman on the talk.rape newsgroup
Greegor
G > Was it something to do with the video of ""your boat""?
KW > How would you know the page is gone?
G > Kent, Did you forget posting a LINK?
KW > Hoping that I posted the video of
KW > The Princess dancing to it? You've already
KW > PROVED you have a SICK fascination with
KW > underage girls, so your hope of seeing her
KW > dancing is a logical guess.
KW > Not to worry. The video is on YouTube.
KW > Spend several obsessive hours looking for
KW > it, if your mentally ill mind requires it of you.
KW > Once you do find it, you'll be very
KW > disappointed as it's not provocative in any way.
KW > Of course, as I understand it, people like you,
KW > those sexually interested in little girls, can
KW > get excited over something as innocent
KW > as an infant dancing.
G > The "Last Boat Ride" video has the boat registration VERY
G > visible IA 6312 WW and was posted Oct 6 2007 with
G > statement it had been purchased just weeks before.
G > (So he says he bought the boat in Sep 2007)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HpteA_Onshg
G > "This video has been removed by the user."
http://www.youtube.com/profile_videos?user=compuelf&p=r
G > "This account is closed."
G > Now Kent, WHY did you remove your videos
G > and close your Youtube account?
G > Did it have any connection to the boat registration?
G > Brilliant timing by the way!
Kent and the BOAT registration
1. Kent posted links to photos of his boat.
2. Kent made public claims about his boat registration.
3. Checks with Iowa boat registration reveal it's registered to
Caquelin's.
4. Kent lied about boat registration some more.
5. Kent's posted link to a youtube video of his boat.
6. The boat registration was plainly visible. IA 6312 WW
7. video posted Oct 6 2007 purchase weeks before (Sep 2007 purchase)
8. Checks with Iowa boat registration reveal it's registered to
Caquelin's.
9. Kent claimed otherwise supposedly calling boat registration after
4:30.
10. Kent lied about boat registration (government) phone hours on
recording.
11. Kent removed the youtube video, and his entire youtube account.
The Kent Wills saga continues
Greegor
G > Was it something to do with the video of ""your boat""?
KW > How would you know the page is gone?
G > Did you forget your BRAGGING about it?
KW > Bragging? How is offering links to a site
KW > than ANYONE can have, bragging?
Sure Mister WEBMASTER! LOL
http://www.pcpages.com/altfriends/bday.html
KW > Be specific as I suspect you are the
KW > ONLY person who thinks getting a
KW > YouTube page and linking to it is bragging.
KRP > Oh postying it on MANY newsgroups
KRP > are acts of Polish HUMILITY?
KW > You started the cross-posting.
KW > I simply replied to the same groups.
KRP > Now you BITCH and call Gregg a "STALKER"
KRP > because he looked at the site YOU
KRP > were BRAGGING ABOUT?
KW > I never bragged about it, dullard.
KRP > Ya know [s-head], most people look at the
KRP > posting of blogs with photos of things you
KRP > CLAIM to own, all over Usenet as
KRP > BRAGGING about it
KW > That the closest thing I have to a blog is
KW > on MySpace. That I have NO photos on
KW > that "blog" doesn't factor in, huh?
KW > Kenny-Bob has LIES to tell.
KW > The truth be damned!
KRP > Most folks take it as grandiosity. I have
KRP > some nice stuff, yet I only mention things
KRP > like my car in answer you your pal's stupid claims,
KW > You have almost nothing.
Unlike you, Kent, Ken P is neither bragging nor is he
hiding all of his assets behind some sort of tax dodge.
What he has is not under a "corporation" or a "family trust", Kent.
KRP > I certainly do NOT have a BLOG with
KRP > photos of THINGS I CLAIM to own
KW > Nor do I. Keep LYING and claiming I do,
KW > if your seriously ill mind requires it, but
KW > the truth will remain the truth.
Kent Wills, arbiter of truth? Comedic genius!
KRP > nor do I post them to dozens of Usenet
KRP > newsgroups to try to PUFF UP my
KRP > credibility as a owner of VAST
KRP > amounts of real property,
KW > Meh... I don't see it as vast. I accept that you do.
KRP > fleets of vehicles,
KW > We don't have a fleet.
KW > Why do you lie?
KRP > boats
KW > Hey, what ever became of you LIE that I
KW > mentioned owning a third boat? When
KW > the light of truth was shown on your
KW > comment, you ran away like the
KW > cockroach you are.
KRP > planes
KW > ONE Piper Cub. One. Singular.
Isn't that a two seater?
How does that work with kids?
KW > I understand that you see one as
KW > equaling a number greater than
KW > one, but I don't think many others
KW > have this affliction.
KRP > etc. Of course if
KRP > I DID post photos of a boat I CLAIMED
KRP > was mine, I'd make SURE the
KRP > registration DID say I owned it instead
KRP > of somebody else. I'm just funny
KRP > that way.
KW > The current registration for both boats
KW > list the corporation as owner.
LLC, incorporated or non-profit?
Isn't it time for the IRS to check out
your little tax dodge?
Was this ""corporation"" scam a means
to avoid paying for your own attorney,
avoid paying restitution or fines?
Certainly having all of your property
listed under a corporation seems
a bit "scammy".
Boats, plane, house, pool serve what purpose
in this corporation?
KW > You would do well NOT to pay
KW > attention to what Jonezie claims.
KW > He will freely lie with NO indication of
KW > regret, sorrow or concern for the truth.
KW > Why are you psychologicaly
KW > COMPELLED to LIE about most everything?
KRP > I'm not the LIAR here Kunt. YOU ARE!
KW > I've proved you to be the liar you are above.
KW > And not for the first time. I doubt it will be the last.
Kent, you show a proclivity for calling everything
you want to hear truth and everything you don't
want to hear lies. It's fairly transparent at this point.
KRP > How does THAT work Kunt?
KRP > You really ARE a big CRY BABY!
KW > Once again the point went right past you.
KW > No surprise, really.
KW > BTW, why did you add so many groups,
KW > Mr. I NEVER start cross-posts?
KRP > What point? How does Greg repeating
KRP > YOUR BULLSHIT make HIM a stalker?
KW > When, exactly, did I post the names and
KW > birthdays of past and current members of alt.friends?
KW > Is there anything about which you will NOT lie?
You made a freakin WEB PAGE for exactly that!
On the WORLD WIDE WEB no less.
KRP > How exactly does that work Kunt?
KRP > Do you see yourself as some special case?
KRP > At your "station in life" do you
KRP > see yourself as some special case?
KW > Have I ever claimed such? Hint: No.
Claiming that gypsy is a slur.
Pretending that posting your Felony
Garage Burglary records is ""stalking"".
KW > When did I say I never do crossposts? I add newsgroups.
KW > So you LIED when you claimed it was Moore who
KW > was the only one doing it. Got it.
KRP > Usually after some LYING ASSHOLE
KRP > removed them, OR when I think that
KRP > they are more appropriate in a different
KRP > newsgroup.Such as making sure that
KRP > the folks in misc.legal get to see your
KRP > LEGAL OPINIONS you post in other
KRP > newsgroups so they can see
KRP > your LEGAL KNOWLEDGE.
KW > Everyone here is aware of me and my opinions.
KRP > Or what you TRY to pretend as formidable
KRP > LEGAL authority and pass off as
KRP > expertise with your "legal opinions."
KW > What is the EXACT reason you are
KW > psychologically forced to LIE and
KW > give me a level of knowledge you
KW > KNOW I don't have?
KRP > I think more REAL LAWYERS need
KRP > to read your LEGAL ADVICE Kunt
KRP > to see what you claim so stridently
KRP > as "THE LAW."
KW > There are a few lawyers in misc.legal.
KW > And I point out in any reply that could
KW > be viewed as legal advice that I'm not
KW > a lawyer. Further, I tell people that
KW > if anyone who is a lawyer contradicts
KW > anything I write, they should go with
KW > the lawyer's opinion over mine.
Shouldn't they also study the brilliant strategy
you used in your Iowa Supreme Court appeal?
KW > Of course, you already know this,
KW > but lack the mental stability to admit it.
Clumsy attempt at manipulation.
krp
>> Oh posting it on MANY newsgroups are acts of Polish HUMILITY?
> You started the cross-posting. I simply replied to the same
> groups.
Kunt the links to your BLOGS were crossposted by YOU initially to BRAG
about all your VAST wealth and holdings. That many panned out to be FALSE
only add to the humor here.
>>>>Now you BITCH and call Gregg a "STALKER" because he looked at the site
>>>>YOU
>>>>were BRAGGING ABOUT?
>>> I never bragged about it, dullard.
>> Ya know shithead, most people look at the posting of blogs with photos
>> of things you CLAIM to own, all over Usenet as BRAGGING about it
> That the closest thing I have to a blog is on MySpace. That I have NO
> photos on that "blog" doesn't factor in, huh?
> Kenny-Bob has LIES to tell. The truth be damned!
Hey DIPSHIT you have one UP as we speak with a little FAIRY mounted on a
HORSE. Your LIES, Kunt are amusing, the photos of your CARS, the YACHTS, the
OLYMPIC INDOOR SWIMMING POOL, and your "wife" they are all amusing. That you
now DENY them is ecen more amusing Kunt.
>>Most folks take it as grandiosity. I have some nice stuff, yet I only
>>mention things
>>like my car in answer you your pal's stupid claims,
> You have almost nothing.
What I "have" Kunt is not any of your business. I have NO need to
externally validate myself and MY "station in life" as YOU DO. I have a few
things. I have a car. My wife has a car - it's HER car. She paid for it. My
Step-son has a car - he's paying for it. I own a modest home. It's paid
for. I have some other "stuff"
that I don't talk about. I don't have the DESPERATE NEED that you obviously
DO for external validation.
>>I certainly do NOT have a BLOG with photos of THINGS I CLAIM to own
> Nor do I. Keep LYING and claiming I do, if your seriously ill
> mind requires it, but the truth will remain the truth.
Oh Kunt - everyone ahs seen your bragging with your house, cars, BOATS
and the like. The swimming pools.... Denying them now just makes you an even
bigger CLOWN.
>>nor do I post them to dozens of Usenet newsgroups to try to PUFF UP my
>>credibility as a owner of VAST
>>amounts of real property,
> Meh... I don't see it as vast. I accept that you do.
Yeah just MODEST land holdings all over the world.
>>fleets of vehicles,
> We don't have a fleet. Why do you lie?
I don't, YOU DO!
>>boats
> Hey, what ever became of you LIE that I mentioned owning a third
> boat? When the light of truth was shown on your comment, you ran away
> like the cockroach you are.
So FAR - SO FAR Kunt you have identified THREE or FOUR different boats
as yours. Unless you want to argue that the boat turned blue or white and
morphed dramaticly in hull design and then the pontoon boat. And the CIGAR
boat with you and your "wife" working on it.
>>planes
> ONE Piper Cub. One. Singular. I understand that you see one as
> equaling a number greater than
> one, but I don't think many others have this affliction.
Registration number Kunt? I can't seem to find it in the FAA files. Is
that ALSO under another name of yours? Like the boat(S) and the rest? Tell
me Kunt WHY is it that when you show a photo of something, a boat, a car,
whatever with actual registration numbers they ALWAYS seem to turn out to be
registered to other names than yours? Is it that UNDERCOVER shit you are
doing again? Is it to keep the paperazi away from you?
>>etc. Of course if I DID post photos of a boat I CLAIMED was mine, I'd
>>make SURE the
>>registration DID say I owned it instead of somebody else. I'm just funny
>>that way.
> The current registration for both boats list the corporation as owner.
> You would do well NOT to pay attention to what Jonezie claims.
> He will freely lie with NO indication of regret, sorrow or concern for
> the truth.
Actually Kunt - they are listed to PEOPLE - NOT YOU. Why is that?
>>> Why are you psychologicaly COMPELLED to LIE about most everything?
>> I'm not the LIAR here Kunt. YOU ARE!
> I've proved you to be the liar you are above.
> And not for the first time. I doubt it will be the last.
No Kunt you CLAIM I am the liar. The PROOF is that YOU are the liar.
Here is a HINT Kunt. You know with photos they cam be expanded and things
like LICENSE PLATE NUMBERS can be seen? WHY do you claim to own cars that
seem to be registered to OTHER people????????
>> >>How does THAT work Kunt? You really ARE a big CRY BABY!
>>> Once again the point went right past you. No surprise, really.
>>> BTW, why did you add so many groups, Mr. I NEVER start cross-posts?
>> What point? How does Greg repeating YOUR BULLSHIT make HIM a stalker?
> When, exactly, did I post the names and birthdays of past and current
> members of alt.friends?
> Is there anything about which you will NOT lie?
You had it on a BLOG Kunt. Ask Gregg - also look back in Google - he
listed the link that traced to YOUR SORRY ASS!
>>How exactly does that work Kunt? Do you see yourself as some special case?
>>At your "station in life" do you see yourself as some special case?
> Have I ever claimed such? Hint: No.
Yet you seem to behave that way.
>> When did I say I never do crossposts? I add newsgroups.
> So you LIED when you claimed it was Moore who was the only one
> doing it. Got it.
Kunt - Moore does it, you do it, I do it, most folks do it, thanks for
the post edit adding a period where there wasn't one. I said I do it WHEN I
am adding back a newsgroup that somebody has removed, or when it is a topic
of more interest elsewhere.
>>Usually after some LYING ASSHOLE removed them, OR when I think that they
>>are more
>>appropriate in a different newsgroup.Such as making sure that the folks in
>>misc.legal get to see your LEGAL OPINIONS you post in other newsgroups so
>>they can see your LEGAL KNOWLEDGE.
> Everyone here is aware of me and my opinions.
No, Kunt, the readers of misc.legal don't generally get to see some of
your more outrageous LEGAL OPINIONS and abusive behavior trying to cram them
down other folks throats as FACTS. Such as your WRONG claims on immigration
law.
>>Or what you TRY to pretend as formidable
>>LEGAL authority and pass off as expertise with your "legal opinions."
> What is the EXACT reason you are psychologically forced to LIE and
> give me a level of knowledge you KNOW I don't have?
Kunt - it is simple. If you REALLY realize your lack of knowledge on
these topics - why are you so argumentative and abusive of those who DO?
That not only includes knowledgeable lay people like myself but actual
LAWYERS! Your arrgoant "I am right and everyone else is wrong" bullshit. IF
you REALLY understood your limitations, Wills, you'd back off a bit and at
least check out links provided to you to show you that you are wrong. You
are an arrogant BLOW HARD Wills amd your "LEGAL ADVICE" is usually SHIT! You
really need to keep it to yourself.
>> I think more REAL LAWYERS need to read your LEGAL ADVICE Kunt to see what
>> you
>> claim so stridently as "THE LAW."
> There are a few lawyers in misc.legal. And I point out in any
> reply that could be viewed as legal advice that I'm not a lawyer.
Kunt the little disclaimer (occasional as it is) is hollow as you try to
BULLY people to accept YOUR opinions as "THE facts" and state of the law,
and often you are 100% full of shit. You argue with lawyers and try to
intimidate them on THE LAW. You give people ADVICE that is BAD LEGAL ADVICE.
You state LEGAL OPINIONS AS FACT when you are wrong. The best legal advice
is "ASK A REAL LAWYER." Not some jailhouse PUNK who is generally full of
shit about the law. A good example of your TOTAL inability to usderstand how
"conflicts in law" are resolved. You can't even understand that they need to
be, much less the process for resolving them. Yet to try to ADVISE people
based on your INCORRECT understanding of the law. You and I were mud
wrestling on the CONFLICT of Visa "regulations" (which have the effect of
law) and actual black letter federal law enacted by congress and signed into
law by the President. That they NEED to be reconciled is a concept you don't
understand much less HOW they are resolved. Not to mention the legal burdens
and costs for doing so.
> Further, I tell people that if anyone who is a lawyer contradicts
> anything I write, they should go with the lawyer's opinion over mine.
> Of course, you already know this, but lack the mental stability
> to admit it.
Kunt - that doesn't save you from the unauthorized practice of law. A
lawyer should HAVE TO contradict you when your claims are BULLSHIT. You
should offer STRIDENT LEGAL OPINIONS in the first place. It is NOT the
responsibility of the BAR to argue with your bullshit.
> "We'd like to arrange for YOUR rape..."
> --Kenneth Robert Pangborn of KRP Consulting, from an argument with a
> woman on the talk.rape newsgroup
FALSE Kunt. That was NOT form me and you are perpetuating a LIE. Your
buddy MOORE using his anonymous remailers FORGED that. You also KNOW that.
It does NOT appear in the Google archives FOR A REASON. It is an INVENTION
of your PSYCHO buddy David Moore the STALKER!
TNKev
>
> my Kent Wills stalking saga continues
>
stalker.
dragonsgirl
"TNKev" <TNKe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fu2he7$68k$2...@news.datemas.de...
> Greegor wrote:
>
>>
>> my Kent Wills stalking saga continues
>>
>
> stalker.
Greg defines stalking...
<Greg Hanson>
"http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
By that definition, Mr. Probert, I could claim that
you and others are stalking me. "
I would think this sufficently defines his bahvior toward Kent, FM, and
others.
(In so far as I know, Greg's comment to Mr Probert above was sarcasm, as
Mark Probert did ntohing remotely like Greg's description)
Kent Wills
<Gree...@gmail.com> wrote:
>G > Kent, Why did you remove your YouTube page?
>G > Was it something to do with the video of ""your boat""?
>
>KW > How would you know the page is gone?
>
>G > Did you forget your BRAGGING about it?
>
>KW > Bragging? How is offering links to a site
>KW > than ANYONE can have, bragging?
>
>Sure Mister WEBMASTER! LOL
So you agree that linking to a site that anyone can have is NOT
bragging. There's hope for you yet.
What assets am I hiding? Be specific.
If you prefer, you may admit you are lying.
>What he has is not under a "corporation" or a "family trust", Kent.
The trust and corporation are there as a means to avoid probate
when Lin and I die. I've mentioned this several times.
Why are you LYING about it?
>
>KRP > I certainly do NOT have a BLOG with
>KRP > photos of THINGS I CLAIM to own
>
>KW > Nor do I. Keep LYING and claiming I do,
>KW > if your seriously ill mind requires it, but
>KW > the truth will remain the truth.
>
>Kent Wills, arbiter of truth?
Yes.
>Comedic genius!
Not been paying attention to my jokes?
on occasion I can throw out a funny joke, but this is the
exception, not the rule. The vast majority of my jokes are really
lame.
>
>KRP > nor do I post them to dozens of Usenet
>KRP > newsgroups to try to PUFF UP my
>KRP > credibility as a owner of VAST
>KRP > amounts of real property,
>
>KW > Meh... I don't see it as vast. I accept that you do.
>
>KRP > fleets of vehicles,
>
>KW > We don't have a fleet.
>KW > Why do you lie?
>
>KRP > boats
>
>KW > Hey, what ever became of you LIE that I
>KW > mentioned owning a third boat? When
>KW > the light of truth was shown on your
>KW > comment, you ran away like the
>KW > cockroach you are.
>
>KRP > planes
>
>KW > ONE Piper Cub. One. Singular.
>
>Isn't that a two seater?
Some Piper Cubs may be. There are several models.
Ours seat five very easily. Six, if the four in back are
*really* good friends.
>How does that work with kids?
They sit behind us. Duh.
Why do you work so hard to PROVE you are as stupid as you
present? Serious question.
