ACCEPTANCE SPEECH (Re: WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, January 2007)
Kadaitcha Man
bawling. Thou fetid, piss-drinking dick. Thou repulsive rude multitude.
Thou potato-headed prater. Ye tattled and ye stuttered:
> <music>"20th Century Fox Fanfare"
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ra_9kgqn7DQ
> </music>
>
> The time has come to announce the winners of the January 2007 Usenet
> Kook Awards. Envelopes, please!
>
> <music>drumroll</music>
>
> BOBO AWARD
>
> The winner is...RICHARD SCOVILLE!
>
> 27 votes YES
> 01 votes NO
>
> Congratulations, Chicken Dickie! So, how does it feel to be globally
> humiliated for your kookery resulting in the loss of your defamatory
> and extortionary kookshite? Oh, that's right, you won't read
> this--you're completely net-dead!
>
> BARDLEY ANNUAL "WHINING BABY NEW YEAR" AWARD
>
> The winner is...ANDREW B. CHUNG!
>
> 15 votes Andrew Chung
> 09 votes Antonio "Jabriol" Santana
> 07 votes Tom Bishop
> 02 votes None of the above
> 01 votes Richard Scoville
>
> Congratulations, Double-Doctor! You managed to win yet another annual
> award to add to your Rookie Kook of the Year, Coward of the Year, and
> Kooksite of the Year for 2006. Are you up for a sweep in 11 months?
>
> KOOK OF THE MONTH
>
> The winner is...PORCHMONKEY4LIFE!
>
> 13 votes PorchMonkey4Life
> 10 votes Warhol
> 08 votes Rebecca Ore
> 02 votes JTEM of alt.paranormal
> 01 votes None of the above
>
> Congratulations, MonkeyBoi! You managed to defeat a perpetual
> contender, a long-time suspected kook, and an up-and-comer through
> your utter st00pidity. Imagine yourself in the position of Joxer the
> Mighty vanquishing this month's fierce competition.
>
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fKGyQRGiAKk
>
> CLUELESS NEWBIE OF THE MONTH
>
> The winner is...PAINE ELLSWORTH AKA PAINIUS OF ALT.ASTRONOMY!
>
> 16 votes Painius of alt.astronomy
> 13 votes Andrew B Chung
> 02 votes Neither of the above
>
> Congratulations, Pain in the Ass! You now have your second AUK award
> and a chance at the Clueless Newbie of the Year for 2007. May your
> cluelessness not interfere with your ability to get it on with a hot
> Sea^H^H^H Space Mermaid, should Darla ever bother to land the
> mothership.
>
> COWARD OF THE MONTH
>
> The winner is...JOSEPH BARTLO!
>
> 11 votes Joseph Bartlo
> 09 votes Rebecca Ore
> 06 votes Steve Chaney
> 03 votes Painius and Bill Sheppard
> 02 votes Wabbit of rec.radio.amateur.policy
> 01 votes Avoid Normal Situations of alt.flame
> 01 votes Robert "Mop Jockey" Wolfe
> 00 votes None of the above
>
> Congratulations, JoJo! I have only one thing to say to you--BAWK!
>
> LOONEY MAROON AWARD
>
> The winner is...ANDREW B. CHUNG!
>
> 14 votes Andrew Chung
> 09 votes PorchMonkey4Life
> 08 votes Ernie Primeau
> 01 votes None of the above
>
> Congratulations again, Double-Doctor! In what seems to be a race
> between you and PorchMonkey4Life for awards this month, you managed
> to beat him handily in head-to-head competition. Pity both of your
> heads are so empty.
>
> GOLDEN KILLFILE
>
> The winner is...MI5VICTIM!
>
> 16 votes MI5Victim
> 06 votes Mike "miguel" Cranston and Brent Armstrong,
> 06 votes Neither of the above
>
> Congratulations, robotic spammer! Too bad for you that the readers
> of 100+ groups won't read your conspiratorial screed, as they've
> dumped you into the bit bucket.
>
> JOSEPH BARTLO PATHETIC ANAL PINEAPPLE AWARD
>
> The winner is...PORCHMONKEY4LIFE!
>
> 21 votes PorchMonkey4Life
> 11 votes nightbat of alt.astronomy
> 01 votes Neither of the above
>
> Congratulations again, Porchie! You won impressively against one of
> the sillier posters known to AUK by being even more silly, to say
> nothing of foul-mouthed and idiotic. Oh, and don't stray too far
> from the podium; your name will be called many more times!
>
> BOB ALLISAT MEMORIAL HOOK, LINE & SINKER
>
> The winner is...ANDREW B. CHUNG!
>
> 21 votes Andrew B. Chung
> 03 votes Notroll2007
> 03 votes Neither of the above
>
> Congratulations a third time, Double-Doctor! Tell us (tinu) how you
> managed to swallow Pope Snarky's hook six times on your kookshite's
> lits o'haet without having a clue that it was the same fisherman each
> time.
>
> PALMJOB PADDLE
>
> The winner is...PORCHMONKEY4LIFE!
>
> 19 votes PorchMonkey4Life
> 05 votes Ernie Primeau
> 02 votes Neither of the above
>
> Congratulations a third time, Farky! You managed to be spanked by an
> impressive array of kookologists, trolls, and kooks in the same
> month, to say nothing of the paddling you gave yourself when you
> socked up as your adversaries and had your forgeries flame each
> other. Why, that alone would have won you the award!
>
> TONY SIDAWAY DRAMA QUEEN AWARD
>
> The winner is...PORCHMONKEY4LIFE!
>
> 12 votes PorchMonkey4Life
> 09 votes Kathy Mosesian
> 03 votes Neither of the above
>
> Congratulations, st00pid Clerks fan! What, you didn't think we (tinw)
> wouldn't catch the reference? Tsk, tsk. Anyone who can do a bad
> impression of Jay at his most delusionally moronic can certainly
> outperform a woman who repeated claims to be leaving USENET forever.
>
> VICTOR VON FRANKENSTEIN WEIRD SCIENCE AWARD
>
> The winner is...PAINE ELLSWORTH AKA PAINIUS OF ALT.ASTRONOMY!
>
> 11 votes Paine Ellsworth AKA Painus of alt.astronomy
> 10 votes Ernie Primeau
> 06 votes JTEM of alt.paranormal
> 01 votes None of the above
>
> Congratulations a second time, Mr. Ellsworth! I wonder, in all the
> time you were posting to misc.writing and rec.arts.prose, if you ever
> thought you'd win an award for writing science /fiction/?
>
> GEORGE PICKETT MEMORIAL TROPHY
>
> The winner is...ANDREW B. CHUNG!
>
> 22 votes Andrew B. Chung
> 05 votes Ernie Primeau
> 02 votes Neither of the above
>
> Congratulations yet again, Double-Doctor! Your crusade to convert the
> infidels of alt.atheism and the netcabal demons of AUK seems to have
> been recognized--as a waste of time for you!
>
> SPECIAL OPS CODY MEMORIAL PURPLE HEART
>
> The winner is...PORCHMONKEY4LIFE!
>
> 13 votes PorchMonkey4Life
> 11 votes Azure
> 01 votes Neither of the above
>
> Congratulations yet again, DoucheMonkey! All of your efforts to run
> up your BI, along with your self-spankings, forgeries, and attempts
> to swear without tripping the obscenity filters damaged you far more
> than they ever did your opponents. Be careful not to pat yourself on
> your back for this win. With your record, you're likely to dislocate
> your own shoulder!
>
> TAR & FEATHERS
>
> The winner is...PAMELA RUSSELL!
>
> 13 votes Pamela Russell
> 11 votes bob&carole
> 08 votes John-Paul Turcaud
> 01 votes None of the above
>
> Congratulations, Fangirlfriend! All of your tireless and clueless
> crusading on behalf of the King of Pop has paid off. Now, join Doc
> and Marty McFly as they send the train hurtling off the cliff into
> Clint Eastwood Gorge!
>
> BUSTED URINAL AWARD
>
> The winner is...PORCHMONKEY4LIFE!
>
> 17 votes PorchMonkey4Life
> 09 votes The saucerheads of alt.astronomy
> 06 votes John-Paul Turcaud
> 01 votes None of the above
>
> Congratulations, yet another time, Howler Monkey! You don't need to
> dig a latrine when you can throw your feces at everyone you see on
> USENET?
>
> UNABOMBER SURPRISE
>
> The winner is...ANTONIO "JABRIOL" SANTANA!
>
> 18 votes Jabriol
> 12 votes Warhol
> 01 votes Neither of the above
>
> Congratulations, Jabbers! Your individual posts may not be all that
> long, but taken together, they certainly take up a lot of room
> without saying much of anything except WAAAAAA!
>
> GOOFY AZZED BABBOON
>
> The winner is...PORCHMONKEY4LIFE!
