Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

"Denial of Service Attack" Against my E-Mail Box Done by a Conspiracy of Sara Salzman, Kenneth McVay, B'nai Brith Canada, and Laurence B. Shiff V1-0 U_0216

3 views

Skip to first unread message

Ward Cleaver

unread,

Feb 16, 2006, 6:18:06 PM2/16/06

LESSON IN HISTORY - HOW JEWS FIGHT "Denial of Service Attacks"

http://groups.google.com/group/can.general/msg/8c8265dd1816bfa9?fwc=1
Subject: CONSPIRACY! Ken McVay of Nizkor, Marc Fournier aka Scrappy of THT.NET
and Dr. Laurence B. Shiff of Toronto v2.0 U_0215
Message-ID: <9hs5v1dconn3f4hv4...@4ax.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 03:28:17 -0600

AND

Directly from the Nizkor web site itself:

http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/b/ftp.py?people/b/bradbury.scott/email/Bradbury.020110
(Archived locally as: Conspiracy-McVay-BB-Shiff)

Shofar FTP Archive File: people/b/bradbury.scott/email/Bradbury.020110

From: Scott Bradbury [mailto:tavis...@ix.netcom.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 4:43 PM
To: b...@bnaibrith.ca; bnai...@total.net; arose...@bnaibrith.ca;
jas...@bnaibrith.ca; bna...@ilos.net; bn...@cadvision.com
Subject: B'nai Brith Can Be Linked to the Criminal Harassment I have
Been Receiving! Care to Deny it B.B.?

Attention B'nai Brith,

I now have evidence that B'nai Brith is conspiratorial. How did Sara Salzman
get my secret e-mail address that I don't make public? I used
tavis...@ix.netcom.com to e-mail B'nai Brith! What have you people of
B'nai Brith have to say about this development and seeing how I also BCCd my
e-mail to certain legal reps I would say that this goes a long way in
proving that B'nai Brith does endorse the harassment of private citizens!

I also have B'nai Brith linked to Ken McVay who is on first name basis with
a Laurence B. Shiff of Toronto, Ontario Canada who likes to make death
threats. I hope you all now realize there is a fire storm coming your way!
No threats of violence BUT you all just buried yourselves!

Here is proof that B'nai Brith revealed my e-mail address:

From: Sara
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Poor Mr. Bradbury's meds wore off
Date: 10 Jan 2002 15:42:46 GMT
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Lines: 9
Message-ID:
References: <155r3u8887i4bnkmc...@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.155.169.45
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC)

In article <155r3u8887i4bnkmc...@4ax.com>,
tavis...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

[more smears and hysterical attacks]

<<Tavish comment February 16, 2006: Let the readers decide for themselves Sara
and here is the link to what you deleted in its entirety:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy/msg/60674c0af9c6e220?fwc=1 or
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=155r3u8887i4bnkmc...@4ax.com
End of comment.>>

--
"Americans have different ways of saying things. They say "elevator",
we say "lift" ... they say "President", we say "stupid psychopathic git."
Alexai Sayle.

Care to deny it now B'nai Brith? Care to deny you are a civil lawsuit just
ripe for the plucking? You all are digging a deep hole for yourselves indeed
and your non-response to my complaints about Ken McVay defaming people
financed by funds funneled through you will make great headlines!

Scott Bradbury

Also note Sara Salzman is part of the conspiracy as well! Her Message ID was
deleted from the web page too but here is her original post never the less:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/55689cf164e6dd48?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: SDS-Conspirator and SDS-Conspirator.jpg)
To unlock munged e-mail addresses go to this link: http://tinyurl.com/9cs59
From: Sara <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
Subject: Re: Poor Mr. Bradbury's meds wore off
Date: 10 Jan 2002 22:59:51 GMT
Message-ID: <catamont-130D95...@news.concentric.net>
References: <155r3u8887i4bnkmc...@4ax.com>

Why would Sara Salzman be showing my not made public secret e-mail in her "In
article <155r3u8887i4bnkmc...@4ax.com>, tavis...@ix.netcom.com
wrote:" when I plainly did NOT post using that e-mail address!
[A]rticle <155r3u8887i4bnkmc...@4ax.com> plainly shows:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.conspiracy/msg/60674c0af9c6e220?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: SDS-Conspirator_2 and SDS-Conspirator_2.jpg)
To unlock munged e-mail addresses go to this link: http://tinyurl.com/9v2vm
Subject: In Peter Outerbridge's Own Words (He Proves He is "Paul Kneisel") R_10
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 07:21:16 -0600
Message-ID: <155r3u8887i4bnkmc...@4ax.com>
"Email: .. <t-a-----v-i-s-h4-8@-i-x.-n-etc-om-c-o-mRemove-Hyphens-2-Mail>"

I had to shortly close the <tavis...@ix.netcom.com> e-mail box because of the
continual e-mail b*mb denial of service attacks being made against it.
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/c30c6a019e8987c3?fwc=1
(Archived locally as: SDS-Conspirator_3 and SDS-Conspirator_3.jpg)
To unlock munged e-mail addresses go to this link: http://tinyurl.com/7t9xz
Subject: PUBLIC NOTICE - MY TAVIS...@IX.NETCOM.COM E-MAIL BOX WILL CLOSE IN 24
HOURS Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:58:01 -0600
Message-ID: <d64c4uo9p1h82ia4l...@4ax.com>

ALL DUE TO SARA SALZMAN NOT RESPECTING MY RIGHT TO PRIVACY!!