>
>KW > I understand that you see one as
>KW > equaling a number greater than
>KW > one, but I don't think many others
>KW > have this affliction.
>
>KRP > etc. Of course if
>KRP > I DID post photos of a boat I CLAIMED
>KRP > was mine, I'd make SURE the
>KRP > registration DID say I owned it instead
>KRP > of somebody else. I'm just funny
>KRP > that way.
>
>KW > The current registration for both boats
>KW > list the corporation as owner.
>
>LLC, incorporated or non-profit?
Proprietorship is, I think, the term.
I'll ask my accountant then next time we speak.
>
>Isn't it time for the IRS to check out
>your little tax dodge?
What tax dodge?
What is the EXACT reason you are LYING and claiming a corporation
and trust, that were set up to avoid probate (perfectly legal), is a
tax dodge?
It would be a stupid way to avoid taxes, since the corp. pays
taxes, and we pay taxes on any and all draws.
Once again you PROVE you are a very stupid being.
>
>Was this ""corporation"" scam a means
>to avoid paying for your own attorney,
>avoid paying restitution or fines?
Please prove it's a scam.
Your pathological LIE aside, the corporation means paying out
more in taxes and fees.
>
>Certainly having all of your property
>listed under a corporation seems
>a bit "scammy".
First, not everything is listed under the corporation. As you
know, but lack the psychological ability to admit, there is the trust
as well.
Second, Lin and I pay more in taxes as a result of it. I don't
view it as our being scammed, but if you want to believe your lie, so
be it.
>
>Boats, plane, house, pool serve what purpose
>in this corporation?
Not everything is owned by the corporation, simpleton. But then,
you surely knew this and are once again lying.
>
>KW > You would do well NOT to pay
>KW > attention to what Jonezie claims.
>KW > He will freely lie with NO indication of
>KW > regret, sorrow or concern for the truth.
>
>KW > Why are you psychologicaly
>KW > COMPELLED to LIE about most everything?
>
>KRP > I'm not the LIAR here Kunt. YOU ARE!
>
>KW > I've proved you to be the liar you are above.
>KW > And not for the first time. I doubt it will be the last.
>
>Kent, you show a proclivity for calling everything
>you want to hear truth and everything you don't
>want to hear lies. It's fairly transparent at this point.
Truth is truth and lies are lies.
I've never even tried to hide this, so it shouldn't be clouded.
>
>KRP > How does THAT work Kunt?
>KRP > You really ARE a big CRY BABY!
>
>KW > Once again the point went right past you.
>KW > No surprise, really.
>KW > BTW, why did you add so many groups,
>KW > Mr. I NEVER start cross-posts?
>
>KRP > What point? How does Greg repeating
>KRP > YOUR BULLSHIT make HIM a stalker?
>
>KW > When, exactly, did I post the names and
>KW > birthdays of past and current members of alt.friends?
>KW > Is there anything about which you will NOT lie?
>
>You made a freakin WEB PAGE for exactly that!
Please prove that I made a web site for the purpose of having you
stalk people.
If you prefer, you may admit your comment is simply another of
your MANY lies.
>On the WORLD WIDE WEB no less.
Wow. A web page on the World Wide Web? Imagine that.
>
>KRP > How exactly does that work Kunt?
>KRP > Do you see yourself as some special case?
>KRP > At your "station in life" do you
>KRP > see yourself as some special case?
>
>KW > Have I ever claimed such? Hint: No.
>
>Claiming that gypsy is a slur.
It is.
>Pretending that posting your Felony
>Garage Burglary records is ""stalking"".
Pretending I have such a conviction, when have I claimed that
posting the information about it is stalking?
Is there anything about which you will not lie?
I've never filed an appeal.
What is the root cause of your pathological lying? Serious
question.
>
>http://www.judicial.state.ia.us/Supreme_Court/Recent_Opinions/20050506/04-0202.asp?search=+Kent+Wills+#_1
>
>KW > Of course, you already know this,
>KW > but lack the mental stability to admit it.
>
>Clumsy attempt at manipulation.
What euphemisms you use to describe truth are your issues to
address, not mine.
Why are you stalking and harassing past and current members of
alt.friends? I've asked several times, and you've refused to answer.
Now you aren't even playing the avoidance game.
Please answer the question now. Thanks in advance.
Kent Wills
>"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:l5k70411umauu7bv8...@4ax.com...
>
>>> Oh posting it on MANY newsgroups are acts of Polish HUMILITY?
>
>> You started the cross-posting. I simply replied to the same
>> groups.
>
> Kunt the links to your BLOGS
I don't have blogs.
The closest you can get is on MySpace, and there is no comment
about anything I or Lin own on it.
Why are you lying about this?
>were crossposted by YOU initially to BRAG
>about all your VAST wealth and holdings.
Liar.
You lied and said I have a miserable life. I replied only to the
groups to which you posted the lie.
>That many panned out to be FALSE
>only add to the humor here.
Please cite where any claim I've made regarding anything I own
was proved to be false.
>
>>>>>Now you BITCH and call Gregg a "STALKER" because he looked at the site
>>>>>YOU
>>>>>were BRAGGING ABOUT?
>
>>>> I never bragged about it, dullard.
>
>>> Ya know shithead, most people look at the posting of blogs with photos
>>> of things you CLAIM to own, all over Usenet as BRAGGING about it
>
>> That the closest thing I have to a blog is on MySpace. That I have NO
>> photos on that "blog" doesn't factor in, huh?
>> Kenny-Bob has LIES to tell. The truth be damned!
>
> Hey DIPSHIT you have one UP as we speak with a little FAIRY mounted on a
>HORSE. Your LIES, Kunt are amusing, the photos of your CARS,
What photos?
There are no photos of any of mine or Lin's vehicles on any of my
web sites.
>the YACHTS,
Why do you LIE and claim I own yachts (plural) when I don't own
even one yacht (singular).
Lin and I own two boats. Neither are a yacht.
>the
>OLYMPIC INDOOR SWIMMING POOL,
It's not Olympic size.
>and your "wife" they are all amusing.
There are no pictures of Lin on any site of mine.
>That you
>now DENY them is ecen more amusing Kunt.
I am exposing you for the liar you are.
>
>>>Most folks take it as grandiosity. I have some nice stuff, yet I only
>>>mention things
>>>like my car in answer you your pal's stupid claims,
>
>> You have almost nothing.
>
> What I "have" Kunt is not any of your business.
Agreed. Odd that you felt COMPELLED to LIE and claim you bought
a new SUV.
>I have NO need to
>externally validate myself and MY "station in life" as YOU DO.
You LIED and said I have a miserable life. I proved your lie to
be the lie it is.
>I have a few
>things. I have a car.
So you were lying when you claimed to have the SUV. No one would
confuse a car with any SUV.
>My wife has a car - it's HER car. She paid for it.
Good for her.
>My
>Step-son has a car - he's paying for it.
Good for him.
>I own a modest home. It's paid
>for. I have some other "stuff"
>that I don't talk about. I don't have the DESPERATE NEED that you obviously
>DO for external validation.
You have nothing about which to mention.
>
>>>I certainly do NOT have a BLOG with photos of THINGS I CLAIM to own
>
>> Nor do I. Keep LYING and claiming I do, if your seriously ill
>> mind requires it, but the truth will remain the truth.
>
> Oh Kunt - everyone ahs seen your bragging with your house, cars, BOATS
>and the like. The swimming pools.... Denying them now just makes you an even
>bigger CLOWN.
You have claimed I own a mansion. You were lying.
You have claimed I own yachts. You were lying.
You claim the pool is Olympic size. You were lying.
And so on.
BTW, I still don't have a blog with any pictures of anything Lin
and/or I own. Never have, and don't expect I ever will.
>
>>>nor do I post them to dozens of Usenet newsgroups to try to PUFF UP my
>>>credibility as a owner of VAST
>>>amounts of real property,
>
>> Meh... I don't see it as vast. I accept that you do.
>
> Yeah just MODEST land holdings all over the world.
>
All over the world? The only land we own is in Iowa and
Arkansas.
Next lie, please.
>>>fleets of vehicles,
>
>> We don't have a fleet. Why do you lie?
>
> I don't, YOU DO!
I've never claimed to own a fleet of vehicles. You have claimed
I do. You lied.
>
>>>boats
>
>> Hey, what ever became of you LIE that I mentioned owning a third
>> boat? When the light of truth was shown on your comment, you ran away
>> like the cockroach you are.
>
> So FAR - SO FAR Kunt you have identified THREE or FOUR different boats
>as yours.
Liar.
>Unless you want to argue that the boat turned blue or white and
>morphed dramaticly in hull design and then the pontoon boat. And the CIGAR
>boat with you and your "wife" working on it.
I've never claimed ownership of a cigar boat. I wasn't aware
such a boat existed until you mentioned it.
I've never made a comment about Lin or I working on any boat.
>
>>>planes
>
>> ONE Piper Cub. One. Singular. I understand that you see one as
>> equaling a number greater than
>> one, but I don't think many others have this affliction.
>
> Registration number Kunt?
It's on the side of the plane.
>I can't seem to find it in the FAA files.
That's because you don't have access.
>Is
>that ALSO under another name of yours?
It's registered under the trust.
>Like the boat(S) and the rest? Tell
>me Kunt WHY is it that when you show a photo of something, a boat, a car,
>whatever with actual registration numbers they ALWAYS seem to turn out to be
>registered to other names than yours?
They don't.
>Is it that UNDERCOVER shit you are
>doing again? Is it to keep the paperazi away from you?
What paparazzi?
How mentally ill are you that you think you can gain some fame by
proxy by LYING about me?
>
>>>etc. Of course if I DID post photos of a boat I CLAIMED was mine, I'd
>>>make SURE the
>>>registration DID say I owned it instead of somebody else. I'm just funny
>>>that way.
>
>> The current registration for both boats list the corporation as owner.
>> You would do well NOT to pay attention to what Jonezie claims.
>> He will freely lie with NO indication of regret, sorrow or concern for
>> the truth.
>
> Actually Kunt - they are listed to PEOPLE - NOT YOU. Why is that?
They are not.
Why are you LYING about this?
>
>>>> Why are you psychologicaly COMPELLED to LIE about most everything?
>
>>> I'm not the LIAR here Kunt. YOU ARE!
>
>> I've proved you to be the liar you are above.
>> And not for the first time. I doubt it will be the last.
>
> No Kunt you CLAIM I am the liar.
I've proved it MANY times.
>The PROOF is that YOU are the liar.
Odd that you've been UNABLE to prove even one. Not so odd,
really, since I've not lied.
>Here is a HINT Kunt. You know with photos they cam be expanded and things
>like LICENSE PLATE NUMBERS can be seen? WHY do you claim to own cars that
>seem to be registered to OTHER people????????
Since there are no photos of any of our vehicles available
on-line, you are once again lying.
I have made pictures available in the past. Each time the plate
has been blocked out. Expand the image all you want. You'll only see
black.
10 out of 10 for your attempt at lying. Negative several million
for failing, again, to pull it off.
>
>>> >>How does THAT work Kunt? You really ARE a big CRY BABY!
>
>>>> Once again the point went right past you. No surprise, really.
>>>> BTW, why did you add so many groups, Mr. I NEVER start cross-posts?
>
>>> What point? How does Greg repeating YOUR BULLSHIT make HIM a stalker?
>
>> When, exactly, did I post the names and birthdays of past and current
>> members of alt.friends?
>> Is there anything about which you will NOT lie?
>
> You had it on a BLOG Kunt.
Liar.
>Ask Gregg - also look back in Google - he
>listed the link that traced to YOUR SORRY ASS!
Since I've NEVER had a blog, unless you count MySpace, you are,
once again, lying.
And no one's birthday is listed on my "blog" at MySpace.
>
>>>How exactly does that work Kunt? Do you see yourself as some special case?
>>>At your "station in life" do you see yourself as some special case?
>
>> Have I ever claimed such? Hint: No.
>
> Yet you seem to behave that way.
Is there anything about which you will not lie? Serious
question.
>
>>> When did I say I never do crossposts? I add newsgroups.
>
>> So you LIED when you claimed it was Moore who was the only one
>> doing it. Got it.
>
> Kunt - Moore does it, you do it, I do it, most folks do it, thanks for
>the post edit adding a period where there wasn't one.
If you're going to lie, make certain the lie can't be proved.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/5460e0d226982dbb
Anyone who wishes may go and see that there was and is no post
edit.
You really need to work on only lying about that which can NOT be
proved. Really.
> I said I do it WHEN I
>am adding back a newsgroup that somebody has removed, or when it is a topic
>of more interest elsewhere.
But you claimed that you NEVER start cross-posts.
>
>>>Usually after some LYING ASSHOLE removed them, OR when I think that they
>>>are more
>>>appropriate in a different newsgroup.Such as making sure that the folks in
>>>misc.legal get to see your LEGAL OPINIONS you post in other newsgroups so
>>>they can see your LEGAL KNOWLEDGE.
>
>> Everyone here is aware of me and my opinions.
>
> No, Kunt, the readers of misc.legal don't generally get to see some of
>your more outrageous LEGAL OPINIONS and abusive behavior trying to cram them
>down other folks throats as FACTS. Such as your WRONG claims on immigration
>law.
Again, if you're going to lie, make certain the lie can't be
proved.
All of my replies to you are from misc.legal. If they aren't
seeing my comments, it's because they have chosen not to.
>
>>>Or what you TRY to pretend as formidable
>>>LEGAL authority and pass off as expertise with your "legal opinions."
>
>> What is the EXACT reason you are psychologically forced to LIE and
>> give me a level of knowledge you KNOW I don't have?
>
> Kunt - it is simple. If you REALLY realize your lack of knowledge on
>these topics - why are you so argumentative and abusive of those who DO?
What knowledge do you have, beyond knowing how to con people out
of money by promising them results that are never realized?
>That not only includes knowledgeable lay people like myself but actual
>LAWYERS!
When have I contradicted a lawyer on a matter of law?
>Your arrgoant "I am right and everyone else is wrong" bullshit.
Dishonest projection noted.
>IF
>you REALLY understood your limitations, Wills, you'd back off a bit and at
>least check out links provided to you to show you that you are wrong. You
>are an arrogant BLOW HARD Wills amd your "LEGAL ADVICE" is usually SHIT!
Only one lawyer has commented on my advice, and he stated it's
not bad.
And I'm willing to admit when I'm in error. You RUN when the
proof of your foolishness is displayed.
>You
>really need to keep it to yourself.
>
>>> I think more REAL LAWYERS need to read your LEGAL ADVICE Kunt to see what
>>> you
>>> claim so stridently as "THE LAW."
>
>> There are a few lawyers in misc.legal. And I point out in any
>> reply that could be viewed as legal advice that I'm not a lawyer.
>
> Kunt the little disclaimer (occasional as it is) is hollow as you try to
>BULLY people to accept YOUR opinions as "THE facts" and state of the law,
>and often you are 100% full of shit. You argue with lawyers and try to
>intimidate them on THE LAW.
Liar.
>You give people ADVICE that is BAD LEGAL ADVICE.
That you claim it's bad is iron clad PROOF that it's very good.
>You state LEGAL OPINIONS AS FACT when you are wrong.
Why do you LIE in EVERY post?
>The best legal advice
>is "ASK A REAL LAWYER."
I often tell people to do that.
>Not some jailhouse PUNK who is generally full of
>shit about the law. A good example of your TOTAL inability to usderstand how
>"conflicts in law" are resolved. You can't even understand that they need to
>be, much less the process for resolving them.
And yet I show a greater understanding than you. Odd that.
>Yet to try to ADVISE people
>based on your INCORRECT understanding of the law.
Since I don't know all there is to know about law, I tell people
that if a lawyer contradicts anything I write, the reader should go
with the lawyer's opinion over mine.
Fairly sage advice, if I do say so myself.
>You and I were mud
>wrestling on the CONFLICT of Visa "regulations" (which have the effect of
>law) and actual black letter federal law enacted by congress and signed into
>law by the President. That they NEED to be reconciled is a concept you don't
>understand much less HOW they are resolved. Not to mention the legal burdens
>and costs for doing so.
Actually, we were dealing with your LIE that you had to marry your
wife so that she could stay.
You offered the PROOF that you were lying yourself. Each link
you posted further proved that she wouldn't have been forced to leave
had you not married her in the U.S.
>
>> Further, I tell people that if anyone who is a lawyer contradicts
>> anything I write, they should go with the lawyer's opinion over mine.
>> Of course, you already know this, but lack the mental stability
>> to admit it.
>
> Kunt - that doesn't save you from the unauthorized practice of law.
Since I'm not practicing law, I'm not worried.
>A
>lawyer should HAVE TO contradict you when your claims are BULLSHIT.
When I'm wrong, I expect at least one will.
>You
>should offer STRIDENT LEGAL OPINIONS in the first place.
First I shouldn't, then I should.
Pick a lane.
>It is NOT the
>responsibility of the BAR to argue with your bullshit.
>
Who said anything about the Bar?
>
>> "We'd like to arrange for YOUR rape..."
>> --Kenneth Robert Pangborn of KRP Consulting, from an argument with a
>> woman on the talk.rape newsgroup
>
> FALSE Kunt.
I don't know if Anastasia was/is a real woman or not. It is
possible she was really a he.
>That was NOT form me and you are perpetuating a LIE.
Why did you ADMIT to writing it?
Whether you intended it as sarcasm or not, the fact remains you
ADMITED to writing it.
If you didn't, why did you claim you did?
http://groups.google.com/group/milw.general/msg/0468b8085d0ee5b5
>Your
>buddy MOORE using his anonymous remailers FORGED that. You also KNOW that.
I know you admitted to writing it.
I can't think of any reason for you to admit to it if you didn't
write it. If there is a reason, please let me know what it is.
>It does NOT appear in the Google archives FOR A REASON.
You nuked it.
You left your post where you ADMITED to writing it.
>It is an INVENTION
>of your PSYCHO buddy David Moore the STALKER!
>
Did he invent your freely admitting to authoring the threat?
http://groups.google.com/group/milw.general/msg/0468b8085d0ee5b5
If you didn't write it, why did you admit to it?
Yes, you claim it was posted as sarcasm. Maybe it would be such
to some. However, the truth is you ADMITED to writing it.
--
"It's attached to a thing called a "WIFE" Betty."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn showing how he views his wife
as an object and NOT a human being.
Message-ID: <KLf2j.31312$9h.4837@trnddc07>
krp
news:m69a04l92g189biif...@4ax.com...
>>>> Oh posting it on MANY newsgroups are acts of Polish HUMILITY?
>>
>>> You started the cross-posting. I simply replied to the same
>>> groups.
>>
>> Kunt the links to your BLOGS
> I don't have blogs. The closest you can get is on MySpace, and there
> is no comment
> about anything I or Lin own on it.
> Why are you lying about this?
>>were crossposted by YOU initially to BRAG
>>about all your VAST wealth and holdings.
> Liar.
> You lied and said I have a miserable life. I replied only to the
> groups to which you posted the lie.
But Kunt you DO have a miserable life. That you are so OBSESSED with
claiming ownership of VAST tracts of real estate, fleets of luxury cars,
boats, planes etc stands as evidence of that. Your obsessive need to
VALIDATE yourself via EXTERNALS. Your desperate seeking of approval and
establishing your "WORTH" via THINGS is amusing Kunt. Not to mention your
pathetic pattern of trying to BULLY those who disagree with you. Your
psychological NEED to prove you are better than others by your THINGS. When
I retort that I have a 2006 Honda SUV it drives you CRAZY. You MUST try to
prove I don't own one. And the door is open for me to keep playing with you.
