Re: Loonel has a gerbil up his as$ right now
Kadaitcha Man
thou art a man of wax. Ye ministered:
> "Respondant" <Respo...@noemail.none> wrote in message
> news:dMSdnSbdQqmmKbrb...@comcast.com
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>
>>> "Henry Schmidt" <schm...@nottelling.nope> wrote in message
>>> news:MANVh.1759$jR5.804@trnddc08
>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>>> "Henry Schmidt" <schm...@nottelling.nope> wrote in message
>>>>> news:YaNVh.1740$jR5.1066@trnddc08
>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>>>>> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:f07be9$91h$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:29:41 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>>>>>> <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:f076g8$par$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 03:31:25 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>>>>>>>> <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From June 12, 2006 until March 31, 2007--nine months, 17
>>>>>>>>>>> days--I made approximately 1811 posts replying to posts in
>>>>>>>>>>> /this/ group, or an average of 6 posts a day.
>>>>>>>>>> And my own posting history would be well into the millions by
>>>>>>>>>> now. It's really not relevant.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Nine and a half months, Lionel.
>>>>>>>>>> Well, I've been here for more than 10 *years*, so I'm afraid
>>>>>>>>>> that 9.6 months really doesn't cut it.
>>>>>>>>> Well, if that were the original comparison, you might have a
>>>>>>>>> point.
>>>>>>>> As I said, it really doesn't matter.
>>>>>>> It does, because you took the answer to a question that wasn't
>>>>>>> on the table and applied it to that question. Now that that
>>>>>>> question is on the table, I'll respond to it, but my reply was
>>>>>>> in response to your assertion that I post to soc.singles.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This /is/ one of the groups that
>>>>>>>> I consider to be my 'home group', & I'm senior enough here that
>>>>>>>> quite a few of the regulars will be likely to see this
>>>>>>>> situation in pretty much the same way that I see it.
>>>>>>> There's that old group-think again.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But I don't care about the opinion of anyone who thinks like
>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>>> You claimed that soc.singles is my "home" group.
>>>>>>>> No, I was just taking a guess. I don't actually have the
>>>>>>>> faintest idea which group[s] you consider to be your home
>>>>>>>> groups, & I have no intention of Googling to find out.
>>>>>>> For the last 10 months, it has been auk.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> But for all intents and
>>>>>>>>> purposes, for the last ten months (from mid June to mid
>>>>>>>>> April--the above figure and dates are only to the end of
>>>>>>>>> March), this has been my "home" group.
>>>>>>>> Sorry, but that doesn't matter.
>>>>>>> Well, that's depends on what you mean.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But you have a killfile, and I believe I suggested you use it
>>>>>>> quite some time back.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> so subscribing to it might be
>>>>>>>>>>>> a good choice.
>>>>>>>>>>> There are some nice people there, but I'm not one of them.
>>>>>>>>>> <shrug>
>>>>>>>>>> So work something out with DaRkAnGeL yourself. I was just
>>>>>>>>>> trying to make a helpful suggestion.
>>>>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>>>> My pleasure. If you'd like to stay in touch with DaRkAnGeL,
>>>>>>>> you'll probably need to subscribe to AHM, or give her a hand
>>>>>>>> subscribing to some other group that may be of interest to you
>>>>>>>> both, because she's still a Usenet noob, & hasn't yet learned
>>>>>>>> how to configure multiple subscriptions.
>>>>>>> God, you're stupid.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Goody4U for not backing down. You have as much right to be here
>>>>>> as anybody. Stick2yer guns and *don't back down!*
>>>>>
>>>>> Apparently when I wasn't looking, auk turned into a private,
>>>>> members-only club.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> yeah with their members only jackets and their jordache jeans
>>>> listening to She-Bop on their Coby I-pod knockoffs.
>>>>> I must've taken a wrong turn on the way to usenet.
>>>>
>>>> Stick2yer guns!!
>>>
>>> It's not an issue, Porchy, really.
>>>
>>> But I will have to take some time to assemble all the documentation
>>> for the Australian Federal Police. It's pretty voluminous. Almost
>>> 1800 hundred emails, many bytes of chat and probably 5000 (or more)
>>> posts. It's a big job.
>>>
>>> I may just turn over my hard drive and point to where everything is.
>>> Easier.
>>
>> Ya just can't let it go can ya, Rhonda?
>
> Can't?
>
> Depends on where you sit, I guess.
>
>> No matter how many times
>> I've tried to be a friend, and tried to divert your attention from
>> this fiasco via personal (family oriented) email, you just can't
>> bring yourself to stop, can you?
>>
>> You are hell-bent on completing some kind of misguided "mission"
>> here. The likes of which I can no longer fathom.
<sings song>
Another one bites the dust
Another one bites the dust
And another one gone, and another one gone
Another one bites the dust
Hey, Im gonna get you too
Another one bites the dust
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bent vast een scheefgerukte duivelse poepvinger.
Undercover Brother
I'm gonna knock you out.
Mama said knock you out.
HAHAHAHAHAHA
Rhonda does NYC. Get the DVD at Blockbuster.
HAHAHAHAHA
Kadaitcha Man
you stones, you worse than senseless things. Ye denounced:
> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
> news:f08iqf$fim$3...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:21:49 -0400, The NYC Kid
>> <OGn...@east53.eat.a.9.fool> wrote:
>>
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:f07k7t$un$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Shit KM - just how many vengeful women do you /want/ in your life
>>>>> at the same time?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You just can't leave it alone, can you, Lionel.
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> DaRkAnGeL: Please allow me to formally introduce you to KM. He's
>>>>> the guy your new girl acquaintance has been fucking over for the
>>>>> last few months, & I think it's a safe bet that he currently has a
>>>>> bit of a hair-trigger on that particular topic.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <shakes head> Always stirring shit.
>>>>
>>>> It should be fairly obvious to anyone watching that you're still
>>>> working out your remaining issues with the ex-girlfriend who
>>>> stalked you by using me as a stand-in for her.
>>>>
>>>> Thus spake Lionel Lauer:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> I'm reminded of a nutcase I broke up with some years ago, who just
>>>>> couldn't get it through her head that the relationship was over.
>>>>> For months, she'd phone me literally dozens of times a day to tell
>>>>> me what a terrible person I was for breaking up with her, & how
>>>>> I'd ruined her life. I started seeing someone else, & the psycho
>>>>> woman somehow managed to identify the poor girl, & started phoning
>>>>> her too. Understandibly, this scared off the new GF pretty
>>>>> quickly. Next thing I find out is that after the breakup, she'd
>>>>> rented an apartment literally 2 blocks away from mine. The final
>>>>> straw was when I woke up one morning to find stalker-bitch
>>>>> standing at the end of my bed, drunk as a skunk & begging me to
>>>>> let her into my bed. After throwing her out & barricading the
>>>>> door, I got on the phone to the cops to find out how to apply for
>>>>> a restraining order on her to keep her the fuck out of my life.
>>>>> The order was served a day later, & the next thing I know, I've
>>>>> got stalker-bitch's *brother* on the phone, threatening to beat me
>>>>> up, because this whole time, she'd been telling her family that
>>>>> I'd been stalking *her*, & claiming that /she'd left me/ because
>>>>> I'd been beating her up the whole time we'd been together! So I
>>>>> just said "screw it", & took out an order on him as well. I got a
>>>>> few more phone calls from her, which I reported, & that finally
>>>>> got her out of my life.
>>>>> If she'd been into Usenet, I'm quite sure she would've buddied up
>>>>> with one of more net-kooks & passed on as much RL data on me as
>>>>> possible for them to use against me online. Fortunately for me,
>>>>> she barely knew how to use email.
>>>>
>>>> Message-ID: <haak139tcofm61aag...@4ax.com>
>>>>
>>>> I'm not her, and all the stalking that's been done has been done by
>>>> you, Lionel, o psycho-stalker-by proxy.
>>>>
>>>> You're a lunatic. I was told that a long time ago--although I
>>>> already knew--and it's as true now as it was then.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Now, love him though we in AUK do, KM's not so much a rough
>>>>> diamond as he is the Usenet equivalent of a six week nuclear
>>>>> exchange between North Korea, China & the USA, combined with a
>>>>> three-continent outbreak of bird flu & Ebola - as many folk from
>>>>> kinder, gentler parts of Usenet (eg; alt.flame & alt.snuh) have
>>>>> found out to their great cost[1].
>>>>>
>>>>> So, seeing as you're being friendly with the ex who's harassing
>>>>> him in his virtual pub & trying to turn his friends against him,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> r6cva.k...@news.alt.net
>>>> or
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.psychology.psychotherapy/msg/c3777625043aab93
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> ejqmbl$oog$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>> or
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/news.groups/msg/aab4ffc50e063dfa
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/24hoursupport.helpdesk/browse_frm/thread/743f13dc04cf9359/4c90859432cec017?&hl=en#4c90859432cec017
>>>>
>>>> and returned just a few days later as Discordian Meme:
>>>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/soc.men/msg/9f81ee522cd7c415
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/soc.men/msg/27ea6bc9b551210b
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> The Death Troll, which he posted without warning me after we hadn't
>>>> spoken in three weeks.
>>>>
>>>> htold1$x6q$8...@incapacitated-jubblies.org.au
>>>> or
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/24hoursupport.helpdesk/msg/a0a9c3ee610e0daa
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> The Acceptance Speech, wherein he felt compelled to drag me back
>>>> in, even though he had already broken off the relationship:
>>>>
>>>> eqhjuf$6ah$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>> or
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.os.windows-xp/msg/74c638955bfd6e08
>>>>
>>>> And that's just the tip of the iceberg.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> you're in
>>>>> rather a delicate position. It really would be wisest for you to
>>>>> keep your opinions on the fight completely to yourself, & possibly
>>>>> even ignore KM's posts completely - if you can - until he's
>>>>> feeling a bit less homicidal towards his ex, or anyone silly
>>>>> enough to wander into the crossfire.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You think he wants to /kill/ me, Lionel?
>>>>
>>>> I didn't think you could get any stupider.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why don't you just drop your panties girl and let me slide up in
>>> that ass.
>>>
>>> You know you want it. Black panther go discovery channel on yo
>>> shit. HAHAHA
>>
>> Hey Rhonda, seeing as how you're handing out blowjobs to Cranston &
>> Porchy to pretend they're on your side, why don't you share the
>> wealth with the NYC Kid here? I'm sure he'd like to join the crew, &
>> it's not like you can afford to be fussy these days.
>
> Sorry.
>
> I'm too busy working on my reply to Rick's complaint:
lmao - fucking nutjob drama queen.
>> If you ever refer to me again on usenet or on the www in any way,
>> even by allusion, or make a single allegation against me, veiled,
>> indirect, direct, or by act of omission, or refer in any such way to
>> anything that allegedly happened between us or anything that directly
>> or indirectly relates to me in any way then I will file an official
>> online harrassment complaint against you with the Australian Federal
>> Police.
>>
>> http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/CyberLRes/2001/31/
>> http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lrc.nsf/pages/r103chp12
>
>
> f06u03$573$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij zompige domme sterreneter.
Kadaitcha Man
Nero. Ye shrilled:
> "Meat Plow" <me...@meatplow.local> wrote in message
> news:pan.2007.04.20....@nntp.sun-meatplow.local
>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 21:18:58 -0500, DaRkAnGeL wrote:
>>
>>> On 2007-04-19 20:57:08 -0500, "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com>
>>> said:
>>>
>>>> [quoted text muted]
>>> Obviously, as is anyone's right.
>>> Doesn't quite make it reality, now does it, love?
>>>> [quoted text muted]
>>> Perhaps. But more likely that I didn't care.
>>>> [quoted text muted]
>>> It clearly never occurred to you that I wouldn't give a rat's arse.
>>> The world is full of people who lie, dabble in falsehoods and other
>>> rot to make themselves feel better, serve their needs, or what-not
>>> ... doesn't mean the average person has to give a fuck, does it?
>>>> [quoted text muted]
>>> Really? You're giving me the same quality that I give you? Shall we
>>> rewind for a moment?
>>>
>>> You: "Do you suck cock?"
>>> Oh my, that *was* clever! Really stunningly brilliant, there! Along
>>> the same lines as the rot Porchy spouts without munging the letters!
>>> How very clever of you! I would *never* find such a question
>>> *anywhere*
>>> else on usenet, much less in any pub after Happy Hour!
>>>
>>> You: "Do you swallow?"
>>> Oh my, what a wonderful, unpredictable follow-up to the cock
>>> question! No, really, love, you're so clever, so avant garde in your
>>> delivery! I don't know *why* I doubted that you were giving me the
>>> pleasure of both lobes!
>>>
>>> You: "Do you have a daughter?"
>>> I don't know why I didn't see the cleverness and wit of this query
>>> at first! What a stellar attempt to shock and/or offend me with your
>>> naughtiness! Of course, love, you're implying that you'll fuck my
>>> female child (if I *had* one, of course) ... again, to shock me with
>>> how hard you naughty boys play, yes?
>>> Of course, you could always come right back and tell me that
>>> *wasn't* what you were implying, though, of course, considering
>>> that I don't know you from bloody Adam, what else *would* I assume,
>>> when taking the first two questions in accounting ... ?
>>>> [quoted text muted]
>>> Ah ... did it escape your godly attention that I was speaking to
>>> Lionel? While that doesn't keep the average twit from responding, I
>>> realise, it doesn't necessarily imply that I care whether one
>>> responds. And if one does respond, I'm not likely to be so congenial
>>> to said
>>> twit. But for the same reasons that others respond to Porchy, I may
>>> or may not respond.
>>>> [quoted text muted]
>>> I don't seem to be the one confused, though if I am, it certainly
>>> wouldn't be the first time.
>>> So ... are you saying that you're not a silly wanker with a need to
>>> shock, irritate, and/or appear superior? If you're not, then, yes, I
>>> am confused.: ^)
>>>> [quoted text muted]
>>> So do many police force members. Doesn't make them right, doesn't
>>> make them superior. Makes them, really, standing on shaky ground and
>>> unprincipled.