X-Sender: tavis...@popd.ix.netcom.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32)
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:29:16 -0600
To: ab...@concentric.net
From: Scott Bradbury <tavis...@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: This is the Result of YOUR Client Violating MY Rights to
Privacy
Cc: cata...@concentric.net, ab...@mindspring.com
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

To whom it may concern,
I sent a formal complaint yesterday regarding Sara Salzman posting my
private e-mail address and my telling her in public forum to stop. Now my e-mail
box that I wanted to remain private is now being e-mail bombed and thanks to
Sara Salzman!
What are you going to do with a person who with malicious intent exposed
my e-mail box to such assaults when she knew full well that my other e-mail box
was being abused. Sara purposely posted my private e-mail address knowing full
well that her accomplices would wage a "denial of service attack" against it!
I provide all the proofs you need below to show that I asked Sara to
stop and proof that now, because of her, my private e-mail box is being flooded!

One example of hundreds which are still coming in regarding my private e-mail
address being e-mail bombed solely because Sara Salzman does not respect my
right to privacy:

Status: U
Return-Path: <refl...@detebe.org>
Received: from detebe.org ([195.247.227.149])
by elektra (Earthlink/Netcom Mail Service) with ESMTP id
u4br0f.a1s.37tiu4v
for <tavis...@ix.netcom.com>; Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:09:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from news@localhost)
by detebe.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id g0GL9XV27907;
Wed, 16 Jan 2002 22:09:33 +0100
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 22:09:33 +0100
Message-Id: <200201162109...@detebe.org>
X-Authentication-Warning: detebe.org: news set sender to refl...@detebe.org
using -f
From: refl...@detebe.org (detebe.org autoreflector)
To: tavis...@ix.netcom.com
Subject: Answer from reflector (Re: test)
Precedence: bulk
X-Reflector: detebe.org
X-URL: http://www.detebe.org/

Hello,
this message is never sent unsolicited. Don't panic.
You - or more precisely someone using your mail address - have
posted a test message to the following Newsgroups:
misc.test

Your message was sent

Wed, 16 Jan 2002 19:55:24 GMT

travelling from your location to the detebe.org (Germany).
Your article arrived here at Wed Jan 16 2002 22:09:33 +0100 (CET)
and this is the way it went (read from back to front):

detebe.org!news-in.ivm.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-onli要e.de!t-online.de!
newsfeed.hanau.net!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!n苟ws-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!
news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!n要tp.kreonet.re.kr!news-hub.kaist.ac.kr!
feeder.kornet.net!news1.kornet.net!n觔t-for-mail

Reflector Mail is sent to anybody posting into a group ending with the
word ".test". If you don't want to receive reflector mails, include e.g.
the words 'ignore' at the top of your articles.

For obvious reasons, mails to refl...@detebe.org are directed
into /dev/null. If you feel to write us, send your mail to
use...@detebe.org instead.

Full headers plus the first 20 lines of your original message were:

| Path: detebe.org!news-in.ivm.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-onli要e.de!
|t-online.de!newsfeed.hanau.net!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!n苟ws-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!
|news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!n要tp.kreonet.re.kr!news-hub.kaist.ac.kr!
|feeder.kornet.net!news1.kornet.net!n觔t-for-mail
| From: tavis...@ix.netcom.com
| Newsgroups: misc.test
| Subject: test
| Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 19:55:24 GMT
| Organization: irritate eventually if Albert's pitcher isn't young
| Lines: 3
| Message-ID: <a24pgq$cf$5...@news1.kornet.net>
| NNTP-Posting-Host: 211.34.38.66
| X-Trace: news1.kornet.net 1011214683 399 211.34.38.66 (16 Jan 2002 20:58:03 GMT)
| X-Complaints-To: use...@feeder.kornet.net
| NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 20:58:03 +0000 (UTC)
| Xref: detebe.org misc.test:140314
|
| test
|
| hiya fatboy
| .
--
autoresponder.pl v1.3 2000 01 07 el...@newsbone.org (Elmar K. Bins)

<<Tavish comment February 16, 2006: Shiff was busily abusing kornet.net with
mass forge cancellations of my posts as well as posting forged child porn ads to
implicate me. See: http://tinyurl.com/arm3y for all the posts documenting
kornet.net being abused to harass me and deprive me ofmy 1st Amendment Rights
of Free Speech.>>

Here is Sara Salzman not honoring my request about the confidentiality of my
e-mail address:

Path: mindspring!news.mindspring.net!washdc3-snh1.gtei.net!
cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!newsfeed1.cidera.com!
Cidera!portc03.blue.aol.com!dc1.nntp.concentric.net!
sjc1.nntp.concentric.net!newsfeed.concentric.net!global-news-master
From: Sara <cata...@concentric.net>
Newsgroups:
alt.revisionism,can.general,soc.culture.canada,misc.legal,alt.lawyers
Subject: Scott Continues to Harass
Date: 16 Jan 2002 20:32:38 GMT
Organization: Concentric Internet Services
Lines: 71
Message-ID: <catamont-7575E8...@news.concentric.net>
References: <catamont-373803...@news.concentric.net>
<30h64ugapcjd1sgk3...@duff.ca>
<catamont-D11AD9...@news.concentric.net>
<u2u64uovgooab6u4i...@4ax.com>
<catamont-FFAACC...@news.concentric.net>
<1si94ugla2tnetb09...@4ax.com>
<catamont-844B26...@news.concentric.net>
<6a7a4uk36ob73utid...@4ax.com>
<catamont-DB6608...@news.concentric.net>
<6amb4ugcrbkdge2sn...@4ax.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.155.170.101
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC)
Xref: mindspring alt.revisionism:1252306 can.general:292985
soc.culture.canada:379725 misc.legal:414993 alt.lawyers:23184