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Kent Wills
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:m69a04l92g189biif...@4ax.com...
>
>>>>> Oh posting it on MANY newsgroups are acts of Polish HUMILITY?
>>>
>>>> You started the cross-posting. I simply replied to the same
>>>> groups.
>>>
>>> Kunt the links to your BLOGS
>
>> I don't have blogs. The closest you can get is on MySpace, and there
>> is no comment
>> about anything I or Lin own on it.
>
>> Why are you lying about this?
>
Kenny-Bob?
>>>were crossposted by YOU initially to BRAG
>>>about all your VAST wealth and holdings.
>
>> Liar.
>> You lied and said I have a miserable life. I replied only to the
>> groups to which you posted the lie.
>
>
>But Kunt you DO have a miserable life.
Liar. My life is very good. That you are EXTREMELY jealous, as
PROVED by your psychological NEED to lie about what Lin and I own, is
your problem, not mine.
>That you are so OBSESSED with
>claiming ownership of VAST tracts of real estate,
You are the ONLY person to think I have such.
>fleets of luxury cars,
You are the ONLY person to think I have such.
>boats,
You have me here. We own two boats.
Hey, what ever became of the third boat you LIED and stated I
owned? What is the third boat you LIE and claim I own?
>planes
You are the ONLY person to think I have such.
>etc stands as evidence of that.
Your dishonest claims stand as PROOF that you are jealous and
hope to gain some sort of fame by proxy.
Your hope will never be realized, since I'll continue to expose
your pathological lies.
>Your obsessive need to
>VALIDATE yourself via EXTERNALS.
You are the one who claims I own things I do not own.
>Your desperate seeking of approval and
>establishing your "WORTH" via THINGS is amusing Kunt. Not to mention your
>pathetic pattern of trying to BULLY those who disagree with you.
When have I bullied anyone other than bullies?
Yes, I do bully you, because you prey on others, often when they
are weakest.
>Your
>psychological NEED to prove you are better than others by your THINGS.
Even if I had nothing, I'd still be your superior.
>When
>I retort that I have a 2006 Honda SUV it drives you CRAZY.
So you lied when you claimed it was a 2008. I expect everyone
knew that, but it's nice that you've admitted to it.
>You MUST try to
>prove I don't own one.
Then explain why I've made no effort.
And asking you to support your claim isn't an effort to prove you
don't own it.
But above you state it's a 2006 and NOT a 2008. You have proved
you lied.
>And the door is open for me to keep playing with you.
>
>
Do you often think of playing with other males?
krp
news:pv3d045c2soen9e07...@4ax.com...
>>> I don't have blogs. The closest you can get is on MySpace, and
>>> there is no comment
>>> about anything I or Lin own on it.
>>> Why are you lying about this?
> Kenny-Bob?
I'm NOT but YOU ARE lying your ass off Kunt. The Youtube shit????? You
put up the sites and take them down like bowel movements. Then you LIE your
ass off about them,m except when you need to refer to them for some STUPID
argument you are making at the moment and the next post you DENY them again.
>>>>were crossposted by YOU initially to BRAG
>>>>about all your VAST wealth and holdings.
>>> Liar.
>>> You lied and said I have a miserable life. I replied only to the
>>> groups to which you posted the lie.
>>But Kunt you DO have a miserable life.
> Liar. My life is very good. That you are EXTREMELY jealous, as
> PROVED by your psychological NEED to lie about what Lin and I own, is
> your problem, not mine.
So you say with your HUGE land holdings all over the world your MANY
yachts, planes, fleets of LUXURY CARS and the rest when you NEED to validate
yourself and your self worth. Which you constantly do when you BRAG about
externals. THINGS don't make for a happy life you frigging DUNCE! Nor does
being a BULLY like you and your gay lover Moore on usenet. Life, my dumb
Polack is validated by the people who love you and who you love in return,
by your relationship with God (or the universe if you will) that KARMA that
you work on. NONE of which is present in your claims.
Here is something interesting for you to ponder. NOT that there is any
realtic hope that you, Sullivan or Moore will EVER be able to understand it.
How do you three creepa attack me? (Maybe I should include Roger and Kevin
too.) You TRY to do that by attackling my wife and my children and
grandchildren. Not my house, my cars, my TV sets. But attacking PEOPLE.
Attacking Joy for her website that dared to say something nice about me.
Attacking my associates and clients. You see Kunt - those are things that I
*HAVE* that YOU do NOT. Hence your "miserable life." You don't come back
talking about how much you love your wife Kunt. You mention her as a
posession, "she's a psychologist" and this or that. Your TROPHY. When I
mention that MY wife was a judge in Cuba, it is only to answer your
despicable claims of her being a "mail order bride." Although, Kunt, I am
EXTREMELY proud of her, not just that she is very pretty, but that she has
such a great mind, is so funny, and her smile can light up a room. Yes, Kunt
I am a very fortunate man to have her love me. I don't think that's
something you can understand. I think that exists on a spiritual plane
you'll never experience. You are too into THINGS.
>>That you are so OBSESSED with claiming ownership of VAST tracts of real
>>estate,
> You are the ONLY person to think I have such.
Probably true because most SANE people know your claims of property
ownersip in Aruba etc are BULLSHIT!
>>fleets of luxury cars,
> You are the ONLY person to think I have such.
Again BING! As you try to BRAG about your Bimmers and Mercedes, Kunt -
just about everone KNOWS you are lying.
>boats,
> You have me here. We own two boats. Hey, what ever became of the
> third boat you LIED and stated I
> owned? What is the third boat you LIE and claim I own?
What of the other boats? Let's see Kunt. So far on your BLOGS (you know
the ones you SWEAR you never had) you have shown at least FOUR different
boats. The white BOATS - the Blue one and the pontoon boat. TWO different
white boats Kunt. Vastly different hull designs.
>>planes
> You are the ONLY person to think I have such.
Kunt - how MANY Piper J-3 Cubs do you think still fly in America? WHY is
it Kunt that the FAA doesn't seem to list YOU as the owner of ANY of them?
From the original TAYLOR in the early 1930's the nice little screwup proof
tail dragger till 1947 when production ended. Thousands were built, how many
survive? (Hint not many.) And as far as FAA records show, YOU are not among
the owners of one.Are they LYING? It's like the BOATS that show other pwople
owning them and the swimming pool.
>>etc stands as evidence of that.
> Your dishonest claims stand as PROOF that you are jealous and
> hope to gain some sort of fame by proxy.
> Your hope will never be realized, since I'll continue to expose
> your pathological lies.
Silly little Kunt jealous of what? Fictional boats? Fantasy land
holdings? Imaginary fleets of luxury cars? Not to mention airplanes? Why
doesn't the FAA show you as owning a Piper J-3 or variant?
>>Your obsessive need to VALIDATE yourself via EXTERNALS.
> You are the one who claims I own things I do not own.
No Kunt YOU are. Why does the FAA not list you as an aircraft owner?
>>Your desperate seeking of approval and
>>establishing your "WORTH" via THINGS is amusing Kunt. Not to mention your
>>pathetic pattern of trying to BULLY those who disagree with you.
> When have I bullied anyone other than bullies? Yes, I do bully
> you, because you prey on others, often when they
> are weakest.
You bully ANYONE who disagree with you. Gregg and others. You are a
PUNK Kunt!
>>Your psychological NEED to prove you are better than others by your
>>THINGS.
> Even if I had nothing, I'd still be your superior.
There you go Kunt. You prove my point.
>>When I retort that I have a 2008 Honda SUV it drives you CRAZY.
> So you lied when you claimed it was a 2008. I expect everyone
> knew that, but it's nice that you've admitted to it.
Nice post edit Kunt. It's a 2008.
>>You MUST try to prove I don't own one.
> Then explain why I've made no effort. And asking you to support your
> claim isn't an effort to prove you
> don't own it. But above you state it's a 2006 and NOT a 2008. You have
> proved
> you lied.
No Kunt it is a 2008 Honda NOT 2006.
>>And the door is open for me to keep playing with you.
No Kunt first it's NOT a door - it's your own FLY and you are playing
with YOURSELF!
Dan Sullivan
tjab
dragonsgirl <drago...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>"TNKev" <TNKe...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:fu2he7$68k$2...@news.datemas.de...
>> Greegor wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> my Kent Wills stalking saga continues
>>>
>>
>> stalker.
>
>Greg defines stalking...
>
><Greg Hanson>
>"http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
>Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
>following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
>By that definition, Mr. Probert, I could claim that
>you and others are stalking me. "
Message id?
gposter
krp
"gposter" <gpo...@live.com> wrote in message
news:32bf1b5c-241d-4129...@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
<snip and LIE>
> No Kunt first it's NOT a door - it's your own FLY and you are playing with
> YOURSELF!
They call it INDECENT EXPOSURE Bobbbeee. A FLASHER. Implies NO "fantasy"
on my part at all. DISGUST! You can STARE if you like, I am sure Kunt will
like that.
krp
"Dan Sullivan" <dsul...@optonline.net> wrote in message
news:a9bb7797-1dbe-4a07...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Still THINK you RUN the place, eh Danny boy?
Greegor
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:a9bb7797-1dbe-4a07...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>
> Still THINK you RUN the place, eh Danny boy?
Proud badass Dan Sullivan, reduced to
topic cop, posting "ot" over and over! LOL
Even his own hyena pack is ignoring his ""efforts"".
krp
news:dc4fe84b-538f-499d...@d1g2000hsg.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 17, 2:51 pm, " krp" <krp24...@verizon.net> wrote:
> "Dan Sullivan" <dsull...@optonline.net> wrote in message
>
> news:a9bb7797-1dbe-4a07...@m3g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> > zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
>
> Still THINK you RUN the place, eh Danny boy?
< Proud badass Dan Sullivan, reduced to
< topic cop, posting "ot" over and over! LOL
Sullivan thinks of himself as the KING of not only ASCPS but ALL of
Usenet. Just some little New York street punk who is only BIG when he has
his GANG backing him up.
gposter
>
> - Show quoted text -
krp
> snip and LIE
> > No Kunt first it's NOT a door - it's your own FLY and you are playing
> > with YOURSELF!
How long have you been attracted to flashers Bobbeee?
Greegor
> >> stalker.
>
> >Greg defines stalking...
> ><Greg Hanson>
> >"http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
> >Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
> >following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
> >By that definition, Mr. Probert, I could claim that
> >you and others are stalking me. "
tjab > Message id?
Betty finally DID post the link showing the context, in a new thread
and minus all of the cross posting. (Wonder why?)
I was ARGUING with a definition of stalker somebody else used.
Betty represented this as a definition of stalker that I embraced.
She took it out of context COMPLETELY to play this game.
Greg whined 'Where's the link?'
1 dragonsgirl Apr 16
2 Greegor Apr 16
3 dragonsgirl Apr 16
Betty tried to pull a fast one re quote
4 Greegor Apr 17
ot asCPS
5 Dan Sullivan Apr 17
Re: Betty tried to pull a fast one re quote
6 dragonsgirl Apr 17
Whether it was "whining" or not to demand to see
the true context of the comment, it WAS the right thing.
gposter
> > >> stalker.
>
> > >Greg defines stalking...
> > ><Greg Hanson>
> > >"http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
> > >Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
> > >following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
> > >By that definition, Mr. Probert, I could claim that
> > >you and others are stalking me. "
>
> tjab > Message id?
>
> Betty finally DID post the link showing the context, in a new thread
> and minus all of the cross posting. (Wonder why?)
>
> I was ARGUING with a definition of stalker somebody else used.
> Betty represented this as a definition of stalker that I embraced.
> She took it out of context COMPLETELY to play this game.
>
>
> Greg whined 'Where's the link?'
> 1 dragonsgirl Apr 16
> 2 Greegor Apr 16
> 3 dragonsgirl Apr 16
> Betty tried to pull a fast one re quote
> 4 Greegor Apr 17
> ot asCPS
> 5 Dan Sullivan Apr 17
> Re: Betty tried to pull a fast one re quote
> 6 dragonsgirl Apr 17
>
> Whether it was "whining" or not to demand to see
> the true context of the comment, it WAS the right thing.
> On Apr 17, 5:03 am, " gooch sniffer" <krp24...@verizon.net> wrote:
> snip
> > No Kunt first it's NOT a door - it's your own FLY and you are playing
dragonsgirl
If history is any idicator you'll be whining about this for seven years to
come just like ....ah...other times that you've been proven wrong.
"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:cd9f426a-f71c-4483...@l64g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
Kent Wills
>"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:pv3d045c2soen9e07...@4ax.com...
>
>>>> I don't have blogs. The closest you can get is on MySpace, and
>>>> there is no comment
>>>> about anything I or Lin own on it.
>
>>>> Why are you lying about this?
>
>> Kenny-Bob?
>
> I'm NOT but YOU ARE lying your ass off Kunt.
You are lying.
If you count MySpace (it's a stretch, but one could argue I have
a blog there), it would be only one. You wrote blogs (plural).
Of course, you think one equals a number greater than one, so
this should have been expected.
That aside, I've never mentioned anything I own on the MySpace
"blog."
You lied. Again.
You got caught. Again.
You're trying to lie your way out of it. Again.
You're failing. Again.
>The Youtube shit????? You
That's not a blog, stupid. It wouldn't even count as a vlog.
>put up the sites and take them down like bowel movements. Then you LIE your
>ass off about them,m except when you need to refer to them for some STUPID
>argument you are making at the moment and the next post you DENY them again.
When have I denied having a YouTube account?
>
>>>>>were crossposted by YOU initially to BRAG
>>>>>about all your VAST wealth and holdings.
>
>>>> Liar.
>
>>>> You lied and said I have a miserable life. I replied only to the
>>>> groups to which you posted the lie.
>
>>>But Kunt you DO have a miserable life.
>
>> Liar. My life is very good. That you are EXTREMELY jealous, as
>> PROVED by your psychological NEED to lie about what Lin and I own, is
>> your problem, not mine.
>
> So you say with your HUGE land holdings all over the world
What land ownings all over the world?
Again, the only place Lin and I own land is Iowa and Arkansas.
No rational person would call either huge.
We own a time share condo in Aruba, but no land.
Why, exactly, are you LYING about this?
>your MANY
>yachts,
What yachts (plural)? we don't own even one.
>planes,
What planes (plural)?
>fleets of LUXURY CARS
Two luxury cars do not make a fleet, simpleton.
And calling the BMW a luxury car is a stretch.
>and the rest when you NEED to validate
>yourself and your self worth.
Odd that you are the ONLY person to claim I own all of the above.
>Which you constantly do when you BRAG about
>externals. THINGS don't make for a happy life you frigging DUNCE!
True. But they do serve to PROVE you LIED.
>Nor does
>being a BULLY like you and your gay lover Moore on usenet.
Everyone knows you're gay and crushing on David. It really is
old news.
And no one cares. You can stop expressing your desires by
projection.
>Life, my dumb Polack
Everyone knows you HATE everyone in/from Poland. Asians as well.
Your bigotry is well known and documented.
>is validated by the people who love you and who you love in return,
Then my life is still better than yours.
I'm still married to my first wife.
My children don't hate me, the way Megan, if not the others,
HATES you.
>by your relationship with God (or the universe if you will) that KARMA that
>you work on. NONE of which is present in your claims.
If Karma is presumed to be real, then clearly I'm doing what is
right.
>
> Here is something interesting for you to ponder. NOT that there is any
>realtic hope that you, Sullivan or Moore will EVER be able to understand it.
It's clear we understand more than you. We don't have to resort
to lies.
>How do you three creepa attack me?
With the truth. It's the one concept you truly hate above all
else.
>(Maybe I should include Roger and Kevin
>too.) You TRY to do that by attackling my wife and my children and
>grandchildren.
When have I attacked your wife, your children or your
grandchildren?
Be specific.
If you prefer, you may simply admit this is another of your lies.
>Not my house,
The one with the sink hole and other problems that you wanted to
hide from prospective buyers?
>my cars,
You can't decide what you own. Sometimes it's a 2008 SUV.
Sometimes it's a 2006.
>my TV sets.
Wow. You own a TV.
Do you think you're special?
>But attacking PEOPLE.
When?
>Attacking Joy for her website that dared to say something nice about me.
When have I, or anyone, attacked Joy?
By now you must be able to accept that Lost flat out LIED to you.
She posted the proof herself.
>Attacking my associates and clients.
When have I attacked any associate or client of yours?
>You see Kunt - those are things that I
>*HAVE* that YOU do NOT. Hence your "miserable life."
And yet my life is still far better than yours.
If you claim that my life is miserable is to be believed, then
how horrible is yours?
>You don't come back
>talking about how much you love your wife Kunt. You mention her as a
>posession,
You are the one who views his wife as a thing to be owned.
>"she's a psychologist" and this or that.
How, exactly, does mentioning her career make her an object?
Oh yeah, you see ALL women as objects.
>Your TROPHY.
Don't project your viewing women as property onto me.
>When I
>mention that MY wife was a judge in Cuba, it is only to answer your
>despicable claims of her being a "mail order bride."
When did I claim she was a mail order bride?
I did provide evidence that she COULD be, but pointed out the
evidence doesn't prove she is.
There may be evidence that she is. If there is, it's far more
work than I am willing to invest to seek it out.
I don't care if she is or not. I only wanted to prove you LIED
when you claimed it was impossible.
>Although, Kunt, I am
>EXTREMELY proud of her, not just that she is very pretty, but that she has
>such a great mind, is so funny, and her smile can light up a room. Yes, Kunt
>I am a very fortunate man to have her love me.
It's a shame your homosexual nature, as PROVED by your constant
homo-erotic references, means you can't love her back. Not in the way
a husband is supposed to love a wife.
>I don't think that's
>something you can understand. I think that exists on a spiritual plane
>you'll never experience. You are too into THINGS.
Following the Karma claim you made above, it's clear I understand
far better than you could every hope to.
>
>>>That you are so OBSESSED with claiming ownership of VAST tracts of real
>>>estate,
>
>> You are the ONLY person to think I have such.
>
> Probably true because most SANE people know your claims of property
>ownersip in Aruba etc are BULLSHIT!
>
We have a time share condo. You claimed "VAST tracts of real
estate."
Where have I ever claimed such?
>>>fleets of luxury cars,
>
>> You are the ONLY person to think I have such.
>
> Again BING! As you try to BRAG about your Bimmers and Mercedes, Kunt -
>just about everone KNOWS you are lying.
>
I have ONE BMW. Why do you see one as equaling a value greater
than one?
I don't own even one Mercedes. Never have. And I've never
claimed to own one.
Why do you LIE?
>>boats,
>
>> You have me here. We own two boats. Hey, what ever became of the
>> third boat you LIED and stated I
>> owned? What is the third boat you LIE and claim I own?
>
> What of the other boats? Let's see Kunt. So far on your BLOGS (you know
>the ones you SWEAR you never had) you have shown at least FOUR different
>boats. The white BOATS - the Blue one and the pontoon boat. TWO different
>white boats Kunt. Vastly different hull designs.
Do you mean the other boats at the dock?
Are you so disassociated from reality that you are
psychologically UNABLE to realize that other people own boats, and a
few of these other people own slips at the same dock as Lin and I?
We have only the two boats. I've never claimed ownership of any
others.
You really need to seek professional mental health care for your
obsessive NEED to lie. I'm being VERY serious.
>
>>>planes
>
>> You are the ONLY person to think I have such.