>
> 16 votes PorchMonkey4Life
> 10 votes John-Paul Turcaud
> 04 votes Neither of the above
>
> Congratulations again, Farky! When you forged Ying, you picked up
> all his bad habits, added some of your own, and spelled it all in
> 1337! PH34R your kooky incomprehensibility!
>
> 72 RAISINS "CRACKPOT RELIGION" AWARD
>
> The winner is...ANDREW B. CHUNG!
>
> 19 votes Andrew B. Chung
> 11 votes John-Paul Turcaud.
> 01 votes Neither of the above
>
> Congratulations, Double-Doctor! You managed to be the first repeat
> winner of the 72 Raisins by beating someone who created his own
> crackpot religion. Now, tell us (tinu) again how people who disagree
> with you become demons who have lost their free will.
>
> BOLO BULLIS FOAM DUCK
>
> The winner is...ERNIE PRIMEAU!
>
> 13 votes Ernie Primeau
> 12 votes Warhol
> 00 votes Neither of the above
>
> Congratulations, Ernie! It looks like the poster on alt.baldspot who
> is getting "crazier and crazier" is you!
>
> ORDER OF THE HOLEY SOCKPUPPET
>
> The winner is...PORCHMONKEY4LIFE!
>
> 16 votes PorchMonkey4Life
> 07 votes Kathy Mosesian
> 02 votes None of the above
> 00 votes Max Varazslo
>
> Congratulations, "Ying Collective!" Not since Brad Jessness was in
> his prime has AUK seen such a doll party. Pity that you've used all
> the teacups for chamberpots first.
>
> BARBARA WOODHOUSE MEMORIAL DOG-WHISTLE AWARD
>
> The winner is...PAMELA RUSSELL, TRAINED BY THE HATER CABAL OF AMMJ!
>
> 13 votes Pamela Russell,
> trained by the Hater Cabal of alt.music.michael-jackson
> 12 votes PorchMonkey4Life, trained by Pope Snarky
> 01 votes Neither of the above
>
> Congratulations to Fangirlfriend and all of her trainers! They
> managed to help her win an unprecidented repeat KotY award and a
> three-peat of the Bag of Coal and they deserved this recognition.
> Good work, haters!
>
> EDMOND WOLLMANN MEMORIAL RUBBER TURKEY FOR NEW YEARS 2007
>
> The winner is...ALEXA CAMERON!
>
> 12 votes Alexa Cameron
> 10 votes Brad Guth.
> 08 votes Ernie Primeau
> 01 votes None of the above
>
> Congratulations, Queen of Screed! Your nearly two-week-long meltdown
> just happened to climax on New Years Day, but it was enough to earn
> you this special holiday award. So, what are you doing this Easter?
>
> **SPECIAL ANNOUNCEMENT**
>
> Two kooks have met the standards for a special award given out by
> executive decision, THE TINFOIL SOMBRERO! Both have displayed
> insubordination above and beyond the usual for USENET kooks and
> therefore have earned this special recognition.
>
> The first winner is...PORCHMONKEY4LIFE!
>
> Farky earned this award by giving out multiple bogus and lame awards
> to kook and kookologist alike, including one to yours truly, the
> FNVW. He also posted a completely bogus ballot in response to the
> one true AUK ballot.
>
> The second winner is...NIGHTBAT OF ALT.ASTRONOMY!
>
> The commander of the Pofound Earth Science Officers earned this award
> by repeatedly rejecting the authority of the AUK awards over
> alt.astronomy and issuing denials of awards that had been properly
> nominated, seconded, and accepted by the FNVW.
>
> Congratulations to both of you! May you enjoy your new headwear.
> which I have made so you will wear with the shiny side out!
>
> We (tinw) now resume presentation of the regularly scheduled awards.
>
> PIERRE SALINGER MEMORIAL HOOK, LINE & SINKER
>
> The winner is...Kadaitcha Man's faked death
>
> 24 votes YES
> 07 votes NO
>
> Congratulations, K-man! While a faked death is the sort of troll that
> nearly everyone has heard of, it's not one that people see more than
> once or twice during their USENET career. You managed to pull of the
> troll of your lifetime by pretending your lifetime was over. Cruel,
> but extremely effective.
First some thanks...
To the FNVW, thanks for the encouragement to out-do this troll in 2008 with
something bigger and better :)
Thanks to everyone who voted, including those who voted no. No votes are as
valuable as yes votes, so no sour grapes there.
Special thanks to that number of friends who emailed me enquiring about my
"condition" and impending death... You gussed it, I didn't tell a soul it
was coming.
I will add here that some of the posted responses were quite touching. Some
were even quite surprising. So much so that I had to fight very hard with
myself to not come out of the closet prematurely. I didn't know how much my
antics on the big, bad stage of usenet were considered entertaining and
appreciated by some.
Now for my first ever genuine apology on Usenet. Suck it up folks, it'll be
the only one you'll ever see.
I sincerely apologise to Rhonda for not telling her about this troll
beforehand. The poor woman was distraught and I got a few frantic emails
from her before I could reply. The omission was not deliberate; I expect
that I assumed Rhonda would know it was a troll on the grounds she'd be the
first one I'd tell if it were true. I was mistaken and I apologise to her
unreservedly for the real distress I caused her. So yes, it was cruel in
some respects, but fuck me dead, it was funny to see the k0oKs clamouring
over my imaginary corpse.
As with my other two Salingers, I will wear my third one with great pride.
Thank you to all who played the game.
<bows to audience>
> OFFICE OF DARTH BAWL
>
> The winner is...ANDREW B. CHUNG!
>
> 15 votes Andrew B. Chung.
> 14 votes Antonio "Jabriol" Santana
>
> Congratulations one last time this month, Double-Doctor. You managed
> to defend your office against a repeat candidacy by one of the most
> determined whiners on USENET. Keep those whines coming!
>
> OFFICE OF VILLAGE IDIOT
>
> The winner is...PORCHMONKEY4LIFE!
>
> 14 votes PorchMonkey4Life
> 10 votes Ken Pangborn
> 08 votes John-Paul Turcaud
>
> Congratulations one last time this month, MonkeyBoi! By setting new
> lows for st00pidity from a USENET poaster who isn't a pedophile truck
> driver living in a trailer park, you unseated the longtime incumbent,
> a moron so dense that he managed to win a vote for Clueless Newbie of
> the year two years after he won it the first time. May your reign be
> as long as you are imbecilic!
>
> KOOKI INFORMATION MINISTER
>
> The winner is...AZURE!
>
> 15 votes Azure
> 11 votes Warhol
>
> Good job, Bl00boi! You held off a challenge from someone who claimed
> that Saddam would rise from the dead after three days. Now, tell us
> (tinu) again that you don't use Supernews as your NSP, even though
> the Supernews name is all over your headers.
>
> MINISTRY OF CIRCLE JERKS
>
> The winner is...THE SAUCERHEADS OF ALT.ASTRONOMY!
>
> 16 votes The Saucerheads of alt.astronomy
> 11 votes The anti-porn-star crusaders of alt.gossip.celebrities
>
> Congratulations, Profound Earth Science Officers! Whilst you all
> wait for the Seans to arrive so you can shag the hottest mermaids in
> space, keep yourselves good and hard in preparation for their arrival.
>
> This concludes the announcement of the winners of the January 2007
> Usenet Kook Awards. Forty-four people submitted fourty-one ballots.
> Five of them managed to violate the rules in interesting ways: two
> people voted from an altered ballot, one person voted for
> himself/herself, another voted for himself/herself using an altered
> ballot (there's always a first for everything) and one voted in the
> wrong thread. Fluffy was pleased with the shredded paper in his
> litter box. Consequently, thirty-nine ballots were deemed valid and
> counted.
>
> See you all early next month, when the buzzards fly north of the Ohio
> River and the crocuses begin to bloom. Until then, enjoy and all
> hail Ming, Bob, and Fluffy!
>
> And now, a special recessional in honor of this month's big w(h)inner,
> MonkeyBoi in the role of Joxer the Mighty. Watch Xena and Gabrielle
> pwn him!
>
> <music>"A Man for All Seasons"
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=et2G44-7C7U
> </music>
--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006 and January 2007.
"K-Man's particular genius, however, lies not merely in his humour,
but his ability to make posters who had previously seemed reasonably
well-balanced turn into foaming, frothing, death threat-uttering
maniacs" - Snarky, Demon Lord of Confusion
Fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist to Kadaitcha Man:
"Imagine if I were to suggest "I have a prehensile tail". You
would, naturally, ask for evidence."
Kadaitcha Man in reply to fuckwitted alt.atheism atheist:
"Not at all. I would unquestionably accept your admission to being
a monkey."
"I have forgotten more about IT than both you sorry bitches combined."
