Why not?
After all, monkeys wrote the bible. If you can believe in a bible
and god, random wind assembling complex machines is not too much of a
stretch.
In other news, with no preceding hurricane, tornado, or any other source
of energy, a vastly complex machine, capable of creating every other
machine ever known to exist, spontaneously created itself in the middle of
an empty field. Local scientists were fascinated by the event, and intend
to study it closely. Local clerics, on the other hand, seem to think such
an event is perfectly normal, and can't understand what all the fuss is
about.
--
MarkA
Keeper of Things Put There Only Just The Night Before
About eight o'clock
Im astounded as to the faith Atheists have in mindless chance .
Certainly more faith that what i have in an intelligent organizing
Source also known as our incredible and wonderful PERSONAL Creator .
Why do you keep reposting this - you are fooling no one but yourself!
We have patiently explained in words of as few syllables as possible how
aircraft evolved on a number of occasions previously. I can only assume that
you either deliberately chose to pretend that it never happened. Or your
mental facilities are so ravaged that you have forgotten yet again.
I herein repost one of my original replies:
"Today's aircraft not only show evolution in action, in that one can see the
evolution from the 747 back to 707 back to earlier types but more
importantly it shows the difference between "evolution" and "design".
Whereas an evolved product HAS to modify the parts from the previous model,
a designed product can start with a clean sheet of paper. Such a "clean
sheet" product would be the non-evolution from piston engines to jet engines
where there was virtually no use of earlier parts.
If humans and the rest of "creation" had been designed one would not be able
to trace their evolution back to the 'primordial soup'."
Slatts
> Scientists were shocked yesterday when hurricane
> Irene suddenly picked up wind speed and roared
> across an abandoned scrapyard. Merely in passing
> it created wind torrents which hurled metal and
> rivets and assembled a 747 Jet plane.
Just like a god would do it, but Evolution does not work that way.
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less
remote from the- truth who believes nothing than
he who believes what is wrong.
Thomas Jefferson
Their suspension of disbelief is stuck in the ON position due to watching too many sci fi
movies.
Since when is the truth a strawman?
hey.
How many sci-fi movies have you watched 10 or more times? I bet you have at least one star
trek episode fully memorized
I rest my case!
NEXT!
It's just a strawman Maddy and has absolutely nothing to do with truth.
> hey.
> How many sci-fi movies have you watched 10 or more times? I bet you have
> at least one star trek episode fully memorized
>
> I rest my case!
>
> NEXT!
>
The fact that you can't separate fact from fiction is just another reason
It is a perfect analogy. The evolutionist expects everyone to believe that life can be
rearranged by random forces into a new kind of life.
>> hey.
>> How many sci-fi movies have you watched 10 or more times? I bet you
>> have at least one star trek episode fully memorized
>>
>> I rest my case!
>>
>> NEXT!
>>
> The fact that you can't separate fact from fiction is just another
> reason why I say ...
> "When you're talking with a creationist, it's not the heat, it's the
> stupidity." - R.Brown
Evolution is a l/i/e/
> On Aug 25, 4:11 am, Loirbaj <Rhodi...@wmconnect.com> wrote:
> > Scientists were shocked yesterday when hurricane
> > Irene suddenly picked up wind speed and roared
> > across an abandoned scrapyard. Merely in passing
> > it created wind torrents which hurled metal and
> > rivets and assembled a 747 Jet plane.
That presumes that all those parts are ready made, which in nature they
are not.
While chance is mindless and purposeless, natural selection is not
purposeless, nor in any way unnatural, or even avoidable.
In a sexually reproducing species, the characteristics of those who
reproduce most will thrive most.
If there is a mechanism for introducing new characteristics into a
population, and there seem to be several such mechanisms, then over time
one may get unlimited amounts of drift as ever more new characteristics
replace older ones as the dominant ones.
The obviousness of this process sure beats any evidence of any gods
doing anything.
> > Guys, guys, guys! This is YOUR strawman. You can shove it up your ass
> > as far as we're concerned.
>
> Since when is the truth a strawman?
Since when is your strawman the truth?
At least we can separate science from science fiction. Call us wen you can.
Those words serve as absolute confirmation that someone is a complete
idiot.