>
> Kunt - how MANY Piper J-3 Cubs do you think still fly in America?
Haven't a clue.
When has anyone claimed the plane is a J-3?
>WHY is
>it Kunt that the FAA doesn't seem to list YOU as the owner of ANY of them?
Since I've never claimed to own a J-3, you shouldn't find me, or
anyone in my family, listed as an owner.
>From the original TAYLOR in the early 1930's the nice little screwup proof
>tail dragger till 1947 when production ended. Thousands were built, how many
>survive? (Hint not many.) And as far as FAA records show, YOU are not among
>the owners of one.Are they LYING?
Probably not. But you have PROVED you ARE, since I've never
claimed ownership of a J-3.
>It's like the BOATS that show other pwople
>owning them and the swimming pool.
The boat isn't registered to the people Jonezie claims.
Again I ask you to prove I lied about the pool. This makes the
fifth, at least, time I've asked. You've been unable to prove I lied.
Little wonder, since I didn't lie.
>
>>>etc stands as evidence of that.
>
>> Your dishonest claims stand as PROOF that you are jealous and
>> hope to gain some sort of fame by proxy.
>> Your hope will never be realized, since I'll continue to expose
>> your pathological lies.
>
> Silly little Kunt jealous of what?
I have that which you desire.
A loving family (at least one of your daughter HATES you),
financial stability (you couldn't pay your creditors), and real
friends.
>Fictional boats?
So they didn't show up on the video?
>Fantasy land
>holdings?
We have a home in Iowa and Arkansas. Some rental properties and
a time share in Aruba.
Old news, actually.
>Imaginary fleets of luxury cars?
You are the only person to see Lin's Caddy (the only real LUXURY
car) as a fleet. But then, you do see one as being various values
greater than one.
>Not to mention airplanes?
There's only the one.
I understand that you think one equals many values greater than
one, but the truth is, one equals one.
>Why
>doesn't the FAA show you as owning a Piper J-3 or variant?
Probably because I don't own a J-3, and have never claimed I do.
Why are you LYING and stating I've claimed ownership of that
which I've not claimed? What is the specific mental illness you have
that FORCES you to lie about such things?
>
>>>Your obsessive need to VALIDATE yourself via EXTERNALS.
>
>> You are the one who claims I own things I do not own.
>
> No Kunt YOU are. Why does the FAA not list you as an aircraft owner?
It does. Not for the craft you LIE and claim I own, but for the
one Lin and I actually own. Although, it's actually owned by the
corporation.
>
>>>Your desperate seeking of approval and
>>>establishing your "WORTH" via THINGS is amusing Kunt. Not to mention your
>>>pathetic pattern of trying to BULLY those who disagree with you.
>
>> When have I bullied anyone other than bullies? Yes, I do bully
>> you, because you prey on others, often when they
>> are weakest.
>
> You bully ANYONE who disagree with you. Gregg and others. You are a
>PUNK Kunt!
I bully those who prey on the weak, or perceived weak. This is
why I bully you and Greg.
And Greg's more recent behavior regarding Roger's son shows he's
far more mentally ill than I ever dared think.
>
>>>Your psychological NEED to prove you are better than others by your
>>>THINGS.
>
>> Even if I had nothing, I'd still be your superior.
>
> There you go Kunt. You prove my point.
Your point was/is that I am your superior? Neat.
[Kenny-Bob's Post edit restored]
>
>>>When I retort that I have a 2006 Honda SUV it drives you CRAZY.
>
>> So you lied when you claimed it was a 2008. I expect everyone
>> knew that, but it's nice that you've admitted to it.
>
> Nice post edit Kunt. It's a 2008.
Then why did you write 2006?
And why did you post edit, then LIE and claim I did?
Here's a link to the post so that anyone who wishes can see
you're LYING. Again.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/79e2a3189d7789f9
>
>>>You MUST try to prove I don't own one.
>
>> Then explain why I've made no effort. And asking you to support your
>> claim isn't an effort to prove you
>> don't own it. But above you state it's a 2006 and NOT a 2008. You have
>> proved
>> you lied.
>
> No Kunt it is a 2008 Honda NOT 2006.
Then why did you claim 2006?
If it were a typo, you would have said so. You didn't. Clearly
you INTENTIONALY wrote 2006.
Which is the lie? 2006 or 2008?
This is mere curiosity on my part. It's clear you lied. Which
one doesn't really matter.
>
>>>And the door is open for me to keep playing with you.
>
> No Kunt first it's NOT a door - it's your own FLY and you are playing
>with YOURSELF!
>
You wrote that, stupid. You're replying to yourself.
--
Kent Wills
wrote:
I think everyone has accepted that Kenny-Bob is gay.
Why he feels the need to continue to prove it is anyone's guess.
--
Vegetarian: Indian word for lousy hunter.
Kent Wills
And it PROVES that by YOUR definition you are stalking me and
others.
http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
By that definition, Mr. Probert, I could claim that
you and others are stalking me.
-- Greg Hanson
Message-ID: <1150922197.4...@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
krp
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:05rf04d7e41ubmhb8...@4ax.com...
>>> No Kunt first it's NOT a door - it's your own FLY and you are playing
>>> with YOURSELF!
> I think everyone has accepted that Kenny-Bob is gay.
> Why he feels the need to continue to prove it is anyone's guess.
But I am not the FLASHER here - YOU ARE!
krp
>>is validated by the people who love you and who you love in return,
> Then my life is still better than yours.
> I'm still married to my first wife.
> My children don't hate me, the way Megan, if not the others,
> HATES you.
And you "know" that Megan hates me HOW? Because your MASTER Moore claims
it? Or tell me Kunt do you ALSO claim to be speaking to her?
My REAL children don't hate me Kunt. The ones your BUDDY David Moore has
made up may. But my REAL kids and grandkids don't hate me at all.
>> Here is something interesting for you to ponder. NOT that there is any
>>realtic hope that you, Sullivan or Moore will EVER be able to understand
>>it.
> It's clear we understand more than you. We don't have to resort to
> lies.
That in itself is a LIE Kunt. Too many of your lies have been
exposed, not to mention your pal Moore's.
>>Not my house,
> The one with the sink hole and other problems that you wanted to
> hide from prospective buyers?
Did I? Your PROOF Kunt? Because MOORE said so? Your PROOF that there are
sinkholes on my property????? The Moore website again?
>>my cars,
> You can't decide what you own. Sometimes it's a 2008 SUV. Sometimes
> it's a 2006.
Nope it has always been a 2008. I traded a 2005 Chrysler 300 on it.
Your HERO Moore tried to "WARN" the dealer and new owners about that too!
GOD told him to!
>>Attacking Joy for her website that dared to say something nice about me.
> When have I, or anyone, attacked Joy?
Oh hell Kunt, your buddies wree on the poor woman like stink on a
garbage can DEMANDING she take down the "false endorsement" of me ans they
called it!
krp
Bobbeee you're a PIG!
gposter
> "Kent Wills" <compu...@gmail.com> wrote in message
Dan Sullivan
gposter
> "gposter" <gpos...@live.com> wrote in message
>
> news:8c1d1e4e-7b3e-44f7...@l42g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
>
> Bobbeee you're a PIG!
Don;t be silly little man. You are the PIG!, just click on and read
any of your posts.
See?
TNKev
>
>
you sick bastard!
--
TNKev
>>>> stalker.
>>> Greg defines stalking...
>
>>> <Greg Hanson>
>>> "http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
>>> Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
>>> following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
>>> By that definition, Mr. Probert, I could claim that
>>> you and others are stalking me. "
>
> tjab > Message id?
>
> Betty finally DID post the link showing the context, in a new thread
> and minus all of the cross posting. (Wonder why?)
>
> I was ARGUING with a definition of stalker somebody else used.
> Betty represented this as a definition of stalker that I embraced.
> She took it out of context COMPLETELY to play this game.
>
redefine "stalker" then greegor,you fr33kin' id10t.
you won't do will you chicken shit?
post a link to your definition of "stalker".
tjab
You define it. Post a definition that applies to him but not to you.
TNKev
--
dragonsgirl
What I find absolutely absurd and colorful is that if you click on the link
that I provided you will find a conversations in which Greg is writiing to a
poster named Mark Probert, who, as far as I know, continues to post to the
MHA (Alternative Health usenet) Group.
In this post Mark asks Greg "Is there ever a justification for contacting a
spouse who is not a Usenet participant?" Greg's simple reply was "Yes"
Greg admits that he sees justification for contacting uninvolved parties in
relation to usenet posters.
That was less than two years ago.
Now, it seems, his opinions have changed with the wind, once again...as
today he does not believe in contacting uninvolved parties such as Joy
Joyous.
Define 'justified internet stalking and harassment' for us Greg.
Kent Wills
Why did you snip away the rest of my post? Do you think no one
will ever see how I once again exposed you as the LIAR you are?
>"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:85nf04l20bo7pn4bk...@4ax.com...
>
>>>is validated by the people who love you and who you love in return,
>
>> Then my life is still better than yours.
>> I'm still married to my first wife.
>> My children don't hate me, the way Megan, if not the others,
>> HATES you.
>
> And you "know" that Megan hates me HOW?
I've read her blog. I've mentioned this before.
Yes, it's quite possible YOU set it up. There's no real way for
me to know.
>Because your MASTER Moore claims
>it?
Please cease projecting your fetishes onto me. That you seek a
master/slave relationship with David is really nobody's business.
>Or tell me Kunt do you ALSO claim to be speaking to her?
Nope. I've never written her, nor has she written me, other than
when I asked to be a MySpace friend and she accepted.
>My REAL children don't hate me Kunt.
It's been said Megan was your step-daughter.
>The ones your BUDDY David Moore has
>made up may. But my REAL kids and grandkids don't hate me at all.
Given that you consistently PROVE you hate all things true and
honest, I think you're lying. Again.
>
>>> Here is something interesting for you to ponder. NOT that there is any
>>>realtic hope that you, Sullivan or Moore will EVER be able to understand
>>>it.
>
>> It's clear we understand more than you. We don't have to resort to
>> lies.
>
> That in itself is a LIE Kunt. Too many of your lies have been
>exposed, not to mention your pal Moore's.
Odd that you've been unable to prove even one lie from me.
Actually, not so odd, since I've not lied.
If David has lied, I've yet to see you prove it.
>
>>>Not my house,
>
>> The one with the sink hole and other problems that you wanted to
>> hide from prospective buyers?
>
> Did I? Your PROOF Kunt? Because MOORE said so?
When you confirmed it.
>Your PROOF that there are
>sinkholes on my property????? The Moore website again?
If there is anything about your house on
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com about your house, I've not seen it.
>
>>>my cars,
>
>> You can't decide what you own. Sometimes it's a 2008 SUV. Sometimes
>> it's a 2006.
>
> Nope it has always been a 2008.
Then why did you claim it was a 2006? Had it been a typo, you
would have simply stated such and be done with it.
You opted to LIE and claim I did a post edit.
Since you didn't admit to making an error, your claim of its
being a 2006 MUST have been intentional.
Why did you LIE?
>I traded a 2005 Chrysler 300 on it.
>Your HERO Moore tried to "WARN" the dealer and new owners about that too!
>GOD told him to!
>
So you claim. Given how freely you LIE, then RUN from the proof
of your lies, I doubt what you're claiming is true.
However, I will examine any evidence you present.
>
>>>Attacking Joy for her website that dared to say something nice about me.
>
>> When have I, or anyone, attacked Joy?
>
> Oh hell Kunt, your buddies wree on the poor woman like stink on a
>garbage can DEMANDING she take down the "false endorsement" of me ans they
>called it!
>
No one attacked Joy. Heck, no one even contacted her.
No amount of your LYING will ever alter this simple truth.
I know I asked above, but why did you snip the parts where I once
again PROVE you are a liar? My guess is that it's because you could
no longer lie your way out of them, and had to RUN or admit the truth.
Is my guess correct? If not, what is the reason?
Kent Wills
How often do you have these fantasies about my being a flasher?
Wait, some things are better left unknown.
That you have a sexual fantasy about me being a flasher is
something best kept to yourself. Seriously.
--
"It's attached to a thing called a "WIFE" Betty."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn showing how he views his wife
as an object and NOT a human being.
Message-ID: <KLf2j.31312$9h.4837@trnddc07>
Kent Wills
[...]
>>> redefine "stalker" then greegor,you fr33kin' id10t.
>>
>> You define it. Post a definition that applies to him but not to you.
>>
>>
>
>
><Greg Hanson>
> "http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
> Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
> following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
BURN!
There is NOTHING to support a claim that you have maliciously
and/or repeatedly followed and harassed anyone.
Once can argue you willfully followed me to misc.legal, but you've
never harassed me, or anyone else in the group. Bummer for tjab,
Greg, et al.
Greg willfully followed me to misc.legal (and other groups) with
the intent to harass me. And he's done so repeatedly.
It's another example of his "I'm always right and everyone else
is always wrong" standard.
http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
By that definition, Mr. Probert, I could claim that
you and others are stalking me.
Kent Wills
In Greg's mind, he's ALWAYS right and everyone else is ALWAYS
wrong. No matter what.
>That was less than two years ago.
>Now, it seems, his opinions have changed with the wind, once again...as
>today he does not believe in contacting uninvolved parties such as Joy
>Joyous.
Sadly, there is no credible evidence that anyone from Usenet has
contacted Joy (presuming Joy Jous is the Joy who is supposed to be the
web master of the Mr. J site).
Yes, Kenny-Bob has claimed, many times, that I've contacted her,
but the truth is I haven't. I've visited the Mr. J site, twice, but
I've had no contact with the person or persons who made the site.
If you've contacted her, it's news to me.
>Define 'justified internet stalking and harassment' for us Greg.
>
I have crickets on stand-by.
--
Do not meddle in the affairs of Dragons...
for thou art crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
krp
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:38:07 GMT, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:
> Why did you snip away the rest of my post? Do you think no one
> will ever see how I once again exposed you as the LIAR you are?
Quit patting yourself on the back Kunt. You'll get a headache.
>>>>is validated by the people who love you and who you love in return,
>
>>> Then my life is still better than yours.
>>> I'm still married to my first wife.
>>> My children don't hate me, the way Megan, if not the others,
>>> HATES you.
>> And you "know" that Megan hates me HOW?
> I've read her blog. I've mentioned this before.
What BLOG is that asswipe? And how are you SURE it is actually HERS?????
Because MOORE told you so?
> Yes, it's quite possible YOU set it up. There's no real way for me to
> know.
But in your best POLACK LOGIC you know things for sure and make
accuisations accordingly. And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
fan and GAY lover.
>>Or tell me Kunt do you ALSO claim to be speaking to her?
> Nope. I've never written her, nor has she written me, other than
> when I asked to be a MySpace friend and she accepted.
Oh really what's the URL for that blog?
>>My REAL children don't hate me Kunt.
> It's been said Megan was your step-daughter.
By your mentral master MOORE! Let me tell you the problem with his and
YOUR bullshit Kunt. When Megan was born there were some "problems" that
caused us to have to go to the genetics lab at the University Medican
School. Despite the ravings oif your LUNATIC BUDDY - DNA has a completely
different story to tell. Now your HERO, was challenged to do some things
that by the end of this post I will challenge YOU to as well to test just
how FULL of shit you are.
>>> The one with the sink hole and other problems that you wanted to
>>> hide from prospective buyers?
>> Did I? Your PROOF Kunt? Because MOORE said so?
> When you confirmed it.
Did I?
>>Your PROOF that there are sinkholes on my property????? The Moore website
>>again?
> If there is anything about your house on http://www.aboutken about
> your house, I've not seen it.
So WHERE have I confirmed it? Google link?
Now Kunt let's do this little challenge since you "CLAIM" to be on
Megan's "BUDDY LIST" and can freely speak to her. We'll do this little test
that the REAL Megan can easily answer.
1. What was the name of the CAT she had when she lived here?
2. What color (s) was that cat?
3. What was the name of the white dog we had?
4. What was the name of the black dog we had?
5. What breed of horse was her first horse?
6. Where did we get that horse
7. What kind of car (and color) did I drive at the time her mother and I
separated?
8. What was the name of the church we attended and where she went to
pre-school?
9. What was the name of the school she last attended?
Now Kunt, IF you are telling the truth and not LYING your fat little
Polack ass off like your buddy Moore does, you'll not make STUPID EXCUSES
and you'll ask her the answers. Of course if you are LYING again - you'll
find an excuse and duck out.
tjab
Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:00:37 -0500, TNKev <TNKe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>[...]
>
>>>> redefine "stalker" then greegor,you fr33kin' id10t.
>>>
>>> You define it. Post a definition that applies to him but not to you.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>><Greg Hanson>
>> "http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
>> Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
>> following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
>
> BURN!
Hardly.
> There is NOTHING to support a claim that you have maliciously
>and/or repeatedly followed and harassed anyone.
> Once can argue you willfully followed me to misc.legal, but you've
>never harassed me, or anyone else in the group.
There is as much and more to support it about you and Kevin than there
is about Greg.
dragonsgirl
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:qppj04h6t5rnvk1sh...@4ax.com...
I didn't contact her, as you already know.
I might not be makin myself clear here....Greg has joined in with Ken is his
rants that the woman who owned that web site, Joy Joyous, was contacted by
several people from this group and harassed by 'them' or 'us'. I'm still
not clear on 'who' they were referring to. At different points in time the
fingers were levelled at different people. I was included in that
accusation, and that was when I made the invitation for Ken to post anything
I had written her (none). Greg's been right in with Ken (who now seems to
think that Greg is stupid) in making complaints of harassment, threats, etc.
However, just two years ago he felt that it was perfectly ok to contact an
uninvolved spouse in regard to usenet activity.
He felt that there was 'justification' for it. I find irony in Greg's idea
that contacting spouses is ok, but web designers is not.
Kent Wills
>"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:7m6i04lnbsfi5ig00...@4ax.com...
>> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 08:38:07 GMT, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> Why did you snip away the rest of my post? Do you think no one
>> will ever see how I once again exposed you as the LIAR you are?
>
> Quit patting yourself on the back Kunt. You'll get a headache.
The truth was just too much for you.
It's OK. When you can no longer even pretend to hope to be able
to lie your way out of it, you ignore it. I think everyone accepts
this.
>
>>>>>is validated by the people who love you and who you love in return,
>>
>>>> Then my life is still better than yours.
>>>> I'm still married to my first wife.
>>>> My children don't hate me, the way Megan, if not the others,
>>>> HATES you.
>
>>> And you "know" that Megan hates me HOW?
>
>> I've read her blog. I've mentioned this before.
>
> What BLOG is that asswipe?
Once again, dullard, her MySpace blog.
Of course, after you kept harassing her on MySpace, she deleted
her account. Unless it was an account you set up as a ruse.
Either way, it's gone.
>And how are you SURE it is actually HERS?????
>Because MOORE told you so?
As I've stated many times before, it's possible you set it up as a
ruse. Not likely, but possible.
>
>> Yes, it's quite possible YOU set it up. There's no real way for me to
>> know.
>
> But in your best POLACK LOGIC
Everyone knows you HATE everyone in/from Poland. There's really
no need for you to keep posting the proof of this.
>you know things for sure and make
>accuisations accordingly.
That the truth hurts is your issue to address.
>And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
>fan and GAY lover.
David is your gay lover?
I know you fantasize about such (you constantly offer the proof
of this), but I don't think your fantasy has become reality.
Only David can say with certainty, but I get the impression he's
heterosexual. As such, he wouldn't be interested in you.