DUHane Arnold in <r_myh.20067$yx6...@newsread2.news.pas.earthlink.net>
Snarky: "I think 'Wolfy's taking the piss..."
Kadaitcha Man: "In which orifice?"
Maximum Hag
<snipped>
<hag>
Kadaitcha Man
black magician. Thou clay-brained reverend vice. Thou abhorrent foul
adultress. Ye penned and ye prattled:
> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:40:03 +0545, Kadaitcha Man Has Frothed:
>
>> First some thanks...
>>
>> To the FNVW, thanks for the encouragement to out-do this troll in
>> 2008 with something bigger and better :)
>>
>> Thanks to everyone who voted, including those who voted no. No votes
>> are as valuable as yes votes, so no sour grapes there.
>>
> Special thanks{SLAP}
>
> drama cunt.
I see you got the gist of it.
Maximum Hag
Rhonda Lea Kirk
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <poll...@netcabal.com> Thou
> bawling. Thou fetid, piss-drinking dick. Thou repulsive rude
> multitude. Thou potato-headed prater. Ye tattled and ye stuttered:
<snipped>
>> PIERRE SALINGER MEMORIAL HOOK, LINE & SINKER
>>
>> The winner is...Kadaitcha Man's faked death
>>
>> 24 votes YES
>> 07 votes NO
>>
>> Congratulations, K-man! While a faked death is the sort of troll
>> that nearly everyone has heard of, it's not one that people see more
>> than once or twice during their USENET career. You managed to pull
>> of the troll of your lifetime by pretending your lifetime was over.
>> Cruel, but extremely effective.
<snipped>
> Now for my first ever genuine apology on Usenet. Suck it up folks,
> it'll be the only one you'll ever see.
IMO, this apology is as hollow as the last apology you offered me on
usenet, and I want it even less than I wanted that one.
> I sincerely apologise to Rhonda for not telling her about this troll
> beforehand. The poor woman was distraught and I got a few frantic
> emails from her before I could reply. The omission was not
> deliberate;
Sure it was.
> I expect that I assumed Rhonda would know it was a troll
> on the grounds she'd be the first one I'd tell if it were true.
What you and I both know is that I am the one person who was absolutely
*guaranteed* to believe it was not a troll.
> I was
> mistaken and I apologise to her unreservedly for the real distress I
> caused her.
I cannot fathom your purpose in making this post, when you, of all
people, know that it would only cause me more distress.
> So yes, it was cruel in some respects,
...but who cares who gets hurt as long as you get a laugh.
> but fuck me dead,
> it was funny to see the k0oKs clamouring over my imaginary corpse.
<snipped>
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Happiness limits the amount of suffering one is
willing to inflict on others. Phčdre nó Delaunay
miguel
>> PIERRE SALINGER MEMORIAL HOOK, LINE & SINKER
>> The winner is...Kadaitcha Man's faked death
>> 24 votes YES
>> 07 votes NO
>> Congratulations, K-man! While a faked death is the sort of troll that
>> nearly everyone has heard of, it's not one that people see more than
>> once or twice during their USENET career. You managed to pull of the
>> troll of your lifetime by pretending your lifetime was over. Cruel,
>> but extremely effective.
> First some thanks...
> To the FNVW, thanks for the encouragement to out-do this troll in 2008 with
> something bigger and better :)
That should take a lot of thought. *cough*
. . .
> I will add here that some of the posted responses were quite touching. Some
> were even quite surprising. So much so that I had to fight very hard with
> myself to not come out of the closet prematurely. I didn't know how much my
> antics on the big, bad stage of usenet were considered entertaining and
> appreciated by some.
I think I liked you better when you were unabashedly an asshole.
If you poke somebody with a pointy stick enough, they'll happily shit on
your grave. This victory you are celebrating comes from nothing more
than a re-enactment of Pavlov's experiments with *completely predictable
results.* As in, fuckin' duh. The "big, bad stage of usenet" you speak
of is more like a befouled, fetid beach where the Star-Bellied Sneetches
give each other reacharounds to flesh out each other's sigs. And for
this, you are taking a bow.
Could you possibly be any more lame?
I seriously doubt it. Please don't surprise me with an even lamer effort
next year.
> Now for my first ever genuine apology on Usenet. Suck it up folks, it'll be
> the only one you'll ever see.
>
> I sincerely apologise to Rhonda for not telling her about this troll
> beforehand. The poor woman was distraught and I got a few frantic emails
> from her before I could reply. The omission was not deliberate; I expect
> that I assumed Rhonda would know it was a troll on the grounds she'd be the
> first one I'd tell if it were true. I was mistaken and I apologise to her
> unreservedly for the real distress I caused her. So yes, it was cruel in
> some respects, but fuck me dead, it was funny to see the k0oKs clamouring
> over my imaginary corpse.
Rhonda, I think you need a new boyfriend.
miguel, nudge nudge
Kadaitcha Man
bloodthirsty, big-bellied gibbon. Thou marble-hearted fiend. Thou
neutered, depraved timepleaser. Ye exhausted and ye stammered:
Well, it is only usenet.
>> but fuck me dead,
>> it was funny to see the k0oKs clamouring over my imaginary corpse.
>
> <snipped>
--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Fuck off and die.
>>> but fuck me dead,
>>> it was funny to see the k0oKs clamouring over my imaginary corpse.
>>
>> <snipped>
--
Kadaitcha Man
Thou ill-bred poor miserable wretch. Thou juno. Thou no-brained, vain
shameless courtesan. Ye confounded and ye illumined:
> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>
>>> PIERRE SALINGER MEMORIAL HOOK, LINE & SINKER
>
>>> The winner is...Kadaitcha Man's faked death
>
>>> 24 votes YES
>>> 07 votes NO
>
>>> Congratulations, K-man! While a faked death is the sort of troll
>>> that nearly everyone has heard of, it's not one that people see
>>> more than once or twice during their USENET career. You managed to
>>> pull of the troll of your lifetime by pretending your lifetime was
>>> over. Cruel, but extremely effective.
>
>> First some thanks...
>
>> To the FNVW, thanks for the encouragement to out-do this troll in
>> 2008 with something bigger and better :)
>
> That should take a lot of thought. *cough*
>
> . . .
>
>> I will add here that some of the posted responses were quite
>> touching. Some were even quite surprising. So much so that I had to
>> fight very hard with myself to not come out of the closet
>> prematurely. I didn't know how much my antics on the big, bad stage
>> of usenet were considered entertaining and appreciated by some.
>
> I think I liked you better when<BITCHSLAP>
I cannot say the same for you, in any tense, past, present or future.
--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Raving
> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <polls...@netcabal.com> Thou
> bawling. Thou fetid, piss-drinking dick. Thou repulsive rude multitude.
> Thou potato-headed prater. Ye tattled and ye stuttered:
> > Congratulations, K-man! While a faked death is the sort of troll that
Oops, silly me. ...
.. I actually lost some sleep bemoaning your plight.
Thanks for the ridicule.
Kadaitcha Man
ill-breeding prince's jester. Thou foul misshapen stigmatic. Silence
thou fellow, I would thee had some cause to prattle for thyself. Ye
whined and ye purged:
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
> Thanks for the ridicule.
You're welcome.
--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
I know just how you feel, RL.
Raving
> Raving <raving.loo...@gmail.com> Thou pure wit. Thou bulbous,
I am glad that you appreciate it.
miguel
> miguel:
>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>>>> PIERRE SALINGER MEMORIAL HOOK, LINE & SINKER
>>>> The winner is...Kadaitcha Man's faked death
>>>> 24 votes YES
>>>> 07 votes NO
>>>> Congratulations, K-man! While a faked death is the sort of troll
>>>> that nearly everyone has heard of, it's not one that people see
>>>> more than once or twice during their USENET career. You managed to
>>>> pull of the troll of your lifetime by pretending your lifetime was
>>>> over. Cruel, but extremely effective.
>>> First some thanks...
>>> To the FNVW, thanks for the encouragement to out-do this troll in
>>> 2008 with something bigger and better :)
>> That should take a lot of thought. *cough*
>> . . .
>>> I will add here that some of the posted responses were quite
>>> touching. Some were even quite surprising. So much so that I had to
>>> fight very hard with myself to not come out of the closet
>>> prematurely. I didn't know how much my antics on the big, bad stage
>>> of usenet were considered entertaining and appreciated by some.
>> I think I liked you better when<BITCHSLAP>
> I cannot say the same for you, in any tense, past, present or future.
Your opinion doesn't matter. You're a sociopath nerd gimp retard fagbo1.