All-Seeing, I'm embarrassed that I share a planet with you. You're a
disgrace to humanity and a shining example of how the educational system
must have failed in the past to produce this absolute sea of imbeciles.
~ Mike
Wait Assman, you have to leave time for an answer before you can rest
your case. Oops, I guess that you don't have enough case to rest.
-
> Since when is your strawman the truth?
It's a strawman when it's a complete
mis-representation of what it purports
to describe.
Which in this case is pretending that
evolution went in one single step from
piles of chemicals to today's complex cellular
life.
Ludwig's S
Apes turing to humans via natural means is like asking a hurricane to assemble junk parts
into an air plane
It ain't gonna happen. Sorry.
How about YOU presenting real actual proof/evidence for the existence
of your imaginary invisible creatorDog, Dicksucka???
> It is a perfect analogy. The evolutionist expects everyone to believe
> that life can be rearranged by random forces into a new kind of life.
It is neither "perfect" nor any sort of "analogy" you clueless imbecile. A 747 is not "life," its parts are not "life," and it doesn't reproduce. (Nor is evolution "random" but that's something we'll have to save for later; when you finally decide to grow up.)
So the analogy fails and you remain forever stupid. It must truly suck to be you, Assman. Spending your days defending something so utterly indefensible that you have to lie about it to people far smarter and better educated than you.
elizabeth
aa#2098
EAC Director of Useless Endeavors
Vice-Chairman Of The Committee For Wasting Time
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
"I was born with a skeptical mind. Now I ask you, is that fair?
If God gives me a skeptical nature and you an accepting one, then
you're going to be a believer and I'm not. If belief is a ticket to
eternal happiness, I'm definitely handicapped. God gives me a mind
capable of asking questions and what? I'm damned if I use it?"
F. Paul Wilson "The Haunted Air"
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Get yourself an education - Watch
"The Secret life of Chaos"
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00pv1c3
http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/secret-life-chaos/
"In this documentary, Professor Jim Al-Khalili sets out to uncover one of
the great mysteries of science - how does a universe that starts off as dust
end up with intelligent life? How does order emerge from disorder?
It's a mindbending, counterintuitive and for many people a deeply troubling
idea. But Professor Al-Khalili reveals the science behind much of beauty and
structure in the natural world and discovers that far from it being magic or
an act of God, it is in fact an intrinsic part of the laws of physics.
Amazingly, it turns out that the mathematics of chaos can explain how and
why the universe creates exquisite order and pattern.
And the best thing is that one doesn't need to be a scientist to understand
it. The natural world is full of awe-inspiring examples of the way nature
transforms simplicity into complexity. From trees to clouds to humans -
after watching this film you'll never be able to look at the world in the
same way again."
Oh - And if you can disprove the mathematics there is a doctorate waiting
for you at Oxfrod University!
Slatts
Let's you and me debate that shall we: everything you pulled from your
laughably dumb ass and posted here? Lets you and me go toe-to-toe on
it right here in this thread. Since you pulled it out of your
abysmally ignorant ass, there's no need to cite academic credentials
to thoroughly rout it. Since I'll be kicking your appallingly stupid
ass right here and not on the phone, you don't need my phone number.
Now are you all out of juvenile excuses or do you have more straw
dolls to play with?
I'm standing firm right here. You're running way the hell over
there. Que sera sera. Whoever will bleat will bleat....
Budikka
> It ain't gonna happen. Sorry.
>
It's already happened. Past tense. You'll just have to get used to it.
Get a clue. Read the bible.
take some reading comprehension classes first
Wow--just when I think you can't say something even stupider than usual,
here you are doing so.
--
JD
"the lybian lier"
No, it's not. It's not even in the same universe as an analogy.
> Get a clue. Read the bible.
Don't keep us in suspense, man!
Which one are you recommending?
--
JDG
Trying to explain things to these two is a waste of keystrokes.
They prefer the less likely scenario that an all-knowing, all-seeing
divine intelligence (a.k.a. that asshole Yahweh) somehow came into
existence -- or was always here -- and magicked the universe into its
presence form for the sole purpose of heaping praise onto said divine
intelligence.
--
JDG
Erm, "present form"
--
JDG
> The evolutionist expects everyone to believe that life can be
> rearranged by random forces into a new kind of life.
The evolutionist is well aware that there are people too stupid and too
arrogant in their stupidity to grasp anything as obvious as evolution.