In article <6amb4ugcrbkdge2sn...@4ax.com>,
tavis...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> On 16 Jan 2002 13:10:19 GMT,
> <catamont-DB6608...@news.concentric.net> Sara
> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

> >In article <6a7a4uk36ob73utid...@4ax.com>,
> >tavis...@ix.netcom.com wrote:

> >> On 16 Jan 2002 03:15:58 GMT,
> >> <catamont-844B26...@news.concentric.net> Sara
> >> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

> >> >In article <1si94ugla2tnetb09...@4ax.com>,
> >> >tavis...@ix.netcom.com wrote:

> >> >> Former subject title: "Poor Scotty STILL doesn't understand the
> >> >> difference"

> >> >> Yes I do understand the difference. A liar like you can tell all
> >> >> the lies you wish in USENET but when you carry your lies into a civil
> >> >> court it is a criminal act known as perjury which is an offense which
> >> >> warrants jail time!

> >> >> On 15 Jan 2002 04:35:03 GMT,
> >> >> <catamont-FFAACC...@news.concentric.net> Sara
> >> >> <cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

> >> >> >In article <u2u64uovgooab6u4i...@4ax.com> wrote
> >> >> >tavis...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> >> >> Your posting an e-mail address I have never made public via posting
> >> >> shows your intent to have it spammed. You show that you are a
> >> >> vindictive person who is a miserable slob poor loser.

> >> >Not at all. It simply shows that everyone is waery of your hysterical
> >> >spew, and that you cannot hide the truth.

> >> Posting my never used in public forum e-mail address is indeed an
> >> attempt to have it spammed. As for your statement "your hysterical spew"- I
> >> merely show YOUR words which contradict each other which you keep deleting so
> >> who is trying to hide the truth? As for your statement: "you cannot hide the
> >> truth"- how have I tried to hide the truth? I keep showing it and you keep
> >> deleting it and posting a private e-mail address which is not meant for usenet.

Then I guess you shouldn't have used it in trying to harass people, yes?

<end>

The statement she made: "Then I guess you shouldn't have used it in trying to
harass people, yes?" was in regard to my filing a complaint to B'nai Brith in
Canada for their funding a person who publicly libels me and I wrote them to
advise them that they could be civilly liable for the libel against me by their
fundee as I complained here in a reply to the above lie:

>Then I guess you shouldn't have used it in trying to harass people, yes?

Complaining to an organization which funds a person who libels me in public is
NOT harassment! I resent you making a legitimate complaint into an issue of
harassment. I wrote B'nai Brith about their funding a person who posts such in
public forum:

I.E.

(Ken McVay's one example of (many) public libel and smear funded through B'nai
Brith):
From: kmc...@veritas.nizkor.org (Kenneth McVay, OBC)
Subject: Re: Will Ken Lewis Name Just One Recipient to the Nizkor Endowment Fund
Other Than Ken McVay?
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 19:38:21 +0000 (UTC)
Organization: The Nizkor Project, http://www.nizkor.org/
Message-ID: <9pidrd$272q$1...@news.tht.net>

Exact quote: "He won't - no balls, no bet. (Besides, he's, er, "impoverished,"
you know... your basic welfare bum.)"

<<Doc Tavish comment January 8, 2002: I am not on welfare and I am not a bum. I
resent such lies and libel which McVay is famous for doing on a daily basis.>>

<end>

If I had a web site funded by a Christian Church and I was posting such as:
"Besides, she's, er, "impoverished," you know... your basic welfare bum."
wouldn't you complain?

Do you wish to persist that an honest complaint is harassment?

Your purposely posting my other e-mail address is harassment especially when I
have repeatedly told you that by doing such you violate my rights to privacy

<END>

If you all don't believe B'nai Brith has a network of people who harass people
then you all should ask yourselves why Sara Salzman who lives in Colorado would
be getting my undisclosed private e-mail address from B'nai Brith in Canada and
now why it is being flooded with hundreds of forged test messages as I gave
examples to above! This proves a malicious criminal conspiracy designed solely
to harass me and intimidate me and to deny me service! I strongly suggest that
Sara Salzman's account with concentric be terminated immediately.

Attention ab...@mindspring.com,
I will be closing my tavis...@ix.netcom.com e-mail box immediately. It
will be as much use now as my former tavi...@ix.netcom.com after these filthy
beasts wage their criminal attacks against it repeatedly. You all know how many
times my e-mail box has been shut down by these unsavory characters.

Thank you,
Scott Bradbury

<END>

Need I say more other than the Nizkook crowd is a group of sore losers!

BTW everyone reading this-- take note that B'nai Brith Canada funds a person who
makes apologia for child porn as my sig line details!

Doc Tavish

--Nizkor.Org Director, Ken McVay, Condoning Child Porn--
"I am weary of seeing the issue of "child porn" blown out of proportion (I've
been on and around the Net since 1988, and have yet to come across anything I'd
consider "child porn." I've seen photos of naked children, but then I've got
some of those in my family photo album, and fail to see the harm, or any great
moral danger to our society)." - Nizkor Director Ken McVay
http://www.spectacle.org/695/mcvay.html (Archived locally as: pedo_McVay)

<<Tavish comment: What McVay fails to appreciate is the fact that there is a
major difference between family member photos in a family album (legally and
morally) and pictures of other people's children naked he has viewed off the
internet. Also what McVay fails to recognize is the fact that by his viewing
naked children photos (who obviously aren't his family members) uploaded by
others is a criminal act on his behalf and child porn is a "great moral danger
to our society" which pervs such as McVay don't accept just as homosexuals don't
think their lifestyle is a "great moral danger to our society."