It's Rhonda Lea's opinion that counts. I say she's falling for me as I
type this.
miguel
Kadaitcha Man
juggling fiend. Thou false trembling coward. Thou would answer very well
to a whipping. Ye affirmed and ye caviled:
> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>> miguel:
>>> Kadaitcha Man wrote:
>
>>>>> PIERRE SALINGER MEMORIAL HOOK, LINE & SINKER
>>>>> The winner is...Kadaitcha Man's faked death
>>>>> 24 votes YES
>>>>> 07 votes NO
>>>>> Congratulations, K-man! While a faked death is the sort of troll
>>>>> that nearly everyone has heard of, it's not one that people see
>>>>> more than once or twice during their USENET career. You managed
>>>>> to pull of the troll of your lifetime by pretending your lifetime
>>>>> was over. Cruel, but extremely effective.
>>>> First some thanks...
>>>> To the FNVW, thanks for the encouragement to out-do this troll in
>>>> 2008 with something bigger and better :)
>
>>> That should take a lot of thought. *cough*
>
>>> . . .
>
>>>> I will add here that some of the posted responses were quite
>>>> touching. Some were even quite surprising. So much so that I had to
>>>> fight very hard with myself to not come out of the closet
>>>> prematurely. I didn't know how much my antics on the big, bad stage
>>>> of usenet were considered entertaining and appreciated by some.
>
>>> I think I liked you better when<BITCHSLAP>
>
>> I cannot say the same for you, in any tense, past, present or future.
>
> Your opinion doesn't matter<BITCHSLAP>
Then don't respond to it.
miguel
>>>> . . .
Or what, sociopathic nerd gimp retard fagbo1?
Rhonda Lea, I'm waiting for your charms!
miguel
ps you are a freak among freaks. Good work there.
Kadaitcha Man
inbred map of woe. Thou pottle-deep rough heart of flint. Thou
swag-bellied thing of no bowels. Ye spewed and ye goaded:
No, not that. More like "or you'll look the fool you are."
Note: You, in the context above, is a second person singular pronoun and is
used in reference to the person being addressed by the nominative, ie you =
miguel.
> Rhonda Lea, I'm waiting for your charms!
>
> miguel
>
> ps you are a freak among freaks. Good work there.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Well, you were half right, Mike. I fell asleep. :)
I would run with this--thank you for the straight line--but the kind of
person who turns a lover into a chew toy when the relationship is over
is not the kind of person I want to be. While it is true that this is
only usenet, our relationship was real life, so that's no excuse. I
can't stop him from fucking with me, but I'm not going to stoop to his
level.
Kadaitcha Man
flatworm. Thou arch-villain. Thou shrub-brained, musty horse-drench. Ye
illumined and ye stage-whispered:
> On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:40:03 +0545, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Kadaitcha
> Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Friendly Neighborhood Vote Wrangler <poll...@netcabal.com> Thou
>> bawling. Thou fetid, piss-drinking dick. Thou repulsive rude
>> multitude. Thou potato-headed prater. Ye tattled and ye stuttered:
>>
>>> <music>"20th Century Fox Fanfare"
> [...]
> Well, I found your act untasteful. You see, I am a cancer survivor.
Like I give a fuck, right?
> I
> went through therapy, and watch dozens of children that had to have
> various forms of chemo and radiation treatments fail time and time
> again.
>
> I not sure If I voted aye or nay on this one. 9does it really mater)
> One part of me enjoyed the rants and gleeful celebration of various
> Kooks while another part of me was haunted by remembrances of those
> young people that slowly faded away, burnt up and consumed by those
> unwanted cells growing inside their body.
>
> I think you may have hit a low spot for this award... But I know
> this will just encourage another person to aim lower. dig deeper and
> reach a new low.
So, let's get this right... it was a lower than low act, and I'm a
completely insensitive cunt for carrying it through, but you enjoyed the
rants and gleeful celebrations, yes?
--
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Memorial Hook, Line & Sinker:
September 2005, April 2006, January 2007.
miguel
> Bob Officer, kook-hunting cancer-boy wrote:
>> Kadaitcha Cunt wrote:
>>> As with my other two Salingers, I will wear my third one with great
>>> pride. Thank you to all who played the game.
>>> <bows to audience>
>> Well, I found your act untasteful. You see, I am a cancer survivor.
> Like I give a fuck, right?
Of course you care. What are you, some kind of sociopath nerd gimp
retard fagbo1?
>> I
>> went through therapy, and watch dozens of children that had to have
>> various forms of chemo and radiation treatments fail time and time
>> again.
>> I not sure If I voted aye or nay on this one. 9does it really mater)
>> One part of me enjoyed the rants and gleeful celebration of various
>> Kooks while another part of me was haunted by remembrances of those
>> young people that slowly faded away, burnt up and consumed by those
>> unwanted cells growing inside their body.
>> I think you may have hit a low spot for this award... But I know
>> this will just encourage another person to aim lower. dig deeper and
>> reach a new low.
> So, let's get this right... it was a lower than low act, and I'm a
> completely insensitive cunt for carrying it through, but you enjoyed the
> rants and gleeful celebrations, yes?
Shut up, cunt.
Kadaitcha Man
spleeny faithless coward. Thou dankish woman's frock. Thou idiotic
rough. Ye uttered and ye sibilated:
> Kadaitcha Cunt wrote:
>> Bob Officer, kook-hunting cancer-boy wrote:
>>> Kadaitcha Cunt wrote:
>
>>>> As with my other two Salingers, I will wear my third one with great
>>>> pride. Thank you to all who played the game.
>
>>>> <bows to audience>
>
>>> Well, I found your act untasteful. You see, I am a cancer survivor.
>
>> Like I give a fuck, right?
>
> Of course you care. What are you, some kind of sociopath nerd gimp
> retard fagbo1?
Does minding one's own fucking business with respect to the daily affairs
and woes of the uncounted masses of faceless usenet posters, yourself
included, imply some kind of sociopathy?
>>> I
>>> went through therapy, and watch dozens of children that had to have
>>> various forms of chemo and radiation treatments fail time and time
>>> again.
>
>>> I not sure If I voted aye or nay on this one. 9does it really mater)
>>> One part of me enjoyed the rants and gleeful celebration of various
>>> Kooks while another part of me was haunted by remembrances of those
>>> young people that slowly faded away, burnt up and consumed by those
>>> unwanted cells growing inside their body.
>
>>> I think you may have hit a low spot for this award... But I know
>>> this will just encourage another person to aim lower. dig deeper and
>>> reach a new low.
>
>> So, let's get this right... it was a lower than low act, and I'm a
>> completely insensitive cunt for carrying it through, but you enjoyed
>> the rants and gleeful celebrations, yes?
>
> Shut up, cunt.
--
Kadaitcha Man
blood warmed, that sting my heart. Three Judases, each one thrice worse
than Judas. Thou chewet. Thou biting bug-riddled, unhygienic death's
head with a bone in his mouth. Ye tooted and ye excreted:
"...I'm not going to stoop to his level."
lol - making that statement is a stoop to the very level you decry. It is
analogous to saying, "I won't stoop to calling that cunt a cunt."
miguel
> miguel:
>>> Bob Officer, kook-hunting cancer-boy wrote:
>>>> Kadaitcha Cunt wrote:
>>>>> As with my other two Salingers, I will wear my third one with great
>>>>> pride. Thank you to all who played the game.
>>>>> <bows to audience>
>>>> Well, I found your act untasteful. You see, I am a cancer survivor.
>>> Like I give a fuck, right?
>> Of course you care. What are you, some kind of sociopath nerd gimp
>> retard fagbo1?
> Does minding one's own fucking business with respect to the daily affairs
> and woes of the uncounted masses of faceless usenet posters, yourself
> included, imply some kind of sociopathy?
So, complete lack of empathy = minding one's own fucking business.
Right. In sociopath world, maybe.
Congratulations on your unsurpassed scummy cuntitude.
miguel
Kadaitcha Man
Thou ye fat-guts. Thou want-wit. Ye exhorted and ye barfed:
Put those goalposts right back where you got them from, retard.
> Congratulations on your unsurpassed scummy cuntitude.
It's called indomitable cuntism, and if you type that phrase into google, my
name comes up.
miguel
> miguel:
>> Kadaitcha Cunt wrote:
>>> miguel:
>>>> Kadaitcha Cunt wrote:
>>>>> Bob Officer, kook-hunting cancer-boy wrote:
>>>>>> Kadaitcha Cunt wrote:
>>>>>>> As with my other two Salingers, I will wear my third one with
>>>>>>> great pride. Thank you to all who played the game.
>>>>>>> <bows to audience>
>>>>>> Well, I found your act untasteful. You see, I am a cancer
>>>>>> survivor.
>>>>> Like I give a fuck, right?
>>>> Of course you care. What are you, some kind of sociopath nerd gimp
>>>> retard fagbo1?
>>> Does minding one's own fucking business with respect to the daily
>>> affairs and woes of the uncounted masses of faceless usenet posters,
>>> yourself included, imply some kind of sociopathy?