>>> Are you standing on shaky ground, love?
>>>> [quoted text muted]
>>> Why, of course some don't understand that ... where did you miss the
>>> words "criminal" and "dolt?"
>>> If I'm speaking to a criminal, then he's obviously been caught, so
>>> it does cast doubt on his intelligence ... so perhaps the two words
>>> should be interchangeable.
>>>
>>>> [quoted text muted]
>>> For the same reason you're asking me, love. :^)
>>>> [quoted text muted]
>>> Not even sure about having kids at all. Haven't thought about it.
>>>
>>> <Note> I have to admit that I may have judged your post unfairly ...
>>> I am asked questions like yours many, many times a day ... often
>>> with lovely visuals of them wanking off in their cells. Usually
>>> accompanied by crime scene photos involving dismemberment,
>>> mutilation, and object rape ... so if I take your post as a juvenile
>>> attempt to shock, it's what I'm used to. If being shocking wasn't
>>> your intent, if you really were attempting to join in the chatter,
>>> then I apologise ... if you
>>> were attempting to shock, well, you did a piss poor job of it. When
>>> you grow up, you might learn better to play with the big boys.
>>
>> I've muted K-man's text and quoted just yours.
>> You're fastly approaching Kook status with these frothing replies.
>> I'd hate to see some of the less caring kookologists start
>> nominating a noob like you. You were asked not to get into these
>> pissing matches for your own good.
>
> Kadaitcha poked her. Lionel and I both cautioned her to stay out of
> the pissing match involving me, but Kadaitcha's poking of her was
> totally independent of anything else that was going on.
So fucking what?
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Straks vind ik je nog een linkse verrotgeneukte brintanicht.
Kadaitcha Man
unhygienic flowerpot. Ye tattled:
> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:s5ji2.m...@news.alt.net
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou gumweed. Thou ye fat-guts.
>> Ye threatened:
>>
>>> "Henry Schmidt" <schm...@nottelling.nope> wrote in message
>>> news:MANVh.1759$jR5.804@trnddc08
>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>>> "Henry Schmidt" <schm...@nottelling.nope> wrote in message
>>>>> news:YaNVh.1740$jR5.1066@trnddc08
>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>>>>> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:f07be9$91h$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 04:29:41 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>>>>>> <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>>> for the Australian Federal Police<BITCHSLAP>
>>
>> For someone who claims to have worked in the legal field, you sure
>> are fucking clueless. It's either that or you're trying to make
>> light of the gravity of your shameful acts by conveniently ignoring
>> the fact that it is the FBI who is responsible for coordinating with
>> international police forces.
>
>> If you ever refer to me again on usenet or on the www in any way,
>> even by allusion, or make a single allegation against me, veiled,
>> indirect, direct, or by act of omission, or refer in any such way to
>> anything that allegedly happened between us or anything that directly
>> or indirectly relates to me in any way then I will file an official
>> online harrassment complaint against you with the Australian Federal
>> Police.
>>
>> http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/CyberLRes/2001/31/
>> http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lrc.nsf/pages/r103chp12
>
>
> f06u03$573$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
WHEEEEEEEEEE!
*SPLAT*
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Nu vind ik je een leeggezogen turbo ganzeboard.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
You trimmed out the part where he called you a sociopath.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
You can discover what your enemy fears most by
observing the means he uses to frighten you. Eric Hoffer
Kadaitcha Man
broken-down devil's dam. Ye wavered:
> You trimmed<BITCHSLAP>
I did it again. Tell some cunt who cares, fuckhead.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bent vast een tepelloze hardnekkige miereneter.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Did you hurt yourself?
Rhonda Lea Kirk
You replied because you don't care?
Kadaitcha Man
musty king-urinal. Ye delivered:
> Indeed.
>
> It's a flame group, so people get flamed here. Duh.
>
> I was only concerned that DaRkAnGeL might not understand the
> philosophy (for want of a less pretentious word), of the game, so I
> did the Right Thing by giving her the data I thought she needed to
> make informed decisions regarding her participation.
<scratches bald head>
I don't know what drives Rhonda to pipe up like that all the time. Right out
of the blue, with no rhyme or reason.
Maybe she's trying to be liked.
Nah. Too preposterous.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bent nu echt een boerkakkende hersenloze gladiool.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
>
> It's a flame group, so people get flamed here. Duh.
But my flaming isn't "adult behavior" so I should leave?
And Rick's threat to go to the Australian Federal Police is "adult
behavior" so he should stay?
> I was only concerned that DaRkAnGeL might not understand the
> philosophy (for want of a less pretentious word), of the game, so I
> did the Right Thing by giving her the data I thought she needed to
> make informed decisions regarding her participation.
Of course you did the right thing, Lionel.
You're the cream of the clued and you would only ever do good.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
rofl!
Says the guy who called the cops on me once already...for saying the
same things to him that I have been saying for months.
It is worthy of note that when the cops came, I did not leave with them.
I wonder what will happen this time around.
>>> If you ever refer to me again on usenet or on the www in any way,
>>> even by allusion, or make a single allegation against me, veiled,
>>> indirect, direct, or by act of omission, or refer in any such way to
>>> anything that allegedly happened between us or anything that
>>> directly or indirectly relates to me in any way then I will file an
>>> official online harrassment complaint against you with the
>>> Australian Federal Police.
>>>
>>> http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/CyberLRes/2001/31/
>>> http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lrc.nsf/pages/r103chp12
>>
>>
>> f06u03$573$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
--
Kadaitcha Man
strangely-visited person. Ye snickered:
> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
> news:f09u0e$2as$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 02:37:13 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>> <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>>> news:f08i9d$fim$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 13:31:58 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>> <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Henry Schmidt" <schm...@nottelling.nope> wrote in message
>>>>> news:MANVh.1759$jR5.804@trnddc08
>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>>
>>>> [About a hundred lines of Rhodenta's usual whining about her
>>>> inability to flame her way out of a paper bag. If you actually
>>>> care, go look it up.]
>>>>
>>>>>>> Apparently when I wasn't looking, auk turned into a private,
>>>>>>> members-only club.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> yeah with their members only jackets and their jordache jeans
>>>>>> listening to She-Bop on their Coby I-pod knockoffs.
>>>>>>> I must've taken a wrong turn on the way to usenet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Stick2yer guns!!
>>>>>
>>>>> It's not an issue, Porchy, really.
>>>>
>>>> <boggle>
>>>>
>>>> That's it Rhodenta - give Porchy some tongue. God knows you need
>>>> all the support you can get, & you certainly can't afford to let
>>>> your last shred or two of pride or dignity get in the way of your
>>>> *VENGEANCE UPON AUK!!1!11!1!.
>>>
>>> Vengence on auk?
>>
>> Forgotten all the times you've waggled your hypocritical finger at us
>> for flaming people you think we shouldn't be flaming?
>
> Protesting your wish to abuse AOK is not vengence.
Erm, don't look now, but that dodge is just a little too obvious.
HTH
>> Or about you posting private email?
>
> Email that I wrote.
And on the other side of the coin, the side you don't want people to see, is
written, "Posted with the deliberate intent to harrass someone else."
>> Or about your public alliance with a net-kook
>> who's forged defamatory email to & about many of the AUK regulars, &
>> who has been trying (unsuccessfully, because he's so fucking dumb) to
>> screw up the AUK awards with forgeries, frogeries & dozens of sock
>> puppets?
>
> I have no alliance with any such person.
Hey, fuckhead. Yes, you. Aren't you the one who has been justifying your own
and crasston's actions with bleats about levelling the playing field and
gibbering on about geese and sauce? And didn't you just accuse someone else
of having an alliance? Fuck me dead. Is there no end to your mad hypocrisy?
> I just no longer believe that everyone is Bowtie.
ObDodge.
>> Or about obsessively dragging your Real Life breakup into AUK, &
>> stinking up the entire group with the shit-stained panties from your
>> overflowing dirty laundry basket?
>
> Here are some examples of dirty laundry, Lionel.
ObDodge.
> ejqmbl$oog$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
> http://groups.google.com/group/news.groups/msg/aab4ffc50e063dfa
>
> eqhjuf$6ah$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.os.windows-xp/msg/74c638955bfd6e08
>
> r6cva.k...@news.alt.net
> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.psychology.psychotherapy/msg/c3777625043aab93
>
> I have more. Many more.
Google has them, you fucking ego-centric whackjob.
>> Or the dozens of posts in which you
>> tried to pick fights with those of us who were trying to avoid
>> looking at them?
>
> I made you look?
>
> I control what you read and post?
>
> Be still my heart.
>
>> Or about the fact that dozens
>
> Got a list?
ObDodge.
>> of long time AUK regulars have
>> told you that your behaviour is totally inappropriate for this group,
>> & that if you aren't going to behave like an adult, none of us want
>> you here?
>
> Please set forth the specifics of adult behavior.
ObDodge.
> Please be sure to include the part about beating up the lame, the weak
> and the ignorant.
Eat crow.
[QUOTE]
>> Careful Rhonda, Dustbin Cook does not
>> like to be beaten or humiliated by a
>> woman (only his Mom).
>
> This would explain the lack of girlfriend, because the lowliest of
> women could beat him in 30 seconds flat.
[/QUOTE]
news:f087lr$jjg$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>> Or the way in which you've vowed to keep posting to this
>> group forever, even though you're about as popular here as the
>> batfuck-crazy old woman in the alley who uses her own shit as hair
>> gel?
>
> Vowed? Forever?
>
> Wow. Where did I do that?
>
>>>> No, sucking on PorchMonkey4Life's cock in front of
>>>> literally hundreds of people who've all grown to either despise you
>>>> or pity you couldn't *possibly* be more embarrassing than quietly
>>>> walking away from a newsgroup, could it, you clueless bitch? Jesus,
>>>> that kind of tactical genius almost makes Porchy look smart.
>>>
>>> Someone made a post. I responded to the post.
>>>
>>> Happens all the time.
>>
>> And yet you whine constantly about how we're hurting your pweshus
>> *feewings*.
>
> Cite?
Eat crow.
> When did I ever say anyone here had hurt my feelings?
>
>> You're obviously too delusional to realise this, but
>> that's a pattern of behaviour that normal people consider
>> hypocritical.
>
> It's a pattern of behavior that you have cut from whole cloth, Lionel.
>
> Get back to me with some cites to prove your contentions.
ObDodge.
>>>>> But I will have to take some time to assemble all the
>>>>> documentation for the Australian Federal Police. It's pretty
>>>>> voluminous. Almost 1800 hundred emails, many bytes of chat and
>>>>> probably 5000 (or more) posts. It's a big job.
>>>>>
>>>>> I may just turn over my hard drive and point to where everything
>>>>> is. Easier.
>>>>
>>>> ROTF,PMSL! You go ahead & do that, you dumb cunt. Are you really so
>>>> fucking delusional & full of yourself as to imagine that anyone but
>>>> you gives a fuck about your lame little emails?
>>>
>>> I live in the United States. If I were going to /threaten/ to turn
>>> anyone over to the police, I would go to the police in the United
>>> States.
>>
>> Well, duh.
>>
>> I can just see how it'd go:
>>
>> <the screen fills with wavy lines, & fades to:>
>>
> <snipped pathetic attempt
If you insist.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Wat ben jij een glibberige volgescheten kwakbol.
Kadaitcha Man
befogged buzzard. Ye clacked:
IKYABWAI - you're scraping the bottom of the barrel.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Ik denk dat je kan doorgaan als een driedubbele door de wc gezakte
dildo.
Kadaitcha Man
Thou balloon-headed, seven-chinned midnight hag. Ye scoffed:
> Y<BITCHSLAP>
oh hum
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij himalayaanse gezogen kutlullo.
Kadaitcha Man
and death. Thou vile, festered contemptuous base-born callet. Ye
palpitated:
> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:s6psi.e...@news.alt.net
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou whoreson malt-horse
>> drudge. What strange fish hath made his meal on thee. Ye dissented:
>>
>>> Apparently when I wasn't looking, auk turned into a private,
>>> members-only club.
>
> "...dozens of long time AUK regulars have told you that your behaviour
> is totally inappropriate for this group, & that if you aren't going to
> behave like an adult, none of us want you here?"
>
> news:f09u0e$2as$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
Perhaps you could call for a vote.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bent nu echt een doofstomme etterpuistige zoetwateradmiraal.
Kadaitcha Man
tardy-gaited, warped most profane coxcomb. Ye vacillated:
I explicitly named your threat; I pleaded with you; I asked for your phone
number; I asked you
to keep talking; I asked you to reconsider; I told you there were
alternatives; I told you nothing was worth giving everything up for; I
expressed distress and horror; all in separate emails, one after the
other. At no time did you ever, not once, step back from what I took to be
your threats of suicide. Calling the police was my only option...If for no
other reason than leaving myself with a clear conscience while someone else
cleaned your shit, piss and brains off the walls and floor.
> ...for saying the
> same things to him that I<BITCHSLAP>
Who gives a fuck about you anymore, you pretentiously melodramatic
fruitcake?
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Ik denk dat je kan doorgaan als een spermaspuitende kreupele stinkzwam.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou clamorous harbinger of
> blood and death. Thou vile, festered contemptuous base-born callet. Ye
> palpitated:
>
>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:s6psi.e...@news.alt.net
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou whoreson malt-horse
>>> drudge. What strange fish hath made his meal on thee. Ye dissented:
>>>
>>>> Apparently when I wasn't looking, auk turned into a private,
>>>> members-only club.
>>
>> "...dozens of long time AUK regulars have told you that your
>> behaviour is totally inappropriate for this group, & that if you
>> aren't going to behave like an adult, none of us want you here?"
>>
>> news:f09u0e$2as$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>
> Perhaps you could call for a vote.
Perhaps you could implement your own ideas, bearing in mind, of course,
that it won't make a damn bit of difference one way or another.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
You're saying he wasn't referring to AOK?