The above Spectacle Org article was verified by John Morris with
Message ID: cf214uoohhmoqblmv...@4ax.com
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/defcb95af24e5fe6
(Archived locally as: John_Confirms)
(For the record this child porn apologist is funded by B'nai Brith as shown
here: http://www.nizkor.org/league-donation.html B'nai Brith must condone
pictures of "naked children" too!)

Does anything else need to be said other than the only way for Ken McVay to view
those pictures of naked children on the NET is for him to have downloaded them!
THAT IS FACT!!

Roger

unread,

Feb 16, 2006, 7:30:54 PM2/16/06

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Ward Cleaver wrote
in message <170av15p8ttsslmrl...@4ax.com>:

>Here is proof that B'nai Brith revealed my e-mail address:

Here is proof of blubberbury's delusional nature:

>From: Sara
>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>Subject: Poor Mr. Bradbury's meds wore off
>Date: 10 Jan 2002 15:42:46 GMT
>Organization: Concentric Internet Services
>Lines: 9
>Message-ID:
>References: <155r3u8887i4bnkmc...@4ax.com>

And if we take a look at that referenced message, what do we find?

That's right, boys and girls, a From: header that looks like this:

From: <t-a-----v-i-s-h...@-i-x.-n-etc-om-c-o-mRemove-Hyphens-2-Mail>

So all Sara did was remove those hyphens, just like it said..

Which is probably why the morbidly obese Shame of Belleville, KY took
out the message ID, to try to make it harder for his delusion to be
exposed.

Too bad zie knows so little of Usenet that zie forgot (this time) to
remove the References header.

Of course, zie'll just correct that now, and go on posting this
garbage as if it meant anything...

Sara Salzman

unread,

Feb 16, 2006, 8:48:55 PM2/16/06

In article <170av15p8ttsslmrl...@4ax.com>,
Ward Cleaver <Ward_C...@001-mayfield.net> wrote:

> detebe.org!news-in.ivm.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online
> .de!t-online.de!
> newsfeed.hanau.net!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!news-spur1.maxwell.sy
> r.edu!
> news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!nntp.kreonet.re.kr!news-hub.k
> aist.ac.kr!
> feeder.kornet.net!news1.kornet.net!not-for-mail

>
> Reflector Mail is sent to anybody posting into a group ending with the
> word ".test". If you don't want to receive reflector mails, include e.g.
> the words 'ignore' at the top of your articles.
>
> For obvious reasons, mails to refl...@detebe.org are directed
> into /dev/null. If you feel to write us, send your mail to
> use...@detebe.org instead.
>
> Full headers plus the first 20 lines of your original message were:
>
> | Path:

And yet, for all 400+ lines you've posted, for all the accusations and
slanders, NOTHING has happened.

And that's because you're a delusional sociopath.

How does it feel to know that NO ONE in law enforcement takes you
seriously?

And no one at the IRS?
And no one at the FBI?
And no one at Concentric?
And no one at B'nai Brith?

In fact, no one at all. Even when you MAY have been correct about
something like Nazihunter, no one paid the slightest bit of attention to
you.

You're a waste of oxygen.

Sara

--
"A great many people think they are thinking when they are really
rearranging their prejudices."
- Edward R. Murrow

Message has been deleted

Roger

unread,

Feb 16, 2006, 9:32:52 PM2/16/06

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)

someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
in message <24810779.BbX6r38vRb@FreeBSD>:

>Sara Salzman wrote:

>> And that's because you're a delusional sociopath.
>>
>> How does it feel to know that NO ONE in law enforcement takes you
>> seriously?
>>
>> And no one at the IRS?
>> And no one at the FBI?
>> And no one at Concentric?
>> And no one at B'nai Brith?
>>
>> In fact, no one at all. Even when you MAY have been correct about
>> something like Nazihunter, no one paid the slightest bit of attention to
>> you.
>>
>> You're a waste of oxygen.

>Sara, did you know that the largest DDOS-Attack 'ever reported' came against
>Jew Watch? This happend last year.

Bullsh*t.

Ben Edelman hit better than 600MB/sec back in February 2005.

The only information I can find on an attack of Jew Watch is
unconfirmed reports on message boards containing mainly speculation.

Please feel free to demonstrate otherwise.

>Funny thing, Hal Turner jumps up and
>says I'll host Jew Watch - He got hammered, millions of packets coming in
>per-sec run his server cpu so high that it overheated.

Says the self-appointed computer expert.

>It was I, yours
>truly that suggested he drop lamer Unix .i.e Linux and switch to BSD. He
>did just that - Jew watch, along with www.halturnershow.com is up and
>running. You people can't bring down a REAL O/S.

Yeah -- and it was at your suggestion that NASA remotely lands the
Shuttle, right?

Message has been deleted

Roger

unread,

Feb 16, 2006, 10:05:57 PM2/16/06

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Tommy wrote

in message <10114966.W7cpN65oOY@FreeBSD>:

>Roger wrote:

>>>> And that's because you're a delusional sociopath.
>>>>
>>>> How does it feel to know that NO ONE in law enforcement takes you
>>>> seriously?
>>>>
>>>> And no one at the IRS?
>>>> And no one at the FBI?
>>>> And no one at Concentric?
>>>> And no one at B'nai Brith?
>>>>
>>>> In fact, no one at all. Even when you MAY have been correct about
>>>> something like Nazihunter, no one paid the slightest bit of attention to
>>>> you.
>>>>
>>>> You're a waste of oxygen.