>> So, complete lack of empathy = minding one's own fucking business.
>> Right. In sociopath world, maybe.
> Put those goalposts right back where you got them from, retard.
They haven't moved, dumbass.
>> Congratulations on your unsurpassed scummy cuntitude.
> It's called indomitable cuntism, and if you type that phrase into google, my
> name comes up.
So that's why you're Snarky's hero.
Kadaitcha Man
sweet delights. Thou pedlar's excrement. Wretched, bloody and usurping
boar. Ye advocated and ye dripped:
> Kadaitcha Cunt wrote:
>> miguel:
>>> Kadaitcha Cunt wrote:
>>>> miguel:
>>>>> Kadaitcha Cunt wrote:
>>>>>> Bob Officer, kook-hunting cancer-boy wrote:
>>>>>>> Kadaitcha Cunt wrote:
>>>>>>>> As with my other two Salingers, I will wear my third one with
>>>>>>>> great pride. Thank you to all who played the game.
>>>>>>>> <bows to audience>
>>>>>>> Well, I found your act untasteful. You see, I am a cancer
>>>>>>> survivor.
>>>>>> Like I give a fuck, right?
>>>>> Of course you care. What are you, some kind of sociopath nerd gimp
>>>>> retard fagbo1?
>>>> Does minding one's own fucking business with respect to the daily
>>>> affairs and woes of the uncounted masses of faceless usenet
>>>> posters, yourself included, imply some kind of sociopathy?
>
>>> So, complete lack of empathy = minding one's own fucking business.
>>> Right. In sociopath world, maybe.
>
>> Put those goalposts right back where you got them from, retard.
>
> They haven't moved, dumbass.
No doubt your bulbous goggle-eyes are to blame for your spatial discernment
issues.
>>> Congratulations on your unsurpassed scummy cuntitude.
>
>> It's called indomitable cuntism, and if you type that phrase into
>> google, my name comes up.
>
> So that's why you're Snarky's hero.
...wrote the grandmaster of gurning.
Frosty
Lea Kirk" <rhon...@gmail.com>, pulled fingers out of her butt and
stuck 'em in her mouth and said gsrpumfmdmurmmscommwuummm:
Here's what I don't get about that whole thing, Miss. R:
You & he who can't be spelled had a RL thing.
He posted a troll about croakin' and you EMAILED him about it??
What? No telephones in that Yourtowne?
Just curious
Frosty
Lea Kirk" <rhon...@gmail.com>, pulled fingers out of his butt and
stuck 'em in his mouth and said gsrmuumfmdmurmmscommwuummm:
Yeah and wadabout the old Frosty guy, havin' to go and think up a
whole new hierarchy -n- all. Jeez!
Frosty
"Kadaitcha Man" <nntp...@gmail.com>, pulled fingers out of his butt
and stuck 'em in his mouth and said gsrmuumfmdmurmmscommwuummm:
>It's called indomitable cuntism, and if you type that phrase into google, my
>name comes up.
Dammitman!
I am fucking IMPRESSED!
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Him = GMT+10 (plus an additional hour for Daylight Savings Time)
Me = GMT-5.
A sixteen hour time difference means that when it's 8 am where I am,
it's midnight where he is.
IOW, for him, it was the middle of the night, and, IMO (at the time),
the need of a dying man for sleep overrides the need of a frantic woman
to know.
> Just curious
And I didn't mind satisfying your curiosity, but after this, I'd rather
not discuss it anymore.
Kadaitcha Man
dost infect mine eyes. Thou grease-covered gossip report. Thou
drain-inhabiting villain. Ye sputtered and ye clamoured:
> On Sun, 11 Feb 2007 04:09:01 +0545, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Kadaitcha
> Man" <nntp...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Bob Officer <bobof...@127.0.0.7> Thou clumsy rude boy. Thou
>> low-life flatworm. Thou arch-villain. Thou shrub-brained, musty
>> horse-drench. Ye illumined and ye stage-whispered:
<snippage>
>>> I
>>> went through therapy, and watch dozens of children that had to have
>>> various forms of chemo and radiation treatments fail time and time
>>> again.
>>>
>>> I not sure If I voted aye or nay on this one. 9does it really mater)
>>> One part of me enjoyed the rants and gleeful celebration of various
>>> Kooks while another part of me was haunted by remembrances of those
>>> young people that slowly faded away, burnt up and consumed by those
>>> unwanted cells growing inside their body.
>>>
>>> I think you may have hit a low spot for this award... But I know
>>> this will just encourage another person to aim lower. dig deeper and
>>> reach a new low.
>>
>> So, let's get this right... it was a lower than low act, and I'm a
>> completely insensitive cunt for carrying it through, but you enjoyed
>> the rants and gleeful celebrations, yes?
>
> It was entertaining, educational... yes,
>
> Enjoyable? No
And whose problem is that, Bob?
Kadaitcha Man
roguish butcher's cur. Thou proud. False of heart, light of ear, bloody
of hand, hog in sloth, fox in stealth, wolf in greediness, dog in
madness, lion in prey. Ye hummed and ye muddled:
> On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 02:26:56 +0545, in alt.usenet.kooks, "Kadaitcha
> Not Mine...
Good, then you won't be offended when I tell you to shut the fuck up because
it's certainly not mine; though the idea that it is you who is saying it
wasn't enjoyable to you seems to have gone in one ear and out the other, and
parted your hair neatly on its way through.
> and notice
Why should I notice anything you have to say when you don't notice what I
have to say, Bob?
"Like I give a fuck, right?"
For example.
> at no time did I tell you never do it again...
At no time did anyone claim you did such a thing, Bob, but please, do feel
free to take the opportunity to vigorously beat up and shred your strawman
to your heart's content before you douse it in petrol and set a match to it.
> I have no desire to control such actions. Just like Rap music, I
> don't mind if other people enjoy it, I just find it not-enjoyable.
Yes, Bob; you have "no desire to control such actions", but you'll whine and
squeal incessantly, much like a piglet poked up the clacker with a pointy
stick.
> I do however wish you well and find this is another point we happen
> not to see in complete agreement.
On matters of things we don't agree on, Bob, I have long suspected you of
being a closet netk0oK. All too often I have seen the cloven hoof of real
k0oKery pop out from underneath the cape on your Looney Toons costume. Your
fixation on telling me how you feel, even in the face of being told multiple
times that I simply do not give a fuck for your feelings, or for your
self-esteem for that matter, is not doing anything to alter that view, other
than cement it. I don't forsee you ever agreeing to that but there it is.
> Do you have a problem with people that have differing tastes?
"Like I give a fuck, right?" You know, as in /give/ /a/ /fuck/?
What business of mine do you suppose it is regarding the tastes and
preferences of others, Bob? Should I concern myself if you have a preference
or taste for prancing about your home in women's hosiery, wearing Givenchy
fishnet stockings, garter belt, fluffy-fronted split-crotch panties,
fire-engine red stilleto's and a delicately embroidered, 56-JJ leather
plunge bra stuffed with forty pounds of Rubber Flubber in each tit sack?
If what you do in private is none of my busines then what business of mine
do you suppose it is regarding your feelings? They are your feelings, yet
you seem intent on trying to ram them down my throat despite me puking them
all back up and spraying vomit in your face.
Lionel
>Newsgroups: 24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.os.windows-vista,alt.os.windows-xp,alt.usenet.kooks
>Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 05:52:37 -0500
>Message-ID: <eqk8gn$e9l$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
[...]
>miguel wrote:
>> Your opinion doesn't matter. You're a sociopath nerd gimp retard
>> fagbo1. It's Rhonda Lea's opinion that counts. I say she's falling
>> for me as I type this.
(No, Michael Cranston, Attorney isn't chasing anyone. *cough*)
>I would run with this--thank you for the straight line--but the kind of
>person who turns a lover into a chew toy when the relationship is over
>is not the kind of person I want to be. While it is true that this is
>only usenet, our relationship was real life, so that's no excuse. I
>can't stop him from fucking with me, but I'm not going to stoop to his
>level.
Nice job of not "turning your lover into a chew toy", hypocritical
Bunny Boiler.
And after all your pretty talk there about not "stooping to his
level", it kind of puts a whole new complexion on your outing of
email, Usenet stalking, encouragement of 3rd party identity theft,
harrassment, etc, you nasty little skank.
--
W "Some people are alive only because it is illegal to kill them."
. | ,. w ,
\|/ \|/ Perna condita delenda est
---^----^---------------------------------------------------------------
Rhonda Lea Kirk
news:f0rotd$459$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhon...@gmail.com>
>> Newsgroups:
>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.os.windows-vista,alt.os.windows-xp,alt.usenet.kooks
>> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 05:52:37 -0500
>> Message-ID: <eqk8gn$e9l$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
> [...]