The other choice, I think, is Mike. Protesting that wasn't vengence
either. I thought it was wrong, and I said so. I still think it's wrong.
Anyone else?
>>> Or about you posting private email?
>>
>> Email that I wrote.
>
> And on the other side of the coin, the side you don't want people to
> see, is written, "Posted with the deliberate intent to harrass
> someone else."
"Someone else" being you, Mr. "I-can't-stay-out-of-Rhonda's-email-box-no
matter-how-many-times-I-promise-to-do-so"?
>>> Or about your public alliance with a net-kook
>>> who's forged defamatory email to & about many of the AUK regulars, &
>>> who has been trying (unsuccessfully, because he's so fucking dumb)
>>> to screw up the AUK awards with forgeries, frogeries & dozens of
>>> sock puppets?
>>
>> I have no alliance with any such person.
>
> Hey, fuckhead. Yes, you. Aren't you the one who has been justifying
> your own and crasston's actions with bleats about levelling the
> playing field and gibbering on about geese and sauce? And didn't you
> just accuse someone else of having an alliance? Fuck me dead. Is
> there no end to your mad hypocrisy?
What does that have to do with Lionel's continuing allegation that I
have allied myself with Bowtie and that I'm committing net abuse and
criminal acts?
As for "someone" having an alliance, as I've said at least once, I'm not
the person who deliberately crossposted into acv, aps and aca-v in an
attempt to involve Dustin in this. That was you.
>> I just no longer believe that everyone is Bowtie.
>
> ObDodge.
>
>>> Or about obsessively dragging your Real Life breakup into AUK, &
>>> stinking up the entire group with the shit-stained panties from your
>>> overflowing dirty laundry basket?
>>
>> Here are some examples of dirty laundry, Lionel.
>
> ObDodge.
>
>> ejqmbl$oog$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>> http://groups.google.com/group/news.groups/msg/aab4ffc50e063dfa
>>
>> eqhjuf$6ah$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>> http://groups.google.com/group/alt.os.windows-xp/msg/74c638955bfd6e08
>>
>> r6cva.k...@news.alt.net
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sci.psychology.psychotherapy/msg/c3777625043aab93
>>
>> I have more. Many more.
>
> Google has them, you fucking ego-centric whackjob.
That's almost like a spelling or grammar lame.
>>> Or the dozens of posts in which you
>>> tried to pick fights with those of us who were trying to avoid
>>> looking at them?
>>
>> I made you look?
>>
>> I control what you read and post?
>>
>> Be still my heart.
>>
>>> Or about the fact that dozens
>>
>> Got a list?
>
> ObDodge.
You can say that as many times as you like, but it doesn't change the
facts.
>>> of long time AUK regulars have
>>> told you that your behaviour is totally inappropriate for this
>>> group, & that if you aren't going to behave like an adult, none of
>>> us want you here?
>>
>> Please set forth the specifics of adult behavior.
>
> ObDodge.
>
>> Please be sure to include the part about beating up the lame, the
>> weak and the ignorant.
>
> Eat crow.
The cock crowed three times.
> [QUOTE]
>>> Careful Rhonda, Dustbin Cook does not
>>> like to be beaten or humiliated by a
>>> woman (only his Mom).
>>
>> This would explain the lack of girlfriend, because the lowliest of
>> women could beat him in 30 seconds flat.
> [/QUOTE]
>
> news:f087lr$jjg$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
That's actually true.
I have always really believed that Dustin is damaged. The fact that he
posted my address and did the other things he did doesn't change that in
the least.
And the fact that you tried to drag him back in even though I'd stopped
flaming him doesn't change that either.
>>> Or the way in which you've vowed to keep posting to this
>>> group forever, even though you're about as popular here as the
>>> batfuck-crazy old woman in the alley who uses her own shit as hair
>>> gel?
>>
>> Vowed? Forever?
>>
>> Wow. Where did I do that?
>>
>>>>> No, sucking on PorchMonkey4Life's cock in front of
>>>>> literally hundreds of people who've all grown to either despise
>>>>> you or pity you couldn't *possibly* be more embarrassing than
>>>>> quietly walking away from a newsgroup, could it, you clueless
>>>>> bitch? Jesus, that kind of tactical genius almost makes Porchy
>>>>> look smart.
>>>>
>>>> Someone made a post. I responded to the post.
>>>>
>>>> Happens all the time.
>>>
>>> And yet you whine constantly about how we're hurting your pweshus
>>> *feewings*.
>>
>> Cite?
>
> Eat crow.
>
> http://groups.google.com.au/groups/search?hl=en&lr=lang_en&q=author%3Arho...@gmail.com+alt.usenet.kooks
That's just stupid, Rick.
>> When did I ever say anyone here had hurt my feelings?
>>
>>> You're obviously too delusional to realise this, but
>>> that's a pattern of behaviour that normal people consider
>>> hypocritical.
>>
>> It's a pattern of behavior that you have cut from whole cloth,
>> Lionel.
>>
>> Get back to me with some cites to prove your contentions.
>
> ObDodge.
Okay, you can consider that I consider these to be the equivalent of
<BITCHSLAP> or some other of your tactics of distraction.
I'm just going to ignore any more of them.
>>>>>> But I will have to take some time to assemble all the
>>>>>> documentation for the Australian Federal Police. It's pretty
>>>>>> voluminous. Almost 1800 hundred emails, many bytes of chat and
>>>>>> probably 5000 (or more) posts. It's a big job.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I may just turn over my hard drive and point to where everything
>>>>>> is. Easier.
>>>>>
>>>>> ROTF,PMSL! You go ahead & do that, you dumb cunt. Are you really
>>>>> so fucking delusional & full of yourself as to imagine that
>>>>> anyone but you gives a fuck about your lame little emails?
>>>>
>>>> I live in the United States. If I were going to /threaten/ to turn
>>>> anyone over to the police, I would go to the police in the United
>>>> States.
>>>
>>> Well, duh.
>>>
>>> I can just see how it'd go:
>>>
>>> <the screen fills with wavy lines, & fades to:>
>>>
>> <snipped pathetic attempt
>
> If you insist.
<laughing>
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> a direct hit on you. You're barely middle range in 24hourfuckwits,
> much less here, so you're inevitably getting spanked between 5-10
> times a day. Ironically, you're so clueless about flaming that you
> don't realise how bad you look - if you actually had a clue about how
> it works you would've left weeks ago out of sheer embarrassment
I guess it's good I'm ignorant then, because I'd hate to feel
embarrassed.
> If I had to try to describe the way you come across to us in AUK, I'd
> compare you Porchy with a sex change, in the cast of "Desperate
> Housewives".
Huh?
>> And Rick's threat to go to the Australian Federal Police is "adult
>> behavior" so he should stay?
>>
>>> I was only concerned that DaRkAnGeL might not understand the
>>> philosophy (for want of a less pretentious word), of the game, so I
>>> did the Right Thing by giving her the data I thought she needed to
>>> make informed decisions regarding her participation.
>>
>> Of course you did the right thing, Lionel.
>>
>> You're the cream of the clued and you would only ever do good.
>
> Exactly correct. I'm glad you've finally seen the light.
Oh God, the irony of all this is just killing me.
Kadaitcha Man
infected glass-fac'd flatterer. Ye chirruped:
> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
> news:f0a0ce$8ad$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 03:22:22 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>> <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>>> news:f09k2a$79b$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:40:16 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
>>>> <turd...@catholic.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Lionel wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:21:49 -0400, The NYC Kid
>>>>>> <OGn...@east53.eat.a.9.fool> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>>>>>> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>>>>> Oh boy, a usenet virtual gangbang. Can't wait for that DVD to hit
>>>>> the bargain bin.
>>>>
>>>> Watch a DVD of Rhodenta servicing Porchy, Bowtie, Cranstoad & the
>>>> NYC lamer? - I'd rather poke out my eyes with a rusty fork.
>>>
>>> I just so love sex lames.
>>>
>>> But the last man I ever had sex with may well be the last sex I ever
>>> have. Wouldn't that be sweet?
>>
>> Why on earth do you think that anyone but you has the slightest
>> interest in your sex life, you demented old bag?
>
> Someone did.
>
> That's how I ended up going to Texas.
>
> If you try to smear me with sexual slurs, you're going to hit Rick
> too,
Lionel can do whatever the fuck he likes and I don't need you to speak for
me in the same way crasston allows you to speak for him. You set the bar on
the standards being used against you, twice in fact, so you can just jolly
well live with the consequences. I gave up caring what happened to you the
very instant you made the threat to post those emails. Bad luck. BOO HOO for
you.
> no matter how you try to avoid it. Our sex life was good, and
> it's written all over usenet from the time when we were happy
> together. There's no taking it back now, no matter what else has
> happened.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bent een afgestorven dichtgegroeide koebeer.
Kadaitcha Man
nauseating, abhorrent gorbellied knave. Ye groveled:
> And Rick's threat to go to the Australian Federal Police is "adult
> behavior" so he should stay?
How very manipulative of you. Completely unexpected. And how very
hypoctrical of you too, also completely unexpected.
I'm sure, if I were as prone to google-scouring as you are, that I could dig
up at least several posts where you... ah, what the fuck. You'll just delude
yourself into believing they mean the exact opposite of what you actually
wrote; that much is expected of you.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Ik denk dat je kan doorgaan als een scheefgepiste pijnlijke pornoster.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Go ahead and repost the emails with your comments intact, Rick. Start
from the one that came out of the blue on the 23rd.
Don't paraphrase what you did, because it paints a very false picture of
both you and your actions.
The fact remains that there was nothing in those emails that I had not
written many, many times before that in the five months it took our
relationship to end. And up to the 23rd, you totally ignored it all,
except for that stupid remark you made about Romeo and Juliet a couple
of months ago.
>> ...for saying the
>> same things to him that I<BITCHSLAP>
>
> Who gives a fuck about you anymore, you pretentiously melodramatic
> fruitcake?
When did you ever give a fuck about me? If you had, we wouldn't be where
we are right now.
Kadaitcha Man
burr-headed slanders of the age. Ye confided:
No. I'm saying don't look now, but that dodge is just a little too obvious.
What word in particular did you stumble over?
> The other choice, I<BITCHSLAP>
Oh hum
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bent vast een homofiele eerloze melkmuil.
Kadaitcha Man
bibble-babble. Ye chafed:
> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:s6to5.s...@news.alt.net
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou clamorous harbinger of
>> blood and death. Thou vile, festered contemptuous base-born callet.
>> Ye palpitated:
>>
>>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:s6psi.e...@news.alt.net
>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou whoreson malt-horse
>>>> drudge. What strange fish hath made his meal on thee. Ye dissented:
>>>>
>>>>> Apparently when I wasn't looking, auk turned into a private,
>>>>> members-only club.
>>>
>>> "...dozens of long time AUK regulars have told you that your
>>> behaviour is totally inappropriate for this group, & that if you
>>> aren't going to behave like an adult, none of us want you here?"
>>>
>>> news:f09u0e$2as$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>
>> Perhaps you could call for a vote.
>
> Perhaps you could implement your own ideas, bearing in mind, of
> course, that it won't make a damn bit of difference one way or
> another.
Well then, that settles it, hey. Dozens of long time AUK regulars have told
you that your behaviour is totally inappropriate for this group, & that if
you aren't going to behave like an adult, none of us want you here.
<shrug>
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Wat ben jij een aan tik-tak verslaafde himalayaanse ploerten.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
The fact remains that if he brings in our sex life, he's hitting you
too.
> You set the bar on the standards being used against you, twice in
> fact, so you can just jolly well live with the consequences. I gave
> up caring what happened to you the very instant you made the threat
> to post those emails. Bad luck. BOO HOO for you.
You never cared for me. I was good for meeting a need. Period.
>> no matter how you try to avoid it. Our sex life was good, and
>> it's written all over usenet from the time when we were happy
>> together. There's no taking it back now, no matter what else has
>> happened.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou arrant knave. Thou
> nauseating, abhorrent gorbellied knave. Ye groveled:
>
>> And Rick's threat to go to the Australian Federal Police is "adult
>> behavior" so he should stay?
>
> How very manipulative of you. Completely unexpected. And how very
> hypoctrical of you too, also completely unexpected.
>
> I'm sure, if I were as prone to google-scouring as you are, that I
> could dig up at least several posts where you... ah, what the fuck.
> You'll just delude yourself into believing they mean the exact
> opposite of what you actually wrote; that much is expected of you.
Y'know what's so funny about the google-scouring bit?
I get nearly all the links I post from "scouring" Hamster's internal
group.
The irony of it all.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Right. More utter blather, followed by post-editing.
> What word in particular did you stumble over?
>
>> The other choice, I<BITCHSLAP>
>
> Oh hum
--
Kadaitcha Man
yammered:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:52:49 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
> <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> <SNIP>
> I might feel sorry for you, except that you ignore or attack anyone
> who tries to help you do something about your personality problems.
Ain't that the TRVTH. So much so I had to fight back the urge to start a
lits.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bent nu echt een dooie puisterige snertvogel.
Kadaitcha Man
beastly feeder. Ye harried:
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Read it and weep, hypocrite...
[QUOTE]
Add the rest of it. All of it. Start to end. Tell it as it actually happened
and not how you want people to perceive it to suit your purposes. And leave
your interpretations and emotions and delusions out of it, and also leave
out emotive words and phrases such as "he abuses wait staff" to embellish
your blatant fact denial.
And don't forget to include what you said to my face at the very conclusion
of it all.
Let everyone see how you take an unfortunate incident and transmogrify
something that concludes with an honourable act on my part and breathless
expressions of admiration on your part into a wholly decrepit and
dishonourable act on my part. Let everyone see what you really do to genuine
acts of atonement and restitution, Rhonda.
[/QUOTE]
http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/afa3a7e1fc736e66?dmode=source&hl=en
Consider my explicit refusal to stoop to your levels as a matter of you
getting a really fucking good dose of your own medicine.