> > The fact that you can't separate fact from fiction is just another
> > reason why I say ...
> > "When you're talking with a creationist, it's not the heat, it's the
> > stupidity." - R.Brown
>
> Evolution is a l/i/e/
If it were, then you should have no problem proving it to be a lie, but
in over 150 years of strenuous effort by millions of you creationists to
disprove evolution, you have totally failed to do so.
For anyone with the intelligence of a flea, that should have told you
you were had a losing case.
> Apes turing to humans via natural means is like asking a hurricane to
> assemble junk parts
> into an air plane
>
> It ain't gonna happen. Sorry.
It already has once, and that is enough. Sorry!
Though those who deny it may do so because they have not have managed to
change all the way.
> > Still don't get (or want to get) the common ancestor thingee? We are
> > apes. Oh, and whales are mammals science boi.
>
> Get a clue. Read the bible.
Done that. And found no outside evidence supporting most of it and some
outside evidence contradicting parts of it.
Mad Magazine is at least as realiable.
Any of them. They are all trying to get to the same God.
Who made such a claim?
All I can assume at this point is that you are a retard, or have a reading disorder, or
are being deliberately obtuse. Which is it?
Here is the deal. The theory of evolution makes the outrageous assertion that a segment of
a population can give rise to one or more new species based on things like gene
frequencies, natural selection, and mutations, over time.
The odds of that happening are the same as a hurricane blowing through a junkyard and
assembling an airplane.
Yet you dopes keep insisting that creationist are saying evolution has to make a new
species in the very next generation. Why is that? How dumb can you be? No one makes such a
claim. Here is what is being claimed:
The hurricane example is showing how THE ODDS of a new species being created via the
evolutionary process is THE SAME AS a hurricane being able to assemble an airplane by
simply passing through a junk yard.
Get it now? Nothing about a bear giving rise to a cat.
Next, the form of evolution known as speciation has to be inferred from the data.
However, the data can be wrong; It can be inaccurate; It can be misinterpreted,
(deliberately or otherwise).
Furthermore, the data is subject to change upon any new discoveries.
How can anyone make a reliable claim that species diverge based on such data? They CAN'T.
Now, add to the above, the fact that 1)nothing else on this planet or in the universe is
known to diverge, 2)no one can observe divergence, 3)it cannot be repeated in a lab, and
4) we have ancient textual evidence that says species will only give rise to new species
"each after his own kind," and we can assume that the claim of species being able to
diverge is pure fantasy.
On a bright note, it would make a great sci-fi movie script.
> I am stunned
You are!
LiarBoi RAN as he *always* does. I'll add your FLEEING from
discussing this with me to the ever-growing list of examples of your
ineradicable cowardice.
Budikka
Aircraft design, like evolution, is guided by environmental
forces.
(piggyback)
Apes didn't turn into humans, you goddamn dirty ape. Humans ARE apes.
> No, it's not. It's not even in the same universe as an analogy.
He's just a dumb ape; he doesn't know what an analogy is.
--
Doc Smartass, BAAWA Knight of Aimin' to Misbehave aa # 1939
Kooks! http://kookclearinghouse.blogspot.com/
Books! http://jw-bookblog.blogspot.com/
If Liberals Hated America They'd Vote Republican
> I am stunned
STUNNED?! Next you'll be tellin' me you were pinin' for the fjords!
--
J. Cleese (Mrs.)
What is particularly sick about these people is that they know this.
Christian morality? What morality?
Well, they only have themselves to blame for being increasingly
shunned by society. Jehova's Witnessess' (sic) are a particulary
dishonest bunch. The dishonesty shows everytime these anti-social
pest knock on your door distrurbing whatever you may be doing. They
are not honest and say 'up-front' "Hi we are Jehova's Witnesses and
would like you to to come to our church and read the Bible with us"
because they know they will be swifty dismissed. Instead they try to
avoid reavealing who they are so they can persuade us by other less
honest means wasting everybodies time for their own selfish ends
tFortunately they are easy to spot straigh away and got rid of
Christianity? Just say NO!
Les Hellawell
Greetings from:
YORKSHIRE - The White Rose County
Isn't it odd how you like Fred Hoyle in one
post and despise him in another?
(no, of course it isn't)
conan