>> miguel wrote:
>>> Your opinion doesn't matter. You're a sociopath nerd gimp retard
>>> fagbo1. It's Rhonda Lea's opinion that counts. I say she's falling
>>> for me as I type this.
>
> (No, Michael Cranston, Attorney isn't chasing anyone. *cough*)
He did this when Rick make me the goat in his acceptance speech for the
Salinger he won trolling me about his impending death.
He could see how wrong the whole thing was, but no one else did.
>> I would run with this--thank you for the straight line--but the kind
>> of
>> person who turns a lover into a chew toy when the relationship is
>> over
>> is not the kind of person I want to be. While it is true that this is
>> only usenet, our relationship was real life, so that's no excuse. I
>> can't stop him from fucking with me, but I'm not going to stoop to
>> his
>> level.
>
> Nice job of not "turning your lover into a chew toy", hypocritical
> Bunny Boiler.
But...but...but...he won. He declared victory several times, as have the
rest of you. How is it possible that he's /my/ chew toy, if I am the
loser in all this?
More seriously, I thought he had gone as low as he could go. I was
wrong.
But he has said he wants it over, Lionel, and yet you persist.
What kind of friend does that make you?
If it's to stop, everyone has to stop. There are no unilateral
declarations that apply to one person only--that's what killfiles are
for, right?
No running people off newsgroups, off usenet. You don't like someone's
posts, too bad for you. Killfile 'em or suffer. He posted his killfile,
and I was in it. But he kept letting me out so he could harangue me some
more, and you would have it that I'm not entitled to say anything about
it.
It doesn't work that way.
> And after all your pretty talk there about not "stooping to his
> level", it kind of puts a whole new complexion on your outing of
> email, Usenet stalking, encouragement of 3rd party identity theft,
> harrassment, etc, you nasty little skank.
I give up on your ever being able to tell the truth. Unfortunately for
your neverending lies, my words speak for me, not yours.
--
Rhonda Lea Kirk
Some are tempted to think of life in cyberspace as insignificant,
as escape or meaningless diversion. It is not. Our experiences there
are serious play. We belittle them at our risk. Sherry Turkle
Lionel
<spu...@databasix.com> wrote:
>"Lionel" <use...@imagenoir.com> wrote in message
>news:f0rotd$459$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com
>>> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhon...@gmail.com>
>>> Newsgroups:
>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.os.windows-vista,alt.os.windows-xp,alt.usenet.kooks
>>> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 05:52:37 -0500
>>> Message-ID: <eqk8gn$e9l$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
>> [...]
>>> miguel wrote:
>>>> Your opinion doesn't matter. You're a sociopath nerd gimp retard
>>>> fagbo1. It's Rhonda Lea's opinion that counts. I say she's falling
>>>> for me as I type this.
>>
>> (No, Michael Cranston, Attorney isn't chasing anyone. *cough*)
>
>He did this when Rick make me the goat in his acceptance speech for the
>Salinger he won trolling me about his impending death.
>
>He could see how wrong the whole thing was, but no one else did.
I thought it was tacky, but even though I didn't see the thread until
it had been running for a while, it was totally obvious to me that it
was a troll. I mean really, who the hell posts to a flame group to
tell them that someone's dying when it *isn't* a troll? Hell, the
"$TROLL is my daddy/hubby/son & he's DYING of cancer!" is one of the
oldest, most obvious trolls in the book. You fell for it? Too fucking
bad.
>>> I would run with this--thank you for the straight line--but the kind
>>> of
>>> person who turns a lover into a chew toy when the relationship is
>>> over
>>> is not the kind of person I want to be. While it is true that this is
>>> only usenet, our relationship was real life, so that's no excuse. I
>>> can't stop him from fucking with me, but I'm not going to stoop to
>>> his
>>> level.
>>
>> Nice job of not "turning your lover into a chew toy", hypocritical
>> Bunny Boiler.
>
>But...but...but...he won. He declared victory several times, as have the
>rest of you. How is it possible that he's /my/ chew toy, if I am the
>loser in all this?
*Trying* to turn an ex lover into a chew toy isn't the same as
*succeeding* in turning an ex lover into a chew to, but the intent is
the same, as you well know.
>More seriously, I thought he had gone as low as he could go. I was
>wrong.
>
>news:r6cva.k...@news.alt.net
>
>But he has said he wants it over, Lionel, and yet you persist.
>
>What kind of friend does that make you?
>
>If it's to stop, everyone has to stop.
Wrong. I will stop when you stop posting to AUK. You don't get to give
me or anyone else orders, Bunny Boiler.
You still seem to have this bizarre idea that we in AUK are employees
or voters or somesuch shit, & that someone tells us who to target. We
aren't - we're just people who like beating up on the psychos of the
net - psychos like you. We make up our own minds who we shoot at, &
you painted that huge red & white target on your own chest.
If you don't want to be shot at, your one & only option is to take
your target-painted self out of the group.
>> And after all your pretty talk there about not "stooping to his
>> level", it kind of puts a whole new complexion on your outing of
>> email, Usenet stalking, encouragement of 3rd party identity theft,
>> harrassment, etc, you nasty little skank.
>
>I give up on your ever being able to tell the truth. Unfortunately for
>your neverending lies, my words speak for me, not yours.
I've lost count of how many times I've caught you blatantly lying in
front of the entire newsgroup, skank. None of your bullshit spin
techniques can change that.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
I can demonstrate that except for the diagnosis, every word in the post
is true.
There is no question at all that I was intended to believe it was true
in its entirety.
>>>> I would run with this--thank you for the straight line--but the
>>>> kind of
>>>> person who turns a lover into a chew toy when the relationship is
>>>> over
>>>> is not the kind of person I want to be. While it is true that this
>>>> is only usenet, our relationship was real life, so that's no
>>>> excuse. I can't stop him from fucking with me, but I'm not going
>>>> to stoop to his
>>>> level.
>>>
>>> Nice job of not "turning your lover into a chew toy", hypocritical
>>> Bunny Boiler.
>>
>> But...but...but...he won. He declared victory several times, as have
>> the rest of you. How is it possible that he's /my/ chew toy, if I am
>> the loser in all this?
>
> *Trying* to turn an ex lover into a chew toy isn't the same as
> *succeeding* in turning an ex lover into a chew to, but the intent is
> the same, as you well know.
He has certainly chewed on me, hasn't he.
>> More seriously, I thought he had gone as low as he could go. I was
>> wrong.
>>
>> news:r6cva.k...@news.alt.net
>>
>> But he has said he wants it over, Lionel, and yet you persist.
>>
>> What kind of friend does that make you?
>>
>> If it's to stop, everyone has to stop.
>
> Wrong. I will stop when you stop posting to AUK. You don't get to give
> me or anyone else orders, Bunny Boiler.
And you don't give me orders, either.
You don't seem to understand it works both ways.
> You still seem to have this bizarre idea that we in AUK are employees
> or voters or somesuch shit, & that someone tells us who to target. We
> aren't - we're just people who like beating up on the psychos of the
> net - psychos like you. We make up our own minds who we shoot at, &
> you painted that huge red & white target on your own chest.
> If you don't want to be shot at, your one & only option is to take
> your target-painted self out of the group.
It's okay, Lionel. Just hold that thought when they come to talk with
you.
After all, if Mike is a part of it, you are certainly even more a part
of it.
>>> And after all your pretty talk there about not "stooping to his
>>> level", it kind of puts a whole new complexion on your outing of
>>> email, Usenet stalking, encouragement of 3rd party identity theft,
>>> harrassment, etc, you nasty little skank.
>>
>> I give up on your ever being able to tell the truth. Unfortunately
>> for your neverending lies, my words speak for me, not yours.
>
> I've lost count of how many times I've caught you blatantly lying in
> front of the entire newsgroup, skank. None of your bullshit spin
> techniques can change that.
When the posts are reviewed by the professionals from whom Rick has
sought assistance, we'll see, won't we?
It is quite true that I'm going to look like a real idiot for going on
as long as I did, but that I can live with, because I never did the
heinous things to him that he did to me.
Cardinal Snarky of the Fannish Inquisition
Chaire, and didst finally confess, after taking Muche Tea:
> "Lionel" wrote
>> On Thu, 26 Apr 2007 23:21:27 -0400, "Rhonda Lea Kirk" wrote:
>>> "Lionel" wrote
>>>>> From: "Rhonda Lea Kirk" <rhon...@gmail.com> Newsgroups:
>>>>> 24hoursupport.helpdesk,alt.os.windows-vista,alt.os.windows-xp,alt.usenet.kooks
>>>>> Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2007 05:52:37 -0500 Message-ID:
>>>>> <eqk8gn$e9l$1...@blackhelicopter.databasix.com>
>>>> [...]