> The fact<BITCHSLAP>
What you do to facts is now an undeniable matter of record. It's time you
stopped using words you don't know the meaning of.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bent een embryonale onnatuurlijke grotjeskicker.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
At the end of the discussion about the waiter, I told you "I love you."
Unfortunately, as evidenced by later events, the excuse you made for
your behavior wasn't sufficient to stop future instances of similar
behavior.
I told you many times, Rick, that one instance of anything means nothing
to me, and I surely forgave many: "I love you, so I'll always forgive
you..."
The problem is that when a behavior repeats, it becomes necessary to
look at the reason for the repetition.
No one will ever say that you fail to use the words "I'm sorry" at much
higher than normal levels.
But this goes back to the problem of what "I'm sorry" actually means. To
you, it appears to mean, "Let's not talk about this anymore," whereas
what I want to hear is "I won't do this anymore."
It's a very fundamental difference that we were never able to resolve.
> Consider my explicit refusal to stoop to your levels as a matter of
> you getting a really fucking good dose of your own medicine.
The emails you wrote to me are not as you would represent them to be.
And, in fact, if you had not written to me after you said you would not
write to me, there would have been no discussion.
>> The fact<BITCHSLAP>
>
> What you do to facts is now an undeniable matter of record. It's time
> you stopped using words you don't know the meaning of.
What you do to facts has long been a matter of record. Your entire
posting history bears witness to your tactics.
Kadaitcha Man
backward fiend. Ye drooled:
> The fact<BITCHSLAP>
I told you, stop using words you don't know the maaning of.
> remains that if he brings in our sex life, he's hitting you
> too.
*ding*
See? That's what you do to facts. Right there. You dress your insane
perceptions up in your tawdry delusions and call them facts. That isn't a
fact at all; it is far from being a fact. It only becomes a fact if I feel
hit, and, assuming for the sake of argument only that I should even care to
feel hit, I sure as fuck aren't going to be handing you a way out of the
mess you've created for yourself by letting on. Bad luck. BOO HOO for you,
you fact-altering, fact-creating, fact-dropping, fact-obscuring nutjob.
And while we're on the subject of what you do to facts, I draw your
attention to this:
http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/c4f25426643560bf?dmode=source&hl=en
You took that genuine plea and turned it into an attack on you. Then you
added more of your demented paranoid delusions by heaping accusations of
passing information to Lionel on top of it, and all the while I sat back
eating popcorn, knowing full well that the only email that was exchanged
was to express my gratitude to him for humbly and graciously backing off
when I asked.
Oh, I also reassured him that when you came back for more, which you so
predictably did, he was not to consider my feelings if he should choose
to deal with you in his own way.
You were cut off at the pass long before you even thought of running for it,
you lying, crackbrained monstrosity. So, fuck you, fuck your repetitive
predictability, and fuck your "facts".
>> You set the bar on the standards being used against you, twice in
>> fact, so you can just jolly well live with the consequences. I gave
>> up caring what happened to you the very instant you made the threat
>> to post those emails. Bad luck. BOO HOO for you.
>
> You never cared for me. I was good for meeting a need. Period.
Yes, dear. No, dear. Three bags full, dear. Been there, done that, time and
time again. You're the spotless, stainless, sinless, righteous and wholly
justified victim whereas I'm the cacodemon who spent all his waking moments
dreaming up diabolical ways to torture you.
Round and round you go... one foot firmly nailed to the floor.
>>> no matter how you try to avoid it. Our sex life was good, and
>>> it's written all over usenet from the time when we were happy
>>> together. There's no taking it back now, no matter what else has
>>> happened.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Nu vind ik je een ontsnapte bavianenneukende verrotting.
Kadaitcha Man
podgy false peer. Ye exudated:
> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:s6v00.h...@news.alt.net
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou arrant knave. Thou
>> nauseating, abhorrent gorbellied knave. Ye groveled:
>>
>>> And Rick's threat to go to the Australian Federal Police is "adult
>>> behavior" so he should stay?
>>
>> How very manipulative of you. Completely unexpected. And how very
>> hypoctrical of you too, also completely unexpected.
>>
>> I'm sure, if I were as prone to google-scouring as you are, that I
>> could dig up at least several posts where you... ah, what the fuck.
>> You'll just delude yourself into believing they mean the exact
>> opposite of what you actually wrote; that much is expected of you.
>
> Y'know what's so funny about the google-scouring bit?
>
> I<BITCHSLAP>
There must be a way to express extreme disinterest in you and anything about
you and anything you might propose to think where you stand even a remote
chance of actually getting it, you tedious, contemptible, lying cow.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Wat ben jij een uitgezakte wandelende dildodel.
Kadaitcha Man
mightily misplaced. Ye fawned:
<aside>
Thus the nutjob takes a direct statement that stands on its own with
uncontestable meaning and transmogrifies it into the "fact" of blather.
> followed by post-editing.
<aside>
Thus the nutjob takes a direct cut signifiying consummate disregard and
transmogrifies it into the "fact" of a post edit.
>> What word in particular did you stumble over?
>>
>>> The other choice, I<BITCHSLAP>
>>
>> Oh hum
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bavianenneukende afgezebberde baanduivel.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Just post your emails from the 23rd, okay?
> And while we're on the subject of what you do to facts, I draw your
> attention to this:
>
> http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/c4f25426643560bf?dmode=source&hl=en
>
> You took that genuine plea
"I think its obvious she's not well, mate."
> and turned it into an attack on you. Then
> you added more of your demented paranoid delusions by heaping
> accusations of passing information to Lionel on top of it, and all
> the while I sat back eating popcorn, knowing full well that the only
> email that was exchanged was to express my gratitude to him for
> humbly and graciously backing off when I asked.
"passing information to Lionel" and "the only email exchanged was to
express gratitude" are not exclusive ideas.
> Oh, I also reassured him that when you came back for more, which you
> so predictably did, he was not to consider my feelings if he should
> choose to deal with you in his own way.
You're a big boy. You can take it.
So can I.
> You were cut off at the pass long before you even thought of running
> for it, you lying, crackbrained monstrosity. So, fuck you, fuck your
> repetitive predictability, and fuck your "facts".
Why don't I feel cut off at the pass?
>>> You set the bar on the standards being used against you, twice in
>>> fact, so you can just jolly well live with the consequences. I gave
>>> up caring what happened to you the very instant you made the threat
>>> to post those emails. Bad luck. BOO HOO for you.
>>
>> You never cared for me. I was good for meeting a need. Period.
>
> Yes, dear. No, dear. Three bags full, dear. Been there, done that,
> time and time again. You're the spotless, stainless, sinless,
> righteous and wholly justified victim whereas I'm the cacodemon who
> spent all his waking moments dreaming up diabolical ways to torture
> you.
PKB.
And a full inbox to prove it.
> Round and round you go... one foot firmly nailed to the floor.
>
>>>> no matter how you try to avoid it. Our sex life was good, and
>>>> it's written all over usenet from the time when we were happy
>>>> together. There's no taking it back now, no matter what else has
>>>> happened.
--
Kadaitcha Man
underachieving, manky white-bearded satan. Ye chuckled:
> At the end of the discussion about the waiter, I<BITCHSLAP>
What about you?
A lottery ticket says you tried to assert "facts" again too.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bent vast een arrogante idiote teringlul.
Kadaitcha Man
traitor. Ye hooted:
> "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> You've managed to turn confuse yourself, Lionel. Someone else is
>> making a report to the police, not me.
>>
>> I have never contacted the police. But the police came. Now I have
>> been threatened with the police again, so I'll be ready for them.
>>
>> That's what reasonable people do.
>
> Personally, I think a reasonable person in your situation right now
> would just unsubscribe to all newsgroups, uninstall your newsreader,
> block "Google Groups", and just get away from this entity called
> Usenet, because as far as I can tell, you're just digging the hole
> deeper with every subsequent post you make.
I'll exercise my predictive powers and add you to the lits in anticipation,
Archie.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Ik denk dat je kan doorgaan als een godsvergeten vervormde poesiewaus.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:58:55 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
> <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:s6v00.h...@news.alt.net
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou arrant knave. Thou
>>> nauseating, abhorrent gorbellied knave. Ye groveled:
>>>
>>>> And Rick's threat to go to the Australian Federal Police is "adult
>>>> behavior" so he should stay?
>>>
>>> How very manipulative of you. Completely unexpected. And how very
>>> hypoctrical of you too, also completely unexpected.
>>>
>>> I'm sure, if I were as prone to google-scouring as you are, that I
>>> could dig up at least several posts where you... ah, what the fuck.
>>> You'll just delude yourself into believing they mean the exact
>>> opposite of what you actually wrote; that much is expected of you.
>>
>> Y'know what's so funny about the google-scouring bit?
>>
>> I get nearly all the links I post from "scouring" Hamster's internal
>> group.
>>
>> The irony of it all.
>
> kind of hunt though a collection of stored Usenet posts, dimwit. Back
> before Dejanews or Google were invented, it was called
> "spool-grepping", or "grepping the spool", & had all the same
> connotations as "Google-scouring" does now, & is precisely what
> *you're doing* when you search through the Hmaster newsspool.
Results 1 - 39 of 39 for "google scouring". (0.25 seconds)
Results 1 - 30 of 30 for "google scouring"
A total of 69 hits from Google and Google Groups. But I think you meant
"generic" not "colloquial."
How about we call it "kiboing," instead? That's something everyone
should understand.
> In other words; he's right, because you *were* 'Google-scouring', you
> stupid old bag.
A third-party PKB. I've never seen one of those before.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:33:23 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
> <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:s6soa.8...@news.alt.net
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou scurvy-valiant ass. Thou
>>> strangely-visited person. Ye snickered:
>>>
>>>>>>>> It's not an issue, Porchy, really.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> <boggle>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's it Rhodenta - give Porchy some tongue. God knows you need
>>>>>>> all the support you can get, & you certainly can't afford to let
>>>>>>> your last shred or two of pride or dignity get in the way of
>>>>>>> your *VENGEANCE UPON AUK!!1!11!1!.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Vengence on auk?
>>>>>
>>>>> Forgotten all the times you've waggled your hypocritical finger at
>>>>> us for flaming people you think we shouldn't be flaming?
>>>>
>>>> Protesting your wish to abuse AOK is not vengence.
>>>
>>> Erm, don't look now, but that dodge is just a little too obvious.
>>>
>>> HTH
>>
>> You're saying he wasn't referring to AOK?
>
>
> Please tell us again how _A_lt._U_senet._K_ooks is your 'home group',
> you brainless fucknugget?
You asserted that "[waggling] my hypocritical finger at [you] for
flaming people [I] think [you] shouldn't be flaming" is vengence. The
person who defines "people" in this instance is AOK. I never said it
wasn't okay to flame, and I never even said it wasn't okay to /flame/
Mike.
How this all ties in with your calling soc.singles my home group, and my
pointing out that I've been posting almost exclusively from auk for the
last 10 months, doesn't parse.
> [...]
>>>>>> I live in the United States. If I were going to /threaten/ to
>>>>>> turn anyone over to the police, I would go to the police in the
>>>>>> United States.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, duh.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can just see how it'd go:
>>>>>
>>>>> <the screen fills with wavy lines, & fades to:>
>>>>>
>>>> <snipped pathetic attempt
>
> Now /how/ did I know you'd be too embarrassed to leave that in? ;^)
I recommend a creative writing class. But if you're proud of what you've
written, here you go again:
<the screen fills with wavy lines, & fades to:>
SCENE: A suburban police station. The Desk Sergeant's lazing back in
his chair, pretending to read a report.
Rhonda Lea Kirk leaps through the door, slamming the door behind her.
She rips open the shopping bag she's carrying, & dumps an enormous
heap of printouts on the Sergeant's desk.
"Look at this!", she screams.
The neatly stapled stacks of paper all bristle with bookmarks &
highlighter marks, but businesslike effect is spoiled by bite marks &
saliva stains on all the corners, & by the fact that she's thrown them
on top of the sergeant's cup of coffee, sending it splashing across
her notes & the cop's lap.
Rhonda grabs the cop by the tie: "Look what they've been saying about
me in alt.usenet.kooks!", she screeches, a couple of inches from the
unfortunate man's face. "But I'm too smart for them! - See? - I've got
ALL the EVIDENCE right HERE!", she says, reaching into a pocket in
her soiled sweatpants & pulling out a hard disk, 'protected' by layers
of soiled underwear.
She waves the drive triumphantly at the astonished officer, who's so
taken aback that he hasn't even noticed the coffee in his lap.
Suddenly, Rhonda hurls the disk drive to the desk, tiny components
flying everywhere as the drive ricochets off the telephone & slams
into the filing cabinet. "What are you waiting for, you sexist pig?
Why aren't you reading my EMAIL?"
"Um, Lady?" says the sergeant, "You need to tell me what the alleged
crime is that you're reporting."
"Don't "ALLEGE" me, you misogynist PIG! I'm RHONDA LEA KIRK, and you
know damn well I'm talking about the CRIMINALS victimising me in
alt.usenet.kooks and trying to drive me out of my Home Group!! It's my
right to post whatever I like to AUK without being insulted! It's my
RIGHT as a WOMAN!"
Rhonda pauses briefly to take a deep breath & wipe the worst of the
spittle from her mouth.
"That sexist bastard LIONEL called me a cunt! He and that fucking
cocksucking ex-boyfriend of mine both deserve the death penalty for
their CRIMES against HUMANITY!"
As Rhonda's tirade winds down, the cop cautiously gets out of his
chair, gingerly wiping the worst of the coffee from his uniform.
"Uh, sure thing, lady, we'll get right on that", he says, gazing
incredulously at the snowdrift of coffee-soaked printouts, hard disk
pieces & foul-smelling underthings that're strewn all over the room.
He glances around the office, where dozens of other staff have
gathered at a safe distance to see what all the fuss was about.
He finally spots a pair of burly officers who're good at 'handling'
the stations more 'excitable' customers, & waves them over.
"Okay lady, these officers are from the, um, CyberInterWeb Crime
Department. They handle all the serious Interhighway crimes, & if you
go quietly with them, they'll make sure that everything gets sorted
out, okay?"