>>>Sara, did you know that the largest DDOS-Attack 'ever reported' came
>>>against Jew Watch? This happend last year.

>> Bullsh*t.
>>
>> Ben Edelman hit better than 600MB/sec back in February 2005.

>Who in the hell is Ben Edelman? And why would anyone want to attack his
>servers?

If you knew the answer to the first, you'd have the answer to the
second.

But once again, a simple Google search is beyond you.

Such are the 133t ski11z of the idiot child.

>> The only information I can find on an attack of Jew Watch is
>> unconfirmed reports on message boards containing mainly speculation.

>Yeah, I guess the attacks on SCO can't be confirmed either.

And as usual, you are wrong:

http://www.caida.org/analysis/security/sco-dos/

>> Please feel free to demonstrate otherwise.

Your turn, idiot child.

Or are you too busy running from the other threads in which you've
been being thrashed tonite?

>>>Funny thing, Hal Turner jumps up and
>>>says I'll host Jew Watch - He got hammered, millions of packets coming in
>>>per-sec run his server cpu so high that it overheated.

>> Says the self-appointed computer expert.

>Roger you wouldn't even know how to launch a DOS attack.

Once again -- don't assume, idiot child.

>I can see Roger
>now, Uh, okay this is the target IP 127.0.0.1. Roger hits his C: prompt and
>types ping 127.0.0.1 Yep one packet per-sec, that will bring the server
>down. LMAO!

None of which changes the fact that you didn't (and probably *still*
don't) know the difference between a shell and a command interpreter.

Or between either and a communications proggie.

Do you *really* want me to dig that exchange out of the archives?

>>>It was I, yours
>>>truly that suggested he drop lamer Unix .i.e Linux and switch to BSD. He
>>>did just that - Jew watch, along with www.halturnershow.com is up and
>>>running. You people can't bring down a REAL O/S.

Run away idiot child -- an ignorant hater like you has no other
choice.

The topic here is your lie that you played any part in any change of
OS for either site.

And in support, I offer your lies about the Shuttle, which I remind
you that you offered in support of your lies about the Moon landings.

Now -- about your lies regarding my support of my children -- I'm
still waiting for you to substantiate that accusation or retract it
like a man.

This one *isn't* going away, pathetic ignorant liar.

I might just decide to go ahead and "follow you" as you claim I do.

Sara Salzman

unread,

Feb 17, 2006, 1:10:11 AM2/17/06

In article <24810779.BbX6r38vRb@FreeBSD>, Tommy <nom...@nospam.org>
wrote:

> Sara Salzman wrote:
>
>
> > And that's because you're a delusional sociopath.
> >
> > How does it feel to know that NO ONE in law enforcement takes you
> > seriously?
> >
> > And no one at the IRS?
> > And no one at the FBI?
> > And no one at Concentric?
> > And no one at B'nai Brith?
> >
> > In fact, no one at all. Even when you MAY have been correct about
> > something like Nazihunter, no one paid the slightest bit of attention to
> > you.
> >
> > You're a waste of oxygen.
> >
> > Sara
>
>

> Sara, did you know that the largest DDOS-Attack 'ever reported' came against

> Jew Watch? This happend last year. Funny thing, Hal Turner jumps up and

> says I'll host Jew Watch - He got hammered, millions of packets coming in

> per-sec run his server cpu so high that it overheated. It was I, yours

> truly that suggested he drop lamer Unix .i.e Linux and switch to BSD. He
> did just that - Jew watch, along with www.halturnershow.com is up and
> running. You people can't bring down a REAL O/S.

And do you know anything about the DDOS attacks against Nizkor and THHP?

And what does this have to do with Scott Bradbury's hallucinations about
a grand conspiracy that include B'nai Brith (which I am not affiliated
with in any way), Ken McVay (whom I have never met). and myself?

Message has been deleted

Ward Cleaver

unread,

Feb 17, 2006, 1:20:53 AM2/17/06

On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:30:54 GMT, <6v5av11a6l3svp6ko...@4ax.com>
Roger <roger@.> wrote:

>In one age, called the Second Age by some,
> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
> someone claiming to be Ward Cleaver wrote
> in message <170av15p8ttsslmrl...@4ax.com>:

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=170av15p8ttsslmrl...@4ax.com

Anyone clicking the link above will see you for the deceitful shite you are
Roger.

>>Here is proof that B'nai Brith revealed my e-mail address:
>
>Here is proof of blubberbury's delusional nature:

Your stupid insults don't refute my facts Roger.

>>From: Sara
>>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>>Subject: Poor Mr. Bradbury's meds wore off
>>Date: 10 Jan 2002 15:42:46 GMT
>>Organization: Concentric Internet Services
>>Lines: 9
>>Message-ID:
>>References: <155r3u8887i4bnkmc...@4ax.com>
>
>And if we take a look at that referenced message, what do we find?
>
>That's right, boys and girls, a From: header that looks like this:
>
>From: <t-a-----v-i-s-h...@-i-x.-n-etc-om-c-o-mRemove-Hyphens-2-Mail>

That's right!

>So all Sara did was remove those hyphens, just like it said..

No she did NOT do that-- she changed the address to tavis...@ix.netcom.com in
her reply post to the referenced message. Why did you delete this Roger?

NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.155.169.45
User-Agent: MT-NewsWatcher/3.0 (PPC)

In article <155r3u8887i4bnkmc...@4ax.com>,
tavis...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Sara removing all the hyphens from:
<t-a-----v-i-s-h...@-i-x.-n-etc-om-c-o-mRemove-Hyphens-2-Mail> still does not
equal: tavis...@ix.netcom.com!!!!