>>>>> miguel wrote:
>>>>>> Your opinion doesn't matter. You're a sociopath nerd gimp retard
>>>>>> fagbo1. It's Rhonda Lea's opinion that counts. I say she's falling
>>>>>> for me as I type this.
>>>>
>>>> (No, Michael Cranston, Attorney isn't chasing anyone. *cough*)
>>>
>>> He did this when Rick make me the goat in his acceptance speech for the
>>> Salinger he won trolling me about his impending death.
>>>
>>> He could see how wrong the whole thing was, but no one else did.
>>
>> I thought it was tacky, but even though I didn't see the thread until it
>> had been running for a while, it was totally obvious to me that it was a
>> troll. I mean really, who the hell posts to a flame group to tell them
>> that someone's dying when it *isn't* a troll? Hell, the "$TROLL is my
>> daddy/hubby/son & he's DYING of cancer!" is one of the oldest, most
>> obvious trolls in the book. You fell for it? Too fucking bad.
>
> I can demonstrate that except for the diagnosis, every word in the post is
> true.
>
> There is no question at all that I was intended to believe it was true in
> its entirety.
Uh-huh. The best trolls contain no outright lies, only false assumptions
made by the trollee(s). You got caught making a false assumption about
K-Man, despite having been told all about his attitude towards usenet.
Repeatedly told. You're just gullible.
>>>>> I would run with this--thank you for the straight line--but the kind
>>>>> of
>>>>> person who turns a lover into a chew toy when the relationship is
>>>>> over
>>>>> is not the kind of person I want to be. While it is true that this is
>>>>> only usenet, our relationship was real life, so that's no excuse. I
>>>>> can't stop him from fucking with me, but I'm not going to stoop to
>>>>> his
>>>>> level.
>>>>
>>>> Nice job of not "turning your lover into a chew toy", hypocritical
>>>> Bunny Boiler.
>>>
>>> But...but...but...he won. He declared victory several times, as have
>>> the rest of you. How is it possible that he's /my/ chew toy, if I am
>>> the loser in all this?
>>
>> *Trying* to turn an ex lover into a chew toy isn't the same as
>> *succeeding* in turning an ex lover into a chew to, but the intent is
>> the same, as you well know.
>
> He has certainly chewed on me, hasn't he.
Well, you keep insisting on inserting yourself into his mouth, so what's
he supposed to do?
>>> More seriously, I thought he had gone as low as he could go. I was
>>> wrong.
>>>
>>> news:r6cva.k...@news.alt.net
>>>
>>> But he has said he wants it over, Lionel, and yet you persist.
>>>
>>> What kind of friend does that make you?
>>>
>>> If it's to stop, everyone has to stop.
>>
>> Wrong. I will stop when you stop posting to AUK. You don't get to give
>> me or anyone else orders, Bunny Boiler.
>
> And you don't give me orders, either.
Duh, no he doesn't. What makes you think he's giving you any orders?
It's very simple: You stop posting to usenet, or at least in any groups
frequented by AUK regs, and all this just evapourates. You stick around,
and it goes on. Not because Lionel, or K-Man, or I can't share this
flamier version of The Place with you, but because you're only in AUK to
criticise the kookological practices you observe in it. That's the sort
of thing which will get you flamed for as long as you do it, and you
don't want to do anything else. Hence, when you say, "everyone has to
stop", you know very well that you're making a demand which can and will
_never_ be met.
> You don't seem to understand it works both ways.
You don't seem to understand that you are the only one attempting to
give orders in this flamewar.
>> You still seem to have this bizarre idea that we in AUK are employees or
>> voters or somesuch shit, & that someone tells us who to target. We
>> aren't - we're just people who like beating up on the psychos of the net
>> - psychos like you. We make up our own minds who we shoot at, & you
>> painted that huge red & white target on your own chest. If you don't
>> want to be shot at, your one & only option is to take your
>> target-painted self out of the group.
>
> It's okay, Lionel. Just hold that thought when they come to talk with you.
>
> After all, if Mike is a part of it, you are certainly even more a part of
> it.
Yeah, I guess they'll arrest him for flaming you, eh?
>>>> And after all your pretty talk there about not "stooping to his
>>>> level", it kind of puts a whole new complexion on your outing of
>>>> email, Usenet stalking, encouragement of 3rd party identity theft,
>>>> harrassment, etc, you nasty little skank.
>>>
>>> I give up on your ever being able to tell the truth. Unfortunately for
>>> your neverending lies, my words speak for me, not yours.
>>
>> I've lost count of how many times I've caught you blatantly lying in
>> front of the entire newsgroup, skank. None of your bullshit spin
>> techniques can change that.
>
> When the posts are reviewed by the professionals from whom Rick has sought
> assistance, we'll see, won't we?
Hey, Rhonda, are you siccing the cops on me, too? If so, which ones? The
AFP, the NJ cops, or the RCMP?
> It is quite true that I'm going to look like a real idiot for going on as
> long as I did, but that I can live with, because I never did the heinous
> things to him that he did to me.
So what? The "heinous" thing he did to you on usenet was troll you. I
don't give a fuck what went on between you two off-usenet. You're the
one who thinks usenet is Real Life.
--
________________________________________________________________________
Hail Eris! Usenet Ruiner #5; Most Hated Usenetizen of All Time #13
Demon Prince of Absurdity; COOSN-029-06-71069; Official Chung Demon
Top Asshole #3; Lits Slut #16; AUK Psycho & Felon #21
Gutter Chix0r #17; BowTie's Spuriously Accused Pedo Photographer #4
Parrot & Zombie #2
"Lola Stonewall Riot" is not part of my email addy.
"If I were a Deep One...blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub, blub,
bloody, bloody, blub..."
"For those of you without hope, we have rooms with color TV, cable and
air conditioning"
WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, March 2007
Message-ID: <Xns990EE557C065pi...@204.153.245.131>
Barbara Woodhouse Memorial Dog Whistle
Trainer of PorchMonkey4Life
http://www.screedbomb.info/porchie/
AUK FAQ: http://www.caballista.org/auk/faq.html
WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, February 2007
Message-ID: <Xns98EE28E1C58ABw...@204.153.245.131>
WINNERS! Usenet Kook Awards, January 2007 MID:
<Xns98D232E44C01pi...@204.153.244.170>
"Hey Theophan, I need your help again. Will you please come assist me
again? aggreen is after me again. He has been after me for a year and
counting now. I want you to destroy his character for me. I can't do
it." -- Olympiada: Not too proud to beg for help when it comes to
character assassination, and Mistress of the Bleeding Obvious.
MID: <45E22F00...@yahoo.com>
"I think we have taken care of the net.KKKopping in alt.gothic. Could
all the kookologists trim alt.gothic from their headers and leave us
alone now? It has gone on long enough. I can take care of myself in there
from here on out. Thanks. I know how to fight off trolls now. Thank you
for the education." -- Olympiada thinks she's had an education, and that
means it's time for those nice kookologists to go away and leave her
sandbox alone now, in MID: <45e330a8$0$16404$8826...@free.teranews.com>
"Who booby-traps a dead end? That's just not right." -- Cordelia
>> Are you the Peter J Ross that I've heard so much about?
>
> Probably. I'm the one who doesn't resort to forgery after losing an
> argument.
"You're the one with the extensive brain damage... okay I see. You're
gonna be easily to own them." -- PorchMonkey4Life: Not aware of too many
things. MID: <bf7xh.834$hH2.64@trnddc02>
At last! See Joxer The Mity Monkey on camera! Watch him freak out!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O_WuaENGqz0
"You're just mad that you got tard stomped again fagg0t. You throw
something incredibly lame out there and I ramming it right back down
your throat. And you wonder how I just did what I did to you. You wonder
how I can make something so lame that you tossed out there so gosh darn
amusing when I fling it back at ya.
"Here's the secret: Unlike you, I am *not* retarded. You're tardness
gets in your way every single time, fagboi.
"Are you still crying over your keyboard, c0ckslurper? Is your mouth
wide open and drool falling out. Is your chunky body convulsing as you
think about how you were once again made a fool of? Are yellow boogie
snots running out of your unnaturally large nose down your triple chins?
"Look at what I reduced you too, tard.. I thoroughly enjoy owning and
abusing you.. Thanks for being so tarded and so easy to beat." -- The
PorchMonkey4Life has gone on to re-define red as yellow, black as white,
and being run over by a truck as just a scratch. Message-ID:
<kX3Nh.525$vI1.380@trnddc02>
"And no, I did not have sex with my son. But if I did I certainly
wouldn't tell you. Something so beautiful and precious should be kept
private." -- Kathy L. Mosesian, or possibly not really her, confesses
she may be a liar and committer of incest with her own son, in MID:
<cfcd3f4660694e3a...@msgid.frell.theremailer.net>
The reporter asked Colin Powell (or George Bush), "What proof do you
have that Iraq has weapons of mass destruction?"