Quiet at last, Rhonda follows the two officers to the parking lot,
grinning triumphantly at the thought of her impending victory against
the AUK pigs who thought they could tell her how to act in her own
Home Group.
The bigger officer pauses to take a bundle of white canvas from the
van locker, & turns to Rhonda, while the other officer sidles quietly
up behind her. "Miss? It's kind of cold today, isn't it? ... How about
I put this nice warm jacket on you?" Rhonda looks at the shapeless
garment suspiciously, & tries to back away - straight into the arms of
the other officer, who's been performing this maneuver for more than a
decade...
---
Rhonda Lea Kirk
A direct statement?
My tummy hurts.
>> followed by post-editing.
>
> <aside>
> Thus the nutjob takes a direct cut signifiying consummate disregard
> and transmogrifies it into the "fact" of a post edit.
You're a master of argument by snippage, Rick. It's your stock in trade.
Get that leaky killfile fixed, will ya?
>>> What word in particular did you stumble over?
>>>
>>>> The other choice, I<BITCHSLAP>
>>>
>>> Oh hum
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:01:53 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
> <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou devil's dam. Thou
>> impatient, podgy false peer. Ye exudated:
>>
>>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:s6v00.h...@news.alt.net
>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou arrant knave. Thou
>>>> nauseating, abhorrent gorbellied knave. Ye groveled:
>>>>
>>>>> And Rick's threat to go to the Australian Federal Police is "adult
>>>>> behavior" so he should stay?
>>>>
>>>> How very manipulative of you. Completely unexpected. And how very
>>>> hypoctrical of you too, also completely unexpected.
>>>>
>>>> I'm sure, if I were as prone to google-scouring as you are, that I
>>>> could dig up at least several posts where you... ah, what the fuck.
>>>> You'll just delude yourself into believing they mean the exact
>>>> opposite of what you actually wrote; that much is expected of you.
>>>
>>> Y'know what's so funny about the google-scouring bit?
>>>
>>> I<BITCHSLAP>
>>
>> There must be a way to express extreme disinterest in you and
>> anything about you and anything you might propose to think where you
>> stand even a remote chance of actually getting it, you tedious,
>> contemptible, lying cow.
There is. Put me in your killfile.
> Not a chance. Remember the old parable about the scorpion & the frog
> trying to cross the flooded river?
Yours too.
> I'm just playing for what little entertainment value there is in her.
> I might also see if it's actually possible to flame someone into
> committing suicide. Could make a for a really ground-breaking paper on
> diagnostic techniques for determining whether a patient is genuinely
> suicidal, or just narcissistic.
I'm so glad you're not a sociopath, Lionel.
Kadaitcha Man
ineffectual silken-coated slave. Ye brooded:
[1]
> Just post your emails from the 23rd, okay?
I refuse to stoop to your level and I refuse to afford you any opportunity
to obtain even more morbid justification from your vile actions, Rhonda.
>> And while we're on the subject of what you do to facts, I draw your
>> attention to this:
>>
>> http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/c4f25426643560bf?dmode=source&hl=en
>>
>> You took that genuine plea
>
> "I think its obvious she's not well, mate."
[2]
Wow! You quoted only the part of the text that sets your "fact". How
completely unpredictable of you, Rhonda. Now, to set fact apart from your
"fact"...
"I think its obvious she's not well, mate. Knock it off, hey? Please."
Why you persist in deluding yourself into even remotely considering you're
going to get away with your demented distortions is completely beyond all
reason. You have been caught doing that endless times, in plain view of
everyone reading your posts, nevertheless there you are still trying to pass
off your psychotic lies in the face of indisputable, black and white,
google-archived proof. You relentlessly persist in proving all the horrible
charges laid against you, all the while being completely and utterly witless
to any understanding that you, your very self, are doing serious damage to
any possible vestige of a notion of believability in anything you claim to
be true.
[1] Laid bare right before your very own eyes was the method you used to
twist reality into "fact" and you followed it up with yet another demented
twist of reality into "fact" at [2]. Really fucking smart that.
You are one very seriously fucked up person, Rhonda.
>> and turned it into an attack on you. Then
>> you added more of your demented paranoid delusions by heaping
>> accusations of passing information to Lionel on top of it, and all
>> the while I sat back eating popcorn, knowing full well that the only
>> email that was exchanged was to express my gratitude to him for
>> humbly and graciously backing off when I asked.
>
> "passing information to Lionel" and "the only email exchanged was to
> express gratitude" are not exclusive ideas.
LMAO - fuckhead.
>> Oh, I also reassured him that when you came back for more, which you
>> so predictably did, he was not to consider my feelings if he should
>> choose to deal with you in his own way.
>
> You're a big boy. You can take it.
You reckon that's a statement of fact by you now, yes? Then account for your
pathetic plea to lionel on my behalf.
[insert whining self-justification here]
> So can I.
Maybe you can, but not without making threats, not without telling
bare-faced lies, not without putting yourself centre-stage as the eternal
victim, not without dragging even more of your dirty knickers out for public
inspection, and certainly not without twisting reality into a grotesque
facsimile as seen through the ghastly looking-glass of your psychopathic
delusions.
>> You were cut off at the pass long before you even thought of running
>> for it, you lying, crackbrained monstrosity. So, fuck you, fuck your
>> repetitive predictability, and fuck your "facts".
>
> Why don't I feel cut off at the pass?
Because you are one very seriously fucked up person, Rhonda.
>>>> You set the bar on the standards being used against you, twice in
>>>> fact, so you can just jolly well live with the consequences. I gave
>>>> up caring what happened to you the very instant you made the threat
>>>> to post those emails. Bad luck. BOO HOO for you.
>>>
>>> You never cared for me. I was good for meeting a need. Period.
>>
>> Yes, dear. No, dear. Three bags full, dear. Been there, done that,
>> time and time again. You're the spotless, stainless, sinless,
>> righteous and wholly justified victim whereas I'm the cacodemon who
>> spent all his waking moments dreaming up diabolical ways to torture
>> you.
>
> PKB.
>
> And a full inbox to prove it.
oh hum... here we go again...
>> Round and round you go... one foot firmly nailed to the floor.
>>
>>>>> no matter how you try to avoid it. Our sex life was good, and
>>>>> it's written all over usenet from the time when we were happy
>>>>> together. There's no taking it back now, no matter what else has
>>>>> happened.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Wat ben jij een ouwe scheefgerukte kakbroek.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:55:45 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
> <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:s6ulv.f...@news.alt.net
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou self-centred dotard. Thou
>>> infected glass-fac'd flatterer. Ye chirruped:
>>>
>>>>>> But the last man I ever had sex with may well be the last sex I
>>>>>> ever have. Wouldn't that be sweet?
>>>>>
>>>>> Why on earth do you think that anyone but you has the slightest
>>>>> interest in your sex life, you demented old bag?
>>>>
>>>> Someone did.
>>>>
>>>> That's how I ended up going to Texas.
>>>>
>>>> If you try to smear me with sexual slurs, you're going to hit Rick
>>>> too,
>>>
>>> Lionel can do whatever the fuck he likes and I don't need you to
>>> speak for me in the same way crasston allows you to speak for him.
>>
>> The fact remains that if he brings in our sex life, he's hitting you
>> too.
>
> physically impossible.
Well, of course you're speaking metaphorically, so it's not "physically"
impossible.
I have pretty thick skin about a lot of things, just not when the person
trying to hurt me is someone I love.
>>> You set the bar on the standards being used against you, twice in
>>> fact, so you can just jolly well live with the consequences. I gave
>>> up caring what happened to you the very instant you made the threat
>>> to post those emails. Bad luck. BOO HOO for you.
>>
>> You never cared for me. I was good for meeting a need. Period.
>
> "BooHoo! You never loved me! SobSobSob! Oh, my mother was right about
> you! Sob! Snuffle! Whimper!"
I've shed a fair number of tears over this, Lionel. If poking fun at
someone else's pain is what gets you off, go for it.
> Christ, no wonder you couldn't hold on to the poor guy. If you're this
> bad in *public*, you must be a fucking nightware behind closed doors.
We had a good time behind closed doors. It's posted all over usenet. You
can go google-scour for it if you want proof.
> BTW, How long does it usually take you to escalate from this level of
> whinyness to the one where you start making threats to deepthroat a
> pill bottle, or take a butter knife to your wrists?
I've never /threatened/ to do either.
I did say to Rick, repeatedly, that if he didn't back off and stop
pressuring me--to spend time with him online and to do things I couldn't
afford to do--that I would not have the wherewithal to survive.
I very clearly stated--several times--that I do want to keep living. I
also stated that if I did not take time to create the means for
survival, there would be no way for me to survive. Somehow, it just
never got through.
Kadaitcha Man
very valiant trencher-man. Ye pined:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:34:36 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
> <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou forgetful man. Thou saucy
>> lackey. Ye clanged:
>>
>>> However, I have been the recipient of the following threat:
>>>
>>>> If you ever refer to me again on usenet or on the www in any way,
>>>> even by allusion, or make a single allegation against me, veiled,
>>>> indirect, direct, or by act of omission, or refer in any such way
>>>> to anything that allegedly happened between us or anything that
>>>> directly or indirectly relates to me in any way then I will file
>>>> an official online harrassment complaint against you with the
>>>> Australian Federal Police.
>>>>
>>>> http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/CyberLRes/2001/31/
>>>> http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lrc.nsf/pages/r103chp12
>>>
>>> f06u03$573$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>
>>> It pays to be prepared in any police investigation.
>>
>> Since when has affording oneself the rightful protection of the law
>> been a threat, you fuckheaded nutjob?
>
> Get busy on that report<BITCHSLAP>
You're a lawyer, so you claim, yes? Then you'd know that complaints are
made, no? And you'd know who writes up reports about said complaints, no?
Need it explained to you, apparent lawayer, indisputable fuckhead?
> Please publish it here for public ridicule.
Why bother when you're there?
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij anale inteelt zwijnenbeffer.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
<CONTEXT RESTORED>
</RESTORED CONTEXT>
> What about you?
What about me?
> A lottery ticket says you tried to assert "facts" again too.
I tried to assert "facts" about what, Rick?
The point of the waiter story relates to what most women are taught at
an early age: no matter how nice a guy seems, if he's rude to the
service staff or to anyone "beneath" him, run. Run fast. The logic is
that if someone is shitty to those who are "lesser," he will eventually
turn it on you.
When it happened, we dealt with it, or so I thought. It didn't become an
issue until there were similar incidents, and then, later, you started
treating me the same way, including "yelling" and even hurling
expletives in my general direction. Your performance here is, of course,
more extreme now than what I experienced in email and in chat, but it is
the reason we started having so many gaps in our discussions.
As I said to you once, imagine treating someone you love the way you
treat posters. You were horrified then, but you turned it on me later,
and I couldn't handle it.
Now go ahead, bitchslap me again. You know you want to.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
news:lcih23hf0kev8jeiu...@4ax.com
> Fri, 20 Apr 2007 05:22:18 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
> <nntp...@gmail.com> licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and
> wrote:
>
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou poor miserable wretch. Why
>> thou art a man of wax. Ye ministered:
>>
>>> "Respondant" <Respo...@noemail.none> wrote in message
>>> news:dMSdnSbdQqmmKbrb...@comcast.com
>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Henry Schmidt" <schm...@nottelling.nope> wrote in message
>>>>> news:MANVh.1759$jR5.804@trnddc08
>
>
>>>>> But I will have to take some time to assemble all the
>>>>> documentation for the Australian Federal Police. It's pretty
>>>>> voluminous. Almost 1800 hundred emails, many bytes of chat and
>>>>> probably 5000 (or more) posts. It's a big job.
>>>>>
>>>>> I may just turn over my hard drive and point to where everything
>>>>> is. Easier.
>
> Before exerting such Herculean effort, please remember, in US courts
> such "evidence" is inadmissable. There is no way to establish a chain
> of custody, verifying the accuracy of the posts. Once such posts are
> on somebody's hard drive, they can be, and have been in the past,
> modified to favor the complainant's POV.
Well, I don't have much choice in the matter. I've been told a complaint
is to be lodged; therefore, I must prepare a defense.
I'll just muddle on as best I can, and we'll see what happens.
>>>> Ya just can't let it go can ya, Rhonda?
>>>
>>> Can't?
>>>
>>> Depends on where you sit, I guess.
>>>
>>>> No matter how many times
>>>> I've tried to be a friend, and tried to divert your attention from
>>>> this fiasco via personal (family oriented) email, you just can't
>>>> bring yourself to stop, can you?
>>>>
>>>> You are hell-bent on completing some kind of misguided "mission"
>>>> here. The likes of which I can no longer fathom.
>
> [...]
>
>
>
>
> Widdershins
>
> Who lit the fuse on your tampon?
Period lames are no better than fag lames, y'know.
(But I'm not wearing a tampon, because I'm not having my period.)
Kadaitcha Man
pus-filled mutable. Ye hectored:
>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:01:53 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>> <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> I<BITCHSLAP>
>>>
>>> There must be a way to express extreme disinterest in you and
>>> anything about you and anything you might propose to think where you
>>> stand even a remote chance of actually getting it, you tedious,
>>> contemptible, lying cow.
>
> There is. Put me in your killfile.
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! Get this through your thick skull, Rhonda. Lord knows how
many times you've been told...
I refuse to kowtow to your perpetual attempts to make your ongoing actions
contingent on my present actions.
You made your bed... if you can guess the rest then it must be a cliché.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Straks vind ik je nog een verroeste verrotgeneukte plofkop.
Kadaitcha Man
eye-offending scut. Ye apple-polished:
> How this all ties in with<BITCHSLAP>
Name one usenet poster, any usenet, apart from your ever-so-silent knight in
shining tinfoil, who will believe you.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bezopen platgekankerde pokkenteef.
miguel
<nntp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou self-centred dotard. Thou
>infected glass-fac'd flatterer. Ye chirruped:
>
>> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>> news:f0a0ce$8ad$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 03:22:22 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>> <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:f09k2a$79b$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:40:16 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
>>>>> <turd...@catholic.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Lionel wrote:
>>>>>> Oh boy, a usenet virtual gangbang. Can't wait for that DVD to hit
>>>>>> the bargain bin.