And before you can LIE and claim I did a post edit, here's the
link to your post where anyone who wishes can see you claim he is your
gay lover:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.child-protective-services/msg/5e9545bceb1d3469
>
>>>Or tell me Kunt do you ALSO claim to be speaking to her?
>
>> Nope. I've never written her, nor has she written me, other than
>> when I asked to be a MySpace friend and she accepted.
>
> Oh really what's the URL for that blog?
Reading difficulties?
MySpace.
>
>>>My REAL children don't hate me Kunt.
>
>> It's been said Megan was your step-daughter.
>
> By your mentral master MOORE!
That you seek a master/slave relationship with David is your
business, not mine. Please stop projecting your desires onto others.
>Let me tell you the problem with his and
>YOUR bullshit Kunt. When Megan was born there were some "problems" that
>caused us to have to go to the genetics lab at the University Medican
>School. Despite the ravings oif your LUNATIC BUDDY - DNA has a completely
>different story to tell. Now your HERO, was challenged to do some things
>that by the end of this post I will challenge YOU to as well to test just
>how FULL of shit you are.
I wrote the truth. Deal with it.
>
>>>> The one with the sink hole and other problems that you wanted to
>>>> hide from prospective buyers?
>
>>> Did I? Your PROOF Kunt? Because MOORE said so?
>
>> When you confirmed it.
>
> Did I?
Yes. Shortly after he first posted the information.
>
>>>Your PROOF that there are sinkholes on my property????? The Moore website
>>>again?
>
Your post edit has been restored at no additional cost.
>> If there is anything about your house on http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com about
>> your house, I've not seen it.
>
> So WHERE have I confirmed it? Google link?
Usenet.
>
> Now Kunt let's do this little challenge since you "CLAIM" to be on
>Megan's "BUDDY LIST" and can freely speak to her. We'll do this little test
>that the REAL Megan can easily answer.
Why, exactly, do you LIE in EVERY post? What is the SPECIFIC
reason?
When you asked if I spoke with her, I replied with, " Nope. I've
never written her, nor has she written me, other than when I asked to
be a MySpace friend and she accepted."
Technically I could have spoken with her and simply not written
her. I should have written I've had no contact with her in any form
outside of the friend request.
Of course, you already knew that, since I've mentioned it in the
past. But that mental illness you have forced you to LIE.
What is the specific mental dysfunction you have the compels you
to LIE? Why are you UNABLE to be honest?
Serious questions.
>
>1. What was the name of the CAT she had when she lived here?
>
>2. What color (s) was that cat?
>
>3. What was the name of the white dog we had?
>
>4. What was the name of the black dog we had?
>
>5. What breed of horse was her first horse?
>
>6. Where did we get that horse
>
>7. What kind of car (and color) did I drive at the time her mother and I
>separated?
>
>8. What was the name of the church we attended and where she went to
>pre-school?
>
>9. What was the name of the school she last attended?
>
> Now Kunt, IF you are telling the truth and not LYING your fat little
>Polack ass off like your buddy Moore does, you'll not make STUPID EXCUSES
>and you'll ask her the answers. Of course if you are LYING again - you'll
>find an excuse and duck out.
>
What lie did I present? Are you claiming that when I stated I've
had no contact with Megan, outside of a MySpace friends request, I was
lying?
The truth is, aside from requesting she add me as a MySpace
friend, I've had NO contact with her. None. Nada.
No matter how many times you LIE and claim I've had additional
contact, the truth will remain the truth. And you will continue to
hate it, since your mental illness dictates that you MUST hate all
forms of truth.
"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
fan and GAY lover."
Kenneth Robert Pangborn LYING and claiming David Moore is his gay
lover. Message-ID: <_MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06>
krp
>>> Why did you snip away the rest of my post? Do you think no one
>>> will ever see how I once again exposed you as the LIAR you are?
>> Quit patting yourself on the back Kunt. You'll get a headache.
> The truth was just too much for you.
The truth is okay for me. Your bullshit isn't.
> It's OK. When you can no longer even pretend to hope to be able
> to lie your way out of it, you ignore it. I think everyone accepts
> this.
Yous peak for "everyone" now Kunt?
>>>>>>is validated by the people who love you and who you love in return,
>>>>> Then my life is still better than yours.
>>>>> I'm still married to my first wife.
What is that necesarily an acomplishment? I know lots of people still
married to theirt first spouse wh live in hell.
>>>>> My children don't hate me, the way Megan, if not the others,
>>>>> HATES you.
>
>>>> And you "know" that Megan hates me HOW?
>>> I've read her blog. I've mentioned this before.
>> What BLOG is that asswipe?
> Once again, dullard, her MySpace blog.
> Of course, after you kept harassing her on MySpace, she deleted
> her account. Unless it was an account you set up as a ruse.
> Either way, it's gone.
Oh so this mysterious site is now GONE..... And you claim it is because
of me. GOOD SELF SERVING SHOW Kunt.
>>And how are you SURE it is actually HERS?????
>>Because MOORE told you so?
> As I've stated many times before, it's possible you set it up as a
> ruse. Not likely, but possible.
If coould have set it up, who else could have set it up as a ruse
DIMBULB?
>>> Yes, it's quite possible YOU set it up. There's no real way for me
>>> to
>>> know.
>> But in your best POLACK LOGIC
> Everyone knows you HATE everyone in/from Poland. There's really
> no need for you to keep posting the proof of this.
Sorry actually I like 99% of the Polish people I have known. Just a FEW
Polacks like you I don't. But them my Polish friends don't like guys l;ike
you either and call you "dumb Polacks."
>>you know things for sure and make accusations accordingly.
> That the truth hurts is your issue to address.
Kunt you mistake your BELIEFS for the "truth." And they are NOT.
>>And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest fan and GAY lover.
> David is your gay lover?
Gay lover wannabe.
> Only David can say with certainty, but I get the impression he's
> heterosexual. As such, he wouldn't be interested in you.
> And before you can LIE and claim I did a post edit, here's the
> link to your post where anyone who wishes can see you claim he is your
> gay lover:
Is that why he follows my every move? HAS to know the MOST intimate
details of my life? He can't abide the thought that I MIGHT sell my house
and move some place he can't find? Has a website about me he has invested
THOUSANDS of hours of his life into? That's not a "CASUAL" thin Kunt - it
WAY into OBSESSION! Read what he said just this morning - that he has a
"RIGHT" to know ALL the details of a POSSIBLE sale of my house even before
there even IS a sale because he has a "CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT" to know this
stuff. That's NORMAL in your world Kunt? Do you see Moore stalking any
WOMEN Kunt? Does your buddy Moore say he has "AN ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL
RIGHT" to know about the potential sale of HER house? Does he GOOGLE her
address EVERY fukkkkking day of EVERY fukkkking week of every fukkking year
Kunt? What makes you think he's hetero instead of a flaming homo?
Dan Sullivan
Kent Wills
>
>"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:q06k04tbingf18b2i...@4ax.com...
>
>>>> Why did you snip away the rest of my post? Do you think no one
>>>> will ever see how I once again exposed you as the LIAR you are?
>
>>> Quit patting yourself on the back Kunt. You'll get a headache.
>
>> The truth was just too much for you.
>
> The truth is okay for me.
You absolutely HATE truth, as PROVED by your following sentence.
>Your bullshit isn't.
I posted truth that you couldn't lie your way around.
>
>> It's OK. When you can no longer even pretend to hope to be able
>> to lie your way out of it, you ignore it. I think everyone accepts
>> this.
>
>Yous peak for "everyone" now Kunt?
Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit.
I wrote, "I think everyone..."
>
>>>>>>>is validated by the people who love you and who you love in return,
>
>>>>>> Then my life is still better than yours.
>>>>>> I'm still married to my first wife.
>
> What is that necesarily an acomplishment? I know lots of people still
>married to theirt first spouse wh live in hell.
Wow. It only took you 48 hours to reply to that comment.
>
>>>>>> My children don't hate me, the way Megan, if not the others,
>>>>>> HATES you.
>>
>>>>> And you "know" that Megan hates me HOW?
>
>>>> I've read her blog. I've mentioned this before.
>
>>> What BLOG is that asswipe?
>
>> Once again, dullard, her MySpace blog.
>> Of course, after you kept harassing her on MySpace, she deleted
>> her account. Unless it was an account you set up as a ruse.
>> Either way, it's gone.
>
> Oh so this mysterious site is now GONE.....
It wasn't mysterious.
>And you claim it is because
>of me.
You are the only suspect.
>GOOD SELF SERVING SHOW Kunt.
>
What terminology you wish to call truth is up to you.
>>>And how are you SURE it is actually HERS?????
>>>Because MOORE told you so?
>
>> As I've stated many times before, it's possible you set it up as a
>> ruse. Not likely, but possible.
>
> If coould have set it up, who else could have set it up as a ruse
>DIMBULB?
Anyone could have, but you have and had the only motivation.
Personally, I think she set it up and it was 100% genuine. But
that's simply what I think. It's still possible you did it.
>
>>>> Yes, it's quite possible YOU set it up. There's no real way for me
>>>> to
>>>> know.
>
>>> But in your best POLACK LOGIC
>
>> Everyone knows you HATE everyone in/from Poland. There's really
>> no need for you to keep posting the proof of this.
>
> Sorry actually I like 99% of the Polish people I have known.
Why do you lie?
>Just a FEW
>Polacks like you I don't. But them my Polish friends don't like guys l;ike
>you either and call you "dumb Polacks."
You HATE everyone in/from Poland. This is already accepted. As
such, you don't have any Polish friends.
>
>>>you know things for sure and make accusations accordingly.
>
>> That the truth hurts is your issue to address.
>
> Kunt you mistake your BELIEFS for the "truth." And they are NOT.
If I believe something, I state so. If I know something, I state
so.
>
>>>And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest fan and GAY lover.
>
>> David is your gay lover?
>
> Gay lover wannabe.
That you want him for your gay lover is old news, actually.
>
>> Only David can say with certainty, but I get the impression he's
>> heterosexual. As such, he wouldn't be interested in you.
>> And before you can LIE and claim I did a post edit, here's the
>> link to your post where anyone who wishes can see you claim he is your
>> gay lover:
>
> Is that why he follows my every move?
Prove that he does.
>HAS to know the MOST intimate
>details of my life?
Prove that he does.
>He can't abide the thought that I MIGHT sell my house
>and move some place he can't find?
You ORDERED him to find the information.
>Has a website about me he has invested
>THOUSANDS of hours of his life into?
Thousands?
Never actually designed a web site, huh? It doesn't take very
long.
>That's not a "CASUAL" thin Kunt -
I don't think it has anything to do with vaginas, thin or think.
>it
>WAY into OBSESSION! Read what he said just this morning - that he has a
>"RIGHT" to know ALL the details of a POSSIBLE sale of my house even before
>there even IS a sale because he has a "CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT" to know this
>stuff.
That was YOUR claim.
>That's NORMAL in your world Kunt? Do you see Moore stalking any
>WOMEN Kunt?
I don't see him stalking anyone.
He did as you wanted. You told him to seek out the information
about you, and he did so.
>Does your buddy Moore say he has "AN ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL
He's not my buddy, and no amount of your lying will change this.
>RIGHT" to know about the potential sale of HER house? Does he GOOGLE her
>address EVERY fukkkkking day of EVERY fukkkking week of every fukkking year
>Kunt?
He's admitted to Googleing your address once. And it was AFTER
you ORDERED him to find information about you.
>What makes you think he's hetero instead of a flaming homo?
>
Comments he's made.
I could be wrong. As I stated, only David can say with
certainty.
Why didn't you address the remainder of my post? Was the truth
that I have never claimed to be in contact with Megan too much for
you? Do you hope that by ignoring it, no one will realize you LIED
and claimed I speak with her, when you knew (and know) I have NO
communication with her at all?
It's not going to work.
You lied.
You got caught.
Deal with it.
>>
>> I know you fantasize about such (you constantly offer the proof
>>of this), but I don't think your fantasy has become reality.
>> Only David can say with certainty, but I get the impression he's
>>heterosexual. As such, he wouldn't be interested in you.
>> And before you can LIE and claim I did a post edit, here's the
>>link to your post where anyone who wishes can see you claim he is your
>>gay lover:
>>
--
freedom
If one adds up the hours spent authoring http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com,
it would probably still come out to less time than Ken spends posting on
usenet during a single week.
>
>>That's not a "CASUAL" thin Kunt -
>
> I don't think it has anything to do with vaginas, thin or think.
>
>>it
>>WAY into OBSESSION! Read what he said just this morning - that he has a
>>"RIGHT" to know ALL the details of a POSSIBLE sale of my house even before
>>there even IS a sale because he has a "CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT" to know this
>>stuff.
>
> That was YOUR claim.
And it's false....I never said anything of the sort.
>
>>That's NORMAL in your world Kunt? Do you see Moore stalking any
>>WOMEN Kunt?
>
> I don't see him stalking anyone.
Ken's just projecting again.
> He did as you wanted. You told him to seek out the information
>about you, and he did so.
>
>>Does your buddy Moore say he has "AN ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL
>
> He's not my buddy, and no amount of your lying will change this.
>
>>RIGHT" to know about the potential sale of HER house? Does he GOOGLE her
>>address EVERY fukkkkking day of EVERY fukkkking week of every fukkking year
>>Kunt?
>
> He's admitted to Googleing your address once. And it was AFTER
>you ORDERED him to find information about you.
I follow orders dutifully, and get attacked by Ken in return. What an
ingrate.
>
>>What makes you think he's hetero instead of a flaming homo?
>>
>
> Comments he's made.
> I could be wrong. As I stated, only David can say with
>certainty.
Not to mention the fact that Ken himself, claims that I've been engaged to
two different women in the past year. One of whom lives 1500 miles away,
yet he claims to have photos of me with. This would mean that I had met
her in person, which would have required investment of significant time and
money (keep in mind that Ken also claims that I am unemployed and that I
spend hundreds of hours per week working on
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com)...someone who isn't into women probably
wouldn't go to such effort, I wouldn't think? :)
>
>
> Why didn't you address the remainder of my post? Was the truth
>that I have never claimed to be in contact with Megan too much for
>you? Do you hope that by ignoring it, no one will realize you LIED
>and claimed I speak with her, when you knew (and know) I have NO
>communication with her at all?
> It's not going to work.
>
> You lied.
> You got caught.
> Deal with it.
>
>
>"We'd like to arrange for YOUR rape..."
> --Kenneth Robert Pangborn of KRP Consulting, from an argument with a
>woman on the talk.rape newsgroup
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,
in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
"...my aunt wouldnt come over to our house anymore because of how he would
talk to her and come on to her....and he had over 180 pictures of her on
his computer"
- --Ken Pangborn's former stepdaughter Megan, on growing up in the Pangborn
household
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/AwUBSArKOabdsu4taRc6EQJLGQCfawpk+WlyquT0ZtygH7vg1OiSxQIAoIfr
WnhaZjDmSZS7AWTRBjFAhlqc
=3141
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
krp
"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:v8gl049vhkphj4ho2...@4ax.com...
>>>>> Why did you snip away the rest of my post? Do you think no one
>>>>> will ever see how I once again exposed you as the LIAR you are?
>>
>>>> Quit patting yourself on the back Kunt. You'll get a headache.
>>
>>> The truth was just too much for you.
>>
>> The truth is okay for me.
>
> You absolutely HATE truth, as PROVED by your following sentence.
>
>>Your bullshit isn't.
> I posted truth that you couldn't lie your way around.
how's your FEELT there ADMIRAL?
>>> It's OK. When you can no longer even pretend to hope to be able
>>> to lie your way out of it, you ignore it. I think everyone accepts
>>> this.
>>You speak for "everyone" now Kunt?
> Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit.
> I wrote, "I think everyone..."
Based on what contact with "EVERYONE" Kunt?
>>>>>>>>is validated by the people who love you and who you love in return,
>>>>>>> Then my life is still better than yours.
>>>>>>> I'm still married to my first wife.
>>
>> What is that necesarily an acomplishment? I know lots of people still
>>married to theirt first spouse who live in hell.
> Wow. It only took you 48 hours to reply to that comment.
Was this a "TIMED TEST" Kunt?
>>>>>>> My children don't hate me, the way Megan, if not the others,
>>>>>>> HATES you.
>>>
>>>>>> And you "know" that Megan hates me HOW?
>>
>>>>> I've read her blog. I've mentioned this before.
>>
>>>> What BLOG is that asswipe?
>>> Once again, dullard, her MySpace blog.
>>> Of course, after you kept harassing her on MySpace, she deleted
>>> her account. Unless it was an account you set up as a ruse.
>>> Either way, it's gone.
>> Oh so this mysterious site is now GONE.....
> It wasn't mysterious.
Wasn't it? Buit it is now VAPOR............. Hhhhhhhhhh what a
coinkydink!
>>And you claim it is because of me.
> You are the only suspect.
For what? Moore can't be a suspect?
>>GOOD SELF SERVING SHOW Kunt.
> What terminology you wish to call truth is up to you.
Kunt the reason folks call you a "Stupid Polack" (I'm NOT the only one)
is because you your bullshit belief that you are telling the truth as you
spread your BULLSHIT! Kunt let me give you a simultude. You are like a
former participant in soc.men,m a feminazi by the name of Stacy Alexander.
She, like you could pound out more bullshit in 5 minutes on her keyboard
that all the other users combined. She would rant on and on and on about the
emedemic of wife beating in America on Superbowl Sunday. How just millions
of women were battered on that day every year. She gave statistics, pretty
much like you do, and claimed that the "truth hurt" just like YOU do. The
problem is that her "statistics" like most of your posts were PURE BUNK like
most of yours in most of your posts. Happy B ULLSHIT you just make up. YOPU
declare it to be the ULTIMATE TRUTH OF THE UNIVERSE, but - Kunt - - it's
BULLSHIT. You just try to drown out everyone who tells you it is.
>>>>And how are you SURE it is actually HERS?????
>>>>Because MOORE told you so?
>
>>> As I've stated many times before, it's possible you set it up as a
>>> ruse. Not likely, but possible.
>> If could have set it up, who else could have set it up as a ruse
>> DIMBULB?
> Anyone could have, but you have and had the only motivation.
> Personally, I think she set it up and it was 100% genuine. But
> that's simply what I think. It's still possible you did it.
Oh REALLY? David Moore has NO motiove? He's JESUS as his website about
me PROVES? It's still possible I killed cock robin too. IN YOUR FANTASY
WORLD.
>>> Only David can say with certainty, but I get the impression he's
>>> heterosexual. As such, he wouldn't be interested in you.
>>> And before you can LIE and claim I did a post edit, here's the
>>> link to your post where anyone who wishes can see you claim he is your
>>> gay lover:
>> Is that why he follows my every move?
> Prove that he does.
Look at his website. Look at his MANIC OBSESSION with getting ALL the
details on the potential sale of my house. NORMAL people do that?
>>HAS to know the MOST intimate details of my life?
> Prove that he does.
Don't you think the obsession with demanding to know the details about
my house being listed for sale is proof by itself? id YOU feel compelled to
scan the fir sale listing in my area EVERY DAY Kunt? Much less every HOUR of
every day?
>>He can't abide the thought that I MIGHT sell my house
>>and move some place he can't find?
> You ORDERED him to find the information.