>Which is probably why the morbidly obese Shame

Hurling insults based on one of your fellow liars deceit does not refute the
truth Roger. Why do you liars resort to hurling insults if you are correct (in
your own minds)?

>of Belleville, KY took out the message ID,

I did NOT take out the Message ID. I posted exactly what your pal Kenneth McVay
had at his web site and I pointed the fact out someone took out the Message ID!

Look at the link I gave:

http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/b/ftp.py?people/b/bradbury.scott/email/Bradbury.020110
(Archived locally as: Conspiracy-McVay-BB-Shiff)

Why did you also delete this Roger?

That is two deceitful acts I caught you in so far Roger!! Care to admit that you
don't know what you are talking about or are you going to do a two step dodge
and avoid admitting you are totally wrong as usual?

>to try to make it harder for his delusion to be exposed.

That's your pals who did the deletion whether it was B'nai Brith or McVay I
don't know. I just posted what Nizkor has at the web page.

>Too bad zie knows so little of Usenet that zie forgot (this time) to
>remove the References header.

Why would I want to do that? It proved my point precisely and I even made
comments on the referenced 155r3u8887i4bnkmc...@4ax.com in my post
which you deleted from your current denial of fact.

>Of course, zie'll just correct that now, and go on posting this
>garbage as if it meant anything...

You are still delusional and you were caught lying again.

Tavish

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/623165aa1b6c029b?fwc=1
Subject: My Opposition Proven to be Mentally Unstable, Delusional, Peeping Toms,
and Retarded aka Re: Friedrich Berg is NUTS! V2.0 U_0122
Message-ID: <3o38t15bfcpqcqiom...@4ax.com>
Date: 22 Jan 2006 23:00:49 GMT
------------------------------
Also related to the sanity of the masses of Jewry:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/3da3d2d78074226?fwc=1
Subject: Physician Claims Jews are Paranoid Schizophrenic U_0123
Message-ID: <4vb9t152r8hm6ind3...@4ax.com>
Date: 23 Jan 2006 10:34:26 GMT
------------------------------
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.politics.nationalism.white/msg/ef2a2ddb008fc113?fwc=1
Subject: Group Fantasies and Jewish Radicalism by Stanley Rothman V3.0 T_1220
Message-ID: <ikqhq193ka66lq7gf...@4ax.com>
Date: 21 Dec 2005 05:51:58 GMT
------------------------------
One "mentally unstable" and "crazy man" Jew as an example:
Special Note: Yale F. Edeiken Esq. of Allentown, Pennsylvania- Supreme Court
ID# 40290 has falsely asserted he was associated with the two law firms
mentioned below (Todd Miller & Associates and Trainor Law Offices). Both law
firms told me first hand that Yale F. Edeiken was never an attorney at their
firms!! That is fact! (Archived locally as: YaleTheNut)
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/79dab24b047e1e68
From: "Yale F. Edeiken" <ya...@enter.net>
Subject: Re: The Common Thread To All These Cancel Announcements...
Message-ID: <SH9g7.634$7d.2...@newshog.newsread.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 15:06:26 GMT

Defendant Bradshit <rdoc_...@my-deja.cpm, tavi...@ix.netcom,com> wrote
in message news:7lp1otkrsh37k7ioi...@4ax.com...

[...]

> Care to tell all of us why both Todd Miller and Paul Trainor distanced
> themselves from you

Because they were dealing with someone who was "mentally unstable"
(their dscription) and a "crazy man" (again, their description) who they
wanted to go away as quckly as possible.

~~End of GOOGLE Archive~~

Ward Cleaver

unread,

Feb 17, 2006, 2:02:28 AM2/17/06

On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:48:55 -0700,
<catamont-F2AA74...@news.giganews.com> Sara Salzman
<cata...@concentric.net> wrote:

>In article <170av15p8ttsslmrl...@4ax.com>,
http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=170av15p8ttsslmrl...@4ax.com

>> detebe.org!news-in.ivm.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!

>> t-online.de! newsfeed.hanau.net!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!
>> news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!nntp.kreonet.re.kr!news-hub.k

>> aist.ac.kr!feeder.kornet.net!news1.kornet.net!not-for-mail

>>
>> Reflector Mail is sent to anybody posting into a group ending with the
>> word ".test". If you don't want to receive reflector mails, include e.g.
>> the words 'ignore' at the top of your articles.
>>
>> For obvious reasons, mails to refl...@detebe.org are directed
>> into /dev/null. If you feel to write us, send your mail to
>> use...@detebe.org instead.
>>
>> Full headers plus the first 20 lines of your original message were:
>>
>> | Path: detebe.org!news-in.ivm.net!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-onli
>> | ne.de!t-online.de!newsfeed.hanau.net!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!news-spu
>> | r1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.direct.ca!look.ca!nntp.kreonet.re.kr!news-hub.

>> | kaist.ac.kr!feeder.kornet.net!news1.kornet.net!not-for-mail

That's not my fault!

>And that's because you're a delusional sociopath.

You hurled that same exact insult in another post you lying fat slob and it came
back to bite you on your big fat arse!

I.E.

http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=oqqav1h7n223hmohh...@4ax.com
Subject: Re: Bradbury Spews Again
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:42:07 -0600
Message-ID: <oqqav1h7n223hmohh...@4ax.com>

>How does it feel to know that NO ONE in law enforcement takes you
>seriously?
>
>And no one at the IRS?
>And no one at the FBI?
>And no one at Concentric?
>And no one at B'nai Brith?
>
>In fact, no one at all. Even when you MAY have been correct about
>something like Nazihunter, no one paid the slightest bit of attention to
>you.
>
>You're a waste of oxygen.

