Greg whined 'Where's the link?'
dragonsgirl
If you're so stupid that you didn't see it (more like probably attribute it
to someone else and is now playing his 'where's the link' game) then let me
help you out a bit. Heaven knows I would just love for you to see that your
behavior is talking, harassment, and obsession at the very least.
From: "dragonsgirl" <drago...@sbcglobal.net>
Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services
Subject: Greg gives his definition of stalking and harassment...
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:06:57 -0500
Lines: 13
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
Grouping both together, I might add:
<Greg Hanson>
"http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
By that definition, Mr. Probert, I could claim that
you and others are stalking me. "
@
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.parenting.spanking/msg/5ec84f42bba34c7a?dmode=source
Greegor
> I posted the link to your stalking and harassment statement.
> If you're so stupid that you didn't see it (more like probably attribute it
> to someone else and is now playing his 'where's the link' game) then let me
> help you out a bit. Heaven knows I would just love for you to see that your
> behavior is talking, harassment, and obsession at the very least.
>
> Newsgroups: alt.support.child-protective-services
> Subject: Greg gives his definition of stalking and harassment...
> Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 10:06:57 -0500
> Lines: 13
> X-Priority: 3
> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
> X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
> X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
>
> Grouping both together, I might add:
>
> <Greg Hanson>
> "http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
> Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
> following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
> By that definition, Mr. Probert, I could claim that
> you and others are stalking me. "
>
Message header is for a message BETTY posted April 15th.
How does this prove I said something?
That's VERY funny Betty!
No wonder you posted it only to one newsgroup.
dragonsgirl
"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:af2d2e44-efa8-4831...@2g2000hsn.googlegroups.com...
*****You COULD look at the link at the bottom of the post.
That's VERY funny Betty!
****You are. And?
No wonder you posted it only to one newsgroup.
*****I ALWAYS post to only one newsgroup, unless my post is a reply.
Greegor
accusing me of believing in and being hypocritical about.
You snipped it and took it out of context to accuse
me of using a double standard.
Anything for the hyena pack, Right Betty?
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.parenting.spanking/msg/5ec84f42bba34c7a?dmode=source
Path: g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!
b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Greegor" <Gree...@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.parenting.spanking,alt.support.foster-
parents,alt.support.child-protective-
services,misc.kids,alt.support.breast-implant
Subject: Re: BETTY LIES ABOUT A THREAT
Date: 21 Jun 2006 13:36:37 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <1150922197.4...@b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <4mj592t6f8e20816j...@4ax.com>
<d3r892pa2nm6jgphb...@4ax.com>
<6pib9290beu7tvedo...@4ax.com>
<p6ob92dfb7fiti46r...@4ax.com>
<1150676022.8...@y41g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>
<1150680421.2...@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<bMxlg.10$JV...@fe11.lga>
<1150726640.1...@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>
<uKidnaMsDt_JSwvZ...@scnresearch.com>
<TRAlg.46709$fb2....@newssvr27.news.prodigy.net>
<1150769340.9...@g10g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
<dCKlg.25959$VE1....@newssvr14.news.prodigy.com>
<1150870468.8...@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com>
<kObmg.290$mE6...@fe12.lga>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 12.217.183.28
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1150922202 13687 127.0.0.1 (21 Jun 2006
20:36:42 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 20:36:42 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <kObmg.290$mE6...@fe12.lga>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows 98; Win
9x 4.90; .NET CLR 1.1.4322),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups...@google.com
Injection-Info: b68g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-
host=12.217.183.28;
posting-account=t9ET8wwAAADHIMJMMxtoFpD3z_N1Oh0z
> 1. Would you not agree that what she has
> engaged in is clearly stalking behavior?
Clearly? No.
> 2. Is there ever a justification for contacting
> a spouse who is not a Usenet participant?
Yes.
> I am especially interested in your answer to the second question.
>
> Can you spare a moment and answer?
The Psychology and social work types define
stalking so vaguely that they have yet again
converted normal human interaction into a pathology.
Their definition is very political.
http://www.stalkingbehavior.com/definiti.htm
Stalking is defined as "the willful, malicious and repeated
following and harassing of another person" (Meloy, 1998).
By that definition, Mr. Probert, I could claim that
you and others are stalking me.
The LEGAL definition is less like "Chicken Little".
Kane's definition came closer to that.
Dan Sullivan
dragonsgirl
I didn't take it out of context at all.
I quoted the whole paragraph.
Further, no one needs to see your defiition of stalking and harassment.
All they need to do is read your comments about FM posting your legal info,
etc, and then watch you pound me for posting the personal info of Anthony
Zaffuto (when in reality it was Bee who posted it, and you jumped to attack
me for posting, but when realized it was Bee who did so you clammed up on
the attacks pretty quick.)
You do have a double standard.
Anything to try to save face after making an ass of yourself. Right Greg?
"Greegor" <Gree...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:f167f800-a7d8-4855...@8g2000hsu.googlegroups.com...