No Kunt - I was TAUNTING HIM to find the details. Details he is STILL
manicly attempting to get. It's driving the poor boy NUTS. He is absolutely
beside himself. He's SURE I sold the house. He's bleeding from the ass
because he can't get the details. I bet there isn't an unbroken dish in his
momma's house or a wall that doesn't have a hole from his fists. He is SURE
the house has been sold. He is just shaking with his insane NEED to know WHO
may have bought the house so he can CALL them! He has to "WARN" them. GOD
told him to! He, like you isn't smart enpough to see he's been SET UP to
implode. I am enjoying every second of the little prick going NUTS. Your
little side show is merely amusing. I am having so much fun watching Moore
run all over the place.This is better than Hollywood. You know Junt some
other people are getting a kick out of it too. Watching Davey melt down. Him
and his "COALITION FORCES."
>>Has a website about me he has invested THOUSANDS of hours of his life
>>into?
> Thousands?
Yep. Maybe tens of thousands. His "RESEARCH" alone consumes a day every
day. Not to mention his search engine placement game. This isn't just using
the free search engine services, this is dedicated evvert EVERY DAY of the
week to get the #1 listing in over a thousand categories. EVERY DAY of EVERY
WEEK for a DECADE Kunt. This is taking OBSESSION to a new level.
> Never actually designed a web site, huh? It doesn't take very long.
How many pages Kunt? How many revisions? Over 100 revisons.
>> it WAY into OBSESSION! Read what he said just this morning - that he has
>> a
>>"RIGHT" to know ALL the details of a POSSIBLE sale of my house even before
>>there even IS a sale because he has a "CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT" to know this
>>stuff.
> That was YOUR claim.
No - it was HIS as he tore into the staff at the realty company
DEMANDING to know and threatening lawsuits for denial of his "CONSTTUTIUONAL
RIGHTS." His "ABSOLUTRE LEGAL RIGHT" to EVERTYTHING. He demands the "listing
contract" for his LEGAL REVIEW for him and his STAFF of lawyers, and any and
all other docvuments pertaining to "the Pangborn house." and you even
agreed that he HAS such a LEGAL RIGHT! You are as big a LOON as HE is. He
has NO rights whatsoever with regard to MY house. NONE! Not a single one
Kunt.
>>Does your buddy Moore say he has "AN ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL
> He's not my buddy, and no amount of your lying will change this.
Sure he is Kunt.
>>RIGHT" to know about the potential sale of HER house? Does he GOOGLE her
>>address EVERY fukkkkking day of EVERY fukkkking week of every fukkking
>>year
>>Kunt?
> He's admitted to Googleing your address once. And it was AFTER
> you ORDERED him to find information about you.
Nope BEFORE he admitted THAT moron.
>>What makes you think he's hetero instead of a flaming homo?
> Comments he's made. I could be wrong. As I stated, only David can
> say with
> certainty.
Don't you think it STRANGE he is following a MAN around and demanding to
know everything about his life? Doesn't that creep you out just a little?
>>>> Serious questions.
>>>>1. What was the name of the CAT she had when she lived here?
>>>>
>>>>2. What color (s) was that cat?
>>>>
>>>>3. What was the name of the white dog we had?
>>>>
>>>>4. What was the name of the black dog we had?
>>>>
>>>>5. What breed of horse was her first horse?
>>>>
>>>>6. Where did we get that horse
>>>>
>>>>7. What kind of car (and color) did I drive at the time her mother and I
>>>>separated?
>>>>
>>>>8. What was the name of the church we attended and where she went to
>>>>pre-school?
>>>>
>>>>9. What was the name of the school she last attended?
>>>>
>>>> Now Kunt, IF you are telling the truth and not LYING your fat little
>>>>Polack ass off like your buddy Moore does, you'll not make STUPID
>>>>EXCUSES
>>>>and you'll ask her the answers. Of course if you are LYING again -
>>>>you'll
>>>>find an excuse and duck out.
>>> What lie did I present? Are you claiming that when I stated I've
>>>had no contact with Megan, outside of a MySpace friends request, I was
>>>lying?
Oh so you ADMIT that the only stuff you know comes from Moore and some
myspace blog that was allegedly up a couple years ago.
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
news:55cd572de53382d8...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>>>RIGHT" to know about the potential sale of HER house? Does he GOOGLE her
>>>address EVERY fukkkkking day of EVERY fukkkking week of every fukkking
>>>year
>>>Kunt?
>> He's admitted to Googleing your address once. And it was AFTER
>>you ORDERED him to find information about you.
> I follow orders dutifully, and get attacked by Ken in return. What an
> ingrate.
What orders Davey? You had alrteady been hassling the real estate agents
for DAYS before I mentioned it here. I was and AM taunting you to find the
information you are POSITIVE is there. You are SURE the house HAS been sold
and that you can't get the details is driving you NUTS. (Short trip, you
have been there for 2 decades.)
Poor Davey so SURE I sold the house and so HYSTERICAL that he CANNOT get
the detains he believes he's "legally entitled to!"
Dan Sullivan
Kent Wills
>ADMIRAL OF THE FLEET
>"Kent Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:v8gl049vhkphj4ho2...@4ax.com...
>
>>>>>> Why did you snip away the rest of my post? Do you think no one
>>>>>> will ever see how I once again exposed you as the LIAR you are?
>>>
>>>>> Quit patting yourself on the back Kunt. You'll get a headache.
>>>
>>>> The truth was just too much for you.
>>>
>>> The truth is okay for me.
>>
>> You absolutely HATE truth, as PROVED by your following sentence.
>>
>>>Your bullshit isn't.
>
>> I posted truth that you couldn't lie your way around.
>
> how's your FEELT there ADMIRAL?
I don't have a FEELT (whatever that is) and I'm not an admiral.
Why do you consistently LIE about what I am? Is your psychosis
that bad?
>
>>>> It's OK. When you can no longer even pretend to hope to be able
>>>> to lie your way out of it, you ignore it. I think everyone accepts
>>>> this.
>
>>>You speak for "everyone" now Kunt?
>
>> Reading comprehension isn't your strong suit.
>> I wrote, "I think everyone..."
>
> Based on what contact with "EVERYONE" Kunt?
You still can't comprehend simple English.
I suggest a remedial reading class.
>
>>>>>>>>>is validated by the people who love you and who you love in return,
>
>>>>>>>> Then my life is still better than yours.
>>>>>>>> I'm still married to my first wife.
>>>
>>> What is that necesarily an acomplishment? I know lots of people still
>>>married to theirt first spouse who live in hell.
>
>> Wow. It only took you 48 hours to reply to that comment.
>
> Was this a "TIMED TEST" Kunt?
>
I wasn't aware that vaginas were tested with time.
Care to elaborate on this?
>>>>>>>> My children don't hate me, the way Megan, if not the others,
>>>>>>>> HATES you.
>>>>
>>>>>>> And you "know" that Megan hates me HOW?
>>>
>>>>>> I've read her blog. I've mentioned this before.
>>>
>>>>> What BLOG is that asswipe?
>
>>>> Once again, dullard, her MySpace blog.
>>>> Of course, after you kept harassing her on MySpace, she deleted
>>>> her account. Unless it was an account you set up as a ruse.
>>>> Either way, it's gone.
>
>>> Oh so this mysterious site is now GONE.....
>
>> It wasn't mysterious.
>
> Wasn't it?
No.
>Buit it is now VAPOR............. Hhhhhhhhhh what a
>coinkydink!
I can't know the reason, but your constant harassment of her is a
plausible explanation.
>
>>>And you claim it is because of me.
>
>> You are the only suspect.
>
> For what? Moore can't be a suspect?
For what? Are you really so detached from reality that you can't
understand the thread?
>
>>>GOOD SELF SERVING SHOW Kunt.
>
>> What terminology you wish to call truth is up to you.
>
> Kunt the reason folks call you a "Stupid Polack" (I'm NOT the only one)
Everyone knows you HATE everyone in/from Poland. Old news.
>is because you your bullshit belief that you are telling the truth as you
>spread your BULLSHIT! Kunt let me give you a simultude. You are like a
>former participant in soc.men,m a feminazi by the name of Stacy Alexander.
>She, like you could pound out more bullshit in 5 minutes on her keyboard
>that all the other users combined. She would rant on and on and on about the
>emedemic of wife beating in America on Superbowl Sunday.
Was she the one who motivated you to tell men to beat their wives?
>How just millions
>of women were battered on that day every year. She gave statistics, pretty
>much like you do, and claimed that the "truth hurt" just like YOU do.
You consistently PROVE that truth hurts you a great deal.
>The
>problem is that her "statistics" like most of your posts were PURE BUNK like
>most of yours in most of your posts. Happy B ULLSHIT you just make up.
Prove I've made anything up.
>YOPU
>declare it to be the ULTIMATE TRUTH OF THE UNIVERSE,
Liar.
Cite one time where I've made such a claim.
>but - Kunt - - it's
>BULLSHIT. You just try to drown out everyone who tells you it is.
That would be you, when you aren't RUNNING from the truth.
>
>>>>>And how are you SURE it is actually HERS?????
>>>>>Because MOORE told you so?
>>
>>>> As I've stated many times before, it's possible you set it up as a
>>>> ruse. Not likely, but possible.
>
>>> If could have set it up, who else could have set it up as a ruse
>>> DIMBULB?
>
>> Anyone could have, but you have and had the only motivation.
>> Personally, I think she set it up and it was 100% genuine. But
>> that's simply what I think. It's still possible you did it.
>
> Oh REALLY?
Yes.
If you have evidence that shows it's impossible for you to have
done it, present it. I'll examine it.
>David Moore has NO motiove? He's JESUS as his website about
>me PROVES?
His site does no such thing.
>It's still possible I killed cock robin too.
I let you in on a secret. It's a child's NURSERY rhyme. It's
not a true story, dullard.
Besides, the sparrow confessed to it in the nursery rhyme.
>IN YOUR FANTASY
>WORLD.
You think a character from a FITCIONAL nursery rhyme is real.
Clearly you live in a fantasy world, but I don't think anyone has ever
argued against this.
>
>>>> Only David can say with certainty, but I get the impression he's
>>>> heterosexual. As such, he wouldn't be interested in you.
>>>> And before you can LIE and claim I did a post edit, here's the
>>>> link to your post where anyone who wishes can see you claim he is your
>>>> gay lover:
>
>>> Is that why he follows my every move?
>
>> Prove that he does.
>
> Look at his website. Look at his MANIC OBSESSION with getting ALL the
>details on the potential sale of my house. NORMAL people do that?
>
There is nothing about the sale of your house on
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
Wanna try a new lie?
>>>HAS to know the MOST intimate details of my life?
>
>> Prove that he does.
>
> Don't you think the obsession with demanding to know the details about
>my house being listed for sale is proof by itself? id YOU feel compelled to
>scan the fir sale listing in my area EVERY DAY Kunt? Much less every HOUR of
>every day?
Trying to cover up your lie with more lies isn't impressing me.
Either offer the proof or admit you lied. I'll accept either.
>
>>>He can't abide the thought that I MIGHT sell my house
>>>and move some place he can't find?
>
>> You ORDERED him to find the information.
>
> No Kunt -
OK, you DEMANDED.
It's a matter of semantics.
>I was TAUNTING HIM to find the details. Details he is STILL
>manicly attempting to get. It's driving the poor boy NUTS. He is absolutely
>beside himself. He's SURE I sold the house.
If you had, it wouldn't be listed as For Sale on the real estate
site.
>He's bleeding from the ass
>because he can't get the details.
Do you often think of David's ass?
Never mind. You've proved you want him as your gay lover, so of
course you do.
Presuming for the moment that he is gay, or bi, it's clear he has
NO romantic interest in you. None. He'll NEVER accept your attempts
at enticing him into a romantic relationship.
You'll enjoy more luck at a near-by gay bar.
>I bet there isn't an unbroken dish in his
>momma's house or a wall that doesn't have a hole from his fists.
Considering his mother is dead, I doubt it.
>He is SURE
>the house has been sold.
He's posted nothing that I've seen to indicate that.
>He is just shaking with his insane NEED to know WHO
>may have bought the house so he can CALL them! He has to "WARN" them. GOD
>told him to! He, like you isn't smart enpough to see he's been SET UP to
>implode. I am enjoying every second of the little prick going NUTS. Your
>little side show is merely amusing. I am having so much fun watching Moore
>run all over the place.This is better than Hollywood. You know Junt some
>other people are getting a kick out of it too. Watching Davey melt down. Him
>and his "COALITION FORCES."
There is no coalition.
You need to accept that you are NOT important enough to have a
massive conspiracy formed against you.
I understand that your mental illness FORCES you to believe there
is, but the simple truth is, there is not. Accept this and move on
with your life.
>
>>>Has a website about me he has invested THOUSANDS of hours of his life
>>>into?
>
>> Thousands?
>
> Yep. Maybe tens of thousands.
Very unlikely.
>His "RESEARCH" alone consumes a day every
>day.
Which would leave no time for him to call various people about
you.
You can't maintain a lie within a single post.
>Not to mention his search engine placement game. This isn't just using
>the free search engine services, this is dedicated evvert EVERY DAY of the
>week to get the #1 listing in over a thousand categories. EVERY DAY of EVERY
>WEEK for a DECADE Kunt. This is taking OBSESSION to a new level.
>
Do you know how long it takes to submit a URL to a search engine?
A few seconds, if one types slow, at most.
>> Never actually designed a web site, huh? It doesn't take very long.
>
> How many pages Kunt? How many revisions? Over 100 revisons.
Presumably when another major Kenneth Robert Pangborn con is
exposed, it warrants being added to the site. However, it doesn't
take thousands of hours.
And I've not seen any changes to the site since I first became
aware of it.
>
>>> it WAY into OBSESSION! Read what he said just this morning - that he has
>>> a
>>>"RIGHT" to know ALL the details of a POSSIBLE sale of my house even before
>>>there even IS a sale because he has a "CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT" to know this
>>>stuff.
>
>> That was YOUR claim.
>
> No
Yes. You alone are claiming any sort of *Constitutional* right.
>- it was HIS as he tore into the staff at the realty company
>DEMANDING to know and threatening lawsuits for denial of his "CONSTTUTIUONAL
>RIGHTS."
Prove it.
>His "ABSOLUTRE LEGAL RIGHT" to EVERTYTHING. He demands the "listing
>contract" for his LEGAL REVIEW for him and his STAFF of lawyers, and any and
>all other docvuments pertaining to "the Pangborn house."
Prove it.
>and you even
>agreed that he HAS such a LEGAL RIGHT!
If the information is public, which house sales are, then anyone
who wants may look up the information.
It's not always convenient to do, but there is nothing preventing
one from doing so.
>You are as big a LOON as HE is. He
>has NO rights whatsoever with regard to MY house. NONE! Not a single one
>Kunt.
Since sales are public information, he has the same right as
anyone else to see the information.
You may wish your home being put up for sale was/is a state
secret, but the truth is, it's not. You aren't that important.
>
>>>Does your buddy Moore say he has "AN ABSOLUTE CONSTITUTIONAL
>
>> He's not my buddy, and no amount of your lying will change this.
>
> Sure he is Kunt.
Nope.
We've had very few Usenet discussions and zero discussions
outside of Usenet. I've had more discussions with you on and off
Usenet than I have with David.
You can LIE all your mentally ill mind requires, but the truth
will remain the truth.
>
>>>RIGHT" to know about the potential sale of HER house? Does he GOOGLE her
>>>address EVERY fukkkkking day of EVERY fukkkking week of every fukkking
>>>year
>>>Kunt?
>
>> He's admitted to Googleing your address once. And it was AFTER
>> you ORDERED him to find information about you.
>
>Nope BEFORE he admitted THAT moron.
You ordered him to find it before he admitted he found it.
At least we can agree on that.
>
>>>What makes you think he's hetero instead of a flaming homo?
>
>> Comments he's made. I could be wrong. As I stated, only David can
>> say with
>> certainty.
>
> Don't you think it STRANGE he is following a MAN around and demanding to
>know everything about his life? Doesn't that creep you out just a little?
>
No more so than your LIE that David is your gay lover.
I accept that you really WANT David as your lover, but I don't
think he actually is your gay lover.
Why, exactly, in MID MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06, did you claim David
is your gay lover when he's not?
I've asked before and all you did was claim you want him as your
gay lover.
That you want him as such isn't a big deal. He doesn't appear to
care that you have a crush on him. However, declaring that he is your
lover when he is not only served, and serves, to further prove you
have a serious mental illness.
>>>>> Serious questions.
>
>>>>>1. What was the name of the CAT she had when she lived here?
>>>>>
>>>>>2. What color (s) was that cat?
>>>>>
>>>>>3. What was the name of the white dog we had?
>>>>>
>>>>>4. What was the name of the black dog we had?
>>>>>
>>>>>5. What breed of horse was her first horse?
>>>>>
>>>>>6. Where did we get that horse
>>>>>
>>>>>7. What kind of car (and color) did I drive at the time her mother and I
>>>>>separated?
>>>>>
>>>>>8. What was the name of the church we attended and where she went to
>>>>>pre-school?
>>>>>
>>>>>9. What was the name of the school she last attended?
>>>>>
>>>>> Now Kunt, IF you are telling the truth and not LYING your fat little
>>>>>Polack ass off like your buddy Moore does, you'll not make STUPID
>>>>>EXCUSES
>>>>>and you'll ask her the answers. Of course if you are LYING again -
>>>>>you'll
>>>>>find an excuse and duck out.
>
>>>> What lie did I present? Are you claiming that when I stated I've
>>>>had no contact with Megan, outside of a MySpace friends request, I was
>>>>lying?
>
> Oh so you ADMIT that the only stuff you know comes from Moore and some
>myspace blog that was allegedly up a couple years ago.
>
>
The site was up a few months ago. Another Kenneth Robert
Pangborn LIE to add to the ever growing list.
You're lie aside, I stated that I had no contact with Megan,
outside of a MySpace friend request, from the beginning.
Why did you LIE and claim I was in further contact with her?
"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
fan and GAY lover."
Kent Wills
>
>"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>news:55cd572de53382d8...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>
>>>>RIGHT" to know about the potential sale of HER house? Does he GOOGLE her
>>>>address EVERY fukkkkking day of EVERY fukkkking week of every fukkking
>>>>year
>>>>Kunt?
>
>>> He's admitted to Googleing your address once. And it was AFTER
>>>you ORDERED him to find information about you.
>
>> I follow orders dutifully, and get attacked by Ken in return. What an
>> ingrate.
>
> What orders Davey?
You ordered David to find the new about you.
>You had alrteady been hassling the real estate agents
>for DAYS before I mentioned it here.
There is NO evidence to support such a claim.
>I was and AM taunting you to find the
>information you are POSITIVE is there.
You demanded he find the information he found.
>You are SURE the house HAS been sold
I've seen nothing from him to indicate such.
>and that you can't get the details is driving you NUTS. (Short trip, you
>have been there for 2 decades.)
>
> Poor Davey so SURE I sold the house and so HYSTERICAL that he CANNOT get
>the detains he believes he's "legally entitled to!"
>
They are matters of public record. As such, he can see the
information, if he wishes. Anyone can.
"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
fan and GAY lover."
krp
>>> I follow orders dutifully, and get attacked by Ken in return. What an
>>> ingrate.
>>
>> What orders Davey?
>
> You ordered David to find the new about you.