He replied, "We kept the receipts." -- Bill Hicks
Looney Maroon nominee for August 2006 Johnny D Wentzky foamed:
"You never asked someone who goes into areas of the internet that are
only for adults who has an underage id somehow or another if they are a
cop posing as an underage person online?
I guess lots of people just don't watch dateline or read stories much.
Why don;t you go to pervertedjustice,com and see what they do. They are
awash in their self-proclaimed glory after they lied to membners of the
public.
They are awash in their self-proclaimed glory after they posed as an
underage person and agreed to do all sorts of sex acts wioth adult
males, and they are adults posing as teenager themselves. They make
themsleves into liars by falsely impersonating underage persons and by
not fuilfilling the words they tell the victims online in their chats.
Why don't you read it where they tell these victims of their deceit
about how they have been with grown men and such? Why don't you read it
where they say, "That would be cool." after someone makes an advance
towards an adult who is posing as a teenager? And, where they agree to
meet the person, etc.
Lost control, didn't you?
Is that why you feel as if you need to lie so much now? I see where lots
of these false impersonation games are not sticking. They feel as if
they can lie and then order the victims to get counseling in the
gayblade, governmental, pro-choice tax leech counseling centers. They
are doing nothing more than usury and fraud in many cases." -- Wentzky
almost comes out of the closet as a pedo/ephebophile in MID:
<H%%Eg.28916$Uq1....@bignews6.bellsouth.net>
To Whom It May Concern: Michael J. Cranston attorney kook is a dogfucker
Lionel
IAWTP.
Rhonda Lea Kirk
I was certainly gullible. And scared.
That doesn't change the fact that the intent of the troll was to cause
me distress.
>>>>>> I would run with this--thank you for the straight line--but the
>>>>>> kind of
>>>>>> person who turns a lover into a chew toy when the relationship is
>>>>>> over
>>>>>> is not the kind of person I want to be. While it is true that
>>>>>> this is only usenet, our relationship was real life, so that's
>>>>>> no excuse. I can't stop him from fucking with me, but I'm not
>>>>>> going to stoop to his
>>>>>> level.
>>>>>
>>>>> Nice job of not "turning your lover into a chew toy", hypocritical
>>>>> Bunny Boiler.
>>>>
>>>> But...but...but...he won. He declared victory several times, as
>>>> have the rest of you. How is it possible that he's /my/ chew toy,
>>>> if I am the loser in all this?
>>>
>>> *Trying* to turn an ex lover into a chew toy isn't the same as
>>> *succeeding* in turning an ex lover into a chew to, but the intent
>>> is the same, as you well know.
>>
>> He has certainly chewed on me, hasn't he.
>
> Well, you keep insisting on inserting yourself into his mouth, so
> what's he supposed to do?
One does not chew on those one loves.
And I'm not talking about the chewing that has taken place
post-relationship, but the chewing that took place over five months each
time Rick brought real life to usenet.
>>>> More seriously, I thought he had gone as low as he could go. I was
>>>> wrong.
>>>>
>>>> news:r6cva.k...@news.alt.net
>>>>
>>>> But he has said he wants it over, Lionel, and yet you persist.
>>>>
>>>> What kind of friend does that make you?
>>>>
>>>> If it's to stop, everyone has to stop.
>>>
>>> Wrong. I will stop when you stop posting to AUK. You don't get to
>>> give me or anyone else orders, Bunny Boiler.
>>
>> And you don't give me orders, either.
>
> Duh, no he doesn't. What makes you think he's giving you any orders?
He has ordered me to leave auk.
> It's very simple: You stop posting to usenet, or at least in any
> groups frequented by AUK regs, and all this just evapourates.
"Do this or else."
> You
> stick around, and it goes on. Not because Lionel, or K-Man, or I
> can't share this flamier version of The Place with you, but because
> you're only in AUK to criticise the kookological practices you
> observe in it. That's the sort of thing which will get you flamed for
> as long as you do it, and you don't want to do anything else. Hence,
> when you say, "everyone has to stop", you know very well that you're
> making a demand which can and will _never_ be met.
You have taken "everyone has to stop" out of its context, which was the
discussion of real-lifing.
>> You don't seem to understand it works both ways.
>
> You don't seem to understand that you are the only one attempting to
> give orders in this flamewar.
But I'm not.
And I certainly haven't called in the law to enforce the orders you
claim I'm giving, unlike Rick.
>>> You still seem to have this bizarre idea that we in AUK are
>>> employees or voters or somesuch shit, & that someone tells us who
>>> to target. We aren't - we're just people who like beating up on the
>>> psychos of the net - psychos like you. We make up our own minds who
>>> we shoot at, & you painted that huge red & white target on your own
>>> chest. If you don't want to be shot at, your one & only option is
>>> to take your target-painted self out of the group.
>>
>> It's okay, Lionel. Just hold that thought when they come to talk
>> with you.
>>
>> After all, if Mike is a part of it, you are certainly even more a
>> part of it.
>
> Yeah, I guess they'll arrest him for flaming you, eh?
I didn't call in the police, Snarky.
I have no idea what they'll do.
>>>>> And after all your pretty talk there about not "stooping to his
>>>>> level", it kind of puts a whole new complexion on your outing of
>>>>> email, Usenet stalking, encouragement of 3rd party identity theft,
>>>>> harrassment, etc, you nasty little skank.
>>>>
>>>> I give up on your ever being able to tell the truth. Unfortunately
>>>> for your neverending lies, my words speak for me, not yours.
>>>
>>> I've lost count of how many times I've caught you blatantly lying in
>>> front of the entire newsgroup, skank. None of your bullshit spin
>>> techniques can change that.
>>
>> When the posts are reviewed by the professionals from whom Rick has
>> sought assistance, we'll see, won't we?
>
> Hey, Rhonda, are you siccing the cops on me, too? If so, which ones?
> The AFP, the NJ cops, or the RCMP?
I haven't sicced the cops on anyone. Rick has.
You'll just have to wait and see if they're interested in you too, I
guess.
>> It is quite true that I'm going to look like a real idiot for going
>> on as long as I did, but that I can live with, because I never did
>> the heinous things to him that he did to me.
>
> So what? The "heinous" thing he did to you on usenet was troll you. I
> don't give a fuck what went on between you two off-usenet. You're the
> one who thinks usenet is Real Life.
No. I'm not the one who brought real life to usenet, Snarky. Rick did.
He did it countless times post-breakup, and then he did it again with
the emotional abuser post.
I can demonstrate that without any difficulty at all.
Art Deco
Indeed, but I see that the word weaseled response is already in.
--
Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco
"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief
Henry Schmidt
yer all kooks. Rhonda seems to be the kookologist. And she's owning
y'all rather easily.
>> You don't seem to understand it works both ways.
>
> You don't seem to understand that you are the only one attempting to
> give orders in this flamewar.
>
Liar.
>>> You still seem to have this bizarre idea that we in AUK are employees or
>>> voters or somesuch shit, & that someone tells us who to target. We
>>> aren't - we're just people who like beating up on the psychos of the net
>>> - psychos like you. We make up our own minds who we shoot at, & you
>>> painted that huge red & white target on your own chest. If you don't
>>> want to be shot at, your one & only option is to take your
>>> target-painted self out of the group.
>> It's okay, Lionel. Just hold that thought when they come to talk with you.
>>
>> After all, if Mike is a part of it, you are certainly even more a part of
>> it.
>
> Yeah, I guess they'll arrest him for flaming you, eh?
>
That's what you do.
>>>>> And after all your pretty talk there about not "stooping to his
>>>>> level", it kind of puts a whole new complexion on your outing of
>>>>> email, Usenet stalking, encouragement of 3rd party identity theft,
>>>>> harrassment, etc, you nasty little skank.
>>>> I give up on your ever being able to tell the truth. Unfortunately for
>>>> your neverending lies, my words speak for me, not yours.
>>> I've lost count of how many times I've caught you blatantly lying in
>>> front of the entire newsgroup, skank. None of your bullshit spin
>>> techniques can change that.
>> When the posts are reviewed by the professionals from whom Rick has sought
>> assistance, we'll see, won't we?
>
> Hey, Rhonda, are you siccing the cops on me, too? If so, which ones? The
> AFP, the NJ cops, or the RCMP?
The vancouver, bc mounties will be coming to get ya, Gayton
>
>> It is quite true that I'm going to look like a real idiot for going on as
>> long as I did, but that I can live with, because I never did the heinous
>> things to him that he did to me.
>
> So what? The "heinous" thing he did to you on usenet was troll you. I
> don't give a fuck what went on between you two off-usenet. You're the
> one who thinks usenet is Real Life.
>
Why do you speak to one of yer owners likethat?