In article
<
8b359ff4-9f4a-4707...@d10g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>,
Loirbaj <
Rhod...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
Only abysmal self-complacency can see in
Man a reason which Omniscience could
consider adequate as a motive for the
Creator. The Copernican revolution will not
have done its work until it has taught men
more modesty than is to be found among
those who think Man sufficient evidence of
Cosmic Purpose.
毅ertrand Russell
What's anti-scientific about a commitment to theism?
The anti-scientific part is the commitment to a prior conclusion,
especially when that commitment is explicitly made to reject any
interpretation that conflict with that prior conclusion. In this
example, creatioinism, that prior conclusion is a theism rooted in
forms of biblical literalism.
The apriori rejection of upsetting conclusions is anti-science.
Further, the mission driven scheme of ID to reach specific apriori
conclusions is just as anti-scientific.
--