But he hasn't found the INFO yet. He already KNEW that there was a for
sale sign up. What he absolutely MUST find, his life depends on it, that's
the names of EVERYONE who has looked at the house, and everyone that MAY
have made an offer. If Davey doesn't find it by the end of this week he will
slit his own throat. What's more he absolutely HAS to find where I might be
moving to. Is it in Florida? Where? Do I have a new phone number yet? What
is it? What's the new ADDRESS - these are all IMPERATIVES for the COALITION
FORCES INTELLIGENCE UNIT! Moore HAS to have it this week or heads will roll!
He has satellite surveillance up. Straining to see license plate numbers on
cars parked outside. He has little fatty reporting in HOURLY. Poor kid
hasn't slept in 2 weeks. The KLAXONS are still going off in nutcase MOORE'S
basement bunker. And *I* am having a BALL watching the little son of a bitch
go NUTS.
Dan Sullivan
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
TNKev
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:00:37 -0500, TNKev <TNKe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
>>>> redefine "stalker" then greegor,you fr33kin' id10t.
>>> You define it. Post a definition that applies to him but not to you.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> <Greg Hanson>
>> "http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
>> Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
>> following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
>
> BURN!
> There is NOTHING to support a claim that you have maliciously
> and/or repeatedly followed and harassed anyone.
He followed you and I to alt.friends,I had all but quit replying to him
when he started harassing the friends group and I am sick of replying to
him yet again. he keeps asking the same questions and ignoring answers
and...........you know the story.
> Once can argue you willfully followed me to misc.legal, but you've
> never harassed me, or anyone else in the group. Bummer for tjab,
> Greg, et al.
I did follow you to misc.legal and 2 or 3 other groups as well,I believe
misc.legal and alt.friends are the only groups we both subscribe to at
this point.
> Greg willfully followed me to misc.legal (and other groups) with
> the intent to harass me. And he's done so repeatedly.
and also harasses the people of alt.friends,and they did absolutely
nothing to him.
> It's another example of his "I'm always right and everyone else
> is always wrong" standard.
"Stalking" for everyone else is stalking,for him it is "investigating"
>
>
> http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
> Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
> following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
> By that definition, Mr. Probert, I could claim that
> you and others are stalking me.
> -- Greg Hanson
> Message-ID: <1150922197.4...@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
--
TNKev
you show some proof that I followed greegor and harassed him.
I'll not disturb the crickets to wait for proof of such an absurd
allegation.
that sorry piece of useless dermis followed Kent and I to alt.friends
when Kent went on vacation and wasn't posting.
greegor is obsessed with stalking Kent.
He is a snake tjab,be sure and stay close so he bites you too.
--
Kent Wills
>"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:m9an04ha8civ9f6oh...@4ax.com...
>>>> I follow orders dutifully, and get attacked by Ken in return. What an
>>>> ingrate.
>>>
>>> What orders Davey?
>>
>> You ordered David to find the new about you.
>
> But he hasn't found the INFO yet.
Yes he has. He found that you're selling your house. Just as
you demanded he do.
>He already KNEW that there was a for
>sale sign up.
Prove he knew it before he followed your demand that he find the
information about you.
>What he absolutely MUST find, his life depends on it, that's
Pretending for a moment that he does want to know the names of
anyone interested, I doubt he would die if he wasn't told.
Can you offer anything to support your claim that his life depends
on knowing?
Didn't think so.
>the names of EVERYONE who has looked at the house, and everyone that MAY
>have made an offer. If Davey doesn't find it by the end of this week he will
>slit his own throat.
Well, we shall see if he's still posting on Sunday. If he is, we
can be certain that he found out or you lied.
I'd go with you lying, but others might opt for the other option.
>What's more he absolutely HAS to find where I might be
>moving to. Is it in Florida? Where? Do I have a new phone number yet? What
>is it? What's the new ADDRESS - these are all IMPERATIVES for the COALITION
>FORCES INTELLIGENCE UNIT!
There is no coalition. You aren't important enough to warrant
such. Accept this and move on with your life.
>Moore HAS to have it this week or heads will roll!
Starting with his own, unless you lied.
>He has satellite surveillance up.
Prove it.
>Straining to see license plate numbers on
>cars parked outside.
Prove it.
>He has little fatty reporting in HOURLY.
How would you know? Have you put an illegal tap on her phone
line?
Oh wait, you're lying. Again. Or should I state, still?
>Poor kid
>hasn't slept in 2 weeks. The KLAXONS are still going off in nutcase MOORE'S
>basement bunker. And *I* am having a BALL watching the little son of a bitch
>go NUTS.
>
The only person displaying indicators of mental stability between
the two of you is YOU.
Do you actually believe the stuff you post, or do you realize how
off the wall your lies really are?
freedom
On Mon, 21 Apr 2008, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:
>"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:m9an04ha8civ9f6oh...@4ax.com...
>>>> I follow orders dutifully, and get attacked by Ken in return. What an
>>>> ingrate.
>>>
>>> What orders Davey?
>>
>> You ordered David to find the new about you.
>
> But he hasn't found the INFO yet. He already KNEW that there was a for
>sale sign up. What he absolutely MUST find, his life depends on it, that's
>the names of EVERYONE who has looked at the house, and everyone that MAY
>have made an offer.
Nope, I couldn't care less. When the sale is complete, the deed will be
recorded, and I'll get the name of the party at that time. Then, I'll
print out a copy of your divorce paperwork, with the part about the
sinkholes and termites hi-lited, and drop it in the mail. If you haven't
disclosed these known defects, you'll be royally screwed. :)
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,
in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
"...my aunt wouldnt come over to our house anymore because of how he would
talk to her and come on to her....and he had over 180 pictures of her on
his computer"
- --Ken Pangborn's former stepdaughter Megan, on growing up in the Pangborn
household
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/AwUBSAvvJqbdsu4taRc6EQKgfQCfeLS0ed/10jaCKZrWjyiQgO8c25AAnjHJ
tTbwJFRHxd56uGBOQch7tsgO
=Sbog
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
freedom
Add megalomania to Ken's many mental disorders (multiple personality
disorder, Fregoli, sociopathy, etc.)
>
>>What's more he absolutely HAS to find where I might be
>>moving to. Is it in Florida? Where? Do I have a new phone number yet? What
>>is it? What's the new ADDRESS - these are all IMPERATIVES for the COALITION
>>FORCES INTELLIGENCE UNIT!
>
> There is no coalition. You aren't important enough to warrant
>such. Accept this and move on with your life.
>
>>Moore HAS to have it this week or heads will roll!
>
> Starting with his own, unless you lied.
Reminds me of a joke:
Ken comes home early one evening, and comes into the bedroom to find
Barbara in bed doing what she does best, with the next door neighbor.
They're laughing and having a good old time, ignoring Ken completely. He
takes his gun out of his drawer and holds it up to his own head. They're
still laughing. Ken says "What are you laughing for? You're next."
>
>>He has satellite surveillance up.
>
> Prove it.
>
>>Straining to see license plate numbers on
>>cars parked outside.
>
> Prove it.
>
>>He has little fatty reporting in HOURLY.
>
> How would you know? Have you put an illegal tap on her phone
>line?
> Oh wait, you're lying. Again. Or should I state, still?
>
>>Poor kid
>>hasn't slept in 2 weeks. The KLAXONS are still going off in nutcase MOORE'S
>>basement bunker. And *I* am having a BALL watching the little son of a bitch
>>go NUTS.
>>
>
> The only person displaying indicators of mental stability between
>the two of you is YOU.
> Do you actually believe the stuff you post, or do you realize how
>off the wall your lies really are?
I think he may actually believe this stuff, even to the extent that he
believes that everyone around him is either me, or reporting to me.
Still, it's good that he's doing it here, where Google will archive it.
Then, anyone considering working with him can see for themselves what
they're buying into.
>
>"And you RULE OUT that it could be MOORE my biggest
>fan and GAY lover."
> Kenneth Robert Pangborn LYING and claiming David Moore is his gay
>lover. Message-ID: <_MlOj.598$pH4.7@trnddc06>
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,
in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
"...my aunt wouldnt come over to our house anymore because of how he would
talk to her and come on to her....and he had over 180 pictures of her on
his computer"
- --Ken Pangborn's former stepdaughter Megan, on growing up in the Pangborn
household
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/AwUBSA0aeqbdsu4taRc6EQKEAwCfVe1elHf0+WmGUBkIUFpMU0dr+x4AnjgL
CoyWBWR76wT1CkZOkea+rVCL
=tALA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
krp
>>>>> I follow orders dutifully, and get attacked by Ken in return. What an
>>>>> ingrate.
>>>>
>>>> What orders Davey?
>
>>> You ordered David to find the new about you.
>> But he hasn't found the INFO yet.
> Yes he has. He found that you're selling your house. Just as
> you demanded he do.
Look you demented Polack. All he knows is that it is LISTED. But he knew
that DAYS before I posted anything. He was sending me blackmail for days
before I posted on my list about it. The MORON still hasn't figured out
he's being played like a cheap dime store harmonica. ALl he knows is that I
*MIGHT* be moving and his HAS to know the details. And that this is another
opportunity to STALK and HARASS me.
>>He already KNEW that there was a for
>>sale sign up.
> Prove he knew it before he followed your demand that he find the
> information about you.
Golly would you accept his e-mails to me at my regular address where he
was *DEMANDING* $5,000 to keep quiet about it? I bet NOT.
>>What he absolutely MUST find, his life depends on it, that's
> Pretending for a moment that he does want to know the names of
> anyone interested, I doubt he would die if he wasn't told.
You underestimate his level of OBSESSION.
> Can you offer anything to support your claim that his life depends
> on knowing? Didn't think so.
Nothing that YOU would accept Mr. TROLL. However his frantic e-mails to
me (threats) and his screaming at his TROOPS not to mention his contacts
with realtors DEMANDING his "LEGAL RIGHTS" to the info (something he has
stated he has here) pretty well paints a picture of somebody out of
control.
>>the names of EVERYONE who has looked at the house, and everyone that MAY
>>have made an offer. If Davey doesn't find it by the end of this week he
>>will
>>slit his own throat.
> Well, we shall see if he's still posting on Sunday. If he is, we
> can be certain that he found out or you lied.
Or HE has lied.
>>What's more he absolutely HAS to find where I might be
>>moving to. Is it in Florida? Where? Do I have a new phone number yet? What
>>is it? What's the new ADDRESS - these are all IMPERATIVES for the
>>COALITION
>>FORCES INTELLIGENCE UNIT!
> There is no coalition. You aren't important enough to warrant
> such. Accept this and move on with your life.
Tell HIM that. He still believes hne is COMMANDER of a MASIVE coalition
forces against me.
>>Moore HAS to have it this week or heads will roll!
> Starting with his own, unless you lied.
Or HE did.
>>He has satellite surveillance up.
> Prove it.
Google Earth.
>>Straining to see license plate numbers on
>>cars parked outside.
> Prove it.
He's talking to his troops about it. The FAT girl has been asked to get
the PLATE NUMBERS off EVERY CAR that parks outside "Kenny's house."
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Add megalomania to Ken's many mental disorders (multiple personality
> disorder, Fregoli, sociopathy, etc.)
Thank you attorney - er DOCTOR Moore. <snicker>
>>>What's more he absolutely HAS to find where I might be
>>>moving to. Is it in Florida? Where? Do I have a new phone number yet?
>>>What
>>>is it? What's the new ADDRESS - these are all IMPERATIVES for the
>>>COALITION
>>>FORCES INTELLIGENCE UNIT!
>> There is no coalition. You aren't important enough to warrant
>>such. Accept this and move on with your life.
>>>Moore HAS to have it this week or heads will roll!
>> Starting with his own, unless you lied.
> Reminds me of a joke:
<sigh>
> Ken comes home early one evening, and comes into the bedroom to find
> Barbara in bed doing what she does best, with the next door neighbor.
> They're laughing and having a good old time, ignoring Ken completely. He
> takes his gun out of his drawer and holds it up to his own head. They're
> still laughing. Ken says "What are you laughing for? You're next."
Davey YOU and Kunt are the Polacks here NOT me. BUT your joke does
reflect HOW you think. PERVERT!
> I think he may actually believe this stuff, even to the extent that he
> believes that everyone around him is either me, or reporting to me.
> Still, it's good that he's doing it here, where Google will archive it.
> Then, anyone considering working with him can see for themselves what
> they're buying into.
Moore look at what you have already admitted to right here in this
newsgroup. (Crossposted). That is to the constant monitoring of my address
on
Google, and to harassing real estate agents with your "WARNINGS" about me
and my house. You are the one claiming a "Constitutional Right" to know the
details about the potential sale of my home. YOU claim it is a "public
record" and you go on to claim that you have a "legal right" to the
information. That, really says all that needs to be said about anyone's
mental health Davey.
krp
"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> But he hasn't found the INFO yet. He already KNEW that there was a for
>>sale sign up. What he absolutely MUST find, his life depends on it, that's
>>the names of EVERYONE who has looked at the house, and everyone that MAY
>>have made an offer.
> Nope, I couldn't care less. When the sale is complete, the deed will be
> recorded, and I'll get the name of the party at that time. Then, I'll
> print out a copy of your divorce paperwork, with the part about the
> sinkholes and termites hi-lited, and drop it in the mail. If you haven't
> disclosed these known defects, you'll be royally screwed. :)
So you say ATTORNEY MOORE! However there ARE such things as postal
inspectors. BUT Davey while you THINK that such things are automatically
PUBLIC RECORDS - they're NOT. Davey - I have made sure that YOU -
specifically will not see the transaction.
Moore for more than a decade you have TRIED to bully and blackmail me.
Has it EVER worked sissy? Has it ever even come CLOSE to working? NO! Your
threats are the ranting of a CHILD. Your threats about Jay and Peggy"filing
charges" and Tong doing this or that are so frigging LAUGHABLE Davey. You
have NO idea how pathetic you are.
Dan Sullivan
Kent Wills
>>> There is NOTHING to support a claim that you have maliciously
>>> and/or repeatedly followed and harassed anyone.
>>> Once can argue you willfully followed me to misc.legal, but you've
>>> never harassed me, or anyone else in the group.
>>
>> There is as much and more to support it about you and Kevin than there
>> is about Greg.
>>
>
>you show some proof that I followed greegor and harassed him.
He is so DESPERATE for a win against me that tjab has resorted to
posting nothing but lies.
The sad thing is, he's having no more luck than when he was being
honest.
>
>I'll not disturb the crickets to wait for proof of such an absurd
>allegation.
>
>that sorry piece of useless dermis followed Kent and I to alt.friends
>when Kent went on vacation and wasn't posting.
GregWhore was worried I had abandoned him. I wasn't giving him
the attention he so desperately wanted.
>
>greegor is obsessed with stalking Kent.
>
But it's ok, in GregWhore's mind since he's the one doing the
stalking, as defined by the very definition he posted.
>
>He is a snake tjab,be sure and stay close so he bites you too.
I recall GregWhore taking exception to people posting without
their names. It's almost funny how he has no problem with tjab not
using his real name.
I've always presumed tjab is somehow associated with his name, but
it's not likely to actually BE his name.
And yet GregWhore doesn't have a problem with it. Odd that.
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- GregWhore Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child
abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>
Kent Wills
>Kent Wills wrote:
>> On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 17:00:37 -0500, TNKev <TNKe...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>> redefine "stalker" then greegor,you fr33kin' id10t.
>>>> You define it. Post a definition that applies to him but not to you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> <Greg Hanson>
>>> "http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
>>> Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
>>> following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
>>
>> BURN!
>> There is NOTHING to support a claim that you have maliciously
>> and/or repeatedly followed and harassed anyone.
>
>He followed you and I to alt.friends,I had all but quit replying to him
>when he started harassing the friends group and I am sick of replying to
>him yet again. he keeps asking the same questions and ignoring answers
>and...........you know the story.
It's said that the definition of crazy is doing the same thing
over and over and expecting different results.
GregWhore keeps asking the same questions over and over expecting
a different answer. Seems very close to crazy.
>
>> Once can argue you willfully followed me to misc.legal, but you've
>> never harassed me, or anyone else in the group. Bummer for tjab,
>> Greg, et al.
>
>I did follow you to misc.legal and 2 or 3 other groups as well,I believe
>misc.legal and alt.friends are the only groups we both subscribe to at
>this point.
>
As far as I know, those are it.
I followed you to the Dead group, but since I'm not the fan the
Mrs. is, I left.
>
>> Greg willfully followed me to misc.legal (and other groups) with
>> the intent to harass me. And he's done so repeatedly.
>
>and also harasses the people of alt.friends,and they did absolutely
>nothing to him.
EXACTLY!
But his hope was to get them to join him. He failed. As he
ALWAYS does.
>
>> It's another example of his "I'm always right and everyone else
>> is always wrong" standard.
>
>"Stalking" for everyone else is stalking,for him it is "investigating"
>
And, of course, he was FORCED to do it. It's all the other
person's fault. He didn't want to do it, but was required. He's the
victim, you see.
That is, more or less, what GregWhore would claim.
"My family's case is for Neglect, but we are treated
in virtually every regard as child abusers, marked on
the Child Abuse registry, for example."
-- Gregory Scott Hanson telling Usenet he's a FOUNDED child abuser.
Message-ID: <35120b16.04011...@posting.google.com>
Kent Wills
Everyone knows you HATE everyone in/from Poland. You don't need
to keep proving it.
>BUT your joke does
>reflect HOW you think. PERVERT!
>
It when right over you head, huh?
>> I think he may actually believe this stuff, even to the extent that he
>> believes that everyone around him is either me, or reporting to me.
>> Still, it's good that he's doing it here, where Google will archive it.
>> Then, anyone considering working with him can see for themselves what
>> they're buying into.
>
> Moore look at what you have already admitted to right here in this
>newsgroup. (Crossposted). That is to the constant monitoring of my address
>on
> Google,
No such post has made it to misc.legal.
David did mention that he Googled your address (this was AFTER you
DEMANDED that he find the information about you). No mention of it
being done constantly was made.
>and to harassing real estate agents with your "WARNINGS" about me
>and my house.
No such post has made it to misc.legal.
You are the only person to make that claim.
>You are the one claiming a "Constitutional Right" to know the
>details about the potential sale of my home.
No such post has made it to misc.legal.
You are the only person to claim David has a Constitutional
right.
>YOU claim it is a "public
>record" and you go on to claim that you have a "legal right" to the
>information.
Once the paperwork is filed, it will be a matter of public
record. As such, he does have the right to see it, if he wishes.
>That, really says all that needs to be said about anyone's
>mental health Davey.
>
I doubt anyone would question that you're mentally unstable.
Kent Wills
>DAVID MOORE WHACKJOB
>"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>news:2c97be10ff5760c9...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>>> But he hasn't found the INFO yet. He already KNEW that there was a for
>>>sale sign up. What he absolutely MUST find, his life depends on it, that's
>>>the names of EVERYONE who has looked at the house, and everyone that MAY
>>>have made an offer.
>
>> Nope, I couldn't care less. When the sale is complete, the deed will be
>> recorded, and I'll get the name of the party at that time. Then, I'll
>> print out a copy of your divorce paperwork, with the part about the
>> sinkholes and termites hi-lited, and drop it in the mail. If you haven't
>> disclosed these known defects, you'll be royally screwed. :)
>
> So you say ATTORNEY MOORE! However there ARE such things as postal
>inspectors.
And?
Are you claiming that David will send something illegal through
the mail?
>BUT Davey while you THINK that such things are automatically
>PUBLIC RECORDS - they're NOT. Davey - I have made sure that YOU -
>specifically will not see the transaction.
Home sales are public record. No amount of your pathological
lying will alter this truth.
>
> Moore for more than a decade you have TRIED to bully and blackmail me.