Your insults still do not refute the facts as presented above with YOUR and
YOURS own writings!! It's not my fault that law enforcement etc. won't enforce
the laws and policies they are obligated to enforce.

Stay stupid you fat slob.
Tavish

>Sara

http://groups.google.com/group/alt.revisionism/msg/e11cb065b764b2fa?fwc=1
Subject: Leon Salzman Actionable for Unprofessional Libel? Could Be! Perhaps I
Should Consult with my Local Attorney!!
Message-ID: <jo0ktvo8vvbs51uja...@4ax.com>
Date: 12 Dec 2003 18:12:15 GMT

Roger

unread,

Feb 17, 2006, 7:13:26 AM2/17/06

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)

someone claiming to be Tommy wrote
in message <15644159.LN6r4y9hnX@FreeBSD>:

>Sara Salzman wrote:

>>> > And that's because you're a delusional sociopath.
>>> >
>>> > How does it feel to know that NO ONE in law enforcement takes you
>>> > seriously?
>>> >
>>> > And no one at the IRS?
>>> > And no one at the FBI?
>>> > And no one at Concentric?
>>> > And no one at B'nai Brith?
>>> >
>>> > In fact, no one at all. Even when you MAY have been correct about
>>> > something like Nazihunter, no one paid the slightest bit of attention
>>> > to you.
>>> >
>>> > You're a waste of oxygen.

>>> Sara, did you know that the largest DDOS-Attack 'ever reported' came

>>> against Jew Watch? This happend last year. Funny thing, Hal Turner jumps
>>> up and says I'll host Jew Watch - He got hammered, millions of packets
>>> coming in per-sec run his server cpu so high that it overheated. It was
>>> I, yours truly that suggested he drop lamer Unix .i.e Linux and switch to
>>> BSD. He did just that - Jew watch, along with www.halturnershow.com is up
>>> and running. You people can't bring down a REAL O/S.

>> And do you know anything about the DDOS attacks against Nizkor and THHP?

>No, don't know anything about it. Do you know anything about the attacks on
>Jew Watch?

That they cannot be verified by the normal means.

>> And what does this have to do with Scott Bradbury's hallucinations about
>> a grand conspiracy that include B'nai Brith
>> (which I am not affiliated with in any way)

>I'm sure you have enough class to not associate with the ADL. Perhaps Scott
>meant the terrorist group J.D.L. You are affiliated with the JDL, yes? You
>were friends with Irv Rubin, were you not?

Both wrong. But that won't stop you from lying about the matter, now,
will it?

>> Ken McVay (whom I have never met). and myself?

>Sara have you not seen the sick bastard that post child porn adds in Mr.
>Bradbury's name? Doing shit like that is way out of line. You can't blame
>Scott for being weary of YOU PEOPLE.

Your assumption that those forgeries were done by "YOU PEOPLE" cannot
be supported by any facts.

>Who is doing that, Nazi Hunter?
>Scott has a right to be paranoid, you people took him to court,

"you people" did?

Which "you people" are you lying about now?

>you drove to his town, threw rocks threw his window, etc.

You can prove that Sara threw anything at all?

>I would be mad if you people
>done those things to me(I would have my revenge, one way or the other) .

But then, you're an amoral little baby who thinks that "Getting back"
at someone is the height of justice.

>You people should leave him alone.

If zie stopped posting zir lies and abuse, no one would ever mention
zie again.

Same as you.

>Be glad he doesn't think like I do.

Why? You're both such ineffectual nothings.

BTW, I'm still waiting for you to post that substantiation or retract
your lie about me supporting the children you haven't even shown I
have, idiot child.

Roger

unread,

Feb 17, 2006, 7:14:44 AM2/17/06

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)

someone claiming to be Ward Cleaver wrote

in message <avsav1pi02fd6g9gu...@4ax.com>:

>Stay stupid you fat slob.

You mean stupid like the claim that following your directions and
removing the hyphens *must* have involved the B'nai B'rith?

Roger

unread,

Feb 17, 2006, 7:25:27 AM2/17/06

In one age, called the Second Age by some,
(an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
someone claiming to be Ward Cleaver wrote

in message <enpav1pmb6edqlka2...@4ax.com>:

>On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 00:30:54 GMT, <6v5av11a6l3svp6ko...@4ax.com>
>Roger <roger@.> wrote:
>
>>In one age, called the Second Age by some,
>> (an Age yet to come, an Age long past)
>> someone claiming to be Ward Cleaver wrote
>> in message <170av15p8ttsslmrl...@4ax.com>:

>http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=170av15p8ttsslmrl...@4ax.com
>
>Anyone clicking the link above will see you for the deceitful shite you are
>Roger.

Not even in your dreams, lard ass.

>>>Here is proof that B'nai Brith revealed my e-mail address:

>>Here is proof of blubberbury's delusional nature:

>Your stupid insults don't refute my facts Roger.

No, the real facts refute your "facts," fat boy.

>>>From: Sara
>>>Newsgroups: alt.revisionism
>>>Subject: Poor Mr. Bradbury's meds wore off
>>>Date: 10 Jan 2002 15:42:46 GMT
>>>Organization: Concentric Internet Services
>>>Lines: 9
>>>Message-ID:
>>>References: <155r3u8887i4bnkmc...@4ax.com>

>>And if we take a look at that referenced message, what do we find?
>>
>>That's right, boys and girls, a From: header that looks like this:
>>
>>From: <t-a-----v-i-s-h...@-i-x.-n-etc-om-c-o-mRemove-Hyphens-2-Mail>

>That's right!