>>>>>
>>>>> Watch a DVD of Rhodenta servicing Porchy, Bowtie, Cranstoad & the
>>>>> NYC lamer? - I'd rather poke out my eyes with a rusty fork.
>>>>
>>>> I just so love sex lames.
>>>>
>>>> But the last man I ever had sex with may well be the last sex I ever
>>>> have. Wouldn't that be sweet?
>>>
>>> Why on earth do you think that anyone but you has the slightest
>>> interest in your sex life, you demented old bag?
>>
>> Someone did.
>>
>> That's how I ended up going to Texas.
>>
>> If you try to smear me with sexual slurs, you're going to hit Rick
>> too,
>
>Lionel can do whatever the fuck he likes and I don't need you to speak for
>me in the same way crasston allows you to speak for him. You set the bar on
>the standards being used against you, twice in fact, so you can just jolly
>well live with the consequences. I gave up caring what happened to you the
>very instant you made the threat to post those emails. Bad luck. BOO HOO for
>you.
Let's see a reprise of your atonement/unconditional forgiveness
foamout, mmmkay?
miguel
<nntp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou block. Leave thy vain
>bibble-babble. Ye chafed:
>
>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:s6to5.s...@news.alt.net
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou clamorous harbinger of
>>> blood and death. Thou vile, festered contemptuous base-born callet.
>>> Ye palpitated:
>>>
>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:s6psi.e...@news.alt.net
>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou whoreson malt-horse
>>>>> drudge. What strange fish hath made his meal on thee. Ye dissented:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Apparently when I wasn't looking, auk turned into a private,
>>>>>> members-only club.
>>>>
>>>> "...dozens of long time AUK regulars have told you that your
>>>> behaviour is totally inappropriate for this group, & that if you
>>>> aren't going to behave like an adult, none of us want you here?"
>>>>
>>>> news:f09u0e$2as$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>
>>> Perhaps you could call for a vote.
>>
>> Perhaps you could implement your own ideas, bearing in mind, of
>> course, that it won't make a damn bit of difference one way or
>> another.
>
>Well then, that settles it, hey. Dozens of long time AUK regulars have told
>you that your behaviour is totally inappropriate for this group, & that if
>you aren't going to behave like an adult, none of us want you here.
I want her here.
Kadaitcha Man
to have thy name repeated. Ye huffed:
Can't you read?
> My tummy hurts.
>
>>> followed by post-editing.
>>
>> <aside>
>> Thus the nutjob takes a direct cut signifiying consummate disregard
>> and transmogrifies it into the "fact" of a post edit.
>
> You're a master of argument by snippage, Rick. It's your stock in
> trade.
So, for the benefit of less astute readers, you may now proceed to describe
the logical process you used to make the gigantic leap of faith required to
get from "consummate disregard" to "argument by snippage".
<pops some fresh corn>
> Get that leaky killfile fixed, will ya?
Lame on.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Ik denk dat je kan doorgaan als een gewassen zure anusacrobaat.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
news:j0mh23dv9omaq0ifo...@4ax.com
It's remarkable that certain usenet posters think they have the right or
ability to throw others right off the group.
It's too bad for them that I'm not violating the acceptable use policy
of any of my providers. I'm sure they'd be netkkkopping me right and
left.
P.S. Lionel hasn't gotten back to me about my alleged net abuse and
criminal activity. I wonder why not? I've offered to sign a release
opening any and all information to him, as he pleases.
Do you suppose it was all bluster?
miguel
>Before exerting such Herculean effort, please remember, in US courts
>such "evidence" is inadmissable. There is no way to establish a chain
>of custody, verifying the accuracy of the posts. Once such posts are
>on somebody's hard drive, they can be, and have been in the past,
>modified to favor the complainant's POV.
That goes to weight, not admissibility.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou bovine porpentine. Thou
> eye-offending scut. Ye apple-polished:
>
>> How this all ties in with<BITCHSLAP>
>
> Name one usenet poster, any usenet, apart from your ever-so-silent
> knight in shining tinfoil, who will believe you.
You're the one making lists.
I'll leave you to it.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Kookologistkook, you mean.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
"Consummate disregard" would be me in your killfile.
"Argument by snippage" is most of your current posts.
> <pops some fresh corn>
>
>> Get that leaky killfile fixed, will ya?
>
> Lame on.
Hey, I'm not the person who posted her killfile, sweetheart.
Kadaitcha Man
their drenched natures lie. Ye vituperated:
> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
> news:f0aeae$c2p$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:03:33 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>> <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>>> news:f0a9ib$r2$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:52:49 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>> <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> [...]
>>>>>> Why on earth do you think that anyone but you has the slightest
>>>>>> interest in your sex life, you demented old bag?
>>>>>
>>>>> Someone did.
>>>>
>>>> It must really suck to get old & lose your looks when you have the
>>>> personality of a lamprey. You already seem to be 2/3rds of the way
>>>> to becoming one of those lonely, bitter old women who spend their
>>>> days spying on their neighbours from between the curtains, &
>>>> annoying the cops with weekly reports of imaginary terrorist
>>>> activities.
>>>> I might feel sorry for you, except that you ignore or attack anyone
>>>> who tries to help you do something about your personality problems.
>>>
>>> <choking on laughter> So lonely and bitter I had to go all the way
>>> to Australia to find a man.
>>
>> ..,And you fucked that up too.
>
> I did.
>
> Truly fucked up.
>
> And yet, if not for the ever-present pressure, it all would've worked
> out fine, because Rick has a lot of wonderful attributes. He's smart,
> he's fun, he's kind and loving, he's comfortable to be around. Or at
> least, mostly. But carrying a joke too far is hurtful if it happens
> too often, and pushing when one has been asked to let up is a
> relationship killer.
<SNORT>
You have painted me as a fucking abusive man, perpetually jealous,
perpetually angry, perpetually controlling, perpetually disrespectful of
your dignity, perpetually squeezing you with unrelenting pressure.
You have drawn direct parallels between me and your abusive ex-husband and
your horribly abusive father who, imo, does not deserve to breathe, let
alone be called sub-human.
You have told bare-faced lies to feed your delusional grip on whatever it
is you are pleased to label as reality from one passing moment to the
next.
You have directly asserted that I am responsible for you not having a
job since before we met.
You have attributed nervous breakdowns and panic attacks directly to
me.
You have taken disgustingly morbid satisfaction in your threats and
subsequent actions, all the while asserting that your actions where
the deliberate choice of anyone but you.
You have asserted that online behaviour is not easily separable from
offline behaviour.
At every twist and turn you have abrogated your responsibility and your
culpability for every single nefarious thing that you have said and done.
You have run around telling these things to people in email, and you have
done all these things in public on usenet, and you even pre-empted a
justification for sending my usenet posts to my employer; that you even
thought of writing such an idea is indicative of what's in the back of
your mind, you fucking unbelievable dipshit.
You tore my heart right out of my chest and you crushed it mercilessly
right before my very own eyes, and you tried to do it again right before
the eyes of everyone reading your fucking demented shite on usenet. You
left me with hardly the barest of a tenuous grip on the basic belief I had
in myself as an ok, average type of bloke.
You even went so far as to beat me up for merely agreeing with you over
not using artificial sweeteners, you fucking mad cunt.
If you believe the former, then the latter says you really did screw up,
well and truly. Too late now, hey. You can kick yourself up the arse for
all eternity for all I care.
And if you don't really believe the former then the latter stands as an
uncontestable indictment of every single one of your tawdry fucking lies.
Catch-22, Rhonda. Excellent self-nuke that; almost as spectacular as
your kookout in posting those emails.
>> Looks like you're screwed, honey - & I
>> don't mean in the nice way.
>
> I did. If I had known at the outset the pain it would cause down the
> road--for both of us, I'd never have written the first post, much less
> the first email.
LMAO - you posted parts of private emails that you first dressed up as
unsolicited email then you bizarrely justified your actions by asserting you
only posted "your" emails, and you tried to pull that off by only quoting
the text that you wrote, then you fucking bitched to anyone who would listen
about incomplete pictures that you had drawn your very self, all the while
asserting nefarious collusion that never took place, even while asserting
that your act of posting them was caused by someone else.
Un-fucking-believable.
Truly, I piss on you, Rhonda Lea.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Straks vind ik je nog een grote cocksucking zandhaas.
Kadaitcha Man
fool. Ye balked:
> sweetheart.
You make me puke.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bent nu echt een himalayaanse afgeragde schuimhoer.
Kadaitcha Man
me ere I come to hell. Ye bickered:
> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:s7aap.r...@news.alt.net
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou bovine porpentine. Thou
>> eye-offending scut. Ye apple-polished:
>>
>>> How this all ties in with<BITCHSLAP>
>>
>> Name one usenet poster, any usenet, apart from your ever-so-silent
>> knight in shining tinfoil, who will believe you.
>
> You're the one making lists.
No. I'm the one quietly implying it but not actually doing it. You're the
one asserting it as fact.
> I'll leave you to it.
And that, no doubt, is yet another of your lies.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Wat ben jij een vadsige orgy-feestjes bezoekende potter.
Kadaitcha Man
Ye gnawed:
Which begs the question, are you wanted here?
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bent vast een onbeschofte mini-maximale wijf.
Kadaitcha Man
instrument of darkness. Ye disclosed:
> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>
>>
>> <the screen fills with wavy lines, & fades to:>
>>
>> SCENE: A suburban police station. The Desk Sergeant's lazing back in
>> his chair, pretending to read a report.
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk leaps through the door, slamming the door behind her.
>> She rips open the shopping bag she's carrying, & dumps an enormous
>> heap of printouts on the Sergeant's desk.
>> "Look at this!", she screams.
>> The neatly stapled stacks of paper all bristle with bookmarks &
>> highlighter marks, but businesslike effect is spoiled by bite marks &
>> saliva stains on all the corners, & by the fact that she's thrown
>> them on top of the sergeant's cup of coffee, sending it splashing
>> across her notes & the cop's lap.
>>
>> Rhonda grabs the cop by the tie: "Look what they've been saying about
>> me in alt.usenet.kooks!", she screeches, a couple of inches from the
>> unfortunate man's face. "But I'm too smart for them! - See? - I've
>> got ALL the EVIDENCE right HERE!", she says, reaching into a pocket
>> in her soiled sweatpants & pulling out a hard disk, 'protected' by
>> layers of soiled underwear.
>> She waves the drive triumphantly at the astonished officer, who's so
>> taken aback that he hasn't even noticed the coffee in his lap.
>> Suddenly, Rhonda hurls the disk drive to the desk, tiny components
>> flying everywhere as the drive ricochets off the telephone & slams
>> into the filing cabinet. "What are you waiting for, you sexist pig?
>> Why aren't you reading my EMAIL?"
>>
>> "Um, Lady?" says the sergeant, "You need to tell me what the alleged
>> crime is that you're reporting."
>>
>> "Don't "ALLEGE" me, you misogynist PIG! I'm RHONDA LEA KIRK, and you
>> know damn well I'm talking about the CRIMINALS victimising me in
>> alt.usenet.kooks and trying to drive me out of my Home Group!! It's
>> my right to post whatever I like to AUK without being insulted! It's
>> my RIGHT as a WOMAN!"
>>
>> Rhonda pauses briefly to take a deep breath & wipe the worst of the
>> spittle from her mouth.
>>
>> "That sexist bastard LIONEL called me a cunt! He and that fucking
>> cocksucking ex-boyfriend of mine both deserve the death penalty for
>> their CRIMES against HUMANITY!"
>>
>> As Rhonda's tirade winds down, the cop cautiously gets out of his
>> chair, gingerly wiping the worst of the coffee from his uniform.
>>
>> "Uh, sure thing, lady, we'll get right on that", he says, gazing
>> incredulously at the snowdrift of coffee-soaked printouts, hard disk
>> pieces & foul-smelling underthings that're strewn all over the room.
>>
>> He glances around the office, where dozens of other staff have
>> gathered at a safe distance to see what all the fuss was about.
>>
>> He finally spots a pair of burly officers who're good at 'handling'
>> the stations more 'excitable' customers, & waves them over.
>>
>> "Okay lady, these officers are from the, um, CyberInterWeb Crime
>> Department. They handle all the serious Interhighway crimes, & if you
>> go quietly with them, they'll make sure that everything gets sorted
>> out, okay?"
>>
>> Quiet at last, Rhonda follows the two officers to the parking lot,
>> grinning triumphantly at the thought of her impending victory against
>> the AUK pigs who thought they could tell her how to act in her own
>> Home Group.
>>
>> The bigger officer pauses to take a bundle of white canvas from the
>> van locker, & turns to Rhonda, while the other officer sidles quietly
>> up behind her. "Miss? It's kind of cold today, isn't it? ... How
>> about I put this nice warm jacket on you?" Rhonda looks at the
>> shapeless garment suspiciously, & tries to back away - straight into
>> the arms of the other officer, who's been performing this maneuver
>> for more than a decade...
>
>
> Holy shit! That was too damn funny - you gotta give credit where
> credit is due Rhonda, thanks for the laugh.
>
> <aside> This soap opera between you an Rick, while entertaining, is
> really embarrassing. I feel like I'm back in the cafeteria in 6th
> grade. I feel sorry for the whole lot of you. The only question I
> have is who will take the "high road" and stop all this pointless,
> sophomoric, and degrading banter? Clearly no "winner" will emerge
> from this. This may not be any of my business, but when this crap
> gets x-posted to 6 unrelated groups it's not easy to ignore.
Whilst it is true there is no winner, the court of public opinion has
already spoken.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij gore zachtboerende urinemonster.
Kadaitcha Man
wild heart. Ye vacillated:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 22:26:02 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
> About as much as the proverbial fart in the elevator.