Prove it.
>Has it EVER worked sissy?
Pretending he has done so, yes.
>Has it ever even come CLOSE to working? NO! Your
>threats are the ranting of a CHILD. Your threats about Jay and Peggy"filing
>charges" and Tong doing this or that are so frigging LAUGHABLE Davey. You
>have NO idea how pathetic you are.
>
Yet you are the one crying about how David did as you demanded
when he looked for and found the information about your house.
Dan Sullivan
Kent Wills
>"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:iq4q04hg4cgcrp5sm...@4ax.com...
>
>>>>>> I follow orders dutifully, and get attacked by Ken in return. What an
>>>>>> ingrate.
>>>>>
>>>>> What orders Davey?
>>
>>>> You ordered David to find the new about you.
>
>>> But he hasn't found the INFO yet.
>
>> Yes he has. He found that you're selling your house. Just as
>> you demanded he do.
>
> Look you demented Polack.
Everyone knows you HATE everyone in/from Poland. You don't need
to keep proving it. Really.
>All he knows is that it is LISTED.
A home isn't listed unless the current owner is looking to sell.
>But he knew
>that DAYS before I posted anything.
Prove it.
>He was sending me blackmail for days
>before I posted on my list about it.
Prove it.
>The MORON still hasn't figured out
>he's being played like a cheap dime store harmonica. ALl he knows is that I
>*MIGHT* be moving and his HAS to know the details.
You were quite open about moving on your listserv.
>And that this is another
>opportunity to STALK and HARASS me.
Since you DEMANDED that he find it, you can't actually claim he's
stalking. He's only doing what you want.
>
>>>He already KNEW that there was a for
>>>sale sign up.
>
>> Prove he knew it before he followed your demand that he find the
>> information about you.
>
> Golly would you accept his e-mails to me at my regular address where he
>was *DEMANDING* $5,000 to keep quiet about it? I bet NOT.
If it's from him, sure.
If, as I expect will be the case, it doesn't even exist, no.
>
>>>What he absolutely MUST find, his life depends on it, that's
>
>> Pretending for a moment that he does want to know the names of
>> anyone interested, I doubt he would die if he wasn't told.
>
> You underestimate his level of OBSESSION.
Presumably he doesn't know, and yet he's still posting. Since one
needs to be alive to post, we can safely accept he's not dead.
>
>> Can you offer anything to support your claim that his life depends
>> on knowing? Didn't think so.
>
> Nothing that YOU would accept Mr. TROLL.
Since I'll accept the truth, you've outted yourself as the liar
you are.
>However his frantic e-mails to
>me (threats) and his screaming at his TROOPS not to mention his contacts
>with realtors DEMANDING his "LEGAL RIGHTS" to the info (something he has
>stated he has here) pretty well paints a picture of somebody out of
>control.
Again, prove your claim.
If you prefer, you may admit you're lying.
>
>>>the names of EVERYONE who has looked at the house, and everyone that MAY
>>>have made an offer. If Davey doesn't find it by the end of this week he
>>>will
>>>slit his own throat.
>
>> Well, we shall see if he's still posting on Sunday. If he is, we
>> can be certain that he found out or you lied.
>
> Or HE has lied.
You are the one who claimed he would kill himself. If he's still
alive on Sunday, it will mean he either found out, or you lied.
>
>>>What's more he absolutely HAS to find where I might be
>>>moving to. Is it in Florida? Where? Do I have a new phone number yet? What
>>>is it? What's the new ADDRESS - these are all IMPERATIVES for the
>>>COALITION
>>>FORCES INTELLIGENCE UNIT!
>
>> There is no coalition. You aren't important enough to warrant
>> such. Accept this and move on with your life.
>
> Tell HIM that. He still believes hne is COMMANDER of a MASIVE coalition
>forces against me.
No, you have a delusion that makes you think you are important
enough to warrant some sort of conspiracy.
You aren't. Accept this and move on with your life.
>
>>>Moore HAS to have it this week or heads will roll!
>
>> Starting with his own, unless you lied.
>
> Or HE did.
You made the claim. If he doesn't commit suicide, it will mean
one of two things:
1) he got the information you claim he wants
2) you lied.
There are no other option.
>
>>>He has satellite surveillance up.
>
>> Prove it.
>
> Google Earth.
A picture taken, most probably, a few years ago is satellite
surveillance?
BTW, David doesn't own or run Google Earth, simpleton.
How deep is your psychosis?
>
>>>Straining to see license plate numbers on
>>>cars parked outside.
>
>> Prove it.
>
> He's talking to his troops about it.
Prove it.
>The FAT girl has been asked to get
>the PLATE NUMBERS off EVERY CAR that parks outside "Kenny's house."
Prove it.
>
>>>He has little fatty reporting in HOURLY.
>
>> How would you know? Have you put an illegal tap on her phone line?
>
No answer?
Of course the truth is that you flat out lied. I'd be surprised
if anyone actually thought your latest bull has any sort of merit.
Dan Sullivan
krp
> Everyone knows you HATE everyone in/from Poland. You don't need
> to keep proving it.
Nope! JUST YOU - dickhead!
>>BUT your joke does reflect HOW you think. PERVERT!
> It when right over you head, huh?
>> Ken comes home early one evening, and comes into the bedroom to find
>> Barbara in bed doing what she does best, with the next door neighbor.
No Kunt - not at all. Just shows the FILTHY mind that lives in a TOILET
that thought it up.
>>> I think he may actually believe this stuff, even to the extent that he
>>> believes that everyone around him is either me, or reporting to me.
>>> Still, it's good that he's doing it here, where Google will archive it.
>>> Then, anyone considering working with him can see for themselves what
>>> they're buying into.
>> Moore look at what you have already admitted to right here in this
>>newsgroup. (Crossposted). That is to the constant monitoring of my
>>address on
>> Google,
> No such post has made it to misc.legal.
But it WAS posted to ASCPS.
> David did mention that he Googled your address (this was AFTER you
> DEMANDED that he find the information about you). No mention of it
> being done constantly was made.
He mentioned it after I mentioned it HERE (ASCPS) but he had been doing
it for many days, which his blackmail e-mails clearly show. Demanding that I
pay him $5,000 or he's ruin the sale of my house.
>>and to harassing real estate agents with your "WARNINGS" about me
>>and my house.
> No such post has made it to misc.legal.
> You are the only person to make that claim.
But they WERE admitted to in ASCPS. I can't help it if the little prick
removes newsgroups so he can get off on a technicality.
>>You are the one claiming a "Constitutional Right" to know the
>>details about the potential sale of my home.
> No such post has made it to misc.legal.
> You are the only person to claim David has a Constitutional
> right.
But you are LYING. He DID - and THAT indeed WAS crossposted to
Misc.legal. You have even agreed with him, you put your own spin on it but
you say he does have the right.
>>YOU claim it is a "public record" and you go on to claim that you have a
>>"legal right" to the
>>information.
> Once the paperwork is filed, it will be a matter of public
> record. As such, he does have the right to see it, if he wishes.
Ni he has NO RIGHT whatsoever to see it. It is PRIVATE if I choose to
make it private. And ATTORNEY Wills your LEGAL opinion, as usual, is SHIT!
krp
>>>> But he hasn't found the INFO yet. He already KNEW that there was a
>>>> for
>>>>sale sign up. What he absolutely MUST find, his life depends on it,
>>>>that's
>>>>the names of EVERYONE who has looked at the house, and everyone that MAY
>>>>have made an offer.
>>> Nope, I couldn't care less. When the sale is complete, the deed will be
>>> recorded, and I'll get the name of the party at that time. Then, I'll
>>> print out a copy of your divorce paperwork, with the part about the
>>> sinkholes and termites hi-lited, and drop it in the mail. If you
>>> haven't
>>> disclosed these known defects, you'll be royally screwed. :)
>> So you say ATTORNEY MOORE! However there ARE such things as postal
>>inspectors.
> And? Are you claiming that David will send something illegal through
> the mail?
Hmmmmmmmmm well that's an interesting point. It's not so much that what
he would send through the MAIL is illegal (a SICK BIRD by the way) BUT that
Davey,m the COWARD that he is clings to his anonymity for dear life. SO the
little pussy can be SAFE from responsibility for the shit he pulls. He can
get away with all sorts of shit on the INTERNET. - - - BUT when he goes to
U.S. mail - postal inspectors can and DO hunt down little pricks like Davey
all the time. Given what he ahs sent me, the threats and extortion, using
the U.S. Mail to further his CAMPAIGN will get him nailed. You see that's
traceable even IF Davey uses his "DUSTIN CALLOWAY" alias. I know because I
have had a U.S. Postal Inspector as a client. I have waited for the asshole
to use the mail for years.
>>BUT Davey while you THINK that such things are automatically
>>PUBLIC RECORDS - they're NOT. Davey - I have made sure that YOU -
>>specifically will not see the transaction.
> Home sales are public record. No amount of your pathological
> lying will alter this truth.
They are ONLY if the parties want them to be Kunt,m your prtactice of
law SUCKS!
Dan Sullivan
Kent Wills
consulting" <krp2...@verizon.net> PROVED he is a pathological liar
when he wrote:
>ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW
No matter how much your mentally ill mind forces you to believe
your lie to be true, the simple truth is that I am not a lawyer.
No amount of your pathological lies will ever alter this simple
truth.
>"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:drrs04d2gfkbojk1u...@4ax.com...
>
>>>>> But he hasn't found the INFO yet. He already KNEW that there was a
>>>>> for
>>>>>sale sign up. What he absolutely MUST find, his life depends on it,
>>>>>that's
>>>>>the names of EVERYONE who has looked at the house, and everyone that MAY
>>>>>have made an offer.
>
>>>> Nope, I couldn't care less. When the sale is complete, the deed will be
>>>> recorded, and I'll get the name of the party at that time. Then, I'll
>>>> print out a copy of your divorce paperwork, with the part about the
>>>> sinkholes and termites hi-lited, and drop it in the mail. If you
>>>> haven't
>>>> disclosed these known defects, you'll be royally screwed. :)
>
>>> So you say ATTORNEY MOORE! However there ARE such things as postal
>>>inspectors.
>
>> And? Are you claiming that David will send something illegal through
>> the mail?
>
> Hmmmmmmmmm well that's an interesting point. It's not so much that what
>he would send through the MAIL is illegal (a SICK BIRD by the way) BUT that
>Davey,m the COWARD that he is clings to his anonymity for dear life. SO the
>little pussy can be SAFE from responsibility for the shit he pulls.
You claim to know where he lives.
>He can
>get away with all sorts of shit on the INTERNET. - - - BUT when he goes to
>U.S. mail - postal inspectors can and DO hunt down little pricks like Davey
>all the time. Given what he ahs sent me, the threats and extortion, using
>the U.S. Mail to further his CAMPAIGN will get him nailed.
You've yet to prove these phantom threats exist anywhere other
than the confines of your mind.
>You see that's
>traceable even IF Davey uses his "DUSTIN CALLOWAY" alias. I know because I
>have had a U.S. Postal Inspector as a client. I have waited for the asshole
>to use the mail for years.
There are many ways around your delusion, even if we pretend that
warning the new owners of the problems listed in the divorce documents
were to be illegal.
>
>>>BUT Davey while you THINK that such things are automatically
>>>PUBLIC RECORDS - they're NOT. Davey - I have made sure that YOU -
>>>specifically will not see the transaction.
>
>> Home sales are public record. No amount of your pathological
>> lying will alter this truth.
>
> They are ONLY if the parties want them to be Kunt,m your prtactice of
>law SUCKS!
>
Please cite federal/state or case law that allows one or both
parties to keep the information private once filed.
If you prefer, you may admit you lied. Again.
Kent Wills
>"Kunt Wills" <comp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>news:3irs04p99klj8aggu...@4ax.com...
>
>> Everyone knows you HATE everyone in/from Poland. You don't need
>> to keep proving it.
>
> Nope! JUST YOU - dickhead!
You keep PROVING you're a bigot.
>
>>>BUT your joke does reflect HOW you think. PERVERT!
>
>> It when right over you head, huh?
>
>>> Ken comes home early one evening, and comes into the bedroom to find
>>> Barbara in bed doing what she does best, with the next door neighbor.
>
> No Kunt - not at all. Just shows the FILTHY mind that lives in a TOILET
>that thought it up.
It's a very old joke.
>
>>>> I think he may actually believe this stuff, even to the extent that he
>>>> believes that everyone around him is either me, or reporting to me.
>>>> Still, it's good that he's doing it here, where Google will archive it.
>>>> Then, anyone considering working with him can see for themselves what
>>>> they're buying into.
>
>>> Moore look at what you have already admitted to right here in this
>>>newsgroup. (Crossposted). That is to the constant monitoring of my
>>>address on
>>> Google,
>
>> No such post has made it to misc.legal.
>
> But it WAS posted to ASCPS.
So you flat out LIED when you stated, "Moore look at what you
have already admitted to right here in this newsgroup.
(Crossposted)."
Suddenly it wasn't cross-posted.
Where you lying when you stated it was cross-posted, or are you
lying now when you claim it was not?
>
>> David did mention that he Googled your address (this was AFTER you
>> DEMANDED that he find the information about you). No mention of it
>> being done constantly was made.
>
> He mentioned it after I mentioned it HERE (ASCPS) but he had been doing
>it for many days, which his blackmail e-mails clearly show. Demanding that I
>pay him $5,000 or he's ruin the sale of my house.
Again, prove he did such.
If you prefer, you may admit you are lying. Again.
>
>>>and to harassing real estate agents with your "WARNINGS" about me
>>>and my house.
>
>> No such post has made it to misc.legal.
>> You are the only person to make that claim.
>
> But they WERE admitted to in ASCPS. I can't help it if the little prick
>removes newsgroups so he can get off on a technicality.
You are the one who made the claim about his "confession" being
cross-posted.
>
>>>You are the one claiming a "Constitutional Right" to know the
>>>details about the potential sale of my home.
>
>> No such post has made it to misc.legal.
>> You are the only person to claim David has a Constitutional
>> right.
>
> But you are LYING.
Then you should be able to prove it.
>He DID - and THAT indeed WAS crossposted to
>Misc.legal.
No such admission made it to misc.legal.
>You have even agreed with him, you put your own spin on it but
>you say he does have the right.
He said that public records are public. And he's correct.
You are the only one to mention it being a Constitutional right.
>
>>>YOU claim it is a "public record" and you go on to claim that you have a
>>>"legal right" to the
>>>information.
>
>> Once the paperwork is filed, it will be a matter of public
>> record. As such, he does have the right to see it, if he wishes.
>
> Ni he has NO RIGHT whatsoever to see it. It is PRIVATE if I choose to
>make it private. And ATTORNEY Wills your LEGAL opinion, as usual, is SHIT!
>
For the third time, please cite the federal, state or case law
that enables one or both parties to prevent those who wish to see the
records once filed at the court house.
If you prefer, you may admit you are lying.
freedom
On Tue, 22 Apr 2008, " krp" <krp2...@verizon.net> wrote:
>DAVID DANIEL MOORE CHILD BEATER
.....didn't write the message in question. Yet another lie by Ken
Pangborn.
>"freedom" <about...@aboutISkenApangbornFRAUD.com> wrote in message
>news:72e23bfd5341e2ce...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net...
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>
>> Add megalomania to Ken's many mental disorders (multiple personality
>> disorder, Fregoli, sociopathy, etc.)
>
> Thank you attorney - er DOCTOR Moore. <snicker>
>
>>>>What's more he absolutely HAS to find where I might be
>>>>moving to. Is it in Florida? Where? Do I have a new phone number yet?
>>>>What
>>>>is it? What's the new ADDRESS - these are all IMPERATIVES for the
>>>>COALITION
>>>>FORCES INTELLIGENCE UNIT!
>
>>> There is no coalition. You aren't important enough to warrant
>>>such. Accept this and move on with your life.
>
>>>>Moore HAS to have it this week or heads will roll!
>
>>> Starting with his own, unless you lied.
>
>> Reminds me of a joke:
>
> <sigh>
>
>> Ken comes home early one evening, and comes into the bedroom to find
>> Barbara in bed doing what she does best, with the next door neighbor.
>> They're laughing and having a good old time, ignoring Ken completely. He
>> takes his gun out of his drawer and holds it up to his own head. They're
>> still laughing. Ken says "What are you laughing for? You're next."
>
> Davey YOU and Kunt are the Polacks here NOT me.
I'm not Polish.
> BUT your joke does
>reflect HOW you think. PERVERT!
>
>> I think he may actually believe this stuff, even to the extent that he
>> believes that everyone around him is either me, or reporting to me.
>> Still, it's good that he's doing it here, where Google will archive it.
>> Then, anyone considering working with him can see for themselves what
>> they're buying into.
>
> Moore look at what you have already admitted to right here in this
>newsgroup. (Crossposted). That is to the constant monitoring of my address
>on
> Google,
I stated that I typed your address into Google. That hardly equates to
"constant monitoring."
> and to harassing real estate agents with your "WARNINGS" about me
I've harassed no one.
>and my house. You are the one claiming a "Constitutional Right" to know the
>details about the potential sale of my home.
I've made no such claim. This is another of your silly lies.
>YOU claim it is a "public
>record"
Home sales are indeed public record.
> and you go on to claim that you have a "legal right" to the
>information.
I have as much right as anyone else to access public records.
> That, really says all that needs to be said about anyone's
>mental health Davey.
Yes, your thinking that you are important enough to warrant having your
home sale information concealed, indeed says quite a bit about your mental
health.
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,
in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
"...my aunt wouldnt come over to our house anymore because of how he would
talk to her and come on to her....and he had over 180 pictures of her on
his computer"
- --Ken Pangborn's former stepdaughter Megan, on growing up in the Pangborn
household
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/AwUBSA50q6bdsu4taRc6EQLUWwCg6kL+ITxmudT1fRQv0AYsMbQuIvYAn3UB
dPNy5n4Krcqts4osjDchVKpa
=dKD5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
freedom
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008, Kent Wills <comp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 00:52:34 GMT, " Kenneth Robert Pangborn, of KRP
>consulting" <krp2...@verizon.net> PROVED he is a pathological liar
>when he wrote:
>
>>ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW
>
> No matter how much your mentally ill mind forces you to believe
>your lie to be true, the simple truth is that I am not a lawyer.
> No amount of your pathological lies will ever alter this simple
>truth.
Hmmmmm....reflecting upon this, maybe when he labels you as a lawyer, he's
subconsciously making reference to what HE wishes he could be?
That would also explain why he frequently falsely labels me as a child
beater, as well....
http://www.aboutkenpangborn.com
The truth about Kenneth Pangborn, who supports convicted child sex
criminals
"If you call the police, I'll knock out all of your teeth, I'll cripple
you. I may go to prison for it, but when I get out, I'll be able to walk,
but you will still be a cripple."
- --Pangborn puppet Greg Hanson of alt.support.child-protective-services **,
in a verbal threat to his girlfriend
"...my aunt wouldnt come over to our house anymore because of how he would
talk to her and come on to her....and he had over 180 pictures of her on
his computer"
- --Ken Pangborn's former stepdaughter Megan, on growing up in the Pangborn
household
** - this conclusion was reached via applying Ken and Greg's logic
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: N/A
iQA/AwUBSA8jeqbdsu4taRc6EQIVjwCgmtS4lrgqYtLlQhtca3vP+ZPsU0MAmwSc
NzYl4OwEV53XGP+bYnSePMzR
=rd7J
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----