>>So all Sara did was remove those hyphens, just like it said..

>No she did NOT do that-- she changed the address to tavis...@ix.netcom.com in
>her reply post to the referenced message.

And all she had to do was remove the hyphens, just like your
instructions said to.

>Why did you delete this Roger?

Because it was not needed to prove my point.

>>of Belleville, KY took out the message ID,

>I did NOT take out the Message ID.

How do you explain it's absence, then?

It's there in the archive on Google.

>I posted exactly what your pal Kenneth McVay
>had at his web site and I pointed the fact out someone took out the Message ID!
>
>Look at the link I gave:
>http://www2.ca.nizkor.org/ftp.cgi/people/b/ftp.py?people/b/bradbury.scott/email/Bradbury.020110
>(Archived locally as: Conspiracy-McVay-BB-Shiff)
>
>Why did you also delete this Roger?

Because you *also* gave a Google link, and all I needed was to show
that what you posted as having come from that link, did not actually.

Thanks for the admission.

>That is two deceitful acts I caught you in so far Roger!!

Nope.

>Care to admit that you
>don't know what you are talking about or are you going to do a two step dodge
>and avoid admitting you are totally wrong as usual?

Care to admit that you are delusional as always?

>>to try to make it harder for his delusion to be exposed.

>That's your pals who did the deletion whether it was B'nai Brith or McVay I
>don't know. I just posted what Nizkor has at the web page.

But claimed that it came from Google, that being the first link you
gave.

>>Too bad zie knows so little of Usenet that zie forgot (this time) to
>>remove the References header.

>Why would I want to do that? It proved my point precisely and I even made
>comments on the referenced 155r3u8887i4bnkmc...@4ax.com in my post
>which you deleted from your current denial of fact.

>>Of course, zie'll just correct that now, and go on posting this
>>garbage as if it meant anything...

>You are still delusional and you were caught lying again.

Bottom line: all Sara did was remove the hyphens, which your
instructions said to do.

And you've deluded yourself that this indicates some massive
conspiracy against you when quite frankly, lard ass, you're not worth
the trouble of organizing.

Now, about that double standard you keep running from regarding the
posting of personal details....?

Sara Salzman

unread,

Feb 17, 2006, 8:03:42 AM2/17/06

In article <15644159.LN6r4y9hnX@FreeBSD>, Tommy <127....@127.0.0.1>
wrote:

> Sara Salzman wrote:
>
> > In article <24810779.BbX6r38vRb@FreeBSD>, Tommy <nom...@nospam.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Sara Salzman wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > And that's because you're a delusional sociopath.
> >> >
> >> > How does it feel to know that NO ONE in law enforcement takes you
> >> > seriously?
> >> >
> >> > And no one at the IRS?
> >> > And no one at the FBI?
> >> > And no one at Concentric?
> >> > And no one at B'nai Brith?
> >> >
> >> > In fact, no one at all. Even when you MAY have been correct about
> >> > something like Nazihunter, no one paid the slightest bit of attention
> >> > to you.
> >> >
> >> > You're a waste of oxygen.
> >> >
> >> > Sara
> >>
> >>
> >> Sara, did you know that the largest DDOS-Attack 'ever reported' came
> >> against Jew Watch? This happend last year. Funny thing, Hal Turner jumps
> >> up and says I'll host Jew Watch - He got hammered, millions of packets
> >> coming in per-sec run his server cpu so high that it overheated. It was
> >> I, yours truly that suggested he drop lamer Unix .i.e Linux and switch to
> >> BSD. He did just that - Jew watch, along with www.halturnershow.com is up
> >> and running. You people can't bring down a REAL O/S.
> >
> > And do you know anything about the DDOS attacks against Nizkor and THHP?
>

> No, don't know anything about it. Do you know anything about the attacks on
> Jew Watch?
>

Yes, I do. And I can't help it if you're an ignorant baby.

> > And what does this have to do with Scott Bradbury's hallucinations about
> > a grand conspiracy that include B'nai Brith

> > (which I am not affiliated with in any way)
>
> I'm sure you have enough class to not associate with the ADL. Perhaps Scott
> meant the terrorist group J.D.L. You are affiliated with the JDL, yes? You
> were friends with Irv Rubin, were you not?

ADL? JDL?

Neither of those are B'nai Brith, ignorant one.

And no, I never met Irv Rubin, never spoke to Irv Rubin, never
communicated in any way. That's a complete, total lie, little ignorant
baby.

Why must you lie so blatantly?

>
>
> > Ken McVay (whom I have never met). and myself?
> >
>

> Sara have you not seen the sick bastard that post child porn adds in Mr.
> Bradbury's name?

No, because Ken McVay has never posted anything in Mr. Bradbury's name.
That's another lie.

> Doing shit like that is way out of line. You can't blame

> Scott for being weary of YOU PEOPLE. Who is doing that, Nazi Hunter?
> Scott has a right to be paranoid, you people took him to court, you drove to
> his town, threw rocks threw his window, etc. I would be mad if you people

> done those things to me(I would have my revenge, one way or the other) .

> You people should leave him alone. Be glad he doesn't think like I do.

Who are "you people"?

Chris Larson

unread,

Feb 17, 2006, 3:35:23 PM2/17/06

Jewwatch! <smile>

That's the site where over 40% of the folks in the list aren't even
Jews.

0 new messages