> And I'm astonished that the Bowturd & Porchy haven't spoken up in her
> favour. OTOH, it's possible that they're just smarter than Michael
> Cranston Attorny,
I'll buy that one.
> & have already figured out that award-winning kooks
> don't get to vote anyway. OTGH, Michael might be taking advantage of
> Rhodenta's cluelessness to score brownie points that'll get him that
> one step closer to the blowjob he imagines he'll get from RLK for the
> plausible deniability he supplies her when she needs to get some dirty
> work done.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij witte patserige satan.
Kadaitcha Man
stone. Thou venomed knave that smells of sweat. Ye screeched:
Note the exceedingly great power I have over you, Michael Cranston attorney.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bent nu echt een afgepelde gezweepte lullepijp.
Kadaitcha Man
little honesty as honour. Ye sniggered:
> Sat, 21 Apr 2007 00:30:00 +1000, Lionel <use...@imagenoir.com> licked
> the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:17:13 -0700, Widdershins
>> <sini...@liripipe.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Fri, 20 Apr 2007 05:22:18 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>> <nntp...@gmail.com> licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou poor miserable wretch.
>>>> Why thou art a man of wax. Ye ministered:
>>>>
>>>>> "Respondant" <Respo...@noemail.none> wrote in message
>>>>> news:dMSdnSbdQqmmKbrb...@comcast.com
>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Henry Schmidt" <schm...@nottelling.nope> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:MANVh.1759$jR5.804@trnddc08
>>>
>>> [...]
>>>
>>>>>>> But I will have to take some time to assemble all the
>>>>>>> documentation for the Australian Federal Police. It's pretty
>>>>>>> voluminous. Almost 1800 hundred emails, many bytes of chat and
>>>>>>> probably 5000 (or more) posts. It's a big job.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I may just turn over my hard drive and point to where
>>>>>>> everything is. Easier.
>>>
>>> Before exerting such Herculean effort, please remember, in US courts
>>> such "evidence" is inadmissable. There is no way to establish a
>>> chain of custody, verifying the accuracy of the posts. Once such
>>> posts are on somebody's hard drive, they can be, and have been in
>>> the past, modified to favor the complainant's POV.
>>
>> Damn you, Widders! I was saving up that little factoid for a very
>> special moment, you bastard! I was so looking forward to telling her,
>> letting her spend a few days calling me a liar, then dropping a few
>> juicy cites on her.
>
> Mea culpa! Mea maxima culpa!
Gluteus maximus!
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Ik denk dat je kan doorgaan als een prachtige oude raviolie.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
The trouble with "coy" is that it lacks "clarity."
>> It's too bad for them that I'm not violating the acceptable use
>> policy of any of my providers. I'm sure they'd be netkkkopping me
>> right and left.
>
> Hardly.
If you say so.
>> P.S. Lionel hasn't gotten back to me about my alleged net abuse and
>> criminal activity. I wonder why not?
>
> Gee, that does seem to be a bit of a mystery, doesn't it?
As a matter of fact, it is.
See below.
>> I've offered to sign a release
>> opening any and all information to him, as he pleases.
>
> You have? - That's the first I've heard of it. You must've buried it
> one of your enormous soap opera kook-screeds of yours, bunny boiler.
> Post a MessageID & I'll go & find out if it's yet another of your
> worthless bits of rhetoric.
Here:
---
Message-ID: <f03fd6$rm1$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhon...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Holey Sockpuppet alert (Re: Lionel, also Rick, Rhonda,
Miguel,)
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:40:59 -0400
<snipped>
I would have no hesitation about opening my computer to inspection nor
to authorizing the release of any and all records in the possession of
my current ISP or former ISPs, NNTP providers and mail providers. I
don't have a blessed thing I need to hide.
<snipped>
Message-ID: <58nl8fF...@mid.individual.net>
From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhon...@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: NOMINATION: Michael Cranston for Bobo Award
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2007 18:39:54 -0400
<snipped>
I know that someone (or several people) are forging emails and posts. I
haven't a clue now who it is, although I simply took it for granted
before that it was Bowtie. You still tell me it's Bowtie, but you also
tell me that I'm engaged in the same activities.
If you want, I'll give you whatever information you require to prove it
to yourself and a release authorizing you to do so. Have at it.
<snipped>
---
>> Do you suppose it was all bluster?
>
> Oh, I'm sure it'll all become clear in time.
One can only hope.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> miguel <mjc...@gmail.com> Thou prodigal. Thou big-bellied, uneducated
> very valiant trencher-man. Ye pined:
>
>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 12:34:36 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>> <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou forgetful man. Thou saucy
>>> lackey. Ye clanged:
>>>
>>>> However, I have been the recipient of the following threat:
>>>>
>>>>> If you ever refer to me again on usenet or on the www in any way,
>>>>> even by allusion, or make a single allegation against me, veiled,
>>>>> indirect, direct, or by act of omission, or refer in any such way
>>>>> to anything that allegedly happened between us or anything that
>>>>> directly or indirectly relates to me in any way then I will file
>>>>> an official online harrassment complaint against you with the
>>>>> Australian Federal Police.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/other/CyberLRes/2001/31/
>>>>> http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lrc.nsf/pages/r103chp12
>>>>
>>>> f06u03$573$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>>
>>>> It pays to be prepared in any police investigation.
>>>
>>> Since when has affording oneself the rightful protection of the law
>>> been a threat, you fuckheaded nutjob?
>>
>> Get busy on that report<BITCHSLAP>
>
> You're a lawyer, so you claim, yes? Then you'd know that complaints
> are made, no? And you'd know who writes up reports about said
> complaints, no? Need it explained to you, apparent lawayer,
> indisputable fuckhead?
Is that a "you used the wrong word" lame? Lionel doesn't like them.
But I'll fix it for Mike, since he's out for the afternoon:
"Get busy on that complaint."
>> Please publish it here for public ridicule.
>
> Why bother when you're there?
Sinkin' fast.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou poor rat. Thou
> three-chinned, pus-filled mutable. Ye hectored:
>
>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 19:01:53 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>>> <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>>>> I<BITCHSLAP>
>>>>
>>>> There must be a way to express extreme disinterest in you and
>>>> anything about you and anything you might propose to think where
>>>> you stand even a remote chance of actually getting it, you tedious,
>>>> contemptible, lying cow.
>>
>> There is. Put me in your killfile.
>
> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH! Get this through your thick skull, Rhonda. Lord
> knows how many times you've been told...
>
> I refuse to kowtow to your perpetual attempts to make your ongoing
> actions contingent on my present actions.
>
> You made your bed... if you can guess the rest then it must be a
> cliché.
<shrug> You can do whatever you want. But what you wrote was "There must
be a way to express extreme disinterest..."
Hmmmm...
Actually, it isn't "distinterest" you wish to express, because
"disinterest" is neutrality. "Non-interest" is what you're looking for.
And to express non-interest, all a person can do is /be/ uninterested.
Stating ones lack of interest is generally looked on as being
interested, much as a teenager's statement that s/he doesn't care is
usually taken as an indicator that s/he cares very much.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou mud-soaked baboon. Thou
> ineffectual silken-coated slave. Ye brooded:>> news:s73m6.i...@news.alt.net
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou worthless lowly vassal.
>>> Thou backward fiend. Ye drooled:>>>> news:s6ulv.f...@news.alt.net
>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou self-centred dotard.
>>>>> Thou infected glass-fac'd flatterer. Ye chirruped:
>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 03:22:22 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>>>>>> <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 04:40:16 GMT, Rev Turd Fredericks
>>>>>>>>> <turd...@catholic.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lionel wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:21:49 -0400, The NYC Kid
>>>>>>>>>>> <OGn...@east53.eat.a.9.fool> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>
>>> I told you, stop using words you don't know the maaning of.
>>>
>>>> remains that if he brings in our sex life, he's hitting you
>>>> too.
>>>
>>> *ding*
>>>
>>> See? That's what you do to facts. Right there. You dress your insane
>>> perceptions up in your tawdry delusions and call them facts. That
>>> isn't a fact at all; it is far from being a fact. It only becomes a
>>> fact if I feel hit, and, assuming for the sake of argument only that
>>> I should even care to feel hit, I sure as fuck aren't going to be
>>> handing you a way out of the mess you've created for yourself by
>>> letting on. Bad luck. BOO HOO for you, you fact-altering,
>>> fact-creating, fact-dropping, fact-obscuring nutjob.
>
> [1]
>
>> Just post your emails from the 23rd, okay?
>
> I refuse to stoop to your level and I refuse to afford you any
> opportunity to obtain even more morbid justification from your vile
> actions, Rhonda.
>
>>> And while we're on the subject of what you do to facts, I draw your
>>> attention to this:
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/c4f25426643560bf?dmode=source&hl=en
>>>
>>> You took that genuine plea
>>
>> "I think its obvious she's not well, mate."
>
> [2]
>
> Wow! You quoted only the part of the text that sets your "fact". How
> completely unpredictable of you, Rhonda. Now, to set fact apart from
> your "fact"...
Just the other day, you pointed to two lines from my last post in a
not-so-short thread in 24hoursupport.helpdesk, and you used it as proof
of...something.
Are you now saying that pointing to the relevant portion of a post--the
part that makes the point one wishes to make--is wrong?
> "I think its obvious she's not well, mate. Knock it off, hey? Please."
Let us focus on "its obvious she's not well."
I'm better than I've been in many long months, but you, of all people,
know where my buttons and my soft, white underbelly can be found. The
fact that I've now built up some resistence to it (thank you very much)
is all to the good, but given your knowledge of me, it was most
assuredly just another poke.
If your true intent had been my wellbeing, you'd have phrased it in a
non-button-pushing way or you'd have done it privately. And at that
point, if Lionel had stopped, it would've been the end of the whole
thing.
You've been poking me on usenet and in private for months. One more time
is no big deal, but don't call it something it isn't.
> Why you persist in deluding yourself into even remotely considering
> you're going to get away with your demented distortions is completely
> beyond all reason. You have been caught doing that endless times, in
> plain view of everyone reading your posts, nevertheless there you are
> still trying to pass off your psychotic lies in the face of
> indisputable, black and white, google-archived proof. You
> relentlessly persist in proving all the horrible charges laid against
> you, all the while being completely and utterly witless to any
> understanding that you, your very self, are doing serious damage to
> any possible vestige of a notion of believability in anything you
> claim to be true.
Horrible charges?
You're so weird.
> [1] Laid bare right before your very own eyes was the method you used
> to twist reality into "fact" and you followed it up with yet another
> demented twist of reality into "fact" at [2]. Really fucking smart
> that.
Please hurry up and get on with the reporting to the Australian Federal
Police, Rick.
That'll resolve this right quick.
> You are one very seriously fucked up person, Rhonda.
When I didn't run after the first time you fucked me on usenet? Probably
so.
>>> and turned it into an attack on you. Then
>>> you added more of your demented paranoid delusions by heaping
>>> accusations of passing information to Lionel on top of it, and all
>>> the while I sat back eating popcorn, knowing full well that the only
>>> email that was exchanged was to express my gratitude to him for
>>> humbly and graciously backing off when I asked.
>>
>> "passing information to Lionel" and "the only email exchanged was to
>> express gratitude" are not exclusive ideas.
>
> LMAO - fuckhead.
:)
>>> Oh, I also reassured him that when you came back for more, which you
>>> so predictably did, he was not to consider my feelings if he should
>>> choose to deal with you in his own way.
>>
>> You're a big boy. You can take it.
>
> You reckon that's a statement of fact by you now, yes? Then account
> for your pathetic plea to lionel on my behalf.
It was a plea on my own behalf. But he can't help but nail you every
time he goes after me using sex, and I thought pointing it out to him is
a reasonable thing to do.
The one thing you won't hear me complaining to anyone about is our sex
life. Everything else has pretty well gotten trashed--although it was
only one single thing that actually overshadowed all the rest--but it
doesn't seem necessary to take a bite out of the one thing that didn't
have a down side.
> [insert whining self-justification here]
>
>> So can I.
>
> Maybe you can, but not without making threats, not without telling
> bare-faced lies,
I haven't told any lies.
Not one.
> not without putting yourself centre-stage as the
> eternal victim, not without dragging even more of your dirty knickers
> out for public inspection, and certainly not without twisting reality
> into a grotesque facsimile as seen through the ghastly looking-glass
> of your psychopathic delusions.
Right. Because I'm an "emotional abuser."
The projection is blinding.
>>> You were cut off at the pass long before you even thought of running
>>> for it, you lying, crackbrained monstrosity. So, fuck you, fuck your
>>> repetitive predictability, and fuck your "facts".
>>
>> Why don't I feel cut off at the pass?
>
> Because you are one very seriously fucked up person, Rhonda.
I keep hearing that from people who I know to be a bit wonky. Even from
people who have described the people I'm hearing from as being a bit
wonky.
Consider that my troubles with Lionel began when I took him on over his
desire to flame a Formosa'd person. Consider that my troubles with Kali
began when I refused to discard a friend because he was flaming her a
little. Consider my troubles with you began when you were asked
repeatedly, but repeatedly refused, to stop putting pressure on me.
It's pretty funny, all in all.
>>>>> You set the bar on the standards being used against you, twice in
>>>>> fact, so you can just jolly well live with the consequences. I
>>>>> gave up caring what happened to you the very instant you made the
>>>>> threat to post those emails. Bad luck. BOO HOO for you.
>>>>
>>>> You never cared for me. I was good for meeting a need. Period.
>>>
>>> Yes, dear. No, dear. Three bags full, dear. Been there, done that,
>>> time and time again. You're the spotless, stainless, sinless,
>>> righteous and wholly justified victim whereas I'm the cacodemon who
>>> spent all his waking moments dreaming up diabolical ways to torture
>>> you.
>>
>> PKB.
>>
>> And a full inbox to prove it.
>
> oh hum... here we go again...
You're the one who's telling me what I think I am and what I think you
are.
I have plenty of flaws. They're just not the ones you've attributed to
me for the purpose of winning the argument.
>>> Round and round you go... one foot firmly nailed to the floor.
>>>
>>>>>> no matter how you try to avoid it. Our sex life was good, and
>>>>>> it's written all over usenet from the time when we were happy
>>>>>> together. There's no taking it back now, no matter what else has
>>>>>> happened.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 10:19:35 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk">> news:f0ag06$gl3$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou devil's dam. Thou
>>>> impatient, podgy false peer. Ye exudated:>>>>> news:s6v00.h...@news.alt.net
>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou arrant knave. Thou
>>>>>> nauseating, abhorrent gorbellied knave. Ye groveled:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And Rick's threat to go to the Australian Federal Police is
>>>>>>> "adult behavior" so he should stay?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How very manipulative of you. Completely unexpected. And how very
>>>>>> hypoctrical of you too, also completely unexpected.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm sure, if I were as prone to google-scouring as you are, that
>>>>>> I could dig up at least several posts where you... ah, what the
>>>>>> fuck. You'll just delude yourself into believing they mean the
>>>>>> exact opposite of what you actually wrote; that much is expected
>>>>>> of you.
>>>>>
>>>>> Y'know what's so funny about the google-scouring bit?
>>>>>
>>>>> I<BITCHSLAP>
>>>>
>>>> There must be a way to express extreme disinterest in you and
>>>> anything about you and anything you might propose to think where
>>>> you stand even a remote chance of actually getting it, you tedious,
>>>> contemptible, lying cow.
>>
>> There is. Put me in your killfile.
>
> every post? Oh yeah, that'd be a really smart thing to do...
>
> And before you ask again, no, I'm not going to killfile you. You'll
> either leave AUK, or you'll finish morphing into our latest village
> idiot.
Another nomination? Yayyyyyyyy!
>>> Not a chance. Remember the old parable about the scorpion & the frog
>>> trying to cross the flooded river?
>>
>> Yours too.
>>
>>> I'm just playing for what little entertainment value there is in
>>> her. I might also see if it's actually possible to flame someone
>>> into committing suicide. Could make a for a really ground-breaking
>>> paper on diagnostic techniques for determining whether a patient is
>>> genuinely suicidal, or just narcissistic.
>>
>> I'm so glad you're not a sociopath, Lionel.
>
> So you should be. Imagine how screwed you'd be if I was? ;^)
Screwed? From posts on usenet?
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 09:37:24 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk">> news:f0addg$ada$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:58:55 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk"
>>> <rhon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:s6v00.h...@news.alt.net
>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou arrant knave. Thou
>>>>> nauseating, abhorrent gorbellied knave. Ye groveled:
>>>>>
>>>>>> And Rick's threat to go to the Australian Federal Police is
>>>>>> "adult behavior" so he should stay?
>>>>>
>>>>> How very manipulative of you. Completely unexpected. And how very
>>>>> hypoctrical of you too, also completely unexpected.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm sure, if I were as prone to google-scouring as you are, that I
>>>>> could dig up at least several posts where you... ah, what the
>>>>> fuck. You'll just delude yourself into believing they mean the
>>>>> exact opposite of what you actually wrote; that much is expected
>>>>> of you.
>>>>
>>>> Y'know what's so funny about the google-scouring bit?
>>>>
>>>> internal group.
>>>>
>>>> The irony of it all.
>>>
>>> Fuck, you're clueless. "Google-scouring" is a colloquial term for
>>> any kind of hunt though a collection of stored Usenet posts,
>>> dimwit. Back before Dejanews or Google were invented, it was called
>>> "spool-grepping", or "grepping the spool", & had all the same
>>> connotations as "Google-scouring" does now, & is precisely what
>>> *you're doing* when you search through the Hmaster newsspool.
>>
>> Results 1 - 39 of 39 for "google scouring". (0.25 seconds)
>> Results 1 - 30 of 30 for "google scouring"
>>
>> A total of 69 hits from Google and Google Groups. But I think you
>> meant "generic" not "colloquial."
>
> I meant exactly what I said, bunny-boiler.
Well, I'm not a vocabulary teacher, so carry on.
>> How about we call it "kiboing," instead? That's something everyone
>> should understand.
>
> 'Kiboze' or 'Kibozing' in fact, noob.
Is that a spelling lame?
>>> In other words; he's right, because you *were* 'Google-scouring',
>>> you stupid old bag.
>>
>> A third-party PKB. I've never seen one of those before.
>
> Please do explain how that's a PKB, Hon. Given the utter cluelessness
> you've exhibited every other time I've seen you attempt to use a piece
> of jargon, I'm sure your explanation will be hilarious.
Utterly hilarious. Rick is the king of google-scouring. If I had an
nickel for all the times he has google-scoured, I could retire and live
in luxury for the rest of a very long life.
Kadaitcha Man
toad-spotted, pus-filled fellow of servants. Ye chattered:
> "Widdershins" <sini...@liripipe.com> wrote in message
> news:lcih23hf0kev8jeiu...@4ax.com
>> Fri, 20 Apr 2007 05:22:18 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
>> <nntp...@gmail.com> licked the point of a #2 Yellow Pencil, and
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou poor miserable wretch.
>>> Why thou art a man of wax. Ye ministered:
>>>
>>>> "Respondant" <Respo...@noemail.none> wrote in message
>>>> news:dMSdnSbdQqmmKbrb...@comcast.com
>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Henry Schmidt" <schm...@nottelling.nope> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:MANVh.1759$jR5.804@trnddc08
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>>>> But I will have to take some time to assemble all the
>>>>>> documentation for the Australian Federal Police. It's pretty
>>>>>> voluminous. Almost 1800 hundred emails, many bytes of chat and
>>>>>> probably 5000 (or more) posts. It's a big job.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I may just turn over my hard drive and point to where everything
>>>>>> is. Easier.
>>
>> Before exerting such Herculean effort, please remember, in US courts
>> such "evidence" is inadmissable. There is no way to establish a chain
>> of custody, verifying the accuracy of the posts. Once such posts are
>> on somebody's hard drive, they can be, and have been in the past,
>> modified to favor the complainant's POV.
>
> Well, I don't have much choice in the matter. I've been told a
> complaint is to be lodged; therefore, I must prepare a defense.
>
> I'll just muddle on as best I can, and we'll see what happens.
LMAO
Ok, you've had enough self-pity mileage out of that one.
I already stated, more than once, that I would not stoop to your levels, so
here, read the first two paragraphs of this and see if you can get the free
clue...
http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/29021b5ebd2b4803?dmode=source&hl=en
Bloody dowager drama queen.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bent vast een uit de kluiten gewassen kreupele koeienkut.
Kadaitcha Man
putrefying, money-grabbing fat friend. Ye harangued:
What I care about now in all of this shit is already on record and it has
not changed, by even one iota. So stop your pathetic pontificating and get
thee to google, google-scourer.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Ik vind jou een alles jattende sociaal ondermaatse zuigsnor.
Kadaitcha Man
and all the devils are here. Ye chatted:
Especially if he needs you to fix his fuckups.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Ik vind jou een klotige spermaspuitende trotoir.
Kadaitcha Man
Thou coward. Ye gabbed:
Unsupported assertion. Claim necessarily fails. Google is that way -->
> Are you now saying<BITCHSLAP>
Round and round we go...
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Ik vind jou een gehandicapte spastische ballonnekenskop.
Kadaitcha Man
hungarian wight. Ye indicted:
There is no auk office of village idiot, you village idiot. And you ought to
know that if auk was your "home group" as you seem to now claim.
>>>> Not a chance. Remember the old parable about the scorpion & the
>>>> frog trying to cross the flooded river?
>>>
>>> Yours too.
>>>
>>>> I'm just playing for what little entertainment value there is in
>>>> her. I might also see if it's actually possible to flame someone
>>>> into committing suicide. Could make a for a really ground-breaking
>>>> paper on diagnostic techniques for determining whether a patient is
>>>> genuinely suicidal, or just narcissistic.
>>>
>>> I'm so glad you're not a sociopath, Lionel.
>>
>> So you should be. Imagine how screwed you'd be if I was? ;^)
>
> Screwed? From posts on usenet?
<aside>
Amazing. A 100%, pure, unadulterated turnaround, and it's not the first one
noted in the last few posts. Perhaps a psychotic break is in the offing.
Me <- Out.
For now.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bent een eerloze zakkende verpleger.
Kadaitcha Man
bachelor. Ye extruded:
> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:s75ev.9...@news.alt.net
>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou mindless slave. Thou
>> underachieving, manky white-bearded satan. Ye chuckled:
>>
>>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:s710h.o...@news.alt.net
>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou sodden witted lord. Thou
>>>> beastly feeder. Ye harried:
>>>>
>>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:s6u93.e...@news.alt.net
>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou dunghill groom. Thou
>>>>>> tardy-gaited, warped most profane coxcomb. Ye vacillated:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:s6fhg.7...@news.alt.net
>>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou thorny hedgehog.
>>>>>>>> Thou blocks, you stones, you worse than senseless things. Ye
>>>>>>>> denounced:
>>>>>>>>> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> news:f08iqf$fim$3...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 19 Apr 2007 15:21:49 -0400, The NYC Kid
>>>>>>>>>> <OGn...@east53.eat.a.9.fool> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>>>> Sorry.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm too busy working on my reply to Rick's complaint:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> lmao - fucking nutjob drama queen.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> rofl!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Says the guy who called the cops on me once already
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I explicitly named your threat; I pleaded with you; I asked for
>>>>>> your phone number; I asked you
>>>>>> to keep talking; I asked you to reconsider; I told you there were
>>>>>> alternatives; I told you nothing was worth giving everything up
>>>>>> for; I expressed distress and horror; all in separate emails, one
>>>>>> after the other. At no time did you ever, not once, step back
>>>>>> from what I took to be your threats of suicide. Calling the
>>>>>> police was my only option...If for no other reason than leaving
>>>>>> myself with a clear conscience while someone else cleaned your
>>>>>> shit, piss and brains off the walls and floor.
>>>>>
>>>>> Go ahead and repost the emails with your comments intact, Rick.
>>>>> Start from the one that came out of the blue on the 23rd.
>>>>>
>>>>> Don't paraphrase what you did, because it paints a very false
>>>>> picture of both you and your actions.
>>>>
>>>> BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Read it and weep, hypocrite...
>>>>
>>>> [QUOTE]
>>>> Add the rest of it. All of it. Start to end. Tell it as it actually
>>>> happened and not how you want people to perceive it to suit your
>>>> purposes. And leave your interpretations and emotions and delusions
>>>> out of it, and also leave out emotive words and phrases such as "he
>>>> abuses wait staff" to embellish your blatant fact denial.
>>>>
>>>> And don't forget to include what you said to my face at the very
>>>> conclusion of it all.
>>>>
>>>> Let everyone see how you take an unfortunate incident and
>>>> transmogrify something that concludes with an honourable act on my
>>>> part and breathless expressions of admiration on your part into a
>>>> wholly decrepit and dishonourable act on my part. Let everyone see
>>>> what you really do to genuine acts of atonement and restitution,
>>>> Rhonda. [/QUOTE]
>>>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com.au/group/alt.usenet.kooks/msg/afa3a7e1fc736e66?dmode=source&hl=en
>>>
>>> At the end of the discussion about the waiter, I<BITCHSLAP>
>
> <CONTEXT RESTORED<BITCHSLAP>
> Now go ahead, bitchslap me again.
If you insist.
> Y<BITCHSLAP>
Feel better now?
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Jij bent nu echt een afgetakelde slappe rugrunner.
Kadaitcha Man
infinite deal of nothing. Ye disputed:
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 23:16:35 +0545, "Kadaitcha Man"
> I too have an amazing power over Michael J. Cranton, Attorney.
> With nothing but a few taps of my fingers, I can force him to sock up
> under a silly name & post a bunch of laughably sad lames about me.
> It's like having my very own pet clown, only he works for free.
I'll steal a big red clown nose off a bus on Red Nose Day and send it to
you.
--
alt.usenet.kooks
"We are arrant knaves all, believe none of us."
Hamlet, Act 3, Scene 1 [129]
Hammer of Thor: February 2007. Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook,
Line & Sinker: September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Official Member:
Cabal Obsidian Order COOSN-124-07-06660
Usenet Ruiner Lits
Top Assholes on the Net Lits
Most hated usenetizens of all time Lits
"Now I know what it is. Now I know what it means when an
alt.usenet.kook x-post shows up."
AOK in news:ermdlu$nli$1...@registered.motzarella.org
Wat ben jij een godverdommese tamme spritzer.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou hilding. Fiend, thou
> torments me ere I come to hell. Ye bickered:
>
>> "Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:s7aap.r...@news.alt.net
>>> Rhonda Lea Kirk <rhon...@gmail.com> Thou bovine porpentine. Thou
>>> eye-offending scut. Ye apple-polished:
>>>
>>>> How this all ties in with<BITCHSLAP>
>>>
>>> Name one usenet poster, any usenet, apart from your ever-so-silent
>>> knight in shining tinfoil, who will believe you.
>>
>> You're the one making lists.
>
> No. I'm the one quietly implying it but not actually doing it. You're
> the one asserting it as fact.
[Quote]
I'll exercise my predictive powers and add you to the lits in
anticipation,
Archie.
[/Quote]
Message-ID: <s75n2.a...@news.alt.net>
>> I'll leave you to it.
>
> And that, no doubt, is yet another of your lies.
I'm not making any lists.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 11:35:13 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk">> news:f0all5$146$2...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>
>> Kookolo[*SLAP!*]
>
> You don't have a say in any of this.
Oh baby, hit me again.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Usenet posts were part and parcel of our real life relationship.
That's a different matter than usenet posts from a stranger, Rick. If
you don't see it, I'll remind you again of the post to Peter, the post
from 4Q and several others that had a real impact on our real life, and
*not* because *I* was the one who flipped out over them.
> Me <- Out.
>
> For now.
--